Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-02-DR - SCHNEIDER - PARKSIDE TOWNHOUSE DESIGN REVIEW88-02-DR SCHNEIDER TOWNHOMES May 26, 1988 Tukwila Building Department Subject: Parkside Townhouses Soils Report Dear Sir: On May 23, 1988, 4 test holes were dug and logged in the area of the the proposed structures, as shown on the attached sketch. Competent soils meeting the requirements of UBC chapter 29, cover most of the area approximately 18" to 30" below the top of the existing native soils. Test hole 4, on the south lot, revealed approximately 6' of fill consisting of angular fractured rock from 2" to 10" in crosssection. The fill is rather old, in excess of 12 years and appears to cover the Southwest slope and extend into the lot approximantely 50'. Consolidation of the underlying topsoil has been achieved and is at such depth as to have no significant differential settlement influance on the foundation proposed. No special treatment of the foundation soils are necessary and standard footing maybe used. I will be onhand to inspect the foundation excavations and monitor progress of the project. Sincerely, H.C. Bloss encl. HCB /eb HCB ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION 3211 Callow Road Lake Stevens, Washington 98528 248 -2471 MAY 1988 C CP: Of- l'LfiPJh1;NG C.EPT. _ .1 SITE PLAN NTS PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES SOILS REPORT - • EXPLORATION DRILL HOLE LOG PROJECT )24 e.SztVer* tePeoev /444'..sers HOLE No I- DATE Z $ -Be HOLE DI A. il)c RIG 5 8:3 41 SAMPLER AO HOLE ELEV AO DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER INITIAL. eir FINAL LOGGED BY ier-oe Akio/4s APeol3 /54.z )Q4. Acv g 3'1 /a , ' hitran 4-c & goa gia /-frite 0e7/4. ,Aide /looses, .r.e.,rp Smtoo , StZ 45 ratv ARC. de. 44see. /Sam Defon 0■Pal,0 Loins.e "VA .44frAte 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10- 11 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- • • EXPLORATION DRILL HOLE LOG PROJECT eit-1j.deS/.O6" 1 4C.Y4.'LV 46t IerS DATE 67:13 -88 / ✓Lw1I4s, .earoVS S/Gzy S . Vy SAtwo r i vtt' / HOLE DI A. Z - (� HOLE ELEV NA DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER INITIAL Se. Gr?1 S. -itA9 P/A $ 61?4iit/ - C &Napa, !.aclAilS /o /o �'' /?r, .s✓/ 8R.A/ TAN C i-re, r # -.Bar e97c .7 .40 RIG 5 e C h E SAMPLER Alair pm .A,f„ r p 4/41. FINAL phase ro S/eny O wSG Sol SM HOLE NO 4 LOGGED BY .4 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10- 11- 12 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- itcoes EXPLORATION DRILL HOLE LOG PROJECT Agee S6 1 6 TLrGLt/ /r(6cejCS DATE S . 23 -Se HOLE DI A. Z X G RIG Sep BdcgetbE SAMPLER HOLE ELEV A0 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER INITIAL Ni FINAL 4 ' LOGGED a f/4~S /0013 Se' C/ .S.f vo / z ar Go2�sci czis) 1 5.' c. r Svo , . .4rAv i�o LC' &.e.pni vitrav - ' s,. 7 - 44•, 11/ors/ —p Logo 3 Swi 4 - S �J HOLE NO 2 6 7 8 9 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17 18- 19- A EXPLORATION DRILL HOLE LOG PROJECT g�fek,S /Oc 7 •ti/ HOLE NO / DATE 5 -se HOLE DI A. Z )C G RIG S`So , K,S/o e• SAMPLER / HOLE ELEV N /A' DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER INITIAL ��i� FINAL LOGGED 6Y 4, 1CC/J Nc!/19KS 4.2013 £z . $ c/, S•hvr� ,*/44A" Cv/lyt! czi„ 7 ?z4 9/ 4 4-r r LC' e SAC 84N - 7 AVo 1- fiM3L6 Se Xt2/1 / R¢N f -, Moist pMWp Ptop Lex,SE Awe To/ S 2 3 4 - 5- 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10- 11 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- iutP..CliJ:�3caG`i,']: `' df"utH'1.v t'idii"ism,. i5 .2:412r,'ZtElP.'. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: File: 88 -2 -DR FROM: Rebecca Fox DATE: May 18, 1988 SUBJECT: LIGHTING FIXTURES FOR PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES jY.b* c aFlOi g.VSCY3xhLrS: +t'�. 7d'SCf fe17 Dale Schneider will use lighting fixtures P1 233 AB per written specs. This fulfills the Planning Commission's . requirement2 in the Staff Report. ;az�•rasv raym.w,,.w.ne�:�l:t1� :i:`.2: PATIO DETAIL PLAN 1. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 1. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 2. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 3. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 4. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 5. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: (21 /NTC.5 -12) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on May 12, 1988, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission Public Hearing 87 -2 -CPA: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALK POLICIES City of Tukwila Add policies on the design and provision of sidewalks in the CBD to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70 (Noncon- forming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning Code) and TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction). City of Tukwila, south of I -405 and east of I -5. Board of Architectural Review Public Meeting 87- 14 -DR: State Farm Castillo Company, Inc. Construct a two -story office building with 18,401 square feet on a 4.42 acre site. Approximately 100 feet east of the Interurban Avenue South/ Southcenter Boulevard intersection in the NW * of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4, Tukwila, WA 88-2-DR: SCHNEIDER TOWNHOMES DESIGN REVIEW G. Schneider Construct 9 two -story townhouses on two separate lots. East of 65th Avenue South, at the east end of South 153rd Street, Tukwila, WA. 88 -3 -DR: 6450 BUILDING Bruce Solly Development Company Construct a one - story, 15,000- square foot office building on a 53,000- square foot parcel. NW corner of the Southcenter Boulevard /65th Avenue South Intersection, Tukwila, WA. 88 -4 -DR: PARKWAY RETAIL BUILDING A. Shimatsu /Y. Mikami Construct a one - story, 24,243- square foot retail building on a 66,000- square foot parcel. On Southcenter Parkway, immediately north of 17015 South - center Parkway, Tukwila, WA. 88 -5 -DR: METRO INTERURBAN PUMP STATION ODOR SCRUBBER Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Construct and screen a 9.33 -foot tall odor scrubbing pipe and tank. On Interurban Avenue South, across from Foster Golf Course, Tukwila, WA. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday May 1, 1988 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) STAFF REPORT to the Board of Architectural Review Prepared April 5, 1988 April 28, 1988 88- 2 -DR:. Schneider Townhomes Gerald E. Schneider Build nine townhouses on two individual tax lots. Dead -end of South 154th Street and 65th Avenue South 27,720 square feet Medium Density Residential R -3, three- and four - family dwellings. DNS issued 4/19/88 Vicinity Map Site /Landscape Plan Elevation ( "North" units) Elevation ( "South" units) Alternate Site Plan STAFF REPORT 88 -2 -DR: Schneider Townhomes to the BAR Page 2 VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION FINDINGS 1. Project Description: The applicant proposes to build nine townhouses divided between three buildings on two separate lots, one on each side of South 154th Street. This property straddles the north and south sides of the easternmost end of South 154th Street. One duplex and one triplex are to be located on the north side of the street. On the south side of the street a fourplex is to be built (Attachment A). 2. Existing Development: The site is currently undeveloped. 3. Surrounding Land Use: Multi - family residential uses are located to the north and west, Tukwila Park lies to the south, and the hillside sloping down to Interurban Avenue is to the east. 4. Terrain: The terrain slopes at approximately 8% from the north lot to the south lot. 5. Vegetation: Blackberries and shrubs cover the property. Several large fir and maple trees are located on the northern lot. 6. Soils: A soils analysis must be provided by the applicant at the time of building permit review. 7. Access: The property will be accessed by extending 154th Street by approxi- mately 102 feet to the west. The grade will not exceed 15 %. 8. Utilities: All utilities will be available at the site as the property is developed. DECISION CRITERIA The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact. 1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site The site plan shows that the parking stalls immediately abut the roadway. Ten parking stalls on the north side of South 154th are broken into two groupings of two stalls each and one grouping of six stalls. There appears to be some landscaping between the parking islands. Parking on the south side of the street is a group of eight stalls unbroken by landscaping. (Attachment B) The landscape plan provides little detail about specific plant materials to be used in moderating the visual impact of the paved parking areas. The plans also show no sidewalk along the road. At the time that permits are issued, sidewalks must be provided per the Sidewalk Ordinance or an exemp- tion must be sought and received. STAFF REPORT 88 -2 -DR: Schneider Townhomes to the BAR Page 3 The five units on the north side of South 154th are a duplex and triplex building separated by 15 feet of lawn. Offsets along the building facades provide some separation, giving some break to the facade. 2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The three buildings are harmonious in texture, lines and masses. A land- scape transition is shown between the applicant's property and the adjoining properties. The landscape area abutting the existing apartments ranges from 8 to 17 feet in width. Landscape adjacent to undeveloped property ranges from 17 to 20 feet. Vehicles exit directly from the parking areas to the roadway, crossing less than 15 feet of asphalt. 