Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 85-35-DR - NENDEL'S RESTAURANT - DESIGN REVIEW
85-35-dr 15801 west valley highway 15901 west valley highway nendel's DESIGN REVIEW City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 22 March 1993 Brooks E. Harlow Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager Carlson 4400 Two Union Square 601 Union Street Seattle, Washington 98101 -2352 • Subject: Nendels Dear Mr. Harlow This response addresses your 1 March 1993 letter regarding the above hotel development in Tukwila. As I explained to Julie Freedman, the easement from Helen Nelson on the west side of the site allows the development to comply with landscaping, screening and parking lot standards and is shown on approved shoreline substantial development and building permits as part of this development. Per the zoning code parking, shall be screened from the river subject to standards and as approved in the permit. The survey also shows that a small portion of the parking lot was constructed within the easement. Loss of the easement would therefore create a nonconforming status for the development. Any future development or redevelopment on the lot would trigger compliance with the requirements of the nonconforming section of the zoning code. The easement on the north side of the property is not a requirement of the City. I hope this information satisfies your request, you can reach me at 431 -3651 if you have any further. questions. Yours truly, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner Enclosures John W. Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 .( /H /H0) Permits for Developments on Shorelines 173 -14 -055 for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock 4/15/85. Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.200. 78-07 - feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or 01 1 (Order 'DE 78 -7), § 173 -14 -040, filed 6/14/78; vegetation for livestock feeding and /or grazing, nor shall Order DE 76 -17, § 173 - -14 -040, filed 7/27/76; Order it include normal livestock wintering operations; DE 75 - -28, § 173 -14 -040, filed 12/4/75; Order DE 75• (f) Construction or modification of navigational aids 22, § 173 -14- -040, filed 10/16/75; Order 71•••18, § 173 such as channel markers s . nchor buoys; '/ /5 /w2/ )%d 14 -040, filed 12/16/711 (g) Construction on, wetlands by an owner, lessee or ,�i3 contract purchaser of a stn:' - family residence for his � WAC 173 -14 -050 Application of the permit system own use or for the use of his family, which residence to substantial development undertaken prior to the act. docs not exceed a height of thirty -five feet above aver- Substantial development undertaken on the shorelines of age grade level and which meets all requirements of the the state prior to the effective date of the act shall not state agency or local government having jurisdiction require a permit except 'under the following thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to circumstances: this chapter. "Single- family residence" means a de- (1) Where thc activity was unlawful prior to the ef- tached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family fective date of the act. including those structures and developments within a (2) Where there has been an unreasonable period of contiguous ownership which arc a normal appurtenance. dormancy in the project between its inception and the An . "appurtenance" is necessarily connected to .the use effective date of the act. and enjoyment of a singlc- family residence and is lo- (3) Where the development is not completed within cited landward of thc perimeter of a marsh, bog, or two years after the effective date of the act. in deter- swamp. On a state -wide basis, normal appurtenances mining the running of thc two -year period hereof, those include a garage; deck; driveway; utilities; fences; and periods of time after June 1, 1971, shall not be' included grading which does not exceed two hundred fifty cubic during which a development was not actually pursued by yards (except to construct a conventional drainfield). construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably Local circumstances may dictate additional interpreta- related thereto made it reasonable not to so pursue. tions of normal appurtenances which shall be set forth (4) Where substantial development occurred. prior to and regulated within the applicable master program. the effective date of the act on a shoreline and continued Construction authorized under this exemption shall be on to a•diffcrcnt lake, river or tributary after the effec- located landward of the ordinary high water mark; Live date, a permit shall be required for thc development (h) Construction of a dock, designed for pleasure craft undertaken after the effective date. only, for the private noncommercial use of the owners, Substantial development undertaken prior to the ef- lessee, or contract purchascr of a single- family resi- fective date of the act shall not continue without a per - dence, for which the cost or fair market value, whichever mit into other phases that were not part of the plan is higher, does not exceed two thousand five hundred being followed at the time construction commenced. dollars. [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.200. 78 -07 -011 (Or- (1) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, der DE 78 -7), § 173 -14 -050, filed 6/14/78; Order 73- waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now 23, § 173 -14 -050, filed 10/23/73; Order 71 -18, 3 1.73. exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of 14 -050, filed 12/16/711 an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artifi- cially stored ground water from the irrigation of lands; (j) The marking of property lines 'or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water; (k) Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on the effective date of the 1975 amendatory act which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system; and (1) Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW. (2) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. • (3) Exempted developments authorized by local gov- . crnment shall' be consistent with the policies and provi- sions of the act and the applicable master program. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 90.58 RCW. 86 -12 -011 (Order 86 -06), § 173 - 14-040, filed 5/23/86. Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.030, 90.58.120 and 90.58.200. 85 -•09 -•043 (Order DE 85 -05), § 173 -14 -040, filed . WAC 173 -14 -055 Nonconforming development standards. Where, nonconforming development standards do not exist in the applicable master program,. the fol- lowin definitions and standards shall apply: (1) "Nonconforming development" means a shoreline use or structure which was lawfully constructed or es- tablished prior to the effective date of the act or the ap- plicable master program, or amendments thereto, but which docs not conform to present regulations or stan- dards of the program or policies of the act; (2) Nonconforming development may be continued provided that it is not enlarged, intensified, increased, or altered in any way which increases its nonconformity; (3) A nonconforming development which is moved any distance must be brought into conformance with the applicable master program and the act; . (4) If a nonconforming development is damaged to an extent not exceeding seventy -five percent replacement cost of thc original structure; it may be. reconstructed to those configurations existii g immediately prior to the time the structure was damaged, so long as restoration is completed within one year of the date of damage; 173 -14 -055 Permits for Developments on Shorelines (5) If a nonconforming use is discontinucd for twclvc • consecutive months or for twelve months during any two -year period, any subsequent usc shall be conform- ing. It shall not be necessary to show that the owner of the property intends to abandon such nonconforming usc in order for the nonconforming rights to expire; (6) A nonconforming use shall not be changcd to an- other nonconforming use, regardless of thc conforming or nonconforming status of the building or structure in which it is housed; and (7) An undeveloped lot, tract, parcel, site, or division which was established prior to the effective date of thc act or the applicable master program but which does not conform to the present lot sizc or density standards may be developed so long as such development conforms to other requirements of the applicable master program and the act. [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.200. 87- 16 -101 (Order DE 87 -09), § 173 -14 -055, filed 8/5/87. Statutory Authority: Chapter 90.58 RCW. 86 -12 -011 (Order 86 -06), § 173 -14 -055, filed 5/23/86.] WAC 173-14 -060 Time requirements of permit. The following time requirements shall apply to all permits: (1) Substantial progress toward completion of a per- mitted activity shall be undertaken within two years af- ter the approval of the permit by local government. Substantial progress shall include all of the following, where applicable: The making of contracts; signing of notice to proceed; completion of grading and excavation; and the laying of major utilities; or, where no construc- tion is involved, commencement of the activity: Provided, That local government may authorize a single extension before the end of the time limit, with prior notice to parties of record and the department, for up to one year based on reasonable factors. (2) Permit authorization shall terminate within five years. after the approval of the permit by local govern- ment: Provided, That local government may authorize a single extension before the end of the time limit, with prior notice to parties of record and the department, for up to one year based on reasonable factors. (3) The running of a permit time period shall not in- clude the time during which an activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of reasonably related ad- ministrative appeals or litigation. (4) Local government may issue permits with a fixed termination date of less than five years. (5) When permit approval is based on conditions, such conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy or use of a structure or prior to commencement of a nonstructural activity: Provided, That an alternative compliance limit may specified in the permit. (6) Revisions to permits under • WAC 173 -14 -064 may be authorized after original permit authorization has expired under subsection (2) of this section: Pro- vided, That this procedure shall not be used to extend thc original permit time requirements. [Statutory Au- thority: RCW 90.58.200. 87 -16 -101 (Order DE 87 -09), § 173 -14 -060, filed 8/5/87; 80 -04 -027 (Order DE 80- c [Ch. 173 -14' WAC. --p 1 9), § 173 -14 -060, filed 3/18/80; 78- 07. -01 1 (Order DE.' 78 -7), § 173 -14 -060, filed 6/14/78; Order DE 75 -22, § 173- 14- 060, filed 10/16/75; Order 71 -18, § 173 -14- 060, filed 12/16/71.] WAC 173 -14 -062 Applicability,of permit system to federal agencies. The permit system shall be applied in the following manner to federal agencies on lands meet- ing the criteria of the Shoreline Management Act and the department for shorelines of the state. (1) Federal agencies shall not be required to obtain permits for developments undertaken by the federal gov- ernment on lands owncd in fee by thc federal govern- ment, unless the federal govcrnmcnt grants or reserves to the state or local 'government, substantial jurisdiction over activities on those lands. (2) The permit system shall apply to nonfederal activ- ities constituting developments undertaken on lands sub- ject to nonfederal ownership, lease or casement, even though such lands may fall within the external bounda- ries of a federal ownership. (3) The permit system shall apply to developments undertaken on lands not federally owncd but under lease, casement, license, or other similar federal propcity rights short of fee ownership, to the federal government. (4) Federal agency actions shall be consistent with the approved. Washington state coastal zone management program subject to certain limitations set forth in the • Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. [Stat- utory Authority: RCW 90.58.200. 78 -07 -011 (Order DE 78 -7), § 173 -14 -062, filed 6/14/78; Order DE 75 -- 22, § 173 -14 -062, filed 10/16/75.] WAC 173 -14 -064 Revisions to permits. When an applicant seeks to revise a permit, local government shall request from the applicant detailed plans and text de- scribing the proposed changes in the permit. (1) If local government determines that the. proposed changes arc within the scope and intent of the original permit, local government may approve a revision. (2) "Within the scope and intent of the original per- mit" means all of the following: (a) No additional over water construction is involved except that pier, dock, or float construction may be in- creased by five hundred square feet or ten percent from the provisions of the original permit, whichever is Tess; (b) Ground area coverage and height of each struc- ture may be increased a maximum of •ten percent from the provisions of the original permit; (c) Additional separate structures may not exceed a total of two hundred fifty square feet; (d) The revised permit does not authorize develop - ment to exceed height, lot coverage, setback, ,car any other requirements of the applicable master program ex- cept as authorized under the original permit: . (c) Additional Landscaping is consistent with condi- tions (if any) attached to the original permit and, with the applicable master program; (f) The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed; and • TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE • replacement cost at time of destruction, in the judgment of the City's Building Official, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with provisions of this title, except that in the R -1 zone, structures that are nonconforming in regard to yard setbacks but were in conformance at the time of construction may be reconstructed to their original dimensions and location on the lot. (3) Should such structure be moved for any reason or any distance whatsoever, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the zone in which it is located after it is moved. (4) When a nonconforming structure, or structure and premises in combination, is vacated or abandoned for twenty-four consecutive months, the structure, or structure and premises in combination, shall thereafter be required to be in conformance with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. Upon request of the owner, the City Council may grant an extension of time beyond the twenty-four consecutive months. (5) Residential structures and uses located in any single- family or multiple - family residential zoning district and in existence at the time of adoption of this title shall not be deemed nonconforming in terms of bulk, use, or density provisions of this title. Such buildings may be rebuilt after a fire or other natural disaster to their original dimensions and bulk, but may not be changed except • as provided in Section 18.70.040(5). (6) In wetlands, watercourses and their buffers, existing structures that do not meet the requirements of Chapter 18.45 may be remodeled, reconstructed or replaced, provided that: (A) The new construction does not further intrude into or adversely impact an undeveloped sensitive area or the required buffer; (B) The new construction does not threaten the public health, safety or welfare; and (C) The structure otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter. (7) In areas of potential geologic instability, coal mine hazard areas, and buffers, as defined in Chapter 18.45, existing structures may be remodeled, reconstructed or replaced, provided that: (A) The new construction is subject to the geotechnical report requirements and standards of Section 18.45.080(e) and (f); (B) The new construction does not threaten the public health, safety or welfare; (C) The new construction does not increase the potential for soil erosion or result in unacceptable risk or damage to existing or potential development or to neighboring properties; and (D) The structure otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter. (Ord 1599 §5, 1991; Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982) Page 18-70 18.70.055 Mobile and manufactured homes. Legally preexisting mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD - approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: • (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof; (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of three inch rise for each twelve inches of run, or about twenty-five percent; • (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and wind load factor of eighty miles per hour; (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels; (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. (Ord 1467 §3(H), 1988) 18.70.060 Repairs and maintenance. If any building is devoted in whole or in part to any nonconforming use, work may be done in any period of twelve consecutive months on ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of nonbearing walls, fixtures, wiring or plumbing to an extent not exceeding twenty -five percent of the current replacement value of the building. (Ord 1247. §I(part), 1982) 18.70.070 Building safety. • Nothing in this title shall be deemed to prevent the strengthening or restoring to a safe condition of any nonconforming building or part thereof declared to be unsafe by order of any City official charged with protecting the public safety. Alterations or expansion of a nonconforming use which are required by law or a public agency in order to comply with public health or safety regulations are the only alterations or expansions allowed. (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982) 18.70.080 Nonconforming parking lots. Nothing contained in Chapter 18.56 shall be construed . to require a change in any aspect of a structure or facility covered thereunder including, without limitation, parking lot layout, loading space requirements and curb -cuts, for any structure or facility which existed on the date of adoption of this title. If .a change of use takes place, or an addition is proposed, which requires an increase in the parking area by an increment less than one hundred percent, the requirements of Chapter 18.56 shall be complied with for the additional parking area. If a change of use takes place, or an addition is proposed, which requires an increase in the parking area by an increment greater than one hundred percent, the requirements of Chapter 18.56 shall be complied with for the entire parking area. (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982) 18.70.090 Nonconforming landscape areas. Adoption of the landscaping regulations contained in this title shall not be construed to require a change in the landscape improvements for any legal landscape area which existed on the date of adoption of this title; unless and until a change of use or alteration of the structure is proposed. At such time as a change is proposed for a use; or structure, and associated premises which does not comply with the landscape requirements of this title, a landscape plan which substantially conforms to the requirements of this title shall be submitted to the Board of Architectural Review for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The BAR may modify the standards imposed by this title when, in their judgment, the existing and proposed additional landscaping and screening materials together will adequately screen or buffer possible use incompatibilities, soften the barren appearance of parking or storage areas, and /or adequately 'enhance the premises appropriate to the use district and location . of the site. (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982) 18.70.100. Conditional uses. A legal use " does not become nonconforming because the zone in which it is located is changed to a zone which requires a conditional use permit for the use, or because the use is changed from an allowed use to a conditional use within the same zone; provided, however, the use may not be allowed or buildings may not be enlarged without first obtaining a conditional use permit 'pursuant to requirements of Chapter 18.64 of this title. . (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982) • 18.70.110 Nonconforming adult entertainment establishments. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any adult entertainment use or establishment which is rendered nonconforming by the ordinance codified in' this 'section shall be terminated or discontinued within ninety days from the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section. (Ord 1465 §4, 1988) 18.70.120 Sidewalk dedication. No building setback or landscape area on the sub- ject lot at the time of donation or easement to the City for sidewalk purposes shall become nonconforming by reasons of such donation or easement. (Ord 1516 §4, 1989) TITLE 18 — ZONING City of Tukwila Office of the City Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Moira Bradshaw FROM: Linda P. Cohen gty Attorney RE: DATE: March 17, 1993 Thanks again. LBC/cc NENDELS.001 Nendel's Foreclosure John W. Rants, Mayor Linda P. Cohen, City Attorney Thank you for updating me on the easement affected by Nendel's foreclosure. Please convey this information, in writing, to Mr. Harlow. Ross' input should be included in the letter as well. If they have more concerns and if you think it would be useful, you, Ross, Mr. Harlow and Julie Freeman might meet in person and try to resolve them. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433-1867 • Fax (206) 433-1133 BROOKS E. HARLOW Ms. Maura Bradshaw Associate Planner City of Tukwila Suite 100 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Bradshaw: MILLER, NASH, WIENER, HAGER & CARLSEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 4400 TWO UNION SQUARE 601 UNION STREET SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 -2352 TELEPHONE (206) 622 -8484 FACSIMILE (206) 622 -7485 March 1, 1993 Subject: Zoning Compliance ':j....� 1,.0 r. r i t i n "" MAR 2 1993 CC.! \ilMUN TY OE liz i4AILIRbTCE: 3500 U.S. BANCORP TOWER Ill S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 -3699 TELEPHONE (503) 224 -5858 TELEX 364462 KINGMAR PTL FACSIMILE (503) 224 -0155 We represent United States National Bank of Oregon ( "U. S. Bank ") in its foreclosure action against Nendels Tukwila Associates, et al., King County Superior Court Cause No. 92 -2- 20441-0. The foreclosure action is based upon, inter alia, a deed of trust encumbering the Nendels Inn - Southcenter ( "Nendels ") property. A copy of the deed of trust and its amendments, accompanied by a legal description of the encumbered property, is enclosed. As you know from your February 18, 1993 conversation with Julie Freedman, manager of the Nendels Inn - Southcenter, U. S. Bank needs to know the effect of the potential loss of an easement right benefitting the Nendels property. A copy of the document creating the easement, which was recorded in King County under recording no. 9111260669, and a copy of a survey demonstrating the location of the easement, are enclosed. In particular, U. S. Bank needs to know whether the loss of the easement benefitting the Nendels property would result in any violations whatsoever of Tukwila's zoning ordinances or any other aspect of Tukwila's municipal code. It is our current understanding that if Nendels does not have the use of the easement benefitting the Nendels property, the current use of the property will still be in complete compliance with all relevant ordinances, laws, and regulations. We would appreciate receiving confirmation of this belief in writing. If we are incorrect in our current understanding, we would appreciate an explanation in writing of the effect of the loss of the easement right upon compliance with Tukwila's ordinances, laws, and regulations. MILLER, NASH, WIENER, HAGER & CARLSEN Ms. Maura Bradshaw cc w/o enc: Ms. Linda Cohen Ms. Julie Freedman - 2 - MAR 2 1993 c0��iM UN:TY D i, : ,arciVal m9 93 Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We appreciate your assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours„' Brooks E. Harlow . e DEED OF TRUST — WACfi1NGTON / f • run 14 RECORD Al REQUEST or S4fE .111 INSURANCE COk1PAr ' 2615 a ;n AVENUE, SLAIILL, WA 9b121 -' - - -• October -I — - - -- 10 • NENDEL'S TUKW ILA ASSOCIATES_, a Washington_ eneral_ Partnersl- •t. P -- ' "- _genera ------ -------- •-- - - -•�- Grantor —• __._, ___2230 Rucker Avenue_, Everett, Washington 98201_ Adores: Betsefitiary ("Lender "; O.. Q — Addles! 5IlCR TITI E 1NSlM OMPANY nut= to ox ea e, 'a tinq on A ddress The Lender has lo aned Grantor • (Borrower) EIfHI_MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND N0/1O0 11JyII EA�IATES NATIp�IAL BANK OF OREGON F th h V' �Bl t�'ldina. P 0 I3 21987 S ttl 11 sf t 98111 -- Truster S_fl,1IIl1.00O 110 , which is repayable with interest according to the terms of a promissory note datediO /1/1985 under which the linal payment of principal and interest is due on 09/1/2000 The term "Indebtedness" as used in this Deed of Trust shall mean (a) the principal and interest payable under the note and under any number of extensions and renewals of the note, (b) any future amounts, (except any sums owed on a Visa account incurred for a personal, family or household purpose) together with interest, that the Lender may in its discretion Loan to Borrower or Grantor and any number of extensions and renewals, whether or not the future advances are related to any Indebtedness currently secured by this Deed of Trust by class or kind, whether or not the future advances are currently contemplated by the darties, or whether or not any note or other evidence of debt states that it is secured hereby, and (c) any sums paid or advanced by the Lender G1To discharge obligations of Grantor as permitted under this Deed of Trust, with interest. 1-i secure payment of the Indebtedness and performance of all obligations of Grantor under this Deed of Trust, Grantor irrevocably grants cand conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in the County of . ,.King ®rate of Washington. CO See attached exhibit "A" for legal description together with all appurtenances. all existing or subsequently erected or affixed improvements or fixtures. and. unless this Deed of Trust is being given to secure an extension of consumer credit requiting disclosures under the Federal Truth. rn•Lending Act. Grantor also hereby grants to Lender a Uniform Commercial Code security interest in all equipment. furnishings and other articles of personal property now or subsequently located an or used in connection with the property: all of the foregoing is collectively referred to as the Property. The Property is not used principally or primarily for agricultural or farming purposes. Grantor hereby assigns to lender as additional security lot the Indebtedness all present and future rents. leases. and profits from the Property. 1. Possession and Maintenance of the Property. 1.1 The Properly shall be maintained in good condition at all times. Grantor shall promptly make all necessary repairs. replacements and renewals so that the value of the Property shall be maintained. and Grantor shall no commit or permit any waste on the Property. Grantor shall comply with all laws. ordinances. regulations and private restrictions affecting the Property. 1.2 To the extent that the Property constitutes commercial property. Grantor shalt operate the Properly in such manner as to prevent deterioration of the land and improvements including fences, except lot reasonable wear and tear Irom proper use. i.3 Grantor shall not demolish or remove any improvements from the Property without the written consent of Lender. 2 Completion of Construction. If some or all of the proceeds of the loan creating the Indebtedness are to be used t0 construct or complete construction of any improvement on the Property. Grantor agrees 2.1 To commence construction promptly and in any event within 30 days from the date of this instrument, and complete the same in accordance with any agreements relating to construction and plans and specifications satisfactory to Lender within 8 months of the dale of this instrument: 2.2 To allow Lender to inspect said property at all times during Consirucfi0n: 2.3 To replace any work or materials unsatisfactory to lender within 15 calendar days after written notice to the Grantor of such tact: 2.4 That work shall not cease on the construction of such improvements for any reason whatsoever for a period of 15 consecutive days. 3. Taxes and Liens. 3.1 Grantor shall pay before they become delinquent all taxes and'as :ess- ments levied against or on account of the Property, and shall pay as due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or material furnished to the Progeny. Special as:essn errs shalt be paid :u;rently. without de'err_l. tress the hen for deferred assessments is subordinate to the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust. or lender gives its prior written consent tc the de! et' al Grantor shall maintain the Property tree of any liens having priority over or ma: to the interest of the lender under this Deed of trust. except for "Permit :e: Encumbrances' as defined in 8.1, the lien of taxes and assess• ments not delinquent. and except as otherwise provided in 3 2. 