HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 85-13-SMP - KAISER DEVELOPMENT - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT85-13-smp
interurban avenue south south 133rd street
KAISER DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Governor
Kaiser Development Co.
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94643
Gentlemen:
Re:
Linda S. Rankin
Permit Coordiantor
Shorelands Division
c c:
City of Tukwila
ECY 050- 1 -28(a)
Rev. 11/81
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504
COUNTY: King Co. - Application No. 85 -13
APPLICANT: Kaiser Development Co.
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 590--14 -5306
sos /sss -e000
M M EM M
JUL 9 1985
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
The subject Shoreline Substantial Development. Permit was
received by this office on June 25, 1985 . The review period
by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will
terminate 30 days from the above date.
If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the
permit may commence following expiration of the review period,
provided that all other federal, state, and local laws regulating
such construction have been complied with.
Jo° c eo pi
( A-4 6 -6 !"
Director
June 24, 1985
Linda S. Rankin
Permit Coordinator
Shorelands Division
Department of Ecology
PV -11
Olympia, WA 98504
Re: Shoreline Management Permit 85 -13 -SMP
Dear Ms. Rankin:
Enclosed is the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit 85 -13 -SMP
being hand delivered by the applicant.' Please forward the enclosed application
the the Attorney General's Office.
Sincer
' ick Beeler
Associate Planner
C
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433.1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
RB /blk
cc: Attorney General's Office
sxinr,.:
it:rl 2i'iw4"Fi'i;;lf1.-
NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR LOCAL
GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
Type of Action
I X(
E
(1 Variance
Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to:
Kaiser Development Company
to undertake the following development: construct two storm sewer outfalls into
the Duwamish River.
upon the following property: NE* Section 15, Township 23N, Range 4 WM and SE*
(legal description, i.e., section,
Section 10, Township 23N, Range 4 WM.
township, range)
Substantial Development Permit
within Duwamish
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 .
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Conditional Use
(name of water area)
The project will be
(be /not be)
(RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a
Application. No. 85- 13 -SMP .
Administering Agency City of Tukwila
Approved X Denied
Date
(name of applicant)
(be specific)
and /or its associated wetlands.
within shorelines of statewide significance
urhan
(environment)
designation. The following master program provisions are applicable to this
development pp. 41 -4.4, 4.6 and Sections 18.44.110 -15 Zoning Code
(state the master program sections or page numbers)
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the follow-
ing terms and conditions hydroseeding of construction areas
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and
nothing in this permit shall excuse the application from compliance with any
other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to
this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter
90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the per -
mittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof.
CONSTUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL
THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND
WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN
RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c).
(date)
Director, Planning Department
THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT.
Date received by the department
• Approved Denied
This conditional use /variance permit is approved /denied by the department pur-
suant to chapter 90.58 RCW.
Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and
conditions:
(date) (Signature of Authorized Department Official)
197 -11 -970
36.62 acre site
South 133rd Street.
REVISED
MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal 500,000 square foot industrial park development on a
Proponent Kaiser Development Company
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Interurban Avenue South and
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -25 &85
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). 'This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
C1 There is no comment•period for this DNS
[21 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted
by May 31, 1955
responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 '` -
Date May 16, 1985 Signature Q � 6
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
This determination is made per the attached mitigation measures.
4
Mitigation measures
EPIC 258 -85
vd.n�wvrr�i tYas� W
1. Accomodation of the future potential extension of 45th Ave. S. across the
southeasterly 55 -foot portion of the property if and when the extension is
included in the City's adopted 6 -year transportation and improvement plan.
2. Signalization and rechannelization on SR 181 in the vicinity of S. 133rd St.
per traffic engineering reports.
3. Rechannelization on SR 181 to allow the left and right turns in and out at
the secondary access per traffic engineering reports.
4. . Construction of the internal access loop and utility corridor to City
standards.
5. Dedication of a public trail easement along the riverfront dike.
6. Building, utility and street foundations being constructed per requirements
of geotechnical and hydrological engineering reports.
7. Utility crossings will accommodate METRO sewer and effluent transfer system
and Seattle City Light requirements.
8. Washington State Department of Transportation limited access restrictions
being removed.
9. Storm drainage system will discharge into the Duwamish River per applicable
State, County and City requirements.
10. Provision of right -of -way for the new 'access points from the project onto
SR 181.
11. • Provision of necessary right -of -way in SR 181, if needed, to accommodate
signalization and channelization per traffic engineering reports.
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DR- 07 -85: KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
AGENDA ITEM
INTRODUCTION
The Kaiser Development Company is purchasing the property generally at the loca-
tion of the northerly intersection of Interurban Avenue South and what would be
48th Avenue South (the property generally south of the existing Par Gas facility
and north of the existing Time D C truck terminal). Development plans for the
property include phased construction of approximately a total of 490,000 square
feet of office and warehouse buildings spread over the `36.62. acre : site. Currently
a landfill permit is in the final approval stages for the approximate 20 por-
tion of the site adjacent to Interurban Avenue South. Development of Phase I will
closely follow the stabilization of the landfill. To serve the total development,
a storm water drainage system will include channelling all surface water into two
outfalls on the Duwamish River. These outfalls require a Shoreline Management
Substantial Development Permit which features Board of Architectural Review (BAR)
of the proposal, per TMC 18.60.030(2)(A). A Shoreline Management Permit
(85- 13 -SMP) is in process.
Guidelines for review by the Board of Architectural Review are contained in TMC
18.60.050, including the City's Shoreline Master Program.
1. BAR 'criteria 18.60.050(1)(a): "Relationship of Structure to Site"
Findings
The proposal for the Shoreline Management Permit and the Board of Architectural
Review is for two storm sewer outfalls into the Duwamish River at the north-
westerly portion of the site. This outfall design of concrete pipe and rock rip
rap is not within the context of a building to which this design criteria is
addressed.
Conclusions
Although the storm sewer outfalls are not normally considered within the purview
of this design review criteria, it appears that the outfalls are of adequate scale
in relationship to the site to provide minimal disruption of the river environment
and provide appropriate river bank stabilization for the river environment (TMC
18.60.050(1)).
2. BAR criteria 18.60.050(2): "Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining
Area"
gr
Page -2- r
Planning Commission
DR- 07 -85: KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
June 13, 1985
Findings:
At this time within the shoreline environment buildings are not proposed, only the
two storm sewer outfalls into the Duwamish River. These outfall structures con-
sist of only the concrete pipe and rock rip rap riverbank stabilization.
Conclusions:
The storm sewer outfall structures do not fall within the context of this design
review criteria which relates to buildings. However, TMC 18.60.050(2)(b) requires
"Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided."
Submitted plans indicate only rock rip rap is proposed in the riverbank area to
stabilize the riverbank, while restoration of the existing vegetation or in the
construction area is not shown. Since subsequent phases of the development
include buildings and site improvements in the river envrionment and along the
storm sewer construction areas, it appears appropriate that at this point only
hydoseeding of the construction areas be required. Deferment of any;: other .
landscaping requirements should be postponed to the evaluation of the Shoreline
Management permit for the development in this area. On this basis the proposal
conforms to TMC 18.60.050(2) and in particular subparagraph (B).
3. BAR criteria 18.60.050(3): "Landscape and Site Treatment"
Findings:
At this time the proposal contains no buildings. The proposal does include
construction of the storm sewer outfalls.with rip rap riverbank stabilization
along the landward portion of the property.
Conclusions:
The design review criteria which does not address buildings includes TMC
18.60.050(3)(A), (C). The existing topographical features of the site remain
undisturbed, and the rock rip rap bank stabilization is•an appropriate treatment
of the site (TMC 18.60.050(3)(A) and (C)). As mentioned earlier, it would be
appropriate for hydroseeding of the construction area to occur in order to stabi-
lize the exposed soils and riverbank. When actual development of buildings in
this portion of the site occurs, landscaping in addition to any existing trees on
the site will be considered.
4. BAR criteria 18.60.050(4): "Building Design"
Findings:
The proposal of the storm sewer outfalls is the exclusive consideration at this
time. Buildings are not included, but will be featured in subsequent development.
(PC.KAISER)
Page -3-
Planning Commission
DR- 07 -85: KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
June 13, 1985
EXHIBITS
A - Site Development Diagram /Site Utilities Plan
B - ATLA Survey
C - Cross sections map
D - (1 -5) Cross sections
E - Site Grading Plan
F - Site and Vicinity Plans
. ..aLf:v. *::.�tr�..o• "1�2`rti�.,n ' fe:ze;c*; ,1. , ,:.�r' .f� ,iCt',�:�: 1* k�. � ,.�.,. � .�S'!'- �xt:�. r" ;5 Zy.�;J + @i�
';� `S „. '..;t [ it. �S�ti�: .. 'ti , Sv._. fa.rn.. .J '�9tS5: i(i� ?...fie7 ry : •,7:x�.�a:o.,;:
Conclusions:
Most of the design review criteria in this section do not apply, since the storm
sewer outfalls are not buildings, per se. However, the outfall pipes and rip rap
riverbank treatment is difficult, if not impossible, to screen with landscaping, or
other measures from view from properties across the river. Hydroseeding of the
construction area, including the rock rip rap, will eventually provide groundcover
to adequately disguise the outfall structure (TMC 18.60.050(4)(F)).
