Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 82-06-A - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - ANNEXATION82-06-a south 135th street 48th avenue south WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES ANNEXATION CITY COUNCIL, REG(IR MEETING 18, 1982 a W BUSINESS Surplus 3 Police Vehicles Disposition of Old Police Dept Building Ordinance #1276 - Designating the Tukwila Fire Dept. as the hazardous mate- rials incident command agency Resolution #837 - Fixing the date and place for a public hearing for 2 petitions for annexation (Foster Park & Southgate) Recommendation on petition for proposed annexa- tion by Western Pacific Properties ANNEXATION Ordinance #1277 - Relating to crimes involving domestic violence MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT PERMISSION BE GRANTED TO SURPLUS THE THREE POLICE VEHICLES. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY PHELPS, THAT ADMINISTRATION PROCEED WITH THE DEMOLITION OF THE OLD POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING.* Councilman Hill suggested the building be sold for the salvageable material. *MOTION CARRIED WITH HILL VOTING NO. • MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Woo read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Washington, designating the Tukwila Fire Department as the hazardous materials incident command agency within its respective boundaries and authorizing the Fire Department to accept mutual assistance between the City and persons with equipment,'personnel and expertise in the handling of hazardous materials incidents, by establishing limitations on liability for those persons responding. MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1276 BE ADOPTED AS READ.* Councilman Bauch said he feels there is not enough fiscal restraint on this ordinance so he will vote against it. *MOTION CARRIED WITH BAUCH VOTING NO. MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Woo read a resolution of the City of Tukwila, Washington, fixing the date and place for a public hearing for two (2) petitions for annexation of certain properties within the Tukwila Planning Area. MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY PHELPS, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 837 BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Public hearing on the proposed annexations will be November 15, 1982. MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT A PETITION BE DRAWN TO REQUIRE THAT THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SUBMITTED BY WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES ASSUME THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE CITY AND THAT THE AREA BE BROUGHT INTO THE CITY ZONED R -1.* MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY BOHRER, THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO DESIGNATE THE ZONING AS R -1 7,200. •MOTION CARRIED. A gentleman from the audience commented that the total assessed value of the area is almost $600,000 and he doesn't believe that the owners of 75% valuation of the property will sign such a petition. Councilman Bauch commented R -2 zoning could be con- sidered at the time of the Public Hearing. Mr. Turner commented that R -2 zoning would be satisfactory to the people he talked to in the area. Councilman Hill said they want to bring this in at the low zoning so they can control the development. Council does not intend to hurt anybody with the zoning. *MOTION CARRIED WITH PHELPS VOTING NO. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY MORGAN, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Woo read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Washington, relating to crimes involving domestic violence and permitting the issuance of no contact orders by the Tukwila Municipal Court. Lot Area Current Use Divisible for. R -2? Y '.' N Total Potential R -2 Units • Remarks A 18,300 S.F.R. X X X X X • 4 Flag Lot Req'd B 20,100 S.F.R. 4 Illegal Duplex/ Flag Lot Req'd C 24,600 S.F.R. /VAC. 6 May Require Const. of Pub. St. Access • D 7,700 S.F.R. - Less than Min. Lot Size . E' 8,750 VAC 2 F 7,300 S.F.R. - Established R -1 G 12,200 S.F.R. - Use , Established R -1 Use H 13,300 S.F.R. - Established R -1 I 17,500 S.F.R. 4 .Use , J 30,000 S.F.R. 6 Unoccupied S.F.R. K 27,500 S.F.R. 6 , L 27,500 S.F.R. 6 11 38 AGENDA ITEM OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION CITY C OUNCIL STAFF REPORT tern Pacific Properties Annexation SUPPLEMENTAL ST) HORIZATION OF PETITION /ZONING At the City Council's he- Whole on October 11, the Western Pacific annexation was put forward to the regular meeting for the purposes of establishing minute -order direction on of the formal annexation petition, as provided in RCW The petition, which ;ed and signed by owners of at least 75% of the assessed valuation of the annexation area, must include a map and legal description thereof; the petition must reference the Council's decisions regarding assumption of bonded indebtedness and appropriate city zoning. Therefore, at the October 18th regular meeting,. the Council should direct the City Clerk to note in the official minutes: - If the legislative body has required the assumption of all or any portion of City indebtedness by the annexation area. - If the adoption of a proposed zoning regulation is required. These facts will then be noted in the text of the petition. Zoning During the last Council discussion of zoning for the Western Pacific annexation, staff was asked to analyze the development potential for R -2 (.duplex residential) useage within the area. The following table is keyed to the identification of individual properties appearing on Exhibit 1: SKETCH T 4f 0 do et. 44 "err 0► by J \.,/ LOT • • • LOT Ci • q s d >'f 9/. \ 3 / \ N., ,fLer • LOTH ` r N • DoT f aq 1.r i y S • q1 i • I"= Ioo' • ' TYPICAL ASSESSORS PARCEL NUM6ER IN WeJ4 SEC. IS-25-4 IN KING COUNTY t WA. NOTE: TH15 MAP REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OP RECOROeD DATA AND DOES NoT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY, . COMPANY *LEGAL D#CRIPTION ' 1.7S Acres Ta+� $ R TO s v b vran To I, ;sh; D D M , • FRes.d er.*;a CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY E X f I I B IT ONE Aos, �.9 5KETGN TO 9 I �. 1" =100 G4 4 r •> s s>, J TYPICAL ASSESSORS PARCEL Nui/lE3ER IN we SEC. I5 -23-4 IN RING COUNTY WA, NOTE: THIS HAP REPRESENTS A COMPIL4TION OP RECORDCD D4TA APO Does NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY, . COMPANY 'LEGAL D CRIPTION To•n S R TO ,S To I, Ight nM p I.7S Acres M , • Res,d e.14-1a1 ^ - C QTY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY sIEPAN t ASSOCIATES, VC . 9 Fedari Way, WA 9800 AGENDA ITEM Supplemental Staff Report II -- Zoning CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 8 October 1982 • 82 -6 -A Western Pacific Properties Annexation As you are aware, the matter of determining appropriate zoning classification(s) for the proposed annexation area has been before the Planning Commission at its regular August Meeting, and more recently at the Commission's September meeting. On both occasions, the Commission deadlocked on the issue of residential versus industrial use designations and was unable to present a clear consensus recom- mendation to the Council on this matter. There seem to be two concerns to the residents in the annexation area which are paramount: first, determining the optimum separation of industrial and residen- tial use areaswhich will result in the greatest degree of protection for the ex- isting vitality of the neighborhood; second, the extent to which the taxable value of individual properties in the vicinity will be increased if industrial zoning is applied and the time frame in which reevalution may occur. Regarding the issue of separating uses, we direct your attention to the supplemen- tal staff report of 3 September 1982 which describes both a mixed R -1 /C -M approach and a total C -M approach for the annexation territory. It is still the opinion of staff that C -M zoning throughout will provide far greater buffering potential and therefore greater protection for the long -range continuity of residential use than would be the case with the mixed -use option. Please examine Examples A & B closely and note the difference in setback distances. • To refresh your memory on the analysis of the zoning issue to date, we have en- closed copies of all; prior staff, reports. Staff . reaffirms our recommendation that the Western Pacific Properties Annexation should be brought into the city as a C -M (Industrial Park) zoning district. If this zoning approach is not acceptable, then we recommend alternatively that the annexation application be denied until such time as a larger area is proposed which permits sufficient space and topographic distinction to accomodate a tra- ditional transition of land uses from residential to industrial below MacAdam Road. CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM • 82 - A: Western Pacific Properties: nAnneocation Supplemental Staff Report - Zoning During the Planning Carmission's review of the potential zoning classifications for the Western Pacific annexation at the