Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 86-42-V - LINTOW - VARIANCE 16418 51st avenue south Permit 86-42-V - LINTOW - VARIANCE T. . J' Minutes for the The meeting was Board members Mrs. Altmayer. Stetson. r City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Mr. Nesheim closed the public hearing. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Board of Adjustment meeting for September 4, 1986. called to order by Vice - Chairman Nesheim at 7:05 p.m. present were Mrs. Regel, Mr. Goe, Mr. Nesheim, and Representing staff were Rick Beeler, Jack Pace and Kathy 86- 42 -V ::. Lintow, requesting a variance from TMC 18.50.020 to reduce the area of non - conforming legal lot at 5121 South 164th in an R -1 -9.6 district from 8,700 square feet to 8,300 square feet. Mr. Beeler summarized the Staff Report. The Board members asked about the minimum lot size, the history of the property, and the lot size requirements of King County in the surrounding area. Mr. Nesheim opened the public hearing. Fred Lintow, 16418 - 52nd Avenue South, stated his agreement with the Staff Report and emphasized that his request would not change the existing use. He stressed his need for the area for a proposed remodeling project, and stated that other lots in the area do not meet the minimum lot size re- quirements. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA ONE HAD BEEN MET. MRS. REGEL SECONDED MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA TWO HAD BEEN MET. MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA THREE HAD BEEN MET. MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA FOUR HAD BEEN MET. MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA FIVE HAD BEEN MET. MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT September 4, 1986 Meeting Minutes Page 2 MRS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND APPROVE THE VARIANCE AS REQUESTED. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Nesheim recessed the meeting for five minutes. Mr. Nesheim reconvened the meeting. 86 -39 -V: Southland Corporation requesting variances from TMC 18.52.020, Front and Side Yard Landscape Requirements: 10 feet and 5 feet required, 6 feet and zero feet requested, respectively; from TMC 18.52.030, Special Landscape Requirements: 10 feet on southwest side required, 8 feet request- ed; from TMC 18.50.020, Setback Requirements: 20 foot front yard required, 8 feet requested, 10 foot side yards required, zero feet and 8 feet re- quested, on the lower half of Lots 21, 22, 25 and 26 and Lot 20, Hillman's Seattle Garden tracts and Lots 2 and 3 Tukwila Short Plat 80 -24 -SS located at 14211, 14213, 14221 Interurban Avenue South. ' Mr. Beeler summarized the Staff Report. The Board members asked about access to the site, the steepness of the slope behind the proposed building, parking, location of the gasoline island, and clarification of the seven variances requested. Mr. Nesheim opened the public hearing. Steve Lawson, 1035 Andover Park West, Tukwila, representing the Southland Corporation, explained the reasons for wanting to relocate the store, and stated his feelings that the proposal would lessen the degree of noncon- formity which currently exists and be a much more aesthetically pleasing development on the site. He stressed the "Phase II" portion of the site plan is only an idea, and that Southland would be selling that portion of the property. Mr. Lawson submitted several additional exhibits: H - Alternate Site Plan 2 - Photograph of Existing Development 3 - 14 Photographs of Nearby Developments Mr. Lawson pointed out that the two -foot landscape and building setback variance requested for the rear of the building is only for 11 linear feet due to the configuration of the toe of the hill. The remainder of the building would be in conformity along that side. He explained the reason for the location of the gasoline island. Mrs. Altmayer asked about the location of the gasoline island, the curb cut on South 58th and the difference in size between the old 7 -11 store and the proposed new one. Mr. Goe asked about the choice of building placement, the maneuverability of gasoline tankers within the site, and the possibility of utilizing the existing underground gasoline storage tanks. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Meeting Minutes September 4, 1986 Page 3 Mrs. Altmayer asked Mr. Beeler if the seven variances being requested were to be decided separately or as a whole. Mr. Beeler said that each could be considered separately, or the Board may wish to decide them as one. Jim McKinley, 4404 South 164th, stated his opposition to the proposed vari- ances. He felt that the lot was not of an adequate size for the proposed development. He was also concerned with the access locations off Inter- urban and the possibility of heavy traffic congestion. Mr. Lawson stated that the store will not generate any new traffic along Interurban, but will be capitalizing on the existing traffic. He pointed out that the northwest access onto Interurban will be a right- and left -in, but only a right -out. Mr. Nesheim closed the public hearing. Mr. Beeler labeled the additional exhibits entered as follows: 4 - Riverside Inn and Park 'n Ride Photos 5 - Photo of 58th Avenue South 6 - Architectural Perspective Mr. Goe asked staff for a synopsis of the plans for improving Interurban Avenue. Mr. Beeler explained that the City plans call for sidewalks and landscaping on both sides of the street to create a more aesthetically pleasing area. He also explained the role of the Board of Architectural Review in the Interurban Special Review area. The Board discussed traffic patterns, access, possible congestion, location of the gasoline island, and hours of operation. MR. GOE MOVED TO DEAL WITH ALL SEVEN OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTS COLLECTIVELY AS ONE ISSUE IN THE DECISION- MAKING PROCESS. MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION. Mrs. Altmayer stated that she felt the motion is determining policy, which is not property dealt with by a motion. THE MOTION PASSED, THREE TO ONE. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA ONE HAD NOT BEEN MET. THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA TWO HAD NOT BEEN MET. THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Meeting Minutes Moira Carr Bradshaw Secretary r�wdstur�a -- .r �r.•rysa- r.�rr�. :...:. r,: Jxia ^^,r..%s�tNS.,C•!:x,ta;��n;! : �._ R:rF.r,;cd'n'.�c::.�• ?:vu��On�: rrti•:tr,2nresr?mm�••±tna�;r, September 4, 1986 Page 4 MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA THREE HAD BEEN MET. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MRS. ALTMAYER MOVED THAT CRITERIA FOUR HAD BEEN MET. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED THAT CRITERIA FIVE HAD NOT BEEN MET. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. GOE MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND DENY THE VARIANCES REQUESTED. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Attendance MR. GOE MOVED TO EXCUSE THE ABSENCE OF MRS. HERNANDEZ. MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Minutes Approval of the minutes was postponed until the next meeting. MRS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM, 86 -42 -V: Lintow /Taimi INTRODUCTION The Lintows applied for a Boundary Line Adjustment between their property and the Taimis. Prior to adjusting the boundary line, the Board of Adjustment would be required to approve the reduction in lot size of an existing nonconforming lot. FINDINGS 1. The co- applicants are requesting a variance from TMC 18.50.020: 9,600 required, 8,700 existing, and 8,300 requested. 2. The subject area was annexed into the City in 1960 and was simultaneously zoned as R- 1 -9.6. (Exhibit A) 3. The two lots involved, Lot A and Lot B (Exhibit B) of the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment measures 8,700 and 9,400 square feet respectively. 