HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 85-17-SMP - KING COUNTY - METRO PARK AND RIDE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT85-17-smp
13447 interurban avenue south
KING COUNTY METRO PARK AND RIDE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
September 9, 1985
METRO
Environmental Planning Division
821 Second Ave. MS -92
Seattle, WA 98104
Sincerely,
Linda S. Rankin
Permit Coordinator
Shorelands Division
cc:
City of Tukwila
ECY 050- 1 -28(a)
Rev. 11/81.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 206146a -6000
Gentlemen:
Re: COUNTY: King Application No 85 -17 -85
APPL I CANT: METRO .
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 590 - - 5486
The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was
received by this office on August 5, 1985 .. The review per. i od
by the Department of. Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will
terminate 30 days from the above date.
If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the
permit may commence following expiration of the review period,
provided that all other federal, state, and local laws regulating
such construction have been complied with.
I ; [1r
S E P 10 1985
CiTY OF Tl, :.WILA
PLANNING DEPT.
DONALD W. MOOS
Director
4mETRo
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle,Washington 98104
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Action: Constructing and npPrating a park- and -ride lot_
Description of Proposal: Developing a park -and -ride lot at Tukwila,
consisting of 260 -300 automobile parking spaces, landscaping,
passenger, shelters, driver comfort stations. transit information
display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle
parking, lighting and telephones booth(s) on 4.3 acres of land
Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle
Location of Proposal: King County /Tukwila, Washington at the
Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interiirhan AvP_ South
and 52nd Ave. South.
Lead Agency: Municipality of Metropolitan. Seattle
This proposal has been determined to not have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS is not required
under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after
review by the lead agency of a completed environmental check-
list and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official:
Position /Title:
Date: 10/14/83
Manager, Environmental Planning Division
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION
Rodney G. Proctor
Signature:
218 U
isnw;. f�.: n.: u.... �. �: we.` r... i',.' t- Sna': �" tt;. k: �J:::+ i` �S:( i�'.. v_ t` �s.W.i.'�.nxw:.n�.. . .. .......... .. ............ ._.�._.�..++....wne"./ v1�_ i.,>f ..M.riznt.
2)rnETRD
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
l� tY po
Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104
September 27, 1983
TO: Whom It May Concern
RE: Proposed Declaration of Non - Significance for
Tukwila Park- and -Ride Lot
Enclosed is a copy of the Proposed Declaration of Non- Signifi-
cance for the subject project as required by the Washington
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (RCW 43.21C).
Comments are invited and will be received until
Written comments should be addressed to:
Very truly yours,
The comment period for this proposal will expire on October 13, 1983.
Mr. Rodney G. Proctor, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
METRO
821 Second Avenue; MS -92
Seattle, WA 98104
If you have any question please call
Additional copies of this document may be obtained by visiting
Metro at the above address or by calling 447 -5863
Rodney . Proctor, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
RGP:ela
Enclosure
C
4 mETRo
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Bldg. • 1 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104
PROPASEDJd:XDOnh DECLARATION OF
9TORMOOMNOWNON-SIGNIFICANCE
Action: Constructing and operating a park- and -ride lot.
Description of Proposal: Developing a park- and -ride lot at Tukwila,
consisting of 260 -300 automobile parking spaces, landscaping,
passenger, shelters, driver comfort stations, transit information
display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle
parking, lighting and telephones booth(s) on 4.3 acres of land.
Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle
Location of Proposal: King County/ Tukwila, Washington at the
Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interurban Ave. South
and 52nd Ave. South.
Lead Agency: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle
This proposal has been determined to (haeve/not have) a
significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS
(46,/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This
decision was made after review by the lead agency of a
completed environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official: Rodney G. Proctor
Position /T e: Manager, Environmental Planning Division
l
Date:
Environmental Planning Division
4:10
CD
.5 \ 1 tIPO4 - .
5
. 14
CZ;
•
•
.1
/ PI
•
• r,
5.
•
;‘• •••
•
•
CI)
- 1'
•
acomat
-,1
a le
•
•
••••
r
SIG
1. Zd
Men is
Swot
:Bellevue
•
;ler r-
1...r• • z
,s
• -
• /I
: 4.41.2D
Fe4.11'
• •• AL
•,•
A
•-
IA
.:•••"
••
., r.
•Py.c.M.io:c7:s -. • .., ?, 13,:n . .
/.
1.111 0' 1,..,;.; ;I.,:
/
■ I
mhlt • . ..--,,
:1, i i • ....1' •tir• • '' ..'..
..:. 4
"
- Winslow .
0. 43 i
' '''.' I ' ! ;••1,.P .....„ ..... . .
0, Tiac31,Q)1:1..,. 1,
ft . ,.. ... r......... c 0,....1 I::
. . •••
• .G1ard 36:31• 0
::I 4, ,..•• , • •
"N l'er'-'. .6,1
IT •
"..) If
CD .:•* ' ''• • ' ' 6 ' %set Blake
'
1 3 t rill.
10 r
• 4 \1 ....p
erne It, IN W" • p, -.1. • • „-;',...:,
.. i - . 1 ...:vionil. • 11....3.64m,,
,- ......• .... „,,,, •....„
•• 'a , tii• ,.,.,_,:". Pobnl ...
1 .r...... ,
.....,•,.,../..
t • ,.. , 1 5. 11 : .6•••■T tOt V e .... iti.it: - -rikr; ..
I.... MAN., ..... • 1 : h DI
ei ::4., •
pa1..7
..c,.
•L• ‘,.. 0 " ..... .•,..• • ...•••-• ,
. N ,.. •n •,,,.,
.0 Prue .• x.... /
O.
,
• . '.‘:7
*
. '1•11. P O).* ' •
...V4 OrrhMV „
? •■•• .141 11* A. •••! . i ti
1 1 ., 4-, .-.:
JI F 1 0. 1 1..... 4
. ,,,,.:: „. •„ -I- i
• ' s ,... p,-7.••• - . 5 ..1
v ., !...;•:•, - is,..... •
4 '
• 1`. .1 ■• v'< ,. ',: , . •
Ilei
, t '''' / '''',.., ._ • De.i...,„. In ......• -,.. • 7,,, _3,
.\,:. 1 • .: s
--i---,-i•-_,r,„_ -,_,----•:•.:-....--. • _.•• •
.4 " ...„...........„
...,.„.„.:./..,.,
•,_:,..,. 4 . ‘1,. If
;,... „._,,
2 ... r..... ,
. ...
• l . '4, : •
.........._
....;,, •• ; . .. ,.........
CS44...4 rt-Np.
6.4
•
"trvort . I
7 r.. Pa tl
.
•
• ISLA Nt
- -■
ill Proposed Tukwila ,
Park and Ride
• Existing Park and Ride
C
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
_, .Va lAts
.0 m
.., ....+.14,. .. • . •• vi r '
• .• p
• • i ...
r ........ • • • •
• ,.4 :... 1.1 marn
1 .. ." • ' 111*•.r" i . ,a. Par
- glr' - f: 1 ‘p
1 ' :. I- . *. ip:Icf•ik e H'
- . .. wer ., • .,.. .151-AN . ' jE . :t, (Imo., 7.
7 .11 • • - • '• l ig :1;4; •Odift ,.
. „;,:,
••--- - ....6 0 ., • ,_.••••-_, -. ...,..
