HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 89-05-DR - ALFRED CROONQUIST - THOMPSON TILE DESIGN REVIEW89-05-dr
6700 riverside drive
89-02-smp epic-06-89
cpi thompson tile
THOMPSON TILE DESIGN REVIEW
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433-1800
Gary . L. VanDusen, Mayor
,NOTICE OF DECISION
May 30, 1989
FILE NUMBER: 89 -5 -DR
APPLICANT: Corporate Property Investors
REQUEST: Construct a 60,000 square foot warehouse /office
building
LOCATION: North of Riverside Drive between Olympic Avenue
South and Cascade Avenue South, Portion of Lot 23.
NW 1/4 of Section 36 of Township 23N, Range 4;
Tukwila, WA.
The Planning Commission conducted a review of the above request
on May 25, 1989.
The Commission adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in
the Staff Report dated May 17, 1989 and granted approval with the
attached conditions (See Attachment A).
Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the.decision to
the City Council by filing an appeal in writing with the City
Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the
reasons for the appeal.
Molly . Headley
Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENT A
Conditions of Approval for
89 -5 -DR: Thompson Tile
1. The Landscape Plan be revised as shown on Attachment 4
of the Staff Report dated May 17, 1989 to include the
following points:
a. Clarify how the entrances and existing landscaping
in Areas A and B will be landscaped.
b. Deletion of one parking space to provide a
landscape island in the center of the west wall
(Area C).
c. Move parking on the northwest rear wall north to
allow for a minimum 5 -foot landscape strip
adjacent to the wall to be planted with vegetation
(Area D).
d. Revised plan to include shrub screening at the
southeast building corner.
e. Provide alternative shrub - English Laurel - for
screening at rear of lot, that is native, and will
attain a height above 6 feet (Area F).
Please note that all plan revisions are subject to the
Planning Director's review and approval.
........
Planning Commission
May 25, 1989
Page 3
89 -5 -DR THOMPSON TILE - Request for design approval of 60,000
s.f. office /warehouse building and accessory improvements.
Molly Headley, Planning Intern, reviewed the staff report recom-
mending approval with revised conditions.
Al Coonquist, applicant, concurred with findings of staff and
modifications of conditions.
There were no public comments. Therefore, the public hearing was
closed at 9:15 p.m.
MR. VERHALEN MOVED AND MR. CAGLE SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE 89-
5-DR WITH REVISED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 6 AND 7 OF THE STAFF REPORT.
THE REVISED CONDITIONS READ AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Landscape Plan be revised as shown on Attachment 4 (of
the staff report) in the following areas:
a. Clarify how the entrances and existing landscaping in
Areas A and B will be landscaped.
b. Deletion of one parking space and provide a landscape
island in the center of the west wall (Area C).
c. Move parking on the northwest rear wall north to allow
for a minimum 5 -foot landscape strip adjacent to the
wall to be planted with vegetation (Area 0).
d. Revise plan to include shrub screening at the front
edge of the building.
4. Provide alternative shrub, English Laural, for
screening at rear of lot that is native, and will
attain a height above 6 feet (Area F).
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
`89 -3 -SPE PAVILION MALL - Request for special permission for one
freestanding sign to exceed fifty percent of the allowable sign
area (Section 19.32.150).
Darren Wilson, Planning Intern, reviewed the staff report and
pointed out modifications of sign area on a site plan provided by
the applicant. He stated staff recommends approval of increase
in sign area to 356 square feet as requested.
Jim Alexander represented the applicant, Trammel Crow Company,
.
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
ACREAGE: 146,768 square feet
STAFF REPORT
to the Board of Architectural Review
Prepared May 17,1989
HEARING DATE: May 25,1989
FILE NUMBER: 89 -6 -DR: Thompson Tile
APPLICANT: Corporate Property Investors
REQUEST: Construct a 60,000 square foot warehouse /office building.
LOCATION: North of Riverside Drive between Olympic Avenue
South and Cascade Avenue South, portion of Lot 23.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial
ZONING DISTRICT: C -M
SEPA
DETERMINATION: Determination of Nonsignificance (EPIC 6 -89)
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Plan
2. Elevations of Buildings
3. Landscape Plan
4. Staff Recommended Site Plan Modification
STAFF REPORT
TO THE B.A.R.
VICINITY /SI
1. Project De
structure t
warehous
2. Existing
used as ac
vacant lan
3. Surroundi
Park whi
4. Terrain:
the rear or
5. Vegetatio
evergreen
species.
6. Public Fa
of the lot.
DECISION CRI
In reviewing t
guidelines in 1
bold, followin
TMC 18.60.050
(1) Relations
A. The si
provi
B. Parki
impac
C. The h
The build
and lands
Drive. A
screen th
INFORMATION
FINDINGS
S:....:5 -DR: Thompson Tile
Page 2
cription: The applicant proposes construction of a 60,000 square foot
be composed of 5,000 square foot office and 55,000 square foot
use..
evelopment: Portion of the site that fronts Riverside Drive has been
essory parking for Boeing Aerospace. The remainder of the lot is
and vegetation.
g Land Use: The lot is within the Southcenter South Industrial
consists of office /warehouse structures.
e site is relatively flat with the dike and recreation trail located in
north end of the property. Maximum slope is 1 %.
: Existing vegetation consists of a variety of deciduous and
rees and shrubs. Several of the trees are of significant size for the
ilities: The Green River recreation trail is adjacent to the north end
No access has been provided.
e design request, the BAR must use the following Zoning Code
aking their decision. The Design Review guidelines are printed
by pertinent findings of fact.
REVIEW GUIDELINES
ip of Structure to Site.
e should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to
for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements.
g and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual
of large paved areas.
.ght and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site.
ng covers approximately 70% of the site; paving an additional 20%
ape areas 10 %. The front of the proposed building faces Riverside
• re- existing landscape island with adjacent six -foot sidewalk will
building from the drive. The island is bermed at a height of
1
STAFF REPORT 1 8,.. -DR: Thompson Tile
TO THE B.A.R. Page 3
approximately 2 feet and is planted with London plane trees and lawn. The
front of the building is screened from the parking lot with a landscaped area
adjacent to the building. Entrance to the parking lot is provided in two
locations off Riverside Drive in conjunction with adjoining lots.
The majority of the parking is located on the west side of the building (38
spaces), the rear of the building has a total of 32, the front consists of 10 regular
and 2 handicap spaces, with a total amount of 82; 80 spaces are required. The
west side of the building has a ten -foot wide landscaping area adjacent to the
building planted with flowering plum trees and lawn. It also connects with a
pre - existing parking area associated with Building 447 consisting of 56 spaces.
The northeast rear wall consists of a grasscrete area for fire access and
significant plantings of native vegetation adjacent to the building which will
soften the impact of the blank wall.
The dumpster located in the front of the building adjacent to the loading areas
will be screened.
(2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
A. Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms
of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
On the east side of the building the proposed material for the required 5 -foot
landscape area is gravel. On the west side the proposed parking area joins with
an existing parking lot. There is no landscape transition between the two. At
the rear of the lot landscaping consisting of a 6 -foot high hedge will provide
screening for the riverfront trail users.
Circulation with the street is accomplished at the east and west side of the front
of the property at pre - existing entries. The west entrance will be shared with
the adjoining lot, Building 447.
(3) Landscaping and Site Treatment
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development,
they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and
STAFF REPORT
TO THE B.A.R.
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
- 15 -DR: Thompson Tile
Page 4
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and
important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury be pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas in
encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be
accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should
be effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and
pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining
landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with
the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design.
Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
The front facade of the building is enhanced with two landscape islands. On
the west side the applicant proposes planting flowering plum trees and lawn
adjacent to the building wall. The northwest rear corner adjacent to the
building has no planting proposed. The northeast corner of the rear of the
building will include the planting of vine maples, groundcover and shrubs
adjacent to the building. The north west corner of the lot has a pre - existing
landscape area planted with Douglas fir trees.
The rear parking area will be screened from the trail with a shrub hedge. The
area required for fire access at the northeast rear of the building will consist of a
15 foot by 53 foot grasscrete paved drive.
(4) Building Design
A . Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring
developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good
proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall
be consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all
STAFF REPORT 1 L. 15 -DR: Thompson Tile
TO THE B.A.R. Page 5
exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
The structure is a simple two -story building typical of other buildings in the
development. The proposed color scheme consists of a grey exterior and dark
grey aluminum trim, window frame and insulated glass. This is similar to
surrounding buildings.
The building design is modulated in the front by the office area. In addition,
the archway that will provide signage will add additional architectural interest
to the front of the building. The remainder of the building facades on all sides
are unbroken by windows or doors with the exception of a fire access door on
the rear northeast wall. The applicant is proposing to screen all roof and
outside mechanical structures.
(5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
There are no existing or proposed miscellaneous structures or street furniture.
The proposal includes a sign at the front entrance that is attached to the
building but is not a covered walkway. Colors and materials have not been
specified, but will be consistent with other materials previously stated.
CONCLUSIONS
1
The conclusions are grouped under the five Design Review guidelines.
1. Relationship of Structure to Site
The existing and proposed landscape will provide for an attractive and efficient
entrance to the building. The exact relationship between the buildings at the
entrances and landscaping are unclear.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
The amount of paved area, unbroken by landscaping at the west entrance, will
be overwhelming. A distance of 65 feet from building edge to curb edge will
exist. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot landscaped area adjacent to the west
side of the building. This space could be redesigned to mitigate the impact of
the large amount of paved parking area by deleting two of the parking spaces
and replacing them with a landscaped island.
3. Landscaping
The amount of the site covered by impermeable surfaces is consistent with
existing development. However, due to its proximity to the river and
STAFF REPORT ( ... _ 6.- 15 -DR: Thompson Tile
TO THE B.A.R. Page 6
recreational trail it is important to locate the landscaping as effectively, for
screening purposes, as possible. The screening that is required at the river edge
of the lot should attain a height of at least 6 feet minimum. The type of plant
proposed should be native to the river environment.
The east side of the building has a 5 -foot landscape requirement. The adjacent
property currently has landscaping consisting of a photinia hedge
approximately 3 feet high. The existing plants are widely spaced and in poor
condition and do not provide an attractive separation between the two
buildings. Since this area will be visually prominent to the east entrance of the
lot, it is important to ensure an attractive transition. A better transition with
the adjacent lot on the west side would be facilitated by the inclusion of a
landscaping island which would break up the paved area.
The landscaping proposal for the front of the building will present an attractive
appearance. The west wall landscaping will provide an adequate softening
effect for the blank wall. The northeast rear corner of the building should
provide a similar effect by the inclusion of a landscaped island adjacent to the
building.
4. Building Design
The building colors will blend with the surrounding development and will
have a low visual impact on trail users. The mass of the building will be
reduced by landscaped areas adjacent to the building with the exception of the
northeast rear and east walls.
The front of the building is divided into two 100 -foot sections with differing
uses - offices and loading area. The loading area is setback 35 feet and is devoid
of landscaping. There are no common visual elements to connect the two
sections. The applicant has suggested two methods of improving the situation:
1) set the loading doors further back in the wall, or 2) provide a canopy above
the doors.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1
The Planning staff recommends the design review be approved with the following
conditions:
1. The Landscape Plan be revised as shown on Attachment 4 in the following
areas:
a. Clarify how the entrances and existing landscaping in Areas A and B will
be landscaped.
b. Deletion of two parking spaces and provide a landscape island in the
STAFF REPORT
TO THE B.A.R.
L15 -DR: Thompson Tile
Page 7
center of the west wall (Area C).
c. Move parking on the northwest rear wall north to allow for a minimum
5 -foot landscape strip adjacent to the wall to be planted with vegetation
(Area D).
Revised plan for east wall to include vegetation and irrigation (Area E).
Provide alternative shrub for screening at rear of lot that is native, and
will attain a height above 6 feet (Area F).
- ---11111
"-]
BLDG. 488
71-f/r
Sl-1--ir-1e Nr;u5rizvt_
6 .1kPrziNT rruPerely luvesTart-
ALFRED CROONOUSET ARCHITECTS
003 1.1•0041 001.11018 •11.14.0001 011•70 340*
MLATTLE. W48104410 •00030110-0000
-) SITE PLAN
•CALIE 1" •
te•!r:
—
- —
•^Tro.•
reo.-E.'t y
4 t4Z155 44', 7? r
Aral
Tortc. wtersast 5
(*."1.1""T )
-10e:V;
2<141146 it-rrn
.7%tm.
f.._12 mama
r..40
5.ce stou
C014 iervirevers.)
1.etz emcr.2_
.„:
121Er.1_4r. Fea Ifsearme.
a 5
■:
•NI51,5t5e
1
‘1>
ATTACHMENT 1
VICINITY MAP
OP
floWl• Ha Kul
tr)
f
•1.4.1 44 4+41t
Oor...14[417
Lj
,r.-.Dv fl.'
- "
)
•
n_e\,/"TIONI
t .7
N.
1,1KI
4/T1°SaN4 711-7
R-K-et.r. Ter., e
rATe rmapeKri .4ve
ALFREO CROCNOILMIST AnC041TECTS
ORM 06110•1 .01.4640 01•11.011/4111 WATS 7406
661 SUMO 010•1808-0000
ATTACHMENT 2
..witur w mud
s4 • u.N:
'W.TM• tr vl.S. aaS
1Y ..
/lNC..r "Ovum . Y.
fL•.• VYCATIL 1
ti TN '9 ISM,.
/ P
p
M / /
1:1 i c.ei rf
/lam / l4 •►
/ ■104•0 w.rtS 4w■1
< '/ 1 Cri L•v I""c, -1 ;1ove�nv�+ -Er
ATTACHMENT 3
- .-#t„+ Au Craw.
w••■ rwr a
.,..T,• -e w..
O 14 "Swap. 06I141•4.
1 .M now/.•.• 14'1#
I/ GO,.
.Tr, M.T 4 !4r
d ^�
• SinV .ta•ntN
44K (•. AIL.
o II nNr xsv o�w nw -
V NLtS Lil alA ,Anvs •
LC•..at_. +MMW.
2.M•• L• 9'0.G+
ALFRED CROONOUIST ARCHITECTS
ON■ UNION IBOAJAVIII INALCI1NU MIME 3•.•
•*TTLM. MOU I NOTON SSIOI M O M Hl•-MAO
•
14414
.1 -143 a��.10�✓
1`1*JW -
W1•9 •b8 dvU
x'19
� �zl*rLl
11-11 Moa.N
ti�la'lo� lad
abitZ1
MY*
:`.