5. BAR criteria 18.60.050(5): "Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture”
Findings:
As part of the overall development of the site, the storm sewer outfalls provide
drainage of surface water into the Duwamish River. These structures will consist
of concrete pipe and rock rip rap where the pipe does not protrude beyond the
topography of the riverbank.
Conclusions:
The materials of the storm sewer outfalls appear to be appropriate and in harmony
and in scale with the ultimate development of the property and the surrounding
river environment (TMC 18.60.050(5)(A)). Lighting and other structures are not
•proposed (TMC 18.60.050(5)(B)).
PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above the Planning Department recommends the approval of the appli-
. cation subject to hyrdoseeding of the construction areas.
1 -5
�N
re
•
•••
LEGEND
• ••••••• ••••• Sr 6=11
••••••••••••• ••••• •.
• VS Sinai ma..
-_- on. &mud& OPINI•
•■■•■ • ••■•• ••• •••••• •••••
•■•• •■•• MM. 111••• •11•11•11•••
• 1•••••••••■•
• C.11 00
•.11,6
.1008.1
.1116.• ma."&ftwoer
VS ftstetiC
Octal Nor &15 Mr__ 4
IN
• •
• • • • .• • • •
1 ........ • a!, ••■,.......... ...0 ,
• • • • • •
• : e • ::::::.
F_C.T1c:4J & eivrA
a.3trbiLs.: stsztyli5es
[EMEIWffol
t,i4 11 19135]
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
SITE DEVELOPMENT DIAGRAM/
SITE UTILITIES PLAN
MAUL S : & M • -
EXHIBIT A •
SO 51.15
SP-3
••••
•••••■•
i 341 L*5Ck1Y110N
•IY.I h
1 ••••1 I me •t
/ •
aJ-0.1••
a•u•...awa (W..t.
.••a...P.M..."
s.•o
ww•r••u••
' ASP ...•r _.•••.I4_ Igoe
Is •Y•Iao HeC 41 .1..*s
SIS •4wu •••.•wCtau
•• • ..W tom Cab' 44
. 1844/44••• 00.11( SW.
C4•e•*I V tllwC ,•1 a'
•Ixvawl •--_'� �f'QUi •Cf'
/2.22......-...1.11;77. C 410»-4, *4J a
•..••CC d•a1• Air., ti aMaa'.I/t•IfalY1
OIIIIea/ .t•f1 .48`,.....,..
I.1 Mt
•
...*\
ck
.' 1-+4/t
w
• �1
JIJ.w.•w.r. E
cr•m.:tlt �I
•••••••••••••••
at •elnlr 1
•I�1-
aw1•rr•.•. �•
i.$011.40.,..
1I111./1'(111. it,...
0"
/ .....l I_••) it� •/.—
I, •.:r.
1rN
/
r--0•ttCJ1
Mf
-•:.:•-••••:.";:/ /. .I °'
•t•••:•(.•• !.1.:4.41( ..
/\.f .
•
.v
\
357.9i 4ut1 \
1.1359,a7 Slows 4 \
.w».. 4
\\
news. C
\
•\
t.
itA
•
9
•
•
w
»._
10:: 0 :._».w»00 ».m. 4404
.w
•�».•
• w•• •w•r4» y
-N_i
+
.
w
..'.
w •w» 4.•• N = •.rNM a...i4.6•.:=40
40. `••r
:
711.-4•- -• •• •_ •-•;;;;;••;;;;;;;•-•-•••••••:••••••=-2:-•
noon..N-�
._•=» »�«.w...w»»». w».»......
.».+
•
�
«• •w.
.. .�••••.
.�..�:L•�7 �»...•�.
1(•I •
i• rl/•4•N. �A.
sorsa N R 1•• \�
N•4.•r14•I.t •\•
\
7 ..NW
J• ..-._.0
rw»r.rwal�
4
ISA
ICx, • MAP
LEGEND
..—r--. _Is'_
• • •4842 ••.•
•t. 4,0t a. MM.
�L— _.lone t•wt 1••
•.r IMI•M slue aware
./t a_. N•.
.f 1••1.•N4 M•I
Tart r.Yt••Y.e
o mN 1•••;I
• • 44 •-,I
iwt•e•14.•
MAR 1 1 1985
..• J
CJ i Y OF 1 tJKWs;;A
PLANNita; WEPT
•
M Irw� wIN41••••••• MM.
Ma • r W .r• I•••. Os . •••4/ 4/ \ r• ••• r 4/
•..•..e.» w••=1(• r . •••._• r u 1.4/ r•••••
rr.•.. rwr. r ••••••• 4•11••••010610 41 10r••o. 0101..1(•••
1•ulw•w1•
451
EXHIBIT B
..,,W
1.
}
41
H
I FA
i
L 5 took 11.1 .6 W tr....1 r loge Wiwi MAW, Ma
w Il../.. •i 1.Mr.rr Wm Mr NO 11.1 IMO •
► r..t...w..t...11 . t. m. 110•00k ..e.+►ir
•w. _1
„rimy ..1NMI1rrYA8
Iw.r.�1wp r r.dhl.lwrl Wrtlw
,W .....PrThY -. IlL.1~o - ll.. (1.1T1.
a.r mute 811r. 4 I 4 NOM rr.YMrYI
Orisse.4 osiesahowor at raw siva 11
vermarm 44 * vow 0411.11114
1.0.0 me. .J•.M t•AMIo.. 110
ra.. n....v.wr
+..T.
n1w• .4.1►4.11A11.
41..016 •
•
o/
4/
1
1/
i ;:
l
/ r
t\
•
c t.`C--;/t 4) e 4. ' '
{tl
.
1
lest
.
t
11•
'
MINOWN -
e
ii'
11 1985
iiMAR
CITY OF TUKWfiA
PLANNING DEPT,
/
t?_iams imam —
r .
.
I
4
1
/�
/ '
f-
..
1
' --- 1
•
.00
irtr - •..e o.'k.r
SECTLW O•AD
EXHIBIT ' C
4
D,
U)
S
v
1
on
1
1
i
•
4
w
N
•
•
•
•
K
•
•
os .ui !see et.st rt'
•
1!!11.{11.•..... <.•.±1
-/
/
SK/ION /.30
•q
/
•t
/
SECT/LW .0#
/3
au
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
sccnav 3/00
40,04 1t•
YY1r� aam 143•11111 OP, 1.1
1
•
•
'0
w.1 ;
•
• Arad
•
r1• •.r....w•
64
usoff•Sr.••ro-
sea
ANIMEIO
MAR 11 1985
CITY OF TuKwILA
PLANNING DEPT.
•/ •
•
1
&CTLW 2/25
EXHIBIT D1
N
0
W
N
co
0 pc
ft
U -3
•
allllll
1
I lbw .41111 PIO
saw& k-
• V.r
YM'
♦ P • G
.11
s£cTrav 4 +sD
7.1tyYr.. wyrro
& C7/Ail i•Ts
+1N
..
Ctldrw fluor°
•
•
11
at/ AM
N
N
N
...r...r.r iv
..A' •.•••.11••111•
•
Mk rY /4/19,11011 41. /
1
-
- t •M.• •Y...
/
1'941.1$.1 SIM* •LW 14
•
• r•1•.•wr4111•1.11•'
4
•
are•1614 memo
t{ty slono•ow to a
r
—'y
1
/
•
IMO
srr/xw a+rs EXHIBIT D2
i I
r
'iitiiii
4111111
:i
GEMENE
4 -
MAR 11 1985
i
CITY OF TUKWILA
z --PLANNING DEPT.
are•1614 memo
t{ty slono•ow to a
r
—'y
1
/
•
IMO
srr/xw a+rs EXHIBIT D2
i I
r
'iitiiii
4111111
:i
•
F----... IW44•Mw 48.
1 71
M /-
1
Kiri.-..,.....' cI i
M /
t.
•
•
1
/•
SECTKW 7+.59
II NW. ••.rn r.r+•' /
/
1—
I lt•I
—I,:..i lM. 1.4•111a ea
-.1
/
-
1--
• . 1
_
/
/
�� •..•„moo...•
sea
•1 r
•
SEC/e1V 6.75
I�
"re
r • a.
_a. • .Nr•.•YI•
N.rr...• r
•..rr •w•
•
•
r
•
•
9
•
4
•
•
•
•
afro raw am or
•
1
1
1.
MAR 11 1985
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
(rams arra
1
arra era ass .r
/
-_/
/
/
/
. Z
S41LW 0026 -
EXHIBIT D3
CROSS SECTIONS
1
1
1
s
1111
/1 111111
1
fras PP
•.—
/LV
~�►..a 1
rr.
