HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-12-DR - RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL - DESIGN REVIEW87-12-DR
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY GRADY WAY INTERURBAN AVENUE
GREEN RIVER
RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL
. I,� � .,. , <,1 ,._ . �7 ...• �r'rl:',.::A!';.- ,: . v.i.,r..,...:`:.�„`a :7:.. n _ ... ,... u u . "�•... > ...
Planning Commission
December 17, 1987
Page 2
Discussion ensued on the request.
Discussion ensued on the request.
{ i
87 -5 -CA: RADOVICH - ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT - Expand building
height exception for the area generally located N.E. of I -405 and
West Valley Highway. Height limit would increase from 35 feet to
115 feet.
Jack Pace, Senior Planner reviewed the staff report recommending
approval for the request.
John Radovich, 2000 - 124th N.E., Bellevue described the favor-
able impacts this request would have to his property.
MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO
THE CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATION OF THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO EXTEND UP
TO AND INCLUDING 115 FEET FOR THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF FORT DENT
PARK, EAST OF INTERURBAN AVENUE, WEST OF THE CORPORATE LIMIT AND
NORTH OF I -405, BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
THE MOTION PASSED WITH HAGGERTON, KNUDSON, HAMILTON, KIRSOP, COP -
LEN VOTING YES AND MR. LARSON VOTING NO.
87 -4 -R - SHIMATSU /MIKAMI REZONE - Rezone 66,685 square feet from
R -1 -7.2 - Single Family Residential to C -2 - Regional Retail.
Mr. Umetsu reviewed the staff report noting a change on page 3
which should read, "Specific property is not consistent with
surrounding development and zoning ..." The staff report
recommended approval of the request.
MR. COPLEN MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE
REZONE 87 -4 -R, BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
MR. LARSON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO HAVE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR C -2 AND C -M
ZONES, AS WELL AS ELECTION OF OFFICERS ON JANUARY 18, 1988 DUE TO
THE LENGTHY AGENDA ANTICIPATED FOR JANUARY. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED.
87 - - UCU &. 87- 12 -DR RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL - Design Review
approval and Unclassified Use Permit request for topsoil mixing
and storage operation with accessory structures.
,....� Tl: ):: :.
Discussion ensued.
Planning Commission
December 17, 1987
Page 3
Mr. Pace reviewed the staff report, recommending approval of the
request with six conditions. A letter from Elva Miller Ross
objecting to the proposal was read into the record. A photograph
was distributed for review by the Planning Commission.
Douglas Buck, 8805 S. 121st, Seattle, owner of Renton Sand and
Gravel, clarified the proposal.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. COPLEN SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVED
87 -2 -UCU AND 87- 12 -DR, BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLU-
SIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The pile height be maintained at its existing height because
the firm was recently annexed into Tukwila from Renton.
2. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the
entire use.
3. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to five feet in
height at a minimum 20 feet on center.
4. A fence screening the operation on the west side of the use,
north of vacated Monster Road is required.
5. The fertilizer pile must be covered at times it is not being
used.
6. Any accessory structures shall be painted in accordance to
code.
THE MOTION PASSED WITH COPLEN, KNUDSON, LARSON AND KIRSOP VOTING
YES AND HAMILTON AND HAGGERTON VOTING NO.
87- 11 -DR: RIVERBEND Design review of a three -story 13,647
square foot office building.
Mr. Umetsu reviewed the revised staff report recommending
approval of the request with three conditions.
Lee Hanson, 1006 Fryar Avenue, Sumner WA 98390, architect for
the proposal supported the staff's comments except he disagreed
with the colors proposed by staff.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVED
THE DESIGN REVIEW REQUEST FOR 87 -11 -DR BASED ON THE STAFF'S
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
.;i t•:.t;.`.!:. ,.:;fC'*':":,'.Ci�L :i'f1�v "'�:�.. �:;5r r,.."', °�;�wi.
DESIGN REVIEW
HEARING DATE:
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
CitV of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
STAFF REPORT
to the Planning Commission
and Board of Architectural Review
Prepared December 7, 1987
December 17, 1987
87- 2 -UCU, 87 -12 -DR
Renton Sand and Gravel Company
Unclassified Use Permit to allow mixing screening, and stor-
age of topsoil; and design review of the permit.
