Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 89-07-DR - SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL DESIGN REVIEW
89-07-dr 4242 south 144th street 89-01-cup foster high school south central school district Cit ~of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 89 -7 -DR - Foster High School APPLICANT: South Central School District #406 REQUEST: Design Review for Foster High School LOCATION: 4242 South 144th Street The Board of Architectural Review conducted a review of the above request on August 24, 1989, and approved with five conditions (see attached). The Board adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the staff report dated August 16, 1989. Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal. NOTDEC NAME: TITLE DATE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • 'The Community Development staff recommends approval of the Design Review application subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a revised site plan showing: a. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at the north end of the bus load area (along 42nd Avenue SE) between the public sidewalk and the bus load area. b. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at either end of the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a site lighting plan showing: a. Reduce wattage of the fixtures used in the parking lot lighting (Type "C" fixtures) to 250 watts unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. b. Restriction of the lighting distribution to within the property boundaries of the site c. Statement on the drawing which indicates the use of the tennis court lighting shall be restricted to no later than ten p.m. d. Information on the specific exterior lighting fixtures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department revised landscaping plans showing: a. Additional landscaping (trees, groundcover) along the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. b. The addition of three trees to be located within the lawn area along 144th Street South (next to bus load area). c. The addition of a minimum of a trees to be located within the lawn area located along 42nd Avenue SE. d. A minimum of 24 inch shrubs along the east perimeter of north parking lot (next to athletic fields). e. Substitution of 36 inch for 24 inch shrubs (laurel shown) in locations where used between site perimeter and adjoining parking stalls. f. Landscaping specifications for the planting of the London Plane trees will be reviewed in detail and must include a 3 -foot minimum planting dis- tance of 3 feet back of curb with a trench for each tree to be a minimum of 4 feet deep, 5 feet wide, and 10 feet long. Special soil mix may be required at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The height of the (2) earth berms located at the southwest corner of the site and within the vision triangle area ((south and west of the visitor parking area) shall not exceed (3) feet in height above street grade. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Community Development Department plans showing the location and screening details for exterior trash receptacles. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Flesher, Kirsop, and Knudson. Absent: Lee Cagle Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, and Joanne Johnson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AUG 10, 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 89- 1 -SPE; 89 -7 -DR; 89 -1 -CUP -- SOUTHCENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #406 (FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL) Request for approval of a cooperative parking agreement, design review and conditional use permit for Foster High School. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposal using a model of the site as well as detailed site plans of the project. He reviewed the staff report recommending approval of the coopera- tive parking agreement with two conditions; approval of the design review with five conditions; and approval of the condi- tional use permit with no conditions. Brad Collins, 365 Ericksen, Bainbridge Island, WA 98118, represented the applicant. He concurred with the staff report in general. He reviewed each of the requests in detail. Dr. Michael Silver, Southcentral School District Superintendent stressed the importance of the new facility to the community. He expressed appreciation to the city staff and consultant. Bill Riggs, 11319 - 26th Avenue S. , Facilities Director for Southcentral School District reviewed the history of the project. Frank Smith, BJSS Group, 320 West Bay Drive, Suite 98502, Olym- pia, WA, architect for the project, reviewed the design aspects of the project. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 2 Akira Sato, BJSS Group, designer of the project, expressed his enthusiasm for the project design concepts. Mr. Collins felt that although the site is small, the design will work well. He credited Chris Johnson as the other designer for the project. Jeannelle Baldwin, 5827 S. 144th Street, School Board President, assured the Commission that it is the philosophy of the school district to immediately remove graffiti, which discourages further incidents of graffiti. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:55 p.m. Discussion ensued on the three proposals. MR. FLESHER MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR A COOPERATIVE PARKING AGREEMENT (89- 1 -SPE) BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND INCLUDING PROVISIONS ONE AND TWO AS READ IN THE STAFF REPORT. Provisions 1 and 2 read as follows: 1. When activities /events are scheduled in such a manner as to require the simultaneous use of any combination of the high school complex facilities and thereby potentially generate parking demand which will exceed the on -site 282 parking stalls, the School District shall provide necessary staffing and signs to direct traffic to nearby designated overflow parking locations. Failure on the part of the School District to do so may cause rescission of this agreement. 2. If there is a demonstrated consistent daytime high school use) parking demand which exceeds the on -site 282 parking stall capacity for the high school use, the matter shall be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at that time require the School District to construct the additional on -site parking (as shown on the site plan as future parking) in a reasonable period of time. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR DESIGN REVIEW (89 -7 -DR) BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND INCLUDING ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 3 Conditions read as follows: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a revised site plan showing: a. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at the north end of the bus load area (along 42nd Avenue S.E.) between the public sidewalk and the bus load area. b. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at either end of the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a site lighting plan showing: a. Reduced wattage of the fixtures used in the parking lot lighting (Type "C" fixtures) to 250 watts unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. b. Restriction of the lighting distribution to within the property boundaries of the site. c. Statement on the drawing which indicates the use of the tennis court lighting shall be restricted to no later than ten p.m. d. Information on the specific exterior lighting fixtures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department revised landscaping plans showing: a. Additional landscaping (trees, groundcover) along the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. b. The addition of three trees to be located within the lawn area along 144th Street South (next to bus load area). Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 4 c. The addition of a minimum of 3 trees to be located within the lawn area located along 42nd Avenue S.E. d. A minimum of 24 inch shrubs along the east perimeter of north parking lot (next to athletic fields). e. Substitution of 36 inch for 24 inch shrubs (laurel shown) in locations where used between site perimeter and adjoining parking stalls. f. Landscaping specifications for the planting of the London Plane trees will be reviewed in detail and must include a 3 -foot minimum planting distance of 3 feet back of curb with a trench for each tree to be a minimum of 4 feet deep, 5 feet wide, and 10 feet long. Special soil mix may be required at the time of build- ing permit issuance. 4. The height of the (2) earth berms located at the southwest corner of the site and within the vision triangle area (south and west of the visitor parking area) shall not exceed (3) feet in height above street grade. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Community Development Department plans showing the location and screening details for exterior trash receptacles. MR. FLESHER MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (89-2 - CUP) BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE IS ALREADY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THAT SITE AND THE ONLY NEW AREA IS THE AUDITORIUM. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. A recess was called and the meeting reconvened at 9:12 pm Chairman Haggerton reviewed the procedure for this meeting, indicating that public testimony would not be taken; and a decision would be made on the request for zoning designations and comprehensive plan designations for the Cascade View Annexation area, based on the public testimony taken at the at the August 10, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 89 -3 -R E 89 -2 -CPA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION - Request to establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre - annexation Zoning Map designations for the Cascade View Annexation area. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, reviewed the testimony which was presented on August 10, 1989 meeting. He reviewed area #15 of the map pointing out the present uses and proposed zoning and testimony given for this area. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 5 Discussion ensued next on Item #1. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF RMH FOR THIS AREA. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Item #2. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION FOR A ZONING DESIGNATION OF SINGLE FAMILY AND COMP PLAN DESIGNATION OF MEDIUM DENSITY. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Item A, Area 3. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND R -3 ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ITEM A, AREA 3. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH KIRSOP, FLESHER, HAGGERTON, HAMILTON VOTING YES AND MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO. Discussion ensued next on Item #4. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR AREA 4 AS R -3 ON THE EASTERLY TWO THIRDS AND R -2 FOR THE WEST WHICH CONSISTS OF AN EXISTING APART- MENT STRUCTURE. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Item #5. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF R -1, 7.2 ZONING DESIGNATION. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Items B, C, D; Areas 6 & 8. MR KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND AREA 6 HAVE A ZONING DESIGNATION OF R -2 BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A BUFFER FROM RMH AND STILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 7. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR R -1 ZONING. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 8. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND R -2 ZONING DESIGNATION FOR AREA 8 PRIMARILY FOR THE DIFFICULTY OF THE SITE AND THE PROXIMITY TO THE HIGHWAY. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 6 Discussion ensued next on Area 9, Item E. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND PO ZONING FOR THIS AREA BASED ON THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION AND THE APPROPRIATENESS FOR SENIOR HOUSING. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Areas 10 & 11. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION THAT AREAS 10 AND 11 HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH A ZONING DESIGNATION OF R -1, 7.2. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 12. MR. FLESHER MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR AREA 12 FOR P.O. ZONING DESIGNATION. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 13. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF R -4 ZONING. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEETING LENGTH BEYOND THE 10:30 PM DEADLINE. MR. FLESHER SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 14. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND R -1 ZONING AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TASK FORCE. MOTION CARRIED WITH KIRSOP, FLESHER, HAGGERTON AND HAMILTON VOTING YES AND MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO. Discussion ensued on Area 15. MR. FLESHER MOVED THAT AREA CM (INDUSTRIAL PARK) ZONING THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED HAMILTON VOTING YES AND MR. Discussion ensued next on Area 16. 15, ITEM H, BE REZONED TO REFLECT A DESIGNATION. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED WITH KIRSOP, FLESHER, HAGGERTON AND KNUDSON VOTING NO. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO SUPPORT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF R -4. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY AP- PROVED. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 7 MR. HAMILTON MOVED TO ACCEPT. THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS, FINDINGS AND'CONCLUSIONS AS SUBMITTED. TO THE'PLANNING COMMISSION WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF THOSE MODIFICATIONS MADE AT TONIGHT'S MEETING. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. DIRECTORS REPORT Jack Pace, Senior Planner stated that September 25,..1989 has been set aside .for a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission on. Wetlands. .Also,.September 28,.1989 is the BAR meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Re ectfully submitted, Lei - ..� 9 d - L. e2—• anne John on, Secretary FILE NUMBERS: REQUEST: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor HEARING DATE: August 24,1989 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared August 16, 1989 89- 1 -SPE: Foster High School 89 -7 -DR 89 -1 -CUP: APPLICANT: South Central School District # 406 There are (3) separate requests for the Proposed Foster High School Complex: 1. A cooperative parking agreement 2. Design Review 3. Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 4242 South 144th Street (N.E. corner of 42nd Avenue South and South 144th Street) ACREAGE: 12.4 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Public Facilities ZONING DISTRICT: R-1 - 7200 Single Family Residential SEPA DETERMINATION A Determination of Non - Significance was issued by School District No. 406 on May 11, 1989. ATTACHMENTS: A. Site Plan E. Utilities & Grading Plan B. Elevations F. Site Lighting Plan C. Elevations, Sheet 2 G. Parking Report D. Landscape Plan STAFF REPORT to ti( Planning Commission VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION GENERAL BACKGROUND . -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 2 FINDINGS 1 1. Project Description: Construction of two main structures which will house administrative, classroom, shop, athletic, and auditorium functions. Also included is the renovation of parking lots, bus loading areas, and landscaping. 2. Existing Development: A multi- structure (one and two - story) high school complex. 3. Surrounding Land Uses: West — vacant land (zoned R -1 7200), two apartment buildings (Normandy Apartments, The Samsera) North — single family residences, church (St. Thomas Catholic Church) East — school (Showalter Middle School) South — single family residences, fire station 4. Terrain: The site is essentially flat except for the southeastern portion which rises approximately fifteen feet (15') in elevation above the remainder of the site in the vicinity of the indoor swimming pool. Slopes on the proposed site do not exceed ten percent (10 %). The South Central School District # 406 is proposing to demolish and replace a substantial portion of the existing Foster High School Complex. When the high school was constructed in 1952, one of the primary building materials used in the construction was asbestos. Development of the existing school site consists of a several separate structures: one and two-story classrooms, a gymnasium, an indoor swimming pool, a library, and a stadium. Also located on the site are a ball field, (4) tennis courts, a stadium and covered stands and several parking areas. Only the Foster High School facilities are included on the 12.4 acre site. The entire school district property which includes both the high school and the middle school is 34 acres. Portions of both the proposed west and east wing structures although exceeding the thirty foot (30') height limitation are exempt from the height requirement because they are classified as non - habitable under provisions of the TMC (18.50.080): the mechanical space in the west and east wings and the fly loft area (loft over and behind the stage) of the auditorium in the east wing. The Board of Adjustment granted to the School District several variances (from 5 feet to 15 feet) on July 6, 1989. STAFF. REPORT to t( Planning Commission _,.. -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89- 1-CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 3 The proposed auditorium shown on the site plan is to become a joint use facility which will house not only high school related events, but community sponsored public performances as well. STAFF REPORT to t( Planning Commission FINDINGS 1 DISCUSSION The current site provides for approximately 160 parking stalls for both the high school and the library. Based upon comments from the School District and trans- portation consultant's report (Attachment G, by Stephen B. Lovell and Associates, dated July 18, 1989), the existing parking facility appears to be under- utilized. The existing facility is designed for 600 students. The current enrollment is approx- imately 420 students and approximately 50 teachers and administrative personnel. The enrollment is not expected to appreciably increase soon. The site plans shows a total of 376 parking stalls. The School District is proposing to construct 282 with 62 shown on -site as future parking (to be constructed when the need arises). There are 32 parking stalls available at the Showalter school during the evenings when it is not in session or sponsoring an evening social function. The 376 parking stalls are distributed as follows: On -site Off -site I COOPERATIVE PARKING AGREEMENT North parking lot 112 stalls East parking lot 144 stalls Visitor parking lot 10 stalls Bus lanes parking 16 stalls Future parking lot 62 stalls Sub -total 344 stalls Showalter Middle School 32 stalls TOTAL 376 stalls The analysis of the required parking (per TMC 18.56.050) is as follows: i -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 4 The proposed high school facility is designed to have an enrollment of 604 students, 70 teachers and administrative personnel, and expected to have not more than 5 visitors at any one time during the school day. Based upon the current zoning code, 1279 on -site parking stalls would need to be provided if each use contained within the proposed high school complex were pro- vided for. The amount of land necessary to provide surface parking for 1279 parking stalls is approximately 14.68 acres (CO 500 SF /parking stall). STAFF REPORT to t( Planning Commission Proposed Maximum School Enrollment 604 students 242 stalls 70 teachers and 70 stalls administrative personnel 5 visitors (at any one 2 stalls time during the day) Library 10 stalls. TOTAL 324 stalls Existing School Enrollment 420 students 168 stalls 50 teachers and 50 stalls administrative personnel 5 visitors (at any one 2 stalls time during the day) Library 10 stalls TOTAL ,i -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 5 230 stalls CONCLUSIONS 1 1. The primary use of the complex is the high school education facility which is predominantly a daytime use. 2. The most intense use of the auditorium, gymnasium, stadium, and swimming pool facilities occur during primarily during the evening hours. 3. Although designed for approximately 600 students, the current enrollment for the existing high school is approximately 420 students and is not expected to increase in the near future. The existing parking lot (with approximately 160 parking stalls) is considerably under utilized. 4. The only occasions when the proposed 282 parking stalls would not be adequate is in the evenings when for example the stadium or the auditorium was being used to full capacity. 5. Unless the School District experiences substantially increased enrollment, the proposed 282 parking stalls is more than adequate for the anticipated parking demand. 6. The School District is the owner of the total property (they lease to the County for their swimming pool facility) and is able to coordinate scheduling of the various activities /events which use the auditorium, gymnasium, stadium, and the swimming pool. STAFF REPORT to t Planning Commissi n t ,t -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 6 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 The Community Development staff recommends approval of the Cooperative Park- ing Agreement proposal. The Agreement shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director. The Agreement to be signed by the City and . the School District Superintendent, Principal of Foster High School, Principal of Showalter Middle School, and the Manager of the King County Swimming Pool facility and must contain the following provisions: 1. When activities /events are scheduled in such a manner as to require the simultaneous use of any combination of the high school complex facilities and thereby potentially generate parking demand which will exceed the on -site 282 parking stalls, the School District shall provide necessary staffing and signs to direct traffic to nearby designated overflow parking locations. Failure on the part of the School District to do so may cause rescission of this agreement. 2. If there is a demonstrated consistent daytime (high school use) parking demand which exceeds the on -site 282 parking stall capacity for the high school use, the matter shall be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at that time require the School district to construct the additional on -site parking (as shown on the site plan as future parking) in a reasonable period of time. STAFF REPORT to tI( Planning Commission DISCUSSION II DESIGN REVIEW . -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89- 1-CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 7 FINDINGS 1 TMC 18.60.030 also requires Board of Architectural Review of the specific design of the proposed high school complex and landscaping. The Design Review guidelines are printed bold followed by pertinent findings of fact. 18.60.050: GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Relationship of Structure to Site a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. a. Streetscape, landscaping, pedestrians Within the limitations of a small site, the applicant has setback the (2) struc- tures from the property line (48 feet and 42 feet) and preserved open space for needed outdoor facilities. The street setbacks allow for the inclusion of land- scaping features (trees, lawn) to create a pleasant transition for both pedestrians and adjoining development. The proposed landscaping along both public streets matches the existing land- scaping and the linear spacing of the London Plane trees will provide a pleasing rhythm. To provide for pedestrian movement, the applicant is proposing to add a 5 -foot wide sidewalk for the entire length of the property along 42nd Avenue S.E. b. Parking, service areas Parking is separated into two areas. The future parking area is located logically adjacent to the auditorium, gymnasium, indoor swimming pool, and stadium. Both parking areas have considerable depth from the public streets, thereby minimizing the amount of frontage exposure. Both parking areas are land- scaped within the interior areas as well as in perimeter areas where the land- scaping will soften the appearance of the parking areas from exposure to the public streets. STAFF REPORT to ti( Planning Commission c. Height, scale L -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 8 The bus load areas are separate from the parking (therefore not disrupting traffic movement in the parking areas) and located off - street and convenient to the buildings. Due to the variety of facilities contained within the proposed high school com- plex, the (2) structures vary in height. The applicant has placed those taller portions of the structures away from the perimeter of the site where possible. The facades of the (2) structures (particularly those portions along the street frontage) and the proposed exterior materials are compatible with adjoining residential development. Although the exterior walls facing both public streets are straight with no offsets (approximately 225 feet along 42nd Avenue SE and a 255 foot section along 144th Street SE), the texture of the brick and the proposed design of the brickwork together with the supplemental landscaping soften the appearance of the two-story structures. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be pro- vided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encour- aged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. A high school is a unique use which is permitted in residential zones subject to Design Review and receiving a Conditional Use Permit. The needed floor area has been provided using two separate structures instead of a large, single struc- ture. The proposed design also includes both the use of brick on the exterior as well as the peak roof form help to soften the appearance of the large building facades. In addition, the two structures are setback an additional (12) feet (along 144th Street SE) and (18) feet (along 42nd Avenue SE) and utilize landscaping to provide transition from the street to the buildings. The main entrance (pedestrian) to the proposed high school is through a large landscaped entry court at the southwest corner of the site. The wide pedestrian concourse separating the two buildings leads the students from the entry court at the intersection of the two public streets into either building. The use of the wide concourse also provides another viewpoint to residents and others pass- ing by from which to view the structures adding additional visual variety. STAFF REPORT to t1( Planning Commission . -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 9 The main entrances to the gymnasium and auditorium facilities have been located near the east parking area where most the participants will be arriving. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combina- tion. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and and paving s of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The applicant has proposed the addition of London Plane trees to match the existing street landscaping and reinforcing the unity of the character of the (2) public streets (42nd and 144th). The proximity of the parking area (east of the library) and the appearance of structures and the activities as seen from the adjoining residential development on the north perimeter of the site are softened by the use of landscaping (trees, shrubs, and ground cover). The proposed massing of landscaping (trees, shrubs, ground cover, lawn) at the southwest corner of the site reinforces the entry's importance in the overall site design. In addition, this area at various times of the day will be an area of heightened activity so that the massing of the trees will create a pleasing transition for both students approach the walkway to enter either of the tall structures and resi- dents walking past this area. A focal point has been created at the end of the walkway (to the northeast) by the landscaping along the exterior walls and that which is massed at the outdoor gathering area. The third area where landscaping has been appropriately massed is near the vehicular and pedestrian entrance to the east end of the activities building which houses both the auditorium and the gymnasium, both very "public" facilities which will be utilized often in the evenings. STAFF REPORT to tc Planning Commissiot -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 10 The interior of the parking areas contains adequate landscaping except for the pedestrian walkway area. 4. BUILDING DESIGN a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building com- ponents and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or build- ings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with build- ing design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The (2) structures while housing substantially different activities are harmon- ious in design. They are separated approximately 55 feet by a wide, paved out- door walkway between the (2) structures which provides for both pedestrians as well as service (and if necessary, emergency) vehicles. They are linked by an enclosed second story walkway which provides protection during cold and /or inclement weather. The peak roof design, while adding to the height of the structures along both public streets, does soften the traditional "institutional" appearance typically associated structures of this type and size. In addition, the variety of heights in the (2) structures and types of coverings (the canopy over the second story interior walkways) also provide visual interest and avoid the "institutional" appearance. The mechanical equipment is concealed beneath the peaked roof portions of the (2) structures. The use of brick on the street facades (42nd and 144th) provide a measure of compatibility with both existing and future residential development. The predominant earthtone colors of the brick veneer (brown, red, and tan with a blue accent) and stucco (light tan or gray) and the off -white color of the metal roof will be harmonious and compatible with existing residential develop- ment. (Color renderings with specific details on the colors have been submit- ted and will be available at the public hearing.) STAFF REPORT to th( Planning Commission 8. . -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 11 Exterior lighting will be provided on standards which range in height from 25 to 40 feet. The exterior lighting plan shows lighting which will provide for both public safety (along the main pedestrian entry between the (2) structures; parking areas; tennis courts) and visual interest (exterior lighting of facades along both public streets (42nd and 144th). Typical lighting for the tennis courts has been provided. CONCLUSIONS 1 The conclusions are grouped under the four design review guidelines. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site The proposed structures, which consolidate several activity areas previously disbursed on the site, visually simplify the appearance of the site and are com- plimentary to each other. The location of the structures "anchor" the primary focal point of the site and because they occupy similar positions to the existing structures on the site minimize disruption to the other portions of the site (e.g. playfields, parking areas). 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The proposed sidewalk along 42nd Avenue SE will allow for improved pedes- trian movement. The setbacks are generous enough to create a comfortable pedestrian environment and yet not overburden the open space on the remaining site area. The use of the brick together with the pattern and color of the brickwork help to soften the appearance of the long, straight walls to the general public. The fly loft portion of the auditorium has be located away from the perimeter of the site to reduce it's impact. The exterior lighting is generally adequate, however, the staff feels that some conditions are warranted to mitigate potential impact of the proposed lighting on the adjoining properties where lighting distribution may be an issue. See Conditions 2a., 2b., and 2c. No details for the specific design of the fixtures was included in the submittal, so Condition 2d was added. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment Generally, the landscaping is adequate to excellent. In general, the massing of the trees reinforce the main entries into the buildings. Retention of and the addition to the existing street trees helps to unify a large site and soften the impact of two -story structures to both pedestrians and adjoining properties. Several areas, however, should be enhanced with additional plant materials to further define edges and /or clarify specific activity areas of the site. In addition, the use of London Plane trees can cause upheaval of pavement if improperly STAFF REPORT to tliC Planning Commission -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89-1-CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 12 planted. Therefore, Condition 3f has been added. See Conditions 3a., 3b., 3c., 3d., 3e., and 3f. Generally, the provisions for pedestrian movement are excellent. The provi- sion of a public sidewalk on 42nd Avenue SE provides the general public as well as the students with needed pedestrian circulation. The staff feels that additional enhancement of the pedestrian facilities is warranted. See Condi- tions la and ib. 4. Building Design The applicant has presented plans for a high school complex which is a con- siderable improvement over the existing facility. The use of two structures housing the academic and activity centers allow for more architectural variety than a single structure. Both structures relate well to the wide pedestrian promenade which separates them. The peaked roof, the vaulted skylights over the interior walkways, and the fly loft portion of the auditorium (the space in a theater, above and behind the stage in which scenery is hung) provide addi- tional visual interest to the building. The proposed development plans did not show any provision for exterior trash receptacles so condition 5 has been added to the Recommendations section of this Staff report. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 The Community Development staff recommends approval of the Design Review application subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a revised site plan showing: a. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at the north end of the bus load area (along 42nd Avenue SE) between the public sidewalk and the bus load area. b. An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, contrasting material) at either end of the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a site lighting plan showing: STAFF REPORT to tl( Planning Commission 1 -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 13 a. Reduce wattage of the fixtures used in the parking lot lighting (Type "C" fixtures) to 250 watts unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. b. Restriction of the lighting distribution to within the property boundaries of the site c. Statement on the drawing which indicates the use of the tennis court lighting shall be restricted to no later than ten p.m. d. Information on the specific exterior lighting fixtures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department revised landscaping plans showing: a. Additional landscaping (trees, groundcover) along the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. b. The addition of three trees to be located within the lawn area along 144th Street South (next to bus load area). c. The addition of a minimum of 3 trees to be located within the lawn area located along 42nd Avenue SE. d. A minimum of 24 inch shrubs along the east perimeter of north parking lot (next to athletic fields). e. Substitution of 36 inch for 24 inch shrubs (laurel shown) in locations where used between site perimeter and adjoining parking stalls. f. Landscaping specifications for the planting of the London Plane trees will be reviewed in detail and must include a 3 -foot minimum planting dis- tance of 3 feet back of curb with a trench for each tree to be a minimum of 4 feet deep, 5 feet wide, and 10 feet long. Special soil mix may be required at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The height of the (2) earth berms located at the southwest corner of the site and within the vision triangle area ((south and west of the visitor parking area) shall not exceed (3) feet in height above street grade. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Community Development Department plans showing the location and screening details for exterior trash receptacles. STAFF REPORT to 4_ Planning Commission III CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1 , 1 -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 14 FINDINGS 1 INTRODUCTION TMC 18.12.050 and 18.64.040 require public review of the proposed high school renovation as a Conditional Use and approval by the City Council. The existing high school complex has previously received a Conditional Use Permit from King County. There is no proposed increase in enrollment for the high school. Except for the auditorium portion of the proposed high school complex, development plans represent replacement facilities for the high school. Therefore, the content of this staff report is limited to a review of the auditorium facility portion of the proposed high school complex and acts as an "umbrella" permit by incorporating the conditions of the Cooperative Parking Agreement, Design Review, and Conditional Use Permit by reference. DECISION CRITERIA The following criteria in Section 18.64.050 of the TMC shall be used by the Planning Commission in granting a Conditional Use Permit: A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. High schools are unique uses and are permitted in residential zones subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. Although the size and scale of a typical high school facility normally exceed those of adjoining residential structures, the proposed auditorium is a normal feature of a high school facility. The activity building (housing the auditorium) has been set back from the property line and the auditorium has been located within the building away from the site perimeter so that it will not be injurious to adjoining properties nor materially detrimental to the public welfare. Reconstruction of the high school is a public benefit because of the need to protect public health by removing harmful asbestos. The approval of the proposed development plans together with the attached conditions for the Conditional Use Permit application minimize possible adverse impacts on the area in which it is located. STAFF REPORT to tl Planning Commission 8 . -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 15 B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The proposed development plans for the high school complex together with the approved variances and the attached conditions meet the performance standards in the R-1 - 7200 zoning district. C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Although the auditorium (it represents only a portion of the activities building or east wing) exceeds 30 feet in height, the auditorium has been set back from the public street (144th Avenue S.) to minimize any impact to adjoining properties. It is also over 300 feet from the north property line and about 400 feet from the west property line. The needed floor area for the entire high school complex was divided into two structures to reduce the overall bulk of a single structure. While the activities building is a large structure, an effort has been made to minimize the impact of the structure from adjoining properties by several design features: use of a brick veneer exterior with a variegated color pattern to the brickwork, a peak roof for the portion of the structure between the auditorium and the street, and landscaping to further soften the south elevation. The proposed development plans will allow the continued use of the high school complex which was constructed in 1952. The overall proposed high school use has not been expanded in terms of enrollment and is not anticipated to substantially increase traffic and pedestrian circulation or impacts from the building and site design. The proposed auditorium does represent an expan- sion of the existing auditorium facility. However, the proposed expansion is not expected to generate significantly greater traffic volumes or impacts from the auditorium and site design. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the com- prehensive land use policy plan. The provision of the expanded auditorium for joint -use by the school district and the community is supported by policies 2 and 5 of the Open Space Element of the Land Use Policy Plan. Although not specifically a land use policy, the replacement of the high school complex mitigates a public health problem (asbestos) present in the existing high school. STAFF REPORT to tl( Planning Commission )-SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89- 1-CUP: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Page 16 E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The proposed development plans together with the attached conditions mini- mize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the surrounding area. CONCLUSIONS 1 1. The proposed full -sized auditorium facility with fly loft and other performance features is a facility normally found in newer high schools. 2. The auditorium facility has been well located to minimize impact to adjoining properties while easily accessible to pedestrians walking to the facility and those which come by automobile. 3. The proposed auditorium will be a public benefit to the community as a whole. 4. The proposed high• school complex has been granted a Variance and the staff has recommended approvals for both the required . Cooperative Parking Agreement (including Conditions 1 and 2) and the Design Review to the Board of Architectural Review (including Conditions 1 through 5). All of the issues and concerns regarding impact of the proposed high school to the adjoining areas which normally would be part of the Conditional Use Staff Report have been evaluated and addressed in the Staff Report for the Design Review appli- cation. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 The Community Development staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit application. • 3 q . Y e a if 33 ii m 1, j i • 1 O 71 el O co o A Ili 11 1 DPI M IaYI.r man• w M. woo .w © 100HOS HOIH U31SO3 3O 1N3130V1d31:1 1 i 1 1 1 IA O01Y 1111.Oa• .1l .aa1r aww•a..li i11 1.11 YsR1 1• I • 1! I' • 1 , 1 .ii if •w •r 1 1 I 31 ®• IOIY MY PT —ILL111lIJlll1111 7 1 1 1 1 __t ■101 On W.••..• NON a•.•.•1•.•••.•••- wa 111611a W - wal• a••lYawl• .apl• ••••••.•. Dom Anw710M.ir1 . nnl. larelmm 11.•rw WM.OI Moral Mao NOMA I SSISAI WOY.Ol nnN IMPS MOW Y41a1 1101 MOM A011t ammo lO1•MYinO.w n nos 1.10. 1101 sous 'OW Dean .U1Y•.O1o1.0.1•al v •M •1W n •..w IMin •.•r u n•a• ••01 3tt 1:1 ARCHITECTS if PLANNERS. AIA 110 VW OM MIN sun I 00101/111%01011X11110•110 n • 0. • •. •■••10 2 9 0 FOSTeR HIGH SCHOOL. sow*, CIP41111* RAW. DieltiCr ATTACHMENT B R ELEVATION - WEST NW- bjss group I I 3 j • • ATTACHMENT D CRDUP ARCHITECTS i PLANNERS. AIA to K W Ml O11MMR11III Qf1M M 11tl111W14.* am aim *0 11111 .1■440 calo REPLACEMENT OF FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL W11Mi/MI1L 110M/L rIr,. S 1111R4 11L�t -:. ..., - - - .... . ..... _ 1 1,..„ 111 I - - ' ,11 , 1 1 1 1 .31 '4 ,..0 • 00 i • •' GROUP 01 .,' ,.- L „. if . i • .+. 11 r / / /‘:• - • . '' A - ARCHITWTS St PLANNERS, AM MT S. 011111 SUM 111 01.11.1/14 *AMU UMW.. , , -.,.. • __ ...; . • . . ;-- - - : •-7--7L-"--1--- 1 ' .• ... • 7.'-7'41 - ATTACHMENT E FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL SCHEMATIC OMICIN UTILITIES AND GRADINIS ♦ Warr/ •D•�••/•YY•L•n 1 � r•••.1Y••• w1I •IM••• s•Ir• • • n•w�I1•.y1Y•nY•fe Y• C TiwCR •D.�Y•..�•.M•••q • IY.w.M1w tiw f.! ..10....1110.1...•• I r.Yr M.•.• •�.Y •� w •Y•1 Irwcvet IWWW WOOL SITE t IGHTING Ant • - IL • - •-•• . • - I -Il • . M.M- Y,• -M• -.D 1.•wr•IMr•/ ur. LIMIT IF 1 •[• •• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • •••.•1D• •Dtw •••Y•• • 1• ISM •IT M.1000. D•ttct ••• - J r.... - :. - - - T :_ - __.__T. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REPLACEMENT OF FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL • \ \ z Stephen B. Lovell aC Associates July 18, 1989 Bradley J. Collins, AICF' Collins °' Associates =65 Ericksen Avenue N.E., Suite 326 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Re: Determination of Parking Requirements and Cooperative Parking Agreement for the Foster Senior High School in the Southcentr School District, Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Collins: The following information represents the results of the analysis regarding the number of required parking spaces for Foster Senior High School in Tukwila, Washington. This analysis is based upon the existing parking usage and the projected demand as required by the City of Tukwila Zoning Code. Other information, as available, has also been included in order to estimate the actual number of on -site parking spaces that should be necessary. The following information pertains to the requirements of the City of Tukwila Zoning Code, Chapter 18.56, Off- Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Required Number of Parking Spaces (TMC 18.56.050) High Schools Places of P u b l i c Assembly Outdoor Sports Areas Public Facilities Consultants in Urban Transportation 1 12 a . 1 for each staff plus 2 for every 5 students or visitors 1 for every 4 persons based on occupancy load Shall be Determined by the Planning Commission Shall be Determined by the Planning Commission ATTACHMENT G 1614 40th Avenue • Seattle, Washington 98122 • (206) 329 -9463 The information presented below illustrates the approximate number of parking spaces that would be required if all of the activities would occur concurrently, a highly unlikely scenario, which is followed by the approximate time of use or period for the various school site uses. Required Number of Parking Spaces High School 70 staff 604 students 5 visitors Subtotal Places of Public Assembly Auditorium (500 seats) Gymnasium (1200 seats) Subtotal Outdoors Sports Areas Stadium (1200 seats) Sports Fields Tennis Courts (6) Subtotal Public Facilities Library Swimming Pool Subtotal Total All Uses Time of Use High School • Auditorium* Gymnasium 70• parking spaces required 242 parking spaces required 2 parking spaces required • 314 parking spaces required 125 parking spaces required 300 parking spaces required 425 parking spaces required 300 parking spaces required 20 parking spaces estimated 10 parking spaces estimated 330 parking spaces required 10 parking spaces estimated • 200 (Maximum Historic Use) 210 parking spaces required 1279 parking spaces required 9 months (except summer) Monday - Friday lam - 4pm 12 months Friday - Sunday 7pm - 10pm 3 months (winter). Tuesday - Friday 7pm - 10pm Stadium 3 months (fall) Friday 7pm - 10pm Sports Fields 6 months (spring - fall) all week (greatest on Saturday) 4pm - 7pm Tennis Courts 6 months (spring - summer) all week (greatest on Saturday) gam - 7pm Library 12 months all week (greatest on Saturday) gam - 9pm Swimming Pool 12 months all week (greatest on Friday Saturday evenings lam - 9pm Existing Usage The Assistant Manager of the swimming pool stated that thei heaviest usage occurred during a Friday or Saturday evening which filled the adjacent parking lot. However, this has onl occurred once, and generally the parking lot has many space available, even during school activity evenings. On several occasions during the Spring of 1989, I observed th usage of the student parking lot, and found that it was neve more than one -half full during school hours (the student parkin lot has approximately 164 spaces). The staff parking lot, wit 31 spaces, was generally fully occupied during these sam periods. The other parking available on -site appeared to be used by th school shops and the library. Ten vehicles'were parked at then locations. In addition, there was a maximum of 44 vehicles parked at th Administration Building during one of the observation periods There are also six parking spaces in front of the Showalte School. Loading Space Requirements (TMC 18.56.060) Institutions 2 loading spaces required (1 O' :; 30'x 14' or 12'x 65' x 14') Parking For the Handicapped (TMC 18.56.080) Minimum (314 parking spaces) 4 handicapped spaces required (minimum 12.5' wide and near primary public entrance) Cooperative Parking Facility (TMC 18.56.070) When two or more uses occupy the same building or when two or more buildings or uses cooperatively share an off- street parking facility, the total requirement shall be at least the sum of the requirements for the greater of the uses at any one time or as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission. All applications for cooperative parking shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Greater Use At Any 314 parking spaces required One Time As stated previously, if all of the identified activities were to occur simultaneously, there would be an on -site need for approximately 1,279 parking spaces. However, this scenario is very unlikely. Other possible combinations of activities could occur which would require more than the 314 parking spaces indicated above, although the scheduling of these events could be managed to generally avoid such a demand. The school would want to schedule events so that large attendance events (auditorium + gymnasium + stadium) did not occur concurrently. The school does not, however, have control over the scheduling of events at the swimming pool. The possibility does exist that some swimming event with a large attendance could occur at the same time that an event is scheduled for the auditorium; however, this could also be avoided with coordination of event schedules between the school and the pool. During evening events, if a demand for more than 314 parking spaces did occur, other parking areas are available at the administration building and the Showalter School which would raise the total parking spaces to approximately 365 spaces. Further, if a combination of events occurs which would require substantially more parking spaces than the 365 spaces indicated above, the catholic church immediately north of the school has a paring lot which could accommodate in excess of 200 vehicles. For this to be used, some form of an agreement should be made between the church and the school, and a pedestrian connection provided. The cooperative parking agreement should reflect these conditions as well as provisions for using the catholic church parking lot, if that should be required. Overall, with proper scheduling of school events, and good coordination with the swimming pool activities, I feel that the 314 on -site spaces plus the overflow parking available at the Showalter School should be adequate to accommodate the maiority of parking demands generated by events held at the high school. As was mentioned previously, the student parking area was . observed to be, at the most, only half -full during school hours. If this proportion continues and the student population increases to approximately 600, we would expect student drivers to occupy 120 parking spaces during school hours, leaving the additional 120 spaces available for other activity uses. I hope that this information provides the necessary material for the school district and the City of Tukwila to arrive at agreement of on -site parking needs. My experience tells me that the :114 on -site spaces will be adequate for the vast maiority of events which occur at the school. If you or the city have any questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Very Truly yours, Stephen B. Lovell & Associates "IttipLiA izvzJz_ Stephen B. Lovell Principal City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on Thursday August 24, 1989, at 8:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing CASE NUMBER: 89 1 - SPE, 89 - 7 - DR, 89 - 1 - CUP: South Central School District #406 REQUEST: There are three separate requests for the new Foster High School: 1. A Cooperative Parking Agreement. 2. Design Review. 