Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit DR-13-85 - IVY HILLS APARTMENTS / RYERSON - LANDSCAPE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW
This record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below. DR-13-85 Ivy Hills / Ryerson 13735 Interurban Avenue South th 13820 56 Avenue South th 13730 56 Avenue South DIGITAL RECORDS (DR) EXEMPTION LOG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION Page # Code Exemption Brief Explanatory Description Statute/Rule The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress' intent that social security numbers are a private concern. As Personal Information – such, individuals’ social security numbers are Social Security Numbers 5 U.S.C. sec. redacted to protect those individuals’ privacy pursuant DR1 Generally – 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a); RCW to 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure under section 42.56.070(1) of the 552(a); RCW 42.56.070(1) Washington State Public Records Act, which exempts 42.56.070(1) under the PRA records or information exempt or prohibited from disclosure under any other statute. Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit expiration Personal Information – RCW dates, or bank or other financial account numbers, 3 DR2 Financial Information – 42.56.230(5) which are exempt from disclosure pursuant to RCW RCW 42.56.230(4 5) 42.56.230(5), except when disclosure is expressly required by or governed by other law. dr-13-85 13735 interurban avenue south 13820 56th avenue south 13730 56th avenue south RYERSON IVY HILLS APARTMENTS DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF TUKWILA TREASURER'S CHECK BANK TLJKWILA•ANOOVM PAIN( URANON ANDOVER DARK JL 1 F? � � 5 ys .. :i 5:•: �E - :rft ,AN:Xv. to i;Go:<fl,Cladri . .<:dQ:valo o r: /� utt ' oriz od ' b ;'Cl(" st f f IAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Tvy Rills Apartments DATE: 2- .15 -90 , ' )EVELOPMENT ADDRESS: 13820 56th Avenue S. PERMIT NO.: 5014 ,ASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: D.P... Construction. Inc. TEL. NO. 322 -5228 HALL BE REFUNDED • 1Y MAILING TO: ADDRESS: 1495 E. Denny_WaY ' • • - ploaso print) CITY/STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 081.22 ' • ►ESCf1IPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE IAN5L UMENJS.METIE IEMaABE.DESOf1iDED): (lydroseed portions of the upper site which have jiitsuf.fici.ent ground - covey . CASH I' t :,; 1 , I'• IUI,1 . r.. 01 ,. . , t. }; As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 1,650.00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. i will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 1 I 11 / g0 ), or risk having the City use those funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. if I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed above prior to requesting , inspection and release of those funds. D.H. Construction, inc. SIGNED: tlCA.•{./ &G- cr�t�„r,,_ '- TITLE: Jerry ilansen /General Manager ` ,....,. 5:. v`tt. \ . ni { ,v,5•T •`i>,`•:' �::�w.1r: }:` <:4 >:yi t Ti C A €(to Uv<CVf2•►pJ /Pt > . R { :" lly.: ::..ir; »: �: ?; THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO DE ACCEPTED. • SIGNED: 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND IIELEASE OF FUNDS 27. Co isr,e ,' - / reo DEVELOPERS REPRESENTATIVE: ,Wa.4.64,_e,..„. DEPARTMENT HEAD: 4MOUNT: . found cash �.•_ f :7:i i:: :1 it accoptablo assignment. ©� �; , ..t .l: CASH ( CASH EQUIVALENT DEPOSITED THIS DATE: CITY RECEIPT NO. C oTi N ' 1 ' (O ho : Co • i : : > $tlt f ! ) / <{ RECEIVED DY: C TI(y N 3 (t be cam p lat e� cd : ; b y ; cf ovalo p e r )r ; >; ! >; Al; work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. I hereby request inspection and release of my castVcash equivalent. .u, i.V . •- DATE: Co 4sA o 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND IIELEASE OF FUNDS 27. Co isr,e ,' - / reo DEVELOPERS REPRESENTATIVE: ,Wa.4.64,_e,..„. , . "y °� fi fi) r" ^; :< <= I have �: '--°'' w ..; °:;>,iil mpl t., �ta >:.:. " • :�a�rrfl � �b�b o. Ycv 4/r � >1 �:. authorize roviowod the above work and the release of the above DY: L•:.:.:. Y' •.n 4.:....i.1r..:J::.�..:.. •....`.1:. found cash �.•_ f :7:i i:: :1 it accoptablo assignment. ©� �; , ..t .l: L:>:.` and therefore •- � - � i 1 " —^ I: >::.......:..\V.:>i:::{::V:.• :I::•.•......••:l' V.J: CHECKED DY: AUTHORIZED • ..................•.....••. t...:>:.. i. A: r.......•....: l: n... ri•.••..•.\ i>, iI:.. IIUAJ:• l 'i•.11!•.••......ti:: >.' >:A>.:. u: C oTi N ' 1 ' (O ho : Co • i : : > $tlt f ! ) / <{ AMOUNT: FEB - 11991 CASH EQUIVALENT- LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: Lr-7--- - Q ' F i UK . RELEASED BY: Pt . AM1'INiNG D' ' - , FINANCE DEPT. CASH CiTY CHECK NO. 1•1.1' OF TUKMI.A DEVELOPER'S . d` .JJECT WARRANT'. f 1QUEST• FORM Upon oomplotion through Soction 2, Finance personnel shall sond copios to: - Dovolopor - Financo Dopartmont - Permit Coordinator, DCD Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 07111M CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 Type of Inspection Site Address Requestor Special Instructions P v 1173 c J (Luz S. (3-1.f.„) PERMIT # INSPECTION RECORD Date et Date Wanted 77 9 --9/ -11 1-1-J — 9,1 6/96 - 10VC,0 Project Phone # ...utimummolielerboaMeWWW a.m: , Inspection Results/Comments: PHONE q (2061 433.1800 Gary L. VOnDnsen, Mayor DATE: March 5, 1991 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TO: Alan Doerschell Finance Department FROM: Ann Siegenthale Department of Community evelopment RE: Release of Cash Assignment for Ivy Hills Apartments City Receipt No. 6144, 2/28/90 On 2/28/90, the City accepted $2,550 from D.E. Construction as a cash assignment for the Ivy Hills project (receipt #6144). A portion of this amount, $650, was for fireplace work, while the remaining $1,650 was for hydroseeding. Based on information from the general contractor, and Kim Hart's research (on 2/13/91), it appears that the $900 was refunded. However, the remaining $1650 for hydroseeding was never released. Staff conducted a final inspection of the Ivy Hills project on 2/22/91. We conclude that the general contractor has completed hydroseeding as required. Accordingly, this Department authorizes the release of the remaining $1,650 in warranty funds accepted on 2/28/90. cc: File Jerry Hanson, D.E. Construction Jack Pace PK- (5w t• 1 1) R-13-4S5 Pfia-- 15 -ggS )-3D-11 Application for City Business License 1991 Please update following information and complete application in its entirety. (Please Note: This is an APPLICATION ONLY and not a license to conduct business) * BUSINESS NAME LOCAL MAILING ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE 248 - 7630 Ivy Hills 38(.S inaaRURt QN Aoc so. iii Se.":11te. W le 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 ' (IF BUSINESS NAME HAS CHANGED IN PAST YEAR, LIST FORMER NAME LOCAL MANAGER (include name and home phone) HOME OCCUPATION troatt faea - nee, e, O111- $081 YES( ) NO(4) DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (GIVE DETAILS, ALSO, LIST TYPES OF PRODUCTS SOLD OR STORED) rvLt III' - ea.n. I h lM on a.- /0S-4.t t /rPaRT'w.e..+l Co.,..a, IQ X . INDICATE OWNERSHIP STATUS INDIVIDUAL ( ) PARTNERSHIP 1/" CORPORATION ( ) NON - PROFIT ( 1 LIST OWNERS, PARTNERS OR OFFICERS TITLE RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY /STATE/ZIP PHONE . S o e Qe v s H , P a R t n v e v . l9 a9 Taco.,,. 4 ' . S 0 383 -4sy .2Vy L[.S /4SSOC /a trS 1aco., co* 9Noa2 TOTAL EMPLOYEES AT TUKWILA LOCATION, INCLUDING MANAGEMENT NUMBER IN EACH TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT RETAIL WHOLESALE OFFICE AMUSEMENT DEVICES ON PREMISES? LICENSE FEE, BASED ON NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES City of Tukwila DEC 2 9 RECO Renewal License ❑ New License MANUFACTURING ORIGINAL OPENING DATE OF BUSINESS YES ( ) NO Q NUMBER DO YOU USE/STORE /DISCHARGE FLAMMABLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? YES ( ) NO (>4 IF YES, STATE TYPE AND QUANTITY �j /� OFFICE USE ONLY 1 DATE / - � / ""! REC. NO ■ CHECK NO .33 4/ CASH 1. BUILDING 2. PLANNING 3. POLICE 4. FIRE DATE ISSUED LICENSE NUMBER CORPORATE ADDRESS — re. Ero „, Thi ,vc - / I I I a (4 a ^ 44).4 Se-a i t'( w t4- CORPORATE PHONE WAREHOUSING OTHER ✓ SIGNED BY OFFICE/TITLE FULL TIME ( aft a8a.-Igloo WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX NO. APPLICATION DATE (- 1(. -9 . ** 4v e. A/a ? 5/do 781o9 SIZE OF FLOOR SPACE USED SQ. FT. PART -TIME 1990 BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER p IN EMERGENCY NOTIFY PHONE 1 • {.•/ nR l q R a rice e Res t o�a ,vT /1i+ a40 -80S 2.JoR l:art(stacm,, area Mite 9'R IF THIS IS A NEW BUSINESS: WILL THERE BE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR REMODELING? ❑ YES $.NO A CHANGE OF SIGNAGE? ❑ YES N ANO WILL THERE BE INSTALLATION OF COMMERCIAL STORAGE RACKS? ❑ YES *O WHAT WAS THE PREVIOUS USE OF THIS BUILDING /SPACE? IAN d 8 - 100, $100.00 ( ) 100 8 ABOVE, $200.00 IA r a 3 7to '/ I CERTIFY THE ABOVE INF• RM /r'• N IS COR T. „i ec. n! V June 25, 1990 Ms Molly Headly, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Building Permit #5014 Dear Molly: Jerry Hansen Enclosure cc. File: 43/M Sincerely, NORDS \DATA \43LET133.DOC D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. The hydroseeding of the upper portion of the site was completed sometime in March of this year. Unfortunately, I forgot to notify you regarding an inspection of the work and a release of the $1,650 we deposited with the City on February 15, 1990. Enclosed is a copy of the Develoner's Project Warranty Rectuest Form with my signature in section 3, certifying that the work has been completed. Pursuant to section 3 of the form, please inspect the work and release the $1,650 or advise me of any problems you have in releasing the cash bond. Please note that D.E. Construction, Inc. is not responsible for the ongoing watering and maintenance of the landscaping. C-- FEB.: ±1991 0 -0 OF 1 uK1s`�1iLf� PL /\IN,!.41N°" -DEPT. 2510 WESTERN AVE. SUITE 500 • SEATTLE WA 99121 209/726.4400 FAX 209/7291401 L,CI DECONI.15ONE . May 1, 1990 Mr. George Casady Job Traci, Inc. 5025 California Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington 98136 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Landscaping Dear George: This letter is to advise you that Ivy Hills Associates, Inc. is now responsible for the watering of the landscaping. The planting of Phase Ill and parts of' Phase 11 was done during the dormant season. As warmer weather is upon us, it is important that the new plants and lawn areas be adequately watered. The older plantings also need to be watered, but to the extent that they have had an opportunity to establish themselves over the winter months, they are less delicate than the spring plantings. We left hoses in the storage area of building L -4. Sincerely, cc. Joe Devish, Ivy Hills Assoc'. Inc. File: 43/G -1 43LET126.DOC 02/25/91 J�.wertt_ 08:03 D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC.. 0.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 002 %.i Ceista4A. FEB 25 1991 I ui NY OF • PLAN ►t .j rw:p7 or 26.10 tivesi vette. Wes- State,5oO C E. CoNsneuc tew 2510 WESTERN l f. BUM 00• COMM WA9 14) g 1 2. J MN Mt 4400 I'M #001764401 UV/ O GONPISONB April 27, 1990 George Casady 5025 California Avenue S.W. Seattle, WA 98136 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear George: Regarding Issue #2: Sincerely, Molly A. Headley Assistant Planner City of Tukwila cc: Joe Devish, DJB Acquisitions Jerry Hansen, DE Construction I am in receipt of your letter dated April 25, 1990. Regardng issue # 1 Landscape Materials, destruction and replacement and ordinary maintenance: - The concrete curbs installed on 4/24/90 will provide protection in the future for the landscape materials; however, the damaged materials and weeds in the landscape areas need to be dealt with in a timely manner. - In addition, the landscape materials fronting Interurban Avenue which were impacted by subsequent construction by Public Works must be replaced. It is your responsibility to contact Phil Fraser in the Public Works Department and work out an agreement on the replacement of the materials. - Based on the preceding statements and observations on- site, these issues will not be resolved until these issues are resolved either by completing the actual work or by providing me with a work plan for their accomplishment. Action must be taken by your office before May 11, 1990. - Any relocation of Dumpster Units must be approved by the Planning Department. Do not authorize or accomplish any work concerning these units until you have obtained approval from this Department. Submit plans on or before May 11, 1990. If I can be of any assistance in clarifying these issues, please call 433 -1849. JOB TRAC' 206/938-0451 Aven206/938ue Seattle, Washington 98136 rt Ji Ski ATM a e t kV VP' �,. �.�,,. nix• TS INV r k;(3 �fl 7 r,S2 MAE x April 25, 1990 !i ' / r ' iL = ; i ?jj\ 1 APR 2619901 Ms. Molly A. Headley, Assistant Planne CITY CITY OF TUKWILA I_ r�!_�, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard �� � : Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Molly; Pursuant to your letter dated April 20, regarding the above named project, I have contacted the Owner and Contractor for the project and transmitted copies of your letter. The Contractor (Jerry Hansen of DE Construction) has had a tragedy in his family which has made him unavailable on short notice, however, will respond as quickly as he becomes available. The Owner (Joe Devish of DJB Acquisitions) has responded upon receipt of our correspondence. You call attention to three items: 1) Landscape Materials, destruction and replacement and ordinary maintenance. On 4/24 we installed concrete curbs in front of the parking stalls at the lower level. This was done to eliminate the tenants driving onto the landscape areas. Tecton Landscape Division of Tecton Inc. has entered into an agreement with DJB Acquistions to provide ongoing maintenance and replacement of plant materials and is doing so. We have provided the City of Tukwila with a copy of this agreement. This issue is resolved in our opinion. 2) Dumpster Screening Units. DE Construction has accepted the responsibility for relocation of the unit near U4. The second unit the Owner has agreed to provide a "change order" to make corrections, rPti Iv however, to date have not received the costs tffi involved. We agree that the work will be completed, however, must have all proper documentation including costs prior to approving the start of work. This issue is in the process of being resolved. 3) Metro screening fence paint. By your own statement, this work has been completed and properly painted to match our buildings. • This issue is resolved. Summary of the above indicate that both items #1 and #3 have been completed. Item #2 is contracted for and in the process of completion. We refute any threat of ''violation of City . Municipal Code" and fines relating to. same. The Owner and Contractor have resolved two of the three items, and are resolving the final issue you have addressed in all possible haste. If you have any further concerns, please feel free to contact me directly. My telephone number is. 938 -0451. Yours very truly;, JOB TRAC' INC. George M. Casady, President CC: Joe Devish, DJB Acquistions Jerry Hansen, DE Construction sent (JORGE CASADY slreton 5 o C ALIFORNIA AVE. SW PO SE \ TTLEI, Code 98136 Postage S .25 Ceritied Fee .85 Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered .90 Return Receipt showing to whom, Dale, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees S2. 00 Postmark or Date +pifi M pr M t�rc; i +'n + �+ y + $a V,?,`.y{ it Kz 1 L, �T ;�.tT7 3+� ?lr1�',�r: zt SENDER: ;O bmPirte+i te l nI41 a andt2 }when! sddltlonili igatiVIc�$Tar. and complete Itsme 31 �' k• a y c w < e M x 4 e`Y wl' a :4 ■n. 7 l x� n'. r tS t S 7f$k. a . 'fA 7 , . ,.!,/ itX ;?y-'�r•'., t �f^ 1.. ?,� ?. •1rn� i. .;s 'a , �►1t1'� „r,,'"`�lf�:�ia 1 .a •?r .; ' k k A 4 ! c: IfN� � -i' a x . •f . c F i :; 3..,, i v�• f�G .F: », ^ <: 2.4 „�.. z-r4 f, , ,!k4�a fifi 4uti: yol ir;;i ddri * .111:itri:;a,?±,REi; 1 IN1TO - tl i " rivsrsi Il dti:�FellUr d� o.t h li-WI11 ` pruJint:thi ' s.;; ;i aijd ` fron §0 iturntd :Vol Tht retdiin r,Oet e t faU v iiii ; }brovi the nitmi �f' the danon !? <<`dallietiod tQ in s' `dat ofsll idy < For addlt ona N the o services ere evel ow ebl� Co ;p oetmatter"for f.N and check box(ee) fdfAddltional ierVloois) ngUirtid , ;i3 "n' r t s ' 1,)P,Show to- w lt�om;dillwtW sdets, e «'s eddVess `"ti r 2 'ii 11; R trliii 0 IN ¢, 4 )1A ii.it ; :t �Exti charge)t. :s., �„ i;s ' <s3.;44,5; i .6t lkiiita/W!'gef TX.t PS`FriiK38110Mar; X19 9. u x�Fy� j,3 T, . J•.�.w.,nJ >.: .:YS.. °' �LUmher r1. -r P>t12`6i "Alwsyi�ol�t�ifn '�piieturbf., "�idii ol' pent iilil.`pA E%DE LIVERE Adtiroseee7 Addrell ,ONL`Y i regiieskd'nd:fee pa °`" P 726 53 ' 113 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) IR iOMESTiLe i1Et,Ci.01 0E6'60 ,... f,. yY, L•rc t g}l(.,s�� Sit J f DR -13 -8s ...,.. .„• -.. si 1 April 20, 1990 George Casady Job Trac', Inca 5025 California Ave. SW Seattle, WA 98136 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear George: In a letter dated March 9, 1990 you were informed of three issues which required resolution on or before April 15, 1990. The following concerns were: 1. Landscape Materials - destruction, replacement and ordinary maintenance. 2. Dumpster Screening Units 3. Metro screening fence paint As of Friday April 20, 1990 I have had no response concerning issues 1 and 2 and a site check reveals that the conditions previously noted remain the same. The fence painting was accomplished by Metro. Please note that the above conditions constitute a violation of the Tukwila Municipal Code and if they are not resolved by April 27, 1990, you will be cited and fined $500.00 per day. Please call if I can be of assistance. I can be reached at 433- 1849. Sincerely, Molly A. Headley Assistant Planner City of Tukwila April 4, 1990 City of Tukwilla Department of Cmunity Developement Tukwilla, WA 98188 Attn: Molly Re: Hydroseeding at Ivy Hills Apartments Dear. Molly, Sincerely, R.L. Cathcart General Manager RLC /wmw cc: Jerry Hansen, D.E. Construction CATHCART LANDSCAPE SERVICES 13300 SE 30th • Suite 205 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643-0441 MarMig I APR 111990 CITY OF 'I . PLANNING This letter is to inform you that the hydroseed application for the Ivy Hills Apartments has been completed as of March 27, 1990. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 March 8, 1990 George Casady Job Trac', Inc. 5025 California Ave. SW Seattle, WA. 98136 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear George: Sincerely, Mol A. Headley Assistant Planner I reviewed the painting of the fireplace chase enhancers earlier this week and found them to be acceptable. In the process of reviewing them, some issues came to my attention which need to be addressed. The first issue is related to the landscape materials which have been destroyed by vehicles driving over them. I noticed a significant number of damaged plants along the Interurban frontage. Please note that you are required by code to maintain the level of landscape materials indicated on your approved landscape plans. If they are destroyed, they must be replaced with plants of equal size and density. You have two options of dealing with this issue: 1) Install curbing and /or wheel stops to prevent vehicles from driving onto landscape areas; or 2) Replace plants as they are destroyed. The second issue concerns placement and screening of the dumpster units in the upper lot. Your manager indicated that the refuse company would not pick up trash where the dumpsters were located and they have been moved to facilitate pickup. The relocation and screening changes of the dumpsters must be submitted to the Planning department for approval. The third issue concerns the fence around the Metro odor - scrubber. It should be painted to match your apartments. Jerry Hansen indicated that the fence was installed by Metro at your request to provide screening of the scrubber station and to prevent vehicles from driving over the rockery. You may choose to coordinate maintenance efforts with Metro. These issues must be resolved by April 15, 1990. Please call if you have any ' additional questions. If I am unavailable, please ask for Moira Bradshaw. PHONE N (2061 433.1800 Gary I.. VanDascn, Mayor March 5, 1990 D.E. CONSTRUCTION,;IN Dear Molly: As of this date the fireplace chase enhancers have been painted in accordance with your request. Enclosed is a copy of the Developer's Proiect Warranty Reauest Form, dated February 15, 1990, with my signature in section 3 certifying that the work has been completed. Pursuant to section 3 of the form, please inspect the work and release the $900.00 cash bond posted by D.E. Construction, Inc. to warrant completion of the work. As we discussed, the hydroseeding is being delayed until mid -March on advice of the landscaper. Sincerely, Jerry Hansen Enclosure cc. Job Trac', Inc., George Casady Rob Porcaro, Porcaro Painting Leon Whiteside File: 43/M 43LET123.DOC 3425 E. DENNY WAY•SEATTLE WA 98122 206/322-5228 LICt DECONI • 150NE SECTION1- (to • be filled in by,dovol open /attthorizecl byClty..,stall) . :..: NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Ivy Hills Apartments DATE: .2 -15 -90 DEVELOPMENTADORESS: 13820 56th Avenue S. PERMITNO.: 5014 CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: D.E. Construction, Inc. TEL. NO. 322-5228 SHALL BE REFUNDED ADDRESS: 3425 E. Denny da BY MAILING TO: Y Way (please print) • CITY/STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 98122 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DE CRIDEp): _ ' i . . ►} Paint fireplace chase enhancers on all buildings. ''; I : :; t'.19.) is i` r_, ,. �• 4 . As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of . $ 900.00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 3 / 31 / 90 ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. It I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed above prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. D.L. Construction, Inc. • SIGNED: NZ-te-ti-iii TITLE: Jerry I ansen /Genera]. Manager ' ».+3::a::.1::a.: '..: v}:: ot;:;.::; N:; i:::.: ::.::;:�:: :2:i2:::J:4::;;•::::. G'::V:Fa:v �::J:i:�w:J;4 :.: � .: SECTION> `'(to` e'completa l b) SIGNED: AMOUNT: CASH 0 CASH EQUIVALENT CRY RECEIPT NO. NJ. :v:;JM % V> CITY OF TU DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST .FORM ty : ata fs?)' SE CTION 3 (10 be completed by d©volopet 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. ce3(457 At/c, DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: CHECKED BY: or , A,./. I Wave reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. a AUTHORIZED BY: Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD RECEIVED BY: THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO DE ACCEPTED. DEPARTMENT HEAD: DEPOSITED THIS DATE: Alt work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been ,.r.� DATE: 3A /0 DEPARTMENT: PIG,�i i�ui SEC TION: Q; (t o comp/o tod y :'still AMOUNT: CASH EQUIVALENT- LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: CASH CITY CHECK NO. RELEASED BY: FINANCE DEPT. ♦rrvn..:W.....,v.....vv. ..w v... .. v........:\. rv. r.:.... nr..,, r. n. vvw...:. w:: iJrnn,,.:,.. v.: vwv::;::»: Si:;;•:; 4:;; iK\;;:;:; v :;•:v:v:ui,v:,;;K:K:;4:;;w.ti;;: w:4.. '•. ri:;i4: et•AN .. nm ,v.....:.•n.:J \;::::.v......... n......., Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 07111160 CITY OF TU a : JILA Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST .FORM t•.. i:J}ww� <t«iJi:.tinii<:•i.. \v`ah nv..`.•M v}. n4L: 4CtJ% 9AYni: W{: 4G.... vYr.: M: isitvm.: it< ifT 1>. i< iMCOtvtKSA<. vrVPAtaV�\< LJ�W:»\ i4: 2: 44:: is 47M1\` 4. 1NP}. P.:< t: ti: J: ih ti. 40.W Ini.i vo*>>. V.< 6% nVJN. 1::: 0■Woliwi%+ t4C .W.e.i.v1.