1602 Monster Road S.W. (vacated), with area bounded by Grady Way,
Interurban Avenue, Green River, and railroad right -of -way
4.3 acres
Light Industrial
M -1, Light Industrial
DNS issued November 20, 1987
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Drainage Plan
Shoreline Profile
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND
DECISION CRITERIA
87- 2- UCU /87- 12 - Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 2
FINDINGS
c .•5 e., u.. .a c..n.4<•e r,�t °t.:i_...i... .r. ..... $.Cti ,.t..._
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
1. Project Description: Import, mix, screen, and store topsoil material (soil,
fertilizer, shavings, sawdust).
2. Surrounding Land Use: Dairy, single - family rentals, nursery, pasture, rail-
road main line, interstate freeway, auto repair.
3. Terrain: Flat.
4. Vegetation: Pasture grass.
5. Soils: Clay, sand, and demolition fill.
6. Access: Vacated Monster Road (Nelson Place) via Grady Way.
7. Utilities: Puget Power, City of Renton Water, no sanitary or storm sewers
exist on the site.
Mr. Buck, president of Renton Sand and Gravel, is currently operating a topsoil
mixing business on the site. Formerly the site was used for pasture and dairy
farming. The Zoning Code (TMC 18.66.020.14) requires topsoil mixing to be
approved as an "unclassified use ". Because the site is next to the Green River,
a shoreline permit is also required for which TMC 18.60.030(2)(A) requires
design review by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The unclassified use
permit and BAR review are consolidated in this report.
The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria for an Unclassified Use
Permit are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact.
1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in the area.
The subject site is part of several large lots, of approximately 12
acres. This site is accessed via vacated Monster Road (Nelson Place),
which intersects with Grady Way. The Green River, high voltage power
lines, railroad, and elevated Grady Way border the property. A single
family residence is located to the southwest of the use and dairy and
farm buildings lie along the west part of the site. The use is to the
rear of the site at the end of vacated right -of -way. The subject site
and the adjacent structures are owned by several members of one family.
The dirt, fertilizer, and sawdust are arranged in 10 -foot to 40 -foot
high piles on portions of the property, as shown on Attachment B.
STAFF REPORT
87- 2- UCU /87 -12=t : Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 3
2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, land-
scaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the
district it will occupy.
The underlying requirements of the zone for yards, landscaping and
height apply per Zoning Code Section 18.66.030, unless specific modifi-
cations are required in granting the unclassified use permit.
The parking standard does not apply to this use because there is no
building (other than an accessory shed for tools and fuel). There is
a front yard adjacent to Grady Way that would normally require 15 feet
of landscaping; however, Grady Way is elevated a minimum of twenty
feet. Landscaping along this yard would be ineffective.
The use does abut the shoreline, which requires landscaping with a
solid evergreen screen six feet in height, or substantial shade trees.
The drainage plan shows 2" caliper evergreen trees 30 feet on center.
The Zoning Code TMC 18.52.040(2) and 18.50.020 respectively requires
that outside storage be screened from abutting public streets and
adjacent properties by a screen a minimum of eight feet in height and
that outside storage of materials may not exceed twenty feet in height.
Attachment B shows materials as high as 40 feet. No screening other
than adjacent to the shoreline is currently proposed.
The use abuts the railroad on the east property line and Grady Way on
the south. The remainder of the use is surrounded by the other uses
located on the site.
The Tukwila Fire Department does not allow above - ground tank storage of
hazardous materials in excess of 60 gallons. The operation has been
using two above - ground diesel fuel tanks for fueling the machinery used
on the site.
An all- weather access road is required per the Fire Code within 150
feet of combustible storage. The sawdust shavings are considered com-
bustible but are located within 100 feet of vacated Monster Road, which
is an asphalt driveway and acceptable to the Fire Department.
Storm collection and detention facilities do not exist in the area.
The proponent has submitted a collection /detention plan for the north
half of the site (Attachment C). The proposal is to collect storm water
runoff in two grass -lined swales on the east and west sides to drain
towards a collection detention area created by a berm - enclosed area.
3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding
land uses.
