Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-06-80 - SUNWOOD CONDOMINIUMS - PHASE II LANDSCAPE PLANdr-06-80 15101 sunwood boulevard 15195 sunwood boulevard sunwood phase ii 190• City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Van Waters. Pacific Townhouse Builders FROM: Mark Caughey, Planning Department DATE: 12 May 1982 SUBJECT: "Sunwood" Phase II Occupancy As a result of our field inspection this morning, our office takes the following position with respect to your request for a certificate of occupancy on Sunwood's Phase II units: A) Actions to be completed by Pacific Townhouse Builders before CO is issued: 1) Install five (5). randomly - spaced conifer trees with an initial height of ten (.101 feet along the common property line with the Sipe residence. Also, remove all downed timber and debris, reshape the ground contour and treat the area with hydroseed. 2). As described in Dick Gilroy's letter of 2 June 1981, install seven (7) conifers and three (3) vine maplets plus hydroseeding in the area of the filled retention pond on lot 4 of the "single- family" plat area. Spacing of the trees should occur at random, but should emphasize visual separation of lot four from the adjoining public trail right -of -way. Provide documentation that public access easement on north property line is recorded per stipulation four of Short Plat 80- 44 -SS. Complete installation of all shrubs, decorative and bark ground cover and ornamental trees for Phase II units per the approved landscape plan of 28 August 1980. ) Actions to be completed by Pacific Townhouse Builders as a condition of issuance of the CO: 1) Within 45 days of the effective date of the certificate of occupancy, complete installation of all sod as required on the approved landscape plan for Phase II. 2) Within 30 days of the effective date of the certificate of occupancy, complete hydroseeding operations on the westerly slope of single - family plat lot 2 (the "fire lane" location referenced in Mr. Daily's letter of 19 January 1982). MC /blk xc: P1ng. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor Pacific Townhouse Builders 1115 108th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Dick Gilroy Subject: Sunwood Phase II Landscape Plan The landscape plan transmitted to our office on 28 April 1981 is hereby approved. Based on remarks by Don Dally at the Planning Commission meeting of 23 April 1981, I understand that you intend to install decora- tive landscape structures at the Sunwood Blvd /62nd Avenue entry to the project as part of Phase II. Since these improvements are not shown on the referenced landscaped drawing, separate approval action for them by the Tukwila Board of Architectural review will be necessary. I have enclosed filing forms as required for B.A.R. review. Please call me if you have any questions. Tukwila P)r iing Dept. Ping Dir Marc Caughey Associate Planner 4 May 1981 Dear Mark, RG:ded Enclosure C Pacific Townhouse Builders Mark Caughey City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle office: Mariner Building, 1370 Stewart Street, Suite 105, Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 682 -7830 Bellevue office: 1115 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -1726 April 28, 1981 Per your letter of March 26, 1981, please find enclosed one Sunwood Phase II Landscape Plan showing location of all tree's replacing indigenous specimen's per the Vegetation Removal Plan approved by the City Council on March 16, 1981. Please note that these are approximate locations and may vary in actual installation due to electrical vaults, water meters, fire hydrants, rock, and other site problems. All replacement conifer's will have an initial height at time of installation of not less than ten feet. Cordially, Pacific Townhg/se Builders O Richard ilroy City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development Pacific Townhouse Builders 1115 108th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Dick Gilroy Subject: Sunwood Phase II Building Permit review Our office has reviewed the plan set submitted to the Building division on 6 March 1981; the following concerns are noted: A) "Snow Fencing" - Per Ordinance 1181, Section 4, snow fencing or comparable material must be installed at the boundary of the growth- preservation zone at the east edge of phase II before construction begins. The purpose of this temporary barrier is to prevent accidental accumulation of debris and encroachment by construction equipment within the open -space area. B) "Growth Preservation Zone, North