HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 84-10-V - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - NORTH HILL OFFICE VARIANCENORTH HILL OFFICE VARIANCE
84-10-V
5900 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD
Mr. Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 SouthCenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Variance Application 84 -10 -V
Dear Mr. Beeler:
Pursuant to your letter of May 15,' 1984'in the above.referenced.matter.
in which•you advised that.the Board of Adjustment approvedour variance
application, we • wish to confirm that we will meet the City. requirements .
for landscaping on our property and the public right -of -way. on SouthCenter
Boulevard per the approval of the Board of Architectural review.
Thank you for your courtesies herein.
SVJ:dlt
250 LIBERTY S. E. / P. 0. BOX 2508 / SALEM, OR 97308 / (503) 585 -6221
July .26, 1984
Steven V. Johnson
Corporate Counsel
The REAL family restaurant
.1 .
CI ( 1 I C. .t/.,Li-
�'l,�,i� ?li�Ca C)ir :p1 - ,
May 15, 1984
Dear Sirs:
" Rick reeler
Associate Planner
RB /blk
cc: Planning Director
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
DON MOODY
Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Ave. S.
Tukwila, WA 98168
VINCENT FERRESE
Mithun Associates
2000 112th Ave. N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004
RE: Variance Application 84 -10 -V
City ° Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
..
This letter is formal notification that on May 3, 1984 the Tukwila Board
of Adjustment approved a variance of 10 feet from the front yard land-
scaping requirement of Section 18.52.020, Tukwila Municipal Code. The
action was subject to City requirements for landscaping of your property
and the public right -of -way of Southcenter Boulevard. In addition, the
City Attorney is to approve the necessary agreement relative to the latter
landscaping.
I have referred the matter to the City Attorney for advise and will call
you as soon as I receive his opinion.
If you have any questions call me at 433 -1847.
Respectful1
Cit y of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
r
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of the May 3, 1984 meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 8:10 p.m. by Vice Chairman Wheeler.
Other members present were Mrs. Altmayer, Mrs. Regel and Mrs. Harris.
Chairman Goe was absent due to pressing work commitments. Representing
City staff was Rick Beeler, Planning Department.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Mr. Beeler briefly reviewed the status of the Urban Design Study.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
84 - - Bon Marche (Allied Stores), requesting a variance of 3' from
the side yard building landscaping requirement of TMC 18.52.020 to
widen the existing pavement at 17000 Southcenter Parkway.
Mr. Beeler presented an oral request from Bon Marche to continue the item
to June 7, 1984.
MRS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE JUNE 7, 1984 MEETING. MRS.
REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
84 -10 -V: Western Pacific Properties, Inc., requesting a variance of
15' from the 15' front yard landscaping requirement of TMC 18.52.020
to permit required parking at approximately 5900 Southcenter Blvd.
Mr. Beeler presented the staff report.
Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties, briefly summarized the application
and responded to questions. Contruction of covered parking was alledged to
be economically infeasible due to the height restriction of the Zoning Code
and building design features. Undergrounding of the parking was also found
to be economically infeasible. Mr. Moody stated that a square building
could be constructed without a need for a variance, however, visual
interest via modulation was accomplished in the proposed building design.
Vince Ferresse, the Mithune Associates, explained the amount of excavation
and existing indications of bedrock on the property in the area of the
existing parking lot. He reviewed the existing building setbacks from the
V.
Page -2-
2oard of Adjustment Lutes
May 3, 1984
The public hearing was closed by Vice Chairman Wheeler.
Mr. Beeler read the staff report.
Southcenter Blvd. right -of -way. Mrs. Harris expressed reservations with
the Planning Commission's rezone decision not including consideration of
the parking problem. She also questioned the legality of using public
right -of -way to meet private landscaping requirements of the code. Mr.
Moody stated a development contract could be negotiated with the City. Mr.
Beeler stated that the City could require some sort of an agreement to be
consumated per the City Attorney.
