Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-03-R - CITY OF TUKWILA - RIVERTON ANNEXATION REZONE88-3-R Permit 88-03-R - CITY OF TUKWILA - RIVERTON ANNEXATION REZONE 8903300381 CASHSL CITY OF TUKWILA 9.00 WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /S 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE RIVERTON ANNEXATION AREA, ADOPTING ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, PROVIDING THAT SAID ANNEXED AREA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME ANY SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. *:: +::+::t9.00 a0 M 0 O co WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila received a petition certified as sufficient by the King County Prosecuting Attorney, calling for an election t.3 vote co upon annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila determined that the signa- tures on the petition were sufficient and filed the Certificate of Sufficiency with the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 1080, passed July 18, 1988, approved the proposed Riverton annexation area election- method annexation, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official for the City issued a Declaration of Non - Significance, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340, the City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 1479, 1480 and 1481, providing for zoning and land use regulations for the area to become effective upon annexation, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board approved the ar nexa- tion in File No. 1537, dated December 8, 1988, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1095, passed December 12, 1988, approved the proposed Riverton annexation area election method and requested an election date, and WHEREAS. pursuant to King County Council Ordinance No. 8818, an election was held in the area proposed for annexation on March 14, 1989, with the results of said election being that the voters approved annexation together with the pro Posed zoning and land use regulations and rejected assumption of the City's outstanding indebtedness. and WHEREAS, the County Canvassing Board will submit the Statement of Canvass to the King County Council, and the King County Council will enter its finding with regard thereto, and a certified copy of the minutes reflecting such entry will be transmitted, along with the certified abstract of the vote, to the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to annex the area proposed for annexation without requiring it to assume any portion of the City's existing indebt- edness, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKVJILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: #0381 A RIVERTON ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page 2 Section 1. Annexation. The real property known as the Riverton Annexation Area, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and shown on Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila as of aB"- /S , 1989, and shall thereafter be subject to the zoning and land use regulations as adopted in City of Tukwila Ordinance Nos. 1479, 1480 and 1481. Section 2. Assumption of Indebtedness. Pursuant to the results of the annexa- tion election, the property within the territory annexed hereby shall not be required to assume through assessment or taxes, any indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, contracted prior to or existing as of the effective date of the annexation. Said prop- erty shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City to pay for any bonds issued or other debts contracted subsequent to the date of annexation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereby approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASH- INGTON, at a special meeting thereof this 02 7 day of 1989. APPROVED: G : L. Van Dusen, Mayor Maxine Anderson, City Clerk A PROVED AS TO FO ffice of the City At • rney Filed with the City Clerk: 3- .27- g'? Passed by the City Council: 3 - 8p Published Valley Daily News: 3-3/ Si Effective Date: - 6 - 8 9 Ordinance Number /6 Q ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: EXHIBIT A RIVERTON PROPOSED ANNEXATION 12 AUG 88 REV. Beginning at the intersection of the east margin of East Marginal Way South and the north line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37 In the southwest 1/4 of Section 10, T23N, R4E, W.M.; thence southeasterly along said east margin of East Marginal Way, 442.30 feet to the south line of Tract 22, Riverside Interurban Tracts as recorded in Volume 10, Page 74 of Plats, Records of King County, WA, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence easterly along said south line of Tract 22 and the easterly prolongation thereof to the west line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway right - of-way; thence southerly along the west line of said right -of -way, 850 feet more or less to a point opposite the south line of Tract 33 of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; thence east along the easterly prolongation of the south line of said Tract 33 to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence along said thread to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southwesterly along said east margin and the southerly extension thereof 460 feet more or less to the southwest margin of Interurban Avenue South; thence northwesterly along said southwest margin to an intersection with the southerly extension of the west margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly along said west margin of 42nd Avenue South contiguous with the Tukwila City Limits as set forth under King County Commissioner's Resolution No. 23309 dated 10 -11 -61 (Tukwila Ordinance 276), to the south margin of South 131st Street; thence westerly along said south margin and continuing westerly along the north line of Tract 58 of said Riverside Interurban Tracts to the east margin of South 131st Place (East Marginal Way South); thence southeasterly along said east margin and easterly along the north margin of South 133rd Street,respectively, to the west margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly along the southerly extension of said west margin to the south margin of South 133rd Street; thence easterly along the easterly extension of said south margin of South 133rd Street to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly and continuing in a southeasterly direction along the northerly margin of South 135th Street to the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 1.86 acres of Tract 14, in Fostoria Garden Tracts as recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, records of King County, WAA thence north 40'17 east along said north line 220.32 feet; thence south 49 ° 43 1 east, 91.43 feet to the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 0.86 acres of said Tract 14; thence north 40'17 east, a distance of 132.89 feet; thence south 49 ° 43 1 east, 10 feet; thence north 40 ° 17 1 east, 119.11 feet; -2- thence southeasterly along the southwest margin of South 134th Street 150 feet more or less to the southwesterly extension of the southeast margin of 47th Avenue South (formerly Adams Avenue); thence northeasterly along said southwesterly extension and southeast margin, respectively, to the west line of Primary State Highway No. 1 condemned under Superior Court Cause No. 618283 records of King County; thence southerly along said west line to an intersection with the easterly extension of the south line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37; thence westerly along said easterly extension and along said south line, respectively, to the west margin of Macadam Road South (46th Avenue South); thence southerly along said west margin and continuing south along the west margin of 46th Avenue South to the north margin of South 139th Street (formerly Hill Avenue); thence westerly along said north margin to the west line of Lot 23 of Block 3 in Riverton Macadam road Tracts, recorded In Volume 15, Page 53 of Plats, Records of King County, WA; thence northerly along said west line to the easterly prolongation of the north margin of South 139th Street; thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said north aD M line to the east margin of Pacific Highway South (Highway 99); CD thence northerly along said east margin to the thread of the CD Duwamish River; M thence easterly along said thread of the Duwamish River to the west C line of Section 10, T23N, R4E; lers cA thence southerly along said west line to the south line of the north 1168.66 feet of said Section 10; thence easterly along said south line to the west margin of East Marginal Way South; thence southerly along said west margin to Its intersection with the north line of Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930; thence westerly along said north line of Lot 1 and its extension to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; thence southerly along the west line thereof to the Southwest corner of said Short Plat; thence easterly along the south line of Lot 4 in said Short Plat to the extended east line of Lot 16, Block 4 of Riverton Addition as recorded In Vol. 13 of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said extension and east line, and the east line of Lot 9 to the north margin of South 124th Street; thence easterly along said north margin and along the easterly prolongation thereof to the east margin of East Marginal Way South; thence southerly along said east margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RIVERTON ZONING I R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 7200 R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 12,000 M R-4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY C-1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS C-2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS C-M INDUSTRIAL PARK P-0 OFFICE M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY • '711 '.41V 311111111111 ADOPTED BY ORD. '480.i CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. Mre AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING A ZONING MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE RIVERTON ANNEXATION AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, a petition has been filed proposing that described area be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and the requested pre - annexation zoning, and WHEREAS, the City Council, in Ordinance No. / Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map for the area, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official has made a nonsignificance, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and on August 2, 1988 recommended the adoption of zoning zoning map in the event of annexation, and WHEREAS, two public hearings upon said proposal were notice before the Tukwila City Council on August 15, 1988, 1988, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is described in Exhibit A. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon. Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and shall be zoned as shown on Exhibit B hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereby approved or upon execution of the Concomitant Zoning Agreement, whichever is later. SSED CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1,• • , • M1 ING • i s 3 day of PA 1988. ! alir MAYfl•I, G.. AN DUSEN ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: OFFI F THE CI AT LERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: By i FI ED WITH THE CITY CLERK: /0- 3- P Q PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: JO-3-f?' PUBLISHED: /0- 13- pr EFFECTIVE DATE: /p - - ORDINANCE NO.: pulp 3483C3'440A K the hereinafter petitioners have has amended the determination of on July 28, 1988, regulations and a held upon proper and September 19, EXHIBIT A RIVERTON PROPOSED ANNEXATION Beginning at the intersection of the east margin of East Marginal Way South and the north line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37 in the southwest 1/4 of Section 10, T23N, R4E, W.M.; thence southeasterly along said east margin of East Marginal Way, 442.30 feet to the south line of Tract 22, Riverside Interurban Tracts as recorded in Volume 10, Page 74 of. Plats, Records of King County, WA, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence easterly along said south line of Tract 22 and the easterly prolongation thereof to the west line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; thence southerly along the west line of said right -of -way, 850 feet more or less to a point opposite the south line of Tract 33 of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; thence east along the easterly prolongation of the south line of said Tract 33 to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence along said thread to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southwesterly along said east margin and the southerly extension thereof 460 feet more or less to the southwest margin of Interurban Avenue South; thence northwesterly along said southwest margin to an intersection with the southerly extension of the west margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly along said west margin of 42nd Avenue South contiguous with the Tukwila City Limits as set forth under King County Commissioner's Resolution No. 23309 dated 10 -11 -61 (Tukwila Ordinance 276), to the south margin of South 131st Street; thence westerly along said south margin and continuing westerly along the north line of Tract 58 of said Riverside Interurban Tracts to the east margin of South 131st Place (East Marginal Way South); thence southeasterly along said east margin and easterly along the north margin of South 133rd Strest,respectively, to the west margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly along the southerly extension of said west margin to the south margin of South 133rd Street; thence easterly along the easterly extension of said south margin of South 133rd Street to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence southerly and continuing in a southeasterly direction along the northerly margin of South 135th Street to the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 1.86 acres of Tract 14, in Fostoria Garden Tracts as recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, records of King County, WAA thence north 40 east along said north line 220.32 feet; thence south 49 ° 43' east, 91.43 feet to th'e northwesterly line of the southeasterly 0.86 acres of said Tract 14; thence north 40w17 east, a distance of 132.89 feet; thence south 49 ° 43' east, 10 feet; thence north 40 ° 17' east, 119.11 feet; • 12 AUG 88 REV. thence southeasterly along the southwest margin of South 134th Street 150 feet more or less to the southwesterly extension of the southeast margin of 47th Avenue South (formerly Adams Avenue); thence northeasterly along said southwesterly extension and southeast margin, respectively, to the west line of Primary State Highway No. 1 condemned under Superior Court Cause No. 618283 records of King County; thence southerly along said west Line to an intersection with the easterly extension of the south line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37; thence westerly along said easterly extension and along said south line, respectively, to the west margin of Macadam Road South (46th Avenue South); thence southerly along said west margin and continuing south along the west margin of 46th Avenue South to the north, margin of South 139th Street (formerly Hill Avenue); thence westerly along said north margin to the west line of Lot 23 of Block 3 In Riverton Macadam road Tracts, recorded in Volume 15, Page 53 of Plats, Records of King County, WA; thence northerly along said west line to the easterly prolongation of the north margin of South 139th Street; thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said north line to the east margin of Pacific Highway South (Highway 99); thence northerly along said east margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread of the Duwamish River to the west line of Section 10, T23N, R4E; thence southerly along said west line to the south line of the north 1168.66 feet of said Section 10; thence easterly along said south line to the west margin of East Marginal Way South; thence southerly along said west margin to its intersection with the north line of Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930; thence westerly along said north line of Lot 1 and its extension to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; thence southerly along the west line thereof to the Southwest corner of said Short Plat; thence easterly along the south line of Lot 4 in said Short Plat to the extended east - line of Lot 16, Block 4 of Riverton Addition as recorded In Vol. 13. of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said extension and east line, and the east line of Lot 9 to the north margin of South 124th Street; thence easterly along said north margin and along the easterly prolongation thereof to the east margin of East Marginal Way South; thence southerly along said east margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CI ..V .i s� - Alearlagall • -4 ' I NIA. M MIAMI T1 • .1.1.J• ti EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT H R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(12,000) R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (7200 S.F.) - R -4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL PARK OFFICE - C-1 C -2 C -M P.O ® M -1 LIGHT INDUSTRY Ems as ., M -2 HEAVY INDUSTRY \ice T t w A r C g 'j n PROPOSED RIVERTON ANNEXATION ZONING NORTH • NOTE: A LARGER SCALE MAP IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ti. �u 115 3483C2/440A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /41ft AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING A ZONING MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE RIVERTON ANNEXATION AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. On , 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance No. 1/70 , which provides as follows: Adopts zoning regulations and zoning map for property known as the Riverton Annexation Area; said regulations and map to become effective upon annexation to the City of Tukwila of said area or any part thereof; and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of L Y,C J , 1988. Va►/G7 ]A„1 flews- lb -, 3 - gr a t4 ded C " -..°(— Z2 CITY CLERK City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 2, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Nagger - ton, Knudson and Hamilton. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, and Joanne Johnson. 88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA RIVERTON ANNEXATION - Request for: 1. Pre - annexation zoning for the Riverton area. 2. Amending Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. 3. Amending the Tukwila Zoning Code. Mr. Coplen explained that the public hearing was closed and the Commission would make a determination based on the testimony from the July 28, 1988 meeting. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the various maps depicting the Riverton area and the various lot sizes. Mr. Pace referred to the minutes of the July 28, 1988 meeting and pointed out the first property area for consideration which was represented by Robert Fadden, as well as written testimony. The approximate location is bordered by S. 135th St, 48th Avenue S. and 134th Street. MR. COPLEN MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE ZONING BE CM WITH THE RESTRICTIONS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED FOR THE OTHER CM PROPERTY IN THIS AREA. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOU- SLY PASSED. Mr. Pace referred to the minutes of the July 28, 1988 meeting and pointed out properties owned or represented by Sabey Corp., Philip Hemenway, Donna Meagher, Elizabeth Springer, Betty Gully, Romona Crossen, Jeff Bohall, and Bruce Hansen. Discussion ensued on these properties with the consensus of the Commission that no action be taken to change the recommendations by the Task Force. Mr. Pace then referred to the properties owned by Bill Kirkland and Les Olerich. Discussion ensued which resulted in the following recommendation: Planning Commission August 2, 1988 Page 2 MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOM- MEND THE PROPERTY OWNED BY BILL KIRKLAND AT 13500 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH BE ZONED PO AND THE WESTERN PORTION OF LES OLERICH PROPERTY AT 13409 - 40TH AVENUE SOUTH BE ZONED P0, OFFICE USE, WITH THE EASTERN PORTION OF HIS PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY AND AMEND THE MAP COMP PLAN AND ZONING FOR THAT AREA. The motion passed with Kirsop, Haggerton, Hamilton and Knudson voting yes and Mr Coplen voting no. Discussion ensued on properties owned or represented by Sharon Bernhard, Bill Sheffler and Kathy Stetson. The consensus of the Commission was that no action be taken to change the recommenda- tions by the Task Force. MR. HAMILTON MOVED TO ADOPT RIVERTON ANNEXATION, FILE #87 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA, AND 88 -3 -R, AS AMENDED BY THE ACTIONS MADE TONIGHT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Discussion ensued as to future meetings which are scheduled for: August 25, 1988 regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting, August 30, 1988 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing on Thorndyke and Foster Annexations and the possibility of September 8, 1988 meeting, if needed. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 pm. Respectfully submitted, Joanne Johnson Secretary MINUTES City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 < +err. a•:x •xman:yw3e rvn�:a,.•c.:r:: �.�aw „ra n:. -u:u» CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 28, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Cagle, Haggerton, Knudson and Hamilton. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, and Joanne Johnson. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED THAT THE JUNE 23, 1988 MINUTES BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOU- SLY. Mr. Coplen briefly reviewed the basic concept of the Planning Commission in the City of Tukwila and how it is structured. 88 -6 -DR: DEVANEY TENANT IMPROVEMENT Request for design review of planned renovation of an existing 2,304 square foot one -story building at 14805 Interurban Avenue South. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, reviewed the project, pointing out an amendment to Attachment "B” ELEVATIONS of the staff report. He stated that the Planning Department recommends approval subject to the conditions as stated in the staff report. Mr. Jim DeVaney, 18521 115th S.E., Renton, stated he was in agreement with the staff report. Discussion ensued on the proposal. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED THAT BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT THAT THE SUBJECT PROJECT, 88 -6 -DR DEVANEY TENANT IMPROVEMENT, BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS 1, 2 AND 3 AS SPECIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT: 1. Provision of a developer's agreement to provide a sidewalk upon reconstruction of Interurban Avenue, at no cost to the City. n: �. n•... 1T rf•::;;^, t�;_•'.? �y3.. M; r.. g:f::^. t': rt;.:.':'::• Y.'.:,.. w9U r ,• .t.`�y . rf;;`'.$':�: r '�` ^ ":`. ,. Planning Commission July 28, 1988 Page 2 ACC', MI S,. 'MeK..twMxmwmihnmmuv..n 2. Submittal of a landscape plan which satisfies Zoning Code requirements, in a manner similar to the potential landscape modifications in Attachment A. 3. Submittal of a landscape irrigation plan. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 87 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA RIVERTON ANNEXATION - Request for: 1. Pre - annexation zoning for the Riverton area. 2. Amending Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. 3. Amending the Tukwila Zoning Code Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the history of the Riverton Annexation area as well as the current status and annexation process. A letter from Richard Barene, dated July 28, 1988, was entered into the Record as Exhibit I. Allen Ekburg, 4123 S. 130th, spoke in favor of the annexation. He referred to his involvement in the annexation task force as well as his involvement in the community for 18 years. Barbara Moss, 2203 Airport Way S. #200, representing the SABEY Corporation spoke in support of the City staff and task force recommendations. She commended the staff and Planning Commission for their efforts. She distributed a letter from the SABEY Corporation to the Commission members. Philip Hemenway, 4036 S. 128th Street, reviewed the history of various rezones in the Riverton area. Donna Meagher, 13242 40th Avenue S. spoke in opposition to the zoning designation recommendation by the Task Force of RS -1500 because of the resulting higher taxes on her property. She explained the development constraints of her property because of a bog that develops in the rainy season. Discussion ensued as to buildable versus unbuildable lots and tax impacts that might be imposed. Elizabeth Springer, 13325 42nd Avenue S., is opposed to the 7200 square foot designation recommendation by the Task Force because of the resulting higher taxes. She favored leaving the zoning the way it is. s •t'tt sSS ..mvnrver »s; .xtavY'K /•DF+,JZ^SJIESCY •. <.:. nr,:..-:... z�v: vw:r- m:....... ra .... ............,..........,_.....» n.,.u.- .�r.c+.�..; vsuflr ::n xn:rrur;SS711,orw WAX( vr:r nk..:c:wr_,c:s:-nn4•.c.. , ..::yxo, rrTMO t:ti'_:_rt z.i,..; '. rAW Z:,....:.,...iv'.i �.,:� y 4 ° ..: a " " - .t i c Planning Commission July 28, 1988 Page 3 She further disagreed with the 115 foot height exception area. She also felt that the zoning designations for the Fire District #1 annexation area adversely impacts her property in the Riverton Annexation area. Betty Gully, 13017 42nd Avenue S., Seattle, WA. supported the task force recommendations. She described her involvement with the task force. She asked that the Planning Commission recommen- dation preserve the residential atmosphere of the Riverton area. She described the industrial encroachment that has occurred in the area. Ramona Crossen, 13250 - 40th Avenue S., was opposed to the R1- 7200 recommended zoning designation for her property. She felt her property is difficult to develop and this designation would result in an increase in her taxes. Robert Fadden, Lance Mueller & Associates, 130 Lakeside Dr., Seattle, WA represented the Halverson property and their neigh- bors. He supported a buffering plan for this area. He also favored a M -1 or Industrial Park designation for the property. Jeff Bohall, 12840 - 35th Avenue S., represented his mother, whose property is single family. He supported the recommended zoning designation of R -7200. He asked that the Commission break down the larger zoning areas into smaller areas, more appropriate for their use. He commented on past King County action in the area. Bruce Hansen, 14529 282nd Place, favored changing his property's zoning designation from Single Family to Light Industrial or Industrial Park. Bill Kirkland, 13500 Pacific Highway S., asked that the present RM -900 zoning designation be maintained for his property, rather than the recommended Light Industrial or Professional Office. He felt that this would be down - zoning his property and opposed the annexation if this recommendation were used. Sharon Bernhard, 3418 S. 126th, Seattle, 98168, represented property owners on the south side of 126th. She expressed a concern with the transition areas. She supported zoning desig- nations that would result in the highest and best use of the property there. She wanted some flexibility in the zoning designation with a potential of Light Industry or industrial park, if possible. . n. wa,.....,.......,. ��x. �,,,.., n.,... «,..•».W.— r ^...........,...�.. , .� ...,«- .kw.mwn, new•. �r 11.+u+S�'.�^tkF:r+r- n:at?::^;vx wa5+. xrv. �v cNC�:: naFS171,1,wne.s✓.as rcx ry ...ur. .xrwu4mwarrraalxtuxgtrn ACC4VN2+.1:t ;tYt:.,r..3 ,n ^ve. •: Planning Commission July 28, 1988 Page 4 Bill Sheffler, 4033 S. 128th, member of the task force, commented on.the requests made and felt if the Commission wanted to change some of the task force's recommendations, it would be fine with him. A 5- minute recess was called and the meeting resumed at 11:00p.m. Kathy Stetson, 13258 - 40th Avenue S. asked for an explanation as to the impacts SR -7200, SR -1500, 9600 and 12,000 densities have on property taxes. As a member of the task force, she felt their recommendations can be altered by the Commission if needed. She felt that task force spent must time in determining the delineat- ion line for the transition area and they tried to be fair to everyone. Les Olerich, 13409 - 40th Avenue S. stated that due to the unusual topography and proposed 7200 density on his property, it would be difficult to develop and detract from the sale of the property. Donna Jean Gully, 13217 - 38th Avenue S. concurred that as a member of the task force, they tried to be fair in determining where the buffer zone would be placed. She pointed out that speculators and absentee landlords are not going to live with the result of the development of their property and some of their proposed development would adversely impact the quality of the single family residential neighborhoods of the area. She agreed with the task force recommendation in general, but certain deviations would give more opportunity for first time home buyers. Sharon Berhard spoke again commending the Planning Commission for their efforts. The Public Hearing was closed at 11:20 p.m. Tuesday, August 2, 1988 was set for the next Planning Commission meeting when they would analyze the testimony given and it would be used in determining a recommendation to the City Council. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 pm. Respectfully submitted, Joanne Johnson Secretary ol+it'Vt:L 'vr.N WI i;:9?PA 9.Sf.; d..Trnu:�, HEARING DATE: July 28, 1988 FILE NUMBER: 88 -1 -A, 88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA INITIATED BY: Riverton Annexation petitioners REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Amendments 2. Pre - annexation zoning 3. Zoning Code Text Amendments LOCATION: ACREAGE: Approximately 223 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: See Attachments B and C ZONING DISTRICT: See Attachment D SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance ATTACHMENTS: �..