The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit 84-21-CUP - CITY OF TUKWILA - NORTH HILL RESERVOIR CONDITIONAL USE84-21-cup 14953 57th avenue south dr-08-84 84-26-dr epic-235-84 84-19-ss 84-20-ss CITY OF TUKWILA - NORTH HILL RESERVOIR CONDITIONAL USE CONDITIONAL USE City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 /cd MEMORANDUM TO:.' Rick Beeler, Associate Planner FROM: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer DATE: February 3, 1986 SUBJECT: North Hill Reservoir - 84 -21 -CUP The. North Hill Reservoir project is now nearing its final design. Within the next few months this project will be advertised for construction this year. Per the July 13, 1884 (sic) letter, the CUP expired June 28, 1985. Requested is . an extension of this expiration date at this time to January 1, 1987. cc: Public Works Director City Administrator Planning Director Parks and Recreation Director City Clerk 1 LL • € `(- t.,sT 1'1 _g D. D. BROWN DIRECTOR - SYSTEM PROJECTS AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT R. 0. RICE MANAGER - SYSTEM PROJECTS L L DOLL MANAGER -REAL ESTATE ENGINEERING R. W. CHRISTENSEN REAL ESTATE AGENT G. B. COLLINS MANAGER - TITLES & CONVEYANCES Dear Mr. Haney: CC: Union Pacific Railroad Missouri Pacific Railroad . Phil Fr cc - UNION PACIFIC SYSTEM '�A , EASTERN DISTRICT DISTRICT REAL ESTATE D D. H. LIGHTWINE REAL ESTATE AGENTS R. J. ZADINA T. J. STENSTROM M. S. SCHULTE P. L. WHITE Mr. James E. Haney Office of the City Attorney City of Tukwila 2001 6th Avenue, Suite 2300 Seattle, Washington 98121 C. O. DURHAM DIRECTOR -REAL ESTATE R. F. NIEHAUS"^ L f ASST. DIRECTOR -REAL ESTATE WESTERN DISTRICT IRECTOR DISTRICT REAL ESTATE DIRECTOR M. A. PASSO REAL ESTATE AGENTS D. R. RECHTENEACH W. T. GALLO D. R. LEWIS January 20, 1986 Please refer to previous correspondence concerning the request received on behalf of the City of Tukwila to obtain from the Railroad Company temporary and permanent easements in connec- tion with the expansion of their existing pumping station in Tukwila (Andover Park), Washington. Please be advis no objections to proposed lease to begin constru progressing towards the proposed project. greement, Audit PLD -44 -• is pro•• =- r, Senior E ukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 ecessary easement document. d 1416 DODGE STREET OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179 ad Company management has ou are in receipt of , which will allow the City facility in advance of our Very truly yours, 4 Np J °ter I r 723 -60 fit'.. ...' M ..: .. . 15 THWESTERN DISTRICT DISTRICT REAL :ESTATE DIRECTOR A. O. MEYER REAL ESTATE AGENTS F. B. SHARAR P. G. FARRELL W. L LOFFER J. E. MATZA City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 July 13, 1884 Byron G. Sneva Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear By: This letter is formal notification that the Planning Commission on June 28, 1984, approved this conditional use permit application subject to: 1. Site plan alternative No. 3, 2: Incorporating tennis courts or other park use, 3. geview of lighting by the Board of Architectural Review, 4. More easterly location of the reservoir to minimize visual impact, particularly to the south, and 5. The permit not being construed to impede in any way access of adjacent property owners to their property. On July 9, 1984, the appeal period expired for this decision without filing of an appeal. This permit will expire on June 28, 1985, unless a building permit is obtained or an extension is granted by the Planning Commission per Section 18.64.060, Tukwila Municipal Code. L. Rick Beeler Associate Planner LRB:mlk cc: City Administrator Planning Director Parks & Recreation Director City Clerk Re: North Hill Reservoir - 84 -21 -CUP ..: % ✓�Y.e:...x ...,.. r..v '�1'��..,. . r. r'i!.., ws l'. �5•'t v'j.. t ... r. ..w .+ _ .. Wes.. {'�.a_. ..r .. _... :'ci:: / ? }'J +:.:+f. +- iu':�. +�i.. r!i4: %..,,irG.N:S'/i *rw�d: :.. +.:3?l �Ir. .•_, ..,., ✓�J. r� .. ,rS:'fielt.7 Y:L.;•l " ✓.JJhY NAT r� +NnTt� },x �tN�'XG!:1:1N�::�'��i�..✓. �:._.�R'�ra _ra: L1914.. ..,�, n.J %�l... r. .... ...�::I1��. .. 