4. Both lots are developed with single - family homes. The proposed boundary line adjustment would follow the line of an existing fence line. The bound- ary line is being adjusted to allow the addition to the house addressed as 16418 - 51st Avenue South, and to allow alignment along a fence line and use area that has existed for 23 years. Exhibit C shows the fence line between Lot A and Lot B and the patio area of Lot A in the area of adjustment. The subject area measures 400 square feet. CONCLUSIONS 1. TMC 18.72.020(1) - The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed is located. The King County Assessor's map (Exhibit D) which shows lot size, when com- pared to the zoning map, does indicate that many lots are nonconforming in size by hundreds and thousands of feet. It would therefore not appear to be a grant of special privilege. The limitation upon uses of other properties is the inability to create lots of less than 9,600 square feet. Granting PLANNING COMMISSION (._ STAFF REPORT ., 86 -42 -V: Lintow /Taimi Page 2 the variance would therefore be inconsistent with the limitations imposed on property owners who are desiring to subdivide their properties. Existing nonconforming lots however are allowed to be developed and used for single- family purposes. 2. TMC 18.72.070(2) - The variance is necessary because of special circum- stances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property in order to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. The special circumstances which appear to exist in this case is an irreg- ularly shaped lot whose rear lot line has been misconstrued by the two adjacent, past, and present property owners. As Exhibit E illustrates, the Lot B property owner assumed a rear line at the fence and Lot A property owner, as indicated on the site plan, has a patio built to the fence line. the variance does not, however, appear necessary to provide it with the use rights of the R -1 zone, which is to develop a single- family home. The Lot A property owner wishes to own the 400 - square foot area. Approval of the variance would facilitate a boundary line adjustment to coincide with the use patterns which have been established on the property since the erec- tion of the fence 23 years ago. 3. TMC 18.72.070(3) - The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improve- ments in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is situated. The properties have been used as 8,300- and 9,400- square foot lots for the past 23 years. Improvements as shown on the site plan are existing. There- fore, it would not appear to be materially detrimental to property or improvements. 4. TMC 18.72.070(4) - The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implementation of the comprehensive land use policy plan. A review of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan reveals that the approval of the requested variance does not conflict with the Plan's goals or policies. 5. TMC 18.72.070(5) - The granting of such variance is necessary for the pres- ervation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same zone or vicinity. As the applicant has indicated in Schedule F, the 400 - square foot area could legally be claimed by the owners of Lot A (through adverse condemnation). A quick claim deed process was started by both property owners in February of 1986, but is on hold pending the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment. The current property owner of Lot A bought the property in 1968, eighteen years ago. The request by the applicant to reduce the area of lot size even fur- : �ti. i :.:: . 4 .:'. Cr_ eS:' 1:-'"} �' iJ. i; �rir'!:: 13yi^ � iltdr: �n: �tl.';. s'> 9' 4: J.: �. t: rii:. i'.'!.'•:: F;&; U.+:r:^.': L::: R: 2:/(+: R" C.:« i:" 1C:l AtYfTl' C1. Y.• L". iCl4i 0t: rvLklNae'l ariialt4Y. i[: A: 7! dCtIYYCJ1rfd: sltW, tcettl T. IId! Sa. R'. N.:* r.:.. T) t�i�C�Er2�F., 1' r1HS5. KT.) LFlrratJS�SMwcrueagrvaYrrrttrt lY+�"raMJ mudrAwi PLANNING COMMISSION C. (1- 86 -42 -V: Lintow /Taimi STAFF REPORT Page 3 ther below its minimum would allow redefinition of the legals and property lines of the two subject lots to coincide with established use of the lots. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment make a motion to adopt the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report of September 4, 1986, and approve the requested variance. EXHIBITS A. Zoning Map B. BLA Map C. Site Plan D. Assessor's Map E. 1967 Building Permit F. Variance Application `""`".`C. Lot Line Adjdstment CALE: t"- 40 1 ' (1.* r NORTH r 3 - /00 0 0 824 "Ar,S2E 8477' • NB9' / 3/ •tip! /00' _ - ,- t, , •. •!7.M..'".:.rr..utr `.:• v': St; c.' itY4. is�; b7trc:+' �x,'• ni? '.iti9T^::'%r2t�tL!:.f?d%:rF.7n ard5icla *az .AzSYtS+�f:<,vx ntmt>;;J.x .•�!Srr:^ n• „ Land Surveyor's Certificate: This Boundary Line Adjustment cor- rectly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute. /0 N89 ° W Qr ` , '4d✓usred P ro ' • i(�,r1, ti • Wood a C. Ofi9inccl North o p1c Cot A' N 89" .1 .3/ .vv • • • • • • `n a ' O — T' •. o. ,1 2 mss... Direction: Man on File in Vault Sea, e N I "` 40' Lo /sit€ 8706 C � L (J F -�orne -�- G oT ;,)lo C ZckS2vA .v,t - acs Y - 33 E\etlr ; I� fewer 1tne L3a: e r \v\ e._. /rWI1 c- Ifis7t-t;NT 40,1 LoA P - 1 -$5S - a$' 3o' Gc.ra -5,DOs-- - a0 aC' Ads b -Maw\ -\cor - )- 1a0k,ci C ecarc� ctuO r -Q08 s fit, - 1 4- 1� X t 5�X µe`tL* c e sk-'kv. 5 house. - 15s' Nei b v. o cAcX- -t5v. - 5e U.)er \ ammo loo' S� 12 - Dts*-rtict \€e.ya estdelnce, Ne,Q Old NOV:. 1 corck i 5 5' 1 ° wee A -■at,\ 1 ■ne rest 0� -k pi t''e odkr\ \Du bc.ke:r i es. cow 0•14E11 �.. 141 7 _! l� wile .L F_ S a L. E R L Das, ADDRESS P HONE --r DATE ��� BUILDER ADDRESS SO. FT. EXISTING BUILDING AREA - SO. FT. ARCHITECT ADDRESS EXTERIOR FINISH JOB ADDRESS STREET /v J, ^ l �, /) 'L/7. . 1 cy _ � G I UD rL .? ! .c ► Ste/ 1 O �- UMBER t he/ { r S LOT SIZE LOT AREA R USE ZONE -1 LEGAL _ # - /F //,/, ! 2 / A , ) / Ca . LOT BLOCK YARDS DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES MAIN BUILDING SET SACK SIDE YARD REAR YARD NEARES BUILDING ACCESSORY BUILDING SET SACK SIDE YARD REAR YARD NEAREST BUILDING SIZE OF BUILDING l a ,.. . 4 , :l o , U MAIN BUILDING WIDTH DEPTH AREA X FT. X FT. - SO. FT. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ACCESSORY BUILDING WIDTH DEPTH AREA / d FT. X w O FT. = A 0 Q SO. FT. ..1 �C SO. FT. EXISTING BUILDING AREA - SO. FT. LOT COVERAGE TOTAL AREA OCCUPIED LOT AREA LOT AREA OCCUPIED p � c /0 SO. FT. SO. FT. EXTERIOR FINISH OCCUPANCY TO BE USED S Al ` ,�„_ HOW HEATED BASEMENT SIZE SO. FT. ROOMS TOTAL I BED ROOMS BATHS LIVING L-O COMBO DEN KITCHEN NOOK K O NOOK GARAGE ATT. ❑ DET. ❑ VALUATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS HOUSES GARAGES L „id i � HOUSE • ATT. GARAGES OTHER S FOUNDATION OK FRAMING OK FINAL INSPECTION BDILDUIC MGT CLASS OF WORK NOTICE: THIS PERMIT DOES NOT COVER PLUMBING. SEWER. OR WIRING INSTALLATION. CITY 1F TUKWILA BUILDING Pth TUKWILA, WASHINGTON REMARKS: DESCRIPTION OF ANY WORK NOT COVERED ABOVE WARNING Notify Building Department by Street Address and Permit Number when ready for inspection. Work must not be covered before inspection and OK for covering has been given by Inspector in writing on Permit Placard. I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and I further agree to comply with all City Ordinances, State Laws, and lawful orders of the Building Inspector governing building con- struction. Written Authorization of the owner must be pre- % sented when work is done by occupant or lessor. OWNER ��'� 0. ` fir'�� I3T X PERMIT FEES: (THIS SPACE FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE QNLY) -+' HOUSE R , OTHER HOUSES f:ARAGE S I" .ARAGE S . BUILDIN •F 1 RECEIV � IOW PE BOND NO TOTAL FEES S ' a -BY r BY BUILDING PERMIT No. N° 374 MISC. FEES S DATE PERMIT PLACARD MUST BE POSTED ON THE WORK I A Peelscul, He; 117c '0 2, P-relle. weca/tve., eev_k /?.(4:7 1.94 /toe 4%pf se, 7712, 1,4,4 avd, s )4s2_6, 42. riv 74 CH4-155-0 ;- ..�.., ,... ,. ...,. .,.... L0t l ' , . Pee gs6w lie/ fis, *'D , 2, � � ECG oR ;� /ni� . u. .. a .. /R2.CU _ _i, lw .. ked _6 3 0f" /?4 a fs . / % l 1 ..