Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-04-CPA - CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER ANNEXATION REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT87-04-CPA 13530 53RD AVENUE SOUTH 87-05-R STRANDER ANNEXATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING COMMISSION March 24, 1988 Page 2 .874-CPA 87 -5 -R' STRANDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING Request for Comprehensive Plan map change from Low Density Residential to Commercial, and pre- annexation zone designation of Regional Retail Business (C -2). Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report which recommended approval of the request. Cris Crumbaugh, 1002 S. Third Street, Renton, representing the applicants, disclosed that he is also currently representing Chairman Coplen. Mr. Coplen stepped down as Planning Commission Chair and Mr. Haggerton presided during the hearing on this agenda item. Mr. Crumbaugh, representing the applicants, further clarified the proposal adding that he agreed with the staff report in general. Debbie Craig, 5306 S. 132nd voiced her support of the request. Mr. Norris Saari, 13535 53rd Avenue S. spoke in favor of the rezone. No one spoke in opposition to the request and the Public Hearing was closed. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST IN VIEW OF THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED, THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT, THE REALITIES OF THE PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY AND RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE AMENDED FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL FOR THIS SITE. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. KIRSOP AMENDED THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT THE PROPERTY BE ZONED C -2 UPON ANNEXATION. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 88 -2 -CA - ADULT ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE Request for text amendment to the Tukwila Zoning Code establishing regulations for Adult Entertainment uses. Mr. Coplen resumed his position as Chairman of the Planning Commission. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the request and entered into the record the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, Final Report, dated July 1986, Volumes 1 and 2 as Exhibit I. He entered into the record the Planning Advisory Service Report No. 327, Regulation of Sex Business as Exhibit II. wrr *m .`.S1 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 HEARING DATE: March 24, 1988 FILE NUMBER: 87 -4 -CPA, 87 -5 -R APPLICANT: John C. Strander STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission Prepared March 17, 1988 REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map change from Low Density Residential to Commercial, and pre- annexation zoning designation of Regional Retail Business (C -2) LOCATION: 13530 - 53rd Avenue South ACREAGE: .71 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tukwila Comp Plan Designation - Low Density Residential King County Comp Plan Designation - No designation ZONING DISTRICT: County zoning - RM 2400 (Medium- density Multiple Dwelling) and B -C (Community Business) SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS issued February 19, 1988 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (B) Existing Zoning Map (C) Proposed Zoning and Annexation Area Map (D) Applicant's Written Submittal (E) C -2 (Regional Retail Center) STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION FINDINGS 8"1= -CPA: John C. Strander Page 2 1. Existing Development: The site is vacant. 2. Surrounding Land Use: To the north vacant commercial land; to the west, residential and METRO Park - and -Ride lot; to the south, a vacant residential lot; and to the east, residential. 3. Terrain: The site is flat facing 53rd Avenue and drops down towards Inter- urban Avenue. 4. Vegetation: The site contains some alder with a ground cover of wild grass and weeds. 5. Public Facilities: Sewer and water services can be provided for future development. When development is proposed, additional road right -of -way will be required. BACKGROUND The applicant has requested pre- annexation zoning to the City of Tukwila. As part of the annexation request, the applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment. The Highline Community Plan does not contain any Comprehensive Plan designation for the area between I -5 and the existing Tukwila city limits. However, the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map does cover this area. As shown on Attachment A, approximately 7,000 square feet is designated Commercial and remaining property, approximately 25,347 square feet, is designated Single Family Residential. The Planning Commission will be making a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the proposed zoning. State law requires the City Council to hold two public hearings of its own on the annexa- tion request. After the second hearing, the Council is to adopt by ordinance the Comprehensive Plan amendment and proposed zoning to become effective upon annexation. This report is divided into two sections. The first section reviews the request for Comprehensive Plan amendment. The second section review the proposed zoning upon annexation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA The criteria for Comprehensive Plan Amendment are listed below in bold and are followed by a discussion of the proposal. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is justified if one of the two criteria below is met. Generally, the more signifi- cant the change, the greater will be the burden of showing that the change is justified and in conformance with the overall Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission 87 =4 -CPA: John C. Strander Page 3 1. There is an error in the factual basis of the plan. In address this criterion, is there factual evidence that supports an addi- tional or changed public need for the proposed designation? The applicant has stated that: "There is no demand for SFR zoning in area of site. Park N' Ride, Golf Course, apartments and offices in area have created increased commer- cial demand at site." When the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1982, the size and located for various land use designation was not based solely upon market demand for various uses. The Planning Commission and City Council were concerned with buffering and transition from commercial and industrial uses to abutting residential uses. In addition, the applicant fail to provide any factual evidence that supports their statement that there is no demand for single - family residential zoned land in this area. 2. There is an unforeseen change in circumstances from the point at which the plan was adopted. In address this criterion, the applicant and City are looking at unfore- seen changes in circumstances that have occurred in community conditions that justify a Comprehensive Plan redesignation of the subject property (examples: new or changed City policies /plans). In response to this criterion, the applicant has state: "Metro Park N' Ride lot put in immediately across 52nd from site - drive way exits @ site. Increased traffic noise, glare. Apartments put in across from Golf Course. New bridge across river. Increased commercial activity at shopping -gas next door." In addition to the statement above, the applicant has submitted written material (see Attachment D) which contains further analysis of applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies which relate to their propose Comprehensive Plan Map amendment. Of the several items mention above as unforeseen change in circumstances, the Comprehensive Plan amendment for the METRO Park and Ride lot fits this criteria. In 1986, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the property west of the applicant's site. The amendment was from Single - Family Residential to Commercial with a zoning designation of C -2 (Regional Retail Business). This amendment extended the commercial designation further back from Interurban Avenue. The other items mentioned do not fit this criterion. The apartments being built along Interurban Avenue are an outright permitted use in the C -2 zone. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan only indicates what the most intensive uses. Public and private improvements that are permitted under the Comprehensive Plan would not constitute a change in circumstances. STAFF REPORT to the 8/-4 -CPA: John C. Strander Planning Commission Page 4 As mentioned by the Applicant, the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment in 1986 created an unforeseen change in circumstances. The issue then, is the applicant request appropriate for this location? The following is a discussion of applic- able Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Section 1: Neighborhood Objectives and Policies (page 45) Objective 1. Protect all viable residential neighborhoods from intrusions by incompatible land uses. This objective discourages intensive, disruptive land uses from undermining the quality of life in viable, established residential areas. Given the existing uses around the site and current County zoning, this site should be considered as a transitional area. In addition, this site has been nega- tively impacted with the comprehensive plan amendment and development of the METRO Park and Ride lot. Policy 1. Use natural features, like topography, to separate incompatible land uses from the residential areas. Probably the most important kind of buffer between incompatible land uses is not merely space ( "The further I am from that nuisance, the better! "), but the appearance of visual separation. The existing designation provides no separation from residential and commercial uses. The property ownership is split between residential and commercial. If the proposed designation was approved, the setback requirements plus the existing streets and right -of- way would provide addition buffering or separation between uses. Section 1: Compatibility (page 60) Policy 2. Commercial uses should be located functionally convenient to major trafficways. One of the major criteria of business center locations is the transportation system. This is especially true of Tukwila, which has many businesses which have a regional drawing power. It is important to have a good transporta- tion system from the freeways to the business areas. It is also important for the heavy traffic generated by business areas to remain on major traf- ficways to avoid impact on the residential community. The applicant property proposed for annexation, combined with their property to the north abutting Interurban Avenue, will provide ease access to Inter- urban Avenue. When development is proposed, design review consideration should be given to limiting access to 53rd Avenue. Hn STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission CONCLUSIONS 87 =4 -CPA: John C. Strander Page 5 1. In addressing criterion Number 1, the applicant did not provide any factual evidence to show that an error in the factual basis of the plan had been made. 2. Due to the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment made in 1986 for the METRO Park /Ride lot, there has been an unforeseen change in circumstances that warrants a re- examination of designation for the subject property. 3. Under the existing designations, minimal separation of single family resi- dential and commercial uses can be provided. 4. Given the location of the applicant's other property, direct access to Interurban can be provided. 