441L4 1909 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: After a review of the Planning staff's report and recommendation, I would like to say I agree with their recommendation to approve Alternative No. 3 and hope the Commission will give formal approval to this proposal. However, there is additional information you should be aware of and consider. The soon to be published new Tukwila Park and Open Space Plan identifies a current need of five City tennis courts, and by 1990 six will be needed. In 1986 when the two lower tennis courts in Tukwila Park are rehabilitated into one court and a tennis wall /practice court, we will lose one court and will need at least one and possibly two new courts. The opportunity of developing two courts on top of the water tank is very good and should be given strong consideration. Because more information needs to be developed for the site, I do not think it would be wise to be too design specific concerning fencing, parking, lighting, hours of use, and landscaping. Approval of a general plan like the plan sub- mitted would be best with general guidelines added. The Board of Architec- tural Review should provide specific design review. The Park Commission will also make a recommendation on user concerns. Thank you for considering my comments. DW /co PLC6 -27 City of Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director June 27, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM IV) B. (HILL RESERVOIR) ON JUNE 28 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IV) B. 84 -21 -CUP: City of Tukwila AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION The City of Tukwila is applying for construction of a new reservoir in the North Hill area to be called the North Hill Reservoir. Recently the City was granted a short plat (84- 20 -SS) to create a 38,281.89 square foot parcel on which to construct a 2 million gallon water reservoir implementing the City's long range plans for increasing water service in the North Hill area. The property is located at approximately 14953 57th Ave. So. (or at the end of 57th Ave. So. north of the existing Hampton Heights Apartments and adjacent to the recently approved Cottages Apartments (J.B. Wright Corp.)). FINDINGS 1. The subject property is zoned R -1 -12 which requires the proposed water reser- voir be reviewed and approved as a conditional use (TMC 18.12.050(8)). Requirements for conditional uses are specified in TMC 18.64, including the review criteria that must be applied by the Planning Commission per TMC 18.64.050. The Board may approve, modify, or deny the application. 2. The City of Tukwila proposes to construct the reservoir during the period from 1985 to 1987 as part of the City's plans for increasing the water capacity in the North Hill area in order to alleviate the existing water supply problems experienced by residents. A new 12" water main will be constructed in the area and connected to the reservoir. 3. Alternative site plan concepts have been generated, each having different environmental and visual impacts associated with construction and feasible site development. The Parks and Recreation Department has indicated that the site is very desirable for joint usage and development for recreation pur- poses, particularly tennis courts. 4. The property slopes east to west with an elevation of 265' at the easterly property line and 216' at the westerly property line. Substantial vegetation exists on the property, the majority of which is to be removed under either of the three development concepts. The original owner of the property, residing at 14951 57th Ave. So., will continue to live on the adjacent property some 147' north of the proposal's northerly property line. Along the southerly portion of the property is located the recently approved development of the Cottages Apartments (J.B. Wright Corp.), which site plan indicates the adja- cent area to bed developed for recreational purposes. Easterly of the subject Page -2- Planning Commission 84 -21 -CUP: City of Tukwila June 28, 1984 a. property and across 57th Ave. So. is located an existing residence at 14952 57th Ave. So. At this residence the street terminates and connects with the City trail extending southerly to 152nd Ave. So. West of the subject property is a large parcel occupied by the residence of 14949 57th Ave. So. Access to the proposal will occur via one curb cut at the northeasterly corner of the property. 