Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 81-16-SMP - FOSTER REVETMENT81-16-SMP GREEN RIVER BANK - FOSTER GOLF COURSE FOSTER REVETMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1OHN SPELLMAN Governor • City of Tukwila 6200 S. Center Blvd., Tukwila, Washington 98188 NK:sb cc :King Co. Pub. Wrks Headquarters Shara Stelling ECY 050 -1 -28 Rev. 6/78 STATE OF WASHNGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4350 -150th Avenue N.E. • Redmond, Washington 98052 June 10, 1981 Dear Ms./Mr.: Re: COUNTY: KING APPLICANT: KING COUN'T'Y PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 3315 -17 A- (81- 16 -SMP) Development of rip -rap river bank stabilization improvements. The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit . was received by this office on June 8, 1981 . The review period by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will terminate 30 days from the above date. If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the permit may commence following expiration of the review period; provided, however, all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. Sincerely, Resource Management NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE DONALD W. MOOS Director / , - -- //, � - 2, : a ©. - 3 7 ,1 r 2A4' a 7 / ^ %'/3- 2— 73Go y, f rt; - r� pu--0-c-4 . /70P/. C Public Works Director: Your assent is requested for this work. NPSOP -RF PROPOSED WORK: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX C -3755 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98124 P0JU3LLOC MDVUCI a. Location: In the Green River at Tukwila, Washington. b. Physical Character: Excavate; place fill and riprap. c. Purpose (as explained by the applicant): Bank protection. The State of Washington is reviewing this work for consistency with the approved Washington Coastal Zone Management Program. 1 June 1981 Reference: 071- OYB -2- 007360 Tukwila, City of Application has been received from King County Department of Public Works, 976 King County Administration Building, Seattle, Washington 98104 (ATTN: Larry Gibbons, telephone (206) 344 -4036) on behalf of the City of Tukwila for Depart- ment of the Army permit in accordance with Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for certain work described below and shown on the inclosed prints. The evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. Preliminary review by the Seattle District indicates that this work will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The preparation of a Federal Environmental Impact Statement is not anticipated at this time. Preliminary determinations indicate that the activity will not affect endan- gered species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threat- ened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). Formal consultation pursuant to Section 7 of the Act with the Department of the Interior is not required for this activity. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. 4 FL ^ ;. ''$ uF 'TUr∎WILA • 'JUN 2' '1981' '7908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 15345 36th St. N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 18 May 1981 Subject: Application 81 -15 -SMP Shoreline Management Substantial develop- ment Permit Enclosed is a copy of City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit 81 -15 -SMP and related materials. The permit has been . approved by this office after processing in accordance with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the State Environmental Policy Act. We have also determined that this permit action is consistent with the provisions of the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan Program. Approval of the subject permit will allow placement of riverbank erosion control materials within the Green River channel. xc: Attorney General King Co. D.P.W. Tukwila Planning Dept. Brad Collins Director SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY Type of Action ® Substantial Development Permit ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to King County Public Works Dept. upon the following property township, range) Application No. Administering Agency City of Tukwila (City or County) Date received 23 April 81 Approved XXX Denied Date 6 June 1981 (name of applicant) 976 King Co. Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 to undertake the .following development Placement of Riverbank protection material NONE 81- 16 -SMP (be specific) S.E. of Sec 14. T_23 N R. 4F W.M. (legal description, i.e., section, The project will BE within shorelines of statewide (be /not be) significance (RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a URBAN designation. The following master (environment) program provisions are applicable to this development Shoreline Master Plan Program, Chapter 6 (state the master program sections or page numbers) Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordi— nances or regulations applicable to this project, but not incon- sistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL. THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED.• 6 JUNE 1981 (Date) Director, Office of THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE. Date received by Department of Ecology Approve Denied This substantial development permit with conditional use / . variance is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: (Date) (Signature of Authorized Community Development Department of Ecology Official) SUMMARY OF OUMTIT 1E NO. I TEM.