Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit DR-02-85 - HAMPTON INN - DESIGN REVIEW
dr-02-85 7200 south 156th street HAMPTON INN DESIGN REVIEW (_ 3ITY OF TUKWILIA PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION . INTRODUGTION In 1982 the City approved a shoreline management permit for development of the Hilton Hotel on the subject 5.5 acre property directly west of the So. 158th St. entrance to Longacres Raceway. Development of the eight story hotel was abandoned, but Hampton Inns, Inc., optioned the property for construction of a different four story hotel. The latter proposal is within the scope of the Hilton's permit, thereby precluding processing of a new permit. However, Board of Architectural Review jurisdiction continues, causing Hampton Inns to seek the Board's approval of the revised proposal. Two significant events affecting the proposal have occurred since 1982. Traffic on West Valley Highway now requires a traffic signal at the intersection with S. 158th St. for safe access to and from the proposal. In addition, the City is seriously evaluating per the 6 -year Transportation Plan extending Tukwila Parkway eastward to West Valley Highway. The latter may require the applicant to design for the future right- of- way.connection at S. 158th St. Together these events, and other less significant ones, caused delay of completion of the environmental review of the proposal. Until this review is completed the Board is prevented from completing an action or decision. Because the applicant previously informed the Board of his need for some indication of the acceptance of the proposal on February 14, 1985, the Board members may individually comment on the proposal. However, a concensus or final motion cannot be considered. Accordingly this staff is structured to facilitate your individual review. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The Hilton Hotel consisted of an eight story building containing 274 rooms, a restaurant, meeting rooms, a swimming pool, a lounge and offices (Exhibit A). Hampton Inns, Inc. proposes developing two phases of 4 story buildings containing 254 rooms with a separately owned, freestanding restaurant (Exhibits B and C). Phase I (the subject application) is to be located exactly on the Hilton Hotel building location and will hold 148 rooms and lobby. This phase will also locate parking along the riverfront area in conformance with Zoning Code and Shoreline Master Program requirements. Landscaping will be provided, plans for which will be submitted for the Board's subsequent final review. Hampton Inn's building is one of the "stock plans" being used by the company throughout the country. The exterior colors are off -white walls and a dark brown metal roof. Access will be from West Valley Highway at a point opposite So. 158th St. and possible at the southerly portion of the property. Improvements to the Highway will be required per the environmental review process. DR- 02 -85:. HAMPTON INN Page Two CONCLUSIONS Sufficient detail of submitted plans prevents total confirmation of compliance with TMC 18.44 (Shoreline Zone) and the Shoreline Master Program. However, general acceptability of the proposal can be determined pursuant to the intent of the applicant. 1. Phase I substantially conforms to the existing Hilton Hotel permit. The Hampton Inn is a less intense proposal and features less traffic- generating uses. 2. Phase I substantially conforms to the Shoreline Master Program. 3. Phase I substantially conforms to the review criteria of TMC 18.60.050. 4. Phase I substantially conforms to the zoning regulations of TMC 18. Exhibits A Photograph of Hilton Hotel proposal. B Hampton Inns, Inc., site plan. C Photograph of Hampton Inns, Inc. proposal. Knv VtAr. mUmw'xe!rvttelvxnn1 Rtro+u':csF. +r;A w «lw f °'k VIM m w . V 1I8IHXJ iUIi In I ' mu llYJffilhI .' 111111 IaiI )F ♦ AM Mom AM AMMAN 1111111 1111115 MANNA am rAKt 10.01 M N NAR IrIMA *UtI.ATA RUMII St.waiA COIII/ I W 011 KO•owCO1MIT KOMINIC KW IAM11 100f.•MM ® ACO CilleNATIas KMAI 01011LA PON* W 1I' ' wK TM NAM tU*OIWS rN CUAa01C AMA O mull CONTNITA rKUOOflUCA WPM= rlltaaANA raa Mil DOUGLAI NI tg1MTAN MN= i t ONOTA TIMM ILIA Oa AIWA UNNTIUI MANN 11AIDM1 IUGMTTCA MMR MNNL0CAd5 104000000•011I0T01 MOWN MOP IMAM OCAIMT IMAMS 10LL► 7*11 •NLW RMat Mom, Lunen • M GM.WINK 0II00mfMrl*r DAM MAIMS LI m1OON 11 11•151! 110•A rna W01.1110.111 CAIKMM IACIITIAIOUA 1RrNALf LO•►NI OOlON1MiM 011111! we ST. 70NILI0aT SMARM 11011* Y m 2 Co j PM :S !LlrATN1 /1.� PROROPOSED `J \ VICINITY NAP >H N M •04:11* 0 ' �: .' d � del 0L4410Ta5. GN ule aV nrtrcnw yclYC+e Mt= LEGAL DESCRIPTION P URE EXPANSION N001AM !NON WATIN LIN, Eur.• 11.5 •0 1v INAT IOrTON o I•M► MAIM OONATDNCSNI IO K L►1M Mai 111X111 1A. Tammy b N/atla LAMB t a•AL N NM COURT. •A701010K 001100) AS 1050•. $NDN)5 AT 111* rrt71CTI011Cf. ON MINI UM Of BOUfO 111111 STMT. AS ml fArt Al Ol•IALLT NT AND IN •Ot TALLIT Nom? ILSK Lrt TN01C1 N rife • AWN TM CC ea tat O/ MC •Ill VAWT MOO? AV 3111 PUUT! DIMS ■ seers,. • ILU PM 10 TM TOT 1510101 SAD MGN•A► APO TIM Tsui POI11 Cl SIGINMNy OWN= 11UNKIL► MON Tile •ppfol► 151101 Cl LAD 1117051 5 "VW a ma run 710111 I Mall • 111.51 I[et1 TMSICe I 11IfW t 551•3 /KT omen $I WIP • TO TM moat? ■N Mt 0/ t CAM 11Th AS NOV OTAKAlm1 1110111 •5151► Apo /M5TMfg► ALONG SAO MU WOK 10 A Kan 111101 = 3 t1ti17P • P1011 TMS TIM 0511 05 aNOMlq TIMM Al w I TO IN tluS lbMT w .1GPNS 01051 11151 1111701 111010? AOOO•M 1111 MINI NM co.11Ir1R1 of TM NATI of •A001GION N IM WIIT► MINION mull CAME w 111101 NO OICNTM' 11 M nil x011111110 MD PRIMO A 111/ 0 Lase 11 PUT IN •0TN 105111111► NO SRMAUgLT OF NO ar••1aT 5175•10 1111 11105110 ►Olio! 108t .0*11O050& PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE /SITE PLAN M1• 4, 40 •• ►' a1►' .Q are 7YA:. MASONS O{7NOOTTSIN V / W 1a IJO.JI OWC c1 p� 1." � 1G 11.111 400 1130.01. . MLT 'y rt. W11TI OP Om CPawNt RLVaMa 6,70.1w443 LOT 11.0 10 .w I.O. der Nb LONMa 11100.4 a* J• 10 PIeOV1oa 40041 P OT . P113040.40 � , rf�+ i I A /R INON �T Q �0 !TOT *D V PLANT LIST N1r AY1r mina 5 0) 10111 Mal% MAIM la ACM 04 w 1* RIGA* RM1A a OOIIA STAWdr • .2 Mom, NAM NI ITALUI osoll NS WALLS 000/101011 STATISTICS I 4 B P1 a 2 2 z 0 I- n . 2 4 • NI t N. It • _• 0 a aK a ° • w r= K w = IN N•i • 3 0 • - w Y.. i . • JohnsonBraund design group p.$. ; Inc: architecture, engineering & planning consultants ( 111111 01: its no in - . .. .... .. .... . .. I 0 Airwa 1111 MI I 5.: r P e R u 0: 1 0:111D iv )1ASAPTOPUliti FINISH FLOWIIILIVATION: 111/.11 V ; Ad, log• • 41 • ;.- i;.1 e • 1 I OW0 20 Or/wG. /MO IC4O.00011‘4<TIL OW1 FUTURE EXPANSION 3424 GREEN RIVER PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN O 10 20 *0 00 1V2 Ncrie• "tre-APPrnori."1-NareAonnie "%ecru...qv:0P+ rise<o<TIka • frlIZT 1 00e A001.1400641 1110 auf Ifferi 00'0 11 0 se re 4.1.41P. .. • 1 0 I- n . 2 4 P1 a JohnsonBraund design group p.s.,Inc. architecture, engineering & planning consult.ints • • • i • • CO • • — 1111111111111 l l 1111 PHASE ONE TOP OF BANK • • • -- GREEN RIVER PROPOSED HAMPTON INN TUKWILA WA. 12/07/84 SCALE: 1 " 100' 0+4'11111111111D OIIHIIIIIHIHID .... •' ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE TOP OF BANK T1T AREAS +/- HOTEL: 3.73 ACRES RESTAURANT: 1.75 ACRES TOTAL: 5.48 ACRES PARKING PROVIDED HOTEL: 260 RESTAURANT: 151 PHAS1 PHAS TOTA- EXHIBIT C HAMPTON INN HOTEL Interior - Corridor Prototype 44 -I. w "'4 4 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433-1800 • Gary L VanDusen, Mayor ▪ 7908 TUKWI LA PLANN I NG COMMI SS I ON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE;IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the - 1 lth day of April, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in t City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: /DR- 03 -85: Metro ETS, requesting approval of a 96" buried forcemain pipeline and bridges over the Duwamish River. DR- 04 -85: NC Machinery, requesting approval of plans for a 2 -story office building located at 17025 West Valley Highway. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, April 3, 1985 Distribution: Mayor City Clerk _ Adjacent Property Owners •w wa.!.v m ._.., <s�,1 J ..,.,.. e ( «: i s S; i. , i;. wsrz, ;a,u,.,•,,,..� „•.wr.�,.�.,..,:. ma n. a.,,a.as,^ ur +.::v,frc+.,..,+o�, ev +.uno-,.•- w�,r,r..wa. F;iblished: DISTRIBUTION: Mayor. CITY CLERK PROJECT FILE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER - CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING OF THE. TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tut dla PLANNING CCFVISSION has fixed the 14th day of February , 1985 at 8:00 p.m. P.M. in City.Council Cambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for.. DR -2 -85: Hampton Inn, requesting approval of plans for a 4 -story hotel replacing the previously approved Tukwila Inn Hotel at approximately S. 158th St. and West: Val ley 'Highway. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Record Chronicle Date: February 3,1985 r. . ..r.. x.7 ..�. ,i .y3.%∎?t � .,..? `i S', `! i' °r :41MI � .� h :...... . ....... ....� .�. �.6's�u ....• :Ii as.i.........,...:a...:c. _ :aa..rew�,a «:.�_ ,.:ax�.�•a,....�.a�:�.�• ::i ..,.... ....,..4.r , �.t wi ,� ... .r .�., ILA ▪ 19 OS City of Tukwila • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard - Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY ;OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Any and all interested parties are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, February 17, 1985 Distribution: Mayor City Clerk Adjacent Property Owners File NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the 28th day of February 1985 at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: DR- 03 -85: Metro Effluent Transfer System (ETS), requesting approval of construction, operation and maintenance of a 96" buried forcemain pipeline, and bridges over the Duwamish River. /DR- 02 -85: Hampton Inn, requesting approval of plans for a 4 -story hotel placing the previously approved Tukwila Inn Hotel at approximately S. 158th St. and West Valley Highway. r7 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the February 14, 1985, Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Knudson called the meeting to order at 8:04 p.m. Other Commissioners present were Mr. Kirsop, Mr. Coplen, and Mr. Kirsop. Representing staff were Rick Beeler and Becky Kent, Planning Department. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW A. DR- 02 -85: Hampton Inn, requesting approval of plans for a 4 -story hotel replacing the previously approved Tukwila Inn Hotel at approximately S. 158th St. and West Valley Highway. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report, and explained that the Board would not be able to act on the item that evening because the environmental review wasn't complete, and the lack of a quorum, so the Boards review would be strictly advisory. Richard E. Pringle, representing the applicant, explained the history of the project. Helen Nelson, 15643 West Valley Highway, Renton, WA, was concerned with the contract sale stipulations, drainage, maintenance to the river, clearing of the bank, landscaping, water and sewer service, and property easements for the purpose of trail construction. Mr. Beeler said the City was requesting a trail easement within the dike maintenance road along this property. Greg Allwine, Johnson Braund Group, 304 Main Ave. So., Suite 200, Renton, WA 98055, said they were unaware of the City's plans of extending Tukwila Parkway until the latter part of the process. The Commission discussed the Tukwila Parkway extension and how it would affect the property. Susumu Takahashi, Chalon Restaurant, spoke in favor of the project. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Page. -2- Planning Commission February 14, 1985 Mr. Beeler reviewed the Crestview Annexation and 51st Annexation rezones, the new Council Committees, So. 188th Connector project. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. TUKWILA PLA WING COMMISSION Page -2- . PLANNING COMMISSION MIhufES January 24, 1985 Joanne Poirer, 13405 42nd Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98168, expressed her con- cern with maneuverability problems, early morning and late evening noise, and trailer parking from other operations on the site. Chairman Knudson closed the public hearing. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORTHWEST IMPORT AND DISTRIBUTION, CORP., FOR USE OF APPROXIMATELY 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING B ON THE SITE SUBJECT TO LIMITATION OF OPERATING HOURS FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND THAT THERE WILL BE NO LONG TERM PARKING OF TRUCKS, VANS, OR TRAILERS ON THE SITE. MR. ORRICO SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Coplen asked the applicant if the stipulation of not being able to use Saturday or Sunday would be a hardship. Ms. Pitts said no. Mr. Orrico asked if this would apply only to this company. Mr. Beeler said yes. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Mr. Knudson opened the public meeting. A. DR- 05 -84: Gull Industries, requesting approval of final color scheme of the expansion and remodel of the existing service sta- tion at 13435 Interurban Ave. S. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report and submitted a color sample to the Board. Roger Olinberg, Gull Industries, described the color scheme to the Board. Mr. Coplen was excused from the meeting at 9 :05 p.m. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO ACCEPT THE GULL INDUSTRIES COLORS AS PRESENTED. MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Orrico was excused from the meeting at 9 :05 p.m. B. DR- 02 -85: Hampton Inn, requesting approval of a hotel replacing the previously approved Tukwila Inn Hotel at approximately S. 158th St. and West Valley Highway. Mr. Beeler said the application was not ready for the Board's review because the environmental review had not been completed. Richard Pringle, representing the applicant, requested a special meeting for February 14, 1985. The Board granted the request. • • • 1908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard o Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the January 24, 1985, Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Knudson opened the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Other Commissioners pre- sent were Mr. Orrico, Ms. Avery, Mr. Sowinski, Mr. Knudson, Mr. Coplen, Mr. Larson, and Mr. Kirsop. Representing City staff were Rick Beeler and Becky Kent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. ORRICO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 10, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MR. COPLEN SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 85 -10 -CUP: Northwest Import and Distribution, Corp., requesting approval of a truck terminal at 4475 S. 134th St. Chairman Knudson opened the public hearing. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report, and added a preliminary second recommended condition of operation during regular business hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Mr. Beeler read into the record a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Alan Merkle expressing opposition to the conditional use permit. Deanna Pitts, Northwest Import and Distribution, Corp., described their truck terminal operation. The Commission discussed the circulation on the site and the condition of hours of operation. Ms. Pitts indicated the hours of operation would not be a hardship and their working hours were 8 :00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Mr. Beeler clarified that there would be at most two trailers on site at one time, but that at a maximum during the day there would be six round trips. The applicant agreed. Public Meetings: ,.a ,,.... ,.,.,,u,rra�ers- ..•.a: r. sa . i ^, L. ^ ^ . ^A7i "..:.: ? tr T;S uF:' "V. i' ,M 1 %;o ' i ' MIVi i`: A City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND HEARING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the 24th day of January, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: Public Hearing: 85 -01 -CUP: Northwest Import and Distribution Corp., requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a truck terminal in an existing building at 4475 S. 134th Place. DR -1 -85: NW Volvo White Truck Center, requesting approval of plans for an outside storage area at 14000 Interurban Avenue South. p/ Hampton Inn, requesting approval of plans for a 4 -story hotel west of West Valley Highway at S. 158th Street. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, January 11, 1985 Distribution: File Mayor City Clerk Adjacent Property Owners �.... • ?':u _ .� . ';s:'i�iT% � ter"`', w r , .�';r:�:��" � , -::K' '...� i:tv ,Y; , x «; •'� '•'t �� n ,;q. .w., .. _ . •. � ;f`: - c;..s... ,:- ...,,•._,..; x'.v:,r.l.: ^Y'.�.,. �•.. �F��rb :F•.�i`i�r'ti"'�K� TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR HAMPTON INN DEVELOPMENT Prepared For JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP Submitted To CITY OFIIJKWILA January 1985 CENTRAL — ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Street /Highway System 3 Existing Traffic Conditions 6 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WITHOUT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 11 TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 12 Traffic Generation and Assignment 12 Projected Traffic Volumes and Levels -of- Service 16 Safety and Parking Impacts (Signalization at North 20 Driveway, Proposed Access Driveways and Parking) TRAFFIC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 23 Programmed Transp. Improvements (by Tukwila, WSDOT, etc.) 23 Proposed Street /Access Improvements (by Developer) 24 Other Recommended Improvements (by Others) 27 APPENDIX Peak -Hour Turning Movement Volume Summaries (1984 and 1986) Hour -by -Hour Volume Estimates at Longacres Entrance (SR -181 @ S. 158th) plus Signal Warrant Summary Trip Generation Calculations FIGURES 1. Vicinity and Location Map 2 2. Site Plan 4 3. Existing Conditions 5 4. Existing Geometrics and Right-of-Way 7 5. Project Generated Traffic and Trip Distribution =-- 15 6. Projected 1986 Traffic Volumes With and Without Project 17 7. Proposed /Planned Street /Access Improvements 25 28 TABLES 1. Level -of- Service - Existing Conditions (1984) 10 2. Trip Generation Summary 14 3. Level -of- Service - Future Conditions (1986) with Project 19 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the traffic analysis by Centrac Associates for the proposed Hampton Inn development and is intended as a technical supplement to the site development plans and SEPA checklist. The purpose of this analysis and documentation is to identify the traffic impacts and access /ROW requirements of the proposed development, as well as appropriate physical improvements (or.policies) to mitigate the effects of these impacts on the existing transportation system. This traffic study is only intended to be an update analysis since other recent studies have been completed for similar development proposals at this site and another site 1/4 mile to the south. A Hilton Hotel was originally proposed for the subject site in 1982 but was never developed due to uncertain economic conditions. The traffic volume and access /safety impacts were analyzed and documented by the TRANSPO Group (Tukwila Hotel, March 1982) to supplement the DEIS prepared for this project. Centrac recently completed a traffic impact analysis and report for the Tukwila Retail Center and Brock Residence Inn development (July 1984) at the NW corner of SR -181 and Strander Blvd. This joint use project is now under construction, with full occupancy by 1986. Traffic data and future (1986) volumes from these studies have been utilized for the Hampton Inn traffic analysis. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed development site is located - south of I -405 and immediately west of the entrance to Longacres Race Track. The site is bordered on the east by the West Valley Road (SR -181) and on the west and south by the Green River. The Hampton Inn development consists of a 4 -story hotel complex with a total of 252 guest rooms and a quality restaurant with 8,000 square feet separate from the hotel building(s). Depending on future economic conditions, the hotel may be constructed in two phases, with 148 rooms for Phase I and an additional 104 rooms • S 3177N ST. rr S 3..70 .l•R. ESLlR C Trout LIN a • • Frnu.d SW 43RD ST. V Orillia ST. •'BRIE RD sr. Thomas Rh 711711 . 151 AY N. l (n1e. AB West d Cli Blakely t 3orN f may` Port Blakely sr PJ. White i �'M, cOI ' Nr ,� � i At Ethan Boy 4 I.° 71 We Ct w 4, .. RRestoration AI R.KR ' L • � 1 5 r •51.1 • Point .nu nAt 1 - ' o Enet NAVAL l ^ POD ' Liu Point ; + w w7 rtman • Cta , �. r � Bar South Beach ® ` NaRenton NgtcR sr NIL — — — — — N1r'1 RD h. u.IS • Manchester N3 � . Colchester Yukon 12. • Colby rtorbo. South Colby ^ Harper r A 311TH NW Orchard Heights Maks /stand ate; ark Fort Nnpueny NINRLIR Browns Pt. Commencement Bay lR [ MiN SW AC1[1 MARSHALL AV ormandy Park Des Moines a Beach Robinson Pl. Software, Stare Pare 'orcrfy Boy Woodmont Beach Redondo Buenna elaide •m Milton (PI) t ST. Roo L S 111TH ST. lR WASHH•070 . ILOATING OR. RI a ST N fW ANSA ST 110 Tukwil c s � 0 f 11611. acorns \L•1 • Bell LOIN , uI00* "' Beaty Arts • � ` Mercer Island `. Sower: Para 3R0 A0 SW. Newport Shores Bryn Mawr _ v Di Kent me C,, Co P %AH, L. 3t PL Limy( NA Rent Ma piewr ro7H PIT Panther Lake No. Gowen Runt 4 72 SE 3131111 r S7 _ SI 3177N S SE 370TH 5 7 . ▪ • °mon fine r Comm Canape CENTRAC Associates TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ISM 20A 7m SI Figure 1 VICINITY AND LOCATION MAP 1/ during Phase II construction. Primary access to the site would be provided via a full access driveway onto W. Valley Road opposite S. 158th Street (fourth leg of SR- 181/158th intersection). The preliminary site plan (see Figure 2) also includes a second access driveway approximately 400 feet south of the main driveway. Traffic at this secondary exit /entrance would be restricted to right- turn -in and right- turn -out only. The proposed motor inn /restaurant development is scheduled for construction in the fall of 1985, with occupancy by June 1986 for Phase I units and by June 1988 for Phase II units. The site location is currently undeveloped although the existing zoning is C -2, regional retail, with the land use designated as commercial. Approximately 310 parking spaces would be provided on -site for Hampton Inn with 92 parking spaces also provided for the restaurant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Street /Highway System • The existing street /highway system in the vicinity of the Hampton Inn development is shown in Figure 3. Access to the site would be provided primarily by the West Valley Road (SR -181). via I -405 and a full interchange immediately to the north, with secondary access via Strander Blvd. connecting the site with the greater Southcenter commercial - industrial district.:_ I -405 is a 4 -lane limited access freeway and provides access to Renton and the — Eastside and connects with I -5, I -90 and SR -520 freeways. The West Valley Road provides access to the Green River Valley and is a 5 -lane roadway (2 lanes southbound and northbound plus a center two -way left -turn lane) except for a 700 -foot section south of the site where only 4 lanes. Strander and Southcenter Blyrds. are the primary east -west arterials connecting West Valley /Interurban to the City of Tukwila, Southcenter regional shopping center and Q • 'G >0 -v m —I O co Z— z m v r Z m c0 C CD N D N N 0 A Al CD W D - n . n -a N c v roam rem! TOP OF BANK ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE GREEN RIVER PHASE ONE 4 STORIES 148 ROOMS I I TOP OF BANK eeni01•1 TIT RESTAURANT 1 -8000 S.F • • POMMM remmil sacwe oo 4 a D r rn 13,700 1 5,400 0 1Ir Stop Signs LEGEND 15,400 Estimated Daily Traffic Volume (2-Way AWDT 1984-85) 0 Traffic Signals A N CENTRAC Associates TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Figure 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Andover Business Park. Strander Blvd. is a 4 -lane arterial, but widens to 5 lanes to accommodate left -turn movements at intersections with north -south arterials such as Andover Park E. and SR -181. Traffic control in the vicinity of the project is provided by traffic signals at major intersections, including Strander /SR- 181, Strander /Andover Park E. and SR -181 /I -405 NB ramps nearest to the site. Stop -sign control is utilized at all other nearby intersections, with the exception being the SR- 181 /S. 158th St. intersection. Since 158th Street is the main entrance to Longacres Race Track, the City of Renton assigns officers to manually control traffic on SR -181 between I -405 and 158th during the racing season (April to October) from approximately 2:00 - 4:00 PM Wednesday through Friday and from 11:00 AM to Noon on Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Speed limits in the immediate area are posted as 40 mph for SR -181, 30 mph for Strander and 25 mph for S. 158th Street. The existing geometrics and channelization along SR -181 in the vicinity of the proposed site development are shown in Figure 4. Immediately south of S. 158th, SR -181 is a 4 -lane section except for the short left -turn acceleration pocket for westbound left turns from 158th. North of S. 158th, SR-181 includes two lanes westbound and eastbound plus left -turn lanes at all signalized intersections .(I -405 NB ramps, I -405 SB ramps /Grady Way and Southcenter Boulevard). Existing Traffic Conditions_ Current average weekday traffic volumes (AWDT) on roadways in the vicinity of the proposed development are shown on Figure 3. Estimated daily volumes vary from nearly 50,000 on I -405 to 1,100 on S. 158th (6,000 during racing season) and are derived from 1981 counts by Washington State Department of Transportation, City of Tukwila records, prior traffic reports and recent intersection turning movement counts by Centrac. Existing AWDT volumes on SR -181 adjacent to the site are approximately 28,000 vehicles per day (31,000 with Longacres open), with 15,400 on Strander Blvd. just west of SR -181 and 12,200 using the I -405 NB on /off ramps. Based on recent turning movement counts at SR -181 /I -405 NB ramps and the SR- 181 /Strander intersections, the most critical peak - hour of traffic.occurs during the PM commute peak between 3:45 and 4:45 PM. The AM peak hour (7:15 - 8:15 AM) and the noon peak hour (11:30 AM - 12:30 PM) represent about 80% and 85% of PM peak -hour conditions at this intersection adjacent to the project site. Weekday traffic volumes on SR -181 were found to be substantially higher than weekend day traffic volumes and thus weekday traffic has been analyzed to identify the impacts associated with this project. Furthermore, the combination of project generated traffic volumes and existing non - project volumes will be highest during the average weekday. See Appendix for existing AM, Noon and PM peak turning movement volumes. During the PM "street" peak -hour, which represents about 10 -12 percent of average weekday traffic volumes in the vicinity of the . site, the dominant traffic flows are eastbound on Strander and northbound on SR -181 toward I -405 (with 65 %/35% directional split- in hourly traffic volumes). SR -181 presently carries approximately 1,100 vehicles per lane northbound during the PM peak and nearly 1,000 vehicles per lane southbound during the AM peak (effective capacity of a traffic lane is normally 1000. * The "worst case" traffic conditions actually occur between 3:00 and 4:00 PM on Wednesday through Friday when Longacres is open (April to October), just before the PM "street" peak hour. However, this special event "peak" is not representative of average weekday peak conditions which occurs between approximately 4:00 and 5:00 PM for both SR -181 and project site traffic. -8- Andover Business Park. Strander Blvd. is a 4 -lane arterial, but widens to 5 lanes to accommodate left -turn movements at intersections with north -south arterials such as Andover Park E. and SR -181. Traffic control in the vicinity of the project is provided by traffic signals at major intersections, including Strander /SR- 181, Strander /Andover Park E. and SR -181 /I -405 NB ramps nearest to the site. Stop -sign control is utilized at all other nearby intersections, with the exception being the SR- 181 /S. 158th St. intersection. Since 158th Street is the main entrance to Longacres Race Track, the City of Renton assigns officers to manually control traffic on SR -181 between I -405 and 158th during the racing season (April to October) from approximately 2:00 - 4:00 PM Wednesday through Friday and from 11:00 AM to Noon on Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Speed limits in the immediate area are posted as 40 mph for SR -181, 30 mph for Strander and 25 mph for S. 158th Street. The existing geometrics and channelization along SR -181 in the vicinity of the proposed site development are shown in Figure 4. Immediately south of S. 158th, SR -181 is a 4 -lane section except for the short left -turn acceleration pocket for westbound left turns from 158th. North of S. 158th, SR -181 includes two lanes westbound and eastbound plus left -turn lanes at all signalized intersections .