Prop. Line" - Ordinance 1171, Concomittant Zoning Agreement, item 2 requires as follows: "To preserve the visual landscape buffer in the R -2 zone at the north edge of the property, the developer shall re- tain all flora within 20 to 25 feet south of the north edge of the property in the R -2 zone in a natural growth preser- vation zone, as designated on the site plan." We note that sheet A -1 provides a 25' wide setback from the north boundary of Phase II. Vegetation removal in this area is res- tricted to those materials which.must be cleared to provide a fire -break adjacent to the buildings, and to those materials which are dead or irreversibly deseased. C) Landscape Restoration Plan - The _Cancomittant Zoning Agreement of Ordinance 1171, Section 6 requires staff approval of a landscape /vegetation restoration plan for each project phase, simultaneously with building permit approval. A conceptual 26 March 1981 Page -2- Pacific Townhouse Builders 26 March 1981 landscape plan was approved by the Board of Architectural Review on 28 August 1980; we should have a copy of that approved diagram for inclusion in the building permit plan set. To serve its function as a restoration plan as well, the diagram should reflect the following: - Location of all trees replacing removed indigenous speci- mens per the vegetation removal plan approved by the City Council on 16 March 1981. - Notation that all replacement conifer specimens will have an initial height at time of installation of not less than ten feet, per the Concomittant Zoning Agreement. D) Shingle - Siding, Buildings K,L,M,N,0 - Stipulation 2 of the Board of Architectural Review approval of 28 August 1980 re- quires 6 -8 "wide cedar channel siding or comparable material and the exterior finish of all buildings in Phase II. We have interpreted the use of shingle siding on buildings K -0 as consis- tent with the Board's stipulation. E) Single-Familr Area Utility Improvements - A matter of record, we wish to remind you that prior to occupancy of Phase II con- struction, all stipulations of short plat approval 80 -44 -SS must be met. These stipulations include: - Documentation of an on -going maintenance funding procedure for private utility lines installed according to the plat. - Recording of a. access easement on the north property line, and restoration of vegetation removed by the abortive fire lane. Please submit the above - described landscape plan so that we may expedite release of your permit plan set; the other comments contained in this letter are for your information as a matter of record. MC /blk cc: Bldg. Official TUkwila g Dept. Ma Caughey• Acting Director March 16, 1981 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OF LIONEL C. BOHRER, MABEL J. HARRIS, GEORGE D. HILL, DORIS E. PHELPS, COUNCIL MEMBERS DANIEL J. SAUL, Council President GARY L. VAN DUSEN. OLD BUSINESS Cedarwood Habitat - Council President Van Dusen said the applicant, Mr. Campanella, . Waiver Application. has requested his waiver application not be considered at this time. In place of that discussion, the Sunwood project will be discussed. Council President Van Dusen said Don Dally, developer of Sunwood, has met all of the conditions of Phase II as requested by Council. Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director, said the Council had requested Mr. Dally to prepare an inventory of trees on Phase II site, showing which trees would be saved and which would be removed. Mr. Daily has complied with the request. The inventory is introduced and made a matter of record at this meeting. It was submitted in a timely manner. V Sunwood Project. Councilman Phelps asked if the developers were required to submit landscaping plans? Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director, said it is a requirement for restoration. Councilman Harris asked if the plans have been through the Planning Commission? Mr. Dally said they have been approved by the Planning Commission. Inquiry on the Council President Van Dusen asked what the Council would like to status of Sign Code. do with the sign code. Several letters have been received. requesting some action. It has been requested that we extend the present sign code to take into account the economical effect it would \have on businesses that are concerned. There .are threats of 1 aw `'ssmi is . The general request is to review the' present *ordinance and make it more palatable to business:" Councilman 'M elps asked about the scope of authority? She said Mr. Dick Goe'had requested a citizen's committee address the matter of the 9n ordinance with a projected meeting date of April 16, 1981. \ Council President Va?' said the citizen's committee is going to look at the present sign ordipance. As a member of the Board of Adjustment, he gets most of letters about the present sign code. \ .% TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL City Hall ' --COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Council Chambers M I N U T E S Council President Van Dusen called the Committee of the Whole Meeting to order at 8:40 p.m. The City Council members looked at the inventory chart. Councilman Bohrer said the development we are going to see will take all of the trees off the top of the hill. It will be bare. This will happen because the buildings are being sited where the trees were. The time to consider this was when the Council approved the project four years ago. We need to plan ahead or we get what we bargain for. Mayor Todd said the City needs` ither a new sign code or an extension of the present: There re many concerns about what will happen when the / enforcement date begins. Jan Wiesner, Chamber of Commerce, saidvt might be a good idea to extend the date and then review the s1' n code with both the City and the // business people offering inpu Councilman,Phelps said at one time considerat n was given to the possibility of an ad hoc committee composed of aff, businesses, etc. Maybe there are industry standards that sho ld be known. Mayor suggested extending the present sign ordi ance until such time as a Planning Director is hired so his input be considered. Al Pieper, Building Official, asked that the Council repeal Ordinance No. 1175 (present sign ordinance). TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTW' ! March 16, 1981 Page 2 OLD BUSINESS - Contd. Inquiry on the status of Sign Code - contd. Councilman Bohrer said part of the problem we had in 1980 was the fact that a piece meal change was made. It appears that is what is being asked for again, a piece meal change. Last year we extended it with the anticipation that within three months we would have a new sign code. We have just the same piece meal attempt. This calls for a comprehensive approach. The City has had the sign code since 1973. A number of businesses have complied with it and some have nonconforming signs. The longer we try to piece meal it the longer the problem exists. We seem to be in a rift and just talk about it. Al Pieper, Building Official, said he specifically asked the ,. Council for suggestions, whether they wanted to amend, revise or what the present sign ordinance. He said he did not receive any directions. He said if they want a new code he did not want to come to them with a piece meal revision. He said he,vas not inclined to do anything with the code until the Councii'tells him what they want. If a new code is wanted, one can be,drafted. Before Ordinance No. 1175 was passed he said he did /hot have any trouble with the sign code. The Planning Commissidn recommendation for staff to put in ordinance form was not adopted. Ordinance No. 1175 cannot be enforced. When businesses cone in with their attorneys they . laugh at the ordinance. He ask e'd that the sign ordinance be repealed. Councilman Harris asked Mr. Pieper to specify the portion of the sign code that is unenforcible. �` Mr. Pieper said Paragraph 7 (A) which relates to signs on faces of buildings is an example. The word/ "faces" is plural and could mean anything. You can have one sign on each street that the building faces. The implication is that you can have more than one sign when the building faces / two streets. The percentage chart in Ordina e 1175 is an improvement. He said he spends a lot of time ,working with the ordinance. Councilman Borher said muc,h'of the language of Ordinance No. 1175 that the Council is to repeal is the same as in the original ordinance: f MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE \PROCESS BE GIVEN TO THE NEW PLANNING DIRECTOR, THAT IT BE A COMPOTE PROCESS, THAT THERE BE SOME INVOLVEMENT TO BE DEFINED BY THAT INDIVIDUAL WHEN HE COMES ON BOARD OF,THE CITY STAFF, THE COUNCIL AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN ESTABLISHING A NEW SIGN CODE. * Council President Van Dusen said he was afraid the Cbuncil is going to have to be /careful about what they are loading onte \the new Planning Director. We have some really capable candidates and it is intended that he be involved with the new zoniq ordinance. Councilman Phelps said she was not really concerned about 1 the Planning Director with work because he