HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-03-83 - L HARTONG FOUNDATION - OFFICE BUILDING DESIGN REVIEWDR-3-83 DR-03-83
6412 S 144TH ST
L HARTONG FOUNDATION OFFICE BUILDING DESIGN REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW
190S
Lloyd Hartong
5715 So. 147th St.
Tukwila, WA 98168
MC /blk
xc: A.J. Radford
C Jf Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
• Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
Subject: Board of Architectural Review
This letter confirms the decision of the Tukwila Board of Architectural
Review to approve application DR -3 -83 consisting of the site layout
plan for a single -story office building to be located at 6412 S. 144th
Street. The Board's decision is based on Exhibit A of the application,
and is-subject to the following conditions:
1) The approval action pertains only to'site layout as depicted on
Exhibit A and authorizes the Building Official to process a
foundation permit for a single -story office building. B.A.R.
approval of building, landscape /irrigation and lighting shall be
required for any subsequent construction pursuant to installation
of the foundation and completion of site paving.
2) Exhibit A shall be modified prior to issuance of building permits
to reflect compliance with TMC 18.56.040(4D).
3) Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer's Agreement
recorded under Auditor's File #8108250512 shall be amended to
eliminate building encroachment on the 72' parking reserve as
provided therein. Should the City Council elect not to amend the
agreement, Exhibit A shall be modified to reposition the future
building envelope outside the 72' parking use area reserve.
We appreciate your participation in the design review process. Please
call. if you have questions.
TUKWILA PL NNING DEPARTMENT
Mark Caughey
Associate Planner
10 June 1983
8307110472
Note: This Developers Agreement is an amendment of Developers
Agreement ( .icuted by Lloyd E. and Le Grace Hart
and filed Jo'�th King County Records un �r #810825• 2..
HARTONG, husband and wife, are the owners of certain real
property situate in the State of Washington, County of King,
and more particularly described as follows, to -wit:
and
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT
The South one -half of Lots 34, 35, 36 and 37,
Block 17, of HILLMAN'S SEATTLE GARDEN TRACTS,
as per plat recorded in Volume II of Plats,
page 24, records of King County, Washington;
1 3 or/ o f vl ids
WHEREAS, the grantors, LLOYD E. HARTONG and LENA GRACE
(hereinafter "the Property "); and
WHEREAS, the Property has been redesignated Lot A, Lot B,
and Lot C upon Short Plat No. 77 -60, which Short Plat has
been recorded by the King County Auditor under King County
Auditor's File No. 7803280705; and
WHEREAS, the grantors have made application to the City
of Tukwila, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State
of Washington, for a permit to construct a building upon
Lot A of such Short Plat No. 77 -60; and
WHEREAS, the City of.Tukwila is unwilling to issue such
building permit unless it be adequately assured that each of
Lot A, Lot B and Lot C of such Short Plat No. 77 -60 will at
all times and despite their lack of common ownership, be
adequately served with ingress, egress, utilities and parking;
WHEREAS, that portion of the Property described as
the West 13 feet of the South 99 feet of Lot 35 and the East
12 feet of the South 99 feet of Lot 36 appears adequate to provide
ingress, egress and utilities to each of Lots A, B and C of
Short Plat No. 77 -60; and
WHEREAS, the Northerly 69 feet of Lot . 0 appears adequate
to provide parking service for all of Lots A, B and C of Short
Plat No. 77 -60;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the issuance
by the City of Tukwila of a permit for the construction of
a building upon Lot A of Short Plat No. 77 -60, the grantors
do hereby give, grant, convey, dedicate and quitclaim unto
the City of Tukwila and to the future heirs, successors and
assigns of their respective interests in Lots A, B and C of
Short Plat No. 77 -60 a mutual and reciprocal easement for
ingress, egress and utilities over and upon the West 13 feet
of the South 99 feet of Lot 35 and the East 12 feet of the
South 99 feet of Lot 36, and a mutual and reciprocal easement
for purposes of parking upon the Northerly 69 feet of Lot C
of such Short Plat No. 77 -60; and the grantors do hereby
irrevocably covenant with the City of Tukwila, a municipal
corporation 'of the State of Washington, as a covenant running
with the land, and as an irrevocable and perpetual equitable
servitude upon the land, as follows with respect to their