(I -405 NB ramps, I -405 SB ramps /Grady Way and Southcenter Boulevard). Existing Traffic Conditions Current average weekday traffic volumes (AWDT) on roadways in the vicinity of the proposed development are shown on Figure 3. Estimated daily volumes vary from nearly 50,000 on I -405 to 1,100 on S. 158th (6,000 during racing season) and are derived from 1981 counts by Washington State Department of Transportation, City of Tukwila records, prior traffic reports and recent -6- -8- vehicles per hour). The worst levels of congestion and longest delays to motorists will generally occur during the PM peak period. A measure of the relative congestion levels can be made by comparing the level- of- service at intersections. Level -of- service relates traffic volume demand to capacity and can range from LOS "A" (free -flow conditions) to LOS "F" (forced -flow or jammed conditions), with LOS "E" being capacity conditions. LOS "D" (tolerable delays at intersections) is generally considered adequate for intersections in urban areas such as Tukwila. The existing (1985) PM peak -hour LOS at the three most critical intersections, using "Transportation Research Board's Circular 212 ", are summarized in Table 1. All of the intersections currently operate at an acceptable LOS except the SR- 181 /Strander intersection which is operating near capacity conditions (LOS D /E). During 1980 and 1981, accidents were not a serious problem at any of the four intersections. The highest accident location is the SR- 181 /Strander intersection, which has experienced 4 accidents per year for the 1980 -81 period. This intersection was signalized during 1981 and had experienced 6 -9 accidents per year. (1977 -79) prior to signalization. All other in the= :::_ vicinity have experienced less than 4 accidents during either. calendar year. Metro Transit provides peak -hour transit service along SR- 181,- -- = r:. including Route 154. (Seattle- Auburn) and Routes 158 /159 = - - (Seattle -Kent East Hill). These routes connect to Seattle -via Interurban Avenue (north of I -405) and I -5. There are several other routes which provide express and local service into the Southcenter area via Southcenter Blvd. and Tukwila Pkwy., which are beyond a reasonable walking distance for patrons or residents of the proposed development. TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS (1984) PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Comments SR -181 @ Strande.r Blvd. D/E (C) SR -181 @ S. 158th St. A (D /E) SR -181 @ I -405 NB Ramps C Signalized. - Signalized (LOS improves to "C if dual LT lanes provided on Strander approach). Stop sign control on 158th (LOS at or near capacity during Longacres racing season). • FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WITHOUT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Peak -hour traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed hotel /restaurant development have increased quite dramatically compared with other volume trends in the Tukwila area. At the SR- 181 /Strander intersection, commuter peak volumes have increased approximately 20% during the AM peak and over 45% during the PM peak since 1981 (when counts taken by WSDOT prior to signalization.). This amounts to a 6 -12% annual growth rate for peak -hour traffic the past 3 years, which far exceeds the 2.9 percent per year average growth rate for the Tukwila area as determined by Entranco Engineers during the Tukwila Micro -Model Study. Some possible explanations for the high growth rates for Strander and W. Valley Road include: Strander Blvd. and SR -181 are being used by many commuters as an alternate route to either I -405 or S. 180th Street, which both operate at or exceed capacity conditions during peak -hour periods; and, increased development on Southcenter Pkwy. and within the Andover industrial area (i.e. Doubletree II Hotel, Boeing Engineering Center, etc.) have generated significant volumes of "new traffic" along the SR- 181 /Strander access corridor. Since the West Valley Road (SR -181) and its intersection with Strander Blvd. presently operates at or near capacity conditions during peak -hour periods, the SR -181 and Strander corridors - cannot handle significantly more traffic in the near future without additional widening of these 5 -lane arterials. The -- Tukwila Transportation Improvement Plan (T.I.P.) completed_ Entranco in 1979 projects an additional southbound and northbound -i-:„ lane will be required on SR -181 by 1990, but with no additional -- - - widening of Strander Blvd. being required (since Tukwila Pkwy. is to be extended east to SR -181 at S. 158th Street and would become alternate route to Strander). Future traffic growth along Strander is limited and along SR -181 is "restrained" until future widening to 7 lanes occurs. Thus, the average growth rate of 2.9 percent per year (from the micro -model study) was utilized to TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Traffic Generation and Assignment forecast daily and PM peak traffic volumes for 1986 (summarized on Figure 6 in the next section), assuming the Hampton Inn development is not built. Projected peak -hour levels -of- service at nearby intersections in 1986,,without the subject development being constructed, would be slightly worse than existing conditions (see Table 1), with an assumed 6% overall traffic growth rate. Daily and peak -hour trips generated by the proposed Hampton Inn and quality restaurant were estimated separately but then combined since common driveways would provide access /egress to the joint -use development. Trip generation statistics assembled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE, Trip Generation, 1982) indicate that daily traffic volumes generated by quality restaurants are somewhat higher on Saturday, with daily volumes for hotels /motor inns being significantly lower on Saturday, compared with projected traffic volumes for an average weekday. The peak -hour of travel for the proposed restaurant typically occurs between 12 :00 and 1:00 PM (weekday), except on Saturday when the peak occurs between 8 :00 and 9:00 PM. The maximum peak period for. Hampton Inn would occur either between. 4:00 -6:00 PM or 6:00 -8:00 PM. Thus the peak period for the =__ -- primary traffic generator (hotel) would overlap the 4:00 -5:00 PM- "street" peak on SR -181. * Construction of the proposed hotel /restaurant development is projected for completion by Summer, 1986. The non - project traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 assume Longacres is open (April to October) and the extension of Tukwila Parkway east to SR -181 (at S. 158th) has not been constructed. Table 2 summarizes the daily and peak -hour vehicle trips generated by land use proposed for the Hampton Inn site. Even though the maximum peak -hour volume for a specific trip generator may exceed the "street peak" volumes by up to 25 %, the "worst case" conditions would still occur during the weekday "street" PM peak -hour (when non -site traffic is maximum) or between 4:00 - 5:00 PM. When fully constructed and assuming 100% occupancy for Phase I and Phase II hotel units, the proposed joint -use development woul.d generate approximately 2,320 vehicular trips on an average weekday, with 170 of those trips occurring during the PM peak hour. In order to analyze the "worst case" traffic impacts of the proposed development, it has been assumed that all trips to the complex will be "new auto trips " -- no vehicles currently using the adjacent roadway system will use the proposed restaurant /hotel facilities and that no reduction to trip generation forecasts has been made for possible carpool and transit trips to /from the site. The daily and PM peak traffic generated by the restaurant and hotel were assigned to the proposed access driveways on W. Valley Road (SR -181) and then distributed to the adjacent street system using the trip distribution pattern shown in Figure 5. Approximately 65% would access /egress the site via SR -181 north, with 35% using SR -181 south or Strander Blvd. The City. of Tukwila's proposed extension of Tukwila Parkway east to SR -181 at S. 158th Street (shown on Figure 5) has not been included for assignment of site trips since this new - connection is programmed for completion by 1990, with the Hampton Inn to be fully operational by 1986 -88. During the PM peak, estimated=-- _ - directional split is 55% arrivals and 45% departures from the proposed development. Most of the PM peak exiting vehicles were * Typically, 10 -15% of all trips generated by a new development will already be using the adjacent street system, traveling to another nearby destination. Trip Generator 1. Quality Rest. (8,000 S.F.) TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Projected Trips Generated AWDT (SAT) PM Peak (Street) .Max Peak (Gen.) In Out In Out 599 794 30 19 •61 22 2. Hampton Inn Phase I 1011 779 35 36 41 42 (148 units) Phase II 1721 1327 59 61 70 72 (252 units) Phase I TOTALS 1610 (1573) 65 55 102 64 Phase II TOTALS 2320 (2121) 89 80 131 94 NOTES: 1. Peak hour for quality restuarants typically occurs between Noon and 1:00 PM except for Saturdways when the peak occurs between 8:00 and 9:00 PM. 2. Peak hour for hotels occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 PM and 6 :00 and 8:00 PM. 3. The evening peak hour on SR -181 occurs between-3:45 and 5:00 PM. 1050 6596; 78 5IO 6596 .I.IO. 170' IO% 375 23 %• 28 1 540 23% 30 I 1 .1050 65% 78 1514 65% 110 560 35% 42 8I0 35% 59 560 35% 42 810 35% 59 12 240 0% 17 CENTRAC Associates LEGEND % OF TOTAL TRAFFIC GENERATED AWDT i P.M. PEAK Hotel (Pliase 1) 8 Restaurantw l ote (Phase 11) Restaurant~ O , p N TRAFFIC IMPACT STIJDY Figure 5 PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION J assigned to the full access (north) driveway, although approximately two - thirds of the right -turn traffic would utilize the proposed south driveway (limited to right turns in /out). Projected Traffic Volumes and Levels -of- Service The projected 2320 daily and 170 PM peak trips for the restaurant and hotel were combined with the projected 1986 non -site traffic to estimate 1986.daily and PM peak volumes for both hotel construction alternatives- -Phase I with 148 rooms and Phase II with 252 rooms, assuming full occupancy. These volumes are shown in Figure 6 for the impacted arterials, on an average weekday when Longacres race track is open. West Valley Road (SR -181) would carry approximately 37,000 vehicles per day (vpd) north of the site and 34,000 vpd south of the site. When Longacres is not open, daily volumes would be reduced by approximately 3,000 vpd on SR -181. Since the "effective daily capacity" of a 5 -lane roadway is approximately 30,000 vph, SR -181 would operate at capacity conditions (LOS E) during extended peak -hour periods. Strander Blvd. would handle over 17,000 vpd by 1986 between Andover Park E. and SR -181, and operate at tolerable level -of- service (LOS C or D) with the existing 4-lane section. The 1 -405 northbound ramps would handle nearly 16,000 vpd and S. 158th volumes would remain at approximately 6,000 vpd with the proposed= project. It should be pointed out that the proposed development would at most contribute. only 2 -4% of these projected daily and peak -hour traffic volumes on these arterials, adjacent to the - project site. The projected 1986 peak -hour volumes were analyzed at the four most critical intersections /driveways, using the level -of- service (LOS) methods described in the Existing Conditions section. In order to estimate the traffic impacts of the proposed project during average weekday peak conditions, the 4:00 -5:00 PM period (street peak) was analyzed with and without Longacres open for both Phase I and Phase II development of Hampton Inn. The 28540 3250 28375 3240 28000' 3210 15810 1585 15560 1570 15000 1540 33210: 3780 32960 3760 32400 . 3720 ` 24200 2490 23990 2470 23500' 2420 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA PKWY. EVANS -BLACK DR. BAKER BLVD. AWDT LEGEND P.M. PEAK 34310 34060 33500 3915 3900 3855 + 4 W /.;Project`' (Phase 'W %`P'roject (Pliasir W/0 Project; CENTRAC Associates STRANDER BLVD. PROPOSED ■ •• XTENSION • 2 17270 17185 17000 1970 1965 1950 Z m 0 A. 37510 37050 36000 6050 6030 6000 A - 34310 3915 34060 3900 33500 3855 4045 4015 3935 330 325 320 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Figure 6 PROJECTED 1985 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH AND WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT I -18- Intersection TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE FUTURE CONDITIONS (1986) WITH PROJECT PM Peak Hour (4:00 -5:00) Level of Service' w /Existing w /Proposed Geometrics Street Improvements 0000 0000 SR -181 @ I -405 NB Ramps D C D C D C D C SR -181 @ S. 158th St. C B C B B B C B (3:00 -4:00 PM) (E) (B) (E) (B) (D) (B) (D) (B) SR -181 @ South Driveway C C C C B B B B SR -181 @ Strander Blvd. E E E E D C D C 10 Case 1: Phase I Development with Longacres Open:(April- Oct..) - - 2 Case 2: Phase I Development without Longacres ( - April) 3 Case 3: Phase II Development with Longacres Open (April- Oct.)