The site, although supporting several single - family residences, is not
generally thought of as a residential area. The site usage is mixed and
in transition from agricultural uses (nursery and dairy) to the M -
zone uses. A railroad, river, power poles, and a transportation net-
STAFF REPORT 87- 2- UCU /87 -12 -T : Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 4
work surround the site. The comprehensive plan designation and zoning
- Light Industrial - indicate that more intense use of the site is
appropriate and desirable. The proposed use, while more intensive and
visually imposing than the former pasture use, does not seem to be
incompatible with the site, especially if limited to the standards.
Limited utilities are available to the site and severe access restric-
tions exist now and in the future.
4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan:
"Encourage a diversity of business uses to promote maximum occupancy."
(page 62)
"Encourage a part structural, part non - structural storm sewer system."
(page 86)
"Where beneficial to downstream properties, control peak flow runoff from
the source at a rate similar to natural conditions." (page 86)
"Consider non - structural as well as structural solutions to storm water
control." (page 88)
The proponent of the use has designed an erosion control and detention
facility to handle the flow of water on the north part of the site.
The south lot has no plans for controlling storm runoff.
5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which
the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located.
If the topsoil enters the river, siltation and fecal contamination
occurs. The applicant at one time accepted City of Seattle storm sys-
tem residual dirt. The unknown contents of that dirt requires Seattle
to certify its content before depositing the dirt on the site. The
storm water controls were proposed by the applicant (Attachment C).
The elevation of the top of the riverbank is 25 (Attachment D). The
100 -year flood level is approximately 22.2. The likelihood of the
property flooding is therefore low. Stockpiling of materials is set
back 40 feet from the mean high water, therefore bank stability is not
a concern associated with the use.
Aesthetically, the use has no greater impact than storage of any mater-
ials which is outright permitted in this district. The earth - moving
equipment and the movement of the dirt is the characteristic which
makes this use unclassified. The noise created by the machine mixing
the soil will be limited to daytime hours. Providing screening is the
most important element to alleviate aesthetic impacts.
The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.60.050 Design Review Guidelines
are listed below in bold followed by pertinent findings of fact.
STAFF REPORT
87- 2- UCU /87- 12`-R: Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 5
6. Relationship of Structure to Site
The applicant has not planned any structures on the site. He has
indicated in conversations that he will provide a Sani -can on site for
his one employee. He has also indicated that one or two accessory
structures (less than 120 square feet each) for machinery tools and
supplies would be necessary.
There is no streetscape or pedestrian movement associated with the
area of the site where the use is located. The use gains access via a
vacated street.
7. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
The topography of the site is flat. The landscaping shown on the storm
drainage plan (Attachment C) are 2" evergreen trees 30 feet on center
planted along the top of the storm detention berm. The site is ac-
cessed by a 40 -foot driveway (vacated Monster Road or Nelson Place)
which extends from Grady Way and ends along the east edge of the site.
The use is at the end of the driveway and is the last use on the site
to access the driveway. There are no sidewalks and the surrounding and
subject uses do not generate pedestrian activity. The landscaping
proposal does not show any additional screening of the use. No exter-
ior lighting is proposed.
8. Landscaping and Site Treatment
As established in Finding #2, eight -foot screening is required of all
outside storage. The M -1 landscaping standards also would normally
require a 15 -foot landscaped front yard. Effective screening of the
use is impossible along Grady Way because the roadway is elevated above
the use.
Screening could still be used adjacent to the east and west sides of
the use.
9. Building Design
Building designs for the accessory structures have not been submitted.
Any accessory structures, painted an appropriate color, would be
screened by the piles of dirt and many other structures of various
sizes scattered throughout the area.
10. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
The Sani -can is likely of a plastic material. Colors have not been
indicated.
STAFF REPORT
87- 2- UCU /87 -12 -`fit': Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 6
Interurban Special Review District:
11. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
The storm drainage plan and landscaping along the river is a sensitive
treatment of the area's amenities.
12. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
The proposed use has no impact on the use or enjoyment of the recrea-
tional area or its facilities.
13. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
There is no anticipated pedestrian use of the subject site.
14. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
The scale of the use is somewhat overwhelming to the residential uses
on the site. The houses do not directly abut the dirt piles but are
close to where the use is proposed and will need to be reduced to meet
maximum standards. The use is, however, compatible with the use dis-
trict in which it is located. Wholesale storage, light manufacturing,
and sales and rental of heavy machinery and equipment would be compat-
ible with the use characteristics of topsoil mixing and storage.
15. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse envi-
ronmental impacts.
The proponent has proposed a storm drainage plan and some screening of
the riverbank. The drainage plan and landscaping need to be expanded
to provide sufficient coverage.
16. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
The proposed use will not affect historic features in the area.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed use, strategically screened with either a fence or dense land-
scaping, can be a compatible use in the area. The transitional nature of
the subject site and the physical restrictions imposed on the site because
of the surrounding land uses lends itself to the proposed use. The topsoil
business is greater in scale sizewise than the previous agricultural uses on
STAFF REPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS
87- 2- UCU/87- 12=11R: Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 7
the site, but less intense structurally and as a vehicle generator than is
permitted on the site. The use will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the improvements in the area.
2. The standards regarding screening and storage have not been met. Heights
of stored materials need to be reduced, opaque fencing or dense landscaping
provided on east and west sides, and increased landscaping along the river.
Eight -foot fencing on the east property line and along the west edge of the
use on the north side of vacated Monster Road is required. The proposed
evergreen landscaping along the river, needs to be a minimum five feet in
height, 20 feet on center. The normal landscaping requirement adjacent to
Grady Way would be ineffective and therefore unnecessary.
3. The proposed drainage plan meets the needs of the use located north of the
driveway. Drainage for the area south of the driveway is not addressed but
should be integrated into a stormwater collection /detention plan to avoid
siltation and /or contamination of the Green River. Providing for storm
drainage will implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Certi-
fication from the City of Seattle of the content of the material used is
necessary. Other than the storm drainage dirt, fecal contamination from the
fertilizer is of concern. Any runoff from the fertilizer and other piles
should be adequately contained in the drainage system.
4. No conclusion needs to be drawn regarding the relationship of structure to
site and adjoining area because there are not large structures proposed.
Any accessory buildings for tools would be compatible with the diversity of
uses and structures in the area. The colors of the structures should be
brown to blend in with their background.
5. The site cannot be developed to relate to adjoining area because of only a
portion of the site is being developed. The portion being used is set back
from any access points and is cut off from adjoining properties by the
adjacent uses.
The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the above Find-
ings and Conclusions and recommend approval with the following conditions to the
City Council; and that the BAR adopt the above Findings and Conclusions and
approve the development subject to City Council approval of the Unclassified Use
permit.
1. The pile height must be reduced and maintained to a maximum of 20 feet in
height.
2. The storm drain plan shall be designed to accommodate the entire use.
3. The evergreen landscaping shall be increased to five feet in height at a
minimum 20 feet on center.
STAFF REPORT
(22/87- 2- UUDR1 -3)
87- 2- UCU /87 -12 Renton Sand and Gravel
Page 8
4. Eight -foot opaque fencing along the east property line and along the west
side of the use north of vacated Monster. Road is required.
5. The fertilizer pile must be covered at time not being used.
6. Any accessory structures shall be painted brown or in earthtones.
fd. v.. ^I..lr:a�_eV� • �: J!. i�. 1iN51k "7h+R:`1:Y.t'N"iBa'if?.:A: JCaxri.'1:i'Sk::.iY.`t;1:- Ri'n:kJ� &i�'.•:t.+:'SMwa•1k+
S v
,/""
r
•
✓
Rh)
((
FRep /VeLS o;t.) 1/11 %c.
..::n.w..xn:vnn.ewr-arsur:t4 r. sft•.:s o,rsty ",KVZ:rttn,%Vr e1:t /ri ,e"SC""nii57 .! R'''ai+!^'°i?:i r : "•: *N'..' �': 1'.
3
D 17 /\
490
x os �
j \ �,;; I 87
• 5 i9
•
ATTACHMENT A
•
^ """'
PHONE BALDWIN 6.2255
N
g °
t2M*OtL So.lAcl F �',tcwee
905 Rainier Avenue South Post Office Box 28
Renton, Washington 98055
3 2 re
SoiLs
t� o'
146n' q
TED t1ChATC ._.. -
2.