5. Off site improvement and site design issues will be addressed when the proj- ect goes through the Design Review process. ZONING CRITERIA RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Single Family Residential to Commercial be approved. ZONING UPON ANNEXATION Since the applicant is requesting pre- annexation zoning, the normal criteria used for a rezone does not apply. The key criteria for the zoning request is the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As shown by Attachment C, the current zoning for the property is RM 2400 (Medium Density Multiple Dwelling) and B -C (Community Business). The applicant is requesting the entire property be zoned C -2 (Regional Retail). Attachment F contains some basic information concerning the C -2 zone. The City has zoned all the commercial areas along Interurban as C -2. CONCLUSIONS 1. If the Planning Commission agrees with the staff conclusions and recommen- dations on the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, the zoning request would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map as amended. 'ti'fa +s6.;;, STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission 2. The C -2 zoning designation would be consistent with the zoning designation for other commercial property in the area. Planning staff recommends approving the applicant's request for C -2 for the entire site. (22/87- 4- CPA.1,2) L RECOMMENDATION l 87 -4 -CPA: John C. Strander Page 6 APPLICANT'S PROPER ,. Tye' ti : i *• . i .' � :................... 6161 ATTACHMENT A TUK _A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL i i • .i • i i . ' • ' • • •• • • • _ 61.. *.....•.�.:::.... �°- •- !�!•_•_���.�..•„�•••••• iii• • • • • • HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • ■•- KING COUNTY / S R F"TSTING ZONING MAP \\\ 414, le■CITY LIMITS of .14144 • • S R Lc 71 EXISTING CITY LIMIT '-" -.1 • 4GUE 70 AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION :ID CAW 110 /o ' .5O 3 ed it. b if DC. TI.? 18 5 6 oc SFOC T.L. /O/ H. 0 9 )W Ac 1 • V 5 7 ( O kS 7 86 J f C u 0505 7-7d 1 ATTACHMENT C ( ZONING AND ANNEXATION AE MAP I D' ` / � \ 1 \�_�� �. O 0 0 p N Ik 9 t}:G ++wie+ivww:ti ur.: waswmntsnrr :vine.>~uAd,Victin ?nn+tttC�.?s4. wj. N:sN «Jwk.anG+fNn Y Utt+G I�XMWn - � GENERAL GOALS pp. 12 -13 teirmJ7,c <FSaiY,b:' ATTACHMENT D APPLICANTS WRITTEN SUBMITTAL ANSWERS TO QUESTION NO. 9 OF COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN.AMENDMENT APPLICATION OF JOHN C. STRANDER. The application is consistent with and supported by the following Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tukwila: Goal * 1. Promotes the public health, safety and welfare by locating commercial within and next to area of high traffic, noise, light glare; locates sane boundaries between commercial and residential use; coordinates uses in an area; and puts property in the most logical jurisdiction for safe, efficient provision of services. Also increases tax base without sacrificing levels of service. 2. Encourages regional goals and local aspirations by logical planning of city borders and services. 3. Encourages planned expansion of corporate borders. 4. Coordinates City's plans with those of other jurisdictions (King County). 5. Strikes a balance between economy and environment. 6. Helps to attain a balanced land use pattern in the area. 8. Strives to provide the most effective service levels and efficiency. • Page 2 THE ELEMENTS AND THEIR GOALS AND POL I CYS: s"1. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT Element Goals, p.15: *1. Gauges development of land suitable to natural environment in that land topography and location of property is more compatible to develop with the commercial properties to the East and North. *3. Future development in coordinated fashion would help to clean up area which is not very beautiful and would enhance aesthetic resources. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 24 - 30: Objective 1. Recognizes the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and promotes its retention. Policy 3. The vegetation is not proposed to be removed until such time as a specific development proposal is brought forth for the property. Objectives 3. Recognize the advantages and opportunities afforded by the topography and plan it's use accordingly. Policy 2. Preserves the view of hillside residents. There is already commercial zone on portion of the property. Zoning the remainder will not change the view factor, and may in fact enhance it. Objective 6. Recognizes the characteristics of local geology. Policy 1. Land is not proposed to be developed at this time. If and when development is proposed the building permit process assures that if there is a realistic question on slope stability (which the applicant does not think there is) an analysis of slope stability can be done to confirm stability. Objective 8. Recognize the environmental basemap of the Tukwila area which depicts the distribution and extent of natural amenities based on the previously mentioned objectives and use this map as a general planning guide. ' Page 3 uma.mynwp m.+rw +r Jea'- sa.+`e�.`n nrx.�rwrzun .>✓u .re.z. .+u y[:kSMVe;,1 y„':'Y, ^. - The property is not shown as one having special or sensitive development considerations on the comprehensive plan map. *2. THE OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Element Goals, p.16: The Goals of this element are not directly applicable to this proposal. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 31 - 41: The objectives and Policies of this element are not directly applicable to this proposal. *3 THE RESIDENCE ELEMENT Element Goals, p.17: *1. Preserves integrity and pleasantness of single family areas in that it unifies borders, removes residential from conflict with commercial and other uses and cleans up the area. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 43 -56: t45.'