■ a.4/ 5' /4 ST, > 5 740 5 Seq s-0,e 51 ptIe g 2 6 42 ,1 v S'004 CH4 1550 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 3) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT U VARIANCE IS APPROVED: c'QSA etc (1 2) 4 5) RESPONSE: CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System IHME.M AUG 6 1986 CITY 1 vr:WILA PLANNING DEPT. 1) TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) SECTI FROM WHICH ARE ESTING VARIANCE: M C 4�, .�c�, � c� wr Oh $ a r vv\t �p�r i m \ z e ��uS�lnnpv�� . botoW(A �-� � L car 2) DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: PROPERTY, • THE PRO USE S C H E D U L E . LAND USE VARIANCE ERTY IF THE DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SATISFIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.72.020 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY). 1) THE VARIANCE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LIMITATION UPON USES OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF WHICH THE APP I CAT ION WAS F I LED I S LOCATED. C'' D . n ■ 1 Y ,� 1 RESPONSE: Y 1 i \ Y / C)k , i 1 o�Vll n t U �e Y�� ` THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE SIZE, SHAPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION OR SURROUNDING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE IT WITH USE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PERMITTED TO OVER PROPERTIES IN t E VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS - RE PONSE: 1$ I A iii' 1 _ at 1* A••4•. t II • • r • 3 ) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. RESPONSE : ) t �" 11.� I l Y � THE AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. TO .eV'-IiP ivk fe") lit • O O1li►. 1..! 1114 THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE APPLICANT POSSESSED BY THE OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME ZONE OR VICINITY. RESPONSE : 1 (`P . 1 ` vuYl'`lS •, )W€ of \ O, ACS e Inu \DoE0 a& 'Se.r -QaS SS\- iovs , pali,m p u.ase ORDINANCE NO. 315 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TUKWILA APPLYING A ZONING TO AN AREA ANNEXED TO THE TOWN OF TUKWILA UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 306 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 312. WHEREAS, the Tukwila Town Council, acting upon the recommendation of the Tukwila Planning Commission, extended the Tukwila Comprehensive Zoning Plan into the area annexed and described in Tukwila Ordinance No. 306 and amended by Ordinance No. 312 and applied to said area a zoning of R -M -H, as defined in Tukwila Ordinance No. 298, to that portion of the area lying north of South 160th Street; and applied to said area a zoning of R- 1 -9.6, as defined in Tukwila Ordinance No. 251, to that portion of the said area lying south of South 160th Street. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF TUKWILA as follows: SECTION 1. That a zoning of R -M -H, as defined in Tukwila Town Ordinance No. 298, be applied to that portion of land lying north of South 160th Street, annexed to Tukwila under Ordinance No. 306, amended by Ordinance No. 312; and that a zoning of R- 1 -9.6, as defined in Tukwila Ordinance No. 251, be applied to that portion of land lying south of South 160th Street, annexed to Tukwila under Ordinance No. 306, amended by Ordinance No. 312, and described as follows: Portions of Sections 22, 26 and 27 in Township 23 N, Range 4, EWM described as follows, except such portions which extend into the proposed Rights of Way of the forthcoming Interstate Freeways or access roads: Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of South 158th Street with the Westerly margin of 51st Avenue South; thence Westerly along said North margin 627.71' to an inter- section with the Westerly margin of E* of SE4 of SE* of said Section 22; thence Southerly along said Westerly margin and said Westerly margin Produced Southerly to the Southerly margin of South 160th Street; thence Easterly along said Southerly margin of South 160th Street, to a point on said Southerly margin of South 160th Street 98.4 Westerly from the inter- section of the Westerly margin of 51st Ave. South;thence S 0015 +15" E 