Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-09-DR - HEIDECKE MARK - US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN REVIEW87-09-dr uprr right-of-way 87-05-smp epic-13-87 us sprint communications Je *ILA w City of Tukwila • 19 09 (29 /NTC.SPRINT) PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 87 -9 -DR APPLICANT: US Sprint Communications REQUEST: Design review and approval for a buried fiber optic cable. LOCATION: Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on August 27, 1987, and approved it. The BAR adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated July 25, 1987. Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Coun- cil by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal. Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner DATE: 3: L j / 1 *l11 /�/'(i L/ Planning Commission August 27,..1987 Page 5 5. Provide several benches or picnic tables in landscape area adjacent to river. A VOTE WAS TAKEN WITH UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. 87- 9 -DR :. U. S:: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY - Design review and approval of a buried fiber optic cable. Moira Bradshaw reviewed the staff report, entering it into the record as Exhibit I and indicating staff's recommendation of approval subject to coordination with METRO on location of utility lines. Mr. Mark Heidecke, 8181 Nebus Avenue, Beaverton, OR. spoke in behalf of the applicant. Discussion ensued on the application. MR. COPLEN MOVED AND MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE 87 -9 -DR: U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY SUBJECT TO THE COORDINATION WITH METRO ON LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES. UNANI- MOUSLY APPROVED. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 12 :06 AM. Respectfully submitted, Joanne Johnson Secretary ACREAGE: N/A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DISTRICT: M -1 Light Industrial ATTACHMENTS: (A) Site Plan (A) (B) Site Plan (B) STAFF REPORT to the Board of Architectural Review Prepared July 25, 1987 SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS - August 12, 1987 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 HEARING DATE: August 27, 1987 :FILE NUMBER: t 87-94R APPLICANT: US Sprint Communications Company REQUEST: Design review and approval of a buried fiber optic cable LOCATION: Within the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way, Duwamish/ Green River shoreline environment in SE * of Section 14 and SW } NW * of Section 24, Twn 23, Range 4 STAFF REPORT 87 -9 -DR: US Sprint Communications to the B.A.R. Page 2 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description: Project construction will utilize plowing, trenching, boring, and bridge attachment. A crawler will be used for direct burial of a i -inch diameter fiber optic cable encased within a li -inch diameter plowable conduit. A backhoe or trencher will excavate a 1 -foot wide trench for placement of the cable or encasement of the cable in either a 2 -inch diameter PVC conduit or a 2 -inch diameter PVC conduit encased in 3i bag pea gravel mix or both. The boring process for fiber optic cable placement involves boring machine installation of a 4 -inch diameter black iron pipe to contain a PVC conduit which encases the i -inch fiber optic cable. The shoreline management area crossings involved within the subject permits will be made by encasing the I -inch fiber optic cable inside a 4 -inch diameter galvanized iron pipe and attaching to existing bridges. 2. Existing Development: Railroad tracks and railroad bridge. 