HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 86-44-A - CITY OF TUKWILA - CROISSANT, SCHOOL AND PARK ANNEXATION II86-44-a
south 139th street 53rd avenue south
CROISSANT SCHOOL AND PARK ANNEXATION
TO: REBECCA FOX, Planner
City of Tukwila
FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN,
Executive Secretary
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 -4196
November 26, 1986
IN RE: CLOSING LETTER
FILE NO. 1409 CITY OF TUKWILA
Proposed Annexation
(Croissant /School District)
You have been advised that the above file was formally filed effective as of
September 26, 1986
The Board has received no request for review and has not itself chosen to invoke
jurisdiction. Therefore, the 60 -day filing period having now elapsed, this notice
is hereby deemed approved as of November 25, 1986
The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are
changes by the Council, the Board may be required to review the action at that
time.
When the proposal is ready for finalization, it will be necessary that you file
one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with
the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle,
Washington 98104, together with a copy of this letter.
GBM /pr
CC: Office of the Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski
K.C. Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight
K.C. Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock
K.C. Dept. of Planning & Community Development,
ATTN: Mr. Keith Artz, SEPA Coordinator
K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections
E -911 Program, ATTN: Mark Peterson
TO: Rebecca Fox, Planner
City of Tukwila
FROM: PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst.
PAR
Ref. 930
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 -4796
October 29 , 1986
IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
T.F. # 9 -5 (File No. 1409) CITY OF TUKWILA
Proposed Annexation
(Croisant /School District)
The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office is now acceptable for filing
and has been filed effective September 26, 1986 and assigned
File No.1409 . You will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action.
As you are aware, a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County Council
by this office. This was under date of September 26, 1986
Any revisions to the legal description subsequent to that date must be incorporated
in your final ordinance /resolution filed with the King County Council.
CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski
Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight
Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock
Dept. of Planning di Community Development,
ATTN: Mr. Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator
f',1 O il. 0 5 19 ;
it [F., - 0,, [ F!!)
CITY 01-
: r a'as:.nv..
1908
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
Ms. Paula Russell
King County Boundary Review Board
King County Courthouse
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Paula:
RF /sjn
attachment
October 23, 1986
Subject: City of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation
(Croissant School District Park ANNEXATION)
Per your letter of October 20, 1986, the City of Tukwila agrees to accept
into the annexation all portions of 53rd Avenue South lying north of the
proposed annexation area. This is described in the attached revised legal
description.
Thank you for contacting the Chairman of the King County Boundary Review
Board regarding the execution of Tukwila's requested waiver.
Yours very truly,
Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
• CITY PARK PROPERTY
A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of Section 14, T23N,
R4E, W.M., described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the north line of
Colegrove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 85, of
Plats, Records of King County, Washington, with the
centerline of 53rd Avenue South said intersectio9 being the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 89=41`181 a distance
of 20 feet to the easterly margin of 53rd Avenue South;
thence north 0=31"18" west, 257.95 feet along said easterly
margin; thence west a distance of 40 feet to the westerly
margin of 53rd Avenue South; thence south 0=31"18" east along
said westerly margin to the northerly margin of South 139th
Street (formerly known as Orchard Street); thence south
89=41'18",west, 332 feet; thence south 0c300"29"west 334 feet
to the northerly line of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Colegrove"s
Acre Tracts; thence north 89c a distance of 10
feet; thence south 0=00"29"*vest, 148 feet to the southerly
line thereof; thence south 89=44'30`'west, a distance of 10
feet; thence continuing south 0=00`29"**est, 77.97 feet;
thence north 89=22`00" east 351.94 feet to the centerline of
53rd Avenue South; thence northerly awlong said centerline a
distance of 537.68 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
•
Dear Rebecca:
€-
,..-,....
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 -4196
IN RE: CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed Annexation
(Croissant School Dist. /Park)
Boundary Review Board T.F. #9 -5
October 20, 1986
Mr. Williams at the Park Dept. and I discussed this at length Thursday, Cxtober 16th,
because of the comments and request from King County Department of Public Works.
It was my understanding that the City would voluntarily agree to accept and include
the referenced 53rd Ave., South, which would become an island due to this annexation.
Would you please confirm in writing, submitting a legal with that addition, and deleting
the area marked out referring to Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38. Once this
is received, I will contact the Chairman and ask her to execute the requested Waiver
of Review. The addition of the road will not effect the filing date which is computed
to be September 5th. However, this matter needs to be expedited as quickly as possible.
If you have any questions, please call me? The Board itself cannot add territory (or
at Mr. Williams' request, we could have done so for you), outside of taking jurisdiction
and holding a public hearing, then a modification hearing, etc. As you can imagine,
the costs would be astronomical.
Par
Encls. as noted
Yours very truly,
WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW
BOARD FOR KING COUNTY
1
IOCT . 1985
King County
Department of Public Works
Donald J. LaBelle, Director
900 King County Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 344 -2517
October 10, 1986
Mr. G. Brice Martin
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
W -378 Courthouse
Dear Mr. Martin:
Very truly yours,
AsSe^Rex H Knight, P.E.
Manager
Engineering Services
RHK /JRB:mw
Enclosure: Entire File
cc: Helene Mociulski
402 -A Courthouse
i
RE: Proposed Annexation to CITY OF TUKWILA (Croissant School District)
Temporary File No. 9 -5
;�� <�
We have checked the legal description of the attached proposed annexation and
find it needing revision.
The attached copy of the legal description is marked with our comments on this
matter. The King County Department of Public Works is requesting the inclu-
sion of all portions of 53rd Avenue South lying north of the proposed site to
be part of this annexation. If this proposal is passed as submitted, King
County will be required to continue maintenance of the remaining island portion
of 53rd Avenue South which could only be reached by passage over City streets.
The attached map illustrates the resulting island area of King County created by
this proposal.
The related Assessor's map appears to be for the same area as described in the
legal description.
This annexation does not appear to include a portion of a County park nor
conflict with any other city in the vicinity.
..,,
FECEBIEn
uu S E P 2 6 1986
WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY
REVIEW BOARD FOR KING CO.
4 ,,, I ,Addid,
?ease-)
CITY PARR PROPERTY
Ct
9:CA OY
4
(i
That .portion of
the southwest 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M.,
described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the north line of Cole- .
grove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 85, of Plats,
Records of King County Washington, with the centerline of 53rd
Avenue South; thence north 0- 31'18" west, a distance of 20 feet
to the easterly extension of the northerly margin of South 139th
Street (formerly known as Orchard Street) and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING: thence south 89- 41'18" west, 352 feet; thence south
00- 00'29" west, 334 feet to the northerly line of lot 3, block.1
of said Colegrove's Acre Tracts; thence North 89- 44'30" East a
distance of 10 feet; thence south 00- 00'29" west, 148 feet to the
southerly line thereof; thence south 89- 44'30" west, a dittoes
of 10 feet; thence continuing south 00- 00'29" west, 77.97;
North 89- 22'00" East, 351.94 feet to the centerline of 5Yrd
Avenue South; thence northerly along said centerline a distance
of 557.68 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ANNEXATION TO
COUNCIL DISTRICT
KING COUNTY ORD. NO.
CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO
iyiti ii. °nat.
N. A0 R
TACOMA
4[11TTL
w
a
MK, AY.1T
King County Department of
Planning and Community Development
811 Alaska Building
618 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 344 -7503
October 15, 1986
JN:VN:am
CPO47 /AO2
cc: Gary Van Dusen, Mayor, City of Tukwila
ATTN: Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Planning Department t�
Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator
Bill Jolly, Acting Manager, Planning Division
ATTN: Lois Schwennesen, Chief, Community Planning Section
Vaughan Norris, Community Planner
C 12 0 1988
.r
f'L:'lPais "'� DEPT.
The annexation appears to be a logical expansion of the City of Tukwila and is within
the area covered by the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The annexation
would incorporate less than ten acres into Tukwila in order for the City to develop
a park on the property. The subject area is not covered by the Highline Community
Plan and Area Zoning. This area was omitted from the 1977 Plan area because it
is separated from the Highline planning area by Interstate 5. We find that it is consistent
with King County Comprehensive Plan's Policy E -105 and support the annexation.
TO: G. Bric ti , Executive Secretary, King County Boundary Review Board
FM: Joe Na E l r ctor Designee, Department of Planning and Community Development
g p g Y P
RE: T.F. 9 -5, City of Tukwila Proposed Annexation (Croissant /School District)
CITY OF TU
0042.010.011
JEH /ko
07/14/86
WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. / o / V
1
I, Maxine Anderson, City Clerk for the City
of Nita, do hereby certify that this
document is a true and correct copy of the
original on :ftie'in.the.office of the City
Clerk. DATED THIS 9th day ,•f October, 198
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY TO ANNEX
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CROISSANT
AND SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTIES FOR CITY
PARK PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A NOTICE
OF INTENT TO ANNEX THE SAME WITH THE KING COUNTY
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.14.300 and 35.13.180 authorize cities to
annex territory outside the city limits for municipal purposes
when such territory is owned by the city or all owners of such
territory consent to the annexation, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has purchased property located
outside the City limits at 13919 53rd Avenue South, commonly known
as the Croissant property, and
WHEREAS, the Croissant property is surrounded on'three sides
by property owned by the South Central School District on which
the City of Tukwila currently holds a long term lease, and
WHEREAS, the City's long term lease on the South Central
School District property requires the City to develop the same as.
a public park and the City desires to integrate the Croissant
property and South Central School District property into a single,
comprehensive park project, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that annexation of the
Croissant and South Central School District properties would be in
the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare and
would promote use of the same as a City park, and
WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has issued a
Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for the annexation, now,
therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Intent to Annex. The City Council hereby
declares the intent of the City of Tukwila to annex that certain
property commonly known as the Croissant and South Central School
District properties located on 53rd Avenue South at approximately
139th Street and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth
in full, and to make the same a part of the City of Tukwila. The
municipal purpose for which said property is to be annexed is
declared to be the establishment of a public park on such
property.
