Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-01-CA - CITY OF TUKWILA - FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION ZONING CODE AMENDMENT88-01-ca 88-1-CA 88-1-R 88-01-R EPIC-3-87 EPIC-03-87 area wide zoning CITY OF TUKWILA - FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION / ZONING CODE AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FIRE STATION #1 ANNEXATION ZONING CODE AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE AMENDMENT CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. M 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may at some time in the future be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988 and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and amending the Zoning Code and Zoning Map and that the existing plan, zoning code and plan, and zoning maps, be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4, 1988 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new use zone to accommodate existing, unique, heavy industrial trucking areas that require less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping, and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1988, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. /5/7 , amending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and plan map to provide for a plan for the area in the event of annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Fire District #1 Study Area and is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and to the zoning map which consists of Exhibits B, C, and D hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows: 3296C5/334A Page 1 (7) Truck terminals. (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; A. Section 18.42.020(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dieing, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws. B. Section 18.42.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: C. Section 18.42.030 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. D. Section 18.42.040(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: E. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as shown on Map 2. F. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 and Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.040 to include areas as shown on Exhibit E. G. Section 18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.045 Height regulations around major airports. For the purposes of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provision of this section, the city adopts the following airport height map: 3296C5/334A A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, 1986, and as the same may be amended. Page 2 H. Section 18.70 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre- existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD- approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof. (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and windload factor of eighty (80) miles per hour. (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. I. Section 18.06.220 of the Tukwila Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or a modular home is not considered a mobile home. J. Section 18.06.240 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.06.240 Dwelling, single- family. "Single- family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 § 1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is considered to be a single - family dwelling. K. Section 18.06 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. L. Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 3296C5/334A Page 3 Sections: CHAPTER 18.43 M -2L DISTRICT - -HEAVY INDUSTRY /SPECIAL LANDSCAPING 18.43.010 Purpose. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. 18.43.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique industrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping in recognition of use trends of heavy truck' terminals and servicing thereof. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. In the M -2L district, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than the following uses, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.42.030 and 18.42.040: (1) Any principally permitted uses in the M -1 district; (2) Any principally permitted uses in the M -2 district; (3) Truck terminals. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit from the city as provided in Chapter 18.64: (1) (2) (3) Conditional uses as provided in the M -1 district; Conditional uses as provided in the M -2 district; General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 of this title. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. In the M -2L district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and maximum height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. M. Table 2, Required Municipal Code, is hereby Front Yard Zone Landscape District (in feet) M -2L 5 3296C5/334A Side Yard Landscape (in feet) A. Office of the City Clerk Landscape Areas, of Chapter 18.52.020 of the Tukwila amended to reflect the addition of the following: Page 4 Rear Yard Landscape (in feet) none none Section 4. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter. approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 4.' day of 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: ITY CLERK, INE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFIC F THE CITY TTORNEY FI WITH THE CITY CLERK: 4-4- - fiP PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 4-6-11 PUBLISHED: (, - - if EFFECTIVE DATE: (, - 19r pQ' ORDINANCE NO.: /447 3296C5/334A DUSEN IIL • IF* { it - 114 m Ohne inbAlinkk IIPLIILEE L rim �n© 4 , I t m S \, i lig n .C• NTY ■ T C. � t tY ■ Fra R0=0 missie ~' a EMI' _• yap 1 f 4' c T 0 N FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Laos! •Sme1• Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. T NORTH ATTACHMENT A r r �� PO V N EE I M �a a r 1 X N X i•-i I Q a. i ccc • X 8 N <y a i i § N 7 ki- • • . . . .... •-•-• „ „. • ,„ "- • /c.f. •••••••••••• •••••••••• • ••••—• . . . .. . • ••••••• • •.• -:•••• ••• :• • • • • • ••••••••• • • . .„ • • • . :- . .... ::: ..../.". ..: . . „ -.. .". % ..: :-.. - .';. Z . ::. - f.. :- ...- ... • • •••• " • FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 kcgrj4 MEM 11111111111 [2:7A INDUSTRIAL PARK CM CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH Single-family Residence R Low Apartments R Multiple Residence/High 12.;" Density Regional Retail Business C Light Industry 14 Heavy Industry M EXHIBIT C ATTACHMENT K J FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 2 & 4 Legend MEN Single-family Residence R-1-7 .2 R-4 I Multiple Residence/High RR Density [7777:771 Low Apartments r" M It 779 1111111111) ■ r 4 CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH a ASSOC.,INC. STALZER a ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH Professional and Office PO Community Retail Business c-1 Regional Retail Business C-2. Light Industry M-1 Heavy Industry M-2 Industrial Park CM EXHIBIT D ATTACHMENT L f 111P : nclEnki, FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY HEIGHT EXCEPTION 11 1 1 1 NORTH AREA UP TO & INCLUDING 115' outicjit Pam*letl per *MOM UP TO & mum= 115 with BAR appall per *BOOM EXHIBIT E CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & AUOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT M FIGURE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /4 6 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. On 6 , 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed finance No. /447 , which provides as follows: Adopts zoning regulations, a zoning map and amends the Tukwila Zoning Code to provide for the area described as Fire District No. 1 Study Area; said regulations, map and amendments to become effective upon annexation of the City of Tukwila of said area, or any part thereof; and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of e'4.1L4A4A. MAX ANDERSON, CITY CLERK 3296C2/6/334A R. I, josh s Valle Dam II News - Ju,ne. /a, PUT , 1988. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area, at some future time, will be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, parts of said area are within the City's planning area and therefore subject to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, existing ordinance nos. 1118 and 1138 provide for land use planning and zoning regulation for two parts of said area, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988, and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and that the existing plan map be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the planning area of the City of Renton includes portions of Sub -Area 3 of the Fire District #1 Study Area and the Tukwila City Council has met with the Renton City Council, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 is characterized by steep slopes, unstable soil conditions and sensitivity to seismic activity according to the King County Seismic Area Map, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 would be more appropriately developed by light industrial /commercial uses, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, 3359C2/392A CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. / Page 1 Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138 of the City of Tukwila are hereby repealed. Section 2. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map is hereby amended to reflect that the property known as Fire District #1 Study Area and shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby added to such plan map, and the policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and amended in Ordinance No. 1246 and as hereafter amended, shall apply to said area. Section 3. At such time as said described area or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan for the subject area is shown on the map which is attached as "Exhibit B ". Section 5. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of the City Clerk B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 6. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 0.6 day of 1� , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: IT CLERK, INE ANDERSON FIL 2 WITH THE CITY CLERK: 41- 4- Y8 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 6-6 - 88 PUBLISHED: 6-42- 8S EFFECTIVE DATE: b -' l - Pf ORDINANCE NO.: 1 41(, 3359C2/392A Page 2 FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System knout animism Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A NORTH CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT A I FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations Legend I WSW 8133M3 r•WWW* %Atria Low Density Residential High Density Residential Professional/Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Parks and Open Space Public Facility EXHIBIT B CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT I FIGURE 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. On 6 , 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed dinance No. /466 , which repeals Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138, amends the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map to add Fire District #1 Study Area, provides for the application to said area of standards for future development, utilization and growth of the City as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and Ordinance No. 1246, and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of Pa bI/ sh : valley .DQI l y 1Vt_w5 - Jane. /.2 1•pr 3359C2/392A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /4 :V/ MAXINE ANDERSON, CITY CLERK May 23, 1988 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT CITY STAFF PRESENT CITIZEN'S COMMENTS Black River Quarry Coalition EXECUTIVE SESSION 7:10 - 7:30 P.M. SPECIAL ISSUES Prop. Ord. adopting Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan & Plan Map for Fire Dist. #1. and Prop. Ord. amending Tukwila Zoning Code to provide for Fire Dist. #1. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL City Hall COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Council Chambers AGENDA Council President Harris called the Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting to order. MABEL J. HARRIS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT), JOE H. DUFFIE, EDGAR D. BAUCH, MARILYN G. STOKNES, JOAN HERNANDEZ, CLARENCE B. MORIWAKI. Rick Beeler (Planning Director), Larry Hard (City Attorney), Ross Earnst (City Engineer). Michelle Nangle, 14140 56th South, Tukwila, presented the Black River Quarry Coalition's platform and urged all citizens to join the Coalition in order to support our quality of life. It is a nonprofit corporation formed to oppose the siting of a King County garbage incinerator at the Black River Quarry. The Coalition offers alternatives to incineration in a combination of waste reduction, recycling, composting and material recovery strategies. Ms. Nangle circulated the Coalition's platform. membership enrollment form and sign -up sheet. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED. The Committee of the Whole Meeting was called back to order by Council President Harris, with Councilmembers present as previously listed. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained the area concerned and the information in the agenda packet. Mr. Beeler explained the residents along the freight lines where it is zoned R -1 were not interested in a land use change at this time. The Map 4 recommendation by staff was for comparable zoning from King County. The batching plant proposal would go in there. The City zone of C -M would be the closest to Renton's for a business park. The quarry plant would be a non - conforming conditional use. The next closest would be C -2 which is for retail. Council President Harris said we have pledged with Renton that we would discuss compatible uses of neighboring areas. Councilmember Duffie said the people in Fire District #1 have faith in Tukwila that we will zone in a manner that will be beneficial to them. Councilmember Moriwaki stated he also cannot agree to an interlocal agreement at this time with Renton. Council President Harris said we should provide zoning and use areas that would blend in with surrounding area. Councilmember Bauch suggested the Council go along with the staff recommendation of C -M. Larry Hard, City Attorney, stated the zoning of C -M would be better than M -2. Council President Harris stated the consensus of the Council is then that it should be C -M. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated if zoned C -M that would make the operation of the Black River Quarry non - conforming and Stoneway would have to come back for a non- conforming permit. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT STAFF BRING TO THE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL ZONING THE AREA DISCUSSED C -M TO OAKSDALE. * Larry Hard, City Attorney, stated there is professional office zoning as an alternative. * MOTION CARRIED. Dan Wolf, Chairman of the Task Force on the proposed annexation, stated the residents in the area of the railroad tracks have not TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMT OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTE" 'May 23, 1988 Page 2 SPECIAL ISSUES - Contd. Prop. Ord. adopting Compre. Land Use Policy Plan & Plan Map for F. D. #1 and Prop. Ord. amending Tukw. Zoning Code to provide for F.D. #1 - contd. Approval of Labor Agreement for Sueprvisor Bar- gaining Unit for 1 -1 -87 - 12- 31 -89. CIP Policies 1988 Agreement w/ Councilmember Hernandez stated this agreement has come from the Chamber of Commerce Finance Committee. REPORTS Council President Community Affairs Finance & Safety Utilities objected to the zoning. The dwellings are deteriorating. It is an isolated area. No one objected to bringing in warehouse. No one wants to live in there. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated on Exhibit D in the upper corner that would come in as professional office. The zoning of M -2L would permit trucking and related. It would allow for 5' of landscaping rather than 15' of landscaping. This is a unique industrial area developed some time ago. John Miller, representing Rainier Bank, said they would like to have the option of being able to build to 115'. There are not special plans for increasing the height but they would like to have that option. With the 65' height allowance we could come in and ask for a height variance. On the east side of the building the annexation line is through the building itself. Council President Harris stated at the Regular Meeting of the Council on June 6 the two ordinances concerning the plan map and the zoning code for Fire District #1 will be on the agenda. Council President Harris stated the approval of the labor agreement for the Supervisor Bargaining Unit contract from January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1989 will be on the agenda of the Regular Meeting on June 6, 1988. It has the approval of the union. MOVED BY HERNANDEZ, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE SUPERVISOR BARGAINING UNIT CONTRACT FROM JANUARY 1, 1987 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989 BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON JUNE 6, 1988. MOTION CARRIED. Council President Harris stated the CIP policies will be on the agenda of the June 6 meeting. In the meantime all City Council members should go