.11E'.lt.wr11 e.txrv.mn Objective 1. Protect viable residential neighborhood from intrusions by incompatible uses. Quite frankly some portions of the neighborhood which this property borders are not in very good shape. Buildings have been removed and old foundations lay bare. If sometime in the future the subject site is developed as commercial it will prevent intrusion of residential property next to commercial use along Interurban, and it will keep residential use away from the Park N' Ride and it's entrance road which alms directly at the property. The City has previously allowed the zoning change for the Par N' Ride. Also if the topography were graded to coincide with the commercial property directly to the East, it would enhance segregation of the upland area from the commercial corridor which exits along Interurban. ' Page 4 Policy I. The proposal may in the future enhance segregation by topography for separation of uses. Policy 2. Policy 2 prohibits spot zoning and this proposal definitely supports this policy as no spot zoning is involved Policy 6. If development actually occurs sometime in the future this proposal will have furthered the spirit of this policy of eliminating unkempt property because as 1 t stands now the property 1 s not very useable and the propoAAl would Ancourago goad coordlnatod dpVPloomAnt Af the Alto. Policy 7. This.policy would be supported in that the proposal would bring land that is located next to Tukwila into the City and under its regulatory jurisdiction. Objective 2. The Objective is not applicable. Objective 3. The project diminishes the environmental effects of man made systems that adversely effect the quality of living in that no residential use is going to want to be right directly at the end of the entrance road for the Park N' Ride, so the conflict will be eliminated. *4 THE COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ELEMENT Element Goals, p.18: *1. Assures healthy economy, growth, employment, strengthening and diversification of the economy by making area that is not very useable for commercial (although zoned) useable and viable property for good development. Puts land under City jurisdiction for efficient regulatory processes. *2. Assures healthy pace of growth consistent with City's ability to provide services. Area is small and the City is actually providing many services in effect now, and it will obtain tax revenues by this action. *3. Promotes diversity of land uses in a manner that makes sense. Page 5 Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 60 -68: Objective 1. This proposal encourages steady and planned growth of the business community. Policy 2. This proposal allows for the expansion of existing commercial area which expansion is compatible with surrounding land use and not detrimental to the public welfare. Policy 5 This proposal will facilitate the renovation of an area which is not ascetically very pleasing. Policy 8. The proposal encourages a diversity in the community of business uses. Objective 3. This proposal encourages the continued viability of the commercial and retailing activities in the City. Policy 2, This would locate a commercial property next to the Park N' Ride and functionally convenient to major trafficways. Policy 3. The benefits of retail activities are recognized and promoted by the proposal. *5. THE TRANSPORTATION /UTILITIES ELEMENT Element Goals, p.19: - The proposal is not directly related to the specific goals, but the the proposal is generally consistent with the goals of this element. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 60 - 68: - The proposal is not directly related to most of the specific Objectives and policies, but the the proposal is generally consistent with the Objectives and policies of this element. Objective 1, Policy 11. The proposal would encourage a use buffer between the residential areas to the South and West from the major arterial to the East and the Park N' Ride to the North. END .: ::1i F.4.."i::e1 :i;+.i,.., , i.f21 12.: 2i2 snr+» v'+. cn•22w..2»... +wsn:21•1142' Sections: 18.30.010 18.30.020 18.30.030 18.30.040 18.30.050 18.30.060 .M. %�ar� s.au .a'..r.rt �henY. mKJNVih .M+SYt:y::NR,At•l•�t- SHrtirJY. �:!N�4T'St�! �. :+:iv��!v }�w �i.�^ ATTACHMENT E C -2 (REGIONAL RETAIL CENTER) Chapter 18.30 C -2 DISTRICT -- REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS Purpose. Principally permitted uses. Accessory uses. Conditional uses. Height, yard and area regulations. Parking regulations. 18.30.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide areas for diversified commercial /retail activities which serve a broader, regional clientele. C -2 district uses generally attract traffic from a broader area than C -1 uses and are also generally larger in scale than those found in the C -1 district. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982). 18.30.020 Principally permitted uses. In the C -2 dis- trict, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than the following uses: ( 1) Any principally permitted use in the C -1 district; ( 2) Auto repair shops; ( 3) Automobile or travel trailer sales rooms and travel trailer or used car sales - lots. No dismantling of cars or travel trailers nor sale of used parts is allowed; 262 (Tukwila 8/82) 18.30.020 ( 4) Barbecue stands; ( 5) Cocktail lounges when in association with a restau- rant facility; ( 6) Billiard or pool rooms; ( 7) Bowling alleys; ( 8) Bus stations; ( 9) Business or commercial schools; (10) Cabinet shops or carpenter shops employing less than five people; (11) Car washes; (12) Commercial photography; (13) Confectionery manufacturing, in conjunction with retail sales, not to exceed twenty thousand square feet; (14) Convention facilities; (15) Data processing and record storage facilities; (16) Drive -in restaurants; (17) Feed