Section 2. Authorization for Mayor. The Mayor is hereby
authorized to file a Notice of Intent to Annex the property
described on Exhibit A with the King County Boundary Review Board
and to take all necessary steps to obtain Boundary Review Board
approval for such annexation.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, this g 4 day of , 1986.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
/ /LA%
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH TH CITY
PASSED BY THE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. 0
XINE ANDERSON
APPROVED:
July 15, 1986
2
H. D FF , COUNCIL PRESIDENT
That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38
*located in the southwest 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E, W.M.,
described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the north line of Cole -
grove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 85, of Plats,
Records of King County Washington, with the centerline of 53rd
Avenue South; thence north 0- 31'18" west, a distance of 20 feet
to the easterly extension of the northerly margin'of South 139th
Street (formerly known as Orchard Street) and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING: thence south 89- 41'18" west, 352 feet; thence south
00- 00'29" west, 334 feet to the northerly line of lot 3, block 1
of said Colegrove's Acre Tracts;. thence North 89- 44'30" East a
distance of 10 feet; thence south 00-00'29" west, 148 feet to the
southerly line thereof; thence south 89- 44 west, a distance
of 10 feet; thence continuing south 00- 00'29" west, 77.97; thence
North 89- 22'00" East, 351.94 feet to the centerline of 53rd
Avenue South; thence northerly along said centerline a distance
of 557..68 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
,
September 23, 1986
Subject: Notice of Intention, "Croissant /School District"
Annexation between 53rd Avenue South and
South 139th Street (File #CN -86 -010 - Park Annexation III)
As required by the provisions of RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby
given by the City of Tukwila to annex approximately three acres lying at
the corporate limits between South 139th Street and 53rd. Avenue South and
generally referred to as the "Croissant /School District Annexation ".
As the enclosed materials indicate, the annexation petition is supported by
100% of the property owners involved, consists of less than 10 acres and is
assessed at less than $800,000. We request that you refer this request to
the Boundary Review Board with a recommendation to waive jurisdiction.
Please forward your written response to our request at your earliest con-
venience.
Sincerely,
Al
Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
I
NOTICE OF INTENTION
As required by RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby given to the King
County Boundary Review Board by the City of Tukwila.
1. Background Information
The City of Tukwila desires to annex approximately three acres of land
located at 53rd Avenue South and South 139th Street. The area includes a
lot recently purchased by the City of Tukwila and three acres of vacant land
owned by the South Central School District and leased to the City of Tukwila
under a 30 -year, non - cancellable contract. Tukwila intends to build a park
on the property, and desires to annex the area for municipal purposes
(RCW 35.13.180). A letter from the South Central School District assenting
to the annexation is included as Attachment A.
This annexation area was part of a six -acre annexation application (BRB File
#1388) submitted in June 1986 and approved in August 1986. This annexation
action was not implemented since residents representing 75% of the assessed
valuation failed to sign the petition. (See Attachment B: Letter to Brice
Martin dated September 16, 1986.) The City of Tukwila could possibly at-
tempt annexation of the five residences at a later date.
2. The Tukwila City Council will adopt an ordinance stating its intent to annex
the subject area after Boundary Review Board action. It will review the
attached resolution on September 29, 1986 (Attachment C).
3. A determination of non - significance (DNS) was issued by the City of Tukwila
on September 2, 1986. The checklist and determination is included as
Attachment D.
4. The City of Tukwila is seeking annexation of the subject area for municipal
purposes per RCW 35.13.180. This notice is being filed according to RCW
36.93.090 and .120.
The City of Tukwila is requesting that the Chairman of the Boundary Review
Board provide a written statement that the Board's review is not necessary
to protect the interest of the various parties and that it thus waives jur-
isdiction pursuant to RCW 36.93.110. RCW 36.93.110 allows the Board to
waive its normal review process in those cases where the proposed annexation
area is smaller than 10 acres and less than $800,000 in assessed valuation.
The proposed annexation area encompasses approximately three acres and
$210,000 in assessed valuation.
5. The legal description of the proposed annexation area is shown in Attach-
ment E.
6. The proposed annexation area with service points is shown on the Assessor's
Map as Attachment F.
NOTICE OF INTENTION
7. Vicinity maps are included as Attachments G -I.
8. N /A.
"Croissant /School District Annexation"
Page 2
9. A. There are no residents on the property. 1986 Assessed valuation of the
area totals $210,000. Of this, $154,100 is property currently owned by
the South Central School District, $55,900 is property owned by the
City of Tukwila.
B. A large open space, owned by the South Central School District will be
leased to the City of Tukwila on a 30 -year, non - cancellable lease for
the possible development of playing fields. The City of Tukwila owns
an unoccupied single family home and it will be sold and moved to
facilitate development of the playing field.
C. 1. The area is within the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan,
adopted March 16, 1982.
2. Tukwila has no franchise for the area. None is anticipated.
3. The proposal is consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan's "Urban" designation. The Highline Community Plan desig-
nates the area as Single Family RS -7200. Possible changes to the
Highline Community Plan are under consideration for 1988 or 1989.
4. No additional county policies, or plans adopted subsequent to the
Comprehensive Plan affect the area.
5. Current King County zoning is S -R (Suburban Residential, 4 to 6
units /acre). The current County Comprehensive Plan designates the
area an Urban Area, suitable for a range of activities, including
commercial /industrial areas that serve surrounding communities.
6. The area is within a local sewer service district in the King
County Sewerage General Plan, adopted 1/79 by Ordinance #4035.
D. The area is generally flat, on the top of a hill. There is a small
"dip" in the middle of the property. An open ditch storm drain flows
into Tukwila's storm drain lines, which in turn flow into the Duwamish
River.
E. The projected population growth for the general area is likely to be
small. The actual annexation area has no residents and is unlikely to
have residents in the future.
The proposal lies within Census Tract #262, which had a population of
3,505 in 1980. The estimated 1981, 1982 and 1983 population was 1911,
1948, and 1995, respectively. (PSCOG) Future projections are not
available since the area has been combined with nine other census
tracts to form the Riverton Forecast Area Zone (FAZ).
NOTICE OF INTENTION "Croissant /School District Annexation"
Page 3
The City of Tukwila had a 1980 population of 3505, with a 1990 projec-
tion of 4001 ( PSCOG 3/84; FAZ 3900). Total Tukwila employment was
20,930 in 1980 with a 1990 projection of 29,508 (PSCOG 3/84; FAZ 3900).
F. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila would be responsible for the
area's police and fire protection. Police protection would come from
the Tukwila Police Department at 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. Fire
protection would be based in the Tukwila Fire Department at Fire Sta-
tion #52, 5900 South 147th, with back up from 444 Andover Park East.
Tukwila would also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. Mainten-
ance service would be provided from the City Shops at 600 Minkler
Boulevard. No problems are anticipated in serving the area. The City
will provide water service to the area as soon as meter swaps can be
made with Water District #125.
G. The current location of community facilities include: 1) the Tukwila
City Hall and Police Station located approximately 11 miles to the
southeast; 2) the fire station located approximately 3/4 mile to the
southeast; 3) the Tukwila Library located approximately 3/4 mile to the
southeast; 4) the Tukwila Community Center located approximately } mile
to the northwest. Various parks, including the Foster Golf Links are 1
to 3 miles away.
H. 1. Present "municipal" services available in this area: a) Tukwila
provides sewer; b) Fire District #18 provides fire protection; c)
Water District #125 provides water; and d) King County provides
street maintenance, emergency and administrative services. At
present, King County provides police patrol. At the time of
annexation, Tukwila will assume fire and police service. Water is
provided to the property by Water District #125 via a 4" line on
South 133rd Street. Tukwila provides sewer via an 8" line on 42nd
Avenue South.
2. Please refer to 9.C.3.
3. Present costs of City of Tukwila services are described by the
following, including a comparison with existing service district
rates.
a. Tax rates are not a factor in the annexation action as the
subject properties, owned by the City of Tukwila and the
South Central School District, are exempt from taxes.
b. City of Tukwila Water Rates
Meter Minimum
Size Charge
3/4" $ 6.80
1" 10.80
1 1/2" 15.30
NOTICE OF INTENTION
2"
3"
4"
6"
811
The minimum charge is for 500 cubic feet or less. For each
100 cubic feet in excess of the 500 cubic feet allowed for
the minimum charge, the rate shall be fifty cents per 100
cubic feet.
c. City of Tukwila Sewer Rates
1) Residential Service: A flat rate of $5.20 per month
for each single - family residence shall be charged.
2) Multiple and Industrial: The rate of $5.20 per month
for the first dwelling unit and $4.70 for each addi-
tional unit shall be charged.
3) Commercial and Industrial: A flat rate of $5.20 per 900
cubic feet or less of water usage shall be charged. The
rate of sewage service on premises using more than 900
cubic feet of water per month shall be .52 cents per
additional 100 cubic feet.