3. Surrounding Land Use: Green River, Fort Dent Park and industrial companies. 4. Terrain: Flat with a steep (45 %) or gradual (5 %) slope to the river. 5. Vegetation: Railroad right-of-way is generally overlain with rock. 6. Soils: Alluvial soil. BACKGROUND The portion of cable within Tukwila is a portion of an overall network extending from Seattle, Washington to Eugene, Oregon, and then throughout the United States. DECISION CRITERIA The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact. 1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site No structure is proposed, however, Metro has inquired as to the location of the cable and its relationship to Metro utilities in the area. 2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area No structure is proposed and buried cable will create no change in contours. STAFF REPORT 87 -9 -DR: US Sprint Communications to the B.A.R. Page 3 3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment No replanting is proposed within the one -foot wide trench. Areas where trenching will occur are vegetated with mostly grasses and blackberry. Revegetation is expected to occur naturally. 4. TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design No building is proposed. 5. TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture Not applicable. Interurban Special Review District Guidelines: 6. TMC 18.60.060(4)(A) - The location of the cable, 17 feet from the centerline of the Union Pacific track, does not contain any significant vegetation. 7. TMC 18.60.060(4)(B) - Because the cable will be buried with no change in existing contours, recreational areas will not be affected. 8. TMC 18.60.060(4)(C) - No pedestrian circulation occurs on site. 9. TMC 18.60.060(4)(D) - Undergrounding of a communications line in a transpor- tation right -of -way is a complementary sharing of the use district. 10. TMC 18.60.060(4)(E) - A Declaration of nonsignificance has been issued for the project in the City. 11. TMC 18.60.060(4)(F) - Cultural resource specialist performed an assessment of the Washington State alignment. Results indicate that the cable follows a railroad right -of -way where previous disturbance has resulted in a very low probability of intact cultural deposits. No significant cultural sites were considered close enough to the cable route for any mitigation measures including archaeological monitoring during cable installation. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal does not appear to have much applicable to the BAR's design criteria. 2. The proposal would not conflict with the guidelines of the Interurban Spe- cial Review District. STAFF REPORT to the. B.A.R. (22/87 -9 -DR) RECOMMENDATIONS 87 -9 -DR: US Sprint Communications Page 4 Based on the above Findings and Conclusions, Planning staff recommends approval of the project subject to coordination with Metro on location of utility lines. err wi taint SITE PLAN x.Le 1.1co' 1•11cA (J/L/ NUlf{ AS ear N Ii. s' 01► 57/tl- /I1C pYMtMD7r g- 13 24 • �N'S•ft� w. r Nov T/.!Y4 feet TYPICAL TRS.YCN CA3_: O% rwv r.. r �i n�i �n�ir , )11r-11ri C ( ;!)! - • 0 2:1111 aliadry 11. Kyr ray mil. OS WOW IP 1111; tw.11.e�1 asNV.s LIano owl sY. V! Ulcl N IT' MaP � UWAM D I/ . M (1).t. ap*N-r MLR PORT " 1 i./MMwRf —no. .M nOM OP• bomb mum amt. CA/L/ /Metes AM ARIA D /e.{MA1Tte AS A M �VR$AM •MVIROIMWT f nt w Sr N/sVAMT TO TOO � KML WVNTV ee.esLM5 IM.MKSMIMT f/N�A 198 7 a /OV A MAY Z 1 77t. LAM. Wt Is MAMVMtTURIML MNN• AM. V V / j OVARI.