Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-02-UCU - BUCK DOUG - RENTON SAND & GRAVEL CONDITIONAL USE87-02-ucu 1602 monster road 87-12-dr RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL CONDITIONAL USE REVISED City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Shoreline Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE File Number: Approved Date: TYPE OF ACTION: Q Substantial Development Permit ; i Conditional Use [] Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: DOUGLAS M. BUCK POLICY 2 (P.4.2) Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: SEE ATTACHMENT "A" FOR CONDITIONS OF PERMIT Received by Shorelands Management Section a l ?lq ° A1E 87 -8 -SMP XX Denied JANUARY 99, 1990 to undertake the following development (be specific): MIXING, SCREENING AND STORAGE OF TOP SOIL MATERIALS upon the following property (legal description, i.e., section, township, range): 1602 MONSTER ROAD (VACATED) SW } 24 -23 -4 BOUNDED BY GREEN RIVER, INTERURBAN AVFNHF, ROS RATNTFR AVFNIIF S. GRADY WAY & RURI TNGTON NORTHFRN RADIUM!) RQW. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development (state the Master Program sections or page numbers): POLICY 4 (P.4.1) • ..o.y e...... ....... •■•• w.....0.•' . ....∎.............. r•. ».._..._..... �«..�...... �....�.. .� DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT : APPROVED (date): X Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: 4 -1:7 -to Date cc: Applicant, File, D.O.E. (25 /SHOR.PMT) PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Page 2 This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the per - mittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM..T. DAT OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RC )(a)(b)(c). rec ..c Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173 -14 -060. THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. DENIED (date): (S ' ' a ure o au hor ze or, ann ng 'epar ment cr:; ?,'S....._ This conditional use /variance permit is approved /denied by the department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. artment official) 1. Obtain a State Waste Discharge Permit No Fuels and Chemicals stored on site 3. Vegetative buffer will be planted with riparian vegetation (i.e., cottonwoods, willow, salmonberry). 4. The pile height be maintained at its existing height because the firm was recently annexed into Tukwila from Renton. 5. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the entire .use. 6. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to five feet in height at a minimum 20 feet on center. 7. Eight -foot opaque fencing along the east property line and ,along the west side of the use north of vacated Monster Road is required. 8. The fertilizer pile must be covered at times it is not being used. Planning ComnissL December 17, 1987 Page 2 :r. 87 -5 -CA: RADOVICH - ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT - Expand building height exception for the area generally located N.E. of I -405 and West Valley Highway. Height limit would increase from 35 feet to 115 feet. Jack Pace, Senior Planner reviewed the staff report recommending approval for the request. John Radovich, 2000 - 124th N.E., Bellevue described the favor- able impacts this request would have to his property. Discussion ensued on the request. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATION OF THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO EXTEND UP TO AND INCLUDING 115 FEET FOR THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF FORT DENT PARK, EAST OF INTERURBAN AVENUE, WEST OF THE CORPORATE LIMIT AND NORTH OF I -405, BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE MOTION PASSED WITH HAGGERTON, KNUDSON, HAMILTON, KIRSOP, COP - LEN VOTING YES AND MR. LARSON VOTING NO. 87 -4 -R - SHIMATSU /MIKAMI REZONE - Rezone 66,685 square feet from R -1 -7.2 - Single Family Residential to C -2 - Regional Retail. Mr. Umetsu reviewed the staff report noting a change on page 3 which should read, "Specific property is not consistent with surrounding development and zoning ..." The staff report recommended approval of the request. Discussion ensued on the request. MR. COPLEN MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE REZONE 87 -4 -R, BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LARSON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO HAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR C -2 AND C -M ZONES, AS WELL AS ELECTION OF OFFICERS ON JANUARY 18, 1988 DUE TO THE LENGTHY AGENDA ANTICIPATED FOR JANUARY. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 87 -2 -UCU & 87 -12 -DR RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL -. Design Review approval and Unclassified Use Permit request for topsoil mixing and storage operation with accessory structures. Discussion ensued. Planning Commission December 17, 1987 Page 3 Mr. Pace reviewed the staff report, recommending approval of the request with six conditions. A letter from Elva Miller Ross objecting to the proposal was read into the record. A photograph was distributed for review by the Planning Commission. Douglas Buck, 8805 S. 121st, Seattle, owner of Renton Sand and Gravel, clarified the proposal. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. COPLEN SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVED 87 -2 -UCU AND 87- 12 -DR, BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLU- SIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The pile height be maintained at its existing height because the firm was recently annexed into Tukwila from Renton. 2. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the entire use. 3. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to fi`ive feet in height at a minimum 20 feet on center. 4. A fence screening the operation on the west side of the use, north of vacated Monster Road is required. 5. The fertilizer pile must be covered at times it is not being used. '6l Any accessory structures shall be painted in accordance to /� code. THE MOTION PASSED WITH COPLEN, KNUDSON, LARSON AND KIRSOP VOTING YES AND HAMILTON AND HAGGERTON VOTING NO. 87- 11 -DR: RIVERBEND Design review of a three -story 13,647 square foot office building. Mr. Umetsu reviewed the revised staff report recommending approval of the request with three conditions. Lee Hanson, 1006 Fryar Avenue, Sumner WA 98390, architect for the proposal supported the staff's comments except he disagreed with the colors proposed by staff. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVED THE DESIGN REVIEW REQUEST FOR 87 -11 -DR BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: yrRFwPYti u itwat City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 87 -2 -UCU RENTON SAND & GRAVEL APPLICANT: Douglas Buck REQUEST: Unclassified use permit for a topsoil mixing and storage operation with accessory structures LOCATION: 1602 Monster Road (vacated), bordered by the Green River, Interurban Avenue, Grady Way, and Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way The City Council conducted a review of the above request on March 7, 1988, and found that the request should be approved subject to conditions. The Council adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the Planning Department Staff Report dated December 7, 1987. The action of the City Council on all matters shall be final and conclusive unless, within ten days from the date of the Council's action, an applicant or an aggrieved party makes an application to the Superior Court of King County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. (29 /NTC.BUCK) Date: Associate Planner /7678 WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 1067 CITY OF TUKWILA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING AN UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT FOR MIXING AND STORAGE OF TOPSOIL FOR RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL. WHEREAS, Renton Sand and Gravel has filed an application with the City Planning Department for an Unclassified Use Permit for mixing and storage of topsoil located at 1602 Monster Road S.W., Tukwila, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.66.050 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the permit application, and at the conclusion of said hearing adopted findings, conclusions, and a recommendation to the City Council to approve the permit, and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the permit application at a regular City Council meeting on March 7, 1988, and determined to adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Unclassified Use Permit Approved. Pursuant to Section 18.66.050 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves the issuance of an unclassified use permit for Renton Sand and Gravel for the mixing and storage of topsoil located at 1602 Monster Road S.W., Tukwila, Washington, as shown on drawings submitted with the application and subject to the terms of the conditions set forth in Appendix A attached hereto. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting'thereof this 7th day of March, 1988. Filed with the City Clerk: 03/07/88 Passed by the City Council: 03/07/88 Resolution No. 1067 /i / % j ' Mabel J. Harry, President Approved as to Form Attest /Authenticated Office of the City Attorney Mn Anderson, ity lerk (80 /APPENDIX.A) APPENDIX A 87 -2 -UCU and 87- 12 -DR: Renton Sand and Gravel Design Review approval and Unclassified Use Permit request for topsoil mixing and storage operation with accessory structures. Conditions 1. The pile height be maintained at its existing height because the firm was recently annexed into Tukwila from Renton. 2. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the entire use. 3. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to five feet in height at a minimum 20 feet on center. 4. Eight -foot opaque fencing along the east property line and along the west side of the use north of vacated Monster Roa is required. 5. The fertilizer pile must be covered at times it is not being used. cfT'7. ".ff ;;VS,:1v;. : rc•: 154.1 ztxlAPYU tm'.AM. Citt of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 :,.rvtrarrr+;rfr.:n crra nY.1,0c , wT.'?Yr te: §Ra',:7 STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review Prepared December 7, 1987 HEARING DATE: December 17, 1987 FILE NUMBER: 87- 2 -UCU, 87 -12 -DR APPLICANT: Renton Sand and Gravel Company REQUEST: Unclassified Use Permit to allow mixing screening, and stor- age of topsoil; and design review of the permit. LOCATION: 1602 Monster Road S.W. (vacated), with area bounded by Grady Way, Interurban Avenue, Green River, and railroad right -of -way ACREAGE: 4.3 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DISTRICT: M -1, Light Industrial SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS issued November 20, 1987 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Vicinity Map (B) Site Plan (C) Drainage Plan (D) Shoreline Profile STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND DECISION CRITERIA VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION tttt 87- 2- UCU /87- 12 - Renton Sand and Gravel Page 2 FINDINGS 1. Project Description: Import, mix, screen, and store topsoil material (soil, fertilizer, shavings, sawdust). 2. Surrounding Land Use: Dairy, single - family rentals, nursery, pasture, rail- road main line, interstate freeway, auto repair. 3. Terrain: Flat. 4. Vegetation: Pasture grass. 5. Soils: Clay, sand, and demolition fill. 6. Access: Vacated Monster Road (Nelson Place) via Grady Way. 7. Utilities: Puget Power, City of Renton Water, no sanitary or storm sewers exist on the site. Mr. Buck, president of Renton Sand and Gravel, is currently operating a topsoil mixing business on the site. Formerly the site was used for pasture and dairy farming. The Zoning Code (TMC 18.66.020.14) requires topsoil mixing to be approved as an "unclassified use ". Because the site is next to the Green River, a shoreline permit is also required for which TMC 18.60.030(2)(A) requires design review by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The unclassified use permit and BAR review are consolidated in this report. The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria for an Unclassified Use Permit are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact. 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the area. The subject site is part of several large lots, of approximately 12 acres. This site is accessed via vacated Monster Road (Nelson Place), which intersects with Grady Way. The Green River, high voltage power lines, railroad, and elevated Grady Way border the property. A single family residence is located to the southwest of the use and dairy and farm buildings lie along the west part of the site. The use is to the rear of the site at the end of vacated right -of -way. The subject site and the adjacent structures are owned by several members of one family. The dirt, fertilizer, and sawdust are arranged in 10 -foot to 40 -foot high piles on portions of the property, as shown on Attachment B. STAFF REPORT � 87- 2- UCU /87- 12 Renton Sand and Gravel Page 3 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, land- scaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. The underlying requirements of the zone for yards, landscaping and height apply per Zoning Code Section 18.66.030, unless specific modifi- cations are required in granting the unclassified use permit. The parking standard does not apply to this use because there is no building (other than an accessory shed for tools and