stores (no grinding); (18) Funeral homes or undertaking establishments; (19) Furniture sales; (20) Garages (public); (21) Hotels; (22) Job printing, newspapers, lithographing and pub- lishing; (23) Commercial laundries; (24) Medical and dental laboratories; (25) Miniature golf courses; (26) Motels; (27) Nightclubs or taverns; (28) Package liquor stores; (29) Pet shops, if entirely within a building; (30) Planned shopping center (mall), provided the gross leaseable floor area is less than three hundred thousand square feet; (31) Skating rinks; (32) Telephone exchanges; (33)• Theaters, provided that adult motion picture theaters are prohibited within the area circumscribed by a circle which has a radius consisting of the following dis- tances from the following specified uses or zones: (A) In or within one thousand feet of any R -1, R -2, R -3, R -4, or RMH zone district, (B) One -half mile of any public or private school with curricula equivalent to elementary, junior, or senior high schools, (C) One thousand feet of any public park, (D) The distances specified in (A), (B), and (C) above shall be measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the property parcel upon which the proposed use is to be located, to the nearest point of the parcel of property or the land use district boundary line from which the proposed land use is to be separated; 263 (Tukwila 8/82) Sections: 18.34.010 18.34.020 18.34.030 18.34.040 18.34.050 18.34.060 .. c�!ra ..,- .e:..a.....,r..�•c:r, -,, .a. .. .,. ., %..e -: n.�au _r,. ....a 18.30.030 -- 18.34.020 (34) Tire and battery shops; (35) Upholstery and furniture repair; (36) Wholesale or retail sales offices or sample rooms, with less than fifty percentage storage or warehousing; (37) Other retail business activities of a regional character such as those enumerated above and not included in any other classification. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982). 18.30.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures custom- arily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as those stated in Section 18.28.030 for the C -1 district. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part) , 1982) . 18.30.040 Conditional uses. General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 require a conditional use per- mit from the city. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982). 18.30.050 Height, yard and area regulations. In the C -2 district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982). 18.30.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982) . Chapter 18.34 C -P DISTRICT -- PLANNED BUSINESS CENTER Purpose. Principally permitted uses. Accessory uses. Conditional uses. Height, yard and area requirements. Parking regulations. . 18.34.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide an area appropriate for a planned business center. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982). 18.34.020 Principally permitted uses. In the C -P dis- trict, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than any principally permitted use in the C -2 district, provided planned shopping center (mall) may exceed three hundred thousand square feet of gross leaseable floor area. (Ord. 1247 Sl(part), 1982). 264 (Tukwila 8/82) VESTED IN: EXCEPTIONS: y} Charge: Tax: +.uixrvruwR+:WD�+,iNrcMN',a; MVy4 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1800 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN CAMERON STRANDER, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE As on Schedule B attached hereto. SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said King County, to —wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) *200. 00 $15. 80 $215. 80 Records examined to December 17. 1987 at 8:00 A.M. ': CiriYTXi ..WM'.FAMfU�YnLV.' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ....r Frank. Kelly' Title Officer' 628 -5659 m1..mtw Yrkt n,�.,.,m"wT.l v Mfger M V Order Number 123255 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Order Number 123255 THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, INKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT CONSISTING OF AN IRON PIPE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FOSTER STREET AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE DUWAMISH — RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, AS SAID STREETS ARE LOCATED AND DEDICATED IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 49 DEGREES 11'08" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID FOSTER STREET, A DISTANCE OF 83 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, HEREAFTER CALLED POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 49 DEGREES 11'08" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 25.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 03'30" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 147.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 49'16" EAST 189.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40 DEGREES 36'00" EAST TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 49 DEGREES 24'00" EAST FROM SAID POINT "A "; THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 24'00" WEST TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 49 DEGREES 24'000" EAST 110.00 FEET FROM SAID POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 49 DEGREES 36'00 "WEST 70.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 24'00" WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID FOSTER STREET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 03'30" WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. `e.vC'idS',744 r.:1!?7^.Srny, IVaS EitkS, rxAP+v t: at✓.', R7! a. M 1t,a tAtrrrA :ar .:efssar. mniwerzwinc..rw aev:'[e�;. k:n:+ itemr, r5 an : /YX. h111SM:Cr7:1714fatV,.r: M"`I;IZZtal6tglie ;'_ I s I. 2 ;Y; . �. 