HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-14-DR - CASTILLO CO - STATE FARM INSURANCE DESIGN REVIEW87-14-dr
6840 fort dent way
87-09-smp
epic-31-87
STATE FARM INSURANCE DESIGN REVIEW
fort dent park entrance
DESIGN REVIEW
RE: Conflicting designs.
MEMORANDUM
To: Homewood Suites /Fort Dent II /State Farm Files
From: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner
Department of Community Development
Date: November 6, 1990
1. On Friday, 11/2/90 at 4:30, Greg Villanueva brought a
problem to my attention: the Homewood Suites access road
was under construction and several State Farm trees and sod
would be removed. Catch basins were already in and the road
location was fixed. A quick review project review also
showed that the Ft. Dent access point seemed to be
incorrectly located and other design conflicts. 010.1IN ttcv4 r °"
2. On Monday, GV scheduled a meeting for Tuesday at 11:00 A.M.
3. The following summarizes the Planning items covered.
a. Ft. Dent II parking area drainage uses catch basins
instead of sheet flows. This will result in a 4 ft.
deep biofiltration ditch instead of a 1 ft. deep ditch
with gradual slopes. This perimeter design does not
allow BAR required landscaping nor the overall
perimeter design. It must be redesigned to provide for
a shallow swale.
b. Homewood Suites is responsible for all restoration for
access road construction. Homewood representatives
agreed that they would be responsible for landscaping
the 9 foot perimeter north of the access road which
lies on State Farm property. Homewood will coordinate
with State Farm on an acceptable design and submit it
to me for review and approval.
c. Two State Farm trees, sod and irrigation lines were
removed by Homewood for road construction. Homewood
will be responsible for replanting or replacement.
I noted that the trees were to have been originally
installed outside of the 40 ft. easement and not need
to be moved (per landscape plan). State Farm and
Homewood were clearly informed that there should be 10
ft. of landscaping between State Farm parking and back
of sidewalk to be planted per approved plans. State
Farm will be checking to see what irrigation lines need
to be installed.
A side issue is that Ft. Dent III landscaping adjacent to
Homewood Suites may in conflict with the Homewood Suites
Design. Ft. Dent landscape architects were previously told
to coordinate landscaping between both projects. A later
phone conversation with the landscape architect disclosed
that she had not seen the Homewood Suites design. Both
Homewood Suites (Jim Ford), and Ft. Dent developer and
landscape architect have been informed. This will be
resolved during the BAR review.
-� 1T, �, -' (Fr r2r2zZ f
Mx(?). �
k.e 779 A ?ov - G *KCB l'- ' c wasr t-Pe
( ffolr o ob cAW •
5 FA-kit-( (' L 1qabt4 611 , 0 7) d2&7� &) (7
Po.?. cu2 s 7C c 'lf RQti":?)
6 7. O - V , r 7 ,'v pica 7 5 p frl,
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433.1800
Gary L. Vanousen, Mayor
PLANNING COMMISSION
WORK SESSION
OCTOBER 26, 1989
APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. CAGLE MOVED
MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE
AS PRESENTED. UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED.
SENSITIVE AREA DRAFT ORDINANCE
comments received from the public at
held on Wednesday, October 25, 1989.
for adopting the Ordinance.
Chairman Haggerton called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m.
Members present were Haggerton, Hamilton, Cagle, Kirsop,
Knudson, Gomez, and Flesher.
Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Moira Bradshaw, Vernon
Umetsu and Joanne Johnson.
AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A
SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 MEETING
- Moira Bradshaw reviewed
the informational workshop
She reviewed the process
General discussion ensued on the merits of the ordinance.
A portion of the November 1989 Planning Commission meeting is
to be devoted to a work session on the ordinance.
MULTI FAMILY DESIGN STANDARDS - Vernon Umetsu reviewed the
concepts contemplated for the changes to design review process
which include more specific standards, design review criteria,
and design guidelines.
A brief discussion ensued on these concepts.
A Planning Commission workshop is scheduled as well as a public
hearing in December.
ilk- 04 FARM - Vernon Umetsu discussed the conditions of approval
placed on the design review of this project on May 12, 1988
Planning Commission meeting. Condition 6 stated that the
building facade /colors are to be specified by applicant and
approved by the Board.
Mr. Michael Glanz, architect for State Farm, 16212 Bothell Way,
Suite F -146, Mill Creek, WA introduced samples of brick and glass
to be used in the design of this project. He pointed out five
combinations to be considered.
Planning Commission
October 26, 1989
Page 2
The merits of each were discussed.
MR. FLESHER MOVED AND KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION THAT THE COLORS
OF THE BRICK COMBINATION BE REDONDO GRAY, WITH MAUNA LOA BROWN AS
ACCENT; AND WITH DELORIAN GRAY AS THE MORTAR COLOR. MOTION
PASSED WITH KNUDSON, HAMILTON, GOMEZ, FLESHER, CAGLE, AND KIRSOP
VOTING YES AND MR. HAGGERTON VOTING NO.
Vernon briefed the Commission on Southcenter Retail Building
project presented by Bob Schofield. He clarified the decision
that was made on the design review of the project.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT Jack Pace reviewed the
King development at Tukwila Pond.
Mr. Gomez reported on a recent seminar he
material he obtained at the seminar.
•
ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 10:31 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joanne Johnson, Secretary
changes to the Burger
attended, distributing
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
FAKL- 1)r} -(1Ar Chi
10 41/9F
October 23, 1989
Michael Glanz
MGA Architecture
16212 Bothell Way S.E., Suite F146
Mill Creek, Washington 98012
RE: State Farm Building Permit Review.
Dear Mr. Glanz,
This letter is to confirm and supplement our telephone
conversation today on the following two design issues:
Building Facade
1. State Farm was not prepared to specify the exterior facade
materials to be used on its building at the time of B.A.R.
review. State Farm representatives therefore agreed to the
following condition:
"6. Building facade /colors to be specified by
applicant and approved by the Board."
The proposed brick materials and pattern do not have
sufficient texture and color to reflect the architectural
quality represented to the B.A.R. during its review. A new
exterior material sample of masonry /brick, glass, and
mullions will be submitted for review on Wednesday for
review by the B.A.R. at its meeting on October 26, 1989.
Landscape Island
1. The revised landscaping satisfies the approved B.A.R. design
except for the front landscape berm.
The Department determines that the front. landscape island
would be an appropriate change if revised to provide
landscape accents on the street -side slope in coordination
with the overall project design.
2. A building permit could be issued on the project if the
front landscape island is revised to reflect minimum quality
in the B.A.R. approved design as shown in the attached
landscape plan.
0
A landscape plan modification by the B.A.R. is possible
after building permit issuance. However, only installation
of the approved landscape plan will allow the Planning
Division to authorize issuance of final building permit
approval.
The earliest B.A.R. landscape plan review is on December 14,
1989; if alternative landscaping is submitted by November
14, 1989. The next B.A.R. meeting is scheduled for January
25, 1990.
Please feel free to contact me at 433 -1858 if I can be of further
assistance.
Since ly,
Vernon m tsu, Associate Planner
1
•••411I ..k"nst
.4Ft, -WS!
0 0,
.6.1.41.e. Owl. •
•
cut: •otts
Ti-{ _CA.ST: LLO ..CCMPAflY roffili
SOUTH SEATTLE. WA.
t4••CI 1,01•
•
- • ■. /
I ,
_ . .... _ .._..._. . _........ ...
[ STATE 1 ARIA LIU I UAI AU 1 CAA0E1 ILE INSURANCE COMPANY
... ‘,.., ......... ........... ....... .....
llotr tikitRIAL.
MOM 1:08642
It•I' tott,C1r 1 1l1t
atattat to'r
ittset
.tottott Las ow.
mt. not
..4•117..tto-4
W MEM
811
•
Ingo architecture
and planning
October 10, 1989
Mr. Vernon Umetsu
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA. 98199
CITY of T
0 1 8 1189
PERMIT CENTER
re: State Farm Insurance (CN89 -155)
Dear Vernon:
All minor revisions required by Public Works are now incorporated
into the plan.
In addition, the following comments address your planning comments:
1. We have placed screening materials in the two locations
you requested.
2. The landscaping is designed as the owner wants it. This
is for benefit of employees and clients of State Farm
Insurance, not for casual motorists. Following your request
would be tantamount to removing a house so people could view
a nice back yard from the street as they pass by. The owner
does not want to expend the significant sums required for
redesign of this area. Modulation of land form is not a
code required, nor defined term. We would appreciate a
definition in order to completely understand what you are
attempting to enforce.
3. The "light earth tone" brick is specified by State Farm
Insurance Companies and a sample was delivered to your
office on 10/5/89.
4. We have relocated the pine trees along the North Western
perimeter to reflect the future road alignment. We disagree
that the planting of boulevard trees is necessary along this
private access. Boulevard trees would visually indicate a
continuation of Southcenter Boulevard onto a private access
easement between private entities. This would be confusing
to the motorist and a liability to the adjacent property
owners creating a liability problem of immense proportions.
5. The glazing contractor will be instructed to submit a
letter indicating that the glass used in this project is a
maximum of 20% reflectivity. However as the energy note #4
on sheet C -6 and specification section #08800 both state the
glass will be less than 20% reflectivity. Please see
attached specification section and sheet C -6.
16212 Bothell Way S.E. Suite F146 Mill Creek, WA 98012 (206) 486 -6134
cc:
ichael Gla
MG:pa
6. We have deleted the wall sign on the south building wall
to .comply.
Please proceed with a rapid completion of approval for this permit.
Sincerely,
MIL
Duane Griffin
Shana Schmillen
Paul Marsh
Chuck Bessler
�...,...... :
OWNER
SOUTH SEATTLE
SERVICE. CENTER
RECEIVED
STATE FARM MUTUA � I i
AUTOMOBILE p T R 9
PERMIT CENTER
INSURANCE COMPANY
ARCHITECT
No 499
•
.
STATE FARM MUTUAL
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPAIJY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA
BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS 61710
MGA ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING
16212 BOTHELL WAY SE .SUITE F1.46'
MILL CREEK, WASHINGTON 98012
Cabgt1 486 •6134 •
r
' 0;
7/ait &ENT
BOOK'
1.0 General
1.3.2 Heat - Treated Glass Standard: FS DD -G -1403.
Section 08110 - Hollow Metal Doors and Frames
Section 08360 - Sectional Overhead Doors
Section 08410 - Aluminum Entrances
Section 08520 - Aluminum Windows
08800 -1
SECTION 08800 - GLASS AND GLAZING
1.1 Furnish and install all glass and glazing as indicated on
the drawings and as specified herein. In general, all glass
on the exterior of the building shall be color as selected
or approved by the Owner, or as specified herein.
1.2 Consult the following other sections and the drawings for
additional information related to project glazing
requirements:
1.3 Applicable provisions of the following standards govern the
work under this Section, unless otherwise. indicated:
1.3.1 Prime Glass Standard: FS DD -G -451.
1.3.3 Safety Glass Standard: Consumer Product Safety Commission
16 CFR 1200 "Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing
Materials ".
1.3.4 Installation: "Glazing Manual" of the Flat Glass Marketing
Association.
2.0 Materials
2.1 Clear Float Glass: Type I, Class I (transparent), quality
q3 (glazing select). Use for interior glazing and in
sectional overhead doors.
2.2. Tinted Float Glass: Type I Class 2 (heat absorbing and
light reducing) quality q3 (glazing select), manufacturer's
standard gray tint with visible light transmittance of
18 -26 %, maximum reflectivity of 20% and shading coefficient
of 0.40 -0.67 for 1/4" thick glass; 1/4" thick unless
otherwise indicated. Use for all exterior glazing except
glass in sectional overhead doors.
2.3 Tempered safety glass shall be 1/4" thick, gray or clear for
condition of use, certified to be in compliance with the
Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials (16 CFR
1201), where required by code or in insulated units as
recommended by manufacturer.
..
.�. «....�.
2.4 Wired glass shall be Type II (rolled), class I
(translucent), quality q8 (glazing) complying with ANSI
Z97.1, 1/4” thick, Form 1 (wired, polished both sides), Mesh
ml (diamond). Use in all fire rated doors where vision
panel shown.
2.5 Insulating Glass: Two sheets of float glass, outer light
gray, (except clear in sectional overhead doors) inner light
clear, Quality q3, 1/4" thick, and 1/2" dry air or
gas - filled space construction to maintain hermetic seal.
2.5.1 Edge Construction: Twin primary seals of polyisobutylene;
color anodized tubular aluminum spacer -bar frame with welded
or soldered sealed corners, and filled with dessicant; and
secondary seal outside of bar, bonded to both sheets of
glass and bar, of polysulfide, silicone or hot -melt butyl
elastomeric sealant (fabricator's option). Construction in
same barometric pressure zone of building site.
2.5.2 Warranty: Provide manufacturer's standard 10 year product
warranty on maintained hermetic seal.
2.6 Figured /Patterned Glass: Type Ii (rolled), form 3
(figured), quality q8 (glazing), finish fI (figure one
side), pattern p2 (geometric), class 1 translucent; "Burlap"
by Hordis Inc., "Flax" by AFT Industries, Inc., or
approved. Provide for lower lights between Vestibule 100
and Lobby 101.
2.7 Spandrel Glass shall be prime glass which has been processed
to fuse a permanent ceramic coating or Water silicone
emulsion, Opaci -coat 300 from E.L. Hartung Co. on one face,
and shall be color matched to the adjacent vision glass to
produce a non - banded, color compatible curtain wall, as
approved by the Owner with Architect's concurrance. Use
heat strengthened glass for spandrel glass. Touch up any
damage to water emulsion face prior to final glass
placement. Replace damaged ceramic units.
2.7.1 Provide factory insulation for spandrel glass by laminating
2" thick 6 - lb. density black glass fiber insulation board
(k -value of 0.26 maximum) on inside face of panel, with'a
backing of reinforced aluminum foil, formed at edge to
profile indicated or approved by Owner.
2.8 Consult Sections 08510 and 08520 for information regarding
gasket or other glazing methods and materials for the
products specified in those sections.
08800 -2
2.9 Environmental insulating glass shall consist of 2 sheets of
glass as noted herein, and a 1/2" dry air or gas filled
space with -200 F. dew point, or lower, with a Class A
sealant type edge construction to maintain an hermetic seal;
fabricated to provide the overall performance
characteristics indicated below:
2.9.1 External panel shall be grey tinted float glass with any
reflective surface on the #2 surface, Quality q3, 1/4" thick
Where recommended by manufacturer, use heat strengthened
glass.
2.9.2 Interior panel shall be clear float glass, quality q3, 1/4"
thick, tempered as recommended by the manufacturer.
2.9.3 Edge construction shall consist of twin primary seals of
polyisobutylene, bronze color anodized tubular aluminum
spacer bar with soldered sealed corners, and filled with
dessicant, and second seal outside of bar, bonded to both
sheets of glass and bar. Polysulfide, silicone or hot -melt
butyl elastomeric sealant, manufacturer's option.
Construction shall be in the same barometric pressure zone
as the location of the building site.
2.9.4 Provide manufacturer's standard 10 year warranty on hermetic
seal and contractor's warranty for five years against
uncontrolled leakage.
2.9.5 Manufacturer's furnishing products complying with the basic
requirements specified for environmental insulating glass
include the following:
Environmental Glass Products Div., Shatterproof Glass Corp.