3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment Although no contour drawings are provided, the applicant has indicated that the site will be made generally level. The landscape plan provided (Attach- ment B) is very general, showing little detail. The landscaping proposed around the building consists of a lawn with a few trees and shrubs around the structure. Five existing maple and fir trees in excess of 6 feet will be retained the north property. The landscaping proposed between the parking area and the buildings consists of grass and boxwood. Photographs of exterior lighting from the Bridgewater West Townhome project in Kent are indicative of lighting proposed for use by the developer. They are com- patible with the building design. The applicant indicated individual unit patios of approximately 200 square feet. Although there are no drawings of rear fences and patios, the appli- cant has provided photographs which he has taken of the Bridgewater West Townhomes. These indicate small patios for each unit and 6 -foot picket -type fencing. The applicant has said that he will follow this general design. 4. TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design The applicant is proposing a "contemporary" version of an architectural style which is generally traditional in appearance. The building floor plan is modulated somewhat with offsets. This breaks the mass of the building and emphasizes the individual units to produce a more distinct single - family look. Windows will have shutters. Roofs are pitched. Overall, the project will be similar in appearance to the Bridgewater West development in Kent developed by the applicant. (Attachment C and D) The building siding will consist of rough -hewn cedar clapboard painted in "Brown Owl ", a medium grey -tan. The trim will be painted "Mirage ", a dark cream color. 5. TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture No miscellaneous structures or street furniture is contained in this pro- posal. STAFF REPORT 88 -2 -DR: Schneider Townhomes to the BAR Page 4 CONCLUSIONS 1. The height and scale of the three structures is compatible with, and some- what smaller than, other residential structures abutting the site. 2. The applicant has provided some landscaping but has not submitted detailed plans. 3. The applicant is proposing to use exterior lighting similar to that shown in photos of the applicant's Bridgewater West project in Kent. 4. The proposed structures are of appropriate scale and compatible with neigh- boring residential developments. The pitched roofs and offsets avoid monotony of design. The proposed architectural style is "traditional" in style. The quality of design is somewhat higher that that of surrounding residential structures. 5. The present siting of two buildings on the north property creates a 15 -foot wide narrow, shadowy space between the buildings. Shifting the buildings on the lot, as shown on Attachment E, will enhance usable space and visual interest, and enable residents to better enjoy views to the east. 6. No street furniture is provided for the project. No drawings are provided of rear area fencing or patios. RECOMMENDATIONS Planning staff recommends approval of the project subject to the following conditions. 1. Submittal of a revised landscape plan prepared by a landscape architect to include the following items, subject to the approval of the Planning Director: a. Detailed landscape plan identifying plant materials to be used. b. Additional trees and shrubs shall be planted along the west edge of the property to enhance the transition between the development and existing residential structures. c. Break the eight -space south parking lot with a landscaped island. d. Show details of landscaping near individual units patio /fence areas. 2. Use of lighting fixtures similar to those shown in photos provided by the applicant. 3. Revise siting of buildings on Lots 17 -20 as shown in Attachment E to mini- mize unused landscape area and enhance residents' views. 4. Detailed drawings of rear yard fences and patios with materials and dimen- sions. BENSO H l2 0102.411 35 AS n11U HUDI 35 AS 0.401 S AS N1S1 M fdu`y P,vlgrmu>D A8 t+861 ©'1HOIHAd00 Zr drW aaS or 4Dw aas ATTACHMENT A. VICINITY MAP list � __i. S o Olil — 4 x lb Lobrimq • M‘Ye ll 1 0 44 10 24W pc.A.L. asni d 544 (16 " .- .. \4 '` CP 4 0 um 24 41" w "Tr 2-ULIrr 120 • • • + • "••-•-•••• etadO*s TYP/C 4L m. exinkial4e 116, °4ces -Q0C PATIO 4:44.4 feup 6:40201ftuag. ATTACHMENT. B SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN ' a Levd1 .F.• /WU retCFEp. NOW ME OILEFT 4 ATTACHMENT C 4111410114143"-TYPE 3.- TR. -ELIMAT BUILDING ELEVATION (NORTHSIDE) LEFT SIDE REAR RIGHT SIDE "I* II01 I FRONT JNIT 4111 :ANT WOW :fr:■T'11111111•• BUILDING TYPE ELEVA ;4". 1 -.." ATTACHMENT D BUILDING ELEVATIONS (SOUTHSIDE) A1 f.- 1-r INA gektvi &sc.4&i-, &in 6to ola yotA) kejctni v old cyow4 ti ovi- sit) • ATTACHMENT ,E ALTERNATE SITE PLAN Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on April 28, 1988, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: . 1. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 1. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 2. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 3. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 4. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained'at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday April 17, 1988 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. (21/NTC.4 -28) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Planning Commission Public Hearing 87 -2 -CPA: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALK POLICIES City of Tukwila Add policies on the design and provision of sidewalks in the CBD to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70 (Noncon- forming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning Code) and TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction). City of Tukwila, south of I -405 and east of I -5. Board of Architectural Review Public Meeting 88 -2 -DR: SCHNEIDER TOWNHOMES G. Schneider Construct 9 two -story townhouses on two separate lots. East of 65th Avenue South, at the east end of South 153rd Street, Tukwila, WA. 88 -3 -DR: 6450 BUILDING Bruce Solly Development Company Construct a one - story, 15,000- square foot office building on a 53,000 - square foot parcel. NW corner of the Southcenter Boulevard /65th Avenue South Intersection, Tukwila, WA. 88 -4 -DR: PARKWAY RETAIL BUILDING A. Shimatsu /Y. Mikami Construct a one - story, 24,243- square foot retail building on a 66,000- square foot parcel. On Southcenter Parkway, immediately north of 17015 South - center Parkway, Tukwila, WA. 88 -5 -DR: METRO INTERURBAN PUMP STATION ODOR SCRUBBER Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Construct and screen a 9.33 -foot tall odor scrubbing pipe and tank. On Interurban Avenue South, across from Foster Golf Course, Tukwila, WA. April 6, 1988 Dale Schneider Schneider Townhomes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. #1 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Schneider: You Truly, RF :br cc:H.C. Bloss .+�..n.rui .n._a.an .., .11�nc a�......`.^;:r 4�P' #:.Sr1g ".i'J'C�3; `Y.rt_:l:' n�ttv„1N.+tM -. w..Mn M u�.✓rn+...2. ri City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 O st) At the March 31, 1988 Development Review Committee meeting, staff requested additional information to be received by Tuesday April 5, 1988. This included: 1) revised site plan; 2) revised landscape plan; 3) drawings showing individual space behind buildings i.e. fence, patio; 4) greater offset of buildings; 5) pictures of your existing development; 6) example of project lighting; 7) examples of building materials and colors including paint chips, building, roofing. As of 8:30 A.M. April 6, we had not yet received this information. If we do not receive this information by 5:00 P.M. Wednesday April 7, we will not be able to complete our review of your project in time for the April 28 Board of Architectural Review (BAR) meeting. In this case, your project will be continued to the May 26, 1988 (BAR) meeting. Rebecca Fox Tukwila Planning Department N.B. We have also determined that an environmental checklist is also required for your project, as it is for all residential projects over 4 units. There is a $100 review fee payable when you pick up your checklist form. In order to make a review for the 4/26/88 BAR meeting, the completed environmental checklist is due to us no later than 4/12/88. o.o 1%, .ar APAK-1-0\ 11-9 1 c:) 1988 INK3 DEPT. LV 12:7 1g5 4-4 r - - 1 I I 0 -121i-k .112r:15:1- Lamp ; V)LJ uclt41 7.5 + .LigsT5 -r • , • . . . • • -;"-X r 4 5ou T44 11 S4 Sr P gA\ELIF e5x110' °sc. kicAzAz).`f A \64A-C- FVV:WC'EPDP-11AS ; 15474 z13 e-ox\vccC) . frstflW ay.e...,5 jJi.1 cZ7 02 -4-120eCt II Lt;., t.t 111 1 1988 PL.ANNING ZONING AND CODE DATA ZONING: K ^3 OCCUPANCY 'FL -I andr\ -1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION! V -N, NON- SPRINKLERED TOTAL SITE AREA IGCjR 5Q TOTAL BUILDING AREA 58W-Y- y PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE V5 BUILDING SUMMARY TYPE NSF AREA REDO A 9 J827 5f• TOTAL L 7 .7• £;p. UNIT SUMMAR UNFF NO. - NETA QUANTITY I.IUT( {2OI . 1207 SF ;1 UNIT 1287 1290 SF 3 UNIT 114.1 1110 SF 1 1 TOTAL 5 7 SITE COVERAGE A 'TOTAL- TOTAL LANDSCAPING (INCLUDING SIDEWALKS) PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS > C TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PARKING STALLS: ' 10 TOTAL CODES: U.B.C.-1985 U.M.C.-1985 U.P.C- 1985 U.F.C.-19S5 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE -1988 PARK1DE, bWNHOIES 1 DRAWING INDEX A I,GQ TITLE SHEET As Alp. 49 SITE PLAN A 2.0 A2.1 A 5.0 A3.1 A4.0 A4.1 A9.2 A SC A'5.I • "",y • • a a.