HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-12-85 - TUKWILA MINI STORAGE - DESIGN REVIEWDR-12-85
INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH
SOUTH 143RD STREET
TUKWILA MINI STORAGE DESIGN REVIEW
Planning Commission
June 23, 1988
Page 3 DESIGN REVIEW
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 263 PARKING SPACES; AND A WRITTEN AGREEMENT
PROVIDING A STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE OPENING
OF THE HOTEL AND VALLEY PARKING OR ADDITIONS TO THE PARKING
STRUCTURE BE PROVIDED SHOULD THE STUDY WARRANT IT.
THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Mr. Kirsop was excused at 10:55 p.m.
DR -12 -85 TUKWILA MINI- STORAGE - Request for a revision to June
1985 approved mini - storage proposal, to allow phasing of project
and interim design of project.
Mr. Carl Tollifson, 720 Industry Drive, represented the applicant
stated he concurred with the staff report.
MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. CAGLE SECONDED A MOTION THAT BASED ON
THE STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, TO ACCEPT THE REVISION TO
JUNE, 1985 APPROVED MINI - STORAGE PROPOSAL TO ALLOW PHASING OF
PROJECT AND INTERIM DESIGN OF PROJECT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. Substitute Northern Red Oak (minimum 2 1/2" caliper) and
grass along Interurban Avenue to complement planned street
trees.
2. Move rhododendrons back behind tam junipers and supplement
with shrubs to provide a solid landscape border.
3. Specify variety of heathers to be used in containers to
provide sufficient height and bulk.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Jack Pace, Senior Planner reviewed with the Commission scheduling
of future work sessions and meetings.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:07 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Joanne Johnson
Secretary
LOCATION:
City uf Tukwila .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
STAFF REPORT
to the Board of Architectural Review
Prepared June 15, 1988
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988
FILE NUMBER: DR- 12 -85: Tukwila Mini - Storage
APPLICANT: Monte Scruggs and Carl Tollefson
REQUEST: Revision to June 1985 approved mini - storage proposal, to
allow phasing of project and interim design of project.
Northwest corner of intersection of Interurban Avenue and
South 143rd Street; Lots 1 -7, Block 18, Hillman's Seattle
Garden Tracts
ACREAGE: Approximately 5.5 acres
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial
ZONING DISTRICT: M -1 Light Industry
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Site Plan - Phase 1 and Phase 2
(8) Landscape Plan
(C) Site Plan - Phase 1
(D) Elevations - Phase 1
SEPA
DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - significance issued June 27, 1985.
' STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
BACKGROUND
FINDINGS
DR- 12=s5: Tukwila Mini - Storage
Page 2
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
1. Project Description: Phase 1 - five, single -story linear storage structures
with a two -story office /apartment building on approximately Lots 4 -7.
2. Existing Development: Undeveloped.
3. Surrounding Land Use: Riverside Inn, single - family homes, freight ter-
minals, used auto sales, offices.
4. Terrain: Relatively flat.
5. Vegetation: Second growth alders, large mature cottonwoods along shoreline
and fruit trees along vacated Maule Avenue.
6. Access: Interurban Avenue, South 143rd Street, and 57th Avenue South.
7. Utilities: All available.
8. Public Facilities: METRO bus stop along Interurban Avenue.
The applicant initially proposed the development of the entire site with 114,200
square feet of mini - warehouse space (Attachment A). BAR approval with condi-
tions was granted in 1985. The conditions were as follows:
1. Provision of an irrigation system and the required sidewalks.
2. Plum trees increased to a minimum two -inch caliper.
3. Revision of the site plan and elevations to show the location and design of
exterior lighting per review and approval of the Planning Department.
4. Revision of the elevations to show redesign of Buildings A, H and office to
add variety and interest to the facades.
5. Modification of the cyclone fence and landscaping to a more aesthetically
sensitive screening design in the Green River shoreline environment.
The applicant now proposes a two -part phasing of the project as shown on Attach-
ment ' There is a five -year time limit on completion of a project approved
under he Shoreline Program. The Shoreline Program requires substantial pro-
gress by March 1989 and completion by March 1992.
' STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
DECISION CRITERIA
DR- 12 -65: Tukwila Mini - Storage
Page 3
The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria are listed below in bold,
followed by pertinent findings of fact.
1. TMC 18.60.050(1) - Relationship of Structure to Site
The change in the proposal will create an undeveloped area between the front
yard landscaping and the first phase of development. The Phase II area will
be hydroseeded, with an 8 -foot chain link fence with wood slats adjacent to
the storage structures. Under the original approval a structural concrete
masonry wall provided screening of the entire interior of the site.
2. TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
Approximately 600 feet of frontage is proposed for delay to Phase II. To
provide transition, the front yard landscaping for this frontage is proposed
to be installed as part of Phase I. The remainder of the site will look
vacant as the entire site does now. The front yard landscaping becomes not
only important by itself but also as a screen.
3. TMC 18.60.050(3) - Landscaping and Site Treatment
The landscape plan shows purple plum trees planted thirty feet apart and an
ivy ground cover at the base, with one rhododendron planted between each
plum tree. Tam junipers four feet apart are placed behind the trees. Pur-
ple plums will attain a height of between 18 and 25 feet, tams of about 18
inches, and rhododendrons of between 4 -6 feet. The street improvement plan
for Interurban Avenue is to use Northern Red Oak as the primary street tree
and grass for the ground cover.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Previous review and approval was based on the architectural screening of the
interior of the site. Screening must now rely on less effective means until
Phase 2 is built. Due to the length of the frontage, the landscaping's
function will be to provide screening, aesthetic variety and interest.
2. The plans for Interurban Avenue have progressed to where the proposal's
landscaping can be reviewed in relation to the street improvements.
3. Purple plum trees do not provide (as outlined in the design criteria) axial
orientation or shade, or strengthen vistas. In landscapes, they should be
used as ornamentals and accents. The Northern Red Oak, which can grow 8
feet a year up to 60 -80 feet, should be used to complement and strengthen
the boulevard street tree plans for Interurban Avenue.
4. The use of lawn instead of ivy would be preferable to complement the right-
of-way buffer and ground cover on the project's north side. Experience has
STAFF REPORT
to the BAR
(22/DR- 12 -85)
RECOMMENDATIONS
DR -1k5: Tukwila Mini - Storage
Page 4
shown that lawn is maintained better whereas ivy as a ground cover does not
always provide complete cover.
5. Evergreen shrubs such as the proposed rhododendron are most effective when
grouped with other plant material to form a solid landscape background.
Instead of their use between the street trees, they would be more effective
mixed with the tam junipers behind to provide a more effective border along
the edge of the property. The junipers are more of a ground cover, therefore
the 18 rhododendrons should be augmented with complementary shrubbery.
6. The designer has provided containers within the exterior walls of the build-
ing. The proposed heather is very low growing, 9 -18 inches depending on the
varieties chosen, and therefore ineffective in a container unless an appro-
priate variety is chosen or dwarf varieties are supplemented with a material
that can add substance.
The Planning staff. recommends approval subject to the following conditions to be
approved by the Planning Department:
1. Substitute Northern Red Oak (minimum 21" caliper) and grass along Interurban
Avenue to complement planned street trees.
2. Move rhododendrons back behind tam junipers and supplement with shrubs to
provide a solid landscape border.
3. Specify variety of heathers to be used in containers to provide sufficient
height and bulk.
RIVERSIDE INN
Sret13...tea_ P.O;/•!tle
eittl.lber •W•VeM a
LAND•CAP
PEW Mum —
Pernicc7=
por•-.D•
Mtn- Pvt. Cr U•16-C1Y
(cn
u fLai rte.%
OKiTa•Cf Pqr.4.1
VOtotA
PHASE 2
rime 644:co
44‘2. (11?..■ •)•:•••i
6. CC•Crelt
freI
•=ireedo-tu casomnt
1.0.4311WjeriTer5 .05
• k
417-ota3
SETSA
P-cormencedm tr4ritcri
dicr.rt 1Y-24 SI par. ed..
"PO arrilfreD'M ran,
40.
4',
4+
JUI-oreO-1EP
00efec To L.1.1
tillrErt15 vrr-rgcrtxr
LANDSCAPE PLAN
,Lea40.1.0 MVO- -Trees
w-ri WM. rya° e ed
iv 1 .rtlef" rp•
istrt et-wo rca-
rd.zrtircx
Cfak CDA7- 10 OE
Er4ra rtn fdt
fat 14 %CON. rfle
BLOO. 0
•I I
GREEN RIVER
SLOG C
• I
• I
11
SLOG. •
•CUVED MCP- W4.1440114
14703.06201 SATS CCM.
/1 1.070 EEPICHI
ONSWPI.
SLOG.
Atk
• 4opi-
a...nor.otmr.bos
-e•-•efr • tO &'.I.3.
..••• as DEW :WO
.-•rot.•-••••2 NK
n••••tP. (iTro,-)
PHASE 1
S. 143rd ST.
i.
MEWL 11.11
.1.10fro. rIVLCA esit•E-
CosoLete•ircm.)
OAR NARSOR
•PREICIPIT LINE
rrr fP144 apu.
CwrEsou roc wl
s.E0o.o.en ercrwy Cireerq
marina rou.
es. 42H
LANDSCAPE
NITPICK
7.0
4
•
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
1.••■••••••■•••■•• • ••1•• • ■••••••
4.
0
a
4
m g'
4
:411
66 MCPI
Ibf
al
■1
•I
NI
.I
al
NI
■1
NI
■I
■;
•I
NI
al
NI
.I
•I
=
i I
= I
=
L 1
= I
:1
I.
1=
I=
1=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
1=
I=
In
I.
I.
IN
IN
IN
I.
IN
I•
III 1=
.I li
Ill 1=
■I I=
1 ■I 1=
■1 I.
Ni 1=
' .I I=
at 1=
1 .1
■l t=
, ■I 1=
.1 l=
e l 1=
1 1.