143.20'; thence Easterly parallel with the Southerly. margin of. said 6 outh 100th Street 93.1' more or less to the Westerly margin of 51st Avenue South; thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of 51st Avenue South to a point SOO' North and 30 West of the .lest .4 corner of said erection 26;, thence S 39 East 964' more or less to the Westerly limits of the present Town of Tukwila, ordinance No. 247; thence in a Northerly directicn, following the said Westerly limits to the Northerly boundary of the Irik4 of Section 26; thence Westerly along said, Northerly boundary to the Northwest corner of said NWT_•; thence Northerly along; Easterly boundary of :section 22 to a point 30' Last of beginning; thence West 30 to the point of beginning, all of which lies within thrt corporate limits of tr.e Town of Tukwila, County of King, State of ';ashington. ,ECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall be in effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as provideu by law. PASSED this 16th day of January, 1961. APPROVED this 15th day of January, 1961 Ord. 0515 Lois T. Newton, Clerk (21,4 o Charles 3+. Baker, Mayor S /64' -'" S- ( '. vF_ Sr) S /66 S s Y /R.CW/A 4r) 44 w. WA. 26-23 -4 I4 eter7v EX+. Er= Tuk Published: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA Notice of Public Hearing of the Tukwila Board of Adjustment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Board of Adjustment has fixed the 4th day of December, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., in Conference Room Number 3 of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: Public Hearings 86 -59 -V - Harold and Karen Olson are requesting a variance from TMC 18.50.020, sideyard building setback as follows: Reduce the required eight -foot setback to seven feet. Property is located at 4835 South 160th Street. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Z3� Record Chronicle, November . 21, 1986 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA Notice of Public Hearing of the Tukwila Board of Adjustment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Board of Adjustment has fixed the 4th day of September, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., in Conference Room Number 3 of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: Public Hearings Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, August 24, 1986 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File A. 86 -39 -V: Southland Corporation requesting variances from TMC 18.52.020, Front and Side Yard Landscape Requirements: 10 feet and 5 feet required, 6 feet and zero feet requested, respectively; from TMC 18.52.030, Special Landscape Requirements: 10 feet on southwest side required, 8 feet requested; from TMC 18.50.020, Setback Requirements: 20 foot front yard required, 8 feet requested, 10 foot side yards required, zero feet and 8 feet requested, on the lower half of Lots 21, 22, 25 and 26 and Lot 20, Hillman's Seattle Garden tracts and Lots 2 and 3 Tukwila Short Plat 80 -24 -SS located at 14211, 14213, 14221 Interurban Avenue South. B. 86 -42 -V: Lintow requesting a variance from TMC 18.50.020 to reduce the area of non - conforming legal lot at 5121 South 164th in an R -1 -9.6 district from 8,700 square feet to 8,300 square feet. - s.. ' ...V. 7 3 - 3 , 91 -K • •-vc. I k\k stev s Ie, e./ JO 5 4 WV. I 1* 4. • • 3 ..r 9 4 0 6-11 , -. • .A._ 0 • I 4 OS - /Di 5•-. I 0 otr Jo v.; . 00 t- ' .: t. • t ' 114) Li ; , '• /42 i 20U' . > . . • 4. 1 ... I. .. .1.- 0'33 hi 1110 • 74 / i ,:e - • Or. . • -2 _ cror!N/' Aarik4/ 0 / 46.41 1 Il l''- 4 41 • ,K11 4 . IP 43: .• he 0' • ig 4 7 • " • • fi.S.1I • 2 0 • 0 (1 ( .1 4 5 II a Zo cc .ua cf,,L,D0 •r. t • 0 cP cP C t v 0 0 0 I. v • j 11. 111 1" I I C, CI 3/ i0-'7 , A .4. c , IA .5 i 4 * k•- ...so . 1 ' . JP,_9:5 4: • r • 5' .1;i...a . .0 "° el 0 •16, 0 S ti i ,) ; .5 " • ' 6 0 P r , lk v -v, 1 Sco,le 9 /Ilea- or A 4406 G G 1986 L iTy VII ILA PLANNING DEPT. . , • 0.15/0e- roo &0 Getrele:56; ZsIsevykelAN- i-k(se ' Sewer kvne._ UJo.. kr VI V\E- ""ms . 