3 2 Grantor may withhold payment of any tax. assessment. or clam in connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay, so long as Ine lender's interest in the Property is nol jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed as a result of nonpayment, Grantor shall within 15 days alter the Lien arises cr. r'• a hen is tiled. within 15 days after Grantor has notice of the filing. secure tce discharge of the hen or deposit with the lender cash or a sufficient ce':ra ;e 'Insert - Grantor - or the name of the borrower it drtleren; tr:;;:r r::e Gram;r, surely bond or other security satisfactory to the lender in an amount suffisrent to discharge the lien plus any costs. attorneys lees or other charges star accrue as a result of a Iarectosure or sale under the Len 3.3 The assessor or tar colleclor of the county in which the hope;, located is authorized to deliver to the lender a written statement et ; me wo:la taxes assessed or owing at any time. 4. Insurance. 4.1 Grantor shat: carry such insurance as the lender may :e.asa require. This sha :l induce Insurance on the Progeny against lire risks covered by a standard endorsement for extended coverage. ar.; s_: ... e• risks as may be speafied by the Lender. including 'thou; li rr a :'b'• ' : } :: . war rusks Insurance on Ine Properly shall be came; rn companies a': policies approved by the lender and shall be f0- an amount ec.:• 1: ". remaining unpaid portion of the Indebtedness ar the lull Insurable :rte Property. whichever is less. and an amount sufficient 1: - ;:note r.::h a , co-insurance provision in any policy. 4.2 AN policies o1 insurance on the ProperlyshaH bear an enr: is : form satisfactory to the lender making loss payable to the lende::r.::nar deposited with the Leader In the event of loss. Grantor shall rmmcc, the Lender. who may make proof of loss if it is no: made promptly :.,• S•a -t :: Proceeds shall be pa'd directly to the Lender who may comgrum :s e insurance company and make a final settlement wnich shall be bc Grantor. The lender may. at its election, apply the proceeds lc the the Indebtedness or the restoration or repair of the Property 4.3 At Least 30 Cats prior to the expiration qt any poky a s_' s'a::'• renewal or substitute policy shall be secured by Grantor. 5. Reserves; Mortgage Insurance Premiums. 5.1 If allowed by law, and if Grantor and lender do not other.is: e':• :ess • agree in writing. lender may require Grantor to maintain reserves for taxes (including special assessments and other charges against the F:::+,1! governmental or Quasi - governmental bodies) or premiums or. :re5•e :• ins ante or both. The reserves shall be created by payment each me0i0 10 of an amount determined by the lender to be sufficient to produce :, :re :a :: they are due amounts equal to the estimated taxes and Insurance pre:r be paid. If at the time that payments are to be made the reserve for eft- :- 'are: or insurance premiums rs insufficient. Grantor shall upon deman• ::o, s.,:' additional sum as Ine Lender shall determine to be necessar, required payment. 5.2 If the Lender carries mortgage (default) insurance ment of all or any pan of the Indebtedness. the premiums for such swan :: shall be paid by the Grantor. and if allowed by law. the lender r.. :. :e :u+ Grantor le maintain 2 'esir've for such purposes in the sane manse• a i r !ire and property insure::e. a'd subject to the sane e aE'ee•e0 :s 5 3 If Grantor 10 carry a package C!an c'' n >.:a' :•: :' ... coverage in addition 1: rat required under this Dee: Of i;., allo•.ed by law ma. a: •:: colon establish an: = .., r s:er a purpose In suer, e.a a premium atl'bc:ab'e to :at. re.: : . Co' :Crate shalt be _ : secatatelf. and the .• -a'• . ' ' furnish a eert'fr:a :e ..lance raster (tan deposit me gci..' a:.._ : 4.2. If at any time ;^.: lec;e; holds an ms' :fhc.en: amba -: . reserve to cover :he :re- i tar Me enure package p oh :y. wC ie - - • - ' discrefion• oav u Onion 01 toe p -'a e::'rbC:aa•e ras:rra • :e :he ler:,ci r, a• cs - -.c'„ tits 1r: ! : - - • .. • • a an:A t:I•2 i.) • 5 L , :,• aa: wrIpcf. eh_ „e tar fOne.C1Mg reSeriV, 3rol WV: r.n tirileis 111 :servos shall not constitute a rust Gran:or •rt at Leilit•: 'nay commingle reserve funds with other funds 01 Lender. are: not loves: ;nem for the benefit of Grantor. Granter agrees that tender pay Gt anti( interest on reserves. unless applicable statutes requite pay of interest notwithstanding any contrary agreement. 6 Expenditures by Lender. II Grin::' shall fail to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust, the lender may. :: Is option, on Grantor's behalf take the required action and any amount that 7 erpends in so doing shall be added to the Indebtedness. Amounts so added s:•.: :e payable cri demand with interest at the same rate as provided in the note "*.rn the date of expenditure. The rights provided for in thus paragraph s` a't be irt addition to any other rights or any remedies to which the lender ma? entitled on account of the default, and the Lender shall not by taking the :ed action e..re the default so as to bar it from any remedy that it otherwise : have had d Late Payment Charges. OD To c.).: "esi extra ex:enses involved in handling delinquent peyrnints. ender me? rge a late :large on any scheduled payment which Lender does of 15 days after the due date, or by the next business day, it the 5-day cer::.: ends on a Saturday. Sunday. or legal holiday. The amount of the ate charie VI be as s:ecified in the cote or, it the note specifies no late 5-4harge. . . percent of the payment of principal and Ldnterest. er : - .ion of sue^ Payment. which Lender does not receive within the C015.day pen:: The late charge under the ride or under this Deed of Trust shall in no event exceed the maximum charge, it any, specified under applicable taw. Collection e late charze shall not constitute a waiver of or prejudice the Lender's ;•!•-• :) pursue e other right co remedy available on account of the dehnquer.:, 8. Warra7; Defense of Title. 8.1 Gra - 7:: warrants :hat beholds merchantable title to the Prowl( :n lee IIMOi•!. ; all entairtie•ances other than (a) those enumerated in :tie uric policy. if A*. issued for the benefit of the Lender in connection with thus transactisn i••O accepter: ay the lender, and (b) the encumbrances described . . . • e ,...red to as 'Permitted Enc.:mbrances S. :•:•••.r warrants and will breve: defend the title against the lawfu: claims. Permuted Encumbrances. of all persons In the event any action or pr • - eming is cc - merited that questions Grantor's title or the interest of the ader this Deed of Trust. Grantor shall defend the action at Grantor's a: a' se. 8.3 if a Permitted. :..acumbrance .s a lien. Grantor shall pay any ians and do ant acts ne:essary to prevent a default or prevent any action a: conditior. t.- :-. with the !a se of time. the giving of notice. or anyother actier.et a creditor. mild be a default or enable any creditor to declare a default or foreclose any Permitted Encumbrance which is a lien. 9. Condemnation. 91 It " at any part 31 the Property is condemned, the lender may at its electron re:., :e that all :r any portion of the net proceeds el the award be applied cc Indebtedness. The net proceeds of the award shall mean the award ahe: payment of all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys lees necessarily :::•d or incur:id by Grantor and the Lender in connection with the condemn?: 9.2 II proceed' in condemna:ion are filed. Granter shall prorectly take such cc :s as may be necessary to detand the action and obtain the a•••ia:::• Grantor te*::, assigns t: ender the net atoceeds of any condemnatien award ir Impaction of Tax by State. :01i9wing constitute state :axes to which tars oarairape. (a) A spa ::tic tax upon trust deeds or upon all or any pan of the I secured by a deed of trust. 0) A specific tax on the owner of properly covered by a deed of 1 which Ire taxpayer is authorized or required to deduct from on te deed of trust. :cl A lei on premises covered by a deed of trust chargeable the Be - •eliciary under the deed of trust or the holder of the • ..;cureil (4) A st:i :die tax on all *..! any portion of the Indebtedness or on :e.rnents at - .cipal and inte:est made by a Grantor under a deed of :• _It. )0 i* any federal ::ate or local tax to which this paragraph applies is e ailed subs:: Ant to the da:: al this Deed of Trust, this shall nave :re same elle:: es a def ault. sn the Lender may exercise any or alt of , ernedies i:ailable to it .n the event of a default unless the •: 'ring car : •.ons are met: la*, Cr • • ;: may !a ;ay the tar or charge imposed by the tax. or.: (b1 Gra :::x pays or olfi's to pay the tax or charge within 30 s after n:: from the Ler:sr that the lax law has been enacted. 11 Due On Sale Clause. • I; agree: at lender Ma:. at lender's option, declare the entire Indebted immediate • due and pays:le if all or any part of the property. or an inte:c: :::etein. is d. transferred further encumbered, or alienated. II Lende. • • ,,'s the 0:: :, to Orlare r I entire Indebtedness immediately due • ,trantor LeaCe' - ay use any default remedies permit. let u.," •is 1)e liust and under appticabie e'er •. • i part iereis der s rights s under this Due Di St .e t• -• fulthei encumbered. et ahenated whether :: • -.: 1- • exercised !order s rights under this or any other Dee•Or••52'i : I? Security Agreement; Financing Statements. 12 I This instrument shall constitute a security aglee.men: is to respect :a any personal property included within the description of the 12 2 Grantor shall min with the Lender in executing one or mare financing .statements under the Uniform Commercial Code and shalt file te statement a: Gre,ntor's expense in alt public offices where filing is required :o perfect the security interest of the lender in any personal property unoir the Unite:el Commercial Code. 13. Default, The following shall constitute events of default: 13.! Any portion of the Indebtedness is not paid when de 13 2 Failure of Grantor within the time required by this :ss? at 1 res: t: make any payment for taxes, insurance, or mortgage ■nsuranc!:.:miums ef • reserves for such payments or any payment necessary to ore.s7: fitter; cf : • discharge any lien. 13.3 failure of Grantor tr: perform any other cart e• this Dee: :' Trust ivithrn 20 day: after receipt of written notice 1:: tee se:c.'. • ; the failure :3 - !f this Deed of Trust secures a construc::.::. ra,roie :• Grantet or builder or any other person or entity to con.:ty :• :trier r“ . proviso:1 cf any construction !OM agreement executee in ** :::• ca 4:tr. loan within 20 days after receipt of written notice from the Lvder the failure. 13 5 Mau:: in any obheat:on secured by a • t: 'I.; pow; ever ti'.:: Deed or Trust. the commen.:erotr; any p EON( Cfar.:01 al R: - ewer become insolvent. ':e . : in benteuniey, biecme sub;ect of an involuntary oet:tr: in :::). ma ?- assignment for the benefit of creditors. or consent :: roe :• a receiver cm trustee for any portion of the Procerty or a:. : Grantor's or Borrower's assets. 14. Rights and Remedies on Retard:. ' Wen the occurrence of a.'y event of default at any tiree :re Ler.der any one c: ••••••••• r.; - • t *.i710•i•• • Dy nota :• ' • ' cue and rmyacte tSr all of any part of the Inc right t. .:e.ose by judiciat .r Th.2 !.0 ha*:e the Trustee sell the Prr...e • • the Dec' of Putt Ant ot the State et Wine.. eitr: : r tee••:•- Gar Code of tha State of Washington w'•ere a:: *.2:'e : . aection to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee me: irestee's sale. The oower of sate conferred by this Deed o! trust art: r•e .s nct an exclusive remedy and when not exercised ter de• ::. Deed 01 Trust as a T:Igage. The Trustee is r:: ::! : • • z.arli hereto of pending sate under any other deed of tray. ar. .• e•-• In which Grantor. Trustee, or lende.:..shalI -•::: 5,1" 2clicr. preceedieg is brought by the Irus'. : d) Wrth re:;:ect ta all or any part of the Pre:ie• : , e c.., ',1.:;•.:tIc.31 Code. and remedies of a secured par.y :a* c t ".•- tot The iiiht ,..;:rr..ut notice to Grantor P:::ert; cn"e:! rents and profits. incle: !7:i ai•J 3pr,: tvc proceeds. O•lif and In furtherance or ; tig • e :• any tenant et o'er user to make pa!::::::s - e•:: ese •ee: erre:try to the Lender, and payments by such trier :: 1: res:c.rise to its demand shall satisfy the obligation lc: rex, pa -•.5 are made, whether or no'. any proper grounds for the dc existed (f) The right in ccnnection with any legal oroc:::•ngs n na.: few:et appointed to ta'..e possession of any .' f • peiser to protect and preserve the Prueiri. .• :•• pre:ling foreclosure or sale and apply ne:a of receivershio a;1:nSt the iniettx • •• :• bend if permitted :.:y law. Thu am_ b rer.v..V shall exist whether or not apparent vatea at tr.; r•eeie, ai-• • -• the Indebtedness by a substantial amount. ig) Any other right or remedy provided in tms - Diemissory note evidencing the Indebtedness. an 31 under the taw. 1.1.2 to exercising its rights and remedies. the lance: a': sr a free :a 3% or any part of Inc Property together or ier.212'.; • PlOpifli and retrain from selling other ' 1* r: tie bid at any out:.; sale on all or any ocr..:7. •.• 1 ..1 ine Lender shall gre Grantor reasonable nnice : of any pone sale of any personal property or of the lime atter .) :.• sale or other intended disposition of the Properly is to be - ide 7•er,r. notice shalt mean notice given at least ten days be the : - e ct the se': :• disposition. I A waiver by either party of a breach ol a oratiwr :' this ai shall no constitute a waive: of or prejudice the PMI's • int other:0:e demand strict compliance with that provision or are a•Nr 3:r :ie.:* the Ler.le: to pursue any reedy shall not exclude :' •••••:* and an efncuon tj expenditures or take action to perform an obligation of Grantor under the J of Trust alter failure of Grantor to perform shall not affect the Lender's right to declare a default and exercise its remedies under this paragraph 14. 14.5 In the event suit or action is instituted to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust the Lender shall be entitled to recover from Grantor such turn as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and on any - ;peal. All reasonable expenses incurred by the Lender that are necessary at any time in the lender's opinion for the protection of its interest or the enforcement of its rights, including without limitation, the cost of searching records. ,) obtaining title reports, surveyors' reports, attorneys' opinions or title insurance. 0 whether or not any court action is involved, shall become a part of the 1 Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest at the same rate as provided in the note from the date of expenditure until paid. 15. Notice. Any notice under this Deed of Trust shall be in writing and shall be effective 1 TAIL Or Ctit•:@ANk. r Q 1 ss. •ounty of „ ilerwr THIS CERTIFIES that on inns 1 p son a'] /area :lot me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and lot said County and Stale, Inc within named E ( d-M- c�^ M. S , n tiro be the persons named in and who exec led the foregoing i strument and who _ memo er S of the partnership of vnowtodged to me that _____Itte6f--. executed said instrument steely and votuntanly for the purposes and use therein mentioned, on na11 01 said partnership. IN T ESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal the day and year last aoovo written. Before me. • INDI VIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT L w•h( rally delivered or. if mailed. when deposited as re serer, ci mail „veered to the address stated in this Deed of trust r;h ^r pr:. change the address for notices by written notice to the otaer Garr 16. Succession; Terms. 16.1 Subject to the limitations stated in this Deed of trust on Grantor's interest. this Deed of trust shall be binding upon and inure I:, • benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 16.2 In construing this deed of trust the term deed of trust or trust Dt shall encompass the term security agreement when the instrument is h: construed with respect to any personal property. 16.3 Attorneys' fees. "Attorneys fees, • as that term is used in the note a in this Deed of Trust, shall include attorneys' lees, if any, which may be awa': by an appellate cou NE U ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership day of cX-<'- PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT known IO me to be e1u OA-- STATE OF WASITINuTON' 1 l ) u. County of t ' 1 K 'tt\t1sta_� 1 Gtc• On this ail__ day of C.If � kr_s., 19 %��i , bet or me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of W 1SWr '1 -:or,, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 'Tj (irk r ``ll, iM, j:c y r known to be the person __ named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and Who known to e to be member_ of the partnership of . I • acknowledged to me that _he_ signed and sealed the said instrument freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein mention Son t ehalf of said partnership. To Trustee: WITPI my hand and official seal affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. .:.. _ry,r.' f, /5d 1 / Date REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE Notary Public in a d for State of Wsshirrgton i t>• �--- residing at: /a 70a f. e A t r S r tit fAcI (F- 97. 3 The undersigned is the holder of the note or notes secured by this Deed of Trust. Said note or notes, together with all other indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust, have been paid in full. You are hereby directed to cancel said note or notes and this Deed of Trust, which are delivered hereby, and to reconvey, without warranty, all the estate now held by you under this Deed of Trust to the person or persons legally entitled thereto. 8510041180 EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Henry Meader Donation Claim'No. 46, lying within Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: • BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of South 158th Street as the same was originally established, and the centerline of West Valley Highway (SSH 2 -M) ; thence North 7 °40'58" West along centerline of the said West Valley Highway 32.17 feet; thence South 86 °04'17" West 280.13 feet; thence North 7 °40'58" West 20 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence South 7 °40'58" East 20 feet; thence North 86 °04'17" East 220 feet to the Westerly line of said highway; thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of said highway South 7 °40'58" East C ao 109.00 feet; r ..1 thence South 2 °31'16" West 101.61 feet; r4 thence South 7 °40'58" East 285.08 feet; CD • thence leaving said Westerly margin South 86 °04'17" West to the Easterly bank O of the Green River as now established; N thence Westerly and Northerly along said river bank to a point which bears QD Q7 South 86 °04'17" West to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 86 °04'17" East to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion thereof adjoining the Green River, condemned by the State of Washington in King County Superior Court.Cause No. 592029; AND EXCEPT a strip of land 10 feet in width lying Southerly and Southeasterly of and immediately adjoining the excepted portion first above described; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof, described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the centerline of South 158th Street as the same was originally established, and the centerline of West Valley Highway (SSH 2 -M) ; thence North 7 °40'58" West along centerline of the said West Valley Highway 32.17 feet; thence South 86 °04'17" West 60.13 feet to the West margin of said highway; thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of said highway South 7 °40'58" East 109.00 feet; thence South 2 °31'16" West 101.61 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 2 °31'16" East 101.61 feet; thence North 7 °40'58" West 109.00 feet; thence South 86 °4'17" West 220.00 feet; thence North 7 °40'58" West 20.00 feet; ' thence South 86 °04'17" West 43.78 feet; thence South 4° West 191.52 feet; thence South 86° East 290.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. INITIAL • By UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON s'rAT %VAS) tiNGTON County of - - - • .• Beneficiary I certify IMO the w,Irt,n •SItutheht was received ror the record on the day 01 at M. and recorded I in Book on oage . Record ol mortgage-. o! S$� COunly WqmOSS my and seal of County aitixed h Ill 1:(94().tiG nt turev I SS • . income propertj. Finance B P.O. Box i2 A.l hos., .Portliod, OR .7720 . K. Phon Income Property Finance0„0„mem tueuoo 6/44. t . ......••••••••w The undersigned have previously executed and delivered to UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON ( "Bank ") a Deed of Trust (Construction) dated October 1, 1985 . The above Deed of Trust is recorded in Book Page as Instrument No. 85- 10041179 of the records of King County, State of Washington. The undersigned and Bank now wish to amend the Deed of Trust to include the following property in the legal description of the above noted document. 0,2 NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned agree that the following is hereby added to and r4 O made a part of the Deed of Trust: d rf Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of South 158th Street co as the same was originally established, and the centerline of West Valley Highway (SSH 2 -M); thence North 7 ° 40'58" West along centerline of the said West Valley Highway 32.17 feet; thence South 86 ° 04'17" West 60.13 feet to the West margin of'said highway; thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of said highway South 7 ° 40'58" East 109.00 feet; thence South 2 ° 31'16" West 101.61 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 2 East 101.61 feet; thence North 7 ° 40'58" West 109.00 feet; 4:222 E thence South 86 ° 04'17" West 220.00 feet; _ thence North 7`40'58" West 20.00 feet; thence South 86 °04'17" West 43.7.8 feet; thence South 4 °West 191.52 feet; ' thence South 86 ° East 290.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Executed this � day of a /(4.0A ,19 . STATE OF ss County of 17//„(4,,,, AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUF, HEED OF TRUST 1 Fl. FOR RFCCP: .. ='::j 51 2615 4th r,n'si121 lig 60g NENDEL'S TUKW A ASSOCIATES, a Washington gener -1 part a .hip THIS CERTIFIES that on this 1 {t '' day of (2 1i t.; „/ I !k = , personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fir said County and State, the within ram ^d tec(cl,,`Yl. a Washington general partnership and acknowledged to me that he executed said instrument freely and voluntarily for the purposes and use therein mentioned on behalf of Said partnership. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal the day and year last above written. (741 J 21 -) e ? /70( � / M cor:raission expires: lltril /, /% "2 tary Public fof vz�rtw�w: r,_ i;: m. :e.:.......«..wn...,....arnsa.s rc'bZY:.':.:e•1' :aa.:c.<;.a... t�. ,.n.k,mw CV CV ' 00 O 0 CO I ss. j THIS CERTIFIES That on IhiS g t7-1 day of Of J -er I oero.e me he undersigned, a Notary Public io and for said County and State. Ine within named - - /M . C�'�/I�il� .nowr 10 e oe the person._ name° r....... ul the IN goi 9 inslr ment and who r� L' emoer ,, of the partnership of /l/Q . _ ickno Tlodged to me that _�Tte _ executed said instrument heel" and voluntarily for the purposes and use therein mentioned, on renall of said partnership. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my IIa;J and notarial seal the day alto year last above written. Before me: Notary P ro:--aeasQn qty co•.um,•.:,cr...�... • 9 natty app red known to me t0 be AMENDMENT TO DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES t 2E ; ;TS NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON ( "Bank ") a Deed of Trust dated day of (WAI7c■ , 19QS 2615 41n A',i!IUi. Mil I,A yE.:2I n16 The undersigned have previously executed and delivered to UNITED STATES October 1, 1985 and an Assignment of Leases and Rents dated October 1, 1985 The Deed of Trust is recorded in Book , Page as Instrument No. 85- 10041180 and the Assignment of Leases and Rents is recorded in Book , Page as Instrument No. 85- 10041181 of the records M C 1 of King County, State of Washington. 00 CD The undersigned and Bank now wish to amend the Deed of Trust and the T4 Assignment of Leases and Rents to include the following property in the a3 legal description of the above noted documents. NOW, THEREFORE, the under- signed agree that the following is hereby added to and made a part of the Deed of Trust and the Assignment of Leases and Rents: Commencing at•the intersection of the centerline of South 158th Street as the same was originally established, and the centerline of West Valley Highway (SSH 2 -P1); thence North 7 ° 40'58" West along centerline of the said West Valley Highway 32.17 feet; thence South 86 ° 04'17" West 60.13 feet to the West margin of said highway; thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of said highway South 7 ° 40'58" East 109.00 feet; thence South 2 ° 31'16" West 101.61 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 2 ° 31'16" East 101.61 feet; thence North 7 ° 40'58" West 109.00 feet; :r7 4:::2 r thence South 86°04'17" West 220.00 feet; thence North 7 West 20.00 feet' CAS1:::L thence South 86 ° 04'17" West 43.78 feet; thence South 4 ° West 191.52 feet: thence South 86 ° East 290.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. NENDEL'S TUKWIIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general part hip �fC THIS CERTIFIES that on this / day of O n •.( , (cits personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, the within named rerld.c N, .1 4k ,_. known to me to be the person I of the partnership of NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES a Washington general partnership and acknowledged to me that he executed sa instrument `reely and voluntarily for the purposes and use therein mentioned on behalf of said nartnershin. IN TESTIONY I!IIEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal the day and year last above written. � 1 e u . ' � gc�rfr y yf _ 1 NoaryPub My commission expires: ttc, ,i '/, KW/ PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF before me undersigned, a V.otaiy Publr in and for said County and State, the wltnin named know rf,lo rrf to be the person._,S._ named in and ho eaecule. me lore. 9 instr eni and who member_5 of me partnership of 1 �_.. • a.knowledged to me That _the 14_ executed said instrument freely and votuntafrly Tor the purposes and use Therein mentioned. on WHEREOF. 1 have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal the day and year last above written. Notary Pu re for &croon My COmfn.SSron CapneS; known 10 me to be 8610161206 AM[NOMENT TO CONSTRUCTION DEED OF TRUST - WASHINGTON This instrument amends that certain Construction Deed,of Trust - Washington dated October 1, 1985, recorded October 4, 1985 as instru- ment no: 8510041179...and amended by-Amendment dated October 1985' and ' recorded October 8, 1985 as instrument no. 8510081222. The Construction Feed of Trust was executed by Nendel's Tukwila Associates a Washington general nartnershio in favor of United States National Bank of Oregon ( "Bank ") as beneficiary and covers the real property described, in attached Exhibit A. The Construction Deed of Trust described above is hereby amended to reflect that Bank has extended'an additional principal advance to Nendel's Tukwila Associates, a Washington general partnership in the amount of $400,000.00 as evidenced by a Real Estate Note - Construction Loan dated October 7, 1986, said note being in the principal amount of $8,500,000.00, which represents a renewal of the original note in the amount of $8,100,000.00 plus the new advance of $400,000.00. The final payment on said note'is due December 31, 1986. The parties: hereby agree that all sums owed and owing under said $8,500,000.00 note are fully secured by the above descibed Construction Deed of Trust. Except as provided above all of the terms and conditions of the above Construction Deed of Trust remain in full force and effect. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BA'!K NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, a OF OREGON Washington ,.•eral partnership, ��y By, D` L C ,.. .1 , V 1 ' /t9 /L1 'tom DANI A. GOODRICH ' L date Assistant Vice president United States National Bank of Oregon 1 1 1 - wiIEt4 CE ' EBERT JO 0 to date 8706121529 AMENDMENT TO DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS /late PAGE I OF UNITsi TATES NATIONAI ANK ' F OREGON NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. a Washington General Partnership This instrument amends that certain Deed of Trust dated October 1, 1985, recorded October 4, 1985, instrument no. 8510041180, and also that certain Assignment of Leases and Rents dated October 4, 1985, .recorded October 4, 1985. instrument no. 8510041181, both amended by Amendment dated October 7, 1985, recorded October 8, 1985 instrument no. 8510081223. The Deed of Trust and Assignment of Leases and Rents were executed by NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, a Washington General Partnership, in favor of UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON ( "Bank ") as beneficiary and covers the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ". Concurrently, the Deed of Trust and Assignment of Leses and Rents described above are hereby amended to reflect that the Bank has extended an Additional Principal Advance to NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, a Washington General Partnership in the amount of 5400,000.00 as evidenced by a new Real Estate Note Variable Interest Rate ,/dated jine J. 1987 • said Note being in the principal amount of 58,500.000.00, which represents a renewal • of the original Note in the amount of 58,100,000.00, plus the new advance 5400,000.00. The final payment on said Note is due June 1. 