right, title and interest in and to the Property:
1. Any sale, device or other alienation of Lot C of
such Short Plat No. 77 -20 shall be subject to a mutual and
reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and utilities over
and upon the West 13 feet of the South 99 feet thereof, which
easement shall be appurtenant to Lots A and B of such Short
Plat No. 77 -60, and shall be further subject to an easement
upon the Northerly 69 feet of such Lot C for parking purposes,
which easement for parking shall be appurtenant to Lots A
and B of such Short Plat No. 77 -60 and shall include an easement
over the Easterly 12 feet of Lot A for purposes of ingress,
egress and utilities; and
2. Any sale, devise or other alienation of Lot A shall
be subject to an easement for purposes of mutual and reciprocal
ingress, egress and utilities over the Easterly 12 feet thereof,
' LLOYD E. ' ARTONG
which easement shall be appurtenant to Lots B and C of such
Short Plat No. 77 -60, and shall include an easement over the
Westerly 13 feet of the South 99 feet of Lot C of such
Short Plat No. 77 -60 for ingress, egrees and utilities and
shall include an easement for parking purposes over and upon
the Northerly 69 feet of Lot C of such Short Plat No 77 -60;
and
3. Any sale, device or alienation of Lot B of such
Short Plat No. 77 -60 shall include an easement for purposes
of ingress, egress and utilities over the Easterly 12 feet
of Lot A and over and upon the Westerly 13 feet of Lot C of
such Short'Plat No. 77 -60 and shall include an easement for
parking purposes over and upon the Northerly 69 feet of Lot
C of such Short Plat No. 77 -60.
DATED this 60 day of h4 , 1983.
LENA GRACE HARTONG
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
Count'y of King
On this day personally .appeared before me LLOYD E. HARTONG
and LENA GRACE HARTONG, to me known to be the individuals described .
in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary
acts and deeds, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and seal this 4;V day of
1983.
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington; residing at Tukwila.
8108250512
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT.
81/08/25
RECD F
CPEHSL
WHEREAS, the grantors, LLOYD E. HARTONG and LENA GRACE
HARTONG, husband and wife, are the owners of certain real
property situate in the State of Washington, County.of King,
and more particularly described as follows, to -wit:
The South one -half of Lots 34, 35, 36 and 37,
Block 17, of HILMAN'S SEATTLE GARDEN TRACTS,
as per plat recorded in Volume II of Plats,
page 24, records of King County, Washington;
(hereinafter "the Property "); and
WHEREAS, the Property has been redesignated Lot A, Lot B,
and Lot upon Short Plat No. 77 -60, which Short Plat has
been recorded by the King County Auditor under King County
Auditor's File No. 7803280705; and
WHEREAS, the grantors have made application to the City
of Tukwila,• Washington, a municipal corporation of the State
of Washington, for a permit to construct a building upon
Lot A of such Short Plat No. 77 -60; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is * unwilling to issue such
building permit unless it be adequately assured that each of
Lot A, Lot B and Lot C of such Short Plat No. 77 -60 will at
• all times and despite their lack of common ownership, be
adequately served with ingress, egress, utilities and parking;
and
#0512 E
* ** *5.00
22
WHEREAS, that portion of the Property described as
the West 13 feet of the South 99 feet of Lot 35 and the East
12 feet of the South 99 feet of Lot 36 appears adequate to provide
ingress, egress and utilities to each of Lots A, B and C of
Short Plat No. 77 -60; and
WHEREAS, the Northerly 72 feet of Lot C appears adequate
to provide parking service for all of Lots A, B and .0 of Short
Plat No. 77 -60;
RECORDED 1 HIS ;;h Y
AL►G LS 1 a' 1
RECO:�DS�� ECTIONS
„�:; of
S
KING COUNT Y
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the issuance
by the City of Tukwila of a permit for the construction. of
a building upon Lot A of Short Plat No. 77 -60, the grantors
do hereby give, grant, convey, dedicate and quitclaim unto
the City of Tukwila and to the future heirs, successors and
assigns of their respective interests in Lots. A, B and C of
Short Plat No. 77 -60 a mutual and reciprocal easement for
ingress, egress and utilities over and upon the West 13 feet
of the South 99 feet of Lot 35 and the East 12 feet of the
South 99 feet of Lot 36, and a mutual and recriprocal easement
for purposes of parking upon the Northerly 72feet of Lot C c�
of such Short Plat No. 77 -60; and the grantors do hereby