fuel). There is a front yard adjacent to Grady Way that would normally require 15 feet of landscaping; however, Grady Way is elevated a minimum of twenty feet. Landscaping along this yard would be ineffective. The use does abut the shoreline, which requires landscaping with a solid evergreen screen six feet in height, or substantial shade trees. The drainage plan shows 2" caliper evergreen trees 30 feet on center. The Zoning Code TMC 18.52.040(2) and 18.50.020 respectively requires that outside storage be screened from abutting public streets and adjacent properties by a screen a minimum of eight feet in height and that outside storage of materials may not exceed twenty feet in height. Attachment B shows materials as high as 40 feet. No screening other than adjacent to the shoreline is currently proposed. The use abuts the railroad on the east property line and Grady Way on the south. The remainder of the use is surrounded by the other uses located on the site. The Tukwila Fire Department does not allow above - ground tank storage of hazardous materials in excess of 60 gallons. The operation has been using two above - ground diesel fuel tanks for fueling the machinery used on the site. An all- weather access road is required per the Fire Code within 150 feet of combustible storage. The sawdust shavings are considered com- bustible but are located within 100 feet of vacated Monster Road, which is an asphalt driveway and acceptable to the Fire Department. Storm collection and detention facilities do not exist in the area. The proponent has submitted a collection /detention plan for the north half of the site (Attachment C). The proposal is to collect storm water runoff in two grass -lined swales on the east and west sides to drain towards a collection detention area created by a berm - enclosed area. . 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. The site, although supporting several single - family residences, is not generally thought of as a residential area. The site usage is mixed and in transition from agricultural uses (nursery and dairy) to the M -1 zone uses. A railroad, river, power poles, and a transportation net- STAFF REPORT 87- 2- UCU /87- 12=vtt: Renton Sand and Gravel Page 4 work surround the site. The comprehensive plan designation and zoning - Light Industrial - indicate that more intense use of the site is appropriate and desirable. The proposed use, while more intensive and visually imposing than the former pasture use, does not seem to be incompatible with the site, especially if limited to the standards. Limited utilities are available to the site and severe access restric- tions exist now and in the future. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan: "Encourage a diversity of business uses to promote maximum occupancy." (page 62) "Encourage a part structural, part non - structural storm sewer system." (page 86) "Where beneficial to downstream properties, control peak flow runoff from the source at a rate similar to natural conditions." (page 86) "Consider non - structural as well as structural solutions to storm water control." (page 88) The proponent of the use has designed an erosion control and detention facility to handle the flow of water on the north part of the site. The south lot has no plans for controlling storm runoff. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. If the topsoil enters the river, siltation and fecal contamination occurs. The applicant at one time accepted City of Seattle storm sys- tem residual dirt. The unknown contents of that dirt requires Seattle to certify its content before depositing the dirt on the site. The storm water controls were proposed by the applicant (Attachment C). The elevation of the top of the riverbank is 25 (Attachment D). The 100 -year flood level is approximately 22.2. The likelihood of the property flooding is therefore low. Stockpiling of materials is set back 40 feet from the mean high water, therefore bank stability is not a concern associated with the use. Aesthetically, the use has no greater impact than storage of any mater- ials which is outright permitted in this district. The earth - moving equipment and the movement of the dirt is the characteristic which makes this use unclassified. The noise created by the machine mixing the soil will be limited to daytime hours. Providing screening is the most important element to alleviate aesthetic impacts. The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.60.050 Design Review Guidelines are listed below in bold followed by pertinent findings of fact. STAFF REPORT 87- 2- UCU /87- 12=uR: Renton Sand and Gravel Page 5 6. Relationship of Structure to Site The applicant has not planned any structures on the site. He has indicated in conversations that he will provide a Sani -can on site for his one employee. He has also indicated that one or two accessory structures (less than 120 square feet each) for machinery tools and supplies would be necessary. There is no streetscape or pedestrian movement associated with the area of the site where the use is located. The use gains access via a vacated street. 7. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The topography of the site is flat. The landscaping shown on the storm drainage plan (Attachment C) are 2" evergreen trees 30 feet on center planted along the top of the storm detention berm. The site is ac- cessed by a 40 -foot driveway (vacated Monster Road or Nelson Place) which extends from Grady Way and ends along the east edge of the site. The use is at the end of the driveway and is the last use on the site to access the driveway. There are no sidewalks and the surrounding and subject uses do not generate pedestrian activity. The landscaping proposal does not show any additional screening of the use. No exter- ior lighting is proposed. 8. Landscaping and Site Treatment As established in Finding #2, eight -foot screening is required of all outside storage. The M -1 landscaping standards also would normally require a 15 -foot landscaped front yard. Effective screening of the use is impossible along Grady Way because the roadway is elevated above the use. Screening could still be used adjacent to the east and west sides of the use. 9. Building Design Building designs for the accessory structures have not been submitted. Any accessory structures, painted an appropriate color, would be screened by the piles of dirt and many other structures of various sizes scattered throughout the area. 10. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture The Sani -can is likely of a plastic material. Colors have not been indicated. STAFF REPORT Interurban Special Review District: 87- 2- UCU /87 -12S R: Renton Sand and Gravel Page 6 11. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. The storm drainage plan and landscaping along the river is a sensitive treatment of the area's amenities. 12. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. The proposed use has no impact on the use or enjoyment of the recrea- tional area or its facilities. 13. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. There is no anticipated pedestrian use of the subject site. 14. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The scale of the use is somewhat overwhelming to the residential uses on the site. The houses do not directly abut the dirt piles but are close to where the use is proposed and will need to be reduced to meet maximum standards. The use is, however, compatible with the use dis- trict in which it is located. Wholesale storage, light manufacturing, and sales and rental of heavy machinery and equipment would be compat- ible with the use characteristics of topsoil mixing and storage. 15. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse envi- ronmental impacts. The proponent has proposed a storm drainage plan and some screening of the riverbank. The drainage plan and landscaping need to be expanded to provide sufficient coverage. 16. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. The proposed use will not affect historic features in the area. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed use, strategically screened with either a fence or dense land- scaping, can be a compatible use in the area. The transitional nature of the subject site and the physical restrictions imposed on the site because of the surrounding land uses lends itself to the proposed use. The topsoil business is greater in scale sizewise than the previous agricultural uses on STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS 87- 2- UCU /87- 12 -br: Renton Sand and Gravel Page 7 the site, but less intense structurally and as a vehicle generator than is permitted on the site. The use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the improvements in the area. 2. The standards regarding screening and storage have not been met. Heights of stored materials need to be reduced, opaque fencing or dense landscaping provided on east and west sides, and increased landscaping along the river. Eight -foot fencing on the east property line and along the west edge of the use on the north side of vacated Monster Road is required. The proposed evergreen landscaping along the river, needs to be a minimum five feet in height, 20 feet on center. The normal landscaping requirement adjacent to Grady Way would be ineffective and therefore unnecessary. 