- 4D Case 4: Phase II Development without Longacres Open (Oct. - April) 1 PM peak hour conditions. for 4:00-5:00 PM (street peak)- in.yearv 1986 when Hampton Inn development is open.- Longacres peak hour conditions (3:00 -4:00 PM) are not significantly impacted by the proposed project, i.e. the projected level -of- service would still be LOS E/F with or without the Hampton Inn project. 2 Assumes new signal at this location, with separate left and right turn lanes at north driveway, and no south driveway. Safety and Parking Impacts Signalization @ North Driveway (SR- 181 /S. 158th): As part of their traffic impact analysis for the Tukwila Hotel EIS (Hilton Hotel proposed at same site in 1982), the TRANSPO Group performed a signal warrant analysis for this intersection with and without Longacres open. Volume warrants for signalization were not satisfied for the minor road approaches (158th and north driveway), even with the proposed Hilton Hotel and Longacres feeding traffic through this intersection (see Appendix for volumes assumed and signal warrant calculations by TRANSPO). The SR -181 volumes have increased significantly since 1982, but projected crossing traffic at this location would be reduced since the Hampton Inn project would generate approximately 80% of the Hilton project plus Longacres has opened a new south exit (which has reduced exiting volumes on S. 158th). Despite the fact that projected volumes for the SR- 181 /S. 158th intersection in 1986 will not meet signal volume warrants, an actuated traffic signal is recommended at this location for the following reasons: 1) With approximately 1,000 vehicles per lane on SR -181 in the peak direction, exiting traffic from Longacres -(via - = - -= 158th) or the Hampton Inn site will experience significant delays during peak periods in waiting for adequate gaps in upstream traffic. Left -turn egress movements would be extremely hazardous without- signalization since an adequate gap in - traffic both ---- directions would be required (existing left -turn refuge area south of 158th would be converted into a northbound left -turn lane to the Hampton Inn site). 2) The proposed hotel /restaurant development located directly west of the main entrance to Longacres could generate significant pedestrian traffic between the -20- 4 site and Longacres, especially from April to October. Without a signalized pedestrian crossing at this location, pedestrians would either cross on their own or wait for patrol officers to wave them across. This would be extremely hazardous with the potential for severe injuries and legal suits, as well as further complicate the manual control of this congested location by officers before and after race track events. 3) Emergency vehicle access and egress to and from the Hampton Inn site and S. 158th Street would be severely hampered without signalization. Response times would be longer with increased congestion plus the police and fire personnel would experience the same delays and hazards when leaving Longacres or the Hampton Inn site. The heavy southbound left -turn volume from SR -181 onto S. 158th prior to Longacres events (700 -800 vehicles per hour) can be accommodated by providing a second left -turn lane. This channelization revision can be provided if SR -181 is widened on the south side (as proposed - -See Figure 7), but a dual left -turn movement cannot be safely accommodated without signal control. Proposed Access Driveways:_ _The projected peak hour traffic volumes to be generated by the Hampton Inn development can be- - -- - - - accommodated via a single, full access driveway at the proposed SR- 181 /S. 158th_signalized intersection. - As in Table -3, the PM peak level -of- service at this -location would be desirable (LOS- B or C) even if all traffic for the Phase II scenario were assigned to the north driveway. A single driveway is not desirable for the following reasons. 1 2 Parking Impacts:. Parking spaces for the proposed restaurant /hotel development will be provided on -site without any :. parking required off -site or adjacent to bordering arterials and roadways. Approximately 400 total parking spaces will be provided - -90 for the restaurant and 310 for Hampton Inn. No projected parking overflows are anticipated during peak periods; although the enforcement of parking .by hotel and restaurant— patrons only will be critical during Longacres racing season.- 3) A second driveway at the south end of the site would permit site traffic destined southbound on SR -181 to make a right -tu'rn without waiting for the signal. Southbound right turns destined for the hotel could also this driveway, which would improve internal circulation and reduce potential conflicts with pedestrians at the north driveway. Traffic queuing at the single exit would at times block vehicles arriving and leaving the first parking bay. Aisles for north -south parking spines would be utilized for circulation for parked vehicles to /from the south half of the site, which would increase vehicular and pedestrian conflicts and potential accidents. The north driveway will be the "focal point" for pedestrian access between the project site and Longacres. Concentration of all vehicular traffic inbound and outbound at this driveway is not desirable and could potentially result in severe accidents involving pedestrians. TRAFFIC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS Programmed Transportation Improvements (by Tukwila, WSDOT, etc.) The City of Tukwila has programmed several short -range and long - range transportation improvements, as part of its 6 -year Transportation Improvement Program (1985- 1990), that should help alleviate peak -hour congestion and improve traffic flows in the vicinity of the subject development. During 1985, the north approach of SR -181 at the Strander intersection will be widened to accommodate a right- turn -only lane and sidewalks the entire length of the Brock Residence Inn site (presently under construction). Tukwila has identified the widening of SR -181 from 5 to 7 lanes from I -405 to Strander as a long range (1987- 89) transportation need to handle projected traffic volumes for this State highway. Thus, providing an additional southbound lane for the entire length of the Hampton Inn site would accommodate the ultimate 7 -lane roadway section for SR -181. Other programmed transportation improvements that could impact traffic circulation at the proposed Hampton Inn development include: overlay, safety and drainage improvements by WSDOT on SR -181 from I -405 to Strander (Spring, 1985); realignment of Southcenter Blvd.. to intersect with Grady Way and widening of the T -Line Bridge by WSDOT and City (1985 -86); extension of Tukwila Pkwy. to connect with S. 158th Street at SR -181 with a new bridge crossing Green River by Tukwila (1985-90), which would provide an alternate east -west route to Strander Blvd:; .widening__ _ �- of Strander Blvd. (from Andover Park W. to existing Green River "= _- bridge) from 4 to 5 lanes by Tukwila as part of connecting Strander to S.W. 27th Street in Renton to provide new east -west link south of Longacres (1987 -89); widening of S. 158th (Longacres Way) by Tukwila to 4 lanes (SR -181 to east city limits) plus improved pedestrian access (1985 -86); and, I -405 NOV lanes added by WSDOT from Bellevue to Tukwila (1985 -87). Proposed Street /Access Improvements (by Developer) The following traffic control and access improvements, as summarized in Figure 7, will be provided by the developer during construction of the Hampton Inn development to mitigate the traffic and safety impacts of the proposed hotel /restaurant development: o Provide new curb and gutter and 8' concrete sidewalk along the west side of SR -181 between the north property line and the south driveway, plus participate with the City of Tukwila and WSDOT in providing a new 12' southbound lane on SR -181. These street improvement should complete the west side of the ultimate 7 -lane urban roadway section for SR -181. The new 12' lane would function as a thru /right turn lane along the Hampton Inn site and then taper to match the existing roadway beyond the south driveway. ° Participate in funding of a new fully- actuated signal and - -- channelization improvements at the intersection of SR- 181,.... -= S. 158th and the north driveway. Loop detection should be . provided for left -turn movements from SR -181 as well as on S. 158th and Hampton Inn driveway approaches. _ single pedestrian crosswalk with signal . actuations should be provided across SR -181 east of S. 158th Street. The-7 - Hampton Inn development would contribute 2 -3% of daily * Per recent conversations with WSDOT, the proposed HOV lane improvements along the I -405 corridor would not affect the limited access zone along the west side of SR -181. The limited access zone for the east side of SR -181 may be extended south as part of these improvements by WSDOT. o In conjunction with the above widening /channelization improvement, S. 158th Street needs to be widened at the SR -181 intersection to accommodate the proposed dual left -turn movement. The City of Tukwila has programmed a design study for 1985 to examine the widening of Longacres Way (S. 158th) to 4 lanes from SR -181 to east city limits as well as improving pedestrian access. o The existing left -turn channelization on SR -181 between and S. 158th could be revised to provide additional left- turn storage capacity for the existing single southbound left -turn lane to Longacres. The existing "C" curb transition length exceeds WSDOT design standards for left -turn channelization and an additional 100 -125 feet of storage could be provided at minimal cost (see Figure 7). This channelization revision could be made during construction of proposed overlay /safety improvements for SR -181 (scheduled by WSDOT for April 1985). o The new traffic signal at the SR- 181 /S. 158th intersection should be interconnected with the adjacent signal to the north (at 1 -405 NB ramps). to provide progression of SR -181- traffic through both intersections. (AWDT) and peak -hour traffic volumes at this intersection, with S. 158th Street traffic representing 7 -8% of total projected traffic. o The North driveway onto SR -181 would provide full access and is 36' in width to accommodate two 12' exit lanes, with separation of left /thru and right- turning movements, and one 12' inbound lane. Channelization revisions to SR -181 are required to accommodate northbound left -turn vehicles (raised island removed to provide 150' left -turn lane. This driveway intersection will be controlled by a new traffic signal (critical left -turn egress movement improves from LOS E to LOS C). o The South driveway onto SR -181 provides partial access and is 24' in width to accommodate one exit and one entry lane (12' each). A single exit lane is adequate at this stop - controlled intersection which will permit right turn in /out movements only. Note: No signing is required to enforce limited access at this driveway, since left turns in /out are impossible with the existing raised island median on SR -181. o Standard turning radii (25' minimum) will be provided in order to safely accommodate vehicular traffic turning right in /out at both driveways. o Approximately 400 parking spaces will be provided on- site,= - which should adequately handle the vehicular:traffic--=- projected for the joint hotel /restaurant developing during "peak" or worst case conditions. All parking stalls will be 90° and 2 -way circulation will be provided for all aisles and connections to driveways. 27- Other Recommended Street Improvements (by Others) ° The proposed site plan layout (shown in Figure 2) may need to be modified somewhat along the north perimeter of the site to accommodate the future extension of Tukwila Parkway to the SR- 181 /S. 158th intersection. This may require reorientation of the restaurant and parking layout so that the main driveway would connect to Tukwila Pkwy. instead of SR -181. Traffic access and internal circulation patterns would not be significantly different. ° In order to mitigate traffic congestion between I -405 and S. 158th Street on SR -181 during the inbound peak prior to Longacres events, a second southbound left -turn lane is required to accommodate the 700 -800 turning vehicles per hour at the entrance intersection. Widening on the west side of SR -181 from the I -405 NB ramps intersection to S. 158th to provide an additional southbound lane would permit conversion of the existing inside through lane to a. through /left lane (new southbound through lane would match the proposed additional lane along the Hampton Inn site). This improvement in conjunction with anew fully - actuated signal would permit a dual left -turn movement plus two . through traffic lanes during Longacres special events - -and, a single left -turn lane and three southbound through_lanes at all other times. As shown in Figure 7, initial construction could include only taper widening starting at the left -turn transition and then widening to the lane later on Since the heavy turning volume that - = -. -= -f requires additional left -turn capacity is being generated by Longacres and other properties east of SR -181, the costs of this improvement should be borne by these property owners. ' ':21t. ": '1 INDICATE NORTH WITH ARROW 0C/iT1oN /4S _'SN0 _ 8S-LOW _ __ PR ou c - -c _I-1 A.tatp N.! _ 'tii ►._I _ o is N - - - - e4cC ae f1d4oelate4. ?me. O r - -r — - - - - -- - t . Engineers • Architects • Planners , sl iZA Ez.. .13,wD 4n 41` (c La o r L ( izgq I — - - - -- I- I I L _J J i / OF �, FORM T M -4A TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM N E4Z11 TIME PER too .:46 -.4 ;4S PM DA 4 DATE YZ.[• /8¢ Tt PP64- FAxi 5 pm 'PEAK Eysn JG- TIME PERIOD - -¢; Fti DAY4 DATE, 17 -,U2. V1/` a Arr COMPILED DATE BY �1V_Es 3ji��•_ CHECKED ,DATE BY G± 6Sok 2c�9 INTERSEcTooN W. VALLEY R.D. (5/2.-1131) [ SIXAKID6t2 BLVD. Loc. No. 1 1NOICATE NOR TI-1 WITH aRP.ow po czkA 3 ' LCC A TION _ (_.I '- PRDJGC-r TVKW1( oeveLAPMENT 1 s94- 1279 00 ciN co th r/ 1 '1241 1 ,14441e. atea. 9Kc. �/ Engineers • Architects • Planners 14- (, I305E5 'MOWS L - ---..J caac ti —.. - - -J f13031 19 4 P r Ea. _ 1 E lt J -- 51l2A-ND64_ STRAIJ DEL 244 360 TUKWWI I L4 - - 721 F Y 4 DATE SHEET o FORM - m -4 TURNING MOVEMENT' 'DIAGRAM 14E41.11. 