meeting of 26 August 1982 and at the subsequent City Council review on 7 September 1982, an alternative approach was suggested which is in essence a canbination of low- density residential use and light industrial use within the annexation boundaries. This approach seemed to be favored by same of those persons who testified at the Planning Commission hearing and r even by same of the Carmissioners present as a means of protecting the vatality of the established resi- dential use pattern of the neighborhood fram the adverse influences of adjoining light-industrial activity. As we shall attempt to illustrate, staff believes that the mixed--use approach will have the opposite affect on neighborhood preservation by reducing the stringency of land use controls which could be be applied under C -M (industrial park) zoning as we rexmmended previously. Example "A" depicts in conceptual form the mixed residential /industrial use transition and the degree of "buffering" possible under application of conventional setback standards. As illustrated, the potential separation of developable space between R -1 and C -M is as 3J 1e as 15' within the annexa- tion boundary. In L.cample "B," C -M use is expanded to include the entire block, yet the average separa- tion buffer between R -1 and industrial use is 120' to the south and is over 130' to the west, except for a short stretch near the southwest corner. It remains our belief that C -M zoning for the entire annexation area offers the greatest opportunity for protecting the long -range continuity of residential cohesion in this neighborhood, while recognizing the emerging trend of controlled industrial activity as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff reaffirms our previously recommended designation of this annexation area as C -M (industrial park) zoning. Alternatively, the annexation should be denied until such time as a larger area is proposed which would better accarodate a traditional transition of land uses from below Macadam Road. • .••• PI. 1 1_ residential to industrial AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION CI T Y NTRODUCTION CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • Western Pacific Properties Annexation—Zoning ` On 26 July 1982, Western Pacific Properties, repre- senting the owners of a number of contiguous pro- perties near the northwest boundary of the city, filed with the City Council a notice of intention to begin annexation proceed- ings. Among other topics which the Council must analyze in deciding to pro- ceed with the annexation:, is appropriate city zoning for the newly - incorporated territory. Therefore, the Council has referred this matter to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation on zoning. FINDINGS 1) The proposed annexation encompasses 3.1a acres bounded generally by 48th Avenue South between South 134th and South 135th Place. 2) The northerly edge of the annexation boundary is formed by the existing city limit line. 3) The area is currently zones S -R (Suburban Residential) in King County. Contiguous property within the City,of Tuk- wila to the north is zoned M -1 (Light Industry). Sur- rounding unincorporated lands in the county are also zoned Suburban Residential (i.e. - Single Family). 4) The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan specified land use designa- tions for properties which are not in the city limits but . are within the city's planning area. The annexation area Page -2- PLANNING COMMISON - STAFF REPORT is designated for "industrial" usage on the Comprehensive Plan. 5) The predominant existing use of the annexation area is single - family residences, as is the predominant use of properties to the west and south. The existing Fostoria Industrial Park, as well as other existing or planned industrial uses, are prominent to the north and east. CONCLUSIONS 1) In most instances, determination of zoning for an area proposed for annexation to the city is largely a matter of consulting the Comprehensive Plan. That approach is not wholly informativ in the case of Western Pacific Properties, however, Ammediately across 48th Avenue South and South 135th Place the Comprehensive Plan identifies "low- density" (i.e. - Single Family) resi- dential use, reflecting the presence of a long- estab- lished single - family neighborhood. It concerns us that the Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation area as an industrial use district immediately adjacent to an established low- density neighborhood. The transi- tion in uses strikes us as being too abrupt for the area east of South 135th Place, since it is without sufficient physical /topographical differentiation. 2) We reason that the Comprehensive Plan's influence on the zoning review process must be subjected to interpretation; therefore the following alternative zoning strategies are suggested for consideration: Alternative One - Reject Annexation In their request for annexation, the petitioners have indicated specific interest in obtaining M -1 zoning. Because there is not sufficient geographic space nor cohesive patterns of property ownership within the annexation boundaries, it does not appear feasible to provide a classic "stepping down" of zoning use- inten- sities between the industrial uses to the north and east and the residential areas to the west and south. Annexation should not proceed until a larger land area is proposed and a transitional configuration of zoning designations can be devised. Alternative Two - Comprehensive Plan Concept (M -1 Zoning) Under this alternative, all lands within the annexation boundary would be designated "light- industry," with the specific impacts upon the R -1 neighborhood from resulting development left to be resolved on a case - specific basis. r Page -3- PLANNING COMMI - STAFF REPORT Alternative Three - Industrial Park. Concept (C-M Zoning) Staff suggests that designation of the annexation area as a C -M (industrial park) zone will accomplish two objectives: First, it will allow the City to select a zoning classification which is nominally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Second, the C -M zoning district embodies design and performance standards for development which will afford greater protection for the adjoining residential neighborhood than would be so with conventional light - industry zoning. Adverse impacts upon the remaining R -1 neighborhood can be mitigated better on:a case- specific basis under C -M zoning than M -1 zoning. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the 3.19 acre territory proposed. for annexation to the City of Tukwila by Western Pacific Propertiesunder Master File 82 -6 -A be zoned C -M (industrial park) with the following conditions: 1) Any development of this area subsequent to annexation shall proceed in full compliance with all performance standards of TMC 18.38. 2) Board of Architectural Review approval shall be obtained prior to issuance of building permits for any action, except single family homes, to develop or redevelop any portion of the subject area following annexation. MC /js /blk Of SKETCH TO ;CCOMPANY • 'LEGAL description NOTE: TTN 5 i"AP REPRESENTS A GOMPJLATION OP RECORP D DATA ANC) DDES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL FIELD Si FEY. S I Er1,11 & ASSOCIATES, 9 .) Smik A , tk %2033 AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 82 -6 -A: Western Pacific Properties Annexation The original petition for annexation of the lands represented by Western Pacific Properties was submitted to the. Planning Di :vi:sion of 28 May 1982, The council considered the petition at jts meeting of 8 June 1982 and decided at that time to refer it to the,.Communi:ty Affairs subcommittee for further analysis and recommendation. The CAC did review this matter at its meeting of 15 June and requested the applicant to revise the boundaries of the annexation to include those properties adjoining the north margin of 48th Ave So, Between S. 134th and S. 135th streets. The applicants then i'nterviewed those property owners in the effort to obtain their signatures ° to the peti'ti on , While the result exceeds the minimum threshold level of assessed valuation necessary to commence annexation porceedings, certain signatures 'were not obtained (See diagram) and the petition is therefore not unanimously supported by the affected property owners. The petitioners are requesting that the entire annexation area be zoned Light Industry (M -1). This proposal was not heartily supported by the CAC, however; it is recommended, therefore, that prior to the formal hearing on 6 September 1982 for the annexation itself, the City Council refer the matter of appropriate zoning to the Planning Commission for a recommendation at their regular meeting of 26 August 1982. Adoption of the attached resolutton.wilibegi'n the formal process- of annexation by acceptance of the petition and establishment of a public hearing date. AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION On 26 July 1982, Western Pacific Properties, repre- senting the owners of a number of contiguous pro- perties near the northwest boundary of the city, . filed with the City Council a notice of intention to begin annexation proceed- ings. Among other topics which the Council must analyze in deciding to pro- ceed with the annexation,,, is appropriate city zoning for the newly- incorporated territory. Therefore, the Council has referred this matter to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • Western Pacific Properties Annexation—Zoning on zoning. FINDINGS 1) The proposed annexation encompasses 3.1' acres bounded generally by 48th Avenue South between South 134th and South 135th Place; 2) The northerly edge of the-annexation boundary is formed by the existing city limit line. 3) The area is currently zones S -R (Suburban Residential) in King County. Contiguous property within the City Tuk- wila to the north is zoned M -1 (Light Industry). Sur- rounding-unincorporated lands in the Bounty are also zoned Suburban Residential (i.e..