Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 88-01-DR - SOUTHCENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK - BUILDING 447 DESIGN REVIEW
88-01-dr 18200 olympic avenue south southcenter south industrial park building 447 LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Sheet 2 of 4 Filed for record at the request of: Name BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. Return to: Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON APPROVAL Department of Planning: Examined and approved this day of 19 _,__ _ Vi rector, '6epartment o `PTan' nfing Dept. of Public Works: Examined and approved this d'ay of 19 recto ept. o u is W orks NEW LOT 22 Lot 22 and a portion of Lot 23 as said lots are shown on City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 78 -455P recorded under King County Recording No. 7905011098, as revised by Boundary Line Adjustment No. 86 -57BLA recorded under King County Recording No. 8612010233 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly right -of -way line of Riverside Drive, said point being S78 "E 4.00 feet from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 22; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING along the northerly right -of -way line of Riverside Drive and the boundary line of said Lots 22 and 23 N78 °36'10 "W 44.00 feet; thence tangent to the preceding course along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 110.00 feet and a central angle of 43 °20'41" an arc distance of 83.22 feet; thence leaving said right - of -way line of Riverside Drive N78 °36'10 "W 119.49 feet; thence N11 °23'50 "E 846.14 feet; thence S75 °45'00 "E 11.44 feet; thence 556 99.00 feet; thence 544 °26'00 "E 100.00 feet; thence 537 °39'00 "E 70.58 feet; thence S11 °23'50 "W 675.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 185,798 square feet of land more or less (4.263 acres). NEW LOT 23 A portion of Lot 23 as said lot is shown on City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. 86 -57BLA recorded under King County Recording No. 8612010233 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly right -of -way line of Riverside Drive, said point being 578 4.00 feet from the southwesterly corner of said Lot 23; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING,' leaving said northerly right -of -way line N11 °23'50 "E 675.39 feet to a point on the boundary line of said Lot 23; thence along said boundary line S37 °39'00 "E 29.42 feet; thence 536 °49'OOE 99.00 feet; thence S36 °08'00 "E 100.00 feet; thence 535 °35'00 "E 99.00 feet; thence S29 °38'00 "E 32.89 feet; thence S11 °23'50 "W 430.27 feet to a point on the northerly right -of -way line of said Riverside Drive; thence along said northerly right -of -way line N78 °36'10 "W 263.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 146,768 square feet of land, more or less (3.369 acres). DR /ljr 3 -570- 1602 -21 2/2/88 Sheet 2 of 4 DECLARATION: Know all men by these presents that the undersigned, owner in fee simple of the land herein described, does hereby make an application for a boundary line adjustment thereof. The undersigned further declares that the attached map is the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment and that same is made with the free consent and In accordance with the desire of the owner. In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals *Secrets STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) COR By: ROP R INV TORS Peter T. Bepler, I ATTEST: Vice President - General C ounsel.. • 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of l98 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and o r t State of New Yor , c , o sworn, personally appeared Peter T. Bepter, II and , to'r Vi wn to be the Vice President and Assirrtaat Secretary to CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS, the trust that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said trust for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that said individual was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and yea his certificate first above written. / ,i. No4r u is in and for the State of Iew York, residing at Notary te tra ar of New Yolk ausiin.d in Weethemsr Commission E, Ims Nov. 310, Page 3 of 4 New Bdey c'ornmon Yo Gofs 22623 1- ine Cornmor, Land