. ., • .....
fetes
1 --'- .: •' .;: 7 •_:,,f• I 's ',...'•Z. I . '.,:
■■
,,, d , ;..ii . ■,; ....... \ ; ....t. ., , ,........'-.,4? , .. .•-• 1 T. -, . imihi
gir•-• ,,
17: ... „..
r: /
i .' La:7 Cn..... .....":
i ',
; mccamid _ ./3 7 . Noy,. /" •
. • " ,. ,• •:: 1. , •
,.-i i•-••I' .' :•••.....• A
... -' A ! .• ISCANS
. :„
*- 4: .
- --. I. - ..rp„,,..
,,, i
. , 1
• liollong loy
4% NORTH
•••■••
Sc 1 8 •
ale: °
• • I tr!
! F.
FIGURE 1
Regional location
•...
:; •• l k •-•
••140,...(1••••■•
•
t • s :
Kitidand
A•
c•••
iii•
1.1
• ;;
.
• .3scc I/
00.•0111 itRC NT
Medlou •
:tot! {
• SAM•It(
0 :
2 i■ •
•
METRO PARK AND RIDE • TUKWILA
t
Algona 1,
11•11.
tf.J.
•
KWILAr
.•
•
7. • .1
c "•-• • • • 3...
• 1 / 4 ..•
4. 11.410r
KIR
.
•
•
RkT c • 4.
• -
••■ L
at&
„
t ic;� �;►
C
2)mETRD
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle,Washington 98104
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
PROPOSED ACTION: Constructing and operating a park- and -ride lot.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent
Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 821 Second
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 447 -6619
3. Date Checklist Submitted September 27, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist King County /City of Tukwila
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Tukwila Park - and -Ride Lot
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (in-
cluding but not limited to its size, general design
elements, and other factors that will give an
accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Metro proposes to design, develop and operate a park- and -ride
lot on 4.3 acres of land irn King County /Tukwila, Washington.
It will consist of 260 -300 automobile stalls, landscaping,
lighting, passenger shelters, driver comfort station,
space for motorcycle and bicycle parking, telephone booth(s)
and transit information display and signs.
Attachment #9
Agency
Tukwila
King County
State
DOE
rsheriesfflames
WSDOT
Federal
iahw3 iA1. T4- LS''S+J. , 1rc'*'KCA1M.Illix.
Permit
o Conditional land use
o Substantial• development
o Building
o Drainage /Grading
o Street use
o Flood Control zone
137S : - eorps -- of
- Aeer -6- o -Corp _ E ., - Pc ; t
o Substantial development 'r"
o Building
o Drainage /Grading
o Street use
o -- Kydretr - ics
o Air space lease - use and development in
the 1 -5 limited access area
The .project also requires Metro Council and Federal approval
(UMTA /DOT).
pe�cr. Hsu•. � :4'LI�:'-�'��+`�7sSat":.�.'?'»
VITAL $TATIf TICS
•••■••t tT•l<t w ••t••
'Mau. RI •CJt YrO
Small YTrOrTT .— 001 •t•
•4 .,, 8011•41. • IT
., z_••• c -t
• _ 1 1 1 5 _ 1 _ TOTAL .0
.Tt1IO1 1pT
r• 61•01 •t•GT•
Y.:[r��.�' =pit �u�!��.T'�s? %,'�khRv"e � .•.
None
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals
Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local --
including rezones): See attachment
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or
further activity related to or connected with this proposal?
If yes, explain:
Yes. Metro proposes to initially develop about 260 parking
spaces. An 4 additional 40 spaces could be provided in 0.9
acres of land not presently planned for development.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the
property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain:
See attachment
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed
regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is
expected to be filed at some future date, describe the
nature of such application form:
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the
proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected
by any environmental impacts, including any other information
needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal):
The site is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Ave. So. in Tukwila_ The
majority of the site is in unincorporated King County and abuts
the Tukwila city limits. The Duwamish River is wit -hin 150 feet
east of the site. Interurban Avenue is between the river and the
proposed park- and -ride lot along with a convienr•e stnre /gaa station.
The site is occupied by nine residential rental units, one owner -
occupied residential unit and two businesses_ Snter -c iq on
Eh-6-north Eh and a portion of the site would be within the limited
access area. The southern bouncy iq 52nd Avenue South_
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1985
Attachment 11
_ �... �. ...................,,.. � ,.....,.......,�,�+:�..�a.am,a+ scum racaFUxC.+ �a�
Design studies have commenced for the joint City ofTukwila /King
County project to construct a new Foster Bridge. The previous
bridge was aligned on 56th Avenue S. approximately 100 feet north
of the 52nd•Avenue S. intersection:tand was removed after it
collapsed several years ago. The current proposal aligns the
new bridge to junction with Interurban Avenue oppositfe552nd
Avenue S. The intersection would be signalized, which would
serve bridge traffic, auto traffic to and from the park-and-ride
lot, passenger movement between the northbound bus pullout and
the park- and -ride lot, and nonsite traffic from 52nd Avenue S. . ...
The opening date for the new bridge would be late 1984 or 1985.
The City of Tukwila proposes to improve Interurban Avenue South
from Southcenter Boulevard to Interstate 5. Improvements would
include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, transit turn-
outs, additional landscaping, pedestrian and traffic signalization.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe"
answers are required.)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering of the
soil?
c) Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d) The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or
stream or the bed of the ocean of
any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation: See Attachment
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air quality?
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in
climate, either locally or
regionally?
X
Yes Maybe No
X
X
Explanation: The emission from buses and automobiles will
result in a slight deterioration of air quality on site.
The pro however. w
quality overall.
1 • • -
1-
•
1) Earth a,b, c
The site straddles the change in slope at the foot of a hill.
The highest point of the site isin the southwest corner at about
a 50 -foot elevation. The ground descends toward Interurban Ave.
to about 20 feet, about a 25 percent slope. At the 20 -foot
elevation, the ground flattens and continues across the central
and northeastern site to Interurban Avenue. The topography
remains relatively level across Interurban Avenue to the banks
of the Duwamish River. The level portion of the site is partially
paved or developed, covering portions of the site.
Some modification to the original topography may have occurred
because it appears the toe of the slope has been excavated,
extending the level portion of the site to the southwest. No
unique geologic formations are evident on any alternative sites.
The site soils are composed of glacial till and recent alluvial
soils which probably underlies the northeastern portion of the
site adjacent to Interurban Avenue. Fill may be present on
portions of the site which has past development.
Glacial till, a dense unsorted silt, sand and gravel mixture, is
exposed in small, old cuts on the southwest edges of the existing
parking lots. Previous geologic mapping indicates that till
underlies most of the site's southwest portion.
Sandstone is visible in a 20 -foot bluff at the 'southern corner
of the Interurban Avenue and 52nd Avenue South intersection
across.: the the street from the site. The sandstone is com-
pletely weathered at the surface and can be easily gouged.
Sandstone may also underlie the glacial till. Recessional
outwash is mapped in a narrow northward - trending deposit in
the southwest corner of the site. This deposit generally
consist of well- sorted sand with gravel.
The proposed action requires grading and filling to develop
a uniform slope. The majority of the site would be paved.
Erosion is possible during construction but measures will be
used to channel surface water away from slopes. Temporary
fabric would also cover exposed soils on embankments.
A pond would also be constructed to remove sediment before
discharge in to the drainage system.