- Single Family). 4) The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan specified land use designa- tions for properties which are not in the city limits but are within the city's planning area. The annexation area is designated for "industrial" usage on the' Plan. 5) The predominant existing use of the annexation area is single - family residences, as is the predominant use of properties to the west and south. The existing Fostoria Industrial Park, as well as other existing or planned industrial uses, are prominent to the north and east. CONCLUSIONS 1) In most instances, determination of zoning for an area proposed for annexation to the city is largely a matter of consulting the Comprehensive Plan. That approach is not wholly informative in the case of Western Pacific Properties, however, immediately across 48th Avenue South and South 135th Place. The Comprehensive Plan identifies "low- density" (i.e. - Single Family) resi- dential use, reflecting the presence of a long - estab - fished single - family neighborhood. It concerns us that the Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation area as an industrial use district immediately adjacent to an established low- density neighborhood. The transi- tion in uses strikes us as being too abrupt for the area east of South 135th Place, since it is without sufficient physical /topographical differentiation. 2) We reason that the Comprehensive Plan's influence on the zoning review process must be subjected to interpretation; therefore the following alternative zoning strategies are suggested for consideration: Alternative One - Reject Annexation In their request for annexation, the petitioners have indicated specific interest in obtaining M -1 zoning. Because there is not sufficient geographic space nor cohesive patterns of property ownership within the annexation boundaries, it does not appear feasible to provide a classic "stepping down" of zoning use- inten- sities between the industrial uses to the north and east and the residential areas to the west and south. Annexation should not.proceed until a larger land area is proposed and a transitional configuration of zoning designations can be . devised. Alternative Two Comprehensive Plan Concept (M -1 Zoning) Under this alternative, all lands within the annexation boundary would be designated "light- industry," with the specific impacts upon the R -1 neighborhood from resulting development left to be resolved on a case - specific basis. • • / • & •t - -: t5 . . ,.. MAP KEPRE t i 7 A . . Alternative Th_•ee - Industrial Park Con r- (C -M Zoning) Staff suggests that designation of the annexation area as a C -M (industrial park) zone will accomplish two objectives: First, it will allow the City to select a zoning classification which is nominally con with the Comprehensive Plan. Second, the C -M zoning district embodies design and performance standards for development which will afford greater protection for the adjoining residential neighborhood than would be so with conventional light- industry zoning. Adverse impacts upon the remaining R -1 neighborhood can be mitigated better orr•acase- specific basis under C -M zoning than M -1 zoning. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the 3.19 acre territory proposed. • for annexation to the City of Tukwila by Western Pacific Properties under Master File 82 -6 -A be zoned C -M (industrial park) with the following conditions: 1) Any development of this area subsequent to annexation shall proceed in full compliance with all performance standards of TMC 18.38. 2) Board of Architectural Review approval shall be obtained prior to issuance of building permits for any action, except single family homes, to develop or redevelop any portion of the subject area following annexation. MC /js /blk • STEM & `:TE , AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT A complete Notice of Intention to Com- mence annexation proceedings for the 1.78 Acre area described on exhibits "A" and "B" was received by the Plan- ning Division on 28 May 1982, and is presented to your council for prelim- inary discussion in accordance with RCW 35.13.125. M-I Western Pacific Properties Annexation 82 -6 -A M 7 T 1 4 \ \ \4I / Once the council has been informed of a notice of intention, several decisions must be made by the local legislative body as prescribed by law. First, the council must decide whether or not to accept the petition for annexation. If that decision is affirmative, the council must then decide what is an appro- priate zoning classification for the site, and whether or not the annexed area should assume any portion of the existing indebtedness of the city. To assist your deliberations on these preliminary questions, staff suggests that the first strip should be to refer this matter to the subcommittee on Community Affairs for their study and recommendation. Should the C.A.C. and the full council agree to go ahead with the annexation as proposed, the city clerk would then be directed to prepare a resolution accepting the'petition and set- ting a date for a fromal public hearing. 1 Tax Lot #0044 That portion of Tract 14 of Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, on page 95, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the most Northerly corner of said Tract 14; thence Southwesterly along Northwesterly boundary of said Tract 14, a distance of 494.52 feet to Southwest corner of said tract which point is also the North line of 135th Street (ALSO KNOWN AS Foster Street); thence Southeasterly along said margin of county road, 95.38 feet; thence Northeasterly along the line parallel with said Northwesterly boundary of said tract, 472.12 feet to the Northeasterly boundary of said tract; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly boundary, 90.24 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT therefrom the Northeast 272.12 feet thereof; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. TOGETHER WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TAX PARCEL NUMBERS 0044, 0046, 0049, 0050 & 0051 LOCATED IN THE N1 /4 OF SECTION 15 -23 -04 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Tax Lot #0046 & #0050 That portion of Tract 14 of Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, records of King County, Washington. Beginning at the Northwest corner of Tract 14; thence Southeasterly along the South margin of Valley Street, 90.94 feet; thence Southwesterly along a line parallel to the Northwesterly boundary of said Tract 14, 252 feet, which is the true point of beginning; thence Southwesterly parallel to the Northwest boundary of said Tract 14, 220.32 feet to the intersection of the North margin of Foster Street; thence Southeasterly along said margin 169.8 feet; thence Northeasterly along a line coinciding with the Southeasterly boundary of Tract 14, 235.98 feet; thence Northwesterly along a line parallel to Valley Street, 169.06 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT that property described in Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under recording #6207383. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING GE=T . EXH E`;T Q_. M.F. 82 4; - TOGETHER WITH Tax Lot #0049 That portion of Tract 14, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract 14; thence Southeasterly along the South margin of Valley Street, 90.94 feet; thence Southwesterly along a line parallel to the northwesterly boundary of said Tract 14, a distance of 252 feet to the true point of beginning; thence Southwesterly parallel to the northwest boundary of said Tract 14, a distance of 220.32 feet to the intersection of the north margin of Foster Street; thence Southeasterly along said margin 169.8 feet; thence northeasterly along line coinciding with the southeasterly boundary of Tract 14, 235.98 feet; thence northwesterly along line parallel to Valley Street 169.06 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT the Southeasterly 70 feet in width thereof. TOGETHER WITH Tax Lot #0051 That portion of Tract 14, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, in King County, Washington. Northeasterly 252 feet of the Southeast 0.86 acres of Lot 14, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, in King County, Washington. EXCEPT the North 10 feet of the Northeasterly 119.11 feet of the Southeast 0.86 acres of Lot 14. The legal descriptions shown hereon are based solely on recorded data and are not the results of a field survey. 