±- ..- .- .:_...._ t _ . Q'.3P al • 1 • CLEARING" '. - . _ .. : :... EXCAVATION : :. LUMP BuM_ :`__:_ : :. : : : • 50 CU61C YARI., 406 euatC 'At fLL c(1etiy, RE -R4 ROCK RIP - RA ∎1 :_-. 8(00 costC L,YARUS SuMHARY OF QuANIT iii E S ' No.-- •QUANTYTY - -ITEr/ --- -- E kGA V A'r i M1 LL- z c C Lt B - YAM Rock eiP -dpi - 33G Cu( (s1 YAQtS • -1 LEGAL. TM - LOT _4R oK: THE NW Y4 Q F THE. • SE .:V4' _ OF 5a ...1 - 23 N - R.4 E " vi M;_: - - _.... -- _�_ - - • u4 Y. CduWT(, WASHINGTON:... SPECIFICATIONS : : :__ LIGHT_:1_O05E RV? RAP RANGE i 25# . TO 150' - : 75% LARGER -THAN 504 _._._ -._ - :.._. -.50• LARGER -'MAN (c0'_'_ ::. _ :: ::: -: 30% LARGER TNAN 15# - LESS :: T - HAt1. 25* _ .._._.... -•-_a ' - I- -- 1 — +-_F -f .. _i ....- _-__ ; ........1.........,.....k -t- - 122=1 S�5.... i 6 j i + . I 1 ,, --1 1 { F i � .• --i : : { ' t I , ! i ! 1 ( -1 r--h-- � I ! WATE RWA�L, .. t* o, IA-. .-• _ _.....4 _- JZoC K LA./ILL se PLACED W ITt -k .10 RA G L 1 - -: T _ ` r P u,QPD S E BANK PeOTEc.T1D N - • .�_. DAZurii :_ M S. L. _ - T� y - AD.i AGENT PWDPERTY_.. OVINE R _ :'-' ___ — _ , _ 4 . 0 Alex ---- . 4 GaNV R►cho ci ll' t �_._ - : ;: 3) RgGNr BAUk:._G1TY - : D.F. TL KWICA:=,--. TukWILA w_._! —± 1 . : , • I. • ...... _;__:�_ - `i Zoe) LOCATION' \/ICIIAITY• MAP..: ... - No Scale - - - . -.._ -. _..__ • $ -4S I; • TOTAL P RU3E�.T- �tilli'1� t i _ 171-1\14 REV 1s 0 - 1 1 - - 0 Y 13 - - 007 360 * -- M- .,---+ ' -1, i ; I t ' PIZOPOSEb EXCAVATION' Al1.11:) - ._F1L`L1 1 4- i u T HE GRE_E.M R1v ER: CLEFT IAN k)17 - RIVE R :MILE: 1 ► - . __._ . _i- -- -.; j *- _ ` ri_ 13 00 . IUTE1Z11R11A^1. ME S. ._ ; _ t �__; i AT:. TuKW 1LA - 1 . ir1G Co - WA uGTO1 - �- AP �t`NE'C1Ty - ru,KWIL.A - _..DA`t E. « : `. ::: _- 5 h1>t;.z1 - 1 oc a- -': mAx. ENCE_co.cav1ENT'F o1aw :T>, -cn ; E._ 9F; F >,L�.I, ' ;. [ ?RoPoSED I . RA P!- RAr. ; j _ EXJST UJG CseA I + -t • _1_. -r_ _ t • ! F _1 I I i I !- t i t i I 1 - L I I 1 __.1.4_1.f y 1 _,. j . ..1 I .. +_ -;_. _ :. i . r. - A FL ' SEC1I\Q } - t if ! I ; (� o w l t i • i , ' i ! 1 1 ; t i a , 1- 1- 1. vER7 a 1 I- t t { i p!cAvA7vD79A.' P2oPo5Ep i . I tit ©Rbmkv,z`S H]CGM I t i } } J •jI , t I l . : - + 1 1 11.A 1_ 'T' Notice is hereby given that who is lessee, etc.) of the below- described property has filed an application for a substantial development permit for the development of Rip - rap river bank stabilization improvements located at intersections or streets. within S.E. (quarter section) of section 14 of township 23 N., Range 4E W.M., in Tukwila, King County, Washington. Said development is proposed to be within IIv I t i.L VI AI 1 L1 VA I 1 UI1 _FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SLSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERU Easement holder (describe relationship to property, such as owner, purchaser, (describe development including uses) Green river bank adjacent to Foster Golf Course (give street address, if known, otherwise relate to nearby Green River • (name of water area) . (state full name) notify Brad Collins, Planning Director King County Dept. of Public Works (name of local government official) and /or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express MO views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should such in writing of interest within thirty (30) days of the last publication of this notice. The final date of publication, posting, or mailing of this notice is 6May 1981 Written comments must be received by .. 6 June 1981 • (date) Published in the Record Chronicle on 29 April and 6 May 1 QR1 • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Affidavit of Publication ss. Michele Roe being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Chief Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a ....Appli.catinn T1659 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 2 29 day of consecutive issues, commencing on the Itna April , 19 81, and ending the 6 day of May ,19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 18 * gQvhich has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Ckai 0.1.e r.k Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of LAY , 19... Notarrpublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at am. King County. Ka burn — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C. Form No. 87 Roil. 7-79 PIA d • DESIGNATION OF AUTHORIZED AGENT oil - aye —2 —oon 3G0 TAK.u) I ` G rrl OF I hereby designate King County, Dept. o1 Public works_ as my authorized agent as stated in Item 5 of the Application for a Department of the Army Permit (ENG Form 4345). tarry R. Gibbons authorized to sign the attached permit application for. a Department of the. Army permit and is further authorized to act as the permit application coordinator to include agreeing, on my behalf, to any special permit conditions that may be appropriate. It is understood that this designated agent cannot sign the permit on my behalf, should it be issued. DATE Mav 13, 1981 The City of Tukwila DA's „ May 13, 1981 NPD 289 (Replaces NPA 5, Aug 76) Oct 77 (Previous edition may be used until, exhausted) Applicant Authorized Agent and Title Brad Collins -- Planning Director is *ILA ; 190 8 4/ y City oor Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor Dept. of the Army Seattle District, Corps of Engineers PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Subject: Application 071 -0YB -2- 007360 14 May 1981 Enclosed is an executed copy of Form N.P.D. 289 authorizing King County