HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 90-10-DR - CALLISON PARTNERSHIP - SECURITY PACIFIC BANK LANDSCAPE DESIGN REVIEW
This record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure
pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW
as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below.
90-10-DR
Callison Partnership / Security Pacific
12400 East Marginal Way South
DIGITAL RECORDS (DR) EXEMPTION LOG
THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION
Page # Code Exemption Brief Explanatory Description Statute/Rule
The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress'
intent that social security numbers are a private
concern. As such, individuals’ social security
Personal Information –
numbers are redacted to protect those
Social Security Numbers 5 U.S.C. sec.
individuals’ privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec.
DR1 Generally – 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a); RCW
552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure
under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington
552(a); RCW 42.56.070(1)
State Public Records Act, which exempts under
42.56.070(1)
the PRA records or information exempt or
prohibited from disclosure under any other
statute.
Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit
card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit
Personal Information –
expiration dates, or bank or other financial
RCW
8 DR2 Financial Information –
account numbers, which are exempt from
42.56.230(5)
disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5)
RCW 42.56.230(4 5)
,
except when disclosure is expressly required by
or governed by other law.
Permit 90-10-DR - CALLISON PARTNERSHIP - SECURITY PACIFIC BANK LANDSCAPE DESIGN REVIEW
12400 E MARGINAL WAY S
EPIC-20-90
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: SECURITY PACIFIC BANK LANDSCAPE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: /. 02 4 - .44/4P-C,. i JA WA-, c• PERMIT NO.: 6
CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: , .eA c LC C'BGC rC /i6/2. LE S TEL. NO. j 6 ,, -
SHALL BE REFUNDED ADDRESS: " 7
BY MAILING TO: 'j 5/9 /"t'8 — /YE /D 8o•X /
(please print) CITY/STATE/ZIP /”? of c K Ia l.U4 9: 07.3
DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENC
PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBEDI:
2 ?//4 /A/ /NG 44 ND SC /k pm/6 7' s'r 4 • ,/ ,W,0 ATTAc •I4D
LF-7'T CC6 k0A re /14t 57 -2 /F/)
As th owner, or authorized agent of the owner, l hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of
$ /33 -16 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting,y
docum _entation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final Inspection by this date:___ !`" - 7/
( / ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or
in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out
completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to com • _:te all =rk listed above prior to requesting inspection and
release of these funds.
SIGNED: =
SECTION ?r(tO b ColttttlOfe f` ll`Y} lafll •••• «_
SIGNED:
AMOUNT :2, /33
CITY RECEIPT NO. c72 3611a29
DEVELOPERS REPRESENTATIVE:
i.li :i:i
CHECKED
CASH
2,q5
CASH CITY CHECK NO.
• City o;lukwiia G21
DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY
REQUEST FORM
a b com !feted: b
CASH EQUIVALENT
72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR
INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS
CASH EQUIVALENT— LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE
boa
Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall
send copies to: — Developer
— Finance Department
— Permit Coordinator, DCD
TITLE:
...............
THIS FUND IS AU j • 0 BE ACCEPTED.
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
DEPOSITED THIS DATE: (/ -3 /#/
RECEIVED BY:
All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed
and retumed to department which authorized warranty. I hereby
request Inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent.
DATE:
I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore
authorize the rele se of th above cash assignment.
LAtJi1iORIZED BY: 1 ' /
DEPARTMENT:
NC r
AMOUNT:
RELEASED THIS DATE:
Upon completion
send copies to:
6 - a 7/
, FINANCE DEPT.
of entire form, Finance personnel shall
— Developer
— Finance Department
— Permit Coordinator, DCD
owl
o .
,
•
•
w
�cn
• 1908;
DATE: 6/24/91
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
TO: Alan Doerschell
Finance Department
FROM: Ann Siegenthaler
Department of Community Development
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS
P.O. BOX 817
REDMOND, WA 98073.
cc: Bldg. permit file
Lease Crutcher
DR fle = - 90- 10 =DR:
RE: Release of Cash Assignment for Security Pacific
City Receipt No. 9238A000
Please make check payable to, and mail to:
Based upon a final inspection of the Security Pacific Riverton
Operations Center project, conducted on 6/24/91, staff concludes
that Security Pacific has completed the items specified in the
project warranty dated 6/3/91 (copy attached).
Accordingly, this Department authorizes the release of the warranty
funds accepted on 6/3/91.
MEMO TO FILE
Security Pacific - R.O.C. Permit #6278
Landscape Inspection
6/24/91
cc Bldg. permit file
DR f ile<: 90-1O-DR :
APS inspected site as requested by applicant, who wants cash
assignment released. Site inspection status (refer to Cerna letter
dated 5/28/91):
Items 1 through 5: OK and in place.
Item 6 (Viburnum tinus along EMWS):
a) rhododendron substituted south of fire access. OK.
b) Zabel laurel (3) substituted north of entry
walk. Landscape architect says this will grow
tall enough to accomplish screening similar to
arbutus or viburnum tinus. Maybe. OK at this
point.
Called Rick Heier. Discussed above. AS will request release of
cash assignment.
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: g�cc,e, Ty P4- c1,�/� j �N DATE: j
DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: / 4'7 0 rl Ail / r/AL ua - , • PERMIT NO.: ‘ S
CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: ,44s C , zercJ g 2_6w/ 5 TEL. NO. -9537-tz2 2'0
SHALL BE REFUNDED : ''
BY MAILING TO: ADDRESS: 'y5e ,51) / � - NE Re:), a D•x 8/ •
(please print) ' CITY/STATE/ZIP - 2 - i�1�I,G2'K n LJJA• 9g 073
DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENC
PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBEDI:
Z? )v_ 4N /,VG .44 ND s vk- p /NG 'Pep_ SI-YT 4 •) , 'o ,47 i c+f P
L 7-z Ce6'Ziu A re, /q'ur22k)/ 5 g /7) .
As th owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of
$ , /334 1 6 - ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting,
J
docum ntation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: /"�' /i
( : / 13 /,'. ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or
in -house manpower. If I fall to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carryout •
completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to com ,te all ork listed above prior to requesting inspection and
release of these funds. SIGNED: / r a : ', :: r
�i �..�:i
TiTLE: /
>i»GTIAN.'2.11p...b Af • # f�M J `.. > `........ _
AMOUNT: 12 /33
§ CASH
CITY RECEIPT NO. 9'2 34222
SIGNED:
72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR
INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS
DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE:
; : : Ottf l.te+ :>
CHECKED BY:
• gK:...,...r%.: v•,.• ... •” •∎•:• :•.•M.Vi{t< W: ltrJ: 4/ nit, �viAV .!J:•MRO(tV.AX!vvi.MONO:UO.: tJ::v4..v. }.J%r,4i.: •
. >SE GON 4 {'to RR comptotod bry Glty, st`airj :
•
r,..›X..,: •. • ... , X l,•%<. ... e..: aT• MtO. N\« V•[ r.:< r. v..<. n% M.X•: hO .p:: <r!n..•awW! <YrY.JP.Y,•tttC Vtui! o J WOI::V..:v:VriK «OXC•s::tothVN't ,., :(t m. •••( . \:t <:VgX<PM�UOVwtOXO: %N' <oX<to
CASH EQUIVALENT - LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE
CASH CITY CHECK NO.
City of Tukwila
DEVELOPER'S PRWECT WARRANTY
REQUEST FORM
CASH EQUIVALENT •
:Vh•
Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall
send copies to: - Developer
- Finance Department
- Permit Coordinator, DCD
• THIS FUND IS AU
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
DEPOSITED THIS DATE: •
RECEIVED BY:
AMOUNT: ..
RELEASED THIS DATE:
RELEASED BY:
0 BE ACCEPTED.
All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed
and retumed to department which authorized warranty: I hereby:::. '-
request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent.
DATE:
I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore
authorize the release of the above cash assignment.
AUTHORIZED BY: DEPARTMENT:
, FINANCE DEPT.
Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall
send copies to: - Developer
- Finance Department
- Permit Coordinator, DCD
Lease Crutcher Lewis
Attn: Ed Murray
P. 0. Box 817
Redmond, WA 98073
RE: Cost of Additional Plantings, installed:
Dear Ed:
Here's the breakdown:
Remove dead trees (as needed), hauling and disposal ,
2 Flowering Plums @ $110.50 each (,2i')
• 2 C ed ar* or Fir Trees (18') @ $142.80 each
* Note: The cedar may not be available.
2 London Plane @ $76.50 each Col ")
3 Rhodies @ $29.75 each (.y" sPREAO)
(southwest corner of new building)
25 Hypericum @ $2.25 each C-9 co►vvkludRs.)
16 Viburnum Tinus @ $22.95 each 0
r)
CC:rp
Cerna( Andscape & Maintenanc(,
25856 34th So.