5. The three alternatives for development of the property are: 1. Alternative one consists of a totally freestanding 30' high steel round tank located approximately in the center of the property. This tank is 107 feet in diameter and would be located on a level graded portion of the property. A 10' access and maintenance road would encircle the tank and exit the property at the northeast corner. Necessary grading and excavation would remove essentially 90% of the existing vegetation and not provide space for recreational develop- ment. This concept provides inadequate space along the northerly property line for landscaping and screening of the proposal from the northerly abutting single family property and residence. 2. Alternative two is essentially the same as alternative number one except a 117' diameter tank would be sunk into the ground so only the top approximate one -half (or 15' to 20') would be exposed. This reduces the amount of grading and excavation on the property, thereby removing only about 75% to 80% of the existing vegetation. In addi- tion, the opportunities for landscaping and screening along the northerly property line is substantially increased and becomes effec- tive and feasible. However, sufficient space for recreation oppor- tunities remains insufficient. 3. Alternative three is a reinforced concrete square tank measuring 120' x 112' proposed to be sunk near the existing grade of the easterly portion of the property. This minimizes the grading and excavation necessary for the tank, thereby reducing removal of existing vegeta- tion to approximately 60% to 75% of the property. However, due to the proposed construction of two tennis courts atop the reservoir tank, parking is required along the easterly portion of the property which necessitates removal of nearly all of the vegetation therein. Landscape plans for either of the alternatives was not submitted. 6. TMC 18.60.030(2)(E) requires Board of Architectural Review of the proposal. This review is to be conducted separate from the Planning Commission's review of the conditional use permit. 7. Staff issued a Final Declaration of Nonsignificance. 8. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan indicates the subject property to be in an environmentally sensitive area, particularly owing to the slope of the pro- Page -3- Planning Commission 84 -21 -CUP: City of Tukwila June 28, 1984 perty, existing vegetation and view from the valley floor. Attached Exhibit E, contains the applicable portions of the Land Use Policy Plan. CONCLUSIONS 1. Material detriment to the public welfare may occur relative to view obstruc- tion on or from the subject property through alternatives one and two. The 30' height of the tank in alternative one will produce a substantial visual impact upon the neighborhood in terms of view obstruction and the charcter that exists. Alternative two produces less visual impact, however, the character of the neighborhood continues to be impacted by the incursion of a round steel tank. Alternative three produces the least impact on the neigh- borhood and provides the greater recreation potential of benefit to the general public. Injury to property in the area will occur mostly in terms of the aforemen- tioned visual impact and alteration of the existing character of the neigh- borhood. Alternative three appears to present the least injury and most opportunity for neighborhood enjoyment of a recreation facility capitalizing on joint usage of the property. Therefore, it appears that alternative three will produce the least material detriment and injury (TMC 18.64.050(1)). 2. Either alternative appears to comply with the site and setback regulations of TMC 18.50. However, alternatives one and two appear to be the traditional approaches to water reservoir siting and construction which do not "...exceed the performance standards..." of the R -1 -12 zoning district. These alter- natives make no provision for joint usage by recreational facilities and pro- vide a utilitarian approach to the water reservoir project. Alternative three appears to exceed the single family zoning requirements and traditional approaches to water reservoir construction and siting in that recreational usages for the neighborhood are provided in addition to increased oppor- tunities for building setbacks and a non - utilitarian image for the project. Appropriately screened by vegetation and /or fencing the water reservoir could be difficult to distinguish from a public park facility for serving the recreational needs of the neighborhood (TMC 18.64.050(2)). 