� I ST\.N., Ars MAR[e0VKU1A. .4r US Sprint_ FFD(03 D Fleas GPrIG (481-E 1.GZA1IO4 aced OUW411454 RIVER 5INELAND .L.M LAN: EIG �D 4x.r( , /r" 1 •r L 23 SITE PLAN 14s1 ISm tt PACti 01.1.f ii . will .0. 4IuT MG N TYPICAL T RS.YCN CAS..! ONLY /44 f• lw.w M ! wM 4 l77 1r. /errs A. 3•••■ AN, I.••• 1's,I C...r.r. OA.PIP $1'Ow limo Leo. rrr /CAL S.vCASSW_NT CZ. POR A:L :r.:S Trr:C L 7.TSN0f DETAIL SPLIT DUCT !NCASS7 saw •• S17eM e1M w.ww Mr •11/11 VICINITY t1 P Iti CRffM RI (VAS. SPOw4T MILE POT - 12.0) tuMMAVW TMf NITAWTM OVA SWIM* VIefS OR C CANIf Shim/ AM Noy. Ni1GMAIUD A3AeIMSIIM low IRSIM(air 4M411fiM1S Puesu*M• TO TM " e.14 GNMT• 1II ..Lads MM1Nf11SMT ms/o% MMJ4RAM;Al1oUeG 144 / ITN. 1.403 wig K MSUIW{IM4 AM) *ROAM VACAAT MV4TeI1L/CM$•KIA‘ MNIV►ACTV•AIG AM4 raw*tr TefATMsiT. LAO ONO AM..... IMO aft P � l Err rr MI If Xf.14 L19,1. f.4V. VAM., VJMC own' A WI- ..4.M M11N 4- US Sprint_ woo fo 1 D City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on August 27, 1987, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Case Number: 87 -2 -CPA: Central Business District Sidewalk Policies Applicant: Tukwila Public Works Department Request: Add policies on the design and provision of sidewalks in the CBD to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70 (Non- Conforming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning Code) and TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction) Location: All City areas bounded by and including Southcenter Boulevard on the north, I -5 on the west, and the City limits on the east and south. 1. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 2. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 3. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: 4. Case Number: Applicant: Request: Location: City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Planning Commission Public Hearing Board of Architectural Review Public Hearings 87 -5 -DR: Gencor Azaria Rousso - Architect Design review of apartment complex which will have five buildings containing 57 apartment units 5700 block of Southcenter Boulevard, generally located above Denny's Restaurant 87 -6 -DR: Southcenter Gateway Centron Corporation Design review of an 84,000 s.f. office building Generally northeast of where 178th Street crosses I -5, NW }, Sec 35, Twn 23, Rge 4. 87 -8 -DR: Kaiser Gateway Corporate Center, Phase III Kaiser Gateway Associates Design review of Buildings 7, 8, 9 and 10, totaling 204,352 s.f. of office and research and development space. 12700 - 12788 Gateway Drive 87 -9 -DR: US Sprint Communications US Sprint / Mark Heidecke Design review and approval for a buried fiber optic cable. Along Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way within 200' of the Green River, SE * of Sec 14 and SW * of Sec 14, Twn 23, Rge 4 Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - August 16, 1987 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File (21/NTC.8 -27) • • FROM U.S. SPRINT 8. J, MILAUGHLIN A89ISTANT VICE PRESIDENT- ENGINEERING C. Cl. YUNO CNIEF ENOINEER•PLANNING J. W. HEAVIN GENERAL PLANNING 8 PRODUCTION ENGINEER C vNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COtvIrANY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7. 