Kent, WA 98032
941 -5382
May 28, 1991
SP' 1 c5Ao)
Total
The scheduled planting time will be the week of June
1991. Should there be any questions, please call.
Muchas Gracias.
Carlos Cerna
Landscaping - Commercial Grounds Maintenance - Apartment Grounds Maintenance
Ivl °
iC�ia�1 +F
DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT
5/31/•91•'
1 j4,
_ASE CRUTCHER LEWIS
SAY
INVOICE NUMBER
5/314 R1499
ti i.:i
P.,O.,BOX 817
4330 N,E is d
REDMOND, WA 98052
(206) 455 -2480
'O THE
)RDEROE. City of Tukwila
THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW, IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIRED.
EASECRUTCHER LEWIS«'"
pine 4
E'X A C "►" I �'�I'
•
landscape architecture plan
Fax ltapsmittat Me
14
FROM HEIER /URN DE UfINTER ORI)UP 206- 451 -8108
Company
i Location
' Fax ty
Comments
CITY OF RECEIVED
MAY 2 3 1991
PERMIT CENTER
May 22, 1991.
Telephone N
Mr. Ram Prasad, AIA
The Callison Partnership
1420 Fifth Avenue
Suite 2400
Seattle, WA 96101
Dear Sir;
END
A u.. .1. !,_
Respectfully Submitted;
Heier /Van DeVanter Group PS
P.
R. Richard Hele1t, ASLA
Registered Landscape Architect
05.23.199% 09121 P. 1
7872 No. of Pages 1 ( (' Tod /ytDateS,2 Time 1 :221
• From
Company
Location
Fax N
ho f firms aw fA • el)5e6 (tL
Re: City Review of the Landscape Construction;
cc: Ms. Ann Sietenthaler, Mr. Ed Murry.
Dept.Cher 4we
1Q
Telephone N 15. I
Origin ,
Original
OrIgln ition_ 0 Destroy Return D Cell for pickup
i
HEIER / VAN I)i: VANTI:R
GROUT' PS
Site Design
Services
Suite 203
612 Bellevue Way NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
(206) 451 -8001
Riverton Operations Center, Computer Center Expansion.
As requested by Ed Murry, LCC; Rick Heier, Heier /Van De
Vanter Group, met Ann 5ietenthaler, city landscape architect
to discuss the project site landscaping. In general, the
landscaping was found to be substantially complete; however,
the following items were noted to be completed prior to her
signing off on the landscape:
1. Add 1 Flowering Plum tree CD) to the northeast corner
of the building. Shift the rhododendron if necessary.
2. Add 1 Flowering PLum tree CD) to the north side of the
existing computer center.
-'3. Replace the 2 dead or dying Cedar trees (E) at the
south end of the addition. Minimum size: 10' height.
4. Replace 2 dead or dying London Plane trees CB) located
at both ends of the south parking lot.
5. Add 3 Rhododendrons at the south most westerly corner
of the new mechanical room.
6. Add 20 +/- Hypericum calocinium CO) in the southwest
corner of the south parking lot to fill in the bare
spot at the end of the parking stalls.
7. Add additional parking lot screening between the south
parking lot and East Marginal Way; replacing dead and
small scale shrubs: (two options)
-.a. Add 16 Viburnum tinus or Rhododendrons In groups
along the Inside of the fence. They may replace the
small Otto Luyken Laurels. or
b. Add 16 deciduous shrubs to be determined and
relocate or add Otto Luyken Laurel shrubs In a
complete row along the parking lot edge.
If these Items are not as you recall please notify me
at once.
** *END * **
PROJECT: R v- rton 0pQy ( S
PERMIT NO. (.19&`Jl
DATE CALLED: ', LI - Ct }
SITE ADDRESS: 1 1 00 -- in l�l n al I C {
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
DATE WANTED:
REQUESTER: Ed 'Inu r ry
PHONE NO.: Z.1-{ 1u" 1'
a.m.
p , m ,
<'
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS:
A
i
:.. r
INSPECTOR: DATE:
CITY OF TUKWILA
Dept. of Community Development - Building Division
Phone: (206) 431 -3670
elonn'Ir3 - P\n n
INSPECTION RECORD
6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100
Tukwila Washington 98188
Transmittal
❑ Memorandum
❑ Phone Record
❑ Meeting Notes /I••,,,,''
TolFrorrr. • L 5e,
Re:
We are sending you
the following:
For Your:
Action required:
MOM
Attached
❑ Prints
pt Use
❑ As indicated
❑ Under separate cover $ via
❑ Originals
❑ Comment
❑ No action required
Date:
Phone No:
s
❑ As requested
❑ For signature and return
HEIER / VAN DE VANTER
GROUP PS
Site Design
Services
Suite 203
612 Bellevue Way NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
(206) 451 -8001
If enclosures are not as noted or subject matter Is not as you recall, kindly notify us at once.
May 7, 1991.
Dear Sir;
» �
~'
Mr. Ram Prasad, AIA
The Callison Partnership
1420 Fifth Avenue
Suite 2400
Seattle, WA 98101
.
�
Re: Landscape Construction Observation; Riverton Operations
Center Computer Center Expansion.
As requested by Ed Murry, LCC; Rick Heier, Heier/van De
Vanter Group, met Jay Hornbeak, Hornbeak Irrigation, walked
the project site and reviewed the irrigation and
landscaping. In general, both landscaping and irrigation
were found to be substantially complete. The following items
noted:
IRRIGATION
Operation of the irrigation system was observed and coverage
appears to be proper and complete. An exact count of
sprinkler heads was not made at this time.
1. The missing head shall be installed in the northeast
corner of the lawn area adjacent to the parking lot.
2 Irrigation heads (approximately 3) were eliminated in
the most southeast planting island, because existing
line serving this area was found to be (3/4") and not
the (1-1/2") as noted on the drawing. Coverage in this
area is complete with the reduced spacing.
3. Sprinkler Zones were renumbered from that shown on the
plan. Contractor will provide new numbering in a chart
(and a reduced drawing) which will be located in the
controller.
4. It is to be noted that during the operation of the
system, lawn and-shrub heads operate on the same zone,
in new Zone 3, the turn around island and north of the
.
Mr. Ram Prsad, Callison
Observatill.., ROC Expansion
main entrance (not in the contract). This is contrary
to existing as built plans and is not usually done in
the industry on commercial projects.
5. Pressure tests, operations manual and chart have not
been received at this time.
LANDSCAPING
0Y,16. /
6. It appears that there were 7 Cedar trees (7-E) to be
relocated and not 3 Cedar (E) and 4 Fir (4- F) trees.
These 7 Cedar trees have been relocated on plan where
Fir (E) and Cedar (F) are called out.
7. Three new Cedar trees (3-F), 6'+/- height, have been
planted adjacent to the mechanical room where 3 existing
cedars were shown to remain. &~/ OK?
Four Autumnal us Cherry's have been relocated as shown on
the plans. One Cherry not found on the site south of
the new computer room was traded for an additional maple
(1-A) completing the row of maples in the lawn.
0/. Grass pavers were seeded in place of sod as recommended
by the paver manufacturer. The seed type is to match
sod seed types and shall be guaranteed and maintained
until a complete, uniform stand is approved. The seed
has uniformly germinated and appears to be growing well.
- 10. Arbutus unedo (G & L) have been replaced with Zabel and
Otto Luyken Laurel to match existing planting. These
plants replace Arbutus killed this winter on site and in
the nurseries, (The contractor found them to be
unavailable in the size specified). Laurel are hardier
plants and will survive existing growing conditions
better than Arbutus. 6q4
V -11. Seven Plum trees (7-D) are planted al ong the north side
of the new computer room, as this is what fits in the 1
space. Two additional Maple trees (2-A) were planted '
where trees have died in the parking lot west of East
Marginal Way.
- 12. It was counted that 181 evergreen and deciduous shrubs
were planted along East Marginal Way , (133 specified).
Zabel Laurel, Otto Luyken Laurel P ` and Compact
Burning Bush (R) were provided. ° u� 6^ �
' 4»6
V13. Two Plum trees (D) need to be staked along the East
Marginal Way wall.
V14. Dead branches should be pruned from the Arbutus which
remain.
'/15. Bark has been placed on existing landscaping to remain.
Bark has been added in the northerly mast parking lot
island.
END
Respectfully Submitted;
Heier/Van De Vanter Group PS
R. Richard Heier, ASLA
Registered Landscape Architect
May 7, 1991
Page 2
NVERSATION RECORD
t.,
MON TUE WED THU
FRI SAT SUN
wit
you:
TIME: /d; *,2 M.
P.
