HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 89-11-DR - CONNELL - WHITCO DESIGN REVIEW89-11-dr
withdrawn whitco
41722/ 2/)gd..eisikel
--
'
/6a. zee() Pf-/I-Die
/Wiee52-i-
Signature:
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION • --
SEP 121989
!' i t <WiLA
access driveway.
115th Street.
3. APPLICANT :* Name:
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL:
Quarter: NW Section:
To construct a security fence and gravel
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection)
Tax Lot No. 102304- 9057 -00 250 feet east of East Margin Way north of South
10
Township: 23 Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
Bush. Roed & Hitchings. Inc. Attn: Rob O'Connell Jr , PE
Address: 2009 Minor Avenue East. Seattle. WA 98109
Ph ne: 323 -4144
(� ' Date: / Z Oof4 g7
Robert W. O'Connell Jr.
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
Address: 5900 Second Avenue South_ Seattle, WA 95105
Phone:
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
ALLENTOWN ROCK PILE ASSOCIATES
E. J. WHITE, GENERAL PARTNER
767 -4767
I /WE,Csignature(s)] . C ,C/LJ A - t C
swear that I /we are owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date: / 1 Z iq
C E
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: Only structure is a fence which will enclose a vacant lot. There
will be no impact on pedestrians, or vehicles using South 115th St. Visual
transition shall remain the same as it is now.
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: The fence will be a wire cyclone type. 6 feet tall. which'
will not cause any change in visual impacts.
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
C
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE: Only Element "A" applies to this application. It is the intent of
the security fence to preserve existing topography and site
features which are being destroyed by trespassers in "all- terrain"
and 4 -wheel drive vehicles. The fence will allow same vista as
before.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
8. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: Not applicable to erection of a security fence.
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: Not applicable to erection of fence.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
- in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
FPnra rnnatriirtinn will not change ayicting V1StaS Or ViPWS
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
This fence will have no impact on public recreation areas or
facilities.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
Fence construction alone is not applicable to this item.
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
The Whitco property is zoned MH. Fence construction of this
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant. adverse
environmental impacts.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
Not applicable
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
type is typical for the zoning.
The fence shall limit if not stop damage being done by trespassers
in all terrain and 4 wheel drive vehinleq mhn deatrny existing
vegetation and add to erosion problems on this site.
Form No 1058 (1/70)
ALTA Loan Policy — 1970 with
ALTA Endorsement — Form 1 coverage
(Amended 10- 17.70, 10.17.84)
C
RECEIVED
JUN " ;\ 1989
~ 3
ROED & HIiCHINGS INC.
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
C First American Title Insurance Company
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B
AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown
in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs,
attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by
the insured by reason of:
1. tide to the estate or described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. lack of a right of access to and from the land;
4. unmarketability of such title;•
5. the invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon said estate or interest
except to the extent that such invalidity or unenforceability, or claim thereof, arises out of the
transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon
a. usury, or
b. any consumer credit protection or truth in lending
8. the priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage;
7. any statutory lien for labor or material which now has gained or hereafter may gain priority over
the lien of the insured mortgage, except any such lien arising from an improvement on the land
contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy not financed in whole or in part by
proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured
ha advanced or is obligated to advance;
8. any assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of P lic
which now have gained or hereafter may gain priority over the insured mortgage; or
9. the Invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment, shown in Schedule A, of the insured mort
or the failure of said assignment to vest title to the insured mortgage in the named insured
assignee free and clear of all liens.
¢S .t AMER,
.. iit M* .a.
sae,
•••
ISSUED BY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First American Title Insurance Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed
by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
70.E
t1 sI7N1
J �' '. ,. P U . •. X4 4 . lf f I
BY PRESIDENT
SEPIEM8ER 71, i Z
l d 1968 •;:' f
\\ 04 / /foRH
�MiNw�•'
First American Title Insurance Company
ATTEST sV :W4► C. lagriel.
mss•
SECRETARY
SCHEDULE A
TOTAL FEE FOR TITLE SEARCH, EXAMINATION
AND TITLE INSURANCE $1,875.00
AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: $800,000.00
DATE OF POLICY: MAY 5, 1988 AT. 2:13 P.M.
1. NAME OF INSURED:
ELMER J. WHITE, SR.