• vlinw�A .!z.- ..•n..- L`) %IFu:Y...r2iu::N ; Ixr. �r.: rt` 5 ey ^di ifLt:•�fa,� ^ :3FG CLiS�ePtY:JYS. , sK.. LL. L. xs...ar,. r.w:. v.» r.. yevr-•vw xtMr _:.rtFM.renutiVnneNNe.nrzf.:u.+ era» ,w» naxnN+ a'. nnq.:Yrfiue.MeelkY.:4ltriT
FROM METRO 5.25.1989 13 :52 P. 2
May 25, 1989
Dear Mr. Beeler:
*METRO
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 - 1598
Rick Beeler, Planning Director
City of Tukwila
6200 Southoenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Determination of Non- Significance
File No.:, x,89 corporate Property, investors
%
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to its wastewater facilities.
Niter Quality
Conetruction- related erosion and debris should be prevented from
entering the Green river. The storm drainage system should
include biofiltration, e.g. in the parking area, to reduce
pollutants discharged to the river.
Public Transportation
Ths Southoenter South Industrial Park is experiencing severe
traffic congestion during peak periods. Therefore, the proponent
should be required to under take the following Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) actions to encourage high occupancy
vehicle (HOV) use.
Provide direct, hard surfaced walkways for pedestrians
between building entrances and curbed sidewalks.
- Post and distribute appropriate transit /rideshare
information.
▪ Designate an Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) to
help employees use transit /rideshare modes.
- Provide preferential parking for vanpools and Carpools
adjacent to building entrances.
• Allow alternative work hours to enable some employees to
commute outside of peak periods.
FROM METRO
5.25.1989 1 I52 P.
E •.
Rick Beeler
May 25, 1989
Page. Two
Contact Carol Thompson, Metro market development planner at G84-
1a10 for additional information and assistance.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
sincerely
Gregory M. Hush, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
GMB :jmg4714
ccs Carol Thompson
Sincerely,
Molly A. Headley
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
May 17, 1989
Mr. Alfred Croonquist, A.I.A.
One Union Square Building
Suite 3404
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: Thompson Tile
Dear Mr. Croonquist:
The City Engineer has determined a need for the following
conditions based on your Entranco study, submi.ted May 5, 1989.
1. Stripe the eastbound Todd approach.
2. Install the left and right only markings based on the
Entranco count and LOS evaluation.
3. Install signal signs under or adjacent to the signal heads
facing eastbound traffic.
4. Install side - mounted lane control signs.
These requirements must be satisfied prior to issuance of a
Building Permit. If you have questions on spe:ifics of these
requirements, please contact Ron Cameron, City Engineer.
71(;{,2e4 5h8l89
x i��i�ahiatw - 6 — 414 us: 5 . ta. tag1t� '4s.vatr.,r Sx �x m��ra aacaiwv usw.^ onsWa z arty !xc:a2 xr rr,xtr � s ar•avnraaa:cm�aansm �avva »nmvnnsr.ev,..�w.ae,u x . .
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Molly Headley
FROM: Ron Cameron, City Engineer gtw
DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Thompson Tile
MAY 1 11989
•
The attached Entranco investigation lists traffic operational safety improvements.
Particularly, the development should provide:
1. Striping the eastbound Todd approach.
2. Installing the left and right only markings based on the Entranco count and
LOS evaluation.
3. Installing signal signs under or adjacent to the signal heads facing
eastbound traffic.
4. Installing side - mounted lane control signs.
RC /kjr
Enclosure
File: Thompson Tile Developer's File
;
May 5, 1989
Mr. Ron Cameron
City Engineer
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter. Boulevard, Suite 101
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Dear Ron:
vaan:v.-�rmnvu <:.+7ts
6
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC.
LAKE WASHINGTON PARK BUILDING (206) 827 -1300
5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E., KIRKLAND. WA 98033
Re: Traffic Impact Study for the Proposed Thompson
Tile Office /Warehouse in Tukwila, Washington
Entranco Project No. 89809 -06
This letter outlines the traffic impact analysis performed
for the Thompson Tile Office /Warehouse Development in south
Tukwila. The proposed site is located on Riverside Drive ad-
jacent to the Green River just south of South 180th Street.
The proposed development will consist of 10,000 square feet
of general office space and 55,000 square feet of warehouse
space. Two access driveways are planned to ingress and
egress the site on Riverside Drive.
The streets which provide the major access routes to the pro-
posed site include West Valley Highway and Todd Boulevard.
West Valley Highway is a five lane north -south principal ar-
terial which connects the City of Kent to the cities of
Tukwila and Renton. It is currently signed for 50 miles per
hour.
Todd Boulevard is a two -lane east -west local street which
serves the Southcenter South Industrial Park. Although Todd
Boulevard is not currently striped for two lanes eastbound,
vehicles form two travel lanes to increase the capacity and
traffic flow to West Valley Highway.
The intersection of Todd Boulevard and West Valley Highway is
controlled by a traffic signal. PM peak hour (3:30 -4:30
p.m.) counts were performed by Entranco Engineers on May 4,
1989. Traffic flow operations were also observed during the
PM peak hour. The observations showed that approximately two
vehicles per ten - minute period would make double left turns
from eastbound Todd Boulevard. A maximum of ten vehicles
were in the eastbound left turn queue, although all vehicles
generally cleared in one cycle of the traffic signal. The
eastbound right turn movement experienced a maximum queue of
three vehicles indicating adequate gap time for the movement.
EVERETT OFFICE 516 SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING (206) 258.6202
1602 HEWITT AVENUE. EVERETT, WA 98201
0 .,V.VAiS';: 551 {h:01 .4 S:'.; tn J` u):` R^ taa: ek7ra rn,] f.n wtn: t! : !ttWr.SVrrt`Oro'nT'EtM'SlmtInvxm nyA
Mr. Ron Cameron
May 5, 1989
Page 2
The level of service (LOS) was analyzed for the PM peak hour
following the methodology outlined in the 1985 Highway Capac-
ity Manual. A LOS C was obtained for the Todd
Boulevard /West Valley Highway intersection under existing
conditions. (LOS calculations attached.)
Table 1 summarizes the total number of trips which the pro-
posed development will generate during the PM peak hour.
These trip generation values are based on the total gross
square feet of floor area and the rates published in the In-
stitute of Transportation Engineers' "Trip Generation
Manual," 7th Edition, September, 1987.
Table 1
Trip Generation Summary
Average Daily PM Peak Hour
Land Use Traffic Enter Exit Total
Office
10,000 sq.ft. 244 14 15 29
Warehouse
55,000 sq.ft. 545 16 28 44
Totals 789 30 43 73
The proposed Thompson Tile Office /Warehouse Development will
generate a total of 789 average daily trips, with 73 occur-
ring during the PM peak hour (30 inbound and 43 outbound).
Trip distribution of the project - generated trips was based on
the existing turn movement volumes at the Todd Boulevard /West
Valley Highway intersection. All trips generated were also
assumed to be destined to and from West Valley Highway (i.e.,
no internal trips in the industrial park).
The level of service was again analyzed for the Todd Boule-
vard /West Valley Highway intersection with the addition of
the project generated traffic. The intersection LOS will re-
main and operate at LOS C with the additional traffic.
However, the intersection will experience a slight increase
in overall delay, from 18.67 seconds per vehicle to 19.11
seconds per vehicle.
:UV .4':.7 ESN':_wAr:iit. q.