Yes Maybe No
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in
either marine or fresh waters? X
b) Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
•
c) Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? _IL_
d) Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X
e) Discharge into surface waters, or in
any alteration of surface water
including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen ygen or
turbidity? X
f) Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters? X
g) Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents,
waterborne virus or bacteria, or
other substances into the ground
water?
i) Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Explanation:
:r:,`•+ . .. iN2w Mrur.L « ..r.....,��..._ _...
X
_.X__
_.X.__
Dra_ inage
Condition Area (acres)
Discharge Rates, fat.
Tukwila park- and -Ride
Pre - Development 4.27
Post* Development 4.27
*Post - development
mitigation.
II Environmental Impacts
No. 3 Water b,d,e,f & g
The site is located in the Green River watershed in the range of
river mile 9 to 10. Site runoff would be conveyed to the
Interurban Avenue drainage system and ultimately discharged into
the Green River about river mile 10. (See figure 11.) The
following table displays the•increases in runoff rate as a result
of paving the existing permeable surface areas.
Raga= Storm
Peak Discharge Ratan,
(cubic feet Fer Decond)
5 -year 10 -year 25 -year
2.7 3.3 4.2
5.7 7.0 9.1
discharge rates are without
Water quality could be affected during construction grading
because site soils would be exposed to potential water erosion.
Without mitigating measures, there may be significant soil loss
and significant soil loss and subsequent increases in suspended
and settled solids in site runoff. Downstream sedimentation and
turbidity may result. The risk of flooding could also increase
if sedimentation clogs storm sewers.
Long -term operation of a park- and -ride lot would result
intensified site use and increased concentrations of various
pollitants in site runoff. An increase in pol1tant
concentrations reaching the Green River is anticipated. Adjacent
land uses are producing similar or worse runoff quality.
Significant impacts on groundwater quality is not anticipated.
Runoff detention would be provided in conventional surface
detention facilities. Runoff detention storage capacity for a
10 -year storm would be 4,900 cubic feet. On -site flood storage
would be provided for the 100 -year, 7 day storm or the equivalent
of 10 inches of rainfall. The detention storage for the above
condition would be accommodated within the parking area. The
100 -year, 7 -day flood storage requirement would be about 155,000
cubic feet. During construction the following measures would be
implemented to reduce impacts on water quality:
o Scheduling construction activities during the summer months
of June through September. Special conditions would be
instituted for work during other months with the appropriate
agencies.
o Using temporaryerosion control procedures such as strawbales
fabric and plastic sheeting to cover soil stockpiles.
o Minimizing slopes of earth fill banks.
o Revegetating landscaped areas as soon as possible following
construction.
o Providing erosion control performance criteria in
construction specifications and adequate construction
inspection.
Metro would provide detention facilities to also promote
sedimentation preliminary site schematics indicate about 3600
square feet of developable space for sedimentation facilities.
The amount of surface area provided would remove 40 micron size
particles and larger with about a 50 percent pollutant removal
efficiency. Additional sedimentation space could be provided
which would reduce the number of parking stalls. Insoluble
materials such as oil and grease would be additionally mitigated
by using elbow and tee pipes in storm sewer manholes or
coalescing plate oil /water separators. An artificial wetland
could be created in the buffer strip between parking areas.
Also, detention time could be extended to promote sedimentation.
metro figure 11
Yes Maybe No
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic
plants)? X
b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora? X
c) Introduction of new species of flora
into an or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X
d) Reduction in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop? X
Explanation: The project would remove.existinq grass, shrubs
and trees. The proposal would provide landscaping for
aesthetic purposes.
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna
(birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
c) Introduction of new species of fauna
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
fauna?
d) Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat? X
Explanation:
See Attachment
X
II Environmental Impacts
No. 5 Fauna d
The Duwamish- Green River system has a variety. of . fish using the
river - estuary for breeding, rearing, forage and transport.
Chinook, coho and chum salmon as well as trout and perch use the
Duwamish -Green River system.
Increased turbidity 'during construction would affect water
quality in less than desirable conditions for migrating salmon.
Construction activities of grading and fill would take place in
the summer to reduce water quality impacts on salmon. (See II 3
water.)
` Upstream migration
Summer-
Fall Spawning
chinook Intragravel develop.
Juvenile rearing
Juv. out migration
I
I
i
---
1
.
•
Upstream migration
Coho Spawning
Intragravel develop.
Juvenile rearing
Juv. out migration
--
I
;
I
'
Upstream migration
Chum Spawning
Intragravel develop
Juvenile rearing
Juv. out migration
-
I
I
I
I
--
l
I
i
i
1
Upstream migration
Summer
steelhead Spawning
- -• . Intragravel develop.
Juvenile rearing 1/
Juv. out migration
..
i
j
j
Upstream migration
Winter
Spawning
steelhead
Intragravel develop.
Juvenile rearing 1 �
Juv.. out migration
' --
` ,
�--
I I
TIMING OF SALMON AND STEELHEAD FRESHWATER LIFE
PHASES IN GREEN-DUWAMISH BASIN?'
Fresh -water
Life Phase
TABLE 12
Month
J F M A M J J A S O N D
! extends over a two -year period.
Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission. Comprehensive Study of
Water and Related Land Resources. Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters.
Appendix XI, Fish and Wildlife, March 1970.
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase
existing noise levels?
Explanation:
Serer Attar!hmPnt
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce new light or glare?
Explanation:
The •i 1 ity wnt,lri prnvir&P lighting- SpPria1
fixtures to wins. .2 c. the fari l i fy wnnl i
be used_
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in
the alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Explanation: The site is presently zoned Regional Retail and
Multi- family Residential. The proposed use would change
the site to a public use.
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
the risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals
or radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe No
X
X
...awiJ:rv!....th ay.,Z;fi.�i.(:. fy.T �•:;' -'.'; 5�3i� �..�.
X
X
II Environmental Impacts
No 6 Noise
.,.=,.?, c, ow. x tv+ ��., �:+: u? L7�ySY: rsa' L'f x,:': ,.t�•.nttx.�r: >ex.»s.�,..,«w... ..._..�....._...... - ......« w+?.. oo,.+ nmsr,+ zx'�.?.,r...x...��,�+:GJi.: «;' ...
Noise resulting from park- and -ride lot operations would exceed
King County ordinance levels by only 1 dBA and only at receivers
bordering the entrance and exit adjoining 52nd Avenue South. For
receivers abutting this entrance and exit automobile noise could
be mitigated by constructing a barrier along the length of the
driveway on the property line.
According to EPA guidelines, receivers very close to the entrance
off of 52nd Avenue South would experience insignificant
increases, in Leq during morning rush hour due to automobile
traffic on the site. The accumulated noise exposure over 24 -hour
period (Ldn) would be unaffected for all receivers. These
receivers presently experience noise levels that exceed the
federal government's recommendation for maximum 24 -hour total
residential noise levels (Ldn), and that level would not change
due to noise from the park- and -ride lot.
EXISTING AND PREDICTED SOUND LEVELS IN dBA
TUKWILA SITE D
Predicted Levels Criteria
Existing Off On King Federal
Location Time Level Site Site Total County Consensus
D -1 Commercial Midday 70 70 55 70 60 70
(northeast)
D -2 Residential 7 -8 AM 63 63 58 64 57
(south) Daily 67 6 65
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area ? -
Explanation: See number 12 attachment
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Explanation: See Attachment
13) Transportation /Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular
movement? _
b) Effects on existing parking facilities
or demand for new parking?
c) Impact upon existing transportation
systems?
d) Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods?
