HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-05-DR - SEATTLE METROPOLITAN - INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION LANDSCAPE DESIGN REVIEW88-05-DR
13775 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH
METRO INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION ODOR SCRUBBER DESIGN REVIEW
LANDSCAPE PLAN
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
Mr. Mat Harris
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building, 821 Second Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104 -1598
Dear Mat:
MCB /sjn
September 1, 1988
Yours_truly
gg
I went back and reviewed the BAR file on odor scurbber 88 -5 -DR. The land-
scaping condition referred to continuation of landscaping around all sides
of the scrubber. Since the rockery borders two sides, the laurel need only
be placed on the north and northwest sides. This will require an addi-
tional one foot between the proposed asphalt curb and fence. Please see
notes on plan. If you have any questions, please call. Otherwise changes
are as we discussed by phone.
Moira Carr Bradshaw
Associate Planner
a 4
O
u
E r.r T11
R„cY QEETAIIALIG
1411.1.J._ Ty. 7.4
IuTEUR r,6U Avc.
LATE .UQ11.LL Q_ 1,1 LruG. -
METKD
Ec.Sa r.ELu-
L=L 7_
PARKANG
-r 30'
ry
Mall 1
5. lor i
il i\J),7,z
' /\
\\ \
V 1,
C t o,
IWO VW, ,ne.....,ti.......a
. p ft;en:
X X X X
Zaa Mar uoli 1
1 1=6".44, -
(dice. Pan
419;47
Cuee O
ESN
weal) Fl:. x
See !bce 2. ,
4
s
tL HATCH 1-.2
6 i 6=0 a 2;4 .'
l / f
DESIGNED
MSK
DRAWN
RECOM.
APPROVED
l.
3 ct Tovso:\ s\ r1.
\.o•ce • ,n 9. +.vNRc. SN.\
■w a (0 - 10- SwRu,3 Fe' .VATE.vie, Aa
at 1►+r1T FV.R ( ) t2`n ;oek \ S
.3S O D. c.. " Co d urt l -? hli
2. YA;,a-c MAN,
SCALE:
AS NOTED
AV' A C.e4'7 q cr-t-Nea7 S .
m qQ hisnicipay of Meltopaillan SW*
ARMS:
INTERURBAN AVE. PUMP STATION FILE
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
bVaNO.
SPIT 2 OF 2
3 mETRD
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 - 1598
August 25, 1988
Ms. Moira Carr - Bradshaw
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
, , it IU, 4
AU G 25 1988
Interurban Pump Station /Odor Scrubber - File No. 88 -5 -DR
Dear Ms. Bradshaw:
The enclosed drawings are in response to the Board of
Architectural Review's decision that Metro install an eight
foot high wood fence around the proposal and vegetation
along Interurban Avenue.
The drawings show the dimensions of the easement and the
wood fence surrounding the above grade structures. The re-
mainder of the property is needed for safe vehicular access.
Four rhododendrons, matching the Ivy Hills landscaping plan,
will be planted and maintained in a planter box in front of
the fence along Interurban Avenue.
I believe that the concerns have been adequately addressed.
Please accept my apology for the delay in providing this in-
formation to you. The engineering time for design and draw-
ing was not immediately available. Should additional infor-
mation be desired, please call me at 684 -1371.
Very, truly yours,
/✓
Ma Harris
Right -of -Way Agent
MH:cg
Enclosures
*..,..,>,.. .....*
1.11 '4 w a s City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
a. Pinus contortas
b. Laurel zabellianas
c. Rhododendrons
d. Azaleas
(29 /NTC.METRO)
✓ Vi
NOTICE OF DECISION
FILE NUMBER: 88 -5 -DR
APPLICANT: METRO
REQUEST: Odor scrubber for Interurban Pumping Station
LOCATION: On Interurban Avenue across from Foster Golf Course
The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on
May 12, 1988, and approved the scrubber subject to the following conditions:
1. Installation of an eight -foot high wood fence around four sides of the
scrubber, painted the same color as the Ivy Hills Apartments.
2. Continuation of Ivy Hills landscaping around remaining three sides of fence
to consist of the following or acceptable substitutes:
3. Submittal of a site plan which accurately depicts the use of the entire
easement, the screening, and the immediate parking and right -of -way improve-
ments.
Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Coun-
cil by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of
the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal.
Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner
May 13, 1988
Planning Commission
May 12, 1988
Page 5
MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION WAS APPROVED WITH
CAGLE, COPLEN, KNUDSON, KIRSOP VOTING YES AND MR. HAGGERTON
VOTING NO.
Mr. Haggerton went on record saying he had reservations as to the
traffic impacts of the development.
88 -4 -DR - PARKWAY RETAIL BUILDING - Request to construct a one -
story, 14,143 square foot retail building on a 66,000 square foot
parcel.
Vernon Umetsu reviewed the proposal pointing out the modifica-
tions to the original landscaping and building design. He
entered the May 6, 1988 addendum to the April 7th staff report as
Exhibit 1.
Mr. Bob Schofield, 3806 130th Avenue N.E., Bellevue represented
the applicant. He clarified the proposal.
Lance Mueller, 130 Lakeside, Seattle, 98122, architect for the
building explained the design and signing of the building.
Mark Wiseman, 2329 E. Madison, Seattle, WA 98112 landscaped
architect, clarified the landscaping design.
MR. HAGGERTON MOVED THAT THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW ACCEPT
THE DESIGN AS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT AND GIVE THE APPLICANT
THE OPTION OF EITHER USING HANGING BASKETS OR AWNINGS IN THE
DESIGN. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Kirsop was excused.
88 -5 -DR - METRO INTERURBAN PUMP STATION ODOR SCRUBBER Request
to construct and screen a 9.33 -foot tall odor scrubbing pipe and
tank.
Jack Pace, Senior Planner, described the proposal, recommending
approval with conditions.
Matt Harris, 821 - Second Avenue Seattle further clarified the
proposal.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. CAGLE SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE
REQUEST AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. MR. CAGLE SECONDED THE MOTION
WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
i a u1
2' ur�JL�. G��'u -k j . Sta!a9 O
SGharG - tk. a. a�Yrzc. Co-eat ad.) � � 3 s�d�d �,/ ca. tM �� �.f
A. L'o� l t+,c 1 .usl d revr►a�"u - 0 0 Ae
ce , 61 6-0)-4.
a,, P . 1.40.A.�1. -5ad.�.�ua.Na e c du�i,Hdrt lso a. s n
3 a.t
.6, httt . .F a s i.& pt wk act eact . 41144.10 +ire use o c� 4 . ea 44 ' 'r. � 5eA 1 ), °
tti i,v4tnu.cl t P' �`�'` ' °e N111:")44%Ll *'S • /7i1... /3. RA
HEARING DATE:
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Commercial
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
STAFF REPORT
to the Board of Architectural Review
Prepared April 13, 1988
April 28, 1988
88 -5 -DR: Interurban Avenue Pump Station Odor Scrubber
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Installation of an odor scrubber for the Interurban sewer
pumping station consisting of an activated carbon tank
scrubber, ducting and 2 hp fan.
Interurban Avenue, across from Foster Golf Course;
in front of Ivy Hills Apartments
916 square feet
C -2, Regional Retail
Determination of Non - Significance
Vicinity Map
Existing Site Plan
Proposed Site Plan
Elevation
Ivy Hills Landscape Plan
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
FINDINGS
STAFF REPORT `" 88 -5 -DR: METRO
to the BAR Page 2
1. Project Description: Odor scrubber for an existing sewer pump station.
2. Existing Development: The site surrounding the easement is being developed
with 104 apartment units (Ivy Hills Apartments) accessible from either
Interurban Avenue or 56th Avenue South.
3. Surrounding Land Use: Interurban is characterized by offices, commercial
stores, and the golf course.
4. Terrain: Flat.
5. Vegetation: When completed, front yard landscaping for Ivy Hills will be
installed pine trees and laurel shrubs are proposed adjacent to subject
easement.
6. Light /Noise /Air Quaility: Interurban Avenue is a principal arterial and a
truck route; therefore, noise is a factor because of the traffic.
7. Access: An existing curb cut will remain onto Interurban Avenue for the
pumping station.
8. Public Facilities: Foster Golf Course.
BACKGROUND
Odors emanate from the pipes extending above ground at the subject pump station.
METRO is proposing an odor scrubber (Attachments B, C and D) to eliminate the
odors. The pump station is owned by the City of Tukwila on an easement granted
to the City for the use. METRO and the City have agreed to provide METRO's
joint use and duty to maintain, operate and repair the trunk sewer, force main
and pumping station.
Development of the surrounding adjacent site for Ivy Hills Apartments necessi-
tated resolution of the odor problem.
DECISION CRITERIA
The Board's review criteria are shown below in bold, followed by findings of
fact. Because this property lies in the Interurban Special Review District,
additional criteria also apply.
1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site
The structure proposed to eliminate the odors consists of duct work, an
activated carbon tank and 2 hp fan. The maximum height of the structures
STAFF REPORT w 88 -5 -DR: METRO
to the BAR Page 3
is 9.5 feet (Attachment D). A 916- square foot easement exists for the
structure, which has a 40 -foot frontage on Interurban Avenue with a curb cut
to allow access to METRO maintenance vehicles (Attachment A). The siting of
the scrubber is restricted by the location of the existing pump station.