Telephone — 0 Incoming 0 Outgoing
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Telephone No.:
(office� bureau, au, e
DATE: 0 / 5 -7/
TYPE: El Visit El Conference
Name of per son s) contacted or in cLonta
Location of Visit/Conference:
CO
SUBJECT: .CI TTY r4C4 rlee i '
SUMMARY:
4Y he g &w,eij e
-14 if7"gle /(..-haetf 414c t hA
Signature:
Title:
-3/3,42
Date:
BULLING SECTION A-A
BAR. M(SISED AVERT 3. 1100)
BUILDING ELEINTIONS AND SECIONS
The Caftan Pareneship
SOUTH ELEVATION
SE•FALS TO MATCH
EAST ELEVIITION
RECAST COSSIEll MM.
MEM SLR* 011 GRACE
BULDING SECTION B-B
RIVERTON
OPERATIONS
CENTER
11.1U""aalig12,4
ATTACHMENT EXclowaticarim
•
•
•
1 h. Ow
IllaDING NWT 9111111MTPL JAN 17.7a110 1.1111•114.11.4
•
The Callon Petroship
-17
- -
.7."-• p o •-•••
-
. -
■-• - -
•
IMAM]
11)
•
• 7:
'mom. a...ma ••■••
• -• 11,1• .8.9 8G.
TURN •J•31•0
, 4•••1
•••t. 11■••u...
,•■••••• ft% •
IAN IDITII••Ct L _
MLitt° AMWAY moue r
EXISTING
KANT UST
‘.•
....,.. ..... y. ,... ,.., ,,,..,
• • , , t• 1 .........
_.,,,, • ,..r.. I, oft, 0.,.... • ,
1
8 011th
,.., 1 ,....,. -,... ,,,,, 7
- . -
..-i vori
,, .,„ , .......,,,... - - - - taste
...; .1 ".: .•,• A .t.... - - --'-
..a•••• •.. •••••-, •••••T
ve •-.4 ."2..15.•••
fr.
_
_
.-:TJ
•••
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN
t.12=4.2 •••••■
•
VERTQN
RATIONS
CENTER
EffirEGMBN
cs ealpao P3. ear%
,..••••■••
LEASE CR UTCHER LEWIS
,
No.
13.91 12:41 No.006 P
1 "97 6 : ''7 ') '7
7 tiro ow, y.tr cv 7V
d #W enoe
! loot
a1 __ ��c. r /�
1. Cp ��
AIWA
73JtdowZ /X8
1 M, :1
7,P •, +/
y /YU 00,0/
,' .0• loje
- / ,,1 v 9 I 1r IOW ,v_
XI/ /y ono/04W'
.s'
•
0
4
,......... ..•.•. ...1••••/• • ...,_
t
-.7';
wed
R6 'O/
0
1
is
EA wAY
24 .1 }- ---� --
ol=„4
`LEASE CRUTCHER LEWI ._ TEL No.206241524
FPo
(1/, - 4469
or Fr6 '*VP
-GALS: / = 1=C)
getnoFOil.Gt•
per, (NJ Po 114 4 4 a
ON V E04 Al o csv,4 174. Ai of d9,1/37)
ET •
5.91 1i:4:1
20Q
0cis
Tye
„.57 / &Ai i' lee a ( •
Scd a, WIC c ierd
Z. Lesfird
TOTAL P.02
tY
UTLrry uoGg7 6 4or.e.rvt.1 .1401,44._
tWE4-€'T%O1.
2 I 4 -1/
MUT( La WS'? t 4CIE \MOM/
It•YTSr- Zol 4.11
NJ. -'esE kovenoN —
t•boic‘t4est 4otrrok. 2 -
2
4e.r-rce-N V4E4T 0444-
Avicam
20441en
ct0.4)-AS
.�.r3 -; 00
C7,6. /-
2
Ae.
qoAo - pi;
,S 06
•
Planning Commission /B.A.R. Meeting Page 3
August 23, 1990
been Evans -Black Drive. He stated that the applicant is wanting
to revise a previously approved project design to accommodate
longer term needs. The revision results in a 14,224 sq. ft.
building area increase. He noted that while the area between
Evans Black Drive and the building has become narrower, the
applicant is keeping the same amount of landscaping, thus
increasing the landscape density. This softens the transition
between the building and the street. The staff feels that the
design modification which added area, has resulted in an
increase of architectural harmony, and that the transition
between Evans Black Drive and the building has been increased by
the softening effects of a denser landscape area.
Mr. Haggerton asked if the deletion of parking spaces would
effect the project. Mr. Umetsu noted the applicant would be at
the minimum of 2.5 spaces per 1,000 g.s.f.
Mr. Malina asked if the Fire Department access and turn around
was adequate. Mr. Umetsu stated that the Fire Marshall has
approved the site plan.
John Hallstrom, architect for the project spoke on behalf of the
applicant. He re- stated that the applicant found he did not have
adequate space to store his merchandise in the previously
approved plans.
Mr. Haggerton asked if the reason for the revision was due to the
fact that the applicant would be purchasing the property rather
than entering into a long -term lease.
Mr. Holstrom indicated that was part of the reason, but his
primary concern was the lack of space to store his product line.
Mr. Haggerton added that the staff report should be changed to
reflect this.
Mr. Haggerton closed the public hearing.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO APPROVE 90 -5 -DR REVISION BASED UPON STAFF'S
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
90- 10 -DR: RIVERTON OPERATIONS CENTER::
Ann Siegenthaler reviewed the staff report. She explained that
the applicant is proposing to expand the computer room operations
with a new edition. The proposed expansion is approximately
15,800 sq. ft., which includes reconfiguration of parking stalls
Planning Commission /B.A.R. Meeting Page 4
August 23, 1990
to make room for the building expansion. A waiver was obtained
by the applicant from the Sensitive Areas moratorium. The
applicant has also proposed landscaping for the displaced parking
area. Ann reported that the staff had 2 main areas of concern:
The relationship of the large building mass to the street and the
effectiveness of the existing landscape. Staff feels the
applicant has generally resolved these issues through the
addition of a trellis and concrete planters along the building
wall and additional trees and shrubs.
The staff would then recommend the following:
1. Adding a concrete lip or cap to the trellis along the west
wall, as well as lighting to provide for safety at night.
2. Extending the trellis around the north wall, approximately
48 feet to give the north wall more definition and
moderation.
3. Berming the southwest corner of the addition 2 -3' and using
"Grasscrete" or similar open paver for the fire access
driveway.
4. That shrubs along E. Marginal Way S. be of a sufficient
density and at least 18" in height at planting so there's an
adequate screening. All plants should be in good condition.
5. That a minimum 2" caliper tree be used and that ground cover
be planted in sufficient density to achieve 90% coverage in
three years.
6. That all landscape areas should have irrigation.
Mr. Haggerton asked if the street furniture for employees would
be replaced.
Ann noted that it was not clear as to whether the furniture was
included in the proposal.
Mr. Malina asked if there was pedestrian access from the southern
parking lot to the main entrance.
Ann stated that there was not paved access from the southern
parking lot to the main entrance on the northeast corner of the
building. Pedestrians would need to go to the street versus
crossing internally.
Mr. Malina asked if there were back doors to the facility.
Ann said there were back doors, however, these are limited access
doors.
Mr. Malina asked if these doors were key card doors.
Ann noted she was not sure if they were key card doors and would
Planning Commission Meeting Page 5
August 23, 1990
have to defer that question to the applicant. She added that the
southern parking lot was to be used mostly by maintenance and
special personnel who would have access to the back doors.
Mr. Haggerton asked if there were sidewalks all around the
building.
Ann said there were no sidewalks coming out from the southern
parking lot to the main entrance.
The applicant, Leonard Ruff stated that the intent of this
project was to keep the addition understated, simple and
harmonious with the existing building. He then addressed the
following issues:
* The south parking lot is reserved for the "housekeeping"
facilities and only for those people who have access to it,
such as maintenance people and vendors.
* With regard to extending the screening wall north, we do not
want to confuse people into thinking this is the main
entrance. The applicant would like to down -play this
section of the building, not draw attention to it.
* In response to the staff's recommendation to add a cap to
the trellis, the applicant doesn't feel this will add much
impact from 25 -40' away when one is driving by on E.
Marginal Way. It's not an effective use of the owner's
money.
* The proposal currently includes low -level lighting to light
the main pedestrian pass along the north edge of the
building, as well as the south. There are also 20' light
poles which will provide general area lumination and
security lighting. We don't feel lighting the screen wall
itself will accomplish much.
* The existing outdoor furniture is very mobile, therefore, it
will be very easy to move those around to fit into the new
area.
Jack Pace asked the applicant how they felt about changing the
fire exit from paved to "grasscrete ", and putting in some
berming.
Mr. Ruff responded by saying that the berming would not be a
problem. As far as the fire exit, they would be willing to
consider some open material, perhaps not "grasscrete" since that
is a brand name being used in a general context here.