�..• C A
4
E
•
•
ao .•••• aura ago
. ..------
r.• b.. P.) I I
•
4 .•
t
I
•
I
I
•
•
•
4
•
•
•
SECTION 1005D
40 ••41, 444.4• ••4
— .
Ilue...411.agt.I.l.al, WW1
•
144.4 •••••AAVO
1 •
/ N.
I N.
1 N.,
SECiA*I 3175
114.11•01 ii•••••
. . _
•••1 • ••••46••••r•
•••••••••
•7&••••• ••••
•
•
~ad dallall
air. oar 4•••••wa
1
1
rlionha••• 'Jaw aid p24
1
—
MAR 1 1 1985
Eni OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT
SECT/4V llea
EXHIBIT D4
co
z
41/4 • .
1
•
4
4
•
•
•
4
•
•
•
El
. q
....••••••••••••• 1..
1 ••••••....
''....,_
i :
1 / e •44104 4140000
E•1.0.0 .10100,....1 '
• .
SECTION #.50
•••••••
i••••.”404.0 Of •14144 64040
. — —
4
40
seenav le#75
4
9 4-
•
•
4 -
4
•
- r-
M[MEIWEI1
MAR 1 1 1985
co
I mu)
0
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT. 5
11
4 r
at•
.,....••••!,.41,.....r.41E
4.001 ••••••••••01•
00404a4 00
0440004..,
EXHIBIT D5
• 1
•
r**4&I SIN 4:
Cs y-) ("`"")
•• , � \ k.-
LEGEND
• $
�\\
•
•north
SITE GRADING PLAN
'CNA: •• : •w - 1•
EXHIBIT E
Z .
aye
Z .c
cc a
c°
agc
0°
WW!
to i
N••
SP -2
•1'
1.1
Yr N.•••
•411111.8 NIL
1.8
• 1. -ks
11[11-111111HN
• •
SITE PLAN
SCALE. 1• : 100 ••
• north
•
•LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
061110
•11 •••••••••• NI 1. 660 6•0••••••••••••••• 111.
01.1 0...06 0 6116. ••••• • Moalt
0.. 1a 61.4 ••••16010. 1606* . 61.0
0.1.406 •• • 101.1 es •••••••01.1. ••••••• 01 •••
• 6006 dasoes• 0.6 10 061..60 1/01. .1. 6.6
WW1, Os. a.. 600.0 10.11.• •••
.11. • 0... 01. 11...111.•• Om* •• P.m 1.•
6116 6060 16.0 60. •••••6 61 •••••••••• 604 .4..11 000
S. ••••••••• 600. •••••• 060 NI 1.1 ...Y.
11.01141 ma 00.0 11.0161. so •••••••• 16 0600 MD
▪ •••••. pa. 1. 60 164 6.11 6.6•11 ••• .•••••
.06 *WW1, .611 •10.4 .10 •••••••••011. 0.61.•
1.1041 686 MD G. 00434 64 41.114*00
16.• .06 WW1. ha• 00 a/ 000
0.6 160 ••••••••• moot WOO
0.06 ...•• ••••• I.••
.166.
16.21 Oa
• 6100.0.6.101 .00.0 ••• ••••• ••• ••.•••
.111. 0600. •••••••••
• es a•••. N.. 4.4 10 .4.44•• •••••••• ...•••••••••
. 16. 00.•.6 • 1.0 ••••••••• so ••••••••
0.06.1. • .106 11.1161•0000 .01.1 01166 S..
6.1 6.00 • 1.0. to•••••11..... •••a• •••11: ••:•„...1••
."•=•to 1•8t 1.1.• 100=6:16.1. I. 00
606 •••••••••••• ••••• •••••••• NINO ••••14*
01.01. 34 •••• 44066 ..• 44 I •••••••••• 0.1140.116
*100.0 •••••.1 •••••••• 66 .1.0 MD MI 60. VW
••••••• 6 6.0. 6660. •60.
0.6116 O.
466 ••••• 0..11.60 •••• 061••••••••6111.10. .
1.011.0 1.0
•••••• ••••• 0,646 10.11.• 0.00
1.00 •••••••• M. •••• Mb ••••• 06.6 .
60.0.. .4* ••••• •••••••••••• 4.01.00 Mos
Ur. 0••• .14 .60.6. 11. Om. Sr NV ••• on 14
I••• t• •••.••••••••.••••••• ••• ••••• ••••• Poo* • Ulm
ca. 0.661.1•10
1••••44• M. • 044 I*. N.M. 4.- 1..016 1611
.0 ea. ore... NONNI NI ••••• ••••••••• wow..
40.00 Dr••••••••11.01•10 YU. ••••• ••••••
O m. • 11.1.1 6. I..... • 010.. 0110••• 11.1. an. Or
• 0. 6610. 0••••1106.1601 •••• ••••
••••• ••••••
444414 ••1 proton O.. ••• 110 •66•16
0• 61. 66 oil 11.6110. 6.6o .16.
SITE AND VICINITY PLANS
1.0 111.1!010 1.010. 1..1011
.11•60 • ..6101•16.46.11600..
1.010% MI6 QM GM .1.
MI • 1.00.6•00114.1661011111
4- • 1161. 6.61 4.. •• 166.10 .•• 11.•
O 111 • 1.11.6.1 66.1111. 116101
EXHIBIT F
a:
I- 2
o
°
-I I-
0
Ce2iE
CL '
Oa111'
•
g
SC (C
>••
4
ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING.
LEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED IN
SECTION I: GENERAL DATA
TYPE OF
APPL ICATION: 0 sale
APPLICANT
OWNER:
ont
Purchaser)
SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION
5)
6)
THIS V1.7 La%.
SITE UTILIZATION:
ZONING DESIGNATION
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA
LANDSCAPE AREA
PAVING AREA
TOTAL PARKING STALLS:
- STANDARD SIZE
- COMPACT SIZE
- HANDICAPPED SIZE
TOTAL LOADING SPACES
AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA
AVER. SLOPE OF SITE
SUesCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME
F - T 1 ON CN OMPLETE f APPL 1 CAT 1 ON5 WILL NOT BE
MAR 1 1 1985
r r ,vr
PLAN :NG DEPT.
° S P U � T S U B D I V I S I O N ®S
PERMIT E D PRD �PMUD I NTERURBAt
0 CONDITIONAL Q ❑ VARIANCE U
ZONING
USE
® Environmental Checklist
NAME
ADDRESS3 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3
NAME Kaiser Development Company
ADDREss300 Lakeside Drive, Oakland,
TOTAL 1/ FLOORS 1
TOTAL GROSS 4°1 R5f1
FLOOR AREA •
�1 =
0415
5 % P
I : T EEN-DJ
1,100
420
30
30 min.
1 -3%
1 -2%
M -1
light Indus.
441,500 0
173,317 O 0
R2R,350 0 0
_ '1r
DATE /' , `—'C
DAY OF D { w(14 -
I 9 ' 5.
. N
yic 7 lac e /Ct ric<
NOTAj Y PUOL I C IN ANc FOP. THE STATE OF worwireedwoN
/+ K
RESIDING ATI`;C, � t` ��!% /1 4„� 7
r' -,
11
EXHIBIT G
COMP. PLAN
6.1AMENDMENT
Mackenzie /Saito &Associates, P. TELEPHONE (206 ) 451 -1005
Suite 233, Bellevue ZIP 98005
TELEPHONE ( 415 ). 971-C767
California Zip 94643
PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) Interurban & South 133rd St.
DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YQU PROPOSE Multi -use (warehouse, research and development
And nffire) buildings_ phased construction, built on speculation
ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM May /1985 TO May /86 (1st Phase)
WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED,IN PHASES? ' EYES CI NO 1F YES, DESCRIBE: 2 -3 phases
Buildings cosec to Interurban developed first -- see site plan
). PROJECT STATISTICS:
A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET GROSS EASEMENTS
B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT
INCLUDES.: 0 BASEMENT
EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES
0
IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE
MAP? EJ Y ES ❑ NO
SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
I.
RA_ Dumper . BEING DULY SWOP.N, DECLARE THAT I AM THE
CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE-
GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN
ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
(SIGNATURE OF CpNTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER)
mil. vi-� ✓ ill_ �r-
-ll
OFFICIAL SEAL
VIOLET MACDONALD
NOTARY PUOUC•CAUIFO11NIA
• COUNTY OP AI.AMEDA
• VI Celteltsltl Etpvut W1 11.1111
® MEZZANINE
® MEZZANINE
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION F
f
CITY OF TUKWILA
Central Permit System MEM
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
•
4) PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
MBAR 11 1985
CITY OP
PLANNING DEPT.