■1 I=
1 .1 i 1 .1
.
l
INN
OW
OW
OW
VW
OW
OW
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
a
•
•
a
U
r
•
•
•
•
R 111[RB10[1MR m id 4.2C 110441071
4+M.L CT? A ' +�
LAMOSCAP4
IN
RPM /NW VOW �— PM
KrfuLD - y' .
1V5- V'- 4 A
IA ILSO ,•14
revs
Itlytt wr cbfftE%
7L•LD R-W CRTINI NL
d . CV O Q.C.Tt
LJUA am' (Vrfor•
(veer. VAN" 21 IOC
Mn arlrrco atp.ttr+ ,
'
9B
44,
erla NT
4/ F
SICapc f•
64 ass
4.
y(/ Iwo ruaa a IYG'
P9 . 1 1 : 1 4 1 ' r Ma ".
IIVICrtrteD Mo. ram
1
afC6 0 Ctrer T
1-1.1 '` t
•
• t d d .d q ,.M�MV
OAT 1 : �O.O' . 1-J l�� �.rI
AWL !. W I.
9Ct oe.1V - .-a aces
LANDSCAPE PLAN `..`•`lirrx)
GREEN RIVER
KNOW roc* `ML1L4"'.
I 0 n,
I I ala•+.
I I YM_L ICS'
1
S. 143rd ST.
•
�•
MOM* • lTrt eriq 4:1%. . •
0A1.4.l11t- TTG'L) 0
OAR MANSON
IREIOMT LINE
mrNse. Qv*.
4mo i Nry arta'q
/6- 14104
gh.L
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
THE AfCFIITECTUFIAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
d
•
WV
endr y •
•
•
•
•
Oct 145,1
trfL �
NITENSIOE INN
•AAAACIL
LANO•CAP••
ft• -r'e 1:!esI 1 '
SITE PLAN
04•*4+4• Ferri
AI.
1.07 OA'a'. WVE fr,
CM} !•,•••44:0' arc,
• Woo.
r a d d
o•T •o.o•tU- SLl --1
GREEN RIVER
C
C
C
I NNMI 111.8'
•
OAR NAN•ON
C /N211INT LUIS
Hd% no At TN[ trot or
MfY Oef•• •1 a! P II•.
` /PV Or CMA04• t10 act PC
9 AK*: 11•1•C T • ilea& • 111 aPC•
C ORrz: IMO IF • it WPM
/}Pfif10.1Y: DOO ■•• • 1 goon
T/W.QPC•S m•Oureo: 1!L
TVA. 41•CLa q .:I.• 1!e
C �0 4•'•0••0 0!1
•O CO'1♦C QtlC* —C
C ' ClreyiF PUCe. ul
C
C
N. Nem
LANO•CAP•
----- CR
•
0
2 I
z
W
• j .
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. RS•
•
•
Ov
occfs
J
ac
•
. &.
unr r —o r:Jw:ti r,v10 e t C2
4 \ � v
fa� _ • 11�' J11111111111JIIIl11Ur iafifM�i1IIIIIVailnal..
,►� ..:....�I 1 - �I OMl►1 an al G RAanMEPei6IlPI Paw NWiii�i,l Emitiii
r, I 1 4JiORi0W `irrYt• CCPTIC ad HMI
CtIPIN L1111, r Witte 6
WEST
PHASE 2
nnala.'0'
PHASE 1
, r.
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. RS.
..... • 41...■••....11. •
sser
cdsr••
,,.11
_
O
1-
W
0=
Q
CC
0 ` �
M r
I
2
_ W
22
a
J�
a
3.
I- J
ORT 1. 100.0
VICINITY. MAP
site plan landscape plan
site plan landscape plan
site plan landscape plan
RIVERSIDE INN
LANDSCA
SETBACK
qlwerreae - o
FREIGHT LINE
OAK HARBOR
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board
of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on June 23, 1988, at
8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, to consider the following:
Planning Commission Public Hearing
Case Number: 88 -2 -CPA, 88 -2 -R: SCHNEIDER ANNEXATION
Applicant: Gerald E. Schneider
Request: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 35 acres
from low- density residential to office; pre- annexation
zoning designation of P -0 (Professional Office) without
multi - family for portions outside Tukwila and rezone from
R -A (Agricultural) to P -0 for property in Tukwila.
Location: Immediately south and east of 5425 South 178th Street, south
of 178th, and east of I -5, partially within unincorporated
King County and partially within the City of Tukwila.
V Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement
or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be
obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify
your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above
items.
Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday June 12, 1988
Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants,
Adjacent Property Owners, File.
(21/NTC.6 -23)
Board of Architectural Review Public Meeting
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI - STORAGE
Monte Scruggs and Carl Tollefson
Multiple - building mini - storage project of tilt -up concrete
Northwest corner of Interurban Avenue and South 143rd Street,
Lots 1 -7, Block 18, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts.
DESI ( UN REVIEW r7_
I 1: : IJ33
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Mdc77pLE 71J/L »i.Jf
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access
street, and nearest intersection)
Quarter: S / 4df.4ection: /4- Township:
3. APPLICANT :* Name:
Signature:
4. PROPERTY
OWNER
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
Address:
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Date:
Range: 4- E457; e ,I
Ai /IL
772:aa441/ 9 - 9g/gS
Phone: (ac) f757—I3/3
,
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding
the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent
unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
Name: Ai /A`E 7
Address: 9760 /12 -- �A V9 - /41 9A03
Phone: 927—
I /WE,[signature(s)7 972 A r r ig
4/
swear that we are the owner s or •ontract purchaser ) f the
property involved in this application and that the foregoing
statements and answers contained in this application are true and
dorrect to the best of my /our
knowledge and belief. Date:
5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
‘tit.SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 2
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your
proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri-
terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the
criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space
on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form.
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation
to it site.
$ f /,v6r ai /L1- j?E - er- ea/L/7/04, z&'41/.6 /go)
6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be
provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab-
lished neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
RESPONSE:
7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of
a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian
or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs
in paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un-
sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or
combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and
summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such
as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be
used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and
the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of
a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area.
Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE:
A/2& ,8 /,ur' r + 1/ 7 /7 RIVE-7z eve.
Or
r..
Pt &
5 r G
UG
411,6_
CO
ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 3
6
8. BUILDING DESIGN
I/ /.044 /
ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 4
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should
be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per-
manent neighboring developments.
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets -
should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated
life of the structure.
0. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix-
tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with
building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
RESPONSE:
- ; / //E , T/s ,Q, =�-z. /7 .:701 3 ,4 So
9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 5
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate,
colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro-
portions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni-
ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and
buildings.
RESPONSE:
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area
in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear-
ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize
on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and
nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented
use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth.
Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this
District. Use additional response space, if necessary.
10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
(29 /DSGN.APP1 -3)
I
•
ESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
Page 6
12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
? 774/.d-cJ .47vp
13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
p/2DP P p,2a/, j USG (5 tio! /Xla'14.0719Lb 6J/7
/1-/e-7h/, v5
14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features in the area.
SPECIFICATIONS
• HOUSING Rear housing is rugged, lightweight,
corrosion- resistant, die -cast aluminum. Stainless
:.teed external hardware; includes sloped and
tamper -proof fasteners.
• r )I' I IC'; R( :Il, :rir,r I:, while painted aluminum.
I n,nl Iii,ir.iiul and rr:Ilei.Irn are UnI, 111( :(,( :, 1111 :1.11
n11,lrlu(i, I )V !.1;11/111/1111 111)1y1;;11111/11;1111. I);11k brorvu
11111%11 e. ',Ian16u(1 M(,(Ill1111 bn,nie u1 111.11.1% hlle.11 r,
t.j luilt.rl I11•I1.n.lnl 1'...1!.111111 ;trul r1.1',1tr'hlrl 111 1111111
1 ( :nl( ;Incr: ul ut11 ( :onl ;nn11l 11111. MI:dilll11
I „c.(: porcelain Ianl(, holder.
• I!AI I A'i I Will power factor
• Ind,, FAL I A11()14 liackwiro arses:; on a 3” or A"
rn1110t box Tut, wire access through 3/4•" conduit
1•ntr;iru r :. 1 (wit Ihru wiring can be achleve•(I by
u .11lg a c°ndul11 too. Mounts on any flat sulfite°.
• I ISI'ING U.L. listed suitable for wet locations.
CATALOG
NUMBER
TWPWG
TYPE
WATTS WEIGHT DESIGNATION •
Ihs kg
11X-HPF Ballast / 7
'(1 111.r;7 70S '.
1',') 11 )1 ii 'I 100S I i
1.,0 1'. 11. !) 150S I i
1'." V' )L1 ')NLYI REACTOR BALLAST HPF
"1 I'(', ri 2 70SR (
1 ', 1'. 111i 3 100SR (
1 .r, I'.) t,', 15OSfi !
•.) ,.• • •nr: 1; ; ' eV? l,,d .1•,1 1't.uL'• Ire t,r
vnu.••l•
■.'nugh1 irilo von: •.nmp;etnu:nl
ACCE SSOEUES i•arb:r ;c, :,r:I, ;I:;Itr: item)
NOTL: 1 .,r nun • detail.. .04 01111r, nr i e:d,une:,
•.1•..:A
JOB NUMF3111
JOB NAME
LOCATION
L /THON/A
HI-TEK
DESCRIPTION
Wire
ITW
1
WATTAGE
n
15'
39.21 cm
73/4"
r19.68cm
i 1
VOLTAGE
DESIGNATION ✓
120 [_]
(HX -HPF only) 208 ( !
(HX -HPF only) 240 !
(HX -HPF only) 277' I
(HX -IIPF only) 480 ! ]
E
40.0ficn1
IWD • IWI
ORDERING INFORMATION
1 he luminaire catalog number guide below Illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog number
bur .nd(:nnq purpre.os. To use, select the wattage, voltage and options for your requirements, then transfer the designations to the
appii,pn;de hlr,rk•, Arr.(••;•,ones should he 1)011111(1 as s1:INeale 11110 den:.