Ford Glass Company
Libbey- Owens -Ford Company
PPG Industries, Inc.
2.9.6 Submit samples of environmental insulating glass for
selection and approval of color and performance
characteristics. Specifically identify any deviations from
required performance characteristics.
2.10 Face glazing compound shall conform to FS TT -G -410; use for
glazing single thickness panes unless otherwise recommended
by the glass manufacturer.
2.11 Setting blocks shall be neoprene, 70 -90 Shore A hardness.
2.13 Spacers shall be neoprene, 40 -50 Shore A hardness.
2.14 All manufactured environmental glass units shall have a
flatness tolerance of +/- 1/8" across any 10' panel,
diagonally.
2.15 No tong glass shall be used in the manufacturing of
insulated units. .
3.0 Installation
3.1 Cut glass to size required for measured openings; provide
adequate edge clearance and full glass bite all around. Cut
prior to laminating and prior to fabrication into insulating
glass units.
3.2
3.3
3.4
Do not install sheets which have edge damage or other
defects.
Replace glass which is broken or damaged prior to the time
of acceptance.
Each piece of exterior glass must be airtight and
watertight, and without glass breakage, through normal
weather /temperature cycles, and through normal door /window
operations.
END OF SECTION
08800 -4
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
September 15, 1989
6200SOUT!IC!NTERBOULEVARD, TUKN'lI.A, WASHINGTON !lxlxx
Michael Glanz, Architect
16212 Bothell Way S.E. Suite F -146
Mill Creek, WA 98012
RE: State Farm Building Permit File (CN 89 -155)
Planning Division Permit Review
Dear Mr. Glantz:
PII # (_' *).1 a 1,m0 Gary 1.. VrnDuueu, Muvor
It is my understanding that significant site plan changes are
required to satisfy Public Works requirements. The following
Planning changes should be incorporated in coordination with
Public Works requirements.
Revised plans should be submitted to the Building Division and
will be subject to additional Planning review. All changes
should be clouded and dated.
Planning Conditions for Approval
1. A headlight glare screen shall be placed along the parking
perimeter. This screen is to be composed of shrubs or a
combination of berm and shrubs, which will be a minimum 36"
high and form a solid dense screen at planting.
2. The front berm and landscaping at the island between the two
entrances shall be modified to maintain the general planting
pattern, but making these plantings visible from the road
per the BAR presentation. The berm should be retained and
the plantings brought forward to rest on the road oriented
slope. This would provide modulation of land form as well
as an attractive planting bed to accent the foreground of an
otherwise standard commercial building site.
3. Concrete color shall be specified. The BAR presentation
reflected a very light earth tone.
4. Pines at the north entry and along the western perimeter
should be relocated or eliminated to reflect near -term road
construction, and the planting of boulevard trees along the
eastern easement edge (i.e. London Plane 35 ft. o.c.).
Michael Glantz.
September 15, 1989
Page 2
5. The glazing contractor shall submit a letter certifying that
only exterior building glass with less than a 20%
reflectivity has been used on this building prior to issuing
a final building permit.
6. There are three signs shown (2 wall and one monument). One
sign must be eliminated since only two are permitted.
Please feel free to contact me at 433 -1858 if I can be of any
assistance.
Sincerely,
Vernon Umetsu
Associate Planner
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
87- 14 -DR: State Farm
Castillo Company, Inc.
NOTICE OF DECISION
Construct a two -story office building with 18,401 square feet
on a 4.42 -acre site.
Approximately 100 feet east of the Interurban Avenue South /
Southcenter Boulevard intersection in the NW * of Sec. 24,
Twn. 23, Rge. 4, Tukwila, WA.
The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on
May 12, 1988, and approved the proposed project.
Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Coun-
cil by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of
the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal.
(29 /NT C.STFARM)
L
ernon Umetsu, Associate Planner
May 13, 1988
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 1988
The meeting was called to order at 8:07 p.m. by Mr. Coplen,
Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Knudson,
Cagle and Haggerton.
Mr. Larson and Mr. Hamilton were absent.
Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, Rebecca Fox
and Joanne Johnson.
MINUTES
MR. HAGGERTON MOVED THAT THE MARCH 24, 1988 AND APRIL 14, 1988
MINUTES BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE
MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Lee Cagle from N C Machinery Co. was introduced as the new
member of the Planning Commission.
87 -5 -DR: GENCOR - Request for approval of landscape plan
modification.
Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner reviewed the proposal recommend-
ing approval. He entered into the record the Gencor Memorandum,
File No. 87 -5 -DR, dated May 6, 1988 as Exhibit 1.
Steve Friedman, 1633 - 72nd Avenue S.E., Mercer Island, WA
represented the applicant. He further explained the proposal.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REVISED ADDENDUM TO THE LAND-
SCAPE PLAN BASED UPON THE STAFF REPORT AND INFORMATION PRESENTED
AT THE MEETING. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MR. HAGGERTON AND
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. (MR. CAGLE ABSTAINED).
87- 14 -DR: STATE FARM - Request for approval of a two -story
office building with 18,401 square feet on a 4.42 acre site.
Vernon Umetsu reviewed the proposal recommending approval subject
to conditions. He entered into the record the State Farm
Memorandum, File No 87- 14 -DR, dated May 6, 1988 as Exhibit 1.
Planning Commission
May 12, 1988
Page 2
David Parker, Phoenix, AZ represented the applicant. He further•
clarified the proposal.
MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR STATE FARM BASED ON
THE MATERIAL PRESENTED, STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS. REGARDING ITEM 7, THE GLASS WALL
REFLECTIVITY SHOULD BE NO GREATER THAN 20 %. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED
THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. (MR. CAGLE ABSTAINED).
The APPROVED conditions are as follows:
1. Drainage and flood control structures to be approved by the
Public Works Director.
2. The short platting and establishment of a 40 -foot access
easement as discussed in Background 2.a to completed without
significant changes in the site plan. Any significant
changes, as determined by the Planning Director, shall be
reviewed by the Board.
-Nov
3. Final landscape design to be approved by the Planning
Director as discussed in Background 2.b.
4. Automatic irrigation shall be provided. Irrigation plans to
be approved by the Planning Director.
5. A pedestrian path to the Christensen Trail from the building
shall be constructed per approval of the Parks and Recrea-
tion Director.
6. Building facade /colors to be specified by applicant and
approved by'the Board.
7. Glass wall reflectivity should be no greater than 20 %.
8. Luminaire plans to be approved by the Planning Director
based on BAR Criteria 3 and 4. Light standards shall be
harmonious in height and design with that provided by the
facing development, and provide for no off -site spillover.
9. Modify drainage swale to filter as much parking lot runoff
as possible, as determined by the City Engineer.
87 -2 -CPA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALK POLICIES - Add
policies on the design and provision of sidewalks of the central
business district to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70
(Nonconforming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning Code)
and TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction).
TO:
FROM:
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
Tukwila Board of Architectural Review
Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner
DATE: May 6, 1988
SUBJECT: 87 TATE FARM - ADDENDUM TO
GAFF REPORT OF MARCH 18, 1988
ei4 lwb c f
Otiokuiv, C� ovn vk i ss/ c�v✓
s • -k�
The Castillo Company has submitted design modifications (attached) in response
to comments from the Board at its meeting of March 28, 1988. Project modifica-
tions are generally as follows:
1. Site design has been modified to incorporate a 40 -foot access easement along
the north property line. This easement is necessary to provide access to an
eastern lot which would be created as a result of this project. The access
easement has been approved by the City Engineer and will be landscaped until
needed.
The access easement will require modification of the drainage swale system.
The collection system should be modified to filter as much parking lot run-
off as possible through the remaining west swale as determined by the City
Engineer.
2. Building design has been modified to extend the second story glass wall
around to the westward building face. This will architecturally relieve the
two -story blank wall by reducing design monotony and add variety of form and
detail.
Vehicle access doors to the service evaluation area have been moved from the
north building face, opposite the park entrance, to the eastern face. This
increases the harmony of site design with adjacent (park) uses.
The Planning Department concludes that the proposed modifications respond to the
Board's comments.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the modified project subject to
the conditions of the original staff report and this addendum. These conditions
are shown on the following page.
'MEMORANDUM to:
Tukwila Board of Architectural Review
May 8, 1988
Page 2
Recommendations in the Staff Report of March 18, 1988:
1. Drainage and flood control structures to be approved by the Public Works
Director.
2. The short platting and establishment of a 40 -foot access easement as dis-
cussed in Background 2.a. to completed without significant changes in the
site plan. Any significant changes, as determined by the Planning Director,
shall be reviewed by the Board.
3. Final landscape design to be approved by the Planning Director as discussed
in Background 2.b.
4. Automatic irrigation shall be provided. Irrigation plans to be approved by
the Planning Director.
5. A pedestrian path to the Christensen Trail from the building shall be con-
structed per approval of the Parks and Recreation Director.
6. Building facade /colors to be specified by applicant and approved by the
Board.
7. Glass wall reflectivity should be specified and approved by the Board.
8. Luminaire plans to be approved by the Planning Director based on BAR Cri-
teria 3 and 4. Light standards shall be harmonious in height and design
with that provided by the facing development, and provide for no off -site
spillover.
Recommendation in this addendum:
9. Modify drainage swale to filter as much parking lot runoff as possible, as
determined by the City Engineer.
VU /sjn
Attachment F:
Attachment G:
Attachment H:
Excerpts from the minutes of the Board of
Architectural Review meeting on March 24, 1988
Modified Site Plan, April 21, 1988
Modified Building Elevations, April 21, 1988
Vernon Umetsu
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 24, 1988
Page 3
He pointed out that in order for a business to be termed an Adult
Business, 20% of the merchandise must be X- rated.
Mr. John Colgrove, Attorney representing the City stated that 20%
is a very defendable position.
No one responded to the request for public testimony on this item
and the Public Hearing was closed.
MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND .MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR ADULT ENTERTAINMENT USES AS OUTLINED
IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE CRITERIA FOR AN ADULT BUSINESS BE
ESTABLISHED AT 10% OF ALL STOCK AND TRADE BE X- RATED. PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
A 5- minute recess was called.
87- 14 -DR: STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY Request by the Castillo
Company to construct a two -story office building with 18,401
square feet on a 4.42 -acre site.
Vernon Umetsu, Planner, reviewed the proposal. He entered into
the record the staff report as Exhibit I. He also entered 4
photographs as Exhibit II through V and a pane of glass as
Exhibit VI into the record.
David Parker, Castillo Company, Phoenix, Az. represented the
applicant and added further clarification to the proposal.
Mr. John Radovich, 2000 124th N.E., Bellevue, WA expressed his
concerns regarding the design of the project. He entered into
the record a photo board depicting the outlook from Fort Dent
Park as Exhibit VII, an aerial photograph of the area in question
as Exhibit VIII and a drawing of Fort Dent Two (Option 2) into
the record as Exhibit IX.
Mr. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, revised staff's recommenda-
tion as follows: 1) the building be turned 180 - degrees on the
site and 2) recommend the blank wall be redesigned so that it
provides some three dimensional relief or that it definitely
looks like an office wall.
Mr. Mike Hemphill, Andover Company, suggested that the cement
wall could be remedied by using glass and the doors could be
visually screened with landscaping.
MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO TABLE THE
REQUEST. UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
' VIA
.1 Of. •CE
GOMM IMO ELMS .
••••••■•• ••■••• Oe MEND MID
1111. •OPID MO OM •••
/
4 /
•
-
\\
e fts, 4 ..
7. v : ,, " • .
..•••••„_
71-:= C?ArlY 1
• 33 ., „ • r !nor 4,14 94, IPA
SOUTH SEA TLE • .VA.
•
C. -‘.
..-'
0
I
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COWAN i
ril re . r•
Inn ;a
,•••■••••
• MI Opl•••• •••■■ Oft • MO. AO*.
■•• •••••■• .11 =ENNIS
. _
•
WEST IIIIUIVATIOM
CAST MUIVAT1ON
THE CASTILLO COMPANY fmnil SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
• t 0./Or M. as. /V v. 1 �X701
1111111111111111.1111111.11111111
11.1111111111111111111111111111.11111 :5 4
111111111 111111.111111111111
=NMI MILIIVATION
STATE FARM MUTUAL. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY 1
00. Rata IllOOVIVMS . 61
PA *
■=mr■=111.■
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board
of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on May 12, 1988, at
8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, to consider the following:
Planning Commission Public Hearing
87 -2 -CPA: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALK POLICIES
City of Tukwila
Add policies on the design and provision of sidewalks in the
CBD to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70 (Noncon-
forming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning Code) and
TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction).
City of Tukwila, south of I -405 and east of I -5.
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
2. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
3. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
4. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
5. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Board of Architectural Review Public Meeting
87- 14 -DR: State Farm
Castillo Company, Inc.
Construct a two -story office building with 18,401 square
feet on a 4.42 acre site.
Approximately 100 feet east of the Interurban Avenue South/
Southcenter Boulevard intersection in the NW * of Sec. 24,
Twn. 23, Rge. 4, Tukwila, WA
88 -2 -DR: SCHNEIDER TOWNHOMES
G. Schneider
Construct 9 two -story townhouses on two separate lots.
East of 65th Avenue South, at the east end of South 153rd
Street, Tukwila, WA.
88 -3 -DR: 6450 BUILDING
Bruce Solly Development Company
Construct a one - story, 15,000- square foot office building on
a 53,000- square foot parcel.
NW corner of the Southcenter Boulevard /65th Avenue South
Intersection, Tukwila, WA.
88 -4 -DR: PARKWAY RETAIL BUILDING
A. Shimatsu /Y. Mikami
Construct a one - story, 24,243- square foot retail building on
a 66,000- square foot parcel.
On Southcenter Parkway, immediately north of 17015 South -
center Parkway, Tukwila, WA.
88 -5 -DR: METRO INTERURBAN PUMP STATION ODOR SCRUBBER
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Construct and screen a 9.33 -foot tall odor scrubbing pipe and
tank.
On Interurban Avenue South, across from Foster Golf Course,
Tukwila, WA.
Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement
or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be
obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify
your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above
items.
Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday May 1, 1988
Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants,
Adjacent Property Owners, File.
(21 /NTC.5 -12)
Dear Jack:
The Castillo Company, Inc.
gg
`Mr. Jack Pace
Senior Planner
CITY OF TUKWILA
Planning Department
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
;Tukwila, WA 98188
2345 E. University Drive -
P.O. Box 21 087 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 C8021.231 -9000 ■r'
April 20, 1988
FEDERAL EXPRESS
RE: Proposed State Farm Service Center
South Seattle, WA (SEA)
Enclosed are 4 sets of drawings reflecting modifications in our
proposed building design. These include:
1) Sheet A -1, Site Plan
2) Sheet A -2, Exterior Elevations
Both are dated April 19, 1988, and are for your review.
t r.fi
n 988 .
Please note that the overall site plan configuration has changed
only to the extent of its relationship to the redesign of the
building plan. As well, the choice of materials that was
displayed at the March 24, 1988, B.A.R. meeting is still valid
for the new design.
We are showing a proposed 40 -foot access easement along the
northwest property line that will accommodate an access driveway.
;However, this driveway is not designed and we are currently in
negotiations with the current property owners as to its
responsibility. This should not hold up the review of our
project.