% « 00, .Ji}:C: \ \Wh : +%i. Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 07111M0 ECTION X - (to b filled I n by d evelop er l authorized by City staff} NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Ivy Hills Apartments DATE: 2 -15 -90 CEVELOPMENTADDRESS: 13820 56th Avenue S. PERMITNO.: 5014 ASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: D.E. Construction, Inc. TEL. NO. 322 -5228 HALL BE REFUNDED ADDRESS: 3 425 E. Denny a y Y MAILING TO: y lease print) . CITY/STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 98122 ESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE .ANSIDOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBEQ): _ w U Z . w a U.1 w ¢i ow W Q w Q aQ cir • mw Ous 2 N u ,z O w a Er D n. . . i t Paint fireplace chase enhancers on all buildings. As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 900.00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting • documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 3 / 31 / 90 ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed above prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. D.E. Construction, Inc. SIGNED: t/4fi4 N� y TITLE: Jerry Hansen/General Manager S4:a.L<`vt 440 ::4,iJ<i;4.a*2404.:6At4x <4.4. �:: iYSNa: avalbRtaa±Jb..4iaaiQ:+ia:a 2aNS :a<::vk:xi2i:aYutiA.Uaii is S.vtlotN aiY'aJ::+ax"4>z«:,: aC :iN:a:iSJ:aw.2::fade a:::::a>', : .:: :<.m: ::.J:a::F<Y:: `SECTION2'(16 be completed by: Cit !staff) THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. S IGNED: DEPARTMENT HEAD: AMOUNT: 0 CASH () CASH EQUIVALENT DEPOSITED THIS DATE: CRY RECEIPT NO RECEIVED BY: • .• 4 .... .•• " ''<:t<:<i:::44i,..4n,;:aca iJ:' WavwMGO.say. , .. Mh W. Kww •naay.4:44tiWCNFrii<<tid...+Mi veTweeaoivien WJ %<.4.1.. a.<»wn<va.AQ% <G .. .a •SECTION 3 (tu be completed by developer All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. DEVELOPERS REPRESENTATIVE: DATE: '• ' ` " :Ito be: Ggmp /eted /ty; > > >! . .. I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore P authorize the release the above of cash assignment. CHECKED BY: AUTHORIZED BY: DEPARTMENT: /% 4iiv w 4T<4:iwicWw4,ve%<itiiaViiii%aX• .J } } %iWM/eX 4i:4:17MSO OON0094.1v ONsW.J:tONiiv:Sitiriv*:SriC:«AY. .W:ia M0.`' 7NiW:t•}K.N7V}: OCNIXWAK'Ph'•X~..JY.9:+' '...YQ:J.W ;* •%S:\` YOC}: SSC: N: }7C«ii:4:i:4KS :<3SS:SCf. . %•MO P:. 4 ta b ,. comf %eted:by ' ::: < » < °> s AMOUNT: CASH EQUIVALENT - LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: CASH CITY CHECK NO. RELEASED BY: , FINANCE DEPT. CITY OF TU a : JILA Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST .FORM t•.. i:J}ww� <t«iJi:.tinii<:•i.. \v`ah nv..`.•M v}. n4L: 4CtJ% 9AYni: W{: 4G.... vYr.: M: isitvm.: it< ifT 1>. i< iMCOtvtKSA<. vrVPAtaV�\< LJ�W:»\ i4: 2: 44:: is 47M1\` 4. 1NP}. P.:< t: ti: J: ih ti. 40.W Ini.i vo*>>. V.< 6% nVJN. 1::: 0■Woliwi%+ t4C .W.e.i.v1.% « 00, .Ji}:C: \ \Wh : +%i. Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 07111M0 February 15, 1990 Ms Molly Headley, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Molly: During the recent months, the banks and other areas on the site have withstood two major record rainfalls without any serious erosion. The bank between building U -4 and the recreation center was hydroseeded just prior to one of the torrential downpours. Much of the seed was washed down the hill, but the bank remained stable. This heavy rain took place prior to the installation and connection to the storm system of the roof downspouts on all of the upper buildings. This area will be re- seeded when weather permits along with other areas planned to have lawn as groundcover. Through the balance of the winter weather, D.E. Construction, Inc. will maintain and repair any damage to the steep embankments on the site that currently are not adequately protected against erosion by hydroseeding or other methods. When weather is conducive to proper germination of seeds, D.E. Construction, Inc. will complete the hydroseeding of the site. Sincerely, tie-st4frirle Jerry Hansen cc. Cathcart Landscape Services Leon Whiteside Job Trac', Inc. D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. File: 43/M, 43/G 43LET120.DOC • D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. •i 3425 E. DENNY WAY•SEATTLE WA 98122 206/322-5228 LIC# DECONI • 150NE February 15, 1990 Ms Molly Headley, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Molly: Enclosed herewith please find two DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORMS, one in the amount of $900.00 for completion of the painting of the fireplace chase enhancers, and one in the amount of $1,650.00 for completion of the hydroseeding of the project. Also attached to the forms is the documentation for the value of the work remaining to be completed, and a cashier's check for the aggregate amount of the two forms. As you know, this work has been impossible to conclude due to poor weather conditions. As soon as the weather is acceptable, we will complete the work. I trust that the enclosed is satisfactory and that you are now in a position to accept the final building in the complex by signing for the Certificate of Occupancy. Sincerely, -Vesed7., Jerry Hansen Enclosures cc. Leon Whiteside D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. Job Trac', Inc. File: 43/M, 43/G 43LET121.DOC k VEB 2 199° \ 3425 E. DENNY WAY•SEATTLE WA 98122 2061322.5228 LIC# DECONI ' 150NE SEC 1 (to b e filled in by developer / authorized b y City st f) NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: I Hills Apartments DATE: 2 -15 -90 DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: 13820 56th Avenue S. PERMITNO.: 5014 CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: D.F. Construction. Inc. TEL. NO. 322 -5228 SHALL BE REFUNDED BY MAILING TO: ADDRESS: 3425 F. Denny Way (please print) CITY /STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 98122 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBED): :g Hydroseed portions of the upper site which have wisuf'ficient ground •coveir . ■ ; < < , l'1 9J i -. , , As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 1,650.00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 3 / 31 / 90 ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed ab9ve prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. D.E. Construction, inc. SIGNED: t /V�c ,,,` / TITLE: Jerry Hansen /General Manager _ ._�.. .,,. . .. .... ...... .... ,.:_:..u:.tisxiiiYR_ ti4Y.? i<::•..:: ti{•> Yx•: 1Y• 55t:• 1: f+ ebyi': 3v1LtiffAR: CC.\>.• 3r:: Y.•• ic: CiYY: isSV`\: C4' 2:; a\ b' Y. f•: 'a: \`::a...:tJGV':.i'G:S'tbw., "'♦`:22ku::S•:i:::4 "..w:2 x CITY OF TINILA DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST . FORM SIGNED: • ' COd7%t l p .. THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. Ito CASH CITY RECEIPT NO. AMOUNT: CHECKED BY: " DID to be cor d 10 be Complete CASH CITY CHECK NO. CASH EQUIVALENTC •9EPOSITED THIS DATE: SECTION 3 ( to be completed by dVie 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: AUTHORIZED BY: Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: — Developer — Finance Department — Permit Coordinator, DCD DEPARTMENT HEAD: RECEIVED BY: k AMOUNT: CASH EQUIVALENT— LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: Al! work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been I have completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. • I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. DATE: reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. DEPARTMENT: w.,,.0.v. w.tt::a :u <k;w>•61:11 v:.• > aS: i:: aav: b» axoocr N:ax >mwcaxo>.wrxvccw:. muacroaxr�a :a»:a >. roc» o> xcx�n +xv >x xxcarxsc <awn>mrruo>xrr>: xaxc:ax:•r.;sasmo' xvx•XO.V.Noxvnxwx+x•>Haw w.vav ICCOX:uvx.:.M.X , M,»:a: RELEASED BY: / , FINANCE DEPT. c:;r <;::';;' w:.: : <:wvx:.acra:wx::oY.w>::;sxwaas v,w. far>.,, w., wcawcaw: uw :a^c.�w..,�w,v>xw.va:,:x.n „�.aa rAUwGa ;wZw:xw:aLatan:,v,',�tafac3ca;: c:w” Sow: oo3ci�auca ::tco'""'aawaw>xo>xaSfa: Y;: a: C. owakNhxt ;::�:rµ:;x;:•:w:utoct<2:i�ara Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: — Developer — Finance Department — Permit Coordinator, DCD ............................. • RICK CATHCART Owner City of Tukwila Dept. of COmmunity Development Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Sincerely, Cathcart Landscape Services CATHCART LANDSCAPE SERVICES 13300 SE 30th • Suite 209 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643-0441 rk - • ) 1990 D.E, Dear M011y, This letter is to follow up on our conversation on 1/22/90, Ivy Hills Apartments, Phase 3. The landscape has been completed for buildings U-1,U-2,U-3,U-4 and the upper berm area. The upper berm,north and south ends, as well as, area between U-1 and U-2 will be hydroseed with a clover mix. Hydroseeding can be done when weather conditions became more favorable for seed germination. Estimated time of hydroseed application will be in March 1990 depending on weather conditions. Estimated cost for this hydroseeding is $1,100.00. FEB 27 1990 SECTION i - {to b e f)lled In by developer / authorized by City s NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Ivy Hills Apartments DATE: 2 -15 -90 DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: 13820 56th Avenue S. PERMIT NO.: 5014 CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: D.E. Construction, Inc. TEL. NO. 322 -5228 SHALL BE REFUNDED ADDRESS: 3425 E. Denny a BY MAILING TO: Y Way (please print) CITY /STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 98122 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE D SCRIBED : € Paint fireplace chase enhancers on all buildings. i � •1 ! .: i`lYJ As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 900.00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 3 / 31 / 90 ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed above prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. D.E. Construction, Inc. SIGNED: V",, X . TITLE: Jerry Hansen /General Manager i2 i...... a12Y3: dbiL.... Q :.V:SQ.:A'+a::ix.::zV \i;... K : < 'W}..` . :. 2-u2i4hV. • { CS C.CkOrYL�iC:SQ ` p` '`Ch(t... .: o..y:, ::..- •�w {y'1."V:.\4,..•. CL\`2ry1tG4a g.,.,•. WC{h.. \..:.v.....CS!a: •... fi«fi:•:.g w: • • - CITY OF TUGILA DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORM ON : : : :o b ;<,; com let ed<"I THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. SIGNED: Th a. - AL ea dte DEPARTMENT HEAD: AMOUNT: 4900, 00 CASH l CASH EQUIVALENT4F48g55. 1gj DEPOSITED THIS DATE: CITY RECEIPT NO. RECEIVED BY: %11'e -haled 1k� SECtlON 3 • ( to be completed b devg DEVELOPERS REPRESENTATIVE: be c9m pleted CHECKED BY: CASH CITY CHECK NO. C;;; i;:\ CSt \S4i;tS4.4�i;0 }:i4 }:5,4:'%•T }}: ti4x:4:5• }:o } } \+C;4iCi+n4 ax4o . . ............ a. ......... ..:u 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS AUTHORIZED BY: /Ns vmw} wu4T•: W}\ vn..•\ 4hT:++ T%• k' 1. 4: f: 1\ 4}%r 74}} ktiN} M{ tiv}} M4USC�; B?? Yn: VOi} OLQ A1 b\ 1W. i{ i: iW+% tC 4 : 4 }}% ttAtiCiA � 4 ? k k ViJ %irri:Li: 4}J4:1∎41t4::.`X ... K. }}}].X':.`X•Mt:iKM.}=PN=N.Kiii• ^ "!•}X•ii•C AMrd'eX7 :tittL:A: ^`•S+KV ION ; fa be ' com leted 'by >:City f Kj> AMOUNT: CASH EQUIVALENT- LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD All worts identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. RELEASED BY: DATE: .:• a'c :w•a••uw.ti•' ;. ay.a4�aw.4c:. DEPARTMENT: , FINANCE DEPT. Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD Sold to J { 1'�. �`� u r• :I ' 1990 & Colo fiuui • ORCfI ^+� E1VErD • WHITE— VENDOR; YELLOW — ACCTG; PINK— SUPER; GRN —SUPER PORCARO PRINTING 9945 51st Avenue South IMPORTANT NOTICE: INVOICES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PAYMENT UNLESS OUR PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER IS SHOWN. INCLUDE A PACKING LIST WITH EACH SHIPMENT. ALL SHIPMENTS VIA COMMON CARRIER MUST BE PREPAID. THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS CONTINGENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRINTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. Dote Invoice Number Locotlon roe. Q Job Nome 7'U I cAt9A - J e tmucizzl2_ —2:Jr — • 1 as /qv i ; Its {-c 2 C — rczk.k.t.o . i I Q, . V r c1 C9J�..Q..C1 Yr� � �J OalL loo Seattle, WA 98118 RECEIVED BY 1 1 1 1 ORDERED BY { FFB 2 1990 Bol 5 ._INVO COST GE.,vy 4 ( 00 CY D 00 ' } 721 -042 1 1 1 1 1 1 DATE RECEIVED RICK CATHCART Owner City of Tukwila Dept. of Qmnunity Development Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Sincerely, Cathcart Landscape Services cc Jerry en, '.E. Construction CATHCART LANDSCAPE SERVICES 13300 SE 30th • Suite 209 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643 -0441 J /i',j 29 i Dear Nblly, This letter is to follow up on our conversation. on 1/22/90, Ivy Hills Apartments, Phase 3. The landscape has been completed for buildings U- 1,U- 2,U -3,U -4 and the upper berm area. The upper berm,north and south ends, as well as, area between U -1 and U -2 will be hydroseed with a clover mix. Hydroseeding can be done when weather . conditions become more favorable for seed germination. Estimated time of hydroseed application . will be in March 1990 depending on weather conditions. Estimated cost for this hydroseeding is $1,100.00. • Sincerely, Dear Mr. Devish, nrs y'.:4 CI7'Y OF TUKWILA 620n (Ili'1'110ENTERIIOULEV.4R11, TUKWI /.:1, I1:•IS/11,%T,.V 9s188 January 2, 1990 D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. 1929 Tacoma Ave. South Tacoma, WA 98402 Attn: Joe R. Devish I received a memo concerning the status of landscaping at Ivy Hills Apartments in Tukwila from Rick Cathcart (Cathcart Landscaping Services). He stated that the landscaping has been completed for buildings U -1, U -2 as well as the majority of the upper berm area. He indicated that the remainder will be installed after construction is completed by the general contractor. Incomplete landscaping will only affect occupancy approval for buildings which are not complete, Buildings U3 and U -4. The initial agreement stipulated that all requirements, including landscaping, must be met prior to approval of Phase Three. Phase Three refers to all of the upper level units. We can break up the approval into two sections, U -1 and 2, U -3 and 4. If agreed, each section will be approved separately and I can assure that you that the buildings will be approved for occupancy if they meet previously agreed upon standards. Please call my office to schedule a site visit. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call. I can be reached at 433 -1849. Molly A. Headley Assistant Planner cc: Rick Cathcart, Cathcart Landscape Services Jerry Hansen, D.E. Construction Co., Inc. George Casady, Job -Trac, Inc. File I'IIOn (2(16) d3. I. UU Ganv 1.. t au!nseu, Alav,,r RICK CATHCART Owner R.L. Cathcart City. of Tukwila • Dept. of Community Development Tukwila, WA 98188 CATHCART LANDSCAPE SERVICES 13300 SE 30th • Suite 209 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643 -0441 Dear Molly, This letter is to follow up on our conversation on 12/20/89, Ivy Hills Apartments, Phase 3. The landscape has been completed for buildings U -1, U -2 and the majority of the upper berm area. Buildings U -3, U -4 and the remainder of the upper berm will be completed when General Contractor reaches completion of construction. The owners want reassurance that this partial landscape will not impair occupancy of buildings U -1 and U -2 Buildings. Sincerely, Landscape Services City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Wash.. 98188 Attn: Molly A Headley. Assistant Planner Ref: Ivy Hills Apartment Complex Dear Ms. Headley: I am in receipt of your letter of December 18. 1989. received this office 12/21/89. regarding the chase .. enhancers for fireplace chimney units for our apartment complex. After review of same. and subseauent telephone conversations with your- self and Mr. Jack Pace. Please be advised that I am instrucing our General Contractor for this project. D.E. Construction. Inc. to furnish and install these units on this project. We are complying with this directive under duress. JRD /id cc: D.E. Construction C�.. Inc. Job -Trac, Inc. D.J.B. ACQUISITIONS, INC. General Partner for IVY HILLS ASSOCIATES 1929 Tacoma Ave. So. Tacoma, Washington 98402 December 22, 1989 ncerely your DE•U 27 1 989 ns. Inc. R. Devish. Se - Treas. ' s. C. Dear Mr. Devish: tg- CITY OF TUKWILA 620u5UUTHCENTERBOULEVARD. TIIK11•ll.:I, II•;Ic11 /\G•/•(/A' ; December 18, 1989 Sincerely, Molly A. Headley L Assistant Planner D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. 1929 Tacoma Ave. South Tacoma, WA 98402 Attn: Joe R. Devish, Sec - Treas. Re: Ivy Hills Apartment Complex cc: Rick Beeler, Planning Director Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner IYlu.Vli r, I?(u;l •13:).l,suu Gary L. I ,nDusrn. Mayor I have received your letter of December 13, 1989 concerning Ivy Hills Apartments. The issue of the chase enhancers for fireplace chimney units for the apartments must be resolved by Friday December 22, 1989. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of your options should you decide not to comply with the BAR conditions concerning the fireplace chimney screening units. The units were approved and are required by the Board of Architectural Review. They must be installed as noted on the plan unless the BAR reverses the decision or an alternative is presented to the Planning staff and approved. A Certificate of Occupancy for Phase Three involving the upper level of units will not be authorized until you have complied with this condition. You have the option of applying to the BAR for a reversal of its decision. You will need to submit a design review application to the Planning Department for processing. Depending on when your application is received you will be scheduled for the BAR hearing. At this time, we are scheduling applicants for March and have a nearly full agenda. Again, a Certificate of Occupancy will not be apporved until after the hearing resolves the issue and you have complied with the terms of the decision. I will expect a response to this letter by Friday December 22, 1989. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please call if you have any additional questions. I can be reached at 433 -1849. JRD/ j d City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington, 98188 -•�;,r s �; 5 .• J , r r .y 1 0 D.J.B. ACQUISITIONS, INC. General Partner for IVY HILLS ASSOCIATES 1929 Tacoma Ave. So. Tacoma, Washington 98402 December 13, 1989 Attn: Ms. Molly A. Headley, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development Ref: Ivy Hills Apartment Complex Dear Ms. Headley: cc: Mr. G. Eric Pucher, Vice Pres. PFF Mr. Jerry Hansen, D.E. Construction Co., Inc. Mr. George Casady, President, Job -Trac, Inc. }ttl Yr`^ YOM I am advised by Mr. Jerry Hansen, Manager of D.E. Construction Co., Inc., our General Contractor for the completion of Ivy Hills Apartment Complex that you have expressed a concern about the installation of the chase enhancers for the fireplace chimney units. The purpose of this letter is to advise you that as the owner we have deleted these units from the contract. This action is necessary due to the magnitude of cost over run we have and are experiancing on the project. Further, upon investigation with those of knowledge, we find that these units do not afford and real purpose, rather they are strictly an aesthetic enhancement which unfortunately we cannot justify at this juncture. We wish to thank you for your assistance in bringing this project to a constructive conclusion and want to wish you a Very Happy and Joyous Holiday Season. Si cerely yo --- Acq 1 : 1989 rs: c(ns, Inc. R. Devi h, Sec - Treas. `;. :44,'33 :Ltr,71. e,�.`�Wt"l CITY OF TUKWILA 620 SOUTIICIiNTE:R 1101'LEV IRD, TUti{t'll..%, II';1,ti1I1Ncro,v981, November 28, 1989 Jerry Hansen D.E. Construction 3425 E. Denny Way Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Jerry: ;v. h.7 ;e'i. I4h..\ l i gcm 433 mm This letter is in response to your letter dated November 21, 1989 concerning screening of foundation areas (crawl space) at Ivy Hills Apartments. You are proposing to install cedar latticework between the columns and from the grade beam level to the underside of the first floor as illustrated on the attached drawings. The latticework will be painted to match the siding color of the buildings. Additionally, a 1/4 " mesh hardware cloth will be installed behind the lattice to prevent the accumulation of debris beneath the building. Giro L. VanI)nsrn, Mayor Your letter indicates the need for this type of screening for building U -3 and the two buildings to the north of U -3. You stated that the building to the south has a different foundation system which allows the crawl space to be conventionally framed and sided. This proposal is satisfactory with the Planning department as stated. It appears to provide the screening that is necessary and will tie in architecturally with other elements in the structure. Sincerely, Molly A. Headley cc: Duane Griffin, Building Official George Casady, Job Trac', Inc. Joe Devish, D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. Leon Whiteside, D.E. Construction, Inc. vile: Ivy Hills Design Review 604 r 150.024 JEH /ko 10/25/85 WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO / �� 9 CITY O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE GROUP 5 APARTMENTS PRD, CITY FILE NO. 85 -29 -PRD, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, DIRECTING THE CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR TO MAKE CHANGES IN THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application was filed with the City of Tukwila seeking approval for a Planned Residential Development pursuant to Chapter 18.46 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, said application was reviewed by the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review at a public hearing held on August 22, 1985, End at the conclusion of said hearing the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review adopted findings of fact, conclusions of law and a recommendation to the City Council that the application be approved subject to certain conditions, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 16, 1985, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission concerning the PRD and at the conclusion of such hearing determined to adopt the Planning Commission's findings and conclusions as the City Council's own and to approve the application, subject to certain conditions, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non - Significance for the proposed PRD on August 22, 1985, now, therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval of PRD Designation and Plan. A Planned Residential Development designation is hereby approved for that certain property commonly referred to as the Group 5 Apartments PRD, City File No. 85 -29 -PRD, which property is conclusions contained herein; 2 more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The City Council hereby further approves the development plan for such Planned Residential Development submitted to the City on June 6, 1985 and contained in City File No. 85 -29 -PRD. Approval of the PRD designation and the development plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Diversifying the building designs and locations to create a less monotinous visual image and a diversity of designs; 2) Provision of pedestrian linkages between 56th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South throughout the proposal as approved by the Planning Department; 3) Location of existing substantial trees on the site plan and modification of the site plan to retain some of these trees to the greatest extent possible, subject to review and approval of the Planning Department; 4) Inclusion in the landscaping plan of vegetation of sufficient size to accomplish the criteria and l J 5) Verification of sufficient tap water pressure by the Public Works Department; 6) Verification by the Fire Department of the vinyl siding toxicity being within safe levels; 7) Payment of a fair proportionate share of the costs of widening and improving 56th Avenue South when the same is undertaken by the City, and in the event a local improvement district is formed for the purpose of making improvements to 56th Avenue South, to participate in, and waive protest of, such LID. The City Council specifically finds that this condition is necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impact of the proposed PRD upon 56th Avenue South. Section 2. Adoption of Findings and Conclusions. The City Council hereby adopts the Findings and Sections 2 and 3 of the Conclusions contained in the City of Tukwila Planning Division Planning Commission Staff Report attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Duties of Planning Director. The Planning Director is directed to amend the City's Official Zoning Map to reflect the PRD designation for the property described on Exhibit A as set forth in Section 1 above and to refer to this Ordinance for the conditions of approval. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASH- INGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this I/9 day of s Z;ZEi& Le s ... h., 1985. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: C LERK, XINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATT'RNEY FILED WITH THE CI CLER PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCI PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 1369 APPROVED: 3 9/16/85 1/04/85 11/08/85 - in Summary form, 11/13/85 Exhibit A •.`; }�'�'c� ' ra "}7,Xj''�G %�'R! {�✓:,4,J.:`�S. �r t art uwv�•�•t•r �zfj rl. s';�k �. ?,�. "si`iNni °,wkt �`��:i7'ir. �.� • ?r';S7 ?�:tF:l: %�:.�:w. z�`..'JSw BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED NORTH 74.04' EAST AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD), WHICH POINT IS DESCRIBED AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTION DEED DATED DECEMBER 26. 1903, AND RECORDED JANUARY 22, 1904, IN VOLUME 362 OF DEEDS. PAGE 625, RECORDS OF THE AUDITOR OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 45 EAST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 74.04' EAST 125 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 EAST 162.435 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 WEST 115.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45'49' WEST 181.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: ALSO; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED NORTH 74.04' EAST AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) WHICH POINT IS• DESCRIBED AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTION DEED DATED DECEMBER 26, 1903 AND RECORDED JANUARY 22, 1904, IN VOLUME 362 OF DEEDS, PAGE 625, RECORDS OF THE AUDITOR OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 74 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED 125 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 74 EAST 180.204 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 44 °51' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 407.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 °58'45" WEST 161.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 °49' WEST 437.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL AND 133.50 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE AFORESAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH, (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD); AND IN; Exhibit A Ord, #1369 150.024 JEH /ko 10/30/85 On SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 13 I, 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE GROUP 5 APARTMENTS PRD, CITY FILE NO. 85 -29 -PRD, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, DIRECTING THE CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR TO MAKE CHANGES IN THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , 1985, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance No. l .2h which provides as follows: Section 1. Approves a Planned Residential Development designation and plan for certain property adjacent to Interurban Avenue South (across from the Foster Golf Links) and 51st Avenue South, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached to this summary, subject to seven (7) conditions relating to building design, pedestrian linkages, trees, landscaping, water pressure, siding and improvements to 56th Avenue South. Section 2. Adopts Findings and Conclusions relating to the PRD designation and plan. Section 3. Directs the Planning Director to amend the City's Official Zoning Map to reflect the PRD designation and to reference this ordinance. Section 4. Establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of , 1985. Publish: Record - Chronicle, 11/08/85 CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON Exhibit A ALSO; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED NORTH 74 °04' EAST AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD), WHICH POINT IS DESCRIBED AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTION DEED DATED DECEMBER 26, 1903, AND RECORDED JANUARY 22, 1904, IN VOLUME 362 OF DEEDS, PAGE 625, RECORDS OF THE AUDITOR OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 45 °49' EAST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE. NORTH 74 °04' EAST 125 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 °49' EAST 162.435 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 °58'45" WEST 115.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 °49' WEST 181.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED NORTH 74 °04' EAST AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) WHICH POINT IS DESCRIBED AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTION DEED DATED DECEMBER 26, 1903 AND RECORDED JANUARY 22, 1904, IN VOLUME 362 OF DEEDS, PAGE 625, RECORDS OF THE AUDITOR OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 74 °04' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD) PRODUCED 125 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 74 °04' EAST 180.204 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 44 °51' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 407.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 °58'45" WEST 161.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 °49' WEST 437.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL AND 133.50 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE AFORESAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH, (FORMERLY LEMON ROAD); AND IN; Exhibit A Ord. #1369 Exhibit B Ord. #1369 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 22, 1985 FINDINGS 1. Generally the site is predominantly a fairly steep slope (averaging 45% and maximum of 90%), except for a generally level portion at the southwest and northwest corners of the site (Exhibit A). Apartment units are proposed in two rows running parallel with the property and topography (Exhibit B). The westerly row of buildings will feature basement covered parking, while the upper (westerly) units will feature on grade uncovered parking (Exhibit C). The easterly units will be two stories with basement consisting of a total of 56 dwelling units (Exhibit D). The uphill westerly 48 units will be of a slightly less building mass (Exhibit E ). Landscaping of the site con- sists of perimeter and interior landscaping (Exhibits F & G). A recreation building, pool, sport court and grass play area are featured at the southerly corner of the site (Exhibit 6 & H). The topography of the site constrains access for the easterly units to two points on Interurban Avenue South (Exhibit B). Access to the westerly units is from two points on 56th Avenue South. Directly to the north and across Interurban Avenue South is located the Foster Golf Links Public Golf Course, and directly westerly of the site and across 56th Avenue South is the existing multi - family development of the Terrace Apartments. Interurban Avenue South consists of two lanes in each direction. A single lane in each direction within a 30 -foot right -of -way is improved in 56th Avenue South. Parking for 208 cars is provided including 56 covered parking stalls. For the westerly, or upper, 48 apartment units a total of 96 parking stalls are pro- vided per TMC 18.56.050. For the easterly 56 dwelling units a total of 112 parking stalls are provided. Vehicular connection between the two parking areas is not included in the site plan. The westerly 56 apartment units con- tain 7 one - bedroom units and 49 two - bedroom units. The easterly 48 apartment units are comprised of 24 one - bedroom units and 24 two - bedroom units. Building materials will consists of dark gray or black composition shingle roofs, gray or light blue vinyl siding, white trim and windows, and gray or light blue railings and lattice. Exterior illumination is not indicated on 1 the site plan. 2. Various mutliple family development proposals have been sought on the pro- perty, the latest of which featured a combination of multiple family and offi- ces (81- 12 -W). 3. Since the proposal lies within the Interurban Special Review District, the BAR must review the proposal per the criteria of TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060 (TMC 18.60.030(2)(e)). 4. The proposed Planned Residential Development (PRD) requires approval per the criterial of TMC 18.46.110(4). Page 2 5. The proposal complies with the landscaping and recreation space requirements of TMC 18.52.020 and .060. Preliminary calculations indicate that 20,600 square feet of recration space is required (103 x 200 square feet = 20,600 square feet). Required landscaping areas constitute a total of 19,941 square feet, of which 10%, or 1,994 square feet, may be credited to the recreation space requirement, thereby yielding a 18,606 square feet of recreation space required. The pro- posal provides a total of 34,300 square feet of open fairly level lawn areas, sport court, pool and recreation building. Therefore, the recreation require- ments appear to be met in the proposal. 6. The Environmental Checklist (EPIC - 277 -85) indicates the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant will be followed in the development on this property. A determination of non - significance was issued for the proposal per the state Environment Policy act of 1971, as amended. CONCLUSIONS 1. BAR Criteria TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060(4): A. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(1): Relationship of Structure to Site The proposal provides the normal landscaping transition from Interurban Avenue South and 56th Avenue South. Sidwalks will be required along both streets, however, additional pedestrian pathways through and inside the development appear needed except at the southerly portions of the pro- perty and around the recreation building. Walkways or pathways from the upper westerly units to the lower easterly units occur at only three locations. Additional pedestrian linkage should occur due to the reaso- nably anticipated pedestrian usage of the westerly upper units of the recreation facility at the southerly portion of the site and Interurban Avenue South where public transit may be utilized. The parking areas in the proposal run almost the full length of the site with only slight interruption by landscaping along the westerly portions of the site. This design does not appear to "...moderate the visual impact of large paved areas." Therefore, the parking layout should be revised to better minimize this visual impact. Due to the topography of the property, the lower easterly units will be located such that the roofs will be below the existing grade elevation of 56th Avenue South. The roofs of the westerly upper units appear to extend approximately 10 feet above the existing grade elevation of this street. Such location of these buildings on the steeply sloped property is an appropriate site plan considering the westerly abutting properties. The overall visual impact on the easterly abutting public golf course will be the appearance of essentially a continuous wall of development. While this visual image of the multi family units carved into the hillside may appear startling upon initial development of the proposal, maturation of landscaping will substantially reduce this impact over time. This does not appear to be an unreasonable projected impact of the proposal. Page 3 B. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(2): Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The proposal appears to present to Interurban Avenue South a design that overall is harmonious in the design, materials and colors. Landscaping which is appropriate to the adjoining properties is provided. A traffic engineering report indicates safe and adequate access to Interurban Avenue South and 56th Avenue South. These streets will adequately accom- modate the increased traffic. However, 56th Avenue South will function near to capacity. C. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(3): Landscape and Site Treatment The final grading of the site appears to essentially clear the site of all existing vegetation. The final grades create some level areas, par- ticularly where landfill is necessary at the southerly corner of the site. The overall impact of grading appears to be .of producing "...an inviting and stable appearance." The landscape plan appears to treat Interurban Avenue South as a formal street via regularly spaced deciduous trees. Due to the desirable vista from the property to the east, a public golf course and Duwamish River environment, landscaping along this street should be compatible with the City's future plans for improvement and landscaping of Interurban Avenue South. Within the site the landscaping appears to soften the overall impact of the buildings and appears to consider the view potential from the westerly uphill units. Exterior lighting details were not provided, thereby preventing review at this time. If the applicant can provide these details or a general description of sufficient detail in the public meeting, final review and approval of the exterior illumination could be deferred to the Planning Department. D. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(4): Building Design The proposed buildings are compatible in scale with existing commercial, multi family residential and single family residential development in the area, of which multiple family residential predominates the westerly area of the property and the golf course and commercial development dominates the more easterly areas of the property. The design components of the individual buildings display "...good proportions and relationship to one another." The colors chosen of the, dark __gray__or _bl_a_ck_roof,__gray or light blue vinyl siding, white trim and white lattice and railings, and white window trim are "harmonious" with each other. Details of exterior illumination were not provided, but should be "harmonious" with the pro- posed building design. Sufficient "variety and detail" in terms of building form and massing is provided on the site between the upper westerly units and the lower easterly units. The two types of units are dissimilar. Perhaps the major criticism of the lower easterly units is the essentially straight line of the same design with a great deal of regularity without significant interruption. This could present a mono- tonous appearance to Interurban Avenue South and the public golf course facility. Page 4 E. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(5): Miscellaneous Structure and Street Furniture Dumpster locations indicated on the proposal are enclosed on three sides by an unspecified fence. The design, composition and colors of this fence should be discussed for determination of their acceptability. F. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(a): Proposed development design should be sen- sitive to the natural amenities of the area The essentially repetitive pattern of the proposed units in the develop- ment and the essentially uninterrupted large linear parking areas are questionably "sensitive" to the easterly public golf course facility and the Duwamish River environment. Breaking up the units, particularly of the easterly lower level, and varying the spacing between the buildings will reduce the overall visual impact of the development. Further enhancing this image would be exploring landscaping areas for significant contribution to the interruption of the site plan. G. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(b): Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities As mentioned in the previous finding the repetitive, monotonous plan of the property imposes upon the easterly public golf course facility. The aforementioned recommendations will substantially reduce this impact. H. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(c): Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on site pedestrian circulation Since vehicular access from the easterly lower level and Interurban Avenue South is prevented to and from the upper westerly units, the con- venience and normally anticipated access to and from these uphill units is precluded. In addition, the proposal contains minimal pedestrian linkages between the upper and lower units and to Interurban Avenue. I. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(d): Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complimentary to the district in which it is located The location of the proposed buildings and the landscaping provided pro- duces overall general compatibility with "neighboring uses" which are relative to the westerly existing multi family development. However, the repetitive nature of the site plan raises the the question of com- patibility with the easterly public golf course facility and Duwamish River environment. Otherwise the proposal is "...complimentary to the district..." of the C -2 and R -3 zone. The development reflects the nor- mally expected and experienced development within these zones, par- ticularly in the situation of the narrow trapazoidial configuration of the subject site. Page 5 C J. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(e): Proposed development should seek to mini- mize significant adverse environmental impacts The major environmental impacts associated with this proposal is the grading of the property which includes total disruption of existing vege- tation. The soils consultant has indicated that this presents no problem for development as long as their recommendations are followed. The applicant has indicated these recommendations will be followed thereby minimizing the environmental impact. In addition, the impact of cir- culation and access to and from the property, particularly 56th Avenue South, during the normal daily activities of the uphill westerly units presents concerns to staff relative to impacts on adjacent streets. The optimum solution would be to provide total access of the units to Interurban Avenue South. However, topography precludes this alternative. K. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(f): Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area As mentioned earlier, the development should be more sensitive to the Foster Golf Course facility which represents an "historical feature" to the community. *=Planned Residential Development Criteria TMC 18.46.110(4) A. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(A): Suitability of the site area for the pro- posed development Existing topography of the site lends itself to the proposed site plan which for the most part works well with the slopes. Soil conditions sup- port the development. Surrounding streets will handle resulting traffic. Adjacent land uses and zoning are compatible or already exist in a semi - compatible situation. B. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(B): Requirements of the subdivision code for the proposed development Subdivision of the property is not proposed. C. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(C): Reasons for density bonuses as listed in Section 18.46.070: A density bonus was not requested. The total density permitted is 111 units, but 104 units are proposed. D. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(D): Adverse environmental impacts have been mitigated: A determination of non - significance was issued for the proposal on the basis of finding no significant environmental impacts. Staff's review of submitted environmental information indicated the recommendations of the soils enginer and traffic engineer will be followed to reduce any rela- tive impacts of the proposal. However, at some time the City may have to consider appropriate improvement of 56th Ave. So. to improve its traffic carrying capacity. Page 6 C The proposal complies with this chapter. E. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(E): Compliance of the proposed PRO to the provisions of this chapter: F. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(F): Time limitations, if any, for the entire development and specified stages: Two stages of development of the property are proposed. Phase one, the easterly units, will be constructed this year. Phase two will follow in 1986. 3. Planned Residential Development Purpose: TMC 18.46.010: A. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(1): Promote the retention of significant features of the natural environment, including topography, vegetation, waterways and views: Existing topography is essentially preserved in overall form by the pro- posal. However, the little existing vegetation is to be removed. Perhaps some of the few existing trees can be saved, but these need to be located on the site plan to facilitate this determination. B. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(2): Encourage a variety and mixture of housing types: The proposal includes one and two bedroom apartments within two building designs. This questionably represents "variety and mixture." C. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(3): Encourage maximum efficiency in the layout of streets, utility networks, and other public improvements: The site plan is an efficient design of vehicular circulation responsive to existing conditions. Utility plans were not provided, but the site plan facilitates efficient planning of this location. D. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(4): Create and /or preserve useable open space for the enjoyment of the occupants and the general public. A significant amount of open space and recreation area is provided on the site for the tenants of the development. At least 34,380 sq. ft. is useable for recreation purposes. Additional area is designated as open space. While the "general public" may not have access to the proposal, the public will enjoy viewing the amenities. November 21, 1989 Ms. Molly Headley Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Molly: Sincerely, ✓� Jerry Hansen cc. Duane Griffin, Building Official, City of Tukwila George Casady, Job Trac', Inc. Joe Devish, D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. Leon Whiteside, D.E. Construction, Inc. File: 43/G -1, 43/M 43LET113.DOC D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. NOV 27 1989 t. . • Enclosed herewith is an elevation of the east face of building U -3, at the top of the hill behind the lower buildings. This is the side seen from Interurban Avenue. The crawl space beneath the upper buildings will be partially visible through the spaces between the lower buildings. This particular building is the worst case in terms of the height of the crawl space. The two buildings to the north of U -3 have much less height, and the building to the south has a different foundation system that allows the crawl space to be conventionally framed and sided. We propose to install cedar latticework between the columns, and from the grade beam level to the underside of the first floor as illustrated on the attached drawing. The lattice will be painted to match the siding color of the buildings. From an architectural standpoint, this ties in with the lattice railings on the west face of each of the lower and upper buildings. From a practical standpoint, it will not allow people access to the crawl space area, yet will allow the necessary air circulation beneath the buildings. There will also be 1/4" mesh hardware cloth behind the lattice to prevent the accumulation of debris beneath the building. If you have any questions, please contact me. I respectfully request your approval of the foregoing design change. 