HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 80-17-W - SCHNEIDER OFFICE COMPLEX - SENSITIVE AREA WAIVER80-17-w
schneider office complex
26 June 1980
SITE STATISTICS:
CITY OF TUK4lILA
PLANNING DIVISIOPI
C I T Y C O U N C I L
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM : SCHNEIDER OFFICE COMPLEX WAIVER - (80 -17 -W)
INTRODUCTION
The subject property is located within the Interurban Avenue Corridor Area
and is currently vacant. The applicant intends to develop three double -
floor office buildings set in a campus like complex. The subject waiver
application is mandated by the Comprehensive Plan, since the project site
has direct frontage on the Green River which is designated as an
environmentally critical area sensitive area. The applicants indicate that the project will
be developed in phases.
- Present Zoning: M -1 (Light Industry)
- Comprehensive Plan Designation: "Commercial"
- Gross Land Area: 5.9 acres +
- Parking Provided: 295 spaces (13 spaces in excess of min. req.)
-Lot Area Coverage by Structures: 24% +
Note that two alternative site diagrams are provided. Exhibit "A" assumes
vacation by the City of the existing Maule Avenue right -of -way, while Ex-
hibit "6" preserves and improves the Maule Avenue frontage of the site for
future public roadway usage. Further analysis of this aspect of the project
will follow in a subsequent section of this report.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
Staff has concluded that the proposed project is consistent with existing
environmental policy of the City as expressed in its various planning
documents. The following analysis highlights key areas of policy consid-
eration which have been reflected in the project design:
A. Shoreline Management Act of 1971
-- Commercial Development (WAC- 173 -16- 060(4))
"(a) Although many commercial developments benefit by a shoreline
location, priority should be given to those commercial develop-
ments which are particularly dependent on their location and /or
use of the shorelines of the state and other development that
will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of the
people to enjoy the shorelines of the state."
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
Schneider Office Complex (80 -17 -W)
Page 2
RESPONSE: The office project ill encourage usage and enjoyment of
the emerging Tukwila shoreline trail system by concentrating
a large daytime pop lation in the area. Easily identified
visual and physical access corridors to the shoreline are
provided in the project design.
B. Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan
-- Conservation Element -.Goal
"Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural
character of the shoreline."
RESPONSE: The project has bee designed to avoid disturbance of
vegetation and soil within the 40' river use zone. In
addition, several 1 "rge specimen trees characteristic to
the Green River sho eline will be incorporated into the
project landscape p an.
-- Economic Development Element - Goal 3
"Recognize the quality of the xisting economic activities along the
river and.discourage any futur- economic activities that may be of
lesser quality."
RESPONSE: The design configu ation and materials suggested for the
building reflect high quality and sensitivity to the scale
of the site and th•t of the emerging development pattern
on Interurban Aven e. Landscaped areas, particularly the
interior building •triums, provide usable open space for
employees within t e project.
C. Comprehensive Plan Policy Imp ications.
-- Design policies 3 and 4 of he Comprehensive Plan Commerce /Industry
section provide as follows:
Policy 3. Encourage aesthe is building and site design in working
and trading area
Policy 4. Encourage the us- of live landscaping in all developments.
RESPONSE: The project adequa ely addresses the intent of the City
in upgrading the visual quality of development in the
Interurban Avenue Corridor area.
MAULE AVENUE USAGE
The project intends to incorpora'e use of Maule Avenue as an access and
.parking corridor within the over 11 site design. As noted previously,
alternative Exhibit "B" would allow the City to reclaim its use as a
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
Schneider Office Complex (80 -17 -W)
Page 3
thoroughfare at a future time with minimal modification. Relocation of
some of the parking stalls fronting on the Maule Avenue corridor might be
necessary, however, if the City were to intensify its usage.
At its May 22, 1980 meeting, the Community Affairs Committee of the City
Council recommended that a proposed land exchange on this site between
its Maule Avenue frontage and its riparian lands be rejected. This rec-
ommendation was advanced in part by the desirability of creating a bicycle
path on Interurban Avenue within the Maule Avenue corridor. However, staff
suggests that the full council re- assess this position, noting that a
bikeway system of adequate width can probably be developed on the east
side of Interurban within the existing right -of -way and through public
acquisition of the remaining unsold portions of the Puget Power corridor.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the subject waiver request according to the
following stipulations:
A. That the applicant be directed to petition the City for vacation
of that portion of Maule Avenue adjoining the boundaries of the
site.