The adequacy of the proposed 5' of landscaping on private property was
discussed.
MRS. ALTMAYOR MOVED THAT A 10' VARIANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING CODE BE APPROVED
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY THE CITY ON LANDSCAPING ON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AND SUBJECT TO LEGAL OPINION OF THE CITY
ATTORNEY ON THE SORT OF AGREEMENT NECESSARY TO BIND ALL PARTIES TO IT.
MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
OTHER BUSINESS
84- 12 -UI: Marjon, Inc., appeal of the decision of the Planning
Department to deny a business license on the basis of interpretation
of nonconformance with TMC 18.38.020.
Vice Chairman Wheeler opened the public meeting.
Tom Johnson, one of the owners of the business, explained the business
operation and product featured.
Mark Novack, the Koll Co., reviewed the leasing policy for the business
park area and the view that the business does not include heavy industrial
sales.
The C -M portion of the Zoning Code and TMC 18.38.030(15) was discussed.
MRS. REGEL MOVED TO GRANT THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR CONCRETE MIXERS. MRS.
HARRIS SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH FAILED WITH MRS. REGEL OBSTAINING.
MRS. HARRIS MOVED THAT THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FIND THAT MARJON, INC. HOME
MIX ALL PURPOSE CEMENT MIXERS AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "C" IS AN APPROPRIATE
USE IN THE C -M DISTRICT AND GRANT THE APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MRS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED WITH
MRS. REGEL OBSTAINING.
OTHER BUSINESS
MRS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO EXCUSE MR. GOE FROM THE MEETING DUE TO HIS PRESSING
BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT. MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
;
INT'ODUCTION
FININGS
CONCLUSIONS
1.
Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020(1):
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
AGE DA ITEM IV) B. 84 -10 -V: Western Pacific Properties
Western Pacific Properties is proposing to develop a 3 -story office building at
app oximately 5900 Southcenter Blvd. A rezone to P -0 (Professional Office) was
app oved on April 26, 1984 (84- 11 -R). The subject property is currently used for
an nformal parking lot and lies immediately easterly of the existing Arco AM -PM
Mini Mart. The applicant proposes to place required parking to the southerly pro -
per'y line in lieu of the 15 -foot landscaping area required by TMC 18.52.020.
1. The subject property was recently rezoned to Professional Office (P -0)
responsive to the specific development proposal on April 26, 1984 (84- 11 -R).
Previously the property was zoned RMH (High Density Multiple Family).
2. The more northerly portion of the site contains the natural topography that
once existed on the property, but was interrupted by past grading of the
existing portion used as a parking lot along Southcenter Blvd. The applicant
proposes to place the building into the toe of the steep enbankment. The size
constraints of this nearly level portion of the property allegedly causes the
applicant to locate some of the required parking to along the southerly pro-
perty line. TMC 18.52.020 (Landscape and Recreation Space Requirements)
requires a 15' landscape strip along the southerly property line. In lieu of
this landscaping the applicant proposes to install landscaping in the public
right -of -way of Southcenter Blvd. (Attachment A). Attachment A (site plan)
contains a section through the property indicating the general topography of
the site.
3. TMC 18.60.030 requires eventual Board of Architectural Review of the specific
design and landscaping of the building.
4. Utility and /or utility and access easements exists on the westerly and
easterly portions of the property. Access is proposed over the easterly 30'
easement, and the westerly 25' utility easement, wherein pavement currently
exists, will be landscaped.
Page -2-
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
84-10-V: Western Pacific Properties
May 3, 1984
2. Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020(2):
3. Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020(3):
The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the
zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed is
located."
Attachment A indicates the proposed building and parking plan relative to the
existing topography particularly the steep embankment. (Please also note the
section through the property on this attachment.) In order to accomodate the
proposed building and required parking the applicant proposes to locate some
of the parking lot adjacent to the southerly property line wherein is required
15' of landscaping. Existing development easterly of the subject property at
6000 and 6100 Southcenter Blvd. were approved for construction up to the pro-
perty line or across the property line and into the public right -of -way,
thereby largely eliminating landscaping along their southerly property lines.