3425 E. DENNY WAY•SEATTLE WA 98122 206/322-5228 LIC# DECONI ' 150NE I 4:31111I1111111cc-- 1 111111181 1111111 11111111111 11111111011 11111111111 November 20, 1989 Mr. George Casady Job Trac', Inc. 5025 California Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington 98136 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear George: Sincerely, Jerry Iansen 43LET111.DOC �';Y "; •.. :.iy. y.,i "tr' - f..l'r" . >: ",•Y: �SP4` 4•. °A u•ry KN'e `' "�s . � .+ ....v. .are Yn:.c , • � nr +•wrr ktv +^�'�: �: . R'"'i�" .s '[t -. ..k "kV:3: ;_ � � .Lr.•,.. r. r.r ,. -`is% ., �.., c......, �. �... �.. uS�. L... �:.... ��.: �" �sv�s5w...... a. f�,+._. iss.....,.,.+ �k' 1zL.,*. 3: t';': s. v�4c�., cw�.. 5. c...r..: ��tLs,.✓..`>•.... sn. ul �, f,.:...«. 1, �, u, t. Y.�, >�a�t.tr;Ft:;� D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. Attached is a November 16, 1989 letter from our landscape subcontractor advising us that some of their work at the berm along Interurban Avenue has been impacted by the street improvements currently being constructed for the City of Tukwila. Please be advised that we do not feel that we should be held accountable for the loss of the landscaping. cc. Joe Devish, D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. Brian J. Kittleson, Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. Molly Headley, City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Leon Whiteside, D.E. Construction, Inc. 3425 E. DENNY WAY. SEATTLE WA 98122 2061322.5228 LICW DECONI ' 150NE RICK CATHCART Owner ��w,,..i ff�'{:`�Y:i �i��p�i "' ;; §i:v .:a ^i . ° „'t';' `::f�dtC`.'- w;rPFar..�N ;'S't' N't^ r.�. �.. wwt: i Y• — ___..._ ... -�.:.� _�+ "_`_'':..= 1:�1.:�� �+`5,.7c. }t1x. 2 c�jt�;.. s�. �S. 3. i, �. s.: �' Stk. MrA };nrrr ui. m;. yqu*r "r�� �e�{�' D.E. Construction 3425 Denny Way Seattle, WA 98122 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments CATHCART LANDSCAPE SERVICES 13300 SE 30th • Suite 209 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643 -0441 RECEIVED NOV 181989 D.E. CONSTRUG► November 16, 1989 Jerry Hansen, During the course of construction work, along Interurban Ave. Marlino Construction Company has removed various sections of ivy from berm parallel Interurban Ave. Estimated cost for replacement is $600.00. Cathcart Landscape Services t.iW '.1CJ 4y Ii js4ec CITY OF T UKWILA r tun :! /1"PHC'E.VTEh'Rnl.'I.EI'4RD. 7'!'hl II.:%, tt':1SHI.V 'T!).V rx October 12, 1989 Mr. Jerry Hansen D.E. Construction, Inc. General Manager 3425 E. Denny Way Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Ivy Hills Apartments Landscape Issue Review October 2, 1989 Dear Mr. Hansen: PHONE r 06,.133 I'U!! l;.m l.. t rnhrr, rr..'hr• r' This letter is to review our meeting on Monday, October 2, 1989, regarding landscape issues at the Ivy Hills Apartment complex. The meeting consisted of walking through the site and comparing the existing plantings with the approved landscape plan. I pointed out specific areas where additional plant materials were required to provide 90% groundcover within three years as well as specific items and /or areas as follows (items are indicated on attached site plan): A. Items to be completed prior to Planning Department approval of Phase II. 1. Sloped bank at west end of site -- additional ground cover required. 2. Berm along Interurban to be weeded and planted with groundcover planted 1 ft. O.C. as required. 3. Patio areas -- add ground cover and provide additional screening with shrubs and /or trees. 4. • Rear slopes -- blend groundcover at toe of slopes that are seeded, into existing seeded lawn area. 10. Drainage grates -- plant ivy to soften rocks. 11. Rear of buildings -- plant groundcover on disturbed areas. 12. Presentation of revised drawings for design of chimney screens. 13. All dumpsters to be screened and landscaped as approved by planning director. Ivy Hills October 9, 1989 Page 2 B. Items to be completed prior to Planning Department approval of Phase III. 1. Complete planting of landscape materials as previously approved on landscape plan after completion of road improvements along Interurban Ave.S. 2. Clubhouse -- plant shrubs along path, groundcover in all areas, provide for access to clubhouse from parking area. 3. Trail area leading to upper section -- fill in disturbed vegetation with cotoneaster as required. 4. Pool area -- fence to be located on top of berm, wood slatted, planting behind fence to consist of ivy, cotoneaster parneyii and evergreen trees (not Pinus contorta). 5. Fence at corner to follow along previously landscaped area. Fill in with groundcover on previously landscaped area as required to satisfy ground cover requirements. Do not fence in fire hydrant. 6. Interior of fenced area to consist of lawn. 7. Installation of sports court. Option One - install a 30 X 60 foot, hard surfaced, Class B asphalt with a non -slip emulsion surface, and a basketball hoop set back four feet from edge as approved previously. Option Two - install a 20 X 30 foot, hard surfaced, Class B asphalt with a non -slip emulsion surface court with a basketball hoop and the placement of a `Big Toy' in lawn area. 8. Review of upper buildings for compliance with landscape and code requirements. Please note that I will review each condition for compliance prior to signing a Certificate of Occupancy for each phase as indicated above. Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, C 2 . `7 Molly A. Headley Assistant Planner cc: R. Beeler M. Bradshaw B. Davis File IS-141Z. InStU At ' S -•I• •■•••••U a.1e. Y —SI., 1 •C •••••011 t. tent t•allaa { Ow CT E• M es ant, ayoll 'MAW( L 31.1E 1 • ••ems R2 01? 7t.Ir0.I w.ls i.• 014111 1•• .t•tl • MI .u.ut 1•u.OFl ClOIs tr "-^ - alumrszverramanta 1'!1 eft a� 1i tip. , K muri aresl* 1 I�� +i, 1.1 - r r w We-•,- I I I �w � . L .,. y +.• , I ":4°":22;: �%•.• aw..:�e•tr! I 1 I I I wt••a. i rJ .\ I 1 1 I ` I ` l•s10 *.a• .r t•ItLLIH• N. • ).r MIQur ' 1 \ •.Y.eu•l . l *131.1% L VIIU..Ul O *•1151 •.1313•• T.OwetSCt OU. • _-- ,— -� ` lam: •Id rt, aNTII +G NDTE 1. ING UOLIS TO at a' L••••• •n. past* TM•• T•7 SILl O. TM, PLAUT 2 Ine wLLS TO aL 0.113 ltitD *ITM Tr aL • - Way -alt T.I >oll 3 E!V"Lr(•R TO FSI laaT► -/tSMT TAWS •l COOT wt. a ►•LL• It MN M•MOT pCTSla* • .ICIMII.IT •II.S TI •t SI.L -salt. •Y og•T. ITS •Mr•Ow•le• Wits • CIY••It M*� • •.O Stilt T1. Ill MILT wee .ITN 2. T•al ••••L FIT pain S..t •• LIE YLV wimp MINI • GO•SL • waea{ all T. al .S•••CC £IM w 1 ! * >l C. r.V& way-ww. TttLIIL T ill • • 7•11 T. M SUITS Ott !T *waft 1 01•111 I •a70•T• t•( ,,.•,,_ S ,r•tL...r. .;t.a. SAY w.t . V tills • 0111(51* •rl.l..l•. •Can 0..11 TY V.IIwhLOV 1 . • LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN mamma j CENTER ' OLo., , •••• 73 410115• w t_I• nen. ✓ w 5.5.•* • • SCSI • •l a•nw01IF> 131 I v I. • F �7 1•m1. faint 0.11.1, maw.. S••• •1•Ttl . 4.LL Par : ,. • : t ^4, � 0 S'• hC't I• �1` ^5301. 76111 AU6FUOu AND ASSOCIATE; , ►i .IOC C N?El C'C I1170 a1 16 • Wawa women MP • Are ibcton Managcnictlt Corporation Suitt 400 3 11 Quc =en Anne Ave. N. Senitle, WA 9R10 206l2H'L•$100 1 246Q82'9090 September 26, 1989 Mr. George M. Casady JOB TRAC 5025 California Ave SW Seattle, WA 98136 Dear George: I am pleased DJB ACQUISITIONS has selected Tecton Landscape Services to perform the landscape maintenance at IVY HILLS APARTMENTS. As you know we believe handling the management and landscape services at each of the sites managed by Tecton gives us the necessary control to maintain a beautiful and more professional appearance. Regarding your statement that a sprinkler system is in place; this is not a problem. Tecton Lancts% serves twenty-five properties in Puget Sound, of over half do not have automatic sprinkler system_:: ._ have a large crew that will come in and hand water areas. Additionally, Tecton Landscaping has professionals on staff with the know -how to do the job properly. For an example of Tecton's landscape expertise, you might drive through Riverview Plaza Office Park in Tukwila. We look forward to serving you and working in conjunction with the City of Tukwila to make Ivy Hills a beautiful residential community. Sincerely (6 ow: rt-K41:.:»f.r:r;a:Y:�i t.,�r::': t� .tSt:�ft':i.'!!:::'.::.:1:.•..: c.!u:vt Karl Feichtme '`' President =TON MANAGEMENT °OIl R/MON Q1\d$ts\wpdoo \prof \th \1endsc•p TH,E:iTECTON Co September 22, 1989 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Dear Mr. Beeler: (SEP 2 21989 D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. j On September 18, 1989 a letter, addressed to you, was hand - delivered to City Hall. The letter was regarding a memo written to you by Moira Carr Bradshaw, and included a copy of a letter written to me by George Casady, the owner's representative on this project. At the same time this letter was being delivered to you, another member of the Planning Department, Molly Headley, appeared on the site and indicated to one of our supervisory personnel, Brad Adams, that the Planning Department had additional concerns that they wanted to discuss. In my letter I requested your cooperation in resolving some apparent misunderstandings about various aspects of the project that are under your jurisdiction, and requested a meeting be arranged as quickly as possible. To date I have had no response to my letter. Valuable time is being wasted by your lack of a prompt response. To date we have no definitive statement from your department clearly stating any objections to the work. We only have a copy of Ms. Bradshaw's memo to you and Ms. Headley's comments. We do not feel that these constitute formal notice to us as to what corrective action we must take, if any, to satisfy the requirements of the City of Tukwila with regard to the Planning Department. We are willing to cooperate with you to resolve any problems, but we need to have a clear understanding of the problems. We have a right to either your approval of the Phase I (as defined by the Building Department) portion of the project or a written list of corrective items. We, therefore, hereby formally request and demand your approval of the Phase I portion of the project, or if any portions are unacceptable, we further request and demand you express such non - conforming items in writing to us. I continue to believe that a meeting of all parties would simplify our coming to a better understanding, and stand ready to attend such a meeting, as does the owner's representative, at your earliest convenience. However, this does not preclude our request 3425 E. DENNY WAY. SEATTLE WA 98122 206/322.5228 LIC# DECONI • 150NE • Mr. Rick Beeler' • City of-Tukwila 'Planning Department September 22, 1989 Page, 2 . • inspection. I look forward to a prompt response. Sincerely, Jerry Hansen and demand for an inspection of the project and a formal response to such an cc. Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw, Planning Department Mr. George Casady, Job Trac', Inc. Leon Whiteside, D.E. Construction, Inc. Brad Adams, D.E. Construction, Inc. File: 43/M, 43/G-1 September 18, 1989 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments Your Memo of September 12, 1989 Dear Ms. Bradshaw: Please contact me at 322 -5228 to arrange a meeting. Sincerely, arm -r�ti D.E. Construction, Inc. Jerry Hansen General Manager cc. Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw, Planning Department Mr. George M. Casady, Job Trac', Inc. Leon Whiteside, D.E. Construction, Inc. Brad Adams, D.E. Construction, Inc. File: 43/M, 43/G -1 I I SEP 18 1989 • D.E. CONSTRUCTION, INC. Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter dated September 15, 1989, from George M. Casady, Owner's Representative for D.J.B. Acquisitions, Inc. /Ivy Hills Associates, regarding your memo referenced above. The letter clearly establishes the owner's position in this matter. It is imperative that D.E. Construction, Inc. finalize this project quickly. We have done everything possible to satisfy the requirements of the City of Tukwila within the scope of the work detailed in our contract with the owner, and will continue to cooperate with the City in any way we can. We now need your cooperation in providing a quick resolution to an apparent difference of opinion between the owner of the project and the Planning Department. I suggest that a meeting be arranged as soon as possible to include all of the persons required to make a final decision from your department, as well as the project owner and myself. All parties should come away from the meeting with a clear understanding and an agreement as to what action needs to be taken, not only to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I, but the balance of the project as well. 3425 E. DENNY WAY. SEATTLE WA 98122 206/322.5228 LIC# DECONI • 150NE JOB TRAC I TEL No .206-938-0508 Mr. Jerry Hansen DE CONSTRUCTION INC. 3425 E. Denny Way Seattle, Washington 98122 September 15, 1989 Re: Ivy Hills Apartments ' City of Tukwila Planning Department Phase I Certificate of Occupancy Dear Jerry; Sep 1 , 89 10:02 No .002 P.03 We are in receipt of your letter of 9/13 and its enclosed copy of a staff report which was generated by Moira Carr Bradshaw dated 9/12. In response to your letter, I have, under separate cover, provided a copy of Ordinance No 1369, complete with exhibits A and B of the supporting staff comments between the "original" developer and the City of Tukwila. As you know, the people who are represented as the "Project Owners" have taken over this project after it had stalled and construction had been stopped. In so doing, they have secured your services, and attempted to correct and complete the project work. The Owners feel that it is important for the City of Tukwila to understand their position on the staff report items and address an answer to the questions or suggestions they have raised. The staff report addresses three "fundamental deviations" from the approved design review condition, including color of buildings, siding used, and window and door changes. Color of buildings was selected prior to new Ownership, however, a review of the color of the buildings at the time of take -over revealed a strong concern by the City. This concern was addressed quickly upon re -start of the Project and color selection was favorably commented on by the City. In any event, the Owners see no adverse affect to the City in the resulting colors, and intend to use the same colors on the upper units. In reviewing the "staff report" which prompted the Ordinance, the City staff approved vinyl siding reluctantly, and with the condition that proof be provided to the Fire Inspector that no toxic fumes would 1B TRAC TEL No .206 -938 -0508 Sep 18:n 10:02 No .002 P.04 IVY RILLS APARTMENTS CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT RESPONSE result from their burning. The Architect feels that such proof could not be secured and therefore, the decision to change was made. Both the Architect and Owner fee]. that no adverse affect to the City exists because of the change. Window and Doors as shown on plans differ somewhat from the installed units. The Owner has checked with the Architect to determine what affect, if any, such a change might have on the project. Doors installed are not wood decorative doors, nor do they have a half circle window in them. Actual doors installed are steel insulated doors, which the Architect feels are better, more efficient, and provides greater safety than a decorative wood door. Sizes of windows do differ, in some locations, from those .shown on the plans. The cause of this difference comes from the approved trusses used on the project. Again, the Architect feels that the design has not been compromised. The Owner cannot see an adverse affect from this Architect approved change to the City of Tukwila. The above represents the Owners response to the staff report, and indicate their view that in all three findings which were represented as "fundamental deviations" , no apparent impact to the City of Tukwila exists, the changes do not cause an additional threat to life, health or safety, and in some cases, the changes have improved the property. The staff report goes on to make suggestion to the City relating to the Project work. Those suggestions, and the Owners responses are as follows; 1. Irrigate the entire project. This requirement was not are item included in the ordinance no. 1369 and is not budgeted or fundable at this time. In addition, the Owners have a contract for Management and maintenance of the Project site, which includes plant maintenance. Another concern relates to the "sloped" condition of the majority of the project greenspace. Plantings have been carefully selected, installed, and are being maintained, along with considerable expense in stabilization of those sloped areas. In developing a "sloped area" plan, the City has insisted upon the use of a Geo Engineer, who has established the means and methods of stabilizing the sloped areas. Water continues to seep from the sloped areas. Adding water to this condition via an irrigation system has never been part of the stabilizing plan, and could cause less stability, in the case of a failure within a automatic watering system. The Owners believe that the existing landscape plan, which was approved and permitted, is the plan they would expect to be installed. This includes provisions for watering, but does not include an irrigation system (as such). JOE TRAC TEL 'o.206 -938 -0508 Sep °8,89 10:02 N0.002 P.05 IVY HILLS APARTMENTS CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT RESPONSE 2. Dumpster enclosure in place. The Owner agrees with the City, and directs the Contractor to complete this work, as per the approved plans, and in the locations shown on the approved plans. The dumpster located between L3 and L4 must he re- located due to the Metro easement. 3. Install chimney wind soreens. The Owner agrees with the City, and directs the Contractor to complete this work, as per the approved plans. 4, Install 30 X 60 Basketball Court. The .plans presently call for grassed play area, fenced. Additional activity facilities provided within the "recreation" area include swimming pool, indoor spa, sauna, weight and fitness center, game room and equipment and lounge. In addition to the indoor and pool spaces, a large grass area is to be provided for lawn games, lounging and childrens play area. The Owners feel that this agreed upon facility, which is reflected on the approved plans, is adequate for the use intended, and no further improvements are necessary to meet the needs of the tenants. b. Install steps in hillside for access to upper area: The Owners agree that access between areas is necessary, and direct the Contractor to seek out the best location and design to accomplish said access. 6. Compensation for Changes. The Owners feel no compensation is justified, especially where no negative impacts have been realized. As pointed out above, the changes made on this project have been made with Architectural approval, and with the specific intention of providing the completed facility without compromising the concept developed and approved by Designer and the City. In some cases, such as siding and doors, the change has added to the safety and efficiency of the Project. This request addresses an interest in "adding to" the approved landscape plan. The Owners feel that the Landscape plan was approved and issued properly and that no additional changes should be necessary. Additionally, the Owners of the Project feel that they have consistently encouraged, financed and issued policy .decisions directed at meeting the intent of the original Owners agreements with the City of Tukwila. The resulting structures are consistent with work of this type, and do meet every requirement established in negotiations with City of Tukwila staff, and are in agreement with City Ordinance. A careful review with the design professionals involved in the project revealed the same attitude, that the intents that were agreed upon and the concepts established in the design have been closely adhered to. dr IVY HILLS APARTMENTS gr CITY OF TUKWILA'g,+ =LANN ING DEPARTMENT STAFF E'ORT RESPONSE It is the Owners intention (and wish) to maintain the best possible relationship with the City of Tukwila. In so doing, the Owners have attempted to work with the City to resolve the unfortunate condition the project was in a year ago. It should be made clear however, there are no monies available to add to the Project. The Owners request that you make their opinions known to the City of Tukwila as soon as possible. Occupancy on this project was expected on August 1, 1989 and it is presently September 15. Delays of this type, which involve posturing and continuous re- evaluation have cost the Owners a considerable amount of money. If there are serious threats to safety presented, they continue to demand that all participants of the Project respond and correct the problems, however, if Occupancy is being withheld simply to try to attach additional user fees, they object strongly. In every way, the Owner is pleased with the appearance of the project, and appreciates your attention to these details. Yours very truly; JOB TRAC' INC. George M. Casady Owners Representative Copies: Devish /Erby; DJB Acquisitions /Ivy Hills Associates File: DELET216 4 1A:AA PACX' = Al *ILA 1909 4 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor 1-b/irtivir 1(9, l'?:"" CC cites TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the August 22, 1985, Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Knudson called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m. Other Commissioners present were Mr. Sowinski, Mr. Coplen, Mr. Orrico, and Mr. Mckenna. Representing staff were Rick Beeler and Becky Kent, Planning Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. LARSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 25, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. MR. MCKENNA SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING A. DR- 13 -85, 85- 29 -PRD: Ryerson, requesting approval of planned residential development of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. Mr. Orrico stated he lived in the Terrace Apartments, across the street from the property, and had no interest in the proposal and felt he could act upon the application. Chairman Knudson opened the public hearing. Ron Healy, Jon Anderson & Associates, described the building elevations, security of the complex, fencing, vinyl siding of the buildings, pedestrian access and density. Meryle Skare, 13712 57th Avenue So., stated her concern with the water pressure on the hill. Mr. Beeler said the Public Works Department would require conformance with the Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan and that a fire flow test would be required prior to occupancy of the project. Kay Skare, 13712 56th Avenue So., stated her concern with the property line location in relation to their lot. 1'01 Tukwila Planning Comil Minutes, August 22, 1985 Page 2 MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MAIN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. ...'