Mr. Malina asked if handicapped parking was available.
Mr. Ruff indicated there were six spots.
Planning Commission /B.A.R. Meeting Page 6
August 23, 1990
Mr. Haggerton asked if there was a problem with providing
irrigation for the landscaped areas.
Mr. Ruff stated that would not be a problem, as they were
currently providing irrigation.
Mr. Haggerton closed the public hearing.
Mr. Haggerton noted that he felt that adding a cap to the trellis
would not have much impact from the perspective of the people
passing by on E. Marginal Way.
Mr. Kirsop agreed that they would not want to draw attention to
the facility.
Mr. Haggerton stated his support for the grasscrete, or similar
material in the fire exit.
Mr. Malina and Mr. Haggerton agreed that providing lighting on
the trellis would be a good idea.
4 Mr. Malina said that he had driven by the site and in his
opinion, the plants were not in good condition and not being
taken care. He indicated his disappointment with the facility.
MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE PROJECT 90 -10 -DR WITH STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATIONS. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION
PASSES WITH ONE OPPOSITION BY MR. KIRSOP.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
The architect for the Foster High School project, Mr. Sato,
reviewed what portion of the high school will not be built due to
lack of funds.
Mr. Sato indicated that the school would be smaller in that the
auxiliary gymnasium will not be built. That piece of land will
be left vacant so that the auxiliary gym may be built at a later
time. The structure or roofline will not change.
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:55 P.M.
Respectively Submitted,
Sylvia Appleton, Administrative Secretary
4,4111-4 `4 S City of Tukwila
I 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
n Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433.1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
• 1909
HEARING DATE:
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF REPORT
TO THE
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Prepared August 16,1990
August 23,1990
90 -10-DR Security Pacific's Riverton Operations Center
The Callison Partnership
Construct a one -story 15,883 s.f. addition toexisting office
building, to provide forexpansion of existing computer room
andmechanical room.
12400 East Marginal Way South
1.25 acre (approx.)
Light industry
M -1 (Light Industry)
DNS issued on August 14,1990
A. Site Plan & Vicinity Map
B. Landscape Plan
C. Building Elevations
D. Staff Recommended Changes
E. Color board (to be submitted at meeting)
• Pic4ure5
Staff Report to B.A.R
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION:
90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 2
1
FINDINGS
1
1. Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 14,976 square foot addition
to an existing computer room, and a 906.5 square foot addition to an existing
mechanical room. Thirty-nine existing parking stalls will be replaced by landscaping,
with 20 new stalls created by the reconfiguration of existing stalls.
2. Existing Development: Currently the site is used as an office and warehouse.
3. Surrounding Land Uses: The property to the south of the site currently has no use; to
the north is a Metro transit base; on the west is the applicant's existing ancillary
parking lot. The east side of the site is bordered by Interurban Avenue. South of the
ancillary parking lot is a residential area.
4. Terrain: Most of the site is fairly flat. A steep hill lies on the south side of site, but the
proposal will have no impact on this slope.
5. Vegetation: Currently the site is landscaped with shade trees, some native conifers,
low shrubs, ivy and lawn. Many trees and shrubs are in poor health; groundcover
infill has been inadequate, leaving large bare areas.
BACKGROUND
This project is subject to Board of Architectural review due to its location within 300 feet of
a residential area. Because of a steep slope at the south end of the site, the proposed project
was affected by the Sensitive Areas Moratorium. The applicant applied for a waiver of the
Moratorium. The waiver request was approved July 16,1990, subject to filing an
agreement to conform to the adopted Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
DECISION CRITERIA
Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant
facts.
18.60.050: General Review Criteria.
(1) Relationship of Structure to Site.
a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements
b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved areas.
c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site.
Staff Report to B.A.R. 90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 3
The height and scale of the building addition are consistent with the existing structure.
However, the size and design of the west facade and its proximity to East Marginal Way
South creates a large building mass in relation to the streetscape. This is moderated by the
use of a concrete panel "trellis ". Painted in colors similar to the existing building, the
trellis helps to reduce building mass and create a visual consistency with the existing
building.
The transition between the street and this facade is accomplished through the use of street
trees and shrubs, a corridor of lawn, and landscaped beds and planters at the base of the
building. A 6 -foot high chain link fence separates the existing sidewalk from this
landscaping.
Views of parking immediately adjacent to East Marginal Way South are moderated with
shrubs planted along the street.
(2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
a. Harmony of texture, lines and masses is encouraged.
b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
The transition to adjoining properties is accomplished through shade trees and shrubs
along East Marginal Way South, large cottonwood trees along the east property line at
Interurban Avenue, and a dense planting of conifers and shrubs adjacent to the Metro
base. The steep, wooded slope to the south of the site will remain as a natural buffer.
Vehicular traffic is concentrated in the existing large parking lot to the north of the
proposed addition. An ancillary parking lot with 270 stalls is located across East Marginal
Way South.
The primary pedestrian route is along an entry walk from East Marginal Way South to the
main entrance (at the main building to the northeast), connected to ancillary parking by a
crosswalk. There is no pedestrian access from the southern parking lot to the main
entrance.
(3) Landscaping and Site Treatment
a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized, preserved and enhanced.
b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important
axis, and provide shade.
d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is
encouraged.
L Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be
accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination.
g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and
pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used.
Staff Report to B.A.R. 90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 4
h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining
landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the
building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
The landscape along East Marginal Way South consists of tall stature shade trees and a
mixture of low and tall shrubs along the street, with small flowering trees and shrubs in
planters along the wall.
The southwest corner of the proposed addition along East Marginal Way South is accented
with tall conifers at the corner and metal detailing on the trellis. The 14 -foot space between
the southwest corner and the fire access lane is too tight for the large trees and landscape
proposed there.
The shrub planting proposed along East Marginal Way South will not provide total
screening of parking areas, but will partially screen the fronts of cars immediately adjacent
to the street.
Many of the existing plants will be relocated and used in the new landscape. However,
many of the existing plants are in poor condition. Existing ground cover, planted over five
years ago, covers less than 50-90% of the planting beds. Additional groundcover will be
provided to fill in bare areas.
Proposed walkways mainly consist of a concrete entry walk
beginning at East Marginal Way South, and an overhead "trellis" structure at the
building's northwest corner. While the trellis makes the entry more appealing, it is not
substantial enough to create a sense of entry and arrival.
Proposed site lighting consists of standard street lamps at all entry drives and the main
entry walk. In addition, 3-foot high light bollards are proposed along the new main walk.
(4) Building Design
a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to its surroundings.
b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring
developments.
c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good
proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be
consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
e . Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
£ Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all
exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
The proposed building is one story, with a flat roof and parapet walls, and painted concrete
exterior walls. No lighting is proposed for the new building face.
The wall surface is painted a low intensity beige. A contrasting teal color is used for the
horizontal member and metal details of the trellis, with a rose color used for the trellis
columns (see Attachment E).
Staff Report to B.A.R. 90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 5
Both the west and north building walls create a large building mass in relation to
pedestrian and vehicular sight lines along East Marginal Way South, and in relation to a
nearby residential area. The west facade is moderated by a concrete "trellis" along the
entire length of the wall, and by 3 -foot high planters integrated into the trellis at both ends
of the wall. A metal grid detail is incorporated into the trellis at both ends of the wall. The
trellis wraps around the corner to the north wall, which helps to moderate that facade.
(5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should bedesigned to be part of the architectural
concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should
be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions
should be to scale.
b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structuresand street furniture should meet the
guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
No new street furniture or other structures are proposed. Existing benches and tables
along the west side of the existing structure will be displaced by the addition.
CONCLUSIONS
1
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
The height and scale of the proposed structure is consistent with the adjoining
structure. Although the west facade is massive and the existing fence bars entry by
pedestrians, the landscape and trellis help to moderate the facade and provide a
desirable visual transition with the streetscape.
Parking immediately adjacent to the street will be adequately screened.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
The materials, colors and details of the proposed building are harmonious and
consistent with the existing structure. The proposal provides an appropriate
landscape transition with adjoining properties.
While the south parking lot will be primarily used by special staff with access to back
doors, the safety and convenience of circulation would be improved by adding a
gravel path or pavers which connect to the main entry walk.
3. Landscaping and Site Treatment.
The large building mass along East Marginal Way South requires considerable care in
the use of landscape materials. The addition of a trellis and built -in planters along the
west wall, the trellis at the north wall, and other landscaping successfully moderate
the building mass. Extension of the trellis along the north facade by approximately 48
feet would enhance the visual interest of the wall and pedestrian appeal of the
entrance.