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f) Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Explanation:
See Attachment
Yes Maybe No
X
_X._
II. Environmental Impacts
No. 12 Housing
The proposed park-and-ride lot would remove seven residences
including five single-family units, one duplex and one triplex
displacing about ten persons. Two •businesses would also be
removed.
Metro would provide.sufficient relocation personnel,
in both residential and busineEit relocations to this project.
Theterelocation.agents will explain-and identify all relocation
alternatives to the people being displaced from both residences •
and businesses. This Will:be the guidelines asset
.forth the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
.• Real Property Acquisition Policies Act.of 1970,as amended, and
the regulationsof. the Urban Mass Transit Administration as
defined in the circular, .UMTA CA4530.1, dated March :214 1978.
Duties may also include assisting disPlacees•to fill out forms.
•required by lending institutions, • the Small:. Business
...Administration and others on,:leasing',:and purchasing new: ••
premises. . Assistande will also be rendered in 'preparing . and
filing claims for reimbursement After. relocation has been
completed. •
Exiting park- and -ride autos and existing 52nd Avenue traffic
stopped at the Interurban intersection could experience very long
delays (LOS E) at times during the afternoon peak -hour. With
completion of the new Foster Bridge and proposed realignment of
56th Avenue to meet the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue
intersection, traffic from the bridge or the existing driveway
opposite 52nd Avenue would also experience considerable delays
(LOS E) in attempting to cross or turn left onto Interurban
Avenue.
The existing two -way left -turn lane would accommodate "inbound"
left -turn site traffic from Interurban onto 52nd Avenue and left
turns to 56th Avenue. With or without the park- and -ride
facility, Interurban Avenue would handle over 20,000 vehicles per
day (vpd) by 1985 near the site but at tolerable service levels,
because the capacity of the five -lane roadway is approximately
30,000 vpd. I -5 on and off -ramp intersections with Interurban
Avenue immediately north of the site would carry nearly 10% less
peak -hour volume and continue to operate at levels -of- service
(LOS A).
All buses serving the park- and -ride facility would load and
unload commuters at on- street bus zones along special pullout
areas on both sides of Interurban Avenue. Potential conflicts
II Environmental Impacts
No. 13 Transportation a & d
The operation of a park- and -ride lot would attract about 260
vehicles for all day commuter parking. Commuters would ride the
bus or carpool to complete their respective trips. An estimated
670 auto trips would maximize use of the 260 stall facility.
About 35 %.of the total auto movements at the site would occur
during the 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. period. About 80% of the peak -hour
trips would exit from the park- and -ride facility while 20% would
enter during the afternoon peak hour.
Park - and -ride lot commuters are either Tukwila residents (coming
down from hill via 52nd and 58th Avenues), other commuters along
Interurban, or rerouted commuters from I -5 and I -405 corridors.
In addition to the auto mode trips, a number of bus trips would
be routed to the park- and -ride facility. Approximately 200 bus•
trips would service the lot each weekday, with a total of 200
daily and 20 peak -hour bus trips' stopping along Interurban
adjacent to the park- and -ride lot. The projected 870 daily auto
and bus trips and 260 p.m. peak -hour trips will primarily
distribute along Interurban Avenue with approximately 20% of the
trips using 52nd Avenue to and from the Tukwila residential hill
area.
AA.
t,
(17,600
Avcxugo Workday
Traffic Volume
Annual Avg. Accidents
(W►th Injuries)
• Trafflc Signal
METRO
\tun. IN !It y ul Niel! tq. III a11 .. Atilt
!. t O tt
1• 19
•I11■1 ,It t It Iv' II.,
Weekday Daily Volume
P.M. Peak Hour Volume
Note: Includes Ouees
► =METRO
\ tunr i{vlrty of .%L•u.h..J.tan •..vnlr
r Nu1lh
f l(;111 1.: 27
,Illtl {Iflllr tills' (1.1{ {It
•.Iriltlil�� ti;
'::';';:•':
I' ` . :?.
.,
.
Wlth Park ~ ' x ' • ' •, � ".1e ; •
Volume
f 1 2.0] and Rldo (In 1000'6) ~ •' �A•�' •1 • ••'�`
l_.. J s
10.8 V olume W ithout Park i " �
and Ride (In 1000'6 h'A . • =• ' � .
�.METRo
�.1 u11« tluLty , Nlrfrfiw.ltf at, • ■■•ffle
T N,, 1 1 1
1(1n
I••I(;l1I11•: _S
, t lti , ,. •f I• I\
I I I It 1111 I' 1 Ihlf
I I. 1 lli t
∎1)111111t I l ,11111
1
with auto traffic would occur during routine merging along
Interurban a t the bus pullout zones. All park - and -ride 'autos
would enter - or leave the site via a single driveway onto 52nd
Avenue located 200 feet southwest of the Interurban intersection.
The only hazard generated by this proposed access is-potential
right -angle or rear -end collisons between exiting park - and -ride
autos and existing 52nd and 53rd Avenues vehicles coming down the
hill. During the p.m. peak period, backups from .the.stop sign at
Interurban could extend as far as the entry driveway and at times
block both park- and -ride and non -site traffic destined to
Interurban Avenue.
Pedestrian and vehicular conflicts would be minimal since
commuters, would walk toward Interurban where on-street bus stops
would be provided, while park- and -ride autos would be routed to
and from the single entry point along a collector road at the far
west boundary of the site. Bus passengers loading or unloading
to and from northbound buses would have to cross Interurban
Avenue by using the existing flashing signal crossing south of
52nd Avenue.
In order to mitigate the off -site impacts of the proposed park -
and -ride, the following street and signal improvements would be
negotiated with the local jurisdiction:
o Widening of 52nd Avenue adjacent to the park - and -ride site
to provide two approach lanes and one exit lane at Interuban
Avenue. A left /through and a right- turn -only lane would be
included and extend from Interurban Avenue to the park -and-
ride auto driveway. Provide striped island just east of the
entry to delineate the left -turn egress movement from the
park- and -ride lot and the reverse -curve transition from one
to two eastbound lanes.
o A fully- actuated traffic signal is recommended for the
intersection of Interurban Avenue and 52nd and 56th Avenues.
The signal will be required to permit safe egress at this
intersection by autos. The traffic controller should have
capabilities to accomodate a left -turn pahse for Interurban
Avenue and multiphase capability for 52nd and 56th Avenues.
Signals at this location would substantially reduce the
projected average delay and potential hazard for the site
traffic as well as for the existing 52nd Avenue and future
traffic on the new Foster Bridge. This improvement is part
of the Foster Bridge reconstruction project.
o Provide pedestrian signal and crosswalk for all four legs of
the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue intersection to
safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
o Convert the existing two -way left -turn lane (14 feet wide)
along Interurban Avenue on both sides of the 52nd /56th
Avenues intersection into left -turn lanes -to accommodate
projected turning volumes onto 52nd Avenue (toward park -and-
ride lot) and the new Foster Bridge.
o Prior to design Metro in conjunction with Tukwila and King
County Officials would discuss realignment of 52nd Avenue
with the Foster Bridge improvement.
o Provide curb, gutters and sidewalks along Interurban and
52nd Avenues adjacent to the park- and -ride lot to. separate
pedestrians and bicyclists from vehicular traffic.
o Install "Stop" and "Do not Block Intersection" signs along
the park- and -ride entrance driveway at its intersection with
52nd Avenue in order to discourage blocking 52nd and 53rd
Avenues traffic during peak periods when queues from the
Interurban Avenue intersection may on occasion extend back
to the park -and -ride auto driveway.