3. The neighborhood consists of varying densities of single family development, however, the character is predominantly low key especially at this terminus of 57th Ave. So. Traffic circulation is light and a City trail connects the ter- minus of 57th Ave. So to 152nd Ave. So. The three alternatives appear to be compatible with the neighborhood, except the utilitarian design of alter- natives one and two seem to contrast with the building design and site design of existing residential development. Alternative three is more compatible with the existing neighborhood character and represents an enhancement of the potential recreational and pedestrian usage of the facility (Section TMC 18.64.050(3)). Page -4- Planning Commission 84 -21 -CUP: City of Tukwila June 28, 1984 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan indicates the wooded hillside should be preserved as much as possible with development discouraged in steep slope areas. Views are indicated to be preserved as well as the quality of hillside landform. Furthermore, recreation facilities are desired, main- taining the scenic condition of the hillside. Alternatives one and two appear to comply less with the Comprehensive Plan than alternative three. The latter provides for recreational joint usage of the property while minimizing visual impact upon the neighborhood. In addi- tion, opportunities for preservation of the existing vegetation and enhan- cement by supplemental landscaping material is increased. The resulting form of the concrete reservoir tank will be more in keeping with the existing character of the hillside (TMC 18.64.050(4)). The potential adverse impacts of a water reservoir located on the subject property appear largely minimized by alternative three as compared to the other alternatives (TMC 18.64.050(5)). Visually the structure featuring ten- nis courts is significantly more compatible with the existing neighborhood character in design of existing structures and represents a desirable and appropriate parks and recreation joint usage of the property and facility. Additional landscaping must be provided to increase visual buffering of the facility from the adjacent properties and descrease the visibility of the westerly portion of the reservoir tank from the westerly properties and valley floor. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 3 the application subject to submission of a final landscaping plan, eternal illumination plan and hours of operation for review and approval by the Board of Architectural Review. NOTICE OF TIME LIMIT - TMC 18.64.060 The conditional use permit shall automatically expire one year of the date of Planning Commission approval unless a building permit is obtained and shall expire within two years unless substantial construction is completed. Extensions of these deadlines may be requested of the Planning Commission subject to demonstra- tion of extraordinary circumstances or conditions not known or foreseeable at the time the original application was granted. NOTICE OF RIGHT OF APPEAL - TMC 18.90 -020 Any party aggrieved by the decision of the Planning Commission may appeal said decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal to the City Clerk within 10 days of said decision. The appeal shall state the reasons for the appeal. The City Council may hold a public hearing and may affirm, modify or deny the Planning Commission's decision. �pN VU::(, w: w�: 4Yi4Yi?;?. T. a' 2e'. w( li: n+ Ui{ Y':{ ev. 1e. YJ5: � utsH :NShN ✓s,WlRYWA.{w.ersAwrluxs E rame.�+m�w+w�nY+w��.nunvKV^ Page -5- Planning Commission 84 -21 -CUP: City of Tukwila June 28, 1984 RB /blk (PC.RES PC.RES1) :nx miawcuwtv !0# 11; 72 N!! W: W,'F{4StiYLT 1 7 W4:131SiTilaN it ATTACHMENTS A - Application B - Site Plan Alternative 1 C - Site Plan Alternative 2 D - Site Plan Alternative 3 E - Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan - Applicable Portions • • p r: CITY CAF TUKWILA X s Central Permit System CSTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM LEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REOUESTED INFORMAT1CIN••INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE CCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPL I CATION :• D BSIP 1 APPLICANT: NAME Public Works Department 2) PROP. OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 14953 57th Avenue South ECTION 11 : PROJECT INFORMATION D 5HORT PLAT 0 CONDITIONAL USE D UNCLASS. USE` ADDRESS 6200 Southcenter Blvd. NAME Mabel Schults ADDRESS 14951 57th Ave. South, Tukwila DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU. PRoPOSz..Water Reservoir and_ - Appurtenances . (Three Alternates) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 1985 . WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED . 1 N PHASES? 1 YES ONO pressure pump, reservoir construction PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 1.0 B1 FLOORS OF CONSTRUCT l ON : TOTAL I'1 FLOORS N/A SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA EXISTING R -1- 12000. 0 VARIANCE 0 o 13440 0 0 22470 0 0 7600 UNDEVELOPED 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 2% 19% 15 MIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE YES En NO TJ SP 1 J 1: APPLI CANT'S AFFIDAVIT $ ESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT • TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE DATE SCRIBED .J'1D 'FeDOtt ECFURE ME • r.RY P FCR ME Z T AT E 1.7.1W.; LET O S U B D I V I S I O N DS P ER R EL IT E D PRD D PMUD • j I NTERURBAN May 25; 1984 ley. OF WAS. -11 NGTON ( D CHG. OF ZONING TELEPHONE (206 ) 433 -1850 TELEPHONE To 1987 COMP. PLAN L.JAMENOMENT zip 98188 ) ZIP 98188 IF YES, DESCRIBE: pipeline to site, • GROSS 1.0 EASEMENTS None INCLUDES: BASEMENT D MEZZANINE INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT D MEZZANINE 'PROPOSED " NOTES 0 O O No change For Alt. #3 CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE a?f ' L. ?er10usen,, Mayor, City of Tukwila , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE SE R OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED I N THIS APPL 1 CAT 1 ON AND THAT THE FORE - rv■.. S'TG.TnL S AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION ' _SUBMITTED ARE IN I P. .. t'4 OF C• TRACT PURC ER OR OWN ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TUKWILA RESERVOIR SITE SURVEYING 6 SUPPING 87 NORTON DENNIS 8 ASSOC.. INC. 408 NO 7008 0 CITY OF TUKWILA RESERVOIR SITE SURVEYING IS la•PPING OE NORTON DENNIS a ASSOC .INC JOU P0SOOR 0 • (p. 34, Open Space) ▪ Provide for active recreation areas (ballfields, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, community center) con - sistent with the needs of the community. ▪ Provide for passive recreational areas (parks, natural reser- ves, picnic grounds) consistent with the needs of the community. (p. 35, Open Space) LOT MPS lJ t J:'i•J••■•• ..Y 1 1 r I I t• a • J c F I9 Ar.• rO'rC 106111g1LsE wenMf eUAT. •••OI•••••INO• •WATa•••aa Wa A• •04101N0• 1 a• E A • all• rr in SANl/N • • da /sew JT. 1' consultont5 4 . • Ara.. A,i•It : /Wrr•+ • es AWLS' "Ale •ritor r w w rat • .Intl .u.4 .v • u• CITY OF TUKWILA RESERVOIR SITE C0NCLP77.1.11L AC AN S•0 M4r. RL.WFO.KLO CONCA1Y .ex.MeHfN / y'1ZNN41 0114W77 SURVEYING • YAPPING IT NORTON DENNIS • ASSOC .INC. JOS NO 7008 0 [MK GCJC4 //11OV /w• 1.44 mrAY AnIarofer Lao/ AIW..IG•/ ✓G/JIR N./ Ar•••••44 fi.i•• / AMP.. •✓ter AR." "do // A ve 407, ,.CF.Y./Aon'n eims4..i i•gi Last., oar Arai me ay few' Am." neal CA•n(•••.y / / Aim. ...WV rArs. utWNO • tieab w ••. • ••••••• • •"wow • ti} /F ■.r[YJww ay • 4ilimiw Ad 4$0/11 6.• .w•oe•/ala.••AF~/ag/ • •i1 :•r••• i y •••G•A•• A..q. Ay/eV AA• b *snow/ •••••A for •••- e•/•Mm ••p.& •i••/ .40 Aoppolompe •Ii• ALTERNATE #3 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel A - The south 175.65 feet of the east 268.00 feet of Lot 20, Plat of Brooldale Garden Tracts, filed in Volume 10 at plats of page 47, records of King County Washington, except the east 20 feet thereof for road. (57th Avenue South) containing 1.0 acres more , or less. • • Parcel B - The north 154.35 feet of the east 268.00 feet of Lot 20, Plat of Brookdale Garden Tracts, filed in Volume 10 of plats at page 47, records of King • County Washington, except the east 20 feet thereof for road. (57th Avenue South).. Together with the south 8.00 feet of the east 268.00 feet of Lot 19 Plat of Brookdale Garden Tract, filed in Volume 10 of plats at page 47, records of.King County Washington except the east 20 feet thereof for'raod. (57th Avenue South) containing 0.92 acres more or less. • . w > < I -1--- .z, ■ ate 1 — 1.= 20 Pi APE TLIAL ,-1 Lc) AccEss E.,S mr (mg- ige41--/ „ . 1 Parcel a ;1 1 kl: tr) 1 =OD OM IMO. "). .24i-3x= Parcel A 4/ J7 • ,zrzea.z' tr. — 6 A/v 1 e n , 2 p7• 0 9L A SS Eo t . o' 4 tt I C •' !J 9..7 • 9 L . a u a 47t,c y ° •y �a r� AlFY.; - ts : ti 0 • w Ave?' ego` • _ 6 � 0 l. '+' B�2 • • 9, gaggggraTil Oz • •v •v 0 to 0 v 0 0' ?I a 9 : �.......