4) Penalty Charge: .50 cents per month on sewer accounts
more than 30 days in arrears.
d. Metro Rates
The City /Metro charges' as required by the Agreement for
Sewage Disposal between the Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle and the City of Tukwila is set at the sum of $8.50
per residential customer and $8.50 per residential customer
equivalents (900 cubic feet equal one residential equivalent)
for multiple dwelling and commercial /industrial accounts
(1986 rates for METRO).
e. Standby Charges
The rate for fire protection lines (building sprinkler sys-
tems) shall be deemed service charges and shall be, for any
one month or fractional part thereof, as follows:
Size Service Charge
2"
3"
etc....
19.80
37.80
50.80
92.80
140.80
$ 6.00
9.00
"Croissant /School District Annexation"
Page 4
NOTICE OF INTENTION
"Croissant /School District Annexation"
Page 5
f. Electricity
No change in rates would result from annexation since elec-
trical energy is supplied to the County and the City by Puget
Power at the same rate.
g. Utility Tax
Tukwila and King County have no utility taxes.
h. Water District #125 Rates
1. Single Family Residential and Duplex:
Base charge: $10.00/2 months
Consumption
Charge:
$0.45/100 cu. ft. water consumption
2. Commercial (includes triplex or more, business, public
facilities):
Meter Charge: 1" = $14/2 months
1i" = 21/2 months
2" = 35/2 months
Consumption Charge: $0.40/100 cu. ft.
Water District #125 would cease serving the annexation area
once meter swaps are made with Tukwila.
4. No other currently constituted municipal entity is capable of
providing subject service to the area.
5. At such time as major roadway improvements become necessary, elec-
trical utility undergrounding may be considered in conformance
with the rest of Tukwila.
6. Costs of service provision may decrease slightly due to Tukwila's
strong sales tax base. Level of service may increase slightly due
to the proximity of service facilities. Police service is likely
to increase due to increase patrolling.
7. The annexation will have little, if any, impact on other govern-
mental units.
J. The annexation area has no resident population and should have very
little, if any, impact on King County government, economic or social
interests.
10. The proposal supports the stated objectives of the Boundary Review Board in
the following ways:
.>,,, a...>uw�a:¢lti. ^: fi4YL " #fdLV.•�'J ?v,{.Tu�l:k.2.Te: nMt� r,J,r1U1�wr ..wu�m»r�..nw......�.�+....
NOTICE OF INTENTION
RCW 36.93.180(4):
RCW 36- 93.180(7):
(25 /CROISSANT1,2,3)
_....__........ a« w .�.mr.;n�:nar,°t 7�,�1h�`d.�'i�:a'c'�t`r �'.
"Croissant /School District Annexation"
Page 6
RCW 36.93.180(3): The proposal extends logical service areas based on
proximity to basic municipal services.
The proposal extends logical service areas based on
prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries.
The proposal helps adjust an impractical boundary.
South 9entral
4640 SOUTH 144th STREET
SCHOOL DISTRICT 406
KING COUNTY
King County Boundary Review Board
W -378, King County. Courthouse
Third and James
Seattle, WA 98104
Dear Boundary Review Board Members:
The South Central School District supports the annexation to
Tukwila of its property located between South 139th Street and
53rd Avenue South. The property is currently leased to the City
of Tukwila on a 30 -year non - cancellable basis. The District
feels annexation is compatible with Tukwila's plans for develop-
ing the property as a municipal park and that the action will
result in improved receipt of municipal services.
MS :mm
• SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 • Phone: 244 -2100
September 22, 1986
Yours very truly,
Michael Silver, Ph.D.
Superintendent
ATTACHMENT A
Mr. Brice Martin, Executive Secretary
King County Boundary Review Board
King County Courthouse, Room W378
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Mr. Martin:
RF /sjn
ATTACHMENT B
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
September 16, 1986
The City of Tukwila wishes to withdraw its Notice of Intention to annex the
"Park Property" (BRB File #1388) consisting of approximately six acres
lying at the corporate limits between South 139th Street and 53rd Avenue
South. Insufficient signatures could be obtained to annex the . property;
accordingly, the City is dropping this annexation action.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
CITY OF TUKWILA
WASHINGTON
0042.010.011
JEH /ko
07/14/86
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY TO ANNEX
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CROISSANT
AND SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTIES FOR CITY
PARK PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A NOTICE
OF INTENT TO ANNEX THE SAME WITH THE KING COUNTY
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.14.300 and 35.13.180 authorize cities to
annex territory outside the city limits for municipal purposes
when such territory is owned by the city or all owners of such
territory consent to the annexation, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has purchased property located
outside the City limits at 13919 53rd Avenue South, commonly known
as the Croissant property, and
WHEREAS, the Croissant property is surrounded on,three sides
by property owned by the South Central School District on which
the City of Tukwila currently holds a long term lease, and
WHEREAS, the City's long term lease on the South Central
School District property requires the City to develop the same as
a public park and the City desires to integrate the Croissant
property and South Central School District property into a single,
comprehensive park project, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that annexation of the
Croissant and South Central School District properties would be in
the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare and
would promote use of the same as a City park, and
WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has issued a
Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) for the annexation, now,
therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
ATTACHMENT C
Section 1. Intent to Annex. The City Council hereby
declares the intent of the City of Tukwila to annex that certain
property commonly known as the Croissant and South Central School
District properties located on 53rd Avenue South at approximately
139th Street and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth
in full, and to make the same a part of the City of Tukwila. The
municipal purpose for which said property is to be annexed is
declared to be the establishment of a public park on such
property.
Section 2. Authorization for Mayor. The Mayor is hereby
authorized to file a Notice of Intent to Annex the property
described on Exhibit A with the King County Boundary Review Board
and to take all necessary steps to obtain Boundary Review Board
approval for such annexation.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, this
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH TH CI Y
PASSED BY THE CITY
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED:
day of , 1986.
JOE H. DUFFIE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT
July 15, 1986
a r
e OVA , a*M0 fall .y
/.33"
1.[ /• /..w R
S.[ PA..r I!�•
a/0 VI
•1• Q•M • diary
a. I.,,, s. _441 ?/J
4!
•
MIASMA AfI.MD# /i4 /YAW
N
1.110.
IA
.WI!• SO' t JJO As
A
5c cO/
MOO' 4/10 00%f is, f4 ..
;«e s
�.. ss / -ti.•• R
.4111P4OFWV MAN'
•••
,
r •
Iv'
Pat
r
Lot
4•••• Aft •••/......4:•••• �♦
.YI,'MJ4_ MOO
20'
w
N
lb
h
£0
•
1G
ammo
?A
t?
a
WAC 197 -11 -970
Description of Proposal
Croissant properties)
FM.ONS
53rd Avenue South
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
ATTACHMENT D
Park Property Annexation II (School District and
Proponent City of Tukwila
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any South 139th St. and
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -343-86
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCM 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Er-There is no comment period for this DNS
D This DNS is issued under 197- 11 - 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Date c - Z- - Signature C
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
c ontrol No. eN
Epic File No. EP/G-343-84p
Fee $100.00 Receipt No.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Annexation of City park property
2. Name of applicant: Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Don Williams
6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila 98188 431 -1841
4. Date checklist prepared: August 15. 1986
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): To annex the
land into the City in a timely manner, hopefully fall of 1486
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.This site i3 hying
annexed for municipal purposes.
It is no known at this time if any other land in this area may annex
into the City
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. Nn
-2-
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Resolution by the Tukwila City Council to accept the annexation
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
The 3 acre site will be developed in the future as an athletic field
City park. Thus the citvneed the land within the City limits to
properly spend funds and to enforce City codes laws.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
South of So. 139th St. for 522 ft. and west of 53rd Ave. So. for
258 ft.
Location: SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 23, Range 4
-3-
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
No
TO BE COMPLETED BY AC`ICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep, slopes mountainous, other
Flat, small valley in mid
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 6%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Clay and sands
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No - -
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
NA
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
NA
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
NA
-4-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2. Air
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion
other impacts to the earth, if any:
NA
a. What types of emissions to the
the proposal (i.e., dust,
industrial wood smoke) during
the project is completed?
describe and give approximate
3. Water
Nnna •
a. Surface:
or
air would result from
automobile odors,
construction and when
If any, generally
quantities if known.
-
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
No —
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
NA
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of . the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into. The Green River
is within 1/3 mile of the area _
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
NA
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
NA --
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Nr
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
/IA
-6-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
NA
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
NA
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
NA
-7-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Plants
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
NA
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
NA
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, of eF r
shrubs
_x_ grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
— other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
NA '
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None
-8-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
NA
5. Animals
C
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. Unknown
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
NA
-9-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
ft will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
NA
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
NA
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
NA
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
NA
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
NA
-1
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
NA
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
NA
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? Vacant land with no buildings
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. Nn
c. Describe any structures on the site. None, old house
foundation.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
This hat9tog yiously
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? Suburban Residential (SR)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Low density residential _
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
NA
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
None
-12-
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
NA
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:, Regular government regulation
review
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing?
NA
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
NA
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
NA
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
NA
Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
NA
-13-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the
produce? What time of day would it main
NA
b. Could light or glare from the finished prc
safety hazard or interfere with views?
NA
c. What existing off -site sources of light or
affect your proposal?