Therefore, the proposal appears on the surface to be consistent with the pri-
vileges granted by the City in the past for development in the vicinity.
However, the physical circumstances of the 6000 and 6100 properties are dif-
ferent from the subject property.
"The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the
size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property in
order to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other proper-
ties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is
located."
The size of the property is ample to accomodate a professional office develop-
ment. The steep hillside produces difficulty in locating the office building
and attendant parking within the area between the right -of -way and hillside.
It is evident that the size of the proposal produces the parking demand which
attributes to the necessity for locating parking along the southerly property
line. This intensity of development appears to be the circumstance creating
the need for the variance, not the physical circumstances of the property.
"The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity
and in the zone in which the subject property is situated."
Due to the large extent of public right -of -way in Southcenter Blvd.
(Attachment A) there does not at this time appear to be any danger to the
public welfare accruing as a result of the variance. At such time as the
right -of -way is expanded pursuant to increased traffic on Southcenter Blvd.
the close proximity of the parking to potential vehicle lanes may produce some
potential danger. The applicant indicates the public right -of -way will be
landscaped by the owner to mitigate the impact of the variance, however future
improvement of the right -of -way would remove the landscaping and potentially
eliminate most of this mitigation.
Page -3-
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
84 -10 -V: Western Pacific Properties
May 3, 1984
4. Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020(4):
5. Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020(5):
"The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implemen-
tation of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan."
The impact of the proposal on the Comprehensive Plan appears to be minimal.
However, the burden of transition via landscaping between the proposed parking
area and right -of -way has been shifted from the private property to the public
right -of -way. This is contrary to requiring the transition occur on the pri-
vate property, leaving the public right -of -way for flexibility of eventual
development per future needs of traffic and /or utilities. The Comprehensive
Plan might better be served by scaling down the development to conform to the
required 15' landscaping along the southerly property line.
"The granting of such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by owners of other
properties in the same zone or vicinity."
Property owners at 6000 and 6100 Southcenter Blvd. currently enjoy development
which either is similar to that proposed by the applicant or actually intrudes
into the right -of -way of Southcenter Blvd. Based on this fact the proposal is
similar to and in line with these pre- existing decisions of the City.
However, these other properties are of a configuration and possess natural
constraints which appear to be substantially different to lead to the reaso-
nable conclusion that the circumstances would not apply in a similar way to
the subject property. Therefore, the precedent that may be perceived by past
decisions by the City do not appear to carry to the subject property.
6. TMC 18.72.010 (Purpose) requires the Board of Adjustment find that the
variance "...will not be contrary to the public interest and only where, owing
to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of such
ordinance(s) would result in unnecessary hardship."
Extension of the precedent established at 6000 and 6100 Southcenter Blvd. does
not create a precedent for this property mainly due to the fact that those two
properties are of substantial elevation above Southcenter Blvd. while the sub-
ject property is only very slightly above the grade of that street. Being
located at nearly street level, the imposition of the burden of transition
from the parking lot to the property being placed on the public right -of -way
potentially produces conflict with the public interest of maintaining the 15'
landscape strip transition which is not in danger of removal by future poten-
tial improvement within the right -of -way of Southcenter Blvd. Any hardship
created by the Zoning Code provisions accrue as a result of the specific plans
of the applicant for intensity of development contained in Attachment A, and
not the constraints of the property per se. The existing graded area of the
subject site is of sufficient area to accomodate an office development without
need of a variance while maintaining the economic viability of development.
..