has a capable sta that will work with him to resolve the problems. Mr. ,Pieper said the Planning Director, he was sure, would be schooled in the planning field. The sign code is a regulatory code and if there are revisions made it should be worked on by people who are familiar with regulatory problems. That is the problem he has with the sign code. The sign code itself is a good code, except from a regulatory point of view it is hard to regulate. It is ambiguous and a few things like that. He said he did not want to step on any toes, but at the time the sign code was adopted about 8 years ago, one of the problems that we had with it is that it is quite obvious that the people who came up with the ideas, and formerly the sign code, were not familiar with regulatory procedures so he would say that the Planning Director and /or the Finance Director and /or the Public Works Director is not the place to put the sign code for revision. It should be kept in a regulatory agency. ading Pacific Townhouse Builders 1370 Stewart Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 Attn: Don Daily SUBJECT: SUNW00D CONDOMINIUMS -- PHASE II City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard* . Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development 10 September 1980 The letter of 3 September 1980 which I sent confirming the Board of Architectural Review's decision of 28 August 1980 to approve the site, Architectural and Landscape concept for Phase II is in error with respect to Stipulation #2. The correct wording for Stipulation #2 should be as follows: 2) Exterior finish of all buildings is to be consistent with the following: a. Exterior finish is to be six or eight inch cedar channel siding or comparable materials. b. Carports to be of wood. c. T -1 -11 (or comparable materials) are not to be used as the exterior finish material of any'structure material. Please excuse us for any inconvenience which our mistake may have caused you. MC/ j as d. All structures except carports shall be limited to the use of shake roofing material. TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Mark Caughey Acting Director City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development Pacific Townhouse Builders 1370 Stewart Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 Attn: Don Dally SUBJECT: SUNWOOD CONDOMINIUMS -- PHASE II 3 September 1980 This letter confirms the action of the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review at its 28 August 1980 meeting to approve site, architectural and landscaping plans for Phase II of the Sunwood project. Stipulations of the approval are as follow: 1) The alignment of the major internal access road serving Phase II as depicted on Exhibit "A ", where said road is shown to connect with fire access lane on the north edge of the project's R -1 area, is subject to final plat approved under Application 80 -31 -SUB. 2) Exterior finish of all buildings is to be consistent with the fol- lowing: a. Exterior finish is to be six or eight inch cedar channel siding or comparable materials. Structures larger than four- plexes: Exterior finish to be com- bination of stucco and cedar or stucco and brick, depending on building and fire code requirements. b. Carports to be of wood. c. T -1 -11 (or comparable materials) are not to be used as the ex- terior finish material of any structure material. Exhibit "A" is approved in concept only at this time. Prior to is- suance of building permits for Phase II construction, the applicants shall comply with Stipulation 6 of Exhibit "C" of Ordinance 1071. Staff shall report to the B.A.R. following completion of the require- ments of said Stupulation 6, including an inventory of trees to be removed. Final site plan approval may be granted at that time. Building permits for Phase II may not be released until a final site plan Exhibit "A" is approved by B.A.R. 4) Prior to release of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall present for'staff approval a detailed planting plan for the northerly 15' wide portion of the R -1 District of the'Sunwood'site. An excerpt from the minutes of the Board's proceedings is enclosed. rage i Planning Commission Meting (cont')7. PROJECT, APPLCANTS SHALL SUBMIT FOR STAFF APPROVAL A COMPREHENSIVE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE NORTHERLY 15' OF TRACT "B" OF PRELIMINARY PLAT 80 -31 -SUB. MOTION CARRIED 3 -0. C) APPLICATION 79 -5 -CUP - SILVER CLOUD MOTEL - Modification of Conditional Use Permit to allow temporary parking of trucks on the site's Phase II