NA
-14-
12. Recreation
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control
glare impacts, if any:
a. What designed and informal recreational
tunities are in the immediate vicinity? F'n
and Foa _ .e 7 e a
b. Would the proposed project displace any
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control
recreation, including recreation opportuni
provided by the project or applicant, if a
will be developed in 2 rpacied adul
field
■
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
Nnne
-15-
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any: NA _
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any. So. 139th
st_ and 53rd Ave. So. are part of the proposed
annexation
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest .
transit stop? No Park and Ride lot within 4
blocks
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
NA
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
.•
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
NA
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
NA
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe. vpa + hp at•rp ai to
need police and fire protection. Eventual
park maintenance and recreation services will
be needed.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any. No plans to
reduce needs. Needs as a whole will have
little impact to City services
-16-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
te;epnone, sanitary sewer, septic system, otner.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
NA
C. Signature
The above answers
my knowledge. I
relying on them to
Signature:
Date Submitted:
are true and complete to the best of
understand that the lead agency is
make its decision.
-17-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise? NA
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
yA
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
NA
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
NA
-18-
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
NA
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are:
ND
4. How would the proposal ; be likely, to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
NA
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
NA
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
NA
-19-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
NA
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
NA
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities? Park,
maintenance will be needed once the park is
built. The proposed annexation will create a
limited need for posible public works, fire,
police and planning,services. _
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:No proposed measures are being recommended.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. No, the annexation
should have no impact.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? NO
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: NA
K
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
-21-
MEM
•
-
4
f'4$7f 404:4490/44 AVON
d.r w s/ory I
-- -_ - - MEW i
S. /J 3 "1 S T. M. DIP
JOI 00
Aeler0r Zvi ago' • i
r.S PA.. •.ir.
�f w
dleis BOO w d 7
1'74' 14, Se.M
'' !
4
3.0 /'/.v.• Roe
/• CN•••"
,' 'es. Art.
74E OO '
r •
o
8
•
set ee Sfr41 20 .
Jaf /*Were R 1
Awl _.:J,', /110410 •
Coy
Lot
.ma I' /.. ..;•.._ --
s.l BF Tow.
Set /'
I � ►• 441'12' 00'.1 - 6 0 1; 11111111111.1 4
f
20
Th
Lr.
/
a t
ATTACHMENT E
That portion of the Stephen Poster: Donation Claim No. 38
located in the southwest 1/4 of Section 14, T23N, R4E,W.M.,
described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the north . line of Cole-
grove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 85, of Plats,
Records of King County Washington, . with the centerline of 53rd
Avenue South; thence north 0- 31'18" west, a distance of 20 feet
to the easterly extension of the northerly margin of South 139th
Street (formerly known as Orchard Street) and the TRUE. POINT OF
BEGINNING: thence south 89- 41'18" west, 352 feet; thence south
00- 00'29 "west, 334 feet to the northerly line of lot 3, block.1
of said Colegrove:s Acre Tracts; thence North 89- 44'30" East a
distance of 10 feet; thence south 00-00'29" west, 148 feet to the
southerly line thereof; thence south 89- 44'30" west, a distance
of 10 feet; thence continuing south 00- 00'29" west, 77.97; thence
North 89- 22'00" East, 351.94 feet to the centerline of 53rd
Avenue South; thence northerly along said centerline a distance
of 557.68 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
water/
JUM
4 - / / -it
PRo
Sou
M
40
IA
N
t
OXOWNN&
dill
Z/1
TWr w,,A ORD. AM
S. l ,mac s E ,.. ::: tt
ui
- AAarXME�r 6
S. 142ND
_ _ _ _ = • SCALD
I *.12 10
4," - I•
. •
ge 20
ST•
%!I
Rd . eS
i
h 4
4#
X
5
i
3
A N L
//re P/e724175
AirkimInfri
v•ty
MAWR
4C
A)S .
.1c.h. 4,:cP...‹,4 164
FIRE
D IST RIC TS
a :Mt1
FiRE
plo'fRIGT
S.
ATTACHMENT G
AC
CITY
ARE 0071214 T
•
N!
4111 444E4 4141.11■14e.
• i
, '
11
g
S 'US.. .T
t . O
wri.{TN. 'Nigger NS
r INKIEN
IIOUI[W110
,SEWS UTI LPITIE5
ATTACHMENT H
�I -
...al •. K..
at
1
•
u
00
CITY
1
.5:
AnneuhoA Arm
• *+. •
w,. at
•1 'sots It
C. •:at.
r receN
DWI
WATa DTCL,
*12C
I
T
wAtBR DIrRJC'rS
CAM Sao.
J. ••.. :M•1
riNSLE1I
IOM
S :SOT l .r'
/ tt
Ii i / i/ ;
0
coll
r.
e•
CITY
%ma. as
ATTACHMENT I
a.
\
:.\ • w
a
-...■
a
•
• ft I
t�,la�r r
RF /sjn
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
Dr. Michael Silber, Superintendent
South Central School District
4640 South 144th Street
Seattle, Washington 98188
Dear Dr. Silber:
September 22, 1986
The City of Tukwila is preparing an application to the King County Boundary
Review Board for annexation of approximately 2i acres of South Central
School District property. The area, located between South 139th Street and
53rd Avenue South, is currently leased to the City on a 30 -year basis with
the understanding that Tukwila will develop a playing field /park on the
site.
Dr. Fotheringham signed an earlier petition for annexation of the property.
At this point, Tukwila needs an updated letter of support to complete its
application to the Boundary Review Board. I have included a sample letter
for your consideration, as well as a map indicating the location of the
property.
Thank you for your attention to the matter. I will be happy to pick up the
completed letter later in the week; the Boundary Review Board's schedule
dictates our filing the application by week's end. Please call me at
433 -1848 if I can be of assistance.
Sincerely,
4(_.
Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
0046
' 3
l
.
4
10
A ,.
0
!
00?
'
,1.O
•
'�
0. 11 • ; •
°' l f ,
•
n gt o
10 1y
.
,,
0010
. ;
t
0,6
�=
o
D 1a
-9-7-
to
•, yn
a
�1
•
N
.1 , .
. LOT 2 t 0,ye�
`' ..f •. r :57.91
8
l7
■
:+•�
—
,a ` , y 4
004 '
' t
s
" N TU 700E220761 SP 78 - 03 t4
J LOT 1 16 .
f y o n
r
w ! �.: ey
0 ., •1. f•.'. • Sr
rurwl. • o•o MIX
130TH .•.,.. ST.
•
pis 1 •
• , x7•. r.
te
I ' Y S ° 4 -
;i t< •
I ,
Ay .
?WA w.a. or• '141
r
139 I r. • :•rr ".if. 'I 4V;4' ,
• ,7. �e r
.1111 O. Air of
r _ R ". i
r
Mow
' fewg
•
37, too • : e
.It.A .G.± f(. I � •f. * ,.ir
b e
4 0 '
y � 0
/7/ no
...,), /7 /•O 0i. fi o V i
:` 4 '
■fr,, 1iL Z/744 0 ° -- 7 4
; :i .90.7 /- p � 0 0
.r;• .�.. js_.44 /K.I. I. 0 0
9 0
4.L
:
J.
W
142ND ST.
N
r
0
!� A
to
/•i
y+iv 14 Zvi •4
I" too
•
,/.
•54 00
•M ..
0 .
M'
i•t
t
•JA )
•/_
7'1.ri0.1.4 • 050 .
a
teyD `4 4.
• r ' y e0 ,+• f'
31• v\ ! 10,0.00 erJS
; 4:
.... 0:145 :. :.O
044 % \\ 4.
1 , �.
.� I.
1
• ----0—T- I ' o I I I
A � 8 . 1 0 ,
i °a W l,.s 1-4: �� I � .00 O,h I . :
M O(1
l
h I :.'K .7.! .0.. . • n • • i. . 4.V. ,
M
AlOfDN.!/_ - - •..f.I $ 4.47 Y.Y r.w1'
.0
4100__6_ MOM sCap -- --47'� - - -- j,
s
s 10
I? , •11
9
4
3/ •••
►-s 01°0
r- 1 0 I I ;
:014
∎ 12.
141. !
I/ .
r r
. Z5 00' � t
Iy
h 1.271
••
•
9
`.1
.. .
• en ,0
•J
S
Dear Don:
City of Tukwila
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
2001 6th Ave., Suite 2300
Seattle, Wa. 98121
Don Williams
Director of Parks & Recreation
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
July 14, 1986
Re: Annexation of Croissant and School District Property for
. Park Purposes
Enclosed please find a resolution of intent to annex with
respect to the above referenced property. From your memo of July
11, 1986, I understand that you and the Mayor wish to proceed with
this annexation as one for municipal purposes. The municipal
purpose for which the property will be annexed is the
establishment of a public park on the site. Please note that the
resolution refers to an Exhibit A which is the legal description.
You will need to obtain a legal description of both the Croissant
property and the South Central School District property for
attachment to the resolution prior to passage by the City Council.
As a reminder, it should be noted that this resolution is
only the first step in getting the property annexed to the City.
Prior to presenting the resolution to the Ci`Ly Council, you should
make sure that all staff review of the annexation has been
completed, including review by the City's SEPA Responsible
Official,, Brad Collins. You will note that I have prepared the
resolution to state that the City's SEPA Responsible Official has
issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the annexation.
You will need to have an environmental checklist prepared for
Brad's review and Brad will need to issue the Determination of
Non - Significance prior to passage of the resolution by the City
Council. If Brad determines that the annexation is
environmentally significant, then we will need to alter the
resolution and further environmental review will be necessary.
doubt that this will be the case.
C
Don Williams
July 14, 1986
Page 2
Once the Council has passed the resolution, the Mayor should
sign the notice of intent to annex and file the same with the King
County Boundary Review Board. Once the BRB approval is received,
the City Council may pass an ordinance annexing the property.
