The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit 89-02-V - SCHNEIDER HOMES - SETBACK VARIANCE89-2-V Permit 89-02-V - SCHNEIDER HOMES - SETBACK VARIANCE south 153rd street 89-07-smp NOTDEC ma isA4 'sra4 kg.1044v wwVrer .W.W.l4- futSDCtivi4% =OW 441zwrrror«v rxa . wnw.no City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 89 -2 -V APPLICANT: Schneider Homes, Inc. REQUEST: A reduction in sideyard setback requirement from 8 -feet to 7.38 feet for two properties along their common boundaries. LOCATION: 6532, 6534 South 153rd Street, Tukwila, WA. The Board of Adjustment (BOA) conducted a review of the above request on September 7, 1989, and denied the variance request for a reduction in sideyard setback. The BOA adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the staff report dated September 1, 1989 and minutes dated September 7, 1989. The action of the Board of Adjustment in granting a variance, shall be final and conclusive unless,. within ten days from the date of the Board's 'action, an applicant or an aggrieved party makes an application to the Superior Court of King County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. NAME: TITLE: DATE: atez f ,1,a., AMA/ ,56E1 S i 4.4 Law N. Ca .0 1. lb Ycltl I/ 5 `� z_ - L'Vk GL � w a \� ' 14.cp4 4:tiv FATIO •:••:‘ ta4 tiGi . Auv-rc►} ex l gist -T. litmK0 - Par5'cl& Town klay v 1 pCvt ce.L A - n (D530-053'8 5 )53 ? t pcurce 6 - L9531-653'7 b 153 OLD_ A EY h b;-/-- * .3'arJ o f 1. u.s{me..Pi S' eq a v (0531 5 )535t 1 r� r'1j5 51533 - Parkside Townhomes 6530 -6538, 6531 -6537 S 153 St • llotE: \Val► 'N, `[Rb� ; AWJ ICJ FROM if f 6510 Sou1hc.. »ntt r 8t •,ihh,vurd • Suitc, 4'1 • Tuk aci, WA 98188 • (2O . DATE // 5.-- 4/AL TIME: FROM: _Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Blvd. #1 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 248 -2471 FAX NUMBER (206) 242 -4209 T0: FAX 11: CONTACT: -7j d P TOTAL # OF PAGES: 5 (INCLUDING COVER) .., ��, n. 9ww. n <n....�"mW..�w.wont.��rs�.r�i++ ern`. czYCY .':+fiN:nba�,i:!v- /u�.f:rt.rdFax wr.• rcw rw... e. u. wrw .,...w.nvc...«nea arum :CAVUtwvsa�s.wcw.s•.w....,.. 7.14.1989 1 TELECOPIER COVER LETTER HONE # _ 5 "13'2S IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, CONTACT THE ABOVE SENDER AT THE FOLLOWING TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 248 -2471. Call Joanne. 0, 0 0- 7 1 =-C- 4 -10 1.44 3 e7e5 zdleit ea..11777.4 . '1 rKuro C.B. & CAROLYN McCLAIN 207 C AVE, MAJORCA LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 STEVEN R. & LINDA ANDERSON 1431 SHELBY DR. FAIRFIELD, CA 94533 -4348 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 Se MICHAEL ALHA[FF C/O LONGACRES RACE TRACK P.O. BOX 60 RENTON, WA 98057 14. 17t17 14:171 1 93 sz 90 . -� 34 t/ 0 I A 9.5V90 — o - 3sd -? .� ELEANOR L. HEINZ A5-1-190 _ �35 c 6519 S 153RD AVE. TUKWILA, WA 98188 6DO 580 - 0016 35)OQ oa€), LILLIAN ARNSTEIN ( 1`Y S/`��O ` L 1 S5 — 1302 LAKESIDE AVE. S. d' v SEATTEL, WA 98144 RICHARD BALASH JJ�� r � 31623 EAST LAKE MORTON S.E. L 10 5 3 0 y 0 KENT, WA 98031 HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 133a5 CANYON ESTATES CONDOMINIUMS O - L C/O PATRICK MCGUANE, MANAGER 15138 65TH AVE. S. # 114 TUKWILA, WA 98188 . 5/5 S. /5 /g' o o ig1K / A41 6 2/° - 7 2,5" 3 5`6 '3(( 3 ea.ta aac 95 4e90 -0 3 /4 7 Q2 S ** *END * ** ...a.. r: R� -K�1:•:AC'.n.aorwwe�.....r.w.. �i • •— •• v ........J».».• ..4V.V..41.?.. "CXatt•S'J'.!+RS' FROM Townsend Chastain & Association 409 South 3rd Avenue Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Paul Morrow STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1300 Seattle, Washington 98104 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sander Senior Title Officer., Bob Curtis Unit No, 2 343 ■1349 A. 106 A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC}, a Washington corporation ?: ri.': �C f.:c�L"'A':.5 ?,b;.i;`,vyX.lit} J ' r iff• vyi ..r.