Page -4-
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
84 -10 -V: Western Pacific Properties
May 3, 1984
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above staff recommends denial of the variance application._
Should the Board of Adjustment wish to grant a variance along the southerly pro-
perty line staff would recommend revisions to the site plan to clearly indicate
the minimal intrusion into the setback area by compaction as much as possible of
the parking area and /or building. This revised plan could then be brought back to
the Board of Adjustment to be reviewed for conformance with the criteria of TMC
18.72.020.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Site Plan.
B - Application.
RB /blk
CITY OF TUWVILA !.--
Central Permit System
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
1) TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) SECTIONS FROM WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING VARIANCE:
18.52.020
2) DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: To waive the 15 ft. front y a r c
landscape requirement to allow for parking to extend the south property. line
which. affronts Southcenter Blvd. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET)
3) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY IF THE
VARIANCE IS APPROVED :Currently the lower portion of the property is beig used
as a parking lot & the remaining site is vacant. A professional office
building is proposed.
DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH. YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SATISFIES EACH
OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.72.020 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF
NECESSARY).
1) THE VARIANCE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE •
LIMITATION UPON USES OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN. THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE
PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS FILED IS LOCATED.
RESPONSE: Land owners to the west of the proposed site have previously been
aiiowed to purchase
R their portion of the property in fgliestion. These
iiiE
2 ) V A A C E IS N
ATTACHED S SHEET BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE SIZE, SHAPE,
, LOCATION OR SURROUNDING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE IT
WITH USE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PERMITTED TO OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN
THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS• LOCATED.
RESPONSE: (SEE ATTACHED SHEET)
3) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE
OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED.
RESPONSE :The variance will provide physical & aesthetic improvement to the
site and city property.
4) THE AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN.
RESPONSE: The site & surrounding prnerties classified as r�mmerrial in the
corn
rehensi
,
•)4�4cBtT
S C H E D U L E
LAND USE VARIANCE
• - I -
- . It . - . - .
is requested.
5 ) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF A
SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE APPLICANT POSSESSED BY THE OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTIES
IN THE SAME ZONE OR VICINITY.
RESPONSE: (SEE ATTACHED SHEET)
TMC "18.72.070 PROHIBITED VARIANCE. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE BOARD OF " ADJUST-
MENT GRANT A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A USE NOT GENERALLY OR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED IN THE
ZONE INVOLVED, OR ANY USE EXPRESSLY OR BY IMPLICATION PROHIBITED BY THE TERMS OF THIS
TITLE IN SAID ZONE.
.,...,......._..... .............,.. `
In compensation for this allowance, the applicant will
landscape the city property which averages 38 feet in
width between Southcenter Boulevard and the proposed site
property line.
1) portions have been used for access /egress & parking re-
quirements. Land to the east is currently undeveloped.
The topography of the proposed site has been previously
altered from it's natural state. Steep banks on two sides
of the property limit the extent of development. In addition,
the site is narrowed by utility /access /egress easements on
either side of the site. The variance would allow for a
building footprint of approximately 5400 square feet which is
equivalent to the adjacent commercial development.
Owners of adjacent property (Arco Mini -Mart, Dennys), utilize
the property affronting Southcenter Boulevard for parking and
vehicular access. The city of Tukwila is not willing to sell.
this piece of property (previously granted to adjacent property
owners). Mitigation of this loss is requested by the allowance
of the applicant to landscape, irrigate and maintain the city
owned property in lieu of 15 feet of the applicants front yard
Property. Denial of this variance would result in the City of
Tukwila's property to remain unlandscaped and unmaintained in
direct aesthetic comparison to the developed site.
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC MEETING OF THE
TUKWILA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT has fixed the
3 day of May, 1984 at 8:00 P.M. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila City
Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place
for:
Public Hearings:
A. 84 -05 -V: Bon Marche (Allied Stores), variance of 3 feet from the side
yard building landscaping requirement of TMC 18.52.020 to widen the
existing pavement at 17000 Southcenter Parkway.