Surveyor's Certificate: This Boundary Line Adjustment correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute. .Direction: Date 4444/S-408 Certificate 4444/S-408 Boundary Line Adjustment No. Map on File in Vault Scale: Stamp City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 STAFF REPORT to the Board of Architectural Review Prepared February 16, 1988 HEARING DATE: February 25, 1988 FILE NUMBER: 88 -1 -DR: Building 447 APPLICANT: Alfred Croonquist Architects REQUEST: Design review approval to add 32 spaces to an existing parking lot located within the shoreline zone. LOCATION: Building 447, Southcenter South Industrial Park, 18200 Olympic Avenue South ACREAGE: 4.02 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DISTRICT: CM (Industrial Park) SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS issued February 17, 1988 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Parking Plan (B) Parking Plan with recommended landscape modifications STAFF REPORT to the BAR VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Existing Development: The project is located east of Building 447 of the Southcenter South Industrial Park. Adjacent uses include warehouses, offices and associated parking. 2. Terrain: The building and parking lot are located on flat terrain. The Green River is adjacent to the site. 3. Vegetation: Grass is currently found on the site. It will be removed and covered by the asphalt from the parking lot. An existing tree clump will be retained. Additional trees and shrubs will be planted on the site once the paving is completed. BACKGROUND In 1979, Building 447 was built without providing the minimum parking require- ments. The current proposal will include improvements and changes to the existing parking lot to bring it up to code. Upon completion, the building will have a total of 99 parking spaces, nine more than required (Attachment A). In addition, a 20 -foot wide fire lane will be extended from the new parking area around the northwest corner of the building to provide fire access. The Planning staff has been working closely with the applicant to expedite the review and processing of this project to bring the building into compliance. Through a separate permit process, the applicant is seeking a boundary line adjustment to consolidate all the parking onto the property associated with Building 447. Portions of the property are located in the Shoreline area and so the develop- ment automatically falls within the jurisdiction of the Board of Architectural Review. DECISION CRITERIA FINDINGS The applicable Tukwila Zoning Code Design Review criteria are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Review Guidelines 88 -1 -DR: Building 447 Parking Lot Page 2 1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site No structure is proposed. Parking spaces will be built immediately adjacent to the building. 32 new spaces are located within the 200 -foot shoreline zone. Under the proposal, the parking spaces will be added immediately adjacent to Building 447. Twenty -nine spaces will be painted out and relocated to the STAFF REPORT to the BAR 88 -1 -DR: Building 447 Parking Lot Page 3 immediate north. An access easement will be provided for access to parking on both lots. A fire lane will be constructed immediately adjacent to the building on the building's northwest edge. All improvements will clear the toe of the dike. 2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The parking has been designed so that 30 spaces in the easement area will serve a new building proposed on the east side of Building 447. 3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment Three landscaping "islands" are proposed along the building's eastern wall. Scotch pine will be placed along the toe of the dike to screen the parking improvements from the riverside trail. Existing big leaf maple clumps will be retained along the building's north side. The Planning staff recommends that an additional landscape island be placed in the parking lot across from the proposed island to break the expanse of pavement. One parking space will be removed in order to accommodate addi- tional parking lot landscaping (Attachment B, #1). Further, the 'staff recommends placement of two additional trees just beyond the existing clump of broadleaf maple. The additional landscaping will improve the screening of the existing storage yard from the river trail and will also link the existing and new plantings (Attachment B, #2). 4. TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design The proposal does not include a building. '5. TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture The proposal does not include miscellaneous structures nor street furniture. CONCLUSIONS 1. Proposed improvements will bring the building's parking and fire access up to code. 2. A boundary line adjustment will be required prior to any parking lot changes or improvements. 3. The parking lot changes and fire lane access are in conformity with the shoreline management plan. 4. Landscaping plans substantially retain existing clusters of broadleaf maple. 5. The proposal conforms to the criteria of TMC 18.60.050, as recommended herein. STAFF REPORT to the BAR The Planning staff recommends that the BAR approve the request with the follow- ing conditions: 1. An additional landscape island, and 2. Two additional trees be provided per Attachment B. (22/88 -1 -DR) RECOMMMENDATIONS 88 -1 -DR: Building 447 Parking Lot Page 4 OLVAINAC ifAM S. O ONNAFtour C4W • Ito' IND MCSMITY MAP 6 r.••••11.1••7 Li t t t t t . 1 - I — 7 I I - - • - - 1/ , --+ anumocromomumr4ailimwmpurofoullipppr eta 7 I 6. ivet'iy.;/0,7 -c 4t CO:1 11 11- 1 : -. . Vrpoir .... wwww.6. ■PPIII• 11Th 1111 1111111 I BITE PLAN masa sAliffirr-e• M APS zr=rortr.hor..Tb L t=4Ps gs q=0 5 = A 'Clr _6 I / / / - / 40 , / ri`trie.L.IN1M"1(> 7- KA .5.1. • i nt. a) :la - Pnt../- <soupy 7 ,rpe..0, ,rp•ar, •tcp.c.P5 Ft4eKti46, tounic tggts •1 a2.1r14 INVU AMID N. 0001111111111111 /U.A.• 11111111011111•01110111111105 tamertv sum OW IMP IONE WIIMI WWI SO arm& Issmaim GPM IMMO .1•4111,•NO A -1 PARKING PLAN WITH RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT B �IW I CI q #1 ADD TWO TREES I LW/ IIKIvZINIr0 ADD LANDSCAPE W I • • i I fl 0 ISLAND L: 1 : �. Q: �1':>:' �.:' �.�1�•.X:4'a;CnAlti•.?YUn.vtV... Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on February 25, 1988, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday February 14, 1988 Distribution:` Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File, - Dave4apneftt, and the`Oroperty legally posted. (21/NTC.2 -25) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC MEETING 88 -1 -DR BUILDING 447 Alfred Croonquist Architects Parking Lot Addition East of Building 447 Southcenter South Industrial Park located at 18200 Olympic Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98188 NiiA) 1 71.(1. Li (7 rYIFT)15-1-DR Parking Lot 2. RELATION OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: SHOREL ' JE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT t. CONDITIONAL USE R VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION TYPE OF ACTION: EX Substantial Development Permit [[ Conditional Use (l Variance 1. NAME OF APPLICANT: Alfred Croonquist Architects Address: 600 University Street, Suite 2520 City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98101 Telephone: 682 - 2690 [I Owner Q Lessee 5. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST AND FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT (INCLUDE ADDITIONAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS CONTEMPLATED BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION): S 25,000 6. GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: East of Building 447, E:1 Purchaser Q Other (Architect) 3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (be specific): Parking Lot Addition, Building 447, Southcenter South Industrial Park 4. CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: Warehouse and 18200 Olympic Avenue South, Southcenter South Industrial Park, Tukwila, Washington , within * QUARTER of SEC * of Township * N., Range * W.M., in Tukwila, King County, Washington, adjacent to the Green River. (* See attached legal description) - SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 2 7. LIST THE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (USE PROGRAM SECTIONS OR PAGE NUMBERS) WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT: Requirements as listed in the Tukwila Zoning Code 18.44.140(l)(B), (2)(C) and 18.44.150. 