9/70 AM PEAK T1ME PERIOD �S' e: /SAM DAY DATE MO►J. 1/2 • NOW PEA K TIME PERtoD 11:36 AM- 12.:3oPM FRI., 3 /6/e4- 6 e U CoMpI ED DATE. BY CHECK=. CATE BY 7L4 (2345 - INTER5EC1IoN q 510 RAss 1 /c7Li -1 wl'fi -1 Loki to Arrr_-S PP -4-1 1 Loc. No 1N01cATE NORTH WITH ARROW Locr-lT►oN SR 181_ L,-L S,. ( 5 Sf_ - _ PRosc - -cr _�I -1 Z&,-i - — 013 No. =-- ea1444e r4aaseiatea.9.re. Engineers • Architects • Planners 0 0 N I /075 I - - - -- �. - -,.. /6¢s I19¢ol t 0 TIME PERIOD JAY 4' DATE; 4' I , I I I I I I • 1 4-: ' 60 -G=oo. TIME PERIoD I ' i3/461/4(4. JAY DATE K9,C0 4' SHEET - OF FORM tM -4P. TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM N E4ZIl : 3:0 --4: D PM fEAK- 9fit .. . - .. Sta '1;4.55- Vnu.3t-1 cs I )...Yr, LON.1(.14e_r_es r-g Loc. No. INDICATE NORrH WITH ARROW a Locn 52_151 fr PR 0.3 e.crr j-4 P-ro _2:14/4_ .30ec _-_• • e 14 • NiErameasisim Engineers • Architects • Planners 1 11310 1 Isc,o I geao J 4___ - - 1 r- _16a. ToAls PERIoD zfly DATE; .••■•■•• +too.- 5:00 TIME PERtop ?t DATE.. ( f3Co 1 4' L r J • 514F 2 or FORM TM -4A TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM NE4ZIL 3: 001 C fr :0 0 ?dl 'FA 1< Iggeo to J C-A-045' A serr-ef,r's P574-- • 9/ 4 CoL ID/471:: BY b-r CHECK:77.D -DAT 'E • By •. _43/K • 1 INTERsEc IgKa W LoThAut r1r ass. L oc • No, Imoicirre NORTH WITH ARROW • T 4i...b al. ••••• ••• .•••••• •■•■• ■••• Loc Tibri . .(c., t5,5 <4-) PRoJacT _ -- Joe No. - _ ea ltute Adoe6444.1.14. ?( 1 VA - Enpineers • Architects • Planners . . _ PEED. 692- 1234-‘ I SW- r - - PE D. 7-333 J N 5; FOR ;./, 4 F. TURNING MOVEMENT IDIAGRAN't NC.471t. 9/70 440 TIME PERIOD 1 71-4 T Dily 4 DATE 1123C. TIME P DAN( 4 DATE. tub fmc 11551- 130+31.4-z.f 4 1 - (4P w7 -SwiPrz-Vm = G25 +34,i-25 = 1 .0 4:00, g :DO WI fP6s.14. leis 4 W/o PVtAllS 1 I I r .1 (1 kiki/ 7.4.1?■1t41-1 S = 156+ le.f•-s 24- z- 1211 N00.914 DA-I TaviA LocATION _ ..„ _H_AM1? j p4 jots No. - - em44414 1144 Engineers • Architects • Planners . • .P2ZD. 1593 r I — RED. 1 - -_ I Q ‘Ji 3 d i . 1160e1 t l Y i r -I — —1 /— — 2:30 • 4:00 -5:00 TIME PERIOD 1 ?6,6.1e- DAy 4 DATE lq$C# DAY 4 DATE • 5; E FORIV, — CIA -4F. TURNING MOVE fsitENT DIAGR AM Et_____I•E(.9/1 tAVo Vir.vtdrr s-CA/ ‘116 4- 3c,4-7-4 Itti/ t.-1Przti•4 T_CA/ IISS SO+3 +In 24.4 4:00-5:00 TIME PERIOD e Pi re-4•1 19 8( ZMP*./1" EGA/ 12.3% kJ/ tmi.4 wr-es = ■135+ +- fz.st • 7 • . I . / L .•-•-: 44- 0:1SNVILL •■ •■•• 1 - --- OL1 ..5 • • • •••■0_,C o fl ore • **** oc11 " • ••, . • • • 1 • •• • - 1' • - • + 4- 4 ..... IOL • • aSZ • .. • .. 7 . - oL • • • 4 -■ • 4 . 4. • • . . I : • 4. • i- • • ; t • cL1 10 II • 1 ; ! ! • ) .... ! " • 1 • . ... ... • • • • i•"; f-- : t-t r • .. ... 01 • • " . . °11 ... V • i A .1f). 7-YWO7 OA '7):-_ VZI • , 01PS' • • a219 • • • • • • • ••- • •-_-__. . ... . -r • . -:-. • • t --i- - ..166.-S1 ., . 4--....-..-; . . .. . . 1.... '• .; ' -1- • .... ' . ' : • ! ; ; .1.- . , ... -- 7 ;0 te i ' • I I I 7 1 I 1 i ; 77 7 . 111 t - .--t- --- .oti ( al 47771 • ; .0 --1-4-1-4-1.4-4- • t 1 • •• • : . ....1 : : • • • 'Wad !s-ar/OVri 07 • .rocue :141- • • • ' 141, Ii14 . I,; oSI Wd 11 - bk.! 0/ 002 wd 07 - i . • : _L'_*__:12 • • ' " • • • Nei '14 •-• vki S_ ... ___ : - ! - • •1 -9 JLL • • M � ■ 15 . CC t mum r 4. 4 • • II C■ MIFF MUM �_ � ■ ■ - Minn 11C' sum mama 11 111111 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ . • Q 2 • • _1.1.,...... 1 A h'i — ti feW fv. (./Et-ticc) Lire vo /Inas I re% PTc- c.v L cw AcruPk.. (.4/ Loa 44 R. NIA.) oe. gorc. ( — MiJ. c.42 c Tal M CcOovp c.)e. 8 t41z.s . rtokr.cs A1 t. F riso S i St:. pt tAN o2_ 120Ar 6PpeaPictt4 . A Cry AL- t-4/0 _ sKT 15rt Et> eJ P(.2.Es: st4 imp Porz g S Prrn' P-1 • t • 11$F 64'7 I'S EtEl."? LAalejZ%aNr 9 — • caw 0/./ (A•kre,2,6".rT 2 A c 1 . 4 SP EL oc) FLS 547/s Ft al) Rae. Fue_ - I. -N rf.ekAP 7 co oF car v vcvs Poe_ Fug IAJA22AN.17 I • Fog. tyl voe go f4c) o Floi.AR-5 e-IGNAZS t-kma o HO-4e. 5. wAee&17" a ilea Awo ( ' ifeS Ave) wilegoev7 1 (49.6 Iwo WAR/44rr Z.; t-fes ANO I . cryEz I A nicis7 E3L e F012 3 14 WZ.s 2. 5A ( t Er? (i H&J Pr czo (N.07 rJA1 OF ,4J ' t:Lep: 5 A7( S FF1 W '70 P. ea 7, 1..E /. (44/6/ vo/.... E. APFPOPKM- /.5"134 v pirN peg_ List/Jr., S. /6 t4tr c.. io S Ls9 Tt VOL 4frret VOLvmE.S. CAS I nOr.c, Ustric, L'S' ,J M r`i (2.0AD 9 v-itvie-s • 60;22447 2. i »/&. vt/Ae2.ev7 sore 44,a,ey 0-/ Ly) i4 VoLavi e rkeprzw A,c) 75 vph FOR. e 13e.. 0 f-k7waS 4. i L We- Her7Et,; - Foie_ •7 [-owes USIrJ6 • Foe_ 6 HOU/as US/ pa. • Frig- 'A1R-S c-4 2. I w-es ush.g- As crtwed47 2. 7 tfe,S Man_ WI Aett S /-1 0.5/"fr /San, Wc, L4p/Ze44/7 "2.. /0 KS 16/A/c- Pir7Ez, v pw:(1 2. got= wAereAu t Zcce3 The TRANSPO c esauu Engineers • Architects • Planners PROJECT NAMproL S►J SUBJECT_ JS rMt = r`r . Ht7TE ae,usiD-( : O .ci0 e,r,pfotes per Mott,' ADSU sTS0 DA 114 R ,c_ - frzi P rzn = 10. S Y- O.ccI - TU - rP. L- Unt i = 1 4`b 4 104- = Z62 ZSZ( to. 83) = I,12I AW DT 12E,ST �U 2ANT ( 1 SAL r y 8, ooD SF. A` (2 Tr, ?ATE 1 8(14 -.q) = 599 AWE TA L.- -- U kW t tom. 44 o'rrE - = 2 880 A-w (per Try,^ s Pc. (�rnap' e a.(L1LintFa SpAUE-S HA M Prb J: Ardsoc aCee, T•cc. .5a 0 Co4.4 ?4 : l7. 5 ° v e.nnpkN e.e% 1 ■ 506 .41n- (Sip H0tc.i 79% .�.l� rezh o Gas SHEET: _L__..OF BY: MGM• DATE I- I1-P6 CHECKED: Tt DATE 1-1 JOB NO. True tc_ U stsi Otit re. au c,-h o►J . cr_Cu p l td rborn . Uc-t -u; TZA I Dr t= 2 S7...0 Av.., Di It u 232 Z550 = s1 ,o r1 a (u. vr. 14;t4...) - 1st, t.- 14 44.,t +tip r - ) u 4 / o r a s � , . . � . e 4 4 _ b ‘44.41_, - C �,fa r►•-04 G1 :11-041,1 6tftwrs r-u. A-b l . efc row "i‘dzifiette.4, Tote. PROJECT R- AMp r od 7 ^J 1 000 SF 1ZE.s R.AP"r o DA! L'•f o ?M Engineers • Architects • Planners 'PH AsE 2 - Ta - rA LS i SUBJECT Taip (- -)g_raEPA - noNA /DISTI JBt.erf ] • `Phse. Z - 103 UN 1"1 N amt.. 4- 9,000 5.F QUA I- r{ QtrsAuizaNT 14') UN Vr oreu : (U 51 n9 G5/0 Adiu skme T .CAC br o DA' 1-%-f • • 10.5 (O.(.9S) = Ca.83 67.83(14F3)= 1011 AwD-' M ?CAL 3' `f ;9'SPh NI13outi11 ►3iv (0(•5) _ • 234 . 2.34 -(14a = 3S OLITBou r■ D , Si (, (05) _ . 2.4-1 .24i (I48) = 3 to `T4. (s) = 5q PEA K 274 - 11•- SOU N� 4-.43. (L,14) X 8 = 3 o o - rsour.a� 4 (bI E = I 9 4q T OTA l_ A w ts o ID,, A I I l 01 1 4 7gc1 = Ito I O / MJ OT o i? N1 'PEAK t -1sou NI D 3S _ 5' 0 (7fl cu : c„+ 1a = 65 - rvra 12 O SHEET: I OF BY: MC•f . DATE CHECKED: , -h' DATE JOB NO. F54-1- -I'1- SS t -lr1?S e.t4caa ,1Qdaueated, 7%a. Engineers • Architects • Planners PROJECT 1-1 A M 'PT° ►J TN rJ SUBJECT, ' T T Z r f P ( r•l F 0 , o DA tt_-( IN6oWJtU O 14 aQU tit n i Si Qi t3u oat FH ASE- 15 - 104- adcli+-honaI Unr a - DAIL—Y ea. S3 (MO a -.4 tom' EA1L (5 . Z34 (104) = Z4 241 (ID4) = ZS - TOTAL 4+� 1"oN AsE IS DTAt_S PM 'PEAK G A') 1 nt goUt..lr) lab+ 24 = S9 ouTSouNio 6 +. 26 = S 71 To - AL. 1 Co (a 10 - 110 = Z32c7 Aw D'1" SHEET: 2' OF S BY : M G`- DATE 1 6 CHECKED: DATE _ JOB NO. $S`F'L usGzao ,14aouate41 . 9Ke. Engineers • Architects • Planners PROJECT 4 AMP ► SUBJECT T J C- ` DiS - rmarn o :17- eou►.►rJ - (A11 iNI sou kso ' PHASE- 1 - Isiz aA I DP J PM 'PEAK- voLut-ASS LA 6E- M A N r1 F rra- VAN ( 0 5% M -}ham P 1 p L 4 p. - Trevi sp. o s+ ud y Scurf+ -3.5 %d -6m .cis((o )= 4-2 -(05 - 4-2 = 23 • DI.UT Gout N-10 (o S rye '1-o -W e (P5 (5 1. 3c, ?4-14.s E. QJ om:n -1 'frrGri s po study N 2isi zIsu ( r u (' s�. o Tr.) SOU pit) (Zo AeE:vE . 2.0 (4 = S 42 - v = 34 ✓ C rreCuNAb —� Assut "1 S3 j tct -Mr- 1 23 USE_ SHEET: 3 OF 5 BY: MCy DATE I CHECKED: 111,- DATE I- If-89 JOB NO 5511, pnJt Dvv Y #z 'DlAN. (Per layac+' effkzeie PROJECT 0 TO SCAR t,1 1] /144 kciate4. 9%cc. Engineers • Architects • Planners H AMpTbr.! 1 p J o Ovraour— Cos (60) = 52 B0 -52 = z s3 s SUBJECT T1 Arrir T) sr %T UrloN R - Ass It - D I ST2% r3UTI oti1 PM PEAK. 'Jolty nit Es .ca5(as)_ 31 (1 ) (' S ) SHEET: 4 " OF 5 BY' DATE I-11-SS CHECKED: 1 4 DATE JOB NO. g S4 - ro DwY Z [ 11) 'DwY . 625 (5ci) 5'6 .20 CSC) = 12. 55 — IZ = 4-to 89 - = 3 1 $ 2 ( = 10 eN; h4e ,4aaociate4, T.cc. Engineers • Architects • Planners PROJECT I IAr-IP c - 7L - f-4 SUBJECT Trzi P UEr-1 ERA f* c, J /j]isTfLi sunok -1 -r1Z -11 C. voLumeS 19810 gA.s f 1& -I tri4 f3tzDGILs z ,4� Lot'4 Fa■et ERDCJL 1Z SIDer■ac.f ?r-1 118(0 PM 'SEA t< Z - ',JA`{ :11Z.A rrt c. = 3 e SS W . VA LAX`! ¶ZCa . Sp er = Gat? 7.. 1`1 B 4t, Sg , (a o (38SC) 2310 3955 — Z3 /0 = LS4S Lvr� cazEs TrzAP 1r 5B ASSUME 5o/ c 3-4- pm 4 ?r-ii I✓.�rr 1' N (Es, ; pe-r 'A'E M S7t_,� Flo- emT /46-•±I5 7l 340 C • so 17 ZI 0 (.5o - 10S i 1r eo X25 SHEET: 5 OF 5 BY' M G'-( DATE 1- I"1- 5 CHECKED: ' L2- DATE f- JOB NO .ay L.atil 4AG¢ r 5 986 8r4 C•4-- ?t-4 9c4K. w/ Lb 00- A•e/RES 0 M.) —b (t o I 1 11 ) L.ON Clett,MJ Z C 1404- I Ico. -72.o -146 304 1 120+4-0 _ I � (q 8G B•-k. Ct PM) E qtr W/ I;oN 6-0 -.J d PCO 804- 1165 A coo _ t3' (40 t.t 3 0+ I loo 4-30 =/2.4 ealzac ,1aoauated. T ce. Engineers • Architects • Planners PROJECT 4-AAM'PToa 1:4J r! SUBJECT 'Trip (-r - -N r-.rzA -rt -oa - Mn� I4€ U f.' IT N QTE L- kAi ihAK. (Co- a PM) T-7-113our.r p , 4-3 (. 1.05) 1.4. = �I OU -rr3ou�o = , 44 14-b SA Aw oT Se-r 6wcrr a I ( cosh (I4- 7 ), - r -q aU ALt1'( ZEs--AU 2!a D 1--/Iatv 1 4K (1;00 - / :oo f M) 10.51 (I0,355 8 Col 0.4► ( 10.35 B Get.z(a) - /q4- Z 5Z U r.1 rsL. ,c 'E4k T�Qou�o - Ou Jo 0 549 4w or (.6 = 1 521 t�G_ -A1C 42 . e-% (.(n Z67,. = / 0 .44 (.(0) 261-= 72 SHEET: r OF d BY •0) • DATE I' ZI CHECKED: DATE . 1 -7415 JOB NO. g'5 crt- SaT QwDr T here is a new segment of the lodging industry with excellent growth potential —the econ- omy hotel market. This segment, like the auto- mobile industry's econ- omy -car segment, has evolved because con- sumers are more sophis- ticated. They are clearly defining their needs, and many are turning back to the basics. As a company that always listens when customers speak, Holiday Inns, Inc., now offers you the opportu- nity for an exciting new venture positioned within the economy segment: the develop- ment of the company's newest product, the first national chain of consistently superior, economy - priced hotels Product Overview — Hampton Inns" hotels. This new, "limited - service" hotel chain is totally different from mid - priced Holiday Inn' hotels and is targeted at a different market. it will be developed as a national chain, oper- ated and marketed inde- pendently of the Holiday Inn hotel system. The concept behind Hampton Inn hotels has been developed to • take advantage of an outstanding opportu- nity that research indi- cates clearly exists; • compete within the economy market with a superior product de- signed to achieve rate, occupancy and return premiums over the competition; and • become the leading brand in its market segment. s'l. %e`. it 's( rr.}�,sr.z. -, �• 2 The Hampton Inn hotel chain consists of stan- dardized, efficiently designed hotels, built with state -of- the -art operating technologies. The Hampton Inn brand is designed to meet the needs of an increasing number of travelers who require lodging basics— clean, comfortable rooms —at an economy price. Each property will offer 100- 120 sleeping rooms with facilities that are clearly superior to budget com- petition. Instead of offer- ing restaurants, large meeting rooms or luxury amenities which many travelers do not want to pay for, Hampton Inn hotels will introduce a new level of lodging excellence at a very affordable price. To make the guest's lodging experience even more attractive, the Hampton Inn hotel chain will feature free continental breakfast, free local (toll -free) phone calls, free in -room movies, non - smoking rooms, free ice, and a children -(18 and under) stay -free program. Each property will feature an attractive lobby /breakfast area and a small, multi- purpose room which can be used for meet- ings or other functions. All Hampton Inn hotels will be located near full- service restaurants. F or many years Holiday Inns, Inc: s sophisti- cated market research activities have kept the company in close touch with customers' changing needs. Its decision to enter the Market Studies sion (business, family vacation, etc.) rather than by demographics (income, profession, etc.). The initial con- sumer attraction to economy properties is price, but consumers also have a strong limited - service hotel preference for stan- segment comes after dards of comfort and several years of actively cleanliness. studying the dynamics In other studies of of both the overall the economy market hotel market and the we found that economy segment. Re- • budget hotel breakeven occupancies tend to be low, and start-up time to profitability tends to be short; search indicates that the economy hotel segment is ripe for profitable develop- ment, and with the Hampton Inn hotel chain, the company ex- pects to establish mar- ket leadership in this segment, similar to its position in the mid - scale market. A closer look at the research indicates that lodging guests say that mid -scale brands satisfy their travel require- ments much of the time. But they and other hotel customers tell us there are times when they need different kinds of products at different prices. For instance, when con- sumers pay their own expenses during busi- ness or pleasure travel, or when they require lodging on their way to other destinations, they want a clean, comfort- able room with few of the amenities avail- able in mid- or upscale hotels. In other words, the economy market, as well as other lodg- ing segments, are distin- guished by travel occa- lull I . I iu iui � 1i 'lAlllll lul I lhuu� II • over the last two years, the economy segment has outperformed the industry in terms of occu- pancy and profitability; • market share estimates indicate that the econ- omy market shows strong overall growth; and •chain growth within the economy segment is growing at an even faster rate. In response to this research, Hampton Inn hotels offer travelers a superior product at prices clearly below those of medium - priced, full - service hotels. Side elevation for the two-story prototype. 4 l i ii i u II l I U i .. 