irrevocably covenant with the City of Tukwila, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, as a covenant running
with the land, and as an irrevocable and perpetual-equitable
servitude upon the land, as follows with respect to their
right, title and interest in and to the Property:
1. Any sale, devise or other alienation of Lot C of
such Short Plat No. 77 -60 shall be subject to a mutual and
reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and utilities over. •
nd upon the West 13 feet of the South 99 feet thereof, which
easement shall be appurtenant to Lots A and B of such Short •
Plat No. 77 -60, and shall be further subject to an easement
upon the Northerly 72 feet of such Lot C for parking purposes,
which easement for parking shall be appurtenant to Lots A
and B of
over the
such Short Plat No. 77 -60
Easterly 12 feet of Lot A
for purposes of
and shall include an easement
ingress,
egress and utilities; and
'2. Any sale, devise or other alienation of Lot A shall
be subject to an easement for purposes of mutual and reciprocal
ingress, egress and utilities over the Easterly feet, thereof,
CV
.-•
Ci ty of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
Minutes of the Tukwila Planning Commission regular meeting of May 26,
1983.
The meeting was called to order at 8:06 by Chairman Richard Kirsop. All
Commissioners were present except for Commissioner Arvidsori and Commissioner
Coplen. Associate Planner Mark Caughey was present on behalf of the Tukwila
Planning Department.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of minutes of May 12, 1983 was deferred to the Regular June meeting.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
A. Application DR -3 -83: Lloyd Hartong - Requesting site approval for
issuance of a foundation permit for a single -story office building
at 6412 South 144th Street under provisions of the Interurban Avenue
Special Review District. "+ '
Mr. Caughey presented the staff report and recommendation of conditional approval.
Mr. Hartong was present on behalf of the application. He noted that it would be
possible to reduce the parking aisle width at the rear of the building from 31
feet to 25 feet.
At the Chairman's request, Mr. Caughey explained that the Developer's Agreement
referenced in the conditions of approval was approved by Council Resolution No.
794 and allowed all parking for the two - building complex to be placed on a
single parcel. He explained also that only site layout approval is requested
at this time to facilitate construction only of the foundation. When a completion
date for the building is determined, a complete B.A.R. Application will be
required.
Considerable discussion of the required placement of a frontage sidewalk followed.
Mark Caughey explained that the sidewalks are to be installed in accordance with
the sidewalk ordinance even if the resulting structure is only marginally useful
and may not reflect the ultimate level of the street. Mr. Hartong explained his
experience with flooding conditions in the area, and questioned the wisdom of
haphazard sidewalk development.
Mr. Knudson suggested deferral of sidewalk construction through use of an escrow
account. He reiterated his position that any construction should closely
approximate ultimate grade, preventing necessity of future reconstruction.
Mrs. Avery ascertained that the parking area is only rough - graded; it will be
paved at such time as the first building is occupied.
PAGE -2-
PLANNING COMMISSION tUTES
May 26, 1983
Arleigh Radford, Mr. Hartong's contractor, explained the proposed timing for
construction of the building and expressed reservations about proceeding with
the sidewalk at this time.
MOVED BY MR. ORRICO TO APPROVE APPLICATION DR -3 -83 ACCORDING TO EXHIBIT A AND
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, EXCEPT THAT EXHIBIT A •
SHALL BE MODIFIED TO DELETE THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS.
Mr. Caughey cautioned that the proposed motion to delete the sidewalks may
conflict with the terms of the existing ordinance and thus create jurisdictional
confusion which may cause Mr. Hartong delay in obtaining the permits he needs,
as.the applicant will be forced to appeal the matter to the City Council. In
response to Mr. Orrico, Mr. Hartong stated that he is aware of the exemption
procedure contained in the sidewalk ordinance.
Mr. Caughey suggested that the Board could re -state the motion to eliminate
conditional sidewalk construction delay in favor of a corollary finding'which
expresses the Board's concerns about the issue of sidewalks to the City Council.