• , " " • ~ � � "i ?t U :1'o:. 2
s E J'J ' X a ' g +rn+r,, +: I ;. .-'e, . � : �� + e }I77
�:' r:��:. k1;v +3Yn.�.dt. S.`' y i 3 � ' .� rl'.C.: ���{ ° � .�,'� �. , 3:?,#• 1 #yp�� ���� GYr.
t: ,� :f, -� I`f.',..:4"'..'G�irv:4Y �'tt�' c:. ciJt .�ti!Stnk..�.1i1'C�dc.C�FG... HF Q`.Y�t
t 1 1 1
Y
A landscape design has not been resubmitted. We are following
the statements made in the March 18, 1988, Tukwila Staff report,
and have passed the comments on to the State Farm designers who Or;
will work with a local landscape architect when they prepare
construction documents for the project.
Consulting Engineering 0 Development 0 Real Estate
Mr. Jack Pace
April 20, 1988
Page 2
When we are notified of a May 12, 1988, Planning
Commission /B.A.R. meeting, we will send along PMT reductions of
the above two drawings for your use. Also, I will have a set of
schematic building floor plans and colored building elevations to
present at the meeting.
If there is additional information that you need, please call.
Sincerely,
THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC.
and Rh
rhh
Enclosure
cc: Richard Rash (w /enclosure)
Shanna Schmillen (w /enclosure)
Jerry Herman (w /enclosure)
David Parker
Architect
td
The Castillo Company, Inc.
•
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
HEARING DATE: March 28, 1988
FILE NUMBER: 87- 14 -DR: State Farm
APPLICANT: Castillo Company
REQUEST: Construct a two -story office building with
18,401 square feet on a 4.42 -acre site.
LOCATION:
ACREAGE: 4.42 acres
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial
Approximately 100 feet east of the Interurban Avenue South/
Southcenter Boulevard intersection in the NW * of Sec. 24,
Twn. 23, Rge. 4, Tukwila, WA (see Attachment A).
ZONING DISTRICT: C -2: Regional Retail
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
STAFF REPORT
to the Board of Architectural Review
Prepared March 18, 1988
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Vicinity Map
(B) Site Plan
(C) Building Elevations
(D) Conceptual Landscape Plan
(E) Drainage and Grading Plan
STAFF REPORT 87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
to the BAR Page 2
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
BACKGROUND
FINDINGS
1. Project Description: To construct a two -story office building with vehicle
claims evaluation section on the first floor. The proposed development is
shown in Attachments B through E. Building area is divided into the follow-
ing categories:
First Floor Office: 5,190 square feet
First Floor Evaluation Area: 1,392 square feet
Second Floor Office: 11,819 square feet
Total Building Area 18,401 square feet
The project is supported by 146 parking spaces.
2. Existing Development: The site is currently vacant.
3. Surrounding Land Use: The site is shown in Attachment A, Vicinity Map. The
project is located on a peninsula formed by the Green River on the north,
east, and south. The Green River flows along the site's eastern boundary;
Fort Dent Park is located just to the north; the Fort Dent Office Building
is located to the northwest immediately across Southcenter Boulevard; and a
small vacant lot and Interurban Avenue are located to the west.
4. Terrain: Existing on -site grades are shown in Attachment E. The peninsula
has been extensively graded and is relatively flat. There are some minor
low spots where water collects during rains.
8. Access: Access to the peninsula area is from Interurban Avenue South,
thence west on Southcenter Boulevard, a 40 -foot wide collector arterial.
There are two project access points as shown on Attachment B.
9. Utilities: The site is adequately served by a full range of urban utili-
ties.
10. Public Facilities: The site is at a major recreational nexus. Fort Dent
Park lies immediately to the north while the partially completed Green River
Trail runs along the site's eastern boundary, and Renton's Black River Trail
will soon cross to Fort Dent Park.
1. The applicants desire a general site plan approval in order to demonstrate
project feasibility. This demonstration would allow them to prudently com-
plete purchase of the property by their mid -April option deadline.
2. The general nature of the site plan approval desired by the applicant has
resulted in their bringing forward a project proposal which both the staff
STAFF REPORT 87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
to the BAR Page 3
and applicant feel is adequate to describe the proposed development, but
which is in need of fine tuning.
The aspects of this project which need fine tuning are as follows:
a. Property short plat and establish an associated access easement. The
project area shown in Attachments B through E reflect only a portion of
the legally existing parcel. A short plat and a 40 -foot road easement
to the newly created parcel is required.
The City has not received a short plat application, but does not anti-
cipate any significant obstacles once the 40 -foot easement is secured.
The applicant anticipates establishing a 40 -foot easement centered on
the northern property line (the proposed 20 -foot access easement on
Attachment B), but has no assurance of adjacent property owner agree-
ment. Such an easement is not necessary to the adjacent property's
development, nor is the City in a position to require cooperation
between these two private parties.
The applicant understands that placing the entire 40 -foot access ease-
ment on their property or a significant change in the proposed property
boundary may require additional Board review if there are significant
site design changes.
b. Final landscape design. A "Conceptual Landscape Plan" is presented in
Attachment D. The staff recommends approval of the general landscape
design concepts, but has not had an opportunity to work with the appli-
cants on resolving a number of specific concerns. These concerns
include the following:
(1) Establish street landscaping to complement the sidewalk running
through a double row of staggered Long Plane trees which is provided
across the street. This would involve moving the sidewalk from the
middle of the utility easement back five feet to the in -board util-
ity line and placing Long Plane trees within the nine -foot landscape
strip. The Sweet Gun trees would not be required. Feasibility to
be confirmed with utility purveyors.
(2) Reconfigure perimeter landscaping around parking lot, river front,
and driveway areas to reflect the minimum number of trees required
and better mass trees at focal points.
(3) Reconfigure landscaping along the southeast building face and the
due south landscape island to provide better building modulation and
match plant materials with that proposed on the rest of the site.
(4) Overall review of plant materials by a registered landscape archi-
tect for plant selection and design appropriate to a northwest
climate and in specific site situations.
The staff feels that the information provided to the Board is sufficient for
project review, subject to authorizing final issue resolution by
STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
DECISION CRITERIA
87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
Page 4
the Planning Director. The applicant intends to hire local architects and
landscape designers to work with staff and provide detailed project design
upon property purchase. Any significant design changes not authorized by
the Board would be brought back for additional review.
3. This project has more than the usual number of conditions of approval, due
to the conceptual nature of the information provided. The conditions gener-
ally relate to peripheral design elements (see Recommendation).
Building, parking area and circulation system design are not proposed with
any conditions attached. The applicant desires Board approval with all
conditions to be administered by the Planning Director.
The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria are listed below in bold,
followed by pertinent findings of fact.
1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site
The structure occupies only approximately 6,582 square feet of a 180,295
square foot site. All development occurs in the northern half of the site
(Attachment B) with the southern area to be grassed and irrigated. Addi-
tional development of the southern portion of the site should be expected at
a later date.
Concrete walks provide for adequate pedestrian movement. However, street
tree plantings should match those across Southcenter Boulevard to provide a
desirable transition to improvement areas.
The two -story building and paved parking areas are generally landscaped to
moderate the impact of large paved areas. A minimum of five additional
perimeter trees should be provided in order to satisfy the minimum number of
trees required by shoreline regulations (TMC 18.44.140(c)), and all trees
should be better massed at visual focal points to screen development areas
and provide building modulation. Landscaping should be generally modified
to reflect the conditions in Background (2b).
2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
The structure is harmonious in architectural design with the adjacent devel-
opment. Landscaping treatment would provide good transition with the facing
property landscape design with the street tree changes discussed above, and
site access has been coordinated with the facing development.
On -site circulation is provided by a system of concrete walks between street
and building, and long -term parking is separated from the busy activity
areas around the building. No formal connection to the trail is currently
proposed, but should be provided.
STAFF REPORT 87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
to the BAR Page 5
3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment
Subject to the landscape discussion and conditions in Background (2b), and
Criteria 1 and 2, the site is proposed fro development in a manner sensitive
to natural constraints and opportunities. No exterior lighting details
have as yet been submitted. The applicant states that all landscaped areas
will have automatic irrigation.
The project required replacement of 20 -foot wide strip of .City property
along the Green River. The project will enhance natural features by the
construction of an asphalt trail with two -foot gravel shoulders on each
side, along an alignment approved by the Parks and Recreation Director.
A trash enclosure is proposed as a separate wood structure, six feet in
height and adjacent to the river trail. The applicants are aware that the
minimum screening height is eight feet and will comply. Additional land-
scape screening has been proposed at this site to moderate visual impacts
(Attachment D).
4. TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design
Building design is shown in Attachments B and C. Exterior treatment is full
width brick with a medium brown color. Material samples and a colored draw-
ing will be presented by the applicant at the public hearing.
The two -story building is architecturally harmonious in scale and design
with the site and facing development except for the following:
a. The southwest elevation is a plain brick facade with no significant
elements of architectural interest. The applicant asserts that the
interior floor plan dictates this building design and future site devel-
opment will involve building expansion along this face.
Building modulation along this face is intended to be provided by in-
creased landscaping, increased initial tree size, and through the
massing of trees. Planning staff feels that the proposed landscape plan
could satisfy minimum BAR standards by reconfiguring and increasing the
number of trees. The applicant proposed to resolve this issue once a
registered landscape architect is hired, to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director, as authorized by the Board.
b. The second floor glass walls provide a harmonious architectural element
linking this building with the Fort Dent Office Building across the
street. However, no reflective rating for the glass has been provided.
This should be specified. Previous glass walled buildings have been
designed with 20% reflective materials.
c. The medium brown color brick does not seem to be consistent with this
building's basic (modern) architectural design, nor with the architec-
tural style and color of the facing development. No significant accent
colors are proposed.. This evaluation is based only on the textural
descriptions provided at this time.
STAFF REPORT 87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
to the BAR Page 6
The second floor glass walls may minimize the design /facade conflict.
However, the material /color scheme will tend to emphasize the unmodu-
lated blackness of the two -story southwest wall. Planning staff feels
that a light grey brick would be more harmonious with the facing devel-
opment's off -site concrete facade and minimize the impacts of the blank
wall.
d. No luminaire plans have as yet been submitted.
5. TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
The freestanding trash enclosure is the only miscellaneous structure pro-
posed (see Criteria 3 discussion).
6. TMC 18.60.060(4) - Interurban Special Review Guidelines
a. Proposed development use should be sensitive to the natural amenities of
the area.
b. Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
c. Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
With respect to guidelines a, b, and c, the significant natural amenities in
the area are the Green River, Fort Dent Park, views of Mount Rainier, and
the soon- to -be- completed Christensen Trail link to Fort Dent Park running
along the site's eastern boundary. These are also all recreational amen-
ities.
The proposed development as conditioned would be consistent with guidelines
A and B in its provision of harmonious street trees and sidewalk design
which will form a gateway to Fort Dent Park (see BAR Criteria 1 through 3);
construction of a Christensen Trail link along the Green River; and provi-
sion of landscaping which will enhance the project site and adjacent river
trai 1.
On -site pedestrian circulation is provided by a system of concrete walkways
around the building for access to the river trail, and to Southcenter Boule-
vard from which persons can access Fort Dent Park. Formal access to the
river trail should be developed across the landscaped area.
d. Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
The proposed office use is principally permitted in the C -2 zone and is
compatible with the office use facing it across Southcenter Boulevard.
The compatibility of the building has been discussed in BAR Criteria 4.
STAFF REPORT 87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
to the BAR Page 7
e. Proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse envi-
ronmental impacts.
The City has determined that there are no probable significant negative
environmental impacts due to this project and will soon issue a Deter-
mination of Non - significance. Detailed construction measures related to
site drainage and flood control facilities are still being resolved with
the Public Works Department, but no significant obstacles are antici-
pated.
f. Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
There are no known historical features being impacted by the proposed
development.
CONCLUSIONS
Planning staff concludes that the proposed office development generally satis-
fies all BAR criteria and guidelines. It is important to note that this is
based upon conditions identified above and listed under staff recommendations.
The staff has discussed all issues with the applicant and resolved almost all
issues with the conditions contained in this proposal. The remaining sig-
nificant issue is glass reflectivity and building color as discussed in BAR
Criterion 4. The applicant will be presenting additional materials at the pub-
lic hearing. The staff does not view the many landscape issues as significant
to the extent that the Board is willing to authorize the Planning Director to
approve the detailed landscape site plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Department recommends approval subject to the conditions listed
below:
1. Drainage and flood control structures to be approved by the Public Works
Director.
2. The short platting and establishment of a 40 -foot access easement as dis-
cussed in Background 2.a. to completed without significant changes in the
site plan. Any significant changes, as determined by the Planning Director,
shall be reviewed by the Board.
3. Final landscape design to be approved by the Planning Director as discussed
in Background 2.b.
STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
87- 14 -DR: Castillo Company
Page 8
4. Automatic irrigation shall be provided. Irrigation plans to be approved by
the Planning Director.
5. A pedestrian path to the Christensen Trail from the building shall be con-
structed per approval of the Parks and Recreation Director.
6. Building facade /colors to be specified by applicant and approved by the
Board.
7. Glass wall reflectivity should be specified and approved by the Board.
8. Luminaire plans to be approved by the Planning Director based on BAR Cri-
teria 3 and 4. Light standards shall be harmonious in height and design
with that provided by the facing development, and provide for no off -site
spillover.
(22/87- 14- DR.1 -3)
ATTACHMENT A
VICINITY MAP
ENTENNIAL
K
1
03
/
(
a ,
„
(
/
•
cZD I
10• INN. NAN -
/4
auel.‘ ■•4
2 / -
i , / -- • , (::: - .T -:-... „. _. :
L -- -
,... : i „. • , „.
:
/ i I
A.
_ -
• -
IRO SIOR•T
vs' ICE
BUILDING
THE E CASTELLO COMPANY 1mill SOUTH SEATTLE. WA.
e.o. F•tos• Now, It00. Amu 1.11 24 *WO
SCRVICF CENTER
(o)
» ."
DISTRIBUTION OF ARCA
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE: INSURANCE COMPANY
111/10
1 :
51 71 6B OX. 160.29S 50.2T.
4.14 ACRES
BUILDING
°mu AREA 1111 11.619 SOf 1 .
orrla AREA CU 5.190 so.rT.
FVFLUATiON 0E0 1.392 SO.F T.
TOTAL e.aor SO.".
PARKING
010014[0: 2.5i10005.7. Ab SPACES
PROW I DEO:
STANDARD: 121
GUEST: 1 0
CO4B001 : I
BOGD,
(OvERED: 6
RYWOJX,. : g ,
GwATVA
(51161 SOW BREW
,..„. ,••• • ,
num PAP
I . WiSi•tle ,
..... Al
c�-
0
E X T E R I O R F I N I S H E S
lO BRICK VENEER
20 BRICK SOLDIER COURSE
0 TINTED GLASS
o BRONZE ANDOI ZEO ALWIWM FRAME
QS MCT.L COPING
0 PAINTED OVERHEAD METAL DOORS
KZ VISION PANELS
p. BUILDING I.D. SIGN
0
e9 0 3j
1 , "64' "6A.
•
c p amp.= 171 171
0
•
I t L 1 _L i_
0
1 TH E M CASTE LLO � COMPA11 Y 111!1111
SERVICE CENTER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
d! ST.'L FAR. MLA :. 14001•TpI .IUt•Ois RI'!
L.
MI= DRENITIO E
/COON MBE EVEN
MEE malign
EIBI E031 T t4LlLBG1 �E�
e
s
•
_QS? RZt1lA `
..
toe
ris •
• • 0 � Ow .�y A7AttA •
1 61160
1C)
i 1
'
;.