8. LIST ANY OTHER PERMITS FOR THIS PROJECT FROM STATE, FEDERAL OR LOCAL GOVERN- MENTAL AGENCIES FOR WHICH YOU HAVE APPLIED OR WILL APPLY, INCLUDING THE NAME OF THE ISSUING AGENCY, WHETHER THE PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR SAND IF SO, THE DATE OF THE APPLICATION), WHETHER THEN APPLICATION WAS APPROVED OR DENIED AND THE DATE OF SAME, AND THE NUMBER OF THE APPLICATION OR PERMIT: City of Tukwila permits as required for grading, paving and storm drainage system. 9. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. DESCRIBE TYPE OF SHORELINE, SUCH AS STREAM, LAKE, MARSH, FLOOD PLAIN, FLOODWAY, DELTA; TYPE OF BEACH, SUCH AS EROSION, HIGH BANK, LOW BANK, OR DIKE; MATERIAL SUCH AS SAND, GRAVEL, MUD, CLAY, ROCK, RIPRAP; AND EXTENT AND TYPE OF BULKHEADING, IF ANY: (To be completed by local official) 10. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES WILL EXCEED A HEIGHT OF THIRTY -FIVE FEET ABOVE THE AVERAGE GRADE LEVEL, INDICATE THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF AND NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS EXISTING AND POTENTIAL, THAT WILL HAVE AN OBSTRUCTED VIEW: 12. GIVE A BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND LAND USE WITHIN ONE THOUSAND (1,000) FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SITE: Industrial park including warehouses, offices and associated parking and landscaping. 11. IF THE APPLICATION INVOLVES A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE, SET FORTH IN FULL THAT PORTION OF THE MASTER PROGRAM WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE PROPOSED USE MAY BE A CONDITIONAL USE, OR, IN THE CASE OF A VARIANCE, FROM WHICH THE VARIANCE IS BEING SOUGHT: DATE: (To be completed by local official) (To be completed by local official) 02/03/88 (29 /SHOR.APP1,2) I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the above - mentioned applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that to the best of my knowledge the information submitted is true and correct. SIGNATURE: SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 3 •• I I - V 111M11111•••■• =MO NOM 111.1.111111M TIM= CeSX 31215.91•71111111WIDS 0011113M3 aaiSIGAMI soureariuvooary v-rrvionomecwom wen. vd-Jor+.01-. ivbagr914 "X\ a /. / •/ / - / - - . / \ / / -' - 4 a // / - ak./.. \`• c 0•5•4•••.1c. , anclr. • ; , / i I / . / ,,,-.,./ / (ra1 nr ..-1/ffi-41_•0 • SY. AaJ use•/••••• • • 11,11,25 eat. '00111 NVId 3J.II3 111J 1 1 I !' I II IIIIIII 11 [1 I .I 111 H i I 11 lliiq - *PIMA. Wraloaal• &Yr aI. Giber, • - r I r • Ito ; 0 • 1 dVW AJJNIOIA ,1 • •1 4,,4 .Los ..... 1. 1 .......1,-, .73. ,•■ .. .4 p , ..1. s . ..L.. ._ I ,..-oa.•••:. e r .0,2 ....L.Locrs •••,a,. — -4- T.7t 13 3/%11 31e1NIA10 • f q■I �a:2b7R:.",.:*: <<.�. ,....,.:ki6i "�� -:::�w �=:` ��3�r ?:3"fiL�a,r,"v1.a3 ?';i4!GL.' is R- :+"lr:�xvvwa. > wscer .M:.•rorcwerrsMCi.sv�aakr»rua ..vnw.u.w�.�+rmm.w...a SITE SEC. 2 BOTH AVE 0 CITY OF KENT SEC. 35 SR ° VICINITY MAP 2000 • 4000.' . • .CITY OF TUKWILA CITY , OF • RENTON� • • . • s .�_ TL E::; • A. BACKGROUND 1 °. L + • Cr' f ,° .: A ''ontrol No. k `cpic File No. /FP/! -3 - Fee $100.00 Receipt No. /4;9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot Addition Building 447 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Southcenter South Industrial Park 2. Name of applicant: Alfred Croonquist Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person ?l Russell Alfred Croonquist Architects, 600 University Street, Seattle, WA 98101 682 -2690 4. Date checklist prepared: 02/01/88 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Complete construction as soon as possible (Target April 1, 1988). 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Parking stalls may be added along the east side of the access driveway as part of a future development to the east. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None pending 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Boundary line adjustment Shoreline Development Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. This parking lot addition along the east side of Building 447 includes 55 paved and striped marking staffs on the property and a paved access driveway Th ca ed in an easement adjacent to the property. A storm drainage system wiTT provided. Landscaping will be included. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a4$ l description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasoniai!liy available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 18200 Olympic Avenue South Tukwila; located in Southcenter South Industrial Park; Vicinity map and legal description attached. -3- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes. Part of the project, wi,,him the Sho reline 7nnP_ • TO BE COMPLETED BY A "LICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Primarily silty sands. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minimal fill of imported pit run sand and ravel to bring site to level of adjacent l existing) parking lot. f.. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 70% of designated site. 2. Air h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical construction, dust. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Green River is adjacent to the ski e. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2Q56.^s i'F.•::,'. +:G':::5iiA1:d��k''il`Ssvk:::r i10.: :Gll's�nx•::.vnsr 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Part of the parking lot will be within 200 feet of the river. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will be collected into an engineered storm drainage system. -7- 4:x;i'.1i5 ,•.NZ:4.S;},'y;; y�;y'i�.1L ".w r^r.�- rr•Rw.w -ra d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs )( grass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass will be stripped from site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only : wac s;... cu• o �x r... rrun7s: nvavtala: f,.+. r[ csrr nv> uc. �r�,.. w..«....,.................-...,......... ,.,..,...,..,..........,.�..,.. ......,.........mo +.......,, ...«. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will include trees and Omuta, 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: other: Field mice songbirds, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is within the Green River Valley which • is part of a natural habitat for migrating birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No11 Evaluation for _,= Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None 7. Environmental Health b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only n+.:�.r.. >. ... ..r. i.%.3•:,n',nr .rr... . . :.�tTfl ?tied 4:�i::1 , :�.L ?rC�,!rt _ M1r.:Vr hc: «.v��n r b. Noise 8. Land and Shoreline Use 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary noise from construction equipment. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Adjacent uses include warehouses, offices and associated parking. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, the site is in the Green River Valli which had been used for Agriculture in the past. c. Describe any structures on the site. Warehouse Evaluation for Agency Use Only S WGh. r.. y- �. ncv: M: f.: Aht�tM? �: ?.T�+XVFl.kA./lrtl::4:}A /MfY:f d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No g. j• -12- Evaluation for Agency Use Only e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CM formerly M - 1) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light industrial If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is adjacent to the Green River. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None ♦+wAi.1 Ai•••;r ;.r 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Parking lot (at grade) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping will be provided. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Natural recreation related to the Green River. -14- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing . recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None y'ta'.��.ztekW V..0 sn�. n. .n.a.veuwiuni�c`te`��:5narflKNV wa�sa+f�ie+�.tbn 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is within Southcenter South Industrial Park, adjacent to West Valley Highway. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro stops on West Valley Highway. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 55 spaces added, 29 eliminated; net gain 26. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. C utilit urrently ailable the site: refuse service, to ep , an ary sew , sep c system, other. Signature: Storm sewer Date Submitted: 02/88 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm drainage system will be included. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. -17 c r Evaluation for Agency Use Only a rr.:.r:'<a a _ - ;.a .•e.� ,.,..ata�tnt �..: :rs:=.n'A rt;r,: cans r...., n�. w�.:......,., ................. ......•..�,,.....�..o.- ... -,:.. TO BE COMPLETED BY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No change Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No effect Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No change Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No impact Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No effect Evaluation for Agency Use Only A :�`..�........:1,.' �k.;;.,, ... ::8.:::.;ri:: „tSi rFrf. 2: �: Y- itFi.' YVL:'. 5`:• �t' �: s�:. ene.. i. n. r.<.,. ...�.,�...�•.u....,...,..,...ww u...-.:.. �, �.,. �. t.. ww..... w..« �., Q.. �.......}..+ �.,........... 4,......,.. e. �..• n� «wm........��wM:w.w..«u.. «.... +.,...... wm..... ru... mw««..- ..... .............�...b. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: None How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Will meet zoning code criteria 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No effect Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Nnne 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflict :AMICK An env 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None -21 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY A°PLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objectivets) of the proposal? To provide adequate parking for Building 447 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? No suitable alternatives have been found. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only (1' -23- 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive. Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No conflict Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • ''4.4;.1.7.thlera,...1.3:1•.-Uzglaik3144=1445£SIVAKESCX...:"4,474aUrilt ,02$171. 84T1-4 AVE SITE SEC. 2 CITY OF KENT- SEC. 35 vi se , • -4 VICINITY MAP 0 2000 44300 6*NTIO CITY ' OF TUKWILA CITY OF RENTOM17- LE- • . • ' 9 1 • •0 • • 4-.7-7- • : ;;;;W. - * r4, .,....Cee•■•■•• ■14.. OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS • • ••••-^•-•••` TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION BUILDING 447 PLAN •••••• 1 NO *CALE • 12011M.141.•••••■■ • / / / .'\ -/n .•'/ '. • '`/ / A/2'W ;//:;.,'::r:- / At ,,,,, - -i.' 4?" ' V / / / / 4 c.* 44. NJ 4 \ \/ 4 VICINITY MAP lO SCALE 0 . z z 4 a. (.0 0 w4 g M 4 a z i s co cc cff 1 41111 • 1 N- r . al WO SCI t1YT0allIIT - it s teal Mt., — NVIN ainsom R tan SECT ION C S ECIlION A. .�...•.,. . L . • SOUTH CENTER SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PAM BLDG. 447 PARKING EXPANSI011.' _ GREEN RIVER CROSS SECTIONS 1 i WILSEY &HAM caNtate�swl =rryW . f ria�ps r � w deep Gm ..• l� t�•IIM Nl �rYa lYtlttp��0� Id) • i u t; L7. t1L. iJ�:< 37.' rY' ih ?IH(�w1NJL'l:,tChL- ive+m';KUaW wnvwv�w,..acvr�s'xwcuS:. eft! �axwui+ NaMW.. 1v... vtrni ,.rn.wmnsN...+euwaa »w.W V... r...._ r. r.. wv�. a. w.« w, .+.rww..r.w�ww.ra...r.�...vrw «r W r[cn. LEG�.L DESCRCPTION Legal Description of Lot 22, Southcenter South Industrial Park. That portion of Lots 14 and 15 of the plat of Southcenter South Industrial Park as recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, pages 22, 2.3, 24 and 25 in King County, Washington described.as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 1.5; Thence N 11 °23'50" E along the west line of. said Lot 15 a distance of 698.25 feet; Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears S 78 °36'10" E having a radius of 110.00 feet an arc distance of 89.57 feet through a central angle of 46 to the true point of beginning; Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 119.49 feet; Thence N °23'50" E a distance of 846.14 feet to the north boundary of said Lots 14 and 15; Thence along said north boundary Lots 14 and 15 with the following bearings and distances:' S 75 E11.44 feet; S 56 E 99.00 feet; S 44 °26'00" E 100.00 feet; S 37 °39'00" E 65.30 feet; Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 40.00 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 11U.00 feet, an arc distance of 83.22 feet through a central angle of 43 to the true point of beginning. Containing 183,094 square feet of 4.203 acres. OIF `61-1-m L1oo a..Y�Pw ow y SourN-Wts r;oV•N 1DLA4TRj,'1L PaatK SLL AL'50: 1f1F ST-.1-5m1 EPIC--3- 88 Bu 44 1 sm' m..s,IU. tr mate • w T TILT m7 ON mom ram I• WEST • • M'mAKmeAe I. O,q w. 04 .11 VALLEY (tC P'e .r .NL OR SGTi4. 