. ... .,gym .. .. Chairman Knudson closed the public hearing. MOTION ENCOMPASSED BOTH THE THE APPLICATIONS Mr. Beeler stated that during the building permit process the property would have to be surveyed and staked to measure setbacks. Rick Ryerson, 13939 S.E. 47th Avenue, Bellevue, applicant, said he would be happy to set property stakes for the neighbor. He described the proposal, specifically the vinyl siding that is proposed to be used on the buildings and water pressure. The Commission discussed pedestrian linkages, trees on the site, toxicity of the vinyl siding, building design, and stability of the hillside. MR. ORRICO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND REVISED, AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1A. DIVERSIFYING THE BUILDING DESIGNS AND LOCATIONS TO CREATE A LESS MONOTONOUS VISUAL IMAGE AND A DIVERSITY OF DESIGN. 1B. PROVISION OF PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES BETWEEN 56TH AVENUE SOUTH AND INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSAL SUBJECT TO PLANNING STAFF'S APPROVAL. 2. LOCATION OF EXISTING SUBSTANTIAL TREES ON THE SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATION OF THE SITE PLAN TO RETAIN SOME OF THESE TREES TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 3. THE LANDSCAPING PLAN INCLUDE VEGETATION OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ACCOMPLISH THE CRITERIA AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. 4. VERIFICATION OF SUFFICENT TAP WATER PRESSURE BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD A RECOMMENDATION #5, VERIFICATION BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF VINYL SIDING TOXICITY BEING WITHIN SAFE LEVELS. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Mr. Beeler briefed the Commission on the McMicken annexation approval, Capital Improvement Program, annexations, and urban development Phase II. AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE INTRODUCTION A ten - building, 104 unit apartment complex is proposed to be constructed in two phases by Group Five along the westerly side of Interurban Avenue between what would be 137th and 139th Avenue South. The 4.55 acre parcel is zoned C -2 (Regional Retail Business) on the westerly half of the site and R -3 (Multi Family Residential) along the easterly half of the site. The proposal requires approval of a Planned Residential Development and the Board of Architectural Review and the property lies in the Interurban Special Review District. FINDINGS 1. Generally the site is predominantly a fairly steep slope (averaging 45% and maximum of 90 %), except for a generally level portion at the southwest and northwest corners of the site (Exhibit A). Apartment units are proposed in two rows running parallel with the property and topography (Exhibit B). The westerly row of buildings will feature basement covered parking, while the upper (westerly) units will feature on grade uncovered parking (Exhibit C). The easterly units will be two stories with basement consisting of a total of 56 dwelling units (Exhibit D). The uphill westerly 48 units will be of a slightly less building mass (Exhibit E ). Landscaping of the site con- sists of perimeter and interior landscaping (Exhibits F & G). A recreation building, pool, sport court and grass play area are featured at the southerly corner of the site (Exhibit B & H). The topography of the site constrains access for the easterly units to two points on Interurban Avenue South (Exhibit B). Access to the westerly units is from two points on 56th Avenue South. Directly to the north and across Interurban Avenue South is located the Foster Golf Links Public Golf Course, and directly westerly of the site and across 56th Avenue South is the existing multi- family development of the Terrace Apartments. Interurban Avenue South consists of two lanes in each direction. A single lane in each direction within a 30 -foot right -of -way is improved in 56th Avenue South. Parking for 208 cars is provided including 56 covered parking stalls. For the westerly, or upper, 48 apartment units a total of 96 parking stalls are pro- vided per TMC 18.56.050. For the easterly 56 dwelling units a total of 112 parking stalls are provided. Vehicular connection between the two parking Page -2- c.. Planning Commission 85 -29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 areas is not included in the site plan. The westerly 56 apartment units con- tain 7 one - bedroom units and 49 two - bedroom units. The easterly 48 apartment units are comprised of 24 one - bedroom units and 24 two - bedroom units. Building materials will consists of dark gray or black composition shingle roofs, gray or light blue vinyl siding, white trim and windows, and gray or light blue railings and lattice. Exterior illumination is not indicated on the site plan. 2. Various mutliple family development proposals have been sought on the pro- perty, the latest of which featured a combination of multiple family and offi- ces (81- 12 -W). 3. Since the proposal lies within the Interurban Special Review District, the BAR must review the proposal per the criteria of TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060 (TMC 18.60.030(2)(e)). 4. The proposed Planned Residential Development (PRD) requires approval per the criterial of TMC 18.46.110(4). 5. The proposal complies with the landscaping and recreation space requirements of TMC 18.52.020 and .060. Preliminary calculations indicate that 20,600 square feet of recration space is required (103 x 200 square feet = 20,600 square 'feet). Required landscaping areas constitute a total of 19,941 square feet, of which 10 %, or 1,994 square feet, may be credited to the recreation space requirement, thereby yielding a 18,606 square feet of recreation space required. The pro- posal provides a total of 34,300 square feet of open fairly level lawn areas, sport court, pool and recreation building. Therefore, the recreation require- ments appear to be met in the proposal. 6. The Environmental Checklist (EPIC- 277 -85) indicates the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant will be followed in the development on this property. A determination of non - significance was issued for the proposal per the state Environment Policy act of 1971, as amended. CONCLUSIONS 1. BAR Criteria TMC 18.60.050 and 18.60.060(4): A. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(1): Relationship of Structure to Site The proposal provides the normal landscaping transition from Interurban Avenue South and 56th Avenue South. Sidwalks will be required along both streets, however, additional pedestrian pathways through and inside the development appear needed except at the southerly portions of the pro- perty and around the recreation building. Walkways or pathways from the upper westerly units to the lower easterly units occur at only three Page -3- Planning Commission 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 locations. Additional pedestrian linkage should occur due to the reaso- nably anticipated pedestrian usage of the westerly upper units of the recreation facility at the southerly portion of the site and Interurban Avenue South where public transit may be utilized. The parking areas in the proposal run almost the full length of the site with only slight interruption by landscaping along the westerly portions of the site. This design does not appear to "...moderate the visual impact of large paved areas." Therefore, the parking layout should be revised to better minimize this visual impact. Due to the topography of the property, the lower easterly units will be located such that the roofs will be below the existing grade elevation of 56th Avenue South. The roofs of the westerly upper units appear to extend approximately 10 feet above the existing grade elevation of this street. Such location of these buildings on the steeply sloped property is an appropriate site plan considering the westerly abutting properties. The overall visual impact on the easterly abutting public golf course will be the appearance of essentially a continuous wall of development. While this visual image of the multi family units carved into the hillside may appear startling upon initial development of the proposal, maturation of landscaping will substantially reduce this impact over time. This does not appear to be an unreasonable projected impact of the proposal. B. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(2): Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The proposal appears to present to Interurban Avenue South a design that overall is harmonious in the design, materials and colors. Landscaping which is appropriate to the adjoining properties is provided. A traffic engineering report indicates safe and adequate access to Interurban Avenue South and 56th Avenue South. These streets will adequately accom- modate the increased traffic. However, 56th Avenue South will function near to capacity. C. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(3): Landscape and Site Treatment The final grading of the site appears to essentially clear the site of all existing vegetation. The final grades create some level areas, par- ticularly where landfill is necessary at the southerly corner of the site. The overall impact of grading appears to be of producing "...an inviting and stable appearance." The landscape plan appears to treat Interurban Avenue South as a formal street via regularly spaced deciduous trees. Due to the desirable vista from the property to the east, a public golf course and Duwamish River environment, landscaping along this street should be compatible with the Page -4- Planning Commission 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 _t. .... .. t... � „ r._ ... Vi:'. .. ... .n ..i. s+.. .. ... . �.�. fi t...- . + v .r .':l,. �, .':1 � , {•.. City's future plans for improvement and landscaping of Interurban Avenue South. Within the site the landscaping appears to soften the overall impact of the buildings and appears to consider the view potential from the westerly uphill units. Exterior lighting details were not provided, thereby preventing review at this time. If the applicant can provide these details or a general description of sufficient detail in the public meeting, final review and approval of the exterior illumination could be deferred to the Planning Department. D. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(4): Building Design The proposed buildings are compatible in scale with existing commercial, multi family residential and single family residential development in the area, of which multiple family residential predominates the westerly area of the property and the golf course and commercial development dominates the more easterly areas of the property. The design components of the individual buildings display "...good proportions and relationship to one another." The colors chosen of the dark gray or black roof, gray or light blue vinyl siding, white trim and white lattice and railings, and white window trim are "harmonious" with each other. Details of exterior illumination were not provided, but should be "harmonious" with the pro- posed building design. Sufficient "variety and detail" in terms of building form and massing is provided on the site between the upper westerly units and the lower easterly units. The two types of units are dissimilar. Perhaps the major criticism of the lower easterly units is the essentially straight line of the same design with a great deal of regularity without significant interruption. This could present a mono- tonous appearance to Interurban Avenue South and the public golf course facility. E. Criteria TMC 18.60.050(5): Miscellaneous Structure and Street Furniture Dumpster locations indicated on the proposal are enclosed on three sides by an unspecified fence. The design, composition and colors of this fence should be discussed for determination of their acceptability. F. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(a): Proposed development design should be sen- sitive to the natural amenities of the area The essentially repetitive pattern of the proposed units in the develop- ment and the essentially uninterrupted large linear parking areas are questionably "sensitive" to the easterly public golf course facility and the Duwamish River environment. Breaking up the units, particularly of the easterly lower level, and varying the spacing between the buildings will reduce the overall visual impact of the development. Further enhancing this image would be exploring landscaping areas for significant contribution to the interruption of the site plan. Page -5- Planning Commission 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: August 22, 1985 GROUP FIVE G. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(b): Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities As mentioned in the previous finding the repetitive, monotonous plan of the property imposes upon the easterly public golf course facility. The aforementioned recommendations will substantially reduce this impact. H. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(c): Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on site pedestrian circulation Since vehicular access from the easterly lower level and Interurban Avenue South is prevented to and from the upper westerly units, the con- venience and normally anticipated access to and from these uphill units is precluded. In addition, the proposal contains minimal pedestrian linkages between the upper and lower units and to Interurban Avenue. I. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(d): Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complimentary to the district in which it is located The location of the proposed buildings and the landscaping provided pro- duces overall general compatibility with "neighboring uses" which are relative to the westerly existing multi family development. However, the repetitive nature of the site plan raises the the question of com- patibility with the easterly public golf course facility and Duwamish River environment. Otherwise the proposal is "...complimentary to the district..." of the C -2 and R -3 zone. The development reflects the nor- mally expected and experienced development within these zones, par- ticularly in the situation of the narrow trapazoidial configuration of the subject site. J. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(e): Proposed development should seek to mini- mize significant adverse environmental impacts The major environmental impacts associated with this proposal is the grading of the property which includes total disruption of existing vege- tation. The soils consultant has indicated that this presents no problem for development as long as their recommendations are followed. The applicant has indicated these recommendations will be followed thereby minimizing the environmental impact. In addition, the impact of cir- culation and access to and from the property, particularly 56th Avenue South, during the normal daily activities of the uphill westerly units presents concerns to staff relative to impacts on adjacent streets. The optimum solution would be to provide total access of the units to Interurban Avenue South. However, topography precludes this alternative. K. Criteria TMC 18.60.060(4)(f): Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area Page -6- �- Planning Commission 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 As mentioned earlier, the development should be more sensitive to the Foster Golf Course facility which represents an "historical feature" to the community. 2. Planned Residential Development Criteria TMC 18.46.110(4) A. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(A): Suitability of the site area for the pro- posed development Existing topography of the site lends itself to the proposed site plan which for the most part works well with the slopes. Soil conditions sup- port the development. Surrounding streets will handle resulting traffic. Adjacent land uses and zoning are compatible or already exist in a semi - compatible situation. B. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(B): Requirements of the subdivision code for the proposed development Subdivision of the property is not proposed. C. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(C): Reasons for density bonuses as listed in Section 18.46.070: A density bonus of 27 units is requested along the westerly R -3 zoned portion of the property. This 63,383 square foot area is permitted 21 units per TMC 18.50.020 but 48 units is proposed - an increase of 229 %. TMC 18.46.070 permits only a 20% density increase, or a total of 25 units provided the criteria of TMC 18.46.070(3) are met. This criteria requires a "...variety of housing types..." (TMC 18.46.070(3)(A)), but the proposal provides only two different types and designs. Essentially all of the little existing "natural vegetatin" will be removed which contradicts retention of at least 15 %, per TMC 18.46.070 (3)(B). Existing "views" and site topography is taken advantage of (TMC 18.46.070(3)(C)). Automobile and pedestiran circulation is largely separated (TMC 18.46.070(3)(D)). Overall, the development conforms to the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan (TMC 18.46.070(3)(E)). The "public benefit" being derived is not clear, however (TMC 18.46.070(3)(F)). Therefore, existing information appears to indicate the density increase is not supported to be in compliance with the cri- teria. D. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(D): Adverse environmental impacts have been mitigated: A determination of non - significance was issued for the proposal on the basis of finding no significant environmental impacts. Staff's review of submitted environmental information indicated the recommendations of the Page -7- . Planning Commission 85 -29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 soils enginer and traffic engineer will be followed to reduce any rela- tive impacts of the proposal. However, at some time the City may have to consider appropriate improvement of 56th Ave. So. to improve its traffic carrying capacity. E. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(E): Compliance of the proposed PRD to the provisions of this chapter: Except for the proposed density in the westerly row of units, the pro- posal complies with this chapter. F. Criteria (TMC 18.46.110(4)(F): Time limitations, if any, for the entire development and specified stages: Two stages of development of the property are proposed. Phase one, the easterly units, will be constructed this year. Phase two will follow in 1986. 3. Planned Residential Development Purpose: TMC 18.46.010: A. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(1): Promote the retention of significant features of the natural environment, including topography, vegetation, waterways and views: Existing topography is essentially preserved in overall form by the pro- posal. However, the little existing vegetation is to be removed. Perhaps some of the few existing trees can be saved, but these need to be located on the site plan to facilitate this determination. B. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(2): Encourage a variety and mixture of housing types: The proposal includes one and two bedroom apartments within two building designs. This questionably represents "variety and mixture." C. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(3): Encourage maximum efficiency in the layout of streets, utility networks, and other public improvements: The site plan is an efficient design of vehicular circulation responsive to existing conditions. Utility plans were not provided, but the site plan facilitates efficient planning of this location. D. Purpose TMC 18.46.010(4): Create and /or preserve useable open space for the enjoyment of the occupants and the general public. A significant amount of open space and recreation area is provided on the site for the tenants of the development. At least 34,380 sq. ft. is useable for recreation purposes. Additional area is designated as open space. While the "general public" may not have access to the proposal, the public will enjoy viewing the amenities. Page -8 -._ Planning Commission 85- 29 -PRD, DR- 13 -85: GROUP FIVE August 22, 1985 (PC.GRPFVE,PC.GRPFVE3) (5A.2) '. ' } PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION Based on the above, staff preliminarily recommends that the Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission approve the plan subject to: 1. Revision of the site plan to include: A. Diversifying the building designs and locations to create a less monoto- nous visual image and a diversity of designs. B. Provision of additional pedestrian linkages between 56th Avenue South, and Interurban Avenue South throughout the proposal. C. Reduction of density on the westerly portion to 21 units. 2. Submission of a lighting plan and fixture details. 3. Location of existing substantial trees on the site plan, and modification of the site plan to retain some of these trees. 4. The landscaping plan include vegetation of sufficient size to accomplish the criteria and conclusions contained herein. EXHIBITS A Existing Zoning and Grading Plan B Site Plan C Cross - section D Building Elevations and Floor Plans of Easterly Units E Building Elevations and Floor Plans of Westerly Units F Landscaping Plan G Pool Landscaping Plan H Building Elevations and Floor Plans of Recreation Building M -I LIECEND R -A AGPICU.TLIGAL R -1-200 SNLY.E FANCY RESICCNTIAL n R -1420 SINGLE FAMLY RE50EIJTIAL P-I -BIN SINGLE FAMLY f "9LENTIAL P -1.72 St4GLE FAMLY PESCENTIAL ri P -0 PRCFTSSICNAL AND OFFICE r c -I I Mx -GORr xxI PETAL C -2 REGIONAL PETAL R -I -12 0 R•I -120 R•1 -120 R+120 R -2 TV,0 FAMLY RESCENTIAL R-3 THREE AAA FOUR FAMILY RESCENTIAL'. • R-4 LOW APARTWNTS RM-1 MtLTt'LE RES0ENCE HIGH CENSTY C-P PLANNED BUSINESS CENTER C - M INDUSTRIAL PARK M-I LIGHT I!LRiSTR( M -2 HEM' INDUSTRY C-2 t C-2 C.M M -2 C -M II © u V ROHM ll ON. V V aL ROH M C-M LYN ( 1 1l M-I : :p APRIL 20, 982 i '•4 M -I S,�.ftit.ty,�.i�iti.�i(-'Y: -.r.: •i�:�. ��...��;.:•�::. (.1„ ' " • • . • - s .1414ft)Os 1- )Ni cNt Oz k I St N :{ t iii rti i rii 1 ` I ` i ` 1"i"I rrri . ti I J I U I11111 111 I 1 r Oat II - I ' I 1 I I Fi�firl° 4 . em= rte« It z •Mm \ II►N�II� i iiIIlI11 1il;.,wj I i �,� 1 M al " affleimam - xi t - 1.310"TWO t V1uNarr *'�`• wrs 0 T-AN M/ 0 = 0 s• 4e x..b CnN ANT_ 3ourH [+drat•) A/t tarTH ( raw) SITC. ILlN`1 w/ a•en.G m+2i5 •• • Ira• • annum 1UI',WEA .fMTr1 NT WC t'1?W( w 4- ' j . Mr) N2tN5ON 1 ■ i • •`;, �.. 4o • = t.....1 LOT ... + C-11 al sM s %•co - SCUM- 14420 104 MT) = MUM wrr» . atas c s/lrrr GMT ?OWN 140•1•T 4PT ..A+ 4 rna ' M dorm' .rre 54 Knee. (5)1127m1 INA 14 lrwev. CP. n+rN• . w Y arie 'r T rnrn o .w 14 wru.0 wv.ev+ En rlraow w+e •ansr. o Mr.. • 2 rinlrw o m•eao •.n.e tl JOHN AWIETSOI X47 ASSOCIATES PS. INC. 5F: Si t Maw rr•MO= OVA • l • meat WI (- tgYL.1M 820 , NEM IIII • ION NOM& %wan • II MI Aoma,ormouw .141 1111113•SIV INV MIMI NMI? CP4. Lel tsCCO-4; L*01 taw )(41JWOD irfa4lhat/ YON1(411.1. g 4 •■•■■• 1. 1 1 , '311 'Id 1111113111111 IRV 11111111 Noir C NM "9/ %.4›-J I`424 )C14•CO 1.1 s cutlyru. 411_CT1 GNOUYAV , . 1 1 , i ■■ , ■ . 111.1 111 = ; 11 111 ; 4141111111 Ian 1=3 ti= vnti rlrnJ SIM ! M WI ii j ,a• ME I sum ..111111111.. 1 g ra•••• • NO MHO WO • OM ellonnal IMPS • • 78 OM • ,„ .1,0ELIIHOZ5V 121.— -3•1 .eo 1131V13111111V INV 1111111311V moor ...- . • r.., ,....., \ \ __,,,--- (•.,....,\ r...,--= ' \-.2.- • --. ,.......-- . .::. - : .....) ;1; \ V •-• ....:,.:-'.; , . ‘ . .,-- •I ; z d 1154.10\ika gla, ?el IUNCI • 1.1 0/0■ hiCGLI714,1 ■-.10L1 .4o■ Kaidwz0 11 C.1.1141 1 47t1:71 MOILLI t.7jj .1-CA41.1 g ig to r oan••• ••7:7; \ MN • 1011 MINIM 'MIMI • iv nes /W. • 1 NO LOBILOHOEIV 11 h i '3M1 Id 111111301$V III 11113111111 111131' czei. 44'2 SP•nr val >Ca .1J-Al-414.4dY `dlItIL4111L C 61.1h111 ‘4412•401 t-001.1 a-COW a 9 4. _ ...*,...4...t..6 IMO IIIII • MO Wm* vamp. . 0 Ts gm .■■■■■■ • 1011 IMMO • MN Milt 2.9E111.0HOUCI 'Id OM I 3111$11 V INV MIMI "I '.^- ..... •+cl 4-1421ii)M %.(.) t • • • . '"" *.',\ • NCQLQ.144 • LON X11.IWC.7) H1 LJZ-10 Ii "0 3: C. Ems mown raft • . U g ,11.3S.10[HOU9 $2, A •••• 3I 'id 811V31111IV INS imoinv • ii 210 ' 4.1Cilitta • — 1-4COL,1 ‘1 401t4 GeNICniftj L.4a,fri X711WOD 1N714.1!