1.1987 14:53 P. 3 G. F, HITS ROOM tbbb J. A. MAN GENERAL BUDGETS ADMINISTRATION 1416 DODGE STREET GENERAL STRUCTURES ENGINEER ENGINEER OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179 0. l.. BANOHART (402) 271.6000 --' ""� SENIOR DIRECION- PROJECT MANAGEMENT L �� f[ ( 1 �� j I� 1' �il R BV @TEM May 5, �(1 ! � Fg k j I}} I . Ma 6 198? t, ,' �,1 �.. �:,. - JUL ° 8 1987 Right of Way - Fiber Op is ` :Mr. John L. Stoddart t "f'r' r � til�tt� ' 4 , :�'. i US Sprint Communications Co. Pt �" ` - • o "r D` 9300 Dletcalf Overland Park, I{anaas 68212 Dear Mr. Stoddart: Please reference your project No. 405 -102 submitting construction draw- ings for my approval covering installation of a fiber optic cable on Railroad right of way from Seattle to near Tacoma, Washington. The revised drawings are approved; however, you may not begin work on the segment of the project from Spokane Street to Royal Brougham St. in Seattle until the 'agreement with Burlington Northern , (C.D. 66039) has been fully executed. Since you have requested* to place your cable on the timber pile bridge No. 174.40, I would like to advise this bridge could be replaced at any time or it could be destroyed FY fire. Therefore, Union Pacific accepts no responsibility for this bridge attachment; extra cable should be provided at each end of the bridge; and all cost to relocate the cable in the event this bridge is replaced will be at US Sprint expense. The attachment plans for bridge No. 165.95 are approved; however, in the event this bridge is raised the attachments will have to be the type that will not impede Railroad personnel from performing this operation. In addition, the fiber optic cable will have to be located 60 inches below or around the end of all culverts unless otherwise approved by the Railroad, and go behind (field side) of all Railroad signal facilities. In order to plot the final location of the fiber optic cable on Railroad maps, the location of the cable will have to be referenced to Railroad facilities such as bridges, culverts, and switches, using Railroad 1ungineering station- ing. This data will have to be shown on the "as built" drawings to be fur- nished to the Railroad upon completion of the project. Upon completion of the execution of the Construction Agreement and proper notification received by our Regional Office, you may begin on the remaining portion of work for this project south of Spokane Street. Attached for your use are two copies of the approved construction drawings. ' YottVe truly, ✓/ /` r (*Y o rk . C • AlcLAUGHLINN C. 0, BARTON CIIICF ENGI►►EER C. 1. JENSEN GENERAL TRACK ENGINEER P. M. ABARAY GENERAL SIGNAL ENGINEER G. W. McDQt4ALP GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ENO BEEP FROM U.S. SPRINT (Seattle- Sumner) 7. 1.1987 12 '2 ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT dated as of May 21, 1985, (hereinafter the Fiber Optic Agreement), by and between US SFEkINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, a New York General Partnership (US Sprint), and UNION .PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah corporation (Railroad), covering the construction, operation and maintenance by US SPRINT of a fiber System on the System Segments specified in Exhibit A attached to the Fiber Optic Agreement. The Fiber Optic Agreement is identified in the records of the Railroad as C.D. No. 54772 -5. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties as follower C.D. 54772 -5 -1i • F. 1 Section 1. ADDITIONAL SYSTEM SEGMENTS. ' Effective as of the date hereof, the Addendum to Exhibit A hereto attached iha11 be, and hereby is, added to and included under the terms and operation of Fiber Optic Agreement as part of Exhibit A thereto. t ection 2. . PA T. .Section 3. LESSOR LINE INCLUDED. The Oregon - Washington Railroad & Navigation Company (OWR &N), an Oregon borporation, subsidiary of Railroad, has leased the system Segment identified in the Addendum to Exhibit A to Railroad; and,' for and