Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-09-85 - KING COUNTY - METRO PARK AND RIDE DESIGN REVIEWDR-09-85 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 52ND AVENUE SOUTH KING COUNTY METRO PARK AND RIDE DESIGN REVIEW June 5, 1985 Larry Ellington METRO 821 Second Avenue, MS /63 Seattle, WA 98104 • Re: METRO Park and Ride lot - 85- 17 -SMP Dear Larry: n! yin •.rrennawe:�r.:! ^.•xnw�cN This letter is to follow up our telephone conversation of June 4, 1985 wherein I confirmed that the May 23, 1985 decision of the Tukwila Planning Commission did not require annexation of the King County portions of the Park and Ride facility to the City of Tukwila. The Commission requires only that METRO support the annexation in order to minimize disruption of City services to the Park and Ride facility. A copy of this letter is being forwarded to Brian Glynn, King County Building and Land Development Division, to correct my letter of May 24, 1985 sent to King County regarding your concurrent application through the County. Respectfully, L. Rick Beeler Associate Planner cc: Mayor Planning Director Public Works Director Brian Glynn, King County Building and Land Development Division /ks (METRO.PR) 1 Page -2- • Planning Commission M,„utes May 23, 1985 2. FOUR INCH CALIPER TREES ALONG SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD AS CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS POSSIBLE. 3. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF PROPOSED SUN SCREENS. 4. INCLUDE AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 5. LIMIT REFLECTIVITY OF THE GLASS TO 20% AS DEMONSTRATED IN THE SAMPLES. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B. DR -09 -85 and 85 -18 -CUP: Metro, requesting approval of a park -and- ride lot for 260 to 300 automobiles north of the intersection of Interurban Ave. So. and 52nd Ave. So. Chairman Knudson stepped down for this item. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report. Don Pierce, Police Chief for the City of Tukwila, was concerned with juris- dicational problems and suggested annexation to the City of Tukwila. He recommended low growing plants for the landscaping to promote better visa - bility and security on the site. Larry Ellington, METRO, described the project and responded to staff's recommendations in the staff report. Chairman Kirsop opened the public hearing for application 85 -18 -CUP, incor- porating testimony heard on application DR- 09 -85. Chairman Kirsop closed the public hearing. The Commission reviewed the preliminary recommendations. MR. ORRICO MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION DR- 09 -85, METRO, FOR APPROVAL OF A PARK AND RIDE LOT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. REVISION OF THE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO INCLUDE LOW PROFILE SHRUBS AND 2" CALIPER DECIDUOUS TREES PER REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS. 2. PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSIT SHELTER STATIONS TO 8i FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINES OR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. 3. ADDITION OF A 6 -FOOT HIGH SECURITY FENCE ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY. 4. ADDITION OF LIGHTING TO ILLUMINATE ALL TRANSIT SHELTER STATIONS, WALKWAY AREAS /SIDEWALKS, AND PARKING AREAS. Page -3- ( • Planning Commission M,outes May 23, 1985 5. SUPPORT ANNEXATION OF THE KING COUNTY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 6. SPILL -OVER ILLUMINATION WILL NOT OCCUR ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 7. FORWARDING TO KING COUNTY A RECOMMENDATION OF COMPLIANCE OF THE KING COUNTY PORTIONS OF THE SITE WITH THESE CONDITIONS AND ANY OTHER CITY OF TUKWILA REGULATIONS TO INSURE A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT IN ANTICIPATION OF ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT 52ND AVENUE SOUTH AND INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH PER REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. 10. NOXIOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE, AND KEPT FREE OF NOXIOUS GROWTH SUCH AS BLACKBERRIES AND WEEDS. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. ORRICO MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION 85 -18 -CUP, METRO, FOR APPROVAL OF A PARK AND RIDE LOT, WITH THE SAME TEN CONDITIONS AS APPROVED FOR DR- 09 -85. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C. DR -10 -85 and 85 -20 -CUP: Southcenter Daycare, requesting deviation from landscape requirements of TMC 18.52.020 per TMC 18.70.090, and a Conditional Use Permit for a daycare facility located at 345 Andover Park East. Chairman Knudson opened the public hearing. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report. Kelly Grose, Southcenter Daycare, described the proposed project. Chairman Knudson closed the public hearing. The Commission discussed screening of the play area, parking, fencing, and landscaping. MR. LARSON MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATIONS DR -10 -85 AND 85 -20 -CUP WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A DUMPSTER, OPAQUELY SCREENED, BE INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF'S APPROVAL. 2. LANDSCAPING BE IMPLEMENTED PER CODE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BORDER, AND THAT THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH OPEN CYCLONE FENCE OF THE PLAY AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 15' FEET BE LANDSCAPED, INCLUDING THE 5' IN FRONT THE THE TWO PARKING STALLS THAT WILL BE MOVED BACK, AND A COUPLE DECIDUOUS TREES BE PLACED NEXT TO THE FENCED PLAY AREA. CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 85 -18 -CUP AND DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT AGENDA ITEM : INTRODUCTION METRO has purchased the property surrounding the existing Gull service station at 13435 Interurban Avenue South for a park- and -ride lot. Some houses have been removed from the property, and METRO is ready to begin construction of the first phase of the facility. During previous reviews of the Gull station remodel METRO's intentions were discussed. FINDINGS 1. On April 9, 1985, METRO applied for Board of Archietecture Review, a Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for a park and ride lot at approximately 13447 Interurban Avenue South. 2. On October 14, 1983, METRO issued a Final Declaration of Non - Significance for the proposal. The City Tukwila did not take lead agency status per the State Envrionmental Policy Act in the matter. 3. The subject 4.3 acre site is zoned Tukwila C -2 (Regional Retail Business) and King County RM -2400 (Multiple Family), and surrounds the Gull service station at 13435 Interurban Avenue South, and a small portion lies directly across this street. Seven existing single family homes and a commercial building have been or will be removed from the property to accommodate the proposed development. TMC 18.30.040 and 18.64.020 (9) stipulate park and ride lots require a conditional use permit. 4. The property is irregularly shaped and lies mostly in King County. Two small parcels are within the City (Exhibit 1). Both jurisdictions are processing Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits. King County is also requiring an unclassified use permit. Both permits will be heard by the County on June 27, 1985. 5. .The property lies within the area of the Shoreline Master Plan, thereby requiring a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit per WAC 173 -14. Therefore, Board of Architecture Review approval is required per TMC 18.60.030(2)(A). 6. Being located along Interurban Avenue South, the property lies within the Interurban Special Review District of TMC 18.60.060. 'Page -2- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 7. TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060 contain design review guidelines for the Board of Architecture Review to utilize in reaching its decision. The Board may approve, modify or deny the application based upon findings and conclusions. 8. METRO's proposed park and ride consists of approximately 260 parking stalls, landscaping, passenger shelters, transit information displays and signing, irrigation system, lighting and telephone booths, and motorcycle and bicycle parking (Exhibit 3). A single access point is proposed at the northwest corner and the southeast corner of the site. Sidewalks are indicated along Interurban Avenue South, 52nd Avenue South, and around the Gull station pro- perty. (The property abuts Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Avenue South). 