through the policies and bring back ideas as to what they would like to have changed. Pam Thorsen, representing the Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce, explained the service performance of last year's contract. The proposal is to continue to perform the services outlined in the contract. Council President Harris stated the City Council members will look over the projects that have been outlined and make suggestions. It will be on the agenda of the Regular Meeting on June 6. Council President Harris reported the Suburban Cities meeting is coming up. The water rate change will be discussed on June 13, 1988. Chairman Duffie reported the noise ordinance is being discussed in committee. Chair Hernandez reported a large attendance at the last meeting where the tow truck rates were discussed. They will need legal advice on the matter. MOVED BY STOKNES, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES TO CARRY OUT THE SEWER -WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLANS UPDATE TO A FEE LIMIT OF $40,000 AND APPROVE A BUDGET TRANSFER BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE JUNE 6, 1988 REGULAR MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STOKNES, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE AWARDING OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO GREEN RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,390 AND APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET TRANSFER BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE JUNE 6, 1988 REGULAR MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL REG'' May 16, 1988 Page 3 Amendments to Comprehen- sive Land Use Plan & Zoning Maps for F.D. #1 annexation area & to City's Zoning Code - contd. OLD BUSINESS a. Prop. ord. adopting Comp.Land Use Policy Plan & plan map for area known as F. D. #1 b. Prop. ord. amending Tukwila Zoning Code to provide for area known as F. D. #1. Minutes of Regular Mtg. of April 18, 1988 'R MEETING PUBLIC HEARINGS Contd. Ross Earnst, City Engineer, stated the bridge is being replaced now. The bridge is wider than the street so the street will have to be widened. Councilmember Robertson stated Mr. Mackin then would like the 15' landscaping requirement reduced to 5' because the buildings are in the way and the room is needed to get trucks in and out and maneuver the trucks and trailers. He asked if others had asked to have the landscaping reduced. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, stated one request was made in the area heavily populated with truck traffic. The proposed M2 -L which would permit flexible landscaping was explained. Councilmember Moriwaki stated it has been said that the lines would not cut into any buildings. The drawings show 5' clipped off a warehouse. Attorney Mackin said this is not accurate and explained the drawings. George Crestwich, 1221 2nd Avenue, Seattle, stated Stoneway Concrete is in sub -area 3 and the Black River Quarry. They want to continue and consolidate office and long -term planning. They have just learned about the annexation. They would like to maintain as is. This property, sub -area 3 and Black River Quarry, has been designated heavy industrial and is not consistent with what it is now. It is understood the City Council has considered changing it from heavy industrial to light industrial or light manufacturing. They would challenge that. It is heavy manufacturing. They would like it to be consistent. They would like the City to make it heavy industrial. James Hawk, Kent, stated the quarry has been in operation for a long time. There is a lot of truck traffic. Councilmember Moriwaki stated the Renton City Council has indicated they do not believe heavy industrial would be appropriate for that area. Mr. James Hawk said they would like to remain in the County. Council President Harris stated the Black River Quarry is the site the County has in mind for a burning site. Mr. Hawk said they have heard that and they would not like to see it happen. The County can condemn the property and buy it, they have that power. John Richards, 1532 64th Avenue, representing Rainier National Bank, stated the property owned by the bank is cut in half by the proposed annexation. The City would like to match the zoning of King County. The other property is zoned M -2. The bank property is designated M -1. There being no further commented, Mayor Van Dusen closed the Public Hearing. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT ITEMS (a) AND (b), AGENDA ITEM 8, OLD BUSINESS, BE FURTHER DISCUSSED AT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING ON MAY 23, 1988, AND BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON JUNE 6, 1988. MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Robertson said it was not his intent to table the appointment of Jerry Hamilton to the Planning Commission; his intent was to postpone the appointment until he could be interviewed by members of the Council who had not met him. Mayor Van Dusen stated the Motion that was made would have to be reflected in the Minutes in the language it was given as n 1 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 8:06 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Knudson, Hamilton and Haggerton. Mr. Larson was absent. Representing the staff were Moira Bradshaw and Joanne Johnson. MINUTES MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 31, 1988 MEETING AS AMENDED. MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 88 -1 -R and 88 -1 -CA: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION - Continued - Continued Public Hearing from the March 31, 1988 Planning Commission meeting regarding annexation area and City -wide amendments to the Zoning Map and Zoning Code. Moira Bradshaw reviewed the supplement to the March 17, 1988 staff report. The Public Hearing was reopened. Mr. Daniel P. Wolf, 11821 44th Avenue S. expressed his concerns regarding a proposed rezone in the annexation area from R -1 to M- 1. He submittlsd'a list of persons living in the affected area which were surveyed for their preference. This was entered into the record as Exhibit 9. Mr. Mike Levy, 17310 S.E. 45th Street, Issaquah represented the owner of a mobile home park in the annexation area. He expressed his concern at the adverse impacts to low income residents should a change be recommended from what is now presently permitted in the area. Ms. Bradshaw clarified that the park would be unaffected by the proposed changes. .�i Planning Commission April 14, 1988 Page 2 Discussion ensued on this issue. Bob Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121 represented Scott Traverso and Six Robblees Inc. His concern was the adverse impacts the landscaping requirement of the M -2 zone would have on businesses presently operating in the area. Neil Robblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South felt the landscaping requirement would result in poor visibility and, thus, create a safety hazard for trucks leaving his business. He requested flexibility to move landscaping back from the street. Scott Traverso, 11025 S.E. 60th, Renton, concurred with Mr. Rob - blee and also felt that landscaping placed around the building would be more appropriate. Pete Hedegard, 16800 N.E. 31st, Bellevue favored landscaping against the buildings or kept at lower levels and in narrower areas. He felt trees would create a visual hazard for truck traffic and therefore should not be part of the landscaping. Bill Schaible, 5729 S. Pamela Drive, Seattle, WA. He has a 1973 mobile home on his property and wanted it grandfathered in. He has three lots but they are difficult to develop because of their shape and easements. Inability to use a mobile home would render the property useless. Ed Woyvodich, 14415 - 57th Avenue S., pointed out that the fill that took place on his property was in accordance with all King County standards. He submitted a diagram of his property as Exhibit 10. He felt that unless the property is designated commercial, his property will be rendered useless. John Richards, 15320 - 64th Avenue S. represented Rainier Bank. He favored a 65 foot building height limitation or, subsequent to Board of Architectural review, the option of going higher. Sharon Stanl 12072 - 44th Place S. was concerned with the impacts a rezone from R -1 to M -1 would have on her property. She wanted the neighborhood and quality of life to be maintained as it is. Norma Derr, 12507 - 50th Place S. expressed a concern regarding the inability to use mobile homes would have on development of the rather small lots in their area. Glenda Knudson, 12050 - 44th Place S. requested information as to the impacts the annexation and rezone will have on her property. 