;1t
Mr. Ron Cameron
May 5, 1989
Page 3
Based on the level of service analysis and Entranco's PM peak
hour traffic flow observations at the Todd Boulevard /West
Valley Highway intersection, we suggest the following recom-
mendations to enhance the safety and operational efficiency
of the intersection:
o Paint the West crosswalk on Todd Boulevard
o Install pedestrian signals for the West crosswalk
o Stripe the eastbound approach of Todd Boulevard
o Install "left only" and "right only" arrow pavement
markings on the eastbound approach
o Install shoulder mounted "left only" and "right only"
signs for Todd Boulevard
o Install identifying signal signs under the signals for
the eastbound right turn, eastbound left turn, and
northbound left turn movements. These would be small
12" x 18" signs.
o Repaint the South crosswalk
The long term improvement to the intersection would be to
construct a double left -turn lane on the eastbound approach
by partially removing the median on Todd Boulevard. Since
the intersection currently operates and will operate at LOS C
with the project generated traffic, then the intersection
should be monitored with future development to determine the
implementation of the improvement.
We trust that this traffic analysis for the Thompson Tile
Office /Warehouse Development will assist you and Corporate
Property Investors in gaining approval for their proposed
project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the
information in this document, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ENTRANCO ENG
Sherman D. Goo
Project Engineer
n5t xC.} tAIIII ia::++YZ:aMMVACZM'IVZt7o?b`m'n Ar... er- WAln,r..melt.ylP Myrweac12TU:wt vccvnevc.. wvcn...s rrn..:wa+,.t..+ ...ay. aw.n.,,.. , aa,.w,�..n..�..
INC.
SDG:mt
Attachment: Level of Service Calculations
|Intersection:TODD/W. VALLEY HIGHWAY Date:5/5/89
|AnalY/st:JBNES
:Project No.89809-06
:VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS
:IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM
|1.\/olumes
12.Lanes,lame widths
13.Movements by lane
14.Parking locations
15.BaY storge lngths
|6.Islands
|7.Bus stops
!TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY
|Ap|Grd.| % HV | Adj.Pkg.Lane | Buses | PHF |Cnf.Ped| Pedstrn Button! Arr.
|pr| (%)| | Y/N | Nm | (Nb) | |(pd/hr)| Y/N |Mn.Time| Type
|--| ----|-------|-------|-------|-------| - - |--- | --|-------|-----
|EB|+0.0|
|WB|+0.0|
|NB|+0.0|
|SB|+0.0|
|Grade:+up,-down
|HV:veh. > 4 whls
|Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr
| _
|
.
1
(N)
|||
NORTH
D |
I |
A |
G |
R |
A | <**
M 1000 *
| v *
5.0 | N | 0 | 0 | 0.90 | 0 : N | 18 |
5.0 | N | 0 0 . 0.90 | 0 . N . 18 . 3
5.0 | N | 0 | 0 | 0.90 | 0 | N | 10 | 3
5.0 | N | 0 | 0 | 0.90 | 0 | N | 10 | 3
INPUT WORKSHEET
[1210]
SB TOTAL
| |
� v
104 1106
[ 436]
E/B TOTAL
CONDITIONS
Nb:buses stopping/hr
PHF:peak-hour factor
Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr
.
TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PK EXTNG Area Type: CBD XOther
City/State:TUKWILA
=
1-12.0'-LT---
1-12.0'-RT---v
230 |
-> 0 |
_ |
v 206 |
|W. VALLEY HWY N/S ST.|
| 1 1
| 12.0 I
> | | 12.0
0| RTH TH
---- < |
v v
•
.
< |
LT TH |
12.0 | |
| 12.0|
1 2 |
0^
0 0]
-WB TOTAL
0v
TODD BLVD
E/W STREET
1252
102 <^> 0
[1354]
N/B TOTAL
Min.Timing: min'green for
pedestrian crossing
Arr.Type: Type 1-5
:Tim- | G= 15.01 36.01 0= 20.01 G= 0.0| G= 0.0| G= 0.01'0= 0.01 G= 0.0
: ing |Y+R= 3|Y+R= 3|Y+R= 3:Y-1-R= 01Y+R= 01Y+R= 01Y+R= 01Y+R= 0
| | I. |- -| I | -| '|
|Ptmd/Act| A | A | A 1 • | |
| ------
| Protected turns: ****^ 0000^ | Permitted turns: ++++^ | Cycle Length 80 Sec
|
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, Kirkland,. Washington, using NCAP by PSI
�
|A ^ | E | K ^ | N |
| * 1 1 * |
\ **** | ****> | **** | ****> |
| | | + . + .
1 1 1 V 1 v |
__ ................... - ........... '...........................
______ ____________________________________________
!In+ersection:TODD/W. VALLEY HIGHWAY Date:5/5/89
:Analyst:JONES TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PK EXTNG Area Type: CBD XOther
!Project No.89809-06 City/State:TUKWILA
) • = _==__- _=====
�' LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET
_____________ _ ______________ _________
First Term Delay_ |_____Second Term Delay______
LANE | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 { 9 1 10 1 111 12 1 1:
GROUP\ v/c 1 Green| Cycle| Delay | Lane| Delay |Prgrsn|Lane Gp| Ln| Apprch|Apr
_----| Ratio! Ratio|Length| di !Group: d2 :Factor: Delay | 8p| Delay :LO{
1 1 21 X | g/C 1 C |sec/veh|Cap,c|sec/veh| PF |sec/veh|LOS|sec/veh|Tb]
Ap<Mv| � | (sec)! • | (vph)| |T.9-13|(6+8)*9|9-1| 19-1
==|==| |======|======| { --| 1 ------|------=|---| , |-_=
| | | | 1 | �
EB| K| 0.5801 0.2501 80.0| 20.001 8781 0.721 0.85 | 17.61| C | 17.61| C
1 1 1 | | | 1 1 | � | | |
| 1
WB| 0.001 *
| | | | | | | | | | |
--|--|------|------|------|-------|-----|-------|------|-------|---|-------|--
| Al 0.3611 0.188| 80.0| 21.53| 3131 0.321 1.00 | 21.851 C ( |
NB! El 0.925| 0.4501 80.0| 15.75| 15801 7.021 0.85 1 19.36| C 1 19.541 C
1 1 | | | | | | | | | |
--|--|------|_-----|------|-------|----�|- | ----|-------|---|-------)--
1 1 1 1 1 1 � | 1 1 1 |
SB| N| 0.9061 0.4501 80.01 15.521 15591 5.75| 0.85 | 18.08| C : 18'081 C
_____ ___________________
!Intersection Delay 18.67 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9.1 |
----------------------- -----------------
:LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-C.*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PiRMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD]|
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, Kirkland, Washington, using NCAP by PSI
INPUT WORKSHEET_____________
|Intersection:TODD/W. VALLEY HIGHWAY Date:5/5/89
!Amalyst:JONES l[imePeriod #nlyzd:PM PK W/PROJArea Type: CBD XOther
!Project No.89809-06 City/State:TUKWILA
|------ - - -- ----- ---
!VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS |W. VALLEY HWY N/S ST.|
| [1225] 0 ^
�
^ SB TOTAL 1 1 |
| | � | | |12.0| | 0<-[ 0]
| \ < v > | | 12.0 -WB TOTAL
| (N) 119 1106 0| RTH TH 0 v
| ||| ------------_---- <
NORTH v v
|
|
|• 1-12.0'-LT---^
!IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0'-RT---v •
11.Volumes - < |
12.Lanes,lane widths | LT TH | TODD BLVD
13.Movements by lane ^ 251 | 12.0 | 1 E/W STREET
14.Parking locations - | 12.01 1252
15.Bay storge lngths [ 479] -> 0 | J. 2 117 <^> 0
16.Islands E/B TOTAL - | | [1369]
17.Bus stops v 228 | | N/B TOTAL
!TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS
___
|Ap|Grd.| % HV 1 Adj.Pkg.Lane | Buses | PHF |Cnf.Ped| Pedstrn Button! Arr.