2C3.4rM'fPm'k'fiY?.Ya�M?Fd Jr. Mer. • SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Order Number 123255 A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workman's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessment and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. I. (a) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (b) water rights, claims or title to water. J. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00) . PAGE �zFr ."'tt tY.r:UE'i�4. A41, te u.v.W. A llitx 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND RESERVED BY: PURPOSE: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AREA AFFECTED: NOTE 1: GENERAL TAXES: YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: 1147:143nr:u:tillth :. rnYJe1'le cX+e, e.aaausxetr SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B CONDITIONS THEREOF: HILLORY A. FOSTER, HIS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS RIGHT TO MAINTAIN AND OPERATE WATER PIPE NOW CROSSING SAID PREMISES WITH FULL RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SAID PROPERTY FOR SUCH PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE March 28, 1917 March 29, 1917 1124301 UNDISCLOSED PORTION OF SAID PREMISES 2. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS OCCUPIED BY A MARRIED PERSON AND SPOUSE AS A , HOMESTEAD, THE CONVEYANCE OR ENCUMBRANCE OF THE PROPERTY MUST BE EXECUTED BY BOTH HUSBAND AND WIFE, PURSUANT TO RCW 6.12, WHICH NOW PROVIDES FOR AN AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD ON SUCH PROPERTY. 1987 $ 351.63 $ 351.63 000300 - 0038 -03 4615 End of Schedule B ktsz , Votir3: Q MMON MAIMMIR? Y+F Order Number 123255 • 2I •I2 ••...w.,,_..,.w.rw.4•010.n..o- arvw�r_•. w ,r..s•Alwywuvn.anr401[Y t11 wwsv.:1rv•VIA .my alItM•c•74,a77t?:57VAIK• ti? �: :AMI''q. c1". Sntir!i ' ,t ' f�Z tt Chicago Title Insurance Company IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the lend indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. 4iort t4 S4 phe Fos rpon.0_4i0*, Claim to ikle. 14VV2 get.. 14 -TAT. 23 N, - R. 4E 1" 1 x= h' ORDER NO 12.6 9 18600 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 628•S666 N 3. APPLICANT :* Signature: 4. PROPERTY OWNER COM(REHENSIVE PLA AMENDMENT APPLICATION 0 6, A4 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Anemia ben wi4k pee. - 8ppe+avecl enc Comprehensive ?Ian mep G P e . 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Name: Name: Address: Phone: I /WE,Csignature(s)] swear that I/ property inv . statements an 28'3- zz3C -D Ter4iort t e,pl+ei& Tsiar Tbnefio# Claiwt 0' 39; Xnferscc‘,h af t S Quarter: O W Section: 14 Township: .?3 01, Range: 411. W (This information may be found on your tax statement.) '17661 C. 5francier Address: C/d Lamm. S+render , �.O. B01 8$348, 34.11061,8 P one: e?CI,2 -1 Date: Nov- /: /?87 * T S' applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall b� unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.1 �k (�, C or Cris, ;. CAA IMbi '► • 4+6 rated A 16.115- f0- 40E --S- T-4KIA1►-1 a. • �•s S��-/S `/ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4 3 ' e1►h C. S #r t N Aer are the C, ner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the v d in this application and that the foregoing answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: /VoVErvt /3 /987 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION (29 /MB.COMP) Proposed Existing Con'Parent & Proposed 7. USE: Existing Yaczht IOht a i k'a T11ti+eri 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Page 2 6. ZONING: Existing 8-C t R 4M• . 1400 Proposed The burden of proof in demonstrating that the change is appropriate lies solely upon the proponent. Generally, the more dramatic the change, the greater will be the burden of showing that the proposed change meets the criteria by the Zoning Ordinance. The proponent must show in a clear and precise manner why the amendment application should be granted. The Planning Commission and City Council will review your proposal using the following criteria. You may attach additional sheets and submit other documentation to support your request. A. Unforeseen changes in circumstances have occurred in community condi- tions that justify a Comprehensive Plan redesignation of the subject property or existing plan policies. (Examples are Functional road classifications or new or changed City policies /plans) RESPONSE: Me,I o 11414(W R,dt l fkAt' in 111404146 across Ka " crop% s;4t -Drive Mbar 6tih @ s. { e . sncrcvscd 4a.�a. ,nots, ylete . kerimeitit ?I A ai.ross from 601 Coarse . 0E0 &mite %crass ruler . Micree3ed C. w olt re,o3 ac} dh 41 SiTi "1.4as sde ve nrsti vow B. Factual evidence supports an additional or changed public need for the proposed designation. RESPONSE:76CM . 4 so demencl (or 5 f ZOM1y Ir'l ave4 of Sik . perk/4' Zile -601f Course , aperintoels anti of .es fh rret htvt. %reek( Ibicrertei cewnwierc aevnesd r sole. 9. To supplement the above criteria discussion, analyze the Tukwila Compre- hensive Plan policies which relate to your proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. Identify the policies and their page numbers. RESPONSE: See A ,ayer ANSWERS TO QUESTION NO. 9 OF COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN.AMENDMENT APPLICATION OF JOHN C. STRANDER. The application is consistent with and supported by the following Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tukwila: GENERAL GOALS pp. 12 -13 Goal # 1. Promotes the public health, safety and welfare by locating commercial within and next to area of high traffic, noise, light glare; locates sane boundaries between commercial and residential use; coordinates uses in an area; and puts property in the most logical jurisdiction for safe, efficient provision of services. Also increases tax base without sacrificing levels of service. 