` CITY QF TUKWILA Central Fermit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFOFIN1 - -INC PLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. l I - -- Z(r - OR— Cg — ft—{al • SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: D BSIP APPLICANT: P T 0 CONDITIONAL DUNCLASS. USE USE NAME Public Works Department ADDRESS 6200 Southcenter Blvd. SUBDIVISION C]5 PERMMI E D PRD PMUD' INTER BAR RBAN D VARIANCE D CHG. OF ZONING D COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE (206 ) 433 -1850 ZIP 98188 2) PROP. OWNER: NAME Mabel Schults 0 TELEPHONE ADDRESS 14951 57th Ave. South, Tukwila 3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 14953 57th Avenue South ) ZIP 98188 SECTION 11 :. PROJECT INFORMATION 4 DESCRIBE BRIEFLY :THE PROJECT YQU PROPOSE.. Water Reservoir and Appurtenances (Three Alternates) s) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 1985 TO 1987 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED PHASES? ' DYES ONO IF YES, DESCRIBE: pipeline to site pressure pump, reservoir construction PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 1.0 GROSS 1.0 EASEMENTS None B! FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL # FLOORS N/A INCLUDES: D BASEMENT D MEZZANINE TOTAL GROSS INCLUDES: D BASEMENT OMEZZANINE FLOOR AREA SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAV I NG AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AVER. SLOPE OF SITE • AREA EXISTING PROPOSED R -1 -12000 No change NOTES 0 0 13440 0 0 0 22470 0 0 0 7600 0 UNDEVELOPED 0 7 For Alt. #3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2% 19% 8) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? Q YES En NO SECTION 111: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT I , Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor, City of Tukwila , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IIWOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION - -- TH-._SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT•TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE • in B I ' — 1_ __,/ /MP I a. - OF C. TRACT PURC /t ER OR OWN SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN EEFORE ME T H I S r MY QF R E S I D I N G AT DATE May 25; 198 ( NOTARY P . L I C . FGR THE .STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF T U KWI LA Central Permit System MASTER LAND. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 1) PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Undeveloped 2 ). 3 ) 2) PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST (14) water towers and water supply plants DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USED, WHOLESALE /RETAIL /WAREHOUSE OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FAC DEVELOP ON THIS SITE): 2 Million include park uses on the site - water towers and water supply pl IN TMC 18.64.020): USE (FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE STORAGE OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR ILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSE TO gallon water reservoir and appurtenances - may small parking lot, tennis court, landscapinq, fences. ants. DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A CONDITIOIIAL_USE PERMIT WILL SAT ISFY EACH.. OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.64.030 (ATTACH ADDITION- AL SHEETS 'LF NECESSARY ) . 1)' THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED USE OR IN THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1S SITUATED. RESPONSE: Use is- compatible with residential neighborhood THE PROPOSED USE SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT IT WILL OCCUPY. RESPONSE: Reservoir structure will be a ground structure partially exposed THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE GENERALLY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. RESPONSE: Excessive traffic etc. only during construction period. THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. RESPONSE: Goal #8 strive to provide the most effective service level needed as efficiently as. practicable. 