I !♦
g+rn�w twly.a3 --
H / V
H
hn'tA� nN1.
L»405CAPE HA t.121AL
a.l.0012 i•e
+.+xt..++ +..+o, r uuACt
N M v s we
NIL .+ns �• °•
".. A rest aanlcty
I!•e'
A+enb/ fsi.
Z Y.yal�}Y,�••.I fitmtm s 1 .14,4
AoaCla S.J
au. 4.01 - .Met
IXYON .CAR. :4.1..
fM6 AZLLta. S..At
t[D AZA1.64 14L.
14t'ZCY 1Y11 0UL.
6.utr I'�
T WA _
CaNCEPTU
LAN *CAPE
_ �.... __ ... 1 ci p111111
SOUTH SEATTLE. WA.
SEPIICE GENII/
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Wt. En
e..PR.ZO
w
w
MA -
THE CASTILLO COMPANY Mil
• P.O. OR VOW 1.:01111. AMMO .3014 MOD 231.4000
SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
SCR /ICE CENTER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
me Vet 7.1 RASA acculera.tomis elm
•
TOUNLa ENGNEERS
111111/42•■•■1
Fj"
Cit` of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 14, 1988
The meeting was called to order at 8:06 p.m. by Mr. Coplen,
Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Knudson,
Hamilton and Haggerton.
Mr. Larson was absent.
Representing the staff were Moira Bradshaw and Joanne Johnson.
MINUTES
MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 31, 1988
MEETING AS AMENDED. MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
88 -1 -R and 88 -1 -CA: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION - Continued -
Continued Public Hearing from the March 31, 1988 Planning
Commission meeting regarding annexation area and City -wide
amendments to the Zoning Map and Zoning Code.
Moira Bradshaw reviewed the supplement to the March 17, 1988
staff report.
The Public Hearing was reopened.
Mr. Daniel P. Wolf, 11821 44th Avenue S. expressed his concerns
regarding a proposed rezone in the annexation area from R -1 to M-
1. He submittal a list of persons living in the affected area
which were surveyed for their preference. This was entered into -
the record as Exhibit 9.
Mr. Mike Levy, 17310 S.E. 45th Street, Issaquah represented the
owner of a mobile home park in the annexation area. He expressed
his concern at the adverse impacts to low income residents should
a change be recommended from what is now presently permitted in
the area.
Ms. Bradshaw clarified that the park would be unaffected by the
proposed changes.
Punning Commission
April 14, 1988
Page 2
Discussion ensued on this issue.
Bob Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA
98121 represented Scott Traverso and Six Robblees Inc. His
concern was the adverse impacts the landscaping requirement of
the M -2 zone would have on businesses presently operating in the
area.
Neil Robblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South felt the landscaping
requirement would result in poor visibility and, thus, create a
safety hazard for trucks leaving his business. He requested
flexibility to move landscaping back from the street.
Scott Traverso, 11025 S.E. 60th, Renton, concurred with Mr. Rob -
blee and also felt that landscaping placed around the building
would be more appropriate.
Pete Hedegard, 16800 N.E. 31st, Bellevue favored landscaping
against the buildings or kept at lower levels and in narrower
areas. He felt trees would create a visual hazard for truck
traffic and therefore should not be part of the landscaping.
Bill Schaible, 5729 S. Pamela Drive, Seattle, WA. He has a 1973
mobile home on his property and wanted it grandfathered in. He
has three lots but they are difficult to develop because of their
shape and easements. Inability to use a mobile home would render
the property useless.
Ed Woyvodich, 14415 - 57th Avenue S., pointed out that the fill
that took place on his property was in accordance with all King
County standards. He submitted a diagram of his property as
Exhibit 10. He felt that unless the property is designated
commercial, his property will be rendered useless.
John Richards, 15320 - 64th Avenue S. represented Rainier Bank.
He favored a 65 foot building height limitation or, subsequent to
Board of Architectural review, the option of going higher.
Sharon Stanley, 12072 - 44th Place S. was concerned with the
impacts a rezone from R -1 to M -1 would have on her property. She
wanted the neighborhood and quality of life to be maintained as
it is.
Norma Derr, 12507 - 50th Place S. expressed a concern regarding
the inability to use mobile homes would have on development of
the rather small lots in their area.
Glenda Knudson, 12050 - 44th Place S. requested information as to
the impacts the annexation and rezone will have on her property.
'�`�'�
� "�" }.,. ,....
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 14, 1988
Page 3
Louis Stanley, 12072 - 44th Place S. asked if the current zoning
would remain the same if annexation were to occur.
Mr. Hamilton clarified that the intent is to preserve the current
zoning.
Dan Wolf asked for clarification on the current status of the
proposed rezone from R -1 to M -1.
Mr. Knudson clarified that a vote was not taken at the last
meeting.
The Public Hearing was closed and a 4- minute recess was called.
MR. HAMILTON MOVED TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT
WITH A PROPOSED NEW SECTION M -2L WHOSE PURPOSE SHALL READ AS
STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE ADDITION OF "AND FLEXIBLE
FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING, TO AMEND TABLE 2 OF THE STAFF REPORT TO
SHOW THE M -2L ZONE WITH FIVE FEET OF FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING. MR.
KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
MR. HAMILTON MOVED THAT ISSUE NO. 2 MOBILE HOME /MANUFACTURED
HOMES THAT WE ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION. MR. KNUDSON
SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. •
MR. HAGGERTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE HEIGHT OF THE ENTIRE DISTRICT
AS SHOWN ON THE MAP (BOARD 3) TO 65 FEET WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH
OUR EXITING CODE AND HIGHER SUBJECT TO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW APPROVAL ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE
MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY PASSED.
MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO LEAVE THE DESIGNATION ON THE TWO BLOCKS
DESIGNATED LIGHT INDUSTRY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS R -1, 7.2.
MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION. A VOTE WAS TAKEN WITH KIRSOP
AND HAMILTON VOTING YES; MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO AND MR. HAGGERTON
OBTAINING.
Mr. Coplen noted that a note of thanks was received from Mrs.
Sowinski.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Joanne Johnson
Secretary
.- 1111"
Assitumumaminiunk,
amminik.
4FF-07-7-7 5 6=3'16 . S.V4 0 4
A/OLLSC, O/y
-‘)
■••••
o f.
0I
:• , •:S ": a .,
7�.: ,,., ..,,; �•....... ?�k'...m.. .... e:C47n...: \�d.a4d.fc +t:.TJ,.i4x:k: ...._. .ri }fR:. u........} .. 2 .. ....... ,.i.. f ,.�._
N.
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
2. Case Number:
Applicant:
,Request:
3. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
1. Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday March 13, 1988
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board
of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on March 24, 1988, at
8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, to consider the following:
Planning Commission Public Hearing
87 -4 -CPA, 87 -5 -R
John C. Strander
Comprehensive Plan map change from Low Density Residential
to Commercial, and pre- annexation zone designation of
Regional Retail Business (C -2).
13530 - 53rd Avenue South
88 -2 -CA: Adult Entertainment Ordinance
City of Tukwila
Text amendment to the Tukwila Zoning Code establishing
regulations for Adult Entertainment uses.
T3101,1:'.'i.;' ^ ■:^at_t : °:.k
87 -2 -CPA: Central Business District Sidewalk Policies
City of Tukwila
Add policies on the design and provision of sidewalks in
the CBD to the Comprehensive Plan, and amend TMC 18.70
(Nonconforming Lots, Structures and Uses; Tukwila Zoning
Code) and TMC 11.64 (Sidewalk Construction).
Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing
87- 14 -DR:
Castillo Company, Inc.
Construct a two -story office building with 18,401 square
feet on a 4.42 acre site.
Approximately 100 feet east of the Interurban Avenue South/
Southcenter Boulevard intersection in the NW } of Sec. 24,
Twn. 23, Rge. 4, Tukwila, WA
Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement
or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be
obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify
your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above
items.
Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants,
Adjacent Property Owners, File.
Dear Jack:
t
The Castillo Company, Inc.
2345 E. University Drive
P.O. Box 21 097 Phoenix, Arizona 95034 (602) 231-9000
- March ;1Q 19 8
r 'r,t.'A ,..
' 1 \ f_,4 i', F [i ,7; , i
1
Mr Jack Pace 1 r a�
• �� {` �t . ✓� .1,J\ 1 FA l" i
1 Senior Planner +_
Planning Department . - ._ --- _,
�r.
6200 Southcenter Boulevard M f ) .,l t� �t)�tlf✓r s i :: : i '_' .., -- j
ft Tukwila, WA 98188 �--- ",a
III r o
Re: Proposed State Farm Service Center Site x:
q
zu t
South Seattle, WA (SEA)
.•pr c;c�; ..? ;:�i?':3 <:1'i'!" :7K „^ir 3ti "'v_.'.'.i. .i"':s,i'M, f; ;+..�.h;v K,K ,..;..
2„_� is n:., <.,..,'.�..'.'•r:,,..1 F ,. s�: ,..� ? / s ....,.. ,�L ............ ...... �.. .L�. ".�d�L.... $ tiP'.'d...,.
Enclosed are 4 sets of drawings reflecting comments received
after the February 25, 1988 staff review meeting. These include
the following drawings:
1. Sheet A -1, Site Plan - revision dated March 8, 1988;
2. Sheet A -2, Exterior Elevations - dated February 15,
1988;
3. Sheet L -1, Conceptual Landscape Plan - revision dated
March 8, 1988;
4. Sheet C -1, Civil Site Plan - revision dated March 10,
1988;
5. Sheet C -2, Site Cross Sections - revision dated March
10, 1988.
Additionally we have provided PMT reductions of the above
(f drawings for your use.
To supplement the building description provided on Sheet A -2,
please apply the following statements:
1. The building veneer will be a full dimension brick,
built over steel frame. The color will be a medium
brown.
2. The glazing will be bronze tinted glass set in bronze
anodized aluminum frames. The upper and lower sections
of the second story curtain wall will be an opaque
spandrel panel to match the glass.
3. All metal coping and flashing will be painted to match
the aluminum frames.
.4.4/�p. ; ' i r W ;,u,: ,, „ �r _' ,,' ,,' � .., ,r�' w,�r+ '13: ^ . ', EZ : , + . r ” t.,. 541.rn"fi`!A• ,i ? Y !'_ l ,' t
..y 7.,
Y.:_" srJii<. i... �4�rad,.:...... a.: iM: 13i. 1E�'l �rx:,.. SnJit�.' iS' t�<;' ��'S�t.>rvi.S,��.�tcY.S•cta'r.� L�i�: GW: ii. tl�r�llE fl 'ai"�".w�"6tri!w ?'.11i::.l.c..a P
Consulting Engineering 0 Development 0 Real Estate
s�S
}
Mr. Jack Pace
March 10, 1988
Page Two
skc
Enclosures
cc: Shana Schmillen (w /enclosures)
Tom Novosad (w /enclosures)
Jerry Herman (w /enclosures)
The Castillo Company, Inc.
v`wF :.^,' tnr .xiF.3U i45c^W '" 7C ?3.vu ,.K
4. The evaluation bay doors will be painted to match the
brick color.
At the time of the review by the Architectural Review Hoard on
March 24, 1988, a colored rendering and a preliminary colors and
material board will be submitted. We are looking forward to that
review.
If you require further information or have any questions, please
call.
Sincerely,
THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC.
David Parker
Architect
-•
,
Mr. Jack Pace
Senior Planner
City of Tukwila
Planning Department
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Proposed State Farm Service Center Site
South Seattle, WA (SEA)
Dear Jack:
The Castillo Company, Inc.
2345 E. University Drive
P.O. Box 21 087 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (602) 231-9000
February 16, 1988
FEDERAL EXPRESS
Please find enclosed the architectural drawings reflecting new
designs for our project to be located in your city. We have had
some program changes to deal with as well as your design comments
and this has caused the delay. Included in our resubmittal
package are 4 sets of the following:
1. Sheet A -1, Site Plan
2. Sheet A -2, Exterior Elevations
3. Sheet L -1, Conceptual Landscape Plan
These sheets are dated February 15, 1988.
1988
.II' WY'l' * ..dy'��+�` '' .A.t°r0"5`6 1A4F4"aJSPgqWW4MaG•C"? .0(!Ry' , 1• ..
Mr. Touma of Touma Engineers will be submitting revised
engineering and site cross section sheets on Thursday, February
18, 1988. I will be following this submittal up with PMT
reductions of the required drawing as specified in the
application check -list.
Consulting Engineering ❑ Development ❑ Real Estate
P
�v�
, . ..,. :.,.. .
Mr. Jack Pace
February 16, 1988
Page Two
We are anticipating
Review. Board agenda
prior to this date,
information or have
skc
Enclosures
cc: Jim Beemer (w /enclosures)
Jerry Herman (w /enclosures)
The Castillo Company, Inc.
a place on the March 24, 1988 Architectural
. If additional review sessions are required
please let us know. If you need additional
questions, do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC.
CiVage-4
David Parker
Architect
f~''~-■ -
Baltimore Aircoil
Model F1000
Centrifugual Fan
r With the Exclusive BALTIBO
Series
Industrial Fluid'Coolers
to F146XX
Model F144X-- F148X•X
7'9v
3
NOTES:
1. The stsndsrd riph, hand arrangement as shown
has the air inlet sine on the right when Win;
the connection and Leff hand entitlement Can
be furnished by special orde,
4, The recirculating wale eonneclionS, coil con-
nections end overflow connectiOnS are always
located on the same end of the unit.
7. All location dimensions for coil connectIOny ere
approximate and should not be used 10. prefab -
rication Ot Connecting piping.
4. If discharge hoods with positivo Closure
dampers are furnished, COn$vlt B.A.0 Repreaen•
Wive for added weight and height. Use next
larger fan motor slip for the additional external
static pressure.
i. Coll section Is normally the heaviest Motion. •
'Indicates unit ships in one piece,
S. For external static pressures up to 'h' use next
terror motor size.
7, When the tlow rate on model FIS4X•X exCaeda
480 rpm, the quantity of coil Connections will
double.
8. For Indoor applictlon 01 P1000 industrial Fluid
Coolers, the room may be used as a plenum with
ductwork attached to the discharge only II Inlet
ductwork Is required sn enclosed fan *action mull
be speettisd; consult your B,A,C, Rsprssentativs
tor details,
0, Models F171x•X thru F146x - X sre single cols
section units. fan cycling results only in on •Ott
operation. for addltiortat steps of control, two -speed
tan motors are available. More precise capacity
control can be obtained with Modulating fen dis-
charge dampers (ale Pepe 28 for details).
•, -°
?r.... MQDE
O
, WEIGHTS
. g
_
H�'
13 NIIECTIONS
DIMENSION
N N,
C
1
1 on I
A PPROX.
EHPO.
APPROX.
°Pen,
SECTION
COIL
SIZE
DILWASION
P1711 -F
1,460
1,710
1,480'
4,900
2
'h
22%
86
1
2
2
P1712 -F
1,620
1,910
1,000
4,700
2
'h
31'/.