.t
MR. ORRICO RESTATED HIS MOTION TO APPROVE APPLICATION DR-3-83 ACCORDING TO
EXHIBIT A THEREOF AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 3 AS STATED IN THE STAFF
REPORT.
MOTION CARRIED WITH MR. KNUDSON OPPOSED.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Knudson stated his opposition to the motion was based on disagreement
with the sidewalk ordinance. -; -
The Chairman directed staff to prepare a written statement of findings to the
City Council stating that the sidewalk ordinance is creating substantial hard-
ships of double- costing and technological infeasibility for applicants located .
on streets which are subject to imprecise geometrics.
A. Doubletree Plaza Hotel - Request for relocation of existing wall signing.
The Chairman ascertained the Commission's concensus to review this item on short
notice; accordingly, staff presented the written report on this matter.
Pat O'Donnel, of Tube Art Displays, was present on behalf of the Doubletree's
management. He stated that the client's preference is to adjust the signing
as indicated on the drawing accompanying the staff report. •
Mr. Caughey explained that the new sign code renders the existing number of
signs to the west side of the Hotel non - conforming, and controls the
number of signs allowed on a single building face.
Mr. O'Donnel stated his belief that combining the letter and logo elements
will achieve conformance with the sign code, but will not enhance the appear-
ance of the sign.
,PAGE -3-
PLANNING COMMISSION Af7JTES
May 26, 1983
Mr. Caughey noted that the size of the resulting sign is a matter for the
Commission's discretion, but that the number of signs is fixed by Ordinance
and is not subject to review. In response to Mr. Orrico's question as to
the designation of the logo as a sign, Mr. Caughey read TMC 19.08.210 defining
a sign. He noted that an effort to distinguish between a logo and a sign
in the new code was abandoned. It was also considered too difficult to
distinguish between an architectural embellishment and an advertising device.
Mr. Knudson, who served on the sign code revision - committee, reiterated his perception
of the difficulties encountered in creating objective language standards
for display of logos.
Mr. O'Donnel then explained the technical difficulties associated with re-
moving and relocating the structure and wiring of the logo -sign. In response
to Mrs..Avery's suggestion that the "Doubletree" lettering be moved closer
to the logo, Mr. O'Donnel stated that while technically feasible, this
alternative is visually less - desireable.
Discussion followed regarding the process by which the Revised Sign Code
was adopted. Mr. O'Donnel explained that the sign which now exists was
contrary to the original desires of the hotel and the staff at the time
it was installed.
MOVED BY MR. ORRICO TO APPROVE THE RELOCATION OF THE DOUBLETREE PLAZA HOTEL
INDIVIDUAL LETTER SIGN AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT B SUBJECT TO REMOVAL OF THE
EXISTING TWO -TREE LOGO SIGN.
MOTION CARRIED.
B. Discussion of A.P.A. Annual Conference
Eileen Avery requested that the booklet "Deciding With Other, Deciding For
Others" which she received at the Planning Commissioner's Institute be
reproduced and distributed to the other commissioners.
Dick Kirsop reported on the special seminar on seismic hazard planning and
the field visit to the Trident Impact area on the Kitsap Peninsula.
Mark Caughey reported on the Duwamish Waterway Tour, noting especially the
value of the presentation by METRO staff on the pollutant content of the
river and its impact on upstream fisheries. He mentioned also that the West
Seattle Chamber of Commerce conducts an annual tour of the waterway, and
will advise the commission when sign -ups for 1983 are available.
Gerry Knudson reported on his participation in the study of small town
waterfronts, and the simulation land -use game.
Mrs. Avery noted that the seminar on European architecture, which appeared
quite interesting in the program, was in fact disappointing. Conversely,
the "Role of the Planning Commissioner" was outstanding and informative.
PAGE -4-
PLANNING COMMISSION MUTES
May 26, 1983
C. Hazard Assessment for Mount Rainier
Mr. Caughey reported on the Department of Emergency Services briefing on the
hazardous incident report prepared for the speculative eruption of Mt. Rainier.
A copy of the report will be sent to the Commission.
Mr. Knudson thanked the staff for the handouts which are supplied from time -to-
time, and asked that this practice continue.
Having concluded its business, the Commission adjourned at 10:18 PM.