3. Conditional Use Permit. LOCATION: 4242 South 144th Street Persons wishing to comment on the above case may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday August 13, 1989 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Affected Property Owners, File, Site COLLINS & ASSOCIATES 365 Ericksen Ave. NE • Suite 326 • Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 July 31, 1989 Jack Pace Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Jack: Re: Foster High School Cooperative Parking Agreement AUG (206) ' 842 - 5135 Enclosed is the parking analysis provided by Stephen B. Lovell and Associates, the School District's traffic consultant. From the beginning of the Foster High School reconstruction project, it has been' obvious that the total parking spaces required by the Tukwila Zoning Code could not be met on the subject site. If 1279 parking spaces were provided for all uses, there would not be any site left on which to place the uses themselves. Consequently, the School District proposes a cooperative parking agreement to accommodate the maximum number of required parking spaces for uses occurring at any one time per Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.56.070. With careful administration of event schedules, we believe this maximum parking requirement to be 314 spaces, which is based on the high school use itself. All other uses of facilities on the Foster High School site are minimally used during school hours and would not add significantly to the required parking. The timing of all other uses can be scheduled to keep maximum parking requirements below the 314 spaces. Specifically, activities at the Stadium, Gymnasium, or Auditorium and Swimming Pool cannot be scheduled at the same time, and School Administration will be required to coordinate events at each facility. Because seasonal, daily, and hourly peak uses for each facility do not coincide, schedule coordination can be managed satisfactorily. In considering actual parking space usage, the existing parking lot of 191 spaces has been functioning well within its capacity, except for an occasional state basketball tournament game or similar special event. The additional 123 required parking spaces will not be needed for the current student body population. The site plan for the new high school facilities shows 282 parking spaces to serve Foster High School, King County Library, and King County Swimming Pool as well as the Foster Auditorium, Gymnasium, and Stadium. This is 91 more spaces than the site adequately operates with currently. An open space area is also shown as reserved for future parking spaces, which will more than meet the required 314 total spaces. An overlay sheet is provided and depicts the layout of this future parking area in compliance with City standards. Foster High School Cooperative Parking Agreement July 31, 1989 Page 2 In addition to the reserved future parking area, two options are available to meet special event overflow parking needs, if problems arise. First, there are 51 existing parking spaces located on the adjacent Showalter portion of the property and available for special events. Second, the School District can make arrangements with the Catholic Church immediately north of the subject site to use the Church's parking lot of more than 200 spaces for special event overflow parking. In summary, the School District proposes that the Tukwila Planning Commission establish the required parking for the Foster High School facilities at 314 parking spaces. The School District proposes to meet this requirement by providing 282 parking spaces in its initial redevelopment. The remaining 32 parking spaces plus 10 parking spaces dedicated to the Ring County Library will be developed as the student population reaches capacity or as the need for more parking has been demonstrated. In this way, impervious parking lot surfaces can be reduced and open space saved until the future need for the required parking spaces is evident. The proposed cooperative parking agreement not only more than satisfies the actual parking needs for the Foster High School site but also offers several contingencies to deal with future requirements or problems should they occur. Sincerely, F a-t-e-SL_ Bradley J. Collins, AICP cc: Bill Riggs Stephen B. Lovell Dean Willows c DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal: Foster High School .Reconstruction Proponent: Location of Proposal: Lead Agency: Responsible Official: Position /Title: Telephone: Address: Date: May 11, 1989 Signatur South Central School District No. 406 4242 South 144th Tukwila, WA 98168 South Central School District No. 406 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by May 26, 1989 Terri Patton Business Manager 206/244 -2100 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 1/11/ti . (::-412,Va)1„.// South Centrai 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET May 11, 1989 SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 KING COUNTY Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Abbott Raphael Building Mail Stop PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 -8711 Re: Determination of Non - Significance Respectfully Submitted, Terri Patton, SEPA Responsible Official, South Central School District No. 406 encls. xc: Attorney General City of Tukwila • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 • Phone: 244 -2100 Enclosed is the Determination of Non - Significance for the Foster High School Reconstruction Project issued on May 11, 1989, by the South Central School District No. 406. A second copy of the Determination of Non - Significance is included for the Attorney General; please forward to that office. Thank you. iY. • led k ti.V.; "'. , //// . "'---..: •-•"' .., •• • ... ''''. .. Ic■ 11 ' . - - .�1.: L iso� - ■iq.ra wmi f �_ Tirs '- �„ i•� -.... -- _•► __-i ` _ �r l 1 � , r;_ , ; T'— )'. � � , l %t 5 t" y�ly 1 • South Central School District Design Competition for Foster High School wi -- 13Js5 G ou) d I X "� pl w, WA Ee sea - Phass1 o k� Jv ` I� TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. NARRATIVE OF DESIGN CONCEPTS AND PHILOSOPHY 2. DESIGN MATERIALS 3. BUILDING AREA TABULATION 4. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COSTS Page No. 1 - 3 4 - 5 6 - 7 1. NARRATIVE OF DESIGN CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY Three forces combine A. External Forces: B. Internal Forces: C. Symbolism: Al. EXTERNAL FORCES: The most visible and immediate location on the site is the intersection of 144th and 42nd Streets. The existing library and swimming pool buildings form the other two points of a triangle of external forces. An academic wing spans between the "flute and the existing King County Library while the "physical education wing" relates strongly to the existing King County pool building. Finally, the Music /Art Wing radiates from the hub of the building along a central diagonal axis. This relationship also affords the opportunity to locate high public use facilities off the busier 144th Street and classrooms off of the quieter 42nd street.. to shape this project. Existing immediate site characteristics and surrounding neighborhood features. Programmatic requirements and desired spatial developments. What should this building represent? 1 ►g Ct 4 - Main Emry - Nub C( ific School U Baia (0 a>rizalion Our scheme acknowledges and responds to this all important relationship by establishing a Core or Hub of the project at the 144th and 42nd intersection with related components radiating from this hub. With Relationship to Uietin3 {-oolitic, Our scheme purposely subordinates parking to pedestrian circulation by creating a powerful open pedestrian diagonal "street" through the building. Gradation Whin Fideetrian and P ttomobile, S. INTERNAL FORCES: Our scheme is a direct reflection of the program. We have broken the program into three basic components which use the diagonal pedestrian "street" as the prime organizing element. At the "Hub" of the pedestrian "street" we have located central functions such as main entry, administration and gathering spaces. On the 42nd Street side is a 2 -story academic wing, a form which is an efficient expression of its repetitive cellular classrooms. On the 144th Street side are the Physical Education and Music /Arts Wings where the dynamic expression is a direct result of the varied, highly active spaces they contain. These components are then organized around the pedestrian "street" which is bridged above by the symbolic "heart" of the school - The Library! - 2 - This street axis originates at the 144th and 42nd Street intersection and terminates at the playfields. The bulk of parking requirements are then split to either side of this pedestrian "street" which happily minimizes their scale and increases their usefulness by providing joint parking for the school and the King County Library, and joint parking for the school and the swimming pool /football stadium. Only visitor parking and bus areas are located to the front. Finally, additional soccer and baseball field improvements are proposed adjacent to the existing middle school. As external and internal forces are satisfied, we begin to express the parts. gxperhion cf the fartb Outward and Inward C. SYMBOLISM; • . What N dIdt arm with some etimbolism Binder Hub - Commons Library Foster High School must not only set the theme for its immediate campus; it must set an example for its community! In aict ih& book - M�lividuo of Nana*, • -Main of evradon Fundl'o form fht 5tr set y on ►aNad� - *miaow, in Opeounce (Time**. • should Foster High School • Ineido Rle5 L Hard Cove' Wall Aton9 iii Slrecf - 3 - Our scheme seeks to develop a duality of expression or "two sidedness ". A controlled, disciplined "wall" is created along 144th and 42nd t o reinforce the street line and give prominence to the all important intersection. Behind these walls the building becomes a direct expression of its varied parts emphasizing freedom, creativity and individuality! This "two sidedness" then becomes the basis for symbolism! Represent? A school is for young people; yet it has an obligation to serve all people! Our scheme expresses this duality by creating a timeless, permanent expression on the "public" side and an individualistic, technological expression on the student side! Fit it) 1k Ref , flzee t, Fufwv rode* Inst. ar Doors - Hollow metal doors and frames at all exterior areas - with tanimic paint finish for durability and long - lasting color qualities are proposed. - 4 c MECHANICAL SYSTEM The HVAC design provides water to air heat pumps with a central boiler, cooler and heat recovery system with potential for future solar system addition. The system provides individual area temperature control and flexibility for future building space changes or new additions. The building design incorporates fire sprinklering, plumbing and standard lighting systems. rar+ot�" " fading rou9n°ut &raft and • • Fluid Cooler - - - • per PorrA -% eufkM fat. Runpb 1 `Heat Stony. `� Mawm rovafion 3. BUILDING AREA TABULATION PROGRAMMED DESIGN TOTAL Areas Subtotal Area Subtotal Programmed Design 1. ACTIVE CLUSTER 49,900 NSF 49,045 Auditorium 14,850 13,808 Seating 6,450 SF 6,128 Stage /Wings 3,600 2,880 Dressing /Toilets 1,100 1,152 Studio Perform 2,500 2,280 Set Construction 1,200 1,368 Music 3,750 3,801 Vocal CR 1,300 1,326 instrument CR 1,500 1,521 Office /Library/Storage 550 450 Practice Rooms 400 504 P.E. 31,300 31,436 Gym 12,200 11,760 Auxiliary Gym 7,300 7,800 Weight Room 1,800 2,100 Wrestling 1,600 1,512 Training Room 400 364 Lockers /Showers /Laundry 8,000 7,900 2. SOCIAL/DINING /ART CLUSTER 12,900 NSF 12,026 Corm ons 3,000 2,446 Student Support /Cafe/Dining 3,700 3,392 Kitchen 3,000 2,820 Faculty Support/Dining/Toilet 1,200 1,288 Art and Storage 2,000 2,080 3. ADMINISTRATIVE CLUSTER 3,900 NSF 3,817 Building Administration 1,750 1,754 Counseling 1,000 988 Pupil Services, Health 1,150 1,075 4. LIBRARY RESOURCE CENTER Reading 4,600 4,400 Media CR 800 750 Other Spaces 1,000 800 6,400 NSF 5,950 5. ACADEMIC CLUSTER A Foreign Language /Offices 2,000 2,040 Special Education 2,100 2,096 Nome /Family /Storage /Offices 2,700 3,264 6. ACADEMIC CLUSTER B Language Arts /Writing Lab/ Office 7,000 Social Studies /Offices 4,800 7. ACADEMIC CLUSTER C 16,800 NSF 17,108 Math /Computer Lab 3,900 3,564 Science /Preparation/Storage 4,900 4,560 Technical Education 5,000 5,264 Business Ed/Storage /offices 3,000 3,720 8. SUPPORT SPACES 2.900 NSF 3.264 .Storage/Toilets/Custodian Subtotal Walls, Circulation, Mechanical 2 25% Total PROGRAMMED Areas Subtotal Area Subtotal Programmed Design 6,800 NSF 7,400 7,460 5,000 DESIGN TOTAL 11,800 NSF 12,460 111,400 NSF 111,070 27.875 SF 27,767 139,275 GSF 138,837 SF 4. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COSTS The following statement of probable cost was developed from a cost analysis by all Design Team members for the submitted design. The accuracy of the statement of probable cost is relative to the conceptual nature of the submission and the standard of the industry. General Cost of Building: $ 6,658,224 Mechanical Costs: - HVAC System - Fire Sprinklering System - Plumbing - General Provisions Electrical Costs: Site Work Costs: - Utilities - Earthwork - Improvements TOTAL COST The above Statement of Probable Cost for following items: - Demolition of existing facilities - Asbestos abatement as needed - All off -site work /utilities - Furnishings - Equipment and fixtures - Auditorium seating - Contingencies - Sales tax 1,110,148 247,200 559,800 20,000 1,048,580 336,300 360,000 672.803 $ 11,013,055 Construction does not include the May 4, 1989 Board of Directors South Central School District do Vernon C. Bryant, Jr., AIA Bryant & Associates, P.S. 204 111th Ave., NE Bellevue, WA 98004 xc: Aaron Freed, FAIA Emeritus David Hoedemaker, FAIA Dear Board Members, The Jury . was unanimous in recommending scheme No. 1. We believe that it best accommodates and expresses both your needs and your aspirations, as we understand them to be. Our detailed reasons for this recommendation are listed in the enclosed report. To recapitulate some of the most important reasons for our decision, the winning scheme had: ▪ A strong design concept that addresses the community with a substantial, permanent presence and clear, memorable image. ▪ A site plan that deals well with parking and pedestrian circulation and which develops a strong sense of entry and of place. • The most efficient, most adaptable and most expandable floor plan of the three schemes; the more formal and fixed exterior provides not only an interesting contrast to the more informal and flexible interior but also is an idea that can be easily reworked and refined as the design progresses. Excellent access to and identity of community spaces; a civic center that is at once symbolic and functional. Should you not successfully negotiate a contract with Team No. 1, we recommend team No. 3. All teams should be congratulated and acknowledged for the thoroughness of their submittals, especially in Tight of the short time allotted them. On a personal note, we believe that scheme No. 1 most represents the kind of place that we would like to have gone to high school or would like to see our children and grandchildren go. We think you, your community and your children will develop respect and affectionate memories for this design over time. (But remember that there will be inevitable problems with any large building project.) We wish you the best of luck In this important venture and applaud the seriousness with which you have undertaken it. For the jury, Doug Kelbaugh, FAIA Professor and Chairman Findings of the Professional Jury Wednesday, May 3, 1989 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL DESIGN COMPETITION Submitted by Aaron Freed, FAIA, David C. Hoedemaker, FAIA, and Doug Kenozugh, FAIA. The jury is completely unanimous in recommending Scheme No. 1. In order of our recommendation to the SCSD school board, we offer the following outline of our critique and comments. In the case of the recommended scheme, we also offer in good faith to its architects several suggested design changes. In all cases, we realize that, given more time the competitors would have been able to resolve many of the problems identified, but the jury felt that it was its job to point out as many . flaws as it could as objectively as it could in the time allotted. SCHEME NO. 1 I. SITE DESIGN o Very strong site concept and organizing idea: The two brick facades on the public frontages provide a sense of permanence, tradition and civic presence: o Dramatic, legible ceremonial entrance at the corner acts as a threshold for both the building and the whole site; the north concourse is an active, vital "street" to the playing fields and buildings beyond. • o Ample parking, well located; i.e., it serves other community facilities and does not place a "sea of cars" in front on the school so common to suburban shopping malls. o Provides bus shelters attached to building. Problems o Provides less playing fields than the program required. o Poor bus circulation; i.e., buses sometimes must back into street. o Kitchen service entrance poorly located and needs more screening from street. o Front entrance is unprotected from prevailing southwest winds, aggravated by "venturi" configuration of concourses. o Circulation to bus shelters not direct or covered. Recommended Changes o Protect front entrance from wind with appropriate landscaping and /or by extending the bus shelters. o Extend bus drop off /pick -up (2nd possibly bus shelters) along length of south and west walls to allow parallel parking. o Add feature; e.g., seating, pavillion, sculpture, landscaping, at the terminus of north concourse; consider having softball home plate at this location. II. BUILDING DESIGN Assets o Most efficient floor plan; i.e., best gross SF to net SF. o Building's concept and configuration (formal, fixed exterior footprint, elevation and materials and informal, flexible interior - like a crab with a hard shell and soft meat) lends itself to easy modification and refinement during subsequent design phases. o Flexible, adaptable classroom areas. o Easy access to and clear articulation of community spaces. o Commons /dining and interior "street" to parking lot provides active, vital gathering place(s). o Physical education immediately adjacent auditorium and near county swimming pool. o Both academic wing and auditorium complex easily expanded in future. o Sloped gable roofs are conspicuous from streets. Problems o Opening library to central bridge and to dining below creates acoustic conflict. o Roofs are primarily flat and therefore not in conformance with the client's stated desires. Nonetheless, the jury strongly feels that the steeply sloping gable roofs at the perimeter of the public sides of the school best captures the spirit of "a warm, friendly, inviting atmosphere" and are in fact more visible from eye level than the roofs of the other two schemes, whose roofs are more extensively sloped but at a lower pitch. o Home /family life play area is not on ground or near kitchen. o Several rooms are "land - locked," i.e., remote from windows. o There is unused space over the kitchen. o Blank windows on south wall seem unnecessary and inappropriate; brick patterning and /or clerestory windows into gym would be preferred by jury. Recommendations o Either close library with glass walls from abutting circulation and dining below or move it to roof of academic wing, over administrative offices. Moving it would allow double height space in dining area to extend into commons area, thereby better unifying the two functions and the "hemicycle" curved glass wall. o Consider introducing a covered arcade along the south and /or west wall for bus loading and unloading. This may also help to justify and express the gable roofs in plan. o Consider adding skylights in roof of interior "street" between gym and auditorium complex. o Consider gabled or shed skylights instead of vaulted ones; they are cheaper and more aesthetically consistent with gable roofs. Also consider roof monitors; i.e., with vertical glazing and opaque roof, instead of skylights. SCHEME NO. 3 I. SITE DESIGN Assets o Well defined, well scaled entry court that is made more visible and inviting by splaying the southwest wing toward corner of the site. o Vehicular access to service is well handled. o Physical education is conveniently located in relation to county swimming pool and playing fields. o Existing baseball field is well integrated into site design. Problems o Parking is conspicuous from streets and tends to fill front side of building. o Less than required car parking capacity in certain program categories. o Inadequate amount of bus parking. o Auxiliary playing field is too small. o Split tennis court locations makes large instructional classes difficult. • II. BUILDING DESIGN Assets o Straight forward, rational, understandable floor plan. o Friendly, relaxed character that is not formidable or pretentious. o Footprint and circulation is conducive to expansion. o Administrative areas are well designed and located, logically, for public access and surveillance. o Great hall and cafeteria have a symbiotic positive relationship. Problems o Building footprint is conducive to future expansion. o Physical education is well located but may lack sufficient lobby space. o Effort to have all roofs slope, although a commendable attempt to fully comply with owner's desires, sometimes strains the building's visual composition. Several roof and roof /wall intersections are formally awkward. o Low pitch results in low visibility of sloped roofs from eye level, resulting in less civic character and presence. o Language arts and social studies not adjacent to library. o Special education and business education are not adjacent to administration and pupil services, and business education is not conveniently openable for evening classes. o Home /family life is remote from food services and its location on exposed front corner is questioned; would require a fence in addition to or instead of proposed berm, which would tend to block view of entry court that architect has striven to open. o Art classrooms have no art court and are not adjacent to auditorium and music. o Library is centrally located but does not tend to act as a "hub." o Some student support areas are missing. o Access to orchestra pit may conflict with visitor locker room. SCHEME NO. 2 I. SITE DESIGN Assets o Baseball field /concession stand is well integrated into site design, especially the building footprint. o Many classrooms have good distant views. o Front entry is well protected from prevailing southwest winds. o Required number of playing fields is provided. o Phased construction is considered, although costs of temporary buildings is not fully addressed. Problems o Building is surrounded by a "sea of cars," especially in front. o Wider building setback from street diminishes civic presence of building. o Entry court is difficult to clearly read from street, because of landscaping and vehicles. o Gym is distant from county swimming pool. o Parking is distant from playing fields. II BUILDING DESIGN Assets o The commons has several positive qualities and the potential for more. o Math, computers, and science are conveniently located in relationship to each other. o Home /family life is well located and is especially accessible for visiting parents' pick up and drop off. Problems o Serious congestion problems at main entrance(s) to buildings, to auditorium, to gym and to cafeteria. o Classroom configurations are not conducive to future adaptability. o Two large stairs crowd the commons and render it primarily a circulation space (the architect's idea to use them for seating notwithstanding) which is less than ideal for an eating areal the western stair seems redundant, as well. o Foreign language is not adjacent to library and home /family life. Business education is not adjacent to administration. o Relationship of kitchen to commons /eating area is awkward. No daylighting in library. o Worst gross SF to net SF ratio of three schemes. Building does not have as friendly or as inviting architectural character as other two schemes. ' ...91ft:r5 010(d glidt Na Eery. iv - d lc ••■.■1 4.-aar ta,ara • 27 F . , dam ad Oral& LO(0.1 Nen r afrart5n nttrn •••` dad tteca • ,. J , p.aad ' ;a 10.. Catanton raoas EP aada.9 rakt SITE PLAN SCALE 1"=50' NORI r tTh 4rurn t 0 50 1 7 — 1 - - - • 0,, •••• I IM; NI 5 4001c LJ r :1 \ 11:I I ,r- I iot Fad L Alt :1 1;t:, • iSr.t g %ft` • n ]1 1 Li ri r' I XIS! IM; AIMINISI RAI ION SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT • Design Competition • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL' s G3— 11 t+re Loailf tMWd\ GROUND FLOOR PLAN 4) SCALE i /32 " =1 NORTH C L_ UPPER FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1 /32 ".= 0" O 50 100 200 fl ' Lxio 0341.1Z.35011 .rdt fltrrcrri•I• I '"•rlay In•sq . I.tt ( t r ...rt" i 111 \ . \I 11)I l .II Ill\ 4,.' Ii , 4 Dram NORM cirq rG Dairom "43 • •, i . i ' - L - I..,. t`d SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT • Design Competition • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL • g SECTION C-C ACADEMIC SI CI ION B-B COMMONS- AUDI IORIUM -ANIS SECTION A-A COMMONS - PHYSICAL EDUCATION EAST ELM! ION WEST ELEVATION 1"Lrlarl■mad" 0 SO IOU h 1_10 •••,. Lle r .1 I . •- ••.• . . N(IREII EL EI.WI ION SOUTH ELEVATION -k•••• *. 2..,......NnttCr.Z., -......-...--....- . i _:,1,Jrr •ry.. .41.41 • SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT • Design Competition • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL • • Looking into !Exterior Commons Prom S. 144th and 42nd Streets Fit loll11110.5 no.* 11-esur, 1 1: 0.• Tsweb., tre tIman.14 bbai 'Grnion. Pedestrian Street Looking Southwest etlicos:314 the arts cwt.,' ant Irna41 loyak *lc [um C•pcno•I • Owney tetnenad Hatt Mos fxreet 41104 Co.nud - f.0014 - fbrvarwra (Lne'es• Dam /4.4.0 i.•, 4 , • a r ) 6.4 tthrl /.■••-... !CUPP Imruttutit. OC / Yin Darn, SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT- Design Competition • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL • VT ii Y V e t kasa kasn • • • • —. • W • Q t \ ‘v rat ;ems • %ii /OW ii.. South (9entral KING COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 114th STREET • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 91144 PhoM:211.2100 SCALE IN STATUTE MILE, �YLI 31 K 0 i FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL 4242 South 144th Street Seattle. WA. 98168 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL 4626 South 144th Street Seattle. WA 98158 THORNDYKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4415 South 15utr1 Street Seattle. WA 9t55 TUKWILA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5939 South 149th S reef Tukwila, WA 38168 CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 13601 32nd Avenue South Seattle. WA 98168 copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY t • • 0 W E j LB: • • 8 -4 i f 0 200 400 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 0 w HIGH r i 1 � B -3 PARKING J r : J 0 0 B-2 B 8. 