9. Signage on the property is an administrative decision per the City's Sign Code (TMC 19). CONCLUSIONS 1. Conditional Use Permit A. Criteria TMC 18.64.050(1): The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or impro- vements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. Material detriment or injury to other properties do not appear to be caused by the proposal. Traffic engineering considerations have been appropriately addressed. Single family residences in close proximity have been protected by landscaping and a 5 - 6 foot accoustical wall. Intersection improvements at 52nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South will be constructed per Public Works Department requirements. B. Criteria TMC 18.64.050(2): The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. Landscaping standards of TMC 18.52.020 and TMC 18.52.030(2) are met except along the south side of one of the transit shelter stations. The building setback requirements of TMC 18.50 are not met for the proposed transit shelter stations. A 10 foot building setback must be maintained from the property line unless a variance is granted by the Board of Adjustment. The Board of Architecture Review may grant a deviation of up to 5 feet of setback areas per TMC 18.60.060(5)(6) and a landscaping deviation of up to 20% or relocation per TMC 18.60.060(5)(C). In a separate section of this report other criteria for the Board of Architecture Review to grant the deviations will be addressed. It is staff's conclusion that the proposal complies with the criteria and that the deviations should be granted for all but the westerly corner of Interurban Avenue South and 52n Avenue South. Page -3- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 C. Criteria TMC 18.64.050(3): The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Submitted plans indicate the proposal will be generally compatible with the adjacent land uses. D. Criteria TMC 18.64.050(4): The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the comprehensive land use policy plan. Access to the property conforms to the desired access design of Policy 9, p. 74, Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. An accoustical wall separates the closest single family residence (Policy 11, p. 74, Plan). The park and ride facility is part of METRO's service to the community (Objective 3, p. 76; Policies 1 and 2, p. 77, Plan). Adequate pedestrian circulation is provided on the site (Objective 6, p. 79 and Policy 2, p. 80, Plan). The site plan is aesthetically acceptable (Policies 3 and 4, p. 61, Plan). Adequate parking appears to be provided (Policy 7, p. 62, Plan). Therefore, the proposal con- forms to the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Equally important to consider is the relationship of the proposal to the City's Shoreline Master Plan goals and policies. Conformance exists in the proposal. E. Criteria TMC 18.64.050(5): All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. In the interest of public safety, health and welfare the proposal should: 1. Fence (8 feet high) the portions of the site adjoining other privately owned properties 2. Landscape to maximize vision of passing motorists and police vehicles. 3. Illuminate all shelter stations and walkway areas /sidewalks, and parking areas. 4. Annex King County property (approximately 75 % of the site) to the City of Tukwila. Park and ride facilities attract criminal and mischievous activity unless adequate security, lighting and visibility is provided. Therefore, the City Police Department recommends the aforementioned measures to ade- quately minimize these problems. Fencing will prevent access from the facility to adjacent properties. Low growth landscaping with 4" caliper deciduous trees will maximize public and police patrol visual access into the facility, thereby increasing the ability to discover criminal or suspicious activity. Increasing the number of lighting fixtures to illu- Page -4- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 minate all of the parking, walking and shelter areas will also increase visibility of human activity at the facility, particularly the shelter stations and deck area on the north side of Interurban Avenue South. These measures will increase the safety and confidence of METRO riders. Annexation to Tukwila is recommended because the City will be providing police and emergency services to the facility. When any difficulties arise, City services will be called and dispatched. However, problems of jurisdiction will arise for criminal prosecution in King County or Tukwila courts and jails, which drastically increase the City's cost of serving the facility. Arrests made on County property (75% of the site) must be tried in Seattle, while Tukwila's jail and court is located in City Hall. Furthermore, it will beneficially straighten the City's boun- dary line in the area. 2. Board of Architecutre Review Deviation of Building Setbacks A. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(5)(13)(i): The proposed development is pedestrian- oriented either in its intended use or design. The transit shelter stations are for the use of METRO patrons waiting for buses. At that point the patrons have either walked to the shelters from the surrounding community or the proposed park and ride lot. Therefore, the shelters are "pedestrian- oriented." B. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(5)(13)(ii): The proposed development is of such a scale, configuration, or design so as to provide a more desirable and compatible relationship with the street and pedestrian circulation system than the standard setback requirements. The required 10 foot building setback of TMC 18.18.50 would place the shelter stations an inappropriate distance from sidewalks and bus loading areas. A 5 -foot setback is better, although maybe not optimal. Therefore, the 5 -foot setback deviation should be approved. 3. Board of Architecture Reveiw Deviation of the Landscaping Requirements A. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(5)(C)(i): Existing and /or proposed landscape areas are effectively used so as to provide more desirable tran- sitions from the street and neighboring properties than the standard landscaping requirements. A 20 % .reduction of the required 10 feet of landscaping would yield 8 feet of landscaping. The site plan indicates no landscaping between the property line and any shelter stations and /or automobiles at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Avenue South. Therefore, relocation of the landscaping is actually requested. Page -5- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 Appropriate use of landscaping to accomplish transition /buffering of adjacent private properties has been provided. However, transition from the proposed parking lot and Interurban Avenue Sout is not adequately accomplished. Only a sidewalk and shelter station is used for transition, which does not meet this criteria. On the opposite corner of Interurban Avenue South the landscaping behind the shelter stations and sidewalk adequately transitions the site from the street and adjacent properties. The relocation deviation should be approved in this area. B. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(5)(C)(ii): Sufficient natural, mature vege- tation is maintained in the proposed development. Maintenance of landscaping on the property should be assured via the proposed irrigation system. The proposal contains sifficient "natural mature vegeta- tion" if 4" caliper deciduous trees and substituted for the proposed trees. 4. Board of Architecture Review and Interurban Special Review Guidelines A. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(1): Relationship of Structure to Site The only structures proposed are the three transit shelter stations which are the typical design used by METRO. Each shelter is 9i feet in height and is to be placed adjacent to the sidewalk. Landscaping will be behind only the two shelters on the northerly side of Interurban Avenue South. Adequate transition is accomplished with the streetscape, however, landscaping should be provided behind the shelter station adjacent to the park and ride lot. This landscaping will "moderate the visual impact" of the parking lot. (TMC 18.60.060(4)(D)). B. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(2): Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area Landscaping should be provided around the shelter station at the facility to appropriately supply transition of the parking lot from the area and northerly Duwamish River environment. The shelter stations design is acceptable rela- tive to the character of the neighborhood. Access to the site is compatible with the circulation of Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Avenue South. (TMC 18.60.060(4)(A) and (D)). C. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(3): Landscape and Site Treatment Proposed sidewalks safely distribute people to the edges of the parking lot. Otherwise, pedestrians must walk between cars and across vehicular aisleways, which is not an optimal safety situation. (TMC 18.60.060(4)(C)). Screening of the shelter station next to the parking facility is not provided. Some landscaping should be installed in this area (TMC 18.60.060(4)(D)). Page -6- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 Illumination of the area is to be by cut -off square luminaries mounted on square concrete poles. The lights will give off the typical orange tint of sodium vapor. While the fixtures and lighting is acceptable, staff finds that additional fixtures are necessary to provide adequate illumination of all of the parking lot and shelter station areas. (TMC 18.60.060(4)(C) and (D)). D. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(4): Building Design The three brown transit shelter stations are of the same typical design used by METRO. Glass and metal comprise the structures. Wood benches are provided for patrons. These structures are appropriate for the neighborhood. The pro- posed metal and concrete lighting fixtures are compatible with the structures. (TMC 18.60.060(4)(D)). E. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(5): Miscellaneous Structures and Street Fur- niture Bicycle racks, cedar bollards and bus information signs will be provided on the site. These fit the design concept of the proposal. In addition, the complementary lighting fixtures meet the criteria of TMC 18.60.050. 5. Shoreline Zone Regulations of TMC 18.44 All of the proposed structures and parking lie beyond 40 feet from the line of ordinary high water of the Duwamish River. The "low- impact environment" regu- lations of TMC 18.44.140 apply to the transit shelter stations on the northerly side of Interurban Avenue South. These regulations are met provided "large hardy shade trees" are provided by the shelter stations. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above, staff preliminarily recommends approval of the applications subject to: 1. Revision of the landscaping plan to include low profile shrubs and 4 -inch caliper deciduous trees per review and approval of the Planning and Police Departments. 2. Addition of 10 feet of landscaping behind the southerly transit shelter sta- tion per review and approval of the Planning Department or approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment. 3. Relocation of the transit shelter stations to 5 feet from the property lines or approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment. 4. Addition of an 8 -foot high security fence along the perimeter of the site adjacent to private property. 5. Addition of lighting to illuminate all transit shelter stations, walkway areas /sidewalks, and parking areas. �. r r.'vv. n�.�. ..., r':..':... {47i_.}S:: t..s... .... ^.'1.` Gt_.t..'i' {: �SA4.0 .' ^f {:iS'Yb tr' =}V'�v n..1 a: ;.flrp i.. .. F Ltif r l {' �i 5r� Page -7- Planning Commission 85 -18 -CUP and DR- 09 -85: METRO PARK AND RIDE LOT May 23, 1985 6. Annexation of the King County portion of the property to the City of Tukwila. 7. Spill -over of illumination will not occur on adjacent properties. 8. Substitution of 4" caliper shade trees in the area of the northerly intersec- tion of Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Avenue South. 9. Compliance of the King County portions of the site with these conditions and any other City of Tukwila regulations. 10. Construction of intersection improvements at 52nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South per review and approval of the Public Works Department. 11. Compliance with applicable City ordinances and regulations. EXHIBITS 1. Site Plan showing City /King County boundaries 2. Cross Sections of the Property 3. Plans and specifications 4. Master Land Development application form 5. Schedule A - Shoreline Management Application form 6. Schedule D - Conditional Use Permit Application form 7. METRO Conditional Use Permit Application supplement (PC.PRKNRD - PC.PRKNRD2) itSkragW15144 itNe S. I: . : :: t : • CITY OF TUKV( LA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPL 1 CAT ; ON : D es t P 2 ) APPL 1 C„J}Ya T PROP. OWNER: NAME Same O SHORT PLAT SUBD1V1S1 SHORELINE PERMIT O COND USE ONAL QUNUSESS. D VARIANCE' ZON 1 NG ADDRESS ZIP D PRD DPMUD.' BAR INTERURBAN D COMP PLAN AMENDMENT E t unicipality of Metropolitan Seattle TELEPHONE ( 206 ) 447 -4844 ADDRESS 821 Second Avenue NS /63, Seattle, WA. ZIP 98104 TELEPHONE ( 3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) South side of Interurban Avenue South between I -5 and 52nd Avenue South (13447 Interurban Avenue South). SECTION I1: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT. YQU. PROPOSE. _ 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM June '85 8 ) 7-''t- -SGT W I L L PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: C) SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA 'PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD S1 - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE 1. 14,5a TOTAL AVER. AVER. C cc e nilATET LOADING SPACES SLOPE OF PARKING AREA SLOPE OF SITE IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL MAP? 0 YES NO SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT SUeSCR 1 °E^ . 4 D SV:OF.N BEFORE ME 7 rM E DA" G' 3.4 TOTAL I FLOORS N/A TOTAL GROSS N/A FLOOR AREA M 5o /ber CONTRACT PURCHASER-OR OWNER eev- THE PROPERTY EXISTING C -2 C -2 16,400 p 0 20,000 p 50 0% - 4% i r j • ' . �; ;• • AN: F O7 Tr:. T.-TAT:: O F WASH I NGTDk RESIDING AT r �15;077 Ler 268 stall park -and -ride lot 6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED.IN PHASES? 'DYES ONO IF YES, - 1 X i t-1 TTto S GROSS PROPOSED Same Same • 256 Al 38,000 94,000 4 230 33 5 To June '86 4.3 1 NCLUDES INCLUDES: CONSI DERATION ON THE CI:Y'S , BEING DULY SWORN. DECLARE INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT APR 9 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE DESCR 1 BE tj ) $1 EASEMENTS BASEMENT DMEZZAN D BASEMENT DMEZZAN1NE NOTES (existing blgs.remo \ec:; except one ;s 12bUS. :'. ) J.65% -_C, 0.65`; -3;s (area to De ceveloceo ENVIRONMENTAL BASE GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Right-of-Way & Property Supervisor N/A MAT 1 AM. THE AND THAT THE FORE- ER OR OWNER) CITY OF TU1 NILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 1 ) GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: on South side of Interurban Avenue South between I -5 and 52nd Avenue South W i TH 1 N SL's! NI/a (1/4 SEC.) OF SECTION 14 OF TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E W.M., IN TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 2) NAME OF WATER AREA AND /OR WETLANDS WITHIN WHICH DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED: DuwamiSh River 3) CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: Vacant land except for two vacant structures and a temporarily occupied house.. 4) PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: park - and -ride lot ) ••••••,.: 5) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST AND FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDING ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS CONTEMPLATED BUT NOT 1NCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION: Construction Costs: On -Site - $607,000 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: APR 9 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. S C H E D U L E SHORELINE MANAGEMENT - J J. C Total Construction Costs: $740,000 CONSTRUCTION DATES (MONTH AND YEAR) FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT IS REQUESTED: BEGIN June ' 85 COMPLETE June'86 DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE: APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT WILL HAVE A VIEW OBSTRUCTED BY ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. 61T 5. MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 2) 3 ) 4) CITY OF TUk,NILA Central Permit System \NEME APR 9 1385 CITY OF TuC.1NtLA PLANNING DEPT. S C H E D U L E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1) PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: The site is va.ca. ^.L. except for two commercial 1- -ui1cinr's and a residence which are scheduled for demolition. 2) PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST IN TMC 18.64.020): 18.64.020 (9) Park - and -Ride lots 3) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES USED, WHOLESALE /RETAIL /WAREHOUSE FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE STORAGE OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP ON THIS SITE) : A park and ride facility at I -5 and Interurban Ave. South consisting of approximately 260 automobile parking stalls, landscapinc passenger shelters, transit information display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle parking, lighting and telephone booth(s) on 4.3 acres of land.. DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A CONDIT1OFlAL USE PERMIT WILL SATISFY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.64.030 (ATTACH ADDITION- AL SHEETS LF NECESSARY). 1) THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED USE OR IN THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets THE PROPOSED USE SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT IT WILL OCCUPY. RESPONSE• See Attached Sheets THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE GENERALLY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets 5 �sr-= s.: h�• �t..:: a: ;:v w1r.:;aCZALaEw,acvaxrnhIfil , A+ .C:Y3.: '0011iSF,Si1iYt'J V..M :C.0 lire:•h. , t= iT,l'' M xr A? VZ∎i rr 4 :40�7mne41rxv.narirnecmuvenra ALL MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN `PO MINIM!ZE THE POSS IBLE ADVERSE 1 MPACTS WHICH THE PRO- POSED USE MAY HAVE ON THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED. y , RESPONSE; See `Attached Sheets ..•�. ✓.: , arr 1 TUKWILA PARK & RIDE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA HEER APR 9 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 1. The Tukwila Park - and -Ride facility is a public facility designed to serve Tukwila residents and other commuters. Metro's facility design includes drainage detention facili- ties, landscaping, lighting, noise barriers, roadway, and sidewalk improvements. Metro has also committed to addi- tional offsite traffic improvements to provide for public welfare and safety. No significant environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. Traffic and noise analysis are included in the environmental checklist provided. 2. The park- and -ride lot would be located in the "high impact" shoreline environment which allows all uses permitted by the underlying zoning district (18.44.150). The underlying zoning district is C -2. C -2 district uses provide for diversified commercial /retail activities which serve a regional clientele. The Tukwila Park -and -Ride project meets the district requirements. Metro environmentally assessed the project site and coordinated an environmental review with the City of Tukwila and King County. See Final Declaration of Non - Significance Tukwila Park - and -Ride Lot October 14, 1983. 3. The Tukwila Park and Ride facility would be located on Interurban Avenue South. Interurban Avenue is the only continuous north -south surface arterial through the Green River Valley. Interurban Avenue, Southcenter Boulevard, I -5, and the I- 405 /Grady Way junction with the West Valley Road (SR -181), are the important roadway facilities in this area. These roadways provide "maximum exposure" for the proposed park- and -ride site. I -5 on and off -ramps intersect with Interurban Avenue immediately north of the park -and -ride site. The on and off ramps would carry nearly 10% less peak -hour volume with the park-and-ride facility. Land uses at Interurban Avenue South and I -5 are in transi- tion to more intensive uses. The site is located just north and east of a residential neighborhood with a number of multiple - family units. Adjacent residential housing would be buffered from the park- and -ride facility by construction of an acoustical barrier and landscaping. The parking lot access and internal circulation layout for the site is designed to minimize on -site conflicts and Elakit31T 7. potential hazards between auto and bus traffic and between pedestrian and vehicular movements. Park - and -ride autos could enter or leave the site via a driveway onto 52nd Avenue located 200 feet southwest of the Interurban inter- section. A second driveway would be available on Interurban Avenue just north of the Gull Industries property. The second driveway would be restricted to a right turn into the park -and -ride from southbound Interurban Avenue and a right turn out of the park- and -ride lot onto southbound Interurban Avenue. Appropriate channelization improvements and signing would be provided to implement these turning movements. Pedestrian and vehicular conflicts would be minimal. Com- muters would walk toward Interurban where on- street bus stops are provided, while park- and -ride autos would be routed to and from the entry points along a collector road at the site's far west boundary. Bus passengers loading or unloading to and from northbound buses would have to cross Interurban Avenue using the existing flashing signal crossing south of 52nd Avenue. 4. Metro reviewed the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The proposed project supports the following plan goal and objectives. Transportation /Utilities Goal 2 - Provide for a transportation system which includes all transportation modes. Transit - Objective 2 Promote an effective and viable mass transit system which ties the Tukwila area to the region. Policy 2 - Support efforts to increase transit use. Policy 4 - Promote freeway transit stops in conjunction with local park- and -ride lots. 5. The project design provides for on -site drainage detention, acoustical barriers, landscaping, retaining walls, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and a series of off -site improvements including: o Widening 52nd Avenue adjacent to the park-and-ride site to provide two approach lanes and one exit lane at Interurban Avenue. o Providing fully- actuated traffic signal is planned for the intersection of Interurban Avenue and 52 Avenue. 2 Ya'tT. c: i::.:Y 01!7iAlii'.+i1•RS1htin.t' "� TS /PC2 /4 7; «i!: '3?;Y;adYS° $::OYITZinit t%,34. P1. ^., +psiaaf vorearltL6:,mf.- n1LMSr7.A ZI The signal is needed to permit safe egress at this intersection by autos. Providing a pedestrian signal and crosswalk for all four legs of the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue intersection to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Converting the existing two -way left -turn lane (14 feet wide) along Interurban Avenue on both sides of the 52nd Avenue intersection into left -turn lanes to accommodate projected turning volumes onto 52nd Avenue (toward park- and -ride lot) and the new.Foster Bridge. 3 • 4 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433-1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 23rd day of May, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: City Attorney briefing. / y 85- 17 -SMP, 85 -18 -CUP, DR- 09 -85: Metro, requesting approval of a park- and -ride lot for 260 to 300 automobiles north of the intersection of Interurban Ave. So. and 52nd Ave. So. 85 -20 -CUP: Southcenter Daycare, requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a daycare facility located at 345 Andover Park East. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, May 13, 1985 Distribution: Mayor City Clerk Property Owner Applicant Adjacent Property Owners File MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 1) PRESENT UsE OF PROPERTY: The site is vacant . except far two commercial buildings and a residence which are scheduled for demolition. 2) PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST IN TMC 18.64.020): 18.64.020 (9) Park - and -Ride lots 3) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES USED, WHOLESALE /RETAIL /WAREHOUSE FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE STORAGE OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP ON THIS SITE) : A park and ride facility at I -5 and Interurban Ave. South consisting of approximately 260 automobile parking stallp, landscapin DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.. WILL SATISFY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN T14C 18.64.030 (ATTACH ADDITION- AL SHEETS LF NECESSARY). 1) THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED USE OR IN THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1S SITUATED. 2) 3) CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System passenger shelters, transit information display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle parking, lighting and telephone boothis) On 4.3 acres of land.. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets MEM kPR 91985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. THE PROPOSED USE SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT IT WILL OCCUPY. . RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE GENERALLY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets 4) THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. RESPONSE: See Attached Sheets • TUKWILA PARK & RIDE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA 1 1NEWN APR 9 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 1. The Tukwila Park - and -Ride facility is a public facility designed to serve Tukwila residents and other commuters. Metro's facility design includes drainage detention facili- ties, landscaping, lighting, noise barriers, roadway, and sidewalk improvements. Metro has also committed to addi- tional offsite traffic improvements to provide for public welfare and safety. No significant environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. Traffic and noise analysis are included in the environmental checklist provided. 