TUKWI G COMMISSION
Mark Caugh
Associate/Planner
AGENDA ITEM
INTRODUCTION
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DR -3 -83 Llyod Hartong
The applicant is requesting site layout approval
for a single -story office building which consti-
tutes the second phase of a two - building complex.
The site is located at the confluence .of Maule
Avenue and So. 144th Street and is under the re-
view authority of the Interurban Special Review
District. At this time, the applicant is re-
questing only site layout approval so that a
foundation permit may be issued. Review of spe-
cific structural details and landscaping will
be deferred to a date uncertain, but will require
B.A.R. assent prior to construction.
1) The site is located in an M -1 (light Industry) zoning district, and is current-
ly vacant.
2) The property was divided into two parcels by approval of a short plat in 1977;
The proposed foundation permit pertains to "Lot B" depicted on Exhibit A.
3) In July, 1981, a building permit was issued for construction of a single -story
office building on Lot A immediately south of the existing home. By agree-
ment with the city council (As formally recorded 17 July 1981), the applicant
placed the parking lot serving the entire complex on the Northerly 72 feet of
Lot B.
4) General standards for design of off - street parking areas are contained in
TMC 18.56.040.
1) TMC 18.60.060 (3) provides that project proposals situated within the limits
of the Special Review District must conform not only with the traditional B.A.R.
guidelines of TMC 18.60.050 but also with those extraordinary standards which
speak to the intent of the SRD. We have evaluated the site plan (Exhibit A)
in relation to both sets of criteria.
t
Application DR -3 -83
Staff Report Page 2
A) Special Review District Guidelines Applicable to All Proposed Development
Response: The criteria of TMC 18.60.060 speak primarilito a proposal's im-
pact on the historic significance and natural amenities of the SRD. In the
present case, we anticipate no adverse influence on the area. The existing
land use pattern is a haphazard mixture of industrial and residential ac-
tivity and vacant parcels. Further, there is no noteworthy indigenous veg-
etation nor direct shoreline access.
Safety of pedestrians is also of concern in the SRD criteria as the city's
policy is to encourage pedestrian prsence in the Interurban corridor. Note
on Exhibit A that a section of frontage sidewalk will be installed on S.144th
Street in conjunction with the project, providing a link which will facili-
tate eventual sidewalk access the length of the street to the river shoreline.
A minor pedestrian access revision is necessary, however, according to TMC
18.56.040 (4D):
When offstreet parking is provided in the rear of a building
and a driveway or Zane alongside the building provides access
to the rear parking area such driveway shall require a minimum
width of twelve feet and a sidewalk of at least three -foot sec-
tion, adjoining the building, curbed or raised six inches
above the driveway surface."
Since the site dagram illustrates the building to front on So.144th Street,
we suggest that the planting strip on the West side of the building be changed
to a raised walkway as required by .the zoning code. This requirement could
be waived if the building as eventually designed fronts on the parking lot
with direct doorway access.
It
B) General B.A.R. Guidelines
Since the scope of review is limited at this time to the site layout, we have
attempted to compare the project with those criteria which relate site design
to the scale of the building to be placed thereon and to the property's geo-
graphic surroundings. We find that the proposed second building is an infill
development which reflects the scale and use established by the first Hartong
building.
As an M -1 use,.there are no landscape requirements for side and rear yards.
While such cannot be required, we encourage the applicant to reconsider their
inclusion, especially adjacent to the North property line. A 3 -5 foot wide
planter strip could be attained there by reducing the parking aisle width to
25 feet as the zoning code minimum provides.
A final "housekeeping" matter with respect to the Developer's Agreement is noted.
The agreement reserves the northerly 72 feet of the project site for parking
service to the complex. The building envelope now encroaches 3 feet into that
parking reserve. The city attorney advises us to amend the agreement to re-
duce the parking reserve to 69' in accordance with Exhibit A. Your approval
action should be conditioned accordingly.
Application DR -3 -83
Staff Report Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that application DR -3 -83 be approved according to Exhibit A
thereof in accordance with the following conditions:
1) The approval action pertains only to site layout as depicted
on Exhibit A and authorizes the Building Official to process
a foundation permit for a single -story office building. B.A.R.
approval of building, landscape /irrigation and lighting shall
be required for any subsequent construction pursuant to instal-
lation of the foundation and completion of site paving.