in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, OWR &N hereby adopts the terms, provisions and conditions of the Fiber Optic Agreement by and between US SPRINT and Railroad and US SPRINT hereby agrees to be bound to the Fiber Optic Agreement the same as if originally included in the term "Railroad," as to the foregoing OWR &N System Segment only. Section 4. • AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL. This agreement is supplemental to the Fiber Optic Agreement and nothing herein contained shall be construed as amending or modifying the same except as herein specifically provided. 4 ig; , th:assa$ s lw. m. t4n^ a- .4tssgAtai «iru'�"trw`."t �:�.3i�'.•`: �wkc. �1';� FROM .U.S. SPRINT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AVreement to be executed in duplicate as of the 5th day of May, 1987 Attest: (Seal) Attest: Ass stant Secretary Vice Pres dent • Y y ��`�'�'�:F!�1„`1` ��}:'�°.i,:`J+t'r�';�'r r k'�;'_,� � lsi::.�'.�Y. *����,, 4 L. 6 M,:r.If,.�•Iu ,�.aali3 7. 1.1987 14252 P. 2 US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OREGON - WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY AeeLstant secretary Executive Vice Pres dent - Operation (seal) . f .. ,, :-�; 4 rr, a:�rt; y; ;t.n�` �{ t' �? t;< ��% ��4 • ?tsi }%�T�.�:'rx!�,$yft"a�'?,3 �,s;� - i w,. ; }�2 � ,-M S 4 . ,'' � ? . .'1. . kr�7 :L.,.:1.�:L , V vh, o--•..,:s... Ott a� •t :r. � r � s "P"" .,X�t� f •�.. �r w �;. «,..mac ..�, �.: +,a.,.. >a..��..s,s�l, �rt � �. r:�iYlv nG { {N.��`r'1k�r��.�:..n,u; tad -ti+ 4�`i.,T)r..i..r...s.K t �+... INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Dear John: 437p Enclosure Mr. John L. Stoddart Network Planner Network Route Development US Sprint Communications Company 9300 Metcalf Overland Park, KS 66212 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY bcc.� La.er-y Sc.1■neiclrti; llee- I►R ►fit WE 95''"Sr *372 vAiscouver� W A qsc8a May 18, 1987 905.01 Please phone if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, 1416 DODGE STREET OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179 RECEIVED r;. .1•., 1 . R.O.W. & PROPERTY SUBJECT: Fiber Optic Agreement Enclosed for retention is US Sprint's counterpart of an agreement (C.D. 56039) for the use of 1.14 miles of right -of -way between Spokane and Massachusetts Streets in Seattle, WA. This agreement has been executed by both Burlington Northern and Un n Pacific. Following required notice to the General Manager pursuant to this agreement, construction work between Spokane and Royal Brougham Streets in Seattle may begin. J. 'E FARRELL Director - Special Projects (402) 271 -4023 {�1 ;�} aril •. DESI61 REVIEW APPL1 emaW 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Installation of a buried fiber optic- cable within the Union Pacific Railroad Company right -of -way. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) DuwamishRiver Shorelands in SESE& of Sec. 14 and SW4NW,: of Sr. P 24, T23N -R4E WM Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) 3. APPLICANT :* ' U S Sprint Communications Cmpany (Mark R. HPidPrka) Address: PO Box '25247, Portland. OR ' 92252 7 f .c Signature: Phone: (503) 626 -6656 e e I * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY -Name: Union Pacific Railroad Company OWNER Address: Po Box 2500 Broomfield._ Cl) _Bno2o Phone: (402) 271 -334 I/W ,Csignature(s)a ./v tI���` s�...�'t G•�■+� _. swear that we are the tha property involved in this application and that the foregoing of statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: Date: 7/14/R7 W1g(M.1 1 JUL 10 19871 _ E� i� ( C -i °1F,V iLA WITT. _ �I 7/14/87 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right -of -way with no significant impacts to A, B or C. 