2. The park- and -ride lot would be located in the "high impact" shoreline environment which allows all uses permitted by the underlying zoning district (18.44.150). The underlying zoning district is C -2. C -2 district uses.provide for diversified commercial /retail activities which serve a regional clientele. The Tukwila Park -and -Ride project meets the district requirements. Metro environmentally assessed the project site and coordinated an environmental review with the City of Tukwila and King County. See Final Declaration of Non - Significance Tukwila Park - and -Ride Lot October 14, 1983. 3. The Tukwila Park and Ride facility would.be located on Interurban Avenue South. Interurban Avenue is the only continuous north -south surface arterial through the Green River Valley. Interurban Avenue, Southcenter Boulevard, I -5, and the I- 405 /Grady Way junction with the West Valley Road (SR -181), are the important roadway facilities in this area. These roadways provide "maximum exposure" for the proposed park- and -ride site. I -5 on and off -ramps intersect with Interurban Avenue immediately north of the park- and -ride site. The on and off ramps would carry nearly 10% less peak -hour volume with the park- and -ride facility. Land uses at Interurban Avenue South and I -5 are in transi- tion to more intensive uses. The site is located just north and east of a residential neighborhood with a number of multiple - family units. Adjacent residential housing would be buffered from the park -and -ride facility by construction of an acoustical barrier and landscaping. The parking lot access and internal circulation layout for the site is designed to minimize on -site conflicts and potential hazards between auto and bus traffic and between pedestrian and vehicular movements. Park - and -ride autos could enter or leave the site via a driveway onto 52nd Avenue located 200 feet southwest of the Interurban inter- section. A second driveway would be available on Interurban Avenue just north of the Gull Industries property. The second driveway would be restricted to a right turn into the park- and -ride from southbound Interurban Avenue and a right turn out of the park- and -ride lot onto southbound Interurban Avenue. Appropriate channelization improvements and signing would be provided to implement these turning movements. Pedestrian and vehicular conflicts would be minimal. Com- muters would walk toward Interurban where on- street bus stops are provided, while park- and -ride autos would be routed to and from the entry points along a collector road at the site's far west boundary. Bus passengers loading or unloading to and from northbound buses would have to cross Interurban Avenue using the existing flashing signal crossing south of 52nd Avenue. 4. Metro reviewed the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The proposed project supports the following plan goal and objectives. 'Transportation /Utilities Goal 2 - Provide for a transportation system which includes all transportation modes. Transit - Objective 2 Promote an effective and viable mass transit system which ties the Tukwila area to the region. Policy 2 - Support efforts to increase transit use. Policy 4 - Promote freeway transit stops in conjunction with local park- and -ride lots. 5. The project design provides for on -site drainage detention, acoustical barriers, landscaping, retaining walls, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and a series of off -site improvements including: o Widening 52nd Avenue adjacent to the park-and-ride site to provide two approach lanes and one exit lane at Interurban Avenue. o Providing fully- actuated traffic signal is planned for the intersection of Interurban Avenue and 52 Avenue. 2 :Y Fu'ii:.iN.. � : �i;: 45: � 'i ",�Silic;'�.Y.it.s "s:i�- :::ti _;:•'ua,•a";u« TS /PC2 /4 .tt+ gall klX+%iAS 11.1 AiI.1Ml #iW11PIG .RK'.�+�..L Y:lMS25�WUiu�n y!. The signal is needed to permit safe egress at this intersection by autos. Providing a pedestrian signal and crosswalk for all four legs of the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue intersection to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. o Converting the existing two -way left -turn lane (14 feet wide) along Interurban Avenue on both sides of the 52nd Avenue intersection into left -turn lanes to accommodate projected turning volumes onto 52nd Avenue (toward park- and -ride lot) and the new Foster Bridge. G r Plat Map 20 • 4456/f" z�oB sFrit APR 9 1985 CITY Of TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. m ETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Pa h' P Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 Action: Arr Pc41*Att•tr FINAL DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal: Developing a park- and -ride lot at Tukwila, consisting of 260 -300 automobile parking spares, lanr9snaping, passenger, shelters, driver comfott stations. transit infnrmatinn display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle parking, lighting and telephones boohss) on 4.3 acres of 7an(. Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle Location of Proposal: King County _Tukwila . Washington, at- the Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Internrban AvP_ Sni,th and 52nd Ave. South. Lead Agency: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental check- list and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official.: Rodney G. Proctor Position /Title: Manager,'Environmental Planning Division Date: 10/14/83 Signature: ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION laNOTE APR 9 1985 CITY OF TUKwii.A PLANNING DEPT. RGP:ela Enclosure Very truly yours, *METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 September 27, 1983 TO: Whom It May Concern RE: Proposed Declaration Non - Significance for Tukwila Park - and -Ride Lot Enclosed is a copy of the Proposed Declaration of Non- Signifi- cance for the subject project as required by the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (RCW 43.21C). Comments are invited and will be received until Written comments should be addressed to: •Mr. Rodney G. Proctor, Manager Environmental Planning Division METRO 821 Second Avenue; MS -92 Seattle, WA 98104 Rodney . Proctor, Manager Environmental- Planning Division . If you have any question please call Additional copies of this document may be obtained by visiting Metro at the above address or by calling 447 -5863 The comment period for this proposal will expire on October 13, 1983. a‘r METR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • '821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 PROROSEDA?O'1, DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE Action: Constructing and operating a park - and -ride lot. . Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle Description of Proposal: Developing a park -and -ride lot at Tukwila, consisting of 260 -300 automobile parking spaces, landscaping, passenger, shelters, driver comfort stations, transit information display and signing, irrigation system, motorcycle and bicycle parking, lighting and telephones booth(s) on 4.3 acres of land. Location of Proposal: King County/ Tukwila, Washington at the Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interurban Ave. South and 52nd Ave. South. Lead Agency: Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle This proposal has been determined to (heve,/not have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (•tea /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official: Rodney G. Proctor Position /Tithe: Date: Manager, Environmental Planning Division Signature: Environmental Planning Division DILARG acorrqt Air.; !Kent Peri * Proposed Tukwila Park and Rids N • ' P.m • •er•ettshr • • « . • •;••••• ' c.... r .. - y .• .:•• .., C .1.1,04 ...• •,..;:: • .e. • ' 3 : * 1.0•11.5 , - ', 1 , , ,. , : 4 :,I r • ..*- . :-' • Existing Park and Aldo : 1..•■•( 1.• 3. - • 1 • . ■1. e• • •"•• orMs.A..„4 i 01.6tir •...._.,...., • ' • ' i " P, 1• .. • . . p.,,,,, • 0 .1,, 1•140.1•15 ...., L.A..* . ,e .....‘ ts... - 1c....., .•••• 1.....5,., Z ..... • •-••• • ). 4 ••••1 -..5tr's . bro•n• ..- ,... A.e..g --- r \•,;• I. . hislo• " ., r"•••" • : , i ,....... .. (L • : '..• ..." f•• • •• :•.; •( , ..... ' . * ..1Z s. 3 ,•• i . 3' . 5 e . / e l 1 / ,,' f .1! ,, • 5. -! 74 .. Z .r. .,., . wi 7 ..• -, ......., } ...,:,.. ...•,, ,0,,-,s. 1- Nodal ••• .?,..- . . , • " ; ' .. ''.: . l" *._ ji t,' ") .. 4 . 7 . ' . • • -1,- ---. .'L ‘ „F .. - .P. 14;e .- ii-■ -i• •ci gm ist AND ... •;i: u••••1 tot • Mare • • .1.1•I •••• • • is...Asr • ■••• ••:: l'^` .: •.: • 1 • • • • s ot ft •CoZ,„ METRO • • M ipsliry of Metropolitan Seattle NORTH 1 3 4 b..11 Scale: 3 ° "Wk.' :-/N ""..••• •. 0 . ...S . ... / 4.4...,...• • 14545t // -...E . ) . r ........,.......,,- : . , „ 1-11, ../ •• • . PI . .. /J. ••• • • • • - . •-• • .. „,. 52 - .... .. , y ' •• 0.0. 4.. ••■ •••• 5.5,5 .."-.7 ettp,••• • 1 .,:f 7 4-i...ft,. \,-.:•.: 1 , -,.....,..... 5 :, 1. . i Port • _. .... ' ...• . ' %..% Owtheit4.? U; ,, WI i ef . * ' 3 B . ::: .6 ..... // / Z 1 •■-■.,-v'T...:,‘ • •,'' - .).;: / ';. tx$ i0 • ' "....••• -, i. ••• • •• 7 . r ..