2) Exhibit A shall be modified prior to issuance of building permits
to reflect compliance with TMC 18.56.040 (4D).
3) Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer's Agreement
recorded under Auditor's File #8108250512 shall be amended to
eliminate building encroachment on the 72' parking reserve as
provided therein. Should the City Council elect not to amend
the agreement, Exhibit A shall be modified to reposition the .
future building envelope outside the 72' parking use area reserve.
Enclosure: Exhibit A
Developer's Agreement
I tr
"aqinla *it
w
Ic130 ONINNVId
411 *to os
3 IN
119IHX3
• . 7 /
itatA4tytt
V -07
.07/%* Inb'Vr
2fit,Wegrfrante7 t tr A r3tcycrw3"
ItlIVIIVIPS - 11211ardltact 4itittwintS
'vt iittiritl .5mtitigall , itt.AI NNW ~NOS
I --; 7 -v r r— — -- —; I
tV::..• I t . I 1
I 1 I WOW minitsray%
V !:
.... ...,.•: ; ;.' 1 I I
I 914d SteiSift I
... I I
0.
. •
I ro. -- F /21
+motors. Au■IIP
0 nra • 017
- 3"5
ere
r"ke1 :17,04cs
1 •lice40 fa Attozi
•
etc'
s-
•
7
.a
9
it-
L
tear • fermi
1
PRoeoiss °pi
'
Masa Kra sc • SZ. 0
5rri
1::_q" A
BIM
I I
r-A Ij
•• • • I- A
112 'I a.
EXHIBIT A
50 I4
PLANNING DEPT
M.F.
.1
PUS—Sislemeohg•
FOu warartase-Jelk
L214.—
( o
v ut,
(1,004n reO\
eve4
_nu FIX
22.0'
yAlPsie iaMilowt
Mtn"
_SanLP
64 , 044.4-
SO 1,./PN CW
TILeierap avat S.LL
•
ALIO .
J M.014 4e; 0 C
J2.* Mm
"man 422■66
.-201 P2.12Laz
.1 12..."
4A5"0C.
Acrodm...1-ra.L.
-
mow.
•
g -2-,aai A S. SAkmmeter
rbue.CParvo/J FOS An..72.44e.
0,5"211. brkddAllgoef+
1101.
azsimuciutzwrizmaV
. 3Nabs. a
atax.....11_segli&uminsuarriu6_
c2ELr-raulaMt*.ANtalabl,
GF?ic Elledo;.P0dasailfr SAW"
12Rourgert SeisenANW euat At,. •
1,
AlirrierismartalC
I
-9mam•-•AKEDELEa-ada-a7--
_
--"-47416 e-i4"
•
-RocataNDAILAIILarIlL
ehojeLsra =law a* Iftwolkst,
K
Control Number
\ City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
O, Tukwila Wash'riglon 98188
1908'
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete
applications will not be accepted for processing.
SECTION. I. GENERAL DATA
1) APPLICANT' S NAME • Nh- r ra ' / J TELEPHONE : (
2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 3/ /6- ,,,;el, ) 9 77w'• ZIP: 9g /G :: :
3) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME 5'9/J- TELEPHONE : ( ) 5 frig Ai...) 1,,a
4) PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS /4 ZIP: \• %- •• •
•S) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) /2 ,y' :..2.t e
Ov.'/l 2 t' Gill 3 6 7 Le) 7 1 ' .' , 11+,e:aIt" -
rp x? 7' 7 7 - 6 o, , A2cC /7, h /2.4.m4NS .Q7PrZf 6Aeoa
7/214C 7" AS 2E= Cd,epe0 1N hz.- . // _ o F ,D/ , 4966" a'/
Recd go.$ d k'/'N .Co , Gal4 s,V, .
6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL)
SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION
7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE 1HE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: 0.1.5 TA .37V # —1
4S: Aci ( + ls'o t�s t. Fr).
D d C ok,12 cur.
9) PROTECT.
a. NET ACRES f , � n Cl2 C'
b. GROSS ACRES
FEES:
RCPT.
M.F.
EPIC.