2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
No landscaping transition is proposed and the Ivy Hills landscape plan
(Attachment E) does not show the sewer pump station. As the landscape plan
for Ivy Hills demonstrates, the easement and its utilities are part of the
development's front yard and parking lot. Views from the upper stories of
the apartments will have clear views of the proposed scrubber. The golf
course is located on the other side of Interurban Avenue.
No change in pedestrian or vehicular circulation patterns on -site or off -
site is proposed.
3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment
No landscaping has been proposed by the applicant. Attachment E is a copy
of the Ivy Hills landscape plan, which does not acknowledge the sewer ease-
ment or existing curb cut.
4. TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design
Criteria specifies that mechanical equipment or other utility hardware
should be screened from view.
5. TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
Not applicable.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
6. TMC 18.60.060(4)(A) Proposed development design should be sensitive to the
natural amenities of the area.
The odor scrubber's design is utilitarian instead of similar to landscaping
and buildings in the area. However, it will eliminate odors emanating from
the existing pump station.
7. TMC 18.60.060(4)(B) Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard
for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
The use will not inhibit the use of Foster Golf Course directly across
Interurban Avenue from the property. Because golfers can see the equipment,
as proposed, enjoyment of Foster Golf Course may be impacted. Screening, as
recommended herein, will mitigate that impact.
STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
Not applicable.
88 -5 -DR: METRO
Page 4
8. TMC 18.60.060(4)(C) Proposed development should provide for safe and
convenient on -site pedestrian circulation.
9. TMC 18.60.060(4)(D) Proposed property use should be compatible with neigh-
boring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located.
The proposal is accessory to the sewer trunk line and pumping station.
The use is existing and the proposal is to eliminate an impact of the pump
station. Because of the adjacent Ivy Hills Apartments and nearby Foster
Golf Course, the proposal of the odor scrubber trades an odor incompati-
bility for view and aesthetic incompatibility. The view impact could be
mitigated with appropriate screening.
10. TMC 18.60.060(4)(E) Proposed development should seek to minimize signifi-
cant adverse environmental impacts.
The proposal is to eliminate the adverse impact of odor. The design of the
odor scrubber combined with the prominent location of the existing pump
station creates view and aesthetic impacts.
11. TMC 18.60.060(4)(F) Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for
significant historical features in the area.
None known at this time.
CONCLUSIONS
1. In order to meet Criteria 3 and 4(e), screening must be installed around the
proposal.
2. A minimum eight -foot solid wood fence painted the same color of the Ivy
Hilts Apartments is needed to meet the criteria and safeguard the equipment
from child's play.
3. Vegetation which duplicates the front yard landscaping of Ivy Hilts will
create a continuous visual frontage along Interurban Avenue and soften the
effect of a significant structure located so close to the right -of -way.
4. Coordination of site plans with inclusion of actual METRO needs and use
of the site with the parking lot, landscaping and right -of -way need to be
completed.
STAFF REPORT `"' 88 -5 -DR: METRO
to the BAR Page 5
(22/88- 5- DR.1 -3)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the above Findings and Conclusions, the Planning staff recommends the
Board of Architectural Review approve the proposal subject to:
1. Installation of an eight -foot high wood fence around four sides of the
scrubber, painted the same color as the Ivy Hills Apartments.
2. Continuation of Ivy Hills landscaping around remaining three sides of fence
to consist of the following or acceptable substitutes:
a. Pinus contortas
b. Laurel zabellianas
c. Rhododendrons
d. Azaleas
3. Submittal of a site plan which accurately depicts the use of the entire
easement, the screening, and the immediate parking and right -of -way improve-
ments.
4
LOCATION OF
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION
AR. o
?K.0v +n
4
4 INTERURBAN AVE. 5
SITE 1-
INDEX TO DIAMONDS
�L.l1l� �111� DILL
$iso VICINITY. UNMAN INNS AND IIDDT TO OMYINIS
2 Inge 0/11/110 SIT! PLANT
2 MO1 NEVIS 111! --
4 MCI dlVAgsN AT UM
! !lh ILMORICAL WE LINE OIASAAN
• 1107 •S11101 PLAN MAILS
LOCATION NAP
• IA I/4 IA
; 1 GAL , 4 ti F 11 ' 1'111
HFGIFJNI^1G AF IH' t• nrF1: *r rnPNFP IHfr:rr N 44•51" w 37
FEET, THENCE 5 45'11'1 w 10 FIF T'IF'JlF = 44 '5'' F 24
F FF J M'1 10 IHF 50; THI RL : PROPERT , . INF. T∎¢ •1rF F,4'
5R' 4S' W 1 0 14F ',f PRORF R 1 v r ORNF P .
Al! WITHIN FHF F1:.uwING OFS 1 'NOPFRTr.
A TRACT OF LAND IN THAT P0g110N OF STEPHEN '05TFR
DONATION CLAIM NO. 3B. IN ',E''TION 14, !OWNSHIP 23
NORTH. RANC.F 4 EA1I, WILLAMFTIF HFFIJIAN Or S RIHFD AS
FOLLOWS,
BEGINNING AT THE INIFRSFCII OF THE ,OUTHFRIY LINF 0'
5. 137TH 5T FFORMF'IY LEMON 00401. PR000CF0 N 14
F. AND THE NORTHEASTFRIY LINE OF 56TH AVF 5. (FORMFRI I
LEMON ROAD), WHICH PONT 15 DESCRIBFLT AS THE POINT OF
BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTION OEFD, DATFD
MI 2S. 1903, AND RFCOROFD JANUARY 27, 1 904 IN
VOLUME 362 OF UFFD5. PAGF 6:5. PFCORDS OF 'Hf AUDITOR
OF KING COUNTY, SIATF OF WASHINGT(I11 IHFNFF N %4'L'4 F
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF 5. 13;14 51. TrOPMFRLY
LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED 125 FEFT In THE IRUF 00114 OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N :4 E 180.204 FFFI.
TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY IINF OF INTERURBAN AVE 5., A
STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE 5 44 F ALONG SAID SOUTH-
WESTERLY LINE. 407.32 FFETI THFNCF 5 65'58'45' W 161.64
FEET, THENCE N 45•49 W 437.44 FEFT TO THE TRUE. POINT
OF BEGINNING. SITUTAIFD IN THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF.
WASHINGTON.
1AmI•1111,
VICINITY NA►
ws mSTAO ..1«.+1.+- --"
.�. G .,
INTERMIX 'WPM S' 'ia
OT.G Epp1 c u1S . 5011/2111 .
• VICINITY, LOCATION NAPS NO
� ' INDEX TO ORAVINOS
...
III
NNN«
6100
a
DRYWEL
I,JTA F
DRYWELL
EXHAUST-
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION
28 "0
MANHOLE- -
• -10'0 AC CLASS 150
WETWELL INTAKE
• j'i. al ' d•
1
r
-- EXISTING DIRECT CONNECTION
(FABRICATED OF SHEET METAL)
¶ESIGNED.
MSK
• DRA. CHKD,
WEM _ rC
RFCOM,
APPR,
Z ;
78'0 Q
HANHOL F CCI
I
,/ W
�
4
) . - Z
L _ _ ____ `.... 5 '_
10 '0 AC CLASS 150
WETWELL EXHAUST TO
ATMOSPHERE
0'
*METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
SCALE. INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION
3/8 " =1'_0_ ODOR CONTROL SCRUBBER
CONTRACT.
EXISTING SITE PLAN
DATE,
MAR 88
FILE.
085
ONG NO.
M100
SHT 2 OF
NOTE:
•• CORE DRILL 1' HOLE
FOR 3 /4' GRS CONDUIT'
AND SEAL WATERTIGHT
AROUND CONDUIT
FABRICATE AND INSTALL
WETWELL INTAKE RAIN
CAP
DARKENED LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE WORK TO BE
DONE. LIGHT LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION
3 /A" GRS
CONDUIT
(3 -.12 It
1 -112 G),
BURY 6'
MIN DEPTH
REMOVE EXISTING
WETWELL EXHAUST
PUMP
1
t .t A" A ',TALI
DISCONNECT EXISTING 1/2'0 GROUNDING ROD
DIRECT CONNECTION
REMOVE WETWELL
EXHAUST RAIN CAP
. , FABRICATE AND INSTALL:
WETWELL INTAKE RAIN
CAP
iL f
.1 h'
3
3/4" GRS CONDUIT
STUBBED UP IN 4z
CONCRETE FOUNDATION
1 HP BAYLEY FAN LLJ
STYLE AH WHEEL
EXHAUST TO
ATMOSPHERE Z
CO
LL!
Z
GRAVEL FILL TO
4 LEVEL GRADE
(APPROXIMATELY 30 YDS)
f
'.il
1
4'11'
,,•,�
N,A 'tfl 'e i A' �• %A•, .lMl 'p. ;(11 e.
ri; "• A94 1 ` + t ti 4 , '.,1 •
REVISED SITE PLAN
1
'REOFLEX' CONCENTRIC
REDUCER EXPANSION
JOINT (12 NOMINAL)
W/FECH TIE ROOS
12 FRP DUCT
W /Si.IP JOINTS
FL_ G.Ot
UNIFLANGE
,EXISTING 10 AC
CLASS ISO
ANCHOR W/EOUIVALENT
SIZE RAWL -TYPE CONC
STUDS. 302 SS-- --
3/4' CHAMFER
CTYP) -- - --
9.331
EL. 7.83!
1.
NOTE: - 1/210 GROUNDING ROD
DARKENED LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE WORK TO OE CONNECT TO TANK
.DONE. LIGHT LIFEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
SECTION
SCALE. 3/4' =1' -0'
12'0N1o'o 90•
ELBOW
FxISTINC 4'0 ACTIVATFLI
CARBON LANK (FRP)
(OWNS P SUPPI I r.
10'0 FRP DUCT
W /SLIP JOINTS-
\ --8' SLAB ON GRADE
W/.4812 EW,
PLACE ON 2' GRAVEL
BED
dESIGNED.
M5K
DRA. CHM.
WEM 21
AECOM.
APPR,
3/8'0 U -BOLTS
W /WASHER 1 NUT
L 3x3x1 /8x14' L6
CONTRACT,
2 STL PIPE.
CUT TO REO'D LENGTH
t 6x6x3/8 W/3/8'0
RAWL -TYPE CONCRETE
ANCHORS
/// ' AN/ /////4/01r A/ //Y �l r // /
-PIPE SUPPORT (TYP)
SEE DETAIL A/M102
DETAIL
SCALE. 1 1/2 - 1' -0'
'REOFLEX' CONCENTRIC
REDUCER EXPANSION JOINT
(10'0x9 1/4'0 NOMINAL.
FABRICATE FL6 TO MATE W /FAN)
-1 HP BAYLEY FAN
f STYLE AH WHEEL
W /WEATHER GUARD
till-- 6' SLAB ON GRADE
/ W/•4012' OC EW,
-1/2' mum / PLACE ON 2' GRAVEL
$ALV. SCREEN BED
ON DISC ARSE . --3/4' CHAFFER
(TYP)
•
EL. 0.0'
• MET1 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
SCALE. INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION
3/4- =1' -0 ODOR CONTROL SCRUBBER
ELEVATION AT GRADE
10'0 PRP
PIPE
r;
5 t1/4V
-1/2' OROUT
Cr," UNDER
ALL SUPPORTS)
D ATE,
MAR 88
FILE.
085
DWG N0,
M102
SHT OF
4 S
n • Roam R.w f•40 ta•ol• �•1 1•l 701 )
1•. MIU II.0
4 �
LAN!
■• 1111111 IVY
)1 •••••■••••• t•• NAM
- h'�1�•
l) uRW.IU1 O•Vlel
'Patina] 1111100RL1000
902✓.n•W 7f+-laLW tl L *.05170•01'M CLWTIt '/ �//��
•t0U1101 TwVR00.CL00o •
ha AI— 0 &l- Ail_
•••• VI
y,„ RIC 5ouTH �). plans i•n'opio
Intl__. 1C T71 Z
0001'05& 114 1 54
ML0• Gni 14.1'0
[MUM •1'0
PL ANT T00s VS LOW
w 0
wL
fYRT• •10la 50.
f
•0.000* ww0 701.
Lte w •■••••■1..
I ce Inn z r
Wm. rI
Ann Wm.,. Lwat
tt.
a• 0 0015f 51,45E15
LOW OR 51,45E15
•7•1[ • •17100•.
/ •- ••1al•I•tOM 4C•1 MARK
/•1•Oal T1iU *ei0CLO•e
LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN
pronovtrR CENTER PLAUIINI. VLSLN
r �r1 ��rll[i• wwnw a
mts
l
l \
.•�, V. lKtllw II+
J� 0112.
*.
n .r11 I• w 1A&L
1••11 11.221 'CALL a• OC
I
tl ,.110,7 i•Ywtt•
�1• w•1MM Clonal
••M Ca•n•
'J- 1.-.I�s pPM-•nG••J� C R.FJ'
hCh A ttY�h�l
In 1111 1 ��
1155/4501 AND ASSOCIATES PS.
INC
� n 05 � 011.
RE• •1 • *. 5•1•••• �1 •
1
4 }t•u •{L 21
.05
I•
— Y
/ •Mt• 11.01.r07s i;
,
• w
t••11111■
200.81
S' •C
•
1 M•1/ 0
Ia0110L� .1\ •
7 V117 •001,1
el Allak
.I �� R. it M/
1w R. 1�f11.y1
W. V•011.111• .
t1(01141 21.41.1•
vet 0.0.11*.
21-
•iM1• 0040110
1• 11“5110•1 t. Wins,
11.1
C.,••31-1,11t1.•• •• 0.••111 O •t l *.
n►1.1n ►101 0L 0,1•11.10 lta,, . ••11.
W
F
Z
W
0
A 1
e""*" 11*.' l -no1 tI0 •M
Ittnn SP
lllMrllW 1011..
ran
MHO irst4r4prissnyWorepaTOuplimili wa mwi I
i_.
N rmural.V Pl 55_11-t-4
s `1.1M117
[111001•
OL ONTI NGNOTE,
1, 0LLJTIw0 WOLFS 15 Ili L
T11.• T.F SILLS. 00 1111 PLOW
2 maul' inn WLtS 'TV 11L •
T1wN- BwVMIa TOPSOIL
3 Tt *'ILRte TO et 0L00-
wpRlLe At RR 1•0N.rwi
1L00L1l a.t•4 T• IL 0,
+a 0.1•[•t•G•Mf
• Wa0 wain; TO ni InuLt
I1t 1100. -Snot •0 [Yana
l L•an11[*S was Te •[
0. tflh( I0V- TOIL.
T 1.1(7 •••• L'T•11 1•111.
LLI x(51emc,
S..r -,va.. Lim
°` )41-1-
ql lef
r
mETR&
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 - 1598
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
Description of proposal: Metro proposes to reduce odorous
discharges to the atmosphere in the area of the Interurban Pump
Station by installing odor control equipment at the pump station.
The equipment would be located just outside of the southeast wall
of the pump station and would consist of an activated carbon tank
scrubber, ducting and a 2 -hp fan.
Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO)
Location of proposal, including street address, if any:
The proposed project would be located on Metro's Interurban Pump
Station easement which is on the southwest side of Interurban
Avenue South just south of South 137th Street. The site is in
the City of Tukwila.
Lead agency: The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO)
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not
have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.
An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under
(WAC 43.21C.030(2)(c)). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file
with the lead agency. This information is available to the
public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
X This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency
will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Comments must be submitted by April 15, 1988.
Responsible official: Gregory M. Bush
Position /title: Manager /Environmental Planning Division
Telephone Number: (206) 684 -1164
Address: 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104
Date: March 30, 1988
Signature: .^l 731"-
You may appeal this determination to Alan Gibbs, Executive
Director, at Metro - 821 2nd Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104..
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact Wes Sprague, (684 - 1169) to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
..rETRO
I Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
INTERURBAN PUMP STATION -ODOR CONTROL SCRUBBER
2. Name of applicant:
METRO
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Michael Kuenzi, Design Engineer
Metro
821 2nd Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
684 -1950
4. Date checklist prepared:
3/30/88
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Metro
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction - April 25, 1988
Operation - 1988/89/90
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
None.
No.
- City of Tukwila Design Review Committee Approval
- PSAPCA Notice of Construction
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on project description.)
Installation of an activated carbon odor scrubber at a sewage
pump station. Station presently vents ventilation exhaust
directly to the atmosphere.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any,
and section, townships, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a
range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.
While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to
this checklist.)
Pump station is located on the west side of Interurban Avenue
South just South of 137th Street. Legal description is
Southwest t, Section 14 T. 23 N., R. 4E.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other flat.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ?.
+1%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Gravel.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approximately 2 -inch depth of gravel fill.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
No.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
10%, same as existing.
h. What measures are proposed to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to
the earth, if any?
None.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control emissions or other impacts
to air, if any?
Project purpose is to remove effluent - derived odor from
existing atmospheric discharge.
3. Water
a. Surface:
Same as at present. Project will remove effluent - derived
odor from existing atmospheric discharge.
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
plans.
No.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of
the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location
on the site plan.
b. Ground:
According to a FEMA FIRM map the site is in an area which
is subject to shallow flooding to depths of 1 to 3 feet.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities
if known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals ...; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
Slight increased runoff from 4'x4' concrete pad and from
4'x5' pad. Runoff is not significant and should not stress
existing stormwater collection system.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
None.
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
None
None.
No.
None.
Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff
impacts, if any?
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
d. What landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures are proposed to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any?
Potential landscape screen between tank and right -of -way.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
None.
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
d. What measures are proposed to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any?
None.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will
be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electric, used to rui ac hp motor.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,
if any:
None.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
b. Noise
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
2) What measures are proposed to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any?
None.
Traffic and parking lot.
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Construction: Low levels of equipment noise, construction
vehicle noise.
Operation: Low level of ventilation fan noise will exist 24
hours a day.
3) What measures are proposed to reduce or control noise impacts, if any?
None. Noise will not be significant compared to traffic on
Interurban Avenue.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Existing site is a pump station. Adjacent properties include an
apartment complex and golf course.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
g.
Sewage pump station located below grade.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
C -2, regional retail and commercial
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Interurban Special Review District.
ai //uo"l
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
NA
No.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
None, except for periodic operation and maintenance visits by
Metro personnel.
k. What measures are proposed to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if
any?
1. What measures are proposed to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low- income housing.
10. Aesthetics
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
None.
None.
None.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control housing impacts, if any?
None.
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
9r feet above grade, FRP.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any?
None.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
12. Recreation
None.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
No.
e. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if
any?
None.
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Golf course.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts on recreation,
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,
if any?
None.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
No.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
NA
c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts, if any?
NA
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Interurban Avenue, site has existing driveway.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Two, none.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No.
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
15. Public Services
16. Utilities
One per week, no increase over existing O&M visits.
g. What measures are proposed to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
any?
None.
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
No.
b. What measures are proposed to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any.
No.
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity, Metro staff will provide service connection from
existing pump station.
C. SIGNATURE
Signature:
Date Submitted:
TS /EPCKLST1X
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
�� -/r 4%c-liae f „z
31/40-
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
.:5/:
4
2.5%
5LF—
N 45
pJOTE:METRo REQUIRES RELOCATION
OF - rvi E DRIVEWAY 4 PAVEME1.fr
OVER THE PUMP 51 EASEME►JT
AREA. No PA✓EMEtl oR ORIvES
OVER THE PUMP STATIC W. PROVIDE
SIGIJAGE A1JO STRIPPIt.IG A3 PER
METRO STAIJDARDS
8
, Cg/
I NTE
PARKING STALL
RES eRNEW FoQ
M GTR°
0 A.D amem,� RQ'1FORAIN FN7ERC
/ vy ,�l/LL.B
F.'F. GRADE
_ .54.. 00
SO L. F. 12" m GMP 38 �12' 0 CMP
e 5 - 2 41 4._ .- ---,
lam■ "� /l��i!�_ B@
FP
STA. 0433
EC. G- TEE
LIFT STATIO
TO . G
lq8 L. F 15" O CMP\ 1.0
�! ivy rni-i
A .7147. GRADE
5G. 00 39 1..?. t
IOG 1_.F. 1Z0CriPe a%
■W1 \kW
PO S n
115 L.F. 1
REMOJE O tRELOC47E EXIST NG
POWER POLE f GUY WIRE 70 AN A,R:
ADJA J &itT DEregsv
Ad 22.5
c�u��o�*r�vn�rtal(
ROAN
cIS NO. tO
TYPE •
RIMS 404.21
1. 'L.= Crt.12
N
4 TO Fl[YvJ L1w
r11-3M-.1.' '4d Ai:; ie. n.t:tir;
MIN OM
S.S.
E AS G.MEi r
cn NG.
TYPE T
RI M>rlo
I. E.. I G
4P:ITIETRO
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 - 1598
March 25, 1988
Ms. Moira Carr - Bradshaw
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Dear Ms. Carr - Bradshaw:
INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION ODOR SCRUBBER - BOARD OF
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION
1.7:;" 25 1988
PI.ANNh +J(.; GET.
Attached is METRO's application for design review by the Board of
Architectural Review of odor scrubber equipment installation at
the Interurban Pumping Station located at about 137th Street and
Interurban Avenue. With the application are three sets of the
project plans and the $60 application fee (Warrant No. 1670).
Also, attached are copies of the acquisition document (a sewer
easement dated September 15, 1963) for the pumping station
property, between the City and Carl and Hazel Brewer, grantors,
and the agreement whereby METRO assumed the duties of mainte-
nance, operation and repair of the pumping station, while the
City retained its rights of ownership of the easement and the
facility (Agreement for Sewage Disposal, dated October 1, 1966).
Please note that this is not a typical METRO project. This
project has been designed in response to an unanticipated
immediate need. That immediate need is the development of the
Ivy Hills Apartment complex adjacent to three sides of the
pumping station easement.
Currently, the pumping station discharges its exhaust directly
from its wetwell to a standpipe located adjacent to the street.
Nuisance complaints associated with odors emitting from the
standpipe have not to date been significant because of the lack
of surrounding residential or commercial development. This
project was initiated to minimize the level of the exhaust odors
for the remaining duration of the pumping station's operational
life. The pumping station is expected to serve METRO for two to
three more years, at which time it will be replaced by a new
facility at the same location.
,.....*••■••••■•••• **.
Ms. Moira Carr-Bradshaw
City of Tukwila
March 26, 1988
Page Two
Mat Harris
MET ight-of-Way Agent
MH:nr
Enclosures
MH310
The environmental checklist, prepared by METRO's Environmental
Planning Division, will be issued by March 29, 1988. Please
accept this application now for the April 28, 1988 meeting of the
BAR.
You may reach me at 684-1371 for any additional information.
Very ruly yours,
1 R-
imimiiiriiiuinr.
TI L14,-
TyR Z�
IuTEUiCt,GU Va
zume.u2BALL Q.ILi Ltua �1
KET0.o
Et.sz KE4T
L.ZurE 7
7.6
risubt
-1 30'
4" Nwt. 45cwr.L
C
.
g�0
1414
14 cop Fu,cEL
Sect e.
I Ed. c x8-b"
64TE
4 2. H GTLN "LA
CI 8 4=0" 14 241
O
DESIGNED
MSK
DRAWN
RECOM.
APPROVED
No
(PA
/ I�iwlY
)4,
k . � ^ FL'C 6 C - roe . \ nr1‘
11.0. G¢. .1t ‘ Vtem�ac.
wr a (, -to- ( Spftv.3 Fcaz.t.A .T., 1 �
� \paw FakR ( ; ��O{torl S
� 34L " O.C. Lau{eJ 7a&e / ate_
^ N 5 epurp - (9
2. YY„aT - ty r act,
Ar S A Ge.Jr ArtrHtA: S
1►
1a.0 (IA 614Adtptct&
et cceAuk--C aue-A8 G") (cum-
\ao-
19t - CAW •
--- Nutt ufAA-144-0a)e a6taf IA)
(.1 3C4'-
o Mrdplhrd Mdlefle ta Seek TUAk i
S
A NOTED INTERURBAN AVE. PUMP STATION FILE
AS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DWG. NO.
WiT _ OF
March 8, 1990
Dear Mat:
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTIICENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
Mat Harris
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building, 821 Second Avenue
Seattle, WA. 98104 -1598
PHONE # 12061433.1800 Cur' l.. l'anDusrn, Aluvor
I have attached a copy of the site plan for the odor scrubber
located on Interurban Avenue in Tukwila which details the
landscape requirements. I discussed the requirements with Mark
Sakagami of your landscaping department and he indicated that the
plants could be installed by March 16. This would take care of
Areas A and B on the plan.
Area C will require a fence extension to screen the view from
Interurban. Ave into the odor scrubber area. It will also prevent
trash accumulation occurring in the area.
The wire mesh fence with wood slats which has been placed above
the rockery to screen the area from Ivy Hills Apartments must be
painted to match the apartments. I checked with the Ivy Hills
contractor and he stated the Metro had put up the fence to
protect the area from vehicles and to screen the view for the
residents.
You have two options:
1) Paint the fence on your own initiative.
2) Coordinate with Ivy Hills ownership on painting .
It should be accomplished, weather permitting, by April 15.
Please call if you have questions.
Sincerly,
Molly . Headley
Assistant Planner
Executed In.._. t_..counterparts of
which this is counterpart No... lo......_
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE -
CITY OF TUKWILA
AGREEMENT FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL
THIS AGREEMENT made as of this let day of October, 1966,
between the CITY 0? TUICWXLA, a municipal corporation of the State
of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and the
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE, a municipal corporation of
the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Metro ",
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the public health, welfare and safety of the
residents of the City and the residents of Metro require the
development of adequate systems of sewage collection and disposal,
the elimination of water pollution and the preservation of the
fresh and salt water resources of the area; and
WHEREAS, Metro is engaged in developing and operating a
Metropolitan Sewage Disposal System and the City is engaged in
developing a sewage collection system for the City; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to deliver sewage collected by
the City to Metro for disposal; and
WHEREAS, to provide for the disposal by Metro of sewage
collected by the City it is necessary that a contract be now
entered into establishing certain rights and duties of the parties
incident thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows:
•
Section 8. Development of Metropolitan Sewerage System.
It is contemplated that the Metropolitan Sewerage System will be
developed in stages and the nature of all facilities of the Metro-
politan Sewerage System to be constructed, acquired or used and
the time of such construction, acquisition or use shall be deter-
mined in the sole discretion of Metro, it being contemplated that
Metro shall ultimately provide sewage disposal service for the
entire Metropolitan Area and such adjacent areas as may feasibly
be served into the Metropolitan Sewerage System.
Section 9. Use, Maintenance and Rental of Existing City
Sewerage Facilities. From and after October 1, 1966, and until
December 31, 1967, Metro shall have the exclusive right to use
and the duty to maintain, operate and repair the existing City
sewage treatment plant (hereinafter called the "Sewage Treatment
Plant ") subject to the continued availability of such facilities
to receive and treat sewage delivered at the location thereof
by the City. The City shall secure and maintain in full force
and effect any ground lease which may be required to give Metro
possession of the Sewage Treatment Plant and all property neces-
sary in connection with the operation thereof during the period
of its use by Metro. For so long as Metro shall actually use the
Sewage Treatment Plant Metro shall reimburse the City for monthly
ground rentals paid by the City and Metro shall give the City
35 days prior written notice of its intention to terminate the
use of the Sewage Treatment Plant so that the City may terminate
its ground lease.
From and after October 1, 1966, and until the expiration
of this Agreement, or such earlier date as determined by Metro,
11
Metro shall have the joint right to use and the du__to maintain,_
operate and repair the existing City„_trunJC sewer and -fQ . ..min,_
` which runs from a_point near the inter,gectio of Ave nue..
South.. and Secondary State Highway No. 181 to a point at the inter-
section of Macadam Road and South 152nd Street, including the
pumping station thereon (hereinafter together called the "Trunk
Sewer ") subject to the continued availability of the Trunk Sewer
to receive and transport sewage delivered thereto by the City.
It is expressly understood that the Municipality shall have the
right to use the Trunk Sewer for the transportation of sewage
collected by other Participants.
For the right to use the Sewage Treatment Plant, the
Municipality shall pay to the City the sum of $9,351.38 in
addition to the reimbursement of ground rental as provided above.
For the right to use the Trunk Sewer the Municipality shall pay
to the City the sum of $94,763.00. Said prepaid rental shall be
paid in full in cash on or before November 1, 1966, and shall
constitute payment in full for the use of said facilities.
The City . shall continue to retain its existing rights of
ownership in the Sewage Treatment Plant and the Trunk Sewer and
shall continue to pay the principal of and interest on any bonds.
issued to pay in whole or in part the cost of acquisition and
construction thereof.
Section 10. Insurance and Liability for Damages. The
City shall secure and maintain with responsible insurers all
insurance customarily maintained with respect to sewage systems
of like character against loss of or damage to the Local Sewerage
Facilities of the City and against public and . other liability.
ATTEST s_ • .
ATTEST:
between the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof
and constitutes the entire contract between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
BY dot'
Lillian Balk
City Clerk
Maral - Su'llivan
Clerk .r the Council
By
CITY OF TUKWILA
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE
John . Strander
Mayor
. Carey' Donworth
Chairman of the Council
• 40 64 / L •.....
71/ W/[
PUGET
INTERCHAN g 00.3 ' u a esw 3 ac.w4e
:43
ti D
--&---' _ f ss .1A -
RE-5 233Q 44-5/.06W
572l�s
53 s 6! r •
n " w O
• • 0 Q' C
'^ w ti • 0 1 ^)
'c 1/+LG�
0 n
e
4 1*
rrrwe oar
r• S1tf.4 °gym 151
St //5
=� • { •\
h �:' O
s �, ,1 ^'1
C
', p' T ', y1/ I l .tl
�z : I .ail
o0 0
N.
i► e` 1,eji%
.. • /• :
/9
- 13
407 32
ssl �.— 2. 435
•
A
O • t; Y c"
,., y` / tic
1 j ti
a
�q/00 ' :45-4/W /A /.LS
7
56Th,
/ f•
• 4 ••∎MJ
4
VI
r d
or ' UK A FOSTER
/ -veriz 17fu
9+930 : wP f1pI/
.tii3•
s+Z
sct
r
•
5683685 • EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE
CARL BREWER HAZEL BREWER
Sea attached Sheet.
This easement .1s granted vith tha:undarinandinethat thi'peoparty7cffeett.d.
mill be returned •to'a 'conditton'equal ro -Lis 'original condition',
, . •• of construction. Th. Grantee . 4110:agescs:',to',indemnify" and .a4,1)arMins
Grantors from any liablit t* -aria ng 'iron the canstructros::tentegirl9t■rifltecein
. •••• .
*- DATED this day of ;dr., 1-y;/.4*.t." 4'4.441'
• ifashtngton. •
• .
• •
•
• •• • ;!,' -
. . . • - gAiEitElrr , V4ER • I Ltme.•.:- • (
:./ • • '• • ,f.• • •
JAN
. ,-. j: . • :.• .., The geanc .- 'aid . Hiiii-11. - . 5iiaii 7 I. 7 "; - •• • -- • .- • ', :lid ;. -. .•
•,..,::,.,;.::: . ‘ ju n • •• -. ,••;/ ;• hjolifo,. for In consideration
-..;• . . of the sun at .... in handipateVrefoipt thereof ts hereby ackneni- • -
.. ;',1,..:• ' lodged. •do hereby grant; Aral and conyor.tn/the , Cit.: of -Tukirlia
;71 ■ . . •• . • .- • ' .
• - 1:ashtiggton. a municipal .4orporation Grantee. ,its succoviors,and --.:*•:
. . . - assignsnent ancri t_r 4 ,A+a er,.-theyugh, under.• across, upon and•• . .
in the following descr ed real 'property situate In Xing • ' County, Unahing(an,.
to-w/C: • • ; , ••*•:.• .,/ 1 -: ••':.;/':•':,•'''.."••''...-'.*:... •. ....-.'''.. ..•
• • •
: • •••
...
•
• • , `, • • I • • . • I
' . : • ,.‘: . C.ounty•of - , . • .• )
.- : ''..- •••..-: Cmthi• 7 day of2.1..;‘ L9 . - intoia Re personaili • ;
appeared • - .:/ _7.e , . • '-' : •• : • and' , ...,...: :.,.
.. • .73',e i i . • ,.3t e., c ..--•:- v..' . • • : • to ea known .to bq the: • : ".''.-.: ' --
indtvidyals that executed the within and fortgoinz .inlittuttent ;and, ceimariedg'ed . '2..., .*.:.•• •
' •• that they signed and sealed the same as their free 'and voluntary :act and dcuil.• . ... .: .
1 or the ',us -and purposes :therein- mentioned._ -.'..*. •• • . .. : • ..— - ., ' . • , •'' - '
' • -, - -.- ,
. . : . • • . ... • . • • _ . • - . '
. •
• GIVEN under my hand and official seal the.day and year- first 'above
Mritten.. - . • , , . -....
. • .
•.• . • - • • ,
• • : atY FubUc in and Jot the Sta • •
.•
of Vashington residing 0 AttJ
•
• l.gLnntng it the intersection of the southerly line Of S.3.32th
(fort9erly:Lenon Road) produced W .29°09' C, and the northaaiterlY=":::.
of 5Eth Ave. S. (formerly' Lamm Road), which point is describedv'
• as' the' Point 'of beginning in that certain• correction 'deed, dated • ,
. • Decenber 26, 1.903, and recorded January 22, 1909 In. Volume36ny •••• -
• Deeds,. Page .625; records• of -the 'auditor of King County, State of • :4 •
• waahington; thence along iaLd.,,�thsr1v..Uns0f.S. 137th
t.": St. (forserly.Lenori Road)" produced 125 feet:to theArtse".point,•# s • 7-
beginning;',•thenee ;continuing N .29°09' S. 180,20 the
•:.. westerly line orInterurben Avi. V.;,a.State Niemen thence5"99•51'
alceig 'said southwesterly:lina,". j. theriCS :65
161.6" feet: thence N.195e911
• ; ginning; itnate :K
be itts ate
••
'
JAN
1. ".The Southerly,ig•feat'aild the Vaiterly
' (
2. Beginning at the SE property corner thence N 99°51" Id 37 feet, thence ,: ' • •••••
5 *85°09' V 30 feet, thence S 1 0051' E 211 feet 74/L to the Southerly. . • -
.... ••....
- f property line; thence. 5 . 65 0 511'45" W to'the SG property corner.
f•••• ; 1.1 3," A temporary construction easement of the 20 feet adjacent to the .„-, . . . • '.• .......t.:-.: : •
,.` • ?". • • . above descriDed,easersente,'-:: • • . • .
. . •
• . ; . . .. • • . - •.
•• ,
' • • All within the following described property? •.:' .• -
' •
A tract of land in that portion of the Stephen roster Donation Clain •
311, in.Section 19, Township 23 North, Rang* 9 Cast, Willamette • . ••
• Neridian, described as follows t •
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: The installation of an odor srruhhpr at
the Interurban Pumping Station.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection) )377512
A portion of Tax Lot 1, Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38. Just South
of South 137th Street and Interurban Avenue South.
Quarter: SW Section :. 14 Township: 23N Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
3. APPLICANT :* Name:
Signature:
OWNER
DESrGN REVIEW APPLrCA Id_VG; ( }Z!M —
.1
'n, 25 1988
Address:
Phone:
Phone:
Mat Harris METRO Right -of -Way Agent
821 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington
684` -1371
* The applicant i the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
4. PROPERTY Name: City of Tukwila
Address: 6200 Souhtcenter Boulevard
MAnme
Date: March 24, 1988
I /WE,Csignature(s)]
swear that we are he owners or con rac pure aser s of the
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date:
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: Limited site size - 915 sq.ft. - precludes the development of an
extensive transition area. The surface will be crushed rock. A six foot
high chain link fence provided by the Ivy Hills developer will border the
three interior sides of the station. The height of the odor scrubber tank
will be six feet above grade plus duct work for overall height of 9.8 feet.
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: See #5 above. Driveway, curb and sidewalk constructed to vehicular
and pedestrian safety st r rds. The facility is bounded on one side by an
existing street and on sides by apartment complex parking areas.
SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
`" REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE: Because the project is designed in response to ananantictp.ated
condition, the development of the Ivy Hills complex, the available funds
do not allow for landscaping or screening at this time. However, when the
station is upgraded as scheduled in METRO's facilities plan within the next
two to three years, appropriate landscaping and screening will be designed
and constructed. There will be no exterior lighting at this time.
8. BUILDING DESIGN
uESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
, manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: Current operations budget allows for only the development of adequate
odor control. Screening of exposed equipment will be provided for the
redesigned pumping station within three years. The currently proposed odor
control equipment will be visually compatible with existing utility structures
on the site, and will be small in size (covering an area of approximately
7' x 15' with the tallest structure being approximately 9.8' tall).
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: Not applicable due to the small size (915 sq.ft.) of the property.
There will be no exterior lighting.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
The only goal of this project is prevent the escape of offensive odors from
this public facility. This should improve the aesthetic character of the
area.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
Due regard in this case is the elimination of offensive odors.
"ticSIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
Not applicable.
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
See last page - Extra Response Space.
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
The purpose of the project is to eliminate offensive odors. The project
is small in scope and is being undertaken on an existing utility facility
site. The project involves pouring concrete pads and installation /modification
of equipment on these pads and in the adjacent pump station. No significant
adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
Not applicable.
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
Y
EXTRA RESPONSE SPACE
The project site is a utility easement purchased by the City of Tukwila
from Carl and Hazel Brewer on September 25, 1963. On October 1, 1966,
the City and METRO entered into an Agreement for Sewage Disposal
whereby the City retained ownership of the Interurban Pumping Station
and METRO assumed the duties of maintenance, operation and repair.
This project was initiated by the development of a multi - family housing
project - the Ivy Hills Development - on property surrounding the
pumping station. The pumping station is scheduled for a complete
upgrade in two to three years,-including new pumps and updated odor
elimination system. The current odor scrubber project, which lacks
any major site beautification elements, is the maximum allowable by
METRO's 1988 operations budget. Due to the small scale of the proposed
scrubber equipment, its installation will not substantially alter the
sites current appearance. The project will be complimentary to the
surrounding district in that it will eliminate offensive odors.
MP "61--5DR
,fox. i sN-rM0KF>64
/aJ 5
Mato
I
1jrnPi'J&
stPcTtoN o0oF; xizuBBER
Wattt.V.
•!.•
. .
. ,
••••:".•
. • .
FOXY 1110
•
• \
•
* I L
- 7. f. Z.•••••••t:;,-.••• - ••••"-•'• -. .7t•'.....••• • .• •:•. • • • - • ' ;7 "••.• e t • •••••• • • -
. 0. ...":4 •
`-'.-••• • • . • • • • • • ' ' • • • • •
UJI:Tv3E.A.1.
E141,0ST
'•-• 4 0 "rc.■ •
•
•
'2ercl) ;
• .• • - '
f- '
•
T,471 / , -- CD VAV.V.L C'i Ce*A4i. 'r)
s
0 I t ! , I h
DESIGNED.
DRAT rIKDI
REC51
APPRs
■
•
/ OR%-tV
5..1\\NJ,ST
1
1
1,4 1,4 4;i:PY ••'-•Ttt. 0: • •' tr.i' • t, ". xf,1
4•141:0",•''• '11
• !'• !!!- •
1-1
111111111111111[11111111111[11111111111111111111111 1111)1111111W'
2 3 - ,_.4...,..„_, _.-__...,..,5 _. ....B., 9 ' 10 • 11 MADEINOVINN4r 12
,
- V IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT•IS LESS — 41
, CLEAR THAN'THISNOTICE, ITJS.DUE TO
OE 6Z 84 L2 9Z SE V THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Z C ZZ 13 t, _ ? q L 9 s 4 7 E Z 1 v■vi
1 0
11111111111111141111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111iilfilililcillIIIIIIIiiil 6E11111
. ,,,. , . , ,, , 1:st ,..„.0: livr.Arrorir”.„,,,ole j., 7, 4 III iiMiliiiiiii1571151TETREPT nil n Ulf IIIIilaill111111111111111111111111111111111(111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111(11
r ,
7 '•. • ..•.0. ••,t-t ft1,0 t •1 .,,t• 00.7 ,t ■ 1/2,0 0 .0 •I0 \ 1'0' t7:Tk 0.7+'.- , ,,•t•i'.0•i•);■?••t. , ,0 , ,o y.,. , • ,... 5„,... 5:07 , ' '' ‘ + - il't ' r''9 ' 0: tt .A". ' i, " ' •
V i; 1 :. '.'•i" fi".1 v '''. 'N'',.. ;.. i
*„.:„.F,
.....,,,,.•.-:.•-.
! .t •,-si
•
Do!
_
7 i
. . N i
. . . ...,.....:
/ .... --_.
. ... ..!. . . . ..... .,, ..
*METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
SCALE.
CONT r
C N(0
7,T,
DAIE.
FILE.
DWG NO :
SO Of•
r.s
• 7
,,,
ELFI.
9.0±
FORM [SO 1117
1 1 1 1 iiow.t Retac.;,
S
• 1 h 1 . 1. RCk1,ti2i
•104"t; aAU siq e
� Cw,sS 150
> \\ %� \`<' / ���
•
I2 "dp C-
Du �T
i2"(1) 0"4
90 Reou.64y
w.o .
ti
8" a-ts' 3 eA (p
g 4 1 -12" 0.C. E.14
DESIGNt.U, I' -
OFAMS ! * Mur of "•etrupJi,tuh 5eattie
�--� K D: �SCAL � ��
--.... LF _ Ta .e.+�L 3at1 S7orci0
REcOM t.D
, N1kAGj: �1.6
C�OR CctJ'�t2a�. StyauseY3Cfk
1 SeC_M
DA1E1
FIL
E1
DWG NO
4' ct NC:Mrv'co
LPAZts T,,14 1�
CFRP) •
Purr
ion X qy9 6
Neopfe'z S.t
Com er Lyt,
t3At41.es?
FPttJ
/>(/>) ..
1
4 1 .51.A6 Ot l CCRP%1
' -L.V O.
t#!
van ;cr,
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111'1II11 - 1J11 111111111111
0 1STMS INCH 1 3 - - --
Oe 6E 8G LZ 9Z SZ hZ EZ I ZZ
11111111 InIlll111111nllullnnlnilln1lln 1111111111111IiIII1 > 11 1 111411111111 - 11[11il
,4 _.1'Yw:YS'. -�' 4�i1X �" H' 4 it
,� _. .._, q,. - ..... ,. .3. x•44
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
THE.!UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
1111 nu IIII illl Ilii 1111 IIII IIII iilllllll nn 1111 ini Illi i lri ill IIII rlri 1111 F1 1111
i_11- 111 -LIi1 1 lifg 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1'1'1'1'1'1'1
- -6.._ 7 _.. 8 9 10 ' 11 MM INeIRMGM/ 12
6 8 L 9 S h E Z i ww 0
IIII 11111I111111I1111111I111111111IIIIIl1111I111111111III1111111IIINli111 111111111111111111111111111111
4µ
im1' 111bul11111411lnii Hulin ::inIHHiiu111Hiiuulnii HiiIi ri 1n1hi111
1 Iili :l I1 • � ;i III !I!��11I��S���L!I�11(il!Ii !� !I► I1�1�
ts ��.....� iM. Nr
�i Zw.f 9 Lf,� t
VRh : Y4' •. i, v. ;. f . Z .711E ' 4 Jt:x_"'c}3•,
uu1Hi1i1111un1u11u111iililiiii 11111iu1 11i11 �1uilliu
41: ''' 1111111. 11 1Li..1 1 r'1
liri(iu1
11111/111
1111011
1111 101
1;
.i I1. , 11.1 l i 1 I r 111 1111 1� 1:
.I I I }� .
.t ^.. I 1 CC t'
� S.M I C ROF�I,L�IED �,DOCUMENT�I;S� L ES
CLEAR THANzTHI NO ICE, ETTO If I ;D
414E1' ' UA lli Y� OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMEN
nu mrlirirliiiifirifiui�mrltimn nn r iiii 1111 MI
I��: t�.� 1k Is ^ �. �r. �k. 7 ^ {. I}�° Y. I1': '. I
�: :k....`..�,,.F,:.;..r.;,. �hki• 3' t Z .....F4 5 r� blH, .>r,• .I y., 12
4
3
2
A
4
4
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
SHEET NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER TITLE
1 G100 VICINITY, LOCATION MAPS AND INDEX TO DRAWINGS
2 M100 EXISTING SITE PLAN
3 11101 REVISED SITE PLAN
4 M102 ELEVATION AT GRADE
5 E101 ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIAGRAM
6 E102 POWER PLAN DETAILS
M.
w ICI.,
V
SITE PLAN
SCALER 1/16 s1
n
MTE
7
i
AUG 2 1988)
-i1
i •
LOCATION MAP
BA EM Eq
p n -S —nit
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
d
BEGINNING AT THE PROPERTY CORNER
FEET, THENCE 5 45 W 30 FEET,
FEET M/L TO THE SOUTHERLY PROPER
58'45' W TO THE SE PROPERTY COR
ALL WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIB
A TRACT OF 'LAND IN THAT PORTION
DONATION CLAIM NO. 38, IN SECTIO
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF
5. 137TH ST (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD
E, AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
LEMON ROAD), WHICH POINT IS DESC
BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORREC
DECEMBER 26, 1903, AND RECORDED
VOLUME 362 OF DEEDS, PAGE 625, R
OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHING
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF S.
LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED 125 FEET TO
BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING N 7
TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INT
STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE 5 44'51' E
WESTERLY LINE, 407.32 FEET, THEN
FEET, THENCE N 45'49' W 437.44 F
OF BEGINNING, SITUTATED IN THE C
WASHINGTON.
MMIUMM
MSC
NEM Jr
> METRO ww.ydl e1 M,r♦eIIM SNOW
WJAL
AS N01ED
V
INTERURBAN NWING S1A11DN
GD2 CbNTRDL SCRUBBER
VICINITY, LOCATION MAPS AND
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
t_ INTERURBAN AVE. S
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
- INTERURBAN AVE.
RIGHT -OF -WAY
7' N44 °51'00" W
I
1
• INTERURBAN
PUMP STATION
1 STATION
N 1 HATCH in
O 1
m 1
24' S44 °51'00" E
EXISTING 26 "¢
MANHOLES
MUNICIPALITY
PROPERTY LINE
LOCATION OF
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION
1w5. �'h ,
1 I 1111111' 1111111' 11J111I111f 1111111( 11111111111 1ppIIJII -IIIIIIIIIIIII ::::VII
OE 6Z 8 LZ 9Z 9Z 7Z CZ1 ZZ
I1111141 • HliiliilIilil1111J I1111111niiLlilliu111u16lil — iI
1 1I11.I.I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I! IJ I.IitiIJ 1 1 1 1111111 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
9 10 11 MADE INDUMMY 12
6 8 L 9G 7 C Z L NH 0
6 . .. ... 7 __ 8
I IF THIS MICROFILMED. CUMENT IS LESS
-CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
THE sUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
oil nil nii:iii iii iiii 1111 iilihln Iill�liirfliiiliiilliiii nldnil ln� 11Illllllllnii TO iiii�Illlluif lnlf�nlllllll�ullllnl�Imhln�l��IhIII�IInInII�In111III�nIIIIIU�IIIIIIIiI�
E f
THENCE N 44'51' W 37
THENCE 5 44'51' E 24
TY LINE, THENCE 5 65'
R.
ED PROPERTY:
OF STEPHEN FOSTER
N 14, TOWNSHIP 23
MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
), PRODUCED N 74'04'
56TH AVE 5. (FORMERLY
RIBED AS THE POINT OF
TION DEED, DATED
ANUARY 22, 1904 IN
CORDS OF THE AUDITOR
ON, THENCE N 74 E
37TH 51. (FORMERLY
THE TRUE POINT OF
'04' E 180.204 FEET,
RURBAN AVE S., A
ALONG SAID SOUTH -
E 5 65'58'45' W 161.64
ET TO THE TRUE POINT
UNTY OF KING, STATE OF
to
4V =0
CALL 4..0
4= ."
(u_ Pm
Exi_ITL16-
RoCk._ QETdtiaLIG
I ci_ TyF 1
rur EQLQe,au AVE. 5.
ZuTEQueaau. 9_114 LTU& -�
MET0.12 /8'4-
EGSE MELLT Mwuoc��%
LxLa - z_„4
PARKING
I Ea. 4'x8 =b"
(sATI
r
$HATM 4
6 a 4%0" € z 4 l id L"
y
L
0
1
1
DESIGNED
MSK
DRAWN
RECOM.
APPROVED
Noze
1. 1,wr P ;z 3 e a 7 so:\ t\c4S
1i,A G2. .111 Aa . 9%t•AAe •Tti?st.A
■/ a (,-yo- SIA•Rtx3 Fee:■_vm.� oar
\K a Fov,R (. h s
,54 0. C . GMo rd Oa li a nd
a 'Nets ea/Jr 9')
2, ?■,aT W cos, 5SA "Cb K OCC�
A VT Ce�"r et. S •
hr► 815 -5 -toi
OTIETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
AS
INTERURBAN AVE. PUMP STATION
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Skim_
ARMS:
FILE:
N
DWG.NQ
O
2 2
! 4'
111111111' 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111 111(i11111[1:111- 1111111111111
0 1ETHS INCH 1 2
DE 6Z BL LZ 9Z GZ hZ 6Z ZZ LZ
I11111111�I11111ii11Inn11111I1n1( 1n�11111n1Iii1 'III
' ; 7:` s ?`~ . V r t
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS. NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE UAL ITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT , e e L 91 s CI LWW0
H11 11111111 nil 11111 111111111111 IIIi111111111111111111111111 Iln 111 I�III Il�fll Ilff 1111111111111111111111111111111IIIIII11111111111111
111111 1 1 1 .1.1.1111111111111IIftiILIIJII 1111 I1. 1111111. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
5_.... _... _ .._.. 6 7
1 _;, 8, 9 10 11 wAoEINEEEwY/1' 12
I
w
uJ
1-
labC.Y. R.ETZXCII.Uir
1A11..LL T.
1/1.41 1.1uF_
20
Ave S.
CP
t y .) 1
TOM h..sPt011..1•
Cute. To Maui
T. C.. toue-.
19.55 \ 4 11 46
Nal= e.
Lsrvith
I:L.4k AZ
Itc..11.69\ r.771
Rtase. bay. To
EL PI.1C. 1
0
H .. ...•01/4 . . cill
r - • • IC. later
4
FLA.. LI
3 /6 4 `
19 "IS
4 2— Llo ?UMW' THIS den.
ri .46
3"LsPaLLT ' 11 6 11
H r c61
ELZ0.121, L aIL c iaa
Atvinv
:a LAZCULM 1 LS EL 15.N3
DESIGNED
MSK
DRAWN
RECOM.
APPROVED
1.44:r44.4
E 20.2'?
COES 1 _
E xtSTILI VeULT
41 1111IETRO munidpait af metropaitan same
CALE: -
AS NOTED
EXZsralCr VOLT
3 /8".. ro"
ZL.J
- V-4
—7.--
SE.c.rtou 15- ES
Co" r1.1 F. SI -5- DR
INTERURBAN AVE. PUMP STATION
PAVING PLAN •
T :
1188
FILE:
DWG. NO.
SKr OF
1 2
<•
. a AR' M-4-4,'1.44,:P.A"..t!'4.41'.1f1V.44,Y:.A.,,,,?.1.,, ,i;ja
•
'. ::: 4 7 67,0.04 4 A"tht. • .v.p. ,
1 1 I I 1 111-1-111-1.11-14-1-111-1-1111'‘'l 1' 1 \ 1 ' 1_1111 j I 1 1 I 1 1 ;
1 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111I
6 7 8 9 • 10 • 11 """ ERMANY 12
I
0 le THS INCH 1 3 - „ 5
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE , IT IS -DUE TO
THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
lill 1111 1111 fin 111? 1111 1111
, \t,
0€ 6Z 8G LZ 9Z SZ EZ ZZ
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111tglillin
V.Vi•
• '•-•7747.77
vItri 7,01 ,
8 8 L. 9 E P*
IIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIIilIIIIiIIFIIIIIIIIIIIIIlfFIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIlIlIrIIIlIiiIItlIIIIIIIIlI
, 4;•71 : , 77,
• •
•
DRYWELL
INTAKE
HATCH
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I 1
I._ 1
xAK
DRYWELL
— EXHAUST
28 "0
MANHOLE
EXISTING DIREC
(FABRICATED OF
CLASS 150
WETWELL INTAK
EXISTING WETWELL
EXHAUST PUMP —,
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION , - - - ;
I I I
r
CONNECTION
SHEET METAL)
APPR1
1
Xr
10 "p A
WETWEL
ATMOSP
• o
28 '0
MANHOLE
0 to MS INCH 1 2 3
oe^ 6Z 8G LZ 9Z GZ 1 7Z EZI ZZ
4 C3f A �d l'S
DRAt
WEM
CHKDt
14
RECOMs
SCAL
3/8 "=
1 I l l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l 1 l l l l 1111111111111111111111111111111 1 111.911 1111111111111 1111141 l I I 1 - 111 liiif ! lillill 1 ! 1 1 111-111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1
6 _ 7__ ... 8 9 10 • 11 MAN'I'M"' 12
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 8 e L 9 G C "WW 0
IF,THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
llllllllllllllllliillnnlulllnnlllllll1nln1lllu1lliulnnlllulli��h��l iliirnll1ll IIII 11111111 1111 1111 1111 111111111 lllllliitiliilliiililihiliii IIII I iliil Illiliiii 1111 IIII II IIIIun�If lflnnlnf lllllllulllnillllulnnhllllllullnllnllliilllllnlnllllnl 'lln�
c. .' ,t:: ° l,,, i�tit,:. a v 11 's` s '.r sSS �,. :h ..� ''S x'' ,.LE _ (.'.°5 ,.. l'J s •'n;.' ,'Uri yx .;y, g.. 1C a` Sha
�,YCi ;iroSm, k "'k' it � s��,.i5 r. x.. 'x aa� :CH: u. r u; :� �. .5' "'Sa` <�`•�, t, ✓,;w, x . x�. r.". ri. �..