Staff Report to B.A.R. 90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 6
The treatment of southwest corner of the proposed addition is critical, as it directly
faces East Marginal Way South and a nearby residential area. The proposed planting
and trellis treatment at the corner add a desirable accent to this area. Creating a 2 -3'
landscape berm around the corner would give the feeling of a wider landscape area
there, and add visual weight to the corner landscape. Using "grasscrete" or a
similar open paver for the fire lane would also give more substance to the corner
landscape.
The fronts of cars immediately adjacent to the street will be adequately screened,
provided that shrubs proposed for that area are of sufficient height at planting and are
spaced at an appropriate density.
In order for the proposed landscape to fulfil its design intent, any existing plants to
remain which are unhealthy will need to be replaced. Existing irrigation will be
displaced by building construction.
4. Building Design.
The colors, materials and design of the proposed building are appropriate to its use
and are in harmony with neighboring architecture.
The concrete "trellis" and planters, colors and metal grid details create some variety in
textures, shadows and rhythm, which gives the wall more of a 3- dimensional
character and a scale more appropriate to the streetscape. The effectiveness of the
trellis could be improved by topping it with a cap or lip along its entire length. This
would give the trellis more visual weight in relation to the wall and landscape.
The color scheme for the trellis is similar to that used at the main northeast entry,
which helps to visually connect the new building to the existing.
Lighting proposed will enhance both the architecture and landscape. Safety and
aesthetics of the building perimeter would be improved with the incorporation of low
voltage lighting into the trellis and west facade.
5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture.
No new or replacement street furniture is proposed. Incorporation of a new sitting
area in the proposed landscape will add to the pedestrian appeal and human scale of
the proposal.
Staff Report to B.A.R.
A. Building and structures:
90 -10-DR Security Pacific
Page 7
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff recommends approval of Security Pacific's Riverton Operations Center
addition with the following conditions:
1. A 2-3' landscape berm shall be created around the southwest corner of the
addition and planted as proposed. "Grasscrete" or similar open paver shall be
used for the fire access driveway.
2. The trellis at the main entry walk shall be extended along the north facade by
approximately 48 feet (i.e. 2 modules). The trellis shall be topped with a cap or lip
along its entire length.
3. Safety and aesthetics of the building perimeter shall be improved with the
incorporation of low voltage lighting into the trellis and west facade.
B. Landscape and site improvements:
4. To adequately screen the fronts of cars immediately adjacent to East Marginal
Way South, shrubs proposed for that area shall not be less than 18" in height at
planting and are spaced not more than 2'-6" for small shrubs and 4' -0" for large
shrubs.
5. All plant materials used in the proposed landscape design will be in good
physical condition. All proposed and transplanted_shade trees and conifers -will
be a minimum of 2" in caliper. Additional groundcover will be provided to fill
in bare areas, with 90% coverage achieved in 3 years after planting. All new and
replacement groundcover will be spaced no more than 18" on center.
6. Irrigation will be provided for new and existing landscaped areas (Ref. TMC
18.52.050); irrigation plans will be included in plans submitted for building
permit approval.
LOCATION MAP
•
. want •it
ueeloo•
. we
---- -
..,
VICINITY MAP ;
........ ........ .
.0.10000/0
%Ma 0A.
. . . . . . .
,
I
6
, ----- 1 --- \
.
I
•
..0•000
.140 0
?.
0 C.
■ _
-
-
i AaCMJAA• ...ma
. 1121.4■Ta 00.0
I !)
I ;I
I .
I I i
•
COST PARING ATEA
c7
STRIPING
The Callum Partnership
IT •
— T
-LS MLA
IDIXTEXINT POMP?.
B.A.R. SUBMITTAL Aty Ir. MO OilwadN00 3. IWO
SCHEME 'A INATSS SF • secs emu IF Tarw
COW WS &ELME
PROPERTY INN -
EXIST FEICE - -
EXISTING R.O.C.
qfti
• 4 1 3 ‘ ' ..41
EXISTING WING
NEW ME RM
EXPANSiuN
R I V ERTON
OPERATIONS
CENTER
EXIST DETECTOR LOOP
‘
4.02 *1.. 512.111710 99 at
LO° GATE
T FILL SCIEVOLXVAITM 1 U. C. Plwarla,
- NEW LANDSCAPE AREA "STALL 20 ME ROL N COST PUCE
-- EXIST
I MAU
in ITEX . CE EUST SWING GATE CFRE DEPT. ACCEDN
LANDSCAPE AREA
SCALE
04 IS SO 10■11•■■■
I SECURITY PACIFIC
.BANK WASHINGTON
•
T TACHMBNT — SL lm /An Se J.. 3e Map
741
The Callison Partnaship
1 0 IMPIT
&ADM PEST SUBMITTAL JULY 17.0990 OmmaaMmra.
WALK
pAREM
• -• ••■• • •••••TTIN•T
TuRN A040I0
01.••••0•;' M.4•1
■••■ 41..
•
*. /
WAIN TO ANCILLARY PARKING
MAW ENTRANCE L_
EXISTING
COMPUTER ROOM
PLANT UST
mu* , 11 . :4 71 tt :
E • •••• , •••-1. `••
X.... ! 4•T
■•Tot ! •MA T
• " • I *
i
'?'‘•
..'!°•••• ▪ i •44
..... I f:
NOTES
EXISTING WING
LEGEND_
• •• • •
mr.ro
„ a'l
-4, -• Mar 0 "
• • - - tes t
- 1t • ••• j '
scsuo
DOMAN° LEC,MLEGT_All,
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN
.1 .7 I)
".` • u,„,"
1
4
I SECURITY PACIFIC
BANK WASHINGTON
ATTACHMENT 13 — Lama lac ea.pos 1: 1. an
TAG a4313
XOCELX43
SEAS EL: 2E10
METAL TREWS PLANTER
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
b
BUILDING SECTION A-A
ECL
TOG EL 4.143
FEWER. 2t
OAS EL: 2200
&AA. SUBMITTAL ALT 17, 1010 (REVISED AUGUST 3, WM
BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SECTONS
1111=111■
The Caftan Pattnership
Ea. 613 Ea. $ 4
Tvp.
DOTORTED WEST ELIENNICm
SOUTH ELEVATION
RCOF SLOPE VA' / FT. TR.
SUIPEADED OLGT. CALMS
SPRED AO3ESS FLOOR —
•
PRECAST
Ea
METAL TREWS
LOUVER
R I V ERTON
OPERATIONS
CENTER
TAG It 4343
F(( Flit El, 21110
3..M1B 2310
TR.
NEW
EAST ELEVATION
;y1
1
x j
RELOCATED ROLLING OvERNEAD
r■!.41
p
EIISRO
ALONG
REVEALS TO MATCH ExISTNO
REVEALS TO MATCH EluSTING — \
RECAST COCREIE PANEL
1 • / • • • ■••••I •.1 • •■•I II
1111 111 1 1 l• 111
' 11 , 111 1111 011 11 11 1111 1111 Nil 111
I 'II I'll 'II II-MI=
(?1
I 7
Lim,. CONC. FEL / ROO SOHO
I INSULATING SYSTEM IN-01
BUILDING SECTION B-B
[xi]
OS 23 • 12 18 2.1 .4
SCALE 1.11/1--r 1/Er -
arA c. , : c URITY PACIFIC
WASHINGTON
TTHMNT 1 al ra.-t C111116
aULDRIG PERMIT SUBIATTAL JULY 17.11990 *imam rms.* me
•
lhe Callow Partnerthip
•
,...... i..1.7.-
..._ --......-- =..----- ..-...r...
= 1 I ., ;.7..-....-.7.- z.......:..' .... a n . .- ;fr., .- ---: fr.' .. • -:.
.1: ; - ...24 ..„:.......
rAIMMO
*RUC
5 h)
At .0 TI W 01 ARGUN)
• 4•4.1
I t {i• • k
A Z•nt. •
, • t fsr 7
- ..1 M.O. PITY "
L _ ,
L
sum DaRrACE
EXISTING R.O.C.
& Ftemacimmabriclat i-coriss
4,4
SECURITY PACIFIC
WEST FACADE
SECURITY PACIFIC
RIVERTON OPERATIONS CENTER
(ALONG E. MARGINAL WY. S.)
SECURITY PACIFIC
NORTH FACADE AND MAIN ENTRY WALK
7/23/90
7/25/90
7/23/90
SECURITY PACIFIC
WEST FACADE
(ALONG E. MARGINAL WY. S.)
7/23/90
SECURITY PACIFIC
WEST FACADE
SECURITY PACIFIC
MAIN ENTRY AT NORTH FACADE
7/25/90
7/25/90
WAC 197 -11 -970
Description of Proposal Construct a14,976 square foot addition to an existing
computer room, and a 906.5 sf addition to an existing mechanical room. 39 existing
parking stalls will be replaced by landscaping, with 20 new stalls created by the
reconfiguration of existing s a s.