941/4
1
2
2
F1713.13
1,820
2,150
1,180
5,200
3
'h
_ 391/4
103
1
2
2
F1720 -H
2,020
2,480
2.020'
75
9,700
44
131/4
771/4
F172144
2,260
2,800 2,260'
75
10,500
U3
'h
ir
21%
85
■
N
F1722 -H
2,560
3,180 1,650
75
10.200
1 A
30'6
94
P1723 -J
2.930
3,650 2,010
75
11,600
14
38%
103
F1731 -J
3,110
4,080 3,110'
115
16,000
71
%
24
88'
1
2
2
F1732 -J
3.580
4,890 2,470
115
14,500
7%
i.
331/4
F1733 -K
4,020
5,280 2,850
115
15,000
10
%
%
108.
1
2
2
1
4,530
6,050 3,140
150
22,000
10
1
4
331/4
971/2
'°'
1
2
2
P1743 4,
5,140
6,850 3,720
150
23,000
15
1
4
421/4
106%
1
2
2
F1841 -L
6,800_..
8,730
4,000
220
' 33.000
15
11/2
4
24
108%
1
2
3
j
j F11&42 -L
P1S43
7,530
8,170
9,890,920
11,100
220
31 I.A.t
114
4
331/4
117'/4•
1
2
2
3
3
1
5,930
220
33,300
15
11/4
4
42
127%
1
F1342-/A
10,180
15,130 6,560
305
44,000
20
2
4
33"
134%
2
2
3
F1343 -N
11,650
18,980 7,950
305
48,500
25
2
4
42
143%
2
2
3
P144144
9,330
14,600 5,600
47,600
20
24
1421/4
P1442 -N
10,770
16,570 7,050
49,700
25
331/4
151%
F1443.0
12,200
18,480 8,480
8
51,300
30
421/4
160%
N
F1443 -P
12,390
19,670 6,460
68,450
40
421/4
160%
F14111 -P
13,820
21,874 8,320
610
78,400
40
24
14214
(r)e'r
F1481.0
13,860
21,920 8,320
610
84,450
50
24
142'A
F1462 -P
15,890
24,670 10,390
610
76,150
40
111 '
331/4
151%
N
F1483•P
18,070
27,560 12,670
610
73,950
40
421/4
160%
•
to F146XX
Model F144X-- F148X•X
7'9v
3
NOTES:
1. The stsndsrd riph, hand arrangement as shown
has the air inlet sine on the right when Win;
the connection and Leff hand entitlement Can
be furnished by special orde,
4, The recirculating wale eonneclionS, coil con-
nections end overflow connectiOnS are always
located on the same end of the unit.
7. All location dimensions for coil connectIOny ere
approximate and should not be used 10. prefab -
rication Ot Connecting piping.
4. If discharge hoods with positivo Closure
dampers are furnished, COn$vlt B.A.0 Repreaen•
Wive for added weight and height. Use next
larger fan motor slip for the additional external
static pressure.
i. Coll section Is normally the heaviest Motion. •
'Indicates unit ships in one piece,
S. For external static pressures up to 'h' use next
terror motor size.
7, When the tlow rate on model FIS4X•X exCaeda
480 rpm, the quantity of coil Connections will
double.
8. For Indoor applictlon 01 P1000 industrial Fluid
Coolers, the room may be used as a plenum with
ductwork attached to the discharge only II Inlet
ductwork Is required sn enclosed fan *action mull
be speettisd; consult your B,A,C, Rsprssentativs
tor details,
0, Models F171x•X thru F146x - X sre single cols
section units. fan cycling results only in on •Ott
operation. for addltiortat steps of control, two -speed
tan motors are available. More precise capacity
control can be obtained with Modulating fen dis-
charge dampers (ale Pepe 28 for details).
.7.VPrY te
FROM TEAM ENGINEERING,INC 12.12.1988 9:28 . P. 3
Engineering Data /Models F171X•X
Do not use for construction. Refer to factory certified dimensions.
In the Interest of product Improvement, specifications and dimensions are subject to change without notice.
Model F171- to F174X-X
• 4'4" on F171X-1
414" on F172X-X. F173X.X, F174X-X
"3 OFW on F171X-X
4BFW on f172X•x, FIT3X-X, F174X-X
Mod • F134X-X only
10
rtr
Model 112)1.1
10
121A"
*• 4 4 3 t { 3 * 'I +
•
*�t+once%e�Ma'R:ni"•t3.' looaxRa7 VternFill£R 21947
14
. 4
Z1 CI ty i
c rvil
__...�.
•
N
re)
PCL.
/
7
45459 et
0 425
HZ /. 15
KA
/
gis1.14•--PR
>s
CA; AC
0
9E
1331.38
VACM -ED +day 5 19
\ \ a s
2 95490
IN T th ,
B4N ,
\ \
19
0 .0
`Zo
by VOL. 14 /4fy
0 Come the t own o %Tukwila
ourpo1 21-203
\ /
a \ 7
et>
/
7
/PC
\ %1'‘ 1 . .7.4
\
K
32
LiJ
5 3E
r i 78 �Z creje92
0 61. AS 1 Z y 3
B �o .
0
O
C eI VER gT
7 -
$. 96
3r1
0
KING COUNTY
DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS
mF oR
a
\
y ti 0, por.\
, o PCL. 3 \
1' • 0 4
q 0
1
\
k °4 0 ,
\ 0
o��
e
44'
por.
-- v ;; ‘ ,0 4)
/ Oq-
)/ 4/‘�P
o G?C
0
4 64-
1-'
r g co' y q
ti,,�yly y � 9 2z
1334 7 w \
� Q '
9
.A
0" 11 5
AKER'S
\
G
\ Ig3 1 p �.
3 0
INTER
VACP MAY 5; 1919 1:7y Town of Tukwt
— — —
4529/coq
5459GO8
c , ' LINE i I�
THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ASSISTING IN LOCATING YOUR
PROPERTY AND IS NOT GUARANTEED
TO SHOW ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS
- 295490 \ \
DD. VOL. 14/46 \
_ _ _�--
3DRY LN. Poze 3 E N Le }�ar 5 3a 73)
cc c,� usE No 92
WHITE -
GREEN RIVER
(OLO - QGP.T1
85.0 w
1 � h
j.w
oe
s
0
3
in 1
at
_ fLc,.* 10)
NW 24 - 2
N 87— 34
NP
1 ‘ - ‘
ti
GI
A
5 •MGN F O
5 50 ' S5 4
Ad 3 - z�
CD
.7
/
II .41. LUOU.PNG
- - 7
•
• ..... ...... •••• .........................
.. •••••••••...c1==
........ ......... .................
.......... ....... ......
E00 OE 0.D. SO
...... 577Li • • • '.
1,?...% 'OK
i c
- 74
73 WIN MINA MAIL OCOICATICN—„.
170054-414.---„
(VOL.
AREA
SariE ROI
4, 4101 SOO 404 070170
Pr04■41144 LOVIIN441 P.
CONMII
• -ft
[Mk STORK
OFFICE
BUILDING
4474.71
......
44 I
, e / e
or
1 Li
I
.4 STAM FANG
1 "3 OHIMAHICE
AZ
-
iN
DISTRIBUTION OF AREA
SITE A7:0E. 5O.FT.
BUILDING
OFFICE AREA i4.529 50.FT.
EVALUATION ARCA "344 50.FT.
TOTAL 15.673 SO.FT.
PARKING
REOUtREDT 2.5/1000S.F. • 40 SPACES
PROVIDED. 130 • 2 HANDICAPPED
TOTAL: 132 SPACES
THE CASTE LLO COMPANY [MI SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
P.O. OCR 21017 790007. 4517011 11031 16021 231-1001 I SERVICE CENTER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
17( 3747t FAIN NAL OLOONKTO
n
SO
• • -
■••••••••
EIEWATI
a—
SDEPitifl
bp-1,7-440
1.f 3
THE CASTE LLO COMPANY N
I.O. KR t.t Hanle. *a tD., ems4 Ira, 2C -VDGC
SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
SERVICE CENTER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
oc .r n.t■ . 4 0 1 1 . 6 1 / . 0 /0,11.1.1600
C -I e! 2
a—
b —
m. o noma. woo
—
—
awwwra -ww it F_
2:
- 7
CROSS SECTION A • A
J
meow. Paella
I
aPalmi Mr.
www.u.ws•
CROSS SECTION S - S
Wal
P 2
roar •••■•
Cr.wM• PIM efts...
SweurenS fain(
% ' 0 r
EXTRUDED CLOPS DETAIL
CROSS SECTION C - C
—a
•13.0y-rioa Inky. WW1 11•11411110
THE CASTILLO COMPANY PnArl
F.O. at 21011 F.0011 Z. r11200 13134 10031 231 -300
SERYlCE CENTER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
OW STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMULTM .1L11 015 4711
GENERAL MOTES
I. St 1'sllW IOU MO sa 1•137
anon • NM SUMO= • vuvwtlfa
t. 1501113W W (11111NILIIMISIr
MAIM ore M 3.=t twos
aims
3. tSara fns M 51.131113 ;MM. M.W.
1331/ nam
t. MOM. V. O.. 4st. nM • OM Itn
11•/0 s I ratan 3r.. nM • amu•
a•Uao ¢701/[1[11• WM. r- ann•
I. M •OIS SOS • Morn d 11 • MO. a.
em la en nit FM,
I. data 1110 TIE 9041 s 113 M.
L anus iup.., SKIT, Rt 71'13 }Ifa
1. Ev Wo frs fro s 051170 •••■ sans
nor•rn 3011 M TIM M MU, 370
r rri nnrtsat m Mart MOWS AVM
M. reI le 37131[ Mt 11 1/n.d 55 Pm.. ufunr
U. Mr ml d11e Min rA•1311 MM In. % I
fmu -
TOUMA ENGSIEERS
COR
Wraffla
orn
malla 03•
_s
C -S of 2
.
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Customer claims service center with
drive -in automobile claims evaluation area.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection()
Tax I.D. # 295490- 0445 -06. Located on the east side of Southcenter Blvd.,
100 feet north of its intersection iwth Interurban Avenue.
Quarter: OW A Section: 2.4 Township : .3 Range:
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
3. APPLICANT : * . Name: The Castillo Company, Inc.
Signature:
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
Address:
DESI REVIEW APPLICATION c, of TUK
RE E
!�''.
JAN ; a, 1988
f """`•``•: ?w�.`; h' ;vl } yri r.- <` «2 - `.` a •;:::'i;;oii' ``3: DEPT.
j ; `• ^;?'.y < f9 s s ?k,;. tn.,... .•�v �X' .Z'�y; \• >i+.tfrQ:F .�,;.: x:...',i:v:; <
Phone: (602) 231 -9000
See Attached
Address: 2345 East University , Phoenix. AZ 85034
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
fi
Date: December 15, 1987
David Parker
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent,
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
Phone:
I /WE,Csignature(s)]
swear that WW1/are owner(s7 or contract purchaser(s) of tho•
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
correct to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date:
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the .
criter.ia...,_.i.the space provided.for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
\�.t- .;.�TIY_sn. i�'.•rti .,.am v.rrm.. ._ti`�ln:r, -$, ...)) /:P.1 n.rr .watw.r+rh •r"•:1J'<?^, .C. Lt .
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
8. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
RESPONSE: See Attached.
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE: See Attached.
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
RESPONSE: See Attached.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
8. BUILDING DESIGN
r�vea �. r�nxz�.eiue.Nar'.uxa .y.aT�.Yw.u.v.�W9a:cW'�:G..i .^atnwo-nsa cr[�+nr.+rtn
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE: See Attached.
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE: See Attached.
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
(- DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
See Attached.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
.See Attached
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
See Attached.
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
See Attached.
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
See Attached.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
See Attached.
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
5. Access to the area in which this property is located is from
Interurban Avenue to the southwest. We have sited the
building such that minimal parking is seen as the property
is approached. The only parking to be seen is the few
customer stalls located conveniently to the front of the
building adjacent to the main entrance. The bulk of the
parking, which is designated for employee and customer owned
vehicles is located to the northeast near a side, employee
entrance.
6. The building that is being proposed for this site is a
single story masonry building with a flat roof. The main
entrance is accentuated by a projected glass facade and
corresponding masonry side walls. This is topped by a
standing seam metal roof. A similar element exists at all
window locations and serves to break up the long rectilinear
form of the building. Access to the property for the
customer is via the driveway closest to the intersection of
Southcenter Blvd. and Interurban Avenue. Customer parking
is immediately accessible from this driveway. Customers
finishing their business and exiting from the drive -in
evaluation area will follow the drive aisle around 170
degrees and directly exit the site back onto Southcenter
Blvd.
7. The site has the distinction of having for its southeasterly
border the Green River. This presents a major landscaping
element to work around. With the development of the site
and the need for increased storm water run -off storage
capacity the banks of the Green River will be altered in
accordance to City of Tukwila guidelines for increased river
flow capacity. With this alteration, the area set aside by
the City to accommodate the property's link with the river
trail system will move 20 feet further inland. Located
adjacent to this walk will be an employee picnic area to
take advantage of the river views when weather permits. The
parking area will be screened for this river trail area by a
hedge of dwarf burford holly. The parking area will include
curbed islands at the ends of parking rows. These islands
will include typically a 10' -12' Bur Oak tree, Dwarf Chinese
Holly shrubs and an evergreen ground cover. Site lighting
is achieved by two 30 foot high pole fixtures with one
single heads each. The heads are downward directed,
shielded fixtures with a 250 watt H.P.S. lamp. The soffits
over the window area will hold a pair of recessed, wall -
washing fixtures to highlight these building elements.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION, Continued
8. The design of this building is a result of a growth and
expansion program by State Farm Insurance Company. Due to
the wide spread nature of this program, a building design
was achieved that could be flexible enough to be located in
a variety of growing population areas through -out the
country. The design would have to accommodate varieties in
size requirements as well as varieties in local building
vernacular.
Our building is a single story masonry building with a
parapet wall and a flat roof. At each window and door
location is a building projection with a sloped metal roof
and fascia. Materials for construction of these projects is
handled on a local level therefore the final selection of
materials is from local suppliers ensuring a material that
is harmonious with construction materials in the area.
The drive -in evaluation area includes in its design upward
acting garage doors. These provide a means to allow an
enclosed space for damaged vehicle inspection. At the front
of the building, these evaluation area garage doors has been
set back from the front wall of the building and is even
further hidden by the front entrance projection.
All mechanical equipment is located. to the rear of the
building and is screened and protected by a 6 -foot high wood
fence. This screen cannot be entirely opaque due to the
requirement that air be allowed to move through it to the
HVAC equipment. A similar screen is provided around the
trash pick -up area.
Maintenance on a company wide scale is an essential cost -
control consideration. A centralized system for building
up -keep is provided by the company at a corporate level and
is handled out of regional offices. This precludes the need
for a similar building form and similar materials selection
in their construction program. Similar buildings will be
uniform in initial cost as well as future maintenance costs
and maintenance schedules.
9. An enclosure will be built to enclose the trash receptacle
at the rear of the building. The enclosure will be a wood
structure to match the mechanical equipment screen at the
rear of the building. A stained wood structure provides a
relatively long lasting low maintenance item yet allows for
low cost and quick repair should an accident occur with the
use of heavy refuse equipment.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION, Continued
10. Our project.'s use of the site' allows for a relatively large
part of the site to be left undeveloped. In addition, with
the exception of altering the river bank configuration. in an
acceptable means of storm water control, we are leaving a
forty -foot, plus, swathe of undeveloped property on the
Green River frontage.
11. One of the reasons for this site being selected was in
consideration for company employees and the sites
availability to the river frontage and its proposed trail
system and to the proximity to the Fort Dent Park
recreational facilities.