5/20/82 Page 2 of 2 PP INTRODUCTION CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 82-6 -A; Western Pacific Properties Annexation At the Council's 26 May 1982 meeting, Western Pacific Properties, represent- ing the owners of a number of contiguous properties near the north - `,- , west boundary of the City, filed with � ``� the City Council a notice of intention to begin annexation proceedings. Upon l """' advice of staff and the Community Affairs Committee, the matter of determining an appropriate. city zoning classification to become effective upon annexation was referred to the Planning Commission at its regular. August meeting for their review and _ recommendation. DISCUSSION The Commission did conduct a public hearing on 26 August 1982 on the subject of zoning for the Western Pacific Properties annexation. A number of persons testified at the hearing, both favorable to and in opposition to industrial land uses in the annexation area as provided in the Comprehensive Plan. Those speakers favoring industrial zoning viewed that approach. as a logical extension of the emerging industrial park land use pattern at the exisitng city boundary on the north edge of the annexa- tion area. Other speakers, including one residential property owner whose lands are within the proposed annexation boundary, argued that the exten- sion of industrial use would adversely impact the established single - family neighborhood on the adjoining west.and south boundaries. After considerating the public testimony and debating the issues between themselves, the Commission unfortunately was unable to reach a consensus on an appropriate recommendation, and the zoning issue was tabled until Commissioners could visit the area. What seemed to disturb. the Commissioners most was the process of tying appropriate protections for the'single- family use areas to the zoning performance standards embodied in the municipal code and the feasibility of coexistance between residential and non - residential uses with this relatively small annexation area. ... Soo 82 -6 -A City Council MC /blk CONCLUSION In classic zoning technology, there are two methods available for buffering adjacent properties from undesirable impacts resulting from more intensive use. The most feasible alternative in this case is the "performance" approach which includes setback, area, bulk and aesthetic controls as an obligation of internal development within a zoned area. Staff suggests gests that designation of the annexation area as a C -M (industrial park) zone will accomplish two objectives: First, it will allow the City to select a zoning classification which is nominally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Second, the C -M zoning district embodies design and performance standards for development which will afford greater protection for the adjoining residential neighborhood than would be so with conventional light- industry zoning. Adverse impacts upon the remaining R -1 neighborhood can be mitigated better on a case - specific basis under C -M zoning than M -1 zoning, since the requirements for setback, landscaping, building bulk, range of uses allowed, and master - planning are more stringent. • The other traditional approach is that of "stepping down" zoning use intensities. In their request for annexation, the petitioners have indicated specific interest in obtaining M -1 zoning. Because there is not sufficient geographic space nor cohesive patterns of property ownership within the annexation boundaries, it does not appear feasible to provide a classic "stepping down'! of zoning use - intensities between the industrial uses to the north and east and the residential areas to the west and south. If the C -M' zoning alternative is not acceptable for whaterever reason, we suggest that annexation should not proceed until a larger land area is proposed and a transitional configuration of zoning designations can be devised. RECOMMENDATION Staff that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the 3.19 acre territory proposed for annexation to the City of Tukwila by Western Pacific Properties under Master File 82 -6 -A be zoned C -M (industrial park)_ with the following conditions: 11 Any development of this area subsequent to annexation shall proceed in full compliance with all performance standards of TMC 18.38. 2) Board of Architectural Review approval shall be obtained prior to issuance of building permits for any action to develop or redevelop any portion of the subject area following annexation. Single family homes shall be exempt from this requirement. 1 V. • TYPICAL .ASSESSORS PARCEL NuN►6ER IN ,y e Y4 5EC. 15 -23 -4 IN KING COUNTY ) WA. • NOTE TI-115 MAP REPRE5ENT5 A COMPILATION OF RECORPCO c4TA ANO Does NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY. To+aI I:/an • 5 bvrAr' ' Res,d eerfia _p L I9h;- CI =1 a G ITY OF T u K WILh t D%)NDARY C of Tukwila 6200 SouMxenter eou evard 7Likw ftehivon 98t88 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM EXISTING ZONING Suburban Resi dentium ZONING Light Industry PROPOSED REZONE SITE IS WITHIN TULaVILA CITY LIMITS EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE OF SURROUNDING PARCELS: ZONE Nam Light Industry saum Suburban Residential EAST Light Industry WEST Residential Single Family 7200 accessed USE SUPPLErr tARY QUESTIOt1AIRE k—nedule E REZONE APPLICATION D YES © NO Warehouse barn with fenced outside storage 4 rental houses, 3 owner occupied houses Rental house, warehouse facilities Single family USES PROPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED ON PROPOSED REZONE SITE T . use of site not proposed to be changed. Property at 4534 South 135th will be granted duplex status under M -1 Zoning, City of Tukwila. ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED REZONE SITE IS FRCM A DEDICATED, IMPROVED PUBLIC RIGHT -OF- WAY © YES ONO. (If "NV, please describe how the site is PROVISIONS TO BE MADE FOR ADEQUATE SEWER AND WATER SERVICES None Ciy of Tukwila 6200 Soutf+cente► Bouieverd Tukwila VVashigton 98188 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM FEES: RCPT. M.F. EPIC. NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete applications will not be accepted for processing. SECTION I. GENERAL DATA 1) APPLICANT'S NAME Western Pacific Properti e% : (206) 241 -1616 13975 Interurban Ave S. 2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESSSeattle, Washington. 981 ZIP: 98168 3) PROPERTY OttiNER's NAME 3 owners attached TELEPHONE:( ) , , 4) PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS ZIP: ! �' 1 5) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) 6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) 1 SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION 7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: Non- project project only deals with annexation and rezone 8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES? DYES ONO 9) PROJECT a. NET ACRES ± c. PARKING SPACES b. GROSS ACRES d. FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION e. LOT AREA COVERAGE BLDG. SQ.FT. LANDSCAPE PAVING SQ. FT. 10) DOES 11-E AVERAGE SLOPE OF TPE SITE EXCEED 1094? OYES 1:1° 11) EXISTING =ONING 12. EXISTING CCMP.PLAN 13) IS THIS SITE DESISTED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION DYES DNO ON THE CITY'S ENVIROMME.TAL BASE MAP? 14) IF YOU I+;ISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CCRRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE INDICATE BELOW. a. NAME: ADDRESS: b. NAME: ADDRESS: SQ. FT. • J OVER ■ �•jJ t :t;!8S 1 t i CANT'S AFFIDAVIT I, /911 4 Z)47,2_E) K /bein duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner ot the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sw before me this 7"', day of filpy J DATE c 2 —/2c Notary Public in an / ' "t""" '~= allt residing ar' ` `• state ot hasnington Ac18Je.J ure of Contract or on SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS ,T 1 E OF APPLICATION 111 RE ZONING CONDITIONAL USE E VARIANCE I ICOMPRIINISIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SHORELINE MGMT. PERMIT HWAIR SHORT SUBDIVISION FiSUBD IVISION LI B INDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ARCHITEC'IURAL REVIEW [1LANDSCAPE REVIEW 11 * *SEE TABLE 1 FOR DESCRIPTION + OPTIONAL AT STAFF "S DIRECTION SUPPORTING MATERIAL ** SCHEDULE E, 1,2,3,4,5,9 SCHEDULE C, 2,3,5,9 SCHEDULE F, 3,5,9 SCHEDULE D, 2,3,4,5,9 SCHEDULE B, 2,3,4,5,8 SCHEDULE A, 3,9,10 3,4,7 2,3,4,5,9 + ,12 2 9,10 • 1908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Community Affairs Committee FROM: Mark Caughey, Associate Planner DATE: 15 June 1982 SUBJECT: Proposed Western Pacific Properties Annexation (82-6-A) When the full Council directed this annexation application to the attention of the Community Affairs Committee, two specific topic areas were identified as requiring additional research. Our intent in this memo is, therefore, to discuss the results of our investigation into the following issues: A) The