B. That the applicant grant to the City an easement for trail
construction within the 40' wide river use zone specified
in the Shoreline Master Plan.
legal description
site data
.
elevation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Riverside Park and Office Community
Parcel A
Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Block
the portion thereof lying
on the southwesterly line
southeasterly of the most
extending from said point
northwesterly line of lot
the northerly boundary of
Parcel B
Note: A portion of Maule
and 58th Avenue South.
EXHIBIT " 1"
•
18 Hillman Garden Tracts, EXCEPT
northwesterly of a line beginning
of lot 1 at a point 72 feet
westerly corner of said lot and
northeasterly parallel to the
1 and the production thereof, to
said lot 1.
Avenue between South 143rd Avenue
Parcel C
A portion of the Puget Sound Electric Rail Road right -of -way
in the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section
14, Township 23 north, Range 4 east W.M. in King County,
Washington bounded on the northeast by Maule'Avenue, on the
southwest by SR 181, on the southeast by right -of -way no. 5
and the northwest by right -of -way no. 6, both R /W's as defined
in quit clain deed from Puget Sound Power and Light Company to
the City of Tukwila filed under A.F. no. 6557639.
;Iles . .OUNCIL
June 23, 1900
Page 5
Prop. Ord. estab.
LID #30 - contd.
Prop. Ord. pro-
hibiting danc-
ing and /or
music in cara-
rets between
2 AM & 8 AM &
amending TMC
5.08.010.
Waiver request for
Schneider Office
Complex at 58th
So. & Interurban.
CO::::ITTEE OF TIIE WHOLE :MEETING
v� r/ , ,___
MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE
BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE TITLE OF FINANCE DIRECTOR RATHER THAN CITY
TREASURER. MOTION CARRIED.
*MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED.
Councilman Van Dusen, Chairman of the Public Safety Committee, said the
Police Department had gathered information on this ordinance. He said
he would like consideration given to a public hearing at the
Committee of the Whole Meeting. He said Sergeant Robinson gathered much
of the information that was used in the survey.
Sergeant Robinson said he had just completed a turn on the night shift.
He said the entire graveyard shift was called to break up fights at
the night establishments where dancing takes place. The full shift
was assigned to an emphasis patrol on Friday and Saturday nights.
They documented the problems.
In one weekend 42 arrests were made in 4 hours which averages 1 arrest
every 6 minutes. There were all kinds of arrests - opening and
consuming alcohol in public, use and sale of drugs, fights, a gun was
taken from a man planning to use it. The citizens are being endangered
by these acts.
Sergeant Robinson said the Riverside Inn has asked for a copy of the
report. They are going to send it to the Washington State Liquor
Board. Sergeant Robinson said if the City is going to take a long time
to enact this proposed ordinance they should fund overtime to take
care of the problem. The other choice would be to ignore the
Riverside.
Councilman Harris asked the City Attorney if taverns have to close at
2 a.m.? City Attorney Carlson said they must close at 2 a.m. Places
may remain open when they serve food. Those having a dance floor
should close at 4 a.m. They cannot sell liquor after 2 a.m.
Mayor Todd said an establishment cuts the sale of liquor at 2 a.m., but
the people run out to their cars to drink.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE
PROHIBITING DANCING AND /OR MUSIC IN CABARETS BETWEEN 2 A.M. AND 8 A.M.
AND AMENDING SECTION 5.08.010 OF THE TMC BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE
JULY 14, 1980 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING BE
HELD AT THAT TIME. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Van Dusen said the Polio Department is going into the red
to pay overtime for patrol.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE PREVIOUS MOTION TO PUT
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE ON THE JULY 14, 1980 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING BE RECONSIDERED. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE
PROHIBITING DANCING AND /OR MUSIC IN CABARETS BETWEEN 2 A.M. AND 8 A.M.
BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE JULY 7, 1980 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. MOTION
CARRIED.
Mark Caughey, Planning Department, stated the property is located withi
t e Interurban Avenue Corridor area and is currently vacant. The
a.plicant intends to develop three double floor office buildings set in
a campus -like complex. The waiver application is mandated by the
omprehensive plan, since the project has direct frontage on the Green
River which is an environmentally sensitive area. The project will be
developed in phases. Two alternative site diagrams are provided. One
assumes vacation by the City of the existing Maule Avenue right -of -way,
while the other preserves and improves Maule Avenue frontage of the sit
for future public roadway usage. The project intends to incorporate
use of Maule Avenue as an access and parking corridor within the overal
site design. Alternative 2 would allow the City to reclaim its use as
thoroughfare at'a future time with minimal modification. Relocation of
some of the parking stalls fronting on Maule Avenue might be necessary
if the City were to intensify its usage. Mr. Caughey said the Communit
Affairs Committee recommended that a proposed land exchange on this
site between its Maule Avenue frontage and its riparian lands be
TUKj';ILA CITY COUNCIL C :•:NIT'TEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
Page 6 (.
June 23, 1980
Waiver request for
Schneider Office
Complex at 58th
So. & Interurban
- contd.
rejected. This recommendation was advanced in part by the desirability
of creating a bicycle path on Interurban Aveneue within the Maule AvenuE
corridor. He said staff suggests that Council reassess this position,
noting that a .bikeway system of adequate width can probably be
developed on the east side of Interurban within the existing right -of -wi
and through public acquisition of the remaining unsold portions of the
Puget Power corridor. Mr. Caughey said Staff recommendation was the
approval of the waiver with the stipulations that the applicant be
directed to petition the City for vacation of that portion of Maule
Avenue adjoining the boundaries of the site, and the applicant grant
to the City an easement for trail construction within the 40 foot
wide river zone specified in the Shoreline Master Plan.
Councilman Johanson said the current plan is about 15 parking spaces
over that required, does that include Maule Avenue? Mr. Caughey
said there are no parking spaces on Maule Avenue. In both plans
Maule Avenue functions as the aisle space or back -up space serving the
parking spaces.
Councilman Bohrer asked if the current - right -of -way on Interurban is
70 feet? Mr. Caughey said it is. Councilman Bohrer said if we were
to try and develop a system that has four lanes plus a turning lane
plus a sidewalk on the other side of the street, the current City
ordinances would require us to have 60 feet, and the sidewalk on the
one side and the sidewalk on the other leaves no space for bicycle path
or landscaping. Mr. Caughey said that is correct. You would gain some
of that back if you were to cut your travel lane to 11 feet and
possibly reduce your turning lanes to 9 or 10 feet, but it would be
tight.
Councilman Bohrer said in looking at the plans and the parking
configuration proposed along the frontage that is along Interurban Aven
that it would be possible to design a more efficient parking configura-
tion if Maule Avenue were not present. It was his recommendation that
continue with the recommendation of the Community Affairs Committee and
. trade Maule Avenue for the frontage on Interurban. The applicant
could not build buildings over Maule Avenue but they could use it for
parking. Using it in that fashion would make it more useable to him.
Mr. Caughey said the Shoreline Act provides the first 40 feet landward
from the high water mark no development is permitted except picnic
tables or recreation equipment provided by the public sector. The firs
100 feet landward of mean high water permits structures up to 35 feet,
the second 100 feet, or total of 200 feet from mean high water the
development bulk and height regulations are as per existing zoning
You have zero construction for the first 40 feet, 35 foot height
limitation in the next 60 feet and then whatever zoning permits in the
last 100. That would propose to be changed under the new draft 3
zoning ordinance that is being reviewed by the Planning Commission
That 40 foot no development zone would be increased to 50 feet and
within the first 100 feet the height limitation prevailing would be 18
feet as opposed to 35. Those regulations are not on the books, but
are in the talking stage.
MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR SCHNEIDI
OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 58TH AVENUE SOUTH AND INTERURBP
AVENUE BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE JULY 7, 1980 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. 1
Councilman Van Dusen said the Council would have to consider which
alternative proposed by the applicant was favored by Council. The
provisions for sidewalks on Interurban, does that come into the picturE
Mr. Caughey said under the ordinance that the Council recently adopted
there must be an 8' wide sidewalk. You should note that where the
triangular open space green area is on both plans very near the front
of the project there is a sidewalk provided.
Acting Chairman Phelps said she understood that if the applicant applie
for vacation of Maule Avenue then that would determine which plan
the Council will be looking at.
:'Ui;i•:ILA CITY COUNCIL CO:•1b1ITTEE OF THE WHOLE :1LETING
' June 23, 1980
Page 7
Waiver request for
Schneider Office
Complex - contd.
V.S. ,} G4 .•••■
Mr. Caughey said he thought it would be up to Council to decide which
plan is used, based upon what Council wants to do about Maule Avenue.
Councilman Johanson said if the Council encourages this type of
construction use in the form of offices, we should provide good bus
facilities, hoping that they would then bus themselves to the location.
For that reason he said he was reluctant to give up Maule Avenue.
Councilman Bohrer gave a status report, from the Community Affairs
Committee discussion, on the Interurban Avenue plans. He said the
Puget Power right -of -way in front of the property being discussed has
an option to buy. Councilman Harris said possibly a trade could be
made for the 20 feet of Maule Avenue. Councilman Bohrer said he would
agree with that thought. He was uncertain that the City needs the 20
feet. Some provision for bus turn -outs would be appropriate if we do
not have adequate right -of -ways to serve that end. It would seem that
some additional 10 feet would be adequate for landscaping, subject to
final design concepts. Locally, in the area where we currently have
the bus stop the full twenty feet to provide capability of having the
sidewalk and bus turn -off would be appropriate. He said he was
uncertain as to the dimensions in detail in all of those areas.
Acting Chairman Phelps asked for the width of the right -of -way in front
of Maule Avenue on that property. Mark Caughey said he was not sure, bu
it looked like 70'. Councilman Hill said he was figuring if the City
had an additional 10' there we could have landscaping and bike trail.
Acting Chairman Phelps said that was the intent of the Committee.
Mayor Todd said he is part -owner in the piece of property being dis-
cussed. Mr. Schneider has prepared the documentation. He said he would
first address the Council as to whether or not he would consider a
trade for a portion of riverbank for the use or ownership of Maule Avenu
Maule Avenue is 20' wide its full length, no one has ever developed any
part of it, except the Riverside Inn uses it for parking. It has a main
sewer line down the center which, were someone to acquire it, they
could not abandon the easement for sewer maintenance. Maule Avenue
is not worth what you propose for the frontage. The Metro Bus Company
has been for some time encrouching on Puget Power right -of -way which we
have an option to purchase and will exercise. The bus stop is tres-
passing on Puget Power property. We own the 207,000' east of Maule
Avenue. Note there is a City park proposed on the north end of the pro-
ject 72 ' wide that extends from Maule Avenue to the river, which
would fit in well with the scheme to assume some ownership in the river
bank for public use. The fact that it is river bank does not indicate
that anybody and everybody can trespass on it. It is private property
and as such it seems good judgment to connect that portion of recrea-
tional property to the park. That was the reason for the original indic
tion that he was interested in any kind of a trade with the City. He
said the other party and himself were not interested in any trade of the
frontage for Maule Avenue on a one to one basis because there is not
that value in Maule Avenue. There is a sidewalk and landscape strip
proposed along Maule Avenue.
Councilman Bohrer said he had no objections to a private developer
doing all of that if it can be done to City standards. It seems like it
might be better to move the sidewalk out and use the land for other
purposes.
Councilman Harris said she liked the development very much and it is
in theme with the City hopes for Interurban Avenue Corridor. We want
people- motivated development rather than trucking, etc. Mayor Todd
said someday, in his opinion, Maule Avenue will be abandoned either
by law or because it has never been developed.
Councilman Bohrer said he thought the project in general is what the
City would like to see happen there on Interurban Avenue. He said he
felt there should be room for some kind of a trade. He said he felt the
difference between what the property owners have drawn and what the Cit;
has discussed are quite minor.