WITHIN J 5 / /../E (1/4 SEC.) OF SECTION ) t J /6 TOWNSHIP 2 -S N . , RANGE
W . M . , IN TUKW I LA , KING COUNTY, WASH I NGTON . Zt - �O - Z 3 "y
NL -is' _ z3 y
2) NAME OF WATER AREA AND /OR WETLANDS WITHIN WHICH DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED:
PL414 6 - yy) //5 M UiD
3) CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH EXISTING IMOVEMENTS: \!A r . i . "� C r7z�
PR
rrarA1 t r eatii..CC■ CL 4111C1a.')P_ _7
■1 Y dm' -1'1'7-_ I —47
trf l ►.ice► I41 1 / 1 ► 1119IL. -' 1 41 •2 1 1 \1 •
1.41.31 prECV0;iasxmair)
5) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST AND FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDING ADDITIONAL
DEVELOPMENTS CONTEMPLATED BUT NOT INCLUDED I N THIS APPLICATION: , ./(. M u- rof)
6) CONSTRUCTION DATES (MONTH AND YEAR) FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT IS REQUESTED:
BEG IN t'44 -C /1667 667 COMPLETE y 2te • ' ( PA-64.-
TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL:
7) DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE:
8) APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT WILL
HAVE A VIEW OBSTRUCTED BY ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 35 FEET IN HEIGHT.
EXHIBIT •H
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal
before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be
prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal
(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and
to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instruction for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information
about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara-
tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor-
mation known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from
your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts.
If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to
your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers
to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore-
line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If
you have problems, the City staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you
plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land.
Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or
its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may
be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental
sheet for nonproject actions (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words
"project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
a�.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Additional survey work for
shoreline application, subsurface exploration
-2-
Control No. %5
. Epic File No. ;5
Fee S100.00 Receipt No._
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. Nn
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
City of Tukwila Permits
Shnrplinp Permit
King County Flood Control Zone Permit
State Fisheries Permit for Outfall Structure
-3-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
Flat Pastureland
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 1 -2% other than the river bank
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland. Silt &
sand
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. Minimal fill for buildings, access
road and parking.
No quantity.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
• construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? 79.72%
2. Air
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction •
drainage ditching and sediment control ponds
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Only normal business park related
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe. Nn
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any: None
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.vpc, Duwamish River
-5-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans. Yes
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material. Only that required to .
install storm outfall structures
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. Yes
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. No
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. No
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve. None
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe. Storm water
from roofs and parking areas will be collected
in pipes and discharged into the Duwamish River.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: City
approved storm water detention facilities will be
installed to reduce peak runoff.
4. Plants
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface'
waters? If so, generally- describe. No
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? Pasture and shrubs
c. List t'reatened or endangered species known to be on
or neE the site. None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: NnnP
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
None
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
None
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
None
-9-
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site. None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. No
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Flprtric and natural gas. primarily for lighting.
) ating and COMP manufacturing.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: Insulation and ori.entatinn of
builriings
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. No
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required .None
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: None
-10-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)? Traffic
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would cane from the site.
Construction during normal work week hours
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: None
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? Cii rrpnt IMP is pasturP_Adjacent sites
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. Pasture land
c. Describe any structures on the site. Wood shed /barn
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what ?.
Wood shed /barn
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? M -1
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Light Industrial
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? Shnreline area near .
nuwamich RivPr
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
Yes, shorelines area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project? 4Q0 -500
J•
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: The proposed building functional uses
will be compatible with existing uses.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing ? , Does not apply
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing. Does not apply
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: fnPc not apply
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Tallest height 30'.
Principal exterior building material is painted
concrete
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed? None
c. Proposed measures Buildings d in reduce c e or. co d to s aesthetic
impacts, if any: 9
majority of truck loading areas from street view.
-13-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views? No
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal? The large gag statinn signs are
an aesthetic regat
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any: Cut off light fixtures to
reduce glare.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe. No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any: We
- I -
1, -
-14-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro -
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe. No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.NnnP
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any: None
4 Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
jnterurhan Avenue South. See site plan.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? Do not know
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate? 1550
Would eliminate none.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing,roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). On site road
indicated on site plan. Unsure at this time whether
it would be public or private.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so; generally describe. No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. nn�Yim i' 1'V` 2.000 -3 900
g.
Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any: Nnne
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe. No other than what is
normally associated with a business park.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any. None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. Cir 1- utilities currently .aviilabl t_.tb.e te:
ectricity __natural gas,' at r . refuse service
sanitary sewed septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Power Puget Power). Phone (Pacific N.W. Bell).
Water (Ci of Tukwila). Sewer (City of Tukwila).
Gas (Washing Natural Gas -- Service will be
extended to the site)
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision
Signature:
Date Submitted:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
-17-
1'3a
re
Dames & Moore
Mackenzie /Saito and Associates, P.S.
300 120th Avenue N.E.
Building 3, Suite 233
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Attention: Mr. Lynn Takeuchi
Gentlemen:
This letter is responsive to Mr. Takeuchi's request for consultation
regarding the feasibility of site development and construction of one
story warehouse structures on a 37 -acre parcel of property in Tukwila,
Washington. The site is bounded on the west by Interurban Avenue South
and on the east by the Duwamish River. The south property line is
located about 850 feet north of 48th Avenue South. Our reconnaissance of
the site indicates it is undeveloped and currently used as pastureland.
155 N.E. 100th Street, Suite 500 , P.O. Box C - 25901
Seattle, Washington 98125 -0711
(206) 523-0560
TWX: 910 -444 -2021 Cable address: DAMEMORE
January 10, 1985
Consultation
Site Developement Feasibility
37 -Acre Parcel
Tukwila, Washington, for
Kaiser Development Company
Our preliminary evaluation of the subject property was accomplished
by site reconnaissance and review of available information developed by
Dames & Moore and Pacific Testing Laboratories during independent soil
investigations for others on properties which adjoin the subject 37 -acre
parcel. Dames & Moore completed a soils investigation and provided engi-
neering recommendations in 1968 for a freight terminal which was sub-
sequently constructed on the property immediately south of the project
area. Our investigation included 6 borings which ranged in depth from
approximately 45 to 95 feet and 12 test pit explorations. The soils
encountered by our explorations in general consist of an approximate 5-
to 10- foot thickness of silt and organic silt which overlies alluvial
sand deposits. A relatively deep layer of silt, interlayered with the
sand, was encountered at the location of four of the borings. Bedrock
Mackenzie /Saito and Associates, P.S.
January 10, 1985
Page 2
Dames & Moore
was encountered beneath the alluvial sand and silt deposits at three
boring locations. Our engineering services continued after completion of
our soil investigation and included consultation during preparation of
the terminal building areas.
The general soil stratigraphy described above was encountered during
a 1980 geotechnical investigation by Pacific Testing Laboratories for the
property located immediately north of the subject development. That
investigation was accomplished to provide site development and foundation
recommendations for the four warehouse buildings which now exist on that
site.
Based on the results of our reconnaissance and information review,
we conclude that the subject 37 -acre parcel can be developed for ware-
house type structures as envisioned. We expect that conventional shallow
foundation support and concrete dock high or slab -on -grade construction
will be feasible. Selective overexcavation /replacement of the existing
surficial site soils should be anticipated in some areas where foundation
grades will be near or below existing elevations. This procedure will be
necessary, generally where the moderately compressible silt and organic
silt soils exist. Preloading or surcharging of some building areas may
be required to preinduce settlements which might otherwise occur after
construction as a result of structural fill placement and application of
building floor loads.
Our experience on the adjacent property to the south suggests that
the general procedures described herein will constitute satisfactory site
preparation and building support. However, it will be imperative to
complete a program of subsurface exploration to identify specific soil
conditions as a basis for detailed engineering recommendations which
should be incorporated into the design and be implemented during
construction. A proposal for geotechnical engineering services will be
provided under separate cover.
Harakes, P.E.
gineer
1::.
• Mackenzie /Saito'and Associates, P.
January 1985
Page 3
We appreciate the .opportunity to provide this consultation and we
look forward to working with this project. Should you have any .
questions or require additional information please call.
JSH:adn
3 copies submitted
Yours very truly,
ES i,M
�HV�wvr +rw�a......�r«...............+w ra wumsaaaamw
Dames & Moore
*ILA
• 1908
City of Tukwila
Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
ck)
TO: 'Byron G. Sneva, Public Works Director
FROM: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer
DATE: May 14, 1985
SUBJECT: KAISER DEVELOPMENT at SR -181 & SOUTH 133rd STREET - UPDATE
Public Works has reviewed the preliminary design concept plans per the March 12, 1985
letter to the Planning Department from Lynn Takeuchi of the MacKenzie /Saito & Associates
architects for the Kaiser Development Company (Job #384421). Included in the original
submittal was one copy of plan sheets Nos. PL -1, PL -2, and SP -3. Through the past few
week, additional submittals have included the following:
1. Preliminary Land Configuration and Striping Plan (5/9/85
2. Storm, Sanitary and Water Plans (4/3/85)
3. Existing Site Grading Plans
4. Hydrological Report
5. Access & Circulation Analysis (Wilsey & Ham)
6. Updated Access and Circulation Analysis Report
7. Dames & Moore (3/19/85) Soils Report
To date several meetings have been held for the developers and their representatives
regarding this project. City staff have provided the developers with information relative
to their inquiries as the proposal scope of work has been developed, to date.