One final thing to note is that since, as I understand it,
the City wishes to proceed with this annexation rather than the
larger annexation which included the five properties located on
South 139th Street, the status of that annexation should be
reviewed and withdrawal finalized prior to this annexation going
forward. From our conversations in the past, I am not certain
whether you have actually filed the notice of intent to annex the
larger annexation with the BRB at this point. If you have, the
City should write a letter to the BRB formally withdrawing its
notice of intent to annex. If you have not filed such a notice,
then the City should simply note in the minutes of the City
Council that insufficient signatures could be obtained to annex
the property and the proponents, i.e., the City and the School
District, are dropping the larger annexation in favor of this new
annexation for municipal park purposes.
Please let me know if you have any questions concerning the
process that needs to be followed or the specific terms of the
resolution enclosed. By copy of this letter, I am filing the
original of the resolution with Maxine Anderson for placement on
the City Council's agenda when you are ready to go forward. I am
also, by copy of this letter, transmitting a copy of the
resolution to Don Morrison for his and the Mayor's review.
JEH /ko
Enclosures
cc: Maxine Anderson
Don Morrison
0042.010..011
Very truly yours,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
\ 124 i/iey
Ex Apo w I/ r
204.000
S. 1 /39 n '
faS7ze AIEAIOA /AL A#q*
dit■ 804 a ./11 ►
41
�ryv y �•
1 . .6. is �A� •��
l e.0.&61,.-k n ie
IMO -- —
CST.
d.1f. OA
.4 0 JJ2.00'
Sc nCO/
— — — —
A47. 00
/
i
GEM
Set��S�.,k1
.� ref / " /.... f'j. 0 -
MJ'II VO'l //IO AD'
I ,
■
—..
r I
I 1 - •
20'
•
i
C%
L
NIP ∎00:31 € /A200'
20
1��• / elc...... �.� Seel' /..•.P.
Se: �_ �' i.t SF ?,* 30V 74 00' 4/01'11'OO'L eS7. !O '•
I ..1:
3t
at
I
20'
t tj
•
?O•
Se
ir.
� INSURANCE �
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE f3 AND THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
CALIFORNIA (a Stock Company), a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown
in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys'
fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by
reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4. Unmarketability of such title.
This policy, shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating signatory of the Company.
By
Countersigned:
Validating Signatory
TO 2464 (166) Amman lana TAM Assonabon Own*'. Poky — Form B — 1970 (amwww 10-1740)
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
By
Policy of Title Insurance
President
Attest Secretary
CAT NO NN01124
-to be Own biien Insured
its The Company, at its own cost and without undue
may, shall provide for the defense n insured in all
i
litigetbn consisting of actions or proc •. wcommenced inst an
against such insured, or a defense interposed against
..tnsurad.in an action to enforce a contract for a sale of the
Diskette number: D130 MR
1. Name of insured
3.
A- 344415
Number : A- 344415
Date DECEMBER 20, 1985 at 8:30 AM
Amount : $55,900.00
THE NAMED INSURED
SCHEDULE A
ana the w !,pu .y •
expense so Incurred.,
4: Notice of Lou � :imitation of Action
In addition di Condtions and Stipulations, required a under paragraph n writing
these
-
CITY OF TUIOIILA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
2. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof
is vested in:
The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this
schedule covered by this policy is:
Fee Simple Estate
4. The land referred to in this policy is located in the County of King,
State of Washington, and described as follows:
THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 127.4 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 1, COLEGROVE'S
ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE
85, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PAGE 1
S ke'
0042.120.002
JEH /ko
02/05/86
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATF �.CO
61 t
e r6 , _ o(9,1
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as the
"City ", and the South Central School District, formerly known as
King County School District No. 406, hereinafter referred to as
the "District" desire to enter into a Lease Agreement in order to
allow the City to use a parcel of real property owned by the
District for recreational activities benefiting the citizens of
the City and the District, now, therefore,
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and
conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Lease. The City hereby leases from the District, and the
District hereby leases to the City, that certain real
property described on Attachment A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth,
subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement.
2. Term. The term of this Lease shall be for thirty (30)
years, commencing on the date this Lease is signed by the
last party signing the same, unless sooner terminated as
provided in this Agreement.
3. Rent. The City shall pay rent to the District for the use
of the premises at the rate of $ 1.00 per year, the
first payment to be due on or before April 1, , 198n_,
and each subsequent payment to be due on or before the 1st
day of January of each year thereafter.
4. Use of premises. The City shall use the premises for
recreational and park purposes only. No other use of the
premises shall be permitted unless the written consent of
the District is first obtained. The City shall make the
property available for use by the citizens of the South
Central School District under the same rules and regulations
which apply to use of the property by the citizens of the
City of Tukwila.
5. Improvements. The City shall be entitled to make any
improvements to the premises, including the construction at
its own expense or at no cost to the District, recreational
and convenience facilities, restroom facilities and
landscaping. All such improvements must be approved in
advance by the District and must be for recreation purposes.
The City shall commence development of such recreational
facilities as the City determines to construct on the
premises within three (3) years of the date this Lease is
signed by the last party signing the same. At the
termination of this Agreement, all improvements, at the
option of the District, shall become the property of the
District.
6. Utilities and maintenance. The City shall keep and
maintain, at its sole cost and expense, all improvements
installed by the City on the premises, and the premises
itself in a state of good repair and safe for use and
occupancy. The City shall repair or replace as necessary
underground utility lines, water pipes, storm and sanitary
sewer systems on the premises that may be damaged,
interfered with or disturbed by the City's use and occupancy
of the leased premises. The City shall pay any and all
utility charges levied or accrued against the property
during the term of this Lease.
7. Use of premises by District. The City and the District
agree that the premises can be used for school purposes when
the District requires use of the property for recreational
purposes, provided that the District's use is not
inconsistent with the continued use and occupation of the
premises by the City.
8. Assignment and sublease. The City shall not assign, sublet
or transfer any interest in this Lease without the prior
written consent of the District.
9. Indemnification. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold
the District harmless from and against any and all claims,
losses or liability, or any portion thereof, arising from
injury or death to persons, including employees of the City,
or damage to property occasioned by a negligent act,
omission or failure of the City, its officers, agents and
employees in relation to the City's occupation or use of the
premises.
10. Insurance. The City shall obtain and maintain public
liability insurance or other insurance necessary to protect
the public with limits of liability of not less than One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for both
bodily injury and property damage liability. In the event
the City obtains additional insurance coverage above this
amount, the District shall be included in any additional
coverage. The District shall be named as an additional
insured under any coverage, and a certificate of insurance
shall be provided to the District.
11. Lawful activity. The City agrees that all activities
conducted by the City on the premises shall be in accordance
with any applicable state or local law.
12. Nondiscrimination. No person shall be denied, or subjected
to discrimination in receipt of the benefit of, any services
or activities made possible by or resulting from this
Agreement on the ground of sex, race, color, religion,
creed, age, national origin, marital status or the presence
of any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
13. Early termination upon default. In the event of any default
by the City in the performance of any of the terms or
conditions of this Lease, the District may terminate this
Lease prior to expiration of the thirty (30) year period by
giving thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the City
specifically stating the reason for such termination,
provided, however, that no such termination shall be
effective if, within thirty (30) days after such notice, the
City has cured the default.
14. Notices. Any notice or other communications given hereunder
shall be deemed sufficient if in writing and delivered
personally to the addressee, or sent by certified or
registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed as
follows, or to such other address as may be designated by
the addressee by written notice to the other party:
TO CITY:
TO DISTRICT:
Director of Parks & Recreation
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Superintendent of Schools
SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
4640 South 144th Street
Seattle, Washington 98168
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease to be
executed by their respective officers.
CITY OF TUKWILA SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
By
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
DATE:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
On this M.6 day of / / 1986, before me
personally appeared Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor of the corporation
that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on
oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and
year in the certificate above - written.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
On this ( I day of , 1986, before me
personally appeared Dr. John J. otheringham, the Superintendent
of Schools /Secretary of the Board of the corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on
oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and
year in the certificate above - written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OGDEN, OGDEN, MURPHY & WALLACE
Ci Attorneys for the
Ci y of Tukwila
ss.
NO RY P BLIC in and for the State ,
of Washington, residing at .ichco.t_/c`
My Commission Expires p- :,23
ss.
) 1 a 1..��-n / 1 ).i.,,1-
NOTARY PUB I
N T Y P BLS in and for th State
of Washington, residing at Sa t .Q_.
My Commission Expires / /5/87
3
By Vi /4
. JoiTh J. FothEringham;
Superintendent
DATE: X /9 /di
ATTACHMENT A
The east 74 feet of lot 1; and the east half of lot 2 less the west 55 feet
thereof; and the east 64 feet of lot 3; and. the east 74-feet of the north
77.4 feet of lot 4; and all of lot 9 . except the south 70 . f eet thereof;. and
all of lot 10; and all of lot 11 'except the east 100 feet of. the north.
127.4 feet thereof; and all of .lot 12; all in block 1 of the plat. of
Colegrove's Acre Tracts, an addition to the City of Seattle, according to
plat recorded in volume 11 of plats, page 85, in King County, Washington.