B. 84 -10 -V: Western Pacific Properties, variance of 15 feet from the
front yard landscaping requirement of TMC 18.52.020 to permit required
parking at approximately 5900 Southcenter Boulevard.
Public Meeting:
A. 84- 12 -UI: Marjon, Inc., appeal of the decision of the Planning
Department to deny a Business License on the basis of interpretation
of nonconformance with TMC 18.38.020.
Any and all interested persons are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle April 22, 1984
:.
CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT FOR NORTH HILL OFFICE
(WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.) VARIANCE
CITY FILE NO. 84 -10 -V
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is a noncharter optional
municipal code city and as such has the power to enter into
agreements to promote the public health, safety and welfare of
its citizens and thereby control the use and development of
property within its jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, Western Pacific Properties, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as the "Owner" is the owner of certain real prop-
erty located within the City of Tukwila, which is the subject
of this Agreement and which is legally described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if
fully set forth, and
WHEREAS, the Owner is in the process of developing the
said property and has applied for a variance from the 15 foot
front yard landscaping requirement of Section 18.52.020 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code to permit required parking on the prop-
erty, and
WHEREAS, after public hearing on the said variance appli-
cation, the Board of Adjustment on May 3, 1984 determined to
grant a variance to the Owner reducing the required front yard
landscaping by 10 feet on the property, subject to the owners
signing an agreement to landscape five feet of front yard on
the property and to landscape an area of the public right of
way adjacent to the property and lying between the property and
the travelled portion of Southcenter Boulevard, all as shown on
the site plan drawing attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorpo-
rated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, and
WHEREAS, the Owner has indicated its willingness to sign
such an agreement and to perform such landscaping, now, there-
fore,
For and in consideration of the grant of a variance to the
Owner from the front yard landscaping requirement of Section
18.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code by reducing the
required 15 foot front yard landscaping to five feet, the Owner
covenants and agrees as follows:
1. Landscaping on Right of Way. The Owner agrees to land-
scape, at the Owner's expense, that portion of the public
right of way adjacent to the property described on Exhibit
A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refer-
ence as if set forth in full and generally shown on the
site plan drawing attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and
incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in
full. The landscaping shall be installed according
to applicable to City standards and according to
plans approved by the City Planning Director. All costs
for the design, installation and inspection of said land-
scaping shall be paid by the Owner.
2. Landscaping Bond. The landscaping performance and
maintenance bond furnished by the Owner in connection with
Owner's construction and installation of landscaping on
the property as part of Owner's development of the same
shall be extended to cover all landscaping installed
by the Owner on the public right of way. Said bonds
shall be in an amount determined by the City Planning
Director to be sufficient to ensure completion and
maintenance of the landscaping.
3. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be filed and record-
ed with the King County Auditor /Recorder and shall be a
covenant running with the land described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if
set forth in full, and shall be binding upon the Owner,
its successors in interest and assigns.
4. Payment of Recording Fees. The Owner agrees to pay all
costs of recording this Agreement.
5. Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be con-
strued to restrict the authority of the City to exercise
its police powers.
6. Enforcement. In addition to any other remedy provided by
law, the City may, at its discretion, maintain a lawsuit
to compel specific performance of the terms and conditions
of this Agreement or to otherwise enforce its provisions,
through injunctive or other relief, and if the City pre-
vails in such action, it shall be entitled to recover all
costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorneys fees.
7. Severability. In the event any section, paragraph, sen-
tence, term or clause of this Agreement conflicts with
applicable law or is found by any court having jurisdic-
tion to be contrary to law, such conflict shall not affect
other sections, paragraphs, sentences, terms or clauses of
this Agreement which can be given affect without the con-
flicting provision and to this end the terms of this
Agreement shall be deemed to be severable, provided, how-
ever, that in the event any section, paragraph, sentence,
term or clause of this Agreement is found to conflict with
applicable law, the City shall have the right to bring the
proposed development back before the Board of Adjustment
for further review and the imposition of appropriate
conditions to ensure that the purposes for which this
Agreement is entered into are in fact accomplished and
the impacts of the proposed development are mitigated.