3. The proposed drainage plan meets the needs of the use located north of the driveway. Drainage for the area south of the driveway is not addressed but should be integrated into a stormwater collection /detention plan to avoid siltation and /or contamination of the Green River. Providing for storm drainage will implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Certi- fication from the City of Seattle of the content of the material used is necessary. Other than the storm drainage dirt, fecal contamination from the fertilizer is of concern. Any runoff from the fertilizer and other piles should be adequately contained in the drainage system. 4. No conclusion needs to be drawn regarding the relationship of structure to site and adjoining area because there are not large structures proposed. Any accessory buildings for tools would be compatible with the diversity of uses and structures in the area. The colors of the structures should be brown to blend in with their background. 5. The site cannot be developed to relate to adjoining area because of only a portion of the site is being developed. The portion being used is set back from any access points and is cut off from adjoining properties by the adjacent uses. The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the above Find- ings and Conclusions and recommend approval with the following conditions to the City Council; and that the BAR adopt the above Findings and Conclusions and approve the development subject to City Council approval of the Unclassified Use permit. 1. The pile height must be reduced and maintained to a maximum of 20 feet in height. 2. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the entire use. 3. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to five feet in height at a minimum 20 feet on center. STAFF REPORT (22/87- 2- UUDR1 -3) 87- 2- UCU /87 -12 (: Renton Sand and Gravel Page 8 4. Eight -foot opaque fencing along the east property line and along the west side of the use north of vacated Monster Road is required. 5. The fertilizer pile must be covered at time not being used. 6. Any accessory structures shall be painted brown or in earthtones. ' � a � . • �.. tt.v kyi:�}�a•�r..:t.�da'�€;v : x <'ss.lfw"�'i�w..,•pF�a�sfs °sv +.tCKIHYNVI.1'!a' #Wi ,urcTx,.:•. arm !s7.�•. >+z�::.+.+'.- ,urarm.r. - r j A 5 i987 ATTACHM A . Mar- / /0 ' oar 30 ' 4 ct m &0260 P►,i. a BALDWIN 6 - 2255 sis�2t;h • itt A :'N.?. on.,• wow a ocwwrxnwm:wi..,c..nr vw ntrA •.:.cat+ oZ " Ziate44PAI 7- R 4 #S P4194, TIC/ •V ef 4 - 704cf�3zi /•4''1 • 7 3 , 'cc'N7tr[S # K ?' _ le x st ,p _ it i` _ # s - /O C3FonTil= ,Q r 3'4'�1' `1 ,1 4, De7e.vs', ;A/ A) R OA 1 _ J 905 Rainier Avenue South Post Office Box 28 Renton, Washington 98055 N t2em*o & FItWJ Stuoo,: kti 4 4_ - - - AP /'1k - Ua 6 -- _ 1 1‘ P i,f R i v �,Q /44 SL cf)�- L',CEdR Rao: s - 7 e r /0*c/ j .,rms,.vitein .,wacenaunnWr. men+ nrminiMiexxrernra , naMesoesen:rkio c arK IIHIJA V»!iViltr.FOIV. - :i!` CITY OF T''. K'r':" +_.: 1 ATTACHMENT C a t 73 • 'dr 73 le 71 suer w er-rjrrif DIVia r /y' "&i:• T ' '517 is WAK■te Ob AsOCOOo6 • J 5 7 ?Ave%) /N . NQJNJ 18.66.070 -- 18.66.090 18.66.070 Expiration and renewal. An unclassified use permit shall automatically expire one year after the date it was granted by the city council unless a building permit con- forming to plans upon which the permit was granted is obtained within that period of time. An unclassified use permit shall automatically expire unless substantial construction shall be completed within two years from the date the unclassified use permit is granted by the city council unless a renewal is granted or unless the UUP specifically provides for a period greater than two years. The city council, upon recommendation of the planning commission, may renew an unclassified use per- mit for a maximum period of one additional year. No more than one renewal shall be issued for any UUP. A renewal may be granted only if there have been no pertinent changes in condi- tions surrounding the property since the time of original approval. No hearing is required for renewal of an unclass- ified use permit. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982). 