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing raiilroad right -of -way with no change in contours to the existing grades and w i t h nn to the ...a r Nattti nS on pC IICDtt �an5. nJl+:...3.1,44i 1i:. r«.`.1� :itiV.�r..il'yGt !. • dv4 ego, t, t•ray.... ......rw......... >.r•w�rrw....M 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right -of -way with no change in contours to the existing grade and no constructi -on of any structuros, 8. BUILDING DESIGN RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per- manent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE `DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: NOT APPLICABLE INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear- ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right-of -way. It will not have any significant impact to the natural 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right- of way with no impact on recreation areas or facilities. 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right -of -way with no impact to parlastrian circulation surrounding rommprcial /industrial IISPS_ DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 6 13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad right -of -way fully compatible with the railroad's use and the 14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. This is a buried fiber optic cable within an existing railroad (29 /DSGN.APP1 -3) right -of -way. There will be no change in existing grades and no excavation within the aquatic environment of the Duwamish River. No significant impact to the environment. 15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. This buried fiber optic cable will have no impact on signicant historical features in the area. rn F ?;1 Oftztz RA.VJ, N OF 405, 5 5 SEE Atbo: vyw $1- 5-SrriP E %C US. E99i k!pT1oS t.. W.BW. D I c re OF rut viLA PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT: yos - -ioz. II�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�IIII�III�II _4�III�III�I III I�III�I I I I ie TN 1 '� 3 _ I .. .. IIF THISMICROFILMED:DOCUMENT..IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS :NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO O6 6Z 8L • LZ ez sz 4 7Z 7 7 �z .. THE' DUAL ITY OF `THE ORIGINAL °DOCUMENT t t DATE: 6" - /-6 7 SURVEY SECTION:jr. A,'Ls 7Z , - *eicre"- .s PAGE: MILEPOST: // = TO MILEPOST: SURVEY PARTY :,/ //, r 1 / /s.� .I.4LI141114111I1114 IIJI04IJ411111111I III IIII'IINlllNIII IIIII'IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 6 _ . . _ 7 ._.. S 9 10 • 11 wzfoneuum 12 • 1.- 0 , ... TR C•I Anw >u. •:rot 16'O71 4" or C• S..., Csr.ny For R... .9. l • i• . t War 111173 •• Markar ` / Aa 0A• } • ; - ( - 4 �� Cab /c I '. TY n/Cri 1. T.°. YCH CAr.L HANDHCt! 6rc •F Huth +Pa:> I "IO,.n6uFCN u n r U Of LL r= A i `ram fu _.J_# i/pl.Y%Y%NA • Alan!, 3 -2 PVC OOcts F• G Collin, And I- At e r•2• PVC Ou:/) fir 4. Caring. /.V5. 7 8./A Undo Or Ca, I 9) ALL � pP4pr7.