On 3/26/85 at 4:00 p.m., a formal preapplication meeting was provided to the developers.
DRC'staff were invited to review the proposed application, as processed at that time -
and provide developer with some preliminary criteria for further processing of his
proposal. The developers also presented partial information on the development at the
March and April 1985 Transportation and,Utilities Committees.
Attached is a generalized sequence diagram given to the developer at the 3/26/85
preapplication meeting for the purpose of informing the developer of the basic permitting
processes involved with this development (this diagram is only a general guide and not
intended to be inclusive).
Included in this report is the developed set of utilities criteria, to date, for use
of the development of the plan drawings for the utilities proposed by the developer to
be considered for turnover by the City Council at the completion of the project
(turnover at which phase of the project has yet to be determined). This criteria is
from another City project called 168th Street South - New Link Arterial.
Byron G. Sneva
May 14, 1985
Page 2
Also attached is the preapplication Advisory Form which includes compilation of initial
reviews of the various departments including Public Works identifying necessary processes
and permits associated with the development as presented at the time of the 3/26/85 pre -
application meeting (again, this is a preliminary data sheet and may not be inclusive of
permits /processes which may be required in the future).
As identified in the arrow diagram of events leading to the issuance of building permits,
it is noted that no commitment by the City is intended or made throughout the process
until the project is complete and constructed and utilities are presented to the City
Council with staff report recommending such turnover for final disposition of the
turnover.
A brief look at the plans submittal PL -1, PL -2 and SP -3 which identify a proposed Public
roadway system with a new intersection at South 133rd Street - and an additional new
intersection to the north. Comparing this proposal to the staff input and City
requirements to date, the following:
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (3/26/85 CITY RE(1UIREMENTS
1. - 48 -foot wide roadway pavement (same)
2. Right -of -way provided:
A. Section A -A 55 feet ROW /10 foot
easement on west side only.
B. Section B -B: 60 feet ROW /10 foot
easement on both sides
3. Sidewalks:
A. Section A -A: 5 foot sidewalk on north
side only.
B. Section B -B: 5 foot sidewalk
on each side.
4. Roadway section: 2" Class B over 4"
Crushed surfacing over 12" Class B
gravel. (NOTE: Soils Report provides
different section: 3" Class B over 6"
Crushed).
5. Concrete curbs and gutters, both sides.
6. Roadway configuration: Roadway loop with
two accesses onto Interurban Avenue.
7. Design speed standard: 25 MPH.
8. Easements across Seattle City Light
ROW adjacent to SR -181 for both
connections to SR -181.
Right -of -way required:
A. Section A -A: 61 feet ROW with 10
foot easement on both sides.
NOTE: from intersection at SR -181/
S. 133rd Street to 2nd of two
reverse bends -full R/W per State
requirements shall be provided.
B. Section B -B: Per section A -A above.
Sidewalks:
A. Section A -A: 6 foot sidewalks on
both sides.
B. Section B -B: (same as A -A above)
(different)
(same)
City staff input: Roadway loop with
two accesses onto SR -181, plus extension
of South 133rd Street to the river.
(same)
City in conferring with the State,
requires R/W across City Light R/W
properties.
Byron G. Sneva
May 14, 1985
Page 3
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (3/26/85)
9. Coordinate with WSDOT -seek necessary permits,
including signal permit and preliminary
engineering design report per WSDOT require-
ments for new public roadway access onto
South 133rd, for associated, limited
access, revisions, rechannelizations and
sianalizations in SR -181
10. Restrict secondary access (south of South
133rd Street) to right turn movements only
(original report).
CITY REQUIREMENTS
(same)
City staff input: provide full
left -in /out right -in /out and right -
in /out turning movements at secondary
access, including necessary
rechannelization /widening of SR -181.
However, WSDOT requires signal permit
and preliminary design report per
WSDOT requirements.
(same)
10a. Update traffic study by Wilsey & Ham
(4 /2 /85)- left /right -in /out.
11. (No response to date) Requirements with METRO on ETS line
in SR- 181 /provide utilities accordingly.
Per original requirements for environmental review (see attached) Public Works is now
awaiting a revised Transportation Study per the 5/10/85 meeting with State, a developer/
agency agreement for funding and staging the public utilities, etc. and agreements for the
development finance inspections, administrated by the City, per public utility turnover
candidates (and any other Public Works requirements through the utilities and transportation
committees). The revised Transportation Study will include signal permit application draft
and preliminary engineering design report (per WSDOT requirement) and will be necessary
before the City, State and Feds can review and a determination be made for the need for
signalization and rechannelization in the vicinity of Interurban Avenue.
Additional items that need review are requirements of the Recreation Director for the dike
trail improvement (see recreation Director's comments attached). Terry Kirkpatric,
Representative for Kaiser Development, indicated compliance to trail requirements will be
met by the developer at the time of the river phase of construction.
Also, the final detail plans will be stamped by developer's civil engineers, registered
in Washington State. A $1,000,000 professional liability insurance is required by the
City (specifics may be obtained through the City's attorney, Jim Haney - phone: 622 - 2991).
The staff is now considering the substitution for aluminum pipe to the City's Standard per
concrete for storm mains in the public street.
V"SCOT personnel requires an updated traffic data and preliminary design report, to !.!SDOT.
standards, before consideration of rechannelization and signalization proposals including
revisions of limited access at South 133rd.
It is obvious that the full development proposal is incomplete, at this time, and City
staff are awaiting additional information before continuing their review processes. Included
in the documents the City staff is still waiting from the developer are: the developer/
agency agreements for funding and staging the public utilities, (including compliance to
City standards for design of public facilities for turnover); agreements for development-
Byron G. Sneva
May 14, 1985
Page 4
/cs
(BGS.F thru BGS.F1)
K.1
cc:• Planning Director
• Recreation Director
• City Engineer
Fire !Marshall
Building Official /'
• Associate Planner✓
• Police Department
Permit Coordinator
• File
:11.4tn422 3tS�':Y,s. ,Kraraile ur.- a l
financing of inspections, administrated by the City, for public utility turnover
candidates; an updated traffic data and preliminary design report per WSDOT standards;
and a report on coordination with METRO on ETS utility conflicts /mitigations, a final
schedule for staging of the development and building amenities, including amenities
prescribed by the City, WSDOT and other agencies. Staff will provide above information
along with a recommendation for preliminary authorization allowing the development to
proceed into the final PS & E upon review and concurrence through committee action.
1908
•;vv y ., r,�r, !:'4,.� ' :"SII1!r�y�R :S'S;:Sfii: } ,.Y: �"" i t *T..; ,
:rT.'.• > ..< a ... �. �..,A n ^ ^. 1.. C`'r±t.�.s.�'�..i. PYl .e,.ul.a 'J
?i`.�_._;x«�:;iz �`b,. )R':��`to':.F+Y?`x'$. �_lYC...a ,t';�':' "..
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Notice is hereby given than Kaiser Development Company who is owner of the
below described property has filed an application for a substantial development
permit for the development of 2 storm drain outfalls along the Green River
located approximately east of Interurban Ave. So. and north of 48th Ave. So.,
within the NE4 of section 15 of township 23 N., Range 4 and the 5E4 of Section
10 of township 23 N., Range 4 W.M., in. Tukwila, Washington. Said development
is to be within the Green River and /or its associated wetlands. Any
person to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on
thisr;.application should notify Rick Beeler, Associate Planner, in writing of
his interest within thrity days of the final date of publication of this notice
which is April 10,.1985.
Written comments must be received by May 10, 1985.
Published: Record Chronicle, April 3, 1985 and April 10, 1985
Distribution: Mayor
City Clerk
•
. _ .:.
MAR 11 1985
CITY OF KW,
PLANNING DEPT,
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, .
hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in. Schedule A, in favor of the proposed
Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or
referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules
A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy
or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance
of this Commitment or by subsequent indorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obli-
gations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies
committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault
of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its ByLaws..This Commitment
is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
First American Title Insurance Company
PRESIDENT
ATTEST � , � r\/w+ C rG•+r SECRETARY
V4C rC 1
Jacket - Form No. 1755- Pr ' iminary
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
To: First American Title
Company
Fourth and Blanchard
Seattle, Washington
Attn: Sandra Duffin
. AMENDED REPORT
Insurance
Building
98121
SCHEDULE A
SUBURBAN PROPANE GAS COMPANY, INC.
As attached hereto on Schedule C.
Fourth and Blanchard Building
Seattle, Washington 98121
206- 382 -0400
1. Effective Date: November 13, 1984 at 7:30 a.m.
Proposed Insured: Kaiser Development Company
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount
OWNER'S STANDARD COVERAGE To follow
EASEMENT COVERAGE
aue " \ge Form WA -5
INSURANCE. COMPANY
Commitment No. 110786
Your No. None
Kaiser Development Company
Premium Tax
$57.50 $4.54
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this commitment and covered herein is FEE SIMPLE and title
thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in:
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows:
Perm wA4C 0170
wrem. scAwwN •
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
SCHEDULE d - Section 1
Requirements
SCHEDULE 8 — Section 2
Exceptions
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the nests or
interest to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for
record.