67:;d" ?iii:: > ;(7 ;,%iJ,J,. +.;...::..`z,i.q .....,�H?.: .1 =r; .: r�� ...,.cb.rrra?.e. ^.,n:n�aai::. cif.._ r.,^:..?[ iSctT :utrYr: ?•!P: PLANNING COMMISSION April 14, 1988 Page 3 Louis Stanley, 12072 - 44th Place S. asked if the current zoning would remain the same if annexation were to occur. Mr. Hamilton clarified that the intent is to preserve the current zoning. Dan Wolf asked for clarification on the current status of the proposed rezone from R -1 to M -1. Mr. Knudson clarified that a vote was not taken at the last meeting. The Public Hearing was closed and a 4- minute recess was called. MR. HAMILTON MOVED TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT WITH A PROPOSED NEW SECTION M -2L WHOSE PURPOSE SHALL READ AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE ADDITION OF "AND FLEXIBLE FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING, TO AMEND TABLE 2 OF THE STAFF REPORT TO SHOW THE M -2L ZONE WITH FIVE FEET OF FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAMILTON MOVED THAT ISSUE NO. 2 MOBILE HOME /MANUFACTURED HOMES THAT WE ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE HEIGHT OF THE ENTIRE DISTRICT AS SHOWN ON THE MAP (BOARD 3) TO 65 FEET WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR EXITING CODE AND HIGHER SUBJECT TO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPROVAL ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY PASSED. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO LEAVE THE DESIGNATION ON THE TWO BLOCKS DESIGNATED LIGHT INDUSTRY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS R -1, 7.2. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION. A VOTE WAS TAKEN WITH KIRSOP AND HAMILTON VOTING YES; MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO AND MR. HAGGERTON OBTAINING. Mr. Coplen tutted that a note of thanks was received from Mrs. Sowinski., ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 pm. Respectfully submitted, Joanne Johnson Secretary s�r ,�y+�,Rts �;:....:�r.c...... � .,_.....,;•;w:u^;,..«-t'>:A?.:. JOANNE JOHNSON A l( :1 DAV I T [[ Notice of Public Hearing [l Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [l Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [] Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project File Number 88-1 -R & 88 -1 -CA hereby declare that: Signature OF DISTL : O Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice [i Other 0 Other April 8, 1988 rox�s __Ye2•xF;7c;:N.';- 7J5 �:..i: , 19 . V ADJOURNMENT (21 /AGDA.4 -14) .... w+. unw+: vra�aussc+ xrn�uawx:. axw „arzxt�o-*.svro;vamxmratisiwrYr trarvxn�, wne..,, w, w. pv....,.. w.. w+. ar+ a. wr+ rsauw�nx�wnv.+l rov. M�w+k'N2+XVMA �.'�' City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 PLANNING COMMISSION April 14, 1988 8:00 p.m. - Council Chambers in City Hall AGENDA I CALL TO ORDER II ATTENDANCE III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 31, 1988 IV OLD BUSINESS Continued Public Meeting Continuation - 88 -1 -R and 88 -1 -CA Annexation area -wide amendments to: 1. Zoning Map 2. Zoning Code (annexation area and City -wide amendments) t,• TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING April 4, 1988 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Consider amend- ments to the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code and Map for the proposed annexation of the Fire District No. 1 area Mayor Pro Tem Harris declared the Public Hearing open. Mr. Beeler explained that this is the beginning of the Coun- cil's process in reviewing the annexation. They are required to hold two public hearings on the annexation, including a review of pre- annexation zoning, Comprehensive Plan amend- ments and text amendments. The Planning Commission has held one Public Hearing and has forwarded their recommendation to the Council. He pointed out the area involved. They are proceeding with the process so that it will be ready for the citizens to vote on in November. Before continuing the hearing, Attorney Hard issued an oath to all those wishing to testify. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, gave an overview of the proposed annexation area. She stated the present King County zoning and what it would be on a comparative level under the Tukwila Zoning Code. She also explained the changes in zon- ing that are being proposed. The Planning staff went out into the neighborhoods to talk to the people, explain to them what is going on, and receive feedback on how the people feel about their residential areas. They also had a citizen task force that reviewed existing zoning and discussed what prob- lems there might be. Based on these actions, the staff came up with proposed changes. Part of the problems that surfaced were due to spot zoning done by King County. An example of this is the Union Tank Works, which is in the middle of a residential area and had an Industrial Park Zoning - Planning staff gave it an M -2 to allow that use. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan shows it as low density residential so a Comprehensive Plan amendment is needed to be consistent with present zoning. She explained other areas that are inconsis- tent and the changes being proposed. There is quite a lot of trucking going on in an area to the north - truck terminals, truck distribution, truck sales, truck storage. In the Tukwila Zoning Code, truck terminals are allowed only as a Conditional Use in C -M, M -1 and M -2. The recommendation is to make truck terminals a permitted use in M -2. Ms. Bradshaw continued to explain the staff recommendations. The Planning Commission approved everything recommended in the Staff Report except for the additional light industrial and M -1 zoning for the blocks north of 116th and east of 42nd. They postponed three issues for further discussion: 1) additional M -3 zone, 2) zoning for light industrial blocks in Allentown, and 3) the mobile home issue. Ms. Bradshaw distributed Exhibit 8, a letter dated March 29, 1988 from Charles A. Shaw, Staff Counsel, Spider Staging Corporation, concerning sanitary sewage disposal. She also distributed Exhibit 9, a letter dated April 1, 1988 from James A. and Doreen R. Hamilton (12091 - 44th Place S.), concerning the zoning classification of the piece of property lying along the entire northern boundary of their property. Mr. Robert Macken, attorney representing McConkey Development Company, showed the Council their location - Boeing Access Road to the north, City Light right -of -way on the east, the Duwamish River to the south and west. They are asking for M -3 zoning. Basically, the businesses in that area are fam- ily businesses. It is primarily a warehousing -type. area. This is an area that depends on heavy trucking - sales, dis- tribution and warehousing. The problem is getting these large rigs with trailers in and out. You cannot make a 90- degree turn with these vehicles. It will be even tighter TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL', REGULAR MEETING April 4, 1988 Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) if King County widens the road. If this happens, the truck trailer businesses will go out of business - there is no way they could exist. The business character of the area will change. This could reduce the square foot rental fees in the _area; over a period of years it would have a great impact. If any of the businesses wanted to do a substantial remodel that would require a building permit, they would face the landscaping requirement. It is not realistic to figure they will not remodel. They need this capacity in the future or will not be able to stay in business. Landscaping has a beautifying effect but in this area it is a safety hazard. These large vehicles need to have good vision. Fifteen feet of landscaping affects the visibility dramatically. Mr. Pete Hedegard, major tenant in the area with Jencor United, explained that because of the landscaping and curb cuts for the building they are in, it is virtually impossible for a 40 -foot truck trailer to turn into their property. If the County widens the road they will be out of business un- less they can get the curb cuts changed. Another factor is the landscaping; the trucks just drive over it because they cannot maneuver around it. Along the buffer there are small trees, but as these grow the truckers will not be able to see to get out of the property. This area is unique enough right now that the landscaping requirement would be contrary to good use of the land. There is very little foot traffic. It makes sense to get the best utilization of the land in the safest manner. It is a burden to the property to require a setback of fifteen feet. Mr. Neal Robblee, of the Six Robblees Truck Parts business