Public Works Department to act as agent on behalf of the City of . Tukwila in obtaining a Department of the Army Permit ENG -4345. Please call on me if further information is needed. BC/blk cc: Larry Gibbons Tukwila Planning Dept. Brad Collins Planning Director FORM FOR [PRAPO&E.D/FINAL] DECLARATION OF [SIGNIFi£ /NON- SIGNIFICANCE] Description of proposal Rock revetment along the Green River. Proponent King County Dept. of Public Works Location of Proposal within the Foster Golf Course, Tukwila, WA Lead Agency Division of Surface Water Management (Larry Gibbons 206 344 -4036) This proposal has been determined to [have /not have] a signifi- cant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS [is /is not] required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official JAMES W. GUENTHER Position /Title Director of Public Works Date April 14. 1981 • Signature Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved to determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or .the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until some time in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (n /a) and continue on to the next question. A. BACKGROUND BALD Page 1 •ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 900 King County Public Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 3. Date Checklist. Submitted 4 - 13 - 81 4. Agency Requiring Checklist State Depts. of Fisheries & Game 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: City of Tukwila Foster Golf Course Riverbank Protection 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Proposed work consists of stabilizing the erosion on 180 feet of riverbank by rip- rapping the slope. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other infor- mation needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): The proposed project is located on the left bank of the Green River in the City of Tukwila. Current land _use is a Golf Course, The extent of this project will be limited only to stabilizing the unstable portions of riverbank. Form 1 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal: September 15, 1981 9. List of all permits, licenses or governmental approvals required for all proposals (federal, state and local, including rezones): Washington State Dept. of Game and Fisheries Hydraulic Permit, Washington State Hood UontroI Permit, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Permit. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If "yes ", explain: No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If "yes ", explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). BALD Darts 7 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth: conditions or in changes in geologic substructures:- b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, depo- sition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X X X Explanation: 1(b) and 1(c) , Project area will be graded to a flatter riverbank slope; rock rip -rap and excavated toe will be placed below line of natural vegetation with rip -rap placed above the line as well. 1(f), Project will greatly reduce erosion and bank sloughing along a 180 foot reach; more stable bottom conditions will result. Fnrm 1 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Charges in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground Waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through intercep- tion of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phos- phates, detergents, water- borne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes Maybe No " X X X X X X Explanation: 3(e) - Temporary turbidity increases will be realized during instream construction of the excavated toe along the tU toot reacn. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers. of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase ex isting noise levels? X Explanation: Yes Maybe No X X Explanation: 4(a) - The grass on the unstable slopes will be removed when the bank is shaped and rocked. But, judging from prior projects, the rock will soon be overgrown with new grass. X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: Only during construction will the noise be increased. And this is due to the heavy equipment needed to construct this project. 7. Light and Glare. Will the pro- posal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances - (including, but not limited to, oil, • pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe ' No X X a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and /or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or alterations to the following utilities: d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Yes Maybe No X X X X Explanation: 14(d) - Stabilizing the riverbank in this location will help prevent any further losses of this recreational facility. 14(f) - Access road and revetment will have to be maintained following con- struction. X a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X X X X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? Explanation: Explanation: •18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public. view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: This project will help to eliminate the loss of recreational land by stabilizing the erosion. 