Proponent The Callison Partnership (applicant): and Security Pacific Bank (owner)
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any
12400 East Marginal Wav South (at existing Security Pacifjj Rixgrtgj Operations Center);
in the S.W. 1 4 of Sec 10 Twn. 23 R.e. 4 Tukwila Washiniton
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -20 -90
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
There is no comment period for this DNS
0 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard T a' " MA 98 X88
Date August 14, 1990 Signature
You may appeal this determination to the tt1y Clerk at City Mall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS •
07/30/90
Callison
Architecture
Programming
Planning
In error Design
Grephikk
11:11 FAX 206 (23 4625
July 17,1990
Mr_ Ron Cameron, City Engineer
City of Tukwila Public Works Department
6300 Southcenter Blvd..
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Security Pacific Bank Washington
Riverton Operations Center Traffic Study
Project Number 89163_05
CALLISON PTNRSHP 44 TUK PUB STORKS
Dear Mr. Carneron:
This letter will serve to address your concerns expressed in the meeting minutes from the project
pre-application conference held June 7, 1990.
1. Identify number of parking stalls lost on site.
Response: 39 parking stalls will be deleted in the proposal.
2. Where are lost parking stalls to be located?
Response 17 existing parking stalls will be re- configured from angle parking to head -in
parking in the southerly parking area and five new stalls will be added along the north
side of the proposed addition. This totals a net reduction of 17 parking. stalls
3. • Are additional parking stalls required?
Response: No. The total gross floor area of 270,937 sf requires 678 stalls at a ratio of
four stalls /I,000 sf. 687 parldng stalls will be provided.
4. Will any parking be supplied on the east side of E. Marginal Way?
Response: Yes_ There are currently 270 stalls provided in the ancillary parldng lot on
the east side of E Marginal Way_
5. What is the existing parking usage?
a _ Parking stalls used? .
• b_ ' Available parking tal]s
1420 Fifth Avenue
Suite 2400
Seattle, Washington
(206) 623.4646
FAX: (206) 623-4625
•
E 1001
07/30/90 11:11 FAX 206 623 4625 CALLISON PTNRSHP 444 TtiK PUB WORKS 12 002
c
Mr. Ron heron, City Engineer
City of Tukwila Public Works Department
Project Number 89163.05
Idly 17, 1990
Page 2
Response: During normal operation, the on-site parldng lot is typically 80 - 90% full and
. the ancillary lot is 25 - 30% full. At peak times (shift changes) the on -site lot is again
80 - 90% full and the ancillary lot is approximately 75% full.
Parking availability is approximately 229 stalls during normal operation and
approximately 107 stalls during peak volumes.
6. Is there any increased pedestrian traffic across E. Marginal Way?
Response: No. Earlier this year, the bank relocated approximately 250 employees to a
different facility. Pedestrian traffic across E. Marginal Way has decreased accordingly.
7. What are the existing pedestrian 'volumes associated with the development?
Response: Approximately 1,000 employees at the facility during a 24-hour period;
divided into three shifts of approximately 450,325 and 325 employees. The maximum
pedestrian volume would occur at the change of first and second shifts wherein 450 staff
wotild be leaving and 325 would be arriving. At present, the ancillary parking lot
provides approximately 35% of the total parking used for the facility which would
represent approximately 158 staff crossing E. Marginal Way to leave work and
approximately 114 staff crossing E. Marginal Way to arrive at work However, it should
be noted that all 773 employees involved in the shift change would not be leaving or
arriving all at once as the second shift arrives before the first shift leaves.
8. Are there any company employee crossing concerns?
Response No concerns identified_
9. Are there any increases in the number of employees?
Response: The proposed addition will not require additional staff. Three employees
currently working elsewhere in the fadlity will be relocated to the addition. Further,
the bank estimates that over the next three years, the staff increase will only be
approximately 2 %. (Refer to Attachment "A"-)
10. Reference agreement for funding pedestrian signals should that need develop and be
ultimately approved by the Oty_
Response: The pedestrian crosswalk linking the facility to the ancillary parking lot is
currently served with a lighted crosswalk sign and flashing yellow signal. No
agreements for further modifications of the pedestrian crosswalk signal are anticipated
at this time.
07/30/90 11:12 FAX 206 . 623 4625
Mr. Ron Cameron, Ch .Engineer
City of Tulcwiia Public Works Department
Project Number 89163.05
July 17,1990
Page 3
I have also included for your reference a copy of the Trip Generation Study based on ITE
standards prepared by The Transpo Group for this proposal. (Refer to Attachment B ".)
Please do not hesitate to call if I can provide any additional information, or answer any
questions you may have
Sincerely,
THE CALLYSON PARTNERSHIP, LTD.
Leonard A. Ruff
LAR-gc
Security Pacific Bank Dave McDonald
Callison: Gerry Gerron, S. Ram Prasad, Jim Rothwell, File No. 9
CALLISON PTNRSHP -►-►a TUX PUB WORKS
0003
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: A 15,883 sf addition to the existing
Riverton Operations Center.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection)
12400 E. Marginal Way S.
Quarter: SW Section: 10
(This information may be found on.your tax statement.)
3. APPLICANT :* Name: The Callison Partnership: Leonard Ruff
Address: 1420 Fifth Ave. Suite 2400 Seattle WA 98101
Phone: (206) 623 -4646
Signature:
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
Phone:
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Security Pacific Bank
Address: 600 University Seattle WA 98124
(206) 621 -4275
Township: 23 Range: 4
I /WE,Esignature(s)]
swear that we are e owner s or con rac pu aser s o th?
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date: 17 /?9d
Date: - 7 -17 -°L '
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: The addition will actually enhance the street frontage by replacing
parking areas with landscaping. The height and scale of the addition
and the existing building are kept low key to maintain a harmonious
relationship to the site.
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: Detailing, textures and color of the addition will be consistent with
existing facility and landscaping will be relocated to accomodate and
enhance the addition. The relationship of on site and street vehicular
circulation will not be revised except for the addition of one 20'
wide driveway for fire department access.
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE :The proposal will include an extensive landscaping relocation and planting
scheme to soften the walls of the facility and increase the aesthetic appeal.
Low lighting bollards will be strategically located to provide increased
pedestrian safety and security.
8. BUILDING DESIGN
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per -
ma.lent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: The e proposed addition will be of the same type of construction, texture,
detailing and color as the existing facility to maintain a consistent level
of quality. Exterior lighting will be accomplished with the use of low
lighting bollards at pedestrian routes to promote safety and security
with pole mounted light fixtures along E. Marginal Way S. for general
illumination. The exterior walls of the facility will be accented with
reveals to match the existing building in order to provide scale and define
massing.
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: The proposal does not include any street or site furnishings. Existing
benches, planter boxes, waste receptacles, etc. will remain in place.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT N/A
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
• • . , •
s .4.,.1.,tit,„, "P 'tc't 1=—.4 4 zz Ow- Iv • g , ,
1.•
,A •fit •, �..
,. ' � •. . ;.§;" -� .fir;, . . • ,�.
.,.�s!? :,.r•, ... .:•.'i4r' .;,`*9•'
.rl��?f':�'ti� �: ° 1 +R�k•�.R���
a::i. ,'��'v.�.�. •i :t.' �`r. Vii ;yY -:14 ..
Tye r a:l •.
yx>,N t F1::S..z:: ti "t:�
f
�' �??:; L `,4��•.kt;i;?`:t:T +,i'i b1. ^tir7
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJuIul iiiiia III III I11III.IJlILJlpIIIIII IuI111111111iiip. _LI.IIlliiIIIIYIIIII'I'II III' I'II'II1IIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIII.
` IF THIS .MICROFILMED.; I.S LESS
CL JH1S`:NOTICE, IT I9 OUE; TO
V (i . vITY?) a �t' L t� a ' GI ALA T
. RTRAMi^P.PP ,
•., , •
• • • •
•
, , :
13,1,4;^ tt
• '..' •
•
...
• • I
•
. .
•
•
'7
•
1‘. • •'.••••
V.;21f„rizleit1
;
Tire.31••
iV
0 1 2
8 • 10 • 11 12
111111.111011111111141911TVWFWITNUTOPIIIIIINTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIPPI
iilli1111111111111111111111
. me
. • • CLEAIVIHAN4 •;•.
MICROFILMED..0.0CUMENTAS LESS • .
ne +Li n nit !MEN
• • •:•.
flrefr,R: jraW ter
74. 1 : 5777 ;F :Fra".gi rr :Ti e
e Y.3 • ue) '
,,= 4 • '
•
• • t
•
- r4`
, • -.P.41•4”...,:t■ , .
4`
•
- re , I ••„
l
, 4 4-
• • '
1
*
■
. /3
1
i
IP OP 6
;S
Al0
, 3
4
00
••■•
1( s
e
n 4 ,
47.5
10
0
*I°
s '
it2 9.
