Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 89-16-DR - BOEING #9-08 - PARK LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW89-16-dr 9303 east marginal way south 89-08-smp boeing 9-08 building Earth Enterprises September 19, 1991 Darren Wilson Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Boeing Cafeteria /Waterfront Park Permit #6498 Dear Mr. Wilson: Confirming our phone conversation this morning, we have a minor delay in the 100% completion of the landscape work for the above referenced project. We are appreciative that our minor delay will not impact the C.O. for this project. As discussed, one type of plant material, the Zabel laurel, will not be available for digging until mid October. These plants pushed heavy late season new growth and the grower advised mid October digging to insure survival. We very much appreciate your understanding in this matter. The balance of our work will be completed on schedule. Very truly yours, Greenscape, Inc. dba EARTH ENTERPRISES Mike Baker, Construction Manager Landscape Construction Department MB:cw cc: JR Lunsford - Ferguson Construction 3006 West Valley Highway North PO Box 330 Auburn, Washington 98071 -0330 206/852 -0091 EARTHE*117PU FAX 833 -7292 qo 4' BRUCE DEES& ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture • Urban Design Site Planning • F crayqe3'c1 Mr. Jack Pace Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Jack, Sincerely, Ray Johnson, ASLA RJ:rmp Enclosure BRUCE DEES & ASSOCIATES d,t jr /�;, "u Job No. 5 -28 -05 RE: BMA/Waterfront Park - Park Luminaire Revision We are requesting a change in park lighting fixtures for the BMA/Waterfront project, Boeing Developmental Center, building permit number 6498, dated March 27, 1991, plan check number 90 -426. Boeing is requesting approval for installing a "Herwig" fixture in lieu of a "Bega" fixture pre - approved by Moira Bradshaw of the City of Tukwila Planning Department. Attached are catalog cuts of both fixtures. Early in our construction document phase, I coordinated the park lighting fixture design with Moira. In our discussions, Moira desired that the "Herwig" fixture (which is existing at Linear Park), and have it continue through the adjoining Waterfront Park. Instead, I negotiated and succeeded in her approval of the "Bega" fixture. Just prior to issuing the construction documents for bidding, our client requested that we change the "Bega" park lighting to the same "Herwig" model Moira originally desired. We complied with our client's wishes, but did not notify Moira of the change to the "Herwig" fixture, on the assumption that she would approve this change. In Moira's plan review (January 23, 1990), she found the "Herwig" fixture non- conforming to the pre- approved "Bega" fixture. Boeing's original response to this review comment was to delete the "Herwig" fixture from the contract. They now want the "Herwig" fixture to be installed, as the added lighting will improve security and safety. The " Herwig" light fixture also fits into the greater context of the Developmental Center by matching fixtures at Linear Park. If you need additional clarification, please contact our office. Your immediate consideration of our request is appreciated. t.C4nt MAY 2 9 1991 PLANNING DEPT, 222 East 26th Street No. 202, Tacoma, WA 98421, (206) 627.7947 FAX (206) 627 -6661 BRUCE DEES& ASSO Dear Moira, Sincerely, Ray Johnson, ASLA RJ:tb Attachment September 17, 1990 Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 BRUCE ! ES & ASSOCIATES 1 Job No. 5 -28 -04 RE: Transmittal Attached are catalogue cuts of the "Bega" pole and luminaire we plan to use for lighting in the Waterfront Park, Boeing North Developmental Center, Tukwila Washington. The style of the luminaire has been coordinated with the Building 9 -12 architect to reflect the character of the building style. Please contact me immediately if you have any questions or concerns regarding the use of this luminaire. MEM MAY 2 9 1991 CITY OF Tvrova.A PLANNING DEPT. Single pole top luminaire with radius arm and pole fitter Sip tits any 3" 0 D. pole top Specular anodized aluminum reflector ' Clear tempered olass Color Black Note 9364M requires a trantormer base on pole for ballast location. Lamp Lumen 9364S 1 50W E•17 HPS 3600 9364M 1 100W E•17 MH 6800 9365S 1 100W E•17 HPS 8550 9365M 1 175W E•23 12 MH 12150 Poles for 9364.9365 — See page 88 Lamb Double pole top luminaire with radius arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Specular anodized aluminum reflector. Clear tempered glass. Color. Black Note 9461M requires a trasnformer base on pole tor ballast location. 9461S 2 50W E•17 HPS 9461M 2 100W E•17 MH 9662S 2 100W E•17 HPS 9662M 2 175W E•23 12 MH Lumen 10800 20400 25650 36450 Poles for 9461.9662 — See page 88 Triple pole top luminaire with radius arm and pole litter. Shp tits any 3•' OD. pole top. Specular anodized aluminum reflector Clear tempered glass. Color Black Note. 9561 M requires a transformer base on pole for ballast location. Lamp 9561S 3 50W E•17 HPS 9561M 3 100W E•17 MH 9264S 3 100W E•17 HPS 9264M 5 t 5:: E•25 1 2 Mr, Lumen 7200 13600 17100 2430(. in/ 956.•9264 S'e naae 68 j riAY« 1991 EEC“.. PLANNING DEPT CONCRETE HANDHOLE TYPE FREE DRAINING GRAVEL e top luminaires _ • a wide beam Tight distnbufion.' " Pile lop luminaires with wide beam rounded symmetrical Tight distribution with excellent glare control Available in two sizes in single, double and triple configurations with a choice of H tight sources . ,;,'Luminaires, arms and poles are integrated into e cohesive unit These luminaires and poles can be supplied in • `"i variety of colors on special order ' 1. KIM DTI '.a� ui�vaatw� PLANNING 1)r ,,T APPLICANT: REQUEST: 2d.bar City Tukwila y u la 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 89- 16 -DR: Boeing 9 -08 Site Boeing Advanced Systems PARKING PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN Approval for parking lot and landscape improvements of an existing paved area and the development of a 9,000 square foot employees cafeteria. LOCATION: 9303 E. Marginal Way South The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on April 26, 1990 , and approved the request subject to the attached condition. The BAR adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the Staff report dated April 12, 1990. Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal. NAME: TITLE: DATE: Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner April 27, 1990 • 89- 16 -DR: Boeing 9 -08 Site BAR Conditions 1 Staff approval of a detailed irrigated landscape plan which provides the following: a. A riparian environment along the riverbank and an minimum five feet of landscaping between the B.E. & C. building and the river, b. The inclusion of alternating trees which will provide significant landscape relief along the west side of the 9 -08 building. c. Benches located throughout the landscape areas. 2. Submittal of a building material more harmonious than the concrete proposed or tint concrete and landscape around structure to soften and minimize significant concrete walls. 3. Submittal of earth tone colors which complement the color on the 9 -08 and 9 -77 structures for the canopies, light fixtures and painted components of the cafeteria. 4. Revision of Cafeteria Elevations to more harmoniously incorporate tower into the overall design and incorporate the steel element into the design of the east elevation. 5. Provision of a gate on the fourth side of the trash enclosure. 6. Submittal pedestrian light fixtures that are harmonious with proposed parking lot fixture and cafeteria design. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 26, 1990 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Flesher, Kirsop and Knudson. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Moira Bradshaw, Molly Headley and Norma Booher. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION THAT A LETTER BE SENT FROM THE MAYOR TO MR. CAGLE THANKING HIM FOR HIS EFFORTS AND HARD WORK ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION; HE HAS BEEN A TREMENDOUS HELP TO THE COMMISSION. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO DELETE THE SECOND SENTENCE IN THE SIXTH PARAGRAPH OF PAGE 1 OF THE MINUTES AND THE WORD "BETTER" IN THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH, PAGE 6, LINES TWO AND THREE, BE SUBSTITUTED WITH THE WORD "DIFFERENT." MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD MARCH 22, 1990 AS AMENDED. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING V 89- 16 -DR: BOEING ADVANCE SYSTEMS - Request for development of curb, gutters, side- walks, covered walkways, seal coat, landscape improvements, and an approximate 9,000 square foot cafeteria and outdoor dining plaze, in an existing paved area located at 9303 East Marginal Way South. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, reviewed the proposal stating the Planning Division staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Staff approval of a detailed irrigated landscape plan which provides the following: a. A riparian environment along the riverbank and a minimum five feet of land- scaping between the B.E. & C. building and the river, b. The inclusion of alternating trees which will provide significant landscape relief along the west side of the 9 -08 building. c. Benches located throughout the landscape areas. 