• . I LAI 3., a £A/3J“. faa.al t\VVt• IYVluaaa• S.1 a alla. BLDG TYPE Q FDN., FLOOR, AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN BLDG TYPE LIMN., FLOOR. ADN ROOF z'RAIrIING PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- -BLDG. TYPE: A EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- -BLDG. TYPE E GARAGES - -PLANS AND ELEVATIONS - UNIT 1201 - -UNIT PLAN UNIT 1287- -UNIT PLAN UNIT 1143 - -UNIT PLAN WALL SECTIONS, DETAILS DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN SEE SITE 012.1.41-1DSCAFe. LEGAL DESCRIPTION G1UU1]63 11- 3 ACO11103.1 j PAeGal- A t,Ct , 14 PP's 2054 2 50 K 111¢ 3.121 17, el I°1, + WO BLOCK 2 VICINITY n■Ap A A10,, __ S V C so r il NEFF SIDEI C*if 111'5 UNIT Wr5 UNII rt.E.vraze. -7/ ;; 1.)Kiii I lel R.E.VE.E.Se IBILIXP illitikaricMin B JXTR.EJATIOS 4 pct: a. 2: .' S. L460011Atal) iV/ VrriNk e: Wi.N tr3 � s:. tis lt?IWW4d.,Vstet.t.W.4.,M.O•V.:x GCANVtAztail.•.AU.shus3,,a7M ".IANAV. e:,,,Mit402. psi+ /�u cu+ x�rt�'» m•: pto+ n f< uanSxaawwwrs +uWNW.vuecws..t.Nnnsma.+vudne r/ nv'+ r✓ n�'�Namtwtl�+ac..^S.•atvtRY'k::S •.. i5FTH f IRLDC7 A 9 A ICV • r . 1;1! 44,491161 '‘ •I "AAA." •-••;44 ow. pLOON ILAN warg.$ 1. Limit •orri -ors. *ca •op*S my- ralerv.t ■•■....4.:Z ar 1.4.4.f • Ito'. IP 1 ors enI*4* Amu. irms%Lik .xtei ella*;* 4 A■11 r NICM BEDRM 1 •■• 4.■ •,e Wt. WW1 t ' -•0. ; • lAD-! - 3 ..es- • 'J. 1 3AV.1 011 ri -- • 1. 10 2 41- 4 .• -.r .;r4.• z 110± D 4 PARKSIDE TOWN HOP\E6 ZONING AND CODE DATA ZONING; OCCUPANCY: Ri A t TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V. J unN- SPRINKLERED TOTAL SITE AREA 12,10C SGj. TOTAL BUILDING AREA PERCENT OF SITE COVERAG. .(c70 BUILDING SUMMARY TYPE NET AREA d "TOW- 400Q- uZir. UNIT SUMMARY urn NO. NEC AREA OUANTfy UIJIT 1201 UNIT 1287 UNIT 114.9 TOTAL 1207 SF 1290 SF 1110 SF SITE COVERAGE • IFAFpucA 'LE. 2 2 14. . TOTAL _. TOTAL LANDSCAPING (INCLUDING SIDEWALKS) PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SIiTF•nv PARKING STALLS: 4 TOTAL 13 CODES: U.H.C. -1908 U.M.C. -1985 U.P.0 -1985 U.P.C.-1906 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE -1980 DRAWING. INDEX A I.O, • TITLE SHEET ars Angzseo SITE PLAN LL..uy 1111: L rLlr., r1.UVra, curl t\l/Vr rtvu la ( ■ A 2.0 BLDG TYPE A FDN., FLOOR, AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN A 2, I BLDG TYPE B FDN., FLOOR, ADN ROOF F^ \MING PLAN A 3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- -BLDG. TYPES ° n A 3.I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - -BLDG. TYPE 'b' NA. GARAGES - -PLANS AND ELEVATIONS AppLkLE) A4.0 A1. I A1,2- UNIT 1201 - -UNIT PLAN UNIT 1287- -UNIT PLAN UNIT 1113 UNIT PLAN A 5.0 WALL SECTIONS, DETAILS A 5,1 DETAILS AS Art o LANDSCAPE PLAN: sr �L ki LEGAL DESCRIPTION : f2 -c t_ ''Es I.1 1'J 14-,15 IC", dI, u uR+anlJAr- c IC -SEAM B. II. V =1 l WIS. H. FLA1 I • E qla lu wuc-Icc. V:cepi \∎/ 0 31 . e..,F . VICINITY ALp , • •1 aA.J 111 \.A 1 V J. • 1 2 . qp. r d E r LAT V u _.: _ . 1 Qo • yaw t 0,J(2'ib & A\ -u ; Cr . l- . : 61[) \vr-P, �+ 441L �- i f D C4 J. �' v �G��,� �'�a,t AIJC Z */e A e N (Q LIM • t " I9 [ ROW Acild awl alvaeF u ri 1143 r k1ee324 •Z7 O. 15r • W ` }A.. PI kk 1b G '+`OILA bUC.WW7 4 u LwlOIJ o leo. j,.orO V-0aut 4 Wit) R -, z01-111•4 SI-De 13 • "now .121•14•10 •—••' _ t • • •-•a•- grid 1100 • fe ' 1 ( --•••■••, • " itt ■:.;" • 1 • .1‘_,‘ . ' la:141.6 g•T.0707 Clib••••■•• • .2••••• 1.,••• . - Or••$4, •.• • • - •,•51 •• •••••■1•2 ; 4 ‘ .0 • ,9)-x...s OS DANN Wirb ••••••••••• t•/!Is y .•,,t 1: 4 1 a • A • - 1.--•••1. -- • 0 •). 41001111110010110 !drag ,11-11 i 0,4 r .•,. • Ir• I •nv/S. — — - - - -,‘• ito V): MINIRINCIIIMI la. alms me l "°"1-1°A\E5 I OLD° IF 40.41 A 11111111111111011ff OI _ . flOrr 1 MAW !wok .2111411•04••• r•Aat-L. 41111NLYAKAL *a! ••••-•-•.•••■•-■ • "W' "VW^ 41:* AT .4.11.41111111 («oar gma 1. 40 0.111,4r. I I 11 0. 4 tzt. 4 .010 Pe) F PR F 13%-a-bR 17 Lc-1' 2-) L,KA c_11.4144.44e4 KaJcico, WA \7L. 4- f gv A lgf t z S. 154: ST PP.- FCRal A --To S 140 1 6 ■L D.TACE- Neff* 7 \V OLIL`f 0 S .44=ti cf4-21., ' ute e44J I I I ' 1 i I. I I I I 1 I I I I . I i -*1 ___ . I _____ _i___ _1 I _ ____ , 1 I I 1 I i _ _____ -I- Fsfesx,41 e 10a Wee" 9k41" kicre : 4 ,ce sfAviet7 BZ Cats1124-q *J A ecerzuct .y/41ile tvc:446, MEF avest CAT Nate: vor rgavuo• ‘akau_ee cp akr.,-ToC ai.ORDILICTIVC.ny q 11.11 vidb • hlAUCA wow coguitup qf am/0J ex* WM Nee.. pACODISP-PFP0 C411414166 12loac • • e 47, v,et■ •••■■■■•.••■• 1015 f7 p6x,cEL'AII kt2 \V 4 voL. 14- Fr 4, 1-$44e-Oa S 64urrolf t..**.o. coal IJcio; -ft) eXt1111-4"TUD Ff.g. Hc AArftai° ATP264E1) h/Cf; g S. 16 ST Pt4i.. KIVU_ ANApb 5 tk.) 41-SiD3&CELICIE, Negf 47 \V nQt-) I I 1 1 . I I 1 , I 4 -- 1 I . -- -4-- 10a kite 94'41"w dare : evice or.4164. et cot-esilawzot, *J A GMLNLICe• ■Yaly Pfru 1 vc>fes6,WE4 2 tdfL covre.. 7poi We: Itoirtiat, i.011..L towAx.-fiC al.DR,D0J4-1Dafy 11.6 ■usi47; ioL1 %%Lac I 1 I' toJeum • utriAwunil cam/414.Jewx.r:ou Aft. pacooeiPi, FRI cwirpt. Mr-el ELWEICFM 12.101 4- DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Nine Townhouses built on:two separate tax lots 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) End of 153rd and East of 65th Ave. Parcel A: Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Gundaker's Interurban Addn. to Seattle Parcel B: Lors 14, 15 and 16, Block 3, Gundaker's Interurban Addn. to Seattle Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) 3. APPLICANT :* Name: H. C. Bloss, Mait -ger of Development & Construction Address: 6510 Southcenter Blvd. #1, Tukwila, WA 98188 n Signature: e: • 0// . 