|pr| (%)| | Y/N | Nm | (Nb) | |(pd/hr)| Y/N |Mn.Time| Type
|--|----|-------|-------|-------| -|-------|-------|-------|-------|-----
|EB|+0.0|
|WB|+U.0|
|NB|+0.0|
|9B1+0.0|
!PHASING
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
N | 0
N | 0
N |
N | 0
|
0
0
0
0
|
|Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for
|HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing
|Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5
| | *
| D 1 * |
| I |<+*
| A | v | | |
| G . � ^| | | |
1 R | | ^ | *| |
| A | <** | * | ***** |
M loop * | * | * | | |
| v * * v| | |
1 | | | | ------|------ | | |
|Tim- 1 G= 15.0| B= 36.01 G= 20.0| G= 0.01 G= 0.0| G= 0.01 G= 0.01 G= 0.01
1 ing |Y+R= 31Y+R= 31Y+R= 31Y+R= 01Y+R= 01Y+R= 01Y*R= 01Y+R= 0
|-----|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---- ' | --|
|Ptmd/Act| A 1 A 1 A | | | | |
| |
1 Protected turns: ****^ 0000^ | Permitted turns: ++++^ 1 Cycle Length 80 Sec
---------------------_---------------------- --------|
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
O | N |
0 8 N |
O N |
O | N |
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, Kirkland, Washington, using NCAP by PSI
18 1 3
18 1 3
10 | 3
10 | 3
�
|Intersection:TODD/W. VALLEY HIGHWAY Date:5/5/89
\Analyst:JONES TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PK W/PROJArea Type: CBD XOther
!Project No.89809-06 City/State:TUKWILA
|
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET
|____|______First Term Delay______|_____Second Term Delay______ITot.Delay_&_LO
GR8UP| v/c : Green| Cycle| Delay 1 Lane Delay |Prgrsn|Lane Gp| Ln| Apprch|Ap
-----| Ratiol Ratio|Length| di :Group: d2 :Factor: Delay | Gp| Delay ILO
1 | 21 X | g/C | C |sec/veh\Cap,c|sec/veh| PF |sec/veh|LOS|sec/veh|Tb
Ap|Mv| | (sec)! :(*ph)! |T.9-13|(6+8)*9|9-1| 19-
==|==|======|------|======|=======|=====|=======|======|=======|===|-------|
| | | | | � | | | | | |
EB| K| 0.6371 0.2501 80.01 20.341 878| 1.101 0.85 1 18.221 C | 18.221 C
| | | | | | | | 8 | | |
�-{--|------|------|------�-------�-----|-------| -|---
1 | --|--
| | | | 1 |
WB| | | | | |
| | | | | |
0.00| *
|
| A| 0.4161 0.1881 80.01 21.771 3131 0'541 1.00 1 22.301 C | |
NB1 El 0.9251 0.4501 80.01 15.751 15801 7.021 0.85 | 19.36| C 1 19.601 C
| | 8 8 � | | | | | | |
-_|--|------|------|------|-------|-----|-------|------�-------|---|-------|--
|
SB| N| 0 0.4501 80.01 15.671 15571 6.581 0.85 1 18.921 C | 18.921 C
| | 8 | | | | | | | |
________
________ ____ ____________ ____________
:Intersection Delay 19.11 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9.1
|_____ _____ ______ ------------- ___
:LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD]
------------------------------------
|A ^ 1 E 1 K ^ | N |
| * 1 | * | |
| **** | ****> : **** | ****> |
| | | + 1 + 1
8 | 8 V | V |
| -------------------------------- --------- _____
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, Kirkland, Washington, using NCAP by PSI
/
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
PAGES:
(206) S75 -8787
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Alfred Croonquist
Jack Bennett
Lot 23 - Easement Agreement
May 18, 1989
6 with 1 cover
CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS
18200 CASCADE AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 124
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188
This has not been recorded. It is in the process for
recording,
MAY 191989
CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS Is the designation of the 'Puglia under a Declaration Of.ltust, as amended and restated, on file with the Secretary of the:
Commonwealth of Meseachusetts. and neither the shareholders nor the Trustees, officers, employees Ot agents of.ths flue created thereby, no any of their .:
personal assets, shall be liable hereunder, end all perdont dealing with the !Mist shall look solely to the Trwt estate for the payment of any claims hereunder or fa
the performance hereof,
01/26/89
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
(Ingress and Egress)
Southcenter South Industrial Park, Tukwila, Washington
Lots 22 and 23
THIS AGREEMENT is executed this c 7 `d ay of / , f ✓ -anger 1989,
by CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS ( "CPI "), a Massachusetts business
trust, as owner of certain abutting and adjoining parcels of real
property located in King County and legally described in Exhibit A
( "Lot 23 ") and Exhibit B ( "Lot 22 ") hereto.
In consideration of the mutual terms, covenants, and condi-
tions set forth herein and for other good and valuable considera-
tion the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
CPI hereby makes, declares, reserves, grants, and establishes an
ingress and egress easement within the easement area legally
described in Exhibit C hereto ( "Easement Area "), for the benefit
of Lot 22, its owners, successors, and assigns, upon the terms and
conditions set forth below.
1. Purpose /Use. The purpose of the easement granted herein
is to confirm the ingress and egress easement required by the City
of Tukwila BLA 88 -1, recorded under recording no. 8803310838, and
to set forth the terms thereof ( "Easement "). The Easement shall
be a permanent, nonexclusive easement in favor of Lot 22 for
vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress over and across
Lot 23. The establishment of the Easement shall not prevent the
owners of Lot 23 from using the Easement Area for any purpose
including, but not limited to, ingress and egress provided that
such use does not unreasonably interfere with the foregoing pur-
poses. The owner of Lot 22 may grant ingress and egress rights to
third parties consistent with the foregoing purposes provided such
rights do not overburden the Easement Area.
2. Maintenance. The owners of Lots 22 and 23 shall jointly
maintain the Easement Area and any improvements thereon in good
condition and repair and share equally the costs thereof includ-
ing repairs or resurfacing resulting from normal usage, provided
that either owner at its sole expense shall repair any damage
caused by it or its tenants' misuse of the Easement Area. If
either owner shall fail to repair any such damage or otherwise
fail to satisfy its respective obligation created by this Sec-
tion 2, the other owner upon thirty (30) days' prior written
notice, may do so and shall be promptly reimbursed for the
reasonable costs thereof by the owner failing to satisfy its
obligation.
3. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended, modi-
fied, terminated, or canceled except in connection with an amend-
ment, modification, termination, or cancellation of BLA 88 -1.
01/26/89
hcd Fla 2R7YS31rCatin rav isvar..itiarrnsrw. c urA aca.r.ra stz wenatiw m Att S 'aritit.1 t *SIl.M`4 !d9VAV IrMIR!!'A
4. Miscellaneous.
(a) The rights and obligations created by this Agreement
shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the owners of
Lots 22 and 23, and their successors, assigns, and subsequent
transferees. The benefit and burden of the easement granted
herein shall attach to and run with the land.
(b) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. It is agreed
that the venue of any legal action brought to enforce this Agree-
ment shall be in King County, Washington. In the event of any
litigation to enforce or interpret the rights and obligations set
forth herein, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award
of reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees in connection
therewith, at trial and on appeal.