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are dimmed of to the
satisfaction of the Company.
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies
taxes or assessmenu on real property or by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained
by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a oommct
survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records.
b. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance t errlof;
water rights, claims or title to water.
S. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
7. Defects, limns, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public rec-
ords or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured aoqukw
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment.
(Continued Schedule B - Section 2) Order No. 110786
Your No. None
8. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said
property if unpaid.
As of the date herein, the Excise Tax Rate for Tukwila is
1.07% according to the latest Public Notice issued by the
King County Records Section. .
9. Assessments, if any, to be covered by a supplemental report to
follow.
10. Easement over an indeterminate portion of the herein
described property as disclosed by contract recorded
January 17, 1963 under Recording No. 5532604.
11. Suburban Propane Gas Company, Inc. does not appear
on the Secretary of State's list of active corporations;
however, Suburban Propane Gas Corporation does; this
company must be further advised whether they are
one and the same corporation.
12. Right, title and interest of Pargas of Seattle, Inc.
as disclosed by the King County Tax Roll.
Examination of the records discloses no matters pending against
the name(s) of Kaiser Development Company, the proposed
insured(s), according to the application for title insurance.
13. A Certificate of Incorporation has not been filed on Kaiser
Development Company by the Secretary of State, as required
by statute.
NOTE 1: General taxes for the year 1984 were paid in the amount
of $2,125.04 for Tax Account No. 000480 - 0012 -05 The assessed
value for land and improvements was $91,700.00 and $98,500.00,
respectively.
(Affects a portion of the herein described property)
NOTE 2: General taxes for the year 1984 were paid in the amount
of $50.28 for Tax Account No. 000480 - 0014 -03. The assessed value
for land and improvements was $4,500.00 and none, respectively.
(Affects the remainder of the herein described property)
cc: Kidder, Mathews & Segner
John Paine, Attorney at Law
Joseph R. Cusenza
•
PARCEL A:
All that
lying in
W.M., in
PARCEL B:
Schedule C
•
Order No. 110786
Your No. None
The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the
State of Washington County of King and is described as follows:
portion of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37,
Sections 10 and 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East
King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Northeasterly margin of the Puget
Sound Power & Light Company right of way, said point being North
22'20'26" West from the quarter corner between Sections 14 and
15, a distance of 1,722.57 feet based on the North Zone Lambert
Grid System for the State of Washington, said point being also
the Southwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to
Frank Menaglia and Vittorie Demarcki, as recorded in Volume 1513
of Deeds, page 13, in King County Recording No. 2693164;
thence North 48'13'44" West along said Northeasterly margin
1,770.27 feet to-the point of beginning;
thence North 41 °46'16" East 179.27 feet;
thence North 81'30'14" West 45.00 feet;
thence South 28 °05'42" West 159.11 feet to the true point of
beginning.
A non - exclusive easement for ingress and egress in and across the
following described property:
A strip of land, 20.0 feet in width as measured at right angles
to and lying Southerly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Northeasterly margin of the Puget
Sound Power & Light Co. right -of -way, North 22 °20'26" West, from
the quarter corner between Sections 14 and 15, a distance of
1,722.57 feet based on the North Zone Lambert Grid System for the
State of Washington, said point of beginning being also the S.W.
corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Frank Menaglia
and Vittorie Demarcki as recorded in Volume 1513 of Deeds, page
131, records of the Auditor of King County, Washington, under
Recording No. 2693164, September 15, 1931;
thence North 48 °13'44" West along said Northeasterly margin
g41 aa'ka`it .".n'.tC:s a&t.,1`:i?.".' ,.i,'tor?.,;,+k' 1.4ck•.: v ath
•
(Continued Schedule C
r.i.a:5`:.n... +.nu " a''`..'. ftiLe' 6' i.?.(` ao. r�7". 2 {'.(..#¢,.t�;�yii',L-0lgtfiture S:Sowss.tu`w.1`a+ ,1 n• {
Order No 110786
Your No. None
1,570.27 feet;
thence North 41'46'16" East 310.54 feet;
thence North 8'29'46" East 20.0 feet to the true point of
beginning of the above mentioned description line;
thence along said description line, North 81.30'14" West 595.37
feet to the Northeasterly margin of the Puget Sound Power & Light
Co. right -of -way;
TOGETHER WITH a strip of land 16.0 feet in width extending from
the most Westerly corner of the above described easement,
Northwesterly along. the. Northeasterly margin of the Puget Sound
Power & Light Co. right -of -way a distance of 190.0 feet, more or
less, to a road crossing said right -of -way being known as 42nd
Avenue South.
EXCEPT any portion which may lie within Parcel A.
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of
Washington.
AMEA
•*.
✓ c 7
$ First American Title Insurance Company
I0UMT• AND 5LANCHHARD WILDING. SEATTLE. MMMeNOTON Intl • (AMA nip att.sroo
-..-.- ,,....•.. m.. tsor.. �' Sreya• Yrw i'.:: au �r.•, �! s' t: 'rs:t�y;J >.yyin:r?ir
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 110786
TO First American Title Insurance Company OUR ORDER No
Fourth and Blanchard Building
Seattle, Washington 98121
Attn: Sandra Duffin
YOUR LOAN/ESCROW No
MORTGAGOR/PURCHASER
Development
cc: Kidder, Mathew &•Segner
John Pain, Attorney g t t at Law
There has b no change i thi title to the Wvared by our preliminary report since
N
❑ EXCEPT AS CHECKED BELOW: (date of fOrmer report)
a
❑ Deed dated
To
under Recording No.
❑ Contract dated Executed by
To Recorded
under Recording No. Excise Tax Receipt No
❑ (Mortgage) dated Executed by
❑ (Deed of Trust)
To Recorded
under Recording No
❑
The following Information affects the title to the property covered by our preliminary report, but is NOT intended to represent a complete report to date:
Title is now vested in
Paragraph No.(s) 9 of our preliminary report has (have) been eliminated.
A search of the records discloses no filings of Federal Tax Liens or Bankruptcies since
Our ALTA inspection of the premises on
Dated November 30
T -1 3/82
Executed by
19 _Siz at 8:00 A.M.
disclosed'
First
Recorded
Excise Tax Receipt No
Carla MacLean
a.m.
I t
Cl
• •••••Il
40
• ••••
. • •• • ...111 •
•
t
• i • . ••
•. ' sr%
:11 • •
• l •
•
•
• • .
I
.. 1
. • •
.
....•••
06 ; li
• '. .
. ...
...... ,.... . r . . •
.......-- - ...-
. A
. Sir OS . •Its ,
• •II 1 •
, , . . .• ....
' •• . •
a.. . . . 11
• .. (''''''.
•
.1
. • . c - •
I - • • " .
! • • .• \*. o . . .' • .
l'
..- .
_..% • .. A .I.
1/ 1 • .. \ .
•
• •• ' ;
• I
I
• IGO • • l•
it •e 01 •
• 1 s • • ; : . • ...
‘• • - ', • • ' ' • : . . 1 . .. t .
•
....- •
..ot 41
. -
• • ' Io 1. ., t I 1 r‘
NI! 7. • - ' • • 1 • ! .., . a •
• . •
" • . .
• •
.4 •
I . •
• I r.
1.; "s
I • •
'
• !
• • i • • •
• •
•
I •
•C
88•4'•
Lr /
• ;;\,, .; •
i
• .1 • r
• • • - ' • : r 4440-.4
.r'. • "r r. • .
. , . .
• %.
I • •
•• G ..—
, Op
, S. -... ./
v ...-
1 ;.1
■•••‘
TM asap doer not purport to rho, atIdghways. Nadi or memento affecting said property as liabi leo . .. -.44.. .,hi l' 441
--'...
b 'nursed ror euriationr la dioseraions Sad Meath& •
•• S.
AZ01. F4 //17ro
A! S&
•
ST AMLA
•
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
TO First American Title Insurance Company
Fourth and. Blanchard Building
Seattle, Washington 98121
Attn: Sandra DUffin MORTGAGOR/PURCHASER Kaiser Development
cc: Kidder, Mathew & . Segner
John Pain, Attorney at Law
Kaiser Development Company
❑ There has been no change in t title to the property covered by our preliminary report since
EXCEPT AS CHECKED BELOW: at a m
(date of former report)
The following information affects the title to the properly covered by our preliminary r but is NOT intended to represent a complete report to date:
❑ Deed dated Executed by
To Recorded
under Recording No. , Excise Tax Receipt No,
❑ Contract dated Executed by
To Recorded
under Recording No. Excise Tax Receipt No
❑ (Mortgage) dated Executed by
❑ (Deed of Trust)
To Recorded
under Recording No
❑
Title is now vested in
JD Paragraph No.(s) 9 - of our preliminary report has (have) been eliminated.