4. PROPERTY Name: Schneider Homes, Inc. OWNER * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Date: 2/23/88 Address: 6510 Southcenter Blvd. #1, Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 248-2471 I /WE,Csignature(s)] 4i!1 1� /1 ,,�, swear that we ar= e . ner s or con rac purchaser s o the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: DI � c2-3 -7=1 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE :A) Existing streetscape is mixed with parking on the North & South sides of the street. B) Parking is in conformance with existing DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 c) Buildings are one and two srnry mixed units Fxisring QtrurturPs are two and three - story. 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: A) Lines of proposed structures will be more broken than existing structures. B) Buffers will he provided between existing strnrtnres and new buildings with cedar fencing. C) No Public Buildings D) Parking will adjoin each unit with sidewalks between parking areas & house. E) N/A 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: A) Site is level with existing street B) Walkways and parking areas will be level C) See landscape plan D) Sidewalks & curbs should protect the landscaping E) See site plan F) See site plan G) See site plan H) Lighting for parking areas will be designed not to flood parking and not to shine into windowed areas DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 8. BUILDING DESIGN DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per- manent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: A) See drawings. Will be architecturally superior to surrounding units. B) Buildings will be above the existing neighboring units in harmony & softness. C) Building components will be consistent with structures. D) Exterior colors will be one of the pastels that are currently in popular use - similar to the exterior colors used at Mapletree Park. E) No external mechanical equipment will be used. F) Exterior lighting will be harmonious with building design. G. See plot plan. 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: A) N/A B) N/A INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear- ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. Units are a mix of ramblers and townhouses with no stacked units. Townhouses are ideal housing for young families. The ramblers are excellent for empty nesters. The natural amenities are the surrounding parks, not the site itself. 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. The adjoining park will be utilized by the future residents of the two sites. 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. No on -site circulation 13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The proposed structures will compliment the adjoining property 14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. The proposed development should not have any significant adverse impart on the surrounding property or neighborhood. 15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. No known historic features (29 /DSGN.APP1 -3) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 6 EXTRA RESPONSE SPACE 11-A-DR egb OF 153 ST of s ;ei EQIC - l3 -8g €44 t4 i DeY2 TDJDntS 119 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING SHEET 1 OF 4 SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N., Rge. 4 E., W.M. King County, Washington RECITAL AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION THE DECLARATION FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM, CONCURREN il_Y RECORDED HEREWITH IS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING No 94/0 G 3Q RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESIRING TO CREATE A CONDOMINIUM PURSUANT TO CH. 64.34 RCW, THE UNDER— SIGNED, SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC., "A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, THE DECLARANT, HEREBY EXECUTES THIS SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM, AND MAKES THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. 1. THE NAME OF THE CONDOMINIUM IS PARK POINTE ON THE HILL. 2. THE LAND IN THE CONDOMINIUM IS DESCRIBED AS BEING SITUATE IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A LOTS 17, 18, 19 AND 20, BLOCK 2, GUNDAKER'S INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE (VACATED) , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 46, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B LOTS 14, 15 AND 16, BLOCK 3, GUNDAKER'S INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE (VACATED) , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 46, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 8 FEET THEREOF. 