1 NUNGCit NLiMBE:L OF 3NFL � CV :W11...14 SEArk t4 oR {-TNI- IS PRAWN. • f t41i,pIN'T SrcnON mumeGR yu:✓5ER of 51I:k-T ON WMIi,H 51..:11•N a pFQ' N 11 wAl-t- 515�TION µµUMEEK GF SHL -T ON WNIC -i SECTION Iai PleAw N. pa p. NLIF DR. HIGHWAY LEGEND (TVPe:i1.) AREA PLAN SCALE 1" ■ 100 RIVEFI TTPICAL gamn GRouN1J 1=1 CANC PLYWOOD SUSPENpC7 ACAU5TIL6LC.£ ra = rI$I t- vJ.K6GFL IIII� - T OLYMPIC Aye 7 1_1111 ... -11II1lIIlULIIIIU.1.1. -- JIn'jig j1P., -.:•.1 SLOG. 300 (TTPICAL II I�ih1 NTmmANT • r Tail 1111 LI sl J1U111 AC.T. Alum. A.H. Bfl . Bldg. Cpt. C.I. C.B. Cont. Cont. • De D . D.S. D.P. Elev. EN. Acount.ical Tile Aluminum Anchor Bolt At Beam Building Carpet Cast Iron Catch Basin 'Center Lino Concrete Continuous Detail Donn Down Spout Drinking Fountain Drawing Elevation Enamel PuaLlc Pmmww+m POR 10 CAA. ' PROJECT 447 ABBREVIATIONS Ea. Each P.F. - Factory Finish Fin. Finish • Pin. Fix. Finish Floor GA. Gauge Galt'. Galvanized C.K.B. Gypsum Wallboard Glu -Lam. Glue- Laminated H.M. Hollow Metal H.W.T. Hot Water Tank Int. Interior I.D. Inside Dimension Lam. Laminated Mat. Material Mtl. Metal Min. Minimum N.I.C. Not - In - Contract o.C. On Center PT. Paint etaulm.o eeT.ACK PER VN^ RALINm. ACT (Ty CAL) relP U-1- DR Plywd q'd 0 • R.B. B.S. Street. Th'ld V A.T. MD. W/ j PJTLISCe. &hi-VINEa • . - - ._ -_ -_ -,__ ----I '® 0 Plywood Required Round Rubber Beim Service Sink • Structural Threshold Typical Vinyl Asbestos Tile Wood With • • PLOW' ♦I Ace.. 0 • • • •.• • • •l3 ex+ q 6 ,t• SDUTHCENTER SOUTH N PARK TUKWILA WASHINGTON PROJECT NO, 1 - 46 WINONA 5.8.7`1 DRAWING INDEX SHEET A-. 1 A -Z A -3 A - A - - Co -2 e -3 5 -4' s -s DESCRIPTION AREA PLAN, L-E61END, GENERAL NDre•S S ITE. 4417 RGnF PLAN , s`{M r E,(TsRlorz EL$VArict , 6EGerION5 WALL SEG'rloNS • rpm. ' LS F01.N17ATIoN PL. AH F•ooP PRA MIN el PI ee , 1--.1 e PANEL 10,4 PAWC.L. el.6V,w c9i.l"r PANEL cONNEC.TIof.J t - LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal Description of Lot 22, Southcenter South Industrial Park. That portion of Lots 14 and 15 of the plat of Southcenter South Industrial Park as recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, pages 22, 23, 2 and 25 in King County, Washington described as follows: . Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 15: Thence f( 11 E along the west line of said Lot 15 a distance of 698.25 feet :' Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 30.00 feet: Thence along a curve me-the right, the center of which beers S 78 °36'10" E having a radius of 110.00 feet an arc distance of 89.57 feet through a central angle .of. 46 to the true point of beginning: Thence N 78°36'l0" N a distance of 119.49 feet; Thence N 11 °23'50" E a distance of 846.14 feet to the north boundary of said Lots 14 and 15: Thence along said north boundary of Lots 14 and 15 with the following bearingi and distances: S 75 E11.44 feet: 5 56 E 99.00 feet: S 44 E feet: 5 37 E 65.30 feet; , Thence N 78°36'10 ".w a distance of 40.00 feet; ' Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 1111.00 feet, an are distance of 83.22 feet through a central angle of 43 to the true point of beginning. Containing 183.094 square feet of 4.203 acres. GENERAL NOTES 1. General Contractor shall verify all dtmeneions and building conditions before commencing • work. 2. General Contractor shall coordinate with his mho all bases, eurbe and access openings as required for mechanical and electrical equipment. 3. Chamfer all right angle corners on exposed concrete walls except where flush walls ebutt each other. 4. All work shall conform with applicable codas and regulations. 5. See mechanical shop drawings for location and site of roof opening. for mechanical ' equipment. Ventilation per section 1205 of the 1976 Uniform Building Code. 6. Chemical fire •xtingui.hera N.I.C. (not in contract) 7. All stud wall. and partitions including furred spaces eha11 be firestopped par cods. 8. General Contractor shall furnish and Install approved protective pipe guards around P.I. . • Valve., Fire Deportment connection., electrical transform. and gas meter.. 9. All doors, including exit., shall be marked per OSHA Standards. 