�ww...rn.......nw...wnnw.a *.V.seMVnKii:4 Xi4r: YFG�siw.�.+e.e.+....._.. 7.14.1989 12:00 RECEIVED JUN 2 3 1989 Title Order No.; 91958 P. 1 Effective Date: June 9, 1989, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: PREMIUM AL,TA Owner's Policy Amount TO SE AGREED UPON $100,00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Tax $ 8.10 Proposed Insured: TO FOLLOW 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple, 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county o King, state of Washington, and described as follows: X. Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Oundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle (vacated), according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 46, in King County, Washington) EXCEPT the west 8 feet thereof. f tL fT�J'�! "_ate'`. +f4if✓ zrr- Wiz= -r- --mss.:..`'?' ��; A - e4-47 w IS .. ; • j%9 N° 2 V 0 • ‘1 162. a V MEN ,jo� 10 50 cpt e3 lc Q` .��5 O l � Gp' .vim - 47 emue tam eca is ,• • 27 aq` •` P. SCALE 1" - 100' / e :> •• �r WN /TO / Wvtie 28 • f 1989 COPYRIGHT BY TRW 8g iI TRY REAL THIS IS REALRESTATEUINFORMATION ,SERVICES.S ACCURACY. K NTY PAR J T Y AQQ NT N R P ATT�D _ _ _ 19 9- T ON iAf l kN4V - 1 iJ1�ER UR T A R ADD - TUKCJIC A VU : T " ACCT-N0 TAXPAY R /OWN RS -NAME i SITUS ADDRESS USE -- ZONING -- UNT 111L1N AQQRL55 __� Q- 0- 5- T- R -�QQ _QLK 0250-Q0 6510 SO BLVD.STE 6 *TUKUILA uA 98 8 S M -SE -23 -23-04 1T -3 THRU 20 *2 0345 -Q72 LAKESIDE AI *SEATTLE uA 98144 6503 S M- SE 23 - 23 -04 1 -2 -3 *3 R-3 4 0346-06 238EASTLAKECMORT 6507 S ON SE *KENT uA 98031 M- SE- 23 -23 -04 404 R -3 4 *3 0348-04 MCCLAIN C B 6 5 153RD 5T 104 R -3 4 MCCLAIN CAROLYN *207 -C AVE MAJORCA *LAGUNA HI M -SE-23 -23-04 6 -7 *3 035095 15.RD A *SEATTLE WA 98188 6515 S 153RD - 2, -23 -04 1 0 4 *3 R3 4 VAC629 0352 6519 S 153RD ST 104 R-3 4 790426 A19 S WA 98188 M-SE -2 -23 -04 1 -11 *3 VAC 0355 5 RD AN SO SSON AP T KY LA WA - 23 - 0356-03 O BOX *RENTON YA 98057 M- SE- 23 -23 -04 14 R 3 15 -16 *3 035764a S52NS V 1 ND DREATTLE WA 98148 M- SE- 23 -23 -04 14 R3 15 -16 *3 0420 -05 WELLS DUB 7 SOUTHCENTER EVERGREEN BLDG *15 S GRAM WAY *RENTON WA 6 985 M- SY- 24 -23 -0BLL 932 4 POR* 0430 -p3 BOx PAT 10636 MAIN ST //303 *BELLEVUE WA 98004 O 98 F 2 000 ;MN 8003 * B E LLEVU E D WA 98005 7 SOUTHCENTER -23-0 - N 4 1700 SOUTHCENTER B M- NW- 24 -23 -O4 7100 SOUTHCE B BL M N 24 -23 -04 STATE FARM MUTUA AU TO INS 6721 SOUTHCENTER B 923 STATE FARM PLAZA *ATT: CORPORATE TAX DEP M- NW- 24 -23- 4 POR* 0450-08 WILAA 98 188 NNW - CITY 1700 SOUTHCENTER 3 BL 04 POR* 0455.83 RADOVICH JOHN C 6720 S BL 263 2 00 0 124TH NE B- 1 03 *BELLE WA 98005 M- NW- 24 -23 -04 POR* 0460 -06 FIORITO Q 001 FERUL E J *1100 NW LEARY WAY *SEATTLE WA 98 M-NW- 24-23 -04 POR* 8 12 C -2 0425 2 '. 124TH 103 *BELL WA 98005 SO MTNWE24E23 04 POR* C2 0426 -09 KING COUNTY 15000 INTEE 349 08 C2 SALE-DATE/PRICE LAND-AV IMP-AV TOTAL -AV //STY SOFT YR _��iA�_Q €S4RIPTQN_ Vr 1 9 -TAX �QT��Y 880114 48 000 31,000 31 VAC & POR VAC STS ADJ 2380 355.59 15510 770802 95,000 26,700 LESS ST PAGE .1,972 121�jg 1711.96 2.0 1 8818 VAC 22, 000 118 0 16140.29 2.0 79 1 46 126 1,450 22,000 118�00t� 16040042 2.0 9 4c Gov 157,500 22,000 130,000 22,000 11821N 1614.0 2.0 9 118 v 1604.42 2.0 . 