definiton and extent of general indebtedness applying to the property. B) Pre - existing conditions /limitations on M -1 land use activities in the adjoining incorporated neighborhood. GENERAL INDEBTEDNESS While state law gives the local legislative body considering annexation of contiguous territory the option to impose on that territory the requirement of participating in the general indebtedness of the City, Tukwila's policy has been consistent in requiring assumption of indebtedness as a prerequisite; of coming ipto the City. General indebtedness is the sum total of all general obligation bonds and similar levies, the repayment of which is imposed on local property owners. At this time, the City of Tukwila has the following G.O. Bonds outstanding: 11 City Hall LTD. G.O. Bonds (1977) - Paid automatically by property tax (6.6% of amount collected) ; no special levy 2) Unlimited G.O. Bonds, Golf Course - Special levy; Council option to impose costs on annexation areas 3) Limited G.O. Bonds, Golf Course (1978) . - Paid by Golf Course revenue only Thus, the only obligation of optional general indebtedness impinging on this annexation action is the special levy for Foster Municipal Golf Course. Ord. 743 Conditions New Zoning Code Matching Provision 1. Processes/equipment restricted 1. TMC 18.40.010: (M -1 "Purpose ") from causing off -site pollu- (Restricts M -1 uses to non- tion impacts nuisance creating activities -- - language implies restriction of off -site impacts) 2. Waste disposal per PSAPCA 2. None. Activity governed by standards "Regulation 1" of PSAPCA, . Seattle K.C. Health Dept., and • Metro permit requirements 3. Noise emission restricted to 3. Ordinance 1120 (Noise), Sec. 3 -02 5 sones at outer boundary Establishes 60 db(A) emission limit at bordering resid. props. "sones" is an antiquated measure- ment of sound transmission energy 4. Public roadway dedication required 4. None 5. Peripheral boundary landscaping 5. TMC. 18.52.030 specifies planter area widths for M -1 uses adjoin- ing R -1 uses; 6. Screening of outdoor storage 6. TMC 18.52.040 specifies height of required screening devices 7. Plot plan demonstrating compli- 7. None. Usually required as a ance with provisions of this matter of course for any construc- ordinance required tion permit application 8. 35'/3 story height limit with 8. Superseded by TMC 18.50.020 area bonus allowing 4 storys /45 feet outright in M -1 9. Screening of outdoor storage 9. See Item 6 above Page -2- Community Affairs Core ttee 15 June 1982 LAND USE RESTRICTIONS The property immediately north of the proposed annexation territory was rezoned from R -1 to M -1 by Ordinance 743 adopted 20 November, 1972. This ordinance, and its accompanying "Use and Development Agreement" specify seventeen conditions of useage which govern industrial operations on this site. As we presume that the full Council may consider imposing similar restrictions on the Western Pacific annexation if M -1 zoning is approved as requested by the proponents, we offer the following analysis of these restrictions.vis -a -vis the newly- adopted zoning ordinance: Ord: 743 Conditions New Zoning Code Matching Provision •10. 50' F.Y.S.B. required. 10. Superseded by TMC 18.50.020 speci- (Landuage taken wholsale from fying a 25' wide F.Y.S.B. in M -1 the old C -M zone) zone 11. Parking required per TMC 18.56 11. Parking per TMC 18.36 still' required 12. Screening of outdoor storage 12. See Item 6 above 13. 15' landscape front yard 13. TMC 18.52.020 requires 15' landscape required. (Appears to conflict with Item 10) setback in M -1 zone 14. Screening of outdoor storage 14. See Item 6 above 15. Landscaping of utility ease- 15. Specific standards already required ments and updated in'TMC 18:52 :040(.3) 16. Landscape plans required 16. TMC 18.52.050 specifies the content of landscape screening plans 17. Uses not allowed which are 17. Vague, unnecessary wording. (Is a unduly detrimental to surround- • duly detrimental impact implicitly ing property permissable ?) Page -3- , Community Affairs co ttee 15 June 1982 (Con't) In conclusion, we find that the content of the M -1 protection covenants already - in affect are largely redundant when compared to the protections embodied in the new zoning code or other existing regulatory acts. Rather than restrict M -1 uses in the new annexation territory to standards less than those allowed elsewhere in Tukwila's M -1 properties (a possible conflict with the "equal protection of law" doctrine), the Council should consider higher, more restric- tive zoning classification alternatives, such as C -1 or C -2. MC /blk xc: Planning Director 7212010569 F TU KWILA I L A WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO / X-- AN ORDINANCE RE- CLASSIFYING CERTAIN' PROPERTY FROM R -1 ZONING TO Iii -1 ZONING WITHIN THE CITY OF TUK:WILA. WHEREAS, The owners of the following described property have petitioned the Planning Commission requesting re- classification of said property from R -1 zoning to M -1 zoning in conformity with the comprehensive plan, and WHEREAS, Public hearings on said petition were held before the Planning Commission of the City of Tukwila, and the City .,.. Council having received a favorable recommendation from the P1anni' Commission with respect to the aforementioned petition; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds the requested classi- fication to be in• furtherance of the public health, safety and general welfare, NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, do ordain as follows: That the following described. real property is hereby classified as M -1 in accordance with Ordinance No. 251 of the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the attached map showing said classification for the real property described as set forth in Exhbit A attached hereto, subject to following conditions: 1. Processes and equipment employed and goods processed or sold shall be limited to those which o y . are not objectionable beyond the boundaries of the 1 . ‘ _RTAcij district by reason of offensive odors, dust, smoke f1L� `1_ipV , or gas. 2. Waste disposal shall be by a method or methods approved by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency, or any other governmental body having jurisdiction thereover. 3. No use shall be permitted if it results in industrial noise above five sones as .measured at the outer boundary of this district. CJ co' t1! N N . 4. Necessary public rights -of -way shall be dedicated to the public either as a portion of a plat or upon acceptance of street dedication by the City Council. 5. To protect the abutting contiguous uses, . a protective strip of land bordering the external boundaries and along any frontage on public rights - of -way and devoted to the planting, cultivation, growing, and maintenance of sight- obscuring trees, shrubs and plant life shall be established and maintained. The maintenance guarantee of such protective strips and the planned landscaping of the site may be bonded to the city in a reasonable amount if required by the City Council. In lieu of such protective strip, under appropriate circum- stances, there may be substituted a use classifica- tion of the outer margin of this district consistent with or not objectionable to the use classification of the peripheral area. 6. Outdoor storage facilities shall be obscured by an approved architectural screen or buildings specified on the plat plan and approved by the Planning Commission. 7. A plot and building plan showing compliance with the provisions herein stated and consistent with the amenities of the land use shall be filed with the Planning Department and the building per- mit application shall comply with this approved plot plan. 8. Structures shall not exceed thirty -five feet in height and /or three stories except that when the site exceeds five acres, the height may be raised one additional story for each additional two and one -half acres within the site area bound- aries when specifically approved by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission. 9. Outdoor storage shall not exceed twenty feet in height, and shall be screened from abutting public streets and from adjacent properties. Such screens shall be a minimum of eight feet high, and not less than sixty percent of the height of the material stored. 10. The minimum setback from all publicly used rights -of -way shall be adequate to provide a park -like atmosphere, and at least fifty feet. The same to be clearly set out in the plot and building plan and upon the building permit applica- tion when filed. 11. Off -stret parking shall be provided as stipu- lated in Chapter 18.56, Tukwila Municipal Code. 12. A solid screen planting and /or decorative pJ«PR1NT OR obscuring fence six feet high shall be provided FILE IN VAULT along the boundaries of the use district, except at streets, where landscape or treatment shall be as described in 415 hereunder. 