-N,H sd1it CzNOLLOZT7 r , •■■1 11111111 ■ WINall — Ig181 111 141 I MS MIN IME 1 NM 0 En i 1111111111 - ilill 11311 110 IiI II NM OM III. MI Eli 1M 1=11 \ '' 111111 \, iiii / Ill11111 1111 .1 • 'Ai / 1 . 1 !11 111 = -1 .1ilwel Now I gm 1 Nom 1, , MI j NMI . : Nom - !‘ I NM L11110 um ........11 I me =4 'limy tirtlinfl InIt El "km_ illi111111 .1,11 11 1;11111111E1 T .1.-_-_ 11 1 jr...:1 U! I lur-- i Jima:IL go Z-11 Argil I =1I .1 — I mg ow '. II•i \OM ...11111111111_ Ill 1 ii. I 4 '. , 1 0 ;7 110 g. . 1 1 1i 1,,,,imli. . 1411111‘ 17 illi 011 . ow 1 a ma i ma i .= : = we , sm ' v PIE i■ 16 11111111111 1.1111811 1111M • ....um-- t,..„_10113.1 III .E 11111 11101=11MM TI; II mifihl Mt Lituniteutimmuumit FORM: riff' 11 . 1 1! ' '41Eni i■ .0 I II T:I ` il 'In 0 I II I ill • ill 1 1 1...pro!ill i laiii, Iv Ilan. , -...,-..., -- .......,..,,,.. • 1'11 -1110.5 I ,, 1. 4 .21 .- iiP ill 11■'. 5":7-ai '1[11 ........... Ill II:111111E11 1 _f_ kill 1_11( II 1 ri ' 572 '• 1 ell .:1111111IIIMIIIIINIIIP 4411 ••• NO • Nes Moos lows • .Ii ow 11.9E1.11.13HONV 111 I 1HVIIIIV 11W 1111111111 III? Welk. Sari A.121-WS -\ • 'N= 'V 1.4311.1 , cw X7 .1.14;11•1161Nthi . • err cerscrIra JJfl ^se)w-i. kax761 1.441.1 • lorm • .......... • . ii 14 1,©EILIHFOOETV A.- 31111 114 1111113111111 INV 111111131INV 111111t s woo A • 1, • sr: n a 1 Ncnt47 )(71.1143D 1.N71 4V4tv V"111•ItArl.. II 0-. CI, 777 tr " 5::/t 4.3 %47J.." .41.t7 .3! 10724, .11,03.11,0HOEIV • um wawa yaw • • n Ems 12 I .; 1111 'Id 131111311111 suv usuuouw va ." a " 2 NOW 401 Ica1dW0) Lt4"44.14-ma P . 0101 1111••■•••71110 0 H.C9c2 r 1.• ii 0 N. IJThfl Li 1■011...1. L1001.I 04411-11. C C It a. 0 r ; g T ' P c) . .1■111116 ' • 4liztlitkra • • l'• - c t o . 'On./ • • ; • ' • . . .• s � 1 i i I I I + i r . ' L..ocx II {! p�O� I ill!! I! I I I& I I I I i T.RA WYNIAL IPAIpuc �. ..MAD 5C-"PE r /N5 Gh FLP:4 A ace" pit �=cirri 3 Pn u u3 1toR7w - iV L• • AL- NEA-T9IT TREED EVIN N 6I1 5.11 L s 9. L•RtsS TM vi 11.RItY1l1110* NAM WARM 17- AEALIA lmL/MI IMf W I•wR Ulnae 313•LAUl(L [AIEWAUR \ \ r -* 5 •••914. •••914. JLii Ms l • LL ZMWTtl .9-AZALEA u3nIA. 9 1r 11•1* et ANNE MLEII �.. _ �•�IM',.:'.�lC'.� %..: W taAl�l�� Nlll*5T 11wA aww• T• /Cil r1ATlNnt �O►uulfw .aL rLR Ln L t11 T '. r w+ ET sr! Y I I I LI I I / CT 1ST•L4LWIL L AKONIA UM CEIRl -111191.13 TMUNI111 OU= _mciTISL i N 11/ {U 111 5531 L N / ,• - ■uALSrL*0• Et SW 110.111 7.1•1111.171611111L01017 r3 1.171611111L01017 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN MURKIER $ CENTER PLAMTIN6 PLDN JnWIL.,'s Pf.A•►i `TC'�f' CT7"-R -EJI M P, ti rtTL T.r1U *US 7UUIOEtCLIN )1 - 1.011111 7 Ittl =l.tl1 3'1N 1 Or A AI n Y- • 1111111*IIT "-S a• O.C. 31.1.1111171.t. T•1111.141.• t I5 1(575'. L•IICER RATINDIIFS DuLE t• . r I/ TAOT3 CISDITA 5t W R •_IWTW .SAI. roe Mons EO JONN ANDSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. /.l e W M O 11 LS c r ENO 1111 • • 1WN � 1 •WiSrM • Sue rai Sr I. ALAI :ABEL. 7•KtR RAT1.IpL(31 5L <C #R /LEI. • _I.lvl 3• Lc w CC l -fW1U* Tu5►1 *CLODS AV7NA WTEAWEL _vr arm' ZSLU1LL E/1WARA Y/1 C11EER LJ✓ � 3.011 SOLE Sl•AtALE• JINE WIWIO e GAII1i- snct11r Si ALRMT•NO AREA `J ALJOIRIUG W11•LIC STRICT TtRLt I. • ■• D• NTCflIJhU.V fr. JOJ11 - 1 IA- AKA FLATINOILE3 D 3.14111f) INTO /T T4/ - PL PLATING .NOTES I . PLWTING MOLES TO El {' LARGER II10 DCIKA TUBS TIE WALL O. TNS ERNA . 2 PLRMTINA WALE TI DC URC1fILLED 111711 T31EEE.W11V -IRII. TOPSOIL 3 FARTILRRR To DE RLQO -MPAT TAO 1 QUEAL I5PR1{D;wS PER MwM1.r ACTYRCR L RECSWA IOW. N. OLAuTING *5153 TL W5 cMlt•RIta RUI T W17M •*t•CME•4•■1■ WU% COMM. MI*TCRIRL { IUD AREAS TO DC Mule Le WIll EW5 RIADL FIR DARK -51.1.1 A► AND NAND GRA {•551 airml ARE TO •l SASOLD [III A Ww3( Or EIUL-.NAV -Mtt TDISUI L 7 7•111 1•11. D TALL TO AEIGUVED OR STAKED Ma Latiakiaa wz C f. flaw* aswit 11.112WW WMINVM %W1 211W2W IMMO lionininl•11 CSflI lornir/2 I 1311.51 NSW W11•511 fugawlelfs VWSWIM wrivIews 11010 • s • 4 .f. 1 ; • ... 1 , \ ..,, ----.', (j...'....., , ., ....:_p_-_ '% ..---- '3110;aNY1 fnatiw nil ne S. wssw II aw. riTivirT MAW 11WWWI 1 . , s ie 41 g o ........ AA" OWE A P igief We f r ' 1.-i- . is" :. . . .- , . . . : • '7'1'4. WWI Sumo. •• ligrii ..21.uwa....=:174 • Ill 9 4 (1 4 ! ....:11.2 WP 1 l& 1111V11.1 WM1101141 tri; ,T1 b r - NMI: f 1 Nium I Tal Tr • I ■ . Al ir , •I111wo3 LI FP • =a1 wman...1 wsw11211WWW.- TY Knru CrJi7rStJglld OT arm .W •10 2••• "". • 42= kit ii1diw lowirtina Ill, .1 IdawqwWwWW10-• llllll Wria2-li I. CL A7 NOUAG LA Y7 GAPINE TUhWq�. PPAhT COMFL GX ra. h■Ch A Nr h3ON D4 ViVtirrr 4 /II• AIIEIIII IIII IIIIICIATEI PI. INC. ION It r Mrs imam HIM r Ma • .._......- ... z.. .. . r.:•( „= `,'n:tti•. �.•..•.�:'.';'. :.:':�� ... ..:.M1•.;r ...h oa:sl'ken PXJ.t5.V4 man .. !M r • N 12 • • 71 UM M ... b©BI,OEOad7 ` .: , 311 'u 1111131111 III 111111111 art? 11.10, 7W JV y 1 %T 11 I tt .11stItt'siza GtJCXl`11 I to O r eN i !fi rua2, PL/4 CL1117 HOU3C. Io 7Uhl411.A. / C.0`111..e..X "'" 0 PTCP1501`4 OAT. 1.21G 'e% • r. 43,44 • t • V-AVItri" ...,....."'"".."'.."''' ..0 .'" ..j ■ '.....--, ', ',.r•- . -..c.F-:.i .,1 ‘ .; _,t ,...) •„, 1 :i .- ;) c.'., -.,- •..,..-":-:._':, \ z, ,. 9 ....: ; i. '.. .111111 11111111 ASSOCIATES P1. I. ARICHOTECTS- nen • ...NA 1.111U.. • Whoa 111•11110111 • 0.1 111‘•111 4 0 ARCHITECTC-+tAL Lighting by 11111DC0 Series Height .1.1 Width 14 Finer for Post 0 D f .1 114 TURN CAPTIVE FASTENER CAST ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION LAMP (nor supplied) -- REMOVABLE PANELS FOR EASY MAINTENANCE a�rft — r wool 6` BALLAST: FACTORY PREWIRED r T STAINLESS STEEL —. FASTENERS WATERPROOF BALLAST HOUSING WITH REMOVABLE ACCESS LID. VM (Mercury Vapor) 100, 175, 250, 400 wort VS (High Pressure Sodium) 70, 100, 150, 200, 250 wort VH (Metal Halide) 175, 250, 400 wart • cost aluminum construction with stainless steel fasteners. Hinged roof with 1/4 turn cap- tive fastener for easy access. ' • ..'_;;SURE isolates ballast from water and hear for longer life. Removable top cap for quick ballast access. •": shall be UL approved and be an integral parr of the fixture. The fixture will bear the listing mark of Underwriters Laboratories. Fixtures suitable for use in wet locations. Socket will be glazed porcelain mogul base, (75W MV, Medium Base), nickel - plated screw shell with spring loaded center contact. All ballasts are regulating autorransformer with power fac- tor better than 0.90 (HPF). Ballasts shall provide ± 5% lamp power regulation and ± 10% input voltage reg- ulation. of injection molded UV stabi- lized polycarbonare provide maximum optical effi- ciency and reduce glare. Panels are removable for easy cleaning. LONG LIFE CRAFTCOAT thermoset polyurethane pow- der coat finish. Refer to inside front cover for specifica- tion derails. rION FEATURES Series Incandescent Model Available 60 Arcr,!recrural , 62 York (Igi 63 Tudor (Ig ) PL-1 1 Landscape Lighting Hadco presents a broad selection of quality Landscape Lighting. Constructed of durable cast aluminum and Brass. Cast combination. Available in a wide range of styles and finishes and coated in our exclusive Craftcoaf finish for years of lasting beauty. Several lamping options available including low volt- age for the ultimate in safety, with fluorescent available for the energy conscious. RECEIVED OCT 4 1982 !ah,f AnAer & Alsoc. Inc. A -39 13Ys" H. 7W W. ' /s" PIPE 60W MAX. N -39 C 1 , 3 ' " H. 53" W, ' /s" PIPE 60W MAX. 5039 13W H. 5 W ''h" PIPE 60W MAX, by HALO 1908 • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard - Tukwila Washington 98188 433-1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 22nd day of August, 1985, at 8:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: Public Hearing 85-29-PRO: Ryerson, requesting approval of a planned residential develop- ment of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. Public Meeting DR- 13 -85: Ryerson, requesting approval of a planned residential develop- ment of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, August 11, 1985 .... ,. : +1:',. �,..,........ ... .,._� ... ".': y' ".>.. �•t - v .: t.L'i'..i:�JV.G ... _. 1.. :..��n_. �. }.!fr;� >.ty !ltY V.4:: ^i'Vi:�T .n.,4C•k. ^..- �V...sfa�_4LC :.. (: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: . • Record Chronicle, July 28, 1985 Distribution: Mayor City Clerk Property Owner Applicant Adjacent Property Owners Applicant CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 8th day of August, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: Public Hearings 85- 22 -UUP: Seattle Rendering Works, requesting an unclassified use permit for two aerobic bio -tower filters to replace existing anaerobic filter at 5795 S. 130th P1. 85- 29 -PRD: Group 5, requesting approval of a planned residential development of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. Public Meetings DR- 11 -85: Jerome Matthews of Kidder, Matthews & Segner, Inc., requesting approval of a three -story office building over a one story parking garage on lot 3, Tukwila Short Plat 78 -2955 located in the southeast quadrant of the 51st Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard intersection. DR- 13 -85: Group 5, requesting approval of a planned residential development of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street south west of Interurban Avenue South. Tukwila Planning k.11ission Minutes, July 25, 1985 Page 2 Mr. Beeler said condition 6 could be striked. C Chairman Kirsop continued the public hearing and design review to the August 8, 1985, meeting. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW B. DR- 11 -85: Jerome Matthews of Kidder, Matthews and Segner, Inc., requesting approval of a three -story office building over a one story parking garage on lot 3, Tukwila Short Plat 78 -2955 located in the southeast quadrant of the 51st Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard intersection. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report, with revisions. Richard Kehle, 1932 First Ave. Suite 302, Seattle, WA, presented samples of glass, brick and stucco material proposed for the building. He requested modifications to condition 4, and said roof top equipment would be screened. He requested the Board consider approval of the application. The Board discussed the reflectivity of the glass, and requested different types of glass with less reflectivity be presented at the next meeting. Chairman Kirsop continued this item to the August 8, 1985, meeting. C. DR- 13 -85: Group 5, requesting approval of a 103 unit apartment complex consisting of 10- apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. A continuance of this item was requested. MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS APPLICATION TO THE AUGUST 8, 1985, MEETING. MR. LARSON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED OTHER BUSINESS A. DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants, requesting approval of fencing and landscaping along the Green River, as required by the Board of Architectural Review's condition of approval of this application at their June 27, 1985, meeting. MR. LARSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE PHOTINIA PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED IVY ALONG THE CYCLONE FENCE. MR. MCKENNA SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Mr. Beeler briefed the Commission on Windmark Homes appeal, Fire District #1 annexation, Tukwila Pond, Valley View Estates Final EIS, and McMicken Heights annexation rezone and comprehensive plan amendment. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard p Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the July 25, 1985, meeting. Vice Chairman Kirsop assumed the chairmanship as Chairman Knudson was not present. He called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. Other Commissioners present were Mr. Larson, Mr. Sowinski, and Mr. Mckenna. Representing staff were Rick Beeler and Becky Kent, Planning Department, and Mayor Van Dusen. Mayor Van Dusen expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commissioners for their volunteer work. He swore in Mr. James Mckenna, newly appointed Planning Commissioner. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. SOWINSKI MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 13, 1985, AND JUNE 27, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS. MR. MCKENNA SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 85- 22 -UUP and 85- 27 -DR: Seattle Rendering Works, requesting approval of two aerobic bio -tower filters to replace existing anerobic filter at 5795 S. 130th Place. Mr. Beeler summarized the staff report, with revisions. He informed the Commission they would not be able to take official action that evening because the environmental determination appeal period had not expired. John Phillips, 2001 Western Ave. Suite 555, Seattle, WA, requested approval of the unclassified use permit and design review, and indicated that it was not their intention to replace the system to increase capacity. Tom Irwin, Ipec USA, PO Box 1607, Vashon, WA, described the nine states of water treatment and operation of the filters. The Commission discussed the affects of a power failure on the aerobic bio- tower filter system. Mr. Phillips explained how the system would work in the case of a power outage, and felt the system met all standards of the criteria. He requested modification to staff's conditions 1, 2 and 3. Published: Record Chronicle, July 14 Distribution: Mayor City Clerk Property Owner Adjacent Property Owne File s City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulev Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor and CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HE RING AND MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLA NING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 25th day of July, 1985 at 8:00 p.m. in Cit Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, ashington, as the time and place for: Public Hearin 85- 22 -UUP: Seattle Rendering Works; equesting an unclassified use permit for two aerobic bio -tower filters to repl•ce existing anaerobic filter at 5795 S. 130th P1. Public Meetin DR- 11 -85: Jerome Matthews of Kidder, Matthews & Seiner Inc., requesting appro- • val of a three -story office building ever a one story parking garage on lot 3, • Tukwila Short Plat 78 -2955 located in the southeast quadrant of the 51st Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard inter•ection. DR- 13 -85: Group 5, requesting approv 1 of a 103 unit apartment complex con- sisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately South 137th Street and 139th Street South west of Interurban Avenue South. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. 1985 *ILA • 1908 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City gt Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433-1800 • Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Board of Architectural Review Planning Department July 19, 1985 Application DR- 13 -85: Group Five ., ,.,:.c:..i.: n�; +trt� %• �. ,.,. �: rv'_ 7ya::r3;Q:Y... «:::aSY.e:tt�,r:S V;s.:.::5 s.�3':�i+::t, , z: sY °L >:!_Y,wii- :,?f.�k7r ✓� During preparation of the staff report it was discovered that this proposal exceeded the permitted density (TMC 18.50.020) and the allowed number of units per building (TMC 18.16.020) and the allowed number of units per building (TMC 18.16.020) and did 'not meet the parking requirements of TMC 18.56.050. In order to resolve these deficiencies the applicant is considering applying for a Planned Residential Development (PRD) and will be revising the site plan. Therefore, it is requested that the Board's review of the proposal be continued to 8:00 p.m. on August 8, 1985. At that time the entire proposal and revised plans can be considered together. cc: Group Five (GRPFV.M) (5A.2) R . City of Tukwila' 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor . CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Planning Commission has fixed the 27th day of June, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: PUBLIC HEARINGS 85-23-R: 51st Annexation between S. 164th and S. 166th Streets, requesting rezone of King County zoning classification of RS -7200 (Low Density Residential) to City of Tukwila zoning classification of R -1 -7.2 (Single Family Residential). located in the first 175.24 feet lying west of 51st Ave. S. between S. 164th St. and S. 166th St. 85- 22 -UUP: Rendering Works, requesting an unclassified use permit for two aerobic bio -tower filters to replace existing anaerobic filter at 5795 S. 130th PUBLIC MEETINGS DR- 12 -85: The Architectural Consultants, requesting approval of a mini - storage warehouse facility of approximately 100,000 square feet, at Interurban Ave. So. • and S. 143rd. V DR- 13 -85: Group 5,;requesting approval of a 103 unit apartment complex con -.. sisting of 10 apartment buildings and a club house, at approximately 137th St. and 139th St. S. west.of Interurban Ave. So. Any and all interested parties are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, June 16, 1985 Distribution:' Mayor City Clerk Property Owner Adjacent Property Owners File TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: cc: Group Five (GRPFV.M) (5A.2) t rvauaJ444 M,',1aY41 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Board of Architectural Review Planning Department July 19, 1985 Application DR- 13 -85: Group Five C+ aFYN�:. T: f. �XANU'. ry�a��.t M.+t 4. 7) tM! INM�f! �F+✓ vYrtsw�zn- «...�.w.m.srrra+�+nv+rwaea. w.�wui.vnn�.nv During preparation of the staff report it was discovered that this proposal exceeded, the permitted density (TMC 18.50.020) and the allowed number of units per building (TMC 18.16.020) and the allowed number of units per building (TMC 18.16.020) and did not meet the parking requirements of TMC' 18.56.050. In order to resolve these deficiencies the applicant is considering applying for a Planned Residential Development (PRD) and will be revising the site plan. Therefore, it is requested that the Board's review of the proposal be continued to 8:00 p.m. on August 8, 1985. At that time the entire proposal and revised plans can be considered together. A. BACK .• 1 11701'1 L . J . UN 6 19 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. D 5. Agency requesting Checklist: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: fits P . y.501.I 4. Date checklist prepared: 3 )N 1` ? ;5 City of Tukwila Contrb i No. Epic File No. Fee S100.00 Receipt No. (2o6)( - 14 - 1- 634© 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: MIYI SE.41 &f-' -YUE. \IA. ° Itela c , 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): r1...Ne fikoc r wt wt-T14 fsgeo cr fr.S 9P Ptr P S Pos5ist ... cast RAC 1 N SWx \LQ EAL C-alrl 42, kJ rri4 cot-Arum SCE - li M c. J N No.42, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1sApN .. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Np. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. C rr r OF �v�UJtl� b IWtl4Ca PrrM rrs ( but LotKC f W ML(NCp rnE) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the pr000sed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. r.ot.m -rwcr' to3 u1J rr pirMt7M Nr C.1) .x CQt�1stSTt�lb c2F aUL.Dt•hle . alt A4 '1'L,X) e -PRCoM utvrtS 14-10 AL .112 1�OU • • • .0 '2C>6 pAR IN 6 S' C S may tow . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. LocA CA -c aF Tole,wIt✓a rth1 t n 4 Avt . R .TwrxtJ - 114r- lo . 5 1.1 +h V t. - . C : a- • oST�R CxYF Cl�y2Si✓ M I fltr -0 -BAN At, E., in 'J6 RV `a . 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE .COMPLETED BY APPLICA(. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, slopes, mountainous, other b.. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 60- 9070 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A SOILS ■1✓POfk PP\EPAI o e c CANFlT,A 4 , NC. ?)( V RR1V. 1NC. OD1N(7 Loboe.X. ALL.. NtP L. Ist44 ) StcTC UAtS. SAi.1p S[otk£ , S■L CsT01 -1M- P4:40 ;Al _ • `t•:Is_ gnu. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Tom. kb A LARGE LO t or_ti,WIAL N :f4:'THE. C ?— tyF 'i�l� S 1 - - TH RT APPEf LS - K� L SLU NP Oft SLAP ,„ WAS . CTS. t r• G d t-. -' fOg. •lL,s e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. - rHrjR>z 1S AN tSn 6 t.L)1) SPOT AT - NE_ Sn lo co�ty Cf___ a_ m4Ar vQ (LI_ F t LL 11-1. QARKI•& A XA A Lc 4E, t Uff R utc si cart �, Tlu... - t' w Lc_. ALSO bMr� C 12...A QCOt c' fi Soy` 01 f. Ccin erosion `os occ result or clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. S DUB - 10 S SLSDPfL or p#,RTS Of STT . A Cp►L ENGINt R. HAS 4 EIN h1Y0L' O D AN 0 w (LL._ AD V t SR- PU Ze t rl6 €2<CAN'ATt or4 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ?fjt.,% Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2. Air 3. Water a. Surface: -5- h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: gou_ p4611.4ecr hAS rfZ -r i c f Comma NAT1oNS #.Nlo t uu.- 9- ADY DO -1%4C. ft.Pc iN - JaN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NoNf_ .. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 140. a.. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 'TALL- La-L-147- 4N IN p& to E.misNor lS W14D Worm e,Mr-40i DU S .46 c r N ST KyCT10N 1T J?& U31c.l , Pte. '1 tS5IoN� . 'Mork tOIP H1%NT AND . MT._ D1JST FRAM c .AVAVDNS b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 140. .. u.e*.. !.T a. �.. ..!il- !:J:i13G, : ^t.71' -v _. '•yyS r:;rr� Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach 'available plans. . 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface 'water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of f i l l material. Np . 4 ) W i l l the proposal require surface cuter withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. moo 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. gyp, 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 1 -6- :.1 > \.) �: ":}fv:.Yi:S ern e.y: ! r'��•faff[n'ar. R-y1 • ry ,..::ta••l.f.`•1s.Y•r:1Mee'!.�^ ; •.••�.i. Wv: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 b. Grouna: -7- 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be 'discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 1\10 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following j chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N otJr, c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. RuNOI tXo4T F(ML SOME- bV- r-PAC.- AND SOME RDNO}'F PRbr LsTS ° ►o i t 4 9 wit . 5t. s rrL Cw t ER/.7cm . s r c)(zs RLTi�N floN S`fs M W 1t L? I Sk 4 O lU C Nrc H AND Hr — n4 is fkuri OFF u. t ._ AF D t S C H AR6r.D IN-1n TJ t- E)c ISTIPIE, cx -■ L _ 'TART \4PNDLE. RtON OFF bN Zi tS LJ AT SocaNk Ti- 4D OF 1�t'TTitUR.(- �Y Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: stnwsi iktM tart 1 ON &csrtM . v- ✓ evergreen shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, other types of vegetation 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found site: tree: alder, maple, aspen, other tree: fir, cedar, pine, other buttercup, bullrush, on the eelgrass, milfoil, other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Do ib - r srEWNyss of '11ArL Urns. Mc& of 'rte V.1S11N( VmcsENTIc cz►u #441)._ IltEAActa). Ttx +SrrrAG TF&ES to 6U510 w►w ZE. p f 1 F 4w w SSE MOSS t6 ._ f . - r c rz- pLose 5.0:h s . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nc. Evaluation for Aoency Use Only 5. Animals 1-IOk■! i- �. Evaluation for d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other 7easures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the sit if any: LAtkoscAPN . furl HItlis MEN PRETAM f rm. ILL I31=. RE_LP%14 c 4' .D, ALL- AREAS NOT . cov s W fl -1 S J R..D IN C, CAL. fh LI:-.0 IC, WILL b!L. 11 0 sc Ap�D Ofd Pc..faN W t - Cm. UROr_ D c c v' & . a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. *-lo$E_ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: t,! of l -- Timk±Li.jsrtoscAtiy€7 Agency Use Only gy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electr c, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will b: used to meet the completed project's energy ne -ds? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ELr_C1'P.ICrt'C' roc. }4e x l_ Ni-AA Uhf -•rIN 'HMOs. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent propertie.? If so, generally describe. No What kinds of energy cons:rvation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control' energy impacts, if any: 1.10 1E_ . ironmental Health Are there any environme including exposure to toxic and explosion, spill, or haza occur as a result of this describe. W m Atst C \NSTUCT tal health hazards, hemicals, risk of fire dous waste, that could proposal? If so, 1C1∎1 - MEM. %S "V t-- tor1'+ Pl.V.A146c u4c R.1' k W 1 of 1( • cnuQUC n 4'4 . 1) Describe special emergency be required. t+-I i c.A l_ services that might PI R1< NNE) fbL.ICE.. I 2) Proposed measures to reduce mental health hazards, i Cr t PLY (AV l..t]CAL or control environ- any: BULLD1i4E cola. De.gb 111 . a, NO WILL S. • " I _ k l_ • • r' . • 1 _ • -10- 6. Ener a. b. C. 7. Env a. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 8. Land and Shoreline Use STA't•1�11�1G . ) Wra: types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? j•4ONC..... 2) What types and levels of noise would be created 'by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. DUR.►t4G O014STgIrmo 4 788. xxxS) 6L TDUfmr..NT c,o�•lSTRu of cctisTt:OCTION K CE.r, C f,7N STRO n oN MAIN 5OL)P r-t_ dN Nclsr wouLD NFL. T:R.01 - r C. CMG 1f 9.4 b`C RgsI DENTS 41141D Y mows . 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mcst` OF'_ TNT - rikAi tc. LOILL, IT DI FLTa7T LAC AV I_ . a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? .2111 l5 CL)iL1�.1'f`Nfl.'( UkUm.p,"ft- }E.m- IS r.:Nt 1 OroNC..E._ — 1}a RT'THL ows- C e rritttN[.D 2 h}oatK. - T�-t� 'R.cftPTC AKCR t1A. R 4 . -- A.V IS A UOL.F COUQSIc. fKoPERT'IC UDOM ALONG I V�6A�1 rs L mtACL C.IAL, R1051 (S Ika)ott1INb _TY VNf uT.1. -OPrD of. RLStDMT(TIP L. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe._11p c. Describe any structures on the site. NoN£ Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? • If so, what? 1'1t QA 57 CUD "- OONCASD Ot'.1% t J 11.,E 1Z lOVCID. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? girl 4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? P.M 4 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? "W/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 'NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project ?1-200 V E.stotcrrrs j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 1-t0'Nv__ k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 14//p, . • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: is coeteA'TI4C . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? 1O5 CAN ITS MI000t.,.- INCOt"1E b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Not t1— c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: -- a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? i - 1 .Vnt i - 'mom LDLOEST C-gADV... "`O IV' c P UD 1\00F — D E,o t LD IN6 1'i.)CTrR100. TO (SE. V1N` L SI , AND FNINTLD Woof) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? UrPtEJ: Q14115 MN"( eLoc -, SOa'1 - v l f-L) OF 60LF C_O ofiLS >E- FOB APAic't -lICKTS nN 4 50 4 1 p w s. P R o , B L -- qNt.N Lc L C . ON RS c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Nitts) t•1A WILL. p - DOWN C r..X1 ST(N6 ?Rt> .S Sltvtn�iD FOSS 113(.1- . EX -t o& L.31(.1, P C. ( N"i r--ST N6 ANC) PL tP,SIN6 , Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? �4k DULO gam. MIN/ M A L. `T *riR1V r6E.. Sony L164fTING cr V1/41 f\CL A tOT r"T t3It4., P -- DI C_Tc (4 ,k1,4 o DQw'1J it AV1O et-NIX . LIGHT ON P431LOrr4E, lAI.LL 1 ONLX U 1TIN6 of IwtMCPI gP.T.A . stioljL t416 T 1 MC c$ ( b.. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NcNt_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 131LL, NTH £R i) 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Ex]p CpVe.srt_ ESN sf H TbsTEr. ME.tyvt.IPL fA24- 4C ' 'FIB flat.. 1 CrNt 7t to foot, f>T - F t 144 -,H &f4OO� b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. D c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: SITS Wv�1 — CPr lTIOr - rte oAcuuoTZ GLO t buSr.. urtN SSA wmFmt .LE . AREA , iuc t.Cts.R.. Kcc' - i NsIc7 41 U..IAj cs _.1pCof'l , Srnr... "TD +HAUL. SL.01 MNt IN6 Poz,L. tfortS _cauKr_ PL.A - C Pit.KA k_JOe IN6 fIvr1{S. -14- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. $40 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.tlbN. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if a ny• 14 oj4j , 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. sue. Sr — r LAi . PKVic SS '7 1TA AC CS S - ro I - S 5 9a5 c.J«.L. t�E_ PRDr� l sz.V��M' L AULSr»r). A 1JD - fl — o'P PPra.-r ccF S Cir. Pg.00 Ski S. — It• NM-kg/WI b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YES rilogm1 SocrriA ON INTK1ZtXZ( c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? L- tLL. rr4AVVi 2 ) CLI M 14 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). i'0. e.. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, describe.___So f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. ne Zoo 'TRIPS orr sr t... m4 r) ' 26b Tg.W enq Tp S 1TV P P►1� T M t�S (,V- 112 00 AM hNO 6.Op PM g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 140.lE._ . 15. Public Services a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Y( Lau... 1-tzUST... 20Q DfL-E. W H (CF\ O(LL INGL,UQE P CNiI pg�t∎l b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities �..r,x. r.s....+.. ��:ti[' /e!a:t4liJi:v 4�:14U:.i..:�i ; i,` r13ki. �. 4ir: �x- S::: LF: 4V: 3:% 7iv'!.'J �„n...y�t:b'1V61ti:fh�x+:n,.Aetii : H�,' ��:' �i;. i.:,. in` �: �;i5d:y�.H:CtW."�:a.•.k:Y1M.1`F . Y _�JN:i�•l::M1RY�+:ki:.fHFkaNi:i ��, t:.:::i:Y +(�- >:i:i!_TV:1h` :i44:iK',f.'1'.• a. Circle utilities currently ay.'lable atthe site: electrici natural gas refuse service) telephone, sanitary sewer sep lc system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. --LSi CT ILtc tTY W H1CH tS AV A1l.P St FCC S CST. W aT . WILL tVaQU►f tL'TAPP►td6 INTO scST'EM 9,K4J3 R . w F4 tc K 0.L) S 11 4Q)USIA Sti' . At o "C �lai1G O- M UNr .2 cP..ot` A NMK.30.6AN PTV t . PL./At-4 C Signature Tne above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICL, -► 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? TROvIDf- tkoQS1146 Fok. 200 ptort.•e, (=100 UN ) E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for ,a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? - ME_ ct4t..7f JcniL Pg.cs11o1<. - t + l t - NOUS t 4 C ON 1TS • b A - 4 / 4 , 1 4 ( 3 7 1 4 E 1 4 r _ - IN rT s O F _ CITY OF `Ti Lo% 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action : Crrc or - TuKWILp, k11Tt - rrS Lno3 Rr.Sit r(•r1AL. POr()(Prrlcm- cA'N °SC. AND SUfrOKt MO X- 811=.5 I DrcNTS • — Mt C- S t'te- IS CLOSt__'10 MAIN. i1 c Jin #41-) O P Tl`.R• LA LS . T 14C. - ARIL Aw -.poczt u7 1'C}11 N M 1 Les SITti IS TirRYEc i M!-T-. STS Gt...OSTL- '(O FAiZI'NS Gout= Coogs E. SCNmI 51 11445 LleAAR`C' FIRL_5 ric2 ANO dTNiR co M MU V Y SAY t CES . 741F S tTr._ IS SimrtY ANr")Src )L 1D NCrr P - USI-,D Ft PeICULTl1QAL. USES . 'tN - 51Tt<• P Pte/ IOT_'S L. ASANT V 1 tLt03 AGRos s L0A RSE 17 A'• Ti Xc_ ,ict t r LoC.RZ1c t4 roe 1) S - r - -(PE OF lOADJfCV Evaluation for Agency Use Only MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION THIS CITY OF TU II LA oeie 6 Central Permit System SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME DAY OF . „,(040 1 rI 62 2 )3-.5" TYPE OF APPLICATION: DBSIP °SHORT QSUBDIVISION QSHORELIN GPRD DPMUD BA R PLAT P ERMIT INT O CONDUSEONAL ❑ D VAR I ANCE U Z C N I ZONING D AM P E I NDM Ell T 1) APPL I CANT : NAME Fi tCI' A . t\-(FiNbot TELEPHONE ( ) 141 - 6 Q ADDRESS t39 $(1 St- ` .LL�y(.�� \ / % . ZIP - � � p 2) PROP. OWNER: NAME e (i�Q up 6 TELEPHONE ( ) l ADDRESS t929 TACO -P A! Ty te S co W A A . Z1P C 1$102 3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 1greF.4JF.t)4.1 AYE. o ext 11 t xT :1411 (34s op 1'61 13 ' Pv i< S . kiNCe6 rftoti rcE1M ear couR- DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. cs14sTs.ucric14 CA=. 1Z. C&N IT 1- 1F-1`IT coHquEx c 4SlsrtN6 or 10 NW:I EW ti..06 A44o a ci e Huv sue.. ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 11(0 1 9 es5 TO LAIL I9$(4 WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED I N PHASES? DYES NINO I F YES, DESCRIBE: PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE : NET 4,55 3 EASEMENTS .- IsTIN(y B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION : TOTAL 17 FLOORS 3 INCLUDES : 0 BASEMENT D MEZZAN I NE TOTAL GROSS \)'1 N4 INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT D MEZZAN I NE FLOOR AREA • ALL euILDIN SITE UTILIZATION: EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES ZONING DESIGNATION I 1H ITN COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA ❑ 39 q As ❑ LANDSCAPE AREA _ ❑ 8 200 ❑ INCLUDES 1-A41.4 PIZZA PAV 1 NG AREA �' ❑ 72,00o ❑ TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - 169 - COMPACT SIZE - 3C) - HANDICAPPED SIZE - 7 TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA pj AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 'L % 25% MAX SU3?E ENcrx . IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? 0 YES NO SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT I, C A • ) . BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNEk OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND TH -•., TI SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNO.LEDGE DATEZ EAS X f -1)i' te .. N •7 1 YOTAR t ..10.1-1': IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT (SIGMA - E OF CON - CT - .RC ••SER OR OWNER L • MASTER FILE LIST - 1986 box APPLICATION DATE 1 FILE NUMBER1 PROJECT NAME ADDRESS I APPLICANT FILE CROSS REFERENCE ACTION 1/2/86 86 -1 -DR Lloyd Hartong 6412 S 144St CN -83 -067 86 -2 -SPE Stress Management 5200 Southcenter B1 CN -85 -373 1/22/86 86 -3 -A Park & Ride Annexation Interurban Av S & 52 Av S Cn -85 -112 86 -4 -CA City of Tukwila Zoning Code Amendment: High Tech Conditional Use in C -2 Zone 86 -5 -DR (modify noncononforming landscaping Joslyn Building/pea/AI & Parking) 401 Baker B1 86 -6 -DR Doubletree Plaza Hotel 16500 Southcenter Py CN -86 -051 2/24/86 86 -7 -DR Al l enbach/U(��(�;;r - ( / f3 53 Av S & Slade Way i_' i CN -83 -093 2/27/86 86 -8 -DR , Tecton Development Corp/ 6450 Southcenter Bl 3/13/86 86 -9 -CUP North Hill Reservoir 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 3/13/86 86 -10 -DR North Hill Reservoir 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 3/7/86 86 -11 -V Peterson 5123 S 151 St 86 -12 -V North Hill Reservoir 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 3/27/86 86- 13 -SMP- SEgale Andover Park West & S. 180 St CN -86 -102 � S. 152 St CN -86 -103 3/27/86 86 -14 -DR Tukwila Heights Apartments 4/7/86 86 -15 -A Coluccio Annexation CN -86 -117 - • MASTER FILE LIST - 1986 box 17K -13 —$5 13135 t N'►ERuR•Pa /4V S 1380 5‘ Rvs 13'130 AV S I v'! 14 32IEN"TIFIC NAME; . COMMON' NAME:. • ' N7: . eiZ : - ' C,.v1MEN - TS • PINU3 CONTOP .. . . • CON1 PirA• PIK1E: :.; : _ .: 3AA., . ... b-10 1 ..:' e, q 5 ., . VINE.:MAYL,I., - 4,: - . .'.10- 1?' . °: tic fb-- euMPS..:.. N', Act FLANTINOIOGS' -. - Ncf1WAY MAPLe..1''. ..'7.e' PUP:PLC. 4-.� LE M. MAP5 :.....: -. , ,. .,.. q + v:.. ... - '.. 10;,,,t ' . !0-L4.'' 154C) :. Y.; 521 6.:..'.: .. - fit , ` FfiUPlU9.THUNPChO OU :_-_— : '': .._ J - I . ....,..21;24'1; . -. IO:i.' :. . . hHOWDPIVGP )C7N. M'VIARIE._ : .. , GAL . . .. :::. .: #i. :; 'Hq _ F}EAY.Y '..:.. . AZALEA : h033 ,UD:, - '._ L AUREL - .. ZAP EilIANA.. i -.' : ZAb EL :'.. ._,.,. - 7G� PHOTNIA::'FP.n¢0eftif .'`:.: ... ... F? _ - .: :` :: :..G?.L'i .': .HE.A'Y' :':`:-.'; :.:.... .. 'T. ::. .r...... .: ._.., , VIF„LJPNLIM:'.IJAYIDI ::...• DWI rDWIDI :'. ..'._.:_ Jo_ COTON M.g• TE3 PikNA EYI '2.1-2-4";....,..- . 1 L G, '(yp:\ lli PLANTC DC: TY••• AICI HEGeNA'. HFa lx 6L7 6ALTlC ' IVY. _ 200o, : • - 7/' 4 POT' yr 1 :L; \ITIC IV'I ON b°•Nfi _ 41111. A 1 h� -'�• - I` I Iz HI-tocoDENDP-0q • - \` . -: JEAN MANE. ` .' .15 AZALEA FC'�BUD N ce I 1o0 CFs2J JC ! J.FIE • 9) PPy'JNU9 - 11 - IUND • bUIu7INe ee. LnNIDx L- vUI I I N v 1J EFL LAND2l_AP. PIJ r NUY. 2o..'2G. . UILpl eF� L?n1 Ja.AN MAPl1E 30 LAUhEI Z+LELIAiJA 3 PAY 3, 504. 3TAcGCP ' ' -- _.._...- .._ . - _- - FLNUC3''THUNCEPCLOUP —✓ g5 LAUPiEL . zAcel_IANA' ' v Ta11119 =ON' ''•. 4b4 Se r 4/1 PAhNGYI Noy'20 7986 CITY. OF TUKWILA "; PLANNING DEPT.!:'.."" _4 • ( )Thur -1175 Ty Uraf-GAUD • /n ; PHOTINIA FFiAePI� DeL h 1 PC h PLATANOIDE PLANTINS } .NOTES - 1PL: NTINe:HOLae BE a LAFiGEh 4 PaaPEP) THAN EAU- OF THE PLANT PLATING HOLEe TO Be•Li'.chrIU.bD t IITH 1}IREE WAY-MI) TCPV FF_h'TIulEP, TOLE ACF O -PLNv i 17- CLP c i A 4?LY FP3i MANUPA -I9 P F" OMMCNQ PLAN TING .. AheAe TO .z.. PINE h l`�eP A^Ip TFJ7 WITH PP-6-GMEhG�•NGC" 146F -0 QO I rp MATehIAL PeD. AFYA3 TOEEMULCHED WI fH'2'P'FINM. GWe. FIN th- °„PP,EW L''i NLY ANI7 0.N D GhADD LAWN AP'F.)M Ape. O ec : sxcEo crl : e QaA°e; Gx'' plI e: =I^IAT - MIX TOF L ' - n - is ' OJFFi Ca .TALL 'T0 r E. GUY E7 Cf i °TAi iED. Hi?CC,'DEN[;PON -ii, MAP+1t 3)A EP PLh7PH IPEF ilk j 171 Z,.F$eLIANA • Notts 5 Gl.c. • STA: FP 1111111111j111j1111111j1111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111I111 .1111111111111111 1111 1 111IIILIIIIIIIlLL1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIJI IIIIII1111111111I1111111I1111111I1111111I1111111I1111111I11111111 0 1 9 3 4 5. . 6 _ CU 7. i.- 8 9 10 11 �,w ".Y» 12 11IIF TEAHIS H M I CROFILMED DOCUMENT S LSS • C LEAR TAN TH IS NOTICE, IT IS I DU E TO' 6 9 a 9 s ry e E Iw o OE 6Z 8L LE 9E 9Z V EE l ' EZ LE f OTHE UALITY OF THE ORI I 1 n ii hi in nn m1 uullnlfiiulnnlnidlii111ih11 a nnllililuillil liiiilil1�1�1i11i 1li111 litilllulii1 11 j1i 111111111111u1nhhn 11iu1 i�l�gli11111111111p1lll 111111 _ m 11 ! 41�1 1 11 Ul 11 U ) l . ,,M.,_. , , �,... 1. . fPhl`,!nYa --- Cr) PINL15 CLI�ITOhTA T10N c' I N1'EhUhbA.N ,e(37ACEh FLAT,AOICM - 5 —, , Aeg ' IJor Mp#tweD exeg rhood) spar toot/rem i ot -( P11JJTIl'l€' . E+CH bEJ PPOPe.P7Y IJNE ). FUIlli r - CLUJD� • ' �Co Pll{= GY.DFJ`I DF�71{' Y J JEAN M•><hIE fj! h HODC9E.NvhoN JE..N MARIE PF'OYIDE. , 7P-IEET ThE.5\5 . P..01 1W 1Uhb>N AYENUE'' PE.h APFF -CfED LANCec/ r . PLAbIS b1T, S LANG C+•PE, AP-H I`I - ECM " (23) 4eetz {3) PUNUB?HUNDEPc!DUD "` ? 'COLON STEPi:.PAHNIEYI CLEARING 175.00 PAD GRADE 23.0 0 PAD GRADE 56. . oo PAD GRADE 58.10 I ft =/371 -3 NOTE. FIELD LOCATE AND RELOCATE DURING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED. TO DIRECT STORM -. RUNOFF TO INTERCEPTOR SWALE. I O DO NOT ALLOW CONCENTRATED T RUNOFF TO FLOW OVER SLOPES. 1+ I CO e I0 join e1'11//29 Yege447 41, £ iI11i1SEDIRXTATl011 =TIM 10TES RYERSON GROUP r 21 5' ' oho '5 T / i cd • WS"- /rear e /4fx -. CQ-4' GQ3 4w MO 6 41/0 7127[ w 70.35 _Zee 0 712 n -11-1 Jo. in Lilo Isar. ad 037 . Ian NLL.70 1. All Melts of cheering aM ereu of ,,9etetton preservation as prescribed on the plan mall . . be clearly flagged In the field and observed der1M construction. 2. All required sedimentation /erosion CatrOl facilities must be constructed and in operaetdn prior to lend cleaned act /or other cnstruala to Inswe that sediment teen our does tot enter the natural drainage system. All erode 7M sediment facilities mall to melntatned In setts factory cpndltlen smell one time thet staring and /or construction Is emitted and potential for mite erosion hes passe.. The Implementation, maintenance, replacement end additions to erosion /sedimentation control systems shall be the nspenslbill ty of Um penittee. . 3. Tha erosion acrd sedimentation eotrol systems depicted on this drning are Intended to be minima. requirements to meet anticipated site conditions. AS construction progresses and ' enacted or fedenal cendition dictate. the penittee should ennelpate that more erosion iM,sedtmentetlon control facilities will be necessary to insure complete siltation control on the proposed sin. During the carte of construction it shell be the obligation end ' responsibility of the pentttee to &darns any nn conditions that air M Crated by his activities and to provide eddittonl facilities, over and acme tlneua rfgulrann, et ear be needed to protect adjacent properties and meter quality of the receiving drainage tystn. 4. Ooprmtl of this Clan Is. for erotion/snwntation control Only. It does not Constitute in approval or Stan trainee* design, shit nor lotatlon of pipes, ratrietort, tunnels or retention faculties. I. any disturof area Wen ha, been teripemd of rfeention and titre no further sort 10 lnttel- fated for a Period of 3D days or mare must be immediately stabilised with mulching, erns planting or other epprmn erosion control treetant applluble to the thee of year In du erns Stetting alone .III be acceptable only during act months of April tnru Smelter Inclusive. Seeding My proceed outside the specified tie. tented whenever it Is in the interest of the ptnhttee, but must Os augmented with eulnlng, netting, or other treatment approved by the Departoent. 6. All erosion /sedimentation control ponds with a dead storage depth exceeding 6 Inches cost have a fence with a *Wens height of 3 fact. TUKWiLA , APARTMENT COMPLEX ti ANS. SA (lemon Rood) N4S 41'00'N' en-4 ,rar Cf GENERAL NOTES I. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING FOUNDATIONS B OTHER IMPROVEMENTS DURING CLEARING B GRUBBING PHASE. 2. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION TO AVOID. DAMAGE -OR DISTURBANCE. CQUSIBUCIIOU-SECUEUCE I. Install construction entries. ' 2. Construct outfall structure and berm for TESCP pond. 3. Grade interceptor *wales. Granites() operations shall he conducted so as to fill TESCP pond location last.. 5. During slope grading, construct interceptor an*le Our Uulall at the top of all banks. Du not permit store, water to rim over mails gradud slopes. Immediately upon completion of slope grading Ilydroseed all bare areas. 7. Maintain TESCP pond in operation until permanent storm drain systum is operating. X 0 ROCK ÷ • I INTERCEPTOR ENTRY PAD w /TEMPORARY CULVERT CR055ING C3 -7 Aim 7/J7 Jnoly/ L1/7 JNTER0114N AVENUE SD1177/ N 44'000 "W glee/ e f S S' /& 4+ dryer rfrfo ground min. of /: /Ws /060 4AoaCd, 3' D.C. • 1/44's/DO - W SWALE PER CA - el '16 Aim 738E Jmdu / 7/7/ 4'x4' /O/ /o w1d What" ea fag /S. t 1"r4 ° %US2et D//er /i6ria 94/ed /o /read r �1k-// fnrlAed .E ti/M. FAB/T /C FENCE DE74/Z (eta/ to scale) TEMPORARY EROSION SILTATION CONTROL PLAN 931.80 __ DETAIL O SMA Top Old IMIrill '111 NIP' r- 1 Moir AM,,1 and Mem JIMt, e4 .. . AuMNII. d eem .l..0 AMMO= NE igZ6a Sri FaAriG 3D 1, 6'/a/ TceelAaS/9 r ■ • 1io// for/ Berm ar;U11L.o ✓ / . -, /- 90'e/bow ens -�� - � riser pipe. li ZxYr� 539 71 Primed iko I �7I\ GRAD, forge ,°%,k°ed. 4 9io.00J 5/f0ie Ie9uired e 8226 143 a 6500{{ ;fire ` 5D4' -/1" Cesar 80.40 % • ✓�- o.- a limit v In✓Du/ 73/4 7709 prtqa). 1> astraw Bahr Detail (no/ to sea /e) I ( o/ E/. /4. e5 /o .47, . i tl'+ t iiii• :iv iliiggiti ,*1✓:(y; AvJ ll�,., •. � n I `Tu t4 v ...� s • ... 4 ,.L mew ��. :. <�::. Ak�. J . 1. d' 1 C>; Y� I�IIIIIjII ill j III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIijI _I1 IIIII11IIIIllfill IIIIII I o k==.«..., I I I I 1 I I I I I i I i I i I I mnn.,n.a 1 2 3 4_ _ 5 6 7 \ k==.«... 12 1yIF THIS MICR DOCUMENT IS L ESS'I ;'CLEAR THAN ` THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOE of IIpIIpIdIIIIII 7 oe L2 9U SO YE CC O If_ OTHE_qU��AL_�ITY _ OF . THE . ORIGINAL DOCUMENTII: s G 1. g s o 7 0 1 oo o I - I iwi illinillminu m. .. ._ ., , illllildnl IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii091111IIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,1iill0411901ililg� ylvidtpilipgplllnnilmllllilonlmll p II11pl1Ulllllllphnl�p111K11111111n11�1D1 )l,lli,lltlil r.� Il . ... . , � / • - " Conkt( �1 e /DxZD'. ioo �r coeval 0 G iJain. deo•1/2 rapt' regaelie egg egD A PAO GRADE ,eocx dirzeo 0?40 7 5tr4/t' BD /e5 "breed rr/k - mitt 4' /on9 ar as PgI.V. ea/ to rtainfoin ,a0s/fi0n. (2 /ow w /lpins er4n /e) 240 en /1 1- 'fin 7173 Jnr. •YO /e: 6iore/ aoPi00Ch a0io r re(9U /ied a/ each o./rewo9 dui✓n9 C'O/L5 / /UCY /a/J ✓JrU.SK art./ . £x+• /SL_ -� l lie/ e_v4e_ So $alien A -A 5�wwfafi0n And (El ro nrk) George J. Lindsay, P. E. EXisl i CB. Irish // ZL.F. of /B'COne. eu/r with raz+ Naef in em/», e8. 400% slope. -272 = /3. GO . / ote 3ci yds at r r'/o'/s'nw.trd4Aaa Armond riser. r NNW A/0 7332 Jnr in Bao CB. ° /3 //1- 0857 Inv. From 68 L4,L7 Z. t.'.Sra• Consulting • Engineering • Planning Omax. /0/it = /1.78 cis mex. & /01/, r 4.24 ,4 /sec.; C seJNfa dtysf o n 4 krr �sbl F.4.1* 71!1 r / /1'CYr 0/00%. C / b1k1 bwrrei EJ /' n KrA GNJIR Zi •, ✓l:.o .5Y4015 • 6 'DR -13 -85 Di/a /ion orSaida D/ei»4e. tE-- TmBoieiy Dro /rieee Sue/t. (lee deka) DR/4 /NAGE CALCULAT/ON5 Temporary Drai»age .Scud /e De %i/ (e.0/ to 5co/ ) 31218 Pacific Highway So. Suite F Federal Way, Washington, 98003 206/941 -5033 SCALE /".,30 t JUL 131986 MAHAN & DESALVO, INC. ANIMIONOMOIONOMP , /8Z 5u20 J7 = 0.030 El. • CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED SEP 241987 As HUIkO L•UiL ^INU L''JI 'O I • !u- warn^_.+r•.,..:...«.r•m. tree. t. r. em. ,a..�:.:«..�.�..�.�.:....�.:.1J JOB NO. 85-087 SCALE. I "m 30' DESIGNED. W.J.S. DRAFTED. S.J.B. II CHECKED. APPROVED. DATE. JAN. • 1986 ' SHEET . ' .3 oF;4 s ✓ •'A --- "■ . '.'••• • • ' • • • • .Ll&f PLAH ix.e,tNc4 o kit•cc:' er (0 • CH id past FINDc..0 531 co le Pot...e.. PP•1 e Dh4Y.4 hCCOMMENPEP LIGHTINIcv L_-5 1.0 FG0 bk_111.1,11 atvi i•-111_1-155•1LuJM NI . . MA7c1-nr-i& L-151-1:15 Arri<HM, 7C) - 11-1. WILCAN65 rIxTLIP Col..0•11AL- STfl TI. 1067 JOHN M. ANDERSON STATE OF WASHINGTON IN7thUhbA • SOUTH E R L • 6:1 WE. 50u . bUt Pet', N'H IN$tQ TAr Ner czC uppth P/9 P•hers• a 0,05 1--v1re. rth . • 9.9 WO &9.r7 0,05 . 14n01-4/415 I014A en.'01-1 - 10 1.01•15h fo•hhiN5 Arr_A e.. 0,05 WATT Ph 50,e7 5c0 .?PT • 0.05 1475 HP-715 Pocn..lre5 c• 160 1.4X1T5 M04 10 • ■■•••••••=1101111, • ' IIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 IIIIIIIIL1111111111111111111111 0 ■• 1 2 3 -4. 5 6 7 L 8 9 • 10 11 ' 44.4.44... . 12 pc az se sz 00 •,z 001 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS \ CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO • 44 14 THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6 B 495 CZ I "-.71,011110114°4141111,.. I IptRillip Flu •. • _11.1rilAJILA , /VAN? MtNT co.mri_tx • F" P A Mth5ON - ■3 if ..ECIERMFIC... NANIc. �M1 14%41E. NO. 517_5- • : CCt1rl.EIN1 :' .... • • IFC1 7 1-ILU5 - ITICULop55 C."1-1A,F,IN. /FEN 8 lo e). kv-LEA .P . 32 G)= • :A2.ALE,A....1•4E><E • 1 1 eAL-. • •PiHOr;cNPRVN JEAN PlAhlE. Ir2 - 12 2-2.4" N- UNIOUt •pi-ic r.:)1 ' JEAN. t•thne 4, 2.I'-.24 , vIDUrDNUm A•Y.101 . 54 -%.I.. • .7. •„.."•.- , „. "„ 71 FMANICAL15 . .. . 4. &--4' ' . CAr1L.1....1A • LIA.FoNic.A. CAMELLIA .. 10 2i-2.4' • . _ PHOTINIA ThA5EP . . 14 lb-'2.1" • .. 1 :.5CIEN•TirIc. W•mft. .. cam NON 1'4 • ' .1 aizE -. cOrimCNT5 - _ - .•f'0EUI-L : cuArlNs. A‘.F.e.N • .•.6 ... I0-12 _ .EAt. . - •/=' , TALEAs • hC)5554.JD : . -- ' ' • - - • • " :GL.T • •-• - - '•:A:2A. MM<E.. . . • : Ir2 - GL • • •pi-ic r.:)1 ' JEAN. t•thne . _ • I(.0 ,' 21-24 • I'HCC • • uNIqUE..„ • .7. •„.."•.- , „. "„ .6 ... • II 7,24 ..,' . . - ..VIDUP , Num DAvIDI : *.c/A,VIMI " . . . " 72:: , •.1... • •: PX.P. .. .•11 .... - " ' *G0 . S7•4'. • : 15[1:: . .. • I I CI) OJA)SIN6 A5PEN 5AZAL5/4 f \\11 eL NI-10ca,ff..N0E _ULAN mt4h15 ho 5 LNIOLIE.' -,zyle,uhNum NAZkir..), MEx5 1.9 EDLIILDING, 'L Co • COPYRIGHT.° 19 JOHN, ANDERSON .21EN CI•CINNA IN-1-1 comNGN NANE. c&yi I 10;•12.• ' 21-24' 21 . Gr)c b&..? NG L 4:PcNA4NNQ'A•EFE.I.1 I , 3 LIflUM trAWIDI • ) a/a-ALEA. Psceabui7 LANN ./. ,ise • - 6 h140E-CDENOP-0‘), JEAN MANE THI5. Al TO bt LEFT NA:TIYE. PLA-11 &AL-71C.. - Ohl ALL 11 SOL- 45 nHODOGENNON5 UNIQUE )kzeLE14. ME / r bLI QDINS - At%F5N - • • • ‘10 hOM600 nkfc . __51-111.01N• JEAN MAhl 11.• (4) frrs.rliMu _ (2)Nia;cceNar UNIQUE ,e..2 UNIQUE _&1_ NI t•.1 5.,E. • \/16UPNUri. pt ' \1.0 \V•vq..Eiss PtEEU IJN 'PAs.(ipi (I) QUAY-MG peFE-1 . ) ' 15Ntituh1m. C:wor. LAWN \1 19 _ stk AZALEA hC6E.61.12 Xf`r.