HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-09-80 - LDR CORPORATION - DESIGN REVIEWdr-09-80
south 134th street
epic-128-80
ldr corporation
190S
Dear Sir:
LDR, Inc.
P.O. Box 80705
Seattle WA 98108
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Public Works Department 433 -1850
Apri1.7, 1981
Re: LDR Office & Warehouse DESIGN REVIEW
The Public Works Department has completed our review of your resubmittal
of Drawing #1 and approve it per the following comments:
The developer shall be required to obtain the following permits by this
department 24 hours prior to construction.
Hauling - Hauling permits must be applied for when any hauling is done
on City streets. A $2,000 bond must be posted along with a copy of the hauler's
certificate of insurance. Permit fee is $25.00.
Sanitary Side Sewers - Sanitary sewers shall be a minimum of 6" diameter
of concrete or PVC (schedule 35 minimum) with Class B bedding or better. Provide
cleanouts at all entrances to building, horizontal and vertical bends on
sanitary sewer lines. Sanitary sewer permit fee for each building under 30,000
square feet is $170.00. (Special connection charges are waived by the property's
past participation in LID #24.)
Domestic Water Meter - A water meter shall be provided in the public right -
of -way or in easements, preferably at the property line. An acceptable location
for the water meter and service line is shown on the plan. The size of the water
meter is 11" (Permit Fee Deposit - $1,000). (Special connection charges are
waived by the property's past participation in LID #24 and by the development of
a private water main extension in vacated 44th Place South.)
to
F
Sanitary Sewer Main Extension (Private) - The 8" sanitary main extension
shall be concrete. An added manhole structure shall be provided at the intersection
of the 6" side sewer and mainline for access and cleanout purposes. Permit Fee -
$25.00.
Fire Hydrant /Water Main Extension (private) - Fire service and main line
extensions shall be provided per the requirements of insurance underwriters and
the Tukwila Fire Department as appropriate. The sprinkler vault for the fire
LDR, Inc.
April 7, 1981
Re: LDR Office & Warehouse
page 2
protection system shall be per the Tukwila Public Works Department Standard Plan.
This vault shall be located in private property, but not in driveways due to the
PIV post which extends above the ground. All piping shall be DIP, Cl #52.
Provide thrust blocks at all junctions, bends, hydrants and ends of pipe. Provide
hydrants per Tukwila Standard Plan. Permit fee - $25.00.
The note at the southwest corner of the plan view on the approved plan sheet
which states:
"Install 10" x 10" - 90 degree elbow with 1.0 C.Y. concrete thrust block"
shall be changed to the following note:
"Provide 10" x 10" x 10" tee and block with division in block ".
Storm Drainage - The main line storm lines in 44th Place South j ;•
5. 134th•Street shall be concrete, including side drains in the paved section.
All mainlines shall have 21 feet minimum cover and be layed at a minimum 0.5% grade.
Side drains from the building site may be either concrete or corregated metal pipe.
If the side drains are corregated steel, they shall be minimum 16 gauge galvanized
and coated inside and out. All catch basins, manholes and inlet structures in the
roadways shall be per the City's.Standard Plans. Permit fee - $25.00.
The oil water separator shall be per King County Hydraulics Standard
Plan (Figure #1 attached).
Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk - Privide sidewalks per City's Sidewalk Ordinance
#1158 and the Public Works Department Standard Plan. .Curb/gutters shall also be
provided per the City's Standard Plan. All driveways shall have aprons per the •
City's Standard Plan. Permit fee - $25.00.
Landscape Irrigation - This plan shall be reviewed per future plan submittal.
Provide four (4) sets of water irrigation plans for Public Works review and
approval prior to issuance of irrigation permit. Permit fee - $25.00.
PRF /jm
cc: Al Pieper, Building Official
Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director
Tukwila Maintenance Shops
Tukwila Finance Department
Attachments (5)
Sincerely,
Phillip R. Fraser
Senior Engineer
INLET
PIPE
MIN.
SLOPE
• Sa o
J
o F F SET FRAME GRATE SO THAT
F- STRICTOR /POLLUTION DEVICE IS
VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND
DIRECTLY OVER THE LADDER
STD. GALV. CB
LADDER STEPS
• _; . ;i
WATERTIGHT CLAN—
OUT GATE WITH MIN .
8" GAUGE SLIDE
•
•
1
' •7.
• INVERT ELEVATION -- '
RESTRICTOR PLATE
APPROPRIATELY . - z^
SIZED ORIFICE CUT
IN PLATE. NOT . ,
REQUIRED IF SYSTEM
I S FOR POLLUT my/ � : " f -- . . 1 ^ j ^N r
CONTROL ONLY
TYPE II CATCH BASIN
OR LARGER IF REQUIRED
FLOW RESTRICTOR /OIL POLLUTION
Figure 1
GRATE ELEVATION
,• •
d
A
CONTROL DEVICE /CATCH BASIN
0.5' iMMIN .
CHAIN — 200T C. =PACI T:
SLACK WHEN GATE IS 1::
WELD CHAIN TO C3 : RA
OVERFLOW ELEVATION
SET TO PROVIDE R EQU:
DETENTION AND ADEQU
OIL SEPARATION PRO—
. TECTION
OVERFLOW PIPE & OUTLET PIPE
s i MUST HAVE CAPACITY EQUAL TO
GREATER THAN COMBI.
INLET SYSTEM
2' MIN .
MIN.
OUTLET PIPE
MINIMUM SLOPE -
NOTE — ALL METAL PARTS AN
SURFACES•MUST SE MADE OF
CORROSION RESISTANT MATER
OR GALVANIZED. COMPLETE
CORROSION PROTECTION MUST
ASSURED'.