OPTIONS
SUFFIX
• +\/•0 FE 2
0
DESCRIPTION
P
70/100/150
HIGH PRESSURE
M
ounting
Initial Lumens
6,300 ' 9,500' 16.000
Lamp Life 24.000 Hrs.
- SF Single Fuse (120, 277 volts) ,
- Double Fuse: (208, 240, 480
volts) 1
- TB Tapped halln•N (120, 208, 2•10, &
277 volts)
- PE Photoelectric control (120. 208,
240, & 277 volts) ' •
- ORS Quartz Restrike Systern
- EC Emergency Circlet
- DMB Architectural Color, Medium Bronze
- DCB Aichitecturat Color, Black
(Senhi- Gloss)
• For Reactnr HPF units, option : available only in 120 volt.
• • Not available Reactor•HPF units.
Cnn'adl Iar.lnry for tiro with tapped billiard
NOTE: 1 111 moo. ' •l t.iiI ., . nphnn•. ,1( 1.11 u•: ,non•. •.heel (: 11A
APPROVAL STAMP
2/85
TWP S
4
Planning Commission,
Meeting Minutes
February 27, 1986
Page 3
MR. ORRICO MOVED TO AMEND TO MOTION TO REVISE THE LANGUAGE OF THE PROPOSAL
IN THE STAFF REPORT TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
"18.30.040 CONDITIONAL USES. THE FOLLOWING USES REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FROM THE CITY AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 18.64.
1. HIGH TECH USES INCLUDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LIGHT ASSEMBLING,
REPAIR OR STORAGE, OF PHARMACEUTICALS AND RELATED PRODUCTS: ELECTRONIC,
MECHANICAL, OR PRECISION INSTRUMENTS: INDUSTRIES INVOLVED WITH ETCHING,
FILM PROCESSING, LITHOGRAPHY, PRINTING AND PUBLISHING, IN CONJUNCTION
WITH NOT LESS THAN THIRTY -FIVE (35) PERCENT OFFICE.
2. GENERAL CONDITIONAL USES AS SPECIFIED IN CHAPTER 18.64 (ORD. 1247
§1(PART), 1982).
MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION PASSED 6 -1, WITH MR. SOWINSKI VOTING NO.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
A. : <DR- 12 -85: Tukwila Mini Storage, requesting approval of revisions
to proposed development at Interurban Avenue South and South
143rd.
Chairman Knudson stepped down on this item due to conflict of interest and
appearance of fairness, and he left the room.
Mr. Kirsop assumed the Chair.
Ms. Bradshaw summarized the staff report.
The Board reviewed the proposed revisions.
MR. URRICO MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION DR- 12 -85, TUKWILA MINI STORAGE, AS
REVISED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. PHOTINIA SCREEN PLANTED THREE (3) FEET ON CENTER.
MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Knudson resumed the Chair.
B. 86 -5 -DR: Alvin Pearl, requesting approval of modified landscape
plans per TMC 18.70.090 for Joslyn Building at 401 Baker
Boulevard.
;1908
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433 -1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
Distribution: City Clerk
Property Owners /Applicants
Adjacent Property Owners
Project Files
Public Notice File
CITY OF TUKWILA
Notice of Public Hearing and Meeting of the
Tukwila Planning Commission
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the
27th day of February, 1986, at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of
Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the
time and place for:
Public Hearings
85 -49 -CUP: Singleton, requesting approval of a truck terminal located at
approximately South 134th Street and 47th Avenue South.
86 -4 -TA: City of Tukwila, proposing to amend TMC 18.30.040 of the Zoning Code,
to allow high tech uses as a permitted conditional use in the C -2 Regional
Retail Business zone.
Public Meetings
DR-12= 85 ':`; Tukwila`:MiniStorage,1 requesting approval of revisions to proposed
development at Interurban Avenue South and South 143rd.
86 -5 -DR: Alvin Pearl, requesting approval of modified landscape plans per
18.70.090 for Joslyn building at 401 Baker Boulevard.
86 -6 -DR: Doubletree Plaza Hotel, requesting approval of modified landscape
plans per 18.70.090 at 16500 Southcenter Parkway.
Any and all interested persons are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle, February 16, 1986
RIVEIISITIE INN
SETBACK
LANDSCAPE
M=1
PHASE 2
• N.
6'00*i-rt. race. aktz.
Fe
SITE PLAN
GREEN RIVER
MUHL 111.5
- -- 1— S: : 143rd ST.
X
PHASE 1
OAK HASSON
FREIGHT LINE
•
sow NR.colUOP4101
044i. D. pi.420".1.04:4
sit..0" "40 At WE 040S OF
NU Wm. pi rue PDX'
AMA Of 01.111,01r0.4 • 114•9E..1 talit.M.V... C -142/5.4
f41.4r1[4: ISOU:u4c - Voogd Sa.fl
Fstaseto: 603 0r* eumr-4 - 14
511C44-1: 110 cAr.c etst.0 rteod-isrt
(rtrn") 6.*-60.16
vt.t. - 0z7IT.4.3r
31.6%
1,221:f4;.
f14 t mums .3r.
lye% t 84,421..591.
17Pi: 241030-o1e
c'N'ttris. !Ince us
t600.6,-Is
A.H154
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
7.0
•• •• • • 11•17•■••7••••••1
•••■111•30.11
•
0
st
0
•
•
•
•
•••••
•
, 1908
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Of Cit Y f Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433 -1800
Gary L Van Dusen, Mayor
w..rc.....
MEMORANDUM
Board of Architecture Review
Planning Department
July 19, 1985
DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants
•
At the June 27,'1985, meeting of the Board the design for a mini - storage
facility was approved subject to resubmittal of the fencing and landscaping
along the Green River. The applicant has since discussed with staff the
concept of substituting photinia plant material for the originally
proposed ivy along the cyclone fence. Because the photinia is a rapid
growing shrub material which will eventually exceed or meet the height of
the fence, this seems to be a reasonable approach to screening the
facility from the river environment. The overall effect will eventually
be a hedge interspaced with deciduous trees which is sensitive to the
use and enjoyment of the river and future abutting public trail.
• Staff recommends approval of photinia plant material along the Green
River portion of the site.
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC.
. 720 INDUSTRY OR. • 9HATTLH • WAUHINOTON • 991138 tH0•1•878•1313
Mr. L. Rick J3eeleriT Associate Planner
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
Tukwila, WA 98188
Gentlemen:
st
(t
Thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
C. G.`Tol efson
July 19, 1985
Re: Tukwila Mini Storage
DR -12 -85
In our Landscape Plan for the project we indicate that the
fence on the river .side of the project has an'8
link fence with slats and ivy climbers. We are prepared to
modify to provide a planting wall of photinia in front of .
the fence as we discussed.
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433-1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Architecture Review
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: July 19, 1985
SUBJECT: DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants
At the June 27, 1985, meeting of the Board the design for a mini- storage
facility was approved subject to resubmittal of the fencing and landscaping
along the Green River. The applicant has since discussed with staff the
concept of substituting photinia plant material for the originally
proposed ivy along the cyclone fence. Because the photinia is a rapid
growing shrub material which will eventually exceed or meet the height of .
the fence, this seems to be a reasonable approach to screening the
facility from the river environment. The overall effect will eventually
be a hedge interspaced with deciduous trees which is sensitive to the
use and enjoyment of the river and future abutting public trail.
Staff recommends approval of photinia plant material along the Green
River portion of the site.
Page -2-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 27, 1985
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
A. DR- 12 -85: The Architectural - Consultants, requesting approval of a
mini - storage warehouse facility of approximately 100,000 square
feet, at Interurban Ave. S. and S. 143rd.
Chairman Knudson excused himself from this item and the remainder of the
meeting. Vice chairman Kirsop assumed the chairmanship.
Ms. Bradshaw summarized the staff report.
Carl Tollefson, The Architectural Consultants, spoke in agreement with the
staff report.
Mabel Harris, 14301 Interurban Ave. S., asked to view the conceptual
drawing presented by the applicant.
MR. ORRICO MOVED THAT THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPROVE THE MINI -
STORAGE FACILITY WAREHOUSE, APPLICATION DR- 12 -85, BASED UPON THE FINDINGS
AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT, AND APPLY THE FIVE CONDITIONS LISTED
IN THE REPORT. MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION.
MR. LARSON MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUIRE THAT THE REVISED FENCE BE
BROUGHT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW. MR. ORRICO SECONDED THE MOTION,
WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS
Ms. Bradshaw presented a revised color scheme for the Flexi -Five building
(application DR- 05 -84), for the Board's comment and information.
ADJOURNMENT
MR. LARSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MR. ORRICO SECONDED THE MOTION,
WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
TUKWIL P ii
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
RB /blk
G COMMISSION
Tukwila Planning Coiu,,ission
Minutes, July 25, 1985
Page 2
Chairman Kirsop continued the public hearing and design review to the
August 8, 1985, meeting.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
B. DR- 11 -85: Jerome Matthews of Kidder, Matthews and Segner, Inc.,
requesting approval of a three -story office building over a one
story parking garage on lot 3, Tukwila Short Plat 78 -2955 located
in the southeast quadrant of the 51st Avenue South and Southcenter
Boulevard intersection.
Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report, with revisions.
Richard Kehle, 1932 First Ave. Suite 302, Seattle, WA, presented samples of
glass, brick and stucco material proposed for the building. He requested
modifications to condition 4, and said roof top equipment would be
screened. He requested the Board consider approval of the application.
Mr. Beeler said condition 6 could be striked.
The Board discussed the reflectivity of the glass, and requested different
types of glass with less reflectivity be presented at the next meeting.
Chairman Kirsop continued this item to the August 8, 1985, meeting.