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila and the South Central
School District are parties to that certain lease executed in
March , 198 86 (hereinafter referred to as "the Lease"),
providing for use by the City of Tukwila of certain real
property owned by the South Central School District, which
Lease consists of 4 pages containing 14 numbered para-
graphs, and
WHEREAS, in further consideration of the rental to be
paid by the City of Tukwila for such property and the City's
construction of recreational facilities on the said property
for use by the City and the District, the South Central
School District and the City of Tukwila have agreed that the
City of Tukwila should be granted a right of first refusal
should the District ever decide to sell the leased property,
now, therefore,
THE CITY OF TUKWILA and the SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DIS-
TRICT HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. (a) In the event that the
District shall ever desire to sell the property legally
described on Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as if set forth in full, and
receives a written offer therefor which the District intends
to accept, the District, before accepting the offer, shall
first notify the City and provide the City with a copy of the
offer. The offer must contain all material terms relating to
the purchase and sale.
(b) After receiving a copy of the offer, the City
shall have sixty (60) days within which the purchase the
property described in Exhibit A upon the terms and conditions
set forth in the offer. If the City does not respond, or
does not elect to purchase the property, the District may
sell the property to the purchaser identified in the offer
upon the terms and conditions set forth in the offer, but not
upon any other terms or conditions.
2. This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running
with the land, and shall be binding upon the parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agree-
ment to be executed by their respective officers.
CITY OF TUKWILA
By
L. Van Dusen, Mayor
DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KNG
On this �: day of L�� , 1984, before me
personally appeared Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor of the corpora-
tion that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein men-
tioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute
said instrument.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KNG
ss.
SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
By 4 �"__
. John J. Fotheringham,
Superintendent
DATE 51f/P4
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day
and year in the certificate above - written.
ss.
NOZ`ARY 'PUBLIC in and for the State
of Washington, residing at,/
On this a day of � , 198 g , before me
personally appeared Dr. John J. Fotheringham, the Superinten-
dent of Schools /Secretary of the Board of the corporation
that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and
on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said
instrument.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day
and year in the certificate above- written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OGDEN, OGDEN & MURPHY
By
City Atto
City of .Tuk
42
t •-y
NOTARY PU L in and for t e State
of Washington, residing at 4...t[et__
ATTACHMENT A
The east 74 feet of lot 1; and the east half of lot 2 less the west 55 feet
thereof; and the east 64 feet of lot 3; and the east 74 feet of the north
77.4 feet-67 lot 4; and all of lot 9 except the south 70 feet thereof; and
all of lot 10; and ITT of lot 11 except the east 100 feet of the north
127.4 feet thereof; and all of lot 12; all in block 1 of the plat of
Colegrove's Acre Tracts, an addition to the City of Seattle, according to
plat recorded in volume 11 of plats, page'85, in King County, Washington.
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
King County Boundary Review Board
Room W378
King County Courthouse
Seattle, WA 98104
June 5, 1986
Attn: Brice Martin, Executive Secretary
Re: Notice of Intention, "Park" Annexation between 53rd Avenue South
and South 139th Street (File #CN -86- 080/1)
/td
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
As required by the provisions of RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby
given by the City of Tukwila to annex approximately 6 acres lying at the
corporate limits between South 139th Street and 53rd Avenue South and
generally referred to as the "Park Annexation ".
As the enclosed materials indicate, the annexation petition is supported by
100% of the property owners involved, consists of less than 10 acres and is
assessed at less than $800,000. We request that you refer this request to
the Boundary Review Board with a recommendation to waive jurisdiction.
Please forward your written response to our request at your earliest
convenience.
nfir 1%0_
5131 sT # 53 s
44.
ilikbiWV14)
P PS ?�?EZt'1
AwaviTict4 1
.0 s:xt.'.n:.... .. ,.,... ". Y;:;: Y4. 41V a.,_ �sw, id :t.:'iF:2' ° a3Y$�E; ^ ..73 "Y3�,., c. ✓:R�.,'isr�usra.:,+ae.�ers
October 6, 1986
Ms. Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Ms. Fox:
We are closing our file on the proposed annexation of "PARK PROPERTY"
BRB File No. 1388, since you have withdrawn your NOTICE OF INTENTION,
per the copy of your letter dated September 16, 1986, attached.
Sincerely,
Helene D. Mociulski
Annexation Clerk
CC: G. Brice Martin - Boundary Review Board
K C Dept. of Public Works, Attn: Rex Knight
K C Dept. of Assessments, Attn: Diane Murdock
K C Dept. of Planning & Community Development,
Attn: Mr. Keith Artz, SEPA Coordinator
K C Dept. of Records and Elections
E -911 Program: Attn: Mark Peterson
Attachment
AUDREY GRUGER
LOTS NORTH
PAUL BARDEN
District 1
District 4
District 7
CYNTHIA SULLIVAN
RON SIMS
BOB GREIVE
am, :rFtnneW;:3 �r.n:,c+a.:5ssnrwnw� swa..m...a...nrmdt:.!C",
King County Council
Audrey Gruger, Chair
Gerald Peterson, Council Administrator
Room 402 King County Courthouse
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 344 -2500
District 2
District 5
District 8
BILL REAMS
BRUCE LAING
GARY GRANT
'� x_' a' zTS, rezY:'., r: .zyMOntffte
a) � ((c-ire,ri\��r) nl a
� I, .1 D
I nr,'T 7 1986
1 C1:1 —`c ,:,, , :..A
District 3
District 6
District 9
Mr. Brice Martin, Executive Secretary
King - County Boundary Review Board
King County Courthouse, Room W378
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Mr. Martin:
The City of Tukwila wishes to withdraw its Notice of Intention to annex the
"Park Property" (BRB File #1388) consisting of approximately six acres
lying at the corporate limits between South 139th Street and 53rd Avenue
South. Insufficient signatures could be obtained to annex the property;
accordingly, the City is dropping this annexation action.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
RF /sjn
cc: Helene Moci u1 ski
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
September 16, 1986
Sincerely,
/I • 6-cot- "-)‹.
Rebecca Fox
Tukwila Planning Department
r.. l r.? .� 'r 'S{�9Tt
:Y::$.•4a:.1`.�z.�.:a;l�rf2 {r�. �f.. viii :v.,i�2 .::^�:x::r_G%.:,f;°.•
TO Ms. Rebecca Fox
City of Tykwila
FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN,
Executive Secretary
IN RE: CLOSING LETTER
FILE NO. 1388
•
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 -4196
August 8, 1986
CITY OF TUKWILA
Proposed Annexation
(Park)
You have been advised that the above file was formally filed effective as of
June 5, 1986
The Board has received no request for review and has not itself chosen to invoke
jurisdiction. Therefore, the 60 -day filing period having now elapsed, this notice
is hereby deemed approved as of August 5, 1986
The proposal could be subject to approval by the County Council. If there are
changes by the Council, the Board may be required to review the action at that
time.
When the proposal is ready for finalization, it will be necessary that you file
one certified copy of your resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action with
the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle,
Washington 98104, together with a copy of this letter.
GBM /pr
CC: Office of the Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski
K.C. Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight
K.C. Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock
K.C. Dept. of Planning & Community Development,
ATTN: Mr. Keith Artz, SEPA Coordinator
K.C. Dept. of Records and Elections
E -911 Program: ATTN: Mark Peterson
r ,l.! ! 1 '.1886
dry" 01-' U WILA
PLANNING DEPT.
TO:
PAR
T.F. #
REBECCA FOX
CITY OF TUKWILA
FROM: PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst.
IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
6 -1 (File No 1388) CITY OF TUKWILA
Proposed Annexation
(Park)
Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 344 - 4196
July 14, 1986
The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office is now acceptable for filing
and has been filed effective 6 -5 -86 and assigned File No.
will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action.
As you are aware, a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County
Council by this office. This was under date of 6 -5 -86 . Any revisions
to the legal description subsequent to that date must be incorporated in your
final ordinance /resolution filed with the King County Council.
CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski
Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight
Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock
Dept. of Planning & Community Development,
ATTN: Mr. Eugene Duvernoy, Acting Assistant Director
f.'.'R?`SE!Y?fl: i - i.' v- '.':.tq'� . .�i15....� �bF ".
.t
JUL 1 C 15861
CFFV OF 7U► WILA
PLANNING DEPT.
King County Boundary
Review Board
King County Courthouse
Seattle, WA 98104
/td
fy-
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
Dear Boundary Review Board Members:
July 9, 1986
The City of Tukwila requests that the Boundary Review Board not waive
jurisdiction for the Park Annexation (File #CN -86- 080/1). At present, the
City of Tukwila does not have the required 75% of assessed valuation on the
petition. The City of Tukwila is attempting to secure the remaining signa-
tures and will need additional time to accomplish this. Residential pro-
perty owners will be invited to an upcoming Tukwila City Council Community
Affairs Committee meeting to discuss the annexation with elected officials
and staff. It is hoped that this exchange will help answer any remaining
questions which the property owners have, and will result in a positive
decision to annex to the City of Tukwila.
In the event that Tukwila is unsuccessful in obtaining the required signa-
tures, we would like to outline the following possible course of action.
Tukwila would annex its own property and that belonging to the South
Central School District under the Municipal Annexation statute. The
School District property is currently leased to Tukwila on a 30 -year, non -
cancellable basis.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerel
Ga . an Dusen
Mayor
1
King County Boundary
Review Board
King County Courthouse
Seattle, WA 98104
Dear Boundary Review Board Members:
The City of Tukwila requests that the Boundary Review Board not waive
jurisdiction for the Park Annexation (File #CN -86- 080/1). At present, the
City of Tukwila does not have the required 75% of assessed valuation on the
petition. The City of Tukwila is attempting to secure the remaining signa-
tures and will need additional time to accomplish this. Residential pro-
perty owners will be invited to an upcoming Tukwila City Council Community
Affairs Committee meeting to discuss the annexation with elected officials
and staff. It is hoped that this exchange will help answer any remaining
questions which the property owners have, and will result in a positive
decision to annex to the City of Tukwila.