❑ A search of the records discloses no filings of Federal Tax Liens or Bankruptcies since
❑ Our ALTA inspection of the premises on disclosed'
0
Dated November 30 19 _Sa_. at 8:00 A.M.
T -1 3/82
�'.`, :,� : ^.!. t: •1... �'.'. J. r: , :ra'l.:vt.:.Y.:ti::...:1`_.:.�. ;:.•;.... ,..a...n ........ ...... ......._.. ......................mn\.� ....,ro�vwe�[eGaatlS4Wk,K a+n.m coetrevd,a0wua.arwnw...
FirstLmerican Title Insurance Comp'
FOURTH AND'LANCHARD WILDING. SEATTLE. NMMMNOTON wttt • ARIA 70x13■2.0•00
YOUR LOAN/ESCROW No
OUR ORDER No 110786
Carla MacLean
During the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide design
services in connection with the following project:
168th Street South - New Link Arterial Street
between Southcenter Parkway and Andover Park West
The scope of
labor, materials,
complete the work
1.
a.
b.
c .
d.
e .
168 STREET SOUTH - NEW LINK ARTEF( }.. STREET
Between Southcenter Parkway and Andover Park West
SCOPE OF SERVICES
work shall include the furnishing of all services and
equipment, supplies and incidentals to conduct and
as follows:
Phase I
a. Preliminary design and surveys.
b. Design report.
Phase II
r :CC..1791V. o ". "Y.YF.l�t�hatm
a. Design street paving; curbs and gutters, sidewalks, driveways.
b. Design storm drainage.
e. Design utilities.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare construction plans in conformance with
standard practice of City for plans prepared by its own staff. Procedures
shall be consistent with the provisions of the current edition of the
Department of Transportation "Highways Design Manual" and amendments
thereto. The CONSULTANT shall provide the following basic engineering ser-
vices for the project consisting of the preparation of detailed construc-
tion drawings and specifications, estimate and other relative information
including, but not limited to the following items:
I. Preliminary Design Phase - Phase I
purvey
The field surveying work shall consist of
Research. •
Field survey and mapping.
Field surveying work for richt -of -way
of right -of -way, and title reports.
Preparation of right -of -way plans.
Preparation of right -of -way takes for
preliminary Design Report.
the following items:
computations, staking
inclusion into the
Scope of Services
Page 2
2. Soils investigations
The geotechnical work under this contract shall consist of:
a. Geologic reconnaissance.
b. Engineering analysis and consultation.
c. Report preparation.
3. Preparation of Preliminary Desicn Report:
This item shall consist of the following items:
• Vicinity map.
o Executive summary.
o Project narrative.
• Description of existing conditions, deficiencies in existing
street network, design parameters to be used, design restraints.
o Discussion of alternatives including number of lanes, vertical and
horizontal alignment, sidewalk location, and private access.
O Recommendation of an alternative and discussion.
o Preliminary cost estimate for recommended alternative.
• Traffic analysis (super block only). This items will include
data collection, design year traffic projections, population and .
industrial growth projections, turning movement analysis, signal
.warrant study, trip generation analysis, capacity analysis, acci-
dent analysis, pedestrian movement.
• Railroad spur lines impact. This item of work shall include data
collection from railroad company and businesses served by the
railroad, evaluation of possiole relocation, evaluation of
possible abandonment, evaluation of design restraints.
• Discussion of utilities involvement. This item shall consist of
review of utility comprehensive plans, location and identification
of existing utilities, identification of utilities requiring relo-
cation, discussion of relocation alternatives, include utilities
required to support comprehensive plan, discussion of power
undergrounding for illumination.
o Identification of permit needs and discussion.
o Roadway cross - sections including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
preliminary pavement section.
O Preliminary Horizontal Alignment drawing.
• Preliminary Vertical Alignment drawing.
o .Preliminary storm drainage analysis.
o Preliminary commercial access improvement analysis.
o Commercial parking disruption discussion.
• SEPA Checklist. Including a recommendation in the report whether EIS
or EA will be required. City Planning Department will make the final
determination.
Sccpe of Services
?ace 3 �
• Bar chart schedule for improvements including final design engi-
neering and construction.
O Final report.
o Public meetings. This item shall also include preparation for
meetings, attendance at meetings and exhibit preparation.
o Client coordination and review meetings as needed.
At the completion of this engineering analysis work, a Preliminary
Design Report with 20 copies shall be submitted to the City.
ii. Final Design Phase - Phase I1
Preparation of detailed construction plans and specifications including the
following:
1. Plans shall be prepared with such provision and in such detail as to
permit the convenient layout in the field for construction and other
purposes within a degree of accuracy acceptable to the CITY.
2. Plans shall include complete details for the construction of the pro-
posed improvements including details for paving, concrete curb and
gutter and concrete sidewalks, and the installation of storm drainage,
sanitary side sewers, and utility adjustments.
3. Plans will consist of a title sheet; plan and profile sheet(s) cross -
sections, typical sections; special details and special layouts.
4. Plans shall be in such detail as to permit the development of an
accurate estimate of quantities for several pertinent items of work to
be performed in the construction of the project.
5. Plans shall be prepared in ink or equivalent on 36" x 24" mylar sheets.
6. The title sheet shall include the following:
a. Project title and number
b. Vicinity map
c. Sheet index
7. The plan and profile sheet(s) will include the following:
a. All rights -of -way, easements and property lines.
D. All storm drainage catch basins with their corresponding invert
and rim elevations, all connecting lengths or pipe with their
lengths, slopes and diameters noted. All storm drainage catch
basins shall be numbered in both the plan and profile.
c. Profile of existing roadway and proposed roadway centerlines.
8. The scales to be used, the lettering and general delineation of the
plans, shall be such as will provide legible reproduction when the
plans are reduced to one - fourth of their original size 150 percent
reduction).
Scope of Services
Page 4
9. The minimum horizontal scale for the plans shall be "one inch
equals 50 feet ".
10. Plans shall include details for pavement marking, signing, and city
streets revisions (paving,.curb and gutter, storm drainage) as
necessary. Plans shall show all the existing physdical features
surface and sub - surface facilities, as determined by field survey
or indicated on CITY or utility company records for each area
included in the right of way, or greater, if necessary, outside the
right of way to include pertinent details adjacent to the right of
way.
11. Special Provisions shall be included in the contract plans for
items of work which are not covered by the APWA and State Standard
Specifications as may be required to properly'cover the work con -
templated by the plans.
12. The CONSULTANT shall furnish such pertinent information and data
with respect to the plans and design as the CITY may request,
including, but not necessarily limited to one (1) copy of the quan
City and design computations.
13 Field surveys required to complete the plans in the Agreement shall
be furnished by the CONSULTANT. The field surveys shall include
sufficient referencing to permit the re- establishment of all
necessary points to the satisfaction of the CITY.
14. P 1 ott ng of street sections and profile, calculation of earthwork
quantities.
15. The CONSULTANT shall review all plans and specifications with the
CITY to check for any omissions, duplications, unnecessary require-
ments, and conformance with CITY standards. The CONSULTANT shall
finalize the plans and specifications in accordance with any CITY
comments. The CONSULTANT shall make such minor changes, amend-
ments, or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by
the CITY. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item.. The
CONSULTANT will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work
even though the work has been reviewed and acepted by the CITY.
- Scope of Services
Page 5
1. Puget Power and Light
2. Pacific Northwest Bell
3.. Group W Cable
4. Washington Natural Gas Conpany
21. Prepare and bind contract documents.
16. Preparatin of the bid items and quantities for the contract
proposal and retailed special provisions will be prepared by the
CONSULTANT. Tne CITY will furnish the standard specifications and
contract documents to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will put
together and retype the standard specifications as required.
17. The CONSULTANT shall assemble the plans and specifications in a
form approved by the CITY that can be used by suppliers and /or
contractors as a basis for formal bids.
18. Supervise any subconsultants used in connection with preparing
design services (as required).
19. Prepare estimate of construction costs based upon the approved
construction plans, bid item quantities and current unit bid prices.
20. Coordinate with the utility c^mpanies in connection with the design
phase of this project and any utility adjustments /undergrounding
necessary. The contemplated utility companies are enumerated as
follows:
22. Coordinate with the CITY on all phases of work.
1I1. Bidding Phase
1. Assist in obtaining bids.
2. Prepare tabulation of bids.
3. Assist in evaluating bids and awarding contract.
IV. Post - Construction Phase
1. Prepare As -Built drawings from information provided by contractors,
record drawings and other inspection reports.
•2. Provide CITY one (1) set of appature cards reproduced from the
As -Build Construction Drawings.
Scope of Services
Page 6
V. Design Criteria
•
The CITY will designate the basic prem= ses and criteria for the
design. Plans and specifications to be extent feasible, shall be
developed in accordance with the lates: edition and amendments at
the time of Notice To Proceed of the following:
1. APWA WSDUT 1984 standard specifica:ions for road, bridge and
municipal construction.
2. City of Tukwila design standards.
3. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control :evices for Streets and
Highways.