portion. Existing motel is located on 48th Avenue South, approximately 600' east of Interurban Avenue. Staff explained that the applicants were unable to be represented at tonight's meeting, and asked that the hearing be postponed to the Commission's Regular September meeting. BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, THE COMMISSION POSTPONED THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION 79 -5 -CUP TO THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER, 1980. VI) BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW A) LANDSCAPE PLAN - PARKWAY SQUARE - (Retail complex located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway, 1/2 block south of Strander Blvd.) Mr. Caughey read the Staff Report. George Erdenberger, landscape designer for the project site, explained concerns they have with Staff Report conditions. MOVED BY MS. AVERY, WITH MR. ORRICO'S SECOND, TO APPROVE THE LANDSCAPE /IRRI- GATION PLAN FOR PARKWAY SQUARE, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBITS A, B AND C OF THE APPLICATION, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) MODIFICATION OF EXHIBIT "A" TO REFLECT A MIXTURE OF EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS SHRUB MATERIAL ON THE EAST AND SOUTH PERIMETER PLANTING AREAS OF THE SITE. 2) INITIAL PLANTING SIZE FOR ALL TREES INSTALLED ON THE PERIMETERS OF THE PROJECT SITE SHALL CONFORM TO THE TABULAR SPECIFICATION DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT "A ". MO ION CARRIED 3 -0. B) DEVELOPMENT PLAN & LANDSCAPING - "SUNWOOD" PHASE II Mark Caughey read the Staff Report introduction and recommendations. Don Dally, representing Pacific Townhouse Builders, responded to proposed conditions in the Staff Report. Regarding architectural materials, he noted that they do not plan to use stucco on any Phase II structures; only cedar siding or shakes will be used. Regarding the requirement for an automatic irrigation system, he stated that Phase I was not required to install such a system, and therefore Phase II should also be exempt therefrom. rayC Planning Commission Meeting b. CARPORTS TO BE OF WOOD. Mr. Satterstrom reviewed the B.A.R. File for Phase I, and was not able to substantiate from the record that the board had consciously exempted Phase I from an automatic watering system requirement. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, WITH MR. SOWINSKITS SECOND, TO APPROVE THE SITE, ARCHI- TECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PHASE II OF THE SUNWOOD DEVELOPMENT, AS DE- PICTED ON EXHIBITS A - E, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1) THE ALIGNMENT OF THE MAJOR INTERNAL ACCESS ROAD SERVING PHASE II AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT "A ", WHERE SAID ROAD IS SHOWN TO CONNECT WITH A FIRE ACCESS LANE ON THE NORTH EDGE OF THE PROJECT's R -1 AREA, IS SUBJECT TO FINAL PLAT APPROVED UNDER APPLICATION 80 -31 -SUB. 2) "EXTERIOR FINISH OF ALL BUILDINGS IS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FOL- LOWING: a. EXTERIOR FINISH IS TO BE SIX OR EIGHT INCH CEDAR CHANNEL SIDING OR COMPARABLE MATERIALS. STRUCTURES LARGER THAN FOUR - PLEXES: EXTERIOR FINISH TO BE COM- BINATION OF STUCCO AND CEDAR OR STUCCO AND BRICK, DEPENDING ON BUILDING AND FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. c. T -1 -11 (OR COMPARABLE MATERIALS) ARE NOT TO BE USED AS THE EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL OF ANY STRUCTURE MATERIAL. d. ALL STRUCTURES EXCEPT CARPORTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE USE OF SHAKE ROOFING MATERIAL. 3) EXHIBIT "A" IS APPROVED IN CONCEPT ONLY AT THIS TIME. PRIOR TO IS- SUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR PHASE II CONSTRUCTION, THE APPLICANTS SHALL COMPLY WITH STIPULATION 6.OF EXHIBIT "C" OF ORDINANCE 1071. STAFF SHALL REPORT TO THE B.A.R. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF SAID STIPULATION 6, INCLUDING AN INVENTORY OF TREES TO BE REMOVED. FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL MAY BE GRANTED AT THAT TIME. BUILDING PERMITS FOR PHASE II MAY NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL A FINAL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT "A" IS APPROVED BY B.A.R. 4) PRIOR TO RELEASE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR PHASE II, THE APPLICANT SHALL PRESENT FOR STAFF APPROVAL A DETAILED PLANTING PLAN FOR THE NORTHERLY 15' WIDE PORTION OF THE R -1 DISTRICT OF THE "SUNWOOD" SITE. 5) ALL "FORMAL" PLANTING AREAS WITHIN PHASE II, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT "E", SHALL BE SERVED