8) O YOU PROPOSE 10 DEVELOP TIS P: ASES?
d. FLOORS OF
c. PARKING SPACES
L r &e_____Releiebv4
e. LOT AREA COVERAGEI5.e1EDG. I/6 S(.FT. LANDSCAPE 3 525 S. FT.
PAVING 4; 75 FT. 4721a
10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10%? FITS J,) NO
11) EXISTING ZONING ,(�'� — j 12. EXISTING COMP.PLAN Y ES
13) IS "NIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION EIYES ONO
ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONAENTAL BASE MAP?
CONSTRUCTION
21.0 e/o
14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER
DOCUMENTS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTEER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE
INDICATE BELOW.
b. NAME: ADDRESS:
•
a. NAME:A f. ? /etaF - osa 4 ADDRESS: a n2 LIS . /44/4( . Tvkrw
OVER'
s
51.
SECTIONrITI ' 'APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
?wK.iS4s n ,r: .s , being duly sworn, declare
contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this
that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the
knowledge and belief.
Subsr_ribed
this .
day of
sworn before
A
?
19aJ
,
tat e
gton
that I am the -
application and
the information
best of my
ontract
laser or owner) -
SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
TYPE OF APPLICATION
r i REZONING
ri CONDITIONAL
USE
!!VARIANCE
1 1
ri SHORELINE MGMT.. PERMIT
WAIVER SCHEDULE A, 3,9,10
I - 1 SHORT SUBDIVISION 3,4,7
[7SUBDIVISION 2,3,4,5,9 + ,12 •
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENTT PLAN 2,3,4,6,9
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 9,10
LANDSCAPE REVIEW 11
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
* *SEE TABLE
1 FOR DESCRIPTION
+ OPTIONAL AT STAFF TS 'DIRECTION
SUPPORTING MATERIAL**
SCHEDULE E, 1,2,3,4,5,9
SCHEDULE C, 2,3,5,9
SCHEDULE F, 3,5,9
SCHEDULE D, 2,3,4,5,9
SCHEDULE B, 2,3,4,5,8
•
12R -3 -83
6411 5 N44T
L. • fboI4P/TIoP1
r
asuArne, 11144.6-
Stvatit'
5
A
srims CarrICA.
Ej*w 4E4' st ofx:
Floe* a. a z. 0'
.2 Cr 85
,AINCth
J iltaig 711710 rtlIMINC.P NWT
MINIM"
irmsn46-
00
It/ (ego/. .
,•■••■• 0
"ur ■+.0"....,•
OF Pr.=
GAIsr#40, pms I
I I !
.-- — — — -I
i I
awe*. wag X., icia.m. vemr.y Rm..
_sacasm__cAa...summins, ./..atitaa...Sierrersadg
afal..rautwot _AZatralPmftalgiat-edatit-iPagnair
.k4/.11 14 Vf ci
•
FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW
0€ 6Z Be L2 9Z SZ 4 7Z CZ ZZ la OZ 61 81 /A 91 9I .I 'CI al U 01, •
_1101141111J1111111111)11,1,11)1110#1,611111A11111111111111111111111111,1111111,61111110111111LIMbillifill4414illatikilattlfilidilithinliTIM11141111.1"
so too
PLANNING DEPT
EXHIBIT A
M.F.
iirtpirrnitorTmi pirrriorturrprin I TTTT :TT:
2 3 4 5 6
7 IF THIS MICROFILMED D,OCUMENT I LES
_CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO _
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
-chi rat
• 21.0
=SWISS'
ZW■ &CC
Tituerso em. 1.11
van 4
I
0: ant "nul
...CoreaC. law•LcItker--• -
. 6 44/a..W.M.L_Can.
Si tjtj 1:"-•
h° •
q'f•Imm re0'
e,v
_404 PLUS
Vim** Pw.rs
41raC•
PI. _MAMA
NW. 10~0
fbw.crareeo or.,& rs..mga
empvis.
„Yeas, l•fo
_ itasmurc..1001
. Tor- a .
_.W.••,Lstaimemaassam&_
_air Rua_ Arakpaaarbiba
Wm* & POItAaMisPoran
snasrarKerros
___aliaAllensvaaawdarea-0
__ZZada_Aeritrio
If •