2. Submittal of a building material more harmonious than the concrete proposed or tint concrete and landscape around structure to soften and minimize significant concrete walls. 3. Submittal of earth tone colors which complement the color on the 9 -08 and 9 -77 structures for the canopies, light fixtures and painted components of the cafeteria. 4. Revision of cafeteria elevations to more harmoniously incorporate tower into the overall design'and incorporate the steel element into the design of the east elevation. 5. Provision of a gate on the fourth side of the trash enclosure. 6e Submittal pedestrian light fixtures that are harmonious with proposed parking lot fixture and cafeteria design. Bruce Dees, landscape architect for Boeing, stated the Boeing Company concurs with the recommendatidns of staff. The trees along the river will' be birch; willow and other trees that will blend in with the environment. George Malina, 15617 47th South, asked if the property is subject to the proposed S.A.O. and stated he favored the landscaping along the river bank. The river bank is important in Tukwila. Chairman Haggerton closed the Public Hearing at 8:23 p.m. Mr, Kirsop asked if Boeing has concerns about the revision to the cafeteria referred to in Recommendation #4. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, said this recommendation refers to the "cap" on the east elevation and they have concurred on the recommendation. The Planning Department has received a letter from "Friends of the Duwamish" requesting applicant to improve the fish environment and provide public access. This will be addressed as part of the Shoreline Permit. There are ducks, heron and otter in the area. The site is not open to the public. What happens along the bank affects the fish environment. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVE 89 -16 DR: BOEING ADVANCE SYSTEMS REQUEST, SUBJECT TO THE SIX STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 90 -2 -DR: W. W. Grainger - Request for design review approval for 17,700 square foot addition to warehouse /office /retail use located at 7625 Todd Boulevard. Chairman Haggerton stated he is a small customer of the applicant and he asked if there were any objections from anyone to his presence in this discussion. There were no objections to his presence and consideration of the subject. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, presented the staff report with the Findings and Conclusions, stating staff recommends approval of W. W. Grainger Design Review application subject to the following conditions: 1. A revised site plan showing the following: a. A 20 -foot wide fire lane access (with turnaround if necessary) along the east property line. On the face of the plan, a note shall contain instructions for installing signing of access per Fire Department requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised set of landscape plans to contain the following: a. Six additional deciduous trees (minimum of 1 -3/4" caliper) to be located as follows: J 411 A • 1909 4 City of Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 • Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: • SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared 12 April 1990 26 April 1990 89- 16 -DR: Boeing 9 -08 Site Boeing Advanced Systems Approval for parking lot and landscape improvements of an existing paved area and the development of a 9,000 square foot employees cafeteria. 9303 E. Marginal Way South approximately 31.5 acres Heavy Industry M -2 Heavy Industry Environmental. Impact Statement - April 1987 A. Vicinity Map B. Site Map C. Site Plan D. Cafeteria Elevations E. Shoreline Cafeteria Cross Sections F. Shoreline Slip 6 Cross Sections ,l B.A.S. Staff Report Pg• VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description: The proposal is to seal coat and restripe the parking lot, install landscaping, fencing, and covered walkways; and construct a 9,000 square foot cafeteria. 2. Existing Development: The site is completely paved and developed with seven buildings of varying sizes and a water tank and pump house. 3. Surrounding Land Use: Rhone Poulenc chemical processing plant is located north, the Museum of Flight and Boeing Field are located east of the site, City Light right of way and additional Boeing Advanced Systems facilities are located south, the Duwamish River, City Light sub- station and a marina are located west of the site. 4. Terrain: Flat except for the river bank which generally slopes down at a 2:1 slope and is covered with rip rap. 5. Vegetation: No vegetation on site except for the trees around the 9 -77 building. 6. Access: One access drive is proposed at a new signaled intersection to be called 93rd Place S. and E. Marginal Way S. BACKGROUND FINDINGS The subject site was annexed into the City of Tukwila as part of the Fire District #1 Annexation on March 1, 1989. The City's Shoreline Master Program does not encompass any shoreline north of the 42nd Avenue Bridge. Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173 -19 -044 states that "Until a new or amended program is adopted by the department, any ruling on an application for permit in the annexed shoreline area shall be based on compliance with the preexisting master program adopted for the area." B.A.S. Staff Report pg.3 A building permit application for the 9 -08 building was underway with the County prior to the effective date of annexation and was issued by the County under the authority of an interlocal agreement with Tukwila. At the time of application with the County, Boeing was not planning any improvements within the shoreline environment. Since then, the site improvements described above have been proposed and require a shoreline substantial development permit. 1. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit: Because the proposed improvements are substantial in scope and cost and within two hundred feet of the shoreline, the applicant must receive a shoreline substantial development permit. The Planning Director must approve, approve with conditions or deny the application and shall use the policies and regulations of the King County Shoreline Master Program. The notice and comment period of shoreline application will expire on the 15th of May, at which time any conditions of the Board of Architectural Review will be folded into the decision of the Director. On April 11, 1990, the City received a letter from a member of the Friends of the Duwamish regarding the subject proposal. Their concerns were that the Boeing Company is not water dependent or water related and therefore there ought to be public access and fish habitat improvements as part of the project. The goals of the shoreline act are generally to preserve the natural character of the shoreline; result in long term over short term benefit; and to protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline. The act is intended to plan for the use, protection, restoration, and preservation of shorelines. The purpose of the County's urban environment, as this area is designated, is to ensure optimum utilization of shorelines and to enhance and maintain the shoreline for a multiplicity of urban uses. It is expected that urban shorelines would be redeveloped with a higher intensity of use. The following are the specific policies relating to this environment: 1. Emphasis should be given to development within already developed areas. B.A.S. Staff Report pg.4 2. Priority should be given to shoreline dependent and water oriented uses over other uses. Uses which are neither shoreline dependent or water oriented should be discouraged except for residential. 3. Emphasis should be given to developing visual and physical access to the shoreline in the Urban Environment. 4. To enhance the waterfront and insure maximum public use, industrial and commercial facilities should be designed to permit pedestrian waterfront activities consistent with public safety and security. 5. Multiple use of the shoreline should be encouraged. 6. Redevelopment and renewal of substandard areas should be encouraged in order to accommodate future users and make maximum use of the shoreline resource. 7. Aesthetic considerations should be actively promoted by means of sign control regulations, architectural design standards, planned unit development standards, landscaping requirements and other such means. 8. Development should not significantly degrade the quality of the environment. , including water quality and air quality, nor create conditions which would accentuate erosion, drainage problems or other adverse impacts on adjacent Environments. Based on the above policies, the Planning Director, as part of the permit, will require that the fence be setback from top of bank beyond the park. The relocation of the fence out of the river environment will improve the waterfront and serve in the restoration of the character of the shoreline. DECISION CRITERIA This project is subject to Board review due to its location adjacent to the shoreline. Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 5 18.60.050: General Review Criteria. (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Transition Landscaping, sidewalks and connections into the site are provided from E. Marginal Way and form the Developmental Center into the subject site. A complete sidewalk along E. Marginal Way S. and the minimum 15 foot front yard landscaping is not indicated but will be installed as a minimum requirement. Sidewalks from the various parking areas are indicated on the site plan. Boeing uses a lighted pedestrian canopy to provide weather cover over many of its sidewalks as well as along E. Marginal Way S. at a proposed future transit stop. Screening The 31.5 acre site has numerous buildings, separated by vast areas of parking. The County shoreline code requires the perimeter of outdoor parking areas to have a minimum of width five feet landscaping. The majority of the site is shown with the minimum landscaping required. However, the parking area in the north half of the site does not meet this requirement. Currently trees are shown planted in the rip rap of the shoreline bank. The service area associated with the cafeteria is located on the east side of the structure towards the parking lot and away from the riverfront. A pedestrian entrance is located on this east side as well. As the site is currently completely paved, the landscaping proposed will be an improvement. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 6 Height /Scale The heights of the structures are disparate around this industrial district, therefore no attempt is made to review the relationship of height and size of buildings on site. The cafeteria however is scaled for its pedestrian environment in the river front park. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Texture /Line /Mass The criteria relating to harmony in lines and masses is inappropriate in this neighborhood. The adjoining sites are a jumble of structures indicative of an industrial area. There are tanks and piped conveyance systems to the north, towers for navigation and radar systems, and an odd assortment of buildings to accommodate the cyclical flow of employees and services for the employees and plant to the south. The relative low scale of the cafeteria, twenty five feet, is however well suited to the pedestrian environment being created along the shoreline and that continues east along Cambridge Court. Landscape Transition The south side of the site is a City Light right -of -way which Boeing has leased and improved with a linear park called Cambridge Court. The west or river side of the site will be improved with a riverfront park that averages about 70 feet in depth. The north side of the site has riverbank and shared property line with Rhone Poulenc, a chemical plant. The landscaping is sporadic and minimal along this side of the site. The north riverfront is a former slip for ships and has piers extending out over the riverbank. (See Attachment F) A helistop is conceptually planned for one of the piers but is not part of B.A.S. Staff Report Pg• this application. The west, north and east perimeter of the site are fenced with an 8 foot chain link topped with three strands of barbed wire which is antithetical to use and structures appropriate to a shoreline. As was mentioned in Background, the Planning Director will request the fence be relocated as part of the shoreline permit process. Circulation Compatibility A special loading and service area is planned for the cafeteria and is accessible from the driveway. The loading dock is perpendicular to a vehicular aisle which will ease backing or maneuvering for service /delivery trucks and is recessed twenty feet from the edge of curb. The minimum size required by code is twelve by thirty feet. The applicant is proposing one vehicular entrance and a new traffic signal on E. Marginal Way S. that will be labeled S. 93rd Place. (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 8 Existing Topography The most significant and important topographic and landscape feature of the site is the Duwamish River, which is designated a river of statewide significance. The site is paved to the edge of top of bank where one foot square creosote posts are bolted to the ground. The eight foot tall chain link fence with three strand barbed wire atop the fence separates the site from the water. The bank, which is covered with rock boulders, then descends at an approximate 2:1 slope into the water along all waterfronts. The north river area has a series of concrete platforms that extend out over the river on piers. Grades The grades of the parking area will remain level and therefore safe. The grades in the liner waterfront park will be changed to create berms and some variation in the landscaping which will facilitate pedestrian views along the river. Landscape Enhancement Features and Protection Trees line the major access drives and pedestrian corridors and will be used in all planting areas and curbing is proposed around the edges of the landscape areas, which will protect the plant material. The west wall of the existing 9 -08 is approximately eighty -four by three hundred and forty feet tall which is equal to 28,560 square feet of flat unrelieved wall facing the shoreline and park. A row of trees is proposed along the wall adjacent to the pedestrian canopy and walkway. A tall pyramidal tree alternating with a contrasting tree would add variety and interest and would help soften the appearance of the massive building. The dumpster is located in the southwest corner of the site and is shown screened on three sides by a concrete wall and landscaping on two sides. The plant material does not indicate whether it will be effective in summer and winter. The applicant's written response indicates evergreen planting around the dumpster area. Exterior Lighting B.A.S. Staff Report Pg. 9 The applicant is proposing two types of light fixtures for the site. The standard parking lot fixture is a sixteen foot tall concrete aggregate pole with a brown anodized aluminum square fixture which duplicates the lights that are currently installed around the Developmental Center. Nothing has been chosen for the pedestrian fixture around the cafeteria and waterfront park. (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, for and siting should be used to provide visual interest. Architectural Quality and Detail The cafeteria will consist of painted steel support structure, concrete and glass walls, and painted metal roof. The architect and landscape architect have collaborated to integrate the structure with the landscape. The structure extends out into the landscape with concrete retaining walls and with earth berming. The wing -like retaining walls will be conveniently sized to allow pedestrian seating and provide enclosure and transition between the outdoor plaza and the pedestrian environment of the park. The structure will have a steeply sloping roof from west to east. At the roof's high point of twenty -five feet along the river front will slope to fourteen feet on the bottom of the eave on the east side. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 10 On the west side of the structure, the painted steel tubular element with its geometric pattern combined with the glass wall will have a light, airy expansive character that will be visually interesting. In contrast the east side will be composed of geometric squares and rectangles that are juxtaposed in a three - dimensional pattern that's sculpturally interesting and fairly well balanced. From the north or south elevation, the tower extending from the mechanical enclosure does not fit with the downward transition of height from west to east. From east elevation, the tower does not relate to the blocky, low, horizontal pattern. Ancillary Equipment, The mechanical equipment will be enclosed in the east portion of the building inside concrete walls with the narrower tower that extends above the enclosure discussed above. Color Earth tone color is proposed for the building which is compatible with the color used throughout much of the Developmental Center but could contrast with the color of the dominate 9 -08 and 9 -77 buildings and new radar tower which are a Sea Foam green. The Sea Foam is light but with a warm tone that could be matched with an earth tone. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture There is no miscellaneous furniture shown. Lighted pedestrian canopies used throughout the Developmental Center will be included in the site improvements. The metal supports are painted the chocolate brown and have a milky concave plexi -glass or plastic cap. The three sided enclosure for the dumpster is proposed to be of concrete duplicative of the cafeteria. The open side will be to the north facing the pedestrian entrance. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 11 CONCLUSIONS 1. An opportunity exists at the the riverbank and to provide the rip rapped riverbank and Therefore, a minimum of five should be provided along the east end of slip six to enhance a landscaped transition between the paved parking area. feet of riparian landscaping east end of slip six. 2. The steel element is a dominate feature of the cafeteria's design on the east side of the structure. If you look at the west side and then the east side, they could be two completely different buildings. Some attempt to carry the steel girder system through to the other major entry way would provide a continuity of building identity. 