• . .0" ". " . •thii ' , ..... .3 -, r •• - " r : .t. • " • r - / ::""•;?' . i 1 ..1,1 .,. • . A!. .1 .' . • . e .. .... • .1 .V:11■45 4,-..1 ,. ,-. ._ : .k.e- • -.r-iri .- •' iNtkj ials? / ,- z- r..,.., in 1 .-.... ,• 5 . ... .,,r,...,., o • •-•-, 1 e . 3* - .11' r . ' ..... " - 1 - ''''' -- • -- i . .. ' ..V ..c.c,.. v c...... * - , 5 ." * 0 , 5 b".:' ‘ 1..) . ' -1.‘,.....i.r....,,...,,5 ..2 • . ■ , . . • t t ••• ....4.7....•••• • •-i i, . ' • go . • • .... ... . .... ,,c 4 i • 3 ', A ..,iiz .• NOT4r :- .......•••:"...\''15;':.....a;: •, ...I :. :g- :. e.1 t ii., •• , . •-:.. . .. :e.i , . 133,1:„.. , - ■ r . - • ,-_ r L..: • T.. Pc.. -• •-• e .... . 1 • ..„ j . ., -..; • ,,ts .• , .. -' ....‘ • : ••• •• ,... . . .. ' , I dn.* •‘• 2 , OOP OW/4y ' ' Part -4 "'.• . lt L •:, '-. • .• N '•" •• •• :Isurirrt--r.,.. . -- /-fi • - • ii....•. ---0-i-..•-1•.xii.-i..-..:-..,Azi.:?0_-....-7.7-, r i o t . enur : , : ••••• t• .1....... s ..: ? •.: it I i.,.. V. gi•'-',/iN.,, 3.• __.' ''.?:::., i • _;t:` "Hog .••••:".-. ',. I .•-'-'4! 1 '..,••= .- j- AV, „.;,••••......, 'III ..' • ., 1 . 4 . , .. 1, ) . .T L . "' Doc t b.,. (47---- .-- / I 7 .1 . • ci•....1,2 ...' • • 'I' gi l ' • ?1 , , ,.. . * ..., • ..,,•. , 1 7 ! '. .r,:•.,151 ; • • ... I F .. : . • ? ! ..-:'-' . t. • V .. :' i • --.': i • ' r' 1 11•00•0e .. • I* 11 .• • •■• 1: to ,44, 0 ▪ • rt • O ion - •- *1 5 • or•• ' 101 ./1,• Irekik • 4, r I ,• ,,,,, : • • I • • .. 5... -.. ',.... „. . balk . \ *... t" strC ••• .. .....,• ... ...„,., 5.• 545KI. . •••• .• - .: 5.5i - • . i • L .... i • i.‘ . .••• ,A• -- - 4 • • • FIGURE 1 Regional location METRO PARK AND RIDE • TUKWIL' JmETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM .PROPOSED ACTION: Constructing and operating a park- and -ride lot. I. BACKGROUND '1. Name of Proponent Municipality of Metropolitan, Seattle 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 821 Second ( Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 447 -6619 3. Date Checklist Submitted 'September 27, 1983 4. Agency Requiring Checklist King County /City of Tukwila • 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Tukwila Park - and -Ride Lot 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (in- cluding but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Metro proposes to design, develop and operate a park- and -ride lot on 4.3 acres of land in King County /Tukwila, Washington. It will consist of 260 -300 automobile stalls, landscaping, lighting, passenger shelters, driver comfort station, space for motorcycle and bicycle parking, telephone booth(s) and transit information display and signs. Attachment #9 King County State DOE Federal Us— Corps � ... Agency Permit Tukwila. o Conditional land use o Substantial development o Building o Drainage /Grading o Street use o , Substantial development ( = 0 ^' , - o Building o Drainage /Grading o Street use Flood Control zone -€a Sheri lames o — 1ydre u3 kcs WSDOT o Air space lease - use and development in the 1-5 limited access area o The project also requires Metro Council and Federal approval (UMTA /DOT). est. 1m 42-1 1 VMS. STAT'STKS tiMM (1►11(n M( ►. 11144.4 R* ►(J( 41p t• =MS Sy1 nod COADY/ rn tom.( ( -t A/Y • ►Q 4 .1t000 Vol ..• M ap( : .11.41• 1 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal): The site is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interurban Avenue South and 52nd Ave. So. in Tukwila_ ThP majority of the site is in unincorporated King County and abuts the Tukwila city limits. The Duwamish River is wit -hin 150 feet east of the site. Interurban Avenue is between the river and the proposed park- and -ride lot along with a convi Pnr- rn -r !g . station. The site is occupied by nine residential rental units, one owner - occupied residential unit and two businesses_ Tnt- PrGfatP -c ig on the north and a portion of the site would be within the limited access area. The southern boundary is 5 7nrl A r nii Louth_ 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1985 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local -- including rezones): _ See attachment- 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yes. Metro proposes to initially develop about 260 parking spaces. An additional 40 spaces could be provided in 0.9 acres of land not presently planned for development. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None See attachment ': Design studies have commenced for the joint City of Tukwila /King County project to construct a new Foster. Bridge. The previous bridge was aligned on 56th Avenue S. approximately 100 feet north of the 52nd Avenue S. intersection:kand was removed after it collapsed several years ago. The current proposal aligns the new bridge to,junction with Interurban Avenue opposiee- 352nd Avenue S. The intersection would be signalized, which would serve bridge traffic, auto traffic to and from the park- and -ride lot, passenger movement between the northbound bus pullout and the park- and -ride lot, and nonsite traffic from 52nd Avenue S. • The opening date for the new bridge would be late 1984 or 1985. The City of Tukwila proposes to improve Interurban Avenue South from Southcenter Boulevard to Interstate 5. Improvements would . include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, transit turn- outs, additional landscaping, pedestrian and traffic signalization. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) 1) Earth. Will' the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Explanation: - See Attachment 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? .:. • f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean of any bay, inlet or lake? b) The creation of objectionable odors? c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Yes Maybe No X X X Explanation: The emission from buses and automobiles will result in a slight deterioration of air quality site. The protect, however. would i mp•rnvP the rpui nn2 s air quality overall. 1) Earth a,b, c The site straddles the change in slope at the foot of a hill. The highest point of the site isin the southwest corner at about a 50 -foot elevation. The ground descends toward Interurban Ave. to about 20 feet, about a 25 percent slope. At the 20 -foot elevation, the ground flattens and continues across the central and northeastern site to Interurban Avenue. The topography remains relatively level across Interurban Avenue to the banks of the Duwamish River. The level portion of the site is partially paved or developed, covering portions of the site. Some modification to the original topography may have occurred because it appears the toe of the slope has been excavated, extending the level portion of the site to the southwest. No unique geologic formations are evident on any alternative sites. The site soils are composed of glacial till and recent alluvial soils which probably underlies the northeastern portion of the site adjacent to Interurban Avenue. Fill may be present on portions of the site which has past development. Glacial till, a dense unsorted silt, sand and gravel mixture, is exposed in small, old cuts on the southwest edges of the existing parking lots. Previous geologic mapping indicates that till underlies most of the site's southwest portion. Sandstone is visible in a 20 -foot bluff at the .southern corner of the Interurban Avenue and 52nd Avenue South intersection across.. the the street from the site. The sandstone is com- pletely weathered at the surface and can be easily gouged. Sandstone may also underlie the glacial till. Recessional outwash is mapped in a narrow northward - trending deposit in the southwest corner of the site. This deposit generally consist of well- sorted sand with gravel. The proposed action requires grading and filling to develop a uniform slope. The majority of the site would be paved. Erosion is possible during construction but measures will be used to channel surface water away from slopes. Temporary fabric would also cover exposed soils on embankments. A pond would also be constructed to remove sediment before discharge in to the drainage system. Yes Maybe No 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters ?. d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground water? i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: X X X _L Drainage Condition Area (acres) Pre - Development 4.27 Post* Development *Post - development mitigation. Discharge Rates for Tukwila park -and -Ride II Environmental Impacts No. 3 Water b,d,e,f & g The site is located in the Green River watershed in the range of river mile 9 to 10. Site runoff would be conveyed to the Interurban Avenue drainage system and ultimately discharged into the Green River about river mile 10. (See figure 11.) The following table displays the increases in runoff rate as a result of paving the existing permeable surface areas. Design BID= peak Discharge Rates (cubic feet per second) 5 -year 10 -year 25 -year 2.7 3.3 4.2 4:27 5.7 7.0 9.1 discharge rates are without Water quality could be affected