By
By
Mayor, Gary L. Van Dusen
Attest /Authenticated:
City Clerk, Maxine Anderson
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
By i4_
STATE OF WASHINGTO•
COUNTY OF KING
) ss.
DATED this day of , 1985.
Accepted by:
CITY OF TUKWILA WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
OWNERS
By
Title
On this day of , 1985, before me,
the undersigned, — i . Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
, to me known to be the
of Western Pacific Properties, Inc., the corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and
on oath stated that , was authorized to
execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day
and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the
State of Washington, residing -
at
3
SIR
xM.Y Wt,a flfl4i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 4:
.NATIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY.
EXHIBIT A
THAT PORTION OF LOT 11 OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, AS
VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, ON PAGES 55, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, LYING
NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY LINE PRIMARY STATE. HIGHWAY ROUTE 1, AS
CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RE—
COR NO. 5473599;
EXCEPT THE LAST 450.86 FEET THEREOF;
SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESER—
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WA.
SITE PLAN
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
i'L/ANC PP PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPL1CAT ONS "�WItL'NOT 1E
ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING.
SECTION I: GENERAL DATA
TYPE OF APPLICATION: BSIP []SHORT SUBoIvIsION OS PERMIT D PRD DPMUD- 0 INTERURBAN
CONDUS tEONAI. Q SS O VAR I ANCE O Z
ON 1 NG OF
AMENDMENT
1) APPLICANT:
2
3
)
8)
CITY OF TUK'. ILA �
Central Permit System - 6709 y /
PROP. OWNER:
ADDRESS 13975 INTERURBAN AVE. SO. ZIP 98168
PROJECT I.00AT I ON : (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT/ BLOCK) PORTION OF LOT 11 OF
INTERURBAN ADDTTTON TO SEATTLE_ SRF. ATTACHFD . T DESCBIPTION
SECTION II :• PROJECT INFORMATION
4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YQU. PROPOSE.A PROFES.SI.ONAL..OFFSCE BLDG. 0E1,3 FLOORS
W /APPROX. 14,500 SQUARE FEET, :PARKING FOR 38 VEHICLES.
5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 08/84 TO 02/85
6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES U NO IF YES, DESCRIBE:
7) PROJECT STATISTICS:
A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE:
B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL #FLOORS 3
TOTAL GROSSt14 5 0 0
FLOOR AREA '
C) SITE UTILIZATION:
SECTION III:
ZONING DESIGNATION
COMP. PLAN DES I GNAT I ON
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA
LANDSCAPE AREA
PAVING AREA
TOTAL PARKING STALLS:
- STANDARD SIZE
- COMPACT SIZE
-HANDICAPPED SIZE
TOTAL LOADING SPACES
AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA
AVER. SLOPE OF SITE
APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
SUBSCRIBED AHD SWORN BEFORE ME
THIS Y DAY OF
NAME THE MITHUN ASSOCIATES TELEPHONE ( 206)454-1144
ADDRESS 2000 112TH AVE. N.E. BELLEVUE, WA. ZIP 98004
NAME WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES. TNCTELEPHONE
EXISTING
RMH •
COMMERCIAL
N/A 0
N/A 0
N/A 0
N/A
N/A
N/A
• N/4
N/A
13.5 %
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASH 1 NGTON
RESIDING AT / Ge c/ `G
NET 1.33 ac. GROSS 1.75 ac.
INCLUDES:
s f ,INCLUDES:
24
13
1
3%
13.5%
IN` APPLICATION
198:j ,.
, r
!., t I 'i I_ j r
l 206) 741 -1616
EASEMENTS .42 ac.