3. The tower element sticks up, is out of scale, and at odds with the general side view and front view of the cafeteria. The tower element should therefore be scaled or enclosed to relate to the proportions and lines of the dominate building lines and pattern. 4. The concrete used in the cafeteria is a new element on site and not consistent with the dominate building skins of the 9 -08 and 9 -77. Because the area is industrial, the proposed architectural concrete may not be out -of- character; however, a more harmonious, higher quality material consistent with the smooth, slightly shiny skin of the 9 -08 and 9 -77 buildings may be more appropriate for an employee cafeteria. 5. The Duwamish River although heavily altered by man still provides interest and amazement because of nature coexisting with industrial activity along a heavily developed shoreline. The applicant takes advantage of this environment by locating their employees cafeteria and a pedestrian pathway and park along the shoreline. The design of the landscaping however should be more reflective of a riparian environment rather than a park -like one. The plant palette is proposed to be trees, sod and shrubs. In order to satisfy the criteria relating to Landscape and Site Treatment, choice of materials should be more indicative of the water environment and a river shoreline. The berming will enhance the view potential from the site, but benches with backs should be installed in numerous locations along the riverfront for pedestrian enjoyment. B.A.S. Staff Report pg.12 6. To provide greater harmony on the site, in an district which has many competing design elements, the pedestrian lighting proposed by the applicant should be of a scale, a material and a design that complement the industrial nature of the site and project. 7. The two dominate colors at the Boeing Development Center are the traditional cream and chocolate brown and the newer Sea Foam Green used on the new massive structures that have been built. These two colors contrast and the "earth tone" colors proposed by the applicant for the subject project should attempt to complement them. 8. The open side to the dumpster enclosure faces the pedestrian entrance to the cafeteria. A gate would allow personnel to dump trash as well as haul it off but would screen the facility during the times when access is unnecessary. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Staff approval of a detailed irrigated landscape plan which provides the following: a. A riparian environment along the riverbank and an minimum five feet of landscaping between the B.E. & C. building and the river, b. The inclusion of alternating trees which will provide significant landscape relief along the west side of the 9 -08 building. c. Benches located throughout the landscape areas. 2. Submittal of a building material more harmonious than the concrete proposed or tint concrete and landscape around structure to soften and minimize significant concrete walls. B.A.S. Staff Report pg. 13 3. Submittal of earth tone colors which complement the color on the 9 -08 and 9 -77 structures for the canopies, light fixtures and painted components of the cafeteria. 4. Revision of Cafeteria Elevations to more harmoniously incorporate tower into the overall design and incorporate the steel element into the design of the east elevation. 5. Provision of a gate on the fourth side of the trash enclosure. 6. Submittal pedestrian light fixtures that are harmonious with proposed parking lot fixture and cafeteria design. KING MINTY AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER (FM) PROJECT SITE FROM SEATTLE - TACOMA AIRPORT FROM DOWNTOWN SEATTLE �OMTE I P�MIR YAW 9 -08 BLDG. VICINITY MAP 599 FROM KENT Z AUBURN EXIT 157 900 NO SCALE ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B AMENDMENT TO 9-08 SHORELWIE PERMIT APPUCATION BOEING CAFETERIA SITE PLAN 0 50 SCALE 25100 OnostART RIME wATERiRORT .ARK (LOLAR PARK E]TENSTOTS SLP NO. 6 T APPLICATION) )I • APRT. 6. 1900 CillUESI ASSOCIATES WO: NY.•IMP• Ias MP. (_btl0_ :0=0D11=N'AP o_IO_:O_:Q_1041 `�C� \.• �, ., •\ \\\ \ \\\N OA STALLS TIO] LOT MECUMS) EO]/TALLI TIN IOTONEOIfD) "/�t!�'lf /,�<lifl ►�) 1///1//llftilet/fl /e//f/////lit/Z/7 fllf aNOIEDWALR COMM MAUI awNliwAIIOIO MA • /r ri�UAPN1OOTW --f rmTsq� x OUTDOOR 001003 1DMACE I ,ray H]n.UTN.IIIIIIII� U f I 111111111111 11 1-11-1 I I i1,11i1 11 11 m •'1MC 'N n•m 11111 193 NEW CAFETERIA BUILDING _L _--_J COMERS TEMJIwAr—J 1111111111111H u TTN /OA10N1 LOT INLTIM IIIICUWAII ]6] STALLS TIN LOT SANE L01ED) • RIL 1— __---�i-i r '""T I_ ITN nAL11 TIN IAA010 LOTS —L 101 — 4 I1 I1,1r, II{� /NOTTTacN10 i r TIMM MT ST MO APPUCA -- OI1.6TIII w. CONCRETE]OREN WALL E]6TR10 UNFAIR PAAAC Arima 411 iQ :416:1!7:4 w�a watZ •OPAEN1TwP� TT STALLS 000IQ01E0) I 1 II IIIIIII!IIII I TAUS( ACCESS ONLY AT TIN WI fit). �11'. ik 41 , nN�� ;e ao'E .:E `ara-wtld-r '.00 `-e�� — — 0 0O N 100 1I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I III111111111 l�ill!fllilillII["\ 170 STALLS IOII 1141 OL0n.AA010 MACRO them mu MIT ..IC • Ram `g 'I IMO Illa 111 • 1•11=11111M 1 /11'11, CONCM1 - r -:rn ir'lr.Aeerl.e LMOING 0 4CLO EYCLO .G1L suite FLOOR J vie ►I.• II �l TRY og RIVER EAST ELEVATION Nbtk MAVI• IN= 1 1l 'II�� 1111 %/ l �'I I YI i • % vna I i,1 , vi SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SIMILAR WEST ELEVATION ANUHG Ellawbf BOEING CAFETERIA SCALE I /8".eOe DUWAMISH RIVER Li EXIST. TOP OF BANK 110.5 EXTREME HIGH WATER 109.5 ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE (HWL) 105.3 WATERFRONT PARK EXIST. FENCE EXIST. EDGE OF PAVING EXIST. RIP -RAP SHORELINE PAVED PATH OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE SECTION X TYP. CONDITION CAFETERIA SHORELINE SECTION DINING ROOM KITCHEN/ SUPPORT APPROX. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 114.5 EXISTING GRADE SCALE: 1 =20' IrO i DATUM BERM PARKING ACCESS ROAD CURBS EX,T Tor so - ExTIS tE 14-i644. — 1a11t - G cowthE Y - I 0. r. EGA op r ii i • 1[KT. tti64+WaTEau t .) 165 3 •XK tR'r- NW Si-facie-444g- \ / NEIL) 9- E et.s 4. SECTION A TYP.CONDITION DUWAMISH RIVER 1.1k1CAIA P4R.IC- �XTEt�1 l (S 931z? PG46Y•E) L444J� -. 1 PE EUFPEFZ ACC E rAvep PAU coy wamAcwAY SECTION B TYP. CONDITION SLIP 6 9 -08 BLDG SHORELINE SECTIONS PA kici G- 'EALvpdT prim TKI PE-) EX !Woo c L, vT4 SLIT' a EXIST Tar or PANS tlC 1 F - Z H k161E rluvr PA tNrola6Pf wo..7 f oRVII TAZii eXts ?• r-ruca I 1 14I64 14 ax rsT- conk. But. r�D4v ) (\ II UNE(IIUA,) to5.s EXIST. RIP –RAP ■\ I t SCALE: 1' =20' BOEING DATUM =1 City of Tukwila PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6300 Southcenier Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Ross A. Earnst, P.E. Director M E M O R A N D U M I TO: Moira Bradshaw FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: April 11, 1990 SUBJECT: Boeing 9 -08 Building - Land Use (Shoreline) Review Public Works Department has reviewed the subject plan and the following comments need be addressed in a site plan submittal to the City Public Works Department. 1. Provide a letter of availability for sewer and water from the City of Seattle. 2. Provide a Developer's Agreement to Ron Cameron for F.E.I.S. traffic mitigation, as identified in January letter. 3. Relocate fire line 10 ft. away from building. No structures shall be placed over utilities, including fire lines. 4. Identify the type of materials for new hydrants (per City of Tukwila Water Development Standards). 5. Review fire loop /hydrant additions with the Tukwila Fire Marshall (Nick Olivas) and the Rating Bureau for compliance. 6. Identify storm roof drains and identify undergrounding these roof drains into the parking lot drainage system. 7. Identify landscape irrigation and provide an O.C.P. approved landscape irrigation plan. Swales are suggested for direct runoff of storm drainage on parking lot into green areas and transmitted into a storm system, if possible. 8. Provide lowest floor elevation of restaurant and reference N.G.V.D. datum so the City may make appropriate xc: Attachments (1) PF /amc:1:9 -08 determination with regards to flood protection measures. 9. Change Cast Iron designation to class 52 duct iron pipe on your standards notes. 10. The City Development Standards for water, sewer, sidewalks, etc., shall be met. Identify this requirement on the plans. 11. Revise notes: 2" PVC or galvanized? 12. Relocate storm line from under building. The utilities including storm mains shall not be located at the building structures. Requested is six (6) sets of site plans along with the filled in Utility Permit Application form (enclosed) to my attention. Ron Cameron Ross Heller Pat Brodin Ted Freemire Development File: Boeing 908 Building (Restaurant Addition) Metro Water Quality Lab - Awarded an A.I.A. Design Honor Award, Seattle Chapter, 1986 Kgy Plant Name Planting Schedule PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 9 -08 BUILDING PARKING & ROADSIDE AREAS Si .g Spacing Acer Rubrum 2" caliper As shown. Turfgrass Sod (Includes Linear Park Extension) c) Shrubs (See Linear Park Extension Plant Schedule) r ; l::jL= y ` 31 41jr r4)V . 2 21'9'89 NOTE: All landscaped areas shall have automatic irrigation systems. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 9 -08 BUILDING LINEAR PARK EXTENSION NOTE: All landscaped areas shall have automatic irrigation systems. Planting Schedule KEY BOTANICAL NAME SIZE .. REMARKS TREES Acer paimatum 21 /2" cal. B & B Ligustrum japonica (tree form) 1 1 /2' cal. Container lagnolia kobus 2" cal. B & B Magnolia soulangiana 2" cal. B & B Magnolia stellata 2" cal. B & B Photinia fraseri (tree form) • 1 1 /2" cal. B & B • Prunus serrulata 'Shirofugen' 3" cal. B & B Prunus serru ita 'Wrote,' (Mt. Fugi) 3" cal. B & B Prunus yedoensis 'Akebono' 3" al. B & ;lynx japonica 2" al. B & B SHRUBS c Melia grandiflora 'Edward Boucher' 15" -18" Container &lea Ami Gni 11"-15" Container ilea Rosebud 10 " -12" Container Arbutus undo 3'-4' B & B Cotinus coggygr 3 in '-4' B & B Cornus moms ' 3'-4' B & B Riga odors 12 "-13" Container scallonia exoniensis 'Fradesii' 13 "-18" Container PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 9 -08 BUILDING LINEAR PARK EXTENSION (Cont.) NOTE: All landscaped areas shall have automatic irrigation systems. KEY c BOTANICAL NAME SIZE REMARKS SHRUBS (CONTINUED) I ie mer ocall is fulva 2 Gal. Container Ilex crenata 15 " -18" Container Pieris japonicum 'Flame of Forest' 15"-18" Container Prunus laurocerasus 'Schipkanensis' • 1 Gal. Container Rhodod A. Bedford 18"-21" B &B Rhododendron Blue Diamond 12 "-15" B & B Rhododendron Blue Tit 15 "-18" B & B Rhododendron Cotton Candy 18"-21" B & B Rhododendron Mrs. Furnival's Daughter 15" -18" B & B Rhododendron Mrs. G.Y. Leak 18"-21" B & B hiok ids indica 'Springtime' 18"-21" Container Rhododendron Liam Valet 18 B & B Rhododendron Purple Splendor -12` -15" Container immia japonica 12 " -15' Container bringa vulgaris Purple 2' -3' Container Viburnum tinus 2' -3' Container Viegela farida 2'-3' Container GROUND COVER (UNDER SHRUBS) • Arctostaphyllos uva -ursi 4" pot 18" O.C. Hedera helix 'Hahn' 4" pot 18" O.C. Hyperioum oalycinum 4" pot • 18" O.C. Vinci minor - Blue 4" pot 18" 0.C. DIAVAM I SH R 'VER OAP • 00 Ms 0 OK l• Wm! 00Di 0 NW V/ awe ii 131 c avoLD.c NM 1 PS EASTINGPARKIGIGLOT LIGHTING I • • EX1S;. SLIP OVERALL SITE PLAN god 1 • 11• .11.111.111 NEW LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP.) 015.114 2•27.IN (AIM) EXISTING 9-77 RANGE BUILDING 72 IN 0.797S 1030 905.55 SAN. PUP 50. MEI CCIONOLLEN cEP 0 AUBURN. 04. 98002 0 KLIMA& .10. 55007 WAIW D LtRLT1. 04.98201 101, AS 0A•11100 D KENT 04.93031 ▪ PORTLAPCOR. 97220 RCNION_, IVA 98355 • SEATTLE. va. 98124 J MIXPLOA.T. A. ea awe 0/0.1P•11..•=11 4 611171.1 dapre 4 4t7 • . • IMRE Siff - IONIAN 910 Oak I. RINIOCC/01 NM MAUNA , 104.4t PM A KAMM . . : :•18171C4701 AN TIE sum. rect.: • 0 .. . - • ' ' .... . 4:11:1101' LiC47106 Or INEININC7 • - • -PAM TO 06TALIMC 1000C • - 0:1. 4. NU OM INT IOW= f BEY • LOOM. MN 110114 POL1 TO IOU- • ' " 5. UK UTILITY Wag W. 1324 NINES • 110100L°01 IIPP0041) (010) PIP •TTESE 511505. NO ALL UOITS IMMO 10 PtANTED WAS. La:5. lIt&�i1 STINNINS. sat t303, (OM 5. 011110OR PCW AM 0■08 OFFICE BUILDING 00A CO OIL P.C. O AY 74 5 A90ratlat• and Finish ' Content Color - ••� Brown -- Black Grey White Buff Green Natural Mold Finish - 0111 0 211 400 8104 19'- 5" 5-34 " Natural Polished 0112 0212 0312 r 0412 0 512 0012 Natural Exposed 0113 0213 tr 0413 0513 0013 Terrazzo Polished 0122 0 222 #322 , 0 422 0 522 0 522 Terrazzo Exposed 0123 0 223 0323 0 423 0 523 0 023 Sonora Gold • Polished 0 532 0 332 . Sonoma Gold Exposed 0 233 0 333 Pole Daly- nation P01. Night Above Ground 13'- 1" Bottom Diameter 6-Ii " Solt Circle Diameter 1114" WITH W'st24 "114" ANCHOR BOLT Ultimate G,L.Monient (tt. lbs.) - 11,060 Weight (Ibs.) 1100 880-4 8504 1f'- 5" 5-We 11,970 400 8104 19'- 5" 5-34 " 12,980 510 8504.5 21'- 4" 6-1/1" 13,920 565 •020 8804 23'- 0" Sours" 13,680 Pole Dale- nation Height Above Ground 9' -10" Em- bedded De . 3'- 3" Over. all Length 13'- 1" Bottom Diameter 5-i4 Ultimate Q.L. Moment (It. tbs.) 9,940 Weight - (lba.) 170 8E0-3 8504 13'- 1" 3'- 3" 15'- 4" 5-?A" 11,060 M. 18E042 17'- 0" 4'- 3"21 4 4" -33 " 33'- 0" II-in" Sours" 12,980 13,880 , 540 010 8EO -5.7 19 = r FROM BE AND C BLD7 30 10.31.1989 15120 Anna and tlxtur s mown S : .Ter Illusaatlon only. lllae aacef,Or1 $ **Won kr available Komi — . SBQ TYPE . F,& __ Seattle Lighting Fixture 0322 -4818 SMALL • BASE PLAT! - SQUARE 3aQ -s -.313 S E Q SMALL - EMBEDDED - SQUARE APPEARANCE CODE P. 2 18.6h/Cer. MOUNTING HEIGHTS FROM 9'10" TO 23'0 CENTRECON, INCORPORATED Page -810.0 IP'''' 1 1 . ..-.r: :� • FROM BE RND C BLD7 30 • mil • •` • .. • • 91" Clear Cowr (rYA Hand Ho Frame Oa. Nax4" Ban Copper Oroundwire Wire Clamp Pape - 510.1 TYPICAL POLO SECTION • (2) s r dia. Counterslnke 2.94" or 2-9" Cast Alum. Tenon. Alloy 5" (2) Si" x'A" '7 Plat Head C Machine Screws Csst Alum. 0etltr 1'ernaHoy 5 4" tq. (2) W' x a " Anchor Bolts POLE TOP MOUNTING DETAIL (8) .197" dia Prestressing Steel Wires ASTM A•421 •- -1-sne" Wali fryp•1 Oa. 013 Spiel Steel Wire at 3• Pitch, • A$TN A-s; Oa, 011 Longitudinal Steel Win''. Welded to Splrsl Wks Aatm A -e2 • 18.31.1989 15121 P. 3 GENERA[ . ]NFORMATION sect SERIES (1) Cut sturrtinum pole top tenons are available In 2 -7/8" O.D. and 2 -3/8" O.D. size. (2) Standard hand hole size Is 1- 5/8 "x8 ", 18" above the ground line. with'cast aluminum frame, cover and stainless steel screws. Tamper -proof screws .available on request. For or Anchor Base Series, standard galvanized anchor bolts are 3/4 "x24 "x4" with • hex nuts and washers. Anchor bolts circle is SE S (1) Cast aluminum pole top tenons are available In 2-7/8" O.D. and 2 -3/8" O.D. sizes. (2) Standard hand hole size is 1.5/8 "xG ".18" above the ground line, with cast aluminum frame, cover and stainless steel screws. Tamper -proof screws available on request: (3) For "6" Embedded Series;;standard cable entrance Is 1- S /8 "x8' ; 18" below the ground line. ,, LOADING Luminsirei :(8y Others) Maximum effective area or 3.4sq. ft. at pole top. Maxlmum,welght • 7OIbs. at pole top. : Loading calculated for 104 M.P.H. winds; (3) For higher loadings consult Centrecon. (4) S "'dia. Holes en 11 144 "die. • Belt Circle • .for K" dia. —' Anchor Sons. MOUNTING HEIGHTS FROM 8'10" TO 23'0" 03 Reinforcing Bar. Mb; I \x:118 \ \ \` • • a mm eta Prestressing wire. STANDARD BASE PLATE (, • •" . . • FROM BE AND C OLD? 30 ecutive • :. .� + • :'4 • • • .• Extruded Aluminum Arm Door Frame woes section extruded aluminum • 1:1 • • Tie Rods ,•: Extruded Aluminum Indwell • (Mounting Arrangements) Primary Disconnect 1Woatt 90' 10.31.1909 1S123 Behest Components removable as a unh nopy F ormed aluminum LENS FRAME AND SEALED OPTICAL ASSEMBLY Extruded Aluminum Peer Prsnie Three t 90' ' Throe at 120' �y N Y n '�'+ ?'•�'' . M , e ~' .y.: i.'i . i.�f��,+; t 1�i �: y .l..'Y t ; �''• : f1 • %T . r . . .•7 t J• •: � t.} • ,' •�� •• ,4... ". r51.•,..*.*:.:' ` 'fin .. i i J Optional Tilt Fitter P. ded L.P.D.M. Casket Clear Tempered Glass Lan* Reflector Housing hydrodormed aluminum extruded hinged and removable aluminum Lamp rip -T mogul socket / !last Tray Lens ' t extruded aluminum tempered glass E.RD.M. Hydro-Formed Aluminum Reflector • Latch push 'Ong ,four at 90° : fee. , �,� FROM BE AND C BLD7 30 NOW TO ORDER ( Build the order number In the follow- ing sequence: 1. Series Code 2. Luminaire Size 30 3. Diffuser Code Clear Glass 4. Luminaire Arrangement 10 - Single • JS• Two at 180° 29 -- Two at 90° 32 - Three at 120° • 39 -- Three at'90° 49 - Four at 90° S. Reflector Options Code 2 IES Type 11 Az= IES Type III 6- IES 1'�ipeV F -- Forward Throw Distribution G. Luminaire Options Code P - Photoelectric Control Receptacle HS -- House Side Cut -off Shield TF - Tilt Fitter SG --• Polycarbonate Stone Guard FL - Fuse Luminaire PP - Fuse Pole N....� Options Not Required . 7. Lamp Wattage 8. Lamp Type Code M -- Mercury Vapor 11 - Metal Halide 7 High- Pressure Sodium 1 - Incandescent 9. Primary Volta e 208 480 240 VND (voltage not determined) 10. Luminaire Finish Code (from fold -out page 38) . 11. Pole or Bracket Code Cross - reference Luminaire Size (Step 2) and Luminaire Arrange- ment (Step 4) with the Wind Load Rating Table below to select the appropriate pole or bracket from fold -out page 36. Wind Load Rating Table Luminaire Size Luminaire Arrangement 10 28 29 32 39 49 20 1.4 2.8 2.8 3.6 9.8 4.4 25 2.5 5.0 5.0 8.3 6.3 7.8 30 3.4 6.7 6.7 8.8 8.6 10. 10.31.1989 15,22 Sample Specification (. The luminaire sidow3lle shall be •miter -bend construction from a single piece of aluminum extrusion, alloy 8063.T6. Crowned aluminum sheet canopy, crimped and seated to hous- ing. Finishing on housing shall be The flat, thermal and Impact tom- pered, clear glass lens 1s set into ex- truded aluminum lens frame, sealed with an EPDM gasket. Door frame as- sembly shall be removable. The door to be hinged with aluminum pins and retained with quick release safety latch. EX20 available with choice of IES II, IES 111, or IES V- Square or F available ) with I Si p1, IES III IES V Square, or F (Forward) pattern. Re- flector is precision hydroformed aluminum, chem brightened and anodized to semi- specuier finish; and reflector system Is sealed to pre- vent entrance of dust or moisture.U� Reflector systems hinged and latched to gasketed door frame for easy cleaning or removal. A discon- nect shall belumished inside the fix- ture so that when the door frame is opened, the ballast primary drouit is broken, thereby allowing the fixturo to be serviced without shock hazard. Lamp socket shall have nickel plated current carrying parts with lamp grip. Ballast components mounted on a separate finned heat -sink extrusion having quick release fasteners that 'operate without loots' Ballast shall be capable of starting watts at type of lamp of _. .._, voltage down to -20° F. The 200° C. 600 -volt Insulated wiring shall be installed between the ballast components and the socket. The standard arm assembly shall be a rectangular aluminum extrusion com- plete with non -slip tie rod channels serving as a compression member with two threaded and galvanized steel tie rods and lock nuts In tendon between pole and luminaire, The Lu- minaire shall bear the listing mark of Underwriters Laboratory Fixtures suitable for wet locations Footnotes: 1. Model EX30 reflect system is dieformed, not sealed. 