11 111 11 1111111 IN 11 11111 11 111 11 ' 'VIIIIIIItIIIIIIi11111111UIIWU" 111111111111111111 tor 111111111111111111 111111111111101111111M IIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUW 111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111H111111 uuumhuueuummh /1111111111/ 111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 era En NE •••• . ... ENE. •••• II ... N. _ .. .... I mm IMMM WWIMMIIMMMUnuuumIIMIM UMMMmMMIMUMMMIIImummuuu MMUU MMIII M S tandardization is the key competi- tive advantage of our new limited - service hotel chain. Through standard de- sign and operating pro- cedures, Hampton Inn hotels offer distinct advantages to investors and developers. For instance, standardized design and construction • save building costs; • offer minimal ongoing maintenance and maxi- mum operating efficiency; • create a distinctive, classic, easy- to -rec- ognize hotel exterior; • minimize construction time; and •enhance earlier profit generation. The proper building site is important to any hotel, but it is a critical aspect of the Design and Site Hampton Inn hotel product. These proper- ties should have high visibility in high- traffic areas. Long -term growth areas dotted with office complexes, light industry, airports or regionally based companies offer strong site possibilities. Hampton Inn hotels will often be built in the proximity of suc- cessful mid -scale hotels to take advantage of obvious market poten- tial. And because our limited - service hotels will not house restau- rants, they will be located near family -style and other full - service restaurants. Hampton Inn hotels are designed according to two basic architec- tural prototypes: a two - story, exterior corridor design and a multi -story, interior corridor design. The two -story, exte- rior corridor type allows maximum flexibility. It consists of either one or two buildings and contains 110 -120 rooms, a lobby /break- fast area and a combi- nation suite /meeting room. The buildings may be connected or detached, and may be arranged in a variety of configurations, depend- ing on the shape of the site (2 -2'h acres of land). Common configu- rations include co- linear, L- shaped and T- shaped. The multi -story, inte- rior corridor prototype consists of one building housing about 120 rooms, a lobby /break- fast area and a suite/ meeting room. (The number of stories may vary) This design is best for cold - climate markets or for smaller sites, since this proto- type requires only 1% acres. Each prototype has a canopied entrance, leading to a lobby/ breakfast area situated in the guest -room build- ing. Both versions have 110 -125 parking spaces. The exterior fin- ish is an off -white masonry surface with a dark - bronze metal roof. Holiday Inns, Inc., furnishes prototype blueprints to approved applicants. In Hampton Inn hotels, clean, comfortable rooms and friendly service are our pro- ducts. Through com- fortable furnishings, selected amenities and attention to detail, this limited- service chain gives the customer a mid -scale room at an economy price. The high quality and consistency of the Hampton Inn hotel guest room make it a real bargain, in terms of the guest's comfort and pocketbook. Typical room config- urations will generally consist of rooms with king -sized beds (single/ double occupancy) and rooms with two double beds (Economy mar- ket demographics show a trend toward higher double occupancy), with maximum flexibil- ity for single and handi- cap rooms. As an added feature, Hampton Inn hotels will offer guest rooms for both smok- ers and non - smokers. Guest room decor will be standardized—sim - ple and attractive as well as functional. Besides the front desk and a lobby/ breakfast area, Hampton Inn hotels feature a multi - purpose suite that can be used for receptions, small meetings or other spe- cial functions. For greater versatility, it is equipped with a fold- out bed, wet bar, con- ference table and chairs and an audiovisual wall unit. 7 H anlpt011 Inn hotel guest rooms are com- fortable and "livable." Some rooms with king- sized beds feature a sofa /study area, and double- double rooms have an activity table and chairs. Far Right: The continen- tal breakfast features pastries, coffee, tea, milk and juice. Guests serve themselves and enjoy their meal in a nearby casual- seating area. • T . - a 8 « 450', MO 'vig cn cc ,6 E = , _C v.) ;-_• 7 g- .-- E E 0 3 'F. a) 0 _o ▪ c c .0 - , - 6._ > 17) '-'„ O „, 0 c: m - .-- o 1-- ( E c = o 0 - Ec > ,■ §octct . -o- -1. 2 = „9- c z ,... ,... ,._ d 8 , i3 ' c 8 1 73) ' 'S coa ,._ 0. 0 E ? 8.. C E cc" co al C-) a 0 r.:. — .0 CO CO L. U CO 1.1... 0 C9 0 .‘ 1 G uest room decor features neutral color schemes with warm accents. Far Right • The front desk area will offer clean, functional design and state -of -the -art computer technology. The main front desk component will be a personal computer that is part of a system totally automating all hotel operations: res- ervations, the telephone system, folio charges, as well as other front desk and "back office" functions. The computer sys- tem will link all Hampton Inn hotels to each other and to Hampton Inn headquarters in Memphis. 12 •Satellite System. Each property will have a satellite "dish" for transmission of in -room movies. Both the personal computer system and the satellite commu- nications system are part of technological advances that enhance both operating efficiency and guest satisfaction. • Lean Staffing. Because of standardiza- tion and simplicity of operation, a typical Hampton Inn hotel may have a complete staff of 16 people. This lean staff comprises less than half the num- ber of employees needed to operate a com- parable- sized, mid -scale hotel and accounts for the attractive operating margins possible with Hampton Inn hotels. Special Features • Sophisticated Manage- ment and Training. These new hotels will be managed by peo- ple of proven capability. Ideal management can- didates for Hampton Inn hotels would enjoy running a business with a good deal of auton- omy but within the con- fines of our systems. They would be involved in sales as well as management, and will receive training from Hampton Inn hotel headquarters. • Corporate Direction. The future of the Hampton Inn hotel chain will be planned with the same clear - sighted drive that guided its research and development. As a Hampton Inn hotel developer or operator, you will have access to Holiday Inns, Inc., limited- service hotel research, financial counsel and planning, all designed to maxi- mize profits. brand because cost deter- mines the product's position relative to that of the competition. Hampton Inn hotel guest rooms will be priced clearly below local mid -scale hotels to ensure a strong price/ value appeal to economy- minded trav- elers. However, guest rooms will be priced at a premium to local budget hotels to convey the facility's superior quality and the availa- bility of amenities not usually found in budget hotels. Our initial approach in building Hampton Inn hotels will be to con- centrate development in major markets that have established evi- dence of segmentation. Holiday Inns, Inc., will lead this effort by devel- oping Hampton Inn hotels in markets with concentrations of com- pany -owned Holiday Inn hotels. The com- pany then will spoke out its development efforts into growing regional markets, there- by establishing a re- gional and eventually a national presence for the new Hampton Inn hotel product. Franchise development will fol- low a similar pattern. Photos and renderings in this booklet are representational and do not depict actual Hampton Inn hotels. 14 December 28, 1984 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Hampton Inn Rick: JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants ....t ..... .. .. .... Y. � ... ....ai.. �.?, ...i i.Sd i�... .i. .: J;t.. .. '. .�ri. J...... L. Our Project #84 -97 The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of the project scope for the above referenced development. Our client, "Castle Inns," proposes to develop a 5.47 acre parcel in three phases. Phase I would include a 4 story hotel located on the northerly portion for alternate #1 on Sheet P -la and on the southerly portion for alternate #2 on Sheet P -1. The hotel would accommodate 148 rooms with adjacent on grade parking for 156 vehicles. No recreational amenities or dining facilities are planned. Phase II would include the additions of a 4 story, 100 room structure, attached to the proposed Phase I structure. This phase would also provide on grade parking for 106 vehicles. No recreational amenities or dining facilities are planned for this phase either. Phase III will consist of a restaurant facility located on the northeasterly portion of the parcel adjacent to the West Valley Highway for alternate #1 on Sheet P -la and on the northeasterly portion for alternate #2 on Sheet P -1 with on grade parking sufficient to serve this restaurant. Phase III would not be developed by this client, but a parcel of approximately 1.5 acres would be platted from the 5.47 acre and sold to a separate developer. The construction for Phase I would commence approximately April 1, 1985, with the construction dates for Phase II and III not known at this time. The proposed Phase I building will cover 14,450 square feet, or approximately 6 percent of the entire 5.47 acre site. Paved areas will cover approximately 30 percent of the site. The remaining 153,050 square feet, or 64 percent of the site will be landscaped or remain in its natural state. The size of structures for Phase II and III are not known at this time. The exterior of the building will be surfaced with a painted "Dryvit" (tm) type exterior coating over expanded polystyrene on gypsum sheathing. The proposed development of the site will include associated improvements and amenities, including floodproofing the building by raising its elevation with fill and constructing a dike, and maintenance road along the Green River. Architecture, Engineering & Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A. Johnson, AIA Greg L. Allwine, ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 271 -7200 (206) 623 -5732 Mr. Rick Beeler Hampton Inn �7'ZJ..¢Y:bea_ira+r :�Mx.caa-vu ^.:MtY':i:'.1:SR1'gS • llwine, AIA GLA:s b In June of 1982, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued for an 8 story 274 room hotel with adjacent conference rooms, recreational amenities and dining facilities for this site. A Final E.I.S., prepared by R.W. Thorpe and Associates entitled the "Tukwila Hotel ", was issued in November 1982. A majority of the information generated for that proposal is still applicable to this proposal. The enclosed environmental checklist makes considerable references to this E.I.S. while addressing the differences unique to this proposal. However, it should be noted that the proposed impacts for the Phase I development would be significantly less than those addressed within the E.I.S as the result of the reduced scale of this project. This proponent intends to incorporate the E.I.S. concerns and comments into this project. In addition, a Shorelines Permit was issued for the original proposal and has been extended to include this project. If you would like any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, JO NSON BRA ND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. 0 cc: Mr. Dick Pringle - Castle Inns Mr. Jeff Anderson - Condel Mr. Sid Sved - Condel 4 Z1.- r' gt9r.'�4�+ IK,IF,J' ?ASP. }�` : #;j { '>�„r�n g M' �?k'.•'".'- N` �zr� ;:iv =.:r:�,�ah:!£'i3��"�w.� a�.� rt:��• �;�:���.•.i,.�r�� � J�9 , �� -2- December 27, 1984 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Associate Planner Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: The undersigned has entered into an option to sell the above real estate which it owns to Robert H. Pof ahl or assigns. Please process any applications to obtain zoning, site plan approval and a building permit by said optionee or his assigns. Re: 5.47 acre tract of real estate which is a portion of Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46 lying within Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. December 26, 1984. Very truly yours, CHRISTENSEN GROUP, INC. By K nneth W. Baines(' resident •. AFTER RECORDING MAIr, TO: ' ' 7t: GF —. Mundt, MacGregor, Rappel, VlaStlingiOn � ',. . Falconer, Zulauf & Hall . 1230 Bank of California Cntr. ;,.; 0 , 4,41•T0$ Seattle, Washington 98164 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED onv yance, 3 7 I . 0 . The GRANTORS Phil and Ethel Shanediing, individually and as Trustees, and Richard Jay and Jeanie Hersh, his wife on October 11, 1974 and at all times thereafter, for and in con- sideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid, convey and ''warrant to Pitney Bowes Real Estate Corporation the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That property described in Exhibit A attacheo hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Subject to the following: condemnation of access to State Highway and of light, view and air by Decree to State of Washington entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 6010; re.trictive coverants, ease- ments, building set -back lines ane slope rights, as described by the plat of Andover Industrial Park No. 1; declaration of covenants, condition,:;, restrictions rend other terms thereof, as recorded under King County Recording No. 5256443, and amended by instruments recorded under Recording Nos. 5332848, 5500900 and 6180358; Deed of Trust from Jeffrey and Joan Temkin to Bankers Life Company dated October 16, 1972 and recorded under Kiny County Pecording No. 721025 -0186; and the Collateral Assignment of Lease and Rents executed by Jeffrey and Joan Temkin dated October 16, 1972 ar.d recorded under Ring County API•n..i l w 1 1.1n / 11 n;" -(11117 44 44 Phi M'LTC ;; MI rCHELI NC' l /LK C..149414111 1Ygt' MK virtu W lOi ti X•Ei;! M Win CC,*erp ao c•o so n.1 t1) DATED this : day of / bi$ •L , 19 Err ^ , / �' � ,r n ane g (_7..14 r� / • Ethel Shp edling (. /ii STATE OF 4 ' 4 v 7� •1` tf5n l ing, Trus /` Imo\' SO. COUNTY OF I ) R c ar ay rs Ethel Shenedling, Z'ru {tN two ror OACOOD AT ,WAIT 4 TRA SAMLOIIC:A TfIt8 INAJAAN't.17 tkNAPANY 14,4) N, I!. Stir Sir 1{(.14.4■ t.::. WtiiM11 to taol I111101 On this day of before me, the undereigned, personally appeared Phil Shamed- ling, to me known to be the individual 1tscrlt'ed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as a free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpoies thiirein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hrve hereunto tot my hand and affixed my official seal the lay and year tirst above written. 