1 :t: • 1 1 VACILESS y * 2380 31.35 11117 VAC W 8 FT 800 2380 9825 880 POR B1 -16 i 2380 1/4 1.56 790815 1 OF TU?WILA 2380 873533 1.04 POR VAC BLKS 4 TO 9 1 2380 27,000 16320 932 M1 *9 i 860131 LORS VAC 12 2380 22 3YR 4.44 921 POR* C -2 THE NWLY i RELY 20 FT "OFO FT PA 2380 20500 POR* C -2 880621 EL 2 TUKWILA 2380 340699 4.05 LOT OF Y!6! TUKW(LA 2380 #zs 7.33 C -2 TR OF TUKWILA7SHOR 47,500 T 2380 28575 C -2 08211 VAC TRACTS 4 1 2386 1 2311613 2.0 32 ?28 87 LOT 2 OF CITY OF TUKW!LA 2380 1156.73 1989 COPYRIGHT BY TRW 2 870731 87,000 31,500 50 1 81 04 80 1.0B M9.50 31,500 556400 1 8§ 950 1.03 ?j 9 64 31,5.0 43 � CR ;fig 58 ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Prepared September 1, 1989 HEARING DATE: September 7, 1989 FILE NUMBER: 89 -2 -V Schneider Homes, Inc. APPLICANT: Schneider Homes, Inc. REQUEST: A reduction in sideyard setback requirement from 8' to 7.38' for two properties along their common boundary. LOCATION: 6532,6534 South 153rd St., Tukwila, Wa. ZONING DISTRICT: R -3 (3 and 4 Family Residential) (A) Site Plan (B) Location Map (C) Photographs of Townhomes (To be distributed at meeting) STAFF REPORT to the 89 -2 -V: Schneider Homes Board of Adjustment Page 2 VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Existing Development: As shown in Attachment A, two separate buildings, a duplex and a triplex, are located on the site facing South 153rd. There are detached garages between the buildings and the street for the use of the occupants. 2. Surrounding Land Uses: As shown in Attachment B, the property is developed as follows: West- Multi - family Residential North- Hillside sloping down to Interurban South - Tukwila Park East- Multi - Family Residential BACKGROUND A variance is a useful tool for fine - tuning zoning code regulations. A regulation which generally serves the public interest may not do so in a specific application. Criteria must be strictly adhered to because the applicant is asking for relief from standards which everyone else has complied with. The variance proposal before you is a dimensional request for variance of a sideyard width. DECISION CRITERIA FINDINGS A. TMC 18.72.020(1)- The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed is located. Applicant Response "The use of the property has been established and two buildings constructed. In other words the use would not change from that allowed prior to this variance. The variance would merely allow us to provide a legal description for one duplex lot and one triplex lot for the sole purpose of securing permanent financing for the property. The variance would not grant any additional use for the property as all improvements are already in place and have been in compliance with existing codes and ordinances of the City of Tukwila and under the approval and supervision of the City of Tukwila Planning department." STAFF REPORT to the 89 -2 -V: Schneider Homes Board of Adjustment Page 3 Staff Response In his response, the applicant must prove that if the variance is granted he will not experience any Special privileges inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property is located. All surrounding properties are multi - family. The large units are not in a position to be divided up and sold separately. The 3 and 4 plex units comply with setbacks between buildings and would not be required to obtain a variance to obtain financing for separate ownership. B. TMC 18.72.020(2)- The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property in order to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and the zone which the property is located. Applicant Response "Additional comments at "C" clarify the intent of this variance, which is not to change or intensify the use of the property but to redefine the property into not more but only different lots, so that the available financing can be secured on a duplex and triplex residential unit basis." Staff Response The applicant must prove that the granting of the variance is necessary in order for him to experience the same rights and privileges as adjacent property owners or properties in a similar zone experience. The reason must be related to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the lot. The original development complied with the zoning code