18.66.080 Revocation of permit. (1) The city council, after a recommendation from the planning commission, may revoke or modify any unclassified use permit. Such revoca- tion or modification shall be made on any one or more of the following grounds: (A) That the approval was obtained by deception, fraud, or other intentional and misleading representation; (B) That the use for which such approval was granted . has at any time ceased for a period of one year or more; (C) That the use for which such approval was granted has been abandoned; (D) That the permit granted is exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval or in violation of any statute, resolution, code, law or regulation; (E) That the use for which the approval was granted is so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety. (2) Any aggrieved party may petition the city council in writing to initiate revocation or modification proceed- ings. • (3) Before an unclassified use permit maybe revoked or modified, a public hearing shall be held. Procedures con- cerning notice, reporting, and appeals shall be the same as required by this chapter for the initial consideration of an unclassified use permit application. (Ord. 1247 §1(part),. 1982) . 18.66.090 Performance bond or other security. A per- formance bond or other adequate and appropriate security may be required by the city council for any elements of the proposed project which the council determines are crucial to the protection of the public welfare. Such bond shall be in 319 (Tukwila 8/82) PHONE BALDWIN 6 -2255 t?* 905 Rainier Avenue South Post Office Bo °28 Renton. Washington 98055 N 47 /' o X - 4/a o --- `3;/ 0/ Rive I3A/yk £. "04- i . F �R 4R0A - •" ,yg S�'Fe %er/ %/ ea540iON 7Ril PA ♦ {/ Y C O■ c L3FA) .4. 43E'oA.frz .0 pp ./ 31/4,'// H S err) GU i r J� c.V A R ktA A RECE /ED CITY OF TUKWILA 6 1987 NO .DEPT: 3 )'Cd'.v7V E * '- �tEN RFvfat a p E N T'e N • i� punt �-,� ?Poo t,J /48 1144 Akipt ,Q.. of # 13 4 1 PHONE BALDWIN 6-2255 124•11fAt co,tzt itztoueie 905 Rainier Avenue South Post Office Box 28 ./ . Renton, Washington 98055 Gree N RIV en - / ELA7 ptif i arLya ,e,e0co# /VW or 'WSW 4i2A0 • tIft OOT 5 1_987 \ CITY OF TT LA PLANNING DaPT. )549 DL. 14 4 ,tier \ N � ' • M��E d Q I - v mI Signature: 4. PROPERTY Na e:. OWNER UL .,LASSIFIED USES,, PERMIT APPLICATION Address: Phon :�► AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP f u 11rar »a' m Rur_ c'�;.urer+!'f?,�ceFv:Gr'Y.L'•W� 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: T S i .Ws --- S m� 4 Y - - 2 47 /izags . /27i> S -.1,7 7ij 1`72 7 ,'is 4s A 4 0 c4 / �5 . 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, block, and subdivision; or tax lot street, and nearest intersection) t 1 ,6 6 cp/.o J', -c � � 3 , - 72.6; ey ;2y h 7 /03 Quarter: £LL) 1 11,.-Section: __ Township: ? 3 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) indicate lot(s), number, access 3. APPLICANT :* Name: k iv ne, /) - cr,RA ��/ Address:6' S�t' / 2 ' ), ©, -4 d f ig ;ezW'fi 0, Q /' 7 Phone: a 'A. SS' 77i/ Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. 0 07 / nJ vaLvvol) a wli / L ...Si(' - 5 16 3/z. ,0 fi �_ �Si�v9GOr`i I /WE,[signature(s)] t /U %Q /�j swear that I /we are a owner s) or of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: .1,I� e l f�7 /g.64.0.70 04) dw..,..1 .,.,.r v.ir 13,71 x.A.r .A:n':. 7; &'. -g AI I)04 n r aYw o� ... r. p:, .rt�ism•vw•r_�....•,• ^e: ckN • ame A�:,:�1.�•s >�Rr'J' a•ab. _ ^..Y:.� UNCLASSIFIEUSE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY:, v4 i 7 -id 1 Yu.eze -- 7c- fv�� ,7 ?� 5r era 6. PROPOSED UNCLASSIFIED USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.6j 7. WHAT IS THE TIME FRAME FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED USE? /4/ 4Wv(cl.c...rc Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for an unclassified use permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.66.060 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). 8. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. RESPONSE: i /tj < S i ,'tv' Xx.e c,t) /g h ,ri A, arc +.< 7.0 N "r4V.2 OAR 9. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: ( . �Q� /,p� I a ... X:t?.`�:7:.a;L is ;= .. <•�ii.�'.' ''a.`_G'1i3: S, fti',' i' �1��tws :�;7�Tlr'.;S..:iF_'f�aaax -r <r. • RESPONSE: RESPONSE: (25 /UNCL.APP) yes J n� [l h14. vv 1'/.trurr.'wn IIwR ?rSa z.:Ar kraut M.+• r• n. ti.; re, u< w: elvnrrR<l r�. m. v. z�rtl. tW : .ws riYlw�r•\ UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page 3 10. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. 11. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: /A3-s. 12. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. �:eM1+'ttiKer : J.1viM i]� APPL A ON DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT L CROSS REFERENCE ACTION 87 -1 -V TUKWILA TWO 16460 - 16660 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY FIRST WESTERN DEV. 86 -18 -SS 87 -2 -V GENCOR 5700 BLOCK OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. STEVE FREIDMAN 87 -5 -DR i . 1 VARIANCES 1987 I • • • • e i • • • • • • • • • • • 40'River Environment Zone Pollution Abatement, f Sedi— ment Control Facilities Per— mitted R 4 a �� SI. o , -1 • 1'J lg � , 29 CX/sT• BALLd3T OE az Be ea sz sz oz ez; zz tz 1 mli 1111 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN' THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO THE IUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT u 1111 m u i nnlindunli��ini on no nil ititni(i ii ui itit __ �� � e B I11ii11 I lu1 nlhi liiijilililililililililililllilllilililili111111lililll1jllililill�ili 1111111JI .li 1111 111i11I1111111114hilLl1lilililllll ll. llililililililililililililililililililililililililil 0 ..». 1 2 3. 4...._ ..- .:s.:.::...... 6 7_...t 8 9 10 11 ...ter 12 • 11 i 111_ 11h m_md111111111n11n111111111111 :'�1tPJf.:"xl.wt1.0 2� PAP ri-g-UCJI • • A � S% 0' fri nn fRESS. • • Zf • 0 OWNER NAME. N /ZZ5 " /6 /o v i •eD. 1'3 4 TIo R rEiz (-iYPIGAL eNTrge F7- Scdt6 / " =Zo s DATUM: U.5C/Y4J BM' 9-Za / CLEF: = 29.09 - daGdoe eeLd C/Ty1adTjGE 1 4 e$ eiOY 5,C/�sc • • .5.14 •••••••■ Atet /T4fia 5 Le eira .2.m...W.;_lrralttpm*mari,AWIA,AMe 'ro r •s=1,*- 11=-Err,' CrieeK04 4%/..fet•> SEC SE .0 ,V4Tiv TAIPE:C, c2 - /5 0 In co elee •■•■• 11 elee 0 0 0 w. cc • o z z co 0 z cc B t SECTION C \ To c . N \ 44(6. R1p4 -: . 54 L- 61- 4 .-SAWZ4. To r e fo/ . 4 — ----- V 40 \ r. - X/%7 a4z24.5r ROCK I '■Y \ .0`° • • ..• ...• . sip c.kff . „ 0' _ 1 A e 1 - 0, . -------- •''•, ............ \ A ..\ \\\,0 • ot9,„ \ \ 0 s . 7 ‘ Z \ d 0 q\ - 7. L - Ti 'Y Q \ \ . .------,• -- 6 x) --} '\---"-- g ------- -------- AO : .-----;<..„.;.--- -" --:... ------- --4% -;.° ----; .0 ,...-'• ---- .... . ,.....--- ...- . .0.• ..- . _.-- N 0111111--- N A 1 • F.E.M.A.. 100YR. FL000votkY LIMIT + FLOOD 1-1AZAFe.C7 LIMIT ........ ELEV. 21.6 Legal Description (FOLLOWS ALONci eAse....A OF ExIST11441 El' TH.47" PaernoAi OP' T;.7 Ah.. /./..92.f•Dfr \ c C ‘ 4.4:11.jrR4:** 13EleMi jc - GT/OA./ 24, r0,4/4/., z 3 , tio,erii A'Abv* -0 .•::.• • 4 LAX s rtiK/4 Col./A/Ty; 4./..f...1: ele'• 40 FI) e r Environmen) Zonerde P Ilut jAbatemen , t Sed1-", me,U• Control Facilities Per- milted .•••••••••••:./:?•••".:•.•, • ".•,..;;; . .* / 4/0 rY1F4c6i-a-utat ' , .. 0 ? .. ro o ...,,,„,,.3v,i- t ., \-„,. .. ....., ..... .,. ,.. e \‘ ..... .....„ ..,„ 0 ,..... „...),...„„ A \\A ,......- '‘.........--- • ..t '■ •T___ %.) • ..CC7253.92 :._ 1 s- V! 0 MT11.11.1 1 2 3 . 4 5 6 7 .... El_ 9 10 11 ......... 12 \ 1IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS, \ • . .ICLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO' oe .ry hr 9zgr C r:, 7 _ ir. !GTHE,QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL,DOCUMENTi .? 8 1 - 9 s • C a 1 - o kinlouttioll100040,44,000ItiftWitittiliFifillipplin11114iiliiliiiiiiiiiliiii4111,iliiiiliiiiiiiiIiijiWo5jhollialiiMilliajvhthilinilltdo#Iiiilliluill . , 4 SITE , , • •• ... ........... At/4 :( 4',/0 4 goei7oA/ ac r ca re7v,e Ltx/.." Peo /A/ goenv.alw y ortr•o -AMY ea, /97.3 AVZ7 . Gloc/.4.rrY C044e7 C.cre./..SE A/0 720392; .4,vo 4450 Z.v/Aly 4:y:: THE c Av " ,eer/c.A./.4tY ,3y -e'e•- co,eop ot.,7Y xia 453942 4'.4.7 925370 .4.49 .54/7 x7 A 72) rfrre .e.4tc,et1442 770 72). ,7 G07%3/ 40c), 7 ro N • I 7 \O • ,N. v 4e/AL /- 55. too fr ,et.vr-o, Ai- NAME, ,/t/VeZ5 ./ ADDRESS, / //a,(4.1 ,ea. POINT OF C 0 N TA C 7, C BUCK C>P6FATele PHONE. errsexr00=—..^..,11:C 444 r L8 ; LucL 11 . I LU 4-8' Pr iza•P F"E-K • E3 er-rraze FIze-m-114e)1. a: -5?-14C S DATUM: Z = /.7 4/"fr OWNER tr. r e *. `Nt *** \ • 4:1) ' 0 0 ' • i/oP -Ng DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT CROSS REFERENCE ACTION 87 -1 -V • TUKWILA TWO 16460 - 16660 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY FIRST WESTERN DEV. 87 -2 -V GENCOR 5700 BLOCK OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. STEVE FREIDMAN O' • • VARIANCES 1987 DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT CROSS REFERENCE ACTION 2/29/88 88 -1 -APP • HAGGARD DUPLEX 14155 - 57TH AVENUE S. PAUL HAGGARD DENIED 6/20/88 88 -2 -APP SUYAMA DUPLEX 5617 S. 149TH ST. SCOTT SUYAMA t . APPEAL 1988 i5)4 4-