2002. The parties hereby all agree that all sums owed and owing under said S8.500,000.00 Note are fully secured by the above described Deed of Trust. Except as provided above, all of the terms and conditions of the above Deed of Trust and Assignment of Leases and Rents remain in full force and effect. . Dahl. Partner e M. Ebert, Representative f the Estate of T.E. Oahl STATE OF OREGON ) II ) ss. County ofJ�,h'1inn ) THIS CERTIFIES that on this Q9 day of �. personally appeared before me, the undeaigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, the within named TE OF !{/a', ) ss NTY OF Before me: Before me: Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: Notary Public for G2i C., 1(y commission expires: 1k7i .67s.9 !'AGE 2 OF 2 known to me to be the person named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and who _.ems known to me to be a member of the partnership of �� 4s - T4,1„,71, F�n�wc._l7 acknowledged to me that he executed said instrument freely and voluntarily for the purposes and use therein mentioned on behalf of said partnership. • IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and notar_al seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public or 0•egon My commission expires : Q,/ J z i t /y 6"' /". State of ) ss. County of On this day of "19 personally appeared to me who, being duly sworn, did say that he is the attorney in fact for and that executed the foregoing instrument by authority of and in behalf of said principal; and acknowledged said instrument to be the act and deed of said principal. THIS CERTIFIES that on this 'J day of �c� „ L r , 19 P;7, sonally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Not�hy P in and for Tall my and State. the within named .�oyee ^I. />'6cs.r F /,r ancL ar vi” erne / rep u,r•i u4 Te; ,t7f �/ ^ '�e6+.%4�r', .(0,-is QF w/iu 4 r a'C „.,/ awn to me to F ,.ap:; -ru.. of t..�.'y,;. ; ' ..:+° =h. of A'47...' ..,e /.i .T��...-f./., c: _. .. /Xt -p G/w fer• and acknowledged to me that h'e • cuted said instrument freely and volunca„i.ly for the purposes and use therein tioned on behalf of said partnership.- t IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have heteuntc set=nWy :h1nd and notarial seal the day year last above written. — TAN -21 -1993 17:17 FROM TA TITLE — RECEPTIONST TO 96227485 P.02 EX SE TAXHOT REWIRED EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS (GRANT OF EASEMENTS) WHEREAs. NENBEW S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, a partnership. (hereinafter referred to es 'Mendel's') is the owner of reel property located in the City of Tukwila. King County. Washington. the legal description of which is es follows, (said property hereinafter referred to o9 the 'Nendel's' property), to -wits That portion of Henry Neoder Donation Claim No. 46 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, N.N., king County. Washington• beginning at a point 32.:7 ft. North of the intersection of the monumented line of State Rood 181. being 72 ft. WeatetlY. anasured at right angles to the Easterly margin of said State Road 181 Right - of -Way, with the monumented line of South 158th Street, being 28 ft. South. measured at right angles to the Northerly Right- of -Wey line of said South 15801 St., thence S 86 -04-17 w 280.13 ft.. thence N 7 -40 -58 W 20 ft. to the Point of Beginning. From the Point of Beginning proceed 8- 7 -60 -Sd E 20 ft., thence s N- 86 -04-17 E to the West Margin of State Highway 181 (also known as West Valley Highway) Right of Way, thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of the Right -of -Way, thence Southerly along the Westerly margin of the Right -of -Way 495.69 ft., thence S 86 -0t- 17 W to the Easterly Bank of the Green River. thence along the Cr: Bank of the Green River Westerly and then Northerly to a point which hears S 86 -04-17 1( approximately 458 ft. from the Point of Beginning. thence N 86 -04 -17 E to the Point of eeginninq. EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in Superior Court Cause No. 5920291 and EXCEPT the Southeasterly 10 ft, in width adjacent to the Above Cause No. 592029; situated in King County. State of Washington, and WHEREAS. HELEN B. NELSEN, a single person (hereinafter re- ferred to a 'Nelsen') is the owner of real property located'in City of Tukwila. King County, Washington. contiguous to the *Kendal's' property described above, on the North end the West. the legal description of which is as follows. (said property hereinafter referred to as the - Nelsen - property) to -wit. That portion of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46 in S ection 24, Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.N.. king County. Washington, beginning et the intersection of the monumented line ^' dote Road lol (nlao known as west Valley Highway) being 72 ft. W.'iterly, measured of right angles to the Easterly margin of said ...etc Road Right -of -Way, with the monumented Line of South 158th St.. bring 28 ft. South, measured at right angles to the Northerly Right -ot -Way line of said South 158th St.. •thence Northerly along .the mn.•nmentnn line n( ...id Stet= Highway 1E1 2:.:7 ft., thence. S 86 -04-17 W 60.13 ft. to the West margin of the Sidle Wigl.way 187-- Right -of -Way .ine, which is the Point of Beginning. From the Point of Beginning proceed 5 86 -04 -17 W 220 ft.. thence N 7 - 40 -58 W 20 ft., thence S 86 -04-17 W approximately 458 ft. to the East Bonk of the Green fiver. thence Northerly along the East Bank to a point that bears S 85- 21 -00 -W from a point on the monumented line of the said State HiglIwrY 181 thrt is 261.51 Page One 2 , (4 .4♦ COMM a 1 I 1 • • JAN -21 -1993 17:18 FROM TA TITLE— RECEPTIONST 9111260669 ft. North from the intersection of the monumented lines of State Highway 181 and S. 188th St., which intersection is mentioned in the paragraph above. thence N 85- 21 -O0 -E to the Westerly margin of State Highway 181 Right -of -Way which is 78 ft. West of the monumented line of State Highway 181. thence Southerly along the west margin of the Right -of -Nay approximately 233 ft. to the Point of Beginning. EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in Superior COUrt Cause No. 5920294 situated in King County. State of Washington. and WHEREAS. 'Nendel's' desires to obtain an easeeunt on a portion of the 'Nelsen' property for landscaping purposes. and 'Nelsen' desires to obtain an easement on a portion of the 'Mender's* property for purposes of ingress and egress as well as three (3) access points into the 'gendel's' property. and WHEREAS. 'Nelsen' caused to be prepared by Kenneth J. Oyler C.E..8.L.S.. a certain map, bearing t:1 date of April 29. 1989, designated 'Helen u. Nelsen Hoag Tree!" (Job Mo. 89009). drawn to scale. showing portions of the 'Mender's' and 'Nelsen' properties relative to the easements the subject of this instrument. a copy p, of which is attached hereto. marked Exhibit 'A' and thereby made a pert hereof. NOW THEREFORE. in consideration of the exchange of easements, hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto ouch• specifically grant CT) the following easements - ono to the other, to -wit. 1. HELEN B. NELSEN. a single person. bareby grants Unto NENOEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. A PARTNERSHIP. en easement for land- seeping purposes in and upon the easterly tan (10) feet of the eforedescribed 'Nelsen' property es it abuts the westerly boundary Of the eforecescribed 'Nendel's' property. all as shown in red on attached Exhibit 'A'. being Ten (10) feet in width and extending in length Two Hundred Twenty Five (225) feet in 1.npth, more or 1- conteinlny 2.252 square feet. more or less, legally described follows. Thwt pnrt4nn of mammy wader 'DonrtSOf. Clam Y.o. 46 in Sectiwl 24, Township, 23 North, Range 4.Eost. W.N., King County. Washington. commencing at the "interseetion of line of State Road No. 181, being 72 feet Westerly, measured at right angle to the Easterly margin of said State Road with the monUmented line Of South 158th Street being 28 feet South. measured at a right angle to the Northerly Right -of -Way line of said South 158th Street, said intersection being represented by a punched railroad spite. From this point continuo North 7 41'30' West along said • monumented line of State Rood Ho. 181 a distance of 32.17 feet. Page Tvo 96227485 P.03 TAN -21 -1993 17 :18 FROM TA TITLE- RECEPTIONST 0 0 Page Three TO 96227485 P.04 thence South 86 Weet 2e0.13 feet. thence North 7•40'58" West 20 feet. thence South 86.04'I7' West approxiasatsly 369.63 feet to the Easterly border of the portion condemned in Superior Court Cause No. 592029, this point being the true point of beginning and the end of the line designated as A. which is the border between Helen 8. Nelsen'e property to the North and Handel Inn's property to the South. From this true Point of beginning continue South 21' 27' 39' west along the Easterly border of the portion condemned in Superior Court Cause No. 592029 approximately 225 feet to the Existing Concrete Right -of -way Harker. thence at a right angle 10 feet to the East. thence approximately 225.4 feet North 21' 27' 3^' Bast to the line designated 'A' above. thence approximately 10.4 feet Westerly along Line 'A" t0 the point of beginning. A. Grantee. "Handel's% may retain and aeintaih the existing curbing /paving within said easement area presently used for parking in connection with the use of the aforedsscribed 'Hendei'a" property. 6. This easement than run with the land, the aforedescrib•d "Nendel's "'property. which is the dominant estates and shall be a servitude upon the aforedescribed "Nelsen* property. which is the setvient estate. II. NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. A PARTNERSHIP. hereby grants unto HELEN O. NrLSEN, a single person. a non - exclusive easement for ingress and egress to end from the eforedescribed "Nelsen" Property. over and upon the aforedescribed "lsendel's' property. specifically over and upon the existing hard surface area (driveway) lying Immediately south of the existing curbing. along the Northern boundary of the 'Nendel's' property. a distance of Five Hundred Ninety Eight (5981 feet. more or less. The easement hereby granted is thirty (30) feet in width. A. The access to and from the 'Wendel's" aforedeseribed property from the easement area shell be limited to the Three (3) access points, each Twenty (201 lett in width. identified on attached .,...lest "A' as proposed access points 1. 2 and 3. and shown thereon in yellow, to - vita ACCT. S roLN? NO. i - - - Com One Hundred Tweety (120) feet, more or less. West of the Northeast corner of the Afars described 'Mendel's' property. in a line directly south of the center line of the existing South to North arivawey to the residence on the afredescribed 'Nelsen' property. �y 32) THN -21 -1993 17 19 FROM TAN -21 -1993 1.7:19 FR0t9 NENDEL•S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. A PARTNERSHIP ByJS ERRY s. moo E. TRUSTEE FOR T.M. +. PARTNE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING .' UUY J. f llli, ER au:AM fUBIIC '47 STATE OF WASHING ) ss. COUNTY OF StNMUltUa$ 1 TA T I TLE—RECEPT I ONST O 0 i TO DATED this day of October, 1991. • HELEN n. N6 EN ) SS. 4e T , . A PARTNER On this day personally appeared before as HELEN D. NELSEN to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand end official seal this /i day of October. 1991. ARV PU for the State of WlJl in7to . residing at . My Commission expires 7/01/92. STATE OF OREGON ) ) es. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SHERRY S. MOORE. TRUSTEE OF T.M. TRUST. a partner in NENDEI. TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. A PARTNERSHIP. signed this instrument, and on oath stated that'she is authorized to'execute the instrument for and. _. on behalf of said Partnership. and that such execution was the free and voluntary set and deed of said Partner. for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. GIVEN under ay hand and official seal this 40Y 01 -October,. 1991. • NOTARY) l3i)RLIC 3�ind T ar tee State of Oregon. residing et filira.Or My Commission expires Page Five I certify that I krow or, have satisfactory evidence that PA1 1CK GARRITY'. A PARTNER' IN MENDEL'S' TUKWILA ASSOCIATES. A PARTNERSHIP. signed this instrument. and on oath stated that he 96227485 P.O6 :• STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) rr: (:•;•. ^ "1. +.. .., s..'.:C:T..�.^.^i�Y r..y..,.rsr.,. +n ..a.r..unne.nf nnwNwnr>ni•±•.� JAN -21 -1993 17:20 FROM TA TITLE- RECEPTIONST TO O O is authorized to execute the instrument for and on behalf of said Partnership. and that such execution wee .the free and voluntary act and dead of said Partner. for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this l day of Serene., 1992. NOVetn(tr -kcc Lo/- e ` pLo NOTARY Y PU8I.. i2 eitd or V : ;a.: fxJ t.�ar.:s:.'ntY+,.vMUa:ve.n. 96227485 P.07 the State of shin on. • residing at My Cowisaian expires 1(� 1 •qJ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JOYCE E86AT, A PARTNER IN MENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, signed this instrument, end on oath stetad that she is authorized to execute the instrument for snd on behalf of said Partnership. and that such execution was the free and voluntary act and deed of Mid Partner. for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. GIVEN w .j ider ny hand and official seal this d ay of November 1991. NOTART7 U4f 1C the Stets of or residing at My Cossissio Pegs Six expires .11 . • • • • • TOTAL P.07 • • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the April 24, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Knudson called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m. Other com- missioners present were Mr. Coplen, Mr. Sowinski, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Kirsop, and Mr. Larson. Representing staff were Moira Bradshaw and Becky Kent, Planning Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING A. 86 -16 -SPE: Nendels Tukwila Associates, requesting approval of a cooperative parking facility for a proposed office building and 151 room hotel with associated conference center and restaurant in the southwestern corner of the intersection of S. 158th Street and West Valley Highway. Ms. Bradshaw summarized the staff report and recommended the Commission continue the item to allow the applicant time to provide more information. John Cheney, architect, 303 Vera Street, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, requested guidelines and thought from the Commission regarding the cooperative parking agreement proposal. Ted Dahl, developer, 2230 Rucker Avenue, Everett, WA 98201, indicated their concern as a developer to provide adequate parking for the facility. Chairman Knudson closed the public hearing. MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO CONTINUE APPLICATION 86 -16 -SPE TO THE NEXT MEETING OR UNTIL THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 24, 1986 Page 2 The Board discussed roof treatment of the building. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW A. 85- 35 -DR: Nendels Tukwila Associates, requesting approval of ele- vations and site plan for the associated restaurant of the 151 room hotel and conference center at the southwestern corner of the intersection of S. 158th Street and West Valley Highway. Ms. Bradshaw summarized the staff report, eliminating staff's recommen- dation 1 due to submission of a revised site plan showing compliance with the recommendation. John Cheney, architect, 303 Vera Street, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, described the proposed restaurant and sitelines for pedestrians and motorists of the garden room roof treatment. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO ACCEPT THE REVISION TO THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED FOR APPLICATION 85- 35 -DR, WITH THE FINDING THAT THE ARCHITECT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED THE CHANGE OF ELEVATION AND ROOF TREATMENT. MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B. 86- 13- SMP /DR: Segale, Mario A. Segale requesting Board of Architectural Review and approval of a two story building on the southeast corner of the intersection of S. 180th Street and Andover Park West. Ms. Bradshaw summarized the staff report noting that the applicant has pro- posed changes to the site plan which would affect recommendation 1. Ann Nichols, Segale Business Park, 18010 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188, presented a revised site plan (Exhibit E), landscape plan (Exhibit F) photograph of a similar building (Exhibit H), and a photograph of light standards (Exhibit G). She described the lighting and lighting fixtures, and submitted a letter to staff regarding easements. She also discussed the proposed motor bank structure. The Board discussed lighting and traffic circulation. MR. LARSON MOVED TO ACCEPT APPLICATION 86- 13- SMP /DR, ACCEPTING STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. REVISION OF SITE PLAN TO INDICATE A LOADING SPACE. 2. PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE TO CHRISTIAN GREENBELT TRAIL ON S. 180TH STREET. 3. ELEVATIONS OF LIGHTING STANDARDS FOR BUILDING AND PARKING LOT. . is ,:, ,.... .:.,_. ,....- .,..,, .:... :_... -� �,._._..._. ...:�:,....:...... _ .. ,- �,,,, :...:.... „_.v. .. __. ..... ... .,...i r... �.:. ..,�........r.,.. . v . .. CI T Y OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PL ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 85- 35 -DR: Nendels INTRODUCTION At the December 19, 1985 Planning Commission meeting, Staff presented a revised east elevation of the proposed Nendels Motor Inn. A building permit was being requested for the development without the restaurant as was initially proposed. The developer explained that the floor plan for the restaurant was not finalized but that plans and actual development of the restaurant were imminent. Plans for a building permit for the restaurant have now been submitted and involve modifica- tions and elevations not presented during the first review of the proposal. FINDINGS 1. Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approval of the revised elevations for the restaurant portion of the development is being requested. 2. The BAR shall use the guidelines of TMC 18.60.050 in its decision - making. 3. Exhibit A shows the elevations the BAR reviewed at their September 1985 meeting. 4. Exhibit C and D are the revised elevations which consist of north, east and south elevations. 5. The restaurant is surrounded on the north and east sides by a boldly fluted concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall with split face trim. Cedar bevel siding, stained a pastel gray color is shown as originally approved. The addition of asphalt shingles over a portion on the east elevation has been added. 6. Required parking for the restaurant is being developed in the northeast por- tion of the lot and is shown on Exhibit D. 7. The footprint of the restaurant has changed slightly along the east side. The center portion of the building's east wall is stepped out in a convex manner. Whereas the original plan showed an indentation occurring in the same section. The elevation of this convex section shows that the roof is sloped rather than flat and finished with asphalt shingles. 8. The dominate horizontal banding used at the approximate roof line of the first floor has been increased in depth from top to bottom creating a heavier and more massive element. 85- 35 -DR: Nendels �r April 24, 1986 Paget 3. TMC 18.60.050(3) Landscape and Site Treatment. 10. The shoreline permit and SEPA determination issued considered the impacts of development of the restaurant as an integral part of the total project. CONCLUSIONS 1. TMC 18.60.050(1) Relationship of Structure to Site. The revised plans show that required parking will be located in the northeast portion of the site that had previously been shown as reserved for future development. The front yard landscaping will be maintained along the entire frontage with additional landscaping on the internal islands. The original location and height of the restaurant remains unchanged. 2. TMC 18.60.050(2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining areas remains relatively unchanged. Access onto the site and circulation remains the same as well as loading facilities and pedestrian circulation. Landscaping will be altered slightly with the development of parking in an area formerly designated for future development and the altered placement of the garden wall on the east side. 9. A south elevation of the restaurant was previously not available but does con- form with the approved footprint and building materials. On the site plan, the service alley is, located in the basement level of the restaurant and is located below the elevation of the dike. The parking provided in front of the restaurant on the site plan does not have sufficient overhang depth between the stall and garden wall and the site plan should be altered to provide sufficient space. The overhang of the parking stalls which abut the required ten (10) foot front yard landscape strip must also be altered to provide two and a half feet of overhang outside the ten foot landscape requirement. 4. TMC 18.60.050(4) Building Design. The proposed sloping roofline over the garden dining area does not relate well to the flat roof or to the horizontal lines and banding used throughout the development. The intent of the variation appears to be for the incor poration of skylights, but the sloping roof with asphalt shingles breaks up the hori- zontal banding that is thematic to the proposal. An alternate solution and /or roof material that maintains variety of form and is more in harmony with the building's design is recommended. 5. TMC 18.60.050(5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. ". �,'.; ut^ �; i,; i``: TO: xu• ,.�.,...,........,...., »_.:.,v. ,. aur_r.r. r .85-35-DR: Nendels April 24, 1986 Page 3 (21 /PC.NENDEL) EXHIBITS A. Original Elevations B. North and East Elevations C. North, East, South Elevations D. Revised Site Plan rr•',, +rro w.n.m...•n.mr•n : rnr/11%. sSY4YR;]uan .teuv.n.mw mwsceusamn41v11=5T e No miscellaneous structures or street furniture have been shown. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the staff recommends approval sub- ject to the following conditions. 1. Revision of the site plan to show minimum 10 feet front yard landscape area without overhangs and minimum overhang depth between parking stalls and garden wall. 2. Revision of garden dining area roof treatment that is in harmony with the overall design scheme. RESTAURANT EAST ELEVATION Motet Inn entry • RESTAURANT NORTH ELEVATION 1 =1� =El J 1111`211111111111111 h:,: MOTOR INN SOUTH ELEVATION MOTOR INN NORTH ELEVATION DC7 MOTOR INN WEST ELEVATION n IJC=J T / l f_ j'! ►� �IdVA SGt_S iif •I o f1— i P1= 11�11 � - F gift trint INKY TUKWILA , WA. THE CHENEY /PAGE ARCHITECTS le, 1 err vEILN 0.1 LSr: 11I1.13To\ 7 v F Raataurent South •ta.atlon not shown ,'d o I z t0 1 ° 1'1 1 ' ! ._ ... eLLMATioN> pu■LD.1ci sccriou 0 • A New Restaurant for Tukwila Associates at Rend*, , LA.W& I I, / 1 111111 kk 194419 • a 0 0 0 rD O l J I The Cheney /Page Architects I ]W 1110 • MII 1101M4301 [ Y».t, M » 11039 I.11039 I7ol,a1l•.til EX 14 I B lT 1»"1» tom uunou 1 7 caul t. 1 0 (7‘ 1 II! 1 -0 0 2 MI.Eva-rrocis .uh row 5c1ILoULL 0 r, A New Restaurant for Tukwila Associates at ./Plide6 ,,uoroximti TUKWILA • WA. The Cheney/Page Architects j MIA WM 1111114 MOW SIMON, WA 11373 11011330IUi • EXHIBIT C 11.111.1.11111011 rti) \ ' 1\ 11 • P'- .$ ,LN/ a • ;0? • ' ' ••••., .■•••••••••■••••■• . , . '•'•-• 7 .1 ,4.■ r . If r.. : , ! I . I 1 , c I '. ,,, I..1 . .11: 1, ..1 • , . ; A 4 ' ' . • I • I l I r , i I I ..j ' IP :1 . ■ ..101 , . . ' . I t . • .1 I • • 4 , ( % 11,i' - CI , • - •I • • ! ,- , , ' . •_ 1. c .. , c „... 111 Seri4cr . 1 ,,, r tar ! ...\ , i ( , 1 • • / ' 1 1 , .... , 1 . : . , ..: i. L. ;._ _ __J .,• it 17 e i 1 1 1 ' 1 1 -...• • ifi ' 1 _ 'hit' ki i • . i i j 1 " 1 t i 1 , . i 4 1 • ' liffil..-.; I 'i .., 1 1 l' " 54.-;:. th 1 ' • 1 > I \: • I j 71 ?•.; ci,..r.ir ' 1 i 1 I / H ye.' 1 1 ''' t •-! l. • •1i . ■ ' 1 1: . : ' ... i 4.k.. • .! se 0 e. ':''Hri; 1 I; !, f I . Ci" • '' it ; 1 r — 1•• 1 I ..4••: ' ''t - ...... - 74;• - • , ., • ! , . a l , 110i 1 L E . I:: 1 I_L[ I :T‘ • 1 \ Li • , i i .. 0 .. ... 4) H. . 1 4 ' • 'e Pt • 1 f „1, , ...,P , . , . . '.. I . d • , r ..;,.. ,..... 1 ! i - .I... 1 , 1 .6 .4 ."TI I. 1..1.15 1 . 1 , i1 .. ''. : i : ......... :. , . ....„.et..._•••'• 1 :.:•La,.. . , 1 - • , : , . ' 1 , .o.......i! : ■) fi , • •1 , ..... - 1 • • • • i — • , • , • ,., ...... ..,... i . A • ; , ,1 IN ■11.4 i!ol 1 I ' 1 111 I . 12 . aff , I ,,:t I I I • . r i es.1011 ' I . f - • - - • • I • ' 19 1 g .c • I -- •• 11 I r; I L I 1. 111A ) 1 \ - - ' 1 4 t ilur.‘,L'i i I .. ,..1 111111 ti ] (1 1 1 L. ti ,.... :_i i 1 ,,, , t . . ,• I . i .. . . 1, 3 v . 7 u• ■ 1 r...1 i 1 I L • , , 1,. ,., fi I • . • X 4. ' tt ' ... I : I ■ g *t.......s=4: — .: gr ‘ ' 1- . ` \ it j I • ;•(.1,,1 . i 1 ', ta;•":" 41\ „ . `, IV :, ., if • , • .____,1_ 1 . - - ' - . U •-'-' Si 101,91 • 211 4 • 0 , • • • . • `b• adfi lt • .• • to,1•11.0.1 • " EXHI6 -. ma t I! 15 6ITe. ri-Arr, A New Rialaurant for Tukwila Associates al . .., 0 1 G I • .8end66 ' ,••:,,- ..' , • um • .••••• WA. -. ' • 14 6" *hrrilti ( 1 ila URA 111■111 The Cheney/Page Architects j b . ‘ Va" ; ... ..........7 • ....4 .. g i r l.41°. b.''.' 111,1PHONI , • '..''. :: .. • 1 : . ...i..1 .1.1.1......4.1.. 1 r....:... ..■ ... 11041 830. M. I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 24th day of April, 1986, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: City � of Tukwila ��. �������y���� 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433°1800 Gary L. vanDusen, mayor Notice of Public Hearing and Meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission Public Hearings delsTukwil'aAsSoci4t6s� requesting approval of a cooperative parking facility for a proposed office building and 151 room hotel with associated conference center and restaurant in the southwestern corner of the intersection of S. 158th Street and West Valley Highway. Public Meetings • 86-13-SMP,DR: Segale, Mario A. Segale requesting Board of Architectural Review and approval of a two story building on the southeast corner of the intersection of S. 180th Street and Andover Park West. 86-14-DR: Tukwila Heights Apartments, Dominion Developments, Inc. requesting Board of Architectural Review and approval of a 66 unit apartment complex on the south side of S. 152nd Street at its eastern terminus. 85-35-DR: Nendels Tukwila.`�Assbci•ates* requesting approval of elevations and site plan for the associated restaurant of the 131 room hotel and conference center at the southwestern corner of the intersection of S. 158th Street and West Valley Highway. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, April 13, 1986 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners/Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, Files i 'l'i : '� ve e .� ., '.ki'r.:•a. Sincerely, 0 • Gentlemen: marix ECY 050-1-30(a) Rev. 11/81 • November 18, 1985' ; • Nendels Motor Inn,. c/o R.W. Thorpe dc ' . ssociat 1300 Alaska Bldg. .. . Seattle, OVA. .98104 inda' S. Rankin Permit Coordinator Shorelands Division ' cc: City of Tukwila ti i•.Sr .. .G.'..'''��` � %1;: 1 ti�'�� �;: °d.2S;'ic;h;.r��.'!:•. .�• •K,- 1..0'�:¢:•iq;:,k�;ti4�:fz''ti rn t, "" `ib ?y•, ° - 7 hit'n:Fr?t ��- 17�i'% . -... pit i %., tNv�S.'N1�t3.:).w'",. .. ,: .r di.,�:�i� L iTitr% il: Al•:-:; i.:: trtk :;`:':n::�:'a,.t"a ".Gi;l::.; iSfi??.k'1i.? • , • sTAn Ci wAtINGN3N • . DEPARTMENT QF ECOLOGY I1Rt1 • OM* Wahtgar MOO NPr saes Inc. • II 1 .. : '. COUNTY: King • APPLICANT: Nendels Motor. Inn ' REVISED SMA PERMIT 6NCX None on application The subject Revised Shoreline Substantial Development Permit was received by this office on October 28, 1985. The review period the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will terminate fifteen (15) days from the above date of receipt. Construction pursuant to the revised permit may proceed during the review period provided that all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. .• • • •1 October 23, 1985 Linda S. Rankin Permit Coordinator Department of Ecology Shorelands Division PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Shoreline Management Permit #N59O -14 -1361 Dear Ms. Rankin: Attached are the plans for a revision to an existing shoreline permit. I would like to address a few concerns that were raised during the environ- mental review for the Nendels project by the Department of Ecology. The first comment referred to the height of the structure. The original SMP was issued for a structure totaling eight stories. The revised plans will be for a three story hotel averaging thirty feet and four stair towers rising to forty -two feet. The second comment referred to public access to the shoreline. Unfortunately, the original owner of the property has placed several cove- nants on the property that restrict public access or trail easements. Please refer to the letter addressed to Brad Collins from John Dobson dated July 20, 1982. Our attorney has advised us that the only alternative for the City to implement its policy of obtaining trail easements is to exercise its right to condemn the shoreline needed and pay a fair market value for it. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 433 -1848. Sincerely, Moira Carr Bradshaw Assistant Planner (RANKIN) (1B) cc: Planning Director File City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard t Tukwila Washington 98188 433.1800 Gary L Van0usen, Mayor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433.1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor October 15, 1985 T. E. Dahl Nendels Tukwila Associates 2230 Rucker Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Re: Shoreline Management Permit #N- 590 -14 -1361 and 85 -35 -DR Dear Mr. Dahl: ,c .� � � ��•::'l. ^'.".�.1!.�R:: x! 'lS "r3;... f<'rSY �t .I. t.w tra �.. w.�� The City has extended the time period for commencing construction under the shorelines permit to January 1, 1987, pursuant to WAC 173.14.060(1). This should provide sufficient time to secure the required permit revision from the Department of Ecology, the necessary building and construction permits, and the completion of contracts. The conditions of the shorelines permit shall be: 1. Rip rap of dike along shoreline. 2. Geotechnical engineers providing inspection of site before and during construction. Please be aware that WAC 173.14.020(2) requires completion of the project by January 1, 1988 and you and your project will be subject to the con- ditions of the Shoreline Management Permit, Mitigated Determination of Significance (EPIC 286 -85) and site, elevation and landscape plans as approved by the Board of Architectural Review. With reference to Board of Architechtural approval, the Board met on September 26, 1985 to review your proposal. The plans were approved sub- ject to the following amended conditions from the staff report: 1. Loading and service areas must comply with TMC 18.51 and 18.56. 2. Luminaire designs must conform to architect's rendering as sub- mitted to the Board at its meeting. Condition #3 was dropped from the staff report. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 433 -1848. Sincerely 4 /ks (NENDELS) (1B) ea Moira Carr Bradshaw Assistant Planner cc: Planning Director Building Official Department of Ecology File' CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS INTRODUCTION Nendels Tukwila Associates propose to construct a three story, 151 room motel with a 9,635 square foot conference center, an 8,000 square foot restaurant, and a swimming pool, along the Green River Shoreline at approximately the southwest corner of West Valley Highway and South 158th Street. Approximately 30,807 square feet in the northeast corner of the site is shown reserved for future development. The type of land use and schedule of development is not known at this time. In 1982, the site was the subject of a Shorelines Management Permit application for the Tukwila Hilton Hotel, (eight stories, 274 units). An Environmental Impact Statement was prepared, and based on proposed impact mitigation strategies, Shorelines Permit #N 590 -14 -1361 was issued. By 1984, construction on the Tukwila Hilton Hotel had not begun and a proposal for a four story, 254 unit Hampton Inn Hotel was submitted. Due to the similarity in use and site plans, the city approved the revisions to the original shoreline permit and extended the time period for commencing construction from January 1, 1985, to January 1, 1987, pur- suant to WAC 173.14.060(1). Per WAC 173.14.060(2), completion of the project is required by January 1, 1988. In both previous hotel proposals, the applicant underwent Board of Architectural Review (BAR) review and approval. Regarding the current application by Nendels, should the proposal receive BAR approval, the City will revise the Shorelines Permit to reflect the proposed deve- lopment and the conditions of its environmental review. FINDINGS 1. The proposed development lies within two hundred feet of the mean high water line of the Green River. Therefore, per TMC 18.60.030(2)(A), the proposal is subject to BAR review. 2. A Shorelines Substantial Development Permit has been issued by the City for a hotel in the same general location on the site. Subject to BAR review and approval, the City will revise the existing permit to reflect the applicant's approved development proposal. The BAR, per 18.60.030(1), must review and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal based on .design review guidelines contained in TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060. Page -2- Planning Commission 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS September 26, 1985 CONCLUSIONS BAR Criteria TMC 18.60.050 .i::..: j.... .S' s,. 3. A mitigated Determination of Non Significance was issued for the development subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the developers will have: 1. Awarded a contract for construction of a traffic signal and crosswalk at S. 158th Street across West Valley Highway. 2. Completed channelization of intersection. 3. Constructed a right turn lane, southbound along West Valley Highway. B. Left turns in and out may only occur at South 158th Street access point. C. A maximum of two access points along West Valley Highway, exclusive of South 158th St. D. Accommodation of the potential future extension of Tukwila Parkway across the northern portion of the property. 4. Along the Green River a twenty foot easement is to be dedicated to the. City for pedestrian access. Within the same area, King County will required the normal dike maintenance road. 5. Along the Green River embankment a dike will be required for flood management. The details of the dike construction will be reviewed by staff and the King County Hydraulics Division prior to issuance of the required grading permit. 6. The zoning of the subject property is C -2, and variances from applicable City ordinances were not requested. 1. Criteria 18.60.050(1): Relationship of Structure to Site A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian move- ment. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. Page -3- Planning Commission 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS September 26, 1985 The southern location of the structure on the site will advantageously screen the majority of the parking area from the longest length of the shoreline adjacent to the parcel. Sufficient use of sidewalks and a river trail ease- ment will provide adequate pedestrian movement in and around the site. Satisfactory landscaping, (trees thirty feet on center along the dike main- tenance road), and in sufficient quantities throughout and around the parking area, is proposed for the development. Additional shrubs appear necessary to complete the landscaping, especially along the north property line, adjacent to a single family residence. Service areas, including the loading space and refuse area, have not been ade- quately shown. The concept appears appropriate, and final plans can be appro- ved by the Planning Department. 2. Criteria 18.60.050(2): Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Development adjoining the site is a variety of uses and building styles - residential, commercial and industrial. The proposal will enhance the neigh- borhood. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation are a concern with development of the site and several mitigating measures were required during SEPA review. Each of the required improvements along West Valley Highway and South 158th Street should combine to improve and facilitate access to the site. Adequate landscaping will be provided along the perimeter of the site except along the north property line. A single family residence exists on this pro- perty, which is similarly zoned (C -2) as the subject property. This house is registered as an historical structure with the State. Therefore, additional landscaping appears appropriate, and will likewise require City consideration, if and when Tukwila Parkway is extended along this property line. Page -4- Planning Commission 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS September 26, 1985 3. Criteria 18.60.050(3): Landscape and Site Treatment A. Where existing topograhic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Landscaping along the perimeter, shoreline and interior of the site are suf- ficient in size and quantity to provide shade, screen service areas and strengthen vistas. An existing cottonwood will be integrated into the parking area landscape treatment. To provide shade along the river, the trees should be increased in size to 2i" to 3" caliper. A lighting scheme has not been illustrated in the plans, but narratively described by the applicant. The proposed low level and ground level lighting for parking areas and pathways would enhance the landscaping as well as pre- vent glare on abutting properties. An example of the lighting standards, which are compatible with the design of the building, should be submitted for review. The service area at the southeast corner of the proposed building is screened by landscaping and topography. Separation of landscaping. from pedestrian and automobiles can be assured during review of the final landscaping plan in the building permit review process. 1 Page -5- Planning Commission 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS September 26, 1985 4. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(4): Building Design A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. C. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building com- ponents and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The proposed style of the building is horizontal in design with a variety of projections and detail to provide visual interest. The exterior materials are cedar bevel siding and some vertical grooved plywood siding stained a soft pastel color. Garden walls, retaining walls and other similar locations are of split faced concrete block. Exterior lighting will be incorporated into the building's architectural features (down lights mounted under the soffits and wall protections and lighting under translucent fabric awnings), and will enhance the structure's features in the evening. Curved mechanical equipment structures are proposed on top of the structure, which blends with the architectural concept. 5. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(5): Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. - e.... v.. u °rKtt M _ ? zor war .qua . r.s aga5:i'F¢: tiL�"v.� ,5i'�5a- a ,;?' . . r!t'J3ti tYrAl7i4' von! Sh,}': a:, n. t.. i�.+.+ SS: ;K:�LY..w.L�l't C_�:. 6JnY_� r1Y�:v.ati vr:l�Knnv ..v.....c�:4Y:1, €;a.�. �a eLid. u.:...:,,.. r. r.. �.,,..., �i.. 1>. �w.:, t�,> u", �,..., r.: w! 3«.. e1- r.,.�.....w...'t`���.v. &.....,. ,.�z...�a... .,h 4. Page -6- Planning Commission 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS September 26, 1985 B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The current site plan shows no miscellaneous structures or furniture asso- ciated with the development. Parking lot illumination isn't shown and should be submitted. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above, staff recommends approval of the subject application subject to submission to the BAR of conceptual plans /details of the following for sub - sequent staff review and approval: 1. Loading and service areas for compliance with TMC 18.52 and 18.56. 2. Luminaire designs 3. Additional landscaping along the north property line. EXHIBITS A - Narrative of the proposal B - Architectural rendering mo'� 0 `'` i lG C - Site plan D - Building elevations E - Landscape plan (NENDELS, NENDELS1) ( #5A.2) DESCRIPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF PROPOSED MOTOR INN AND RESTAURANT FOR NENDEL'S, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Attached is a rendering of a very similar Nendel's Motor Inn constructed in 1984, in Everett, Washington. The proposed Tukwila facility will be very similar in appearance, although the location of the Entrance Canopy and Meeting Rooms has been altered to reflect differing site conditions. The buiding is constructed of wood frame slab on grade, the ex ri n�..mat e.ri_a..l..s_,a.r_e_ p�insj aQ 1 1y cedar bevel siding, aD d.... s. ome_. .,.ver..t- ical. ply.wood s]in o.g.,\ stained .a pastel gray, tint, col orj Small feature ar`e'as — f'"�s p 11 . fat e5d� c iiii - c r'e• t e 'b io c k ' will be ,/ utilized at retaining walls, garden walls, and other similar locations. The four stair towers visible on the skyline are capped with translucent fabric awnings containing the logo of the motel chain and internally lit for a soft glow at night. The level of this light is very low and does not illuminate brightly enough to provide light to the parking areas or any adjoining walkways. The overall building height of the three -story motel is approximately 29 feet above the finish grade at the first floor line. This grade will have been raised to elevation 28.75 for the required flood protection. The awnings at the top of the four stair towers will be aproximately 42 feet above this finished grade. There is a small basement service area under the restaurant and small basement service area under the motel; the floor of which extends to about four feet below the present grade of the site which is about 11 feet below the newly elevated dike height. Exterior lighting in the vicinity of the building will be down - lights mounted under the soffits and wall protections. Parking lot lighting will be provided through a series of low -level cut -off type light fixtures aimed to cut off light and glare from extending across the property lines to adjoining properties, rights -of -way, or river frontage. Ground level pathway lighting and walkway lighting will be provided at key points in the landscaping. \ r., ,1 2 0 1:385 pi '. DEPT. A / A 6. I V 6, 15 it, - - • I. 1 • • .VTA1 —1 • • • • I I I • I " I , • • • , t • io GR.F.5S: 111 Efl 7 '7 t•\f -°`" t. • ! r. _ g I ...••••■ LARGE • — I L — IbJOD PHAF...S ••torag INN - 15 Roc .19 &VIGO FP: (F) EL.. 1 ende s AlOTOR ANS r < 1=1 1=1 I= CONFE CENTER. F.E.Sr■%.:FLIN . 035 ItE et.e,4 •52-20' e000 P. j1ftd) Cat5EME.■.T)24.0e • . .. . f.. , __ _....„..,.._ ..(-.,...,,:_:. - ....e.••••;, --- .'..7" . :•- ',:...._...• - L : .,... . . ' ---- t. , : . • ' ...T,,p 7 , ... ...• .- -:-.. 1. ..• -,:.. • ,,,..........y uhrog tLIA'ref. -•••-...._• • ,..1 -• -. W. & of Ve-Seri.110. --.. • Fp.arl KEGEL t h SuR•itir ' -i :-.. ----,.. - • -GARDEN 7 - &NE t-20.& e - . - • TUKWILA , WA. THE CHENEY/PAGE ARCHITECTS • • 1TE. PLAN; 30C.e Qt.. pessarLE ftssis& 1 Liwes PARKING ?S= : trAcs • F. • WES': VEY rtla,-%4Ay 5 15b1"..t- (7% Motor Inn entry — L RESTAURANT EAST ELEVATION RESTAURANT NORTH ELEVATION 3::.! __Li EETJ 1 ▪ - MOTOR INN SOUTH ELEVATION • • .2 o = . r.2.111P• - 11iS _ match line I I [_]C._3 L. L 7 MOTOR INN NORTH ELEVATION X. • de6 4,1w:we/pm TUKWILA , WA. MOTOR INN WEST ELEVATION =0 == DE1 I ___Lq 1 0 0= Cl • C fi Restaurant South elevation not shown ELE.V A.7 . a 1 •c c. rt..' PSSLIMIN#P.1 FLAN: THE CHENEY/PAGE ARCHITECTS IITVEF.4 , WAttlIr4,51os. 7I')fe,-. 2 / • 1.,AN y. •• ' .././ • / • ••■•-•-_-._ • • • ` • . - var-t HAM- . 1 44"AGIt4 1 /01-1C2rTIC). &4 t Fiqvc! tm 2 ,:v."0.0.1:::1E) 15/.5 €F- ITArr "-ear 1 cLATA.,?.. AGCLIMAA i q•-• pfl ea...I DilrF...14 Pl..- C7....) r.V. 1...,..1 61...cr i 'las • T. I..1 II. p ry •_r .*L • rFlinu.: Cr14'.. -A . 1 , ..) V it flAhl r-. e ex- rare -.'r 1 1 : — , k. i0.140% •,E14.../er Pill ‘1)I e . : -... 1 • 4 . sof. g rp41.g. HI01-4 fv..S) e:-‘, or. 15',..:;.. -:ir...) 9 • • r.... I, cecott prz o•f-* (.t. r " 1; .1" 1:ra. ?.. K. -.....1 .r•rp.) f, J VIT),1••• • TWO Ce I. ru•Nie, 141 'WWI.' C ° .. -IAA rrts,111. AZe■lr.01.. 0-1!,.. --S4 5;•%.. • It.0 ■ ;":.,;—,,Ae.rit CG C: f‘ . ! Ir I- ri-r•ki .N.1 rot. c.. 114 t4jr..^ . . : ft i rt.it.r •:-. ..i....• at — " !t:ekirrt4.•;:t.-.. ; A • - U. • °o ! Af Net.- -•!-Fr. 2........ 4..2...:. t. IM. op _... . m..F., . — - 6.0p ‘,.......04 AREA°, • 5 • 1 JP • .1.more..arrO Pr.V4P,ro Ae-fm. - - • 4 tJ • Au. PEP if :...a.1P.1 G. t> itilt•T I • ■ r.. Fr a 1:Ct.rr. U:441% AXT. 11...4At. ri • 0F. fowl MAP hitIL iJ A : AftEA. o i AVV..) War L.400,1 164.4ro. tgrieA-nc■J ' 17..... At, 1.-.tJuDJ • e c:2 T bTL1 9it./.7r Cr_ T1 ■ fo•-,r . ▪ r.q---4.4- :so AL9.4e. Fog it e.f.tf- Age- rt Ftovet..- - rtrr.p W1fl4 thk 4-1.-41Nt) 5 T tql.rJ ef wfPrO7SE•Pt.Je, • r5Trwilikfrp 4 5T E.4kpe• o r-vtJ1 - FO- ri.g.too r p.,F-6AA • 0 -frre- 6A•41.1441.f... C.:41 rri.Tr ‘7,417..crrmmAii cu. Amu 4A1I VE4 .11' • Ala, riANTILY: hi.SET :Arr LA4000-ere- \ • 41 '1.. '' ‘r• wr-e-9r VALI-47%Y cr.--. ...Awe) LP F1, ! I320.112thSW' Everett.WA.1:. 01347- 2954. nIl77 I;L:gfil:1111111111111iiii:11,63 I I 1 V E- t//4/55 -rgAs1-1 2.4a05dRe 1.1f4112eLa5 AOTOg 11 - rum.] ILA ) WA. lit ci-leNLY/PArge- Agairr Muir VER1400 VIA. 95273 305 QERA ST. lap-336-5771 Jcb tz. 595 9 A se It e k% 11 ,1 6 cm4v). titAikAPsTe.g• 1 1 AT - 112A5H A.. • " H efki liz iz- I L QM Warr. OF Pmette DeVAD / x(. avAit. CAP Woot• stott-iar ■iJAief: PA.111 12k-QIID 12 ( 11 Co 0 WIDE_ iAAAP 1 : 12 - I o XALL I 1 0" ?- 2 cATE42;4:85-,1,A-641 t.ifes , 41411w_L!,$ . 1. `._ _ 0 Tog -1 :T.146.0#4,4wilitt401 Aou vo , . to ot4-vvA-48275 -4-4%-L---- - -6 EAT 4 Joao 595 c A FAG I 7 %r -:TU KW I LA, WA. 303 V SIZA ST. 206 3•365771 -'N 50' .�i . ro;+ ^4 ; �.:i ^ -C'. �.�, : v - ^�_SrcE,�x ?:2 ^- .Y"'•, . , .r" . ni' M.a 'v[;f.. Y3 _ 9Ts;['�, ..tt.r. .v<.a..1,,,. �1iti..u. <r.. , ��. "4: :,� : i,,, ., ,.... «.cr.%r«'''.t= A'ti:� <.'�G.k;i'.�r .�....cv� * �,.�.. , .,, aJi i"-, ti :rk"�'':$:.:4"i�'rHC.^.I»:�kY:? �sTr.:.... Y?. w" i���:' i' sh. +r,..,:- �-nz.,,:'tl?t., :c�'; •��,�.�'.�.S�.t'�. .1..i,.,..,, City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA Notice of Public Hearing and Meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 26th day of September, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for Public. Meeting: 85- 35 -DR: NENDELS TUKWILA ASSOCIATES, requesting approval of a 151 room motor inn, restaurant and conference center at the southwesterly corner of. South 158th Street and West Valley Highway. DR- 10 -84: EVERGREEN MANAGEMENT CO., requesting approval for revised plans of Tukwila Bend, a five building office park, at the southeasterly corner of Interurban Avenue and Southcenter Boulevard. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle Date: September 15, 1985 Distribution: City Clerk Project Files Public Notice File WAC 197 -11 -970 sq ft restaurant with parking. MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 3 -story 151 room motel, 9635 sq ft conference center, 8,000 Proponent J.E.D. Corporation (Nendels Motor Inn) Location of Proposal, including street address, if any southwest corner of West Valley Highway and the extension of 158th Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 286 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS (l This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by September 21, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This determination is subject to the attached conditions. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date September 6, 1985 Signature �� • COQ - =+� You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS Phone 433 -1845 ._ -...» wa�rnxret -: <:nfir�t�..7 ::• K. i. w,<. <.n- ....w:.w :+ cono: xaa�ow. ..b.,..,...,....____- ........_- . MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE EPIC- 286 -85 Nendels Motor Inn The following mitigating measures are attached to this determination: 1. Dedication and improvement of a right turn lane along West Valley Highway per requirements of the Public Works Department and Washington State Department of Transportation. 2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: A. Awarding of a contract for construction of a traffic signal and crosswalk at S. 158th St. across West Valley Highway B. Completion of channelization at this intersection, C. Construction of a right turn lane along West Valley Highway, D. Limiting access to right and left turns in only at S. 158th St. and right turn out only at the southerly curb cut of the development ( no left turns out of the property) until the traffic signal is installed. The Public Works Department reserves the discretion to require installation of temporary barriers in West Valley Highway . per approval of the State Department of Transportation to prevent left turns from the property. 3. Accomodation of the future potential extension of Tukwila Parkway across the northern portion of the property. 4. Maximum of two access points along West Valley Highway, exclusive of S. 158th St. , :i:'' J \p•_ • C1' Q IG DE V- p1_A BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Name of applicant: R.W. Tho Control No. 65 -22-, Epic File No. 2.269 Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. q5.21 ' i��MENTAL CHECKLIST Nendels Motor Inn pe & Associates, Inc. Address and phone number of applicant ea e, WA 98104, Phone: • and contact person: 1300 Alaska Building 4 -6239, Contact Jon Potter Date checklist prepared: July 1985 Agency ' requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule (including submittal of building plans f llnwina Immediate phasing, if applicable): rim RPV1PW Construction will take approxlmately6 to 10 months. Do you have any plans for future related to or connected with 'his area at the NE corner of the -ite additions, expansion, or further activity proposal? If yes, explain. A 30,807 s.f. is proposed to be subdivided and sold to Exxon Corporation as a gas station -ite. Depending upon market conditions following completion of the hotel and r:staurant, an expansion /addition may be considered_ Such a proposal would be subj:ct to SEPA review. List any environmental information be prepared, directly related Hampton Inn Supplemental information. to you know about that has been prepared, or will this proposal. Tukwila Hotel EIS and Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affectinc the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None identified. -2- ra14. /..z•F-Pec A WA Oft iiMitall' Azimaximant go 1 iiiMIPAtif0 J !till PW/450.4r:r :1 WO role; itemirmaikV!.- 441. p,41111111141iifi) L . , 4. .. M • ''!"‘ • • ■ _ ........0 / v Illii- Filijil7S,i1 .. o w:: ::: . ----. lout.: ....„ alin.. I - LOCATION MAP NENOELS MOTOR INN R.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Fill Permit. ore Ines 'anag-men an a Board of Architectural Review . - .. - • Hauling Permit Sign Permit — Building Permit — State Flood Control Lone Permit / Short Plat 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Nendels Motor Inn proposes to develop a 3 story, 151 room motel with a 9635 s.f. conference center, 8 000 s.f. restaurant and swimming pool. Exxon Corporation proposes to acquire 30,807 s.f. and build a qas station at the NE corner of the site. As a part of the devplo melnt of this cY li�-t, Keqal and ASGnriatac Ywuiawed their previous work on the Tukwila Hotel relative to this projprt and hAwo 'mated only very slight modifications from theirprevious engineering plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Township 23N Range 4E Section 24 The Southwest quadrant of the West Valley Highway /South 158th Street intersection. in Tukwila. 13. Goes the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes. The site lies in an area designated as requiring special development considerations, specificaliT Management Guidelines. This designation — des not preclude development; ratter it depicts areas where urban development must respond sensitively to certain environment factors. -3- 1. Earth ,TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is flat with the exception of the 2 to 3 ft high levee.. The oarkin lot sl es 2 •4% (Basic .parking lot slop on nits, i ddetig wI] J. be ti same). Tne b bank on the o a a c. h at genera types of sons are f ound on t e site 2�rloggop�.line will example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you .know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil characteristics are closely related to that of Newberg silt loam (Ng). The soil is suitable for hay, pasture and vegetables. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, however the site is underalin with normally con- solidated alluvial soils. The thick clay silt is compressible and will require preloading. Also the near surtace slits and sands may be subject to liquefaction during an earthquake resuiting in lateral earth movement. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approx. o ft of fill will be required within the motor inn portion of the structure and about 8 ft. of fill within the conference center and restaurant area. To prevent differential settlement, the site will he °reloaded with at least 12 ft. of fill above finished floor elevation, extending 20 ft. beyond the edge of the structure. Between 20 -30 thousand cu. yds. of fill will be imported. Granular imported sands & qr vets as a fied by yAl�� � � , L. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, � T � °�� -- . it construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Tukwila Hotel DEIS. Some erosion of the fill material and worked natural soils is likely prior to construction of the building. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 57.6 % will be covered by asphalt and buildings. 2. Air 3. Water a. Surface: • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion sedimentation control plan will be submitted and approved detinlr:g the erosion control during clearing & grading. WorK will be allowed only during the dry season. Tne plan has siltation ponds and 011 separation devices to control runort over denuded Lana. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate gaantities if known. Dust during construction noxious odors due to diesel powered vehicles from asphalt paving operations. Incremental increase in carbon monoxide resulting from 3069 vehicle trips per day. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Traffic generated by the motel will add to existing carbon monoxide levels. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Green River, immediately south and west of the site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. yes. see attaghed plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year fl.00dplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is within the floodway fringe. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No_ Stormwatpr will Pmn , into the Ri3Q utilized in the stnrmwater system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Pg 37 of DEIS defines stormwater detention volume originally designed tor 13252 cu. ft. The design will be modified slightly to enable a slightly different collection system with the same or similar size — detention. The revised design will also require a controlled outlet at the existing rate of run- off prior to development. The revised design will a so BW approved by City and County. The revised design will illustrate storm discharge at the exact same location as described in the EIS. ( approx. 150' ft. south of the north line into the river.) This location was approved by Wa. State Dept. of Fish & Game, June 18, 1982 in.their hydraulic project approval. This location was also reviewed and approved by City and King County Storm Water Management Division. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Plants 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: see 37 of the TukwU The stormwater detention facility will be similar to the previously approved storm drainage /detention plan. The impervious surfaces will have very little .e<£ect on — The a groundwater flux with the river. -u. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, • l ■ aspen, other( (cottonwood) _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other � / shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, but tercu bullrush, 6:--e-grae skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation P2_ b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Most of the vegetation within the property lines of the subject site will be removed. Some vegetation along the river wl1Tbe 33sturned clue to reconstruction of the dike & const?uc Lion or gravel access road. The iz E Fif is To regain as the existing vegefEELon as possible. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nnnp identified„ Evaluation for Agency Use Only fescue 5. Animals d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site if any: Please see attached landscape plan. All plantings will meet City of Tukwila landscape codes. Approx 42.E or 2_ 3 arxes of the_prnposeri site will be landscaped. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, (ongbir other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, (!almonyCout) herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None identified. c. Is the.site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Migratory watprfnwl havp aap_ olds r, _ in the freshwater and shore habitats provided by the Green River bordering the site and by an oxbow Pond north of the site. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: An erosion control plan shall be followed during construction. Natural vegetation shall be maintained along the stream bank; fill and grading operations will be limited to periods of normally dry weather Jilt traps and oil /water separators shall be maintained and cleaned by project owner whenever necessary. The hotel and proposed landscaping will shade the parking lot, thereby possibly reducing the stormwater runoff temperature. -9- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Combination of solar, gas and electricity will be utilized. Heat pumps will also be utilized. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Prnprnsed energy plan consists of solar for domestic water system, gas for laundry and heating electricity, heat pumps for air conditioning. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N /A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- N /A. mental health hazards, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise :) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on West Valley Highway is the predominant source of noise. — "it is not is gnificant enough to affect hotel use. 2) What types and levels of noise .could be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise peaks in the range of 85 to 95 dBA. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is undeveloped. Property to the south is si'ng.Le 'family.North and west of the site is the gregn Riv r_ Fact is idest Valley Highway. The general - vicinity r'nncis.ts. -of vacant lands, agricultural lands_. single f.mily_, commercial and office uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Grazing for sheep. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only ... MOM W as � � ■ ■.` O 1\ , ;I 1 wils ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■V- --- o' •■ ~ ■� ■ ■i .■ ma • /i • Ili OOOOO •T ■ : / MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL • SINGLE FAMILY ... . RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES SCALE -1"2 1200' NORTH RETAIL PARKS AND ..V..:4Afa.) PUBLIC SERVICES • WHOLESALE ( I UNDEVELOPED DISTRIBUTION PROCESS MANUFACTURING EXISTING LAND USE NENOELS MOTOR INN A.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES SCALE-1":120 NORTH PARKS & OPEN SPACE !i RECREATION SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT CONBIDEAATIONS .At AM AOMICULT LAWS T DESIGNATIOM OHM MAMAS OF MOT MECUM DEVELO•NENT. RATHER. IT DEPICTS AREAS WHERE UNBAR CEVI OMEN! SENSITIVELY TO CE RAET EMVIMOMACNT�K S FACTDK. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NENDELS MOTOR INN R.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES 1111■••■••■• TUKWILA R-A Agricultural C-2 Regional Retail C-P Planned Business Center C-M Industrial Park M-1 Light Industry + SCALE: 1"01200 NORTH C-M -■•110..• wI Reerhon 0 • • Ken+ FIENTON G Single Family Residential B-1 Business Park B-P Business Parking M-P Manufacturing Park H-1 Heavy Industry ZONING NENCIELS MOTOR INN R.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Regional Retail C -2 f.. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial with Special Development considerations. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. VPq Thp pntirp cite Due t — r t River and alluvial sofi$. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The hotel would employ_ approx. 25 full and mart =time employees with varying schedules. The restaurant would employ approx. 45 full j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Shorelines Management Program. Evaluation for Agency Use Only & p/t employees with varying schedules. ,re s. �.rn .nom ,:.C'� -�.. ... �'(;'.. •. :('.Ii , .t.....�v�i 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. The hotel will have 151 rooms. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Nona c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Three stories or 39 feet tall. The building will be wood frame with stained wood siding. Bearing masonry will not be used. Roofing will be built up. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Potential view blockage could occur to the office buildings south of the site across the river. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A landscape plan has been prepared to assure good design practice and consistency throughout the site. Approximately 42.4% or 2.3 acres of the proposed site will be landscaped. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • /41buitati4'2 ... . • 419190:: 36 U.S.G.S. BASE via w ASSESSMENT 1"=2000" NENDELS MOTOR INN NORTH R.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES 4 • • .1 1 3 • • + NORTH 1•■•■••••■• VIEW BLOCK AGE NENDELS MOTOR INN R.W. THORPE AND ASSOCIATES 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light would be emitted from motel rooms, parking b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal ?_� lot lighting and automobiles. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Parking lot lighting could be limited so that no direct light spills off site. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Long Acres Race Track east of the site, Bicentennial Park 1/4 mile south. Tukwila Park 1/2 mile north of I =405, Fort Dent Park 2/3 miles north of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Swimming pool for motel guests only. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Based on an archaeological survey performed on site, there is no indication of any archaeologically significant artifacts on the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Cnnstructinn in the immPrliatp area will b halted if Any ArrhaPningirA1 finria are „nrnver�d And rnn 4.r;ictinn rPSnmpri nnly after the pffire p Archaeology And HiGtnrir PrpGPrtratinn_has had 3n opportunity to research the finaq_ 14. Transportation Please see..attached transportation study for additional information on the proposed Motor Inn. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed from West Valley Highway. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit Stop? Transit stops within walking distance are located north of the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will provide 342 parking spaces, approx. 19 more than ru eg ed by the Zoning Code. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. The city of Tukwila has programmed several short =range & long - range transportation improvements. as part of its 6 yr Transportation Improvement Program (1985- 1990). that should help alleviate peak hour congestion and improve traffic flows in the vicinity of the subject development. Please see P1anned e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate s ecitic vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. There are 2 rail lines which run north -south and lie east of West Valley Rd. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please see Table 1 of the Traffic Study. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Please see Findings and Recommendations ( pg. 6) of Traffic Study. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would increase the workload for the Tuxwiia Tire and Police Depts. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The_motel will be fully sprinkled. -16- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities Date Submitted: atMOr�.v; w.mauru,`w. Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilitiesently available at the site: ricity (natural (rise service) elephone sc rrrtar ewe` ), septic system, other. e site -,s- -a oped, no utilities are .provicied tor the site. However, the circled items above are available for the motel use. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Those activities co •n f utility installation. (e.q. tractors. trucks. grarHng & excavation equipment). Water. sewer, telephone. gas will serve the site. All utilities are under- ground. Same as the EIS. C. Signature •II -• . .— • • • Tire above answers are true and complete to the best of. my knowledge. I understand thathe lead agency is relying on them to ake its Signature: (Cow OA-4) / Z, , f %g S' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUP ?IEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proponent intends to fill a market demand for a motor inn which primarily caters tc the airport traveler. The motor inn would cater to industrial /commercial customers destined or SouthCenter and Greater Tukwila from the airport. Loneequently, convenient access to bea -Tac via I -405 and the local industrial /commercial businesses in Greater Tukwila is required. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Develop a larger hotel than presented in this proposal. For example, the previous proposal for ;.nis site consisted or an 8 story, 2/4 room hotel with wining room, cocktail lounge and banquet facilities. rurtner description is provided in tne 'Tukwila Hotel t.ib lytsl. Jttner commercial uses could be developed than the service station sucn as small convenience.grocery store or fast zood restaurant. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The previous hotel proposal had 123 more rooms than the Nendels proposal of 151 rooms. impacts created by this proposed project will be generally less tnan tne previous proposal in respect to aesthetics, and aemana tor services. Trattic generation will be approx. -00 trips per day greater due to the proposed gas station. 7L her Street orientea ousinesses sucn as grocery store or fast .:uud restaurant will nave similar trarric impacts as the proposed gas station. a xa..11,dV VM':. ir;.: r4. lnrx1 '•,•r,,,,,,,.mn... «».aa.... Y+a�iuvn. tsaanYmau.. ew,..,. .............._........_.___.._ ... ._..�......y.......«...nn..w�.a Common 'lame TREES: Black Cottonwood Biq -IJaf ';axle Oregon Ash SHRUBS: Pacific Mlow Japanese Knotwced Himalayan = lackberry Red EI deroerry HEPEACEOUS PLANTS: Stinging ;fettle Sourdocic Buttercup var. Clover var. Foxalove Common "ullein English P l a n t a i n F•rayweed Chamomile Hairy Cats -ear Wild Lettuce Common Tansy Common Dandelion Fescue -grass var. Foxtail Barley Bluearass var. Vegetation round at the Site Source: R.1;. Thorpe and Associates Scientific "lame Populus trichoc„rpa Acer macrophyI1um Fraxinus Iatifolia Sal i;: lasi. ndra Po I ygonum ,cusp i datum Rubus discolor Samoucus raceriosa Urtica Iyailii Rumex crispur Ranunculus sp. Trifoliurn spp. Dicitolis puraurea Verbose= thoosus Plantaco Ianceolata Anthorn i s cotu I a Hypochaeris radicata Lactuca sp. Tanacotum vuI^_are Taraxacum officinale Festuca sp. Hordeuri nurinum Poa sp. ......A,,... : z .....,...:': M..:.:. +i4iY'?� "1: vYr�:..;:: ni:'; r<' c:. F: k.^, grii. iYs' Fd' :fie?t�✓.:+.� §y-ni;h',•d�nire�: +.. � ................w .s,.Ma«rswnr.�+rmv • . Ccnmort Name Prickly Sculpin Threespine Stickleback Crown ^ui I head Large- mouth Slack bass Chun Salmon Coho Salmon Chinook �alnon Yellow Perch 71ountain whitefish Lena -`lose Coco Speckled Dace Cutthroat Trout Steel.head,Trout Rainbow Trout Dolly Varden Trout Starry Flounder i Spec i e:s 211 ±hg Green, River Scientific Name • Cottus asper Gasterosteus aculeatus Ictalurus nebulosus rlicropterus salnoides Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus tshawtscha Percy flavescens Prosopium wilIiamsoni Rhinichtays cataractac Rhinichtays oculus Salmo clarki Salmo'airdneri Salrno gairdneri Salvel inus rialrna Prosopium stellatus Source: East Side Green River S;atershed DEIS, SCS, November, 1970. KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering July 30, 1985 •'tr. . Ross Earnst. P.E. :ity Engineer of Tukwila h20') Southcenter 9ouievaro - uv..wila, WA 98198 :UBJECT: Traffic study for 'ien'eis Propo:ee 'Iotor :nn ana Related Development at £ !`6th Street anc west Valley 4 oaa ' R :81) Dear Mr. Earnst: At the request of the JED Corporation, iJS associates has oreparea an traffic impact study for the :reposed Nenaeis rukwlia :nn. restaurant int1 service station develooement. This stuav •Jooates a previous study acne ]y Centrac associates (Tra4.i :noact , :waivsis *or -lampton inn :eve_lnmment, January 1995). Existing traffic ]ata and - re ;precasts -utture '1 . 9a6i volumes without site development oreparea :y •:entr3c were :seo as base data or our analysis. 'ROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development is iocatea on SR 131 south of : -41)5. dust nest pi the entrance to ?onoacres Race Track iS 159th Street). The site :s bordered on the east by West Valley Roao (SR i91) and on the west ana soutn by the Green River. Nendels Tukwila deveiooe:.ent consists of a hotel with a total of 151 rooms, a quality restaurant (8,000 5F) and a gasoline service station with eignt pumps. The proposal includes three driveways along the west sine of SR :e1. plus :orstr'sction of the west leg of the S 158th StreetiSR !ai intersection. although this icy wili ettec: vely serve as in entrance to t ilIe .tj t`= 'ear term, the City has plans to extent' 158th westward across the Green River to provide a connection from SR 181 to Tukwila Par'< :way: when this is Quilt, the west leg of the 15EthiSR 1E1 Intersection will 'become part cf the city street, and Nendeis wilt have to develop driveways along the =out~ side of 158th to provide access to the site from this rcacwav, The three oriveways on SR 181 will be :iaitea to ricnt in and right out oniv: left tarn access into or cut of the site will only be aliowec at the :59th street intersection. EXISTING CONNDITIONS ..._,. ,....... n:;' yr {.` :;.iz.i.jr+.ufY,�tt3• ",�...: LLft, :'t : :,.: � :�;' :' :.'.n2;.;.,...,. The existing street, higrwav system it the vicinity of the Nencei=- TuKwiia cevelopment is =town in "inure 1. Access to the site wiouid be croviaeo :rimarily oy SR 181 tWest valley Roam via I - to the north; secondary access would be via Strander 5ivd connecting with SR 1E1 to the south. 14230 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, Washington 98007 (206) 644 -4766 KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering 4r. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 2 iR 181 is a rive -lane roadway (two tnru lanes in each direction plus a center two -way left turn lane). except for a 700 -foot section south of the site where only our lanes exist. Near the site. a raises median and cnannelization prevent left_ turns to /from SR 181 except at tts intersection with S 158th Street. Traffic control in the site vtcintty is provided by traffic signals at major intersections, including Strander /ER 181 and 1 -405 MB raspsiSR 181. There are stop signs at all other nearoy intersections. The 158th/SR 181 intersection is the main entrance into !-ongacres Pace 'rack. During the racing season !April - Jctooer, -_ne :ity of Renton assigns traffic central officers to manually control the traffic on the 5R 161 from 2 -4 PM on ionday through Friday and 11 AM -12 Ph on Saturdays, :unsays and holidays. Although the projected volumes for the SR 181/158th intersection +.TRANSPL. 1982) may not meet signal volume warrants by 1986 (Hilton Hotel Draft Ei= traffic study, The TRANSPO Sraua, 1984), a new actuated traffic signal was recommended by the Centrac study. Centrac concluaeo that stgnificant delays would occur without signalizatian due to high volumes of left turns to and from the Race Track, as well as left turning traffic taifrom the proposed project site. Aso, the ?roposed hotel and restaurant development (located directly west of the main entrance to Lengarces) could generate significant pedestrian traffic between the site and Langarces; a signal would enhance pedestrian safety at this intersection. The developer has indicated his willingness to participate ir furding a new fully actuated signal and channeiizatien improvements at the SR 161 /153th Street intersection. It is expected that the adjacent_ prcoerty owners would also pay their praporttanal share of 'he •,est of signal installation. Planned Improvements The City of Tukwila has programmes sever,i short -range and long -range transportation improvements, as part of Its itx -year Transportation Improvement Program (1985- 1990), that should neio alleviate peak hour congestion and improve traffic flaws ir. tre vicinity of the subject development. These incluce: * The north approach of SR 181 at he :trander intersection will be widened to accomcdate a rignt- turn. -oniv lane, and sidewalks will be constructed the entire length of the Brock Residence Inn site this site is south of the Nendels site i..na is unaer constructions. * Widening of SR 181 frce 5 to 7 lanes from i -405 to Stranaer as a long range (1987 -39 transoertatton need to handle projected traffic volumes for this state hignway. Providing an additional KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering ..r. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 3 :'iSDOT planned improvements: southbound lane for the entire length of nrenaeis site would accomodate the ultimate 7 -lane roaaway section for SR 181. * Extension of Tukwila Parkway to connect with 9 1`9th Street at SR 181 with a new aridge crossing the Green River which would provide an alternative east -west route to itrander Blvd. the City Engineer has inoicatted that It would be a -5 years for the 158th extension to occur. * Widening of Stranger (irony Andover Part W to tze existing green River oridge) fro* 4 to 5 lanes 35 part of connecting Stranger to 3W 27th Street in Renton to provide a new east-west link soutr fo Langacres (1987 -89). * Overlay, saftey and drainaae improvements on SR :81 =ram 1 -405 to Strander. 4SDOT /City of Tukwila combined improvements: * Realignment of Scuthcenter Blvd. to intersect «ith ;rady Way. * Widening of S 158th Street to 4 lanes SR 161 to east city limits'. * Improve pedestrian access and I -405 iiGV lanes from Believue to Tukwila (1985 -87). PROJECT TRAFFIC 3:1`! and peak hour trips generated 5y the note. restrauan:, and :asciine service station, were generated using :pie t"io generation statistics assembled by the institute of Transportation Engineers. (ITE Trip Generation, 1982). The categories specifically used for the trip generation were hotel category 310, service station categary 544 ana quality restaurant category 831. Table 1 summarizes the daily and peak hour vericle trios whicn would be eneratee by the proaosed Tana uses at the Senaeis lotor inn site. The oaiiy and PM pear traffic generated av the :eve ;conent *ere assigned to the proposed access driveways on ER 181, ana then distributed to the adjacent street system as mown in Figure 2. Approximately 20 percent of the project generated traffic was distributed to ana fro* the Lcngacres Pace Tract aue to the close p ro: iei ty of the race track to the project site. The develocer has teen rrepcseo a snuttie van that will r.ravei between the hotel and the track entrance, to provide Ir. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 4 IMPACT ANALYSIS KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering a direct link for peoole from the hotel to visit the track; this may reduce site - generates venicie traffic to /from the race tack. Thirty percent '30X) of the restaurant trios were assumed to cote from the hotel and are not includea in the traffic generation since the restaurant is within walking distance of the hotel. The gasoline service station venerated trips were estimates assuming that 40% of the PM peak hour ,olume involves vehicle traffic already on the adjacent street sys tem for ether purposes. This is a conservative estimate oecause the ITE Trl; 3eneration report for category 844 suggests that 54 -564 of the peak Hour iei:ime already exists an the adjacent street system. The estimated 3,069 Hai1y ana 173 PM peak your trips for the restaurant. notel and service station were coaoined witn the crcjectteo 1986 non -site traffic to estimate .986 daily ano PM peak volumes for the developement. The projected increase in traffic along iR 181 due to the new devetoonent is 2 -4% for the daily traffic and 1 -27. of the PS peat traffic. These volumes are shown on Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 snows the average weekeav traffic volumes with and without the project as well as the percent increase due to the development. Figure 4 shows the estimated FM peak volumes with and witnout the project. In order to estimate the traffic impacts of the proposed project during average weekday peak conditions the 4 :00 -5:00 PM peak period were analyzed. Level of Service calculations were done at the intersection of SR 181 ana S 158th Street for 1986 volumes, with and without the project development. The level of service analysis showed ' : assuring a traj4ic actuated signal would be installed at this location) that on a typical day with the Longarces Race track open that the intersection would operate at LOS C (vic = 0.76) in 1986 during the PM peak hour. During the 3:00 - 4:00 PM period when inbound Longacres traffic is heaviest, the intersection would operate at LOS E (v/c = 0.'751 unless dual southcound left turn Lanes are instaliea to handle the Longacres traffic. With the proposed Meneels hate! :eveicpemenc. the SR 131 and 5 158th Str ?et intersection would still operate at LOS C (vic =.19) during the PM peak `your with the Longarces Race Track .ripen. Centrac Associates (Hampton inn Development, 1995, p.16) analyzed several stner intersections in the site vicinity. Their results show that all the intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS {LOS D or better) except the SR-lei and Strander 81vd wnich is operating near KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering Mr. Ross Earnst July 30, 1995 Page 5 capacity conditions (LOS D /E). LOS calculations by Centrac for the intersections of SR 181 with gtrander Boulevard arc with tne I -4t)5 ramps. showed that project traffic would have an insignificant effect on these intersections; thus. these LOS computations were not repeated for this study. .388 oarking spaces for the propcsea restaurant /hotel developement will be arevidea on -site without any parking required off -site or on street on oordering arterials and roadways. No protected parking over =lows are anticipated during peak periods, althcugn the enforcement of patron - parking -only may be critical during the Longacres racing season. Driveway analysis he proposed site development plan shows three driveways serving the site along SR 181, plus 'the entrance at S I53th Street wiii n will later become part of the city's street system ,snen 158th is extended. In the suture, additional driveways will be developed along the north boundary of the site to provide access to 5 159th Street when It is _onstr';cted. The City Engineer has expressed concern aoout the number 34 driveways serving the site, and their effect cn traffic flew along ER i @1, especially ine lorthern most driveway serving the proposed Exxon service station. Figure 5 shows estimated FM pear, hour turning movements at the 158th Street entrance and at the driveways on SR 181. Turning Movements would be limited to right in, right out at the driveways, and left turns would only be allowed at the 159th Street intersection. As these volumes show, the traffic in and out of any one driveway would be small and would nat adversely affect through traffic on SR 191. The ;middle driveway serves the major parking circulation aisle for the hotel and restaurant. The southern criveeiav, :i1h /.O not critical, provides r n ni egress from the parking lot adjacent to the restaurant and for tr'ucl:s s'uppiynt: the restaurant. The Exxon driveway has beer designed to exceed the recommended standards for driveways which have been adopted by the institute of Transportation Engineers. In its recent publication, Guidelines for Driveway Design and Location f1TE, 1995), the institute recommends a minimum offset of 5 0 feet for a orlvewav locates rear a Aajcr :nters_ect ion (7O-foot ourh radius at the intersection. a 5-foot tangent section, and a 15-foot raolus at the driveway). The proposed Exxon driveway woulo nave a 65 -foot offset from 159th Street (30 -foot corner raaius, 20 -foot tangent, 15 -toot driveway radius), or an additional 15 feet beyond tne recommended rinimu.m spacing. The Exxon driveway provides a smooth traffic flow for motorists entering and leaving the Exxon station. Figure b shows the path of a typical motorist southbound on SR 181 going to the service station under the 1 KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering Mr. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 6 proposed configuration. The motorist can turn right into the site.and :noose an available pump quickly and efficiently. Exiting the station can oe accomplished by a simple left or right turn to get to SR 191 via the aiddle driveway or at 158th Street. Without this driveway, these maneuvers aecome sore difficult as illustrated in Figure 7. In the near term, drivers could turn richt at the 158th Street entrance, and matte a U -turn to the left into the site to reach one of the Dumps. Drivers could then exit the site by heading south to the middle driveway, or by making a 360- degree sweep around the station to reach 158th Street. Once 158th Street is extended westward, the left turn pocket at the signailzed intersection with ER 181 will likely prevent motorists entering :he Exxon site directly via 159th. (See Ficure 8.) The length of :he :eft turn storage pocket and the required tacer will probably exterc oeycnd the Exxon sites frontage on 1E8th Street. Left turns would not ae allowed across the eastbound left turn channelization. Motorists on SR 181 desiring to access the Exxon station would have to enter one of the 4endeis driveways and use the internal circulation roads to reach the cas pumps; such inconvenience may nave an adverse impact on the attractiveness of the gas station to motorists. Thus, it appears that the Exxon driveway would test serve tne puoiic need by allowing convenience ingress and egress to /iron the service station site. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The proposed Nendels hotel /restaurant/gas station development would generate uo tc 3,063 new daily vehicle trips an the surrcunding street system. In the PM peak `.our, the project would add 173 vehicle trips. The increase in traffic volumes on SR 181 would be 1 to 4 percent of daily non - project traffic flows. This small increase is not significant ana probably would not be noticeable to other motorists on SR 181 (West Valley Road). Z. Initially, primary access to the Nendels site would ^e via an entrance at the intersection ar S 158th Street and SR 181 (West Valley Road). The City of Tukwila plans to extend 18th Street westward across the Green River to connect with Tukwila Parkway. When this extension is built, the interim entryway to the Nenceis site will become part of the city street, and driveways will oe ouiit along the new 152th to provide access into the site. KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. • Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering "r. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 7 4. Secondary access will be provided by three oriveways along SR 18i, one for the proposed Exxon station and two for the hotel/restaurant. These driveways will be limited to right-turn-in, and rignt- turn -out movements only. Eacn driveway serves separate functions: • (a) the northerly driveway serves the Exxon station and creates smooth traffic flow through the site, (b) the middle driveway provides a main entryway to the hotel - restaurant complex and, after 156th street :s built west of SR -181, may become the primary entrance to the site for motorists from the north. (c) the southerly driveway enhances circulation for the restaurant parking lot and serves delivery trucks exiting the site. Each of the three driveways alone SR 191 would be cesigned and constructed to City of Tukwila and +1ED0T staroaros. Eacn serves a unique function and contributes to an efficient overall circulation system for the site. The Exxon driveway allows =southbound drivers on 6 gas station site and drive to an open pump with a the proposed location and design of this driveway recommended standards. However, since left turns into or out of this driveway; the width of the driveway reduced from 30 feet to 24 feet. R 181 to enter the minimum cf turns; meets ITE will not be allowed could be The ?piddle driveway provides the main access to the hotel and restaurant from West Valley Road, ano also serves southbound traffic from the Exxon as station. It can also be reduced to 24 feet wide. The south driveway serves the restaurant parking lot, and is the least critical to the overall site circulation plan. Virtually no one will use the driveway to enter the site, and exiting traffic volumes would be minimal. A previous study on the Nendeis site by Centrac Associates (Traffic Impact Analysis }nr +a-otcn Inn Devei.-oment, January 199.5) recc,nmenoed construction of dual eoutnooune left turn lanes on 3R -i81 at 158th street to accommodate Longarces traffic. Signalization of the intersection was recommended to handle the Longarces entering and exiting traffic volumes, pedestrian traffic between the site and Longarces, and emergency vehicle access to Longarces and the hier.deis site. VASA contours with these recommendations. KJS ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning • Traffic Engineering Mr. Ross Earnst July 30, 1985 Page 8 7. Assuming the intersection of 158th and SR 181 is signalized, it would operate at LOS C during the 1996 peak !lour With or without the proposed Nendels development. During the 3 -4 PM Longacres peak perioo, the intersection would operate at LOS E unless southbound left turn lanes are installed to handle the Longacres traffic. 