2. Encourages regional goals and local aspirations by logical planning of city borders and services. 3. Encourages planned expansion of corporate borders. 4. Coordinates City's plans with those of other jurisdictions (King County). 5. Strikes a balance between economy and environment. 6. Helps to attain a balanced land use pattern in the area. 8. Strives to provide the most effective service levels and efficiency. Page 2 % h xrs •:ra x,�.�, , ;�g`1u¢ ,,.; y,, Y.': -'� - ! icY : ii � ?'�:i }.'i�Ty a- p.��.. THE ELEMENTS AND THEIR GOALS AND POLICYS: *1. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT Element Goals, p.15: *1. Gauges development of land suitable to natural environment in that land topography and location of property is more compatible to develop with the commercial properties to the East and North. #3. Future development In coordinated fashion would help to clean up area which is not very beautiful and would enhance aesthetic resources. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 24 - 30: Objective 1. Recognizes the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and promotes its retention. Policy 3. The vegetation is not proposed to be removed until such time as a specific development proposal 1s brought forth for the property. Objectives 3. Recognize the advantages and opportunities afforded by the topography and plan it's use accordingly. Policy 2. Preserves the view of hillside residents. There is already commercial zone on portion of the property. Zoning the remainder will not change the view factor, and may in fact enhance it. Objective 6. Recognizes the characteristics of local geology. Policy 1. Land is not proposed to be developed at this time. If and when development is proposed the building permit process assures that if there is a realistic question on slope stability (which the applicant does not think there is) an analysis of slope stability can be done to confirm stability. Objective 8. Recognize the environmental basemap of the Tukwila area which depicts the distribution and extent of natural amenities based on the previously mentioned objectives and use this map as a general planning guide. Page 3 *2. THE OPEN SPACE ELEMENT #3 THE RESIDENCE ELEMENT Element Goals, p.17: Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 43 -56: - The property is not shown as one having special or sensitive development considerations on the comprehensive plan map. Element Goals, p.16: The Goals of this element are not directly applicable to this proposal. Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 31 -41: The objectives and Policies of this element are not directly applicable to this proposal. #1. Preserves integrity and pleasantness of single family areas in that it unifies borders, removes residential from conflict with commercial and other uses and cleans up the area. Objective 1. Protect viable residential neighborhood from intrusions by incompatible uses. Quite frankly some portions of the neighborhood which this property borders are not in very good shape. Buildings have been removed and old foundations lay bare. If sometime in the future the subject site is developed as commercial it will prevent intrusion of residential property next to commercial use along Interurban, and it will keep residential use away from the Park N' Ride and it's entrance road which aims directly at the property. The City has previously allowed the zoning change for the Par N' Ride. Also if the topography were graded to coincide with the commercial property directly to the East, it would enhance segregation of the upland area from the commercial corridor which exits along Interurban. Page 4 Policy 1. The proposal may in the future enhance segregation by topography for separation of uses. Policy 2. Policy 2 prohibits spot zoning and this proposal definitely supports this policy as no spot zoning is involved Policy 6. If development actually occurs sometime in the future this proposal will have furthered the spirit of this policy of eliminating unkempt property because as it stands now the property is not very useable and the prcpogAl would pnpauragp gAAd AAAr1inatpd dpVplApmpnt Af the site' Policy 7. This policy would be supported in that the proposal would bring land that is located next to Tukwila into the City and under it's regulatory jurisdiction. Objective 2. The Objective is not applicable. *4. THE COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ELEMENT Element Goals, p.18: • # 3. Promotes diversity of land uses in a manner that makes sense. Objective 3. The project diminishes the environmental effects of man made systems that adversely effect the quality of living in that no residential use is going to want to be right directly at the end of the entrance road for the Park N' Ride, so the conflict will be eliminated. *1. Assures healthy economy, growth, employment, strengthening and diversification of the economy by making area that is not very useable for commercial (although zoned) useable and viable property for good development. Puts land under City jurisdiction for efficient regulatory processes. #2. Assures healthy pace of growth consistent with City's ability to provide services. Area is small and the City is actually providing many services in effect now, and it will obtain tax revenues by this action. • r, '.'