4344
I. 4
C163° (..
,
.- ,,„
.
..,,.
.P 6
/ .00 4
,.. . .
,,,,, •
t .0 ■le
7
: ‘,0q. 4
"
:
rovot
ruCaait
a
;Var/Affe sr,
1.
SUBJECT PROP TY
1 - 41z.4
m „„, /III Mot
rap'•'4 4 211 len3
..00 /SOB. •
I 17
t Of u ,
204.64
- 4744 - 41
128311511111166122
c X:4 , 111.C. 07.
// BO • /I • es 0/ .1
o•34.2.
KC SP 78568
124TH
------".. , 3 7"---E
rovont .? oo_o /008
:. .h.....9., oar. dos .. hitt
- H5P ----
ciG 010.• "
_-.....-
,, • __ .A0 •ja •
1S 13 .)6
.,, VAC 101 011•019 eimotop000 • "A x
i . v , , filo 4 . *. Itko •
1 ,,.,.., .,- ..'"i,....4F..5:11-1 ST.
' ° 13 14
t ,l, •
' '"
9 fl g
v) ag
pe & ; 6 443
00
n el
30 vo • o 1.• vo
z
Ire 14 :1 • ': 1 r 6. 4
1 •• • •
lLi ' r•• ■,
; 4 i,7 120 3( too
140.40
'15\
39.73
57.5I
■ AC,
04 27.
03.0C
41
128TH
1/
.See 1
1 1111111H
!.111,111,1
493.1.4.t
1111111.11
• 7 S•nalP
NW 15
po* ssi4E.s.s
• s 1 4 0'44
IPPIIIIRIWITt111)
734060-0421
iFrom Assessor's Map NW 10-23-4)
\
..7ftitlIff.-.•. .. . ' .?:;, ;.
\
S, I28TH ST. a • ;.,
...
1315.36
7
25.02"
2350
AC.
,u4..••
I26TH sT.
44717t
1643/.7
r A47072
111(f0V10)1 1
JUL 1 1P9
1
. '
CiTY Cr; . 1 ' '
PLANNING flEPT.:
IHU19
lIlilliIllilllHtllmllm
BUILDING
..R .ett. 4fburuo
AMIT SUBMITTAL ' JULY ;117,1990 (Revises Auwet 3, ifl90)
l isor9 ` Partners
fiAlintot 14D5'tAf111-
WALK '
ARKING
ti
TURN AROUND
d
lzubt ATF. WriTIAlr WW2 , fi 1wk,f1 ts f 1't a.,
f l V At4 ? r, riu►'lli 4 pe 'IA
15• MATr1{
6i cif ��.. _ � .• �; .
6Z :'..9L • ,LE '.9
J 'i coNc... -0141.1•14 .
': •Ruc .
l >;FI +xtr✓ G11Ekl 1far/.;
p =1sw fl.hl+TEO
-IIr. stE..ku .-
NEW COMPUTER ROOM EXPA
col
;1(1'4101 Gor.k., wH,k l KgiAAIN
t-•Xr,1lwf I, to RfOrt
Muwtl foz
Z
OK TP.te; rei hatcA
(sXl9Tlu (CEDAR) .1 t. .
rzXISTING COMPUTER ROOM .
5111:48, .
Frarcl►
F i .. t, ' .. � ... .. 'r� .. ;'Vi�::17i:;. \'l:ii.' 1 ;i1',.� :1:'t •r I�J
EXISTING. WING
0.6 1r ATr-o
Pitalq ir1 'ro Pkiiiht4
il111111i1111111111111111111�11111111111111111111111�11�1111111 111 111 111LJII1 I I I �� Il i li �� 1J � 111 � In � IiI � III j� J. � li1 � 1. u .,:
0 smart' 1 9 3" _ ...: S . . _ 6 __ _..._ :.. ...:: 8 . 9 . • • 10 • 11 aanrw 12.
130 -0
liM1T:
Wt.
pG ,,PA It•. - , Mf$14■
ro.fOis,: yr ,'LLAZ1 /0. •
.04adi :uitiiRr.u.A'A' OHU1AW5' LORI
9RiM►5 Af.#151F,P ITNfuitll'tl, !•:1 D As H• <:
T(o ' fl.ICATA Rio ctOM
A16006 — . 4114i0teaR( tee
FHpboDtiiW.OA - .
flee* .3/2eich'f {AME of Ge ii0,1 -nmg eflittrar T
tiffrAc (,A1OGIUWHt- !!(I.bNai bMRr
k B PKWY coletfifaM'i111,0170ct000'- RWpoF,Acfeop FWM
:e ^5Pp•
t l T• m1ol�) . l�''fD'
�• 16 t1fRt5 yRU1rCA'Po1VA6 ep T!16yr 12 "91R
. 0 Y15 1 d • AYPtAWir• CALotluluM - `IL JoItIK ofzr ¢G ^F+
P 50 1r.>,.1p5 ..Et.ksu9 'alto .I.0 r $ru- o rrO
t WTK • yF 41'D
r 90 4A !I IA Si 4TA a SAS 1: oP0
R• 54 nu 5 AcwTA �M - �or1PRcT E+� 2}
� YMUry " sfU
NOTES •
I. , AU. r TiI tE01 tp RENEVb L '11.i'uT1 i.11• T t Fiu FIefK ' *AO. OSIOl P.1p5 lu
DNEWriftet To (rFxrfa'e;. 2" flue fiAFc !mitt 5xli.fte4 WAS Td FecltJe- flAUtiw1
4, raper R.Aur ALL Mot M 111*IPl, Al %TAILED odfib's1 t1 ttFrk.
3• Alb 01•01 tto5 to Pk IkW1{AteD WIrlt AA A'!tatp,Tk, 44 4 AD)t
epitoq trzeigTATIu1 h,Y5TEM Ta 1r4I1.I0T NCU1 h dtLOINui ACO1TIew•
1. E$1 %Tnl PLAIITMATP.P114- to be b 1.40, gEnseifp •)Talrnllp Jt uIRD f. RERANT60.
S Ato POT' MArrrAL 511k.. fib gdARItiT6D +Ifkofy 44vc roc pftoklo )n of rut.
yF!�P F► 1011AIJtiFA (5 MPlepokl. • .
NEW MECHAN
ROOM EXPAN
3=
(,Lo - .. 1•A
N1a;,tu bieritrft $ MARtI poor/
both
ek.I((.To,. ?WOW Crfp
ADO NEW . Th- \lIDE Fut .
exAltAAe0. ° set Poor Us
' kR SIB' A JQ J
its .:
Efb
Ode
.. bllra .
BO>
04b
hfy .
bop
Ott
I II ®Gh
itinv , Aniket "1
was Alit
irai �'y,
Ii
1
� ,� � : �nnuuimul:�■u�:cse�rrr»Il�eu�t
"` . ii ..s ll 111»'s�'ee; Ai i
:flllll i11 111� ' •
' AFT :eM t�____ �r iit�lll!II /II YI!t' % '��`llr
11164 .1ii 7 =r d 111� �.t1 11111 " • • • "` �i ' �+
0. •�r o lit l l�n1r1m1u a►u, r .I•ti //I'-;t1,
�. ∎ :�,1` .r�A�a:Cc ^ , 8 � , ►at i: _. m in. � It u11 n.' +'— / ri .� s _ � t�
_ U+�L� Yf 1I1 r��I11U11 11'ilfiAC:111O1 /i!lllu.r
-.li/ x+111 rte► IIAr°� W!lilIRt -:-. ,. ' iVV,�
�.:.. r•'--- r was :`�i�/���U] , �1� �( ; + '{ 0 i�y/l .
'I ` 7
„-�� y;�•� 1I11: , 4111 I� �i•••
a ID II I I `.— rlllRl all,�i1A111 ■
�a EllllllCll� ��.��Ilila
ti 1 / /�,1IU9 �1 _
'fl u r."vl�1�•:�IA r 0 W 1 �.
•u ► a�sioWITI +s rAul �� . , NI � wl�
A 1 u u r.� !•1►!rf� u: ''tO��
�1•�' � OA's H..* --"
CAL
ION
i uurm
.4 "e 410`,31
isadf� w d1li A il
'sue io Al !K 3 IMI11B�III
"p ., 1^1111 011111111f fins 11f1 �':a�
Il• I �.A1II11111i1 I Ilil/ FJ W
r i111111i111i111A i 7f111,'IJJUI�'',
IITIIUWIilliild _ ' 1 �II'� ���
11111111011 1irVii�7. s••- I
111;
�
Ke mrsT111oraNDer-
, 11Q,
3 -
`;ep 0.4/
W:'IT1'Re pr,NFe+vo
UAPERt M0L;411
3 ox,HleoA
w .: 151t1b'1• .