In the event that Tukwila is unsuccessful in obtaining the required signa-
tures, we would like to outline the following possible course of action.
Tukwila would annex its own property and that belonging to the South
Central School District under the Municipal Annexation statute. The
School District property is currently leased to Tukwila on a 30 -year, non -
cancellable basis.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerel
/td
C
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
July 9, 1986
Ga . an Dusen
Mayor
TO: The City Cowell l
Tukwila City Nali
6200 Southeaster loulevard
Tukwila, Ilashingtoe 98188
NOTICE OF INOENt TO ANNEX
(Direct Petition Method)
( "10% PetitionP)
The undersigned, who are the owners of not less than ten percent in value.
according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the property for
which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City Council of the City of
Tukwila that it is the desire of the undersigned residents of the following area
to coherence annexation proceedings:
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "A" (legal description)
attached hereto and is depicted on Exhibit "B" (map) further attached hereto.
The total assessed valuation of the area proposed for annexation is
$482,600
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Tukwila set a date not
later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a meeting with the
undersigned to determine:
(1) Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation;
(2) Whether the City Council will require the simultaneous adoption of proposed
zoning regulations for the area proposed for annexation; and
(3) Whether the City Council will require the assumption of existing City indeb-
tedness by the area to be annexed.
If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning
regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later
than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate
time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation.
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text material and is
intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented and con-
sidered as one Notice of Intention and may be tiled with other pages containing
additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of
Intention.
OWrIER' S SIGNATURE
(Husband or Wife)
�a s
lrr� mrommiorweimirm..vmuirsran:rrearvire
PRINTED NAME
(HnuEX.h1)
(4C.2)
3"714 C3 28 S' 0 ; 3 ��
�,
ADDRESS AND
TAX LOT NUMBER
ms
DATE
SIGNED
_. . .r
(Revised 1/86)
That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38
located in the southwest 1/4 of Section 14, T2:3N, R4E, W.M.,
described as follows:
BEGINNING AT A POINT at the intersection of the north line
of Colegrove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 85, of
Flats, Records of King County, Washington, with the centerline of
53rd Avenue South; thence easterly along said north line 512.8
feet to a point that is 1069.80 feet east of the west line of
said Section 14; thence North 45 °49'00" West, 39.53 feet; thence
North 45 °00' West 323.74 feet; thence west,.276.08 feet to the
westerly margin of 53rd Avenue South; thence South 00 °31'18" East
along said westerly.rnargin to the northerly margin of South 139th
Street (formerly known as Orchard Street); thence South 89 °41'18"
West, 332 feet; thence South 00 °00'29" West, 3.34 feet to the
northerly line of lot •3, block 1 of said Colegrove's Acre Tracts;
thence North 89 °44'30" East a distance of 10 feet; thence South
00 °00'29" West, 148 feet to the southerly line thereof; thence
South 89 °44'30" West, a distance of • 10 -Feet; thence continuing
South 00 °00'29" West, 77.97; thence North 89 °22'00" East, 351.94
feet•to the centerline of 53rd Avenue South ;; thence northerly
along said centerline a distance of 537.68 •feet•to the •POINT OF
BEGINNING.
1 75 Ac
SCH. DIST. 144
BEN OR HELEN
NANE W ICZ
134 At
si • C
ra,lD
W.-AMNIA. ! 11:111111-f It
• 5C14 DIST. 144
147 AG
JF DC.
EA I
I3,I9
• 141rle g
IOC
f.
ON TI
00w If141: yip
S.P. 78 .03
• (2)
/7/0S
11`1?'•
0• JFOC
• 1 •-- «
, •
o I
ti
✓ /o: 'L 2!
al' DC
r[ Io
26
Sr 71-115
(2)
53-20 -SS
(A)
J
J
"q"
1 11 2 ; • J
/e
/ t,r •• •
e ,; :.. 17.TM ;,,
ruMw/LA ORD us:
0
1
0
2001
• � /4
• sr. is} 139 `` fi.T Jp•f0
Jet 4 /d ',✓
74
>i e
0 03 1 k
' • 04
the 4
4e
4 26 w ♦
ti$O
elsa "
75 13
S
20 1 0' '
T,/M w ORO .20L
3 V.2ao
,z64;c -t 4/06
t o
3 1I r,Z o
Q
/74/00 ti vy
„/ . 4 /06 oh o0
� /�y� a G �t9
.2tff.dW/. 4101" �� 0011
W
,10 750 0 , 0 g, .
39 , : „la. etr
• 1 0. A LA/ fic,6 ^ Qk• 7`1 3 05 ♦
IP,9J° 12 i
olt
• .10,700 / 0') 0O
_20 / ,de
7.
l J 0
'o
L ,C
4 r
138TH •-• . ST
/ r5
+ o• o
•2 1l'J' •
•
• 76 1°
l4
8
�0
o
, p 014
, !t
2
F 3
PF j
^, A
•
I t
' ' # + u t
,0 J nl •t ,t
0.-,(,6 ° y,+ I°' X 041
a7 • I 7e
sa rs > 11
142ND ST.
`•• 417 i
.4
In
x
4
y0
Ai
•
h
16
to
10 35
AC.
n
1 1.
55 5.
+.
? �W 14 2 -
.4 s Ch 1.
0
I t o o
ti
>
1
10
lt. 7,
f,5, 00
,r5
rr
•
9 0 045
.4t •••
,40. 08
T✓a'.1/44 - opo
s
cos =1
O af
r•Q
.r7
d
or
nA,
J.•
.q
1o'
•
•
•
t 2
° 0
} 1 ■ 14 o y I
op (Z • j 1 0,7.
t0 t.
4 5 1 • go. •., h
33
AC
„'5
MP Lek
12
•
tP 4 0;00
%1 o
94. \ e
j t V's .7 •
:I �/ 7'UC .J
TYRO Plf. x!!a1 •"r
5,04 1 0.44$
J
♦
ID
150
11
r l0 ° 0'2* 14 ,50
.,Ito I ,,itl B t z>
4 .4 J.' .1.'.' e
on 3
0
_ s
a / :21.,;&144 o
�� — �-- .� 1• �.� !)// ' JJO, 4-- J^� Ala
40
r
•7J
•
5,4 5
. et
73
4,
4
10 00 5 II
ky7O19
1t •'
40 IA
J
n
k
r!
4
0
a
•
•
.69 44.04e
I)0 24
•
10
C�
•0f JJ f h
M! 0f
M 49•00f )! /
117 " T
40•
1 271 .7.'
r
12
Tt
(a04. c t♦ •■
190
6
v (
I
6V° ,••
CC
1 W
so
.,• v
•JO
11.
1v
•
So
Z /
e
•
fi
e ka�
cot
10' p
p
;
,
y et ° a
1t. ,, "
4 .1 0
,1- `24
e
I" O �I
11
I1, 0,0
,,ho
" 16 ' 0 71 h
5
r,
10 0
(O 0.4
L 01t0
I 1b' °r s p
1 °0
O. 01 25
u87 •.L 2011
4 LOT 2 1614
.• . 05 A5 257.11
H
ry
.,
n
i : 'n
4 a 14 r .
,a °,
,' ,
TU 7808 3
N 220761 SP 78 - 71 1
n4 LOT 1 k21
r d 1 .
69. 54 5! ;,
1 .'t 1 5 '• J,.
•■
'.
r
J
J
"q"
1 11 2 ; • J
/e
/ t,r •• •
e ,; :.. 17.TM ;,,
ruMw/LA ORD us:
0
1
0
2001
• � /4
• sr. is} 139 `` fi.T Jp•f0
Jet 4 /d ',✓
74
>i e
0 03 1 k
' • 04
the 4
4e
4 26 w ♦
ti$O
elsa "
75 13
S
20 1 0' '
T,/M w ORO .20L
3 V.2ao
,z64;c -t 4/06
t o
3 1I r,Z o
Q
/74/00 ti vy
„/ . 4 /06 oh o0
� /�y� a G �t9
.2tff.dW/. 4101" �� 0011
W
,10 750 0 , 0 g, .
39 , : „la. etr
• 1 0. A LA/ fic,6 ^ Qk• 7`1 3 05 ♦
IP,9J° 12 i
olt
• .10,700 / 0') 0O
_20 / ,de
7.
l J 0
'o
L ,C
4 r
138TH •-• . ST
/ r5
+ o• o
•2 1l'J' •
•
• 76 1°
l4
8
�0
o
, p 014
, !t
2
F 3
PF j
^, A
•
I t
' ' # + u t
,0 J nl •t ,t
0.-,(,6 ° y,+ I°' X 041
a7 • I 7e
sa rs > 11
142ND ST.
`•• 417 i
.4
In
x
4
y0
Ai
•
h
16
to
10 35
AC.
n
1 1.
55 5.
+.
? �W 14 2 -
.4 s Ch 1.
0
I t o o
ti
>
1
10
lt. 7,
f,5, 00
,r5
rr
•
9 0 045
.4t •••
,40. 08
T✓a'.1/44 - opo
s
cos =1
O af
r•Q
.r7
d
or
nA,
J.•
.q
1o'
•
•
•
t 2
° 0
} 1 ■ 14 o y I
op (Z • j 1 0,7.
t0 t.
4 5 1 • go. •., h
33
AC
„'5
MP Lek
12
•
tP 4 0;00
%1 o
94. \ e
j t V's .7 •
:I �/ 7'UC .J
TYRO Plf. x!!a1 •"r
5,04 1 0.44$
J
♦
ID
150
11
r l0 ° 0'2* 14 ,50
.,Ito I ,,itl B t z>
4 .4 J.' .1.'.' e
on 3
0
_ s
a / :21.,;&144 o
�� — �-- .� 1• �.� !)// ' JJO, 4-- J^� Ala
40
r
•7J
•
5,4 5
. et
73
4,
4
10 00 5 II
ky7O19
1t •'
40 IA
J
n
k
r!
4
0
a
•
•
.69 44.04e
I)0 24
•
10
C�
•0f JJ f h
M! 0f
M 49•00f )! /
117 " T
40•
1 271 .7.'
r
12
Tt
(a04. c t♦ •■
190
ATTACHMENT A
That portion of .the Stephen Foster Donation Claim N•]. 73
located in the southwest 1.'4 of Section 14, T23N., P4E, W.M.,
described as follows:
• BEGINNING AT A POINT at the intersection of the north linen
of Colegrove's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 11, Page 95, of
Plats, Records of 1'i ng County, Washington, with the centerline of
57rd Avenue South; thence easterly along said north line 112.9
feet to a point that. is 1o69. :3o feet oast of the west life of
said Section 14; thence North 49•49'00" West, 39.53 feet; thence
North 49 West 323.74 -feet; thence west, 276.08 feet to the
.westerly margin of 53rd Avenue South; thence .South 00•71'18" East
along said westerly margin ' to th. northerly margin of South 137th
Street (formerly known .43 Orchard Street); thence South•89•41'18 "'
West, 772 Acct; thenc=e South 00•00'29" West,. 334 feet to the
northerly line of 1.dt 74 block• 1 of said C ? 1 .4.grove's Acre Tracts;
thence North 89•44•70" East a distance o= 10 feet: thence South
00•00' 29" West, 148 feet to the southerl'. tine thereof; thence
South S9■443O" West, a 'distance of 10 fe -`.: thence continuing
South 00°00'71r West, 77.97; thence North • 39 °22'00" East, 351.74
feat to the 'centerline of 57 Av3nbte. 3c! ?th northerly •
•alcind said centerline •i di 2tance of 73717..:.,a : eet };a the POINT OF •
.BEGINNING.
/
ATTACHMENT e,
10: t �M1a d�1 •
ifilknotar loolevard
TIMM*. VIIINIniten 901$
The undersigned, who are the owners of not loss than tee. percent in value.
according to the assessed valuation for general tuation of the property for
which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City Council of the City of
Tukwila that It is the desire of the undersigned residents of the following area
to commence annexation proceedings:
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit •A• (legal description)
attached hereto and is depicted on Exhibit 'd• (map) further attached hereto.
The total assessed valuation of the area proposed for annexation is
$482,600
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Tukwila set a date not
later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a wetting with the
undersigned to determine:
(1) Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation;
(2) Whether the City Council will require the simultaneous adoption of proposed
zoning regulations for the area proposed for annexation; and
(3) Whether the City Council will require the assumption of existing City indeb-
tedness by the area to be annexed.
If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning
regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later
than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate
time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation.
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text material and is
intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented and con-
sidered as one Notice of Intention and may be tiled with other pages containing
additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of
Intention.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
(Husband or Wife)
!. /:"a-. L . 60 l•,1/444Q443eiI ` 5 a1 3 - w lb
wr
.01 ✓/ii / =Alt' M 0 7 S 3 - 2 -s - 16
Zb ►) 3 a Ca_ FIT I 374- 20 ;
.r _ -- i- = C ..... a , / o.c...; /3 V •S
"Pi 4
■■■■•■IMMOW
01. •111111• •IIMM
(msNIX.NL )
(4C.
NOTICE Of INTENT TO Ar �I
(Direct Petition Net j)
(•1011 Petltienfi)
PRINTED NAME AOORESS AND GATE
TAX LOT NUMBER SIGNED
(Revised 1 /14)
Q .
t.
Fosi»
Park
Sc1..1
1
1
1
1
Pres en at
•
8041..11 s
.
Fo ire 0-
Park
13 2-b - oKMl stonl
1 - 714ott.rroN
1 N14L- v T%p/
13'14 - 15p.RT1ETT
slab - TRACxy
I 11340 - ORM\statJ
V 1aa - 'TN-oitkrroN
N14L - vEICTIN/ •
13141 - 66- Ret1ETT
Sib - TRAC.ky
�ph,W�l� \4,wt5
^
etN OR HELEN
134 Ac
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary 1.. VanDusen, Mayor
Ms. Carol Bartlett
13744 - 53rd Street
Seattle, WA 98168
Dear Ms. Bartlett:
May 6, 1986
The City of Tukwila is currently reviewing a proposed annexation for the
area shown on the attached maps. The City and school properties identified
on the map are intended for ballfields for the Tukwila Parks and Recreation
Department. The City Council has authorized the circulation of a petition
for annexation and will hold a public hearing on the issue on May 27, 1986.
After the Council accepts the petition, the King County Boundary Review
Board must review and approve or waive jurisdiction on the proposed annexa-
tion.
As you can see, many steps are involved and the City is not the only
governmental body involved. Because of the small size of the subject area,
the annexation process should be completed in a timely fashion. Actual
annexation of the property through the adoption of an ordinance should
occur by the fall of 1986.
If you have any questions, or if you wish to be kept apprised of the pro-
cess, please feel free to contact meat 433 - 1848.
Sincerely,
addide(r"
Moira Carr Bradshaw
Assistant Planner
ScIs..1
Pr • • eti
L.*
Pres
1
1
1
f Bo��
C � Y
� r
BEN OR HELEN
MANE W 1CZ
134 Ac.
s- IMF tzI I• AM. 7'
SCH DIST.144
147
13919
roc
i t.
Jv
f•
1. t.
•A:a
S.P. 71).03
• 12)
„love r
e 1
J , •
✓ 0 ..1 1
V
JI
/V/ NO7 ST cwea
■ r04
ON 17 rt •
!7/ 05
✓,J [ rt i$
, , rt
ID H. A'
T LOW ° \
!36At.
175 Ac
.H. 01ST. 144
t I!
350
1
s
pi a
- a
ROC
Jy
,„3,0
CITY OF
TOKWILA
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 21, 1986
Page 2
CONSENT AGENDA (Contd.)
(,•# )00 -
L gal / c C f -
*MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED.
Accept the Notice of Intent to annex and set May 27, 1986
to meet with the applicants. (Adjacent to Foster Park.)4P"
.�'fbrma -1— 6 O5 — directing administration negotiat
a contract and proceed with bargaining for an agreement for
Fire Service with Fire District #1.
f. Delay fee reduction at Foster Golf Course until the ETS
construction is completed and have further discussion at
that time.
g. A resolution of the City of Tukwila adopting an Equal
Employment Opportunity Policy and committing the City to
fair treatment and nondiscrimination in all City policies
and operations.
h. A resolution of the City Council authorizing the Mayor to sic
an amendment to the 1985 -86 labor agreement between the City
and the Tukwila Police Officer's Association.
i. A resolution of the City accepting donations from the
Sunshine Grandmother's Club, the Pavilion Outlet Center and
Southcenter Shopping Center.
MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY BAUCH, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE
APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. *
Council Member Morgan asked that Item 6(g) of the Consent
Agenda be removed.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY SIMPSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO
INCLUDE THE SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE FOR ITEM 6(C). MOTION
CARRIED.
Agenda Amended MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, TO AMEND THE AGENDA AND
8(a) Meet w /initiating CONSIDER ITEM 8(A) AT THIS TIME. MOTION CARRIED.
party & authorize execu-
tion on the 75% petition.MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY MORGAN, TO APPROVE THE ANNEXATION
REQUEST AND IT BE SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE INDEBTEDNESS
AND ZONING AND THE 75% PETITION REQUIREMENT. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING
Windmark Homes Tukwila, Mayor Van Dusen opened the Public Hearing stating it was
Inc. Appeal continued from March 17, 1986 to include additional information.
7:25 p.m. - 8:27 p.m.
City Attorney Haney stated the City Council upheld the decision
of the Board of Architectural Review. A law suit was filed and
the Council remanded the matter back to the Board of Architectura
Review to consider revised development plans by Windmark Homes.
The BAR considered the revised development plans in January
and February and found they conformed to the criteria of TMC
18.60.050, subject to certain conditions.
Rick Beeler, Associate Planner, presented Exhibits 13, 14, 15,
and 16. With an overhead projector he showed the revised plans.
Ryan Thrower, 15232 Sunwood Blvd., stated he was president of
Sunwood Condominiums. In June 1981 this property was rezoned
from R -3 to R -4 and at that time the homeowners did not oppose
the zoning. The homeowners were concerned about the rezone,
however, and how it would affect the recreation facilities.
The owners made some agreements that were passed. The ownership
of the property for Phase III has changed. It is our understand.
standing that the property owners at Phase III will be given
access to all recreation facilities. We thought there would be
additional facilities made available to the Sunwood residents.
The plans that were being considered showed a jogging trail
that would go around the development. This property has access
to the first two phases but they have no access to the jacuzzi.
•
•
3
i 39ni Sr
0007
0026
o037
0113
00ZO
0/16
01/7
OIOA
0045
0097
0 o 9 6
0085
oog3
, �6�YDo
1 oQgg
00 6
4 re',7e
000.4
CC
ti e s./ /6s; q',zr
00
/74 roe
/t /, /00
ts7, too
/eq. fere
/67,10d
/6 . 900