5) ALL MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS WHICH THE POSED USE MAY HAVE ON THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED. RESPONSE: 1. Extensive site grading will allow for reservoir to fit into the general mass of the hill and the . relandscaping will restore pastoral and 'park like view of the area. feet of hard surface CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI ST ' FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: , City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 3. . Date Checklist Submitted: April ,•1984 This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filing of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. 433 -1855 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washinaton 98188 A. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila, Planning Department 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1987 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: North'Hill Reservoir 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Water reservoir, passive park, landscaping, tennis court. (see attached pland, Alt. #1, #2, #3) 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 14953 -57th Avenue South; 22,00 square feet of landscaping; 7,000 square 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES X NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO.X (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO X (f) Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES X NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NOX (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Extension of 12" water main to site, installation_of constant pressure pump 11'. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at'some future date, describe the nature of .such application form: Short plat (see attached application) division of 1.97 acre site into two parcels. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) YES MAYBE NO 1 Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? X (c) Change in topography or ground surface.relief fea- tures? X. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- X 4. Flora City of Tukwila Environmental Checklist Form Page 2, Page 3 and Page 4 Additional Information ��c(gx; ....la^ C, ._ . r...+ : +., .. ,.r. ➢rr. +.rxrc- m..n.��,�n.,ea::.t," =>- r ;;!'tc :i« =,F,....,.f'a..4. ...1 r .. It Z5... a .2 ... _ PAGE 2 & 3 - I BACKGROUND 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Governmental Approvals required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (continued) h. Provide site drainage to storm sewers in the area i. Provide access to 57th Avenue South j. To provide electrical power to yard lighting and electric motors on water pressure pumps PAGE 3, PAGE 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1..Earth b. Excavation of earth and rock to provide bench in the hillside for erection of reservoir. Nearly all excavation will be removed from the site. A small portion will be relocated, recompacted as non - structural fill material. c. Site grading to accomodate driveway access, create flat building area, approximately 80% of the site will be regraded. e. Storm runoff water will be increased sue to increase in impervious surfaces, but will be controlled on site to limit the site runoff to existing natural conditions. 3. Water b. Storm runoff water will be increased due to increase in impervious surfaces, but will be controlled on site to limit the site runoff to existing natural conditions. a.& c. Approximately 35% of the site will be permanently impervious building materials; approximately 80% of the site will ber regraded and re- landscaped in native and ornamental flora; about 20% of the site will remain in its natural condition of trees, grass, bushes. (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality.? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? ' (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture • or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? -3- X YES MAYBE NO X X X x X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c). Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X. (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X. (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates', detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X (1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail - X able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? • (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (,d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Explanation: t :, ^,.; >m:.....c. n..K .�..�.uu.,.w, er -4 YES MAYBE NO X X :X (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X X , .. :- �:N *.:.1`....,:.', . t/ . . �.: c:t ..l �.e:,�+s t_. »::.