3. AS A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION, DECLARENT CERTIFIES THAT ALI. STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS OF ALL BUILDN S CONTAINING ANY UNITS CREATED BY THE REFERENCED DECLARATION ARE SUBSTA, ,IIAU.Y COMPLETED. DATED: At4 S. • , 1994. DATED: .4/9-Y 3/, , _ 1994. ASSESSOR'S RECEIPT COPY RECEIVED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF GERALD E. SCHNEIDER, PRESIDENT I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT GERALD E. SCHNEIDER IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOW— LEDGED THAT HE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED THAT HE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTUMENT AND ACKNOWLEGED IT AS THE PRESIDENT OF SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH CORPORATION FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. 20.1 � 2 �C/•iCd�i OF W S.V.G _ T STATE OF WASdx.CTOII �OFAU Emi,T A.'.•v VOf1�(/1/l�C /�'!• & /4 My Apoanfmun'Emi•u A'.d IS. IOW' NOTARY PUBUC MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: B'/ -9 7 SCOTT NOBLE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR BY (A. DEPUTY 2-`15.30 2' 5 - o 250 - v4E.- 1994. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, WAYNE E. CHASTAIN, A UCENSED SURVEYOR, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLANS HEREIN WERE MADE BY ME AND AU. INFORMATION REQUIRED BY RCW 64.34.232 IS SUPPLIED, THAT ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL BOUNDARIES OF ALL UNITS CREATED BY THE REFERENCED DECLARATION ARE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WITHIN PLANS, AND THAT THE WITHIN SURVEY MAP REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BETWEEN 2/1988 AND 5/1994 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIRMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE DECLARENT NAMED HEREIN. DATED: MA'f R4 ty , 1994. WA' WE E. CHASTAIN REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE No. 10356 RECORDING CERTIFICATE 9 y O G 30 0 •`/ G / FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. THIS -? o '` DAY OF ✓: ^ , 1994, AT 9.'", 5/o clock AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING No. 9 3 6 0 r1G/ AT VOLUME / / 9 OF CONDOMINIUMS, PAGES INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DEPARTS ELECTIONS • MANAGER R te Q6 fp SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS 8 -A- PR TO 2 sr II�III�IJI�III�IJI�III�IJI�III�IJI�III�IJI�III�IJI�! Ill , 11 } u1ILuJ1111111µ1y111I�Lh! ILIA! I! I1�111J1�ILIIIIIIIIIIIII�I�I�III�I�I�IIIIIII�III�IIIIIII�I�I�II 0 ,.,n.,n' 1 2 3 . 4 . ...... ...: 'S ",...__.... _ 6 . ..._ \ . 8 9 10 11 .,,, , 12 • OE 6Z • ee LZ 9Z GZ 4Z CZ ZZ lZ VIM MICROFILMED DOCUMENT.IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO THE .UALITY OF .THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT �III�II�llllllllllpplll l 1 11 - Iinllll n i I Iii 111 III Im1 6 EI L 9G h C Z nn � II 111 I I I II 1 11 1 11111111 11111 1111111 BOUNDARY OF LAID N CONDOMMUA SHEET 2 of 4 SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N. Rge. 4 E., W.M. King County, Washington NOTE: iks RUM T A -2 g I PO/NT A -4 ' - -IF j eL T. 7 I w _ �. r 1 °� •7 1 4 w 1 3/J/ 1 aim 2046 4. J 99.72 I 130.00 NI N 88' 24' 47' W 150. 0 , /2.91 51.10 1- 48.00 1 • maw 'O• N SE, CORAER CONC. PAD OF POWER VAULT DATUM' ASSUMED ELEV. = /00.00 BOUNDARY OF LAND N CONDOMNUA LHO£R R SURVEY 8 00 RECOR KNG COUNTY WA, FOR BOUNDARY SURVEY OF lirE YAW lI POINT A -1 i . 1 POINT N 88' 24' 47' W 1 Ir B,.99 1 nom je I 1 Y POINT B -2 ti ; R; f I 0. Iy y N. POIN £•2 LI BJ2 Ill l ; - ; 1 20 I 4 PIIGEr soLND POW t L IGH r -- ESM'r, REC. No.e &1070788 YARD o 1 SOUTH 153rd STREET N I PUGET SOL8.0 POWER ! LIGHT N EMT. REC. N. 3977326 REC. Na 8811070788 82.00 _ 20.r + 23r6 o - - IBJ3 ;„ Age. POAVT F-2 ' POINT, G-1 I I I ' - 1 Ss I I : DLL _ ' 6 '1 N UN /T x_1__. _�� r I UNIT F UN/ G 1 + 1 /4,94 W 1 ' POINT 1-1 r — 1,.98 UNir 11 .1,2,1 O L M� POINT F-1 BUILDING 7 B < ti N BB' 24' 47' W PT•� -- 111.1 132,00 102.00 -- EXIST, CHAN LANK FENCE IMMEI IIIIIIiIIIiIiIiIIIiIi11III ;I1I1III1I1I1III1I1I1III;JI;I I�I�I�1 11Itjjl 1�1��111�1 1. ��. GllLI. 1II; lllt1�11111L�11�1� !�JlI�Il�l1111;1.�lllll; III; III; III; III ;III;III�I�I;III;III;III;I1I;II 0 1 3' 4...- 3, .._- 6 . 7 8 9 10 71 �� 12 1 IF•THIS,MICROFILMED DOCUMENT ,IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS IT IS-DUE TO OE 6z Be La 9z ND oz LDI zz Iz THE''UALITY OF THE ORIGI DOCUM . I B B L 9 8 , C z 1 �� 0 I II II II II I I �(�� II I�II1 11111 I I1111l 1 I 1 H1111111111111111 1111111111 1II �IIIIIIIII�IIIII � 1 ¢V' i Y � "Ji"�u' l ro, p ' 4 , 'F S 6"�� ,��5 y4 t �;] <� m t�� �s;�, ,: iRS.I sI; POINT E -/ YARD 30 D-90'00'OO' /1 -20.00 L■3/,42 0.90'00'00' R -20,00 L.31.42 .30 to PA -c u L] DECK 119 2K MERIDIAN PER CANYON ESTATES VOL. 10 OF CONDOMINIUMS PG, 49 LEGEND: PARKNG BOUNDARY YARD AREA . ' PARKING AREA NOTE: 1. ALL BUILDING TES ARE TO THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF THE SIDING AT ME FRST STORY AND 90' OR RADIAL TO PROPERTY LIVE, 2. LOCATIONS OF PATIO AREA PATIO AND DECK LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND ARE INCORPORATED N THIS SURVEY MAP. hh F $B -A -PR . SURVEYORS — ENG1I:tIIS DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 408 SOUTH 3,d AVENUE KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (' 206.) 