during construction grading because site soils would be exposed to potential water erosion. Without mitigating measures, there may be significant soil loss and significant soil loss and subsequent increases in suspended and settled solids in site runoff. Downstream sedimentation and turbidity may result. The risk of flooding could also increase if sedimentation clogs storm sewers. • Long -term operation of a park- and -ride lot would result intensified site use and increased concentrations of various pollitants in site runoff. An increase in ..po11tant concentrations reaching the Green River is anticipated. Adjacent land uses are producing similar or worse runoff quality. Significant impacts on groundwater quality is not anticipated. Runoff detention would be provided in conventional surface detention facilities. Runoff detention storage capacity for a 10 -year storm would be 4,900 cubic feet. On -site flood storage would be provided for the 100 -year, 7 day storm or the equivalent of 10 inches of rainfall. The detention storage for the above condition would be accommodated within the parking area. The 100 -year, 7 -day flood storage requirement would be about 155,000 cubic feet. During construction the following measures would be implemented to reduce impacts on water quality: o Scheduling construction activities during the summer months of June through September. Special conditions would be instituted for work during other months with the appropriate agencies. 'o Usingtemporaryerosioncontrol proceduressuchas strawbales, fabric and plastic sheeting to cover soil stockpiles. o Minimizing slopes of earth fill banks. Revegetating landscaped areas as soon as possible following • construction. o Providing erosion control performance criteria in construction specifications and adequate construction inspection. Metro would provide detention facilities to also promote sedimentation preliminary site schematics indicate about 3600 square feet of developable space for sedimentation facilities. The amount of surface area provided would remove 40 micron size particles and larger with about a 50 percent pollutant removal efficiency. Additional sedimentation space could be provided which would reduce the number of parking stalls. Insoluble materials such as oil and grease would be additionally mitigated by using elbow and tee pipes in storm sewer manholes or coalescing plate oil /water separators. An artificial wetland could be created in the buffer strip between parking areas. Also, detention time could be extended to promote sedimentation. - ''.: . X X : ti: 2'..; J,'' a, is�+ i'. i:; ii��iei= r�x':: Ys.:': �. v:: L4�� .:ifii:::•r':aii�'�_':�l'4i'a �» }i�.F'hioi;- �:i'.nsrauir�svcxr. II Environmental Impacts No. 5 Fauna d The Duwamish -Green River system has •a variety of fish using the river- estuary for breeding, rearing,, forage and .transport. Chinook, coho and chum salmon as well as trout and perch use the Duwamish -Green River system. •Increased turbidity during construction would affect water • quality in less than desirable conditions for migrating. salmon. .Construction activities.of grading and fill would take place in the summer to reduce water quality impacts on salmon. (See II 3 water.) wa+,nr :ro:� >.rras"Ru Nx - ;a'y;rMV,X 1..n _xerm Upstream migration Summer - Fall Spawning . chinook Intragravel develop. Juvenile rearing rearing Juv. out migration 1 . ; - -r-- -- Upstream migration Coho Spawning Intragravel develop. .Juvenile rearing' Juv. out migration — ; � -- — I I 1 Upstream migration Chum Spawning Intragravel develop. Juvenile rearing Juv. out migration - I � -- -, 1 I i I I Upstream migration . Summer steelhead spawning ....... Intragravel develop. Juvenile rearing 1/ Juv. out migration .. -- --' -- - 1 j Upstream migration Winter steelhead spawning Intragravel develop. Juvenile rearing l/ Juv. out migration | J I 1 + i Fresh -water Life Phase TABLE 12 TIMING - OF SALMON AND STEELHEAD FRESHWATER LIFE PHASES IN GREEN BASINY J F M A M J J A S O N D Month i extends over a two -year period. Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission. Comprehensive Study of water and Related Land Resources. Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters. Appendix XI, Fish and Wildlife, March 1970. 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: fixtures t0 riPimtZgl cpillago tho fari 1 i ty wrnnl r1 he use 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: The site is presently zoned Regional Retail and Multi- family Residential. The proposed use would change the site to a public use. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10) Risk of. Upset. Does the proposal involve the risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: SPP A t t a r h mP n t Yes Maybe No _X____ X • • • •s •! X X II Environmental Impacts No 6 Noise Noise resulting from park- and -ride lot operations would exceed King County ordinance levels by only 1 dBA and only at receivers bordering the entrance and exit adjoining 52nd Avenue South. For receivers abutting this entrance and exit automobile noise could be mitigated by constructing a barrier along the length of the driveway on the property line. According to EPA guidelines, receivers very close to the entrance off of 52nd Avenue South would experience insignificant increases, in Leg during morning rush hour due to automobile traffic on the site. The accumulated noise exposure over 24 -hour period (Ldn) would be unaffected for all receivers. These receivers presently experience noise levels that exceed the federal government's recommendation for maximum 24 -hour total residential noise levels (Ldn), and that level would not change due to noise from the park- and -ride lot. EXISTING AND PREDICTED SOUND LEVELS IN dBA TUKWILA SITE D Predicted Levels Criteria Existing Off On King Federal Location Time Level Site Site Total County Consensus D -1 Commercial Midday 70 70 55 70 60 70 (northeast) D -2 Residential 7 -8 AM 63 63 58 64 57 (south) Daily 67 6 65 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?. Explanation: See number 12 attachment 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: See Attachment 13) Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? b) Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? _ c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: See Attachment Yes Maybe No X �L_ ';,: ir:. ,. � iSii•r;:'•::rFi`ti';s� �:...s'; awn.`CyJ:C,�3:s.;iic".:z:.�Y+F, •',,...: a:c::::i`.; .cxan::un• R 1NPl.] . 441 : iV1 ::4�rtL" %tM:VA}KYY.ST:Y.tY.uY�J AtT3.YUWNV.farc��wrnv.ha w+.c+/: .• . rowoir : +wn ++�t•wrvarw+.I�..n+wwwu. II. Environmental Impacts No. 12 Housing The proposed park- and -ride lot would remove seven residences . including five single - family units, one duplex and one triplex displacing about ten persons. Two businesses would also be removed. Metro would provide sufficient relocation personnel, •experienced in both residential and business relocations to this project. These relocation agents will explain and identify all relocation alternatives to the people being displaced from both residences and businesses. :This will be done under the guidelines as set forth in Public Law 91 -646, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and the regulations of the Urban Mass Transit Administration as defined in the circular, UMTA CA4530.1, dated March 21, 1978. Duties may also include assisting displacees to fill out forms• required by lending institutions, the Small Business Administration and others on leasing and purchasing new premises. Assistance will also be rendered in preparing and filing claims for reimbursement after relocation has been completed. II Environmental Impacts No. 13 Transportation a & d The operation of a park - and -ride lot would attract about 260 vehicles for all day commuter parking. Commuters would ride the bus or carpool to complete their respective trips. An estimated 670 auto trips would maximize use of the 260 stall facility. About 35% of the total auto movements at the site would 'occur during the 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. period. About 80% of the peak -hour trips would exit from the park- and -ride facility while 20% would enter during the afternoon peak hour. Park- and -ride lot commuters are either Tukwila residents (coming down from hill via 52nd and 58th Avenues), other commuters along Interurban, or rerouted commuters from I -5 and I -405 corridors. In addition to the auto mode trips, a number of bus trips would be routed to the park -and -ride facility. Approximately 200 bus•• trips would service the lot each weekday, with a total of 200 daily and 20 peak -hour bus trips' stopping along Interurban adjacent to the park- and -ride lot. The projected 870 daily auto • and bus trips and 260 p.m. peak -hour trips will primarily. distribute along Interurban Avenue with approximately 20% of the • trips using•52nd Avenue to and from the Tukwila residential