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? C. SIGNATURE Explanation: Yes Maybe No X I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge . the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- signi- ficance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. X X 41/) -• Joe Aliment & Mrs. Joe Aliment Party C the first part, does hereby, in consideration 6f one dnliar, in•hand aid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, GRANT to-the County of ing, a Municipal Corporation of the State rf Washington, party of the econd part, the right to construct and maintain a rip -rap bank protection id remove debris along the . ' Right and Left bank of Green River fiver, on the following described property: Tracts ?h to Iltr. incl.. Junction Addi.ti nn Sec. lb, Tvl. 21 N.R. j'.L. h.9 Also '?o:'tion of Ste'' +%hen `'Oster T onatl.on Claim A R ivinc, ; n eastci'1 of lour Sound. Electric R l -..a.r ricrbt r' r n n ' el -1 v n7' .t t.� .. o.. ti•. .-r and �o tn� a.. t. Foster St. - Produced Northeasterly. Ilse any reasonable access necessary for River Improvement work. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereunto have subscribed their names and ► ;et their hands and seals on this 4 9 / 5--C day of 6 , r ,E STATE OF WASHINGTON) s s COUNTY OF KING This is t.a certify that on this cf/" day of /C'1S - ter ' 1 �' before me,'the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fcr the State of dashinngtnn, duly > comet and sworn, personally came 'r ' ..cl-7:••4"`L'" F to mo known to t!© the intliy.i uala who executed the within instrum t, and acknowledged to me that .h i ' and . scaled the same as pe./7 Croe and voluntary act and'aed for the uses and purposes therin mentioned. WITNESS my hand and seal the day and year . in this certificate first 7' above mentioned. CL:P M 7/20/60 RIVER PROTECTION EASEI~NT 4: , t•.T ' • p.nd v9entr'r'• Yr r ardor. -r,f. in i� 01'0ra"li i vr 1.•,*. V t.lel 2 1 37 :•: y .- " .: 4'` . • of Tukwila 6200 Southcenror Salome Tukma Was, gton 98188 Igoe' MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATICN FORM 1. General location of proposed project 13500 Interurban Ave. S. (give street address, it known, Tukwila, WA 98188 otherwise relate to nearby intersections or streets.) within S.E. (quarter section of section 14 of township 23 N., Range 4E w.M. , in Tukwila, King County, Washington. 2. Name of water area and /or wetlands within which development is proposed GREEN RIVER 3. Current use of the property with existing improvements Golf Course. 4. Proposed use of property Golf Course QUESTIONAIRE , Schedule B SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 5. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: $32,900.00 B. Construction dates (month and year) for which this permit is requested: Begin June 15, 1981 End September 15, 1981 6. (To be completed by local official) Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any): Low bank, gravel with light vegetation covering 7. (To be completed by local official) In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of 35 feet above the existing grading level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residen- tial units, existing and potential that will have an obstructed view. N/A BLASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete applications will not be accepted for processing. SECTION I. GENERAL DATA King Co. Dept. of Pub. Wks 1) APPLICANT'S NAME Attn: Larry Gibbons TELEPHONE :( 206) 344 -4036 2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 976 King Co. Admin. Bldg Zip 98104 3) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME City of Tukwila TELEPHONE: ( 2flF>) 433 -1800 4) PROPERTY CAVNER'S ADDRESS 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 98188 5) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) Approx. 1 mile east of I -5 along Interurban Avenue in the City of Tukwila within the Foster Golf Course. 6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) Foster Revetment SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION 7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE 1HE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: Reshape and rock a 60 -foot reach and a 120 -foot reach of unstable river bank. 8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES? DYES 9) PROJECT N / A a. NET ACRES b. GROSS ACRES c. PARKING SPACES d. FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION e. LOT AREA COVERAGE BLDG. SQ.FT. LANDSCAPE PAVING SQ. FT. NO 10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10? DYES ONO N/A 11) EXISTING ZONING M 12. EXISTING CCMP.PLALV Agriculture 13) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION EYES ONO ON THE CITY'S ENVIROV'MENrAL BASE MAP? 14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE INDICATE BELOW. SQ. FT. a. NAME: ADDRESS: b. NAME: ADDRESS: 1" /- . T. _.,,SECTION APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT , being duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this E SHORT SUBDIVISION E SUBDIVISION DATE X day of , 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS (Signature of Contract Purchaser or owner) TYPE OF APPLICATION SUPPORTING MATERIAL** Ej REZONING SCHEDULE E, 1,2,3,4,5,9 CONDITIONAL USE SCHEDULE C, 2,3,5,9 E VARIANCE SCHEDULE F, 3,5,9 OMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SCHEDULE D. 2,3,4,5,9 HORELINE MGMT. PERMIT WAIVER BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN E1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 9,10 E LANDSCAPE REVIEW 11 **SEE TABLE 1 FOR DESCRIPTION + OPTIONAL AT STAFF'S DIRECTION • SCHEDULE B, SCHEDULE A, 3,9,10 3,4,7 2,3,4,5,9 2,3,4,6,9