4. Washington State Department of Transportation "Highway Design
Manual" and Construction Manual ".
VI. Documents To Be Furnished By The Consultant
the following documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work
covered by the Agreement shall be furnished by the CONSULTANT to the CITY
upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material used
in the project shall become and remain the property of the City and may be
used by it without restriction.
1. Three (3) sets of Preliminary Plans for review.
2. Five (5) sets of Final Plans and specifications for review.
3. Thirty (30) sets of contract plans.
4. Thirty (30) sets of Contract Documents and Specifications prepared from
the work performed under this agreement.
5. Two (2) copies of the detailed estimate of cost of the work to be
constructed.
6. One (1) set of all sheets comprising the set of contract plans on per-
manent scale mylar reproducibles, together with one (1) copy of all
reports, drawings, etc., appertaininc thereto, plus an equal number of
revised copies, if review discloses :hat revisions are necessary.
7. .one (1) copy of all survey notes taken by the CONSULTANT.
8. One (1) copy of the quantity and desgn computations for the work per-
formed under this Agreement.
.
9. One (1) copy of Environmental checklist.
10. One (1) copy of each license to construct agreements with plan street
profile and cross - section for each property. (CITY to provide executed
license to construct).
11. One (].) set of,appature reproduced from the As -Built construction
drawings.
12. All drawings, plans, data and other materials produced by the CONSULTANT
shall be deemed to be the property of the CITY and shall be delivered to
the CITY upon its request.
VII.. Documents To Be Furnished by CITY
1. the CITY shall provide all criteria and full information as to City's
requirements for the Project, including design objectives and •
constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility
and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies, of
all design and construction standards which CITY will require to be
included in the Drawings and Specifications.
2. Assist CONSULTANT by placing at his disposal all available information
.pertinent to the Project including.previous reports, As -Built Plans, and
any other data relative to design or construction of the Project.
3. Average weekday traffic counts and traffic projection rates.
(SCOPE1 -2)
M.6
�
„<: •::
Kaiser- Tukwila Project for Kaiser Development
Company
Shoreline Permit Submittal '
Kaiser Development Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, California 94643
Gerry Kirkpatrick
Mackenzie /Saito & Associates, P.S.
300 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(Architects and Engineers)
Approval to Install Two Storm Water Outfall
Structures
36.62 acres north of Interurban Avenue South
near the intersection of Interurban and. 133rd
Road South.
h'Xai:•. uce,.+.ww r.�i:7�� .'iY:.� ° �4:n [�ryrC.LfJ.
: xusa",:A a ffil... ?hC:(,rt-:aus:..x iv;Sk't,,.,v.a.Ztt o`er ' . , :' 'Z;.!r lea. Sia zAt t;g , r: fTZ'aS::;1'4 e g. At '
EXPLANATION OF PHASE I_ WORK WITHIN 200' SHORELINES AREA
Phase I will consist of two buildings with approximately 120,000 sq. ft. of
total building footprint area. All Phase I buildings and related construction
will be well outside the 200' shorelines area with the exception of two. storm
water outfall structures and related underground storm water pipes.. The
plans submitted with this application illustrate the extent of work within the
200' shorelines area. The exact size and location of detention systems have
not been developed, however these systems will be designed to City of Tukwila
private development standards.
EXPLANATION OF PROJECT
The 36.62 acre site is to to be developed into a well planned multi- tenant
environment. The project will be comprised of approximately 493,850 sq. ft.
of office, research and development, light industrial and warehousing space
to be constructed in two to three phases.
The first phase of approximately 117,500 square footage will provide buildings
with a minimum of 16 ft. clear height with on -grade and some dock -high loading
doors and extensive use of glass facades and heavy landscaping. Every structure
will be designed to be energy and space efficient and responsive to the natural
environment. A consistently high level of design will be maintained for all
aspects of the project. This well planned ultramodern business community will
provide its occupants and the community a pleasant and functional working
environment.
SITE PLANNING
The buildings are sited to provide excellent views from the buildings and good
visibility of the buildings. The 117.500 sq. foot first phase of buildings
will provide a minimum of 435 parking spaces. The number of parking spaces
is above the City of Tukwila minimums for reasons of practicality and marketing.
The first phase is a portion of the site most remote from the shoreline 200 ft.
environment. No building is closer than 250 ft. to the 200 ft. shoreline area.
ACCESS
Access to the entire project is by two curb cuts onto Interurban Avenue South.
One access point will line up with the existing improvements for 133rd Road
South as requested by the City of Tukwila Public Works Department. Improvements
to this access point including signalization have been discussed. Construction
of these improvements through a local improvement district were also discussed.
At this time it is undecided whether the boulevard road through the site will
be a private or public road.
Rows of parking heavily buffered by wide planting areas extend out from the
buildings. The rows of parking are broken by islands to provide visual buffers
to rows of parking.
CIRCULATION
Pedestrians can access the buildings from a sidewalk which will be installed on
one side of the main boulevard access road. Sidewalks next to the buildings
extend out to the paved areas.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
The design of the first phase buildings is intended to set a tone of quality for
the entire Kaiser - Tukwila Project. Buildings have been sited maximizing views
of landscaped common areas while reinforcing the visual impact of the meandering
central loop boulevard. The boulevard is paralleled by 15 to 20 ft.. of landscap-
ing on each side. During this master planning phase, the buildings in plan view
appear as simple rectangular forms. However, when developed further and refined
more, the high quality of the project will be strengthened. For example, cutting
off corners of some of the buildings will soften their visual impact, make the
buildings appear more compact and allow for wider vistas for views from or to the
buildings. The building plans emphasize flexibility to appeal to a broad range
of tenants. The form of the buildings will complement the horizontal nature of
the site. Precast concrete panels, flat roofs and an extensive use of glass and
landscaping will be used to create a pleasing business environment. All
mechanical equipment and trash receptacles will be screened with enclosures or
positioned such that they are not visible from the street. Parking and site
lighting will be provided per city standards and limited building illumination
is planned.
LANDSCAPE DESIGN
The existing site has virtually no trees. The landscape plan will be developed
in conjunction with city staff to develop a simple but refined character.
Maintenance will be of the highest quality and all planted landscape areas will
be covered by an automatic irrigation system.
UTILITIES
Utilities are generally available to the project and /or will be extended to the site.
All on -site utilities will be underground. The general intent is to bring a loop
of utilities in through the boulevard access road.
1. Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer system consists of an 18 -inch line paralleling
Interurban Avenue South, actually on Kaiser property in a 20 ft. easement
(to be confirmed) next to the City Light 100 ft. right of way. As part
of this project, a loop on -site sanitary system will be extended into the
site in the street boulevard. It is possible some buildings could be
directly connected to the existing sanitary sewer system and the
remainder will be serviced by the extended line. It is also possible
a sanitary sewer lift station may be installed to service the buildings
furthest away from Interurban Avenue.
2. Water System
There exists a 12 -inch waterline parallel to Interurban Avenue South
in the same easement as the sanitary sewer. It is anticipated a
waterline will also be extended in the boulevard street. It is
planned that this line will supply the domestic and fire flow
requirements.
3. Gas
A Washington Natural Gas line is to be extended from 42nd Avenue South.
The line will be extended along Interurban Avenue South.
4. Telephone
The area is serviced by Pacific Northwest Bell who will service this
project with appropriate conduits and service connectors.
5. Electricity
Puget Power service is to the site. Appropriate conduits and
transformers will be provided.
6. Storm Sewers and Drainage
Currently no pipe -storm sewer system exists. Storm water is collected
in a series of ditches paralleling Interurban Avenue South or discharges
overland into the Duwamish River. Storm drainage from this development
will be collected and transported from the developed areas on the site
in a system of pipes. The water from these pipes will ultimately be
discharged into the Duwamish River through approved outfall structures.
The exact size of detention systems and outfall structures have not
been determined.
7. Grading
The site will be graded to accommodate the buildings, access roads, and
parking spaces with a minimum impact on the natural environment. General
subsurface soil conditions and development characteristics are outlined
in a Dames and Moore letter accompanying this submittal.
r ink
1 1?
• , •
ori :
A •
' •.:' • : . :
• • . ••.;•• • ••.:, • ••
Me-AN leqH MATER 1.S
..• "
- .%)°
i 1 - o" ils= •
1111 111
aIII -A Profile
RIP - RAP .
. • .
• ••• -• -• . • • • • •
• ••
„:: ' ;::•• ; -
•
ExcAvAre
srogri
• •
•
E3 1/4/
•• • • • .
•
• .
,•
•
■ .•,
,-;
d isi gin kit
, "'Y • •
, • , •.•
--; -----
-
outfall b profile
;
7..su:JAMis. • c!vE-K
A PLANT SHOWN
oyTPALL 3 PLAN S:MI LAK •
Outfall Plan
y
`- EX i S"''4 4' CO o! ; Z
U =!j 4- COM,O! A
•
SLOP_
• 51- !0'44 ou
?ZOFi L
RIP-- RA?