1 Notary Pii Iic in an or $ t�t q of rea:ding at krNG 1 outer EXCISE IAX PAR' \ IAN 7 1983 1 • r ' ' ..;;:; STATE 0 COUNTY OF On this (c- day of (. t. , before me, the un perso 'lly appeared Ethel Shaned- ling, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as a free and ia.untary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set !.y hand and affixed my official seal the d and year first,,above written. • amulem M'LTOfJ Mi rCHELL M(Mr MII C • ausuNw PAMPA MCI tai mum I, OtaarsINI h M. * Hp STATE OF COUNTY OF awrows t MARGARET I. NUN %IOW mass ;draw" r some mew 1■11 be IL ) 4 88. A8. STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF ) On this 9 )-14.day of -2- Notary Public in and for the State of residing at On this i day of p.•L %X , , 19 , before me, the un ers gned, personally appeared Richard Jay Hersh, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as a free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ." my c ff c 1 1 :cal thz. day and Ya:ar first above written. InJ L4A,YYJX- , 1911, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Jeanie Hersh, to me known to be the individual aescri1,ed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as a free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. owKwa wx tL L" MARGARET I. RAIINN Nota ublic in and for the St n YOT . ' "� of residing at 4 l,Lu • OPICI mama. io mom -a. firm (A. m ►f HU Nota v Pnh c in and for the St e of . residing at 0 trn••Q � c.c i .sat . in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washing;:or.. • after recording return tt,: Safero Title Ins. Co. 40 & Vine Seatt iv, Washiagtan '1Al21 PARCEL B • *our) /q MU FOR REOORO AT REMIT OF S FECO TILE INSURANCE COMPANY 815 eta At E, SEAM. VA NUE TRUSTEE'S DEF:I) k1. . t: r C r' C►i:•Nfd.. matter of Gerald L. Ricker, wwi Patricia L. Rieker, and The Grantor, John S. Wondbt.rne, Trttgta•o in the Patricia L. 'tieker, individually, debtors, in prc:uedings in the United States, Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington, at Seattle, Bankruptcy Nos. 80 -02856 and 80 -02859 for and in consideration of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, convey and quit claim unto William W. Boon and Josephine Boone, his wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington,includ:ng any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire, to wits. PARCEL A That portion of the Henry ?leader Donation Claim No. 46 in Section 24, Township 23 `forth, Range 4 Last, W.`.t., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 355.79 feet South of the intersection of the Easterly margin of fate oul,lic road 'nown an ..tat.1 Secondary Highway No. 2-M "also known as Secondary i tato Highway No. 5 -c1" with the North lino of raid !ionrk, Donation Claim; thence Easterly parallel to the North line of taait', donation claim to the Went boundary ling o`_' the right-of -w;'ty of the Puget Sound Electric R.tilsray Company: thence Westerly parallel with th,, North 1 int of ftta id " o nat:in Claim 40 feet to the tr:•.e point of l oginuino; thence continuing 1:'orterAy pir:111tt1 with t.ho Wo,tth lino of said Donation Claim 1.70 foot; ' thence Southerly parallel with the Went line of naia1 Sound Electric :2atilt.'ray right-of-way 124.50 feet; *_hence Easterly parallel with the North line of ;a l.rit'ate road casement "commonly knowo .1:, South 1:5 otri'` +'t" ao disclosed by instrument recorded Under Auditor's Vile No. 3480349, to a point 40 feet 'ior:', of to Wrat lino of naial Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence Northerly parallel to the West lino of aid Ptif;ct Sound Electric Railway right -of -way 113 feet more or ietw, to the true point of beginning. Thal: :ortio't of I::3nr•. 'Io;tder Ponation Claim No. 46 in i,00tinn 24, Township .3 North, orange 4 Eset, i1.M., in ):in County, 7 .!aghington, cdencrib:d aes follows: 1 tf f17 1 F' day Beginning at the i.:tersjectian of they Easterly' tasaruin uC' Secondary State* nighwav 2 -M 'West Valley llighw \t' being 72.00 feet, as measured at right angles to the monument line thereof; and the Northerly margin of South 158th Street, being 28.00 feet in width, moatiuree. at right angles, to the mon munted line of said street; OD thence North 7 °40'58" West alone the Easterly margin of said SSU 1 -M a dis;tanoe of 312.97 feet; thence North 82 °19'02" East to the West line of a.tr.'t::t of land conveyed to Emily Minter by decd recorded tinder 0,4 Auditor':, Pile No. 7107010196; CD thence South 8 °15'00" East alone said Weat line to the -._ Northwest corner of a tract or land convoyed to Hart and OD Co..by ihutrume -t recorded under Auditor's Pile No. . 6167297; thence Southerly to the Southwe3st corner of said Hart Tract and the true point of belinntng; thence Easterly parallel with the Noah iiiargin of said South 158th Street, to the Westerly margin of Washington .Highway Frontage Road 'Y' line as er;tablinhcd $0 fent in width: thence Southerly along said Westerly margin to the Northerly margin of said South 158th Street; thence Westerly along said Northerly margin to a point distant 150 feet from Easterly margin of SSU thence Northerly at right angler to said Northerly r rcgin 100 feet to the Northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to F.I.r,. Holding Co. by Auditor's File No. 5909a6; )4; thence Northwesterly to t'te True Point of i3o.ainrsin; ; EXCEPT any portion lying within South 158th Street ay. condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 'i92029. ,STATE OF WAZ;U S NC,Tdh' ) COUNTY OF K I N G ) This deed is given pursuant to a tli4r iz; ;t.wn given to such grantor by Order dated April 24, 1091 in the). above bankruptcy proceedings. DATED this day o ' 9 , d e 1 0 1 . On this day personally apnearetd before too JOHN O. WOODE3 ENE as Trustees in Bankruptcy, to me kna•Yn to t ^ Van fiduciary described in and who exvontt d th0 within and f01 - c;oing instrument and acknowledged that ho sxic;n.'3 th+a his free and voluntary act and deed, ass; , nisi oe in Owtlyrts”tc "y, for the uses and purpouesj therein rls *nti.t >ned. G,1VE4 under my hand and rMcie). net thin � , !In. 2 - l .. estiiji's?;e .. s s ii5 `'a at tank ruptcy 1'lUl. Notary irl:.::{ ?4• • ;i • , 0 t 5l a64i.nSjt0:1,, Y'.,:31 ti �ji!;1 ar '8.x , 4.. 4 : ± T� •g. ',a..r ADDRESS 16400 SOIIMEN PARKyAY CITY AND STATE STATE OF WAS COUNTY OF s. On this day parsed PU.SD POa SDOORD AT RJQUSSr OP TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 10635 N. E. 8ch STREET BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 Auctust 15th to me known to,:(} executed the with.z edged that _g# signed the same a. free end voluntw^ therein mention/ GIVEN under nil,. day of Notary Public i at me '- era.iataxatei wb sr i. ietvawld .wnw.rec,.sarsir STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 19 83 't:ribed in and who • t.vnent, and aeknowl• . / uses and purposes this L. Washington, residing i k r1 By SAPECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I THIS SPACE ItISEIIVED POR . :CORDER'S USE 83/08/1S RECD F CASHSI. NINO COUNTY EXCISE iAX PAID THE GRANTOR F.I.G. FOLDING OONPANY, a California Corporation for and in consideration of TEN and NO /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to M083: E 6.0' 22 MANAGEMENT INVESTORS, a Washington general pat rnrtship *AS CONTINUED BELOW the following described real estate, situated in the County of KING , State of Washington: Shown in exhibit 'A' attached hCtetu and by this tefetencec male a part heteof GRANTEE CON'T FROM ABOVE: a Washington general partnership composed of John A. Goodman, John Comick and Robert E. Kellum, Jr., ALL single men, AND Linden E. Larson and Diane M. Larson, husband and wife. 'h' FRA NK W SEAL �: ;. NOTARY PUILIC•CAU PRINCIPAL OPf1C!IN WS ANGELES COUNTY 8T Ce1lSllliSsipg WARS Wy 2t, I%4 STATE OFAVARNONYFON. am ANIMA COUNTY OF Lrs Aa,MOVAL$ On this . /A fN day of .f6i .--- . 19 all, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washl on, duly oommlesionad and sworn, personally appeared ae lfraa. a 1 'S't11I /! Ck and , to me known to be the 'Ng _ PreeklerM and r Secretary, respectiwsfy, of ft A etpiN4 the corporation that executed the foregoing Insuument, and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the free and value Lary act and deed of said corporation, foe the uses and pur• poses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that Tory Mee authorised to saute t h e WS instrument and that the teal affixed is the argon aaeal of said corporation, Witness my hand and oflicisi coat berate fIThibd th4.day . year firs aboYe wri an ,� :, o2: it': :l�riTfrdl6._li { .v .:...5 �. S4•�ac�� 15 3 4s ?F''P' fl it !.' . :t.:tl trs Kilk OA" • , t - "••••-,; • ••••.• • PAGE l' Thit portion of Henry Meder Donation Claim No. 46 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County Washington, lying Easterly of the Easterly line of State Highway No. 5-M, said Edsterlv line being 72 feet Easterly of and parallel with the 2-M line of Primary State Highway Nu. 1, Green River Interchange and Northerly of thy NoLth,Lly line of private Load (commonly known a4 South 158th Street) as condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 592029, described so follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of said South 156th Street and the, said Easterly line of Primary State Highway No. 5-M; thence Easte,ly along said North line of South 158th Street, a distance of 150 feet; thence Northerly at right angles to said North line 100 feet; thence Westerly parallel to said North line of South 158th Street to the said Easterly line of Primary State Highway No. 541; thence Southerly along said Easterly line to the point of beginningv Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Meshinoten. SUBJECT TO: Condemnation by the State of Washington of right of access to state highwai and of light, view and air, by decree, in *tng County Superior Court Cause No, 59429. Restrictions imposed by instrument dated January 5, 1964, recorded on Januatyl, 1964, under Recording No, 5683116, F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY • . . ' . .s, ..,. •:,-, , ,- Services 01 -06- 713028 -7 tk FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 10635 N. E.Bth Bellevue, Wa 98004 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO litf.w li t*skoV% �ilA ■• Nam. CHALON RESTAURANTS OF AMERICA, INC. Address 1804 - 172nd Avenue NE Ott SW* atp Bellevue Wa 98008 Txs onaNTOR RICHARD A. LARSON and BLANCHE M. LARSON, husband and wife, JACOB G. LARSON and BLANCHE M. LARSON, husband and wife, and PETER 0.E.LARSON and ANNA L. LARSON, husband and wife, torandfnconddazactionot TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION haandpaid,converiandlwarrantatoCHALON RESTAURANTS OF AMERICA, INC., a Washington CorporotiQn, the Iolbe,ing described real estate, situated in the County of King , Mate of Washington: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SUBJECT TO easement, covenants, restrictions, reservations and agreements of record, if any. n.iu rlta ltEt D AT NISIN IT of FIANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 10635 N. E. 8th STREET TS .L.LEVUE, 93;)04 Date November 3Q isf PARU A LAS BLANCHE M. LARSON On this day Dersonell appea d efore l cl"R t)e, cam• 6e/ti Z I'44 -r e m. ....fi ..14.... to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and eckpJ' wlpdged that .44 signed tho same as .... r` free and vol ntary net and deed, f..r the ueea and purposes therein mentioned. • GPVEN iu,der Lay :hand and orhlcial seal tykis a -: fry o f / ��� , 106 __ / :•;nrV i' )•. ' ..r the tttate of Nash- ..`*..'a'nt•. Transamerica Title Insolence Company Statutory Warranty Did Gi Atot ^tf wq LSLw.4'!'f mw,.. } t _+'; i J•e,..w. t d... - b7 6 19 82 C.. o*'''g'- COB G. LARSON ' STATE OF WASHINGTON SZATb OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF .... �IY'z..... COUNTY OF ..............._.._....... THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE: 1 . ,ter t .^n L- S7�t7 n 03. rv: On this day of before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the Glatt et 1ilr;b+tt1+ Lington, duly commiseloned and sworn, paraoaa lY and to me known to be the Pr^oaid s+t end__ ....... .........k respectively, of the corporation that executed the forty,olo; imttelek;.ttmt, tieei r•:; : a:i::.4;r ,h the said Inetturnent to he the fine and volume; ey t:c.i t.t;.i afiet::l t::4t,1 �:. ; ; t• at:. for the uses and ptrpusee therein psi Mai ? ir a < ?, nuthert,ted to execute raid itt:tnn;p i 4'„t ?:.:;r-•; aClued is the corporate sun. of said corparsti;•t,. Witness toy hand and nadal sea! Iscri k n:uSe:9 the t ,;ir cu i pi wits" above written. Notary Public in and for the tvu„ ,! ',' ` .. 