and the occupants enjoy the same rights and privileges of surrounding and similarly zoned properties at this time. No connection has been established between the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the lot and the applicants' reason for requesting the variance. C. TMC 18.72.020(3)- The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is situated. STAFF REPORT to the 89 -2 -V: Schneider Homes Board of Adjustment Page 4 Applicant's Response "The density of housing which has been built on this property will not change nor is the variance intended to in any way change or intensify the currently zoned usage of the property. Nor will the variance have any effect on traffic, views, light or aesthetics since it is merely a variance for setbacks on existing buildings that comply with building separation ordinances but would not comply with building setback limitations if the adjustment is granted. The owner of both lots is a common owner and therefore no third party property owner will be affected by the granting of this variance. Since all potential improvements are newly placed on the property, no physical changes to the property and improvements will be apparent to anyone if the variance is granted." Staff Response, The applicant must prove in his response that the variance will not prove injurious to the public welfare or property or improvements in the area or zone in which the property is located. Since applicant is the sole owner of the adjacent property at this time, the variance will not impact adjacent property owners. The property has recently been developed by the applicant so there will be no impact on improvements at this time. D. TYC 18.72.020(4) - The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Applicants Response "The existing separation between buildings conforms to existing building separation requirements. It will make no difference if a lot line is subsequently established equally between the two buildings. The proposed two lots and the existing improvements will have common ownership both currently and in the future if converted to condominiums. Thus there will be no conflict between current or future property owners due to a lack of setback from the internal joint property line." Staff Response The applicant was requested to review the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan to determine if there would be any adverse effect if the variance is implemented. STAFF REPORT to the 89 -2 -V: Schneider Homes Board of Adjustment Page 5 Given the nature of the variance request, staff did not find any applicable goals or policies that would be adversely affected by approving the variance request. E. TIM 18.72.020(5)- The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same zone or vicinity. Applicants' Response "Alternatives to the proposed variance were not apparent to us before or during construction. Otherwise, we would have slid the buildings either to the east or west to make up to 0.6'. Another way to look at this request is for two separate meets and bound legal descriptions. We are adjusting internal lot lines for 4 existing lots that these buildings already span and cross. The existing legals violate the zoning ordinance lot line setbacks for the internal lot lines as does the remaining neighbor properties along S. 153rd St. See attached assessors map. Therefore we are not asking for anything that creates a unique or new non - compliance with "internal lot line" setbacks." Staff Response In his response, applicant must prove that he will experience a negative effect on his property which is not being experienced by neighboring properties or other properties in similar zones. The applicant has stated the intent of the variance is for the "sole purpose of securing permanent financing