-0 JEAN MA J NE, 7tis R bUIUM CAVIDI 1.2) QUANN9 WEN buiLoiNts L- L-4- L/ssiC)5C.APE.. RAN LAHNt. 4f51-4C J ri1C. • THJYA erlAmpAu5 • N ` ■- _LINIcput, (4)AzA-LeA. ri5NE. • .„....•' '- L. ,.. •,.., ,,,,, .j,f•If41,.?P4`;,4,,;:, T•:, ],','• •''. ,.. .:'•.,':‘ .. '.•:::.:;:,"..• .. . .•'5:.g.541•Y■,,if;0'te0,?:KI:q•''.1:7.);•'M.;''''"";:.• *:`.1:'''(''..,F.t':' ;• • , .,.. ",•, - - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11.11RWIWITIIIIITIta I 1111•1111.111•1_11111111.1iliMiliiiiiiliMMIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - 0 ....... 1 3 :4„.. ... 7 8 9 • 10 11 ....----, 12 . IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 1 .. . ,. . •. CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO ; . z !,,,, 0 oe 7 B e gZ SZ V CZ1 ZZ ‘Z THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL:DOCUMENT IL-6 ' 8 . 1 9. .. 1 C . I . •-75 7.777,-...„.„..,,„...zrrr- :. : 1 1 5 ,•• ':'i l 'ri. .''. , ;:...•;:,, , talgokili " ,iiiiii,,,iiiiiii iiimileir 10,,,i,t,,,11„111 II 1 1111 ilibill 1000,14 iiiiiiii .. , - , , , 25: , ,,. , ...',; , ,::a: , •::: ,, s , „i,l , r , ,,5!„.2!;,, , :L.,.., , r67.757:7F,fr -,7,, :::: , :::' , . . "A5PEN s 6 la-AL-EA i1 ENGU5H -- /' 0. . 5nficmc MAINE I AZALEA f Yi Itt1P 2-W1Di 5 r114C2D ----- JEAN MANE . . . „ , t • 1 • ...• , • I . . . ., i',;••, • • ''. .:••• . • ...• , . ,' ,'2c - •.!• • ' ' '• ' '..'' • 1 • ••••• ...,'?'. ' • : ; . 7.1 IN - GLIANN • 7S AZA.LE.A. P .bLJJLPING L-4 . . AD 70 LEPT NATrvc. PLN.rr ENGLisH INey ON PITUriba. ectL 1 • . EUROVE JUL 1 3 1988 lb • Azitt ------ refeti X'hs-102COP_NVN21 'JEAN MANE --16y1FaJNeium MY101 UNQU Fooixo5NGh-,Ti MAHAN & DESALVO, INC. CLUb HOU5F c POOL LANI:r.)=Nft. 1 )Atifq-r-A" 2 Av, rIcee.e:UP 1 e,C, Grot•Act cepte IMRE I NOV 20 1986 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT ------- ■••11.11111111149 fi f .' ,t ItTa+Yt!' LE AZALEA ROSEISUD; ZI� RMODOO R ENbON JEAN MARIE I4tw DiCN'P D) II 315- LAUREL ZABELLINNA _ 4. 5' ON CE 5'1 Y�1� Cti. ii-Rots01E 1.10 MARIE vc. ' ?�"..r • 'Ni "��,F .�aruN>, x,.a�•3.. •,r-{.� .,•' . �:.e.. , . • - - : . ,.. ° �� ��... i.. �� •� ��w�'48 ��� i0} ��wy���'. a' C. 2z= VIBURN UN DAVID% 7.7 PRUNUS THUNDERCLOUD ", r! hl`zlNCy' 251'7 LAUREL LROELIANR: 5' 'ON I CENT,k• 3 .PRUNUS THUNDERCLOUD /. tw.• R , �:++,��}}..�. l lJ..� ��, ,� - �.•, - -- - — • k;•v,Fi i• i - GNT�'D�;R.'. 6w i6 ; i '` jtS:'':'.. t ,,ewe, �P,F r � ,.d9C 4M 91>•'4 W 04tal } ► 1 i1 , E attaft �f� ,�• I/4i � Ii"' -Er 4 •Rdt y g i > "' t:4 st r alr,` 119:; ,-o aia�'A:4:Y lePitf`i ..r��S 0.f..7s. V,h ,,,t4f'tr' . • 3;ACER'.17IATAN0IDE3 t0 LFIUREL ZABELIANA'. .. 5! ON.CENTER •; ; •• 2 = VI NE MAPLE 3'•; C�N`TORTA • `PLANT' "IV G- NOT I:, ,.: P.LAN.TI :N..G .H.OLE.S:,TO •.BE: 6 "_ _LARGE R'_QNA_:RE EPER- THAN.TNE_B1?ILL OF .T PLRNT ' ; • • • .A., PLRN,TLN13,.: HOLES;. A_.6E_BRCKFI.LLEI?,.VJIT_H ?HREE -W AS( -MI TAPSO.IIL .' _F.ERTILI7- R. Tn PSE, AG[ZD LRNS.'.SA.P+_ .5._A. •LillkAL- • APPLJ.ED AS:..P ERiN1AN11FACTUREB �S�RECOMMS.N.DPRT.ION. H. 'PLANTI_NG;RitEAS:TQ BE FINE. .RAK&A..AND TREATE • W ILH': P..RE E ME12G AMQE..;WlEE�_ CANTROL �M!rreRIAL_ .. _5. RlE_q__P.ARERS' TO [3E MU.L'C_ttE.A:_I!I Iltt :.2" .FINE GRADE. _.E11� .PiARK: SPREAD.EVEIJLV A N 6 LAWN AREAS Aft . _(,„_EkE 5012, E•1; . • • O F:: •F_,j.LE. -W.. - 111lIX ,T11Pfa -LLt . e 7. : .3 OV_ER:..6'.TALC TOME. UVED aR_ STAKED .� ' . 3- PINUS .CONTORTA _ NC7r� �.v�. Au.:: Hc- ALTrIr t GP><7W1NC� 1N _I I .. A P1ThtP. A I1JNEs ' SCa AY= 6. 29 AZ'AL' .:RD E6UD .; . 18= .RHODODENDRON JE M AN ARIE 7 TµUNDERCLOUD -� S CAPE . ••NCA PLAN ;' PERIME:TER; . CENTER R(ANTING PLA •'t- PRUNUS THUNDERCLOUD 23-LAUREL ZABELLIANA 5'0N CTR.• 45 60 ENGLISH IVY Z • •O.C. L Q Z5-LAUREL ZABELIANA 5' ON CENTER • STATE OF WASHINGTON IREOJ5TERED (NGSCME MCllll10( FIQAn q :., • 39- PHOTIN IA. ERASER' , 5'ON CENTER'.` F. ' , r .T .); �' IIII�IIII' IIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII IIIIIIII�IIIII .IIIIII.IIIIII.jI��IIIIIIIIIII I�11.L lI111. I. lII II. Ii.' III_' III- VIII.. iIJ IIIII�IIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIIIIII�IIII ,•.H.,�.w 1 7 3 4 .. 5 6 _ 7 8 9 10 11 uw.." - 12 �ITF THIS M ICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS, • ez e e LIZ ez sz n ez; ' Iz CLEAR THAN THIS NOTI IT IS DUE TO: I I a e s s n oe THE UALITY_OF THEORIGINALD000MENTI u I I I I I I nl n l I n l I i 7z,-- l u il IIu II,n11 ull ullrlilflill6n { allw6uilnn Iprinitlgnlirjrlliiillrirlili� (li(�(l�il Ililluillllillm, llmi ulm> �luilinl�liiilllil�nlilllpl ._.... :1*.LV. '.Y CCEIVEI]- 'r CRY:0 F 'N K1M1t o P�UILDIN A TEN , u rHcJrINIA FrA' tt LAWN (3)FHO ENOP�N•.CYN - I'H 1 A :HAMM 4UAY - iNCa. I 9CIFlVTIt'1G:." ... 15UILDING51 U -I U 2 U =3. LANC?:�C,A P PLAN _TIP !CAL- 6UILDING . EACH: VINE :MarLe -.__ (2)Q1-09. ;ING AeN ` CAMELLIA _ (3) r1Ii0 PX) D EN D FON .. JEAN MAPsiIE 10 - 12.' GAL . ?I. 24! . 2I -24' J 2B..2A'r . [o. .21 .. ..10':12!. COMMF JTS ._' :... r:COEFJJD 5 Y I i � �Y.IeUPNu 1 J (IDI �.._41 I! 1,IMC� ASPeN • 13 r1C i'•ILIGHT 5 - NJ ( ` 1— � -r v-� r^r SCI ENT' FIG N - MI,.. CPMMGN N'1 t ' MCN - ..• " . . ck 1E-LLIA . JAPONICA . �-MEWn ... _ 10 :. .21.:4' .PCfULUS "tl ENuL.C ?S.._ '.QuP! 1NCy -N ... 5 10-12 54b PHGTINIA . FP)AgENt P A °GPI 32 21 -24 DII.^D p4I PGN 1JE:?.N MMIe 1 I 21 -z4 VIEJhNUM CAA I Dr (IDI .. :.. ' 21 G L . PZ!�LE A ' EX7°ei�uv .. . 'Ica c A!_ Mal BHT bP. L M er c M 18 GAL '(3)Fif- ICPjQFJ-1OP - 0"4 UNI . YJNE. MAPLE' .4 r (3) NHCPCVENDF:ON UNIQUE y7LPSfiINC> -.ASPEN - (3)NANP.IhIA . tiCAODpNor- N :CY NTHI A clJAn11 A5F5N �l AZALEAYGEEF'J7 EiJFi . DAY 1 0 1= .a ? .;..z:•M ?,•� ±ts'�. �f ;• ?YiFIh ?; • zAbeu pt.1,KHr.le 4) QUAhIN6 P.5Pe'N ` , C(dAzALtA :Ac of JP. _ C .2).F)HOPOPENDP7(X` :J 6"M0 i : ....,. ry ,QUAI �INC� ,: PE>PEN. P03C.ei6C) • .....j5YI61.1f5NUrl C?SY.IDI- .bLIILpINC�•:.:U LA1 '>; )NANDINA' _ . • . •:: 4 JPNN C� er N' " ' ., -, • Cn P,HOCL7DEN'DFiCN :'UNIRUE .. _ 4 ._A .c.) `hHOGODENDFYN uyC :'.. I:IDI ` c ,Q U �ISINC °P_ f'•81 1. : :':. -'. (3.)NPND1W.:: • (3)fSfiocvc Mc • •.. JEt`1TIPIG.; :COMMO.N :.NP!`1E POPULLJ 115e.Mu1QI4, ES::'.::. :CgthhiNG PP I'Etl,`; :LAUNCL:..`ZAEPELM1 '. zA�EI_S .VII5UFNUM„ : DWI 01: :.: ',.:..: AZALEA ". EC .JA,::.: i�lhtECuA ziOcm' _. -, , CPf`1PJ•t. :Nvro IDPGN.AJEA.N "M°PIIG, : hHODoe £NDr`GLV ::.:C(1fi111A NPfJDINA.,... . %G ' tt,1 ' VINE MAPLE HEDeJ!,A:ZHEI k :'TiPi'ficl E�LTIC;:;IY.Y., :6' 1- 1151(6TU*I"v6 PROGRESS PRINT '':: • ISSUE DATE YfIK�FiT s (C�, tO;,r „ JOFNV 11 ON 4 C AE80910TES P.$, Pc. I1 1111111111 j1111111j11111111111II111I11111111 0£ 6Z Be Lz '' '1110041 , 110 9z 96 nz ez; z z 1' 11111 j 11111"1 11111 f 11 1. 11A1U .11.1111.11111.L1111.I1111 L111 1 11111. • 4 5 _ 6 7 F L 8 I S MROIME DCUN OMET S LESS 1 , CLEAR THI TH ICF T HI L S NOTICE IT IS I DUE TO I 'DYNE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL...DOCUMENT, 1 � I II II I II •,Twk II ••Tc I inl %n niVe� ��5..3.Y� • �'i ..'!i • f.....F � 17.�5`�i� .e .. < .. .. �,.. 111111.11111111111 1 1111111111111 I I I i 11 1 11 9 10 11 12 • 6 e L 96 n. C z t ron 0 1111III lliiiIIII IIIIIII 11111 }II IIIII 1.11.1II 11111 11 I, III111111111I111111I1111111111I • 7 ntioWDeNDhON JP,4l MAriIE ��Uhl ir1C, A OLWY,IN'o /FPI H �l l'1tQ INIA rhse -EtII \lo PW?PINIA PhA5�1 l;U1L�ING L -2 POPUW3. - fP,GMULoIFJE3 _11.4.UF A6eL.lANI YIeJWauM DAYIDI AZHt Ef�..PK'�Ebu� C3) P-HQP _ fiH0OCoeN GhON. .UNIQUE r. NNNDINA :-ACEP :' :C1 PCI NA >ENO I CYNTH AT:MN ? ^_ Y.I6IJNVUM DAYIOI 7 YIbU1 �JUM M:AYIDI CAMELLIA �,CI ENT IFIG NP,^1E CY7MMGN NA'1 NO. S IZE CCMM NTS G IELLIA JAPONICA }AMELLJ ' !O . 21 -24 . . .fc ULUS, Th M ULOI2 . . . QUP'H f, PAN B id r..1 6 PHGTINIA PPiP J`.I FFh`vEhl 02 2H24" hFCQ7czHDP•CXV M 1f= II 21 -24' Vl uhNUM 171 DAYIDI 21 . ^aPL A?ALEA ' lc. - .,k1..- MCCNUGH-r bF CM e•F M i , GA. L. •c-no UNIC,.0 r � UJe /,PL � .1icDOveNe�.ort uwquE (t0.14 MACAO ' !' �� Q us4,,1N iv— NP\NO1 A Oyile t .... DINGS .0 - I , -2.4 U -3 L,WN1G''.f<PE. PLAN .. T 1PIGAL eACH bUI C: DING CCNNL'N.NAM. NO QUAW NCB A rE.N (2)QUL ING A°fEN `.CAMEU_IA ( DENDF je&N MARIE lc- 12 b4 e, - GA L 21-24 21 -24 2 21-24 • 2 -2-1' 10' 12 31ZE 1 CGMMENT3 N ChcN 'CYNTHIA L -. ING A`3P51N 12 Yte Ur)NurN pAYIDI 0 > CyJ srls AePe i C') �i1F P1 ztteuAf 11 • MANN. (Io) V*61, 44640 htCPLd As-4E LMJF I . • ZAEEUAN I (e) hHct 00ENOP JePN 11A - ,l 10AVLEA, (0) P,1{CGC:PeNIcf- N JAI MAHE f` . 7 YI'UNNUM Q iYIDI . fil4o0O'eNDPCTI .JEAN I W)I F,HODOGENPf'CN CYNTHIA , QUNN - * t3PEN , ‘R. I(o PZPLEA• . h73EV - -- QUPr' AoPFJ l ,.) lit 16YI6JfNUPI CP.YIDI ( 6 CAME V . %c _P-, GPI •LIFUATUM .hIE.De.hA HELIX 'bPL71Ct Ca) PAOCOCEN UNIQUE. '3V INE. M`IAPLEE • hI+co.DEND -Y. N ur.p4'JE COMMON NAME QUA i P 'PeN ZAbELS _ DAYI pt :CAMP; -I-14, VINe. MAPLL` QUAhINS 21 -2h ". I .7J - - 2A! 0 1'oT. MIMITHD [NOV 201986 OTT OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • mr .1 PROGRESS PRINT ISSUE DATE 0041k N i A~ YIN MA,PL..M. COPYRIGHT ©19 JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES P. §, NC. .1 cWMP O II1111111I111I1I11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111 ! IIILIIIMIII .. «. «�« 1 9 3 O ez 9Z SZ 7 EZI ZZ 1Z II id Li 111I111j11111111L1 MMI1 111111111 .1.111111_111111I1111114 1)111111I111I .4... .. - 5 6 7 . 1_ _ 8 9 IF THIS MIROIMED DOCU I S LESS .1 CLEAR THAN CF : THI L SNOTICE I T I DUE TO'' THE ALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1:, e a i Wallkill 1 II11101 lli d IlrI I�I,I 055 II IIiIIfi 1111ul l�l 11 HIIIIIIIHIHIIII111I11111I11111I11M1111111 ' 10 11 12 • QS .7 e z 1 .« 0_ IIIhII; I uull h I lIIIIII111uIfI111111 °115_ t. 7 ntioWDeNDhON JP,4l MAriIE ��Uhl ir1C, A OLWY,IN'o /FPI H �l l'1tQ INIA rhse -EtII \lo PW?PINIA PhA5�1 l;U1L�ING L -2 POPUW3. - fP,GMULoIFJE3 _11.4.UF A6eL.lANI YIeJWauM DAYIDI AZHt Ef�..PK'�Ebu� C3) P-HQP _ fiH0OCoeN GhON. .UNIQUE r. NNNDINA :-ACEP :' :C1 PCI NA >ENO I CYNTH AT:MN ? ^_ Y.I6IJNVUM DAYIOI 7 YIbU1 �JUM M:AYIDI CAMELLIA �,CI ENT IFIG NP,^1E CY7MMGN NA'1 NO. S IZE CCMM NTS G IELLIA JAPONICA }AMELLJ ' !O . 21 -24 . . .fc ULUS, Th M ULOI2 . . . QUP'H f, PAN B id r..1 6 PHGTINIA PPiP J`.I FFh`vEhl 02 2H24" hFCQ7czHDP•CXV M 1f= II 21 -24' Vl uhNUM 171 DAYIDI 21 . ^aPL A?ALEA ' lc. - .,k1..- MCCNUGH-r bF CM e•F M i , GA. L. •c-no UNIC,.0 r � UJe /,PL � .1icDOveNe�.ort uwquE (t0.14 MACAO ' !' �� Q us4,,1N iv— NP\NO1 A Oyile t .... DINGS .0 - I , -2.4 U -3 L,WN1G''.f<PE. PLAN .. T 1PIGAL eACH bUI C: DING CCNNL'N.NAM. NO QUAW NCB A rE.N (2)QUL ING A°fEN `.CAMEU_IA ( DENDF je&N MARIE lc- 12 b4 e, - GA L 21-24 21 -24 2 21-24 • 2 -2-1' 10' 12 31ZE 1 CGMMENT3 N ChcN 'CYNTHIA L -. ING A`3P51N 12 Yte Ur)NurN pAYIDI 0 > CyJ srls AePe i C') �i1F P1 ztteuAf 11 • MANN. (Io) V*61, 44640 htCPLd As-4E LMJF I . • ZAEEUAN I (e) hHct 00ENOP JePN 11A - ,l 10AVLEA, (0) P,1{CGC:PeNIcf- N JAI MAHE f` . 7 YI'UNNUM Q iYIDI . fil4o0O'eNDPCTI .JEAN I W)I F,HODOGENPf'CN CYNTHIA , QUNN - * t3PEN , ‘R. I(o PZPLEA• . h73EV - -- QUPr' AoPFJ l ,.) lit 16YI6JfNUPI CP.YIDI ( 6 CAME V . %c _P-, GPI •LIFUATUM .hIE.De.hA HELIX 'bPL71Ct Ca) PAOCOCEN UNIQUE. '3V INE. M`IAPLEE • hI+co.DEND -Y. N ur.p4'JE COMMON NAME QUA i P 'PeN ZAbELS _ DAYI pt :CAMP; -I-14, VINe. MAPLL` QUAhINS 21 -2h ". I .7J - - 2A! 0 1'oT. MIMITHD [NOV 201986 OTT OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • mr .1 PROGRESS PRINT ISSUE DATE 0041k N i A~ YIN MA,PL..M. COPYRIGHT ©19 JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES P. §, NC. .1 cWMP O II1111111I111I1I11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111 ! IIILIIIMIII .. «. «�« 1 9 3 O ez 9Z SZ 7 EZI ZZ 1Z II id Li 111I111j11111111L1 MMI1 111111111 .1.111111_111111I1111114 1)111111I111I .4... .. - 5 6 7 . 1_ _ 8 9 IF THIS MIROIMED DOCU I S LESS .1 CLEAR THAN CF : THI L SNOTICE I T I DUE TO'' THE ALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1:, e a i Wallkill 1 II11101 lli d IlrI I�I,I 055 II IIiIIfi 1111ul l�l 11 HIIIIIIIHIHIIII111I11111I11111I11M1111111 ' 10 11 12 • QS .7 e z 1 .« 0_ IIIhII; I uull h I lIIIIII111uIfI111111 °115_ I :dr • al Yi 4t; 114 P>rj '�•,i �S � 5 Ar1Jj y�I A'j`y •IR 0 19 I' 2- RHODODENDRON UNIQUE q•urr :LMNO 6 TRUVA PYRAMIDAL! S I- RHODODENDRON JEAN MARIE Gw T QUAKING ASPEN rinsr R!x!"1 11-GOTONEA PARPIEYI,. •ft. ■ 11 0 ' -, j ` 3- RHODO DERDRON CYNTHIA '41- NANDINA 4- AZALEA NEKE L A ill %NE . �� 1 MAPLE DAV.IDI 4 4. ouAKING ASPEN 17 PI NITCHI I Nti MU •• W bT 7 � t i L ,1 ; lth r t UNIT b r1 COMT L,C�W L.OW LA.N .PE PLAAN _ SCALE Ygl . 1' - d I 0 I7- PHOTI FRA5EFL1 • £ '• 9 5- RHODODENDRON oc JEAN MARIE ,Ld 79•KAI_ 4 4 S L •C•G C -rc� � u•Irr yoe 3 - QUAKING ASPEN • G- CAMELLIA - JAPONICA O • 2LC 1 [WAKING ,ASPEN LAWN MAKE A5 LARGE AS GRADE WILL /ALLOW tAd "�: 3-111 . C YNTHIA 2 QUAKING ASPEN • 7- VIBURNUM �AVIDI .•• 14 ,0 ' iNITIP —AL ottre �,, ■ 3- NANDINA 10 AZALEA NIAGARA VINE 'MAPLE 2 QUAKING ASPEN 3- AZALER ROSEBUD 1 ZABELIANI Al N ingIMEZIr 4 I CAMELLIA O i. : 4! Q 2- QUAKING ASPEN l ' . 7—VIBURNUM . � .AUIDI I 5- RHODODENDRON JEAN MARIE I AZ A I � _EA ROSEBUa CAMELLIA 2- CAMELLIA i \2-6UAK NG' ASPEN r 2rd . L L r. r uILDit ie _. TYPICAL ..I- AND PLAN �ttiLE igl— II -0II.. :. _r b LcA e040 LIVING DINING H U0 0 F 111'10-.L LNG .be MOOT . — 6- RHODf1GENDP. ON UN U UE quAKING A5PEN 3- NANDINA i• iLl� .1 3- AZALEA SOSEFSUI� te0I100r1 O CAMELLIA no sa.rt. 0 te1 OOM # 3 I L IVNG R U NI QU E \ O 7- VIBURNUM DAUIDI VINE MAPLE I0- AZALEA NIAGARA 7 -V 1P,URNUM DAVIDI DINING ISI,CI•IC = tLRtC7-1•2 3- QUAKING ASPEN R- R11ob0BENDRON .HEAP MA I talc - - Iwo DGD1 _ .• 24 0" bR-13- 85' 2 OVAK ASPEN L1UJN 7- LPUREL ZBELIANI' CAME LLIA Z -V I BURR UM DAVID% 0 7 W - 0 • ' 8 fr i `2 �. h•.c , w=ti� r. PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. 111 tY Mi F; COPYRIGHT Telia JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES P.S, NC. I '? OE 6z Be Lz 9Z Ill�!aul lq!��lu._ul�i>,.1!!lll�lu� ^TT f rr . •i 5.5•. <�.. z tI .. ._ 1 1111i.1 1 1 I I � 1 111111 1 111111111111111 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1111 1 CLEAR THAN TH 111 111 � I �� IJIJ�L II l 11.I.1.111.LI lI 1 1 1 .111 1 11111141.111111%1 11 1.11 1 1 1 111 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 � ..•.i•.w 1 7 3 4 5. 6 7 $. 9 10 11 wn"•"' . 12 IF THIS MICROFIS NOTI DOCUMENT S D I S LUE TOESSI . IT I . sz nz eat zz Iz THE UALITY OF THE ORI GIN A L DOCUMENT :: s s n e z o III I I I Iii 1111 Inl I III Ill, unlljplulIIIiIII�iIh111I1111111111�1111allllniiil lllilljll I • I •• 11111 1l ll0 IIIIIIIIIII11I IIIIIIIII1111111111 %111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII U PROGRESS PRM 'ISSUE DATE . COPYRIGHT © 9 JOHN AADERSON AND ASSOCIATES P.S. INC. L ACER PLATINOPDES FEIN C E PHOTINIA PRLISERI L AUJN LAUREL LF ELIAN'A G'RI"IODODCNDRON JEAN M/AKI 3 "RNODDDENDRON UNIgUE 6— AZALEA NIA riARA VINE MAPLE VINE MAPLE • PAC 11VSANI�R(-. 12."&14 1,147 ER RHonot NpRQN I"%ru ql, E 4 VIBURNUM DAVID Ut[hCL°C 5- AZ ALEIa ROSE3UD U CWT Jo" LAN.D50s -kP kICv /o .1 LAWN ENGLISH IVY 3.' ON CENTER y r.,... ) VINE M APLE Z - CLAM ELLIA I I — C OTO N EA 5 TER PARNEYI ti. ORgs -�3 = t ZI- NAND%NA ENGLISH IVY 2' ON CENTER. CO -I • W ' F NC ▪ . . s SC O O y W Oqt AC • W G PROJECT NO. 8205 SHEET NO. CO t t i.% L� J +j.f.. kl:tr;.x�, A itf IIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII1 bikt 111III 1µL}LIiII.IIIl111IILIII liIIIIIIiiIIi I11111llll�rlll111. 1111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111I loll 2 3 4 5 _ . 6 .. 7 -. —. 8, 9 • 10 11 ,, » ",�» 12 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR yTHAN , THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO t O€ 6z 9e LE 9E 9z yz CZ; EE LE oTHE UALITY OF THE O ` e e L 9 s n • C z »» R(� III q �Iff�11 I , l I I II I I I I III I I I II I II II I I II %III I II I IIIIIII i r r Ir I 1111111111111 u r ruu6mmd mmduu �1uullilr�ullll Iriill • • - TD ,.. TacaM L & ND - 1. 'P4 �! WITI N £1% ..N1114 1 -.-: :t"NAI -f :rxif3TUg6: 'ZONING ...frYToeeo zoNINb.. 1151. . Pi1:31 ce:N ^ L.. • IraT:14•CA:.. ACruAL «, uN r r ': • ,hepuir .' rrhh Ir u rr r r1TO ut i t, O r, PJJN..DINC NUMbeh Or. UNITb, N Mbm (11 b p corh .UNrr' . NUN C1) 660h '; UNTO • NUM bCli .OF: PAhY�It:IC�:. _::.. ". LAV TION :.', , : . ' • ' • NuMbrri" :or. R JICDINFib, . . 7 . . NUMbC11" cr... TJNrre _: ' :............. eco NUMf?bh [I) OePhxr1:UNQ9, ;' ..'y:NUMber ei)..bechooM:L :: 4rTe_.: ::..1f9 .. _ .: NUMbGri Ct' -. PAP�I'4NCy : 1 1.2 _;. NUM ten, 01'! :YID. rAhl' ' .. • :46 AbJ1rINC� 5(2' C-4..' "AbUTIIN& INTMUr rho.. . Ac•Ge .121 uNITb b2 UNITS . e I �2 ' G9. UNI10 e JVI^SG10 104 'UNITS • _ 20$ .c..2 /UNIT ~ I S •Ap %!, NG i4N0 •.WIL! -•. ft4C GF}ILbP0 - I - IS• FLAY . . : :p4UIPM01 -I1 ' rcNct : 4-( c3'TATE WI I LA Tice. • - • : ir`r :' of ; rc �z ,,. 1', <. ,�, ;. r :,.. - ,t .: " ' ^�.,`•�'y,K. �. f .1 : �'i 1 1 r. ;r� .`Ft6+.*•�t1.:4:�a> Vi ° �}fi.,.A� fl l:i �: ;; . '., .,� , _':�a ys _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III�III II II IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIj_1_L _I_LIIIIIII.' IIIIll.I�_III.IIji_ IIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIII�lllllllll! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIilll 0 IN. 1 2 3 .4 __.....8 9 10 11 w..m ..— 12 1 IF THIS MICRO DOCUMENT S LESS, CLEAR THAN TH NOTICE, IT IS I DUE T0 )E ez SC cz 9z 9z oz C zz Iz ? OTHE UALITY, OF THE ORIGINAL T • DOCUMENT k' e L 9 s a e z I ° 0 II II I _ un nu nlm1 !). l i l il l!ll iliili!n�ll!d 111111!hm�lil! IIIIIII10191111111l11411.4 iii 1111ll1lllol1mllg11.1 ludlphgl!�111I1t1!Ill�lll!Inp� Ipl I�I�nlllliU�p1<l�lgl�!!I 11I i Cilil>illPunl a r ,..,,. - . • r ..... ., : • r.: b�L,. ��' 6"_ I+ YT' Y!: '�.;;'s'm'(_"':'�"'I::IT nefww n.�.:.� `1Y ki ?O SEATK 5.-al TOCOMA 1--to5 TO RkNTtT' JOHN M. ANDERSON' E STATE OF WA$IIINGTON I 1I11II1111111IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l 1 I I I I! I ! 7 3 • 4 5 1 REGISTERED. __.51 T.. / . CXI3 1Cti.:CON TCJUha: AR .. . I 1.)N D�G�jl� ^'C'%vpv . . 4�.o:y : 'i . •..� yg, ..; ggpp / 1U12+�i; c � tt h 0.;.14+ f Y • • k tV. �o,14. . V ..�U�tii , I I III I � l l lli l lll l l(I II 9 10 11 12 O 9 von o NNIN dnr i r mdulmd0NJN4mdINII NINN 111=51 =o 2JoNIN6 1 - 1 5E . P- 3IGPSITIAL LOT AhGA ALLOWAP,iLe. UNI-T3 - A -4 C -2 PG7UAL + UNITS P,BgUIPec2 DW - 11NK7 UP l'Efl POhTION NUMB, Or VJIL.DING (-4UMbCh OP UNIT NUME -h ( •bf=DP•CONI NiMbf?h e) beDPICori NuMbe-h OP 11 S UNTTS UNITS LOWVh TUITION NuI`1bEh •oI- RUILDIN68' NUM6Ch . C7' umact, NUMP�Et CI) 6e_PT>00MUNIT5 . NLIMbGh (2) peDhc2M UNPTS NUMbeh Cx` PAP NNC� Numeet, OFT c& Y rr-D PAT* N6 PR-13-35 h-4 AbLITINC.7 C-2- AbLJ11 NCB SPMG Mac ' 4.e5 AChCS 121 UNIT' 32 UNITS C I /2cco 89• LINIT3 C I/1500 IQ- •UN ITS 2 C 2 /uNlr AUG 5 IN:\ CITY OF TUKWII �. PLANNING DEPT. T , UNO)GP 7GLEP or-4E I I.I I I LII.I I IlI1IiI1 111 L1 I.IJ I I l 1 6. _ 7 _ e IF-THIS MICROFILMED D OCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO THE sUALITY OF THE.ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Illl III h MI1141011 III II II IIIIIIIIIII 1111111(1 III I II ?N�nNl�r r�lir rf - irrin r i; _ vim. s, • T 3 • • • 'I. ".' • PLAN 0 1-Itcco sphee (,,o • 0-1. IO Lt HOW tv NOTr_5: PP44`)ING 4 P'Plre.HAI hccommeiwes) LaNg1 ..5 1,O FOCITCA.NPX... ENTRACZ ILUJMLNATED 1.41 AVGHtf, 1O TH= \U- COLON1/..L. TL 1067 REGISTERED ARCHITECT JOHN M. ANDERSON STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 MIHSIM. 1 Os sz se La sz sz vi C I zz ., LI&I-FTIN& fLA • Z IN7tht.JhbP■N SOUTH d"' AVE- RUTH • 1 • Per) 1 TAr laNer-p CaDc URRCh PAhhir.r., Ahei. & o.cp kitaTa Fro' qM . . 29o00 % p,rl s, 00e t 14n0 1 + fix 160 HAIG tACH = 10 Lowe!, Pit.hhiNcry e, 0,os. Mlle Ph FT 29 500 .CP,F x 0 1-1 ,05. = 1475 , 915 4 r1KTUre.5 a 150 Jklix r.AtM IC) ' • *a • • • • • tv a. I 'Rh , „ , 4 _4,„„,, • r,V••• •• • - • Ti • V4.A.;(M'AT?46,,,'; , • - 11111111111111111111111111111 3 ' • .. 4. .. 5 6 . . 7 1 8 9 'THE GIAL DOCU , ORINMENT k. 8 CLEAR' THAN , THIS NOTICE, IT IS:DUE . TO °THE UALITY OF .\ 0 L 1F THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LE - 1 . 4 no Hu niiiiiiiiiilgLWia011151irrilkifiriduit idu 1 Wilda . ,L,,. •• ,,,,.....•.;•., .1.,-.:-• •••... . •,..,..., , .7.1LINAILA .COMI7L •r°h hICF A I'Vt.P 50N • • , • / • • . • • • 1.7 - m. • ,••••,- • 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 10 • 11 ..... 12 • 9 E Z 1 POI 0 iilk41111011111111111111111111111/1111111111111111111/0)11) _ .• . je .. PR-13-136 414, SlOCFA,T r' t 4 ■1: • • . • . . • . . . . .. ' ..,,.,;,,...\,, . . .: : • „ . . , • .... • • ... . : „ . . . . . - .. •. • , .'• . . . , .. • • , . , • .. • : . EAST ELEYATIOt`I ... • M>CT -P Mhl ILL ; COI - Ch - 3 SAME LIPPP_P' CO. 5147 *7 • COPYRIGHT © 19 JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, NC. OE 6Z 9L L 9Z It!ll� � 1 . l� 31,!! III CZ: ZZ II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! 1It 'IIII�Ii'IiI!Ii��I�11111I111 9 3 ¢ 5 I I I uI1 I111111111 I!-I! I ILI 6 7 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENTIS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS. NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO I UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT L �jilln Il l uliudun nn pmlm alf *ul • • J 111 9 10 11 12 • 6 6 L 9S 4 CZ l 0 I II udull�uuhn I u�uuhnllunluu�nuluq uuluulunluu�uululll �J. I , , a .. r; ...; 1 11111 111 1111 1 111 1111 I 111I I I I I 111 1111 E 1111 I I I 1 111 I I I I I1 I I I L�1. 41111 L1LI1111111IlIlIlI I I I LI 1 1 1 I� l I I j I I I I I I I I lL1111111111111111111 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 3'. L -4. 5.:... _ .. _6 7 . \. 8 9 10 11 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS,\ • CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT ; IS DUE TO. ` e , 9 9 y ..... ... z p€ 6e 9e Lz 9z 9z oz ez; zz � z •.THE IUALITY _ OF THE ORIGINAL DOC II ohm i ,,,l ` J `nduulunhu luulll Iluuhulllm IIIII :he,..� }• „.....,;t�.. �i :,... �� Pict ITCP.hTY IJNL -) PRO1ECT NO. 8 S SHEET N 71.' k r "a'S�k9dirZki 1S'. ";. +tr';! :Best i i:a)::-1;s';;L�. ?; d;i: +1 i :ilii :,rte N� : 37- U MI mlim GIUTH VItaT ELEYATION LOWSK ULL2NC. JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES P.S, NC. rt�u'LF.:S: T • NOf TTH1 =.A T C L1=YArION 1 /6 1 = 1 -0 t>Tt?)IOP) MATChIALS z. c01.0 °.MME AV UP ?tsh b'UILDINGS , 1 1 1 1 111 1 111 1 111 1 111 0 167101N. 1 2 O€ 6Z BL ea 9Z SZ 7Z 1111i111! 1u11Ig111(0 lJ l 11 ltpl I : 1. NOhT I 5CALt Y(jt =I1 -On �cfehlOh MAThh-,V4 ' ti COt- cf .4••1C A6 UPPed'l bLIILDINC 5 5M .5HT Fa 15 • 1111111111111111111111 OIM 11P1M- 11111i.I111I11 1[1111.11111 11111 1 1 f 3' 4 5 6 7 _ 9 10 11 12 • ez; zz �I THI MICROFI D OCUMENT IS LESS ,1 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TQ e e L 9 s n e z ���p ll �z (THE UALI TY OF HE ORIGINAL OCUMENT} I I fii III I I IIII IIII IIII Illl f lllll ll ll ll T l llllllllllll111111111111111< IIIIII D IIIII�IIIIIInlliuliilii �i ll�o lulduul�ll hu l�llll;luluullm� I, III�IIInll�uul�ltllm�l�lnllll� ._., IIIIIII` IIII �f }l -m t f it 7^ s C . 1 '" trrr • • LJTH WEST r_L A71ON (TYPE �t\I� °rAJ Ybo-1 -d 5TG1 ' fNR' SIMIL AAt'l t . [CND f=1 FYATIGN (5117 F-NO) Yet o li_pw UNIT 1:21-40 SIMIL Ah t7f- I-5 • ON DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT L CROSS REFERENCE • ACTION 1/2/86 86 -1 -DR. .Lloyd Hartong 6412 S 144St CN -83 -067 86 -2 -SPE Stress Management 5200 Southcenter Bi CN -85 -373 1/22/86 86 -3 -A Park & Ride Annexation Interurban Av S & 52 Av S Cn -85 -112 86 -4 -CA City of Tukwila Zoning Code Amendment: High Tech Conditional Use in C -2 Zone 86 -5 -DR (modify noncononforming landscaping Joslyn Building /flajnt & Parking) 401 Baker B1 86 -6 -DR Doubletree Plaza Hotel 16500 Southcenter Py CN -86 -051 2/24/86 86 -7 -DR Allenbach /\J&1( (/ 53 Av S & Slade Way i`. • CN -83 -093 2/27/86 86 -8 -DR Tecton Development Corp/ 6450 Southcenter B1 3/13/86 86 -9 -CUP North Hill Reservoir • 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 3/13/86 86 -10 -DR North Hill Reservoir 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 3/7/86 86 -11 -V Peterson 5123 S 151 St 86 -12 -V NOrth Hill Reservoir 14953 57 Av S CN -86 -079 . 3/27/86 86- 13 -SMP SEgale Andover Park West & S.'180 St CN -86 -102 3/27/86 86 -14 -DR Tukwila Heights Apartments S. 152 St CN -86 -103 4/7/86 86 -15 -A Coluccio Annexation CN -86 -117 MASTER FILE LIST - 1986 • v% �7