BY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. THIS REQUIRE- MENT SHALL NOT EXTEND TO ANY PLANTED AREA IN THE R -1 DISTRICT OF THE SUNWOOD SITE. MOVED BY MR. SOWINSKI, WITH MS. AVERY'S SECOND, TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION TO SPECIFY THAT ALL BUILDINGS SHALL UTILIZE 6 OR 8 INCH CEDAR CHANNEL SIDING OR CEDAR SHAKE MATERIAL. AMENDMENT CARRIED, MR. ORRICO DISSENTING. MOVED BY MS. AVERY, WITH MR. SOWINSKI'S SECOND, TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION TO DELETE STIPULATION 5 THEREOF. AMENDMENT CARRIED, WITH MR. ORRICO DISSENTING. THE MAIN MOTION CARRIED 3 -0, AS AMENDED. AGENDA ITEM DISCUSSION Site: INTRODUCTION Stipulation 2(f) of Ordinance 1071 requires B.A.R. review for each separate phase of development within the total "Sunwood" project. The appli- cants are requesting B.A.R. approval of the site, archi- tectural and landscaping con- cept for Phase II of the "Sunwood" project. A) Stipulation 2(a) of Ordinance 1071 requires that each phase of the project retain similar proportions of open space. Phase I retains approximately 53% open space, Phase II, approxi- mately 57% as noted on Exhibit "A ". The stipu- lation appears to be satisfied. CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUNWOOD CONDOMINIUM HOMES - PHASE II "-1 ,zt ! N rP,4 \. M ( ( \ ri9 1*"..°1 F"48 ..rave p MH - ' ° Ar SITE 1' pa , \ / RI 1 '1'_� \ i IMr f-'' C.• ll1V AI-1 44,4_,m) r ' �� RFAi ,� 0.a : � .` f, � . ; 0.MH �� " 744:--1 0.r. \ c-2 + 3 P= IS 9�` � . L 1 1 r '; . • qy y La Gy. GIB C.Mc: �, M1 .._.7........=_-_ ' ,/ . q 0.1.,4 r I (/ NH ) «1 % /)/ B) Stipulation 2(b) of Ordinance 1071 requires close matching of overall density levels between the project's multi - family phases. Phase II's proposed 86 units equal a density level of 16 D.U. /AC. compares favorably with Phase I's 92 units or 17.5 D.U. /AC density. The City Council author- ized 180 units total for the multi - family portion of the Sunwood site; the applicants now propose to reduce that figure to 178 units. C) Driveway length in front of garage doors for duplex units 14,17, 18 and 19 appear to be shorter than 20' in some cases. Since some residents may prefer not to garage their vehicles, the potential to overhang into the 24' wide main roadway exists. The applicants may wish to study this Page 2 C f' relationship once again and increase the length of the driveways serving these units. D) Alignment of the secondary fire access lane to correspond with the north edge of the R -1 District should be viewed as conceptual only, and should be subject to approval fa-the final plat for the R -1 District. Architecture: A) Scale & Style Concept - The proposed structures are similar in exterior appearance to those constructed in Phase I. Although the elevation draw- ings on Exhibits B through D lack specific material specifications as required by stipulation 2(f) of Ordinance 1071, Staff suggests that B.A.R. approval of Phase II require compliance with stipulation 4 of the "Concomit- tant Zoning Agreement" pursuant to City Ordinance 1071, which states as follows: "Exterior finish of all buildings is to be consistent with the following. a. Four - plexes and smaller: Exterior finish is to be six or eight inch channel siding or comparable material. b. Structures larger than four - plexes: Exterior finish to be combination of stucco and cedar or stucco and brick, depend- ing on building and fire code requirements. c. Carports to be of wood or comparable materials. d. T -1 -11 or comparable materials are not to be used in the ex- terior of any structures." In addition to the foregoing, we suggest that a similar condition be imposed requiring the use of shake roofing material on Phase II units, as was used on Phase I structures. C) Architectural treatment for freestanding carports has not been provided on Exhibits B through D. We suggest that these units be constructed in a manner closely - resembling those of Phase I. Landscape: A) Staff finds the "formal" planting aspects of the landscape proposal adequate and similar in character to that already approved for Phase I. B) Exhibit "C" of Ordinance 1071 contains standards for the preservation and removal of existing trees and other vegetation on the site. Stipu- lation 6 thereof provides as follows: "At the time each phase of the project is submitted to the Planning Commission for review, the developer shall stake all proposed building sites in that phase. The sites shall be inspected by an official from the Department of Community Development. After inspection, the