10. Exit door hardwire shall conform to U.B.C. Section 3303 (C). 11. Complete fire alsrw,'hoee motions, eprinklets and extinguisher layouts shall be submit- tad per separate permit and epproVal of the Washington Survey and geting'eura.0 and rho Tukwila FIra Department.. Fire lance, hydrant location and protective devices shall be submitted concurrently for required approvals. 12. Neahanical and electrical systems including exterior surface and •ubgrsde improveaents, shall be submitted for separate permit. si . SITS W001 PALL. MSC. 81 CITY OR K•NT WIC. D5 CITY OF TUKWILA VICINITY MAP .cm Ma) cL1mvtc hV S 4000 111000 CRY Q INi� GANN .PRCj ,° 47._.x:_: _5tx.J r.I-fGE'N'5R.. - 51,U 1-f INDLJSTFZIAI.. • PARk-: ..- ruKWIL_A _ _ •: - ALFRID H. CROONQUI$T A.I.A. • AffOCIATIL.ARCNITICT$ DATO4.10 /MAWS, WASHINGTON •111114 RMIT NATIONAL SANK M C 1O .11,a • -KN SIE1 .NDI. : IIIIIIIIIIIIJIUIIp�gl III II II IIIJIII �plip II III�I �I jl jill Ijl Ijl�ljl I I I I I �I I III III 111 III IfJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I # 0 4 - S 6 7_1 8 9 • 10 11 12 IF THiS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT iS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO' � 1 THE IUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • ° nplun nn lr lHU� r vml i t 0E ea ad cc 92 02 vi CCI 22 0 L a • D0.433!: c . acl:F// a s uTY C� ,�i•NI..p vrowvt rx. I�.pp'h1UR.1' o. aory, rwq b 66. 17,31 0- PLnl %�w °L' w .. r I�F'T c _.. 1 7 =tea - ... {pp� ```aye 7101 .... , .., SI 7 — —T :. ._. .,,y fc . ._ ,film _ _— {,I.I I I : • 7 ■II I I) t —. e'- OI 1 K..✓ r , •JI J /, ' „II I -. a Il„ )i` .,; • e,1 t�v + - s � r =1 1 ¢ -I�.. 1 9 1 5 l: ^ �� i b, ! (�. ` PF•EV:�T 7 — X 15 "f m ,u9oC4wH) Iy11 - • F - 19"46,4 "Ph�.u` rAvl 17. _� •. �rwM) 132' l \/ 2S V . 'PPf:S c ✓P,IAEP:' ._ Tt+AYSFi:RME4 \ nG./ GA. OI r �19F.IFY :CC4;ILN� BLDG. 469 ' FIN. FLR. ELEV. 27.60 ■ APPROX.'ROOF AREA 126,000 SG. FT. 1 S'cIGGIE L:Nr - • , 1 . a.rs: amu s 'ror e.• i '4a' .y ;1;13 1 _. ∎• -•e; %i!iiL 11111 I A i: 11 I . . 1 111 " 1' S I 1 ll r'. J11•11T ;1AF-2J-IT .2" mvrec .1 •.I V j,” F01 961KG ,L G ve4tipr ec 110.4) 0 O SITE PLAN SCALE 1" 0 40' • ._ 12 -. Try !.►rl. TOP df 54+•11 ■v1G 51Dd • op OII.0 el•GV. 51,75 CAPFROS.> a7 'Ic,' •'r GLr:i_• ME 1314 OK � Llgl l! 1 iµ 11 pp�gggllllllqlllllpl��lll l�! �l lglI 0 1 7 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ; CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO OE ez ae LE vz sz •z cz zz Iz , THE 1UALITY OF 1 HE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 e ° c v c V c z 1 -9 II [ I! 1 11 III III I I - 1 I I I I �@ I ' IIII III II I 111111111111 11n1 �I �d11I I1 11 II 1 - 11I u1 m1u11 ul I I u n 1 w w 111111111111Inu111111111111u .,''ter• x'f c Ri , 1 °; +: yt ' ...L i ` .• _ _ . _ -. r.'t..i�. �":'%:; : :. frJ J 1 4 1 • i. f .. t 9X :i17 ` 3' m'c • •••:11ESJ5- _ INFC 1✓1A1* IP1-4 DJ w1U:a ,- IEIra -I'( 3o 1 6 j . rP,cx. I�p.2LI1JL^I e� 'v ✓if ccv'1r eG rwv 8'6+ fSIrG'1. �`�'1-' SY'-N :;Q2NIL; -BRED L^':' -2 CML!LTI- TENANT) PI¢� zc'1,1E : . 7 , , I L i M - I ;,I ar2r�. IYL•o• . • s5,.90 t ©0 '. :IIC rl WAT• L,.JF 51•Iw' AccPV� r-cnr al-CNU pWKCy.• 14 w ® Fr=ay .^- EPa,IIRED - '_ ' STANDPRO•' o.�:� !.•�T a -.- -:c cJlc: o A TS c+= c-ocN Ft=o arm•- CT`(PI -) • %C' =Y:G : ^, p;it\J .-1i d WGT24Z • TYPI6AL) - PT 71:.E- C�';,_.' v ®® • \ - • pu•IPL s',?I- •.r. -: - tiro NORTH No rl �G 4 1- , Ev'e , - 11 - r yr IF'( Iy a'NsL. S•5K1 - -..E= 21•a 1 LG= i�"�101�5 GN r._... ,1 Ga,<•�wE� GEN Kb - 5iMBoL-I • GI.F- AIJ - G1,r (c.,v.) 1 TIIR115r BLCY.I4INL^1 S IPZINILLER RISER - o®11 FIrLG I1 SAN r g nu , SITE 2IMEN5I0.1s =ITL 1 sdavM.-( &1 c M✓.tA L G,4np �/1uc. - RLb t 78517 9 ..1'u. 5 -Z, _- `-JC14 �_.... :x:: G `cr ,1 ' .'� '' 4 -1_ .r : .T' /..,4 • :\ ..‘•• o,1FCt J pr's. f ^ I ,e 1 OF [0 +w Lv P- , +- ?ri =ia!7 m ?: .'? RI'IFA7 ' • _ *fi r.. 1 • 1\ _a.,_rCC r.L�1 -Lases W:GGp GI.EVT71a-1s B7CI5 OF%%Da - 511: !' -I_I . ''l l! I I p _ N 1 ;ra PP'2vW5 14 4 u LIrY '.. -SD- 6TOWv1 D • �• T - - re.LEFFL%IJ P - wareF� - - - 6LElr,'r�•IG JITE' A�C.Or PLAN , C�Ei�ERAL sY 1S L- ; •:: vlloucr No: o N CRO Ory _ 2cCANN PROJECT •411. ' AFVI710Nl1 ° - 50 HCSKrCSKrreR'. SOId'rH INPIJS II�L. PaRIL'. '. rr _ .•I. u 11 h WANolhl DAM � ED r, `N � v t� ALFRED H. CROO TA +.A. N A SAOCI bES,o RCHIT! .. 1 5LAflLL WASHINGTON x51$4 ►NOW 206- �26110•