144th. STREET IASED ON UNDATED DRAWING BY CITY OF SEATTI r rNGINEFRINR OEPARTMFNT /� +.. I / % ti I I I 1 1 '� I I ND SHOWALTER I FOOTBALL i SCHOOL ---j FIELD r I I ) I I i u /PROPERTY LINE- 8 PARKING W O. BY DATE W -6076 JOC APR 1989 sr/II F _NOTFO EXPLANATION B -6 INDICATES BORING NUMBER AND • APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION SEATTLE, WASHINGTON SITE & EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 1 RZA RITIFJVN al & HAN� art 1400 140th Avenue N. E .h PARKI G 1 )(27 6 411r4C41F-Arallr 6 X\ FEW, V /3 P ANN M AP Li N-vi I 1 L_ 11. , _ POOL LEAcE AZEA 4 AV. JNIDARY LI131ZARlY ACC EJ I /1121 Rr- 4 /9/;.?") K i ..__J 1 , - - --- - -- , / 1 / If I I I I I FOOTBALL I I I I I 278 I I X > I I FIELD III kit \ \ N I I I I II I I $E I I I 1*_ II / / 1411 - - - WINO UMW — ft-sekwevsgreermottrAZMat 0 N I i 1 3 I z I 1 i 0 IN 10 I 7 10 S 8749'78 "E b 379.36 N 0 SD 4" 0 • S�.° 4 ELECT. VAULT TEL. HAND HOLE �— TV HAND HOLE / ELEC. VAULT G TEL. RISER d GAS METER ❑ 0 0 GAS METER ❑ TV HAND HOLE N 0210 "E ® 3.00 4 ?___w S 87'49'18 "E ```�"""""'""`"`"OOOO 120.03 N G S Q N 0210'42 "E 3.00 TEL. HAND HOLE 224.45 SD G J 8 " J G S. 144TH ST. aP r 0 TV HAND ELECT. T 0 4 4 F N W z u Y • 00 0 N M 0 0 • f ni F 3. i• � 1 N • y :t t 0 1R±. J ✓ av 6113 1Jl. S 7 f 8 00 '55 • 10 60 • /le -!e ° IS L99 . IS c pg 6 14 10 0 0 . /3 0 065 r o 06 ° 1 55 1 28.99 i Sr.• N +70.11 A IM1M L• 11.1• 10.21•• K Y 5. S W " 4770/472 w. sat 5 v0 1 4 2 D „„ o/sr -- G 0 NICtlp A. A ✓r 7!3 !• 10 . 740DNO3,1; 7 �•- 1318.94 J O L W ' %N0 ant N 0 0 140 k '.N 4 —ot /21)•6 971. 5 ! 190 /90 144TH (G..• 20 -a, • -•L) 3 39.0 37.5 Si. N 8?-49-.1 ZS o �2S 34 0` �0 Z4 0,'93 3S • 0,15 27 s 34 • 0 O ` ^ 2E O% 33 016 2 9 01 O ` 0( jZ 0160 4 30 1 b0 0,6° /36 99 3 1 • • 0 9 0 s 3 0 %6 T 0 4 4 F N W z u Y • 00 0 N M 0 0 • f ni F 3. i• � 1 N • y :t t 0 1R±. J ✓ av 6113 1Jl. S 7 f 8 00 '55 • 10 60 • /le -!e ° IS L99 . IS c pg 6 14 10 0 0 . /3 0 065 r o 06 ° 1 55 1 28.99 i Sr.• N +70.11 A IM1M L• 11.1• 10.21•• K Y 5. S W " 4770/472 w. sat 5 v0 1 4 2 D „„ o/sr -- G 0 NICtlp A. A ✓r 7!3 !• 10 . 740DNO3,1; 7 �•- 1318.94 J O L W ' %N0 ant N 0 0 140 k '.N 4 —ot /21)•6 971. 5 ! 190 /90 144TH (G..• 20 -a, • -•L) 3 39.0 37.5 Si. N 8?-49-.1 Planner: Cross-Ref erenCe cept 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Replace Foster High School with a new building of the same student capacity. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 4242 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Quarter: SE Section: 15 Township: 21m Range: 4E 3. APPLICANT :* Name: OWNER C DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIO ----) iUN 1 1989 STAFF:` USE :0IL (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Address: Phone: Address: South Central School District No. 406 4640 South 144th Street, Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 244 -2100 * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: South Central School District No_ 406 4640 South 144th Street, Tukwila, WA 98168 Phone: (206) 244 -2100 I /WE,Csignature(s)] swear that we'a'e he owner s o "can rac .urchaser s o tho property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our May 31, 1989 knowledge and belief. Date: DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION The following criteria will be used by the BAR In its decision- making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE Page 2 A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: A. The proposed design recognizes the importance of the intersection of 144th and 42nd Street. A hub or core of the building complex is located at the intersection and houses the main pedestrian entry to the facility. 144th and 42nd Streets are then reinforced by the two wings of (continued on attachment) 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: A. The two formalized wings of the project along 144th and 42nd streets are a "device" to present an inherently diverse, complex program as a controlled, harmonious expression at the edges of the property. This design concept was derived directly from the impact that the now school will have on the surrounding neighborhood. (continued on attachment) 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT reinforce that conceit. (continued on ettachmont) major changes to the existing grades. DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. O. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas Is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. N. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. A. The existing basic topography on the site will be retained, and RESPONSE: preserved, and enhanced by the new design. There are currently no planned B. The grades of walks, parking and other paved areas will be primarily flat with slope only to accommodate storm water run - off. The generous amount o pedestrian and vehicular circulated routes, - which will be will lit for safety, should provide an inviting appearance. The landscaping will again B. BUILDING DESIGN ( 4GN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. 8. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per- manent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: A. The South Central School District is committed to excellence of design. This commitment was recently backed up by a design , compctiti in which three different Architects submitted designs for tha project. _ A. professional jury of architects unanimously selected the proposed design as the recommended winner along with overwhelmiug suDPQrt by the then selected the design. D. The proposed new school is harmonious with the neighborhood development. The intent of the school building is not to be a "background" building but rather it is intended to be a "landmark" building in the cglnmunity which serves as a community and city resource. The design is further intended to portray a sense of permanence and stability to the neighborhood g j surYounding area. (continued on attachment) 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The primary location for street furniture such as planters, benches, RESPONSE: flagpoles, etc. shall be at the main entry court and pedestrian walkway through the building. The furniture and lighting shall reinforce the idea of the pedestrian walkway and the scale appropriate to the pedestrian. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general aopear- ante, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. (I f DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page S ATTACSIOINT TO DESIGN LIEN APPLICATION S. RELATIONSHIP *FAINTERS TO SITE (continued) A. (continued) the building which present a formal backdrop to the two major streets. These wings are held back from the street an adequate distance for landscaping and pedestrian circulation, but close enough to reinforce the basic characteristics of the site. B. The proposed design purposely subordinates parking to the building itself and pedestrian circulation. This is accomplished by splitting the parking and locating it to either side of the pedestrian street. This minimises the parking area's scale and maximizes its usefulness. The design attempts to rid the project of the typical "sea" of cars in front of the building. C. The height and scale of the building is a direct expression of its internal parts and the symbolism we hope to achieve. Our desire is that this facility (which is a major public building) will be a powerful expression of civic pride, and landmark for the community) The height of the building(s) are typical of most high schools throughout the state. The basic program requirements for high school areas such as gymnasiums, theaters, and similar special spaces require higher spaces than a residential type of use. In fact the height of the existing high school gymnasium is higher than the majority of the new proposed design. The "special" heights required for the theater fly loft ( ±70' -0 ") are mitigated by the fly loft being located in the middle of the building mass which minimizes the exterior appearance of the height at street level. 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCMS AND SITS TO ADJOINING AREA (continued) B. The building is purposely set back from the property line to allow a transitional amount of landscaping to buffer the new proposed building from the adjoining properties. A large generous entry court and landscape area on the site at the intersection of 144th and 42nd streets forms the main "entry" of the building and also serves as a transitional landscaped area. C. The character of the proposed design is that of an important public building and a resource to the community. It is apparent that a 140,000 s.f. school building cannot directly match the exact scale and massing of surrounding residential buildings. However, the design attempts to be harmonious with the neighborhood and further reinforce the surrounding character of the neighborhood. ATTACHMENT TO DISICI REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 D. The primary pedestrian circulation patterns are along the sidewalks on 144th and 42nd Street and on the diagonal pedestrian link from the intersection extending through the building. This diagonal link forms the major organizing element from which the design was generated. The parking and vehicular patterns are purposely kept separate from or adjacent to the pedestrian link for safety and convenience. The loading /service areas will be screened visually and functionally to allow for public safety. E. On site vehicular circulation is intentionally separated from the street circulation and the vehicular entrances /exits to the site will be coordinated with the City of Tukwila Public Works and Planning Departments. 7. LANDSCAPE AID SITE TREATMENT (continued) C. The predominant public views of the school will be along 42nd Avenue South and South 144th Avenue. The architectural 'expression proposed for the buildings along each street consists of a disciplined design which will lend itself to the rhythmical pattern of street tress. The street trees will help shade these south and west exposures and accent the pattern repeated in the architectural form. It will also be important for the understory planting along these streets (lawn /groundcover /shrubs) to be Consistent or rhythmical in nature to respond properly to the buildings architecture. The corner of 42nd Avenue South and South 144th Avenue is also the source of a strong diagonal axis /pedestrian corridor between the two buildings which serves as the main entry from the street as well as the parking areas to the north and east. Landscaping in this area should accent the visual corridor while responding to the individuality of each building serving as a means to unify this major use area. The scale and form of the trees in this area will be important for softening the scale of the buildings, providing shade opportunities and enhancing the view corridor. D. Landscaping in high pedestrian and vehicular traffic areas will be protected by using raised planters, bollards and other methods which will separate the plant material from traffic hazards. Where car bumpers overhang landscape areas, the landscape will respond accordingly through use of low groundcovers or lawn. E. Appropriate measures will be taken to break up large paved areas through use of raised planting areas, trees in tree grates and other methods. F. Service yards will be screened using walls, fencing or appropriate evergreen plant material (both broadleaf and coniferous) or a combination of the three to provide year around screening. AT ACOIIT TO DI RION AVINM APPLICATION page 3 G. In area not believed to be appropriate plant habitats, walls, fencing or wings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. N. The concept of exterior lighting around the building and in the site parking areas will be to light the area enough to proaote safety and to provide functional light but not to be glaring or brilliant. Light fixture selection will direct light on the school site only and ioinimite light on adjacent properties. 8. mmILAIUG DESI= (continued) C. The building components shall have proper proportiona'and relationship to each other. See the exterior elevations for a further detailing of the facade. The building components and parts are intended to portray a sense of permanence and quality to the school within the normal budget constraints of a public funded project. D. The colors selected for the design are intended to be harmonious with the neighborhood. The two walls of the building along 144th and 42nd'Streets are intended to be a brick veneer with brighter colors limited to. the rear or non - public side of the building. E. All mechanical equipment on site is intended to be hidden or screened from view. F. The site lighting concept is intended to be incorporated as part of and harmonious with the architectural concept. C. The proposed design intentionally has a great variety of design as an integral part of the design concept. The design seeks to develop a duality of expression or. "two- sideneas ". A controlled, disciplined "wall" is created along the two flanking streets to reinforce the streets .and give prominence to the intersection. Behind these walls the building becomes a direct expression of its varied parts emphasising freedom, creativity and individuality. 