1eC. - N 6 100' R- Disk es idetAce. Ne,o I trve on Old I \*A-e Lo4 N - 1 Q5S ' C - D(9 Ada' -vJr kkDOI .c\oo - DO8 sT - 141- a - aackiftov,- 5 5e-tar k e r 'kV\ 7 .--I- NO. 5ko, cc k ou3e, A pfoper o,AA re:\ GLikned, Vy? \'oc.,ke.r•i es. occoo 1) CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM AU G 6 1986 CITY OF TJ .VV1LA PLANNING DEPT. TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) SECTI FROM WHICH YOU ARE ESTING V'� IANCE: CSC krO� Ya CIVka WO intmCc \ 2) DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: 034 As-Vvvve bot,Ne av\cl LD 3) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT U VARIANCE IS APPROVED: DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A. VARIANCE SATISFIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.72.020 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY). 1) THE VARIANCE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LIMITATION UPON USES OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS FILED IS LOCATED. RESPONSE: 2) OF i PROPERTY, L. PRO<'OSED USE S C H E D U L E LAND USE VARIANCE ERTY IF THE RESPONSE: JS \ v\ct as ( - N.etr pro e rh e s , t h - V 1 THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE SIZE, SHAPE, LOCATION OR SURROUNDING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE IT WITH USE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PERMITTED TO OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS TED. RE PONSE: � �.� . . w . .. 1 , • rE iii ' VIM w►7��!AtEJB E , l T _ A 3 ) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. 1 1 / 4 0- Lo Aot , 4 ) THE AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE '1� POLICY 'r PLLAN . 6vo c 'r y� 1/�'� p j , �(� Q RESPONSE RD) ` 'Q u 1 C �, @ V �[ 1 t ` S t� / L-( l c 5 ) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE APPLICANT POSSESSED BY THE OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME ZONE OR VICINITY. • 1L •I _ • 611! . 11 A. . [ • A RESPONSE: cao trSe_ poss ss� t ov. , ac..qu t r� FL t r7 , - CITY OF TUKWILA �� \\I1-k i 1�,'�`; Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: O BSIP PROP. RESIDING AT OSHORT PLAT O CONDITIONAL UNCLASS. VARIANCE USE USE APPL I CANT : A NAME r h\ (tV\C A I VCLV\C C� LQ � ADDRESS \, 1Q� .\ O ^ '� l OWNER:( v NAME � .11 \JEII\ I �4 ADDRESS Si I �. 1 ( PROJEC LOCATION: (STREET A DRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, I SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM w 1Yi� . l� N 6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES O IF YES, DESCRIBE: 7 ) PROJECT STATISTICS: A) B) C) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE NET I--O 1 ES TOTAL # FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA EXISTING ,��_ -•I • GROSS 0 0 PROPOSED V. 0 0 TO f--eilo INCLUDES: NCLUDES: EASEMENTS BASEMENT MEZZANINE BASEMENT MEZZANINE NOTES 8) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? 0 YES NO SECTION I11: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT Fre 1 — A IA C�1 - GI NGk S (1 I)P (Il �Q 1 knA ( , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT 1, 7HE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED JeD THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF ar KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. X tot •Z.5t��JG � " cr SUBSCR I B.°.n AND SWORN BEFORE ME TM I S DAY OF O SUBDIVISION OSH PERMIT E O PRD O PMUD O INTERURBAN 4a3 DATE 4a + 19956> 19 �6 NOTARY PURL I: I NAND FOR T STATE OF WASHINGTON j /`.0 G ('t9861 CFfl' C)r- TUi\vv;LA PLANNING DEPT. O CHG. OF OCOMP. PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT LIvth TELEPHONE Vt./ , ,) ZIP C' / (� r i TELEPHONE (a06) Qt-1 3 ~' n�lO `U LJD�4c LC . ZIP , l 1 p .