hill area. Exiting park- and -ride autos and existing 52nd Avenue traffic stopped at the Interurban intersection could experience very long delays (LOS E) at times during the afternoon peak -hour. With completion of the new Foster Bridge and proposed realignment of 56th Avenue to meet the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue intersection, traffic from the bridge or the existing driveway opposite 52nd Avenue would also experience considerable delays (LOS E) in attempting to cross or turn left onto Interurban Avenue. The existing two -way left -turn lane would accommodate "inbound" left -turn site traffic from Interurban onto 52nd Avenue and left turns to 56th Avenue. With or without the park- and -ride facility, Interurban Avenue would handle over 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd) by 1985 near the site but at tolerable service levels, because the capacity of the five -lane roadway is approximately 30,000 vpd. I -5 on and off -ramp intersections with Interurban Avenue immediately north of the site would carry nearly 10% less peak -hour volume and continue to operate at levels -of- service (LOS A). All buses serving the park - and -ride facility would load and unload commuters at on- street bus zones along special pullout areas on both sides of Interurban Avenue. Potential conflicts • e err, 07 500 Average Weo)cclity Traffic Volume Annual Avg. AccIdenta (Whh Injuries) Traffic Signal r 'METRO • !slunk ol Mei rt.p.)1s14 n 1 Nil h .1 1. • I il l I FIGURE 19 Ira S I ) 1■ 11. .i O Z J z 0 i C CC s W E 5 with auto traffic would occur during routine merging along Interurban at the bus pullout zones. All park - and- ride 'autos would enter or leave the site via a single driveway onto 52nd Avenue located 200 feet southwest of the Interurban intersection. The only hazard generated by this proposed access is potential right -angle or rear -end collisons between exiting park- and -ride autos and existing 52nd and 53rd Avenues vehicles coming down the hill. During the p.m. peak period, backups from the stop sign at Interurban could extend as far as the entry driveway and at times block both park- and -ride and non-site traffic destined to Interurban Avenue. Pedestrian and vehicular conflicts would be minimal since commuters, would walk toward Interurban where on- street bus stops would be provided, while park- and -ride autos would be routed to and from the single entry point along a collector road at the far west boundary of the site. Bus passengers loading or unloading to and from northbound buses would have to cross Interurban Avenue by using the existing flashing signal crossing south of 52nd Avenue. In order to mitigate the off -site impacts of the proposed park - and -ride, the following street and signal improvements would be negotiated with the local jurisdiction: o . Widening of 52nd Avenue adjacent to the park -and -ride site to provide two approach lanes and one exit lane at Interuban Avenue. A left /through and a right - turn- only would be included and extend from Interurban Avenue to the park -and- ride auto driveway. Provide striped island just east of the entry to delineate the left -turn egress movement from the park- and -ride lot and the reverse -curve transition from one to two eastbound lanes. o A fully- actuated traffic signal is recommended for the intersection of Interurban Avenue and 52nd and 56th Avenues. The signal will be required to permit safe egress at this intersection by autos. The traffic controller should have capabilities to accomodate a left -turn pahse for Interurban Avenue and multiphase capability for 52nd and 56th Avenues. Signals at this location would substantially reduce the projected average delay and potential hazard for the site traffic as well as for the existing 52nd Avenue and future traffic on the new Foster Bridge. This improvement is part of the Foster Bridge reconstruction project. o Provide pedestrian signal and crosswalk for all four legs of the 52nd Avenue and Interurban Avenue intersection to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. .Yl?t_: i7'.s.': I:,:+[ LET.... R: �.' r. W.' �:....,., :?S;r.i!'.:ii,+:r.rc�- ;:P.,.•s. �:3YI:;E . . o Convert the existing two -way left -turn lane (14 feet wide) along Interurban 'Avenue on both sides of the 52nd /56th Avenues intersection into left -turn lanes -to accommodate projected turning volumes onto 52nd Avenue (toward park -and- ride lot) and the new Foster Bridge. o Prior to' design Metro in conjunction with Tukwila and King County Officials would discuss realignment of 52nd Avenue with the Foster Bridge improvement. o Provide curb, gutters and sidewalks along Interurban. and 52nd Avenues adjacent to the park - and -ride lot to separate pedestrians and bicyclists from vehicular traffic. o Install "Stop" and "Do not Block Intersection" signs along the park- and -ride entrance driveway at its intersection with 52nd Avenue in order to discourage blocking 52nd and 53rd Avenues traffic during peak periods when queues from the Interurban Avenue intersection may on occasion extend back to the park- and -ride auto driveway. A second driveway for the park- and -ride lot is under considertion. This driveway would be on Interurban Avenue just north of the Gas n' Go property and would be restricted through appropriate channelization and signing to a right turn into the park - and -ride from southbound Interurban Avenue and a right turn out of the park- and -ride lot to southbound Interurban Avenue. This access would benefit most p.m. peak -hour destinations, which are from the park - and - ride.lot to southbound Interurban Avenue. This movement would thus be divided between the 52nd Avenue park - and -ride driveway and the subject exit. Convenience and travel time benefits would accrue to those motorist, and the park -and- ride's circulation would be reduced, although overall level of service at the 52nd Avenue intersection (under the recommended signalization) is calculated to remain at a LOS A. Explanation: a Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Water? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks and other recreational facilities? e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f) Other governmental services? a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities? f) Solid waste disposal? Explanation: See Attachment Yes Maybe No X X X X Explanation: The site could require additional police patrols. The site would require maintenance by Metro personnel. (See utilities for additional service.) The park- and -ride lot would be availible evenings and weekends for parking by golfers using the Foster_ Go] f course. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: _X_ Explanation: Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? • 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? III. SIGNATURE �d „ -, .. ,,o• ��. .. .. .....,.” t: �.... x..,.....;'< �. c._...:` �' r �,`'.; �'f:`' Sy:' i.. 4 tn ......,�`'f:a.......'.'CL�t�- Yes Maybe No X X X Explanation: The park- and- rideaot could be used on evenings and weekends by people visiting or using the Foster Golf course, thus increasing golf course use. 20) Archaeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archaeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this .checklist should there be any misrepresentation or lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Date: ..,A•C,YA>r.,,;.4 :4e, umm.avioptswtrrrvrAuza Aro+2,iru r Jawsa rivrx.tt'x7„M.lr.g/v.'AYgcCfa:L YA.w..St: ?rxgrraTR'JlgtgNX M • 16. Utilities The proposal will require electrical power for lighting .• for irrigation, sewer facilities for a driverlcomfort'sta drainage facilities for storm water, and provide telephone booths and waste receptacles for bus patrons. MMWMOMOM nos October 18, 1984 RespfJ� - 111i ck Beeler Associate Planner RB /blk (HENOCK.RB) Gary L VanDusen, Mayor cc: Jerri Jackson; METRO Planning Director City of Tukwila 0 1- 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Lanny Henock Building and Land Division King County King County Administration Building Fourth Ave. and James St. Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Metro Permit - South Operating Base. Dear Mr. Henock: .� ....: r, e.,w.c.,e. ern n.f x.�s ., +w, v ta"".' ro:J n: ti: 7`. siO.` i' •"L'"a'!C!X.�:tv'x'.!h7ri7.'..vi :',.r; �.i';Mi � rl fg The plans dated September 17, 1984, for this facility indicate compliance with the Tukwila Zoning Code except for: 1. A solid planting screen within a 10 -foot wide landscape strip with a height of 5 to 8 feet or a decorative fence along the south property line in the area adjacent to residentially zoned property. 2. 15 feet of }andscaping on the applicant's property on the applicant's property along the easterly property line. 3. LandscapThg•;screen of a height of 8 feet up to 65% of the height of stored materiai along the areas of outdoor storage. If you have any-questions call me at 433 -1847.