0 BASEMENT MEZZANINE
D BASEMENT 0MEZZANINE
NOTES
- PROPOSED
p 0_
NO CHANGE
5400 SF°
58898 SF
1730n SFD
IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE
MAP? 0 YES 13 NO
I. 64N 1lfr fiS rte /t! mre. , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE
INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE-
GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN
ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWL E i- BELI F.
DATE 40/m X kee‹. , J✓z!/"4/
paACf'+A.:e /or .RvMLGL
•1 ..1..-r.
1
i 1
......... ...
I
I
V
1
1
f .
'
Mk; KOKP
4
,OP
- 0,00
saIQ-aas (9a) 51190 u 'NM*
sishi uti SAO umtipoom 69cm
Z.74:1""
1%4mnd •ortimoyvo 0611.1.11
• 4
// •.
• // -* -
, / L.L.! 4ZZ, // ---•
f/1 ( I
I 'I
IP
)
) I
•,„ ' 1
/
,./ / t/0
iF --__
I I i‘p,
04- / Ifitt " • 1
z
1021
_..
iii
4
2
I -d
o /
r
I
• ' bold olIatp
a2 A ufnalp
41 .
1. Dino
. i
, - -,.•; .- ; ‘ ( - .:. , 1, , ..1 ' ; '. ; • 1
. . '•, •
i
wQ
sam-aas MOM S1196 u '
Olt ult./ vu SAO umowom 6999
"t11.1":=7•417,4"'
a :17),Nti
6ffiflUd p00
. uo 0 6 al
. arla ••••at..1-0710.11./q 0 *Cao
Lti.0
J.00 ir . ),(Vir•
(
I I 1
•,•,:rta f '44411 '94r1 a
fin
1
:111
1 1
•
so
_
11
I 1 I
1
dt I
I -61
weld y,.„
if.
S2110-aaS(90a) 51196 ta,6uptpm ••IAov 3�,1'fxYr,{3r1
On •W' .0 '.no t.pgpoom 6990 ,W' "iWgnl An , J1:)f3ALtncr, co:A,
M�. If i M MM ta: 1. �1
64Ww,d puo .nA.,,y„o ljuUl�il ;a ^ . - . � =�
c
• l
0 16THS INCH 1 7
0c 6Z 8C CZ 9Z SZ 4Z EZ ZZ lZ
Iiiilliliiiilill IIIIIiIIIIIIIInIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilillnnlllnhul1iililuu iiii ills ill,
I,VTHE SUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
IIII Ti iIIl 1IllI n ihll hill1nn mi nn nllllln
..,m 7r+� : e�.x•� ta'kra5�: , !,*kt:E$^4
r
eVAr•ksc'5�5. su
'� "e�,V:}+'�:%~,N)x" r P 'Nr ,,�, P I I f ,.' &•,: t (.. f1:' . �• . �.,. r r f:.. .'1t7 at u' r :: ^c t - !
.. .a•�t':���'t,R:�S._4,1,,.i :i,'..s. -� .,. `..:. ... :::.:. .. ,:•:,,:x !. ! • . r a. r. r�7, �. 11' S'•.: r. �i;���'�L��r,,.3.$�'��r {ia!'i"r ?ll�,w��.tr,"� >:.i M�" t��.: ! hi:.,a >..�'t,:' .�i.i r !` '�t lG+
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIII +II_9II 111 ll l I I I i 1I11- I-JII111111 11111J1IIf IuLILI111111II111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi1
3", - 4- .__ -- -_ - -. - __ -... --- . - -6_.. - 7 ` 8 9 10 11 "DEINDEaHANY 12
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
IP
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO
8 8 L 9 S C z l WW 0
IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIhIIIIIII(IIIIIIIfIf IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIInIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ I_IIIhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�lllll_
•
IV_ 176 4 . zpNINIe
LGr.ATIO N
Memo" erre.
reereNT • RIM
rl oP eP- Ro
146or OF "JIM 6.1
G•4
NORTH or 417E it-16
R•4
EM T OF SITE 6.4
eOlni1 of ANTE
I ovr
}kskENT • N'CI!NT
FrO1'bSPCD- PEOreb6lo_N.. /al}rf DtLls�
MIWI•14•RT • 7lR•E 'Df/.1foN
leterV/INNT
coNcoreNiume
VACANT
Oa1.rRGCN'Ie& et-.YD.