located in this area, explained that he has looked at the City's M -2 zoned .areas. The main difference is that the fifteen -foot landscaped buffer designates an industrial park environment. Where they are now was developed long before the concept of industrial or business parks came into being. They are stuck with what they have because the ownership of the land is so cut up. This area is already built up and it would tear them up to have an industrial park zone imposed on them. They like to be there. There are five truck parts businesses there and it is a very healthy environment. There are no residential neighborhoods adjacent. All of these businesses access onto a major highway, and this is another thing that makes a landscape buffer impractical for this area. Mr. Robert Macken commented that these people have been there for years. It is the old fashioned American business spirit that is alive in Tukwila. It will be a shame if these people can't continue. They would be very happy to join your City if they can get some of these problems worked out. This area was developed a long time ago; in order to fit into Tukwila and still not have a damaging impact, we would appreciate if we can get some cooperation and make some adjustments to this particular zone. The M -3 zone is the best solution. He thanked the Council for their time and said that if they can't get some amendments to the zoning code, the character of their businesses will eventually change. Mr. Dan Wolf, chairman of the Annexation Task Force, lives at 11821 - 44th Avenue South. He thanked the City for its effort, time and resources in bringing the annexation process to this point. The Task Force has been meeting weekly since last fall sorting through the annexation issues that pertain to the homeowners, businesses and the industrial community. They are contributing information that will be helpful to the annexation process. Some of the unresolved issues are: TUKWILA CITY COUNCt, REGULAR MEETING April 4, 1988 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) RECESS 10:12 p.m. 1) The possibility of M -3 zoning; it is the consensus of the Task Force to recommend this zoning. 2) The Mobile Home or Manufactured Home Code recommendation; he felt that whatever the County allows now, the City should allow. 3) Rezoning the residential lots on 44th Place South that back the Bur- lington Northern property. There is discussion on rezoning this property to M -1 to create a buffer zone to the rest of the residential area. We need to find out how the 20 home- owners would feel about this. If the goes to M -1, it is going to attract traffic and there are only three gates to the area. It doesn't lend itself to multiple use. Mr. Woody Wilkinson is with the firm representing the Boeing Company, Jorgensen Steel and Rhone Poulenc. He has attended every Task Force meeting. It has been a very noble experi- ence. They are located in the north industrial area and represent 80% of the assessed valuation. They have only one voting resident. They were not consulted when the annexation petition was drawn up. The initial reaction was negative. Then, they thought that perhaps Tukwila would approach this more rationally than Seattle did. Perhaps Tukwila would create the opportunity for them to explore the prospect of annexation, to look at the problems and to reach some conclu- sions about what would be best for everyone. The Task Force has done an excellent job of this. He commended the staff that attended their meetings and answered their questions. This annexation is different, it is not like McMicken Heights. This is an annexation that has areas and functions that are significantly different than those found in Tukwila today. We are big and complicated and have enormous invest- ments in what we do. The EIS really points this out. We have a pretty well- defined set of needs and do not expect to create a huge drain on the City. We have participated, gone through the process, and basically recommend all of the zon- ing recommendations that are included in the report coming from the Task Force. We support the idea of creating a zone specific for the Trucking Triangle. Mr. Don Elfstrom, 8104 N.E. 121st, speaking for his father, said they own property at the north end of Allentown which the Planning Commission recommended be zoned to M -1. This would make a good transition zone. His father has owned this property for the past 22 years. There are several old houses in there. With Burlington Northern there you can actually feel the buildings shake. In the past five years, they have torn down one four -plex and are looking at three others. They cannot get enough rent money. He recommended the Coun- cil agree with the Planning Commission. There being no further testimony, the Public Hearing was closed. The Council declared a recess. All members previously pres- ent returned to the Council table and the meeting continued. Councilmember Bauch urged the Council to go along with him and agree that the zoning will be a direct conversion and not a rezone on any property. We have had people before who wanted to use the annexation as a lever to get a rezone when the County had already refused their request. Our in- structions to the Planning Commission and Planning staff was to look, as near as possible, to a direct conversion and not any rezone. He said he hoped they would stick to those in- structions. Councilmember Harris commented that during the McMicken annexation some properties were downzoned. MCVGl+.ASnkYAi1W1 ,,, , . .., „ , . .... ,.. r 1 _ .............._................. o..`..,... a.., u.. rw. esv .�..vc.num.rwn.vrx.�w.,w�.hm ,nKaNa+nar..rir..en n!.. rwy�uM+ Yt" v�. iAA!\ W:•.f JftN>. i\ f�• il: h' M1". ?Ya4mr3.W+'4ri- e]Rtii`*!ucriw.xrr ert- . City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 7 :00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Knudson, Haggerton, and Hamilton. Mr. Larson and Mr. Kirsop were absent. Representing the staff were Rick Beeler and Moira Bradshaw. MINUTES 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA: Public Hearing - Annexation area -wide amendments to: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code (annexation area and City -wide amendments) Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained the process that has been used in responding to the request for annexation. Moira Bradshaw, staff representative, entered into record Exhibits 1 (Staff Report) and 2 (letter from Spider Staging Corporation with respect to the sanitary sewer; which will not be considered in this public hearing). She explained the Fire District #1 annexation petition area and its four sub - areas. In sub -area 1, which is industrial,there are not many problems between the City and King County's designation. In sub -area 2 there are light manufacturing, retail, a non - conforming auto shop, apartments, and community center. The City would duplicate the zoning except for a transitional zone of Office /PO on Ryan Way and for an extension of the high density residential R -4 to include the two remaining lots on the low apartment block. The remainder is proposed for low density and R -1 -7.2 In sub -area 3 in the Empire Way neighborhood there are apartments and a mobile home park, commercial store type uses as well as. light and heavy manufacturing uses. No changes are proposed, although Renton's comprehensive plan is for a green belt area for the southeast tip of the area. Ms. Bradshaw explained the comprehensive plan and zoning changes which would be in sub -area 4 to create comparable zoning. PLANNING COMMIS. IN March 31, 1988 Page 2 Ms. Bradshaw reviewed the zoning code amendments. Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, expressed concern with the height limitation. They would like to have a height limit that would give them the ability to redevelop at the current height limit. Dan Wolfe, Chairman of the Annexation Task Force, 11821 44th Avenue South, stated they would like another zone district of M -3 which would eliminate landscaping in a specified area. Woody Wilkinson, 2505 3rd Avenue, representing Jorgenson Steel, Boeing and Rhone Polene said they are interested in the passage of the annexation packet and have worked consistently with the Task Force to prepare these recommendations. Patrick Dillon, 3278 36th Avenue SW, expressed desire to have the City take a look at the property on the sharp bend of the river and resolve the zoning now so they would not have to wait to take action. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, entered Exhibit #3 (Highline Plan), Exhibit #4 (three zoning map boards), Exhibit #5 (Slides), Exhibit #6 (Drawings, Exhibit #7 (Revised staff recommendations regarding manufactured homes), Exhibit #8 (photo maps of the Helstrom properties). Mr. Dillon explained the present use of the property and his wanting it to be light manufacturing. Chi -Tai Chu, 4431 NE 23rd Court, Renton, inquired of his area, which is R -1 low density. Robert Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 6th Avenue, Seattle, stated he is attorney for McConky Development Company, and they would like to support the Task Force recommendation that a new M -3 zone be created. Neil Roblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South, stated they have a family business of trucks and distribute truck parts and equipment. Scott Traverso, 11025 SE 60th, Renton, objected to a 15' landscape setback preventing room to develop. Jack Minnehan 11901 E. Marginal Way South, stated a 15' landscape setback would put them out of business. Ed Wodovich, 11148 52nd Avenue South, expressed the desire for M -1 zoning on lots fronting 44th Place across from Union Tank Works and backing up to Burlington Northern. Saul Shapiro, 12929 Empire Way South, stated that mobile homes are not the best places to live. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map at 9:15 p.m. RECESS Chairman Coplen declared a five - minute recess. The meeting was called back to order with Commissioners present as previously listed. PLANNING COMMIS.,_JN March 31, 1988 Page 3 Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:25 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, stated page 13 of the Staff Report deals with heights. They would like to continue with the King County zoning as is suggested under discussion page 13. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:33 p.m. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE HEIGHT UP TO AND INCLUDING 115' ON AREA DESIGNATED ON ATTACHMENT M. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Rick Beeler stated height exception could be considered at another meeting. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO INCLUDE THE AREA NORTH OF 116TH WEST OF 42ND AND EAST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN IN AN M -1 ZONING DISTRICT AND A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION BASED ON THE GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE RAILROAD AND THE TWENTY -FOUR HOUR BUSINESSES AND BASED ON THE FACT THIS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. MOTION PASSED, WITH MR. HAMILTON VOTING NO. Chairman Coplen introduced discussion on the request for a new M- 3 type of designation. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated that the concern is with redevelopment of the existing businesses. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE M -3 CLASSIFICATION BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING THIS MEETING AND IT BE ON THE AREA SHOWN BY STAFF. * Rick Beeler stated this issue could be brought back with a purpose statement. *MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BY MR. KNUDSON WITH THE APPROVAL OF MR. HAGGERTON WHO SECONDED THE MOTION. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1988. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING CODE MAP AS PROPOSED AND AMENDED BY COMMISSION AND ZONING. CODE AMENDMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE TWO BLOCKS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS; AND THE M.3 ZONE, MOBILE HOMES, AND HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE RAINIER BANK. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. RECESS (10:40 p.m.) MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE MEETING UNTIL APRIL 14, 1988 AT 8:00 P.M. FOR CONSIDERATION OF THESE ITEMS. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Respectfully submitted, Norma Booher, Secretary EXISTING DISCUSSION City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT IN HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE Supplement to March 17 Staff Report The 15 -foot front yard landscape requirement in the M -2 zone is 7 feet more than the 8 -foot front yard landscape requirement of the existing M -H King County zone. The Tukwila requirement of additional landscaping only appears to be adverse in an area shown on Attachment N. The area is developed with a large number of truck /trailer -type businesses and parcels which are constricted by size, adjacent roads, the river, and /or utility easements. The 15 feet of appears to be reasonable and desirable in the exist- ing M -2 district in the City and the remaining M -2 districts in the annexation area. Therefore some alternative not available in the current City code is necessary to provide comparable zoning for the subject area. The testimony received characterized the area as unique from typically large heavy manufacturing sites which accommodate a manufacturing process. The area currently is a mix of commercial, hotel, office, wholesale, truck terminal, storage and residential uses. The predominant use is truck - related sales or businesses which receive daily truck traffic. A landscape buffer, however narrow, can be effective in defining the roadway and providing visual improvement and relief from concrete and asphalt. A landscape area helps separate maneuvering and parked traffic from the road. A grass strip with trees strategically placed between curb cuts does not inhibit views or public safety, or the City could not require landscaping in any commercial area. A 4 -foot area requires expertise in tree selection, whereas 5 feet gives much wider discretion in choice of plant material. Much of the discussion has focused on the needs of truck traffic. These needs and problems are felt in the existing business community of Tukwila. A landscaping exemption for all businesses in the City and annexation area with frequent truck traffic would eliminate landscaping in a majority of areas in the City's commercial /industrial zones. Therefore one solution is to create a new zoning district which recognizes the uniqueness of the annexation area. However, other solutions are also available. These solutions are discussed below. ALTERNATIVES M -2L r........w... —.r u...•.. ....«......... .aswxowrwtaneMa:eimfi.:7ctF!..rt fit 5 feet None None To include grass and street trees every 30 feet L , . LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT IN HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE Page 2 1. Add a new Section 18.43 - M -2L whose purpose would be as follows: The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique in- dustrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibra- tion, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards in recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. Amend Table 2 - Required Landscape Areas ZONE FRONT SIDE REAR 2. Change the landscape requirement in the existing M -2 zone to permit 5 feet of landscaping for truck terminals and heavy trucking - related businesses and services. 3. Change the landscape requirement in the existing M -2 zone to 5 feet rather than existing 15 feet. EXISTING ALTERNATIVES (22 /88- 1- CPA.S) TRANSITION BETWEEN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND SINGLE - FAMILY DISTRICTS IN ALLENTOWN /DUWAMISH NEIGHBORHOOD As shown on Attachment D, the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Map, light indus- try uses are positioned adjacent to low density residential uses. Now a heavy industrial use - the Union• Pacific and Burlington Northern Railroad railways and yards - is adjacent to single - family development. The Planning Commission recommended a Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning District change to Heavy Industry for the railroad property and Union Tank Works, as shown on Attachments I and L. This action leaves one block between the railroad and Union Tank Works and another block just south of the Hub Center's entrance, with a Light Industry Comprehensive Plan designation and R -1 zoning. The implication is that Light Industry is perceived as appropriate but change in use is not ready to occur until circumstances change (e.g., adequate utilities are available, streets are improved, etc.). The implications of a more intense zone for the subject blocks is discussed on page 7, Item 5.b of the March 17 Staff Report. There are 22 single- family homes in the subject blocks and one nonconforming Light Industrial use. The Kroll Map indicates that two homes were recently built and none have been demolished. The condition of the homes range from poor to excellent with no obvious pattern. Whereas the railroad tracks and freight yard may be unappealing for the subject property owners, the view impact is confined and can be screened with vegetation. Noise impact is not mitigated. The traffic from the Burlington Northern HUB Center is also confined to the one entrance and exit onto 124th Street. A change of zoning would eventually lead to development that will introduce traffic onto the residential streets. That traffic will have a greater adverse impact than the now - needed transition. In addition, the land use intent of the annexation is to provide parity. The sub- ject change would impact the 22 homeowners within the subject area as well as the innumerable homeowners across the street and throughout the neighborhood. 