C. DR- 13 -85: Group 5, requesting approval of a 103 unit apartment
complex consisting of 10- apartment buildings and a club house, at
approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of
Interurban Avenue South.
A continuance of this item was requested.
MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS APPLICATION TO THE AUGUST 8, 1985,
MEETING. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED
OTHER BUSINESS
A. DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants, requesting approval of
fencing and landscaping along the Green River, as required by the
Board of Architectural Review's condition of approval of this
application at their June 27, 1985, meeting.
MR. LARSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE PHOTINIA PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE ORIGINALLY
PROPOSED IVY ALONG THE CYCLONE FENCE. MR. MCKENNA SECONDED THE MOTION,
WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Mr. Beeler briefed the Commission on Windmark Homes appeal, Fire
District #1 annexation, Tukwila Pond, Valley View Estates Final EIS, and
McMicken Heights annexation rezone and comprehensive plan amendment.
A
RECOMMENDATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
.. .. .. ... x. ....n., ...... .,: ,G ...coq::. a
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI - STORAGE
AGENDA ITEM :
INTRODUCTION
The Board of Architectural Review approved with conditions the proposed
Tukwila Mini - Storage on June 27, 1985. The Board requested that condition
5. Revision of Shoreline Fence, be brought back to the Baord for review and
final approval.
Since the Board's action, Maule Avenue, in front of the project site, has been
vacated and Alternative One of the project is able to proceed.
FINDINGS.
1. The Department of Fisheries has requested swales along the river and 57th
Avenue side of the project. The swales are being requested by Fisheries
on all developments within the Shoreline zone. The grass lined ditches
are intended to act as bio- filters for water runoff from paved areas. The
common use of oil water separators in parking lots are not sufficient and
a combination of both is required.
The landscaping proposed for these areas will be required to be hardy in
wet conditions.
2. The treatment along the Shoreline fence has been changed from ivy to pho-
tinia. The material should be planted two (2) feet on center to obtain
maximum screening benefits from the plant. (Exhibit 1)
CONCLUSIONS
1. Photinia is a fastgrowing hardy shrub that would effectively screen and
provide a more sensitive treatment of the proposed cyclone fence with
cedar slats and storage facility.
The BAR may wish to approve the photinia screen two (2) feet on center.
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433-1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
CITY OF'TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETING
OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the
27th day of June, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila
City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and
place for:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
85 -23 -R: 51st Annexation between S. 164th and S. 166th Streets, requesting
rezone of King County zoning classification of RS -7200 (Low Density Residential)
to City of Tukwila zoning classification of R -1 -7.2 (Single Family Residential).
located in the first 175.24 feet lying west of 51st Ave. S. between S. 164th St.
and S. 166th St.
85- 22 -UUP: Rendering Works, requesting an unclassified use permit for two
aerobic bio -tower filters to replace existing anaerobic filter at 5795 S. 130th
P1.
PUBLIC MEETINGS
DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants, requesting approval of a mini - storage
warehouse facility of approximately 100,000 square feet, at Interurban Ave. So.
and S. 143rd.
DR- 13 -85: Group 5, requesting approval of a 103 unit apartment complex con-
sisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately
137th St. and 139th St. S. west of Interurban Ave. So.
Any and all interested parties are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle, June 16, 1985
Distribution: Mayor
City Clerk
Property Owner
Adjacent Property Owners
File
0
(29 /NTC.MINI)
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
a <.mr., *+m.Yr„Y irt.:y:S+bYt: "1`.J.T]M1 °:r �: fiW. �,:` ettiChl.' 4Xi- t7;.1 «+�.�i'.iFiitAii?�}5i
NOTICE OF DECISION
FILE NUMBER: DR- 12 -85: Tukwila Mini - Storage
APPLICANT: Monty Scruggs and Carl Tollefson
.• .
REQUEST: Revision to June 1985 approved mini- storage proposal, to allow
phasing of project and interim design of project.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of intersection of Interurban Avenue and South
143rd Street; Lots 1 -7, Block 18, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts
The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request on
June 23, 1988, and approved the request with conditions.
The BAR adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the Planning staff
report dated June 15, 1988.
Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Coun-
cil by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of
the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal.
lea 0/ l eb(/2ka 6 -el kZ, r —
Moira Carr Bradshaw
Associate Planner
June 24, 1988
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
AGENDA ITEM
Introduction
The applicant is proposing to develop 5.56 acres of undeveloped land into a mini -
warehouse facility of 114,200 square feet. The property fronts along Interurban
Avenue S. and South 143rd Street and extends back to the Green River.
Findings
1. According to TMC 18.60.030(a) and (b) the proposal requires Board of
Architectural Review approval due to the property location within the shore-
line management area and the Interurban Special Review District. (Exhibit A).
Guildelines for this review are contained in TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060.
2. The development will be located on two lots which are separated by unimproved
Maule Avenue (Exhibit A). The applicant has requested vacation of this
20 -foot right -of -way from S. 143rd Street to S. 141st Place. S. 141st Place
is also an unimproved right -of -way. The City Council is tentatively scheduled
to hold a public hearing on the vacation on July 22, 1985.
Parcel B lies between Maule Avenue and Interurban Avenue South and is zoned
C (Regional Retail Business). Parcel A is zoned M -1 (Light Industry).
3.' The has submitted two alternate site plans. Alternative one incor-
porates the vacation of Maule Avenue. (Exhibit ). Alternative two reflects
existing conditions without the vacation. If the vacation is approved, the
right -of -way amount will be relocated to along Interurban Avenue South for
its planned expansion and improvements.
Conclusions
Board of Architectural Review Guideline 18.60.050(1) Relationship of Structure
to S i t e :
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the
streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian move-
ment.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas.
:'many. , ...." ,
Page -2-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to
its site.
The applicant would be responsible for installing an eight -foot sidewalk along
Interurban Avenue S., and six -foot sidewalks along S. 143rd Street and undeve-
loped S. 141st Place. Revised plans should show installation of these
sidewalks. (Exhibit ).
The proposed landscaping, except for along the Green River, conforms to Code's
requirements and consists of Purple Plum trees at thirty feet on center, rho-
dodendrons at thirty feet on center, Tam Junipers every four feet, and ivy
planted every foot. (Exhibit ). The size of the plum trees should be
increased to two inch caliper to be visually meaningful along Interurban
Avenue South. Alternative Plan Two should be revised to show the proposed
landscaping along S. 141st Place. An irrigation system should be required to
maintain the landscaping.
An eight foot tall split concrete block wall will screen the front of the use
along Interurban and on S. 143rd Street. (Exhibit ).
Buildings A through G are one story, Building H is shown as two stories, and a
two story building is located in front at the entrance to be used as an office
and apartment for the full time manager. (Exhibit ).
A portion of the forty foot river environment along the Green River will be
dedicated to the City for a public trail and dike maintenance. An eight foot
chain link fence with cedar slats and plantings of ivy to climb the fence is
proposed at the forty foot setback line and along the east and northwest pro-
perty lines. To enhance the screening of the chain link fence and the
buildings, lombardy poplars are proposed, thirty feet on center, along the
northerly fence line. If the street vacation is not approved, additional
landscaping is required along S. 141st Place. Due to the exposure to the
fencing along this shoreline river environment area to the public, a more
aesthetic fencing and landscaping approach appears appropriate per the
Shoreline Master Plan.
The use of the site will be automobile oriented. Parking spaces have been
integrated into the internal driveways to allow maximum accessibility and use
of the storage units.
The proposal will facilitate pedestrian movement around the site, especially
along the Green River. Proposed landscaping and fencing will effectively
screen the barren and usually uninteresting appearance of mini - storage ware-
houses.
Board of Architecture Review Guideline TMC 18.60.050(2) - Relationship of
Structure and Site to Adjoining Area:
Page -3-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be pro-
vided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established
neighborhood character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation
should be encouraged.
One access point is proposed at the corner of Maule Avenue and S. 143rd
Street. (Exhibit ). An emergency exit is shown on the north side of the
site onto S. 141st Place. The peak hours of use for the site will probably be
weekends, although high volumes of traffic are not expected. It appears that
the proposed access and circulation is compatible with existing facilities.
Development design in the surrounding area is varied. Directly adjacent to
the subject parcel to the east is Oak Harbor Freight Lines, and to the north-
west is the Riverside Inn. Along Interurban Avenue exists the Foster Golf
Course, low scale office buildings, truck oriented operations, apartments, and
convenience stores. This existing development is of less horizontal massing
and scale than the proposal. Therefore, the proposed long and visually unbro-
ken planes of the buildings should be broken up to create a visually com- .
patible development.
Proposed landscaping accomplishes appropriate transition to the abutting pro-
perties. The cyclone fence with cedar slats and ivy plantings may be an
exception in the shoreline river environment where the Shoreline Master
Program requires considerable aesthetic considerations due to the public use
of the shoreline area. Therefore, a more aesthetically appropriate
landscaping and fencing scheme should be implemented in the shoreline area.
Board of Architectural Review Guideline TMC 18.60.050(3),- Landscape and Site
Treatment:
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a
development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
Page -4-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axes, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or
motor traffic,. mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in
paved areas is encouraged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly,
should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations
of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as
fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the
adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a
design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting
should be shielded, and restrained i,n design. Excessive brightness and
brilliant colors should be avoided.
The interior of the site is very utilitarian and is not expected to be a
pedestrian environment. The exterior of the site is landscaped and screened
to buffer the proposal from adjacent properties and uses.
A lighting scheme has not been proposed but should be compatible with the
structures and offer effective lighting for the site without spilling over .
onto adjacent. properties.
The plum trees along the street fronts and the poplars along the Green River
will strengthen these vistas. The use of evergreens and deciduous materials
will add variety, be effective in summer and winter, and add color during
short intervals in the intervening seasons. Additional landscaping and alter-
native fencing seems appropriate along the river instead of the utilitarian
cyclone fence and ivy plantings. The Shoreline Master Program requires more
aesthetically sensitive landscaping :and..screen
Board of Architectural Review Guideline TMC 18.60.050(4) - Building Design:
A.. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be
based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent
neighboring developments.
C. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should
have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building com
Page -5-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
ponents and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of
the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only
for accent. .
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardward on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures,
standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building
design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide
visual interest.
Of the proposed seven warehouse structures, six would be one story, fairly
identical and arranged parallel to each other. (Exhibit ). The seventh
building would be two stories and triangular. The triangular building is
shown with a single entrance, blank walls, no windows or trim, a flat roof,
and a variation in setbacks around the front entrance. No apparatus are shown
on the exteriors of any of the buildings. The northwest side of Building H
would form the boundary or screen along the northwest setback line.
The buildings would be of spli (t,.xoncr._ete_bl.ock tilt -up concrete stained a
cream beige with a chocolate brown or - rust /red =brown color for the trim. The
doors and trim on the majority of the buildings should provide some relief of
the monotony of the long narrow facade of the structures. The west elevation
of Building A should be revised to break up the long blank wall of the struc-
ture, which faces the adjacent property. The elevation of Building H should
also be revised to provide an interesting visual facade. The second story of
Building H will rise above the landscaping and fence being developed around
the site and should, therefore, be made more visually interesting.
The architectural style of the buildings is utilitarian, the visual impact of
which is lessened by the number of doors, contrasting . color trim and varied
front setbacks. Additional softening of the visual impact is necessary. The
elevations of Building A, H, and the office should be revised to create
variety in and more interesting facades. Z5 73 0/41'60'7
Board of Architectural Review Guidelines TMC 18.60.050(5) - Miscellaneous
Structures and Street Furniture:
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be
part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials
should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors
should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions
should be to scale.
Page -6-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture
should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
There are no miscellaneous structures or street furniture proposed. Any
lighting fixtures should be reviewed relative to this criteria and any
spillover of light onto adjacent properties.
Interurban Special Review Area Guidelines, TMC 18.60.060(4) - Proposed development
design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area.
The utilitarian buildings in themselves are not sensitive to the river
environment. Proposed landscaping lessens this impact. However, the
buildings should be modified as mentioned previously to be more aesthetically
sensitive to this location.
Interurban Special Review Area Guidelines, TMC 18.60.060(4)B - Proposed develop-
ment should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public
recreational areas and facilities.
The dedication of a portion of the river environment to the City will allow
the continuation of the City's Christensen Greenbelt Trail system as well as
the enjoyment of additional access into and along the Green River. However,
the proposed landscape plan and fencing should be revised to be more aestheti-
cally sensitive to this environment.
Interurban Special Review District Guideline TMC 18.60.060(4)(C) - Proposed deve-
lopment should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation.
The proposal does not provide on -site pedestrian circulation, since the use of
the site will be vehicule oriented. The pedestrian circulation around the
development would be facilitated through the proposed river trail and
sidewalks along rights -of -way.
Interurban special Review District Guideline TMC 18.60.060(4)(D) - Proposed pro-
perty use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the
district in which it is located.
The proposed use, as recommended herein, is compatible with the surrounding
light industrial, and apartment /condominium and office uses along Interurban
Avenue South.
Shoreline Zone regulations, TMC 18.44
The proposal generally complies with shoreline regulations, except for the
need for more aesthetically acceptable landscaping and fencing along the river
. area.
(PC.MINI- MINI2)
EXHIBITS
Page -7-
Planning Commission
DR- 12 -85: TUKWILA MINI STORAGE
June 24, 1985
Survey
Vicinity Map
Landscape Plan
•Site Plan One
Site Plan Two
Shoreline Profile and Elevations
1',Vii+O1,5':11?..* 57;�iC '. tTe+.' at*. �3' e' 2L� &L�.Rt'iNIMx�ta�cr�n4�il:.xy rLiF+7..:
Preliminary Recommendation
Based on the above, the staff preliminarily recommends approval of the application
subject to the following conditions:
1. Provision of an irrigation system and the required sidewalks.
.2. Plum trees increased to a minimum two inch caliper.
3. .Revision of the site plan and elevations to show the location and design
of exterior lighting per review and approval of the Planning Department.
4. Revision of the elevations to show redesign of buildings A, H, and office
to add variety and interest to the facades.
5. Modification of the cyclone fence and landscaping to a more aesthetically
sensitive screening design in the Green River shoreline environment.
•
I /3 57I
THIS INDENTURE, Made this 19th day of July, In the year of our
Lord, .One Thousand Nine Hundred and sixteen, BETWEEN H. 0. BLANKENSHIP
and FRANCES BLANKENSHIP, his wife, of King County, State of
Washington, the party of the first part, and TOWN OF TUKWILA, a Munici.
pal Corporation of the State of Washington of the Fourth Class, the
party of the second part:
VITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in
i
consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00)', lawful money of the
United States of America, to it in hand paid by the said party of the
second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does by these
presents remise, release and forever quit -claim unto the said party of
the second part, and to its successors and assigns, the following
described tract, lot or parcel of land, situated, lying and being in
the County of King and State of Washington, particularly described
and bounded as follows, to -wit:
That portion of Lot One (1) , Block Eighteen (18) , Hillman's
Seattle Garden Tracts (now Town of Tukwila), King County, State of
Washington, described as follows, to -wit:
t.
Being a portion of said Lot 1+ in Block 18 of said Tracts or
Town, located between two parallel lines drawn as follows: The
northerly line of said tract being established by beginning at the
intersection of the lot line between Lot 1 in Block 18 and Lot 29
in Block 9, of said Tracts or Town, with the easterly line ..of Maule
Avenue of said Tracts or Town, thence proceeding southeasterly along
said easterly boundary line of said I!aule Avenue twenty -two (22) feet
to the true place of beginning; thence northeasterly parallel with the
said lot line between said Lot 1 in Block 18 and said Lot 29 in Block
9, to the easterly boundary of said Lot 1; and the southerly boundary
line of said tract to be formed by a line, the point of beginning being
located as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the said lot line
between said Lot 1 in Block 18 and said Lot 29 in Block 9 of the
aforesaid Tracts or Town, with the easterly boundary line of Yaule Avenue
of said Tracts or Town,/thence proceeding southeasterly along the said
easterly boundary line of Maule Avenue Seventy -two (72) feet to the
true place of beginning of said line; thence northeasterly parallel to
the said lot line between Lot 1 in Block 18 and Lot 29 in Block 9 of
said Tracts or Town, to the easterly boundary line of said Lot 1 in
said Block 18 of said Tracts or Town, ._ to _be__used by the public as a
Thoroughfare_._ or_ forever, Togetrier with s ngufar"trie
teneme6t6; hexed torments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any-
wise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and
remainders, rents, issues and prd'its thereof.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, all and singular, the said premises, together
with the appurtenances unto said party of the second part, and to its
successors and assigns forever.
I`; WITTESS ,THEREOF, the said party of the first part have
2031 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98121
(206) 623.8901
r
TERMS OF SALE:
•
RECEIVED
REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT R Ce CITY OF TUKWILA
� L M
( WITH EARNEST MONEY � Y PROVISION) MAC 2 3 1985
•MyR
Ji gsaw
This contract controls the terms of sale of UR� A'/N0 OSTR
fir
the property. Read carefully before signing. i i
Seattle , ,Washington March 1.
j j .
.
,
II •
r
. Jr.
hereby agrees to purchase. and the undersigned Seller agrees to sell, the following real estate located in the City of ,
County of King , State of Washington, commonly known as Fla rP i.a nri
and legally described as: (The parties hereto hereby authorize GRUBB AND ELLIS COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE COMPANY
( "Agent ") to insert the correct legal description of the above•designated property if unavailable at timf 9f signing, or to correct the
IeQal description entered if erroneous or incomplete.) Approximately 242,000 squar, feet (subject
to survey)' defined as: Parcel A: Lots 1 to 7, inclusive, Block 18,
Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the plat r Lorded in
Volume 11 of Plats, Page 24, in King County, Washington; except that
portion thereof lying Northwesterly of a line beginning on the
Southwesterly line of Lot 1 at a point 72 feet Southeasterly of the most
Westerly corner of said lot and extending from said point• Northeasterly
parallel to the Northwesterly line of Lot 1 and the production thereof,
to the Northerly boundary of said Lot 1 comprising 115,69q square feet
more or less; together with the accreted lands lying between the
northern boundary of said Lots 1 to 7 and the Duwamish comprising
• 92,000 square feet, more or less. Parcel B: refer to Elcbibit "C."
Land Surveys: refer to Exhibit "A" and "B. "
Lit
,19,5
( "Purchaser ")
1. The purchase price is One Million Twenty -Eight Thousm7d Five Hundred
and no /100 Dollars ($1,028.500.00) payable as follo $25,000.00
as an Earnest Money Deposit ( "Deposit "), which sum in the form
of two promissory notes, the amounts and terms of w are as
follows:
a. A promissory note in the amount of $15,000.00 d and payable
sixty -one (61) days from the date of this Agreement, whit is more fully
explained in paragraph 1 under Contingencies, below;
b. A promissory note in the amount of $10,000.00 u and payable
on the date of closing, which will reduce the balance t e paid and
will be held by the Agent for the benefit of the partie ereto.
The balance of the purchase price shall be paid as follows:
$480,000.00 Cash
Balance to be paid by purchaser plus interest at eleven ercent (11 %)
per annum all due and payable eighteen (18) months fro date of
closing. Purchaser agrees to sign a note secured with Deed of Trust •
for said balance.