A second driveway for the park- and -ride lot is under
considertion. This driveway would be on Interurban Avenue just
north of the Gas n' Go property and would be restricted through
appropriate channelization and signing to a right turn into the
park- and -ride from southbound Interurban Avenue and a right turn
out of the park - and -ride lot to southbound Interurban Avenue.
This access would benefit most p.m. peak -hour destinations, which
are from the park- and -ride lot to southbound Interurban Avenue.
This movement would thus be divided between the 52nd Avenue park -
and -ride driveway and the subject exit. Convenience and travel
time benefits would accrue to those motorist, and the park -and-
ride's circulation would be reduced, although overall level of
service at the 52nd Avenue intersection (under the recommended
signalization) is calculated to remain at a LOS A.
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in the need
for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks and other recreational
facilities?
e) Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f) Other governmental services?
Explanation: The site could require additional police patrols.
The site would require maintenance by Metro personnel. (See
utilities for additional service.) The park - and -ride lot
would be availible evenings and weekends for parking by golfers
using the Foster Golf course.
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b) Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or alterations
to the following utilities?
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Water?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
Explanation: _ See Attachment
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result
in the creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic vista or
view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Explanation: The park- and- ridei.lot could be used on evenings
and weekends by people visiting or using the Foster Golf
course, thus increasing golf course use.
20) Archaeological /Historical. Will the
proposal result in an alteration of a
significant archaeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge
the above information is true and complete. It is understood
that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this .checklist should there
be any misrepresentation or lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Date:
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
_X_
f 1 / , • / �/
205-5 E.fgf
EA r 2s1..7
304.7
Subject
N
Plat Map
20
• . orv., vna'n:•:'•uti•�• r; <rr i * %•.'r.IY. ,a.l. :1 <:'W.V.
4 40//"
zi,cB
.5 . e.
I% I�LUI�
APR 9 1985
CITY OF TUK■ILA
PLANNING DEPT.
.✓+w+a�wr+n. wa...n+nr awwr.. swfa+ M. •w�rsM+Y4AMwiimr'rwr�ew- nn.wwu.
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King, State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38, IN. TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,. DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS=
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FOSTER STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID
STREET LINE SOUTH 48 °04'00" WEST 105 FEET; THENCE' SOUTH 29 °30'00"' WEST
79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60 °30'00" WEST 90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35945'30"
EAST 197.83 FEET.EAST TO THE 'SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGHWAY LINE TO. THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
40'
4. The land-referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington• and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER OONATIONAL CLAIM NO. 38 IN TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FOSTER STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID
STREET LINE SOUTH 48 °04'00" WEST 105 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °30'00" WEST
79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60 °30'00" WEST 233.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH
29 °30'00" EAST 222.64 FEET OT THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGHWAY LINE 273 FEET, MORE
OR LESS, TO BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED. AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FOSTER STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID
STREET LINE SOUTH 48 °04'00" WEST 105 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °30'00" WEST
79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60 °30'00" WEST 90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 °45'30"
EAST 197.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGHWAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A- 308455
PAGE 2
4. The and referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38, TOWNSHIP t3
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. N.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON• DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15,
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE SOUTH 12.00 FEET TO NORTH LINE OF CLARK
AVENUE NORTH; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 255.91 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 33 °55'00" EAST 187.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FOSTER
STREET; THENCE NORTH 29 °30'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
FOSTER STREET. 253.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTH 29 °30'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FOSTER STREET
58.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60 0 30`00" WEST 233.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
29 °30'00" WEST 70.97 FEET; THENCE EAST 25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60 0 30'00"
EAST 211.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY OVER THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN
FOSTER DONATION CLAIM N0. 38, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15,
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE SOUTH 12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF
CLARK AVENUE NORTH; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 255.91 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 33 °55'00" EAST 187.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
FOSTER STREET; THENCE NORTH 29°30'00" EAST 247.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 29 °30'00" EAST 6 FEET; THENCE NORTH
60 WEST 93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °30'00" WEST 5.5 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A- 308456
4. The land.referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington. and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38 DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST.W.M.. IN KING COUNTY.
WASHINGTON, 155.84 FEET NORTH OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE EAST
279.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29 °30'00" EAST TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PACIFIC HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE 10.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32 °06'41" WEST 131.87 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY
127.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES OF 90 FEET ;• THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES 69 FEET MORE OR LESS TO MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF TRACT CONVEYED BY UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0.3830062; THENCE
SOUTH 57 °25'00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT TO THE
WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE'SOUTH TO TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD, 51ST AVE. 50.
PAGE 2
7
A- 308457
PAGE 2
rBrw,COY,,v a
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington• and described as follows:
THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM• DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.M., IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON• 155.84 FEET
NORTH OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14; THENCE EAST 279.7 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29 °30.00" EAST 293.6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY; THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY
DIRECTION FOLLOWING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 218 FEET. MORE OR LESS, TO
A POINT 346.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE WITH THE SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 14 TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHWESTERLY 220 FEET;
THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY 96 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES
NORTHEASTERLY TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID HIGHWAY WHICH IS A DISTANCE
OF 96 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION• LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A
DISTANCE OF 130 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY. AT RIGHT ANGLES, 96 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE.
v.•::rY. i.'.. wt w+.•FIw GfJ;N,cr <:.N�c..er...ur.sw..�
A- 308458
...�urrwa.x+FM+3vttxl'lpG�':d l]A.)aY�.:RYif✓�}" +FiLS'�Fd 'XL'itl% ? M'r lwkuYHaw. �w rw: rr:. w«.. �a...•«.... �..vm.w+�>,.rwrmw'fTrG?d'�f.�.M Unv �;x'�lFa.':�7:- A
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY
346.50 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
WITH THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST,
W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES
TO SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY 120 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ON LAST DESCRIBED COURSE 15 FEET;
THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHWESTERLY 100 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES
SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTH ALONG
SAID SECTION LINE TO A POINT 272.84 FEET NORTH OF WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SAID SECTION: THENCE NORTH 57 °25'00" EAST TO A POINT ON A LINE DRAWN
220 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PACIFIC HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS::
EXCEPT THE WEST 20 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY. FOR ROAD BY INSTRUMENT
RECORDED UNOER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 319 AND EXCEPT ROADS.
PAGE 2
A- 308461 PAGE 2
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN A. FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38 AND THAT
PORTION OF LOT 12, BLOCK 5, MORTIMER PLAT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS. PAGE 92, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4
EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AT A POINT 400.73 FEET NORTH OF
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, TO A POINT
118 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AT
RIGHT ANGLES,. 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE
MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER A STRIP OF LAND
12 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH BEGINS AT THE MOST NORTHERLY
CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT AND EXTENDS NORTHEASTERLY 118 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH AND AT RIGHT
ANGLES THERETO.
•■
=MM..» letiar;,,eafehatiit&Fgg
3
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN A. FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38 IN SECTION 14.
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 23.NORTH,
RANGE 4, EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 775.84
FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN.AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID AVENUE LINE 246.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY
AT.RIGHT ANGLES 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE.
CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES 135 FEET; THENCE
•SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID AVENUE 100 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AT
RIGHT ANGLES 135 FEET;'THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 100 FEET THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
A-308459 PAGE. 2
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King. State of Washington. and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38. DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH.