X0 A10
!0
/0'
3
5'0'
m
• A
Pt- £ BALDwIN 6 -2255
: "• ?} '
4
PeA4dow ct•pAct -itztAiatime Dem
905 Rainier Avenue South Post Office Box 28
Renton, Washington 98055
N
41 - ya v --4.
y &E./R 4R404 — Is ao So*. --, 10.
ryF .�F »Z'xtt41IA/ w? is PA •f. -1' e� 7it Eii I
fit-
/c1' c3te.Toft. A tip Acr'e 3' /x' /J' H
si
■
A
CITY OF . T ,.K'm!...;
— —
3 're.v7tr.c S
c
•
1
S 141 af er jr, i f
ad 7 VA ir te'x i. pp/ t s A l 0.1 et
YY‘F 1•1-- Lb DR
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board
of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on December 17, 1987, at
8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, to consider the following:
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
2. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
3. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
4. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
2. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement
or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be
obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify
your neighbors, and other persons you believe would be affected by the above
items.
Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday December 6, 1987
Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants,
Adjacent Property Owners, File
(21 /NTC.12 -17)
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Planning Commission Public Hearing
87 -2 -CPA: Central Business District Sidewalk Plan
Tukwila Public Works Department
To adopt Sidewalk Plan policies and ordinances.
Tukwila business district, south of I -405 and east of I -5.
87 -5 -CA: Radovich Zone Text Amendment
John C. Radovich
Expand building height exception for the area generally
located N.E. of I -405 and West Valley Highway. Height
limit would increase from 35 feet to greater than 115 feet.
Dead end of Southcenter Boulevard, south of Fort Dent Park,
in the N.W. } of Sec 24, Twn 25, Rge 4.
87 -4 -R: Shimatsu /Mikami Rezone
Shimatsu / Mikami
Rezone 66,685 square feet from R -1 -7.2 Single Family
Residential to C -2, Regional Retail.
On Southcenter Parkway, immediately north of the 17015
address (Center Place); otherwise known as T.L. 9011 -07
and 9012 -06 in S.W. } of Sec 26, Twn 23, Rge 4.
87- 2 -UCU: Renton Sand and Gravel
Renton Sand and Gravel
Unclassified use permit for mixing, screening
and storing topsoil.
1602 Monster Road (vacated)
Board of Architectural Review Public Meeting
87- 12 -DR: Renton Sand and Gravel
Renton Sand and Gravel
Design review and approval of topsoil mixing and storage
operation with accessory structures.
1602 Monster Road (vacated)
87- 11 -DR: Riverbend
L. Hansen
Design Review of a three - story, 13,647 square foot
office building.
S.W. corner of South 180th Street and Sperry Drive,
within N.E. * of Sec 35, Twn 23, Rge 4.
8702100641
CERTIFICATE. ' .
J,, the undersigned, MaxineX:tiotoi Clerk of the
ity of Renton, Washington, certif�r.tf�atthi3.is a true
and correct copy of o pe /No 4044
Subscribed and Sealed this 9t ' o f brua 87
•
it[ll ?LLJ
DEC. 1 1987
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT,
$r
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON "
ORDINANCE NO.
4044
/0
RECD F
CASHSL
9. no
.. : .f:: +:4: no
. 'T . CC r^
ri
-c a
- • ` ' r71
0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON :z ;�
VACATING A PORTION OF NELSON PLACE (VAC- 002 -86 , 4 K
NIELSEN) �;'' -. A
WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Nelson
Place, Renton, King Washington, was duly filed with the
City Clerk on or about March 24, 1986, and said petition having
been signed by the owners representing more than two - thirds (2/3)
of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and
WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2652 passed
and approved on July 7, 1986, and after due investigation, did
fix and determine the llth day of August, 1986 at the hour of
8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton
to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and
the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the
manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing
in favor or in opposition thereto; and the City Council having
considered all information and arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS the Board of Public Works of the City of Renton
having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having
found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit,
and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result
from such vacation;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
410641 E:
.. S.i: p:;t: 'f":' P.r 'n: _•.. «�,,,�,,. }ep r ::FS :;V.s.w t`" r4 StV •nc MlY.S r+*fk.+TJtsDfiiY:[ 'u7M` 7O
S'x e . ...,E'::t'!;'T ^. S7S ;Y:':;�... #_.�...x... �.. [.... _... .. .:... �+"ii „tr�
..._.t i,..�.. -.��S .a`i ., .., ...+c'�'
ORDINANCE NO. 4044
SECTION I: The following described portion of Nelson
Place, to -wit:
See Exhibit "A” attached hereto and made a part
hereof as if fully set forth herein.
BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over,
across, under and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor
of the City for utility and related purposes.
SECTION II: The City Council hereby elects to charge a
fee of $ 28,875.00 to Petitioner - Owners, said amount not exceeding
one - fourth (1/4) of the City's appraisal of right -of -way interest
herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper.
SECTION III: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval and five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the
Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of February, 1987.
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of February, 1987.
3ahbasqL.Q.e . Stav c.
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warre
y Attorney
Date of Publication: February 6, 1987
-2-
,tt
,.f ,.. :...nt , ., � tfs?S'.. u' . ... crt?`:... .. .n�,; s];;:vJ`,:;'.t�.^ •;::_-cf.'F.`'• i��,Y °r: i ;; f
ORDINANCE NO. 4044
E X H I B I T "A"
NELSON PLACE
Legal Description
mr All that portion of the Southwest Quarter or Section 24, Township 23
0 North, Range 4 East, M.N., in King County, Washington, described as follows:
O A sixty -foot wide road (formerly known as Steele Hill Road) established by
N
O an "ORDER OF ESTABLISHMENT" by the Board or Commissioners of King County,
Washington, dated the 25th of May, 1931; the centerline of said slaty -foot wide
roadway being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of So. 153rd St., Ste. 65.60.17, Survey No.
1599, Sec. 24, Twp. 23 N., R. 4 E. M.M.;
Thence North 15'45' East a distance of 227.94 feet;
Thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius or 57.30 feet
for a distance of 64.36 feet;
Thence North 80'07' East, a distance of 75.08 feet;
Thence along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 573.14 feet
for a distance of 247.33 feet;
Thence North 55'23' East for a distance of 65.08 feet;
Thence along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius or 674.27 feet
for a distance of 360.78 feet, which intersects with Steel Hill Road, Ste.
6.35.43. to the trminus of said center line.
Together with all that portion or S. 153rd St. lying between the southerly
extentions or the western and eastern right of way lines or sold sixty -foot
wide road (formerly known as Steele Hill Road).
EXCEPT ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF lying easterly of the westerly Right -of-
May Line of the formerly C.M. St. Paul 4 Union Pacific Railroad.
Ural;iringc ^Baia tXtsur,7a! snwaxc eaRmA ial:+ ux
Nelson Place
Page Two
M1.07 6/16/86
vim frx+F.;a:rwK;ra).Utir T.stte�.cecrsar. uragaS itiri=11.7e1.Z£tSr MIC,gsmZVVAP
ORDINANCE NO. 404
EXHIBIT "A"
a .'ti tie ': "n31r1!,z x a �'�( AN., . i.
TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION of a 40 -foot wide street as shown on King
County's Assessor map as Nelson Place lying northerly of the northerly Right -
of -Way Line or So. 153rd Street and lying westerly of the westerly Right -of -Way
Line of C. M. St. Paul & Union Pacific Railroad.
All Situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North,
Range A East, M.M., King County Washington.
� CITY OF RENTON
DIPANTMlNT 0/ PUBLIC wONN•
NELSON PLACE Neu
srizeer YACATIo i
- 0...... OAT E
MS NO ._��
SPAWN —
/•�• ••••_ *.
CMIC .e AeAL■���
•
%•
. • j
�. •
•
/
• /
1 1
•
. I GI t
•' r {1 •
:•1a.
1 :
i t
•
, •
1 9 0
•
1. S
i1
1 •
•
•
.6
•
•
•
. Y
k
\I
ORDINANCE NO.
.
oa
• �.