12. The site has been developed to separate customer related
traffic patterns and those of the relatively high number of
employees. Where customer circulation will cross the paths
of employees walking to and from their cars there will be
separation due to the different times of day involved.
13. The relatively enclosed location of the property within the
bend of the Green River will eventually be developed as
entirely commercial. This is with the exception of the
terminus of Southcenter Blvd in Fort Dent Park. In fact the
entire length of Interurban Avenue in which this area is
associated, is developed as commercial.
14. The relative small scale of the proposed development should
indicate the minimal effect to the environment that will be
resulting. The currently uncontrolled storm water will now
be metered at a controlled rate into the Green River which
will be modified to handle the additional storage
requirement.
15. The historical significance of the area is limited to the
Green River itself. Our development of the property
respects the river setting and its course by maintaining a
substantial natural buffer.
oz.arrnw
•„mos,.....unox .o_veg;KC.xr.+aafeseatzaeihMer7 ZiktSgfV'F:iCW.AVtVtgVt Fair; xacttV t..dt:A4s exr.nxalkzu'V,arnsi n+axetun w.te"V ztrr.VtSQ"Rt,CcFX.... strtritimstycuntextrAttfeM
January 5, 1988
Vernon Umetsu
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: 87 -9 -SMP
Dear Mr. Umetsu:
Cordially,
Katie Greif
Development Manager
rwilh
"AIN
Di
We have received notification of the State Farm Insurance
development on Southcenter Boulevard. We own property on the
northwest side of Southcenter Boulevard within the same Green
River peninsula. We would appreciate being kept informed as to
the status of the project and the decisions made regarding
development.
JohnC.Rzlov
Development Company
2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454 -6060
_______,
- Pi rr
1 -1
........ .
...1A1.... 5 1988 1
CITY OF 1 ik
PLANNING EP i .
Cit;r of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
January 12, 1980
David Parker
The Castillo Company
P.O. Box 21087
Phoenix, Arizona 85034
RE: State Farm Building in Tukwila, Washington.
Dear Mr. Parker,
........................ �.^.......-. .,..e..:..,�....�.c...,....<. -« �na.�:�:a. v,.,�ra.•:Yr.�,.. . c.. wr .:•w<: asRr_or.•: ":
Attached are our notes of the Development Review Committee
meeting of January 7, 1988 at which we discussed your project.
In general, building design was the only issue which required
significant project modification. My own specific notes are
shown below and are supplemental to the attached DRC notes.
1. Building sprinklers are required.
2. A fire hydrant must be located within 300 ft. of all
exterior portions of the building.
3. Modify the eastern access point to allow for fire truck
access (acquire turning radius template from Dave Ray, Fire
Dept.).
4. The (relocated) trail must curve into the existing City
right of way at the eastern and western end of the property;
at the 12,000 cfs flood elevation. Be sure that this
feathering in of the trail conforms with river bank
modifications.
5. The trail should be built with 10 -12 foot wide asphalt and 2
foot gravel shoulders on each side. Design to be approved
by Don Williams, Parks Director and Ross Earnst, City
Engineer (for dike maintenance aspects).
6. Dedication of the 20 ,ft. trail area to the City is
acceptable.
7. Methane construction standards apply (see Duane Griffin,
Building Official).
8. The western access drive must line up with the (Radovich)
office building across Southcenter Blvd.
9. The eastern access is acceptable with its 30 ft. curb to
curb width, but must be built to City road standards (i.e.
as an extension of Southcenter Blvd.) with the apron at the
eastern bend. See Ross Earnst, City Engineer for
construction standards. Please coordinate this item with
Item No. 3.
10. Storm runoff detention facilities and river floodway
mitigation facilities must be approved by Public Works.
Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer has not yet received
calculations from Tom Toume.
11. There is a question of why the grass swales need to be so
deep if, as was stated, they are not for storm detention.
Unless otherwise required, swales should be very shallow
with a slope adequate to carry water to the storm system.
It is recommended that the swale system collect parking area
runoff from the area's perimeter in order to reduce erosion
and overloading the swale in two spots (thus losing the
filtering action).
12. A 12 ft. bank maintenance road of compacted gravel is needed
at the 9,000 cfs flood elevation per City standards (see
Ross Earnst). Also, see Item No. 5.
13. Six ft. sidewalks are required along Southcenter Blvd. This
should match the sidewalk design across Southcenter Blvd.,
and have a minimum 4 ft. landscape strip.
14. Street trees should match those across the street.
15. Cutting down of landscape island to east of evaluation area
will not increase the turning radius for exiting vehicles,
therefore reduction should be minimized.
16. The Planning staff do not feel that the proposed building
design has sufficient off -set, overhangs, and other
significant architectural elements to satisfy Board of
Architectural Review criteria. In the absence of very
significant design improvements, the Department will
recommend denial of the proposed building to the BAR.
17. A review of the project site and surrounding developments
leads the Planning staff to conclude that a two story
building would much more easily satisfy BAR criteria for
compatible site and building design. Such a building could
have a flat roof as you desire. Architectural modulation,
off -sets, and compatibility with surrounding developments
would be essential elements of building design.
,A one story building could satisfy BAR design criteria with
significant design modifications. Architectural design
changes to the proposed one story building could include a
sloping, off -set roof, significant modulation such as off-
setting the building in two areas, modifying the exterior
facade for better compatibility with the office building
across the street, and other various options as discussed at
the meeting.
18. All screening must be minimum of 8 ft. high; not 6 ft.
19. Additional landscape screening of the trash collection area
will be provided.
20. The area light poles should be reduced in sized from 30 ft.
to approximately 20 ft. Additional light poles are
permissible.
21. A luminaire plan will be required to demonstrate no off -site
light spill over.
22. Additional landscaping to break up the large paved parking
area will be necessary.
23. One truck loading space is required.
24. Automatic irrigation is required.
25. A minimum 40 ft. wide access easement from Southcenter Blvd.
to the new eastern riverbank parcel needs to be provided for
prior to any subdivision approval.
Please feel free to contact me at 206 - 433 -1858 if you have any
questions.
Sincere y,
ernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner
December 23, 1987
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
David Parker
The Castillo Co.
P.O. Box 21087
Phoenix, Arizona 85034
RE: State Farm Building Design.
Dear Mr. Parker,
It is my understanding that you have requested to move review by
the DRC to January 7, 1987 at 2:30, and postpone consideration by
the Board of Architectural Review until February 25, 1988.
Please contact me immediately at 206 - 433 -1858 if this is not the
case or if I can be of further help.
Sinceply,
Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner
December 21, 1987
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
David Parker
The Castillo Co.
P.O. Box 21087
Phoenix, Arizona 85034
RE: State Farm Building Design.
Dear Mr. Parker,
This letter is to confirm our conversation on December 18, 1987
and provide two examples of building designs recently approved by
the Board of Architectural Review (BAR).
The Planning Department has completed a preliminary review and
determined that the proposed building does not satisfy the
minimum design required for BAR approval at this time. This
determination will be reflected in the department's staff report
to the Board in the absence of any significant design revisions.
I understand that you feel strongly about working with staff to
make the necessary design revisions and having BAR review in
January. Required State environmental appeal and comment
periods, and departmental timelines for review and production put
severe time constraints on any significant project changes. The
following seems to be the only immediately apparent schedule
which would allow for a January BAR review to reflect significant
design changes:
12/30/87 Meet with DRC to review all significant design changes.
This means that you should be prepared to present or
make all significant design changes at this meeting.
1/ 4/87 All finished drawings must be in this office at the
opening of business.
Significant design changes made after this date will
lead staff to recommend that BAR consideration be
postponed until February to allow for adequate
departmental review.
Sincerely,
Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner
I have included drawings of two recently approved office
buildings the BAR has determined to be well designed. The first
is of similar size and cost per square foot, on a very
constrained site. The second is a two story building located
across the street from your site which reflects a desirable level
of design quality. These buildings do not reflect any
prototypical design, but do demonstrate the desired level of
architectural quality.
Please feel free to call me at 206 - 433 -1858 if I can be of any
help.
APPL CA ION
DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
FILE
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
87 -1 -R
BOUNDARY
'� '�
EPIC -4 -87
2/20/87
87 -2 -R
PARK /CROISSANT REZONE
53RD AVENUE S. & S. 139TH
CITY OF TUKWILA
EPIC-5-87
2/20/87
87 -3 -R
PARK & RIDE REZONE
INTERURBAN & 52ND AVENUE S.
CITY OF TUKWILA
$ - 1- -CPP'
EPIC -6 -87
11/2/87
87 -4 -R
SHIMATSU REZONE
NORTH OF CENTER PLAGE ON SOUTHCENTER
PARKWAY - TL 9011 -07, 9012 -06
SHIMATSU /MIKAMI
EPIC -
11/17/87
87 -5 -R
STRANDER REZONE
13530 - 53RD AVENUE S.
STRANDER
87 -4 -CPA
11/19/87
87 -6 -R
SCHNEIDER REZONE
EAST OF MACADAM ROAD &
NORTH OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
SCHNEIDER /
EPIC -29 -87
6/1/87
87 -7 -R
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
SIDEWALK PLAN IMPLEMENT. /ZONE
CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL BUSINESS DIS
CITY OF TUKWILA
. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
EPIC -12 -87
87 -2 -CPA
ADOPTED
ORD. #1516
TEXT ADMENDMENT (CBD)
REZONE 1987
F 14- DR
80 mg:r Dv/4r W Y
56E A1/2D: mF 7q.srnP
pic'314
5TffE P,tRjv I,4wgMe,
fogzr DEi4T PAcRK affgAMcE
P r
SPRY tr4 AGGeemeH
c"use tAt its Alt 0!"
WHITE - GREEN ) RIVER
coLo LocmioN
o 4,
0
KING COUNTY
DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS
si-vt
/
e 0 PitZat
\
s por.
4 - PCL.3 \
7
•
4 4'
e 4:5 T i
r:
\
co \ \
AKER
0 WO b,
PIG
33
I.C. OP
TR.. A
PP 1.0,11 P.0 P. 1321.81
SEE NW PA • as -4
THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ASSISTING IN LOCATING YOUR
PROPERTY AND IS NOT GUARANTEED
TO SHOW ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS
NW 24 - 23 - 4
N 87 34 31 W
I 0 e
R R ),
01
0 ,04
N 8? - 90 - 31 W
NW 25 - 23 - 4
mingiuiltlioilliiiiiiiiiirupumwRilimiliiiiiiiiiiiiipiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiir''
3 . - ' - „ 5. 6 7 \ , 8 9 ' 10 11 .......^ 12
, IF.TMIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LIEID IP
oe GE 0 t GE GL GE Y G • C Z i ' Le lL_e,..„ 1 T,„,..ous NOTI ., ,)„,-AL. .
" igFailitifigjill I I 4440:41414144196i;
1334.81
READERS
&AV
SW 24 - 23 - 4
.
kelt1/0.1..2 •
IGO
SCALE lIOO
eg
, 0
13S4.81\
NA NW 25 • 2.3 4
.••
MAP REVISED
Jucy /987
:
- T 7
, .1
TRACED OLD ASSE5SO66•MAP
II-
0
N
In
t:
A
I
OUNDAKERIS INT\tli\ 295490
` ' 5 ' 15:1?0. CombYmirti JVtitip:141-'111.4114.: . '
VACATE
:o \
\ \ \., '\
• \ ...• , • \
h;„.10 C \ 6 -- \
\
\ h"t „ / r / S \
,
\
Ci > - ' \
0 ...
......
\
\ 0: Cr:.;4'.:....› 1 . t • i 0 ...,3 \ V- • <
7 .• \
, r \
\
\ •, 4 , 0/ \ \ "
VI' ,
„',..''' .,
\\ f2f: :"; ) ..°. )
,.0 \
SF \ \-, , PC
\ n
/ /
./
<
./
./
7” \ ‘ o
" /
\ . 0 ,,P• •
/ / \ .0.6 o
\ ./ / \ \ D 1 0.
/
\-• \, \
1 / 'i,...o
/ \
/
<\
\\ \
\
DETENTION
BASIN
I
P ' d :■; 4 -161 .-
c.
i .4)
1 /
/
A
C
KING COUNTY
DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS
/
r?
ci
; tO /-L—/
o
W 2 /
1396.52
-- - -
0,
331,36
\ \
THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ASSIST.ING IN LOCATING YOUR
PROPEPITY AND IS NOT GUARANTEED
TO SHOW ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS
NOP n• 0 ,0
----
/
SW l3-23-4
N 87 - 26 - AO W
ALI ad
4O,\ f''' 4 " 7,
.
'..
I , Al i \ \
0',3 4 \ \ \ -,..,. \
\ \ . -... c",..
,- A 75. ■
\ \
V 44 . ,k
0 ...
',! N 4., N
+ G . ,' ...... ...G,:, \
\
\ ..... ,,..„
00N k \
Oacv..,\ \\
\
\ \
., 1 "•- I
T I
../ , ,,\ \ \ \ i
3 \ I I
\ \ I I
\ \ I i
\ \ \ 1\
\ i
c_ \
\ \
11 ,% 1 9V /
40 1 /
ep \ \ ot i I 0 /
\OCCIL'''° )15 \
r \ y, /
N 87- 34 - 35,W
SW 24 -23- 4
' Zil r rectr•?Pote.
T,ack
PIIII0IIIIIWIRIIIPIWIWITIIIIIIIIIWIT1
0 ...... 1 2 3 5 6 7 9 . 10 11 ........ 12
,.
\,, IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS .\
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS.DUE TO
.0c - ,OA , ,, ‘.. i - , c.: A. , . E ENT 0 L. 41 C V C Z ..0
ttibilliouvlui) . Ili UALITY OLTHE,OR GINAL DOCUM
tlIEIRI: ROM • -1-Tglo ii lin 1
,. . . „ .. ..; ..„,„ .... ,.
1346.53
NW 24 - 23 - 4
SCALE 1" 100
10
t
ad'
0,
• WASHINGTON TECHNICAL; CENTER voL.
9 I
e
2oo
1331.38
104.• IDS
N89
359-34•43og 1030i
•11.0•5,•050/ •575.0
,ij0t Th ;sr is ,, bse.../ q survey
AF 9o0t 50 /pp 0 J ..-rey,•00
lunr,:o AY or 4/fl
* 7 r b
.0 as ••24 • Jae
...
5, 47 ° S \ I\
•
MAP REV
4 1 1 . 3 .7
.4.
,
0
14 1
oleTLAND.
. . „
_
•Ar NOVI% t
tit o )1Prf.14 11 1 ' 2 1CTIZ: PI
„ow*
r t041111
• ,: irtr, 1g 445'
Ver. 5 - 7
I.. tele t - 1,00 , 141567 , eti ) . - IUK8 4 111.A - 401.40* (TITLE
WA.;.Srefre alereff,, vrn . eat tuoiliirik•Ftsse
t/5 K1 , .cifiziNgzfzEt2
. . • , .
t AA.