+..,,;.,..,,. �.... x. �........•.+ e...«,. k. �e�.., wo. �cvunr. avn�s�iuim. a. vrxns�.- fmv: wrw, cu. uxirro: rac' mmm• w. snimm�m. �+•. n�`• �r,:. w. rnrrv�n .as�r- �7t^.r.+n:M�rte.-r.rrua. �si�x.+exnrx�..nu*txwinx: �G+Sgk"Sfi'LS�';.�:� " City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission Prepared July 21, 1988 The general location is east of the current City limits and Fire District No. 1, north of 139th Street, south of the Duwamish River, and east of Pacific Highway South (99) (See Attachment A) (A) Riverton Annexation Area Boundary (B) King County Comprehensive Plan Map (C) Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (D) King County Zoning (E) Study Area Map (F) Sabey- Riverton Community Plan Study - Summary of Survey Results (G) Tukwila Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (H) Proposed Pre - Annexation Zoning Map (I) Tukwila Proposed Height Exception Area 1 t:cc =a: S, »rrx:uav>�.r�..",,:w, �...•,,,........ STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission BACKGROUND FINDINGS ..,....o.,.,•....- :o,,.. r.+.....,.......,,.. i....,.. ............,..,.a...,n:c�en>r� � rcaea :w, vnro: 88- 1- A,8 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA In January 1988, the City of Tukwila received a petition signed by residents for annexation with a request for simultaneous adoption of pre - annexation zoning for the area shown on Attachment A. The petition contained 77 signatures, 60 of which were found to be valid signatures of qualified electors within the area proposed to be annexed. The 1987 General Election had 158 voters for the pro- posed area, therefore only 16 signatures were needed to qualify the petition. After the Planning Commission makes their recommendation, the City Council will hold two public hearings. The public hearings are scheduled for August 15 and September 19. After the second hearing, the City Council w i l l adopt by ordin- ance Comprehensive Plan amendments, the zoning and zoning code amendments, to become effective upon annexation. The annexation is scheduled to go to the voters on February 7, 1989. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT In developing the pre- annexation zoning for the area, there has been extensive opportunities for residents, property owners and businesses to be involved. On April 26, 1988, the City held a public informational meeting, which approx- imately 60 people attended. At that meeting, the staff asked if any of the people attending wished to serve on a task force to assist the staff in develop- ing the pre- annexation zoning for the area. A task force of 19 people attended six meetings in the months of May, June and July. The task force recommendation in this report reflects a balance between residents' concerns to protect single - family areas, and business concerns for redevelopment or new development in the area. The task force recommendations for the most part reflect a consensus of the group. For the Planning Commission public hearing, notices were mailed to property owners and a notice appeared in the local papers. As part of the public notice, hearing dates for City Council hearings were also mentioned. REPORT ORGANIZATION The report contains three sections. The first section briefly discusses the proposed annexation. The second section (blue) addresses the Comprehensive Land Use Map amendments and proposed zoning districts. The last section (green) reviews the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Code. 2 STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission ANNEXATION ..«...«..:.s .... V ete+ nvearue .rarswx+usmsizsxaW=W§Wer4 IONT' P12 88- 1- A, -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA As shown on Attachment A, the Riverton Annexation request is within the Tukwila Planning area for annexation. This annexation ties in with the Fire District No. 1 annexation to the north and east, and the Foster and Thorndyke annexations to the south. The Riverton annexation area has a population of approximately 1,224 people. There are approximately 597 housing units, of which 90% are single - family units. As part of the environmental review process, the City examined capital and operation costs to the City. Based upon that information provided by the con- sultant and additional research by City staff, a supplemental budget will be adopted by the City Council'this fall to address the additional service needs if the voters approve the annexation. STAFF REPORT to the 88- 1- A,`88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA Planning Commission COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS AND PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING As part of the Riverton annexation petition, pre- annexation zoning was re- quested. By requesting pre- annexation zoning, the property owners and voters will know before the election what land use regulations will become effective upon annexation. In developing the pre- annexation zoning, the Riverton Task Force and City staff reviewed a variety of planning documents. Attachment F is a summary of community response to a King County community meeting in Riverton to determine community concerns for a King County Community Plan revision. Task Force members were briefed on Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and zoning regulations. This material was then compared to King County's Community Plan and land use regulations to identify conflicts and potential land use issues. Tukwila zones do not exactly duplicate King County's. For example, the County's RM -900 Maximum Density Muntiple - Dwelling Zone allows office uses in the zone, while Tukwila's RMH Multi- Residence High Density zone does not allow any office uses. The following table provides the most comparable zones with refer- ence to uses. King County SR -1500, RS -7200 Single Family Residential (2.8, 6 dwelling units per acre, respectively) RM -1800 High Density Multiple Dwelling (24 dwelling units per acre) RM -900 Maximum Density Multiple Dwelling (48.4 dwelling units per acre) B -N Neighborhood Business C -G General Commercial M -P Manufacturing Park M -L Light Manufacturing M -H Heavy Manufacturing COMPARABLE ZONING CATEGORIES Tukwila R -1 -12.0 R -1 -7.2 Single - Family Residential (3.6/6 dwelling units per acre) R -4 Low Apartments (21.8 dwelling units per acre) RMH Multi- Residence High Density (29 dwelling units per acre) C -1 Community Retail Business C -2 Regional Retail Business C -M Industrial Park M -1 Light Industrial M -2 Heavy Industrial After reviewing the comparable zoning, the zoning was overlaid with Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Several conflicts between the zoning and the City's Comprehensive Plan were identified. Attachment E depicts those areas where revisions in either the City's Comprehensive Plan or zoning were examined. Each of these areas identified are discussed in greater detail in the following pages. DISCUSSION CONCLUSION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION (26 /RA.AREA1) This area's use currently consists of METRO bus parking and storage and vacant lots. A portion of the properties are split between Fire District No. 1 annexation and the Riverton annexation. The City has zoned the portion in Fire District No. 1 as M -2 - Heavy Industrial. The Task Force and staff have concluded that the M -2 - Heavy Industry zoning is consistent with the existing use of this area, as well as earlier City decision for the abutting property in Fire District No. 1. Amend the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map from Light Industrial to Heavy Industrial and zone the area M -2 - Heavy Industry.. Planning staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. -5 - RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 1 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Heavy Industry TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial KING COUNTY ZONING MH - Heavy Industry COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING M -2 - Heavy Industry rl re. x s se .ra araA.r• --_ ∎ 1+ !S 2. 2) u 3 12 a 0) l9� EA 3 DISCUSSION CONCLUSION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION ..w • tt., AREA 4 Vraf This area begins the visual transition between the industrial uses of METRO and Boeing facilities to the north and single - family neighborhoods to the east and south. Tukwila's Comprehensive Land use Plan designates this area Light Industrial, which conflicts with what would be comparable zoning of R -1 - Single- Family Residential by Tukwila. The Task Force has had lengthy discussions concerning this area resulting in the agreement that 126th Street is an appropriate transition point between industrial and residential uses. C -M district designation would provide tighter restrictions on development which would be more compatible with the adjacent residential uses. However, the task force still believes addi- tional standards are needed to provide a better transition from residential to industrial. A C -M text amendment is proposed in conjunction with the C -M zoning designation for this area. See text amendment section. Retain the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation - Light Indus- trial - and zone the area C -M - Industrial Park with the text amendments proposed in Section #3. Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. (26 /RA.AREA2) RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 2 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Single - Family Residential TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial KING COUNTY ZONING RS - Residential Single - Family COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING R -1 - Single - Family Residential (LR 07/20/88) DISCUSSION CONCLUSION The Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map designates this entire area for commercial use. King County Comprehensive Plan splits the upper section as commercial and the lower as residential. The site is divided into two sections by a steep (100%) slope at a height from 75 -100 feet. The uphill portion of the site abuts 99 and the lower section - vacant at present - fronts a residential neighborhood. Zoning decisions for this area were based on two key elements - topography and orientation. The part of the site which is oriented to SR -99 and separated physically by topography from the residential use area is desig- nated commercial. The part of the site with orientation and physically connected to the residential neighborhood should be designated single - family residential. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION The Task Force recommends that the upper section of the site remain commercial but the lower section be amended and designated residential on Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Based upon the Comprehensive Plan Map, the zoning would be C -2 and R -1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the Task Force recommendation. RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 3 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Highway- oriented commercial/ Single Family TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial KING COUNTY ZONING C -G - Commercial R -S - Single - Family Residential COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING C -2 - Regional Retail Business R -1 - Single - Family Residential (26 /RA.AREA3) (LR 07/20/88) 7 +r —anrn I AREA 4 sy ����aloi�n +'7 e`r 1 h1 q1 �i J�: AREA 6 AREA 7 i n M s DISCUSSION CONCLUSION AREA TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. (26 /RA.AREA3 -7) r 0 ° 1 qa sae ■ n a =•. 44 49 73 r a d rn� I �f - 8 - RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 4,5,6/7 KING COUNTY ZONING M -L - Light Manufacturing B -N - Neighborhood Business C -G - Commercial General COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING M -1 - Light Manufacturing C -1 - Neighborhood Commercial C -2 - General Commercial The Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this entire area as commercial. The King County Comprehensive Plan designations range from light manufacturing to commercial and residential. The existing uses include an auto repair business, moving and storage business, second -hand and small grocery stores and a barbershop along East Marginal Way. The surrounding residential area consists of older, well -kept, owner - occupied homes. The current Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan does not reflect existing uses nor change in topography. The task force would like to encourage redevelopment of the commercial area, while also providing a better transition from single- family to commercial use. KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Industrial Single- Family Residential Neighborhood /Community Business TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial The task force is recommending the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Map be amended to reduce the commercial area and designate an area on the west side of East Marginal Way as Light Industrial. The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning are shown on Attachments G and H. In conjunction with this recommendation, the task force is recommending text amendments to the zoning code to provide better buffers (see text amendment section of this report). (LR 07/20/88) CONCLUSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 8 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Residential TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial KING COUNTY ZONING RS - Single- Family Residential COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING R -1 - Single - Family Residential DISCUSSION Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this site as commercial, while King County has designated it for residential use. The property is approximately 6,000 square feet in size. The site is predominantly vacant except for a METRO bus stop. The site is oriented toward SR -99 and then drops to the north and east. As shown on the map, the site is surrounded on three sides by road rights -of -way. This site is surrounded on three sides by roads and as a result is noisy and unattractive. The current single use is for a METRO bus stop with the remainder of the lot vacant and overgrown with weeds. Its primary orientation is to Highway 99. Based on the facts that this site is oriented to Highway 99 and is surrounded by roads on three sides, this site should be viewed as commercial rather than residential property. The Task Force recommended retaining the Tukwila Comprehensive Land use Plan designation of commercial. The zoning will be C -2 to allow for a variety of commercial uses. (26 /RA.AREAB) 9 (LR 07/20/88) DISCUSSION CONCLUSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION (26 /RA.AREA9) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 9 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN High /Maximum Density Multi - Family Housing TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low- Density Residential KING COUNTY ZONING RM -1800 - High /Maximum Density Multi- Family Housing COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING RMH - Multiple - Residence High Density The site encompasses approximately two acres. The existing use is a single- family residence. The topography of this site is oriented to the residential neighborhood. Highway 99 is at a much higher grade and as a result, is physically and visually separate from the lower residential development. Both the Task Force and the staff agree that due to the orientation of the buildable portion of the site and its topography, Low - Density Residential is the appropriate designation. The Task Force recommended retaining the residential designation as stated in the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The zoning under this designation will be R -1 - Single- Family Residence. DISCUSSION CONCLUSION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. (26 /RA.AREA10) - 11 - RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 10 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN High /Maximum Density Multi- Family Housing TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Residential KING COUNTY ZONING RM900 - Maximum Density Multi- Family Dwelling COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING RMH - Multiple- Residence High Density Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area for low- density residential. The King County Comprehensive Plan designates it as High/ Maximum Density Multi- Family Housing. Topography changes at the edge of SR -99 determine its orientation to the surrounding residential development as opposed to the commercial uses on SR -99. The property is currently vacant but there has been a proposal to build a nursing home which is still in the County review process. The proposal has been required to provide an Environmental Impact Statement. Based on earlier discussions regarding topography and existing uses, it was determined that they were again key decisive elements. Highway 99 is located approximately 100 feet above the buildable site with access through the residential area. As a result, City staff and the Task Force concluded that single - family residential would be the most appropriate use. The Task Force recommends that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Low - Density Residential be maintained. The zoning will be R -1 - Single - Family Residential. (LR 07/20/88) DISCUSSION CONCLUSION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. KING COUNTY ZONING RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 11 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN High /Maximum Density Multi- family Housing Highway - oriented commercial Parks and Open Space TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Residential Medium - Density Residential Parks and Open Space C -G - General Commercial RS7200 - Single - Family Residential COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING C -2 - Regional Retail Business R -1 - Single - Family Residential There are several conflicts between Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and King County's Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the zoning in some cases conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan designations. The South Central School District owns approximately 3.6 acres, of which approximately 1 acre is designated commercial and the remaining is designated open space in the County. The portion that abuts Highway 99 has a topography consisting of steep slopes down from the highway. As discussed in other areas, those properties abutting Highway 99 which are at a lower level than the highway should be designated for less intensive uses. The task force recommends that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map be amended and designated single - family residential. The zoning district would then be R -1 (Single - Family Residential). (26 /RA.AREA11) (LR 07/20/88) - 12 - ro iu C 121 3380= • 1S•S.