(c) CPI is the designation of the Trustees for the time
being under an Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated as
of June 15, 1978, as further amended (the "Declaration of Trust "),
a copy of which together with all amendments thereof, is on file
with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The
Declaration of Trust provides that the Shareholders, trustees,
officers, and agents of CPI shall have no personal liability for
any of the obligations of CPI and all persons shall look solely to
the Trust Estate created under the Declaration of Trust for the
payment of any claim against, or the performance of any obliga-
tions of, CPI.
EXECUTED as of the date first written above.
PRESENT OWNER OF CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS,
LOTS 22 AND 23:
a Massachusetts business trust
By
x:rNi%?CAT.AtArnIll YdTN.f.ZYtE:uT.7:1
..:.. -- - - - -
STATE OF NEW YORK )
ss.
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this ___ da of
1989, before me, the undersigned, a no public n an f
the State of New York,
appeared
be the
the trus that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said trust for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that said individual was authorized
to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this
certificate first above written.
3547G
01/26/89
New York, residing at
My appointment expires
PATRICIA MAY WERNER
NOTARY PUBLIC Stets Now TOM
Nu: 30
Austified to Nalsou County
Cei tif; :ate Fired In two Yoi uny
Cornmission Dolma Mar 28. NM
my commissioned and sworn, personally
_ , to me known to
of CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS,
Notary pub is 6/n and for the State of ea 14
NEW LOT 23
A portion of Lot 23 as said lot Is shown on City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment
No. 36 -57BLA recorded under King County Recording No. 3612010233 and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly right -ot -way fine of Riverside Drive, said point
being 578036'10"E 4.00 feet from the southwesterly corner of said Lot 23; thence from
said . POINT OF BEGINNING, leaving said northerly right -of -way line N11 "E
673.39 feet to a point on the boundary line of said Lot 23; thence along said boundary
l r e 537°39'00"Z 29.42 feet; thence 536 °49'OOE 99.00 feet; thence S36 °08'00 "E 100.00
feet; thence 533 °33'00"E 99.00 feet; thence 529 "E 32.89 feet; thence 511 "W
430.27 feet to a point on the northerly right -of -way line of said Riverside Drive; thence
along said northerly right -of -way line N78 °36•10 "W 263.76 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING and containing 146,76E square feet of land, more or less (3.369 acres.
n xur�.sri? �urc r _:rs :rrc a 3 ,nSy rxsz�is�sYFi�rar;� r ,
4 '
•
NEW LO 22
9.vznruura,wj" `°`;emu'.
aaVV •::1:e
4'.
ti
Lot 22 and a portion of .Lot 23 as said lots are shown on City of Tukwila Short Plat No.
78 -43SP recorded under King County Recording No. 7903011098, as revised by Boundary
Line Adjustment No. 86 -57BLA recorded under King County Recording No. 8612010233 a
and being more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly right -of -way line of Riverside Drive, said point
being S78 "E 4.00 feet from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 22; thence from
said POINT OF BEGINNING along the northerly right -of -way lint of Riverside Drive
and the boundary line of said Lots 22 and 23 N78 "W 44.00 feet; thence tangent to •
the preceding course along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 110.00 feet
and a central angle of . 43 0 20'41" an arc distance of 83.22 feet; thence leaving said right -
of -way line of Riverside Drive N78 "w 119.49 feet; thence NI1 "E 8 +6.14
feet; thence S73 1 E 11.44 feet; thence S36o11'0G "E 99.00 feet; thence S44 "E
100.00 felt; thence S37 "E 70.38 feet; thence S11 "w 673.39 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 183,798 square feet of land more or less (4.263
acres).
INGRESS ESGRESS EAST F
•
A portion of Lot 23 as said lot is shown on City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 78.45SP
recorded under King County Recording No 7905011098 As revised by Boundary Line
Adjustment No. 38 -1 BLA recorded under King County Recording No.
1�! / LS" 4 and being more particularly described as follows:
The westerly 25 feet, together with southerly. 51.00 feet of the easterly 50.00 feet of
the westerly 75.00 feet of said Lot 23 as revised under said Boundary Line Adjustment
No. 88 -1 BLA.
t'rafa v KITE.
• It
■
J
3 0
V ery 8 pG
3
0 0 9
1325.01 - - -
End of plan
End • P pipe line —
S[+. 513....110. s
P.S. N. No. .9
Tukwila . S >rn Ave S -
S. 'ear", se. Orin+
se(
•
'r o
- A °e:„
pol o, pt :O' TCt �oN o0. Y
n ooO^ooNTmot. V400.2,0 X5S•
11.c. No:s 5112o5o' E5'1
1
'I�IW W ao►zr, Nor IinOtirv
1 l.ikN 01,IWK
Igo Ira
A.Iza1 64001 -1
Poi?. OF
T U SP
I� P°
?8 4'5, SP
I / or _ W ' AF T 9 50 /ln
V 4 . torX...".6.4 .... 60' . •"-------734-----,___ .
il" 41
i a .
4 1 1 II
4(eCLCD i`
X 70,9_19 , . 7J" I . 4 :7 ( 4 8 m 0 7 D O
%, V II/ co
. .02' 0 70787 4 09, / 1117k:044i
z 41 I i i 0 IA- a
is.., /./ I / ..... .. 1 ......................... ...... a .34-Z3- 4
16 '
i; LOT 19
i
n . k
Ni
il --„34,n,„.. °S°>/
D Ili
t \f °) f 6'it'2.
W 9
• 76 n 6- 77
fa
2 43. 7G
v
ti
n
c
q
�' d
O (6
4� POR. 23
LOT
0
0
N
•
I
/WA a• 9 L
se
ss
D)
7-14W
24
N w Ag- -Sf
98
POR. 0
TU SP 7
AF 790
0
.see
P OR.
JI /I /
ry,2/a hO.M Erg, 20♦l91S / /J -/L •
AA.
SUR. 5113 ru AA CITY L/M !TS
L. JJ6 s' BB• af•Nd
0 •
14r Okt4 &. 41
780
Tv SP MF
, ouo
6 '
4 Cr)
T
J110-4. 49.1
ow . c
1 �1ANTV` PN h N /
) 8(AMe l\l °1
78_ \9 , S.
I tie LOT le
433..i
l e'
H ie
d. 44. 0440
5 ,
1
pa4 Or
y 6/
0
E
. 70BJ - d8$
owNw 17.41‘,/424401m44,1
so
N 86. 44.0 2
10. 0-
5S
��y y�y ti \('• .
0 870
b 5
-f- O
9.00
a
Land i Rdeords Show
TAat This Was 0nca GL. 3
W. TT ./a/z2/.9-4 41
s
0
t•-,2° °
6 Py�'
17) I I
rABJ J
— 4 1333.07
ee R .•9 P• 0 .�
No. 24
C.9 68. 4'
.✓ an- •8-19 J✓ .170. 0 t
.4
4
R
sat 'ta
t 4' .18 JeJ
4FG t .9887 -04 E
W. /oi 5 11 "
100
4
0
-t
•
"47 (//uvr_�
P
1"01
OWN f G, r.1.
- \P -8 889°
� f
�
‘) 17
t O
Je
0o
` b
444.
figb
.1 8..46
J x 8.04
Co
6 .3 A°
o-
Con■•e
W
0
0
E4,
'% ,y. �
9 a
M
V
7
•
. .
OWNER
DESIN REVIEW A'PLiA - TION
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: CONSTRUC A 60,000 SQ . FT.