for the property." This implies that the property ownership would change thus potentially benefiting the present owner, which is an additional benefit not enjoyed by adjacent property owners in the same form. CONCLUSIONS As previously stated a variance is a tool for fine - tuning the zoning code and should be approved only when applicant meets the criteria. It should be granted only when there are unique characteristics which result in burdens on specific parcels which do not serve the public purpose. The following conclusions are relevant to Criteria A -E: A. The applicant has established that he is the sole owner of the property and that any diminishment or enhancement of the property will only affect his rights; not the general public. STAFF REPORT to the Board of Adjustment The applicant has not established the special characteristics, which are related to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property which necessitate the passing of this ordinance. C. The applicant has stated that there will be no change in use or execution of his property rights if the variance is not granted. In order to grant the variance, the applicant must prove that there is a special property characteristic which will be denied him that other similar properties are experiencing if the variance request is denied. The applicant has not proven this point. D. Approving the requested variance will not adversely affect the implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy plan. E. The applicant will continue to experience the same level of enjoyment as previously. All property rights will be retained and there will be no negative differences between this property and other similar ones. RECOMMENDATION 89 -2 -V: Schneider Homes Page 6 Based on the applicants submittal and variance criteria, staff recommends the request for a variance be denied. i O; J 0 SOUTH 153rd STREET { c� ►� Uarrr r. - � _ E arr. REC. No. 5977526 I REC. No. 8811070788 PUGET SOUND POWER d LIGHT ESU T. REC. No.8811070788 tti Q r Fort Oen, Pork RA M1 GreIn-River Interchange. M 2 AT TACHMENT 5elne I der 9/1 /19 ia- Sehtto;der ;kw * C u /01.V •-; VIM, el- 2 ye schtsid liontes A ilitcAsteef "C" a. 9 1 OM 89 • 2 • 'time ider now 11% III 99-2-V Schneider limos 11 Sellocidsr Hole, 11,•2-Y schlock/sr Notnes .t" 2i_c {.�C. i�a. % ?5!! �.a ash§;: i.`....,::' ri.;.:.' 1 R.+.... rrc:' 1'J n` d: i9.¢ s':-.. a... a:':......'± 1�9t��e, YF_.,..:• P. r�4: r: ao. y:;: a,... a... 5H4�. n:: R: fY :2Kt.'h1::0'�7Y1 ?'£:D$+.:YSE "S , +:a� .. . N.i`SP% � .... \1JY4.Y:i^:!c �. ,.^�, K_titw ae).. fi .':.r ^.•�wPJr:Hfe +;tN'auif.� *.t L':1'2i tvh'2o5'-ryvtt:n� Wit. ...1 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: To allow 7.38' sideyard set -back in lieu of 8' as required by R3 zoning. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 6530, 6532, 6534, 6536, 6538, South 153rd St. Quarter: SE 1/4 Section: 23 Township: 23N Range: 4E 3. APPLICANT :* Name: Schneider Homes, Inc. Signature: Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. 4. PROPERTY Name: Schneider Homes, Inc. OWNER Phone: swear that I / e the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 7— I /WE,Esignature(s)7 VA(4IANCE APPLICAk (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Address: 6510 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 248 -2471 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Address: 6510 Southcenter Blvd. #1, Tukwila, WA 98188 248 -2471 concurrently with this varience request. 