•SS 1!I n et C LC t U 4 r AREA 12 :Nutty 4 I) S I n .. �..1 1 u . - 1n Mir e " , / /37TH AREA 13 ISI FRi&R1 /3 EStsi, C ST ti .i., i4' •a r •..o u DISCUSSION CONCLUSION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION (26 /RA.AREAl2) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. - 13 - RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 12 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Single - Family Residential TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial KING COUNTY ZONING RS - Residential Single- Family COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING R -1 - Single - Family Residential Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area as light industry and King County's Comprehensive Plan designates it residential. The existing use includes nine single - family dwelling units and is surrounded by single - family dwelling units in all directions, except the northwest. Designating this area single - family residential is consistent with the existing use and would prevent a "pocket" formation of uses. This decision would predetermine use to the south of this site, but it is not anticipated as inconsistent with present and future development. The Task Force felt that designating this area as residential would be the best use based on current use patterns and topography. The Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan will be changed from light industrial to single- family residential. The zoning will be R -1 (Single- Family Residential). (LR 07/20/88) DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations. (26 /RA.AREA13) - 14 RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 13 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Light Manufacturing TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial KING COUNTY ZONING RS - Residential Single- Family COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING R -1 - Single - Family Residential The site abuts the freeway interchange and the Interurban right -of -way to the northeast. The area to the northwest is zoned and in current use as light industrial. To the southeast, the area is zoned M -1 with existing light industrial use well as a building used as a residence. CONCLUSION Due to the small size of the site, its proximity to the freeway, and abutting high industrial uses, this site should be designated and zoned for light industrial. The Task Force concluded that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of light industrial should be maintained. The zoning should be M -1 - Light Industry. (LR 07/20/88) STAFF REPORT to the 88- 1- A,•3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA Planning Commission `. Currently in the single - family residential areas, County zoning for minimum lot size varies from 15,000 square feet to 7,200 square feet. The Task Force is recommending that the minimum lot size for single - family areas be 7,200 square feet. They felt by recommending this lot size that they would encourage new single - family development in those existing established single - family neighbor- hoods. The new development would further establish this area for single - family development and encourage improvements to the existing houses. CONCLUSIONS In staff meetings with the people in this annexation area, common concerns have been expressed. The concerns are: - Preserve and enhance the existing single - family areas. - Provide a better transition between residential uses and nonresidential uses. - Provide opportunity for redevelopment and new development of existing commercial areas. - Provide opportunity for expansion of industrial uses. The work that has been done in this annexation area should be viewed as a Comprehensive Plan update. By working with residents, property owners, and business people, the staff has tried to identify the land use issues and work with the various affected parties to develop a consensus on a solution to the issues. The land use plan proposed does not always up -zone or down -zone properties. The proposal in this report tries to balance a wide variety of concerns. Due to the short time schedule, every issue could not be resolved prior to annexation. After annexation, further refinement in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Code will be needed. RECOMMENDATIONS Planning staff recommends approval of Attachment G - Tukwila Amended Comprehen- sive Land Use Plan Map, and Attachment H - Proposed Pre- Annexation Zoning Map. -.15 STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS 88- 1 -A,,, -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA This section will review the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Code in conjunction with the pre- annexation zoning discussed in the preceding section. The proposed amendments would be approved through an ordinance that would become effective upon annexation of the area to Tukwila. The proposed amendments are grouped under three categories: Buffering, Height Exception, M -1 - Light Indus- trial Use and Design Review. Proposed additions are shown in bold print and deletions are in C ]. BUFFERING Section 18.52.020 C -M Industrial Park - Setback Standards EXISTING: Front yard - 50 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - 5 feet. PROPOSED: Minimum setback of 50 feet when adjacent to a residential use. Section 18.52.030(4) C -M Industrial Park - Required Landscape Area EXISTING: Front yard - 15 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - none. PROPOSED: Fifteen feet of landscaping shall be provided when development in the C -M zone abuts residential uses. Section 18.60.030(2)(B) Design Review Requirements for the C -M Zone EXISTING: Design Review is required if the proposed structure exceeds 10,000 square feet. PROPOSED: When C -M development is adjacent to residential uses, Design Review is required. Discussion These three amendments are intended to provide a better transition between residential uses and industrial uses. Currently in the City, the C -M Industrial Park zone does not abut any residential areas. The proposed standard would not affect existing uses in Tukwila, but would affect the new development north of 126th in the Riverton area. The proposed standard improves the existing stan- dards for buffering, while at the same time providing the opportunity for greater standards if needed through the Design Review process. STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission HEIGHT EXCEPTION M -1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES - 17 - 88- 1- A,''60 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA Section 18.50.020 M -1 Light Industrial EXISTING: Maximum Building Height - Four stories /45 feet PROPOSED: See Attachment I for areas to be added to the Height Exception Up to and Including 115 Feet. Section 18.50.040 Building Height Exceptions Up to and Including 115 Feet Authorization of building height greater than the heights contained in Section 18.50.020 (Table 1) up to and including 115 feet in the areas of the City as designated on Map shall be made by the Planning Com- mission acting as the Board of Architectural Review pursuant to the guidelines and procedures specified in Chapter 18.60. Any application for a proposed structure exceeding 100 feet in overall height and located north of Interstate 405 shall be submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration for an advisory report. The report of the FAA shall be submitted to the BAR as part of the Staff Report. Discussion The proposed height exception is similar to the text amendment made in Fire District No. 1. The height exception would extend to the area north of 125th Avenue which has a proposed zoning designation of M -1. EXISTING: Section 18.40.020(8) Principally Permitted Uses Manufacturing, processing and /or assembling previously prepared metals or plastics including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of metal [not exceeding 1/8 inch in thickness], engraving, galvanizing, and handforging. PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.40.070 Performance Standards Use, activity, or operations within a structure shall not emit odor, noise, dust, smoke, gas or vibration which are discernible to a person at normal sensitivities at the edge of the property. Discussion The proposed amendment would affect all areas in the City zoned M - Over the last year, several businesses have commented on the limitations of metal thick- ness. Due to changing technology, most cities and counties no longer regulate light industrial uses by metal thickness. The 1/8 -inch thickness is being removed and a Performance Standard is being added to ensure the impacts of light industrial use will end at the edge of the property. DESIGN REVIEW (22/88 -1 -A) STAFF REPORT to the 88- 1- A,e6-3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA Planning Commission PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.60.030(2)(H) Scope of Authority All proposed developments along East Marginal Way between 125th Street and 131st Street in all zone districts, excluding single - family homes. Discussion This amendment would only affect non - single family uses along East Marginal Way in the Riverton annexation area. As mentioned earlier, the task force would like to encourage redevelopment of their commercial area and assurance of better transition between single family uses and non- residential uses. The design review process provides for the opportunity for residents to be informed of what is proposed and comment. RECOMMENDATIONS Planning staff recommends that the text amendments discussed above be adopted as part of the Riverton pre-annexation zone proposal. STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS 88 -1 -A, -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA This section will review the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Code in conjunction with the pre- annexation zoning discussed in the preceding section. The proposed amendments would be approved through an ordinance that would become effective upon annexation of the area to Tukwila. The proposed amendments are grouped under three categories: Buffering, Height Exception, M -1 - Light Indus- trial Use and Design Review. Proposed additions are shown in bold print and deletions are in [ ]. BUFFERING Section 18.52.020 C -M Industrial Park - Setback Standards EXISTING: Front yard - 50 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - 5 feet. PROPOSED: Minimum setback of 50 feet when adjacent to a residential use. Section 18.52.030(4) C -M Industrial Park - Required Landscape Area EXISTING: Front yard - 15 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - none. PROPOSED: Fifteen feet of landscaping shall be provided when development in the C -M zone abuts residential uses. Section 18.60.030(2)(B) Design Review Requirements for the C -M Zone EXISTING: Design Review is required if the proposed structure exceeds 10,000 square feet. PROPOSED: When C -M development is adjacent to residential uses, Design Review is required. Discussion These three amendments are intended to provide a better transition between residential uses and industrial uses. Currently in the City, the C -M Industrial Park zone does not abut any residential areas. The proposed standard would not affect existing uses in Tukwila, but would affect the new development north of 126th in the Riverton area. The proposed standard improves the existing stan- dards for buffering, while at the same time providing the opportunity for greater standards if needed through the Design Review process. 