9. The developer of the Nendels site should participate in funding the installation of a traffic signal and turn chann.eiizaticn at the intersection of 3 159th Street and SR 181. Pedestrian crosswalks and pedestrian- actuation of the signal should also be provided. The project would increase total daily. traffic volumes at the intersection by 7.3 percent. 9. Tukwila has proposed widening SR 181 to 7 lanes from 1 -405 to Strander Boulevard. The Nendels development mould participate in funding construction of the additional lane along the Nest siae of eR 131 along its east property line to accommodate the ultimate 7 -lane cross section. This extra lane will facilitate right -turn movements into and out of the Nendels driveways, as weil as provide additional capacity for thru traffic. 10. The proposed hotel /restaurant development will generate upto 300 potential pedestrian trips daily between the site and the Longacres Race Track twhen the track is open). Provision of sidewalks sn West Malley Road, crosswalks and pedestrian signals at the 15BthiSR 181 intersection will allows these movements to be made safely. In addition, the developer has proposed to operate a shuttle bus service between the race track and the hotel to accommodate any of these pedestrian trips. 11. The development will provide 388 parking spaces_ on -site. This snouid satisfy all development - related parking demana generated by the Nendels development. I trust that this letter report provides adequate information for your review of the transportation impacts of the proposed Nenaels Motor Inn and related developments. Please calf me if you have any questions. Yours truly, KJS Associates, Inc. i P. Savage principal Engineer 15,400 Estimated Daily Traffic Volume (2 —Way AWDT 198/0-85) 0 Traffic Signals T Stop Signs KJS Associates TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Figure 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6Z91 •OA19 !l3ONVUIS gOI fl Dasia 4Ds axv DILLIVIII ammo 1051rOild Z 7CafZS ZOVd1I OL33VtLL pe;.uxeue8 DTd31al. iygo. 'OAl9 4ved Fid zaN 3o z amain sevaTaossy Sry '11Q 90v19 -9NVA9 •AMwd vlomvnt 31N33Mllios 1986 v o project 1986 v project increase % increase LEGENQ • . a��t1Y! x sMi :.a:: +�i�f.:r:tc'ea�. �u rn.w.x'ga6T.t�1'.J;V . Figure 3 • • Projected 1986 Daily Traffic Volumes With and Without The Proposed.Psoject SO UTHCENTE KJS Associates LEGENQ • 86 w o • • ect 1986 w projec 3855 3889 Projected 1986 PM Peak Traffic Volwws With and Without Proposed Prof ect ..._.._. o.,._,_ i e.:_:•:• c^ :�ev�v:5 ^ Y.`^t%: {: +:t :3:1.,:t:; fiVu, 7Y. V. Y64ts...3e;c: x�'�n';:IK:ndSi•iy: 1 1 T r Exxon site Mandela Hotel and Restaurant 50 70 `,15 5 1705 795 760 130 184,..___L 123 Figure 5 1986 PM Peak Hour. Turning Moveaen1 with project, with'Longacres open, 4 i 1 1 1 1 A ; ry ► - i6t.E 8 Woat,g. ( FtSSi;f,S 1 GAMS RK.NG ?S V: DE0 ' -Ft ti Figure 6 Circulation Plan 1. 1 • :• •10 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 • — • • • ••• 1 4 ••• ct 1 DRIVEWAY 4 Fb5St ILS t.t43E5 5,1151,5 /3. 1 1°ANG °Cc V; DE.0 , Figure 7 Circualtion Plan GRANO TOTALS: TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Nendels Motor Hotel ITE Trip Trip Rate AMDT PM PEAK Category Generator AMDT /PM Pk in out Total ::10 Hotel 10.5/.73 1568 55 56 110 (151 units) per room 831 Quality 74.9/6.14 599 30 19 49 Restaurant per 1000 SF (8000 sq. ft) less 307. from hotel -180 -9 -6 -15 Net Vehicle generation 419 21 13 34 844 6as Station 133/3.63 1064 26 22 48 (8 pumps) per pump 40% PM peak volume on road -11 -8 -19 Net traffic. 15 14 29 3069 91 83 173 .........Utv.-ML' MNU ..��;s.Sf.'?,1'.`4:1.�4 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR _ _..... GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPO �� CITY OF TUKWILA. PLAW0}1{4C OT.PT. More construction problems are caused by site subsurface conditions than any other factor. In the early 1970's, subsurface problems were frequently being resolved through lawsuits. In fact, the situation had grown to such alarming proportions that consulting geotechnical engineers had the worst professional liability record of all design professionals. By 1980, Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers- member consulting soil and foundation engineers had the best profes- sional liability record. This dramatic turn -about can be attributed directly to client acceptance of problem - solving programs and materials developed by ASFE for its members' application. This acceptance was gained because clients perceived this approach to be in their own best interests. Disputes benefit only those who earn their living from others' disagreements. The following suggestions and observa- tions are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, cost -over- runs and other costly headaches that can occur during a construction project. A GEOTEC.ERMICAL EOGINEIRIMG REPORT I8 BASED ON A ORION SIT OF PROJECT - SPECIFIC FACTORS A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsurface exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique set of project - specific factors. These typi- cally include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and configu- ration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, and the level of additional risk which the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. To help avoid costly problems, consult Earth Consultants, Inc. to determine how any factors which change subsequent to the date of this report may affect our recommendations. Unless we indicate otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not be used: When the nature of the proposed structure is changed, for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrig- erated one. When the size or configuration of the proposed structure is altered. When the location or orientation of the proposed structure is modified. For application to an adjacent site. We cannot accept responsibility for problems which may develop if we are not consulted, after factors considered in our reports development have changed. MOST GEOTECHNICAL 'FINDINGS' ARE PROFESSIONAL IS?IIIATES Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken, when they are taken. Data derived through sampling and subsequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by the geotech- nical engineer who then renders an opinion about overall subsurface con- ditions, their likely reaction to proposed construction activity, and appropriate foundation design. Even under optimal circumstances, actual conditions may differ from those be- lieved to exist, because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock and time. For example, the actual interface be- tween materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than the report indicates, and actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unantici- pated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their geotechnical consultant through the construction stage, to identify vari- ances, conduct additional tests which may be needed, and to recommend solu- tions to problems encountered on site. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions which existed at the time of subsurface explo- ration, construction decisions should not be based on a geotechnical engineer- ing report whose adequacy may have been affected by time. Please consult us to learn if additional tests are advisable before construction starts. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes or groundwater fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a geotech- nical engineering report. To help avoid these problems, the geotechnical engi- neer should be retained to work with other appropriate design professionals to explain relevant geotechnical find- ings and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues. BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM TEE ENGINEERING REPORT Final boring logs are developed by the geotechnical engineer based upon his interpretation of field logs (assembled by site personnel) and laboratory evaluation of field samples. Only final boring logs customarily are included in geotechnical engineering reports. These logs should not be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design draw- ing, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. Although photographic reproduction elimi- nates this problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misinterpretating the logs during bid preparation. When this occurs, delays, disputes and unanticipated costs are the all- too - frequent result. To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpretation, give contractors ready access to the complete geotechni- cal engineering report. Those who do not provide such access may proceed under the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps prevent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate scale. READ R1BPO•SIBILITi CLAUSES CLOSELY Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgement and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical consultants. To help prevent this problem, geotechnical engineers have developed model clauses for use in written transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses designed to foist the geotechnical engineer's liabilities onto someone else. Rather, they are definitive clauses which identify where the geotechnical engineer's respon- sibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your geotechnical engineering report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. If you have questions, please contact us. Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineering and Geology J.E.D. Corporation 2230 Rucker Avenue _ Everett, Washington 98201 Attention: Ted Dahl Gentlemen: 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone. (206) 643 - 3780 /Seattle (206) 464 -1584 August 1, 1985 E -2699 We are pleased to submit herewith our report entitled "Geotech- nical Engineering Study, Nendels Motor Inn, West Valley Highway at South 158th Street, Tukwila, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, laboratory tests, and engineering analysis. Previous studies were conducted on the site by Shannon and Wilson for the Christensen Group, Inc. The Christensen Group, Inc. was planning a medium -rise tower hotel on the site. This building would have had heavy foundation loads thus deep foundations or a mat foundation with a surcharge load would have been required. The Shannon and Wilson report to Jensen, Krauss and Schoenleber was dated March 12, 1982, and their reference number was W- 3919 -02. The Nendel Motor Inn is to be a light wood framed three -story structure. Soils near the ground surface are very loose but essentially granular. A deeper clayey silt layer is present and could influence long -term settlement. However, it is our opinion that post- construction settlement will be on the order of two inches. Differential settlement between lightly loaded foundations and those with heavier loads will be on the order of one inch. It has been assumed that these settlements are acceptable and our report has been prepared accordingly. If such settlements are not acceptable, we can prepare surcharge or deep foundation design criteria recommendations, if requested. Site soils are very moisture sensitive. If earthwork is done in wet weather conditions, the contractor could expect that on -site soils would be easily disturbed and difficult to compact. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 E -2699 Page 2 The following sections of this report describe our study and contain recommendations regarding foundation design criteria, earthwork considerations, and site drainage. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of the J.E.D. Corporation and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. PROJECT DESCRIPTION At the time our study was performed, the site and proposed building locations were as shown schematically on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on our discussions with your architect, we understand that it is planned to construct a three -story wood framed building containing approximately one hundred fifty one (151) rooms and 73,335 square feet in the Phase I portion and one hundred seven (107) rooms and 42,912 square feet in the Phase II addition. A partial basement at Elev. 21 is planned in the building core. The finish floor of the main portion of the building will be Elev. 28.75 requiring about four feet of fill to meet final grades. We understand that maximum continuous footing loads of thirty five hundred (3500) pounds per lineal foot and maximum column loads of 40 kips are anticipated. If any of the above design criteria change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The proposed building site is located southwest of the intersection of West Valley Highway and South 158th Street in Renton, Washington. The property is rectangular in shape and essentially level except for a slight uphill grade towards the southeast. Side grades vary between Elev. 23 and 25. It is bound on the east by the West Valley Highway and on the south and west by the Green River. At the time of our exploration the site was covered by grasses and thistles with large diameter trees bordering the Green River. The pastureland was fenced and being utilized by grazing sheep. Earth Consultants, Inc. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Earth Consultants, Inc. E -2699 Page 3 Subsurface The site was explored by Earth Consultants, Inc. by drilling one test boring at the location shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the boring log, Plate 4, for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at the boring location. A description of the field exploration methods and laboratory testing program is included in this report following the Discussion and Recommendations section. The site is in a former flood plain so the near - surface soils were placed by alluvial action. The near - surface soils consist of very loose sandy silts and silty sands. The density of the sands increase with depth due to an increase in overburden pressures. In the test boring drilled under our observation the soils consisted of about fifteen (15) feet of very loose sandy silt to silty sand overlying an approximately five feet thick layer of medium stiff clayey silt. Below the clayey silt was medium dense to dense sands. The Shannon and Wilson borings found a deeper soft clayey silt layer at a depth of on the order of sixty (60) feet below the ground surface. The groundwater at the site is expected to correspond closely with the level of the nearby Green River. We observed water levels at nineteen and one -half (19.5) feet below grade but Shannon and Wilson observed water levels on the order of ten feet below grade in the winter of 1982. Fluctuations in groundwater levels may be expected as the groundwater level is not static. General As previously mentioned, there are very loose sandy silts and sands near the ground surface. Also there is a soft compressible clayey silt layer at depth. The loose sandy silts and sands are compressible; however, most settlement occurs within this strata as soon as loads are applied. About 70 percent of total settlement in these strata will occur within a couple of weeks after the loads are applied. The deeper clayey deposits have longer -term consolidation characteristics and thus will contribute more to long -term settlement. Column and footing loads for this structure are similar to tilt -up warehouse structures of which numerous structures have been constructed in the valley. Based on our experience with these types of structures and calculations based on subsurface data obtained by the test borings, we estimate that total post- construction settlement will be about two inches with differential settlements of about one inch. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 E -2699 Page 4 Prior to placement of the fill, we recommend installation of at least five settlement markers within the fill area. These markers should be protected from disturbance by construction equipment. The markers should be surveyed by Earth Consultants, Inc. personnel or a licensed surveyor during fill placement and at intervals of 2, 4, 8, 16 (and so forth) days after completion of the fill placement. The initial reading should show the natural ground elevation and readings taken during surcharge placement should show the surcharge fill thickness. We will evaluate the settlement readings. Once the settlement has stabilized the foundation construction may proceed. We estimate that the fill should remain in place about three to four weeks before foundation construction. Foundations The proposed structure may be supported on conventional conti- nuous and spread footings bearing on at least two feet of granular structural fill. The upper surface of the underlying soil should also be recompacted to the maximum extent possible. Overexcavation of soil below the footing may be required depending on final site grades. Fill placed under footings should extend outwards from the edge of the footings at least two feet. Exterior footings should be bottomed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent outside finish grade. Interior footings may be at a depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of the slab. The footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand (2000) pounds per square foot (psf). Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of twelve (12) and eighteen (18) inches, respectively. A one-third increase in the above bearing pressures may be used when considering short term wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the supporting compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure on the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing soil or backfilled with a compact fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used between the structural foundation concrete and the supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of undisturbed natural soils and well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a fluid having a density of two hundred fifty (250) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend that drains be placed around all perimeter foot- ings that are placed below existing grades. Drainage around basement walls is particularly critical. The drains should be Earth Consultants, Inc. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 constructed with a four inch diameter perforated pipe bedded and covered with free draining gravel. The drains should have a positive gradient towards suitable discharge facilities. The footing drainage system should not be tied into the roof drainage system until the drains are tightlined well away from the building. The footing excavation should be backfilled with granu- lar soil except for the top foot which should be backfilled with a relatively impermeable soil such as silt, clay or topsoil. Alter- natively, the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete pave- ments. Slab -on -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on twelve (12) inches of granular structural fill. Any disturbed native soils below the structural fill must be either recompacted or replaced with structural fill. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free draining sand or gravel. We also recommend that a vapor barrier such as a 6 mil plastic membrane be placed beneath the slab to reduce water vapor transmission through the slab and the resultant moisture accumulation. Two inches of sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. Walls that are designed to yield an amount equal to at least 0.002 times the wall height can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty (30) pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, a uniform force of one hundred (100) psf should be added to the equivalent fluid pressure force. For calculating the base resistance to sliding, we recommend using a passive pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid having a density of two hundred fifty (250) pcf and a coefficient of friction of 0.35. The wall pressures apply only for a maximum wall height of ten feet. It is assumed that no hydrostatic pressures act behind the wall and that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If surcharges are to be applied they should be added to the above lateral pressures. Retaining and foundation walls should be backfilled with compacted free - draining soils with no organics. The soil should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay and no particles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of particles Earth Consultants, Inc. E -2699 Page 5 J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 Earth Consultants, Inc. E -2699 Page 6 passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Alternatively, a geotextile product such as Miradrain may be used. We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of all perimeter retaining wall footings. The footing drains should be surrounded by at least six inches of one - inch -minus washed rock, and provided with a positive gradient towards suitable discharge facilities. The pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing. For retaining walls, other than basement walls, weepholes can be used. The weepholes should be as low as possible to maintain drainage behind the walls. When weepholes are provided, all backfill within eighteen (18) inches of the weephole should consist of one - inch -minus washed rock. Excavations and Slopes In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regula- tions. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). All permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2.5:1 (H:V). These recommendations are applicable to slopes with a maximum height of ten feet. If higher slopes are anticipated, we should be contacted for the appropriate design and construction criteria. We also recommend that all excavated slopes be examined by Earth Consultants, Inc. to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage We suggest that appropriate locations of subsurface drains other than footing drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc., at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface soils J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 E -2699 Page 7 to reduce the infiltration of rain into the soils. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building founda- tions. We suggest that the ground be sloped 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings except in areas that are to be paved. Pavement Areas All parking and roadway areas may be supported on a minimum of twelve (12) inches of granular structural fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. A greater thickness and /or engineering fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet or unstable areas. If fill depths are less than eighteen (18) inches, we recommend placement of a fabric over the native soils. The upper twelve (12) inches of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density. Below this level a compactive effort of 90 percent would be adequate. The pavement section for lightly loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). Heavier loaded areas would require thicker sections. We will be pleased to assist you in developing appropriate pavement sections or specifications for heavy traffic zones, if needed. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be cleared of all trees, brush and tall grass. Removal of the grass root mat is not necessary where fill depths are greater than eighteen (18) inches. Stripped materials should be removed from the site or stockpiled for later use in landscaping, if desired. The stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under build- ings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load bearing areas. Following the stripping and clearing operation, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. Soil in any loose or soft areas should be removed and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designa- tion D- 1557 -70 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under Earth Consultants, Inc. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 Earth Consultants, Inc. E -2699 Page 8 pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Ideally, structural fill to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. During dry weather, any compactible non - organic soil can be used as structural fill. However, we recommend that at least the upper twelve (12) inches of fill below slabs and two feet of fill below footings meet the wet weather fill requirements. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration was performed on July 25, 1985. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling one boring to a depth of forty nine (49) feet below the existing grade. The boring was drilled by Drilling Unlimited using a truck - mounted drill rig. Continuous flight, hollow stem augers were used to advance and support the borehole during sampling. The location of the boring was approximately determined by pacing from property corners. The elevation of the boring was approximately determined by interpolation between contour lines shown on the site plan of the Shannon and Wilson report. The location and elevation of the boring should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. The location is shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of the boring, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. A slotted standpipe was installed in the boring to monitor groundwater levels. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. The log of the boring is presented on Plate 4. The final log represents our interpretations of the field log and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the log represent the approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D -1586. A Shelby tube sampler was used to obtain less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. The Shelby tube sample was driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer falling thirty (30) inches. J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 LIMITATIONS Earth Consultants, Inc. E -2699 Page 9 Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and test- ing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such as sieve analyses and Atterberg Limits on representative samples. Results of density and moisture determinations, together with clas- sifications, are shown on the boring log included in this report. The results of three sieve analyses are illustrated on Plate 5, Grain Size Analyses. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the boring. Soil and groundwater conditions may vary from those encountered by the boring. The nature and extent of variations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, Earth Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to reevaluate the recommendations of this report prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services It is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the con- struction specifications. It is also recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. Because of the nature of this project and soil conditions, we do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observa- tion and testing services. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. .......�...�.,...mr..�_�i..5:r ^•: ��`:v i•: �k" h': �'. �t• b�' k�' �wN• itKx59SA .":Y.tlw' J.E.D. Corporation August 1, 1985 JRF /tm The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location. Plan Plate 3 Legend Plate 4 Boring Log Plate 5,:,,,••••% Grain Size Analyses i ', - *. " Respectfully submitted, h • EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • = Q • • • • • kl • • cc: Structural Design Associates The Cheney Architects R.W. Thorpe rvu+Nf�'I'F� Earth Consultants, Inc. ames R. Finley, Jr., P. E. Chief Engineer E -2699 Page 10 KING GOUN�'Y I✓'h.F 4 61' THOM MAPS DATE; 19e4- Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY r�'INI MAP NENDE-LS MOTOR INNS TuKw�_A , WA. Proj. No. 2G 9 *ate A G e35jPlata I • • • c� ®B -7 • • _ _ y5 .....- ..... -...... �� -....- GREEN RIVER REFEREN cE-5 : I- SITE PLAN BY THE GHENEY /PAGE ARCHITECTS DATED 7- 8-65 2 BORIN6 LOCATION PLAN BY SHANNON 4 WILSON DATED fEB. 1982- ■ ■ ■ ■ 25 ® B -I • RT APPROXIMATE SCALE I 1 1 0 30 CO ROPY LEG END 0 B-IOI ALPPROxIMATE pacific, L0 (s0¢ING FROM PREVIOUS SHANNON 4 WILSGN REPogT PATEP FEB 1962 PQOPO$E.P gUILDING Consultants Inc. lil 4) OEOVECHNIC►L ErWP f 003 • OEOIOOY B ORING LOCATION PLAN NENDELS MOTOR INNS TUKWILA , WA. P,oj No 26 lDato AU6 .85 ' /MN 2 MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH SYMBOL LETTER SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Coarse Grained Sod s More Than 50% Material Larger Than No. 200 Sieve Size Gravel And Gravelly Soils More Than 50% Coarse Fraction Retained On No. 4 Sieve Clean Gravels (little or no fines) !.t • 'l: , • • � • ; + ∎ ' =• • ' ` • GW g yy Well- Graded Gravels. Gravel -Sand Mixtures. Little Or No Fines ......::0:: • • • • • • GP gp Poorly • Graded Gravels. Gravel - Sand Mixtures. Little Or No Fines Gravels With Fines( appreciable amount of fines 1 ^L } III 11 GM gm Silty Gravels, Gravel - Sand - Silt Mixtures GtC gC Clayey Gravels, Gravel • Sand - Clay Mixtures d And Sandy Soils More Than 50% Coarse Fraction Passing No. 4 Sieve Clean Sand (little or no fines) °•°•• •; •° •• °. ;•••: • L SW SW Well- Graded Sands. Gravelly Sand the Or No Fines �;•...::��;: ::• : :;:: ::: r ;•'.:.