4 ............... pt•tsidlny nt •J ACKN°WL1011141NT, INCITI°UAL AMA N ATVQ$NIY IN /ACT. rum Nu. W-43.1 ■ 8210259006. Order No. 713028 October 26, 1982 DESCRIPTIQN: That portion of Henry Mader Donation Claim No. 46, lying within Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., described as follows: .Beginning. at the intersection of. the. monument line of Secondary State Highway 2M (West Valley Highway) being 72 feet Westerly as measured at right angles to the Easterly margin thereof with the monument line of South 158th Street being 28 feet South of as measured at right angles to the Northerly right of way line thereof, said intersection being represented by a punched railroad spike; thence North 07 °41'30" West along the monument line of said Secondary Highway 2M, a distance of 261.51 feet; thence South 35 °21'00" West a distance of 78.11 feet to the Westerly right of way line thereof and the true point of beginning; thence North 07 °41'30" West a distance of 248.39 feet; thence North 88 °04'26" West a distance of 170 feet more or less to the Easterly line of ordinary high waver of the Green River as existed prior to the centerline channel change of the Green River as shown on the Washington State Highway Commission - Department of Highways right of way plan SR 403 Green River Interchange - Station 99+00 to Station 120+00 Sheet 2 of 4 approved January 30, 1962• • thence Southwesterly along said Easterly line to a point fcor..Which the true point of beginnning bears North 85 °21'00" East from said point; thence North 85 °21'00" East a distance of 440 feet more or less to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion condemned by the State of Washington in the King County Superior Court Cause No. 592029; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. All as described in Survey, as Recorded under R� ng Mo. • st STATE OF WASHINGTON, 1 ✓ sc if County of *I On this .30 day of AM ✓e 4 , Ifit , b P grEg. O I f" . LA 12.5 /V Wino known to be be lodivWual in cad the foresoin Instrument for W self end also as Attorney in fact forR /t. S t a A Al. tAR SMIand acknowledged that he signed and sealed the same as 4ie free and vulunts:y act e l dud for if Ih' self and also as '4M_ free and voluntary act and dead as Attorney in Pact for sat4'prksdpebtor a44 the saes and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the Power of Attorney asithodlslug the media of this k stnistest, has not been revoked and that the said principal is now living and is not beeso, Given under my band and official seal the day and y . `, , written. af,tnv aM.. 431,. /nMrylya2»ecvusW�frsxvi r' v' iJJ4 }.Y,ykuia:,ilJf5SGnif i: Yl r. c..,..,. .., .l.. i:..M..u,.,J ..z. ��....... .., ... +..�..,..�:. CITY OF TUIWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA 'JAN 2 1985 BUILDING DEPT, PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: O BS I P SHORT SUBDIVISION OS FIORE L I NE pRD PMUD' BAR PLAT D PERMIT OINTERURBAN O CONO NAL ❑UNUSESS. O VAR I ANCE C ZON 1 NG 6JAMENDMENT 1) APPLICANT: NAME ( 1511 G P TELEPHONE (SO/) (J4 $ 1 ( 2) PROP. OWNER: ADDRESS ( `CV W • 1.41 ' /1MW14WyI S11 1 NI ] ZIP gQ 0 a NAME r'ti '/ C S h � . Cr /-- O V . Z'ef o TELEPHONE ( 1oi) 4,96, 6 ADDRESS s C 0 N i hh SCA, Vancouver, ki. ZIP G, C (/ PROJECT LOCATION!: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT/ BLOCK) a e' po r. f /D /1 m 1' p &PA I' Meador f1 fr,14 10 r1 C a/ n/ 44 /41,>7 S. z4 7 p. t3 /V 11A ,\, e. r4/ 1' SECTION 1 I :. PROJECT INFORMATION 64m G t.Nle. OtJ e.Li4 T ) 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. Q / V a . .. 1-00 opt Aj iD /e a re /. p 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM S "' /- / ,S TO Z, - ( 8'4 6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED , IN PHASES? OYES (:)NO I F YES, DESCRIBE: /WO " 141, IMF, 7) wi // be ddcaed. / rJ Sec. nd ?/Case, PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 3,[ 7 w GROSS ,�, �i 7.4 EASEMENTS B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL II FLOORS T INCLUDES: [J BASEMENT OMEZZANINE TOTAL GROSS � 8o I INCLUDES: O BASEMENT DMEZZANINE FLOOR AREA EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES - Z Co 'PI in . 4 rti_ C ._Go2S SDv 0 0 0 too 0 0 C) SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE /Pa 4" 7 8) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? ® YES l NO SECTIO `` III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT 1 _1 7 1okoo Pa , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE L)Aa. (0 , 1 ?< X (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT PUR ER OR SUBSCR I UED AND SWORN BEFORE ME S THI/ (gall/ ■ 'Y OF , AL AAA "MOW I NO ARY PUDLI J AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT , 1 05 "Itt414 .1.110,110 • .10/2 TUKWILA WA. _,.••.... ......... --•• ............. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE TOP OF BANK GREEN RIVER PROPOSED HAMPTON INN SCALE: • 1" = 100' AREAS +1 HOTEL: 4.20 ACRES. RESTAURANT: 1.22 ACRES TOTAL: 5.42 ACRES PARKING PROVIDEn HOTEL.: 307 RESTAURANT: 80 ' ' ALTERNATIVE 1 CITY OF '11..h.,1L,'A • PLANNING DEPT. ••• • ROOMS :-.' 125 ROOMS . • , • • • " ■ :•ti j . : 0 TA' []W ; 6 8 L 9 G C LHHO EL IIPOMOIMIN4 3GCP7 _ '•>t,%z ' • ; 1 1 ' A" ; , s". • - • , 11-1111IIIIIIIM111 11111111 1_11111111111111111111 I I II_1 1 111 I 1 111111.1111111111 1 1 11 11p1111111111111111111111111111111 1 I I 11 MADE IN GERMANY 12 0 16 THS INCH 1 2 3" . -4 ,-- ,.. .5_. 6 7 . 9 ' 10 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS , . , . ,,,,,,..„ ,....„....• _. , ) CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS' DUE TO'\ Oe V 86 LF 9Z g r 17 e r: ZZ 2 .53THE OUALITV OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT .....nc . . n 11111111111111111iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111 arm! iiiiiiii ippt 'intim ilidipi lin ni illitini 'milli' Hu Hu ini Hull Iiii ... L ,,,,..J.:. ' ,,',"..:':.':'::-,:::,7,•:.:.".,•.,.- ic,•-• • . .. . ...„...........,... „ ..........„ v.. „ .,..,,,„ .::.:::L. • .. • •• • I� 4 I) r 1 -405 NB On /Off Ramps CENTRAC Associates LEGEND NEW SIDEWALK NEW ROADWAY PAVING gN Existing Right —of —Way Limited - Access Zone Approximate Scale: 1 80' SEE NOTE 1 NOTES ..SOLID LINE. - ..SHOWS LIMITS OF INITIAL WIDENING ON SR 181. DASHED LINES _SHOW ULTIMATE.PLAN: WITH.12' LANE AND 8' SIDEWALK EXTENDED NORTH TO 1 -405 NB ON /OFF RAMPS.. 2. , SR 181 WOULD_BEGIN. TAPERING FROM THREE LANES TO TWO LANES_ SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED. DRIVEWAY (APPROX. 320' TAPER LENGTH REQUIRED). • •• N ELIZATI • N RE ISIONS -..a∎ - MB A■ NEW 8' SIDEWALK ■ F I T PROPOSED LIMITED .i ACCESS DRIVEWAY G 1111111111111 _ STOP SIGN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ( NEW OPTION LANE TO ACOM LONG/ CRES TRAFFIC ATE PROPOSED FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY FOR RESTAURANT AND HAMPTON INN ki •To Longacres li FUTURE 4 LANE WIDENING OF S. 158TH BY CITY r 1 Existing Right —of —Way NEW FULLY — ACTUATED SIGNAL (Q CHANNELIZATION REVISIONS) ' , LEFT LEFT TURN POCKET (Raised island g II�III�III�III�III�I�I�III�I�I�III I11I II �I�I�III�III�III�I I�III�I I II 0 t•TN•INCH 1 2 3 11 aIJIIIIIIIIIIIf IIII4L1l11111111111ll1il11111111111111i1 Ii11111111111111111i --. .... ........_ _ 6 _ ... ... 7_ -- 8 9 • 10 ' 11 IMCEINOERMANY 12 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO OE 6Z 8G LZ 9Z S 17 CZ; ZZ LZ , r ( TH UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT li III IIII VIII L III L IIII (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIII fit-IIIIIIIIIfl (Iliz'`�i„lf VIII (till III Illl 1111(III If (IIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIlIl11111II IIIII1f11I1111I1111I1i11 IIII '� , r... _,. ,ri. M t_ .rn ,: 'mss _:�;.". k' �;r.'t`o"fiF'.,q'k2'.tn ttz't �, ,. ;:z`'i +�;�_� ; v:_, .,'; T -• - ,.: r. .. .. .I. ,..�,- �,gy ..y 8 8 L. 9 S h E Z L 7174 0 IIIIIIIiIIlIl111111111IIIIliiIIIiIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiil11Il11IIIIf1I111I111111111111IIlIlllII SR 181 W. VALLEY RD. OTE 2 Figure T PROPOSED /PLANNED STREET /ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS A °H 1 -405 NB On /Off Ramps CENTRAC Associates Approximate Scale: 1"; 80' qN Right -of -Way v Limited Access Zone O 16THS INCH 1 / 3 OE 6Z 8C LZ 9Z 5Z bZ EZ: (LI(III.II II�II) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIf IIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (�I�)I��IILIfIrIIII�If I�I tl .��, ki..: u;� •I r.:.'. � r.yblldl l U'. .rl. � i �i' ` ':): i': t .. ( t 1 ]�, 1 t' ..lb n ( t . i` �F3F�7N�f�.` ir�: �' S: )�1�IF'F ; ;; s�vli. � x�,+,Yr",:�5„ l�iS. „1s- q .;55�:te �SBYh`!i.7q(q:iNW�." Ni^'rG•k f . .. ; �.. ,. if , �f. r. kN . 3 ' . .. �, ., fi i L?Aj:Y• �•x +, `4��1t 7 A .< v ..:....,. IIILIIhII ,. I w III(IIIIIIIIIIIIII) 1111111) 1111111) IIIIIIII )IIIII'lll1l)I1III II )li 1)III)Iilltl1)11 1 - 11) 1111111) IIIIIIOIIIIIII )IIIIIII)III11111111111111111 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS•NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT _ Iill MI 1 11f1 fllflll�ll IIII)i(Ifhlll)I(II InII1l�iIflllflllliil)Illi +llil IIII illllllll lnlllulllllll) Ilillullll�[ Illlllllllllllllllnlllllllllnlllllllllllllll )u�lllllll�ull ry e,. , . t ,.rn -^. ..N �y.�.;u;.a. r .,... ,�,;- ., ., ,.,,.a: , .. ..5. .'.. i. ... ^t^� ,::�,•• ,,. 'w.r r1, .. . .. „, qe. . „a�a.v— r+!gt n!e arm•,'^. SR 181 11 MADE IN GERMANY 12 50' t TolLongacres Existing Right -of -Way rt. Raised Island W. VALLEY ROAD TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Rgure 4 EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND RIGHT -OF -WAY' cp ACER RUBRUAI PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA QUERCUS COCCINEA RED MAPLE LONDON PLANE TREE SCARLET OAK ., PRUNUS b SERRULATA PRUNUS BLIREIANA CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING CHERRY FLOWERING PLUM EASTERN DOGWOOD e ACER CIRCINATUM BETULA PENDULA • POPULUS TREMULOIDES VINE MAPLE EUROPEAN BIRCH QUAKING ASPEN C, () PINUS CONTORTA PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII ?SUCH MERTENSIANA SHORE PINE DOUGLAS FIR MOUNTAIN HEMLOCK X c CHOISYA TERNATA ILEX CRENATA LIGUSTRUM TEXANUM NANDINA DOMESTICA PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS RHODODENDRON SPECIES VIBURNUM DAVIDII MEXICAN ORANGE JAPANESE HOLLY WAXLEAF PRIVET HEAVENLY BAMBOO ENGLISH LAUREL RHODODENDRON DAVIDS VIBURNUM �\ \� Ii` \`fit DRA HELIX 'LOWFAST' ALYCINUM HE PACHYSANDR E A T RM NALIS ENGLISH IVY TONEASTER JAPANESE SPURGE r mt 1 _... —. N®® 22 IWEEN 211 fv' NT, rep a P/' K INCA• 70 ? e... - 1: 7 17. ICI / A 17L•1 - HI i PI.O R- . G1Re°4 ran P 7, r yj �© III . n " ":I o , < ,l � v >>:F, '!`.. ell'. 11' e. QA 2.52 ‘1 ' FUTURE EXPANSION r .. 2 3 IIUN(P9'Te = f� NCL Urer;W /: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE ELEV.— 20.8 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE /SITE PLAN - 0 1020 - THAT PORTION OF HENRY MEADER DONATION CLAIM NO. 46, LYING WITHIN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 E.W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 138TH STREET, AS THE SAME AS ORIGINALLY ESTABLISHED AND THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (S.S.H. 2 -M); THENCE N 7 ° 40'38" W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY 32.17 FEET; THENCE S 86 ° 04'17" W 60.13 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID HIGHWAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID HIGHWAY S 7 ° 40'58" E 109.00 FEET; THENCE S 2 ° 31'16" W 101.61 FEET; THENCE S 7 ° 40'58" E 283.08 FEET; THENCE S 86 ° 04'17" W TO THE EASTERLY BANK OF THE GREEN RIVER AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIVER BANK TO A POINT WHICH BEARS S 86 ° 04'17" W FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 86 ° 04'17" E TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF ADJOINING THE GREEN RIVER CONDEMNED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 592029; AND EXCEPTING FROM THE REMAINDER OF SAID PREMISES A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF AND IMMEDIATELY ADJOINING THE EXCEPTED PORTION FIRST ABOVE DESCRIBED. 11 150 23 1.5 . ACRES FUTURE RESTAURANT (BY OTHERS) GRADING NOTES:. 1,)11 PE1:2�1; E MoN■lAGON1ENT ACTENG'r MAP POK FVGIJP INSLIP., .NGE RATt FOR THE G17 OP W - FIGT THe 100 Ye. -i - GI-E GP THE ' I•F- 1 RIV- AT EL.EvATION 24 %15 AMP LOWER 2 .)PAP - ( 0 - ING LOT �L. 'VATION�i Wllil� P .T N ' I�OhIGrz T)1AIV PizoViIGr . ONE FAT 'OF FOP- PLG02IN01 GON0ITION FLG2:;1 f✓L.E�//�TION OP X1.50 PROVIOE F OF Ffi= O tO PROTl:GTION. JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. IIIIIII' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi IIILiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiII !III III) Illl. IIIIII- Ii1 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlII11 3 _ .4 5 _ 9 10 11 W^' " - 12 IF C THIS MICROF ILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS).∎ • , THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO'' OE 6Z ee LZ 9Z 9Z ryZ EL zz Iz `OTHE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _DOCUMENT11. e 8 9 9 ry E z I "" 0 1IIIII11111111111111IIIIIIIIIII111 ,1 IIIIIII)I1IIIIIII 1111II I111111L1 IIIIIII141,4IIIIIIITIIII LIII IIII IIII IIILIIIII Ip111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111)II 11110111111111PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII III I II IIIIIIIIII 24 SITE AREA: 5.47 ACRES (TOTAL) EXISTING ZONE: C -2 HOTEL UNITS: PARKING: 148 103 STANDARD STALLS • 46 COMPACT STALLS (30%) 7 HANDICAP STALLS 156 STALLS PROVIDED 148 STALLS REQUIRED PLANT LIST STATISTICS • F. 0) 0) 5. If) I v lr;v ¢ � en v T 0 <u G co to - y G � N Lit > I- C O O r cc CC 0 LL a 5 r. 0 0) O .0 C (6 0 U) 0 0 N cn 7 4 N Q) J (N1 CO u) c) CO 0 0 CJ (0 0 C)) 0 Co Cd G7 C 0 0 C 0) 0 CV 0) O U) 0) > c) . 0 co _ E O architecture, engineering & planning consulknIs 44 Thomas A. Johnson, A IA Lawrence S. Braund, PE. HAMPTON . ell •// Mr X a I In .11.41 : 1 70.. MO /AV ACM 1 N 0 OV/ P• &LOY tote-rsoriffe .--:-L.., . &At .w I Oa offAk es i .1 N s.' .4. a,. J. Artsi "7 6 "illiiiiiii A* 'j. ag/f1/ I ' coAritIll .. WO/ iota I • tit AI 'PM, At41 vo lo •.eve.? I!: • • OE 6 Z EIC VICINITY MAP it/071•111: me sir ts Aftwurev awsnevenott n 0 Mier IN AVaif I Ms KEGEL & ASSOCIATES LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 111100 EVERGREEN WA? WOG GRIMM( OFFKI 12 AONG.StASTRII I • /02 M. DM 451.1111 stle tinf.•10 WV At/e.r OTE ELEVATION. -MAP for SHORE LINES MANAtiEMEta 'PERMIT - Fr, lb. Tukwila Hotel SHUT/of Z FILE NO. EMU .1 "WY carrardierke erova, rain NeXT" AIL ige !rags LAM aft 70,170/CS egeS477W ni4771/T N9z same mew IZINT/Aff AfF4S. • 4.1 OMNI ArAilen iwa Of xamsar .4.4PPAVYa, mar sm • ?Au 4ewout 34VG54,00 PhZ IV/4Z Am= matt R7 5 4V. me' .4rat • zio 00afeSSZN AVes 14 / M4fr 1 0 it MY , IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 111'.414111trill.11 I 1 111 I t C.4 V, 0 WM5INCH 3", - 14 1 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 4Z 9Z Z 17Z CZ I ZZ LZ THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Ri f MI flit 11111111 11 till illg,RjrkrI1 11111pl 10111U111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111111111111 111111111 , ' - 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MADEIN GERMANY 12 rxwvirr MAP Airs, We, • • .L • • , • ----.411111119