Contingencies:
1. Purchasers will have sixty (60) days from the 4ate of this
Agreement to review to their satisfaction a soils 4tudy of the
property and to arrange financing. The $15,000.00 $15,000.00tpiromissory note
received as earnest money will be paid at that timeif purchasers
choose to continue with this Agreement. If said prfopnissory note is
not paid to the sellers by the sixty -first (61st) day following the
execution of this Agreement, this entire Agreement 1%411 then be
null and void. The $15,000 payment made by the si )ity -first
(61st) day following the date of execution of this will
be non - refundable when paid, but it will be applicable to the
purchase vrice. Upon payment of the $15,000 to the sellers, the
sellers will extend the time for closing to August 11, 1985.
2. Purchasers will have one hundred twenty (120) days from the
execution of this Agreement to obtain all necessary Shoreline
permits and any other necessary governmental approvals and permits.
Sellers agree to extend the period for permits and approvals an
additional thirty (3.0) days upon receipt of an addi oval $5000.00
on or before the 120th day, which payment will be nets- refundable
but applicable to the purchase price.
!i l
•
CITY OF TUKILA
Central Permit System
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING.
SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA
TYPE OF APPL 1 CAT I ON : BS 1,:. P~LO/1RT SUED 1 VISION ,EIS PERM 1 T E 0 PRO D PMUD MINTERURBAN
0 CONDUSEONAL ❑ 0 VARIANCE ID COONI 0 AMENDMENT
`rf- Atz- 4" L-1 -rrzia -fi+ -Ge Kut.. ,1r5, 1 ,OCR
APPL I CANT: NAME Lu - fl-k - - 2-- S.�e -."-N- 0--(2- TELEPHONE 46) 5 - 13 t'"
ADDRESS - 71.0 Jr-Ai/Ant ) IYG -.VE k S / Wry / � - ZIP q (N
2) PROP. OWNER: NAME A1 ottc P, 7) l / TELEPHONE ( )
3
ADDRESS
ZIP
PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) E 141.- 44-g)
r
•
•
NE
AR
SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION �.��q
4 ) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY .THE PROJECT YQU. PROPQSE. �JE - stJD 1r1.0b ... �- r)(11 c._F >f✓ "(i
/ _
r
ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM �e y (C;i$, - TO M bsca..,- g 42
WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES R NO IF YES, DESCRIBE:
PROJECT STATISTICS: yy��
A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 6. r;‘,
B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOT,t1 /F1.. S
TOTAL -•
C) SITE UTILIZATION:
ZONING DESIGNATION
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA
LANDSCAPE AREA
PAVING AREA
TOTAL PARKING STALLS:
- STANDARD SIZE
- COMPACT SIZE
- HANDICAPPED SIZE
TOTAL LOADING SPACES
AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA
AVER. SLOPE OF SITE
SUBSCRIBED AND BEFORE ME
THIS ,- --- DAY OF
NOTARY
RESIDING AT
FLOOR AREA
DATE 7:;; j ;5 X
a. Kr2
11/ 0.0 j - ,Lt q
tea
i)e -'
EXISTING
C IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
GROSS 5.5
1Lce2
INCLUDES:
fNCLUDES:
77,
PROPOSED
�-I L
RECENED
CITY OF TUKWILA
10 31585
9,ALMO Olt.
EASEMENTS
BASEMENT
0 BASEMENT
NOTES
MEZZANINE
0MEZZANINE
o 02
26,00a
0 t (3 } 215 �
9
a
IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE
MAP? ' YES ❑ NO PAR-17 �Ic�
SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT , /
L/ _L 7 D `v , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE
CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE-
GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN
ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
t
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT - - CHASER • OWNER)
C -, z
¶uJ1L/\ThNl 3re;RJ,6:
•
H6N
Graf
RIVERSIDE INN
TC Ce 10.0IJ.LD l•+
.�1 vf+1 I'°O'� 41..
.8•)
,o4to
0
SETSA
SLOG. F
•I
■1
■I
CI
■I
■I
.1
:I
■I
:I
■1
:I
•MN
— a— A \
111.120..19.
SLOG. E
■I
■I
■I
■1
■I
■1
■I
■1
MI
:I
CI
=I
=I
1 •
OLDS. 0
SLOS. C
I
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
1=
1=
1=
IC
1=
SLOG.
1 1 m
I.
_
■
r ■
mom
Ma
a =
■ _
on
MI ■_ =
III ■ =
■ ■ =
■ = _ ■
■
■
!■ ■ _
!■ ■
■
MO 1■1
■
■
i 000
!•• MEN !� ■ =
1111 _
III !
■
�
•
■
• I I VII I
M di
• C :1
IM 1111
!ii
LANDSCAP
r
• 4, CT/R1M
ru •rtL f1 141 W3
` 'PPL•LLA CL '• JiTEfei
1
oir rro f ry
s ` s
m td 4=e•
44•S CDYP 71arM
6 arcrca.
MN.
ORT
Y1'tt. � CVD 21•ICre1..
iris I.I717 iD'.5 /77lc tr,
Gld'1..W44• rtirrff..0 1 •• ,
/n7 aMTWW 7rwar• IIT�I .
F 9p
Ae .
70 11 ,
r r0 fCN1• •fl•ees
� HI4 P06 W GREEN RIVER
'7FL7 L 19 Pse - tpuc,� d Ct• •p ea poor r0.04 •f •
1 I t
Fe1.11f 1Z'TDiJ .'
-• t
LANDSCAPE PLAN
c ►10 Co./EP-'ID EC
Rrl•fRl -ft/H•IMY•Zt
HbTHYA• Ll• G
•Hr•o llJ.
77A •1F' e.'. ,Nw••
r'HOP. /4•I0 fo a,
G. •4-tP• (1Trrn)
. S. 143rd ST.
N
fX:1
o 9•124•1.
o oesa ,
YNWL
N •r•I• PPre 4'.d ab.
Cs art..ern •7 t)
OAK HANSOM
FREIGHT LINE
7`ff• f> 800 ay—u. 1
• . 1 co -nuo- rave w/
•tc000lv
• ,
d• Hf '-t •YLL
LANDSCAPE
SETSACK
7u0 I
••♦ ow
• . W••NI
FEB 20 198
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
•st
tx)
w
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
••••■ • 1•O••••1
•.NINON.
_ T O' UM/
•
5scfr•
•
4
•
W
0
4(
CC
0
N
Z
0
I-
0
2
4
-I
•
•
••
L -1
•
.
JrE M .,�Jyi;4 ..,•.F
11I111I111II IIIIIII II111I11II111I111I111IIIIII \__l1II�fIl1
0 to THi INCH 1 2 3
p 6Z 8C LZ 9Z 9Z +iZ CZ; ZZ IZ 4
1111111A1111nl; III II IInllhul1nnliln unliiunnlnn1ini11111 1114111 111111111111 111 III 1111111 IIII
. i- wlj11111111ili i [11 1111 1i!1ii11ii1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 11 1
__6... _ - •• - - -- .__ -_.. 7
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT TS -DUE TO
THE tUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
inlliu Iin Iiifiillllifi iiii ifi>�Iili�nilililllnilili _
8 9 • 10 11 MADE INGERLW(Y 12
6 8 L 9 5 C z 1 ww
IIIiIIIIIIII11IIIIIIIIIII111111IIII111III111I11IIII11II��1�1�1�I f ll�l11�1 111 � 111 I�II�III�f11��,
r:
4.
4
CECC011s.4. WU.
ON-Cf IL,,
••.
SETBAC
Ni
MI
111 Ni
UI
UI
NI
UI
MI
UI
MI
UI
NI
UI
NI
UI
MI
UI
UI
UI
1111
1111
NI
NI
• •■■
UI
UI
UNI
INI
' MI
El
NEI
UI
MEI
IU
IN
•
IN
IN
IN
•
•
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
I.
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
I.
IN
I.
.•
NI
NI IN
NI IN
NI IN
•mi IN
um IN IN
. NI IN
• NI IN
pi IN
R.I IN
..1
gm IN
i on IN
N IN
El IN
LE IN
EN: :•
NI IN
NI IN
NI IN
NI IN
NI IN
1E1 IN
1111
NI
NI IN
•al IN
III IN
NI IN
III IN
NI IN
INN IN
•EI IN
NI IN
•
1 I
IN
UN
•
•
•
•
•
•
I.
U.
UN
UN
IN
UN
I.
I.
I.
•
•
UN
UN
UN
UN -
=XI
:1 I NC WM i iTca
If
C-2
ret.CCI'lL Moffat
.DIF
LI:CA
RIVERSIDE INN
SEYPACK —
LANDSCAPE
41,
e r-ra 4
gitois "tin ivy miter.;
40.4,
Adkollp,
4.1,.
■
Nr-vN
5 dcmu arg , 4 1 crt
"'Ala NI
/
Gla.4 10 M
arrrif
-To
94.
94,
91„
r 4tet 0c : 74.Y -12 . 11)14
.ILNIFEFUS TA1
01 ,( 41 1 . : 40.0
SITE. PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN
ALTERNATE PLAN 1
Goff, vas
*-u Ft/C.t.oe so' Ceirt•A
A9 *O-JM"l mere. rvticA.
1511.1.* *
SM.
•
GREEN RIVER / 642: //= 14" g4HCI"
/ 44.1. 1.41114
9 64
147.,
51M. //131:11M.
7 600L14000 amp.Tor4
nof"
4 7:11 rtmiTeD
LIZ.e I doe
2
"I.1_w,. Hwy:
S. 143rd ST.
iN
4 :
1MHWL 15.6'
OAK HARBOR
FREIGHT LINE
M-1
orip1tit4 ra .41
/1 cureers
;POCCWTIV 1.,PLL
/8 H44
• / LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
—
1111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111q1[THIIIIIIIIIMIL 111.111111111.