2. Type F (Forward) reflectors are bright pebbled aluminum sheet; not seated. 9. Model EX30 ballast components 5 mounted on removable plate. hp a SAMPLE gi , 4 ORDER NUMBER: EX 20 A 21 $ 14 150 8 277 C RT132s41 O N Executive TYPE z : , CS Seattle Lighting Fixture 8622-4816 STERNER 13 W.MAROIMAI. WAY MANUFACTURING OFFICE BMA PARKING VERSUS SQUARE FOOTAGE 2.054,959af OM 1 STALL PER 1,000af 1.197.908e1 ® 2.5 STALLS PER 1 ,000af = TOTAL TOTAL STALLS AVAILABLE SURPLUS STALLS 8,782 3.732 2.055 2,995 5.050 SERVICE SINGLE ENTRY EXIT POINT INTO PARK PEOPLE FLOW REDUCE SCALE OF BUILDING SCIENTIFIC TREES SLIDING PANELS LANDSCAPE SCHEME DROP OFF_ WALL ELEMENTS SLIDE INTO PARK -4 - CANOPY 1 3 PLAN CONCEPT 1 " = 20 FT. SKYLIGHT AT ENTRY/SERVERY DOMINANT & SUBORDINATE ROOFS BERMS AND WALL EXPRESSION FROM PARKING CANOPY ROOF FORM AT DINING 1" = 20 FT, 4 ROOF APPROACH 1 4 4 1 4 4 4 ' 4• _ . 7 i � y� i = r r ' 5 AERIAL VIEW FROM PARKING f J 1 o z z 0 m -a \ ■ •I . \ ‘ 0 \ osim■ -"Iula- i , - $1,1 -,...re:-A,- ---. - -. .:k I. .\A . s.. N =!:--- it) ..\,...,. .:N..k, 1 ...\ ' ' 1 1::. lifiliWi . 11:9 . I OWA! k - ' itifilliiilillowir •Eili, thil i maim ihNlito,.% , ,.................. ... .:: ..:. • emitutorAgo ''' • _ . • .• .... TIP: Raw Igt. % h. IIIIIIIIIIJ !711.1111M12i117:51215' '‘1 "'-'11F111 iii, ib;4''lk X , . I . . 1., t pi , 5; 11.4;.3141 ekur irc -_,.--,„,rp,, rt , aortigio got oi , 4 1 44 -6POMP.c.11F s ...mes. Ira . _,„,k 11 1%1WW11.1■111 1 11. v1Pablf NV I I IIPIA1-•■■ OVI%iat I ' •. in MI _AI :zit - --mmicutim. NI 1 ISZ-1 P B' Amok 2,Plii 10112ENTAL SIDDC 3' 19EO5ITE SCIINtK. FUEL 11.23 Q Q 4 4 1 1 s011 PENOC SE I DETAILS SIX A-23A TOP OF KKK= A11111111 r�r IT✓_ :��: 1=111•1• MINE 11 111tttfAt• MINN NORTH ELEVATION 3412 FO• E.10110R OOOI SEC R.F. DETAILS FIFTN FLOQI EL. ISA' -2' FIRST RIP 11.100'-00 RI0410E YAMFACTUE'S STA101W EDGE MID. FEDIDETER OF RIOCIOUT PA ELS. 116 ALL MAD or sown KNEED 1RIY. �I�tt �' • .• .,aa Ilc. ICE •-40 3 S111. •-3AD SIY. 012111E SIEPOOEO CEILI•8 Y.I.C. PRONICE WALE SIIA R{MQS, PERIMETER EE omtUR PAYE. COSA U2tW LL0 10 W R11P/US ONEA MOIOI E l Rua 03Y0581t YETAL M1ILDIC PANEL 3'1 INA. SRO PNR1TICN ME ICS TIDE FPT. A-3 108 TEES 0811 WALL SECTION @ FIRST FLOOR n ]/I• • I• -0 62�2J NO SIY. OOLINE3S ACCESS t FLO. Y.I.C. 1 ogLw 1 8 �ev 0 AUBURN. WA. 98002 tsvM■t1rt 17 -T" NORTH ELEVATION 0 BELLEVUE, WA. 98007 min= a ‘ .....0 F frtw /OE/AF 0 EVERETT. WA.98201 .....o. .., WI S ` FACILLT IES DEPMTAEx1 17 KENT. INA.99031 0 PON 9-08 OFFICE BUILDING %LANG. OR. 97220 0 RENTON. WA.98055 ∎ M • SEATTLE. WA.98124 A , ., h 648 " COL F/A O.C. 051 PE DUCTIUI/Ptv1S106 A ple+tRi& 0.,00 ANIMA CC 03 who 3210 Ag INvotiel ..Y - A-25 FA002 S 08 -823 �ZO� 19 18 17 I6 15 !4 13 12 II 10 '�' 1.0.PEMTIOISE PARAPET SIM FOR PEM11a1SE A-2 A2 rid Ea ' CETAILS SEE A -23A _. 161'a f1 MEM LaIR��.`AR NUMMI �■ wMww�1■ 0 P�6 1C21200AL SID3C 3' (TOME dHL01K, P3I A -2 1 raalw sow 161 LINE LI .a. PPP 19„ Q ROOF PARAPET I_.n.16.• -I• EL. 1 TO' -II' 1.016Xr SLAB FIfiH rim n.I16' -2' FORTH ROM TWO n011 n.132'a SCO70 ROM n.116' -0 FIRST FISCR EL.103'-00' r. •-• FOR EXTERIOR MOS SEE a KTAILS EAST ELEVATION FIFTH n031 . n.IN' -2' FORUM ROM EL. 148'-3 73110 ROM . n.I32' 8' SECOD FLOOR • n.I1i' -0' FIRST 7L0011 * EL 100'-00 LATCH LII[ 3/32' -0' I13TE: 'S' COWES 3PRNURn PUSS IN InIC06 FRAIE. T 7 I FOR ACCESS PORT DETAILS SEE A-31 OAS B 11 • 0357 KTAKnC...I/Li/M.015 dITtRIA 01155 SC TB SC,Q/ C000 06 12111 61111 SILVIS .11. 0 AUBURN, WA. 98002 0 9ELLEVUE, WA. 98007 FAC 0 KENT. WA.98031 WA. 98201 0 PORTLAND, OR. 97220 0 RENTON WA. 98055 • SEATTLE. WA.98124 AXpTA61LIT in o. IO P(R IF A J 2. 71 EAST ElEVA71ON 9-08 OFFICE BUILDING /LOC M CCL 20/1 O.C. sot raw A-26 86062 9.06 -226 COST 9EDCTIa(9ERISROMS PRIRERI3 OMIrIS KR [METAL SIOI14 S• COL OSirE 0113.0114 Pan SC E3 C0 SO 71 P 3 1S 3! Q 1 Q 6,17 33 amIlet A•7 3/332 .1 -0• w s v a ► r �s:er 1,4 7� AFIL iC�futi�t�iYC �. • SOUTH ELEVATION NOTE: • 5 . OEIOTES 5(9NOREL CLASS IM 111001 FVVC. IOE/OY` FALL T1u DCPARiKMr MIN 3..1 • i (CR PENT PRE DEFERS SIC A-23A .703 Or r5MRa0 (3. IN• -S 7/! N EI7E91C9 DOOR SCC 9.r. WAILS 0 AUBURN, WA.98002 0 BELLEVUE , WA. 98007 O KENT. WA.98031 O PORTLAND, OR. 97220 ❑ RENTON WA.98055 • SEATTLE, WA.98124 4 1 n Ea Cr 9DOr PA9.VEf _ ♦ tt.IN • _I • .179'4 SLAB rim /LOCI 1N -7 raw:. 2; (3.009 a.RA!• -3• NIRO FLOCS EL.IR' -8' ACM ..1001 (3. 7194 • FIRST (LOCI (3.190 10:171411ll177 wt,, u,^ l vrm '75 Y 7S 817.6 x-09 SOUTH ELEVATION ! � 9•08 OFFICE BUILDING COL Ali O.C. PURIM 00/IS A-27 330!2 B 9 C3-A77 IQINSOIT.L SIDI'S 3' COMMIT( W ILOIN4 PAWL 1MT01 LINE A.2. Ta P P P P ••••••••••-- MO ro■TIO8111181=1M.-- 8/5 £ 21 32 G] I I . ( I I IB II 12 Av. 1 4 - .101, 7- AJP C. 15 9 19 I ru1111111 � _�1 (t�yU i411111©p a� EIFCCe i`i e k E>1` i rrrrrr3ar33irir`rr I Is A-2, •-33 • 0 TV OF IOOP PARAPET _.CI.tN -1 _ [1.179 -lI A-2. FOAM FLOOR EL 1411 TRIAD FIEF _.11 SECOO rLCOR CL. uII•• 4• FIRST rLOF • EL.100•-00• T FIFA 7LCUR .EL.1S4 _2 FCLAM FALCO EL .166 -5 THIRD FLOM Et. 132• -0• 31930 FLOOR . a. nr FIRST FLOW • .EL. 100 -0 wow E INE 4 Y T WEST ELEVATION 163" - I•-0• — C IOfE: Y LOOM 9961 1. CLASS IR WITCO. TRINE. POI 60QSS PAT DETAILS SEE A-36 • r6C 91(31. :A I• rrmu O B 63 • COST WIRCTIEI/REVISIOG CRITERIA OW(FS SC E6 song. CC CO °Stow 32111 5 35 U • ION ROE /AI FACILITIES DEPARTMENT p AUBURN. WA. 98002 Q BELLEVUE, WA. 98007 Q EVERETT. WA. 9820i p KENT. WA. 98031 p PORTLAND.OR. 97220 RENT • SEATTLE. W LC41LI1Un 3 C y ' son ITN TN 4 3266I WEST ELEVATION 9-08 OFFICE BUILDING MC 606 m 1/20 E.E. - A -28 66062 5 °6-626 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE,' ON Manner: anner: Cross - Reference Files: Receipt 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Develop a new cafeteria for Boeing employees along the Duwanish River. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 9303 Fast Marginal Way South Quarter: NE Section: 04 Township: 23 Range: 04 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Peter- HumTE1, Bruce Dees & Associates Signature: Address: 222 Fast 26th Street, Suite 202, Tacoma, WA 98421 Phone : ( 627 -7947 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. Phone: (206) 544 - 2900 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Robert Ormsby, Boeing Military Airplane Canpany Address: P.O. Box 3707, Mail Stop 46-89, Seattle, WA 98124-2207 I /WBCsignature(s)] U . swear that I /we are the owner s)6 contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this applic ion and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and 4 15 - j qa correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: fie Num • Date: f/eVa C DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient,, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: The cafeteria will not be visible from E. Marginal Way South. The building will be set back 50 ft. to SO ft. from the Duwamish River. The building is sited in a landscaped waterfront park. A landscaped outdoor eating area serves as a transition between the rafeteria and waterfront park pathway. Parking and service areas will be located behind the cafeteria and waterfront park, out of view from the river. (See Extra Response space for Cont.) 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be •encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The lines and masses of the cafeteria will be in harmony with the waterfront park and river. Berming on the inland side will help tuck the building into the park. The glass on the river side will give the building an open, light character that embraces the river. The neighborhood character is strongly industrial. The cafeteria will utilize same industrial materials and will have a similar feel to the nearby Museum of Flight. Pedestrian circulation will tie into and improve upon the existing pedestrian path system (including the Linear Park). (See Extra Response space for Cont.) 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. 0. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: The existing site is flat and paved in asphalt. The cafeteria and surrounding waterfront park will add vegetation and topographic interest. The waterfront park and cafeteria building are being designed simultaneously so that one reinforces the other. The waterfront park (or Linear Park extension) is discussed in more detail in the 9-C8 Building Application. The cafeteria's outdoor dining terrace includes plantings of large trees which will shade the eating area and the building. The paving of the outdoor dining terrace will be concrete or concrete pavers with an attractive pattern providing interest and human scale. Low parallel seatwalls will run through the terrace to connect the cafeteria and waterfront park. Exterior light fixtures will reinforce the human scale of the outdoor areas and provide a subdued lighting. The Service entrance will be screened by landscaped berm ng against the building. The dumpster will be concealed by a concrete wall and planted with evergreen shrubs. 8. BUILDING DESIGN DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per - m: ent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: The cafeteria is being designed to fit into this unique site. It is also serving as a link between an industrial aerospace facility, a waterfront park, and the river. The building components will be in proportion to each other and the site. Materials include concrete for solid exterior walls, glass for the exterior dining roam walls, metal for the dining roan roof, and gravel for the kitchen roof. Colors will be harmonious with each other and the site. Colors include earth tones for the metal roof and grey for the gravel roof. The glass dining roan facing the river will pick up the colors of the waterfront park and the river itself. Mechanical equipment will be located on the ground and screened by concrete walls and evergreen vegetation. Exterior lighting will be an integral part of the building and landscape design. Lighting will be used to add human scale to the outdoor eating area. Derailing and materials for the building will draw on the aerospace nature of Boeing's work. The building's structure will be exposed, where practical, to add visual interest and variety. The siting of the building is carefully planned to take advantage of river views, but also set back to leave space for the waterfront park and pedestrian circulation along the river bank. (. LIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: There are no miscellaneous structures associated with the cafeteria that have not been covered already (see 9-00 Building Application). Landscape furniture in the outdoor dining area will be compatible with the Linear Park and cafeteria. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear- ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. N/ 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. N/A 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. N/A 13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. N/A 14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. 15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. (29 /DSGN.APP1 -3) N/A N/A C_.. DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 6 the vicinity. wide truck loading dock. (29 /EXTRA.RESP) faces the parking lot. Adequate space for truck turning is provided. EXTRA RESPONSE SPACE 5. The building is below the 35 ft. height limit. The dining roan side is oriented toward the river and is mostly glass. The back (service) side of the building is partially bens d to reduce its size and scale. The cafeteria is of a smaller scale and lower height than other buildings in A covered walkway will connect the cafeteria with the south end of the 9-08 Building. The outdoor eating area will connect with a pedestrian path through the waterfront park. 6. The previously- mentioned covered walkway will also, provide direct access to the.9 -08 Building. Vehicular circulation and loading facilities include a drop off at the main entry and a double- The loading dock is located away fran the pedestrian entry and For compatibility with street circulation, see the 9-08 Building Application. ADDITIONAL PLAN NOTES Boeing Cafeteria (from Design Review Application Checklist) r B. See Shoreline. Application Additional Plan Notes. C. See 9 -08 Building Application. !. See Shoreline Application Additional Plan Notes. K through N: These items will be submitted for review on May 3, 1990 (per 4/3/90 telephone conversation with Moira Bradshaw). W.MAROINAL WAY MANUFACTURING OFFICE BMA PARKING VERSUS SQUARE FOOTAGE 2.054.959sf ® 1 STALL PER 1,000sfi >a 1 ,1 97.908sfi ® 2.5 STALLS PER 1 ,000sfi = TOTAL TOTAL STALLS AVAILABLE SURPLUS STALLS 8,782 3.732 2.055 2.995 5,050 DUWAMISH RIVER EXIST. TOP OF BANK 110.5 -- EXTREME HIGH WATER 109.5 ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE (HWL) 105.3 WATERFRONT PARK EXIST. FENCE EXIST. EDGE OF PAVING EXIST. RIP -RAP SHORELINE PAVED PATH OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE SECTION X TYP. CONDITION CAFETERIA SHORELINE SECTION 200' DINING ROOM KITCHEN/ SUPPORT APPROX. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 114.5 EXISTING GRADE SCALE: 1 ' =20 BOEING L DATUM : BERM • PARKING ACCESS ROAD CURBS J � EAST ELEVATION 1 � " -/ �' , � • SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 31IM LAR � ' '•� ■■ i'�p•■ g Iril it WEST ELEVATION BOEING CAFETERIA SCALE I /TIw1' 1 1 : SINGLE ENTRY EXIT POINT INTO PARK PEOPLE FLOW SERVICE REDUCE SCALE OF BUILDING WALL ELEMENTS SLIDE INTO PARK SCIENTIFIC TREES SLIDING PANELS LANDSCAPE SCHEME DROP OFF. CANOPY 1 I • • 1 1"=20 FT. 3 PLAN CONCEPT DOMINANT & SUBORDINATE ROOFS BERMS AND WALL EXPRESSION FROM PARKING CANOPY ROOF FORM AT DINING SKYLIGHT AT ENTRY/SERVERY • SUPPORT � ' � �. �' '� • ' • 4 ROOF APPROACH 1 5 AERIAL VIEW FROM PARKING 'MOW, fl4I N ij loir avow • "Yr, 1111111 ! 4111:gli.Z1V!711%.' "I• 1■1 1. PROPOSED CAFETERIA LOCATION EXISTING UTILITIES: WATER' 1.11.41, 10. • 0 'we vm.vc. ALP( ROA ANTI COVER. *STALL VALVE REACH ROO . NEAREST fLOOOLIONT LE. P.M. Ws RUH ▪ • • PoST CARO. AllANOON • . [LOCATE NOSE RIAD • • 0 0 • c '0" • ,-111 P100000 NT• •IT“ . 7 irggTE • Port total) ;o5000 Rom 110 KAMM . • • • " IDOST. L 7.770 ' • . : • • . • „ • _ • • • 0 • . •"' • '140110E . •.• • 4.— 0 • • • r MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY t I • . ..• . • „ • REITOVE PURI ARO UPIPC 11;ga V v A lithr L ACVM 0 3g 0 0• . rETI C ar . • 1 - C.011STRULT1444 110T05: RAC.00TO olvr/A.,NAL.T AMMO' I* CAPPED *1111R LAIC PPR NADT.Y - TO TRAILCR. Pio/.011 t MUTAT .1 1 0.0010 CALL issuLA•ms roc, .-. rctcza FroluThFrI. '••.- . F.m. WATER 4 SE WALL RE Ed* Map GILlool) LEKL 4 sm,•,.■ 75 1 1,0j AMC*. cr. 7000 PWI. NOTES• • . • L wisrALL momneRrldir 011 ALL ' • . !OK NTD 99999 *CLUCKS TNE 310107101. ONES. REFER 10 DETAIL DRAWN' 0-11 • 2.ENIST. FIRE NT0 AAAAA *Ave TITO POST TYPE ,11 0" 1747 0 0= 1 :11 0 1 0 1 7 -; ": O POST CUM ' ''• •• AK NMI. 'TT IPMATTG flo.00 • r0t01410 CA6T700 I457Pe2 ' • tWroiL 1...o) • 7.17 1077.( IN4v. . • .1,06 c ,t,........... ..:-...,..- ,-. lt,E pr 0 kg^ ••••;.... • • - • • • _ • . . , . LEGEND. ' KW AMY. PIK --TS Kw CAST IRuN PIPE EPIST.CAST MON AND RAM PIM • NIER 7777E HYDRANT MST FIRE *MAN* cAp NM RATE %ALPE, SON Alt coviER. A G- PI PORT OF SEATTLE MARINE FACILITIES . TERMINAL 120 ' • • DEVELOPMENT UNIT NT 3 I ' • DEMOLITION • PAVING 5 UTILITIES WATER DISTRIBUTION:PLAN;... ; E.D.A.- NE 07-01-01790 0-2312 1- 111 1101701C1 • • • • 109 000 91.“ - M l .7 • : I •t • .1 I E •'.e �.;<e;�f~�rl�r,'..,�tiP�IFi I � � ', 4� li!� ! .... ":a k�' 7•f t ,-,1- . ''x3! lailigg : '►c.I'e iig ( ; „ r•t1 f ( ! i• ' ( • • • PROPOSED CAFETERIA — LOCATION • • x0.11,4 r.tr.- •a. /4 •...A.3331.10 , :•ji i j: `_4, I - . fun (5" ib.l 31 ', s/ (21• • ! �, I --11 `s'dZa. F `o - . • r I ( Rs 1' 1 I' :: I' ! I i �ANels t ° , t .s[tvw 1A[weP). i'Ir ,- t �)•\! •I X-,11..- 4.110; ' 1 ; . •A 1. •. :I ( i • :` ' ,I 1 \. 1' 11'..:1 ( •, iL1 ). I I 213 .410 ':.I. ~ . L I Ii I P' • o„ ,t.; ' f • EXISTING UTILITIES: ELECTRICAL •s•., :fit , f 1 s i • H stevts urn.' HATCH1 : ITYPItAl.) 1 _ _ 1 _ , _ : ,- : I : :I - I - , 1 i' J IN ,• �y'1 ,�'= .: - - - - r, • • C.O:. 14:C.0.4. 14:C.0.4. 5[ , _ Ne ;i 10 ` 1021I ■ 100A ;gf;•I•L0 %i. •••• -•i, / •• 4SW - ' _._ J won Sw —• --t I1 .c r i . 1 -l.-_ z•..s � ; • . �n- ' , I 1:.' a i l a i, I`•• • i :ri • •1.1 I - f lit t (' i . , . ..tin `2Y• r •t 1Q ' I • I 0.1 ,( r_.7.. •• . (y 43‘2._ • t- I Pots .13 I :1010([•1) 2 341/0 POLO 117 3LE.IL 2'4 /o i 3. In 3 *VD • ,• I ft• 3 •1/° ( • 3 T SLALE l" + "• • •rr 3.3'. •, 3( (01130 ( • i ( I - • Yl•s :°. II ile _ Po LS ni �.' p�ro Pa LE tt� • l tRyitc * C lb urkin XAru1(T�PIUt) i 1 %/Al.• '1 �'• :.•�•. • t .'1.1 I • 1 5 • iL 41•• • '. •'• L - ♦ •B(w11164) )'- VC •. YQEb 1)r tr,K,((!1(P/PILAL) ! %.:;�i:��:�'ti. ;fir i'. . :TT] = . � 50oMLH _fo SVtfn.el ! I'. 4 - • O 'BOEIWG ' -' . I C1UTIES MUM/AM '. : O P , ;OR ••5 ( BURN, WA: 98002 - FRET'''. WA. 98201 NT; . • WA., 98031 RTLANO. OR. 97220 WON. WA..98055 A TTLE• WA. 9812 4%1.. •••••.••.• Men r.: "1, Ibwua • 1. I�i. P(SIr11�R'�'L16NTING;`�•,': "'.> � POPIOF.aA1nZ.TERMINAI•126'`' ►L,�i,��1,,:��7 i9RD;.)i ` -!�•' 6 j• •'.�; t•_? ; : • 161- poor?,, I , f Lam. '9.3 ►Y :)' ..t .•i 4 ,4ti.s •(. - II r v •)•!. ' �. •i' •' • 3 -� (, ! 1Rr•ADrrO) i/ / 5y ;1• tt: .l1t`=i i.stI . . t�f _. �l�zL_ � i:i l i 1.1 + 2 r /; ,3.150 MLM '•r'1 88 `7 Oe "C. A fu { fTYP1. P 2' /.te. __-4-1' S • ( 3 •L D ° , 4 s , 1 ( 1 .6 i� A ,/ IR[ M0 ,/ /D ) 1`_�— , 11 1 P0tEl0 ( 5 lP) I , • 1 _\ -f - __ , I 1 r " •p1� \ -- L _j 1 � , 500KVA 1 7/1 31 .' 