1. NARRATIVE OF DESIGN CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY Three forces combine to shape this project. A. External Forces: Existing immediate site characteristics and surrounding neighborhood features. B. Internal Forces: Programmatic requirements and desired spatial developments, C. Symbolism: What should this building represent? A. EXTERNAL FORCER: The most visible and immediate location on the site is the intersection of 144th and 42nd Streets. The existing library and swimming pool buildings form the other two points of a triangle of external forces. An academic wing spans between the "k" and the existing King County Library while the "physical education wing" relates strongly to the existing King County pool building. Finally, the Music /Art Wing radiates from the hub of the building along a central diagonal axis. This relationship also affords the opportunity to locate high public use facilities off the busier 144th Street and classrooms off of the quieter 42nd street.. ij aixe 1O - Mein Entn 6sMwunq epic& - Hub of lit *Jul L_ 1 t ( saran::: 1 ~. OWINWOmift Bela 09a*tletion with kittionship 10 Neal faiiifie Our scheme acknowledges and responds to this all important relationship by establishing a Core or auk of the project at the 144th and 42nd intersection with related components radiating from this hub. Our scheme purposely subordinates parking to pedestrian circulation by creating a powerful open pedestrian diagonal "street" through the building. Ora ion Stivrn lidetrian and N ftmobik. S. INTERNAL FORCES: Our scheme is a direct reflection of the program. We have broken the program into three basic components which use the diagonal pedestrian "street" as the prime organizing element. At the "Hub" of the pedestrian "street" we have located central functions such as main entry, administration and gathering spaces. On the 42nd Street side is a 2 -story academic wing, a form which is an efficient expression of its repetitive cellular classrooms. On the 144th Street side are the Physical Education and Music /Arts Wings where the dynamic expression is a direct result of the varied, highly active spaces they contain. These components are then organized around the pedestrian "street" which is bridged above by the symbolic "heart" of the school - The Library! This street axis originates at the 144th and 42nd Street intersection and terminates at the playfielde. The bulk of parking requirements are then split to either side of this pedestrian "street" which happily minimises their scale and increases their usefulness by providing joint parking for the school and the King County Library, and joint parking for the school and the swimming pool /football stadium. Only visitor parking and bus areas are located to the front. Finally, additional soccer and baseball field improvements are proposed adjacent to the existing middle school. As external and internal forces are satisfied, we begin to express the parts. ilmvseks cF fb. arts Outward and Inward C. •YMOOLISM: ,des firm with eang etimmiem Foster High School must not only set the theme for its immediate campus; it must set an example for its community! What should Foster High i Hub • !baron s y ` W r N i tlw std - 1 - School Represent? Our scheme seeks to develop a duality of expression or "two sidedness ". A controlled, disciplined "wall" is created *long 144th and 42nd to reinforce the street line and give prominence to the all important intersection. Behind these walls the building becomes a direct expression of its varied parts emphasizing freedom, creativity and individuality! This two sidedness" then becomes the basis for symbolism! A school is for young people; yet it has an obligation to serve all. people! Our scheme expresses this duality by creating a timeless, permanent expression on the "public" side and an individualistic, technological expression on the student side! At ID 'fit i ie net, Att Amt fir 5 tMwnW F ebruary 3, 1992, Foster High School students, t eachers and stuff left their temporary home in Showalter Middle School for a new home in a brand new school building. Some carried chairs or stacks o f books as they followed the Foster . Bulldog Band up South 144th Street :. and into the new Foster High School, which was built on the site of the old one at the corner of South 144th and 42nd Avenue South. . . What follows is a look back — and ahead — at the new Foster's place in the Tukwila community. III Foster construction incorporates high quality, low cost In building the new Foster High School, designers and the District Board of Direc- tors agreed to use high quality materials and . constrruction-methods for long life and low maintenance. • Dean Willows, president of The BJSS Group; Architects & Planners, which designed the new Foster, lists the following as "items that were constructed at Foster High School that typically had an initial higher cost but were selected by the District based on a life cycle cost which usually translates to lower maintenance costs and lower replacement costs:" Terrazzo floors in main corridors; exterior brick veneer; steel structural fram- ing; precast concrete wall panels in gymna- tun and lockerioo two layers of gypsum -.- wallboard and veneer plaster in main corri- dors; central gas -fired boiler mechanical: system; metal rooting on high sloped roofs; ; synthetic final coat on stucco exterior; - 'ceramic tile floors and wainscots in toilet - rooms; accessible acoustical ceilings; completely' ri:oncombustible structural systems; a fully automatic fire system and hose stations; emergency gen- erator; prefmished aluminum exterior soffits and entry storefronts. - The school also makes nse of high - efficiency, low - maintenance parabolic light- ing comparable to what is used in businesses and offices. The result of those choices is a Quality construction minimizes Foster maintenance costs Advanced technologies built into the new Foster will mean cost savings over time for maintenance, compared to older schools, and those maintenance costs will he in- curred less frequently. "In . the. - building is economical said District Superintendent Michael Silver. "Even the light bulbs used inside the new high school are efficient," said - Foster head custodian Bill Mugford. "Most of the bulbs used in classrooms are high- efficiency, low - maintenance, flourescent lighting units.with parabolic diffusers to reduce glare. I haven't had to change a 48 inch flourescent tube yet. And the new bal- • lasts have come a long way. Some on the market have 'a very high power; factor per - • centage, as do the ones in our building. This is an energy saver. • While the bulbs that decorate the building's exterior are a little more expen- sive, he said, "they do last." £YLt7k Curt tila ur� UPI. l��nlo Focus on Foster One year later... School pride, community access are hallmarks of the new Foster library, math/science lab, publications lab, business office and administration - already have begun using programs, and have received hardware with the intention of joining a larger, school -wide network. .In response to the Technology Corn - mittee report, nearly $200,000 remaining in the Foster High School capital projects fund has been earmarked by the Board for purchase of computer hardware and software'for school and classrcxim use. Foster Auditorium provides student showcase, careers Foster High School drama coach Cynthia Chesak, whose students are rehearsing Pen Pals, an original play, in the new 500 -seat Foster Auiditorium, said the new school — especially the auditorium — "is great. "It's given as a place to really show- case what our students can do. It is providing a nice, formal setting for them to practice theater etiquette, and even the elementary students are so appreciative," Chesak said. . T Foctei Auditorium also is 0 \/ cupL(./ igt5pa 4 facilities available to many community groups for continuing education, recrea- tion, and for community events spon- sored by District schools. The 1992 Tukwila Days cele- bration took place at Foster High School, and several community performances and visiting performers have used the Foster Auditorium. Arts grants this year have made possible appearances by such artists as Bochinche, a Latin - American salsa -style bold; Obo Addy, master drummer from Ghana; Young ACT Theatre perform- ance of Face 2 Face, a play about racial prejudice, and children's performer Tim Noah, who appeared at this year's fifth grade D.A.R.E. drug education program graduation, sponsored by the Tukwila Police Department. The Foster Auditorium also has been the site for. student vocal and instrumental concerts for each of the District's five schools. Highline Community College uses classrooms throughout the building . for credit and noncredit continuing education classes, and the Tukwila Police Department has used the school for its Civil Service examinations. The Tukwila Fire Department even makes use of Foster's gymnasium and weight room for fitness and recreation. A recent University of Wash- ington stage lighting seminar featuring Jennifer Tipton. a lighting designer from New York, also used the Auditorium. • Bond refund saves tax dollars Nearly $ f High School that typically had an initial higher cost but were selected by the District based on a life cycle cost which usually translates to lower maintenance costs and lower replacement costs:" Terrazzo floors in main corridors: exterior brick veneer: steel stnlcnlral Irrm- ine: precast concretC wall panels in gymna- sium and locker rooms; two layers of gypsiun wallboard and veneer plaster in main corri- dors; central gas - fired boiler mechanical system; metal roofing on high sloped roofs; synthetic final coat on stucco exterior; • ceramic tile floors and wainscots in toilet • rooms; accessible acoustical ceilings; completely' noncombustible structural systems: a fully automatic fire • system and hose stations; emergency gen- erator, prefinished aluminum exterior soffits and entry storefronts. The school also makes use of high- efficiency, low - maintenance parabolic light- ing comparable to what is used in businesses and offices. The result of those choices is a remarkably quiet, well - constructed build- ing that is not only beautiful, but stands up well in terms of cost analysis. In fact, notes District Superinten- dent Michael Silver, project costs for the new Foster, figured on a per - square -foot basis, ranked in the bottom for new high schools that went out to bid between June 1990 and August 1992. At the time the hid was accepted in June 1990, construction cost and sales tax for the new Foster amounted to $108.30 per square foot, according to Alberta Mehring in the state Office of the Superintendent for Public Instruction. This amount is well .below the state average of $113.99 per square foot for high schools that went out to bid in the same time period. . . The $16 million bond issue for Foster construction approved by District voters in 1988 was so well managed that funds remained in the Foster High School- . capital project budget after payment of construction expenses. • • • • . The South Central School Board last month approved the expenditure of $350,000 remaining in that budget for the purchase of additional computer and . technology equipment, furniture, site fencing, improvements to the school's . playing field, and an auditorium band shell. maintenance costs Advanced technologies built into the new Foster will mean cost savings over tune tier maintenance. compared to older schools. and those maintenance costs will he in- curred less frequently. "In short. thy- 1 >u ilcline is economical," said District Superintendent Michael Silver. "Even the light bulbs used inside the new high school are efficient," said Foster head custodian Bill Mugford. "Most of the bulbs used in classrooms are high - efficiency, low - maintenance, tlourescent lighting units parabolic diffusers to reduce glare. l haven't had to change a 48 inch flourescent tube yet. And the new bal- lasts have come a long way. Some on the market have a very high power factor per- centage, as do the ones in our building. This is an energy saver. " While the bulbs that decorate the building's exterior are a little more expen- sive, he said, "they do last." The terrazzo flooring, Mugford said, "was an excellent investment. And the boilers are very efficient, the smallest I've seen, and they heat the building. I can't believe it." • "The best things about this school," Mugford said, "is the pride the kills have in it — and they should. It's their school, it's their future, and it's their tax dollars also." Foster plans • for future technology Now that the new Foster High School build- ing looks and feels physically complete, it is time to ... begin a technology plan to outfit the inside," the Foster Technology Committee this winter reported to the Dis- trict Board of Directors. The committee noted that the new Foster was designed with technology in mind, and already includes wiring for a computer network linking classrooms, labs, offices, the library and_adnrinistration of- fices; spaces for integrated computer labs; a video . information system bringing multimedia into the classroom; and a Nov- ell network operating system obtained at re- duced cost and ready for use. Several areas in the building - the hardware with the intention Trudeau, 248 -7578. KANFi: :TR F�F�TUcatil.' "6NIFzEI: • 94." 134 5 s Ate, iq N OTE :-.5174451^1V- PoeieN .TEG OtIc4 Frma. Ei'ai PI,mNT TYF A 1 I ' coNt?ITIoN: A,f►f Tini1_i_T_iretm 11a�4 , In , � S 9 � "' IIIII1u1I111 I U y�Y •'S15'ifi4. ~ ne ;or- - 7 - Vviai;Atip , p4 F't�pTg•�TM,N� ?�??