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
PAGE 1 OF 5
POLICY NO. 143205 -5
2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF
POLICY VESTED IN:
ELMER J. WHITE, SR., PRESUMPTIVELY SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY
INTEREST OF HIS SPOUSE, IF MARRIED, DOING BUSINESS AS
ALLENTOWN ROCK PILE ASSOCIATES
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE C
IS:
PART ONE:
SCHEDULE B
PAGE 2 OF 5,
POLICY NO. 143205 -5
THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF
THE MATTERS SHOWN IN PARTS ONE AND TWO FOLLOWING:
1. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING
LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT
LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE
PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTEREST, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE
ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING
INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF.
3. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH
ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
4. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICT IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN
AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT
SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY
PUBLIC RECORDS.
5. UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN
PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF;
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER.
6. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR
MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY
LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
PART TWO:
SCHEDULE B
END OF SCHEDULE B
PAGE 3 OF 5
POLICY NO. 143205 -5
1. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER
APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER
OCTOBER 31ST.
YEAR: 1988
AMOUNT BILLED: $5,922.52
AMOUNT PAID: $2,961.26
AMOUNT DUE: $2,961.26, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF
DELINQUENT
ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $457,000.00
ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS: NONE
TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 102304 - 9057 -00
2. ANY QUESTION THAT MAY ARISE DUE TO THE SHIFTING AND CHANGING
IN THE COURSE OF DUWAMISH RIVER.
3. RIGHT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THE FORMER AND /OR
CURRENT BED OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER SHOULD ANY PORTION THEREOF
LIE NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
SAID SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
4. QUESTION OF IDENTITY OF THE SPOUSE OF ELMER J. WHITE, SR. ON
MAY 1, 1988 DATE OF ACQUIRING TITLE.
5. MATTERS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE
RECORD AGAINST THE NAME OF THE SPOUSE OF ELMER J. WHITE,
SR., IF MARRIED ON THE DATE OF ACQUIRING TITLE.
6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTOR: ELMER J. WHITE, SR., DBA ALLENTOWN ROCK PILE
ASSOCIATES
TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A
CORPORATION
BENEFICIARY: ALLENTOWN ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP
ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $600,000.00
DATED: MAY 2, 1988
RECORDED: MAY 5, 1988
RECORDING NO.: 8805050802
SCHEDULE C
POLICY NO. 143205 -5
THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE
OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 OF SECTION 10,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF C.D. HILLMAN'S MEADOW GARDENS
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 3, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS AT PAGE 86, IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
AND LYING EAST OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF-
WAY (FORMERLY SEATTLE - TACOMA INTERURBAN RIGHT -OF -WAY), THE
CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE RIGHT BANK OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 55'05'30" EAST, 1,324 FEET FROM THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10;
THENCE NORTH 4'41' WEST 274 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE TO THE LEFT WITH A 2' CURVE THROUGH 9'38' OF CURVATURE
482 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 10, SAID POINT BEING 986 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID RIGHT -
OF -WAY CENTERLINE;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE
IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 469557 AND DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 10 WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 802.75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 6.10 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE 788.36 FEET TO THE
POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID CITY
OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 78.08 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, C.D.
HILLMAN'S MEADOW GARDEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE,
DIVISION NO. 3, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12
OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF
100 FEET;
PAGE 4 OF 5
•
SCHEDULE C CONT.
POLICY NO. 143205 -5
THENCE NORTH 86'15' WEST A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2;
THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE. NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE WEST 3 FEET THEREOF ABUTTING THE EASTERLY MARGIN
OF CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR
SOUTH 115TH STREET.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PAGE 5 OF 5
TOTAL PARCEL LEGAL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
MEADOW GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY
THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12
WASHINGTON;
AND 2 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF C.D. HILLMAN'S
OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 3, ACCORDING TO
OF PLATS AT PAGE 86, IN KING COUNTY,
AND LYING EAST OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY (FORMERLY
SEATTLE - TACOMA INTERURBAN RIGHT -OF -WAY), THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE RIGHT BANK OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER WHICH BEARS SOUTH
55 ° 05'30" EAST, 1324 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE
NORTH 4 ° 41' WEST 274 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE TO THE LEFT WITH A 2 CURVE
THROUGH 9 ° 38' OF CURVATURE 482 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 10, SAID POINT BEING 986 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 10, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY CENTERLINE;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE IN KING COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 469557 AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 10
WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 802.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 6.10 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE 788.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION
WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 78.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, C.D. HILLMAN'S MEADOW
GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 3, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 86 WEST A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET THENCE SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 2; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE WEST 3 FEET THEREOF ABUTTING THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF CITY OF SEATTLE
CITY LIGHT RIGHT -OF -WAY;
AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR SOUTH 115TH STREET.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
89005
SUR 28