� P T THE L pa*rfy IL 'R1E 5URRLUN(A14 -1 5171L. 2, RIGIrf IF WNI/ WILL 6E RFSTDREP To Ki EXI. - nN41 LO GITION. !Allentown .. S; Ig �N k L4-4 ti RIVERCU.'S. SPRINT r•11L_E PosT -11.8 LEGEND DRAFTER p. LILFi5 CARD BY M. \1 C.DA.L4C YEAR RELEASE NUMBER REVISIONS ISSUE' DESCRIPTION DRAFTINO/APPD I ENOR /AMD RELEASE NUMBER /ICI IY, 1L� T 1R ?GL?7' ,vMMAF•( THE INSTALLATION ()FA T;URlEb FIBER OPTIC. CABLE ENTERS AN AREA PE".,ICNI"Te.b Rs AN "URBAN ENVIRONMENT bHOTiELtNE' PURSUANT 'r0 THE ° KING CaVNTY ILHORELIr- ;M \NA4EME NT PROGRAM APPROVED MAY Z 1118, LA ND USE Is r4ANVPACTURINC•I / MINING AND V VACANT IN1;'J ETAI. -, ANJ 'WARE YOUSIN ., DATE - 7-I - 87 DATE 1.1. • 81 DATE PROV!!D, BY DATE 1-2-A7 APPROVED BY 1 DATE SYMBOL' DESCRIPTION i ISSUE I SCA E P ��[ INEI E [Jut. -8 199) C ITY OF TUKNVILA PLANNING DEPT. + US Sprint, AOFSED FI GPrIG C413LE LOCATION Ac PUW4M15N4 i yIR NDREL4J GIT`1 of T'UKWILA 5EG.14 ? Z3N. ( KIIYA COUNTY{ WA. SHEET $ OF Z. I DWO NO. I D !, \ 71.t r! &N L A LE 1 11 Pi (� ARE DJ 1'L6>GE 4' Dlb- 51 MIS gJUSEMENT 1 111 111 !' ll 111111WI1M 11 I IJ11111111111 ►11111 111!11 211111ifilD1101111_1 11 0 '•r "•. "r" 1 2 3 .47 ...... , S . 6 7_ . \. B 9 • 10 11 ".n.u."" 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • Be AZ 9Z RD az CZ) 'AD IZ ? . THE IUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUM a B L B s a C A I "n 0 IIIIIIIIIIII 1111 II 1 11 u l i i 1611 . �i i I i I I rI I I I -rrrl r� I I qd I�mdmllmduuIuolmlimduuinlduuhl t11g1_. CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO III'III'III'III'III'III 'III 'III 'III 'III 'III 'III 'III II 11111111 II I VII II I 'III III 'III 'III 'III III I �lCa�a3' 7' SIT 144.6: I B= IGb' PL—Q 0 TRE1 GABLE IN DWI �2 7RENc1{ & EIy Z"611.41 PVC PvcT Fog GABLE. r\ TYPICAL T.°,E CH CA'L 1 ONLY .7cc>s Snot! Dt Cnca5.d In 3!/2 Sack/Cu.) : Pea Gave/ Mi.' W.•!/, A N.ininu+n 3•• OP Concrete On To e 3" On Cich Sidt. L 7 r. :.VCAS_ M NT tE A POR ALL Warning Marker Ribbon 2 "Split PYY Duct /2 Oro/ T Y, °,'CAL T.4ENCr DETAIL , L/T CLI ' =:VCAS.D NN ina h. INgt lf� tai WNW VP 4 AND GOMPA L The TO e pF W)/ cf 51 51211.• SYMBOL! DESCRIPTION • ,t ! B• , •.n1 1 Z:• EXI57 w L oUD TWN 05 t•FSR,g60 To rr# Br. I:•• I Alt Y al■•u• RIY•r . 1! ,! ! � OT1111t LEGEND ISSUE' DESCRIPTION DRAFTING /APPD J ENOR /APPD RELEASE NUMBER VIGI�ITY NAP %ALE: II'n ?2X GR .SE;N RIVER (U,S, SPRINT MILE POST— IZ,O) VNIM A Fi•( THE INSTALLATION CPA BJRIE.D Fre lz OPTIC CABLE, ENTERS AN AREA DESIGNATED ACAN' ENVf�'ONME +•i7' SNORELINZ' P0I:CVA1 • • THE KING C.OJNT4 L NOR MANAGEMENT MASTER PROGRAM," APPr MAY Z, I`178, LAND USE IS WACcHGULING AND S•ORA4E, V/ICANT INDJs'r2 /COMMISRL=1AL, MAVUFACTVRING,, A SEWAGE 7 DRAFTER D. LILES CHAD BY M. Vle,v Ue.,c t ENGR APPROy9 BY R FoSL APPROVED BY O DATE I DATE 1.7 •8 DATE DATE 1 -2 -A7 DATE ISSUE I SCA E /16 Holm RELEASE NUMBER I! 4e44,-itatem iit , l r �dtl �w ■N 1 trg 7 +"_-.440.41W4igii 'PROJECT _ LOCATION (�` AI Co• I II1 �[! REVISIONS 25 • 2, ' ti 19, US Sprint.. r oFo ABER OPTIC GABLE LOCATION ACizach GREEN RIVER 54-19REI..A•0' erri sec .24 T•231-1. R.4E. W.M. KIILi GovIrTY, W•• SHEET 2 OF 2 I DWG NO. ID .YT iF r s �a y .! n z� ., sx , �1.'4 ,-, r:t.. .:. r ?. .'�6. i �7r " U /�S Y ..N+ 4:. .'�.G�, .> IIIIl111111111111111l11111j11111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I j 1 141 1 1_Illul1lllullllyu1,llul111111 1! 11I11111UI1111111I111111111111111 1'11111111111111111111111111111 11111 0 •••■•■•µ 1 2 3 .4. .. 5 6 7 ._ 1,._. 8 9 10 11 .•••••••.•• 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMEN IS LESS - 1 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO o Bz Be LC sz sz ND Cz 0z I Iz •THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGI DOCUMENT I e B 1. 95 e CZ I •• J1U1�1J� 11111 1111 1 II I III I II I lid IIII . I . ,ii [Ifll I� 1 111 II I I IIII um IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�iiiiliIIIIIIIIIIIII illlllRi VIII II II Holm I ill 11I�IIduulll I IIII IIIIIIIn1IlndIIIIIIIIdullllllllllu Illdllulllul11111 ,. p i�:.t�I''.d'i ?'�'c•r:a)1 rzt ....n ...,...»...:�5.,' , ..