(1yP
`1471 1" lax. M IDGATED • 5 .b
( . • . 1
E ro0 m Atte G
pA RKIN
Arm :sMR1.1Pil bolo t ial Flato.
ADD OtRotAlOcoge- S. 7711:.1 = llu
MOttoft
L•A Ip$Q. . ARCHITECTURE PL 4 ,
• . '. S " ' : f : '1'•D "), '
tzu.Aee 11r ( 'it'4rks)
II�t{r T (4.. (,I)
OnAUi. KE+ANIJ
°oIfi•i*.D 1.h►IDlo►'b.lAllitw►lt.'
(Am opeldin te
pormeR l440*-1 QdA11ff'
IF• 7NIS :tNICROFIi:NED ::D0 00MENTAS: LESS
CLEAR iiTNAN " ?TISS' -Tt = °IS- DUE,TO
TN GI AL DOC ENT
ifID� w 1jlliiisTlil 1 1, fit�m1111117�fl11
IIIi (I1�i110111�(Qnil1>T►ilRtlftf�f
COPYRIGHT 1St TNICALLISON 11119NIASNIt
rlUld''`a;: "+ �; n�" J,% 1. �; ��? 5'FiS` ?t�i:4
SECURITY? ACIE1
3 BANK; WASHINGT
•
101990 : • I .
ctrY CAUG .
•, pLANt•rw' ncor
•
T.O.C. EL 43.43 •
.0.C. EL. •39.43'4 •
1 Z111311•1•1111= CERUMINIZIMI3 ZEilifi 211111 30 Al
MG 111112110131M11151MEM19 12122.11111111311N1.11MIMuU effigs Elummint igge
inewumumr. • ,n iv .
o rtommatowsommav , .,42 am
FiNLI N lk) *OW Al4RF gia
Ma WE
MI 31I OM 301113
Min mstos MB zzmottt s tom 252310stmossmattm aeturaq 3230
MB
Mal
— --
0131131
. ...R. , , , 11013117:mmtimmtmv
1 ,1.K
alma
151124
mmt, ti ssamtotswzmmt:st
1 .t.t.t.X.t.t.:.%:.:4.::::::::::.:Mitaii..t.ii§ia,k,e. Ar.::::im§::::Ai:::::::i ::::::::::::::::*:::::::::::::::;:' iogii.:ki4iiiiimiimi;i:i;i:
.„.., - N ...*„.."••••;:* ,Iii:::::;$ikkit:::::::• 'ili:14••.:::K*::::•......:,,,,,,,,,,,.....
i•:::::isx:::::::::::::::::*:*::::•::::,:xiiiii,:::::::,,....A ii, : ki.• ,:::ixiii.ivo:::::40.,,,,... .ii,?:, i gg i:i . ..,,kk:
ISIZIMEMIMMIZIMEIZEIMPI EOM _ ..__•• , aniii limose alsz ornamessammusionsam Emma mortwesurmuns A ors seamommits Imo
fafinumus irl; 8 emmu=w9m=mammon. cf iAl ims iniffs NEr4 Essiimtiiimmumem if Fat Ignitiotel 1E1 31 21111111331 If
111211:11sziat Lggpi imetit on notectomettmanitmerina NM ItteR113WINt111131111/4151118211111111311■110 iliZ3 111913199112M151. Mal
Rsow.;mmeNsmawayy25.s.w-i • .vot RED AZZ<ZWW. ..4kOAVO. OW' „ ; Az saw ..,,,,..,,,,,,,,, • ..,0., gme x.xtotattot : ...4•:m gm coottgw...sowszot ,NRz ism 55, . •,,, ',,,, . ,.. . ,2, .. . L'I
; i ri
En 82111 ISO
0
SLAB EL 25.10
T.O.C. EL 43.43 •
FIN. FLR. EL: 26.60
SLAB EL 26.10
' • • "
• . • ,
• „ - •
EQ.
EtAt...4RELLIS: 7 t
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION •
• .•
'• •• • , '•• • • •i •
aHison P atners hip
• •• • • •• ••
EINSINGEZIN II =MAUI MGM% a 'moms rasa moms la moisis • 111•31110711111m.MOIM
NM= PI!
13312103112151112113121113110111
xamsliplacorzw,cut! 51
01 8 III
§I!
IElf#§ E01
pill= 9 1121111 GI tii
11101111511111:011161 IN:NMI I mspiisurrias imam
S65 I WWI I CillitlilrfailiPECIERI
slt nmyttamtriptwettsgiumsg Emmoom.
El 0 51
111 A1 Ai PI A 51
5!lal Align RIIRO Hint &RIVE/ A
11111 19111 11111
. .".°E• 2 • 1 .!° 1226 ,!!! 92 AP lit 11 11 LI.
MN.FLR. EL 26
SUSPENDED A.C.T. CEILING -
RAISED ACCESS FL,OOR
•
.• ••• • • -it-4;::•-•
• ‘;.wourri,-;......mecegaisraenVISKIazirmaao....•■•••.*
• • • •
SLAB El.: 25.1Q
BUILDING SECTION' A-A
PITE
REVEALS TO MATCH EXISTING
•
PRECAST ccinicRrE
DISTORTED WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
HOOF SLOPE •1/4" / FT. T
• - `
B.A.R. SUBMITTAL JULY 17, 1990 1 (REVISED AUGUST .3 1990) '
BOLDING ELEVATIONS AND SECTONS,
0
• • •
•
PRECASTCONCRETE:PAIEL:TYP.
: •BENEALS4T0,.. MATCH. EXISTING
LOUVER
11 F- IIE
,. •
• r;
.T.O.C. EL 4343
1-
FIN. FLA EL: 26.f30
SLAB EL: 25.10
EXISTING
IiiiIIIIIIIIIiiillOpiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiitlipLiiiiiillipp Illi
o .... 1 9 7.. 8 9 • 10 11 ........,... 12
IF . T.H I 5 14I61I0,FILHED .DOCGMENT..: IS LESS
: ; - • . . , . : . CLEAR THAtt.THIS'..NOTIdE;''.Ir35":DUE:.:TO . • • . .. ' . -.. , . :
TH " ll , ITY‘i . OF.:•THE. GI ALIO CUMEN : • a , .i- - . '..:, s' ... t• .: ::.• c '. a. : ':::
TYP.
•
NEW
'EAST ELEVATION
RELOCATED ROLLING OVERHEAD DOOR
REVEALS TO MATCH EXISTING
REVEALS TO MATCH EXISTING
PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
LT.WT. CONC. FILL / RIGID BOARD1;
INSULATING SYSTEM (R-19) !)
BUILDING SECTION p-B
01 23'1,
• , •
. • .
. 24 feet : •
118 1'70".
SECURITY PAC
BANK WASHINGTON
MI3NOWNO
AUG 3 1990
CITY OF - T! . .IIWV1LA
PLANNING DEPT.
•
IT .:......i.:.: ',„.;.....
.1 i,•••.: - • .
': :'• •,,,--0.14v:=<••t;•':;..2,A„.•••-.,..•••::.--:':••••'. ::.... • .
• .. .•:',"•,-,7';',•?.:V.....:,''...,'";•::;:•::::..:::'.:::'
, .. ....,
• • , - - , : .. „
1'. .• ilviVrV■• ...0$
?..
‘tiri•itriiit•t
. 4 illi ''
• • •
•
•
Iison Pa hers •
B.A.R. -SUBMITTAL JULY • 17; 1990 • (Revised August 3, 1990)
SCHEME ' (14,976 5 SF + 906'5 SF 15 883 SF TOTAL)
' IDOST BUS SHELTER
PROPERTY LINE
EXIST FENCE
`REFIACEE*(ST SWING' GATE
1.FULL SIDEWALK:WIDTH )
NEW LANDSCAPE AREA . INSTALL'20 WIDE' ROLUtid GATE IN MST FENCE.
pcist LANDSCAPE •AREA (FIRE DEFT. ACCESS) • .
NEW PARKING STALL LAYOUT
EXIST GATE
LOCATION MAP
ANCILLARY PARKING
(SEPARATE PHASE)
0
MICROORAPHIC
PARKING
COMPUTER R�
EXPANSION
PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1
CODE INFORMATION
Bullding Area: ExistinOuilding
New Expansion
Total Area
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Lot Area
Lot Coverage perCentage;
255,054.0 sf
14,976.5 sf Office
906.5 sf Mech
270,937.0 sf
1/400 sf (or 2.5/1000)
270,937 sf (total) /400=678
682 stalls
-
AliG :19 1990
r • crrv- oF,TahiLA
PLANNING DEPT:: •
100 feet
SECURITYPACIFIC:
:BANKOWASHINGTON'
, , : ••""' '
. .•
.••• •••:,.. • ' • • .'•.•
•
•
• ...
::••.•
• - „