1 •
0 \
L • ;• 1
•
4044
1\ 1.•
• \ \ ,
: Z\''
II •
Z
S iii
' * % + , 1
1
•
1
. V : •
• \ •• •
.•1 d• a ft
•
•1 •
1 s
; � •
- --
41 ' '111'•L' Nr • '111
se i Alj ' _ :
A • ,
0. •
0
• V , /
• '• 1
• ••
.
4.
I •
•
1
0
hi\
five \ \
9549
� 0 .
g5.o4 "
153RD 51. go o
a TOr► -m-
wi a
OAtil
cr
.34
cl
� o
vo N °
q ok&I
v‘ • .
g '
co o \O
P o C' GG' - 2_P " „0'
1
Signature:
4. PROPERTY
OWNER
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
DESId si REVIEW APPLICATION
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: „ Z»i Av, S� , ,,/ ?L , e,. x-4
l /Q 7i L, z,9�.� T, ,., r X A L,ofc/ 1f- J ' , M 1 � /op ..17°
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection)
/ 4 6 : 2 - /Yla s7 /h 7 ' ola c/ -j: G29, 27/A4t L 4 0-9,4(
Quarters'(, / Section: V- Township: 03 Range:
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
3 . APPLICANT:* Name: R , r P,d''. K/. G Zia
Address: ,.sS —/Z - . ( 3ci
Phone:
Date: /0 — 9. d' 7
* The applican is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
Name: ►.yitie ,,ie A O/Zvi° w'
Address: 5 % P ,,l /� ) /'.+ r 'z E" , (_V4 9, /d
Phone: _ �Li 63 7 -3
I /WE,[signature(s)] J f ----
swear that I are t elowner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of th?
property invo ved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date:
1 1•
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
RESPONSE: Al S7euC u,e,e'
..;.) .. t
e> iv S 74_"
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria— If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: 4 /4 Nc(.r�1 <.xv 4 s , ,Y
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
�N•L:,4FV C[ti A5 :t3'(:'.e..$�� .V ; ;�T ",t�'Y,!'N ��.l'Ct?„ "r:S'a;a.5n4� ::1':'t15.M1':: X7':,L
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE: Z. rr,o /S'c."0/�A.4lj ,o s' � � ff (Al 7er
8. BUILDING DESIGN
RESPONSE:
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE:
SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
�? k�1 :FC.Y:M'7lY,M,ry�.:.1t'.tC4l'a xeNn �.,:!l.�.n.. +....J... �.t�. �i±.'+itLweryr• ;..... w`'.;" R', �: tS:: �`/,` Y:i_�M...,•:; G.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
_ _.. r..... u.. ti... wa. w. wvnrr.. m. w. ti+. c�• �eu5a. rr w. uv. �r- f,. w.. s.. Wr: u: .. W, v' e�.•�Y.JY.'Y.YY�pA•.�!:•iGiC':ri
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
Thh Z.,SYU +,nw
rn flL;k ..t?g
RI'dLgo4 R.o.w caaN Kit
iN•ceRuR,BAal 4 c- gewJ Rtv62
g6,jTD ■ *I'D 4RPhVEL. ■
LOOT LT1 AGREVIAONT
55,5115
WHITE - GREEN oTT) RIVER
ToLo Lock-T
KING COUNTY
DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS
TPL• A
34 r......N.GILLIA .C.O.A 1324.87
668 8Y 8234
Sown ,. icaomm
,,,,. by h c Sn
VOI .
to ow
7.e
/
./ /
3 ,0 •-• •
• .• ...
V' ,
■
..•
,
i , •\ ‘‘
\ -‘
3
\ \
\ \
\ \
\
\ •
N 87 - 40 - 3 W
NW 25 - 23 - 4
5 IM GOTT LOT 8 • ?
HENRY READERS D. C. NO. 46
000580
5
--ThAOTTT
8,5,5PAILP --- • ---
i
et ., 90 ,•
P i
5
100
4 - 23 - 4
SCALE 1".
64
i
324.07\
53e NW 25 • 23 -
N87- 43-
4•86 (SOCK) •
isTV
MAP REVISED
JUti /987
•
NI.
MNNII\
OCT -5 19871
CITY OF
PLANNING CWT.
88
tr)
T cJ
N
z W
N
4 1, 8
• TRACED OLD ASSESSORS MAP
...
1807