• •�t•� ' �•%• ', S . SF) Poorly- Graded Sands. Gravelly Sands, Little Or No Fines. Sands. With amount (appreciable amou of fines) • �I SM Sin Silty Sands. Sand - Silt Mixtures 4 ^ SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand - Clay Mixtures Fine Grained Soils More Than 50% Material Smaller Than No. 200 Sieve Size Silts Liquid Limit And Less Than 50 Clays I ML rtll n 8 Very , ,Silty- C Fine organic Sends : Clayey Fine Silts Sands w Rock ! Slight Plasticity Flour CL CI Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean i I I I I I I I I OL OI Omc Silts And ganic Silty rga Clays Of Low Or Plasticty Silts Liquid Lima And Greater Than 50 Clays MH mh Inorganic Silts. Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine Sand Or Silty Soils CH ch Inorganic Clays Of High Plasticity. Fat Clays ��i /� /� Oh h Organic Organic Clays Medium To High Plasticity. Organu mc Silts Highly Organic Soils ; --,. — y ' ` ' P1' pt Peat, Humus, Swamp Sods With High Organic Contents Topsoil .,.. „ Humus And Duft Layer Fill ••••••• •••••••••••••• Highly Variable Constituents • The Discussion In The Text Of This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached Logs Notes : Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. Upper case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab- oratory testing; lower case letter symbols designate classifications not verified by laboratory testing. I 2 "0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER II 2.4- ELBY TUBE SAMPLER OR P SAMPLER PUSHED �E SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED 2 WATER LEVEL (DATE) l b WATER OBSERVATION WELL Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY C TORVANE READING, tsf qu PENETROMETER READING. tsf W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight pcf DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT. percent P1 PLASTIC INDEX LEGEND Proj. No. 2699 'Data Aug. ' 85 'Plata 3 BORING NO. 10.1___ Logged By GI ELEV. 25± D 7-25-85 Graph cs Soil Description DePth M.) Sample (N) Blows F (14) 1 ML brownish gray sandy SILT, moist, very loose .... 5 : - - 10 . - - - 20 77 1 2 4 7 11 27 19 42 34 31 30 22 34 51 24 23 20 26 26 53 ._. ._. • . _. . .- _. - • • . . om brown to gray silty SAND, fine grained, mottled, moist to wet, very loose • • I OOI ML gray clayey sandy SILT, low to moderate plasticity, moist, medium stiff ........ : SP ,... ...... ....• dark gray SAND, medium grained, sub- angular, wet, loose to medium dense grades to: fine grained and wet, at 23' 1- - 25 - - 30 35 - - : —.40 11101/ i GI:1 gray silty SAND with some gravel, wet, medium dense SP to gray SAND, fine to medium black to m grained, poorly graded, subangular, dense le SILT lense at 38.7' .—. sm fine silty SAND, wet, dilatent, dense a 33.5' black to gray, fine to medium, silty SAND, subangular, wet, very dense - 45 Boring terminated at 49' below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 19.5' during drilling. Boring backfilled with drill cuttings. • , . . Earth 410 4 ) Cosisultants Inc. l‘i' BORING LOG NENDELS MOTOR INN TUKWILA, WASHINGTON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 2699 I Date Aug. '85 !Plate 4 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS N 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ER . F ME HP IN H $S S ++ jj N V V m \ y , � m [� g g V O O o N �� - r, I1_ 1 1 11 t_ C 111 1 I_ ► 1 11.1 1 1 I .1 _ 4 zt,„ 11 1 1 � 1 0 COBBLES 1 COARSE 1 FINE I COARSE 1 MEDIUM 1 FINE GRAVEL SAND 1 FINES KEY Z S F OP NIN 1 IN H ° O ° CO W a M N Boring or Test Pit No. B -1 B -1 B -1 DEPTH (ft.) 2.5 17.0 37.0 0 Co m U S CS ML ML SP Pf N ". C! tD d P1 N O O O O GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS DESCRIPTION SILT SILT poorly graded SAND 8 88 8 Moisture Content (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 °8 8 8 LL PL August 6, 1985 Mr. Rich Beeler, Planner City of Tukwila Planning Department City Hall Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Nendels Motor Inn Our Job No. 9581 Dear Sir: Mr. John Cheney, the architect for the Nendels Motor Inn project, has requested I inform your department that my office has reviewed his latest site plans. We have also completed preliminary revised designs of the utility plans for the project and have consulted with Jon Potter of R. W. Thorpe in his revisions of the Environmental Review. I can foresee no need for any major design revisions which would change the basic intent of the original plans submitted to the City in 1982 for the previous owner. As you are aware, we will be submitting a revised Utility Plan for the new project after the environmental review is completed. Respectfull R. Michael Spano, P.E. Kegel & Associates, Inc. RMS :le CRD 29 P. Kegel & Associates Inc. G 7 1985 CITY p KV1rrLq PLANNING DEPT. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 9800 EVERGREEN WAY (U.S. 99), EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98204 • PHONE (2061 353-1119/ 775-5424 DESCRIPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF PROPOSED MOTOR INN AND RESTAURANT FOR NENDEL'S, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Attached is a rendering of a very similar Nendel's Motor Inn constructed in 1984, in Everett, Washington. The proposed Tukwila facility will be very similar in appearance, although the location of the Entrance Canopy and Meeting Rooms has been altered to reflect differing site conditions. The buiding is constructed of wood frame slab on grade, the exterior materials are principally cedar bevel siding and some vertical grooved plywood siding, stained a soft pastel gray tint color. Small feature areas of split -faced concrete block will be utilized at retaining walls, garden walls, and other similar locations. The four stair towers visible on the skyline are capped with translucent fabric awnings containing the logo of the motel chain and internally lit for a soft glow at night. The level of this light is very low and does not illuminate brightly enough to provide light to the parking areas or any adjoining walkways. The overall building height of the three -story motel is approximately 29 feet above the finish grade at the first floor line. This grade will have been raised to elevation 28.75 for the required flood protection. The awnings at the top of the four stair towers will be aproximately 42 feet above this finished grade. There is a small basement service area under the restaurant and small basement service area under the motel; the floor of which extends to about four feet below the present grade of the site which is about 11 feet below the newly elevated dike height. Exterior lighting in the vicinity of the building will be down - lights mounted under the soffits and wall protections. Parking lot lighting will be provided through a series of low -level cut -off type light fixtures aimed to cut off light and glare from extending across the property lines to adjoining properties, rights -of -way, or river frontage. Ground level pathway lighting and walkway lighting will be provided at key points in the landscaping. H August 9, 1985 flr. Ross Earnst, City Engineer City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard RE: Wendel's Motor Inn, Tukwila Dear Mr. Earnst: :303 E: F CHITECTh c f� 6 1985 C - rt 'MLA Pt .P;": DEPT. We recently submitted a grading plan and are awaiting a permit to commence these operations. Enclosed please find six copies of six sheets of drawings to supplement the grading plan. These sheets are copies of the work done three years ago by Kegel & Associates, and submitted to the city at that time. I believe this work was approved at that time. The drawings enclosed are as follows: 1. Site Plan showing outfall for storm drainage through dike. 2. Detail Section and Specifications for outfall. 3. Site Plan of outfall location with temporary storm drainage /siltation system (for construction phase). 4. Site Plan continuation of temporary storm drainage /siltation system. 5. Sections of siltation pond details. 6. Notes and Specification for siltation control. All of the above drawings are exact copies of the work submitted earlier, with the exception of the first sheet which now shows the footprint of the newly proposed motel. None of the engineering quantities have been substantially changed in the transition from the Tukwila Hilton Project to the Tukwila Nendel's Project. MOUNT VERNON, \tVASH. 98273 206-336-5771 r e r,...t♦ �, i +SYi.,', r ....r �....,,:. s.... Sincerely, JC: tas Enclosures hn C. Cheney, Jr. AIA }•.i:Y:Y•.:.WT cc Rick Beeler Mike Spano, Kege1 & Associates Ted Dahl Pat Garrity it We request that these supplementary drawing sheets be incorporated with the grading permit application. We have just learned that, pending a renewal of the Department of Fisheries Permit to do this work, we may have only until the middle of September to construct the outfall before the river is closed for construction this year. We therefore request all due consideration for a quick review as soon as the DNS process is completed. We have not yet submitted our permanent storm drainage plans being prepared by Kegel, but this will be done in due course. As the enclosed plans show, the temporary storm drainage is a surface system with swales and siltation ponds, which is all we intend to construct under the grading permit presently requested. If you have any questions in regard to this request, or if I can supply further information, please contact me immediately. /NV 2/20 - 8 C8# /TYPE -.754 OUTLET R!P RAP DETAIL PAGE-4) r • .1 • r r pow vseou r (rvp) 7 s• --r- 1 •• 0 No Z x . `ri BLDG. SETBACK e GROUND 40 run 30' RIVER PROTECTION "ASEMENT TO KING CO. f fY D //fL i.ST /4i.. -t/; - : :+:.t' - I /00'- 18" 0 @ /Oio (C P /P E) B. MIN. TOP OF SLOPE WIDTH 1.0' C. MIN. TOE WIDTH 4.0' E. MIN. THICKNESS AT TOE OF SLOPE 2.0' F. MAX. TOE ELEVATION 1 FT. BELOW RIVER . BOTTOM 1.0' 2 K. MIN. THICKNESS OF TOE 3.0' NAME OF PROJECT TUTIV /CA N /L7av RIVER GREEN RIVER LOCATION TUKWILA DATE �.•5•- ' f PROF' - B OSED TOP Of 01.1's 4 EXISTING RIPRAP OR SPALLS TO BE RESTORED • c r .,: c r r.4i R ro s - AR•' IY CORP Of °N6. 9. »o ;Jr. EXISTING RIPRAP TRASH RACK FLUSH OR RECESSED IN BANK. f; Mn ere! C OUTFALL RIP -RAP WITH DIKE, SPECItICATIONS 1. tI16HT LOOSE RIP -RAP RANGE; 251 TO 1501 75% LARGER THAN 501 50% LARGER THAN 601 30% OF WHICH LARGER THAN 751 LOX LESS THAN 251 2. COMPACTION FOR FILL: MINIMUM COMPACTION = 90% OF THE MAXIMUM IDENSITV AS DETERMINED BY THE NUCLEAR METHOD AS OUTLINED BY,A.S.T.M. DESIGNATION NUMBER 2922 -71. 3. ROCK RIP -RAP SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 160 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, AND IT SHALL CONTAIN NO SOIL OR EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL. 4. ROCK SHALL BE TESTED BY THE KING COUNTY SOILS LABORATORY USING TESTS DETAILED BY A.A.S.H.O. T104 6E FOR SOUNDNESS, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 35%. RIVER BOTTOM 4 :EC ZETA/ PACE-10A V J\ C.5. t/ 1' l 1 % 1 1 /4'J'141 L Sf4/AL E AS \ q PER ,047.4 /L 86' °‘' 34° 16' // , — // ' •' // . C 1 / e c B X CB rl \\ SfE SHEET 3 t STORN J'twen CONSl/YIICl /Oi/ DETI /L 5 N 1 1 t LP 22.7 • JT.4/rE J771,11% DALE - • • J /LT.4TAN/ P0,1 ,2S . X_8t9 i = 1WFAVLOIV ELEY. 23.5 i J'T.4/rE .3M•41Y ewes .1/1747/ON. POND. '2 25'11_436$' x 1' fRFLON' ELEY. ?3.S! - -___ r. ij -- / ' 4------ I -- T -- / / / / / 1 1 / / �, I / // / ,/ 1 `-EX /ST. CONC. PAD s/Z TAT /ON AND r/ Z3 'xZs sx /' A N _JT,4/YE ST/f.IJY - BALES 11f41ra4 e, Al4/MAVN ) PRIOR • fahrt'ffr ) TEMP- ;FAC- POTEN- SFAC- ETED :IP : ONS LD BE LOC- APPROVAL THE DRY • A Ps t D ONES ASV 60fificaW 8 /1747 /ON Pow ((4/L 01A404W Mft © a / 4?L 5 <7) 'C'LJ Top oFx .: , s ;' , agrewrO9 - , . 'F _ - ti . amp G�EgS11�0 �' TO CO 0 1 fag j� / = ' stAgf' - ..a.......,,.., S /L��4 P2ND f e • 6Se 'maim Atrif OM Sea OreiZOSav .4.'f RE4rl rt0 ,"P.Y.l. 1607401M9 AIS69 PIP( Rif MVOS au, T.E.S.C.P. NOTES: • . . ALL WORK AND MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AN SPECIFICATIONS OF THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE CITY Of TUKWILA. 2) THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRICTEO.PRIOR . TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVEDIEMP— . ORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFAre. TORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND THE TIAL FOR.ON—SIYE EROSION HAS PASSED. • — • 3) WHERE POSSIBLE, MAINTAIWNATURALYEGETATION TO MINIMIZE EROSION. . . • 4) PLACE STRAW BALES IN LOCATION SHOWN AND SECURE BY TWO STAKES PER BALE. RIP-MP SHALL BE USED ON BOTH SIDES OF BALES FOR EROSION CONTROL IF FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT. 5) ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION AND DETENTION PONDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFAC— TORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE OPERATIONAL. 6) AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF PAVING WORK, TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROL AREAS SHOULD PHASED INTO PERMANENT APPROVED DETENTION AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. 7) APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF DESIGN, SIZE, NOR LOC— ATION OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS OR DETENTION FACILITIES; BUT IS AN APPROVAL APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ONLY. 8) ALL ATTEMPTS tHOULD BE MADE TO COMPLETE ALL CLEARING AND GRADING WORK IN THE DRY SEASON BETWEEN MAY AND OCTOBER.. 9) CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORM WATER OUTLET SYSTEM UP TO CATCH BASIN #4 SHOULD tOMMENCE;AS SOON AS THE TESCP PONDS AND SWALES ARE COMPLETED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AN OUTLET FOR SEDIMENTATION PONO 02. ;," MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: DB51P 1, NOT - CITY OFTUKv111LA Central Permit System APPLICANT: • 5 ISS.. , c &A- r.Q 0 CONDIT1ONAL USE SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT :lJa SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME RE5'i AT CD SHORT PLAT 0 SUBDIVISION D UNCLASS. USE DATE1 /2/ /TC TH i S DAY OF �� . i 1 9 Q 1 6 "oi � • f C�G L 1 1 N FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 VARIANCE gs=a)10 PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) fl SHF E R R E / L I I' E D PRO D PMUD D CHG. OF riCOMM PLAN ZONING LJAMENDMENT NAME /(4.469,a L S / 7 /:C w / G 69SS oc 4 F TELEPHONE . O e ) _Z r - Leo o ADDRESS #3'O ,X L Aft 4 g ✓E,terr CYiJ ZIP PROP. OWNER: NAME Al /L✓ t.a /£ ,4s EPI-IONE ADDRESS S/9 del < cc4 -• \1ct1-1 t . ) u/,9'F,-3 j y to _-16 SECTION 11: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPQSE 5) 6) 7 ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM TO WILL A) B) 8) IS PROJECT BE DEVELOPED . 1 N PHASES? X YES CNO 1 F YES, DESCRIBE & 63 CCr Moir` 7 �y ' or . ga.9 Cizato ,,C)C i }, Loin 141 tM STA ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 9.41 A GROSS 9.4'7 'Ai EASEMENTS 0 FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL #FLOORS I NCLUDES : SITE UTILIZATION: #6-7 cm ,S r 7' ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING $'rALLS: - STANDARD Sf - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL MAP? AYES ❑ NO L, (7 ■b • 1 TOTAL GROSS / 5 35 INCLUDES: FLOOR AREA EXISTING PROPOSED G--2 • (-Of A 0 0 CJ 0 0 0 0 0 O level CONSIDERATION C - 2. ig BASEMENT EIMEZZAN INE El BASEMENT 'MEZZANINE NOTES C k M 37710 L'77O° 156 0O0 0 2 1S l �5 2-3 0'. - � )(Pc AT pike (STepr) ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF.THE PROPERTY 1NVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELI 1385 Tl ". 'A") LA cat 1.' "''� i DEPT. l ; nom, U 2� ) ZIP 0 BA NTERURBAN (SIGI$TURE OF CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER) rt4:f�=A'tir� {,Y f;•Eth�r; a'i,..t�7f lir. �.* .�.<`::<v:.Nu;:ierit;tdtt�kl': cii "v".:� July 31, 1985 Mr. Rick Beeler, Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Nendel's Motor Inn and Restaurant Dear Rick: PaREP61.1.0 I [ I CITY OF TUI . PLANNING DEPT. J Enclosed please find revised preliminary floor plans for the Restaurant portion of the project. You will note that we have reduced the Restaurant area to 8,100 S.F. on the Main Floor and 2,100 sq. ft. on the Lower Floor. A strict application of your zoning ordinance produces a parking requirement of 10,200 S.F. divided by 100 = 102 stalls. Alternatively, if you consider the seating capacity of the revised lounge to be 100 persons (1500 S.F. divided by 15 S.F. per person) a parking requirement of 100 divided by 4 = 25 stalls is indicated rather than 15 stalls for the same area as indicated by your zoning ordinance. I'm sure we can accept the figure of 112 (10 more than the number generated by the zoning ordinance). To 112 we would add the 151 stalls based on the Motor Inn and the 85 stalls produced by the seating capacities of the various assembly rooms previously shown. The new total of parking stalls is 358. The plan recently sent to you shows 388 parking stalls. I believe this will eliminate the need for exploring any cooperative parking agreements at the present time. I would appreciate your review of this analysis and an indication of whether or not you will concur. Also enclosed for your preliminary review is a series of exterior elevations for the building. These drawings will be incorporated with the checklist being prepared for you. Thank you for your continuing assistance on this project. Si nc Y. r. AIA JC:tas Enclosures: 8112 SF Restaurant Plan 2106 SF Basement Plan Elevations k elt , f v tefrmtr / 6(1 O N' At uk 303 VERA STREET MOUNT VERNON, WASH. 98273 — 206-336-5771 June 24, 1985 Mr. Rick Beeler, Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Nendels Motor Inn Dear Rick: JUN 2 5 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. This memo is to confirm our conversation of last Friday. I have requested your reconsideration of the parking requirement calculations as discussed over the phone. We believe the proper calculation for occupant load of the room identified. as Theater (1200 S.F.) is on the basis of one occupant per 15 S.F., or 80 occupants. This, in turn, requires 20 parking stalls per your zoning ordinance. The basis of this is that the Theater is actually a Lecture Hall (though the Nendels Motor Inn commonly calls them theaters) which will have fixed desks for computer terminals and calculators for each user. We have been asked to provide a theater for 60 occupants, giving each a very generous knee and arm space for note - taking and computations. That is why the room is so large. However, we calculate the occupant load based on the code requirement of 80, as we consider this conservative and prudent. Secondly, you have no doubt noted that the gross square footage of the restaurant facility is presently about 8900 S.F. try client has asked me to hold this area to 8000 S.F, but I have not yet produced a satisfactory floor plan at this size. We are continuing to work on this and expect to reduce the area or, if we fail, increase the parking accordingly. I request elimination of a separate calculation of the Cocktail Lounge as distinct from the rest of the Restaurant. It has been my experience with zoning ordinances which specify restaurant parking at one per 100 S.F. (or other similar figures in other jurisdictions) that this square footage is intended to be the total square footage of the Restaurant, including not only Cocktail Lounges and Dining Spaces, but also Kitchens, Storerooms, Lavatories, and Storage Areas, as these spaces are common to nearly all Restaurants. In the alternative, if there is a desire to calculate a higher occupant load in a Cocktail Lounge, I believe it should be compensated for by calculating a lower occupant load in Kitchens, Storerooms, Service Areas, and 303 \ /ERA STREET MOUNT VERNON, WASH. 98273 — 206- 336 -5771 • f i _ • 'C S : i\L� � , .y .,N.{ f -.M^ �; y .n M'S i . : . i 44 ^ P_. • i ."r.'. ^:e _��: ,•,h ,• W . ati,:.ci<��:;�..�. �.., <a. �o-i�." �r, � t„ F:i.� ".i4;nl.,u.��s:u�•:L..:� : -.:��� tt... u. �,' ��yu; �nic� ,.cu„�..,a� °t,�;,��i;_�,�c.�.. c ,.�55 .x., #,i..:w:��:... �u..xi:;d�.s:!���:.,.��3r .�ti3� ^ a so on; which are accessory and would create little or no occupancy requirements under the provisions of the U.B.C. If this approach is taken toward portions of a restaurant, one finds that there is about the same result as using a straightforward application of one per 100 S.F. Please let me know if you can concur with these observations about our Preliminary Floor Plan and Site Plan No. 10. Thank you for your continuing assistance on this project. 7.X; J.l } ti`J }!�d's".Y.J.y..•?S tY11f �� ° r :''�'�a�Y�+;`..'- �5:vi::'!1'ti •eF,s;`7.: ...`it >.'- .rr '„add.'@: igi�i;:tt:.... June 14, 1985 Mr. Rick Beeler, Planner City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: Enclosed please find an updated Site Plan for the Nendel's Motor Inn. After our pre - application conference last week, I have redrawn this plan deleting the Phase II wing of the motel and increasing the number of parking stalls on the site. This plan shows compliance with the existing city parking requirements with regard to occupancy of the restaurant, the meeting rooms and the number of guest rooms in the Motor Inn. In fact, the parking somewhat exceeds the total to be calculated from the ordinance. I still have not received a site development plan from Exxon, so I have not been able to update this portion of our site plan with any further information. Thank you for your continuing assistance in the development of this project. c.c. Bob Thorpe UMOWE0 JUN 18 1985 CITY�OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 1t 303 VERA STREET MOUNT VERNON, WASH. 98273 — 206- 336 -5771 JOHN W. DOBSON PAUL W. HOUSES DAVID C. DOSSON WYMAN IC. DOSSON c Mr. Brad Collins Planning Director Planning Department City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 98188 DOBSON, HOUSER & DOBSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW aa• WILLIAMS AVG. •O. P. O. SOX SS HINTON. WASHINGTON 05057 July 20, 1982 RE: Christensen Group, Inc. Dear Sir: Miss Helen Nelsen, owner of the property to the North of the property now sought to be developed by the Christensen Group, has an interest as an adjoining property owner and as the original vendor of the prop - erty now owned by the Christensen Group. The property was originally soicl under contract recorded in the office of the King County Auditor recorded on August 14, 1969, under Auditor's File No. 6551402 being recorded in Volume 128 of records, page 590. Reference is made to the description contained in the contract, copy of which description is attached and marked Exhibit "A ". Under the terms of the contract there are certain obli- gations on the part of the purchaser. Paragraph 5 of the contract provides " * * ** *purchaser agrees not to use said premises for gasoline service station, automotive sales or repair business, including new and used cars, trucks or heavy equipment sales and service." Under Paragraph 7 of the contract the seller granted to the purchaser a slope easement ten feet in width along the north line of the property sold which carried the provision " * ** *that any fill within the slope's easement shall be made with topsoil borrowed from other portions of the premises conveyed to purchaser. rej 1 T•L u••, Mr. Brad Collins Page 2 July 20, .1582 • "Purchaser covenants and agrees they will not voluntarily grant any easement to the flood control division of King County, or to any other political subdivision or any in- dividual or corporation along the Green River, adjacent to the premises covered by this agreement, which easement would grant to the general public the right to use such easementt It is understood and agreed that in the designing of the improvements to be placed upon the premises covered by this agreement the drainage plan will be so designed that surface drainage is directed to the West Valley Road or the River, and not towards property of Seller on the north. .,,In this regard drainage plans shall be submitted to the Seller for her inspection and approval, prior to the development." Paragraph"P of the contract provides: "It is understood and agreed that Purchaser proposes to construct an entrance driveway to the above described premises, which driveway shall be fifty (50) feet wide and shall provide access to and from the West Valley Highway. The center of said driveway will be located at a point on the _east line of the above described premises which point determined by an exten- sion of the center line of South 158th Street. Seller recognizes that the location of said driveway must con - form to the requirements of state law, and agrees to locate any driveway which she may construct on that portion of Seller's property lying north of the above described premises, at such .location as may be approved by the State Highway Department. In this connection Seller agrees to use her best efforts to assist Pur- chaser in obtaining the location of a traffic light at the intersection of South 158th Street and West Valley Highway." Miss Nelsen desires the City of Tukwila provisions and asks your department and into consideration. that the County Commission and be advised as to these contract that in any granting of permits the City of Tukwila take them ` J Mr. Brad Collins Page 3 July 20, 1982 If you desire a complete copy of the contract we would be happy to furnish it to you. If you have any ques- tions, please contact either myself at 255 -8641 or Miss Nelsen at 255 -6535. Thanking you for your consideration I am Very truly yours, OHN W. DOBSON JWD:jh encls CC: `Miss Helen Nelsen Christensen Group: Attention Kenneth W. Baines . J *4WEUMAni Governor ;Jecember 1, 1982 Christensen Group, Inc. 2660 N.L. Andresen Road Vancouver, WA 98661 • Gntleven: Sincerely, Linea S. Rankin, Permit Coordinator Shorelands Division cc: Cit of. Tukwila ECY 050- 1 -28(a) Rev. 11/81 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PV-11 ..00,0AJWANron9E01 MMVMOINNWO oorwO W. M00S Meow k 882 j C: OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Re: COUNTY: King APPLICANT: Christensen Group, Inc. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 590 -14 -1361 (82 -4) The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was . received by this office on December 1, 1932 . The review period by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will terminate 30 days from the above date. If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the permit may commence following expiration of the review period, provided that all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. SHutiELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF h/1 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY Type of Action ®XSubstantial Development Permit ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to Christpngpn Grnup, TnC (name of applicant) 2500 N.E. Andresen Rd. Vancouver, WA. 98661 Date received Approved XXX Date to undertake the .following development Application No. 82 -4 -SMP Administering Agency City of Tukwila with related food service and meeting facilities W.M. in Tukwila, King County Wa. township, range) (state the master program sections or page numbers) strategies contained in the project EIS. (City or County) 13 May 1982 Denied 30 Nnvemhar 1982 274 room hntel (be specific) upon the following property SW 1/4 of Sec 24, Township 23 N Range 4E (legal description, i.e., section, The project will b within shorelines of statewide (be /not be) significance (RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a Urban designation. The following master (environment) program provisions are applicable to this development TMC Chapter 18.44 Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions Prior to issuance of construction permits pursuant to this Shoreline Management Permit, the property owner /apllicant shall execute an Environ- mental Impact Mitigation Agreement based on the impact mitigation This permit is granted pursuant to the.'Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordi- nances or regulations applicable to this project, but not incon- sistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL. THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED. n IiSZ (Date) • Direc ,ce of Cemmun i ty D epment THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE. Date received by Department of Ecology Approve Denied This substantial development permit with conditional use/ variance is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to •the following additional terms and conditions: (Date) (Signature of. Authorized Department of Ecology Official) NENDEL'S (SIGNED) LEGEND • © ROMER VAULT O TELEPHONE BOx t] - TRAFFIC ucHr pot£ () SMYTARY SERER MA O CATCH BASIN Ex FENCE • ex 1/2 REBAR • SET 1/2' REBAR 4. FIRE HYO. / J 1e' / ti ∎p J t 2 rye/ 2 '1 EX 1/2' REBAR LS „y 10333 20' WADE ACCESS POINT NO. J 6557 STATE ANGLE METHOD USED FIELD TRAVERSE EQUIPMENT USED GTS 2 TOPCON TEN SECOND rOTAL STATION WESTERLY LIMITS ,I --EX. CON R /WI MARKER f,ACMENT'l 5 LATE CER77F/CA7E TO: HELEN B. NELSEN ANO US NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON - -- LS. 17137.31 `-- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASE HERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE MJH 'MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA /ACSM LAND RILE SURVEYS' JOINTLY ESTABLISHED ANO ADOPTED BY ALTA ANO ACSM IN 1988: MEETS THE ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS OF A CLASS "A' SURVEY, AS DEflNEO THEREIN. ONLY ITEMS Nos. 1.2,10 AND 11 OF TABLE 3 ARE INCLUDED IN THIS SURVEY. _RECORDING CERTIF/CAT RECORD NUMBER FILED FOR RECORD THIS_DAY OF 19_, A.D., AT IN BOOK_OF SURVEYS ON PAGE _AT THE REQUEST OF KENNETH J. OYLER. MANAGER SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS GRAPHIC: SCALE 1 » s. ee to 7 7 EX. CONC R/W MARKER ( L\ 1'/51 1 Mob SO ti 20' WIDE ACCESS POINT NO. 2 S 86'04'17 W (Dena) s 86 W _ _ GATE' JSIA 1/2' REBAR •.. N 07'40:58" W (Desc.) N 07'41':10: W 20.00' 369.6:3' DETAIL s 86'0417" S 8, •O '45 (Desc.) I 30' INGRESS/EGRESS \ 1 EASEMENT AF1f9I11260669 - a £K 6' EXT. CONC. GRUB J0' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT AF/9111260669 NENDEL'S TUKWILA ASSOCIATES I FROM AF. At 91112606691 That portion of Henry Meader Donation palm No, 46 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. W.M. . h :.ng County, Washington. beginning at a point 32,17 feet North of the Intersection of the monumented line of State Rood 1BL being 72 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the Easterly margin of said State Road 181 Right -of -Way with the monumented line of South 158th Street. being 28.00 feet 5'outh, measured at right angles to the Northerly Right -of -Way Ifne of sold South 158th Street, thence 5 860417' W 280.13 feet. thence N 740'58' it 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. From • the Point of BeglnnMg proceed S 74058• E 20,00 feet, thence 4'17' N 86 E to the West Margin of State Highway 181 (also known as West Volley Highway) Right -of -Way, thence :motherly along the Westerly margin e? the Right -of -Way, thence southerly clang the Westerly margin of the Right -of -Way 495,69 feet, thence .5 86t4'17' W to the Easterly Bank of the Green River, thence along the Bank of the Green River Westerly and then Northerly to a point which bears 5 8604'17- W approximatel 458 feet from the Point of Beginning, thence N 860417' E to the Point of Beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof condemend in Superior Court Co. us No. 592029: and EXCEPT the Southeasterly 10.00 feet In width adjacent to the above Cause No. 592029; situated in King County, State of Washington, and HELEN EI NELSEN PROPER :7 I FROM AF. No. 91112E0659 1 That portion of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46 In Section 24. Townsnlp 23 North, Range 4 Eosr, YI.I/.., Xing County, Washington, beginning ct the intersection of the monumentec' lino of State Road 181 (also known ea West Valley Highway) being 72.00 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the Easterly margin of said State Road Right - of - Way, with the monumented line of South 158th Street. being 28 f,.t South. measured at right angles to the Northerly Right -of -Way line 0:' said South 158th Street. thence Nortterly along the monumented line cf sold State Highway 181 32.17 feet. thence 5 8604'17' W 60.13 feet to 'he West margin of the State Highway 181 Right -of -Way line, which Is the Point of Beginning. From the Point of Beginning proceed E: 860417' W 220.00 feet, thence N 7 VI 20.00 feet. thence S 85V4Y7' W approximately 458.00 feet to the East Bank of the Green River. ;trance Northerly along the East -Rank to c point that bean S 8521'00' W f..rem a point on the monumented line of the sate .state Highway 181 that Is 261.5f feet North from the intersection o: :.^e monumented lines of State Higrtway 181 and South 158th Street. Which intersection Is mentioned in the paragraph above, thence N 8521'00' E to the Westerly margin of State Highway IV Right -of -Way which is 78.00 feet West of the Monumented line of State Highway 181, thence Southerly along the West margin of the Right -of -Way approximately 233 feet to the Point of deal:ming: EXCEPT that portion thereto' condemend In Superior Court Cause N. 592029: situated in King County, State of Washington. and SURVEYOR'S CERT/FICAT 77-IIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT 'YE REQUEST OF HELEN 6 NELSEN. CN DEC. 21, 1992 • CE nnc-4TE N E 5524 20' WIOE ACCESS POINT NO. 1 CATE 00' WI 1.61 aCB - -� ------------- -- -- -, t v STA 147+ 1 t \ t 72• 60' __ s 0 O NENOQ, S INN SIGN STA 148+ n ENCE CDR, .'0.55. 'n ----------- O 7 32.17' Z ° O SS MH KENNETH J. OYLER, C.E !e•i - S P.O. BOY 2238 RENTON.. WASHINGTON 98056 FENCE CCP. Ey -c•�• DETAIL No Seale S'.158fh28S T___A 73' STA 151 +00 1 I • 1 A.P. STA 156+15.10 EX, PIPE IN CASE (4/29/89) (206) 255 -5050 ) FENCE CCP. LC:I. d 1.7Y/. STA 149 +25.97 �-' PATCH JN PAVEMENT -X LEAD At TACK SET (4/29/89) DESTORYED 60' _ STA 150 +Q0; ,1 . EASEMENT DESCRIP 770N t FROM A.F. No. 9111260669'1 That portion of Henry Meader Donation Clai :-r No. 46 in Section 24, Township 2.3 North. Range 4 East, MA, King County, Washington. commencing at the Intersection of the monumented line of State Road No. 181. being 7200 foot Westerly, measured at right angle to the Easterly margln of said State Road wi;.n the monumented line of South 158th Street being 28.00 feet South, measured at o right angle to the Northerly Right -of -Way line of sofa South 158th Street. said Intersection being represented by o punched railroad spike. From this point continue N 7'40'58" :V c:ong said monumented line of State Road No. 181 o disatnce of 32.17 lee;. :hence South 8604':7' West 280.13 feet, thence North 7'40 Wes: 20._0 feet. thence South 860417' West opproxmlately 359.63 fool to the Easterly border of the portion condemed in Superior Court Couse No. 592029. this point being the true point of beginning and the and of the line designated as A which 1s the border botweon holm; 6. lloisen property to the North and Mendel Inn's property to the South. From tints true point of boginntnq continuo South 21 West along the Easterly border of the portion conaerrned in Superior Court Cousu No. 592029 approximately 225.00 foot to :ne exist(,g concrete Right- of-Way Marker. thence at a right angle :0.00 feet to the east, thence approximately 225.40 feat North 2127'39" East to the line designated A " above, thence approximately 10. t0' .feet Westerly along line A to the point of beginning. SW 1/4, SW 1/4, OF SEC 24 -23 -5 'W ALTA /SCSI SURVEY OF PORTION OF HENRY READER D.C. NO. 46 SEC. 24 T 23 N. R 4 E., W.M. DECEMBER 21,19921 0 SET 1/2" REBAR W/TAC .Ud NUMBER SCALE: 1' >- 50 i 0R AS SY,OVM 92 -89009 EX CONC MON ,. IN CASE { i ` i tAA • AsL 'st.$/ . : T "� :� :��` °!'�`' ;• :�`' I1�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�III�I�I�IIl�llll�l�4�- III�III�III�I 111 41 I I I I�IIJ 1II I. III 1 1111111IJ11111�. �11111I1111111I1111111II1III1II1111111II1III1II111111II ... 0 leTH"INCH 1 / 3 - .. -- •. - :-- -. Y . . s. - -..'- -- _...._. __ 6 _ .._.._..._.._._..7,�.._.1...- _... 8 9 10 11 tt�EINQLJI N6Y 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED.. IS LESS • J CLEAR THAN THIS' NOTI IT IS -DUE TO of sz Be tz 9z sz 1 7Z z ez; zz tz I • SUALITY OF THE O DOCUMENT I 6 8 L 9 9 C z ww O IIIIIIIIII ull11111lnlllllllhulllulllullli� iiii ililrllltlliliiiil uii mi iiii iili Ili atiinliililii ihifiliii ' fin iirr iii! i►iilil�i liu iln �nnluil1l IIiiniJnuIIInJIfillllll linllln :JIlliluniJllnlllnillnlull 1111111111 n•rn . P'�f +, : i '`T' `',`'P.• R S '•er a i.' 'c. ?. .a ^ .A'tt +' RY / "•4`: >'� rt.w,.'q,' .,N.1 6,�" -; �': %,,,, t ; t 3,��r•: T e�"* c:`s. .� � ,'*� ✓ .aft n ?'trt 1r i II � II ry .�•. >i) �� .�� ii � y " ra, i�it!! €k. •� -��r*+ t" 1. N. t. •i j i.. L I ' :'7., 4 l{ U !..•..'.. � ^ f. ry ', ! ' rdt 4'�rrvt, :`J... J Yu' :�,� NEB .. �F. 2f .I, . F.'� 'T' ;� . ° •"U. r. f��i t .�" `!'S F , I ?. {,r .h i4dxf�vl ' .a " �k •)l:.f. :r?:!Y: �p I� ' •l. 1 \ :"1,RS 1 ; :`t�. ".7' 1'. ,r,} ,{ .'J. )'i t • :Ifi. .11 !. e' F r ' 1 .7 r +.� = . A - s: pa � W,,, .1 t �, r ;t�7��4 ,.•..'� �• ., 5 . t.. rrc. . I , ..ct.: , s.: .t •.1... _ ij, . s.1 k )'.. ... .: •. •' .. .� .'�'� ... ..... .. .. .;. ,, 4'' ,. ._.., r3!•i;r ,..,. •!� !� ... � .. .S. ,,. - .. ., .... ., .i ,.1. "F,1t �... .... .i. r,.,, li, +n kit .•�i. �Pil.(, ....�I ?�� y _...l;r .. r.. ... , ,..r. E .. fit.,. i,.a. ,:,r , •: �i .r.( '� •:,r' ... - ...... ll .xw �t t;• )b -. � t. - ,�,1 5 :.'�!t. #; td, , ti4t'. ry;.: yY. A } .{ . . f , i w. }.;, '� ks�r- �4wh�r � t r 'r''Y '�,}"�}`� r,�'2. �hr�- 1st?• f��r,.', �(' ��tt. ySi�F`. k�, 4. hi !�k:ttl,t'T�1a:4�i,dt'.�,r.'zC , 3 .14247 9 17 "fCt 011 P. fruetcer , p f.,6,4 : • • - r-1-/■*-1-11 - 7 • ".'"? • 1.01.1•!:;!41,.. 1J • .:.1 A N 1 ('r t1 6. 11-01.4•mg...0,,Ati A-' 1+1.7'. . r -c p - .'l.fy 1J ' , k* 4 rx.• s , , ___., :, • .. YillINIP1'. .6 r . • • -. ..?--'-,, c-4 1,, ' , .. - • ' 6.: Y.-,..,-. / I . 1 4.G. C..,41•Jt ' , *. r- 1 '•'. 7 7•7 V1?.); 0W/I Di I ' : . , . .. •. • 0 - ' ,.... ..9 rt-, : • . :z...6.7...,..;,- 4 , ,,... : 4:,-...)k)-1^, • :•',.,;::, :. . . : : ;•.:■, : ' .v. tsie i•I'F?it f. .; , h . ••"?) 67, ‘.-. ': 0 • __..... -• w/eizp,okiD .COviz .. ; P s4 ': : .'9 T • • ' "..., • ; ••: ..4,:ii."•:i..,AA',,q ).cf-4•ey, , :••• 1 ;••••., , :,...''• • ', yfritAi.f.4,1 cw,(A . ... ._• ..... . A(:;r 1 t . (..A , "••••,:v:2!e. ',;3S' c (".'It• .) I 0- i•A pp' .......__. _ _. ........ .......... 11i AK1Air AarAlrol.-1, ( r( it i Tt / A, ;7 ‘4 ,..,, , , . iv • . our 12,•',/,(c., FiLzle.r. • (,?A) t• e,A "I . P-1:4- IA r.' r* y,i :.:141.. It W Cr 1 t'A' •Y'-' 1 -I 'xi" v i • - ' , 1.:11: rt..h I.) vv. (ttsla=.1 --1':•1:-'f- (1E (pin:El 1/1.-.'q k '' en c. ... tfe.., IA (<0 P., ('0n/r) ‘ 15-(: Ai t :rfc';') : v • ..)..... 1141 ,, LTpc p t,,..1,,,,.. T . A .. ,, 1 . GP cizlis • PF7vt."; rd.■ ii- A- (■-..r /. 1 -- Ai: " 11 ' - t'„ HI; il . t 1 — ,lio.1•11.11A rp4,•-.2r..r. 1 ! '-4' P-r. ,I,4 ' tr, 4:-. (D4'..) F'`.• .. 1::. , • VI r -Mt t AA 111\lt./ wr. • " ` 1 .. • . -•,- if 1:.01 lift ; ' KIA OA ' 1 . ' . ' • > .,_ 11 -- I.,AA 1-1 AA : E trot-v.11A pi '.'- , e,.1-1-t" , . 6' :',..• (...rt-r- . 0 f..ii °L)6 PP-n3IDP-0/4 6rf... . ' !- IP *. 1.1.:-/5tsi "v t"' ''''' . : A" . C•fl 6( gc.)1 NA 6A ( ' E 1) P W rri-'- •ri_/ii ' kkal..1 I -47 pl, ,,,, •L 5, • . - • " . . , 5 '• •••••••:• •"••• • • .• • • : A -••••• - • • / • tL ' . • • • ; • • •... ' • . .,•••••,! 1 .•1•J tA 14 K.: • o F• E11•: • 1•'•'1■/!; 4 iv A r.; r M (.rt::; I A.05, (;) . • 7i.• . •= Jt /if.; AL4Jc F.. P5rs, h.S 14- ,Atz . 1 \/111-F 1JA*1 1 ,"C\/!' :1z 1-1,./Rii f A<S pr.":•Er• ELM , k •:•;•‘,.. " I.)r 1 .•-• • ( .1").4kly iS4A'r174.: I \J F..1" L:;- rt)r-t. t1r. °•ty... (Op r,)t.,14"....- t ifJ4j rf•If2jc2 1 MA I pp•-•.20F , , • . • . . -nom- .i...k!v • .,;-11L4 14- A frft•..VAL.- ; tsi 11:••••;• r F.)4.) P. Ai...tr kJ ATI ■15."3. itit' • 11 rk ,v.f.1.ar GI TY '01: ' • • • • • , • i • " " ' , " ••• • ...1, • . .rn't.....•Nrilt.A.v• tl ••:.,/,•':;..',.•...,'-:,' - , • . eiv „•• 1. 1'' • V` , - 4 _ . ' 1:t''' :'...•: •': . ; A ,,,,V , 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111Plillimpllinuuoliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniulmillpj I D1.1111111111111111 0 "... ... 1 2 3 - _4 . 5 6 7 ...... E3 9 I IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS Leg 1 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO oe 6Z ee tz sz sz vz ez 1 zz vz , THEarrr UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 11 . . ,Ii,ollidiji1110 1 1111 1 1111111111111 1 HI 0,11,11 Illuly■IgqiiiiIiiiiliiifildiiiIIIHIIIII4iii:thillaiii,iiiiligiiii,444 it,. '.:,,k, A ,t .,, ,. G-",igi;',' '?:.' r , ••■., ' 7 ... ..r.. . .' :, ! `.•'‘:".:'''.' .•.". '' ',',...V 6 *. . - — • 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 • 10 11 ....K....* 12 .• 54- • , , . . • ••• • s e z •••■ 11 1111111 I lIIIlIIIIlIIIIIIIIIlIIII 1111111111111111111111111 \t•/)'1. 0 ‘, I ' • rvF 13S-3s-DIK --Ltiollui ., lIlIlululIlIlIll 1111 . DESIGN M1111360111 LIMUITID 320 •112th:SW. Everett WA. 347— 2954; 745-8255 I 1 ' , hp MOM. • 10. .01 110 1 k 11111 "1111 I111111111 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 • A .: • 11■!.1.11001CRY .A.I111/17 CO. .E,LE-QATI0&I An . 1 3;'L LTO y 1— 1 • e !Li IQ • ® Li• _ II OE 11 I 0 J --------- II __I L_ 4.4 ----_-_-_-___ --- -.L.' • 11111 .11 :: - __'=- 1 — — — --L — — — • — . - - — — . , PIIIIIIPPINTOPPVIIIIPINIPPINTI 3 P.191711.1n11.1441.11PRPRIWITUNIPWWWWIIIIIIII 6 7 .‘_‘ 9 ' \I IF THIS MICROFILMED LESS 1 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 6E fiL a 9Z SE VE CE I EZ IE jrl'ILL04:,rrY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 4 6 13 L. 1 inlidnolni 00 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 10 11 .{{..4{.{.. 12 • 9 c 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,41 • " '• t ez %,„ • r....t.t.s.a • . • • . . M F Nv•ID 0' 1 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY APPROVED JOB NO. SET NO. SHEET OF • • 0 • •• 4: . . 6,4•4 A - - - t — I `6 ref , DATE "Alo'Y? 8HEETS.f.4 v, O 1 c . ,. Res re; URAMT PIA eMIZ SQUARE per I III I III I III I III 1 111 1 111 1 111 III 11 I III I III I III I III I III I III I I1.1 1 111 1 1II . 1 1 11111 I1. 1 11 1 1 ! 11 11 0 •,HS NCH 1 3 4 5 6 7 1_ . 8 , 9 10 11 .0,..., 12 �1 H S MICROFILMED DOCU IS LESS • IF C LEAR TI THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO OE 6z eG Lz 9z Ge oz CZ; zz tz OTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTi: e a L 9 s i e e 1 ^ IDUIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �° i'' IIIIIIIIIII �ifl „i CII 7rz . •. .-. IIIIII�IIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII111IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfillIIIIIIlIlI1IIIIIItI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILII • 1 . ' '. ,. I , •�F '"< 'e e- 4^?�ay• v-r» r^."t T •« ?mw�.�� ti 1 l 1 • TeAst/ SERVICE dAsEMEMT PCAIJ s. t o o ..5 WAE - Fir RECEIVE o,ul. IIII+ 111111�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 1111 1�11111�IIl�IIL�IL��I�I�LIIII .11.JlIl1.11II.11111111111 ffillillM1111 111111111.11 0 1 2 3 4.. - .... 5 .. 6 7 . ‘ 8 9 10 11••— 12 � IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS j CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO OE az GL cz ez GE Vi EE ; zz Sz eTHE. UALITYOF- THE'ORIGINALDOCUMENT a e .c, 9 s ., E z i��p Il II III 'u l l l u 1 l I I II I I I I I I II I I III I I I I IIII I IIll 11 1111 1111 IIII IIII IIII IIII�IIII�IIII�II1�1III�IIII�IIII�III IIICIIIIIII I IIII IIII IIIII�IIIIIIIII� II I II IIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�III IIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII� 7:3h'R!'�"_ . a . �.�� , � ,.3, ;.'.rii..i.NYY'2A'•, ..�>U ,. .CfF,�"v. +. .•'& �9�'I^ y m7'.d =Y i!`.r..'A.v... c%v 7k..' 'Li;�.:. tl. "N:t�I 2s :.1...,!a:.'�?i'a;;:l!...e "rrX:. 'ric.:itt, ',n. ':J. inn. 1 STo246L Ferezete - - - - — — -- -- G8'' i i o " 1 STo -.4aC 1 - - - -- 1 RIF TS -3 - 1 . L- ei4D :L's G / OUO R sro2 1 a apt a:�r3.H�ZN� {,a� '•�}. {`n {.',`a, DATE REV. DRW. CHK. APP. JOB NO.595 SET NO. SHEETS .• 1';p.._.:Sil:...a, .,.tiair�::4`i:'.kr ?1 • . . • , . . • \ .....*••••••••1■Mt[e■ -. RESTAURANT: EAST ELEVATION 1E Nee match line--1 .410 :;., - - imummumumi mu Kytiri ' 7 ' • Jl ti , RESTAURANT NORTH ELEVATION WIENW11 1 MOTOR INN SOUTH ELEVATION a H LAD nrn 1 1E1 EC 1 • .3ffitts,"11 wprrry,...,r,S.517,V,r1s.,r1;••;-rwivr '• - • ":!. - 1;:1 77 771 717,71:71, 11111 1 1 1 1 4 • r match line I 1 r 1 L _J 11 1 ( 1 .1111111• 1 1 1 1 ', 1 '', — ----— A ' k — ' is . . . _ = == EP _ -- i. iov r _ . 474 = = Ir ,..m.- . .:0—s...fra.--- • 4.31.m _... Ls,..,.............,,_ irr.f , . r..-7.-1.1.-. , ._,. _______. _ _ -Ili& „„. _ =-- -----.. = - ...,.-...,, L- - :.,.... Ea..-__ =-__-- = -__..- .--.„..-..:_. _ _ - i -.. - . 14.r . ,.,. . . . . . . - Motor Inn entry. .. . . MOTOR INN NORTH ELEVATION 1 1 L._ El (Th L 1 MOTOR INN WEST ELEVATION — 111=111111111F 1 1 1 1 1• gib 1 1 L I 1? ende19, T ,1110M1? INNS UKWILA , WA. 1 1 1 1 1 1 '-',.' 0 ...... 1 2 3 - - - . 41 .--- -... 5 . 6 7 i Q., 9 10 11 ........, 12 \ I CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO IF THIS MICROFILMEU qiicuritrif "Th - CETs , 1, • OE 6z se Lz sz sz ni ez: zz ' q THE_QUAL ITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 J10111 1 I 11 111 111111111111 11111111 11 1 1 111 1 711111 litfiliiiiiiTpRilliiiilliti151 iiiiiiiiipliiiiiiiiillii imilliniiiiiIiiiiiiiiiIiiiiimilliiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiilimiliolml 9 7 ,. ' .. . ,,,,. , ..::,, , .4.7. , , , 7754 , imPrA 1 1 11 L J1 [ILI 11 F, E...t.... e. s. L Y I A, fri T rt,i lo4S ,..1, s A6 4:7 66 t t 1 ruA THE CHENEY/PAGE ARCHITECTS c s 1 = 10 FEET 1 V4 0 N , WP:11 I N6Tot•: ' 71501E+1 • --- , •1111•1•1 • rhP TS- NeNDE-Cs Restaurant South elevation not shown 1\ ' , 1 "" 2' erip • •±.5A -001. 11111W l•r•It2 : ..;•;.,5-',, : , 7,r-- --7.::;.4.- ... 1; ' ' '' 1 ; '11 ' ' ': 4" . ' • ' f.L!'; '":7 ; :R. if,::[, ' F.'Itti r r,47 - 1 .- " - - - --- . :1;,i , .‘, , ,,11 '. .....;,,- - 7• ; .' , .. -,-- =;7;77 -- . —,--- . --,-- : - ,-...-- . ., ..1.5,i .J ‘...L ,;,,,,,,,...,,,.,,,,,, ,.'T.f... "' '...2...,:,•,..i.,::.,1,,,: • , " fre,ow- guri (FF•LE-) rLr ov..4121Fot.-1. \ oew fit...1.15112.1 CoiLK) r*JE.R.t-ms 014125 tpLum 112.01,10S 1/4.10S MVP L CroLLE.) Ggpeus pr.02.. &Ewe) 1 rt-larrA, 414:11‘41A VilaCialUm 11 t4OS p-i) s 1„,1„4oe, 1 1 A:wire:4-4.)m Z.itPO4 Z. CI V.C114k1 C: ....1..,Nips G. i lov_uLOSA 1 t.1 •spp 1.4e!pi i • • 4 1 7 . 1,.6 eA „ • • , • • .• , 1 . . - 4:Tr-4.`':,.kA,k1KgoN't";:e6 " 13'e, " • Atr rf.-6Y:Pit2.'PXVIN4Teiv 7 ; • • • • quITT.f.*. ,...,iiiii4(X%;•4ire4 c .0.65..2i: 40 6.6 zs op 0.6160 .itt,t,:kzei3613"634cf:4:14:636444.1as 00 00101.20At 8.0 tas no.86.Cos $0499**"9"21"21111191E- t • Fa; rroi 1.V.441 401 C...41■1171 '0415 flo■cg- f-a7r '04 a r I I I I 5 431. Aorrr, pg_ 1!:0.17.47P" err 15 4.011 14 1% C..e4L-rr 4-01.1 wi7<sw..1.3/61ecow) cast Pori= 1.441. A-V-rpgo. 141 r-0.1a4 14we - (..0. Ater#234.9 VP*: Wfikt .1.410 ,(0606 6 '5■210/er qr4( Lej, ' . t .14 4* rtiOpilf P1N, RIF '85-35-DR LEES RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA. AP :7; 1986 ammo DEFT. • • a •2 4 1 • Lu 1 ,1 matemardowshaterP10111111112011 , ?,%•,,r4,1•f;;;;4„. Pfr: iLfti ;400 " "'"'" " . iXV • • 4" 0 1.1. INCH 1 3 71T IT g c1 :9,THE OUALITy OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENA 69 9$7 to,.. 0 THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS' 1 ;1CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO " 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 • 111911 1„11 . , 5 ,, ,, ,,, IIII 1111 MI VII 1111 lin 1111 IIII 111111111111 IIII IIII 1111 1111 IIII III' • ti • • • o. tu c.) 9 o .7.• 9 ;1 4 rr :711 p -- U1iJAlg M IRAS ti • ZNcLo5uftE. f644411/ 06.1 reric. _ I - ryrick, eAvikis I s' 1,0os rawle n 1 rte iflT7. • LIKE of 165 IS -.''r.----./...---. Y - N ^ N./ . " --.,, ,r7" -^ N.;■ - '7" - N,e; — • - N.,•-'7.N.-7•■../'''' , ":".••.447 . 7 7N , Ll'-i 14 OT e. 'e ' Plkoise[r1.4s mt./ARP , fa 5TS 0R., 6uit. as ARR„_:.10 Se; . ' ' iseTAL:t.trt • A.m ,..,MS mrres 7rt‘,..NN9 Po R41E145 , g,Pril 14 ie.4..e.*, .;„ .4,04.A AN 0 ' HYDRANTS . • ,.... rucht., posTS Ari0 01.1p.e8 -1-,44..i.. eie...i'A!N'TED ;; yeLLer4 : • l,, (c iT.{ oF T4.14.044.A. ort,o, ;f •• . , ', • - (. • I 1 );::),.. ; / ';;:- • •-• , • ; _..);: • , p , ).. . „„, ..,'R; I\ '• • •- -- 1Ig -. N . S • .•::', • PAS.A4e,L.: .• ::: • : • •. • , . • . , . • t, :• .29.i • • :. To ; •4„',;fre="1.o?,5 . . . . . . . • - - o 1 ' . . ° . . ; 0 ` - o4 1 . ■ L.; G . ,i ,": - ' ... ___ ' - •. ,:-.1 •;.. is. <----.--.>, l .; : ,,z, :• '. : \ - • . : N ............ • :' ---- '. . . '' ... . • l' P it. ::''::.::`.., , . _LL, , .::-..TD.,L14/:2(.! a44 E-1,;•,:' . . . . .. . ''''' 5 :TILTS — • Id '1' 15.5 IA..; • ;,. , . i'..t , ';1 _I .; .-.. -4i; ....6— ::.: '---. --1 ' . — ...2. ... ' "CI vt , • „ el, -MEZZANINE ' P;F.sL,A5 eLev. b.75 •-. , . , , I ., .............■..........• .. I - ----- ............ - -- - .-- :•- . - . 4. - .......:, ..,___ --.-....________. ,.,_„,.....,,,,,,.....,..... --.._ -- -- 1 ----„,.___,„ •,__ ,....----------, „....—.)--- ,--,----,:— l',..=<' ■ 14' km‘ce , A valve .".--‘„ • •-.. --....,.. NEN ToP or , rAer.r, , . ----, Lev • Top OR ; !AW& . '"oizoir4Afif • • . 14,41111 ' 1.1N . KOBEL: 8,4.10seo- sultvsy 1612.; A Ge N\°4 P ' AC.C.e.35( TO 70. • e • .. , ,;.y:„.. ; : ,. ., ,, ......., . 7.; ,, . ,.,-,,i,,,l ..1.-1•.;.•;:"...,;;•;,..."..I.T,..-4.•;.1.to:;7 . , -...:................................,...................—.-...---......•....-- ..,....:-.. • ' - 1.Art_f4..411.1:144.Z.VOMIt,Y144 : ' • .; " ''' ''' .;..'''.' '''''..' ' ••••17ji'AiL,4V11:'d.f. ;•••;.,;:,..,....,...;:.;•'..... - ' ''' ',.... '''''''' . '''''' ''''1 '.'i.'i ' ' ' ' . 1 , '''',6.Y`: .., 0 le INS INCH 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W I I 1 9 1 IIIIIIITIIIIIIIYMItit0110110111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 . 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2 3 • , 4 ,.. 5 6 7 \ 8 9 10 11 -...4..... 12 \ ,.1 fiiiiti&ii.t - is' LE'§ 1CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO Z.Z I 'l ' 41 oe 6Z 6L 9Z GZ VZ CZ . ZZ 1Z l oTHE 1 1--.„ 1 •-:,,T, _ ot_giA1.ury_oF... itig. _ORIGINAL pocumEN-rk 50L 9 V C 1111111 „. P 1I P1,11 1111111111fiiiijialir13491111 " IIIIIIIIITIII — Fliilili ,.; ; ' ::-T : ,. .‘ ; ; ‘; 7.. ,,, ,, ,,.„. ,u, J iiillipl.mliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill te' , 4 e pd ' f!,4?; - ;;;:: LOCK LIoUOR DINING . 118 • G. DINING 28 LOUNGE . 86 COUNTER 10 TOTALS 242 0 0.0 . L_ 0 .: 0 sT 0 O y w . ;._ .}Ol•: C.E.'L71 igsk • MRMLMM�OI� - , 'mthav �Li RateMA `• ., s... 1 . Il llilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllliutwl jpJ.IIJipoiIJIIIIIIIIIIuill IpiviIillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 0 .,..... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 wm... 12 if — tiff MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOi of 6z 6e cz 9z 9z az ez; zz l6 O THE QUUA OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTfk _.e 8 c 9S he z t ., o luulnu1unllul1un6ul1uldun1 udun1lulhulInnllm1uldn 11li lCili1mil ml 1111 lil nlnuliiuili111 llunlilidil nlilillmdiiiilaillinllndlul1lpduuImdlluIlplluu1lulhnl1uulm1 IIIIIgnImdllllIllnllulImdmll r. I • ,r,,,i it: .4.: ; • • ) .... . , ..... . . , ... ,..- L ., s, • vi„ ....,.:,:, ,: -,, :.... ,,,,. !::-:, .:!.......,. ..• .:,... ..„.•.• ,ittaifi.,th.iiiIii ' . 04iit stniViiiift*I0/144iiih - .. '';'' . An „,:ppr;. •. 4 .....,.::.?:, : ._.„,, , ' ' ..'" '''''N' ss tt'V'e•''';14 ,, ' ! .'i;‘C . 0.4 . 1 . 1. g e •t. .,',.. • .....,,.. .s...„:41' '- 1 Jillil jd I j JI11. 1 I I I ci l' 1 I ' ' ' '''''''' ' '''' s '' ' ' '''::-.' ' ' ' '' ' ''%'''''' ?i''''4''''''''''''''''''.:" . . . .. ... . ... ,„..,, , , ..,...„ ..,,.„. , ,.,-sts.Als, .... tts...„ ..-ss ., i,:•;4.!'.1f;Z•r ,. ...1;•:' , V.er',q'''43.-4":4..,, ■;:. 4,,,,i, 4 ...41 .,.. • ir ;; - “ — . .,s; .,Wk 0 ' 6THS INCH 2 3 ' .. 4. ... 5 6 ,,,,,,,, 1 ,...,...1,,,,,S. '.. '1,, .., , r... ....r ' • ....—:— '''''''• .,.... ...: . _ • _ . :.e., .. , . 4, ■ 7 \ ._8 9 10 11 "De IN URIWIY 12 it,cw-,-- :d.„.o...:.-:. i IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESSI, \ 06 6Z 9G LZ 9Z SZ 1 7i EZ I ZZ ii igillkililiiiURFIRMtriiihiiiiiiiiiiiii i r,Ritliu■g.iTyoF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1,. 6 8 4 9 S 47 e Z I " 0 !CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO . r • ' CONFERENCE cekI i ER RESTALAANT . IWts 5.1r f F. ELY• 31.00' S000 5.F. FF.;MAIrt) 32,ao' }`•'. } t }f( l;; i. fP. ({5A5EMEv1 - )ZL•00l • OCT 18:1985 CITY C.F rC:;Y19Lq'•;: PI PI;KII.C3 DEPT. • • . 2 i110TUR r i UKWIL�` , , a ,7� T� �iEN1� /PA ARCHI t it { f�l tF.i }2 t • i t f,r y w"`a � } I'. z Z Y ; � , . � f , .r.�i•. pr , . � i v : t 7 1 ) 4 s b't p :. ..,. . 0 .. y . r r . �ti �G � 2t .. .T, ?� i ..� 4 +,:�. , t.: rl ' . '1 . .,,' .{. ,. r Ttr` ` " (/�9 fi+M n aw:.nr_�rsf • .s. arr! u2, sr�. .. ...eKittrIac'.e.".. .........L _,, , -.,-- ..», ....;.' tl r!!44:6, S;;;I M l k Mr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1III[ II 11 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 111n 1 1 I1I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I1I I I11 1 111 I I1I I I1I I I1I I I1I I I11 1 111 I 111 1 111 I 0 I » =" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ., 8. 9 10 11 .....wT 12 \ IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESSI. I • }CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO OE 6Z Be LZ 9E GE hz EE: EE 13 °THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTIi 9. o IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiCIIiIIIIIlIIIIIIRIIII IILI IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIII x A { •a. FL-bop.. .c0A cc +u_NT t4 '3v PC) 5 EPP , Flan 4 Asce I SUITE AAA N\ rt-on 1` PHASE Mt. • I`�T FLR• ILt S,F• ?ND Ft-R.. 14 °i2t 3 {zD Ft-g_ ' 1 `1 32. ( S, F. (Via PFC 5) To'i'AL q .f j 7 5,F. DD DD 'ende s � ,tiroroR INN.S TUKWILA , WA. PLoo? PLAN 5GA.LE, 1 /16 " PR.ELI PLAN Ne 5 THE CHENEY /PAGE ARCHITECTS MT% VAR , WA. .:29:85 *515 Iiltltltltlil+ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltl�ItltliitliLlili�� 111. ItLi. I�. 111tllliltli. lill�l! IihilJililllilil11i1111ItItIIIIII�tItII�tIIItIIIIIIItItIIIIItIlllltltltl 0 + "" " 1 7 3 4. . 5. 6 7 . \ 8 9 10 11 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO • OE 6z Be cz sz sz oz ez; zz fz . UALITY_OF'THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, I 6 e c 9 s o e z t " "0 ii ii �11lLuiiii IL p II II 'III I I IIIII I I I III �I I h II I II IIII iIII VII III' Judtiuln ihilduuliulllilllu iIrliiltlillmilinl ntIFI Ilit mtltnduil�mduulludllulllnhlllluulunl�gllpulln�lu�ll�udnlllludltul .. Y)i % -35- DR r rt -I.A5 a 5A' E.ti4T lsT 2NP t 1A2 3P D rt T OTMI- 0 4� DP 8"• HS61. 4 HDn 9 SUITE Iq TEAL lcL ( 5.F. /I I p'ltl n ^'( t1 2- 9 . 191/ Sir•. �114. ?ECFCSJ 13 1 'I' >5 ti, I\ 514. DD P p 7 PD DD rQ P2 DD On DD 20 5 F. 5K. !AMP 5. 51.4 tin C___ 72 7n PP PP — 1 nD DP cn DD D7 •r : i DD HI'P E HDD th H•4 Hc•c� 51: 6TvK I = ww .1 LOBBY GAL�6•R`l SToR• PD 111111111111111111111i111111111 II I11111111111 1111.Rillt11111 IIIIIM111111 0111.11111111111111111111111111 0 '.' "e 1 9 3 - 4.... • . 5 6 7 \ 8, 9 10 \ IIF THIS. MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE° UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT i, a e L full I I III I IIIII II 11 I - • 11 1 II I III I II IIII Illlfll 1II11111aIiIIf1111 II lill I1111n iinhuill�Illmd i Illih o O8 6Z BL LZ '9Z BZ 4Z CZI ZZ IZ 11111111111111111111111111 11 wnx,° — 12 • wo. II IIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII icte/s uururr 1.V %ti' TUKWILA , WA. PApoi2 1 / Il =:b PFD E:.; M ' •( N ° THE CHENEY /PAGE ARCHITECTS MT VESNON, WA s 59 5 4 9/0 X30 135 4364 I3- Z4\ IZ0°;7c AA z?t\NIN Z Ft-0o R. 1-753 s. F. MEa~7IN& R• 91 S.F. MSETIN6 R-coet. _73o S.F. r ris8 ,AME.TIN IeDOM 1350 5.5 1,151 YbP 15 -35 -DR se .'4ics rD RE5- TPUP-ANT -ro KI7- c.H ■ 2X4 framing 1/2" gypsimi sheathing pwc1; siding or bevel siding R-11 insulation 5/8 Type X gwb 2X6 framing 1/2" gypsum sheathing pwd siding or bevel siding OP RI:6f 'J • IccY I hr 1/2" gypsum sheath'ing (both sides) Owd siding "or bevel siding (both sides) , . . 2X6 frami • • two layers b/8" rYpe X gwb 1/2" gypsum sheathing pwci - siding . ,orbeVersIding - QIt4IN5lNlNa SECTION T. .• t amp* vs: - 32w20 ' 921SW GOR.M1190f2 ADO .12.. CO%- seE DESCRIPTION ag +was 4305 42415429.2 4 ate , 4.c2' 4to" ee-e' PIEO.J GT101.1 ROOM • 2 •, — .- . A .SECTIOW • DESCRIPTI RATING MRK .ON , •PA ION CONSTRUCTION DESIGNATIONS _• 48 - (003) TORACIE TYPICAL PITY/BR(. WALLS I hr double spaced plate 2X4 framing. • 5/W type(X ywb - both sides' I . TYPICAL PLUMBING/8RO. WALL .1 hr• double spaced pi/4e... 2X4 framing 5/8". type X ywii Corridor side 5/8" type X Wr gwb both side 2X6 .framing • • 1 hr 5/8", Type'X gwb' (both side) RATINU MARK FLOOR. FLA . AT CONFERENCE AREA • •".A. er..1"4,t} • • N4., • ' ' "IMPIC'.• •• . • • ' 1; _iiiiipplippliollimilitavviiiiplipliviiiiiiiiimmimininipiiplioliiiiilliiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiwpopoliviiiii 0 m 1 7 3 . 4 .. 5 .......... . , : ____ V , 8_, 9 ' 10 11 ..."... 12 , • 1 \ II OE se se tz sz sz .7i ez 1 az Iz 0 THEAlKITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1,' 88L 99 nC e l"" . 0 J1411 .,) ff • t-; ;4 . 1 " :..:.1 -26 =b5 lz 4.85I •-■ •. , DATE/64)314 REY? II t46 te-, ritalifIrt :tI ;NJ DRWQft CHK hIA A4 r 1 1 1 1/ / ,1 1 11 1 1 (.7 fr■ - (YPE. ' • -1p.,^51 12,E.4u1F.ED er4cLo5uKe. E. Toa PANTE. • 0E04 ELE•! 2.6 \.. a AT . • 1 !. .-1,_ • • 5E4014,7 12.1s e. T TA A t t-LS INcl, 1 j! " 4LINE op - 3 pool.. ' - s..1 fp.,Er#1■411.46 wALL.: I ..,...7,-,... . att. SHT 2q F SlAift4 15' : -- S4 4 6 ,TP ------- cAt•ia ft' O V 17.,/ , x ! ',"••• , , !. • , • . , . . , ,, .... , . - , . , . • , ,,, !,.,--'!"' ' . ., , l,r,.: '`,!,':, !! „ , .• '. , Do •), ., .4.. v," .',.1 ', ...c" '4 ,„ , !..:1••,- ....4:.` !At!: ,,, ''' , A!!`fi' ,, • .! .' • .V ' '''''';!•''''', 1 "'''!q'.:'-'.? ':'."! . .,, FU TULE ft25TAus.ANT 4 ( 15 ,536F A,5 T R.A A I L eLANTIN0 SITE PLAN G10EEN RA/E4 W\ 0TE. Murree. cs L., ARP PT S OR Cu? 55 AE . I NeTALLE0 •Afr. ALA. AS meTelLS , rzo0A,L. TIR,AN5Fortriel , r4141-ER VALy E5 An 0 HYDRAr•ITS Guar PoSTS A1•40 GUR,e6 Au... PAINED YeLLPI1 (cIN oF • ortp, 4 SCALE: -.30 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111711111111111111111 3 - _4. 5 6 7Q 9 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS (DE ez ad LZ 9Z CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS • DUE TO ! E "1 EE I TY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6 11It 1 1111 1 11 111 IIIlIl 1 11 711111311 i dill11111111111111111 e d 04 1711 ,. t .' 1111111)1111111)11111111111111111111111111 10 11 12 NEW Tol of L em 20 PIM ei iariS PSKPet•I iOULAR, To I-1,7(0 .ree oF 11 far. S ogoiNArLY KATs F. kI il Fruni KosW- 9AS6 ea SuFWEy • L Z vor 0 111111111 IIIIIIIII FtV bg iss--35-Dg fAitALLeL. • H 01 1'0 4," c.f peiCt451014$ VeReMniPICULAR To -s ao° 0 t it :•!,!, 4 7te ` •!!..t a DATErwt,:eis DRW:MOLCa CHIC. CW JOB NO: SETNOi SHEETS • 1 • • • , . .. • r, `, • , , , I • •