RANGE 4 EAST. N.M.• IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 775.84
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE PACIFIC
HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE
PACIFIC HIGHWAY. 246.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT
HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE PACIFIC
HIGHWAY. 100 FEET THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL TO THE PACIFIC HIGHWAY,
100 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 100 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF THE
PACIFIC. HIGHWAY AT A POINT 100 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 100 FEET ALONG THE PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A- 308462
PAGE 2
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King, State of Washington, and described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF STEPHEN A. FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38 IN SECTION 14,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4'.EAST, W.M., INKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE NORTH'775.84
FEET TO THE•SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID AVENUE LINE, A DISTANCE OF 246.50'FEET TO THE
-TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, .118.00
'FEET; THENCE. NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID INTERURBAN AVEN.UE'SOUTH,
TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1,•CONVEYED.BY
SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 598594., RECORDS. OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY.ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A- 315184 PAGE 2
8)
-CITY OF TUK( ILA
Central Permit System
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION—INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING.
SECTION I: GENERAL DATA
TYPE OF APPLICATION: D E151P
•
0 SNORT
PLAT
a COND I 'T I ONAL
USE
2) PROP. OWNER: NAME SalTe
SUesCR 1'9E!D AND 5 ORN 'BEFORE ME • . Ti-n5 DAY or /7 1 7 '
SUBDIVISION
D UNCLASS.
USE
O VARIANCE L_ JZD INOF
ZONG
1) APPLICANT: NAME Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle TELEpHOriE ( 206 ) 447 -4844
ADDRESS 821,Second Avenue, MS /63, Seattle, WA. ZIP 98104
ADDRESS ZIP
3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) South side of Interurban
Avenue South between I -5 and 52nd Avenue South (13447 Interurban Avenue South).
SECTION 11: PROJECT INFORMATION
4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT. YOU. PROPQSE.. 268 stall Park-and -ride lot
5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM June ' 2 5
6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED.IN PHASES? DYES ONO IF YES, DESCR1BE: 1 7 4,1145.Q13L
WILL Rte C cn E.Di n) 74 W I t w TTZ-O F.TS
7), PROJECT STATISTICS:
A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 3 . 4 GROSS 4 ' 3 EASEMENTS N/A
B)' FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL#FLOORS N/A INCLUDES: D BASEMENT 0MEZZANINE
TOTAL GROSS N/A 1 NCLUDE : D BASEMENT J MEZZAN 1 NE
FLOOR AREA
SITE UTILIZATION: EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES
ZONING DESIGNATION _C-2 Same
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION C-2 Sarr e
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 16,407 p 256 , (existing b1QS.r
LANDSCAPE AREA - ❑ 3S,000 Al except one _ 1 it JS .t. )
PAV I NG AREA 20,000 0 94,000 ,0
TOTAL PARKING STALLS:
-STANDARD S I Z E . 50 230
- COMPACT SIZE - 33
- HANDICAPPED SIZE - 5
TOTAL LOADING SPACES
AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA 4 5 ',; .0.65
AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 0% - 4`6 0.65 (area to De c :evelooec on1
1 S THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPEC 1 AL CONSIDERATION ON THE C 1 'f7" 5 ENV 1 RONMENTAL BASE
MAP? 0 YES 0 NO
N.'''. YAI • F 1_ IN Ate:". FO % i }-i.. STATE: Or WAtiSH J NGTC
j RESIDING
' SNORELINE
PERMIT
TELEIPHONE
To June I E6
g [i[i MM
APR 91985
CITY OF T UKWILA
• LANNING DEPT.
D PRD DPMUD. BAR
INTERURBAN
COMP. PLAN
AMENDMENT
Right -of -Way & Property Supervisor
)
SECTION 111: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
! , . 51c,s a rl Ai. O /b e r ' .. , BEING DULY SWORN. DECLARE THAT I AMA THE
CONTRACT PURCHASER -OR OWNER THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE-
GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN
ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT - ', OR OWNER )
Ste
mF sI1srnr
13441 1 N-reskuK5/44\1 nV 5
SEA DSO : DR --ogt-Is
ZS-- cur
meno 124kR14 ROC
•
6N
N0.
DESCRIPTION OF THE_PROJECT
, The proposed project'is a Metro Park - and -Ride lot designed"
.to serve transit patrons in the Tukwila and Green River
Valley areas. The project includes a paved 268 - stall''.
parking lot, access driveways to 52nd Avenue South
and Interurban Avenue, bus pull -outs and passenger
:shelters on Interurban Avenue, and roadway widening
and signalization at 52nd Avenue South. The.Parking
lot improvements will include illumination, pedestrian
walks, landscaping, and'a storm drainage system incor-
porating an oil /water separator. The roadway improvements
on the westerly side of Interurban Avenue adjacent
to the site will include curb and gutter, sidewalk,
and landscaping. Roadway improvements and landscaping
on the easterly side of Interurban Avenue at the
intersection with 56th Avenue South are to be constructed
separately as part of the Foster Bridge project. Passenger
shelters, sidewalk and an extension of the pavement
widening for the bus pull -out will be added_aspart
of this project.
EXCAVATED MATERIAL REMOVED FROM THE SITE
An estimated 1,600 cubic yards of excavated material
unsuitable for use in the construction will be removed
from the site. A disposal site for this material will
be provided by the construction contractor.
• REVISION
SY
DATE
0 100 200 400
Scale In Feet •
S-R SINGLE FAMILY •
B-C * commusirry Bu5INE55
M -L UGHT MANUFAG"'URING
RM -2400 MULTI- FAMILY
RM- I800 MULTI - FAMI
VICINITY MAP '— LAND USE AND ZONING
SINGLE mAMILY.20,0005F
51N6LE FAMILY 12,000 SF
BINGLE FAMILY. 7,2005F
3AM> 4 FAMILY OWELLING
REbIONAL RETAIL
A&RI6UL:NRE
�Efll, INDUSTRY.
0 fo o°°
: °oo ° ° LIbHT MANUFACrL+RINb ..
ENTRA 0 Engineers
ENVIRONMENTAL AND TRANSFORTATION,.PONSULTANTS,
RICOMMINDID
*MOM; ✓L✓
PROJECT LOCATION
rn -i - 1- sMP
DwaNm: �ETR0
5Tv Mwllciplity of Metropolitan Seattle
oNAwN: 5Tv ICAL1° TUKWILA PARK & RIDE FACILITY
AS SHOWN
VICINITY MAP
DATE:
ARIAS:
FILE:
DRAWING NUMUER
!MEET OF
IIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIII�Illllll _�Illllll�lll�l�lJlll�l�i� I�1�1�1111�1111111�111111 !�!LIIJ!�!Lll!1!�!U1111�1111.11
2 3" 4.. 5_.., 6 7 ti.�
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS'DUE TO
oe 6z ee 4z 9z 9z vz CC ' 5 15 f e THE IUALITY OF • THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ; 6 e
111II).lp i 1l 1111 m JI a duul111ln ll III n l
1 iif iifl II GI i II i III II II mi lPlnljmll�I41 1 iidi 11111 m�unimllmlr 1 � 1 11111 111111un1un
� 1r�S � it�', F:S�}r, .l �`-�+-,�,il;��,� t;.