13. A setback of fifteen feet, landscaped, shall be provided on the street or public way frontages; this setback to be measured from the minimum build- ing setback line, where no front yard is otherwise required. -2- 14. Outside storage shall comply with C -M requirements except :that screening shall consist of a decorative obscuring fence and /or a solid screen planting of evergreens. In areas ad- ' jacent to residential uses, no outside storage shall be permitted. . 15. Utility easements and areas between property lines and curbing shall be landscaped and /or treated with dust and erosion control planting or O surfacing such as low growing evergreens, ground cover, shrubs, washed stream rocks, or a combine - CD tion of similar materials. D 16. Detailed plans for landscaping and screening shall be submitted with plans for building and /+ site improvements and the certificate of occupancy shall not be issued prior to installation of land- scaping and screening. 17. The use will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent and /or surrounding properties. The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of this Ordinance and map with the County Auditor. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL and approved by the Mayor this lg04b day of November, 1972. �`.. • " '* , �, Attest: .�=.�: ;,�.» •C i er Approved as to Form: J City Attorney Published: // lle hti - /? OLUEPR V oN FRE IN mar E XA M PLE, SKETCH TO fr � I , I " = 100 0 r ;CCOMP4NY • •LEGAL D { T ION Pca►oi Pti we, 111� / / / /.■•=1 NOTE: - r - p.115 } AP REPRESENTS A • GOMPJLA 10H Or RECORPrI, DATA „1 POE5 NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL FIELD 5L VEY. OWNEOS SR TO LAD ur ar, ED an_ gei a. s4ik A M, • Res,d erti;: 1 y C 1TY DF TUKWILA B JNDARY NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION. PROCEEDINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: The undersigned, being owners assessed valuation of the area for with file with the City of Tukwila petitions requesting annexation to ing described property continguous this area will seek annexation not of the City of Tukwila. Area proposed for annexation: (Note: Insert here a legal description describing the boundaries of the area proposed for annexation.) Common Location of Area: 77,500 s.f. SIGNED:: Name & Address Glindel Corporation 1610 35th Avenue S Auburn, Washington, 8002 4625 South 134th Elmer and Helen Manning 2039 South 304th Federal Way, Wa., 98003 4526 South 135th Alfred and Elaine Unzeitig 4534 South 135th Seattle, Wa., 98168 DATE: Property Owned 4534 South 135th 1 9 � of at least ten per cent (10 %) by which we propose annexation, here - our Notice of Intent to circulate the City of Tukwila of the follow - to said City. It is proposed that subject to the general indebtedness (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY) 1982 - 53,300 1983 - 57,800 1982 - 44,900 1983 - 51,6flfl 1982 - 88,400 1983 - 108,400 Total Assessed Valuation: 1982 1983 Land 55,800 - 109,500 Building 130,800 108,300 TOTAL 186,600 217.800 Assessed Valuation. SIGNED: TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURWILA: The undersigned, being owners of at least ten per cent (10$) by assessed valuation of the area for which we propose annexation, here- with file petitions ing described property continguous to said city. It is proposed that this area will seek annexation not subject to the general indebtedness of the City of Tukwila. annexation.) 'Ronald P. Orn Area proposed for annexation: (Note: Insert here a legal Richard 0 B_arene 13423 48th S. 13407 48th Ave S. ea e, a., Joanne M. Finney 412 North K Aberdeen, Wa. 98520 DATE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXAT with the City of Tukwila our Notice of Intent to circulate requesting annexation to the City of Tukwila of the follow- description describing the boundaries of the area proposed for Common Location of Area: Total Assesse.1 Valuation: Name & / Address (P/L/12 13415 48th S., Seattle, Wa. 98168 - 211m ,, tat 1975 a PROCEEDINGS 1982 1983 57,900 108,800 Improvements 135,800 116,600 193,800 225,400 Land TOTAL Property Owned 13415 48th S. 1 42 S, 13407 48th Avenue South (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY) Assessed Valuation 1982 43,600 1983 59,600 1982 - 42,300 1983 - 54,600 1982 - 46,100 1983 - 56,100 1982 - 1983 - 53,300 55,100 ‘ NOTICE OF IN'ENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: The undersigned, being owners assessed valuation of the area for with file with the City of Tukwila petitions requesting annexation to ing described property continguous this area will seek annexation not of the City of Tukwila. Area proposed for annexation: (Note: Insert here a legal description describing the boundaries of the area proposed for annexation.) • Common Location of Area: 77,500 s.f. Total Assessed 1982 Land 55,800 Building 130,800 TOTAL 186,600 SIGNED: Name & Address Property Owned Glindel Corporation 1982 - 53,300 1610 35th Avenue S.E., Auburn, Washington, 98002 4625 South 134th • 2 Elmer and Helen Manning 2039 South 304th Alfred and Elaine Unzeitig out t Seattle, Wa., 98168 DATE: Federal Way, Wa., 98003' 4526 South 135th 19R3 - 51,6nfl 4534 South 135th , 1975 of at least ten per cent (10%) by which we propose annexation, here - our Notice of Intent to circulate the City of Tukwila of the follow - to said City. It is proposed that subject to the general indebtedness (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY) Assessed Valuation 1983 - 57,800 -4982 - 44,900 6/ 1982 - 88,400 1983 - 108,400 1983 109,500 108,300 217.800 NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATI 0 PROCEEDINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: The undersigned, being owners of at least ten per cent (lO8) by assessed valuation of the area for which we propose annexation, here- with file with the City of Tukwila our Notice of Intent to circulate petitions requesting annexation to the City of Tukwila of the follow- ing described property continguous to said .City. It is proposed that this area will seek annexation not subject to the general indebtedness of the City of Tukwila. Area proposed for annexation: (Note: Insert here a legal description describing the boundaries of the area proposed for annexation.) Commori Location of Area: SIGNED: Name & Address 13435 48th Ave S. Seattle, Wa., 98168. Bill and Betty Turner 13435-48th Ave S., Seattle, Wa., 98168. Bill and Betty Turner 13435 48th Ave S. Seattle, Wa., 98168 13435 48th Ave S., Seattle, Wa., 98168. DATE: • •Bill and Betty Turner 13435 48th Ave S. Bill. and Betty Turner 4550 S 135th , 1975 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IF NECESSARY) Total Assessed= Valuation: 1982 1983 Land 31,900 . 46,400 ..Improvemts.106,000 .97,900 TOTAL 137,900 144,300 Property Owned Assessed Valuation 1982 - 43,600 1983 - 43,600 1982 - 700 1983 - 900 4552 S 135th 1982 - 60,100 1983• - 58,500 1982 - 35,500 1983 - 41,300 t (. ;' / P ` S. / •' w � . \ \: / 4- J r f" \ � ' `'� )i. . 4 J \ mi . ;> U el S oe h ; ► U r i ` � �' ?4 /� o • /// / 4 41 // ► / ►'` 7 dV ., r ►. . • : • DEC 281962 5524708 RccCicEO • EST OF 190P DEC 28 P/1 1 4 ROCC;U; i r� _.TOR tuna C;JNTY HASH. ---- C:PUT1• 11ED for Record at Reitact of fl tro A rocs _._. _._.�....._.._.._....._.___.... Dated this STATE OF WASHINGTON, Ciumty d KING Quit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR MILDRED .1. ORN foe sad La consideration of Love and Affection aonvrA and qult calms to RONALD P. ORN the following described nal orate, situated In the County of King Etats of Washington including any Interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire i Southwesterly 110 feat of the Northeasterly 220 feet of Tract Fostoria plat recorded county. ham Lea e NO SALl1:1 TAX • t tf• F495794. becl; Ins2 ' rt ✓� e - ' ry al Saptamber, 1.962 7:7' 4 • 9 (am) Oa this day patonally *Wand before mr MILDRED J. ORN ts es Yam to be the Individual described la sad who aecuted a within sad foregoing Instrument, and aciaoaledgd that she sIgnod tits mow as her fees sad solustsry set sad deed, loe the m sad puRoses thereto meatlond. GIYEN seder my and and diktat aei this thy ol ptemb 1962 �_�._ »..._.... Naa mod for Sties sJ Waslesitoo, ea>+rh�g al Renton. 5264915 Dared this 2 141 STATE OF WASHINGTON County of X int: On this 2 64 ' day of MAR 2 3 1961 john farrell dorothy farrell P,ECORCE VOL................. .......... Cr • . 19611" 23 PM 2 08 ..1 • • jTY Maich, 1961 Statutory Warranty Deed z • THE GRANTOR JOIN V. rA1LLAIrn DOAOTHT FAT.TIL, his wire • for and in consideration of Ten— in hand paid, conveys and "amnia to alcIred J. urn rite or 'toned P. Orn . the followestate, ing described real e situated in the County of Kin Wuhingeort: c Southwesterly 110 feet of the nortl 220 rent of Tract 13, Fostoria Garden Traets, • Idnordine to pl.: therse! rroordel in Volume 9 of Plate, pace 95, reco..de • at said county. This deed is air3n In N1r113rrnt of real ectato contract date June 25, 1953 ...herein the above Grantors were the Sellers and Kenneth T. Lindhere rni "11f J. Linelbere, hie wire were U' Prrchnsere, State Sales Tx paid under t 963eo July 3, 1953 , State of :NW INN PAKTEN CONTRACT AM \ * 1 A. 4. TREMPER, NM COUNTY TREASURER NY \-••• Dung day of h. 1961. Arm a 4 11oret17 f .rdij, 4...? 