1. Provide R -1 -7.2 zoning, thereby retaining the status quo. 2. Change the zoning to M -1 (Light Industry), which has a 25 -foot front yard (4 feet less than the 30 feet required for R -1), no side and 5 -foot rear. 3. Change the zoning to C -M (Industrial Park), which has a 50 -foot front yard setback and 5 -foot side and rear. FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Leacnd •mom= Study Arca Boundary Proposed "M District CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA C. 1 1 \ NORTH ATTACHMENT N FIGURE 1 21.51.040 - 21.51.0.- ZONING 946 in lieu of new plantings, provided they contribute to achieving the intent of this subsection. B. TYPE II: VISUAL BUFFER. Type II landscaping shall consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings including living trees, shrubs and ground covers. Plantings of shrubs and ground covers shall be chosen and spaced to result in a total covering of the landscape strip. Shrubs shall be of a type that achieve a height of approximately six feet within three years, and effectively screen views along the length of the planting strip. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum trunk diameter of one and three - quarter inches at time of planting; evergreen trees shall be a minimum four feet tall at time of planting. All trees shall be spaced at intervals resulting in touching of branches after ten years of normal growth. Trees shall be staggered in two or more rows when the minimum width of the landscaping strip is twenty feet or more. Existing vegetation, architectural barriers or grading (with a maximum slope of 3:1) may be incorporated into the landscape design as set forth in Section 21.51.050, and shall be considered acceptable in lieu of new plantings, provided they contribute to achieving the intent of this subsection. C. TYPE III: SEE - THROUGH BUFFER. Type III landscaping shall consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings including living trees, shrubs and ground covers. Plantings of shrubs and ground covers shall be chosen and spaced to result in a covering of the landscape strip within three years. Shrubs shall be of a type that do not exceed a height at maturity of approximately three to four feet. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum trunk diameter of one and three - quarter inches at time of planting, and be spaced so as to result in touching of branches after ten years of normal growth. Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of four feet tall at time of planting and spaced so as to result in a space between trees approximately equal to the mature spread of the trees used. Existing vegetation, architectural barriers, or grading (with a maximum slope of 3:1) may be incorporated into the landscape design as set forth in Section 21.51.050, and shall be considered acceptable in lieu of new plantings, provided they contribute to achieving the intent of this subsection. D. TYPE IV: OPEN AREA LANDSCAPING. Type IV landscaping shall consist of canopy -type deciduous trees or spreading evergreen trees planted in wells or strips, with a mix of living evergreen and deciduous ground covers and low shrubs. Shrubs shall be of a type that do not exceed a height at maturity of approximately three to four feet. Planting wells or strips shall be a minimum of thirty -two square feet in area, with the narrowest dimension not less than four feet. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum trunk diameter of one and three - quarter inches at time of planting. Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of four feet tall at time of planting. Existing vegetation, architectural barriers, or berms may be incorporated into the landscape design as set forth in Section 21.51.050, and shall be considered acceptable in lieu of new plantings, provided they contribute to achieving the intent of this subsection. (Ord. 5003 S 4, 1980). 21.51.050 Modification of landscaping requirements. A. The manager may authorize reduced width of plantings or waive some or all landscaping requirements in the following instances: 1. In business /commercial and industrial zones, wherever a building is proposed to be placed up to the rear or side property line not abutting a public street, and the wall surface above ground level is textured concrete, brick, or stone and the height of the wall does not exceed eighteen feet above the grade of the abutting lot; provided mechanical venting through such walls LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 947 ` °21.51.050 - 21.51.060 is prohibited, and rooftop mechanical venting and other machinery which would be visible from abutting, less intensively zoned properties is screened; 2. Whenever a building utilized for business or office purposes is proposed to be placed within.. ten feet of the street right -of -way and there are no loading docks on such street, and at least fifty percent of the wall length is utilized for window and door construction, and the setback is utilized in effect as a sidewalk; provided approved street trees are planted within the ten -foot setback or within the street right -of -way, not more than twenty -five feet on center. In those instances where King County is committed to maintaining other landscaping within street rights -of -way within the same block as street trees planted in accordance with this subsection, King County shall assume responsibility for maintenance of those plantings approved within the right -of -way; 3. When architectural barriers or berms are incorporated into the design of the landscaping and contribute to the intent of the type of landscaping required and the minimum width of planting is not reduced by more than fifty percent; 4. When application of requirements of this section would result in more than fifteen percent of the site area being landscaped, in which instance the manager shall modify those requirements such that not more than fifteen percent of the site must be landscaped, provided the landscaping and corresponding setbacks required are those most beneficial to the public; 5. When the inclusion of significant existing vegetation located on the site would result in as good as or better satisfaction of the purposes of this chapter; 6. When, in the case of required perimeter landscaping adjacaent to public street rights -of -way, the ultimate street improvements for that right -of -way have been installed or will be installed as a requirement of approval of the development, and the Department of Public Works and the Real Property Division determines that the proposed landscaping of that portion of the right -of -way between the property line and sidewalk is acceptable, the manager may allow such landscaping in lieu of required landscaping within the development; provided the type and area of planting is comparable to that normally required and adequate provisions are made for permanent maintenance; 7. When existing conditions on or adjacent to the site, including differences in elevation, existing vegetation, location of existing structures or utilities would render application of requirements of this chapter ineffective or result in scenic view obstruction; 8. When the site is less than an acre in area and was a legal building site prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter. B. Where alternative landscaping is proposed the manager shall give all owners of property located within one hundred feet of any boundary of the subject property written notice of the proposed alternative landscaping within twenty days of filing of an application, and allow fifteen days for comment before making a decision. The decision of the manager regarding alternative landscaping shall be made within forty -five days of filing of an application, shall be transmitted in writing to the applicant and all interested parties, and shall identify reasons for denial or requirements for modifications, if any. The decision of the manager regarding alternative landscaping shall be final unless an aggrieved person appeals that decision to the zoning and subdivision examiner pursuant to KCC Chapter 20.24. (Ord. 5003 S 5, 1980). 