II(III111111IIIIIIIIIII11111
0 ,•,,,.:.CH 1
I IIIII11t 1I1lI 1I II1111111IIll1111l1111111I111I
9 10 11 + 12
4 9S o CZ • .p
I l ii dmiluuli anilidiodulm luuluulmlluuhnd
ii
DRAWN
R ICOMMINDID
A»»ROVID
5CA LE:
TUKWILA PARK Si RIDE FACILITY
SITE PLAN
— ss-
- sc-
• —50-
-PD—
O
■ .
EKISTINO SANITARY SEWER
GX15TINO STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAIN
EXISTING CATCH 9ASIN TO REMAIN
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN •
.-0 AREA LIGHT. IEO WATT HP5,240 VOLT LUMINAIRE •
D-.-o SAME AS ABOVE EXCEPT WITH TANDEM LUMINAIRES'
LITTER CONTAINER
BICYCLE RACK
BOLLARD .
HANDICAPPED SIGN
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
TExTURED WARNING GRID !8
MEAN SEA LEVEL
SIGNAL POLE
R -I "STOP" 516N
R•22R "RIOHTLANE MUST TURN RICoHr" 516N
R- IOR "RICHTTURN ONLY" 516N
A" SOLID WHITE LINE
DOUBLE 4' YELLOW LINE
10 CROSSWALK
1!0" THERMOPLASTIC STOP OAR
12" THERMOPLASTIC STOP EAR
SuILPING OGMOWSHED
EXIST' 6UILDINS TO OE REMOVED
FILL MATERIAL
An estimated 8,700 cubic yards of fill material consisting
of free draining pit run sand and gravel will be placed
on the site at the general locations indicated on the
cross sections. This material is to be furnished from
a source to be determined by the construction contractor.
R E V I S I O N
G" PC- RPoRAT(:O
574.23 +toOO - -_
6EQIN CONS_ UGTION
23
L.
gaouNV / 4 t ...
Il covwRCTrE,
l LANIIAPING .\ :
I EE9(T.YP) —
UM T.
o,O3 .RT
EXIS SIGN
• I�1�
PROPERTY
n•. ) 22 ; 9q LI NE _ - •
. SAS I S . 1, A .1' 1S
�j�. �rli�•. a..:. rr; r�. rJ.: x: ��- - °,�'�+l.Y.�:�r.U/.r/�w�ei:
b`r'a';°"° —•!� . , c �:.r;e:- i „•.r -K; �"r.�;'.,'�.,... •: •
ENTRANCO Engineers
ENVIRONMENTAL AND. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
011 ONIO ••
4. 0ECK CSY,oTHERS)
•
28 8,29
I
411 METRO Munici• li of Met
MP)
* STREET'OEnICATioN
TO CITY OR TUNWILA
- -- : - s'151K•ATw ) (sr
1 { OTH6K)
1 d ... ..=
30 ;71:II IN' #VS Al a
10 +00.00 Sa Fy6 . wo 3..
!tan Seattle
�Q 32•t''ii
7 +67.00 62NDAVE• 5. a
20+00,00 ACCESS SD.
Ito
� -3
ARMS:
FILE:
DRAWING NUMBER
SHEET 0
I1IIIIIII1I111I1IIIIIIITIIIIIII1111111I1111111II1III1II111111111111 III _1111111II111I1111011101l. 111111+.111111 112111/111 IJ111111 11 1111 111111llllll111111lll1ll111111lll1ll111111llllllllll
2 3 4 .. 5 6 7 . - 8 9 10 11 ........,••. 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 1 0
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
LE 9z 9z bZ CZ 00 !z THE UA OF' THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ° e c 9 s b e e t .” 0
I I I Ill llll 11 HiIIII 1 I I VIII III unllil VIII m m on Hu mum mlhndlllll iluluidulWdnUlllllllllll11iiliiiiIWI pi l a on udml litil iudl�ulluduulnulW imili llmduulmdmllmdulll
I LE�FZnial .... '. �..•.! n , f'. �� . ' slt LITY p.n S�- ;:;.. `..;! o i2 . t urOn�`�S. - is �..%'.. , ,, ,, t°'
• {,
I 1 111 1 111 1 111 1 1 !11 IL_ �IU .1I.yIIIIIIiI11111uI11i7141.1 j1LI1.1I
6 . '7 ... 8 9
11 I III 11 III 1
' IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS.
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
•• THE - IUAL('TY OF. THE. ORIGINAL. DOCUMENT ! e D
1l 11 111 1 m1 411 1111 111 1 of 11 nu Iiu un 1111 111 mifiiil i III 111 i u nl�uohnl�nidl 1
1 \ C
1I1111II1111111111111I11II1 1111111111111111
10 11 + 12
•
9 S h• C z I «11 0
11111 1111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sall�"n Wiwi F �. t•
A
O
W
40
1O
0
.
rrr
....... CWV/1M -H
Vi1C:
r. '•
..r.r..
....
rrrrrrr,..
:.. ..
r.
.
_.'"_._
- _
i1`I f�iRiJR�MN
A
:Ave.
O
IQi
S'
ti1V@
Z
. r ..
r ...
...rrr . r .
....
.. ....
. , r .
30.
.
10
230•'
...
1.
2
. 6 '
,
rr.
........
�r r...
..rr
..r
`—:
—
.r
..
,.
•
:LIE
...,
... . —
rrr...
• •
g
12.31
ROAD
9T4.1
IFLS ."g44:
1 4, �
1
-
rr..r...r
.
•
.rrrrr
r
..
l
...
.. �
..,.
...,r,. r
,.. r.
r.,
•
r
I00.1VAt�
•
j
f
i
:Q >'!
A't1t�M
t#'f
h4All!C'
OG1k1t
1144{1:
K:
. .
_ ___
FN6
dP
I 6
H 0
ADQ
..
7 <
I '
Fta001a4 L' : Ei;Efw:15.5
• .. :. - -..r .
rrr.
rr •• ...
•
1 , .
•
.,
. r.
....r. r.
� �
....r.
A
, r.r.
rr ..r..
rrr.
QXI9.tIN61
6tRoUNo
1
►�► : Ei;•Y.: I.D ` . '
ORHAl�
ATVR
i -
..,....r.
,
.,.... ..
.r ..r...
rrr.
.r. ..
....rr.
rr.r..r.r
. r.
r. rrr.
_ _
_ __
-_.
rrrrrrr
rrr
—•.
: a '
....
rrr.. ,.
'3':
._Ec •
VT4
•
AO
: 277 +D
. 4:
rr.
..
G
;
o
•
•
•
•
•
• -. '
- EL8
' vATICNS
VIER: _ .---
IN & COW
1055 No
•IT` ..,:D4P
d4 9 DN
3150. R131:
RTMENT OF:P• UaLi6:
•
LNORICb:
•
f
:.., .
4 CLJNA1,4161- :fZIUER.:
CAP.RhGX•)
.r...,...
.r.rrr:r ...
133
.......... ..:..r.. ....r..
rrr....
SI'
..... r.N/URLIRE3AM:�AvE.:
c
ST A; 29
32'•
75
..
37' .
. 44I .
;
10 7 1
9dr
r . r • : : t
•
30:G : i : ;1i�
: Qy . : 15!
Sig
TY •
"
.,
.
" - -••
AH�L ?EKi
..
=29:
..
: W . ,,rr
�.
. .
,rr,.r.. •rr:W
_
:39'0'
..._..._
4 ..
--__
1'1
i
;:'
i t
:!E
HE
w
,_._.•
...
R::
•• .,..