7, r • / (1M) •IP .44.'2.1/4 before me, the , undcr,igncd s Notary Public in and for the State of Wnhington, duly commissioned sworn, personally APPared John V. Farrell and Dorothy S. Farrell to inc known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me dent led/ signed and scaled this said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes hetein mentioned. Liv* • • • GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 2 - 4 " 1 ' •'' 1,„: day of Itarch, 1961 74 4141. a ./z. , Mihaly Poblic in aid for ibo Siam of iroubingtoo, attle • , • , •: 4 ; k•. • •• y• 6579342 2613200026 statutory warranty deed virginia richard beverly 7311270516 QUIT CLAIM DEED This Indenture, Mode this 210.. pt the deer of ear Lard, One !housed Rine /sndred end __ -23 Richard Brundage & Beverly J. Brundage or 134 Between Seattle (Ring) Mash. 98168 the party.■ of site first pert, end Richard Barene I Kathryn barene the Witaeeeeth t That the said part _.y. _ of the first pert. for 0 other - valuable eoasideret4ea -- lawful money of the United States. to__..gl._pn4tt_._ .... _in of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Meese, and forever guit.c ann unto the said pad t_.S 9 __ of the and assigns all right, title. interest and estate of amid Ia /linens hand__.. and .1 STA TV dI wABttzMOT0a w.+atncca. roars as- _ lrLt}.a One 4 04 1 .u.., un tar a.r Gtr tM awe oettetal .hat rise -.. r'.} iXt_dv w.... $11lit .. a•sr�'t�tl.� ,. %ri d d tu. tae eb d Wowhimows. nretnr aa_.�___ -- 7�•_!l4.t1�.!_, Om D. ate. V27 en 4e h tive So. Ails 1 40.1_ sedad port: • 01,wWie e/ the soon by said par rt d She �d _h�ra Y M et fend senile, Wentidanisk in and to apt • avtatn tot._ -_, Owe-- tying and being In the County of_- and parttcrtarty bounded and described as Minos, to -vet: Lot 13 Meth loetoria Garden Tre SWLT 120 Fr. OP RELY 340 PT. (SUBJECT TO ART EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS I RESERVATIONS OP RECORD) Together with all and ssnguiar the tsnemswts, hsredl :ainents and appurtenances Marmite belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversWu, ninetieth" end nnsmtadtrs, mats, lssues and profits thereof. TO HAVE AN TO HOLD all and :angular the said premises, together with the apparpaeweee, onto said part i � of the secon4 part and p hers and assigns forever. the said partX!_._of the first part ALT!. hereunto sd__Yafsr/___. •e'dar, and y ear fist above written. NOV 71973 i (SUL) tU IZ*VIUUAi. ACINOWLQ)OIMeleT. .... 3talt.. te.a.rr pomp. m ...Ito ur seras buds mail" uut no ws.21Ataar at ..... uAfatOD.il!__...- -_. _.... u_.73 game raw aseaat.d rya. e. �_ �ht• rc�_?�i'.uPd.4iy . ....... ..... and dever1 J. nrundage w icy anon W tr tIn ntr,iduaLO.. _. d.arrlewl to end oho aaerabe W .Rhin nrintYt and Acknowledged soot . .. ihmx _shwas and waled Uri hear as the . t .. ft.r sad rmuntan art and seed tat the save sail nal n.. WO. .sett alo5U, . te. (tom) (aftnf.) 5894716 2613200027 real ESTATE CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made am enteredbatethis 10th. day of June, 198 between Ralph W. Lyman and Jennie 11. Lyman, his self. hereinafter called the "seller," and William 0. Turner and Joann. 11. Turner, hie wife hetdoafter called the "purchaser," WITNESSETH: That the seller agrees to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase of the taH4 the following described real estate, with the appurtenances, situate In the County of Xing State el.Wuhington, to.wh t , The southwesterly 130 feet in width of that portion of Tract 13, lostoria Garden Traots, s000rdiag to plat recorded in Volume 9 of plats, page 96, in Iing County, Washington, lying southwesterly of the northeasterly 340 test thereof, as measured along the south. eseterly line of said Traot 13, EXCEPT that portion thereof lying southwesterly of • line beginning a point on the southeasterly line of said Treat 13, distant northeasterly 129 feet from the most southerly oorner thereoft thence northwesterly parallel with the northeasterly line of said Tract 13, • distance of 130 feet to the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 130 feet of said Traot 13. TIN terms and.eondlttons of this contract ars as follows: The purchase pales Is Three thousand and o/100 (16000.00 ) Dollars, o(wbkh Two hundred and no/1100' ($200.00 ) Dollars has been paid, the receipt whereof Is hereby acknowledged, and the balance of said purchase price shat b. paid as fdlowst Twenty dollar. ($20.00) on, or before July 1, 1966 and twenty dollars ($20.00), or acre, on, or before the first of eaoh and every month until paid in full including interest at the rate of six per cent per anus computed an the diminishing principal balanoes. Lg,S ,� P►X 11614 3 ,,'. uN2 l L 116 tai A 'Iba purchaser Is entitled to take pouessinn said premises an iau.diat. The purchaser agrees to pay before delinquency all taxes and usessmenta that may a between grantor and grantee hereafter become a Ilan on said premises. The purchaser auumea all hazards of damage to or destruction of any improvements now on said land or here. after to be placed thereon, and of the taking of said premises or any part thereof for public use. purcluser'grees, until full payment of the said purchase price, to keep all buildings on uld described premises toured to the full insurable value thereof against lose or damage by fire In some company acceptable to the miler and for the seller's benefit u Interest may appear and to pay all premiums therefor and to deliver all policies and renewals thereof to the seller. • In nu the purchaser shall fail to nuke any payment hereinbefnre provided by the purchaser to be made, the welter may make such payment and any amount so paid by the seller, together with Interest thereon from data of payment until repaid at the rate of ten (10) per cent per annum. shall be repayable by the purchaser on demand, all without prejudice to any other right the seller might have by reason of such default. The purchaser agrees that full inspection of said described premises has been made and that neither the seller nor aulgns shall be held to any covenant respecting the condition of any Improvements on said premises nor to any y igrairrierrt for alterations, torprovemenu or repairs, unheu the covenant or agreement relied on be In writing and attached tq and wade a part of ebb eArrere --'� Ii JUN 241E35 • 830 Filed swasswn t • 5301145 2613200028 SELLER'S ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT AND DEED a 7' g ? a THE GRANTOR MART DOl1CHEATT, who is identical with Marie Dougherty, es her C separate estate ,also knovn as Norio A. Dougherty, for velum received convey and warrant to IAN as HASTINI19 sal CO)ISTMICE B. HASTINGS, his wife , the grantee, the following described real row, situated in [inj together with all after Acquired title of the grantorts) therein: County, Suite of W,ddnminn, i 7•- , Northeasterly 110 feet of Tract 13, Fostoria. Carden Tracts, according to plat recorded in volute 9 of pinta, paps 95, in king County, Washington. ' 34 • CJ1TeP;r7 171: ? ' I ildaiLk; tit 1 and do hereby soilyn, transfer snd set over to the grantee the' cettain teal rotate contract dated th day et November , 19 6o, between Mary Dougherty, who is identical with Marie Deudierty, es her separate estate assailer and Paul L. Sanders and Month P. Sanders, his tdia as pneksaer tor the silo and purchs@e of the above deectlbyd real estate. The pante,. 11 hereby SIIIUMO end agree fulfill the condition@ al laid real gnaw einilrItTW the grantor hereby covenant that there la new unpaid in lita principal Of laid contrad the sum et 11,2 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Carty of ling Os t►Ia day personally appeared before ma iw>tRT Dougherty to sae knows to be time Individual described In and who executed the within and foregoing Initrument, and acknowledged that ship dined the same as leer No and voluntary act and deed, for dm egos and purposes thereto mentioned. GIVEN order my hand and official oral this mary dougherty marie dougherty ian hastings constance hastings paul sanders monah sanders , ;�'^={� }�•`, `� tV 4 5263766 quit claim deed 2613200029 ralph lyman jannie lyman and Ia corulderatloa el ORE (51.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable cnnaiderations, convey and quit claim to JAMES R. WALKER and SHIRLEY V. WALkeR, his wife, the following descried real (state, situated In the County of KIM State of Washington including any Interest thereto which grantor may hereafter acquires 1 'Borthweaterly 12 feet of Southeasterly 1h2 feet in width of Tract 13, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in volume 9 of plate, og•. 95, records of King County, Weeh.lnoton, EXCEPT the Northeasterly 3L0 feet thereof se measured along the Southeasterly line of said Tract;' Sales tax paid under E- Ii18201 P1aRZ11991 �'.. Dated this 2nd dey al STATE Of WASHINGTON, Comity of Ling • Quit Claim Dood RALPH N. LTMAN and JANNIE M. LTHAN, hie wife, Oa this day personally appeared betan s s Ralph W. Lyman and Jennie M. Lyman is a Lamm to be the Individuals described is sod who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, and edsowtedged that they diced the same ai their fres and voluntary act and deed, for the ,;es sad porpoise Runts m.ndoned. ,OIVLN.mider ny.hasd and official sod this n/ i day 01 � • i . 