WAREHOUSE /OFFICE BUILDING
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; •r tax lot number, access
street, and nearest inte section)
NORTH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE DR. BETWEE OLYMPIC AVENUE SOUTH
AND CASCADE AVENUE SOUTH PORTION OF LOT 23
Quarter: N.W. Section: 36 Towns ip: 23 Range: 4
3. APPLICANT :* Name:
Signature:
.?Y.9 v.::If.'.r ue.- V!Mbb'SLi iIY.ivt 4.wiAl„.'M:Sfra IA :".it's 40?;.!
(This information may be found on our tax statement.)
Phone:
4. PROPERTY Name: C.P.I.
Address: 600 UNIVERSITY ST. #3404, SEATTLE, WA 98101
Address:
ALFRED CROONQUIST RCHITECTS
(206) 68 —2690
Phone: (2 - 0 - . 5''5-302 .
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNE•SHIP
.w ... u' iY• �r< zl.':): r= 9'. t'! fY. St7:. X.^. r"`l sw.: 3YP�+ i:" N_! N11Y_ yMr." t.••• stt. Gi• �•.•-, .'M:.*)':.t':Sn?Ydt:tshY(a:FtLS
Date: �• /.. 69
* The Applicant is the pe on whom th staff will contact regarding
the application, and whom all no ices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
18200 CASCADE SO., #124, TUKWILA, WA 98188
/ IL
/
I /WE,[signature((,,$)] e
swear that we ay e t e • - ner s o
property in olv d in this applicat
statements a answers contained i
correct to he best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Dat :: 4 e'gq
,27_,.
co r• c a - ' o tha
on and that the foregoing
this application are true and
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion '(if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
v�vicavi✓f..a'a.o Mitiu�v.v ^t•O.ltronnrJr +.. a.... MrcrM'rnnx.Y�a ewa r.�.�aoa+e. a..rwrv�.w.r. �n�w.ria. ws MUUMV.a...7 rf!'�t<'.`t'M
f.. SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: THE DESIGN INCLUDES FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED IN THE
CM ZONE AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING.
THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MAJORITY OF
BUILDINGS IN THIS INDUSTRIAL PARK.
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: PROPOSED BUILDING IS TO BE LOCATED IN SOUTHCENTER SOUTH
INDUSTRIAL PARK. THE BUILDING WILL HAVE MASS, SCALE AND
TEXTURE SIMILAR TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS, AND THUS IS CONSISTENT
WITH ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN A LOGICAL, STRAIGHTFORWARD MANNER
CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING CIRCULATION IN THIS INDUSTRIAL PARK.
4:! t'•:.'. i' r.` A. f.) i;:, 1ti.l G' K5•;. 4si✓::+ �Jn.. bm. . f.msrv , u.4w!.r.r.,,V ^uviweso.v very.,• AwWt tnaaX.T t1tTimhin.'" A' r].• 5 ;::! KJ1iYY'.: �x•. t. fNr` •:`•�i' < »lM wtKtl:M�t•'ii"tt tSA:IXR:�txfx'Y,HKt a+r .o.�. .�w�-1ui+:1WrtT+�t�w +:t
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
'LeESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences; walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE: LANDSCAPING AND SITE TREATMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED IN A MANNER
CONSISTENT WITH ADJACENT FACILITIES IN THIS INDUSTRIAL PARK.
•Yp<Y•:W�.Ytt:Y,lrtt ✓.+..rn+r .�..,....�aw,s
8. BUILDING DESIGN
- .,ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
0
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: BUILDING DESIGN USING PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS, AS WELL AS ITS SCALE
IS SIMILAR TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS. BUILDING COMPONENTS SUCH AS
WINDOWS AND TRUCK DOORS HAVE BEEN SIZED AND LOCATED IN A LOGICAL
SYMMETRICAL MANNER. COLORS HAVE NOT BEEN CHOSEN BUT WILL LIKELY
BE EARTHTONE WITH A POSSIBLE BRIGHT ACCENT COLOR. THE BUILDING
IS DESIGNED WITH A PROJECTING OFFICE AREA SO AS TO CREATE A
MODULATED STREET FRONT ELEVATION.
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: N.A.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
3�ssan`{rLx +4nrx+ ++. xx+ usv.. v+. rww� .�.n.rr+rws.iw�++. +w <!x.neu+ tw .i� y�n.:s�ir s#lvl #S••+r:Y•JCr4C.44'i1Y..i.Rr
�,. iSIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general aopear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
N.A.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
AZVIFY ...AMC NS
CSIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
. 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
N.A.
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
APPLICATION
DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS 1 APPLICANT
FILE
CROSS REFERENCE 1
EPIC -4- 89/89 -1 -CPA/
89 -1- BSIP /89 -4 -DR/
49 -CUP
ACTION
W�T}fpR1�VJN
3/13/89
89 -1 -R
SYIVAN GIFN
18059 - 57TH AVENUE S.
PRIMARK
5/17/89
89-2-R
HALVORSON REZONE
4625 S. 134TH
4535 S. 135TH
LON A. HALVORSON
-1
EPIC -13 -89
DENIED BY
C.C. 8/7/89
4/89
89 -3 -R
CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION
BETWEEN MILITARY ROAD S. /HWY. 99/
S. 152ND & 116TH STREET, SEATTLE
CITY OF TUKWILA
-= - A/' °- - `_
c -22- E
A --- sic-
9/13/89
89 -4 -R
MIKAMI /SHIMATSU REZONE
16813 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
Y. MIKAMI
A. SHIMATSU
EPIC -25 -89
REZONE 1989
•
Uxwr'b LY-�Tt
EeD To KeAMIN
2LG' H I.H±
Z4(141114b AWN DEEM
PLDWEPJNG
(HEKKY 01
IJ - 14"
WALNUT
/
NAWfHOKN t," •
= L,l I- pI GYPI•+'v ^'
PFUIT TF=1%E /
NM
NA N ` HEALTH ` B•
b GC
31,101
878,88
vl,J u:
HALAL I FP.FN4
BUILDING 447
Ex 17TINb . DEODAR GLDAF-
4D" (AL,
Ex1KEINH PHCTINIA HPOkf 7% RI .1
SITE PLAN
1 20' - O"
V6-,
MN rr�r�rr��rr�r
... NATIYD VF.beTATION
to RgMAIN
<-G1-1 MATIG 1- AKIfIN9 '. TION NA 1 /I L/C I
k1YEIL DIKr /•RAID
6 Also
/ePI F�uc�
v / i �.
/ r / /
/
-
/
b LP P PLG
I.UMI' 2a • '2 4 /
n
✓ rrrrr r r r r r r r /
// / /
/// /
/ /
i / P
Q• i \- -1v1 LIT - T :,-, et - je 1 T
/APO. • /
1 P / IrTEK /AR LW P
•G / Ic '•" 6wVe
7, 14 ' • / H10.,AAF MAPLe GRUMP
' / 10.12" , t ',Avg.
/ !
Q . / u' IGI� PMr'�cT Zo!IE
•1 QL. 4TANUh AGO RI fOUA
LONDON PIANe- Tao -
exl ^ -TINe G'H "GAL.