Aim* LI -*Togo 15 itoorlgtx tepolTr,ar,
Cuilfht4i 40 <Hp! MI! fling ,+: 2.1)(11b, REVD;
* ; 064-4. •, • •
oitauwaftootz . 6,161 •or •
• "*SeGer.01 FLoolt ' tL4t4c •
'/241 St =SP
29.41N - tozartersikL, tZeTML (comp i4m.t
46: is& smear. .iReska1: (44 •
.arit Ito, ztt 4 • (443,A t) 4.t%
dbel‘o N114 2420e.... -moo eowe.; !toile ce,01,4
„
t .' . '" - .•:•'•; , ..=....-... , -•': , ;,••';.••
:,.,:„;
.,•••:•,...-,......• • :::-:•:-
71••••••• '....:•',. .. .
i..-:,,
r• •
•,,.. , , ,
; ‘:'•?•.; ,;:-
't",::: .':'',., .
. . .
. . •
I. I II IIIlI II II 1 II II I' I I II II I III II I III I' II II I'll I' I liii I I' III!_ijI!_llhI ij_J.[ij! I 1 liii tillillill II IIj1IJ! liii 1 I! I I I 'I 'I I I I 'I I I I I I 'I I I I II II I' I' I' ' I I I I I I I' I
3 9 10 11 12
. 5 6 8_
V F LE T A F R II 7H714 c 12TroS7122 c 1 I P T Is i guk E rg i.
oc se ye I
IMIP
•
THE UAL I TY_OF_ _E 08,11_3 Itik-9PIE91kr-71
wtijI II I Wilnlri[1, 40 ,
flip 81-i4-1>K
A
kr..eldrIEND
ILA
; • .
te latHi! 44 •
a�iid emoc.700a. scfl
T;
■•••••Ole•••••••••71■-._
" 7 .
r.
T
csgE
k/V
0 , rLitiff . i .61116411114141r61"1" 011 II II II it 1
12
1 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS11
la too* •
'torAS: "' I vilYs` .6v1;,"-IU 44'•404 I !War 11711Y
• 5Tiere 4,4;edt.e.4421eit,
C 111:q =-"cleltJ0:1-zretw
, .
2 trpiet,,s
-!- C% 4.fogd() c144, coo
' erszyreql• . .< . 110 :,1111krleplit....+219t
•
• deitINT) ping tv- 6,161
govt.: (c_ai.viot.%*
c10. PAP* 1 5G. sloSeaft 0 314eN4F4i 144
re pazo.: tbn, z't sf (44st At) 4.t% doveR4e.
.:6e+b mic 1.41.16 t. 3 • '' LoNI S.: erslc ,6 ea wet')
0
• c 0
r Z. �, a
r:d •i "'✓v / ` •''' 7�� J. ui7E+ f s - 4:Wl • - ;f t
W :' "
ti y� R � N"Srr i ts'�6 °1'fll f'riE.Y " p•
� 3_ ti:,i �� yb�n�,l / f, j, I UsR Rk: l ' r 1 , r / r iot iu
r w. > 1:� j rcra �w` � ii vr.^. h�, s 4 : s s y t
}� �EuAI nrt F
al /k 17 lzrx wL',Q„'
r3 Fa�A:3 � ��� ��,,, ,,z1ZZyy�'�� S �,T.�'�'
r�
�yx"Y,,`��{�fei��3. {��2� I� '. i , . � ,►,; �i' :. p� - tom ,
i L: ,,� , v dYI: �.�::4. & � F�: � �, Sy �`7,�7? t >; e:•�,u}'.t ,
,r1 +'' Y ' 1 '. b CLI •f. L wzapatia
wrSRa±i•a' i!�. I ; 1! ' fi3..A:Asl., ''. _5! r uui+ ir1!nt� .li, �', ? -�•: .�'• a •'y j rr,� y zry'
,�rmwa�v,w : .' • �'•. t, '.,�, .' ". , C •aII i'k'Tk&
:9c2 . .e
:. :fold .P�b
?HTt
• . . •': •• — - - -
...
^'; • l :l -. .' "_. : :. : : : : : : :_::: : : :: :.: _ - "•� ::T
_,#- , -,. r.._ f , ...o �.. _.... '� ? t . �.rx., a ..... .. .n. -, o: t y.i.:. ^t _.. FL �,' ". k.,.= 1?' �'. �'�.' u.. Sbl.,:.. ...!'t ..
16X
I 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 l l 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I i l 1 l i l i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I i I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i lil i L 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili1ililili1 1 1 IIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
0 in,..INCH 1 2 3 , 4 5 6 •/ 8 9 1 0 11 .A0E1,4000 ANY 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
pe 6z ea Lz 9z sz V-e CZ; zz Lz 0 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTAL 6 e L 9 9 t' C z L ww p
\ IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIiulhuiil ii uliullniilniiiiliilnnlnulnnlunlnulnnlnulnuluiilnulnnlnnlunlinilniil1111111111un1nnlnii1unlini1nnlnu1nnlun1nulnn1unlun1nulnu1nnluulnnlnul
16X
immOmmal
111111111111131/11til
01111MINEVI I" MIMEO
NM
11111111MS g N .
smommissacaggsvib.11
InissiiiENZIIMiluil;,;.
*SOW al ier...s •
'mow
smshv ga ir :,.4 . ..±iu:,..0 7 -A gip .„Avri r
rearsormiroora =Jr acralsaarLa...• domar••••■•••..1
--ttslog-m.le
%: 1, ‘•
//!, ';=:;;I;;;;;;;Z::.
:;,•,';':i1131::i1111/1 4:111:
. '' ' :':IiMMIINF411.1.1VMMEN vanansensm MI4111111:1111
,;'-: ii111111IIIPANCI011r:
''' ':. 'A i 13!•111I1 I WSW NOMMILEMill II SIIIIC IP 1
!vggNgrgggt!lsIEI
lin
. ;
01
ulip.,..wiswolis..,,...r,::.:
imor qpni1111
Y , Ti MI fIturst.4.•:.4
-•.• i 7 . 1 ' •
„. • ,
;. „ .
.4201019C7diri g 0 ; 12.3 g 1
•
•
•
OMMO,/illEtPro.
. • „
•
•
•
0€ 6Z 8G LE 9Z GZ EZ1 EZ LE
11111111111111111111h11111111111111111111 1114111
J 111
MV
•
r
iliiii1111111111 ;.•
,111111111111111111111111
11111111111111M111111111111111111111N111111111111111
ri. 111
imuminiminnosi rit,t.r
111111111111111111
11111111111M . :N:447 . 81Fr'rithf .2•• milinmommis 111111111111111111111
linnii111111.1111,1 •
-• • '.. • ' • : • ' •'•
0 : •
• • ' "• • • • • • ••
•
:.03
=me:
•
------------
s7.W.i.et,17•7F755:71`.:•-•IT,ta 'Y •
\ IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
1111
9s e z.i14
111111111611111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
•
• ,
••• ‘," .. • „'•••• • 44
AI/Ai ,1 ; ■ V. , 47.6?• 4 •
4 0 4 • t.•4' ••• 6.. ■Yrr,`
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111t1111111/1-1111111111111_1111111 I I I .1.1.1.1.W.1
3 - , 5 - - _6 911111.11111111111011111111111111111111111111111111
11 w.DEN.ENNANY 12
/11 1- 1 111 1 111 1 111 1 1
---"41141
P r
ii ILI '1 vostgagollglitei IIIIIIMMIERSEIV,M1 1' I I II5
1
1 ;' T illit - i__ q IMMIRVRiggiffigiMIL:1141:;::M;
ilinvolvemirall '.11 111111111121111011/1/MIM111111111r:
114;l11IIMSSMAI ,,,'' is MISIENSINS4Mvw mix ii .142
1
nillri
;
mrairtill ,,,, I miliatisesszsrUIRVIIVIIIBilliii;
MIITIMMINti 'Ail !,. 1/1111Elt
.111f
iiiiiillionssist. ....;mamisamiairgillill1H11111111:::;ti
r!
•
MOM IIIMEMElan
t
1 1 . -
llI
• 1111111i1
-".
• Min
ullli4111!
111.1
•12 vvvvvv tl
11■ MIIMERICa.-"MON$
1 :111111i111/ffiliffililifillIMMENILMON
118141M11111111111111
All1111111111111i/1111/111111116M
,111111ili 11111421143111;111111,1111aa
M11111111 W11111111111111111111111111
111111411143IIIIINioii11411111
Iiii11111411111inlit111H111
411111111111111 11111121181i111111111111111111
11111941i1111131 iiiii1111111111111111110111
AHNUNUE :Piiiiii111111111171111111114111
lll1111111111111M1111
lIIIIRUIHJll 111i1H111
11111111111B11111111t41111aFraSiiiilQ
,Nil!IIIIIHM1111.1111110111101
1
lilliii111111H11191111
111I11111111111111/111111.111111111111
111111 411. 114
PA id
111 .13ftel,4 1 11.
111111111160 r. PA tr
11€13itcng.::", rtr,P."3
, . . , • ...:: 1 fi 1
.. .:14A4,;, k ,,,„ 11111
:H igiyiaciietilio„,ey.p.:;;Apni-E=iaTaresiectl,..! yuil,- I 4 ,.,.1 :quaintly •
i,: 1:1.;,., ., „„, 4 e .• ";,‘ ',H.!. •
;,-1.,
• •1,';
;Hp :147 c_,. itagsfitilarlIIIIIIQ ,;111111111111111
, ; ' ' ' AMMAN ' anniNWer4Marnik V 4.• ll llllllllllllll
;.7747111514m6101NREMENAIVINEEIF.I'r"71. ... 4fr!:4 ' " li11 1 11
•
;z1zotrJ4
'
• s
MIL .7.1
WINENIErt.
' • '
lll
- U. • : • • •
•
•
• • . ••, . •
•
- • • •
• •.
• • .
3 4 5 6 7 \ 8 9 10
•,
•
;
, 644v.g •
:mamma
iim) 11 1.11 1011
11 I'MDE IN GERMANY 12
I20FILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS,
• S ; CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
OC 6 B LZ 9 G tZ C 0 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL POCUMENTIL 6 8 L 9 9 i C z
,.,111114\111441
I
LANDSCAPING
N
iK CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL OIKNSIONS AM'
MEASUREMENTS AT TIC JOE. DATA SNO1M ON ONE PMT
Of TI[ DRAWINGS SMALL MPLT TO SIMILAR PLACES
ON ALL ONES PMTS Of THE DRAWINGS.
.49
20'
THE CASTQ LL® COMPANY um
P.O. BOX 21087 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85034 16021 231 -9000
I E
9
SOUTH SEATTLE, WAS
SERVICE ,CENTER
•
1 �- LANDSCAPING
DISTRIBUTION OF AREA
2'- 0 "02' -0" CAST ALUMINUM
LOGO FURNISHED BY OWNER.
ONE EACH SIDE OF SIGN.-
SITE APPROX. 180,295 SO.FT.
OR 4.14 ACRES
BUILDING
OFFICE AREA Ni) 13,520 SO.FT.
OFFICE AREA IL) 6,830 SO.FT.
EVALUATION AREA 1,785 SOFT.
TOTAL 22,135 SOFT.
PARKING
REQUIRED: 2.5 /I000S.F. = 55 SPACES
PROVIDED:
STANDARD: 128
GUEST: 9
COMPACT: 2
HDCP: 2
COVERED: 3
TOTAL: 144
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON,ILLINOIS 61710
VTl,.�
P PPR11j1j RPHIINHOM ull111P1111111111PPRIIP !1111 T8PRIINHU RIIH luMU INII I IN I I I NIN I 1 111 IWIN I IN I HI
3 . 4 3 . 6 7 8 9 10 11 ""'•..•°' 12
IP
I IF'THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT 1S LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS•DUE TO'. D _
oe EE We GE DE CC 55 Cal aa m (*THE :UALITY OF E Q1.01 AL • A , r c a
. III11 Q1ls1IOIIUDI I II I • 4��I1yNk "11''1
Ay9TT
II f
fl.'
r \
15 DEC 87
DATE
MMOrED
O(CRED
DMC By GJK
15 FEB 88
08 MAR 88
19 APR 88
TEYIS IONS
K EIRE OAK REHM
MEN NAP
NOT TO SCALE
B o.
OME - INITIALS -
TARUNGTOR
ALUMINUM LETTERS
ON BLACK ENAMEL
LETTERING ON EACH
SIGN.
SCALE: 3 /B " =1'-0"
SCALE: I " =20' -0
0 10' 20' 40'
pdaa
PP AR.
86- 155 -01
S I [ ET NO W 11
1
6" CAST
W/ BAKE[
FINISH,
SIDE OF
WM
rdl
y
S 1E�_�i��� -�
L
I
LANDSCAPING
N
iK CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL OIKNSIONS AM'
MEASUREMENTS AT TIC JOE. DATA SNO1M ON ONE PMT
Of TI[ DRAWINGS SMALL MPLT TO SIMILAR PLACES
ON ALL ONES PMTS Of THE DRAWINGS.
.49
20'
THE CASTQ LL® COMPANY um
P.O. BOX 21087 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85034 16021 231 -9000
I E
9
SOUTH SEATTLE, WAS
SERVICE ,CENTER
•
1 �- LANDSCAPING
DISTRIBUTION OF AREA
2'- 0 "02' -0" CAST ALUMINUM
LOGO FURNISHED BY OWNER.
ONE EACH SIDE OF SIGN.-
SITE APPROX. 180,295 SO.FT.
OR 4.14 ACRES
BUILDING
OFFICE AREA Ni) 13,520 SO.FT.
OFFICE AREA IL) 6,830 SO.FT.
EVALUATION AREA 1,785 SOFT.
TOTAL 22,135 SOFT.
PARKING
REQUIRED: 2.5 /I000S.F. = 55 SPACES
PROVIDED:
STANDARD: 128
GUEST: 9
COMPACT: 2
HDCP: 2
COVERED: 3
TOTAL: 144
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON,ILLINOIS 61710
VTl,.�
P PPR11j1j RPHIINHOM ull111P1111111111PPRIIP !1111 T8PRIINHU RIIH luMU INII I IN I I I NIN I 1 111 IWIN I IN I HI
3 . 4 3 . 6 7 8 9 10 11 ""'•..•°' 12
IP
I IF'THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT 1S LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS•DUE TO'. D _
oe EE We GE DE CC 55 Cal aa m (*THE :UALITY OF E Q1.01 AL • A , r c a
. III11 Q1ls1IOIIUDI I II I • 4��I1yNk "11''1
Ay9TT
II f
fl.'
r \
15 DEC 87
DATE
MMOrED
O(CRED
DMC By GJK
15 FEB 88
08 MAR 88
19 APR 88
TEYIS IONS
K EIRE OAK REHM
MEN NAP
NOT TO SCALE
B o.
OME - INITIALS -
TARUNGTOR
ALUMINUM LETTERS
ON BLACK ENAMEL
LETTERING ON EACH
SIGN.
SCALE: 3 /B " =1'-0"
SCALE: I " =20' -0
0 10' 20' 40'
pdaa
PP AR.
86- 155 -01
S I [ ET NO W 11
1
suwa," »,.1,•...� +<s.. x., i+U+' v...tfh.1:... .. ,..:MV.n. t..
66_
WEST ELEVATION
i
NEE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
MEASURMENTS AT THE JOB. DATA SHOWN ON ONE PMT
DF THE DRAWINGS SHALL APPLY TO SIMILAR PLACES
ON ALL OTHER PARTS OF THE DRAWINGS.