.f �'::i i ^.!e.1Nl1�i ::•i_ (f�`„� ]�.;;; ?.:ui'_'�� 1.4 �';'� 31i'': i %�'� lv�:ti Page 5 Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 60 -68: *5. THE TRANSPORTATION /UTILITIES ELEMENT Element Objectives and Policies, pp. 60 -68: - The proposal is not directly related to most of the specific Objectives and policies, but the the proposal is generally consistent with the Objectives and policies of this element. n� >::}��.'it. a \_)'?"IJ�Ii } � >f +')Y�.,•� Iv�:�i4 � . . Objective 1. This proposal encourages steady and planned growth of the business community. Policy 2. This proposal allows for the expansion of existing commercial area which expansion is compatible with surrounding land use and not detrimental to the public welfare. Policy 5 This proposal will facilitate the renovation of an area which is not ascetically very pleasing. Policy 8. The proposal encourages a diversity in the community of business uses. Objective 3. This proposal encourages the continued viability of the commercial and retailing activities in the City. Policy 2. This would locate a commercial property next to the Park N' Ride and functionally convenient to major trafficways. Policy 3. The benefits of retail activities are recognized and promoted by the proposal. Element Goals, p.19: - The proposal is not directly related to the specific goals, but the the proposal is generally consistent with the goals of this element. Objective 1, Policy H. The proposal would encourage a use buffer between the residential areas to the South and West from the major arterial to the East and the Park N' Ride to the North. END APPLICATION DATE FILE NUMBER I PROJECT NAME I ADDRESS I APPLICANT I CROSS F REFEILE RENCE ACTION 1/28/87 87 -1 -DR RADOVICH FILL O u-r LOT 1 (79 -7 -SS) NORTH TERMINUS - SOUTHCENER BLVD. JOHN C. RADOVICH EPIC - 353 -86 87 -2 -SMP v APPROVED 2/2/87 87 -2 -DR SEATTLE RENDERING WORKS 5795 S. 130TH PLACE SAME 87 -3 -SMP /EPIC -7 -87 87 -1 -UCU 4/15/87 , 87 -3 -DR ST. GEORGE PROPERTIES 14081 - 14083 - 58TH AVENUE S. SAME EPIC -9 -87 4/13/87 87 -4 -DR SEGALE 871 SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF SEGALE PARK DRIVE "B" AND "C" MARIO SEGALE EPIC -8 -87 87 -4 -SMP M'f OVEa w /c©nbrn o►ss 6/11/87 87 -5 -DR GENCOR 5700 BLOCK OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. AZARIA ROUSSO -. EPIC -11 -87 6/8/87 87 -6 -DR SOUTHCENTER GATEWAY S. 178TH STREET CENTRON CORPORATION EPIC - 316 -86 7/2/87 87 -7 -DR ATHLETIC FIELD FILL 13919 - 53RD AVENUE S. CITY OF TUKWILA PARKS & RECREATION DEP . EPIC -12 -87 7/10/87 87 -8 -DR GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 3 TUKWILA SHORT PLAT 85 -32 -SS PORTION OF LOT 4 10/15 -23 -4 KAISER GATEWAY ASSOC. EPIC - 258 -85 LPN I 87 -6 -SMP 7/13/87 87 -9 -DR U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD R.O.W. NORTH OF 405, S. OF 1 -5 MARK HEIDECKE EPIC -13 -87 U.S. SPRINT COMM. ! 87 -5 -SMP 10/6187 87 -10 -DR FOSTER GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOSTER GOLF COURSE CITY OF TUKWILA PARKS & RECREATION DEP I . EPIC -23 -87 11/2/87 87 -11 -DR RIVER BEND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH 180TH STREET AND SPERRY DRIVE EPIC -26 -87 LEE HANSEN 87 -7 -SMP 11/23/87 87 -12 -DR RENTON SAND & GRAVEL RAILROAD R.O.W., GRADY WAY, INTER - URBAN AND GREEN RIVER DOUG BUCK 81- .-LtCU 11/24/87 87 -13 -DR NORCO -13919 18201 OLYMPIC AVENUE S. MICHAEL STROM 73 -35 -SMP 12/18/87 87 -14 -DR STATE FARM INSURANCE ON SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, OPPOSITE FORT DENT PARK ENTRANCE 87 -9 -SMP CASTILLO CO. FPTf - 11 - R7 BAR APPROVEC DESIGN REVIEW 1987 IMF <614- Cik (?. 3o 53 AV 5 St% ALSO: h1F B7-5-4K 5TIZA1 DSR ANIMEXATIONI, COMP. FLAK xm.wcsme Rezome I ruKW/LA ORD. /212 c 1 4 3 7r2 ti 1 ieoso 0/55 • 6 5. 6"•P'' ' ati 1Z !,4 77i /LA eon 739E d.s ?' rS 304.7 at/ ' 81.2 104 . g� M 1 1 � t li 4. ° • o o 0 • *Or f 2 Ra . 4 7 on /O7 90 NOS -47.6 /67.0 ,'z•50' o /ot0 d 1o4 •o " y1fl l 5, P• A • s • ® ( • 0 18114111 INCH 1 / 3 . r%C A7 A /. / Q7 QZ '4Z EZI ZZ LE • I I l '''I'IIIIII�IIIIIII�'IIIIII ICI III'IIIII!!_ 4_I�I�III�I�I�I ICI I�I I I I 1�1�I111.l�lll�l�l�l��lf II�uIILJI_ �1��1�1�1�IIIIIIIIIIIiI�I�IIIII�IIII IIIIIIII'I'IIIIIIII�'III -- - .:. - 6 7.... 8 9 10 11 KVENWAMNH 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ' CLEAR THAN THIS .NOTICE, IT `IS-DUE TO` . • Tur-•ntIAll- ,TV•• - TUC!- notraruM - nnriiMFNT -- 6 8 L 1 MI, O.... N DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT I CROSS FILE REFERENCE ACTION 1/28/87 87 -1 -DR RADOVICH FILL O illr LOT 1 (79 -7 -SS) NORTH TERMINUS - SOUTHCENER BLVD. JOHN C. RADOVICH EPIC- 353 -86 87 -2 -SMP APPROVED 2/2/87 87 -2 -DR SEATTLE RENDERING WORKS 5795 S. 130TH PLACE SAME 87 -3 -SMP /EPIC -7 -87 87 -1 -UCU 4/15/87 87 -3 -DR ST. GEORGE PROPERTIES 14081 - 14083 - 58TH AVENUE S. SAME EPIC -9 -87 4/13/87 87 -4 -DR SEGALE 871 SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF SEGALE PARK DRIVE "B" AND "C" MARIO SEGALE • EPIC -8 -87 87 -4 -SMP AP4 Jer' WonBA - not45 6/11/87 87 -5 -DR GENCOR 5700 BLOCK OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. AZARIA ROUSSO EPIC -11 -87 6/R/87• 87 -6 -DR SOUTHCENTER GATEWAY S. 178TH STREET CENTRON CORPORATION EPIC- 316 -86 7/2/87 87 -7 -DR ATHLETIC FIELD FILL 13919 - 53RD AVENUE S. CITY OF TUKWILA PARKS & RECREATION DEP • - . EPIC -12 -87 7/10/87 87 -8 -DR GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 3 TUKWILA SHORT PLAT 85 -32 -SS PORTION OF LOT 4 10/15 -23 -4 KAISER GATEWAY ASSOC. LPN EPIC- 258 -85 87 -6 -SMP 7/13/87 87 -9 -DR U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD R.O.W. NORTH OF 405, S. OF 1 -5 MARK HEIDECKE U.S. SPRINT COMM. EPIC -13 -87 87 -5 -SMP 10/6/87 87 -10 -DR FOSTER GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOSTER GOLF COURSE CITY OF TUKWILA PARKS & RECREATION DEP'. EPIC -23 -87 11/2/87 87 -11 -DR RIVER BEND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH 180TH STREET AND SPERRY DRIVE EPIC -26 -87 LEE HANSEN 87 -7 -SMP 11/23/87 87 -12 -DR RENTON SAND & GRAVEL RAILROAD R.O.W., GRADY WAY, INTER - URBAN AND GREEN RIVER DOUG BUCK 8'I- . -L{Cit 11/24/87 87 -13 -DR NORCO -12W, 18201 OLYMPIC AVENUE S. MICHAEL STROM 73 -35 -SMP • 12/18/87 87 -14 -DR STATE FARM INSURANCE ON SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, OPPOSITE FORT DENT PARK ENTRANCE 87 -9 -SMP CASTILLO CO. EETr. -31-R7 BAR APPROVEE DESIGN REVIEW 1987