6. DOES YOUR REQUEST MEET THE VARIANCE CRITERIA? VARIANCE APPLICATION Page 2 JUL 201989 5. WHY IS THIS VARIANCE BEING REQUESTEED? , :; , Y _ ...:... ', In support of lot -line adjustment application, wliicli is submitted The Board of Adjustment will base its decision on the specific criteria shown in bold below. You are solely responsible for justifying why your property should not have to satisfy the same development standards which all other properties /projects must meet. The Board must decide that your variance request meets all five criteria. Be specific; a "yes" or "true" is not a sufficient response. Additional sheets should be attached if needed. The Planning Staff has provided some examples to help you respond to each criteria. Please feel free to use or ignore these as you see fit. The Board will make a decision based on the bold criteria, not staff examples. A. The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed is located. Example: Explain how your requested variance would not give you a special privilege in your use of the property in relation to the requirements imposed on adjacent and neighboring properties and on properties with the same zone classification. RESPONSE: The use of the property has been established and two buildings constructed. The varience would allow us to provide a legal description for one duplex lot and for one triplex lot for the sole purpose of securing permanent financing for the property, an option which should be allowed to all similarly zoned properties. B. The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property in order to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. rem B. (continued) VARIANCE APPLICATION Page 3 variance. Example: Does a special property characteristic such as size, shape or topography, combined with the zoning code requirement, prevent you from using your property in the manner of adjacent properties or other like -zoned properties? Special circumstances should not be due to: 1) actions by past or present property owners (i.e., developing or subdividing property which results in an extremely difficult to build parcel) or paying more for property than was justified by its development potential; or 2) actions which have already been compensated for (i.e., the State condemns a portion of land for I -5 construction and compensates the owner for the diminished value of the remaining parcel. RESPONSE: No Additional comments at "C" below clarify the intent of this C. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is situated. Example: Would granting your request cause any harm, injury, or interfer- ence with uses of adjacent and neighboring properties? (Consider traffic, views, light, aesthetic impacts, etc.) RESPONSE: No. The density of housing which has been built on this property will not chango nor is the variance intondod to in any may PhangP nr the currently zoned usage of the property. intan VARIANCE APPLICATION Page 4 D. The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implementa- tion of the comprehensive land use policy plan. Example: After a review of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, list any inconsistencies between your variance and the Plan's goals, objec- tives or policies. RESPONSE: The existing separation between buildings conforms to zoning requirements. It should make no significant difference if a lot line is E. The granting of such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoy- ment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same zone or vicinity. Example: Without the variance, no uses for which your property is zoned (i.e., for a single - family residence or commercial site) would be possible. Without the variance, rights of use of your property would not be the same as for other similarly zoned property. Describe other alternatives for use of your property. Why were these alternatives rejected? RESPONSE: Alternatives to the proposed variance were not apparent to us before or during construction. Otherwise, we would have slid the buildings either to the east or the west to make