21.51.060 Plan requirements. The site plan shall be accurately drawn, using an appropriate engineering or architect scale, and showing the following: O Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting El Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [I Shoreline Management Permit (SEE ATTACHED) A F L D A V I T O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet a»xo.erere I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project FIRE DIST. #1 ANNEXATION OF DI STR..UT ION declare that: 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Signatu File Number 0 Notice of Action (] Official Notice [] Determination of Nonsignificance [j Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [I Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [I Other C1 Other FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 1988 lenste.m ornt+rCalkinxats .Vi COZW'ddCVVIIXC;V=' i. , 19 . Citiof Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on March 31, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission Public Hearing Case Number: 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Applicant: City of Tukwila Request: Area -wide amendments to: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code Location: . Proposed annexation area of Fire District No. 1, generally bounded by the City of Seattle, Empire Way, City of Renton, City of Tukwila,•East Marginal Way and the Duwamish River. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement 'or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday March 20, 1988 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, File 6191-ft1(9O ) 99196 uoleu!%$oM piongnog Je4ueownog OOl9 1N91N1111/d30 ONINNV1d CI,M 10 413 AI ‘ FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY L PROPOSED COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONES R -1 SINGLE FAM LY R-4 LOW APARTMENTS RMBI MULTIPLE iE.SDENCE HIGH DENSITY C -1 NEIGHBORHOOD FETAL C -2 REGIONAL FETAL M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH i ASSOC.,NIC. STALZER a ASSOCIATES TDA WC. NORTH FIGURE MF U-1 LT'f wtD6 AvLSO: Pic--'1 FliZl� DISTRIa i AtA6NDMet.Ir C1hj OF mKwtt.A City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Knudson, Haggerton, and Hamilton. Mr. Larson and Mr. Kirsop were absent. Representing the staff were Rick Beeler and Moira Bradshaw. MINUTES 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA: Public Hearing - Annexation area -wide amendments to: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code (annexation area and City -wide amendments) Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained the process that has been used in responding to the request for annexation. Moira Bradshaw, staff representative, entered into record Exhibits 1 (Staff Report) and 2 (letter from Spider Staging Corporation with respect to the sanitary sewer; which will not be considered in this public hearing). She explained the Fire District #1 annexation petition area and its four sub - areas. In sub -area 1, which is industrial,there are not many problems between the City and King County's designation. In sub -area 2 there are light manufacturing, retail, a non - conforming auto shop, apartments, and community center. The City would duplicate the zoning except for a transitional zone of Office /PO on Ryan Way and for an extension of the high density residential R -4 to include the two remaining lots on the low apartment block. The remainder is proposed for low density arld R -1 -7.2 In sub -area 3 in the Empire Way neighborhood there are apartments and a mobile home park, commercial store type uses as well as . light and heavy manufacturing uses. No changes are proposed, although Renton's comprehensive plan is for a green belt area for the southeast tip of the area. Ms. Bradshaw explained the comprehensive plan and zoning changes which would be in sub -area 4 to create comparable zoning. PLANNING COMMI; ON March 31, 1988 Page 2 Ms. Bradshaw reviewed the zoning code amendments. Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, expressed concern with the height limitation. They would like to have a height limit that would give them the ability to redevelop at the current height limit. Dan Wolfe, Chairman of the Annexation Task Force, 11821 44th Avenue South, stated they would like another zone district of M -3 which would eliminate landscaping in a specified area. Woody Wilkinson, 2505 3rd Avenue, representing Jorgenson Steel, Boeing and Rhone Polene said they are interested in the passage of the annexation packet and have worked consistently with the Task Force to prepare these recommendations. Patrick Dillon, 3278 36th Avenue SW, expressed desire to have the City take a look at the property on the sharp bend of the river and resolve the zoning now so they would not have to wait to take action. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, entered Exhibit #3 (Highline Plan), Exhibit #4 (three zoning map boards), Exhibit #5 (Slides), Exhibit #6 (Drawings, Exhibit #7 (Revised staff recommendations regarding manufactured homes), Exhibit #8 (photo maps of the Helstrom properties). Mr. Dillon explained the present use of the property and his wanting it to be light manufacturing. Chi -Tai Chu, 4431 NE 23rd Court, Renton, inquired of his area, which is R -1 low density. Robert Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 6th Avenue, Seattle, stated he is attorney for McConky Development Company, and they would like to support the Task Force recommendation that a new M -3 zone be created. Neil Roblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South, stated they have a family business of trucks and distribute truck parts and equipment. Scott Traverso, 11025 SE 60th, Renton, objected to a 15' landscape setback preventing room to develop. Jack Minnehan 11901 E. Marginal Way South, stated a 15' landscape setback would put t out of business. Ed Wodovich, 11148 52nd Avenue South, expressed the desire for M -1 zoning on lots fronting 44th Place across from Union Tank Works and backing up to Burlington Northern. Saul Shapiro, 12929 Empire Way South, stated that mobile homes are not the best places to live. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map at 9:15 p.m. RECESS Chairman Coplen declared a five - minute recess. The meeting was called back to order with Commissioners present as previously listed. PLANNING COMMIS. .N March 31, 1988 Page 3 Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:25 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, stated page 13 of the Staff Report deals with heights. They would like to continue with the King County zoning as is suggested under discussion page 13. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:33 p.m. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE HEIGHT UP TO AND INCLUDING 115' ON AREA DESIGNATED ON ATTACHMENT M. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Rick Beeler stated height exception could be considered at another meeting. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO INCLUDE THE AREA NORTH OF 116TH WEST OF 42ND AND EAST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN IN AN M -1 ZONING DISTRICT AND A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION BASED ON THE GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE RAILROAD AND THE TWENTY -FOUR HOUR BUSINESSES AND BASED ON THE FACT THIS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. MOTION PASSED, WITH MR. HAMILTON VOTING NO. Chairman Coplen introduced discussion on the request for a new M- 3 type of designation. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated that the concern is with redevelopment of the existing businesses. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE M -3 CLASSIFICATION BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING THIS MEETING AND IT BE ON THE AREA SHOWN BY STAFF. * Rick Beeler stated this issue could be brought back with a purpose statement. *MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BY MR. KNUDSON WITH THE APPROVAL OF MR. HAGGERTON WHO SECONDED THE MOTION. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1988. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING CODE MAP AS PROPOSED AND AMENDED BY COMMISSION AND ZONING. CODE AMENDMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE TWO BLOCKS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS; AND THE M -3 ZONE, MOBILE HOMES, AND HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE RAINIER BANK. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. RECESS (10:40 'p.m.) MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE MEETING UNTIL APRIL 14, 1988 AT 8:00 P.M. FOR CONSIDERATION OF THESE ITEMS. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Respectfully submitted, Norma Booher, Secretary