�...�..•..,�..�." �'li'��iu.��. ..f . ,� :. " T':Ai!•::. Explanation: - during construction - park uses Explanation: Explanation: Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X - Construction materials 'If i✓.' «x ∎ , 11:1 •Amawc∎. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable .natural resource? NOTE: Area is in high noise area from Macadam Road and I -5 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: • Only if park uses require lighting for after dark uses 8. Land Use. .Will the proposal result in the altera tion of the present or planned land use of an area? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of..an accident or upset conditions? . a�.,,••,. ..r.n.�..e�na�'h�MxL;4:. ^::Y.:K V::titt,;'C`:.;f�+:tC;i:r� :tC;t' �' ; v'.` c�".s..'�.`.4'.i ['"'�L,.i;w��. YES MAYBE NO X • 11. Population. Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. "Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) (b) Explanation: a - during construction b - for park uses, 8 stalls provided c — location is adjacent to trail #7 . ... � ......i' l:l� %° i i:........,....: ! D"1:•'0.1 h ^�i.. „��..au - ,. xrcc.xr. ?ir;!t r �': 2 '�'.: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area ?' Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne,. rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to. motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? in: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Minor maintenance Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Increased maintenance for structure, pumps, valves, pavements and fences. -6- YES MAYBE NO X X X X X x X P .+':in ..:az Explanation: YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources. of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste. and disposal? Explanation: b - alarm system, controls e - site drainage (retention) 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X X 1 X X YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: - Project is notched into hillside, below summit of hill 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity .of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation:. - Increase opportunities for providing additional services, open space and recreation (active and passive)_ 20. Archeological/ Historical: Will the proposal result in an alteration of .a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation. or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Si.natu - and itle Byron e. Sneva, P. . Public Works Director /4 /51elY Date ; .. rrw 14-42.1--cop 1ug53 5'] AV � AL$o: O• 114- PR ale wz35-• 8'} let-ss 84. -5s bg:r44 AWL Re5ERVO tR •ENOINEERINO•ETREETB• WATER• BEWER•PARKB•BUILDINO• desi ned drawn checked prof eng field kk CITY OF TUKWILA RESERVOIR SITE CONCEPTI/AL PLAN 2. Al a RE /NFORCED CONCRETE . 4/O /R W /TEWN /$ COURTS SURVEYING a MAPPING BY HORTON DENNIS a ASSOC., INC. JOB NO. 5008.0 revisions /B•Map/e 6 FAv // /6 "C e ~ 2 %2 " /ran p,'e wi /h ' /1,unched b %ra caP .9874? 21 t jb 766o/ Ne74513 "W SO. /497.4e ST. ti t of 0 r Cased cone, /riot,. SewerM.N. erM. • . 3.9 Geac. 6o/%/ds Abi/r.p /Pe mo/. O.ad End' s/yn 3%2 ;r3 %2 • "cane. post• w //: /nar,Fer 260 yc n / Parh Parch E /ev. 268.63 a /0 ZO 50 40 BO N0056 /4952 SCALE: 1"-20' Con/our /nferva /.2' SCALE /A/ Aar /20 /60 LESAL OESCR /Pr /ON The 8aufh /7.9:65 ref o/ ,1/re Eosf 268.oar evi 2/'20/20, P /of of B/vo hab /e• (rart/en Trac/s fi /ed/i/ !ta /uax- /o of P /471.5 a/ Page 47, records at /tiny Caun6y, Washinyr EXCEPT /he Eo51 20.ao%f /hervof /or rood, Con /ain /ny /e, Acre more ar /ess LEGEND ® Concre // ,ria/. /n case A /om/nam / owe ma// ".6 w/ %5 eg. brass C4;0 • J/6 iebor se/ by h a.4 /P•card ofSarvey -A,F. e / /2ae9oo.s • s/e re6dr coP se//a-IA survey NOTE: Site /s covered wifh /aw 6sris4 , me/ /o/Cherry, Ma e, Co / /onwood and sma // sap /inys RIV154-21-W? ALTERNATE #3 } F ✓ ILH IIl l l 1 11 I lllll I I lflli.ailllllllhil!111 tiffillli iI 1 r.... N • 1 2 3'. 4- .......- 66 S,_ .. ... _ 6 . .. . 7 8 9 10 11 12 I CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO F THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS oe 6z ad cz ez sz oz Cal ' zz Iz • THE °.UALITY`•OF - THE . ORIGINAL DOCUMENT i 6 e L 9 s 1 e z •" 0 1 I 1 1 1 I n 1 11 Iii " i III 1 1 iNM u I m un u11 Iiuluu6ililmihudim liiinii d Ilgl a Ci n i n 1 1111 11 i l i . i1 1 i induu m hni I uulini uglmi ,..._ . i11 l'i ?-l4