16 - STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission HEIGHT EXCEPTION Section 18.50.020 M -1 Light Industrial EXISTING: Maximum Building Height - Four stories /45 feet PROPOSED: See Attachment I for areas to be added to the Height Exception Up to and Including 115 Feet. Section 18.50.040 Building Height Exceptions Up to and Including 115 Feet Authorization of building height greater than the heights contained in Section 18.50.020 (Table 1) up to and including 115 feet in the areas of the City as designated on Map shall be made by the Planning Com- mission acting as the Board of Architectural Review pursuant to the guidelines and procedures specified in Chapter 18.60. Any application for a proposed structure exceeding 100 feet in overall height and located north of Interstate 405 shall be submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration for an advisory report. The report of the FAA shall be submitted to the BAR as part of the Staff Report. Discussion The proposed height exception is similar to the text amendment made in Fire District No. 1. The height exception would extend to the area north of 125th Avenue which has a proposed zoning designation of M -1. M -1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES 88- 1- A, \d -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA EXISTING: Section 18.40.020(8) Principally Permitted Uses Manufacturing, processing and /or assembling previously prepared metals or plastics including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of metal [not exceeding 1/8 inch in thickness], engraving, galvanizing, and handforging. PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.40.070 Performance Standards Use, activity, or operations within a structure shall not emit odor, noise, dust, smoke, gas or vibration which are discernible to a person at normal sensitivities at the edge of the property. Discussion The proposed amendment would affect all areas in the City zoned M -1. Over the last year, several businesses have commented on the limitations of metal thick- ness. Due to changing technology, most cities and counties no longer regulate light industrial uses by metal thickness. The 1/8 -inch thickness is being removed and a Performance Standard is being added to ensure the impacts of light industrial use will end at the edge of the property. - 17 - (22/88 -1 -A) STAFF REPORT to the 88- 1- A, -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA Planning Commission DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.60.030(2)(H) Scope of Authority All proposed developments along East Marginal Way between 125th Street and 131st Street in all zone districts, excluding single - family homes. Discussion This amendment would only affect non - single family uses along East Marginal Way in the Riverton annexation area. As mentioned earlier, the task force would like to encourage redevelopment of their commercial area and assurance of better transition between single family uses and non - residential uses. The design review process provides for the opportunity for residents to be informed of what is proposed and comment. RECOMMENDATIONS Planning staff recommends that the text amendments discussed above be adopted as part of the Riverton pre- annexation zone proposal. • •, . 110 0 Ill . .. . ..4 ST IN ::°" 111111111A11111111111111111110 1111111111111 '' 31/,!!!IU IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 i ,\ // 1I I�,. IIIIIII ,lIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIilllll 7417111111111111111111 11111111111iiiiiiii111111114 RIVERTON ANNEXATION AREAS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 © SEA -TAC INCORPORATION RIVERTON ANNEXATION ® FOSTER ANNEXATION THORNDYKE ANNEXATION TUKWILA CITY LIMITS TUKWILA PLANNING AREA Rh) Ill W Plini Bea' e K vwAY\ I I I r 3 I' ATTACHMENT A " AT%A• 0 UArnU 1 07. Zrel KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LEGEND •(.NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY BUSINESS HIGHWAY ORIENTED COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY Fa MANUFACTURING ® HIGH /MAXIMUM DENSITY HOUSING ® LOW /MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING Q SINGLE FAMILY PARK AND RECREATION AIRPORT FACILITY J r 7 • .?� n,A r�E e o-� 1 !•ii . \ • ` • _ :t 3 i G ' ‘oi 11 • 1 ATTACHMENT B t ill Win n Klarill • 1111111 UII ICU Pilr /MANIA 1 , ii no ICU Minn fir n:,!,:Tililitliiiir, 10"4.. • V 0 0 A 1,:u ut)0011 idmIgn gt!":1 l'li : • • • I 41.Si ..1 - 1 1, ' ii 1 ti:. i Ail 44 0, rEra DUWAMISH -izpAC'sri Roma." NJP1 S 1/1 ...reJtr • • .41 ao•stG NAL 5 3AV M101. ■ • FP AN tz, Rprorl avidfOilEi ACIFIC t4Wr tc ZP "sc.' ■,. 1 ..„..... ...... e ,! •,--, % ,..._....„. 7 . , ):•,:... '-,.-'' - . 77-‘ ' -. t.."11, V:— - e . c''.7 , 'i 1. - ------- ..‘ ''' - - 7,-:. , " ---•--j----A-n---:-.. , . ... ..._.„...--_-; . -= '' ft i.0 f 0 -.(......./.".... '..., --'•.>--- .- ir'i ....-. . • u -: .7 i -- • u 1 - - i „. • V • Z. l '-11. 1 /-.' ...,• .;. i '''' • , i ' ' .. .'•-• , ..... -- - _ . : - ' - -v . -. -- I.. • ..• i • - • Cr-lr" - .,.' , ..' ' /••,'-'. z .... L . , :_ .,. _ . / ,. .. ,....„,.......,,,r. , , . N -1 _1 7.11, 4,•::%-_-:::.•!•_::..".:.•,..1-:27-'-'11:-1' ' " Ill muir. 7.,,...... .. ,, / e , , • ., • -.; ./ , / :.._ , O P ,, ,.. „., • itt V .,'_ . - .- : . ,.... ,- ..1- p . • 1 2 i. * • e •° ;.c1 :: • ; :. 1 .,:k... ,..., .. . (.1) . '--q i .orqbel: - - • . • 0, 4 ., I 1:et ir I 1 !!!1 7 E:o4:1! . I s , 0 IiIII :11 ... ilir F P .,,• S ' • V .'". -41" I 4 , ... t.. Ps, , s 1 !: .1 . i 4 1 i I il • i I I_ III I : , 6 re e • e •4 Lae s „ TV .0 • • 7 7 ra0_1110 5 3A7 ONZI 4 5 1 -0 a-A • !; ' .0 ° • • I •-- . 10.4. • - .; • 1 .t- ?.„ I. • • 4T1' ATTACHMENT D ATLAS 00 SS. SaNlonr 17 SUMS DuWAMISH e .1 erk!if!' • 1 ,SJI3 5 :30. ' \ ',1 7 42..: • • .1•441 KING COUNTY ZONING 4.1 1.1 — - LEGEND M-H HEAVY MANUFACTURING M-P LIGHT INDUSTRY C-G GENERAL COMMERCIAL M-L NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS S-R SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL RM 900 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL • N r w A C p - A • N • ▪ NORTH, r ** • , ;.. t \k\: _ 1111■1•LII•St DUWAMI N/51 Timet TO 0 040 all, ■r4 r 7N:9,91,7.519.:::::: • . o• • • ; 1 4 4 King County Planning and Community Development Division Parks, Planning and Resources Department 707 Smith Tbwer Building 506 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-7610 RE: Community Plan Revision Studies, Riverton Area, and Northeast Highline Community Plan Dear Northeast Highline Community Residents: The King County Council requested that the Parks, Planning and Resources Department initiate two plan revision studies (Sabey- Riverton and Whitlow) for properties within and adjacent to the Highline community planning area. In March 1988, Community Planning staff held a community meeting in Riverton to determine whether or not to recommend pursuing a plan revision and if so, what the scope of the plan revision should be. A summary of community response to these issues is enclosed. In April 1988, the Council considered a third plan revision study (DeRuyter) in the Riverton area. After reviewing the issues raised by these three plan revisions, the King County Council directed that all three be folded into the upcoming Northeast Highline Community Plan update. The Riverton, Allentown, and Skyway areas are all included in the update, which is scheduled to start this fall. A map of the Northeast Highline Community Plan boundaries is enclosed. The Northeast Highline Community Plan will incorporate a broad range of issues and community concerns. Important elements of the plan will include economic development, water and sewer service, transportation, housing, parks and recreation, and cultural resources. Community Planning staff will work with local residents and business people, representatives from the City of Tukwila, and others to develop the Northeast Highline Community Plan. I will send you more information about the plan update process as work begins this fail. If you have any questions please call Anne Knapp, Community Planner, at 344 -4266. Sincerely, Craig sen Chief CL:AK:mg CPO46 /H /3 Enclosure May 2, 1988 cc: Ron Sims, King County Councilmember Lois Schwennesen, Manager, Planning and Community Development Division ATTN: Anne Knapp, Community Planner ATTACHMENT F April 1, 1988 SABEY - RIVERTON COMMUNITY PLAN REVISION STUDY SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS Sabev- Riverton Plan Revision Study The King County Council has requested that the Parks, Planning and Resources Department initiate a community plan revision study in the Highline Community Plan area for properties located in Riverton. Community Planning staff asked local residents to help them decide what area to study and what, if any, land use changes should be considered. Community Recommendations and Responses h. Questionnaire A questionnaire, mailed to local residents and distributed at a community workshop, was part of the information gathering process. Fifty -three residents completed the questionnaire; their responses are summarized below. 1. What description beet fits the Riverton community? ],$ A. A stable, single - family neighborhood. 2Sz B. An area in transition from single - family homes to other uses. �Q C. Other (please describe). Riverton is also described as a blighted residential area changing to industrial and commercial uses. 2. What would you like the community to be in the future? A. A stable, single- family neighborhood. a. B. A manufacturing, commercial, and office area. C. A combination of A and B. 1 D. Other (please describe). Responses indicate mixed preferences for residential. commercial. or industrial. 