....
rr rr
3
k
i'
• :,
_
:.
:�
rrr:: -
__3
,...,.r,..r, rrrrrrr•.
-
, .. r...,
r......
•
.... ..,r
.. ,r.,..
r.
..r -
-e
..rr..r.
—
4
rrr .
rrrrr
FLODC }LEw.d:::
,....
,rrr...,
..
+ 2•/.;.
12/0
r....
....
.. ••
•
SItcA-
S: Eg.406
r
..
f
—.
_
AGO
W.AL
oo Y.t
Lev:15.5
rrr ' r— . --:
,-
E
r r ...
• g r :.
t/w
Li rr. OIL
..,.
...
rr....r .
.._._..
.... ...
..... ...
. -
��EEL/3LJLh5::'
PaN
-P)...
..,.....
4
,.
•.•..
r .r
rr,r.r
"
'TrSR .rrr.
Le ./..1,0 ... .••
.... .,
y r,.
....r.r..
..rrrrrrr
LIMIT
...r..
F TPL1
.. rrr.
T1
rr...r..r.
rrr.
..
... ('
.. ..._
....
..�.1�
• rrr
rrr rrr
.. r..
. ....
..r.....
r,
, ..
...
,.rrr
rrr.
.rrrrrrr
. r r .....
.rrrrr,.
....r...r
_ ,
• ........
• ��'
o M ANsSEA iliiig.1:
rrr - +- -•-
._ _.......,
_. ..
.. rrr r r . r
.... r .. r .
.... r
.., .. .
ACA
:......... .
r ... r ...
.., . :.
.. ..
., •.. .
011 ON IO: .
5TH
:::: : M,N V
METRO Seattle
DATE
..
•
,
ENTRAIWCO Eng in eers
ENVIRONMENTAAND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
.. -
Munkt• li of Met •titan
F TU K 81 RIDE AGILITY
KW ILA P AR
SHORELINE . PROFILE
DRAWING NOSIER •
■
AS SHOWN
DED:
SR MI5
REVISION • i .: 8Y 0A
A►IIIOVID
■k
SHEET OF •
• {,
I 1 111 1 111 1 111 1 1 !11 IL_ �IU .1I.yIIIIIIiI11111uI11i7141.1 j1LI1.1I
6 . '7 ... 8 9
11 I III 11 III 1
' IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS.
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
•• THE - IUAL('TY OF. THE. ORIGINAL. DOCUMENT ! e D
1l 11 111 1 m1 411 1111 111 1 of 11 nu Iiu un 1111 111 mifiiil i III 111 i u nl�uohnl�nidl 1
1 \ C
1I1111II1111111111111I11II1 1111111111111111
10 11 + 12
•
9 S h• C z I «11 0
11111 1111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sall�"n Wiwi F �. t•
A
O
W
•
SD 3 " � .b
I ITIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIIIIINIIIIIII. 1.IlIiI11II1I11t111111.1111111 1!j1111 0111111 1i1illi111jililili111iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
0 "m.... 1 2 3 4' 5. . 6 . 7 ,._...1 . 8 9 10 11 W.,......,., 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS I
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
0 bz bL cz 9z sz oz ez; zz 1z ;.y THE SUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT , a e c 9 s a e z 1 "" o
1I!IiIIV I,117 II I 1 1 11111 III III IIII IIII1IIIIIIIII1 I II I I II II II II HI III on III IIII no IIII IIII IIII RIIII IIII IIIIlIIIilllll II IIII nil IIII IIII IIIIIlIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIIIl
o-, �:3 5t 1, , ;: ?t•. .. .1...:. ik „irrY.f.� " e > t.( .�' .. >f 't. r+: �. r: 1' 1�Tr' ,:!' �.�"- 4S?t'r'r .. ;. «J�.. "•,' :t;.� zS` ”. :.i d... :.` .d' '. ,",�l ,. I' v i`.'^ fi v's` a` .�1 .
EXISTING SITE DATA
ARMS:
FILE:
SHEET. •
by DATE
i►
NO
•• 1 slxxn^ltct!r_+mTeItOtes n..`�,...�
• 12"
R EVI S I 0 N -
> :
LAS. _. _ �,.� _r �r. =_= _ - - - -•.;� - -
■
- -- 5 -IYe` -
SO 12"
ni r $5- 47,SmP
• ETRO Munici.. of Metro.olitan Seattle.
TUKWILA PARK eif RIDE FACILITY
1
; , •
RooP
sERIOS
PANEL
SERIES P20
PANEL.
SERIES P30
ExIST1N0
GROUND LINO
PASSESISER
pH EL.TER
(
--.0LA66
7
—r
I FRAME F11
1..—RoOP LINE
-H
A I
/\
—1
8=0" en, rucg OF aura)
r /4 " K 4
JOIN• (Tr1?)
29fi(TYP)._
I '-
4 t
:0
1%.
z
m
k 03
3 ma)
0 33
11 - 14 Z
0 NI
OY VI
■--
FRAME 2 - F14 AND 1 - F 11
ROOF 2 - R42 AND 1 - R41
PANEL 1 7, - P23 AND 6 P33
PANEL 2 6 - P22 MO 6- P32
FOOTING 2 0 7-0 x 10' -0" &
1 @ 7' -0" x. 9' -13"
- HANOI cAppEo
pAre<Nom
C ' coNG.
S1DEwAL.K
SIDEWALK
PASSENGER SHELTERS • ITEM • TYPE MATERIAL
. STEEL •
METAL
GL. & WOOD
GL. & NOM .!
REINF. CONC.
; , • S12
1 4"14 4" OxPAN910N
JOINT (Tr?)
1 /4" V
(TYR))
HAND10APPEO
SONS (•R>
19' 0 '
4" M. CO. PAO E wALK
FLUSH WITH ASPHALT
CONCRETE PAV1N
A • el g
•■■■•
PLAN
2
7 .
0
SAL. I It 0"
2
ROOF LINE--
.CL
FoOTINE
1.ANDEGAPIPt)
- - r
PRAMO FI4
LINE
P
LATTER
CONTAINER
(•r2)
3'-3'I$
CONC, ELM:,
FOR LITrER
CONTAINER
•(ThI9CA1i
IS'- O"
EliO•fGt.0
2
-J
NOTES: rnp gs-11-Srre
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS THAT FOLLOW ARE METRO' S STANDARD DETAILS,
• AND„SYSTE14-34 IDE PASSENGER SHELTERS ' PARK- AND-RIDE FACILITIES.;
NECES6KFIT TO iiiii§fRuoi THE SHELTERS AS DEPICTED'
2 LOC SE t; •
•, : A EE SHEET C-3 D 8„
N O.
REVISION
BY DATE
DESIGNED.
OMAN
RECOMMENDED.
APPROVED.
1111 METRO munki
SCALE:
li of Met
itan Seattle
TUKWILA PARK a RIDE FACILITY
PASSENGER SHELTER LAYOUT
DATE:
ARMS:
FILE:
DRAWING NUMBEII•
•
SHEET Of
S111185
111 111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111711111111111111M111
_ _
3' 4 _4.. 6 . . 7 . 8. 9 •
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT'IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE IUALITV OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6 4 s
lallIFIRITINIRIIIME111511 1 Id 1111
40 sz 9Z hi
, IN:
,
phi
,
111111111111111111111111111111111111111
10 11 12
•
svez
11111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
'
„ .
0.
: ,-• • • • -•
• . . •
• • ••••
„.. . ,
A