8
0 167115 INCH 1 2 1
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
1CLEAR THAN THISNOTICE, IT 1S-DUE TO
IiqrLIT Y OF THE_ORIGIDOCUMENT
NA DOC
06 63 Be 12 93 SZ e T Hi JTiii
'lisp or tsuum-rots• 1111,?con
rimsrire, °Jr.q.L
rea tze cir etwarico,
11e1 plgiciric• tepOrriED
12b r31 cdpcen crawl
rir Mr141.16 st
7•0 I
U11:1111r1 11111.11'1'0_"'1'11:111_111111111 itilp11111111 1 qtql1tHlOpOliillitilli1111111111
• 4 , )4 )=.„ ■,'
—
9 10 11 " IN KRMAitt 12
JUN 2 5 198
eiTY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
g WIA•O. • ••I1W • • • INCI••••9••..1•
8 8 L 9 S E Z 0
•
WOWINNOMO OW •
Jure. 7
In
•
4
• . •
A/
7
RIVERSIDE INN
SETBACK
LANDSCAPB
-
•
•
Lori
•
ALTERNATE PLAN 2
cA■rr 1. I 40
SETBACK
4k.
I/
SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN
NMI IN
on no
.1.1 PU
r .1
.1 PU
p i in
1.1 PU
•.1
IN
4
SIM.
IN
Orin
GREEN RIVER
elm'
o!,)
115E0
(Trr.f.
Or% CMP-
S. 143rd ST.
. N
• ,
4 s,
•
1
1
IMHWL 15.5
OAK HARBOR
FREIGHT LINE
M-1
etitLanc--ss ITLe05 4. F.
l> on OHL 'trim,
rer• 102, 4.r. or Millanc../.
fl , 191 Aefrces fatcUirtsz
11Z (49'1H( 0 043Ca5 JN
--LANDSCAPE
: SETBACK
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. RS.
1
0 16 THS INCH 1 9
I IF THIS MICROFILMULDOCUMENT IS LESS'
CLEAR THAN THISNOTICE, IT IS—DUE TO
THE UALITY OF THE: ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
06 6Z Ele LZ 9Z SZ 4 7z EZ ZZ
11111111111111161111111111111111111111111111111111
12
4111-111.1.111111111111111111141[1111111141-1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111101 6. _ . .8 9 ' 10 • mADEINGemom 12
7 • 0 I
• .
e 8 L. 9 s e z vo.4 0
liGIIIIIIIIi1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
' 4 4
WASNII NNNNN • a•.•• • 1•0••••711”.11110
PISW■1111
Jure 'RA
4 4Z5Z4
• esor
•
•
•
•
A
P r
Ti
0
111 •
aims
■44.1111111h1...-
. •
ammekr
.1
H nnnnnrinnrin H nnnn
, •
OC 6Z 8i LZ 9Z SZ • 1 7Z CZ; ZZ
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I
. ,
LZ
rriTiTrr
n n
• WEST
71.0
1 1 1W 111111111.liairr umiuniun r ,-. Liwiz-mi nuumumun uumunurazit
_ a. ak
Or0111101110..._ *.i%.111111Pplpfdliplall01111111i*lifillIWAIIIIIIIMINIERI1111M111P9iliNWIPOIMPINIPII10.111110:111111411 ,
S
SOUTH
I id
l. 'Ito' •
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
• • W•MM1 • •• IM • 1•0•1•••••••••
'CO,V
,t, frb t
11111111111111111111111111111
1 1 I I 11111111111 I 1 I I 1 I 111111111111111111.11 I.1 I I I 111111 iialkli1411. 1 I I 1 I I I I I II I I 1 I I 1 111111111111111111111111111111
0 15 THS INCH 1 3 . . 6 . 7 8 9 ' 10 • 11 %WEIN MUNN 12
8 8 Z. 9 S ' Z CV 0
51,I
IIIHNI•11•1111
••••••••
•
•
••••••••,
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT. IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
THE ILjALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
(
• •
, 1
1 „ • ,
I •
• „ • ,
� J 1
.6:Fx�� f Jf \ „�,
.•• r. Z. •I..
R
.h
11 I i 1 11 I I 1 I I r i i 111 111 111 1 11 i 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I hV I I I I_ I I I I 1 II I j_I 1 111 1 1 I I I I I_1.Iiiiii t-qii i hIi i iiIii i iliItiIi 1-I _y_1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0 ,•YN "INCH 1 2 3 4_.._, __..; _ 5 -. , -.. .........:_._6.......,..._ ._ _. -..7 ` 8 9 10 • 11 NAOEINOERMANY 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT .IS LESS
CLEAR•THAN THIS :NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
o£ 6Z 8G r.z 9z sz aZ CZ, ZZ la I, THE •UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT . , 8 e 1 ' 9G 47E z ` '"'" o
III n�l nInll�llulnn�lulluu�niilnn ilillilil nil Hi iiii 101 iiii Iiii inl th Iilihnifiiii iIilll(iiiliiiigttl iiI{ iiTifiiii 1111 iIII I nIi( IIii�LlLifliil�illlliiil�iliiliill�uilliiil�nillliu�iiuliili�lliiilin�iiilhil � . .
Iiuillnl�lllliiu�linlnil�n n I
ti F
Mn�a• -t�*?A s^<a tt`•'S^'. .+ . ..A!?3"S�G�;?,".rF' :t " '�= (. m.e .i;,d•,, �; u..i,:q.jaaA:� ;* .'4tlfyPU���. k ri).la A�a'.�. �iX� }'.: r'J. "� ia; 4.. !'r i ^ � S'a
•
•r °bl . cl— t s �. 2• 4* C
' ��: ..4:'/ ---
� ■ �tiy O rs_ \
,�� _a -�� c _ - -� �- "l- _ • � S _ = � 712 O
,i!'; • -J ` \` `•�_ C
- ----- zr - - --- `\\ j�
/ ro - Pr te -_ ,.`\ \ \ 1\ II
\ • k \�,� %� I
/ i- ,...2D------_, - _ �� \ d \\ \ 1 \��diI
\ \ •\ i / 1 a_ 1 �� \ \ 11 •
�• sr I ; \\ \``' 1II1
\ \ \ \ \ 111111 -----
1:0911141, \ \ .` . `-, 1 1111 ■
\ \ \ _ , . ., lilill
t 4111
--- . 1 10,1
-a, -' \ .
- . ,
■ II II
1 \\ TI
1 �,
1 �..\ ` �\ . . ; 1 l fl
• lll
1 l
v �� I 1
\ i I 1�1I1
\N.--- 1 I1?II
Cit TI
t`r� b I I
1 , I1I
SURVEY
.__ =- 1
-�-=- _ ii
I
1.:404 ., J:
e'dd�ri�ded „o•
we
e
ORS"
0.115 .411
1 U
141
nas q. �- riYmGUylr7
P . n - J11E9
NUN
UNC
MAY 31 1985
Cli Y IJ .r utiw�LA
PLANNING DEPT.
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. RS.
Wa•M• ••••• • t•••••••••••••
A
'��.. —. •
0
X
•••••••
•
• I.
1
.4 • '1,"
, i ti e 4
■ '
'
111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111\11111,1111 II 111111111111.111.11411�11.1.1111111111111111111.11011111111111_11111
0 "m"mu _.6 _ 8 9 10 * 11 " °E/MANY 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS'NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
1 THE , •UALITY OF THE
LZ , 5 1. 9 G C
o e 6Z Ele Z.Z 9Z SZ 4 7Z CZ: ZZ
11111[1140jAlialic111111111111111111111111111d - 111411111111
713f17117111iiiigalf11.1 11111141111111j11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1
,, S , F77 7 17{ 7 7/77. 77 V7FrIntr77. 7 C . /.
.7%* • irr itr"' ,
•• le• • 11•111• ••••11 •I•11
aNIONI■11=1.1011111,
0•11•111•IM
ON.
•
•
4
•
III•••••
ONNWM5
4
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
44110,0 ''''
•Nr.4-
\
\
r,• „.. .r •. � /1:Y :• �• . " " '•� iL`:'.:. �li:.rii•S.�:a.'i- arrL' •
•
•
•tt.i•1= Vfli4D,,10&4VO r '" %r - 1::!� )t � .r.• • nl:
svgaixoraoizimtvoiwi
r,.
A
0
4
I:
1=
1=
1=
1=
1=
1=
1=
1=
1=
I=
1=
1=
I =
1=
0,
1 % 0
=I I=
= 1 I1=
1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
I=
=1 1=
=1 1=
I=
=I I=
=1 1=
=I I=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=1 1=
=I 1=
=1 1=
=, 1=
=1 1=
=I IE
O
4.,
O
=1
=I
=I
=1
=I
=1
=1
=I
=I
=1
=1
=I
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
I=
a■
1=
I=
1=
1=
1=
1=
1 =
1=
1=
1=
I=
1=
I=
I=
1=
1=
1=
1=
■1 I.
■1 1•
•, 1■
■I 1•
■1 1•
■1 I•
■I 1•
■1 1•
■I 1•
•I 1■
■1 1■
•1 1•
■I 1•
•1 IN
■I 1■
■1 1•
■I II
■I 1■
■I 1•
■1 In
•1 II
■I I•
■I 1■
■1 II
■I I•
■I 1•
■I 1■
•1 1•
•I 1■
■I 1•
■I 1•
■I 1•
■I 1•
■I In
■I 1■
•1 1■
■I 1•
■I 1•
■I 1■
0
O
O
0
O
Yv
1
0
O
0
8. 143rd ST.
•:I
LA NOEL
RIVERSIDE INN
}V•fLE ?UPI ran
Ru 1 ,4 0 +iRI ' i
0141`1 •- 1G'4d IN ow. Isaac.
.lo awe= eerwW 6 ire ,
( 49
44,
d ohnunr p�rlcE w1.1g
,,1: •lvY'
new e'
•
/OKWILA
• MINI PARK
rte. ar aY aid m
ORT 1•.: 40.0'
. LANDSCAPE PLAN
a
fi
� 7M Ju
.0413•012 !MVP lrUi
1 3t4 NOM; IVCCOetVamif"6.