3. What are the most severe problems facing the Riverton community? Please rank the problems from 1 to 5, with 1 being most severe. 1 2 3 4 5 la a E Q A. Truck traffic. . . . . I B. Traffic congestion. Q d C. Changing single - family homes to other uses. a 4 2. Q a D. Few opportunities for economic development. a a z. E. Other (please describe). The most severe "Other" problems are poor communication L bet en _the County and residents, drug problems. lack of indugtrial de•: clopmer t oppertunities . dif.ic:uity obtaining home loans. and Metro Base noise and air pollution. Less severe problems include depressed residential property values, traffic, a deteriorating neighborhood, unattractive land uses, encroachment of industrial and commercial ventures, need for urban services, zoning problems, and prostitution. 4. How can the County help Riverton resolve these problems? The community has reached no concensus on possible solutions Recommendations include rezoning the area to manufacturing or commercial, maintaining the existing residential zoning, postponing the study until the issue of annexation to the City of Tukwila is settled, a quick plan amendment study, enforcement of trucking laws, and better police protection. Boundaries of the Sabey- Riverton Plan Revision Study Community residents requested a wide range of boundary alternatives for a plan revision study. Options varied from a small two block area to an extensive area bounded by State Route 599 to the north and east, Highway 99 to the west, and S. 144th Street to the south. B. Addition 1 Community Response Community Planning also received letters, phone calls, and petitions from residents and developers about the proposed study. Developers support rezones to permit manufacturing uses. The majority of residents are opposed to an amendment that would change the current land use and zoning. The community is quite divided on the issue of changing land use and very sensitive to all County actions in the area. 1. Riverton Annexation Proposal Group In January a group of local residents submitted petitions to Tukwila requesting an election to annex. The grgup of over 70 residents requests that the County postpone the study until after the outcome of the election, 2. Petition From Riverton Community Residents These 98 residents do not favor any amendment to the :,• 0• • • Z. L. • • , : • - • Community Plan that would change the present single - family land use designation. 3. City of Tukwila Gary Van Dusen, Mayor. regyested that the County postpone the plan revision study until after Riverton residents vote on annexation, tentatively scheduled for the February 7, 1989 ballot. The City is already conducting a pre- annexation zoning study of the area under consideration. 4. Additional phone calls, individual letters, and visits from Riverton residents and interested developers over the past several weeks indicate that the community is still very divided over the extent of a plan revision study and the desired outcomes of any such study. In addition, residents are very concerned that they have an opportunity to fully participate in any future County decisions in their neighborhood including rezones, plan revision studies, and plan updates. ,■ sea 0 1 Ems\\' , "Nut e Lake 1St 1.. NORTHEAST HIGHLINE PLAN Riverton • Allentown • Skyway • • 4411 14•1 ••• •r va- J r.• «.I: . r4•i1l.:r. w: r. ai/M1/04.> NI-- • - — •• ••01111•10•• RIVER • 2 \ Wa4 - ti : .1 .� • +sue FQ . i .as,p�� -NMI. ., forgo A O JTY1 :01- INA, e9.999 9,09 I.� ...��. _.e- r...._- Se 41 .,,.r , • �.e•.... 9 — a ,.a• , 11•6P•• ••'l ill WI. 11 MS ypY .:.� .�Iww41 . 4 �'1.•�. �� lv. MIMi•.■••••u iOi`•• Mk •191•101•1111•11M WE te r ••� , �ie. � � $ I13O" Sr .•1•■• ::.0 ..._. . �.�.., w = ice. JO � r,_ IAA = _�......_� TIBI - I MY II e 10A • its. , ' ,1 • � '7 tr.a ..rte _� ATTACHMENT G -; O U W AMI S H •�,�1; ATLAS O nATTLS Na O '1 ` "'5 . . 4 . i 111VERTOM CREST .: • y. • 1 I �• I Q •�. -- CEMETERY - O RC ifi 11 4, 5 • LEGEND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRY HEAVY INDUSTRY r A r ■ e N E / a .;' • N OR rk! TUKWILA AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP • R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R-4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY C-1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS C-2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS C-M INDUSTRIAL PARK M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY ; .9/frep AnAso!Iptrms CI DUWAMISN I. AAAVVOM v , v , zp, , t :I 31 Mom RIVERTON CRESTH CEMETERY . ..0 .; • ATTACHMENT H Sr • •<".., ' r r rV . 17.1..1 1.57 PROPOSED PRE-ANNEXATION ZONING MAP w A NORTH GNA'r £ r c 9 8 A N. R NN •••\ "••••,: (.• .• RIVERTON ' ANNEXATION BOUNDARY rSUB6 FRIT0/1 R, • • 4, • • : ":7 /c 4 / -P. ATLAS tr SellaTLS ,•-••:: ow. 't• S• DUWAIAISH • • • . 4 01111 , rt t•sra.:7:=' *- — f. -- es 9 U 21 41 • 150, • do.girefic,;.4 . 4% it 11170 ILLZP • RIVER 004C 011. • . RIVER ••• ........".J. . ■ I ' 93''..1 an a • *.e 04 4..1.12-.111 tr — – - .'et• , : -1 09 . • 11,A , # iql 4 Q CC ' \ 23C2 II OD .L 0 tor gs. .4— & ST .4 0 I , • 4.. 4 '... 'I P ‘ 4•1 . it c. 0.• " • b -,,...r,„,,, 3,.. • ..• ..t - 2 , ..,..,, , , , ,.. , 44„, 1 . P.• fellikk■- 11 . 91 IP / • ".h Lis 2 r: I - ''s rum 16 s 0ITH • ST t.k •./.• • . • .1. •• —11 31 .14.1111 RIVERTON CREST : on, cr 41 It at • N.. tv GF'71: • - ' ZS • . N.T •}[ 1' '0 • 41 '/E1 " I O • • • . It • .;;@. "!!) ; qns• :.; ' '' or.•4". ;.0 ot • • t• . • 0,4 1:;) I .1 • _ ,.. • ” c .. • ...j••••— . . j *1 . 6 P TUKWILA PROPOSED HEIGHT EXCEPTION AREA metwo4444 IRS tOnIA '•\ I VA \\u\ ALLOWABLE HEIGHT UP TO 115 FEET rE' r ,.2 / fN C 9 R E' 2 ..<•,(' \ il .' • • .i• 4 ..• ilk .„ ( ••• , . • ..... I+ ''.•• Ni;',„' . / .' .■ i . ( • %... . . • - r, :' ... ':. • t•'• ., *N 1 . •• •••■ , • ' • ‘;‘' ‘,`,., ...\;,.. ..t .• 7 • 11 ',•.,:;... ••• :"... . , / .• .F. -- 1°. : __ • ... 1..7 . 1 1 ,..... .S . A. s■ a la 4. .sc. il , 1F' '. : .7 • • -. • -1.4.1 ...=......!.=.1-..,%'.0.--- . • ....• ',to ot.al . ATTACHMENT I 1 XXX • Q Q Q (See Attached) 1, JOANNE JOHNSON AFF DAVIT [ Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of. Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet C1 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [] Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on FRIDAY, JULY 15, 1988 RIVERT Name of Proje File Numbe al-3 -R 8 -3 -CPA 88 -3 -CA .,... �....�..........w....,..,i.•+n. Saar.. xnc4vcuxrn* a�w�' mrix�ae! xuSN.w SUnAM�". J�i�?" v' �'. i?: � ".�_' O F D I S T R` U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Action Q Official Notice U Determination of Nonsignificance (J Mitigated Determination of Non - significance ▪ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Other (] Other p.r Signatu , 19 . Y«t�;:.. :. tit.. s.'. i. �: nuv��.,..... ...,....�........�._.���_.._... _.. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: (21/NTC.7 -28) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on July 28, 1988, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission Public Hearing Case Number: 87 -3 -R, 88-3-CPA, 88 -3 -CA: RIVERTON ANNEXATION Applicant: Riverton Annexation Petitioners Request: 1. Pre - annexation zoning for the Riverton area 2. Amending Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 3. Amending the Tukwila Zoning Code Location: The general location is east of the current City limits and Fire District No. 1, north of 139th Street, south of the Duwamish River, and east of Pacific Highway South (99) Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing 88 -6 -DR: DEVANEY TENANT IMPROVEMENT Mr. and Mrs. J. DeVaney Renovation of an existing 2,304 square foot, 1 -story building 14805 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA, in NE } of, Sec 23, Twn 23, Rge 4. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday July 17, 1988 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. July 12;1988 RIVERTON ANNEXATION REQUEST TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA Dear Resident: In January, 1988, the City of Tukwila received a petition from residents in your area requesting annexation to Tukwila. Over the last several months, City staff have been working with residents and businesses in developing the zoning for this area upon annexation. On the back of this notice is the pro- posed zoning. The City will be holding the following public hearings on the zoning and annexation request. GLV/co P /JP.7 -12 Cit ' of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor PUBLIC NOTICE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ON ZONING ONLY July 28, 1988 8:00 p.m., City Council Chambers Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard CITY COUNCIL HEARINGS ON ZONING /ANNEXATION REQUEST August 15, 1988 /September 19, 1988 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers Tukwila City Hall 6200.Southcenter Boulevard After the public hearings; an election date will be set for the residents to vote on the annexation request. Further information can be obtained at the Planning Department located in Tukwila City 6200 Southcenter Blvd. If you wish to call, the Planning Department' phone number is 433 -1849. City of Tukwila NANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcentei Boulward Tuhwib. Washington 98188 (X/I 433 -1849 RIVERTON CREST CEMETERY, ATLAS RIVERTON PROPOSED TUKWILA ZONING R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R -4 LOW APARTMENTS ;:cca RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY UM C -1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS •• a C -2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS C -M INDUSTRIAL PARK M -1 LIGHT INDUSTRY prrill M -2 HEAVY INDUSTRY C 7 h \ . mo w \ ..• RIVERTON LARGER SCALE MAP AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN PLANNING DEPARTMENT NORTH Ew Y R, A'lN E N T E /R • - ;'... r ANNEXATION BOUNDARY, \ �p ' Rs •sulso a a';\ tit y" w� Noy. •