854 — 2043 SCALE: r . !0' WOOD DECK IND 11 � 9 27 SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N. , Rge. 4 E. , W. M. . King County, Washington SHEET Sof4 4. SCALE • 10' FIRST 1 COMMON FIRST STORY BUILDING 3 OENERAL NOTES I. ALL EXTER /OR WALLS ARE 7' TMC% UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. THICKNESS THE MEASURED FROM PFACE OF SHEETROCK WITION THE TOWMlOMES. 2. ALL TOWNHOAIE DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE MTERIOR SURFACE OF THE SHEET ROCK (OR EMPLACE FACMG 1 .4N0 ARE SHOWN WITH/ +0.10 FOOT. J. CARPETS AND CCEILNG .F ELLEVATIONS ARE WAVER E SURFACE OF CEEMG SHEET ROCK. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE 2010 FOOT. r C I I A LEGEND - FIRE PLACE J.31 14.2 2. 7 i h C1ttJ) F•/14.J2 OIt2J0 L 1_ =C125.00 _ B CEILING ELEVATION FLOOR ELEVATION CEILING ELEVATION BREAK DIRECTION OF CEILING DOWNSLOPE UNIT BOUNDARY UNIT NUMBER a0 •0 SECOND STORY BUILDING 1 tMA C1t3,4t F•/5.A9 C423.42 / POINT 8 2. c uM 4- 0426.33 \ D i y- I" --r-'426.03.— J - 1 I� C•U.46 1 13.T 13.5 2 E7 ae SECOND STORY BUILDING 3 13.9 0623.44 F115.65 E C423,44 C.25.59 4 I 1 20 1 (C•It3,44 j /ao .0 POINT E -1 1.7 T.C.A., INC. SURVEYORS – ENGINEERS DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 409 SOUTH 3rd AVENUE KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 ( 206 ) 854 – 2043 OE 62 BL LL 92 92 46 C2 20 12 III 11 111 11 11111111111 III 1 11 ' 1 J1111111J1111111J1111111J1111111J1111111J1111111J11 !II!l.11llljl►I!111�ijll!1!J� IL111�U111.tyulllu111. 1111 1�1�11U�JJ! 11�11J 1111I1�111111111111111 I1 � '1'�'I'�'1'�'ll�lll�ll'�'1'�'I 0 1 2 3. 14. :., 3. ,...._.. 6 ... _ ._ . 7 8 9 10 11 ..— 12 IF THIS ,MICROFILMED •DOCUMENT IS LESS • CLEAR THAN TFIYS,NOTICE, IT IS;DUE TO THE`IUALITY OF THE ORIGINF. DOCUMENT; • 6 8 L 9 9 , 2 z 1 ��0 1 1 111 1111 111 141 1i 111111 1 11 1 Il i i 1 1III 11111 1 1 1111 1 111111 1111 Im111111111111111111111111111 1111111 ' L,a�F 111 m111 111 POINT F -I POINT F DECK 1a2 J I 7.0 4.1t0.03 3.0 ` CN22Je , l F �� � F4 /225 I C420.03 'IN L_ __fC a0o_ a 1 I C•4!O.03) 7 14.3 { 13.22I OVERHANG OF . SECOND FLOOR r TYP. I AO SHEET 4o /41 170 DECK /Ae POINT C -3 - SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR PARK POINTE ON THE HILL, A CONDOMINIUM Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N., Rge. 4 E., W.M. King County, Washington x .51 11.9 ` I 5.3 ae C•29.99. 2.3 3.2 2.5 a7 /AS PONT U-I F40357 MR,a7 1.2 G I BUILDING 4 53 I 12.0 1 12 C•123.3O m '' 'j H �O r L� 1 I �M2a29 e E F•l1203 NN o al 1 C423.30 m / 4 „ _ F I - {I r w 114 C423.30? :....: I4Q SECOND STORY BUILDING 7 03 I �N1 l.6 PI � " / Z7 2a 2.0 O 17.0 ` 3. 1 0 as/ \ 1 i DECK DECK FIRST STORY BUILDING 7 F403.57 0411.37 . H 14.9 102 740513 MIa73 a4e 1C4/ 0413.85 " J P404.99 i 1 10.2 02 741513 M/an as 1c. Lyi -_ 11 F40495 /0.2 /0.2 F4 0.5.13 741173 woe 1lyl� - 32 2.5 24 QI a3 91 ...-- POINT E - 2 99 10.3 1 C4EO.OZ 1 I -- . 1 v I C•/2223 I F• //2.23 POINT H -2 C12002 3 C420.02 14.0 ae £407.57 C411.31 15.7 na 1.8 DECK /A4 R APO /NT I 0 � -POINT 1-1 r " E5 7.P 1. 30 40 . DECK PONT A -4 PONT F -2 POUT 12-3 GENERAL . NOTES 1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE r PICK - UNLESS OTHERWISE SWIRL TMCKNESS IS MEASURED FROM TIE EXTERIOR SLRPACE CI -THE SONS TO THE STENO" SURFACE OF INF SHEET ROCK 111T1N THE TOMNIOAEA 2. ALL T0V,9 & DIMENSIONS ARE TO RE INTERIOR SURFACE OF THE SHEET ROCK (OR FEIPLACE FAQIRS I AIM ARE SNOW/ WITHIN tOJO FOOT. 3. ALL FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE ON TOP SURFACE OF a EVAN T UND R SWAGE OF c E 9 SN:E7 ROCK ALL ELEVATIONS ARE tOIO FOOT. 4 SCALE. 1•. 10' 1 Rao F40.179 C412.49 ass , A a 1 / C•1/Z48 5 1 2 " 0 :1 0 03 11448 311 10.0 BUILDING 2 10.0 FCZ19 M/O19 J F M/a20 FW0A40 J 0.0 ■ la0 k 7.003 a.4 MI 0 I F40Zq + 1ao N/R,DIMIG Rao � f409/7 h C41W7 3 0 . 4e - a� 7 a � MIW9 N F40A3A I 10.0 1 BUILDING • F F POINT 8-2 ! POINT 0 -1 FONT 1 - 119 28 LEGEND C CEILING ELEVATION FLOOR ELEVATION CEILING ELEVATION BREAK DIRECTION OF CEILING DOWNSLOPE UNIT 40UNDARY UNIT NUMBER T C.A., INC SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 409 SOUTH 3rd AVENUE KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 ( 206 ) 854 - 2043 I1.* IND 02 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIII!.I!III!I!IIjIWj11JP I1 I111I. y 111 MM 1 g ni M U T W I H V II I ' HI N I I HI I' T II I III I O P I I 9 10 11 ,w.«ww, 12 IF •THIS,MICROFILMED DOCUMENT LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO •THE OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT;. ++ III III I III I I I � Ir lommnmlll Ill 1111II111I11IIII1111IIIIIIIIIIIIII _ IIIInIIII II IJ 1IIIIIIII1 111 111 OE 6Z 9L LE 9Z 9Z 7Z CZ ZZ la �3 37 5 S',j t IV1 {.{I. s1't 9 • c 9 9 7 C z '0 1111111 I11111111111t111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII