HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-15-DR - MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS - UNDERGROUND CABLE DESIGN REVIEWF &ISbR
WiThIN -toe UI4IWJ Mc-wiz-
Raaucorr? Ir.c%LW1Y •
seE ALSO: yvw TB -6 -smP
fli&X 1E5cornrnvM tT1OJ'
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
NOTICE OF DECISION
FILE NUMBER: 88 -15-DR
APPLICANT: MCI Telecommunications Corporation
REQUEST: Design review approval for an underground utility cable.
LOCATION: Within the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way
The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on
December 21, 1988 and approved the request. The BAR adopted the Findings and
Conclusions contained in the staff report dated December 7, 1988.
Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Council
by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the
above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal.
J l k Pace, Senior Planner
January 3, 1989
Planning Commission
December 21, 1988
Page 4
The word ADJACENT shall be defined in the definition section of
the zoning code TO INCLUDE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO RETAIN ITEM #3 AS WRITTEN WITH THE INCLUSION
OF THE WORD ADJACENT TO BE DEFINED TO INCLUDE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN
300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. MR. CAGLE SECONDED THE MOTION.
MR KIRSOP AND CAGLE VOTED YES AND MR. KNUDSON AND HAMILTON VOTED
NO, WHICH RESULTED IN A TIE VOTE. THE CONSENSUS WAS THAT NO
CHANGE BE MADE TO ITEM #3. DUE TO THE TIE VOTE.
Discussion ensued on Item B.
MR KIRSOP MOVED AND MR KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO CHANGE ITEM B
TO READ: ANY SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION TO THE EXTERIOR OF EXISTING
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EXCESS OF 10,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET IN
BUILDING FLOOR AREA IN C2, CP AND CM ZONING DISTRICTS. UNANIMOU-
SLY APPROVED.
y/ 88 -15 -DR MCI COMMUNICATIONS CABLE Request for design review
approval for installation of an underground utility cable.
Mr. Pace reviewed the request recommending approval.
Mr. Knudson felt that more safety measures should be used in
installation to reduce the likelihood of the cable being accid-
entally broken by someone digging in the area. He was concerned
with the liability resulting from this.
Mr. Mark Heideke, G.E. Raleigh & Associates, was present to
represent the applicant MCI Communications. He explained their
method of installation.
Ross Taylor, MCI Communications, explained he felt that the
liability issue had been addressed when they entered into the
franchise agreement with the City.
MR CAGLE MOVED AND MR. KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE
RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AND APPROVE 88- 15 -DR. MOTION WAS PASSED
WITH KIRSOP, CAGLE, HAMILTON VOTING YES AND MR KNUDSON VOTING NO.
DIRECTORS REPORT
Because of the work load, Mr. Pace suggested that the Planning
Commission meet on January 11th and January 26th. This was
acceptable to all. He reviewed the status of the annexations and
stated the work plan for 1989 will be covered at the January
meeting as well as Election of New Officers.
WAC 197 -11 -970
MITIGATE0
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal INSTALL A 2" PVC CONDUIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS WITHIN
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY. CONDUIT UNDER THE BLACK RIVER WILL BE
INSTALLED PER DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES.
Proponent
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any BLACK RIVER CROSSING
OF THE U.P.R.R. IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 14, TWN 23; RANGE 4.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -30 -88
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Q There is no comment period for this DNS
El This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
DECEMBER 16, 1988 . The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title
Address
Date
Planning Director
Phone 433 -1846
6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwil'• 981$1
Signature
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
STAFF REPORT
TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Prepared December 7, 1988
MEETING DATE:
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
December 21, 1988
88- 15-DR: MCI Communications Cable
MCI Telecommunications Corp.
Design review approval for an underground ,
utility cable.
The cable will be located within the Union Pacific
Rail Road right of way as it runs through the
eastern Tukwila city limits.
N.A.
Railroad lines have not been assigned a use
designation.
M -1: Light Industry
Mitigated DNS issued on December 1, 1988.
A. Proposed Cable Route
B. Detailed Project Description
STAFF REPORT
to the Planning Commission
88- 15 -DR: 11CI Communications
Page 2
FINDINGS
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
1. Project Description: The proposed cable is within an area which
requires B.A.R. design review for all developments.
MCI Corporation proposes to bury a telecommunications cable wholly
within the U.P.R.R. right of way along a route shown in Attachment A.
The cable will be within a two -inch conduit and generally laid within a
one foot wide by four foot deep trench. The trench will be immediately
covered with no long term visual impacts. Specific installation
descriptions are shown in Attachment B.
The cable would cross approximately three public right of ways which
will require City franchises from the City Council.
2. Surrounding Land Use The cable will be buried wholly within an
actively used railroad right of way.
DECISION CRITERIA
The proposed development requires B.A.R. approval pursuant to TMC
18.60.030 due to its location in the following areas:
18.60.030(A): Within 200 feet of the Shoreline, and
18.60.030(E): North of I-405 and east of I -5 in all zone districts.
The applicable Board review criteria are listed below.
TMC 18.60.050 (Review guidelines)
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
3. Landscape and Site Treatment.
4. Building Design.
5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture.
. ;.....1m:nnra 4,...,27M',
STAFF REPORT
to the Planning Commission
Amot4..443-0.1i LiVIVRtt tI tt:xaW?cp.+:PIVIrO OMtrirbm;= ?. Y!.v ritcri=illi,87 ::G'.AVatiVit .+s'2:.'+:`�i:?•
88- 15 -DR: 1:I Communications
Page 3
18.60.060(4) (Special review guidelines for Interurban special review area)
A. Proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural
amenities of the area.
B. Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use
and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
C Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
D. Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
E Proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
F. Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
The above criteria are either not applicable or satisfied by the special nature
of the proposed buried cable.
CONCLUSIONS
The Planning Department concludes that the proposed project satisfies
Board of Architectural Review standards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed project
subject to granting of the required franchises by the .City Council.
• ....;
TO • . •
011 .n
;I°
212TH ST.
ATTACHMENT A
•
•••••lis
• •‘v ..‘ S EI ATTL JUNCTION
NCTION
;rci
.t t•1•»
1
227 TH PLAC
Li
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The purpose or this project is to make available a high quality long distance voice and data
communication transmission system to the Seattle Area. Fiber optics utilitizes laser technology
and digital transmission. This project is part or a nationwide telecommunication network being
constructed by MCI Telecommunications Corporation and is vital to the continuity of the overall
communications network owned by MCI.
The cable will be constructed underground and located entirely within the Union Pacific Railroad
Company and Burlington Northern Railroad Company rights -of -way within the City of Tukwila under
permits to be issued by the appropriate railroad. This location provides the most direct route from
downtown Seattle to MCI's Kent Junction micro-wave site. Due to the geography of King County, in
particular the Green/Duwamish River Basin, the existing railroad rights-or -way cross Shoreline
Environments. The cable location was coordinated with the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the
Burlington Northern Railroad and is fully compatible with the currant railroad uses and the location
of other utilities and facilities located within the railroad rights -of -way.
Project construction will utilize plowing, trenching. boring and bridge attachment. In plowing, a
crawler will be used for direct burial of a 3/4 inch diameter fiber optic cable encased within one of
two 2 inch diameter plowable P.V.C. conduits. The cable will be placed with a minimum or 42 inches
of cover. In trenching, a backhoe or trencher will excavate a one foot wide trench for direct
placement of the cable or encasement of the cable within one of two 2 inch P.V.C. conduits. The
P.V.C. conduits will be encased in concrete to provide further protection to the cable in those areas
which re likely to have future sub-surface disturbance. The conduits will have a minimum of 42
Inches of cover. The boring process for fiber optic cable placement involves boring machine
installation of a 4 -inch diameter Black Iron Pipe to contain the P.V.C. conduits which encase the 3/4
inch diameter fiber optic cable. In bridge attachment. a 4-inch diameter galvanized iron pipe, which
encases the 3/4 inch fiber optic cable within one of two P.V.C. conduits. is attached to existing
bridges. The cable will be buried at a minimum of 60 inches below the bottom of all strums
requiring en underwater installation.
A warning marker ribbon will be placed directly above the cable and 12 inches below the surface.
The able is wrapped with a locator filament. locatable by a M Scope attached to the cable at
handholes located approximately 2000 feet apart along the cable route; Route locator /warning
signs will be placed at regular intervals along the cable route.
Post - construction contoure will match in situ contours. Extracted native materials will be replaced
back into the ditch or trench after placement or the conduit. When required by the governing body,
extracted materials will be disposed of in an area designated by the governing body. Replacement
fill, when required by the governing body, will be or a type and from a source designated and/or
approved by the governing body.
MCI will protect trem plantings. grass, asphalt and concrete surfaces. irrigation facilities,
drainage structures. and existing utilities during construction. The work sites will be restored to
es good or better condition than es found before construction.
ATTACHMENT B
MCI will exercise sound construction and erosion control practices. Construction techniques will be
used that minimize the amount of disturbance to the adjacent roadbeds and properties, thus
reducing the chance of construction related erosion. All locations of erosion control structures and
mitigation will be guided by the type of soil, amount and type of ground cover. terrain. and
proximity to water bodies. The trench will be backfilled immediately after placement of the
conduit. Hydro-seeding will be utilized in appropriate area or as directed by the governing body.
The Black River and tributaries to Springbrook Creek will require underwater burial of the conduit.
MCI will utilize two trod' mounted excavators working in tandem on opposite banks to dig a two
foot wide trench from bank to bank. It is estimetad that a maximum of 2 hours will be utilized to
excavate the trench and install the conduit at the Blanc River. Another two hours will be utilized
for clean-up activities and placement of rip-rap. Rock will be placed as rip -rap on the stream bank
for erosion control. Additionally. the area will be hydro- seeded as an additional erosion control
measure.
This project is consistent with the applicable City of Tukwila Municipal Code General Requirements
MC 10.60050 (1 thru 5) and TMC 10.60.060 (4XA tau F).
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
/o{
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL:
SEE ATTACHED
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection)
SEE TABLE 1
Quarter:
Section: Township: Range:
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
3. APPLICANT :* Name: MCI Telecommunications Corporation
Signature:
Address: 400 International parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081
Phone: (214) 380 -4448
Date: November 7,1988
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
4. PROPERTY
OWNER
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Union Pacific Railroad Corporation
Name: P. O. Box 2500, Broomfield, CO 80020 (402) 271 -3534
Address:
Phone:
Burlington Northern Railroad Corporation
777 Main Street, Forth Worth, Texas 76102
I /WE,[signature(s)] SEE ATTACHED LETTERS OF INTENT
swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date:
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
• A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE: Existing vegetation at some shoreline management area crossings will
be temporarily disturbed, resulting in short -term aesthetic impacts. No
long -term alteration of existing aesthetic conditions will occur as a
result of this project. After installation, the cable location will be
hydro- seeded with an appropriate seed mixture designated and /or approved
by the governing body.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
8. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-.
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to• provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE
DE - N REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
.District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
MCI will protect trees, plantings and grass during construction. The
work sites will be restored to as good or better condition than as
found before constrpctl'on.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
The fiber optic cable is buried underground and does not affect
public recreational areas and facilities.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
NOT APPLICABLE
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
The cable is within the railroad right-of -way and is compatible with
all railroad uses.
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
The cable route lies within and along a railroad bed and roadways. These
grades are relatively flat and therefore are not susceptible to erosion.
In those shoreline management or other sensitive environmental areas which
have pre- existing vegetation, the areas disturbed during construction
will be hydro- seeded with compatible seed mixture.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
NOT APPLICABLE
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
CITY OF TUKWILA
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
1) The purpose of this project is to make available a high quality long distance voice and data
communication transmission system to the Seattle Area. Fiber optics utilitizes laser technology
and digital transmission. This project is part of a nationwide telecommunication network being
constructed by MCI Telecommunications Corporation and is vital to the continuity of the overall
communications network owned by MCI.
The cable will be constructed underground and located entirely within the Union Pacific Railroad
Company and Burlington Northern Railroad Company rights -of -way within the City of Tukwila under
permits to be issued by the appropriate railroad. This location provides the most direct route from
downtown Seattle to MCI's Kent Junction micro -wave site. Due to the geography of King County, in
particular the Green /Duwamish River Basin, the existing railroad rights -of -way cross Shoreline
Environments. The cable location was coordinated with the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the
Burlington Northern Railroad and is fully compatible with the current railroad uses and the location
of other utilities and facilities located within the railroad rights -of -way.
Project construction will utilize plowing, trenching, boring and bridge attachment. In plowing, a
crawler will be used for direct burial of a 3/4 inch diameter fiber optic cable encased within one of
two 2 inch diameter plowable P.V.C. conduits. The cable will be placed with a minimum of 42 inches
of cover. In trenching, a backhoe or trencher will excavate a one foot wide trench for direct
placement of the cable or encasement of the cable within one of two 2 inch P.V.C. conduits. The
P.V.C. conduits will be encased in concrete to provide further protection to the cable in those areas
which are likely to have future sub - surface disturbance. The conduits will have a minimum of 42
inches of cover. The boring process for fiber optic cable placement involves boring machine
installation of a 4 -inch diameter Black Iron Pipe to contain the P.V.C. conduits which encase the 3/4
inch diameter fiber optic cable. In bridge attachment, a 4 -inch diameter galvanized iron pipe, which
encases the 3/4 inch fiber optic cable within one of two P.V.C. conduits, is attached to existing
bridges. The cable will be buried at a minimum of 60 inches below the bottom of all streams
requiring an underwater installation.
A warning marker ribbon will be placed directly above the cable and 12 inches below the surface.
The cable is wrapped with a locator filament, locatable by a M Scope attached to the cable at
handholes located approximately 2000 feet apart. along the cable route. Route locator /warning
signs will be placed at regular intervals along the cable route.
Post- construction contours will match in situ contours. Extracted native materials will be replaced
back into the ditch or trench after placement of the conduit. When required by the governing body,
extracted materials will be disposed of in an area designated by the governing body. Replacement
fill, when required by the governing body, will be of a type and from a source designated and /or
approved by the governing body.
MCI will protect trees, plantings, grass, asphalt and concrete surfaces, irrigation facilities,
drainage structures, and existing utilities during construction. The work sites will be restored to
as good or better condition than as found before construction.
MCI will exercise sound construction and erosion control practices. Construction techniques will be
used that minimize the amount of disturbance to the adjacent roadbeds and properties, thus
reducing the chance of construction related erosion. All locations of' erosion control structures and
mitigation will be guided by the type of soil, amount and type of ground cover, terrain, and
proximity to water bodies. The trench will be backfllled immediately after placement of the
conduit. Hydro- seeding will be utilized in appropriate areas or as directed by the governing body.
The Black River and tributaries to Springbrook Creek will require underwater burial of the conduit.
MCI will utilize two track mounted excavators working in tandem on opposite banks to dig a two
foot wide trench from bank to bank. It is estimated that a maximum of 2 hours will be utilized to
excavate the trench and install the conduit at the Black River. Another two hours will be utilized
for clean -up activities and placement of rip -rap. Rock will be placed as rip -rap on the stream bank
for erosion control. Additionally, the area will be hydro - seeded as an additional erosion control
measure..
This project is consistent with the applicable City of Tukwila Municipal Code General Requirements
TMC 18.60.050 (1 thru 5) and TMC 18.60.060 (4XA thru F).
TABLE 1
LOCATION OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS
FOR MCI ROUTE IN CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
AREA CROSSING
(AREA NUMBER) JURISDICTION LOCATION ADJACENT STREET
Duwamish River City of Tukwila SE 1 /4 SE /4. Sec. 14 Monster Road
(Tukwila No. 1) T23N, R4E
Green River City of Tukwila SW /4 NW /4, Sec. 24 Monster Road
(Tukwila No. 2) T23N, R4E
site plan vicinity map
typical detail
x
\nentown
j• ' 81acK ; lacK Myer
• -<7?•
•
• .a
•• W•
• N
3M:' :o
i u
Y Y
Y '1
11
Y
.3.3.3.
•
mcaa=a/'
\
. 314
• ••23 '!‘ ; ; iyj •
■ DUWAMISH RIVER-CITY OF TUKWILA NO. I
vice
\ IT
. V1611\I
P
GREEN RIVER
CITY OF TUKWILA NO. 2
REZONE 1988
(ea( -;fr 4-7
APPLICATION
DATE (FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS APPLICANT
1
FILE
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
1/20/88
88 -1 -R
FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEX.
AREA -WIDE INITIAL ZONING
CITY OF TUKWILA
EPIC -3 -87
4/4/88
88 -2 -R
SCHNEIDER ANNEXATION
SOUTH OF 178TH & EAST OF 1 -5
GERALD SCHNEIDER
EPIC -12- 88/88 -2 -A
88 -2 -CPA
88 -3 -R
RIVERTON ANNEXATION
AREA -WIDE
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -1 -A
7/19/88
88 -4 -R
THORNDYKE ANNEXATION
144TH ON NORTH, 99 ON WEST, 160TH
ON SOUTH, AND CITY LIMITS ON EAST
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -4 -CPA
EPIC -14 -88
10/17/88
88 -5 -R
FOSTER ANNEXATION
ANNEXATION AREA
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -3 -A
12/23/88
88 -6 -R
TUKWILA JUNCTION
WEST SIDE OF 57TH AVENUE S.
STARBOW BUILDERS
EPIC -34 -88
88 -1 -SUB