deve- loper shall make minor adjustments where feasible in the building lo- cations in order to preserve as many trees as possible on the site..." Page 3 As of this writing, Phase II has not been inspected by the Planning Division. We suggest that the B.A.R. grant tentative approval to site Exhibit "A" at this time and instruct the applicants to proceed with staking as specified in Ordinance 1071. Staff will then inspect the results in the field, work with the applicants to make minor adjustments if necessary, and report back to the B.A.R. at a future meeting. At that time, final site plan approvals may be granted and Phase II Building permits released. C) Exhibit "E" proposes landscape treatment for the northerly 15' of the fire access lane at the north edge of the R -1 District. As this buffer is of crucial concern to the established residents ad- joining the Sunwood project, and as the level of detail depicted on Exhibit "C" is insufficient to judge the functional adequacy of this landscape area, we suggest that the board require a detailed plan to be reviewed and accepted by Staff prior to release of building permits for Phase II. RECOMMENDATION c Staff recommends approval of site, architectural and landscaping for Phase II of the "Sunwood" development as depicted on Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, sub- ject to the following conditions: 1) The alignment of the major internal access road serving Phase II as depicted on Exhibit "A ", where said road is shown to connect with a fire access lane on the north edge of the project's R -1 area, is subject to final plat under Application 80 -31 -SUB. 2) "Exterior finish of all buildings is to be consistent with the fol- lowing: a. Four - plexes and smaller: Exterior finish is to be six or eight inch channel siding or comparable material. b. Structures larger than four - plexes: Exterior finish to be combination of stucco and cedar or stucco and brick, depend- ing on building and fire code requirements. c. Carports to be of wood or comparable materials. d. T -1 -11 or comparable materials are not to be used in the ex- terior of any structures." e. All structures except carports shall be limited to the use of shake roofing material. 3) Exhibit "A" is approved in concept only at this time. Prior to is- suance of building permits for Phase II construction, the applicants shall comply with Stipulation 6 of Exhibit "C" or Ordinance 1071. Staff shall report to the B.A.R. followign completion of the require- ments of said Stipulation 6, including an inventory of trees to be removed. Final site plan approval may be granted at that time. Building permits for Phase II may not be released until a final site plan Exhibit "A" is approved by B.A.R. Page 4 C Prior to release of building permits for Phase II, the applicant shall present for Staff approval a detailed planting plan for the northerly 15' wide portion of the R -1 District of the "Sunwood" site. 5) All "formal" planting areas within phase II, as depicted on Exhibit "E ", shall be served by automatic irrigation equipment. This require- ment shall not extend to any planted area in the R -1 District of the Sunwood site Si' air WI Sot at *V . J. 1 011 - 0(1 INN .0 —.OE • .1 NV 31IS •••! .... - 4 • 5 t•a 6,1 - r 6 .1d ( 1 • .." t''s• 5.111,14 10 t.I •7tu. 5.111.0 J. •ner, or S11, 99 i.v • 9.* • If • v."• •32•• St tilw 2_ : VI:: . J • 5 iiiIit., I 9 ors', • •rs 999 9 •99.• • • • ..9•9 •••■!•• it Otis,. it S911 Vt :,1,11■15 /101/9 •0•1^1 ,•■•", .01 00,0.3 len •,,1111,,,a, al 1,1,,elle ..,..> 1.4 _ „ Z.v •I-V •,.• z is 0055 - NI 'LI ',I •, I ••1 . i.LA (61 'It '5 'Mt 00 •ifI, - is 55( • ,./5 - • 7•5 £11454' 050- •■•S s14 - tot - •/ Olv • •••••::::::::: • 01 •11 . It 0 •: :, ....itp - 0•S SSCrIr • • • 4,AG 14+, OM. 331/dS N3910 .\\ ,, • ••\ • \-•/ 4. O d:6 6.‘ ENTRY ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 2 A VIEW ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 2 kl , T.;;*",,.. ENTRY ELEVATION BLDG TYPE VIEW ELEVATION BLDG TYPE I END ELEVATION ewe TYPES I & 2 6X1-iitglf ENTRY ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 4 VIEW ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 4 END ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 4 frf:. b' C ...s -'? r?-Q2 .., tF /... . -. . . .. -. ,. >. iK ._ .,_ - .?Z. . r `.v ...i<..L ^::Y' •p- ,:5 + :. - - - r .....,... ,z _. ._.._ __ . -. ...,.' , .... , .... _ .. <_. ENTRY ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 3 VIEW ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 3 . ENTRY ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 5 VIEW ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 5 END ELEVATION BLDG TYPE 5 I NOTES 1 LEGEND U&C;ESTEp pT C4OIGE.5 • A.L r..A..rs TO 55. mEA AND TRJE To T{ra• •PLA.r■Na TYPES 55i V 0E ADJUSTED To Ac-c-OVCDATE CEPI-ALENNEKT gEZEJIEED VER. CAP Acg KIJERUM, LIDUIDMASAR STYKAL/FLUA, QuERco (r ED Svoteraums, ScAKET 0A e fit 'As Aceg CARGNATUM, CoCNOS C00, , opiRAx JAPCSICL, (NSNE MAPLE', KouSA COGWCOD, JAPANESE 41,, TREE) Izatucxwa.a. MENZIES,I. PINUS (Ocua:-As P P.ItS) e,Hui• DONITOKTA, ISUOA cANADENers O MEKTENSANA, MUJA (1..ICATA Ot■OKE ANS cmnolks, CR nta..NrAN HEMLOOK, WESTERN ftep Cz7Ac) gdo2cognipsoN AZALEA VAR, VIEURNUN VAg., AREL/TUS UNEOO, VAC.couum OrATuon (Nyero RHOgorlENDRON4, avERGREM j DEGOL)0O5 AZALEAS, VIBURNUNS, STRAWft( KITRZE, EVERG-g-EEN HUGRLE/SERE.4) . , 713 c-onnme-nrn5 SMALL To ,ytE00 DecirAloUS AMP FLONEX TRESs. ARETOSTAPAiLos 1.10'L4. ut sAAL4o1, C. Pr000N5ENG, MA ilo.CA .0CV &DONP C0VEz..6 TOLNSTicliUM PAAVIruM, ERICA vAg. (Kew■WININIc, WINTERGEEEN, LOW CCEGONGEAPE,WesTERA 5#4.2aPegrA ilaTpieg vuueves.) (5LeP,emetir EMSTINOt veae.TATION wrrrI GROUND czWEK6) LAWN GROWTH (RESERVATION ZONE — EXiSTiNel VEGETATION To ROMAN MEDIUM TO LARGE DEG-MUCUS TREES. MEDIUM TO LARGE oR FAST 420WINGI CowirEss. ZMALL TO MEDIUM CC 51-00i-aKorOAIG COMIFEKS. PLowekinic. 514IZUE•s 6 Wier AVg no 1.5 AM zos ZOO Mg 4VPPIJMILE eUrrIlL /Cr EV LAMM _ • r' MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete applications will not be accepted for processing. SECTION I. GENERAL DATA Pacific Townhouse - Parke Place ;;,,4) APPLICANT'S NAME (Don Daily, Partner) TELEPH3NE:( 206) 682 -7830 1370 Stewart St. Suite 100 2) "'pPPLICANT'S ADDRESSSeattle, Washington ZIP: 98109 3) ' PLZ'7PERTY OWNER'S NAME Same as Above TEIEPHONE. ( ) same 4)' 1 !PFOPERIY OWNER'S ADDRESS Same as Above ZIP: LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) Lots 8,' and 10 Interurban Addition of Seattle 6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) "Sunwood" KROLL PAGE: SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Planning Commission approval of 7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: Phase II, 86 condominium units as required by Ordinance 1071, Paragraph F. 2, One year a tension.opff Zoni (Ordinance 1071,• Paragraph G). 3. Relocation of tire tire as illustrated on six -lot single - tamely preliminary plat, revised August 1, 1980, and on site plan, Sunwood Phase II. 8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES? 9) PROJECT DATE 145 stalls a. NET ACRES N/A c. PARKING SPACES (86 covered) 232,355 b. GROSS ACRES 5.33 acres - d. FLOORS OF crION 2 and 3 story (3..0 acres) e. LOT AREA COVERAGE BLDG. 41, 470SQ.FT. LAN)SCAPE 3 31 , 377 SQ. FT. PAVING 59,508 SQ. FT. (18%) 10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10 %? D YES D 11) EXISTING ZONING R- 4,R -3,& R -2 12. EXISTING COMP.PLAN 13) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION NO ON THE CITY'S ENVIROMIENI'AL BASE MAP? 14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER DOOMMITS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE LNDICATE BELOW. a. Don Dally b NAE Dick Gilroy FEES: RCPT. M.F. EPIC. DNO ADDS 1370 Stewart Street #100, Seattle 98109 ADDRESS: 1115• - 108th Av. N.E. Bellevue , 98004 /s 2 4.40 .7y /��%_ -..3 I Lv h qt/ f( OVER SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT Don Dally , being duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. PACIFIC TOWNHOUSE BUILDERS - PARKE DATE A 7 gnature -o Don Dally, Partner Subscribed and sworn before me this 7 day of 4- , 19 E1 i / . .14/1tri N• IV. 1n • or a ate o as ington resi• / /// PLA SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS NOTE: All applications require certain supporting documents and information which'are described in the following table: TYPE OF APPLICATION (CHECK BOX(ES)) SUPPORTING INFORMATION REQUIRED REZONING 1E, 2 , 3.,. 5, 7 , 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1C, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11 VARIANCE . 1F, 4, 7, it or 17 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1D, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12 SHORELINE MGMT. PERMIT' 1B, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13 SHORELINE MGMT PERMIT REVISION 4, 10, 16 WAIVER 1A, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 SHORT PLAT 4, 5, 9 BINDING SITE DOROVEMENT PLAN 4, 5, 8 ,_,iRCHITEGTURAL REYIEVL, 11', 12, 13 LANDSCAPEREVIEW 14 SUBDIVISION 4, 5, 6, 15 SIGN VARIANCE 4, 6, 16,.17 * *See TABLE 1 for detailed description