1•405
exorrroa, V446144 fG
To W*.N%.%E THE 16 FxoT Fl47NT C .FD LMDOGYiN ' .r
Mecaume M!$1 To "4.4.0W !bR rI•RKR•Y� Tb exT6ND
To INC eenA1N r rOr -JET+( LIM . N COrr81440.11oN
PEW THIS iu sN+NCt. THE Pr•LILI•I•IT WILL I.NeNterre
Vie .GTY Elio XM WHel4 "s444•Ge 90 REST IN WIDTH
DerwE6l•I f/A wet-Ms eoLL #442 4No TH6 plakomrsmc
' 11t rwoPe TT LINE.
WrIoN A•A
tier .0'
lseo'
— 4WD'
Wffe a re • lINV•
2 ND LML
MU. ISa
b l k
iLLEi
APF 5 198'11
..I
CITY U{'
PLANN!NC DEP9.
JOB 4 B
Lf,F
it
n USE .ZpNIHG,
� I!Ia N '
pl<o1 ✓fib
1 OF SITE • o- I MINI f -lo.Rt �j VL'E °�Tf�TioN
. G '2 TAL11zAN T
NORTH of ' ITE CONGoMINIG(1-4.>
FR-4 u D
!f of CITE VACANT
CUTE -1 of e>ITE
Prz2 F� VfI/
To, L tV/E . THE IS Fcr,T FR •iA 7 LANGeoG/DsrINc:;
1 =E Me Tti PI.,I01^1 rolz r/-- IeKIN To ExTENp
Ta - THE cooUTFI. I OI°F ,•T`'( LINE , IN MFEt-14" 4
Folz THE✓ • A1..I1,1 --1 'NGE ; 1-111-1- I ANt� uc c
THE CITY Pf2ol WHe+-I A`/5F- >E-5 be, FEET H W;ptH
C 1II.J -EH THE
SITE I'izoPEIZTY LINE,
ZoNIN�
pt; HT - IMH
I'oc P•O
LA4-4b WOE
E
PP E��F.NT - vr4c-H 1
PP-or2%r-on - P> �f:�,
JoU N1 bt -Vt.7.
x••90
s S��TI �I�I A. /it
Ngl1
'i :ylt >• _f( zZA Lt��llr�L
1122 •67
+ Io' .p'
i
7
0e 6Z 98 LZ 9Z
)I1111111� � 1 I 111111111111
9Z
CZ; ZZ
-1,
1 6 8 Z.
IIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
l
I I
N
a i
NT
IIIIII� II111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIII III! IIIIIIIIIII111IIIIIIIIIIIIII III WIIIIIIII 111.11.110I1111.Ill111 111. 11 1 1 1 1 111II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1.IIT1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9 10 11 12
1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
} CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
vi 1 z 'CTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
III II I I I l y IIII lilil II�ill�ll�l�,ll�ll�ll�l I�Illtlllr�lllulnldlilluuhndl��11 ((II %�lyll mllmfllilllillll
14 - 2 § 2, 5 /Ic:2o
I 38 :JI
1T- It?o�tGH EP�MENT
' I
99 n e z tr
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, I ,�Illlfllllll�lllllllll�llll�._
4 7 , 1:AI.M. It20
•
.51T�
V16IN1 MA __
3f • L /rL
g HD JE.
yMDiplNy L GNitF ea
34- to4
(N(iflFT1
APR 5 1981
CII YUrIUr.:.R.A
PLANNING DEPT.
CC
W
0
CO Q
Z J
n
0
JOB NO Sao28
DATE• 4 4•el