!7 FRUNUh 06112e1,44.1,4
yLIK61A144 FLOW [RHO PLUM
2" tat,
\ •F Ge KGIDI PHyLLUM HA IIJNIGUM
ISATO+UK ' -
:�' LAL�
6 I'./ /EI)e'f4Ue' M �I
RrUbk4" FI - G•f
Al I I /
� ( FINUh /y LVP<TFV�
/ /Y,oTGH PING
hree,iM EI-I IZ'
O $2 PHcrfWIA FSAhEl21
FrAG54 PHlTINIA
5 eAL, C
0 II n- Ha000eu Oteou N7 VA 2CMPLA
24•%a' C 4 o,G,
0 fjry ILEX 6I2-51WTA t/JNVeYA
L LEAP HOLLY
4, /AL, G 2' o, G, ,
r UNIJL LAU . GSC
arra Lure,eN
I bAL. 04,
6sAUL7H6�IA •} F'OLYhTITGHUM MUIJfTUM
�LALI /JWOr.D Fe4aN IN 6 PIN&
&A1, (AN O 3 •V
LAWN
D - Y =X Ie7 Ta $e P„nA9V2D
1
/• uI'h_ .i NCt Cf1 -WI -�
�gIlgl�ql�ql�qllql�qqql�qIIIII�qqqI�NI�IpI1pIIII�III�IN�q1pg�! 11 {W�UIpI1�Iplgt�lUllll�lllpll�lll Ill! �llq! I1�IIgINIIIIIIII�IIIII�I�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�IIIlllll
3 4 • 5, 6 7__ 8 9 10 11 —•—• 12
1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS�1 •
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
oe 6L n I e Lr uz LL ri cLl (•THE •UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ∎ ° 0
" ° ' a e c L I ••
1 W 11 — 0.7m1 l II Of FI� i I J� u I 1 1 lu unll 111 1 11 IIII huh,'
ll
-...
PROJECT NO
II - 5
REVISIONS:
DATE:44 1
T EL
Tr (6 /s—
G oR/°AT Ty I Nue�Ta'
ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS
ONE UNION SQUARE BUILDING SUITE 3404
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 [206)602 -2690
SHIFT NO:
OF
/
■
•
/
EX IhTINb -v EfATION
ol-I DIKE To ps MAIN
O 19 AGM GI INATIJM
• v11Je. MArLE. (GRUMP)
4 -9' A., KNOWN
IC GI". C H e, coKN6R.
an rRIJNIY? Wl9PfPplILA
rOMV6Vr— LAVFEL
0 6AL, C G'a,G,
ALT HN%LIOH LAUR4L
(JUN 121989
Yv► F 89 -5 - �R
54.4 78,
/
SrA n7
dijE_ 7 17 I/kYliet)
k•-•
• 0
0
•
a
c•Parap
.eab TO gawAist
ExIontstb 1-4H/t-1 666114
r2UrlfT6
ii
ri L7.041
l■ 1
..:f1
+ ,
o' ,-
4 •Mal •
' oHOee-y
6X1o1114 6 06012Ale- c-642Ag.
it" 4 ' 4 "
Eacleritqm rtiMPIA. 1.16/2/A.
NATIve.
10 Relw95.,
9Fe1
/ "Milt
/
/ I \ /
r , , 2 /
—
B713.1313
1.1
MN
• . .
Nil:TONAL HEALTH L.
BUILDING 447
Wei
v
I1 /
' NAwri-tog.t.4 Of,
. \
'
/
,
c __,.2p_jitZ..2.. iyiArio „g.
'41..11mr OP /
lo-in) , 1 ' 0161,C.Af 1,44,pkd
/
r - --7-seree. 61464x.1 • /
Gl.UMP JOI
/11MelitnitaT
• Howl
1 GLOW.
ITP1'
e :0HAT.IP.ell6Al
.:7-7 ...77
t.,.......,...A.,,,,,
•• N.
•
AMMON= III.
rt1 W11014 A/A
_1 kr-PI 6Yr14'44.
401
fgur•
SITE PLA
eo'-cr
09116•1•AO
NAT11/6 V6•61.TATIOIJ
10 IzAtil4D.1
1
5 6 7 6 9 • 10 11 .•••••...-- 12
. •
I F TRFRIllH1/41TIECIEOIFIILNig1131122C,IIN11'51gukig
d a il, •
oc ,. o . z , i 1 .1 ae , .,(7 THE •UALITY OE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ' . o c 0 G ./ C 2 1 ^.0
gill0P9 Li 1 ' 1 1 111 11 mmililoillui iliodilii1FielkiliT41 mil ii itlit4mhillinhijil.,
, v,.....•,...•, , , , .!.,..',, , .., ,, z , .--'
nom.910:114101,_...M011.90,711.109
purr Tee.:
-P.' 66,
t
•e
• Arriss6,
AM.
....... 96. :;•"
apa.
r. H . A .0 7 1 .r
41111111
/
411U1 \ /
U7
1,1
Gi.utor
/Ave.
br-rer1-1 0,ttg.
d 4 . 4 1 4 „ :,, 449: °: „
1 v l t: I c : ‘ ,;:r.;:4) m p
A R
. ,,,,
•e9. 1
/ •29 / Lid •A' 1 ait
. / •
/ '.A:f /
,. - 0 1‘,..,
_,„,:.-_
, -
X /
o / /
•■• /
A A /
,
/_. fE.RTPNvo AGSCIFol..1A
Tete-
o.,§.'.
PD r,art2c me...4.47-se.41
.
:5(ft. J y 1..ve
%,„ ize PIMP.
- . _6rve,infar4 Iz'
vHcrriwA 7.c.A•sezi
FrApac. PHo•lt4"
Q.
„,„ 11 p-tpravD-64.10601,2 S,'OVA
a4-3a. c
0 56 11,6X GIT-6-1•4,PTTA tolsvC•70,
- Cer4vext.C. Ho1.t.1
- a
- ;:it-411/ L.-AU La . e '
OTT 5.4.)yr.614 4A-u6.64
LAWN
- R".Xf4T I E, TIT-6e. To 06 ce
1 0
1: waren rn-ler-Xer6
, ••••••■■," R•R . .51.50 -
O Acr.- 4
awe. • mokrt.-E. (
- 4-9' A., "oftowt..4
.2", etZ111.11Y1 Lor,rrAwles,
FevNia ml..
, 1g4to.I1A rb="0)61.1•-. LAllr-ca... •
0101061....1-A PL.TWE-CISIe. 1%4:M . - t lL_. 0
- Ayr
..,C540P14 PLANE. leer-
&AV ,( 04 6, 1.144.1-1UM mut.grum
4 , Wor .p. pe.121.4 6-1/C01
6AI,, CAW 0 •
1 %
2 :A
TLC,
PROJECT NO;
11-
REvis1ONS:
DATE:
rIW fi-S—Oft
CPI PROJECT 157..THOMPSON TILE
SOUTHCENTER S. INDUSTRIAL PARK
BY
CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS
ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ,
ONE UNION SQUARE EIUILDING • SUITE 3404
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 80101 120636132-2690
. WA /31:11 •
:
SHUT
: • :
N
DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
3/13/89
89 -1 -R
• SYIVAN al FN
18059 - 57TH AVENUE S.
PRIMARK -
EPIC -4- 89/89 -1 -CPA/
89- 1- BSIP /89 -4 -DR/
W111tflQAWN
5/17/89
89 -2 -R•
HALVORSON REZONE
4625 S. 134TH
4535 S. 135TH
LON A. HALVORSON
09-1-CUP
EPIC -13 -89
e ° :- A,!3 ° = - cP A /
4;°rC -;2-8 S
DENIED BY
C.C. 8/7/89
/ --drA
4/89
89 -3 -R
CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION
BETWEEN MILITARY ROAD S. /HWY. 99/
S. 152ND & 116TH STREET, SEATTLE
CITY OF TUKWILA
9/13/89
89 -4 -R
MIKAMI /SHIMATSU REZONE
16813 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
Y. MIKAMI
A. SHIMATSU
EPIC -25 -89
•
REZONE 1989