up tho 0.6'. ThP naad fnr this Adjustment was created by federal financing insurance requirements. (29 /VARI.APP1,2) (02/29/88) . , - • . • -• •- Land Surveyor's Certificate: This Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolida- tion correctly represents a survey* made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate Stott. statute. Name: Date: Certificate No. Wag, • A lot consolidation does not r.IMIr 4 Be of the periNeter unieSs the limeS are �$ (291$LA.NAP) Nap OR File in Vault Direction: Scale: rIc14- ZaP • 5 9 40 ui. relirr LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle (vacated), according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 46, in King County, Washington. LEGAL. DESCRIPTIONS i (JUL 201 Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle (vacated), according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 46, in King County, Washington. 1 •/n cr �^ 'g _ " •• lie :MPOR TINT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated r ereon witn reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. PO 1 G undakers T � -deru.rb an Addi+i o,i STEM' (; F TITLE COMPANY of \Vasiiington, Inc. ORDER NO. 4391 Volume (4 Pare 8iock Z s e S 153RD Sr C. __ ,. ' K ; p.a tin . W .. ' r J '.“ _ 1 , . �.r -i �', ' 1 �� .w. / 01r I S o r • • 1y-U6 -4 0 !3 5 1 C J •t ti r• • i • dL ,4 � !C< 'S. rr S a 7/4- •7$.�•(' w0 •. 4 •i N •^ t• 4 1. 30�. PO f TITLE COMPANY of Wasiungton, Inc. ORDER NO. 93 ?6 9 IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Surrey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon witn reference 10 streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. & Ufl cicLkerS Tn4rttrb4,i Addi•}-ioN 1 /7 19 •e S 153RD ST • Vocuw 14 page 44) Block Z 6 r _ ,t r ,.� to . 1 I Idc<. 1N. r , t •1 r1 L. • . j'� / •')'''' � C.t'�� i ' yJ ,'te ' I i 1 \ ♦ s Z t . .t C O, I ..... , 1 __ .( ___ .4 71.4 �5.�•c • • • 4 '/.V •♦ n .S •1 r 5 7 C 5 J .40 4 c • /C;,r �6 a Dt- ti • 30 2 Cry rrr C) 85 08 o ^ rn ut 88 t 4 PI CO tit o � W O Nio V 0� 10' al 144 rti n MN o `'1 u 77 10 � 1 I 20 i on ini A unn 20 0 O O 16_9 7 40.36 1 Land Surveyor's Certificate: N 0/' 35' IX E MONTANA STREET 6 r ( NOT CONSTRUCTED ) MAP I 1 27.31 2.89 kb iO' v I N 01° 35' /3' E 1 0.55 �Im iw This Boundary Line Adjustment /Lot Consolida- tion correctly represents a survey* made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate State statute, Certificate No. v03��( * A lot consolidation does not require a survey of the perimeter unless the lines are adjusted. 18.17 a 89.55 Scale: co./.I& Direction: POIN I A - 3 Map on File in Vault NEW W000 'FENCE 51.02 129.55 . 1 3 E 1LP ze' 28.02 ' to z47 1z2 40 4 ' Fi T" IL I III Cry rrr C) 85 08 o ^ rn ut 88 t 4 PI CO tit o � W O Nio V 0� 10' al 144 rti n MN o `'1 u 77 10 � 1 I 20 i on ini A unn 20 0 O O 16_9 7 40.36 1 Land Surveyor's Certificate: N 0/' 35' IX E MONTANA STREET 6 r ( NOT CONSTRUCTED ) MAP I 1 27.31 2.89 kb iO' v I N 01° 35' /3' E 1 0.55 �Im iw This Boundary Line Adjustment /Lot Consolida- tion correctly represents a survey* made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate State statute, Certificate No. v03��( * A lot consolidation does not require a survey of the perimeter unless the lines are adjusted. 18.17 a 89.55 Scale: co./.I& Direction: POIN I A - 3 Map on File in Vault NEW W000 'FENCE 51.02 129.55 . 1 3 E 1LP ze' 28.02 ' to z47 1z2 40 4 ' Fi T" IL I ENTIRE MAP :ITY OF TUKWILA ,4.DJ, / / F,s i 0 1 1 . ZOcAT /U/>/ (? OAAUS l � 30 2 70.2 7 t A/88-e4 W 503.15 38' 110 _ 0 , 5 2° 1 s i.f -03 t • V 1 62 � Jolo 1 1 , 62 0 \JO 0 P.� fGJ \33 I3 6.6 71 64 44.eg OL/TbF t• 0 19 �� so 00 0 2.7 1 g' ° 45 /e6• 23 • - P, 4- 24-. WN,TE R 1vER 173.3 n 0 1 2 e ' 9 1 • 6• `� 0 5°- — utSJEeT PRo Ptk rY DI Dl as 4 /721 9 9• • SCALE 1" - 100' o o 5 ° a 28 i0 /IP