M•l:n
Ci• •R MM C,
O'PV
64'0040 C .4l`101GE
- f- 4'9u.rIniRn 1Id•A
rI. w 1 " w/v. Hens'
•
•
GT$(D RxL ;.01.01,0,r „4
, I I ' UA4•MIO e71',c.
GREEN RIVER ' 'D met. 1met.
s
OHM 13.6'
4O COJEPID
Wen. W 'oc 4w•
s .
OAK HARBOR
FREIGHT LINE
THE MMLL
• SETBACK
E
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. PIS..
,.o I .•.• • WaSM• • ••••• • •a•••••r••■N
nv
•
z
zit
0
4
, MID
Meast
. ': ,.t •• .Fr ;a .'t �t�, - °> � .,'� csi� y+j}•:a(. n. i `:!� , . ":.ly" •�1" y�:fa- `1' 'i. • t +. 't; S '" i...YT. ". '"t R:� . . t t ?a..
•.{ •/ # ,i . {. 5 } : �', <. 4 7 .( t. C� -.2. >.. : s'+,,. �.« ,,..,,,(r• r S "'S. Ku''."7h 'Si 4c:�
�.,:. , .: •, u! .. ,. A ; • a.. . ::.. ;...,. . >� tY .: >,�zk �IhR .� .Y " .: � '� ri , ,?•,, ;:` °'fy t`T, rt w u
., , s �....> .x• .e„ .a ..r ,. .:. , ..,.. '....�: ,: .. ... ...... ,....„,,. , ,, ,,>„,,,..s.. , r.•.,. �t�� • 1... ;"� 1�....,, >��., fir„ .�
II I _ I _ I
III III III III 111111 III�111 111111 III�IIIIIIIIIII �I� I�I III I I U1111111 �I III ICI III I I IJI III 1_Il �II II III III 11 III III Ij1 hII 11
2 — — 8
', 1•TNa1NCN 3 - , , - 4.-- ;- - -,.., ..-.__6
IF IS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • .
CLEAR THAN THIS. NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO 3L.9 S , E z IWWo
0€ 6Z , 8 LZ 9Z 93 1 73 E3 33 LZ THE- sUALITY THE
OF ..; ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
,.
ulnll ►1iilililliiir rllUllll�rffl�llll ►li 1� IIIIJni �u1 ii1, 1111J�Iu111�1��11�111n1111n111n11��1111�n �1�11�1�II�IIII�ull�n�l�nlln IhIIIII1
1r IIlnn�nliin�imllin�nnllinlnllnn
nulnnnnlnnliuluu unnlnu u nu i .' oil , '�:: ;:..',;:,�
,� y , . m �
r."^ ' �*,.,, � `5",,• -a *l,f 1 . S _ a : h [i.. .t; - .•t ..ff :ri. ,..t,� ... ... ,.. . _
•
C -2
110113901e.
r
4 % 0
■
■
0
4J ,
• �
•
/
/
■1"1■
■I IN
■I IN
■I
■1
MI ■I
■I
NII
■I
■I
■I
:I
■I
■1
:I
■
■I
1 :I
1:1
1 ■
I■
IN
IN
IN
I■
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
1■
IN
I
IN
IM
IN
IN
IN
I:
IN
■I�1■
NI IN
1 ■I IN
■I IN
NI IN
NI IN
■I IN
1 ■I IN
■I IN
1 ■1 IN
■I IN
1 ■I
IN
■I IN
1 ■I I■
■1 1■
■1 I■
1 ■I I■
■.: ■
NI IN
NI IN
■1 IN
■I I■
■I IN
■,
IN
NI IN
■I IN
■1 1■
1 ■1 IN
■I IN
■I I■
NI
NI I■
NI I■
■I IN
■, IN
NI IN
II I
I
NI I
■I I
NI I
II l
II
■I I
Ii l
NI I
1 ■1 I
MI I I
NI
NI I
RIVERSIDE INN
SETBACK —
LANDSCAPE
weu. °po r rrt t'9
' 'r
9
44,
O RT
1 : 40.0 ' I utl --1
SITE PLAN /LANDSCAPE PLAN
ALTERNATE PLAN
G
"SIM.
GREEN RIVER
tom.
)
I
I
I
I
1
1
Now
S. 143rd ST.
tUHWL 15.5'
OAK HARBOR
FREIGHT LINE
M -1
,14r or6UIlaIPYfi•11
.'QED ONI O IE f11 VTALL
rE• 1Oro 4' dALQM(n.
114 19. o4i ce recpurrEo
1215 f9YtiNL& G30•CrA 9i714H
rflr 014'II'16 Oyu. •I'.
LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
LEVERE
F t N..18 1985
. CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
s•• a . wA•ws . •■•• • u••••7•.u1•
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. RS.,
• ee c !
r'IQti�c
Jure'"1&i
c}g1rl
•
•
3
4
•
•••■••••
t.r•z . Y .,t ^U y.
f
fS4 1 `;'11. , !,; , ,:';.,,.
I1111111I1111111I11111111111111111111111I1111111I1 1111111 41- 1 1II III
1111I11111I1I IJ1
0 le THS INCH 1 3
_ 8
IF' THIS,MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS TO
0 € 6Z 8G Lz 9Z GZ ti c Zz tz THE, IUALITY. THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
n � .
IIIIIIIII iliiIIIII ilil w nu woo i9i in.. l Inn ni i infiinlmliiiimlihl iiiill iiiiii ii-f it II i ii i l � l� „roll
ullll�Iililnll . � I nII 1 nI�Inll n s F f
� - �;z nn�In �I ^3 IP t:�' t.r4. , .
111 I1111111111111111 1_ I 1 IJ I IThIl I IJ i.I C I-1! 111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1111111 111 I I I 1 1 1111111 1 1111 I I I I
10 11 MADEINOERMAHY 12
•
9 t 9 G E z L. W
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II^IIIIIIIIIIII�II,II�N
•
•
re717
• , •
%
% %LANDSCAPE
1,p
4 4(. t‘x%
,e •
•
rft4 rf• -
OurICIAIMW To
M ' 4 t
• • %:-
..e•=2
vszfwnvi D
=67•rrec
reicon't
esi Thi•
1‘011OH
RIVERSIDE INN
idine?no•re
t11p4 odorII-et
ALTERNATE PLAN/
Vrl• 0 111 111 9t7 '. ;‘ , ..
• .1
# 4\4 ‘ , T 40.o
SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN •
LANDSCAP \ EN.
seTa•ek
GREEN RIVER
.
„ ••. c...
1MNWL 111.11'
TUKWILA
MINI PARE
•I
UI
UI
MI
UI
MI
UI
UI
Ut
Ull
UI
1111
I=
I=
1=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
1=
1=
I=
I=
I=
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
111
=1
=1
r.1
=1
=1
=1
-1
=1
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
=I
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
=1
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
1=
I=
I=
1=
I=
I=
I=
1=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
I=
UI
11111
MI
INI
UI
UI
MI
UI
UI
MI
El. 143rd .ST,
OAK HARBOR
FREIGHT LINE
• .
16•I•cen
SETBACK
LANDSCAPE
i;
•
- 1/1•11:010•11pri.
PU fPro.U.eL ri•rrime,
ctpuss .91S q 1.• 2S'
0.r•rir-tcv
riishrs (tmo..pnri.L) now*
tram c4 i.erAct/ lav co.
eff•Cri fee9.1.. ft/Z
S EJ3'4WH oN0.4
C.2. rale (9jorit.e. drIvoe..) 1Clai2ge
Irmo 1"sfrcepax2 ele
cif,..cein rWL- AMP
Is .47 4.311:4411
•
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.S.
7.0 I g W••141 ••1•• • 8•••11.•••••1•11.
.•;•
m • Id
Auko 'Fps v •
- .
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111-1111111111M111 I .1_11111111111111111111_111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
0 10 THS INCH 1 3 ______ 5 , . 6 8 9 10 • • 11 KADE IN GERMANY 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS .
•-•-• . e tz z z +7z zz
.
) CLEAR THAN THISNOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
0€ sz s s s ez: i
THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 88L 9 4 7 CZ
J14111
;T••,,
•
Novels.
WV
roctift•
624 ,$•••••••
r-wf Telfe,
u)tri?,
•
-S
•
,
--- ■111119
A
1 • 1 , , •
. •
' • . • • • " • •
t
PROP. LINE
-Jr
SLOG. A
ornonaDoon000nnonovm unnnnnnnnnnnnril
•
S LOG. S
.h.nnnnnnrinnnnnnnnmnnrnnnnnnnnnnnr
O LDS. 11 MOO. 0 SIMILAR)
PROPOSER PROP. LINE
1' 20.0* r117_11.1
SHORELINE ‘be
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnninnnnnnnnriinnnnnnfinnnnnnrinnnnnnnnnnrinnnnnnmnrimnf
SLOG. E
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.rfl IrEirrirninnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrinnnnnnnnnTrin
• SLOG. F (•1.00. 0 SIMILAR)
PROPOSED PROP.•LINE
ILO°. N
fee
LOW PACT
ENVIRONMENT
SECTION A
SECTION B
SECTION C
1
SECTION D
SECTION E
•
SECTION F
PROP. LINE
NIVEA
I ENVIRONMENT
4.
WIWI. 15.6'
GREEN RIVER
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS INC. P.a.
• a • 1111/A•1.11 111.1•■ • 8MMIBI•••••611111111
11V
011•••••••
•••••••116
•
•
•
•
• ■=mmommO
,
c . . 1,■V v
2 • •
11111 111111111111111111111111111111
k: I I
1-1111-1111 1 Hill I Lill I 11111111111_ 111111111-11 1 1 111111111111:1
”l
tei trf tI 0 1 '
. '
;11
16 TM S INCH • 3 _4 - 5_
6 7 8 9 • 10 11 MADE IN GERMANY 12
\ : IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
sz se tz 9Z SZ ez) zz THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT L els 8 L 9 G • Pi
111111111111116151111115RFUTilillifg
1411111111111 111141111111i 4,47'777
4' > 4