�I D% LOT/ BLOCK) $ Akie so, (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT , PURCHASER OR OWNER) Control # 8(o 44 File #(s) Fee(s) $ Receipt # OLo) CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM /'.0 G 6 1986 CITY OP i iJKVVILA PLANNING DEPT. 1) TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (MC) SECTI• FROM WHICH • ARE - ESTING V - IANCE: 2) DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: Ca � ISA tM vt bQ Q P to ' —. *i" 1\ av\a 3) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT U ` OF PROPERTY, VARIANCE IS APPROVED: eV\c (1v\ S C H E D U L E LAND USE VARIANCE PROQOSED USE • THE ERTY IF THE DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SATISFIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.72.020 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY). 1) THE VARIANCE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LIMITATION UPON USES OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS FILED IS LOCATED. 1n 06- M fo�t 2 ) THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE SIZE, SHAPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION OR SURROUNDING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE IT WITH USE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PERMITTED TO OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN 3 ) 5) RESPONSE: THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OCATED. A l . ..• 1 a t c i • A...'.! t /A•• r t • RE PONSE THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. 1/4 LiYk AOt RESPONSE: 4 ) THE AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE APPLICANT POSSESSED BY THE OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME ZONE OR VICINITY. RESPONSE: •► 0 4. A t L ► • `1I< • bu, °averser .QoS ess i ov\ , aCLkui re �p U� cp uurdkase TMC 18.72.070 PROHIBITED VARIANCE. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES: SHALL THE BOARD OF ADJUST- MENT GRANT A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A USE NOT GENERALLY OR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED IN THE ZONE INVOLVED, OR ANY USE EXPRESSLY OR BY IMPLICATION PROHIBITED BY THE TERMS OF THIS TITLE IN SAID ZONE. MASTER Central Permit System LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: Q Bst, SJBSC^IBED�AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS__ J ' DAY OF RESIDING AT p�' SHORT �"���"'�CCC PLAT 0 CONDITIONAL USE SECTION I11: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT I..LiG E? 198f6I i. ;Fr'i' Q:. Cur\ ., _A r l.,�.f4F�i1'JG tDEPT. 0 SUBD1VIStON DS PERMIT E PRD I�PMUD 0 BAR D UNCLASS. USE VARIANCE Lot APPL 1 CANT : L\ NAME F' (t V(i I Va�C �, w i ` U � TELEPHONE LotADDRESS ALj kA O ^ 5k P 1 ` i ] , - t A K (� t (Ck. , ZIP ^� C' / PROP. OWNER:() NAME ! � � 1 1 P UI I �,V�CQ Y l.Y (�P �iLtivrII TELEPHONE (allo) J-- _ 6,4, :e )NAME ADDRESS I D t t (L7 L k - 1 1 u kop L C , Z I P9, U 1 D PROJECT LOCAT I ON : (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC , LOT / BLOCK) `, ( 4I 3 /\� �. A_J t - its v\ 6Q,1 l (oc _. NOTARY PUBL1: IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Control # $(o 'a.¢�- File #(s) Fee(s) $ Receipt # (7c37 DCHG. OF riCOMP. PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT SECTION I I ; PROJECT INFORMATION 0 b v, ,�1� mo t . 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YQU PROPOSE , (na V L \ tA e u,Stwevi 5 ) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM w „ Jl 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: 7 8 ) PROJECT STATISTICS: A) B) C) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 1. -.C)+ FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE TOTAL II FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA EXISTING IP _ _.. A. GROSS ❑ ❑ PROPOSED tiNk e 0 ❑ INCLUDES: O BASEMENT EJMEZZANINE NCLUDES: D BASEMENT EJ MEZZANINE EASEMENTS NOTES IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? ❑ YES igNO . FrM Lt �Anw o. ∎Ack `' itopAn't Tal YV1) , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT 1 are_ ThE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED A D THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN OUK ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF M4' KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE A-a Ca 5 09956 X LO t^ cr thr' cJ (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT PURCHMER OR OWNER) 1-64 . . C A twill' f/ YnF B6 -'•a -v I&i4r& SI Rv Ljtj1bW .