830 ( Filed by WTI - (3 O- 0.0aq_ to f ,-:15 c 11 1 -, :c1;1 g 0 I I i cc 0 s /elm Lee March, -1962. • !i4 � Y ..,eu0 Nay, Ix and Lk Stars e) We,i.gt.., Nal/Leg « Swett e. . • 5706576 2613200030 Mar 5, 1964 THE GRANTOR Comb` of King james walker shirley walker william turner joanne turner the following described real snits, W. hington: That portion of Tract in volume 9 of plats,p Beginning at the most along southeasterly li .;..to the northeasterly southeasterly line of southeasterly along t or lasso to the true Imo; Subject to all sass Dated this 23rd STATE OF Washington On skis ' signed, a Notary Public In and for the and sworn. personally appeased to me known to be the individual as sltcmay ie fact of _.._lbe signed and sealed the same . of the .0-1 Jame A_ Va Mated that the power of attorney auth Ja as A. Ldkan WITNESS l6 gay hand and official MAR 5 - 1964 •8 3 0 FE C 30-0 o o W tatutory Warranty Deed Rusted In the County uI February t•te of King JANIS B. WALKER and BURLEY V. WALKER, his wife, far and In consideratlon of TEN (110.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration In hand paid, conveys and warrants to WILLIAM G. TURNER and JOANNE N. TURNER, his wife, nts, restrictions and reservations of record. day of January, 1996 1 1� 4. (J� 1 . A i .1 , 1 AI. II -r 9 5 eat H hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate abov ' ten. Poem LSO , Slue al 3, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded • 95, in King County, Washington, described as followst outherly corner of tract 13; thence northeasterly ' • thereof 126 feet; thence northwesterly parallel ins 130 feet; thence southwesterly parallel to the said tract to the southwesterly line; thence • southwesterly line of said tract 154 feet, more oint of beginning.. ,, /.f , lea e , Seattle M^ +T l y ..►leet.e Td. lew,nae. Company. Faro L71) SA -'11 1 Ea • • __ ..U5 ti.ZHFi (sat) A D 19 64 before me, the under• Washington duly commissioned Shirley V. Walker bed in and who asecuwd the foregoing instrument for her self and Jame B. Walker also therein described, and acknowledged to me that a. his voluntary act and deed and as the free and voluntary act and deed leer for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath rising the execution of this instrument has not been revoked and that the said is now living. Misery P.Wls I. 1.4 far the Sue. eI �.i 03 TIM CONTRACT, made wed oaten fato this 2nd Car of July, 1979, 7907170671 2613200031 REAL ESTATE CONTRACT between BEN H. VEENHUIZEN and CONSTANCE M. VEENHUIZEN, his wife, hwdadur aned the "star," and WILLIAM G. TURNER and BETTY J. TURNER, his wife, band tor a&d lie "perheeec,• vimn 3SETH: That the NIDv across to .ell to the purchaser cod the purchaser agree to purchase from the seller the toaewier described real effete, with the appmtaoaeae, to Ring County, State of MAIM= Lot 13, Fostoria Garden Tracts, Less NortheasteC1y408 feet, Less Southeasterly 142 feet, Less Northwesterly 15 feet. Adele tanieblblo ""Iol. eedrettrad,So July 2, 1179 alta (� 7tb PilisCm awrw ale Maas is pr Mbar dints at sees and rw.so. Het w w Minn Or+► on /fir Orrtir bums to sat on assts; on I Sat ile anew +d *hi areas As pssriaer law amend O4fooll M rat teee mean' or saw r a�iwea~ r bowman r et impel o m wig on I m or ewssw_ on sea a o ads MA Mots de Mira was to par tae +e 5Aw Mile NOM Met V na lee l � l YM. i � p r im¢sn One h Ilse, PK b Ms/ Ike 4Aiss� saver an snake plea y as Mt rad mar t t *OM as !b Men am Mown MI M ....L as i as t s ao i_ >b d+ y min CO Ifteseirvaf/r.lens elan et MI eat mob he Iona ass use sit minor ear ret at hi so maim MI to MU a aav tm.sssl amawllbe _.o_e. am homonyms Mom sear On do modem tor aim or rte seem d Wkw Ito MI Is I ▪ "weir • f in rmrsm w men die Or .rat m re ours and re it wring* loin R r Mt Ur assIsss mow di bwsse at Maw to or M plebe of on harsrm polo sae as sin mad Mates r Indicm plomf them_~ atl irs r Win Wont mast now or aI mot tierd Ifs yeah arse are Mme sees ma rsswki Mastiss Mr adult ii ii amssrt a w a e.w.w.. lb ow wtp we of MM >~ arse b now fir per on dot perm d err aimlesss mts.f ramie air NCO t mesas wq�ww . �i �e�� ter mom ors ee old ft es realer ass anew • wset • fb sew lots tai a nsr•rMain awes., ewe yasaro wa/A A or r 1rsFe+6 men artM.wro mien to M itYO or frOko- o t e/ w Isar Si IY ems, b rem ell Awn w 010111111611, bow a me Mo n -stmt, it yawn of ass tewm ofartaswei�msrIe ip wow ia ?bModIsee nimbi aeMaieaatsent MOO Islm artia • assasleM M•, Mae. srslemer irwe 11110 ea /amass Ar b emit Is it it fr 11111011011 • t i t s bob r. km* fy mew mamewr err worms e r e , ^" Y 'e"` �- i ~riife�f��te� r.tt•dalwiltbr "-� rsrtlq a, Nods nwdaiigierraa11141IsWSI ia' 26 al ISM Ily set r Os /mite • Is amass, • r ti attfii else aeear asrssir sea/ atatti t -- The taws and oontiss of this anew as as foams: The patrw prier it FORTY -FIVE THOUSAND AND NO /100- ($45,000.00 ) notkr, of •.hicb THRIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO /100 0112,500.00 )Dohnhen his psi , tb sshs .Mrsf h bwhs aAseshd,4. amt the befun of meld words m pda ehal be peld as taker THREE HUNDRED THIRTEEN AND 63/100 - - I 313.63 ) Does», or owes at peel woo, d or Was fir 15th dap of August . fo 79, se THREE HUNDRED THIRTEEN AND 63/100 (i 313.63 ) Denrs, or owe a paadlsaar9 sin" o a beta.. the 15th day st can eocowdlas aksdar oeeth oath the blasts of mid Os,Asea pefw sad Ism hoes fusy p01d. Ike pssdem forthn apes to pep fstaes ea the dlolds6Sst balance of maid perdde pries at the no of ten (10) pw on tea mom bee no 2nd de, of July ,979, u...3 beoom ahr7 ha dsleaaed teen wed, hroalrwt pynort amt the haiesa of ad pram mind is reiuetlas of pdadpal. Alpo pees .tohe Ilan fwesssfte alai M asap at 26256 - 164th Avenue SE, Rent, HA 98031, « arse! osier lobar as the war amt AM Is went pr i,a j : 1) 1 1! , s Jill 17 ID Y RECORDS is tG COUNTY IONS 7907170672 REAL ESTATE CONTRACT CO THIS FACT, wads awl extend mtothis 2nd dsyo! July, 1979, 1 beta BEN H. VEENHUIZEN and CONSTANCE M. VEENHUIZEN, his wife, • bereisalter called the "seller," and WILLIAM G. TURNER and BETTY J. TURNER, his wife, tom- �-f C lem daft« stied the "pardon," O C:" • ▪ WT/NIESSITH: That tie seller apses to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser mania to purchase Crow th..etl.r the follow* described sal estate, with the ngwrtoanm, m Ring Cemtr, riots of Wssbisatoa: ti 0 Lot 13, Fostoria Garden Tracts, Southwesterly 68 feet of. Northeasterly 408 feet Less Southeasterly 142 feet and Northwesterly 15 feet of t;-• said tract, Southwesterly of Northeasterly 408 feet. --. _a TM macs asst mistakss of this eertract ate if follows: The parches Pica le THIRTY —SEVEN FIVE HUNDRED AND NO /100- - (1 37, 500.00 ) Dollars, of which TEN THOUSAND AND NO/100 <i 10, 000.00 ) Delis* hew Imes phi. the smelpt wlrwut r Well selrwlsipd, wail tit bsrro at saki percher pair dean M pald u follows: TWO HUNDRED SIXTY -FIVE AND 37/100 -- --- (t 265.37 m r lie ti ) .oaa , ae diet s po-mesa g 15th der el August , ft D 7 9 mid TWO HUNDRED SIXTY -FIVE AND 37/100 - - -•- 0265.37 ) Dian, ma sew at pwelre's ad" r or Wow the 15th day of cede sacce dlas olweeise west nett) tee balsas of add /odium pfd ma twos peed The r eeds,. lath. 111°°""" bract a• ibm _ _ _ _ kaiaaw of rid pnndlase psis ad es we of ten ( ` 0 ) pr Cut Ise smarm less the day el July . et 7 9, setts haw* shall m da11wrud bee sods Ye samst moos! sad ea bake= of each meow appesd r eeAedsa of perdpL Aapepo.risrmr-ar•etr.uierWMadsm 26256 — 164th Avenue SE, Rent, WA 98031, or M tall scam pits r as say use awl a tdtio• dwedwt rs 4 ter rtttttiu ."Yw a/ d-tlt!' rra r July 2, 1979 n) lea flwermw rwrs sort Mai as is leers as we sot _messes she me a blase Cams- 00 oaa•s le..rile lord m • are r ma sr mak eel r ip as our a( tar suers ills f.•dmer des Cowed Man a e� r.q�s were s td lifer s r for �M wort std r ttlrmt n psalm sail- +s raI em r 6116616661. I" i fm men rbh rml rarer tie peetar �s r w ee mar Uidtr Yr�v cn us taurlor tt/r► OMB .111 /wiser *old is lib der. r bow i eVi� OM are bled. amd a ma rue sawn i!o!� arstil �y 1.116. tllmmt SIR 1s a► ate b ell Om r g _Wtrru bet • scope► sot el e. it rl 4. � � t� it 1r ttrat r.� err eta/ r fir � pew �m meal a A/.e as reeds a1d euer+lo 0000 ean Y a) see 1toMm.r r.. Art r sal rest otetw ire firm male are tees filler M. safbr r br a.eYn dsea br err a s sm •�•e� wtmee all 1i ow _N.wsw a t e. r i ftur•w r si r ttr � y of sum m mr Mg a�lo� ttitarn irtm.srs r aria .dim tar messes r Wu." srrwt w 6 .$ 01 Will mr r iyvt� srweert .see 11 /rlrr MOM di YnaMl all bear- r r iemeeaer 1 sew 11.rpm — woo r sit sue a lee • senor *sal air w at r nlr ,lore erloe -sated few Are / err pia. a� and - __- _ds a . J__I_e�ew i I en A rut tta a/ trY awe dress • lorlrr ter peat sod. ti pttlom ��rr d eeetu11tt •sa tar s s r t� a• ter aria M +ti 6 « �d � aert� IMINISII e mtisltras+tLmAe �a1eb mil ar • �w d slit armd.w•••a _ 4i itaem 01 s, �Mr.ir seem w ftssa Yemnsd mti•� �ds s1 nds kaki. ntkloa a m.a me . 4.w it W r�rw ~tea w�j air as aeAe.etiws r algal of we all e> M • Irr.� 00 1 ea der tMr setirMOe an tee r n`t s. LOT 12, BLK.S MORTIMER PLAT • .) // N/ / c !r • e