CLASS 150
EXHAUST TO
ERE
i T R O Municlpalit, of Metropolitan Seattle
FILEt
085
DWG NO*
M1 00
5 -0"
•a C
IMF -5•17IR
PUMPING STATION
TROL SCRUBBER
EXISTI SITE PLAN
DATE1
MAR 88
SHT 2 OF 6
DRYWELL
INTAKE
•
HATCH ' AlmA
a t
CORE DRILL 1' HOLE
FOR 3/4' ORS CONDUIT
AND SEAL WATERTIGHT
AROUND CONDUIT
NOTE:
DARKENED LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE WORK TO BE
DONE. LIGHT LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
FABRICATE AND INSTALL
WETWELL INTAKE RAIN
CAP
DISCONNECT EXISTING
DIRECT CONNECTION
3/4' GRS
CONDUIT
C3 - .12IR o
1 -02 G),
BURY 6' in
MIN DEPTH
28 '0
MANHOLE
REMOVE EXISTING
WETWELL EXHAUST
INTERURBAN
PUMPING STATION ''�- - r �
FABRICATE AND INSTALL
WETWELL INTAKE RAIN
CAP
EXIST 4' ACTIVATED
CARBON TANK (FRP)
(OWNER SUPPLIED)
1/2'0 GROUNDING ROD
` r
4' -O
ORA1
WEM
RECOM,
PPR,
REMOVE WETWELL
EXHAUST RAIN CAP 4'_6'
DESIGNED,
MSK
C7S
3
3/4' GRS CONDUIT
STUBBED UP IN
CONCRETE FOUNDATION
1 HP BAYLEY FAN LLJ
STYLE AH WHEEL
SCALE,
3/8 " =1' - 0"
CONTRACT,
EXHAUST TO
ATMOSPHERE
r - 28 "0
MANHOLE
GRAVEL FILL TO
LEVEL GRADE
(APPROXIMATELY 30 YDS)
PIP IVO- PR
* X11 STF1 0 Munipipality of Metropolitan Seattle
INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION
ODOR CONTROL SCRUBBER
REVISED SITE PLAN
DATE,
MAR 88
FILE,
Q85
DWG NO,
M1 01
5HT 3 OF s
t s
1 11111 11111111 11 '11111111t1
OE 6E ‘ Be LE 93 SE 4Z CZI EE LE
111111III1111111111I I1111IIi1IIII11111IIII11111111l1111111111111111111111 I�IIIIIiliIr111
1 1 1 01111 1 1 1 1 .141IiiiiIiillilllf iiiiiJIIIJIII[III ilipiiiilllllllillliliwiiilllilllilllillliliiii11111119
,
IF THIS MICROFILMED.DOCUMENTIS LESS
CLEAR THAN 'THIS NOTICE , IT • IS-DUE TO
THE fUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
IIII1111 IIIIIII1111111111111'1111Ill, IIII Ii illfiii Ili, Ill, iiiiiiiiNFRE iii
8 9 10 • 11 M IINOIMNf 12
�-- e L 9S 4 C z L w W 0
IIII II 11111111�11IIIIIII6111116II11161111161f II16111i1611111111111111il11111
I
12'0 FRP DUCT
W /SLIP JOINTS
'REDFLEX' CONCENTRIC
REDUCER EXPANSION
JOINT (12'x10' NOMINAL)
W /MECH TIE RODS
EL. 6.0#
UNIFLANGE
EXISTING 10'¢ AC
CLASS 150 PIPE
ANCHOR W /EQUIVALENT
SIZE RAWL -TYPE CONC
STUDS, 302 SS
3/4' CHAMFER
(TYP)
_ .
2' -2'
1
1
1 1
I I
a
112'0x10'0 90•
REDUCING ELBOW
I
' 0z
-
i Zw
NOTE: \ — v 1/2'¢ GROUNDING ROD
CONNECT TO TANK
DARKENED LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE WORK TO BE
DONE. LIGHT LINEWORK AND TEXT INDICATE EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
- - V
6' -6'
EXISTING 4'0 ACTIVATED
CARBON TANK (FRP)
(OWNER SUPPLIED)
10'¢ FRP DUCT
W /SLIP JOINTS
a
r
1—
; : ;; W/•41120C EW,
PLACE ON 2' GRAVEL
BED
APPRI
1/2' MESH
GALV. SCREEN
ON D I SCHARGE
J .
PIPE SUPPORT (TYP)
SEE DETAIL A /M102
SCALE'
3/4' =1' - 0'
CONTRACT'
3/8'0 U -BOLTS
W /WASHER t NUT
L 3x3x1 /8x14' L6
SCALE, 1 1/2=1' -O'
'REDFLEX' CONCENTRIC
REDUCER EXPANSION JOINT
(10'x9 1/4'0 NOMINAL,
FABRICATE FLG TO MATE W /FAN)
7 -1 HP BAYLEY FAN
2'0 STL PIPE,
CUT TO REO'D LENGTH
t 6x6x3/8 W/3/8'0
RAWL -TYPE CONCRETE
ANCHORS
DETAIL
STYLE AH WHEEL
W /WEATHER GUARD
6' SLAB ON GRADE
W/4P4112'.00 EW,
PLACE ON 2' GRAVEL
3/4' CHAMFER
(TYP)
EL. 0.0'
INTERURBAN PUMPING STATION
ODOR CONTROL SCRUBBER
ELEVATION AT GRADE
10 FRP
PIPE
1/4,
1/2' GROUT
(TYP UNDER
ALL SUPPORTS)
DESIGNED'
MSK
ORAI
WEM
RECOMI
II�III�III�III�III( fll�lll�lll�llf �111 �III�III�IIh�lll�lll�ill�lll�lll�l I�III�III i I 1 J11a ii111 111111JIulllf I- 11111111111111111111 11111111IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
O "" 1 / 3 47. . _ _ s ..... _..6.._. ... -._ __..__ / _ _ 8 9 10 • 11 NMEINOER14" 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
OE ez eG Lz 9z ez � e zz IZ . THE 'UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. , a e L. 9 7 C z 1 wW 0 ft
llullllli .�lliilliil�llnlllll�lui(Ilil I iil�ililfiiii 111111111111111111111111 , 11111111 1111111111��1 I 11ll�nTI 1111 niilii1111111 i
*METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
DATE'
MAR 88
FILET
085
DWG NO'
M1 02
SHT 4 OF 6
int)
T ..,..,.______.____
. „ . A
I
..;
.:it.
*GO V .3 - 600A. BUSS
>--- r
AuToi ......4..........
To AuTo
. CONTROL. CONTRot- CoNTROL
2 .--...ai I To A wro I TO AUTO
3 3
To
CONTRO. .31
48,
0.1
NEW WoRK •
DESIGNED./
1)0N /SR
APPR
2.-MRALLEL. FEEDS
250 MCNI- THW.
44. RS
10 ) I 10E7
..5•CD"." -5/5/1:10.t
QRAi
S
RECOM1
SCALE,
NoNi
CONTRACT
TO PM
conrrA01. LIGHTING LIHT CONTAOL.
P.IINELSoitt D
1
44, cot. s
3 , *a
T
30A
Ex in: Foss
41.• annfiN. .1111
OFR
111F vs4-6-1,K
TO
AUTO
CONTAIN_
131sCoNNIKT
NEM,F3R.
54S2 *D" HU361 RS
*METRO Mum i i pal i ty of Metropol i ton Seattle
INTRRURIAN PUMPING STATIOW
ODOR CONTROL
ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIACULAM
f,
DATE.
Millt• 88
FILE,
a es
DWG NO.
E tot
SHT s OF
1:
;
• v. 41 '""i4
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THISJOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
THE !UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
1111 III 1111 110 11111111 iiii 1111 IIIIIRIKETITIFITIRMINIITI 101 1111 1111
'trw•.!ii ' '' '+ 4 ' ' ' '.,'.,' ''. '.."'", C , '. • .
1411111111
1 11111ii 1 iiliii1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111111111111 111 111111111
6. ,. 7 , .. 8 9 ' 10 ' 11 K'DINC41""M 12
\
,o 6601117
•
• ' 7 .
. 1
1:67;TR
II rrr'irrif `r"Arr,,,rrr. v.yrrit, r
• • --A •
•
•
•
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11111 111111141 I 1 I
3
0 16 MS INCH 1
0€ sz se tx 9Z SZ EZ
11111114111)J11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
4 'Ada'
LZ
•
6 8 L. 9 4 7 e
•
• •
1,
• I
JEN 1ST .
mcc •
f 4N MOT
CORE DRILL- • CoNtit01. RoOM. PLAN VIA. DiscoNNT
,F� ft CoAvurr
8( 5�4L. ' 6144DliND "4/g =1
:11,14.110114101,
• law!
0
e• 1 1.'.".3
i
M
SOW • i
OLS/Pgf,l/ Pai*Pmt4141;;;;;:14
L i . : : 13 1 C., I :
• • I foom : .)
flo■ w • a ••■••111
IPRANSANLVIR $4
CIPAMINI4. .
Maw
i
ANN — be er ~.SW fragi4
fiu IfteNSItl
fl
&Miry 1 PmemiaNg
COMPARTAISIff (pyAP)
WM&
• •••■
AVOMPION,
(0114VP)
INSFitgmeNT
Alle
INIMUNIP
FAM
• • •
11
3—' P2
I is
CoNDULET
M. CO
p &SW&
•
CONTROLS •
COMPARIPAAWIr
tav
NEW COM BINATION N
MOTOR
ss
' 3
•
COMBINATION —STARTER.
NEMA SA. I X) • SBA-52.
SCALE : NONE.
NM Wb
- rAis
spowt OF
TMs M•E•C
RE.movE ALL. IV of ts
STARTER
USE FUSED ,DisoONNECT
(EXIST.) FOR NEW
UV/RING.
UNTIES MCC ...FRONT ELEVATION
_SCALE : NONE
1%S I GNP:
DTI 5 R:
ORA:
SR
RECOMi
APPR:
filtMIRTFIC3 Municipality of Mitropolitan Soattlo
CALE:
Rs s TESURSAN !RIMING STATION.
ODOR CONTROL •
CONTRACT t
POWER PLAN DETAILS
DA PIAR BB
FILE:
CA BC
OWG NO:
E JOL
SHT OF
, ••„, 733., ,
PM MID 1117
1 _i It it, yh• ;$' •T4
0 le THS INCH 2 3
1
OE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P I 1 1 1 111 i 1 1 4 1 -1 1 1-1-1 1 11111-14111- 1 -11L1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6Z 8G LZ 9Z GZ EZ ZZ Z THE $,..Cov f.,41 y 47 JP. 7
'41.
,
)111 1111 III 1111 111 1111 1111 1111 i1111511111flillE 11111111111 1111 III 111111111111111 . . 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
11F THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
_ __6 _ „_ 7_._ _ 8
CLEAR THAN,:::: 4
, NOT ICE, IT IS-DUE TO
t UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ? 1 9 G -40
" ' „fr.c -; fe
9
10
111111111111111111111111111
11 1...e.oeiNANY 12
•
, • , '!••,`'•••••\ • ",•'•'•i
.nrS31.1.,T7MR:3
' , •;. ; ;• • ■
• . "