*MOTION CARRIED.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL CO :•1:•1ITTEE OF THE WIi1,LE ..EETING
June 23, 1980
Page 8
Ltr. from Pac.
Townhouse Buil-
ders and
Park P1. Dev.
*MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED.
Mayor Todd said Item 10 on the
regarding a letter he received
He said he was not prepared to
until the signer or originator
Mr. Sudderth said the fill was to be
of 155th or 255th which is a totally
Todd asked if the fill to be brought
in the swamp. He said Mr. Dally and
when they met with him in the office
MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE OF ..THE WHOLE CONSIDER ITEMS NINE AND TEN OF THE AGENDA AT
THIS TIME. *
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY BOHRER, TO AMEND THE MOTION AND
CONSIDER THE 1979 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AT THIS TIME. MOTION
CARRIED, WITH JOHANSON AND HILL VOTING NO.
agenda is a :proposed discussion
from Dan Saul dated June 20, 1980.
discuss the contents of the letter
of the letter was present.
MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT ITEM 10 (DISCUSSION ON THE
PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT) BE DELETED FROM CONSIDERATION AT THIS TIME AND
CONSIDERED IN ITS REGULAR SEQUENCE. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY VAN DUSEN, THAT THE LETTER DATED JUNE 11
FROM PACIFIC TOWNHOUSE BUILDERS BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE JULY 7, 1980
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. *
Councilman Harris said letters dated June 11 and June 16 requested
the Council extend the deadline for the start of construction of
"Sunwood" Phase II (remaining 88 condominium units) to August 7, 1981.
Mayor Todd said the letter of June 11, 1980 uses economic reasoning
for an extension of time and the June 16, 1980 letter requests the
relocation of the fire lane. Acting Chairman Phelps said she thought
the City Council would like the opportunity to speak with the developer.
The request for 12 month extension is separate from the request for
relocation of the fire lane.
Ron Sudderth, 1450 114th Avenue SE, Bellevue, said he was one of the
four owners of Pacific Townhouse Builders. He said he had sold his
interest in the Tukwila property only. He had no knowledge of the
letters that had been written and felt discussion on them should be
deferred until the writers were here to defend themselves. He said
promised payments on his share of the Tukwila property have not been
made to him. He said he realized it would be cheaper to construct the
fire lane along the northerly boundary of the single family property.
But that is not the planning that the developer had approved and
granted by the City.
Mayor Todd said when Mr. Sudderth and Mr. Dally were in his office
they alluded to the fact that Mr. Sudderth was going to be heir - apparent
to thse six single family lots, and as he recalled the conversation
Mr. Sudderth did agree that the low area in the single family zoned
property needed fill and that was the logical place to put it and
you were going to get it free from your other so- called partners.
placed below the elevation line
different configuration. Mayor
down the hill was to be placed
Mr. Sudderth had difficulty agreeiz
Don Sipes, 14961 62nd South, said he owned the property just north of
the property in question. He said they supported the development
because they thought it was adequate for this property. He said he
had several concerns. First, he would like to ask the status of the
occupancy permit?
Mayor Todd said it was his understanding that unless the 6 lots are
fully developed and improved they cannot get an occupancy permit.
Darlene Sipes, 14961 62nd South, said they sat through the hearing on
this zoning. The developers were to account for every tree. They
have just come in with a bulldozer and completely denuded the land.
She said she was embarrassed that they supported the project. They
had left up a couple of tall firs, which they subsequently cut down.
There have been cars and motorcycles down there and it is nothing
like they said it was going to be.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
Permit
(.
Affidavit of Publication
ss.
Theresa..Skobin being first duly sworn on
oath, deposes and says that She is th eme Clerk of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a
week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County Washington, and it is
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County,
Washington. That the annexed is a ShOre Mana MINA
as it was published in regular issues (and
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
of 2 consecutive issues, commencing on the
16 day of June ,19 80 , and ending the
23 day of June ,19a° , both dates
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21.29 , which
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
thief. . .erk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 3 day of
June 19 80
V.P.C. Form No. 87 Rev. 7-79
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at Rest; King County.
gifbarh
- Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June
9th, 1955.
— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
JYi i4 2/C
MASTER LAM? DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
55'
FEES: 225
RCPT.
M.F.
EPIC.
NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete
applications will not be accepted for processing.
O.C.D.
CITY OF TUK` 4 LA
(JUN i i 1980
•
SECTION I. GENERAL' DATA H. C. Bloss
1) APPLICANT'S NAME C/O Schneider Homes, IncTE : (206) 248 - 2471
2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS $510 Southc•enter jalvd. ZIP: 98183 dd
3) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Geral & K nuds o n TELEPHONE:( )
243••1625 .
14446 -59th S.
4) PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS 15751 -118th P1. S.E. ZIP: 98168 ''.
1
5) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) east side of
Interurban Avenue between S. 143rd Street and 58th Avenue So.
KROLL PAGE: 325
6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) Riverside .Park and Office Community
SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION
7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE:
construction of three office
structures, each two s;torieshigh with associated circulation
roads, parking and landscaping
YES DNO
c. PARKING SPACES 295
14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER
DOCL7.E'VTS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE
INDICATE BELOW.
a . , NAME : Schneider Homes, Inc.
b. NAME: ADDRESS:
8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES?
9) PROJECT DATE
a. NET ACRES 5.49
b. GROSS ACRES 5.88 * d. FLOORS OF
CONSTRUCTION 2
e. LOT. AREA COVERAGE 23 %BLDG. 58, 80CSQ.FT. LANDSCAPE 66,891 SQ, FT.
PAVINd01,232 SQ. FT.
10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10%? EJ YES NO
11) EXISTING 20NING NI 12. EXISTING CCMP.PLAN MI /Commercial
13) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION YES ONO
ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP?
ADDRESS: 6510 Southcenter Blvd.
SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
Oeqg ! , being duly sworn, declare that I am the
contr t pure aser or owner of t the property involved in this application and
that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this / da of
residing at
DATE ‘ ' , ("Co
•
ture
o Contract
rc ser or owner)
SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: A11 applications require certain supporting documents and
information which are described in the following table:
TYPE OF APPLICATION (CHECK BOX(ES)) SUPPORTING INFORMATION REQUIRED
REZONING 1E, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1C, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11
VARIANCE 1F, 4, 7, 11 or 17.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENt 1D, 3; 4, 5, 7, 11, 12
/SHORELINE MGMT. PERMIT 1B, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10. 11. 13
SHORELINE MQ4T PERMIT REVISION 4, 10, 16
WAIVER lA, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13
SHORT PLAT 4, 5, 9
BINDING SITE ThIPRC V 1ENfT PLAN 4, 5, 8
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 11, 12, 13
LANDSCAPE REVIEW 14
SUBDIVISION 4, 5, 6, 15
SIGN VARIANCE 4, 6, 16, 17
* *See TABLE 1 for detailed description
$
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
1. State specifically the action in Ordinance No. 1137 to which you are
requesting a waiver: Rn\rirnnmental sPnsiti.TP areas within
200 feet of major waterways
2. Briefly and generally describe the project you are proposing: .
construction of three office structures each two stories
high with associated circulation roads, parking and
landscaping
3. Is your project 'unique in terms of design, land use or benefit to the
Tukwila community? provides office space within walking
distance•to restaurants, general business and bus stop - , .
Design provides large % landscaping & access to Duwamish River
4. Is your project significant in scale?
YES
(
SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTIONAIRE
Schedule
WAIVER AL'ICATION
S. If the request for waiver involves building, grading, clearing, excava-
tion, or filling in an environmentally - sensitive area, what mitigating
solutions do you propose to offset the impact of such activities ?,
Install temporary erosion control and permanent storm
drain control
6. What goals and policies can you identify which support your request
for waiver, if any? 1)Conforms with comprehensive plan use;
2) Contributes to City's economic base;
3) Enhances existing area & provides connecting link to buwamish River
4) Convenient location to transportation modes
7. In your opinion, do the requirements of waiver ordinance 1137 impose
a hardship on the use and development of this site? YES