NORTH ELEVATION
THE CASTQ LL® COMPANY Far
P.O. BOX 21087 PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85034 (602) 231 -9000
EAST ELEVATION
min
miamommi
imprxmommilmi
SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
SERVICE CENTER
SOUTH ELEVATION
Y
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON ,ILLINOIS 61710
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDIIpppllpllllpl !P!1�!I!II�III�III�III�II�I Ill! Il u�llllllllllllllllllggllllllpll! Llll! I! III11tIIIglUllllllllll{ 1PIII {IIIIIIIIIPIIIIIII11
7 3, 4 . ,. 3 ........ . 6 7 .. 1 9 10 11 - -- 12
IIF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • •
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
of °L Y< LL Via 14 ' Ca A LL �L HE IUALITY OEI E Q. GINAL • c ° ° • ° •
L " "0
finIPTlmlIF
111F V1-4-DR
11 AFR
DAM
APPROVED
CHECKED
DRAWN BY
REVISIONS
DATE B
PP 1OI E tAt.$ ✓• U.
PP ND.
SHEET NO. 2
MASTER CH.•
I
j111 j111 �1Upu�iupullupupupllpuplq ulll ll llu ll ll ll �I P1111 �111j! I! WI�lUllupuplyulpu�llplq�!��l�lu �lu�luplq 1111111111'�11911'PIIp 1111 U1111� Il �l 111
0 T 7 3 4 _.:. . .,.. 5 . : .,. .6 .. 9 10 11 .w -•.w., T2
•
\ IF THIS MICROFILMED.000UMENT.IS LESS NO
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
06 6C , 06 Lc SE s L • CLI. LL L (C THE UALITY 0 IJ„E O1 AL DOCUMEN G 0 L 0 9 • C z p
40 I:
SHEET N0.
MASTER��
+16.16
30
FINISH Roo,R EL • tt00
23 — {
AIWA 10 EO
Y1. S CRAO(
12,000 CfS 100.5EAR EL • 22.30
20 — I �Y ^ I�•IFRZ
0.000 CFS EL • 11.70
/3 —
/0 —
3 —
0
30—
FINISH FLOOR EL • 22.00
23 --
12,000 CFS loo -TEAR EL • 22.30
20 —
0.000 ors EL • 10.70
15 —
10 —
3 —
0
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ANO
MEASIIRMENTS AT THE JOB. DATA SHOWN ON ONE PMT
OF THE DRAWINGS SHALL APPLY TO SIMILAR PLACES
TIN ALL OTHER PMTS OF THE DRAWINGS.
ER. (005 OF ALPS!
^ $2' MOINT. ROAD
t l
/
(R (DOE of RIVER
T H E CASTQ LL
CROSS SECTION A - A
SCALP HO,E12. I • • 20 •
FEAT. 1•. 3'
COMPANY Ruff
P.O. BO% 21087 PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85034 (6021 231 -9000
12117100 PROFILE
PROPOSED PROFILE / I1
FF 28020010 2100. • 2E.00'
(2107104 PROFILE
SCALP NORIE. /-• 20•
VERG I•.S'
CROSS SECTION B - B
FINISH FLOOR EL • 2E.00
25
12.000 CFS 100 -YEAR EL • silo
20
0.000 CF0 EL • 12.70
/3
/0
3
0
SERVICE CENTER
—35
— JO
— 25
/ro
I
1
} \ I I
IX.1005 OF RIVER
PROPOSED WALK
PROPOSED PROFILE
AR
—12 MAINS. ROAD
054VA7(0
TORAOE
• PROPOSED CURS ITVPI
SURFACING
TOP COURSE
1
D.R.A. NYra Cowan:
FAY••IMM CORFMCTED OCPTN CROONED
2YE• MIN. COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSNED
SURFACING BASE COURSE
GRACES BASS CLASS ''3 MAY BE R10U/REo osPENO/A•r. O0•
•SON, rpy01T/0NS • .._
EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL
PROPOSED COY/ IMO
CROSS SECTION C - C
SCALP MDR/1. I•. 10'
VERT. I• • 3'
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON • ILLINOIS 61710
EX /ET,AG OROF/LE
PROPOSED PROFILE
STORAGE Foy
—30 GENERAL ' NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA
�- DEPARTMENT OF. PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS AND THE LATEST
— YS EDITION OF APWA STANDARDS 6 SPECIFICATIONS..
•
.2. LOCATIONS SHOWN OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE'APPROXIMATE.
17 SHALL DE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
LOCATIOBS.AND DEPTHS TO AVOID CAMAOINR EXISTING
UTILITIES. / rt .
1 —20 1 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL iE RESPORSEBLE FOR OBTAINING NECESSARY
CO NSTRUCTION PERMITS. . :I. •
/. BENCVIARKt 9.0.5. NON ..4p : 40B.,OISC ON SOUTH FACE OF
fl THE SOUTH OF 6 CONCRETE S PORT PIERS•ON CENTERLINE OF
UNDERPASS OF INTERSECTION OF MIGHWAY.409 - HIGHWAY 101 •
29.731.', •
•
, 5. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF FAXIHUM DRY
DENSITY PER AST" TEST 0- 1657.
—/0 x
6, DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5D.
r:
. 7. FILL AREAS SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED IN 6• LIFT:
TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DIY DENSITY PER 95EM TEST 9.1557.
0. " EXTRUDE0 CURBS SHALL BE STANFAR^ 0550190
— N0. 9. : jt
9. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL.BE TESTED FOR CORRECT WATER
RUNOFF BY FLOODING IN ORDER TO PROVE ADEQUATE SLOPING .
AND SHAPING OF PAVEMENT.
—0 10. CATCH BASINS TYPE 1 AND TYPE II REFER TO APWA STANDARDS
ANO SPECIFICATIONS. f:.
ID. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM 'RAIN
SYSTEM. • . . .
C7 TOUMA ENGINEERS
201 Southwest 4 101 8110 01 • Renlon.WeshlnQlOn 98055
• (200)251.9000
DATE
APPROVED
CHECKED
DRAWN BY
REVISIONS
B.A•R•
DATE.L PROVO RTIALS�
V. J.
—/3
—10
—5
—
,?ea-oc %&7/
BA, CS
n
Tr,20.70-
...........
.........
/
NC CONTRACTOR SHALL TERN, ALL DIWNSIONS AN)
MEASUREMENTS Al 11C JOB. DATA SNOW ON ONE PMT
or Tit BRAVING! SHALL APPLY ID SIMILAR PLACES
ON ALL OTHER PARTS OF RE DRAWINGS.
P.O. BOX 21087 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85034 1602) 231-9000
- i• B;p:TZ:0,1
P(R LID 23
RIM EL • 0.1.3
It c.t CO
21 LOAD. • WO
4
oe ea oe Li At AT At
fr E. 8
THE CASTQLLO COMPANY Fur SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
SER / I CE CENTER
.........
IX. co
fil
cr WSW CO.. • 1021
a • 1.4 el
if 14T W COWL • mar
%AWN"
•-• '•'" • ,s1 II • '
r • • e • .• •
_
3 -4, , 5.. .6 , 7 8 9 10 11 44 ..44 12
IF'THIS 'MICROFILMED DOCUMENT.1S LESS
•
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS.DUE TO ID
A2/ " E UALITY,0 HE 0 GINAL DOCUMENT • 0
MM
APpRoX. WATER
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE SATE FARM PLAZA BL00MINGTONALLIN015 61710
pH 44. 3.54.41
fx.
RIM • tHEE
If Mt, Co.. • MP?
13 CONC. Moo
IF trir CO.. 20.07
•
I A
fk SS OM
Rim EL • 87.70
IF • N35 PVC • IZ.7.1
•OLJAAA ENGINEERS
201 AIM mo • 1.0.1.0...lon 96055
• IMIIBRMICOO .
DATE
APPROVED
CHECKED
CRAM or
REVISIONS
B.A.R.
ArPROVED
TATE 1, I( 9
-- 4
14
— 10
..... ...
SCALE. 1
0 10' 20' 40'
rn < 61 8 '" 14 -
•-•
G reAss
Akt
TIE CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS NO
KAM/REIMS AT THE JOG. DATA 51101N ON OK PMT
Of DE DRAWINGS SHALL APPLY TO SIMILAR PLACES
ON ALL DINER PMTS Of INC DRAWINGS.
THE CAST11 LL
P.O. .BOX 2108?
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85034 15021 231-9000
*
COMPANY Frinr
SOUTH SEATTLE, WA.
7 8 9 ' 10 11 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENf IS LEI
CLE S -\
AR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO 111
THE UALITY E 0 GINAL_DOCUMENT
0E se , ce ca CZ CZ
SERiICE CENTER
r
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOB I LE INSURANCE COMPANY
ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON.ILLINOIS 61710
c v c 0
4011,9114044,4,,,,,,
•
HATEKIAl_.
1340Fle.. 44009 a-go -
' 15wer usurce
ocre1ch4 A4.1 s"
KAApt.z. Apo...c.pc-s-rfec '5"
. ..14'0E UV8. oAK.
VINE 1
14111s pLowagisk izzo 61-15.
Kr-3T&J ri ,
• EVEedigeenl munkfrriU6 (DA n) 6,ALL014
A.HrPoceA JUNIPAC 5 ,AL.
LUE JuNipse 56,AL.
OReGo1..1 emEAPE. 1. GAL.
PNK AZAL&A 56,AL.
ZEP , A,ZALEA
kle/sTteH ytkl
8140,L.151 IV
ruNinc,
NCEP
dg
APPROVED
CHECKED
DRAIN SY
11 H83.88
b:frode,e0.
REVISIONS
-To g_einsel),
peg_ pc.,Ainiffq
t TO
Ngld
• ROFce - t:r
G LASS L.) C. C. O PI
SC,1 pa-oe
s'Irrs ,4 , Pet- MA*
AloPr OP r(OPT c/ /Z3 fRef.%
B.A. R
,APPRED ,
,
D V
ATE J11.13_INITIALS.Y.,.E.-
SCALE: 1".20'-0
20Z, 40'.
F .K
If
-- ■1111119
A
1 7 4 4444 r .herectib QR.
RnRagR 6ARGC
. BtDG MASS tRi.em YRA b
A7DITIVEALTERNATE ;NO .SIX (6)i
rRC.nva 4 Jusr.41- t:A•s41 (pm zrearrar rx
N LIEU q° N Tb PLAN Mt!
LJM75G1 xD •
• -
0,•ur4xv- rs Ierc -
of Additive;
AItei'nate 6 ,
PLANT
YYNNe ra.isc;4e-e. r.t ri h'1aFR41h.AR -rote. 4.;41 ' • x.' „,
civ ICa - 1c.K JN - rt:EAJZEAr- L-'T'ncc'"N'}r�'"r 1 - L U c A- t�
.1.-Mt :?J-a. rv`tii,. _ r _ r.: . .!J').T'E_ M...,,...;;;4*, CA'f�' 1.4..
w . 5' 0 r oww...?F FIR - r.FUIGV - xA E,VLE al
30 IB -ZI;NT ORECClicozxre NoU- Y '1'FU\
.-t4 :4•. ACajir..LIA . \ "•
30 -12:- H1 SALAL T.G1•54ILTNEKI, 5I {•../04 Y _ _ _\ ' 1 1
- l'.. Y,'V EKTR/JL KpFERb Af�}1 . -. . . A I Fdfc V.YoUr.•. / T
. ,( �3,.,.. �•. ..
r i?'� a k 5 ." CC
i, tr..�`.4 n c:r ' - •a' • . r ,.?„ i . fry ;•.:1::
cr1 iS.1 i... v�.Iar. r.'�'.dl0nry...'1
- . r.rR ` J.1f's': - e•:•r+y' �♦ � 1' .1�.. ,.
.�....: ,SrfFS�H {1J`i:JA1''CY .i1�iS�t1
1gIIlplgqlll1Ippplqqlll1IUpII1IIq 101 UI�II!jDVI: 11111IgilgqqllqyiHlllqHi1llylplqqlli1qlbl
0 "M• 1 2 3 .4 5 6 7 L 8 9 10 11 12
IF THI MICRO DOCUMENT IS LESS •
CLEAR THHC, IS UE O
r,o ez a� az uz ( 0'rue noel ttv AN T n1: IS T nB ITA DOCUMEN T TI e c z I •.
•
'I•
t
� .Ya J't, �e(
ct:
,r -i•- ; l GtiF:I
. ?1
P: ✓
CI " h.'�ri cNr.
L,3J5I uJ.l . ;crFvra
r2td�Gt:. x1;It�Z;'tit�
'h.Vr JNT LV,.:tzE�
H1; M K :4I 1tW : •
TUUt*i - WN1TD. 4 L'AYEFIt
EVave MJXED cY2C$
l qr
N,C�c'o jJJToitaNTITiPS A'IE Nor JVGAI ,
Il ; , 4T xN IT rbTNE
RESJI�IY:, 3LI1Y To I�TYJ2M QUA T TI
N. u I ES
NOTE,t P `T 6e0TigJ'O i'GR
a�r.2.r_cao t•cNc
P'�A4ETREE.
PAfe,JAY rl,.erJ�.Y
; U5ries 4 PWE
Jr'a1JrK J.F'cR i' .: <:'J i
.. E.'$ . .
w x Lew'.iue'�r•... -
2" CA.L.
2" C1L.
15 J7•IG4,F, b "lOY �R7T'
.... • .
i �1M 1 0°ILYFER.-
cciir
IS t3
3 42'
G4 4>
e >FN C5
•
kW-
FULL GAIN '
t -ei L dtJ." ceo.
WELL r.�lA�U -1.:3� J^V
ULL CKC14:4 v „
PULL 1 - e.l2R •
t;JELL e$,<>>;I- 2O W/
FULL L r ne e t,r
J'•IELL P_ . W
CENTRAL
eck& Baird /Beattie:;
Landscape Arcttect`Planning Urban';Dea
3414 N.E. 55th Street
Seattle. WasMngtoh. 98105,',(206) 526:0468
.
c�IIJ.G'CFd:�
=Of NCV1RA 'a
OC
.R1YIR CE.IIFi1
6 I•'
CJ t
, DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
4 \, ADDRESS
APPLICANT
L
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
2/20/87
87 -1 -R
•RENTON /TUKWILA BOUNDARY EXCHG.
TUKWILA EASTERN BOUNDARY
SOUTH 180TH - 1 -405
CITY OF TUKWILA
EPIC -4 -87 .
2/20/87
87 -2 -R
PARK /CROISSANT REZONE
53RD AVENUE S. & S. 139TH
CITY OF TUKWILA
EPIC -5 -87
2/20/87
87 -3 -R
PARK & RIDE REZONE
. INTERURBAN & 52ND AVENUE S.
CITY OF TUKWILA
s -- 1 -tea
EPIC -6 -87
11/2/87
87 -4 -R
SHIMATSU REZONE
NORTH OF CENTER PLACE ON SOUTHCENTER
PARKWAY - TL 9011 -07, 9012 -06
SHIMATSU /MIKAMI
EPIC -
11/17/87
87 -5 -R
STRANDER REZONE
13530 - 53RD AVENUE S.
STRANDER
87 -4 -CPA
11/19/87
87 -6 -R
SCHNEIDER REZONE
EAST OF MACADAM ROAD &
NORTH OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
SCHNEIDER ,
EPIC -29 -87
6/1/87
87 -7 -R
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
SIDEWALK PLAN IMPLEMENT. /ZONE
CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL BUSINESS DIST.
CITY OF TUKWILA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
EPIC -12 -87
87 -2 -CPA
ADOPTED
ORD. #1516
TEXT ADMENDMENT (CBD)
I
L.
REZONE 1987