12 ri]y1" • I 1 ~173 4 ' - = 0 I , 1 I yl(u A1MGr. W ila�, '1 2 - 1.2/0 ; � I• h — eLppt.. y - si - .. S 3 I X1XE C Or(o 33cTOR :• �- 1 . A. I 3•I bl War[n). 4.11 L••1S • PLAN •L0 •• • A •I .8 P \di P011 1• • IYi ti . , ) '�:) : ?�L (2)2% 4 ‘, 4 /0.- 1 I %i i 11.1% • .1 • I • BLOC 130 . \: :.r . F .e -. f Wive, Fa it J4 i'hiLe:tk ••Ii; I:• . .. t n . 1: 034 t- 1 r 'd r; . 1 1 C r p• A Poll sit O Po i Y ) fY 01.0 1 -11 1L ►111" iR{ EN344.1 r - • 111fFE'r 11 k t,� 1 8 I N it i. f, • 9: ' 1 Z w• si w' .+te uti a• 1L " 4 1 1 .1, ,:74", : r !.: . '4 :72 r. . } , I •Jt�� ' 71 N - -- • . .�1 .' 7 , . r:. aa,,. 1 _ .• - / . • �.... �.•' , ^ ;'. • P.. M r K J e . it • •• 7 , ,1�n.vr '� •..:., :� . 1 - ) a iL ✓.e � .._ . I. - , •' L .- � -6 — — •• TOIVG4aA ice. r _ r 1 �; f rnl PROPOSED CAFETERIA I LOCATION - - s^ .r. : • :� . 5 —: a f . ..H. •, :er - ' , • •. •. . .. j..,; • �. • ■ 1 i M. 1. 211 • �D. „,j� Wf i 1 ' ��; r IYJ, 101.•19 IC rot p 1 r 1.?Yt –k_— J. \\ I • IES: STORM Mg t 270 \ \ O 1, NOTE: NO NEW l.� F 043 r. j. 10� E OUTFALL R a QUIRED �' ` ���1 a , 'ntka 1.1” OS Jtb i.W . • , .i.%.",?'.. I \ /{ \ \ \•`\ EXISTING <a.r „r UTILI W .:1[ E SUN .e.. ID Me OnL. U.1. SEWER • • r . fr ? a < l yg w .. • '"•'"" Y �' _ _ ^... •..w. son a.. •..... a. . .•^.• ••w O AUBURN. WA. 98002 BOE /NG O EVERETf, WA. 98201 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT KENT. WA. 98031 FA 0 PORTLAND. OR. 97220 O RENTON. WA. 98055 OSEATTLE, WA. 98174 J ' r r : te ! F �j- y yl'� i...` �..�n � ` Ac°IP a.. ..a.. .. F 7 ..00 Site Topograpl y P ,•,.. 7 A I D.C.A. 640 Building Area a ' 834002.5 ^^•• a.... •.• -.-.. DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATI`N ( NOV221989i1 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Develop 9 -08 Building, new curb & gutter, side- walks, covered walkways, seal coat & restripe existing parking lot, extend Linear Park north along the Duwamish River to Slip No. 6 and other landscape improvements. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 9303 East Marginal Way South Quarter: NE Section: 04 Township: 23 Range: 04 3. APPLICANT :* Name: OWNER (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Terry Neal Tunison, Boeing Advanced Systems Address: P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 46 -87, Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 Phone: (206) 544 -2931 Signature: 7" /l4t-' * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Date: ///22/'7 4. PROPERTY Name: Ralmond L. Rutkowski, Boeing Advanced Systems Address: P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 46 -89, Seattle. WA 98124 -2207 Phone: (206) 544 -2900 I /WE,[si ' - swear that ' "e ar " e owner s or con ract purc aser s o property nvolved n this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 1 - "&c:!) the and C The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered to it site. screened to in relation RESPONSE: The 9 -08 Building will not be visible from E. Marginal Way South. 93rd Place will be the main entrance to the site. Parking areas will be screened from 93rd Place and E. Marginal Way S. w /landscaped berms. A service area is located between the existing 9 -77 Building and the new 9 -08 Building, and is screened with landscaped buffers. The existing parking lot between the 9 -08 Building will be screened from the river by an extension of the Linear nark. (See 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA extra response sheet.) A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The neighborhood character in the project vicinity is industrial with some office uses. The new building has an industrial /office character and is a lower height than the existing 9 -77 building which it is adjacent to. The circulation pattern separates vehicles and pedestrians. A new bus stop has a 125' long x 20' deep pullout off E. Marginal Way S. Automobile and service access tothe.parking and building is directed to a central entry /exit (South 93rd P1.), which connects to E. Marginal WayS. This main entry is centrally located in the site for safety (a limited access driveway is 380 ft. south on E. Marginal Way S. 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: Existing topography is flat and paved (existing parking). Variety in topography and revegetation of the site will be introduced through landscaped berms with tree planting. The berms will parallel both sides of the entry road, as well as E. Marginal Way. S. On the Duwamish Rivera 780 ft. long extension of the Linear Park with trees, shrubs, pedestrian walks, and open lawn areas will border the riverbank. Walks and parking areas . throughout the site will be sloped minimally to provide drainage (approx. 2Z). All landscaped areas adjacent to parking or roads will be protected with concrete curbs. Pedestr ian walks will be defined with paving to separate them from landscaped areas. Landscaped areas along E. Marginal Way S. internal roadway, and at the new building entrance will provide shade and give a more human scale to the building site. New exterior lighting will consist of High Pressure Sodium (HPS) pole - mounted lights around the 9 -08 Building for pedestrians. Parking lot lighting will utilize existing lights. (See Extra Response Sheet.) 8. BUILDING DESIGN DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per- ma ant neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. 0. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility. hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: The new 9 -08 Building is lower than the existing 9 -77 Building which it is adjacent to. The siding and color scheme for the 2 buildings will match. The siding consists of very lightly textured metal panels. The color is "Sea Foam" with greenish trim color "Lime Stone" at the joints and parapet. There will be three 32 ft. high horizontal bands of the Sea Foam color, with slightly lighter hues at each band. The horizontal trim separates these 3 bands. Sea Foam is a cream color with a slight greenish tint. Mechanical equipment will be located in the center of the roof (set back 57') for screening. A 5 ft. high parapet will also screen this equipment from view. The 9 -08 Building will have large windows for the fifth floor offices, which are in scale with the rest of the building. Exterior lighting will not be attached to the building, but will consist of pole- mounted lights which are of a transitional scale (T6 ft. ht.) between the building and pedestrians. The 9 -08 Building is of a distinctly different form and shape than the adjacent 9 -77 Building, adding visual interest. 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE rSIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. 8. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: New structures other than the 9 -08 Building include walkway canopies. The canopies are intended to be oriented toward a human scale. Materials will be durable and complimentary to the 9 -08 Building and other site developments, utilizing mainly metal. Exterior lights are included in the underside of the vaulted walkway canopies. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear- ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. N/A 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. N/A 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. N/ A 13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. N/A 14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. N/ 15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. N/A (29 /DSGN.APP1 -3) 0ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 6 Response No. 5 continued: 5. Pedestrian movement is facilitated by covered walkways between a new stop on E. Marginal Way S., parking area, the Linear Park extension, and the main entrance. The new 9 -08 Building is lower than the existing building and set back 180 ft. further from East Marginal Way. It is also set back 500 ft. from the riverbank, and over 200 ft. from Slip No. 6. Response No. 7 continued: (29 /EXTRA.RESP) EXTRA RESPONSE SPACE 7. Glare from the new exterior lights will be minimized by the fixtures themselves, which will be oriented downward and provide shielding of the lighting element. The new fixture poles will be 16 ft. high and exposed aggregate. Additional lighting in other structures is described under Item #9. 7 � ADDITIONAL PLAN NOTES: 9 -08 BUILDING (From Design Review Application Checklist) 1. Item C: Existing lot size: 689,250 S.F. Percent covered with impermeable surfaces: 100% (asphalt). (concrete, asphalt, and existing 14 -01, 14- 02/14 -03 Bldg.) Proposed Development Percent covered with impermeable surfaces: 82% Percent landscaped areas: 18% (125,760 S.F.) 2: Item N: Color samples are not included because the proposed building will match the existing 9 -77 building which is visible from East Marginal Way South. � ¢. 4 ,, ? BUILDING CONCRETE SCREEN WALL 170 STALLS FOR 041 BLDG PARKING( BOEING CAFETERIA SITE PLAN • ,, TERRACE EA ST ELEVATION, existing utilities water port of seattle plan cafeteria location marine facilities water distribution plan FACILITIES DEPARTMENT O AUBURN, WA. 98002 O EVERETT, WA. 98201 O KENT, • WA. 98031 O PORTLAND, OR. 97220 O RENTON, WA: 98055 p SEATTLE, • WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITY 'THIS DESIGN'ANOIOR SPECIPICATION'IS APPROVED existing utilities electrical site plan