8007280474
DEVELOPER' S AGREEMENT✓ '
The City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation in the State of
Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Litho Development and
Research (a /k /a J & R Investors) and Normed, Inc. hereinafter referred
to as. "DEVELOPERS" agree as follows:
WHEREAS, Developers are the owners of the following described
• properties:
1. Litho Development 8 Research -- Lots 6 through 10 inclusive
in Block 4 of . Fostoria Garden
• Tracts Subdivision Blocks 1 -5
in King County
2. Normed, Inc. -- Block 3 in entirety of Fostoria
Garden Tracts Subdivision Blocks
1 -5 in King County
locat:d in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, and
WHEREAS, Developers have petitioned the City for the vacation of
the following described portion of right -of -way:
ti A forty ( 40) foot wide street identified as 44th Place South,
vi lying between Blocks 3 and 4 in the plat of Riverton, replat
O of Lots 1 to 5, Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded
ti in Volume 13 of plats on page 40, records of King County,
formerly identified as Ruth Street, except any portions
CD
thereof taken by primary State Highway No. 1, Foster Inter -
act change to South 118th Street
located in the City of Tukwila, and
WHEREAS, the City desires said right -of -way to be constructed
and improved in accordance with certain conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Developers agree to maintain the full 40' wide vacated
right -of -way and to construct improvements within the full
width thereof. The Developers agree also to prevent any
encroachment upon said right -of -way.
2. Developers agree' to construct, at their sole expense, im-
provements to. said 40' wide right -of -way consisting of a
road, free of any obstructions, on the southerly 30' there-
of adjoined by a 5' wide landscaped area on the north edge
of said roadway. The said landscaped area shall be adjoined
on its north edge by a 5' wide sidewalk.
3. If said improvements, as described in paragraph 2 above,
do not meet minimum construction standards for the City
of Tukwila, the City may refuse to accept any dedication
of said right-of-way. •
4. This Developer's agreement shall be recorded and shall be
binding upon the heirs, assigns, grantees and successors .
to this agreement.
DATED THIS 8 DAY OF I q y
LITHO OPME ► & : ES ' CH
BY
TITLE
1.980
. ATTEST:
•
A PROVED AS TO FORM:
• f.,.
'1ty Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON
SS.
COUNTY OF KING
NORMED, INC.
• BY ti 1I D� fO
t C C
TITLE /,'c E'_ P/7 ,C�M,�
L
APPROVED AS TO ADEQUACY:
airman, "u. i / -or
cA —Sq
otary •u• is in an or e tate
of- Was.hk+gton-, residing at Por-
Oret
I.
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at e - .,
•
•
•
•
‘:r Or
OF Or )
COUNTY OF- YIncw�l�) SS.
CD
N On this day personally appeared before me S oy. tie..11 .. to `:I
0 me known .to be the Vice 6l r es i d e rare , respectively of LITHO . DEVELOP-
0 MENT AND RESEARCH, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,
cp and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed
of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein' mentioned, and on
oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument..
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS fh = DAY OF nava,/ , 1980.
X p
• On this day personally appeared before me 1.& erca. M .Skoma to
me known to be the V ice< - ryes , respectively of NORMED; INC.,
the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that..he were
authorized to execute said instrument.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS 12. DAY OF � �' " - , .198d::,
•
•
S;
lS
Q
Ir—
I 1
1/45
r =/
n °
%%
`y / /�•
\
\
• <? � ,
I
/ ,'SOUTH L /NE OF IC. C. LEVY /5
NOR H LINE ... fl same,/ iosr
1
,
/ ?:
S. ti
• / ` / a..
O/\ 0
1'1, i
. t.l.i•;.: x•..,..;.11..11. -
1h /
• • ; i ° '•
a)
City of Tukwil
Fire Department
AL PIEPER
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF TUKWILA
RE: L.D.R. PROPOSAL
DEAR AL:
Edgar D. Bauch
Mayor
Hubert H. Crawley
Fire Chief
L I L.
APR 3' i98i'
3. HOSE STATIONS ARE REQUIRED PER CITY ORDINANCE *730.
5. FIRE HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED AS DETAILED IN CITY
ORDINANCE 4729. (ONE ADDITIONAL HYDRANT REQUIRED)
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
MARCH 18, 1980
r
IN REVIEWING THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROJECT FLANS, PLEASE NOTE
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
1. PER UFC SECTION 10.1Q4 (B), ALL DOORS IN OR LEADING
TO EXITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED.OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE
WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT
AT ALL TIMES WHEN THE BUILDING OR AREA SERVED THEREBY IS
OCCUPIED ".
:2. PER UFC SECTION 10..113. AT EVERY REQUIRED EXIT
DOORWAY, AND WHEREVER . OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY
INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS, AN EXIT SIGN WITH LETTERS
AT LEAST SIX INCHES HIGH AND READILY DISTINGUISHABLE SHALL
BE MAINTAINED.
ALL SPRINKLER DRAWINGS SHALL BE F'REF'ARED BY COMPANIES
LICENSED TO PERFORM THIS TYPE OF WORK. DRAWINGS SHALL
FIRST BE APPROVED BY THE WASHINGTON SURVEY $ RATING BUREAU,
THEN BY THE TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT. NO WORK SHALL
COMMENCE WITHOUT APPROVED DRAWINGS.
4. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER NFF'A 410, AS
A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
City. of Tukwila
ire Department
PAGE 2
6. A ROOF ACCESS HATCH AND LADDER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
INSIDE THE BUILDING.
7. PROTECTIVE GUARD POST OR CURBS ARE REQUIRED AROUND ALL
GAS METERS. ELECTRICAL VAULTS, SPRINKLER VALVES AND
HYDRANTS.
8. FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE ROOMS SHALL CONFORM STRICTLY
TO SEC. 15.404 OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE..
9. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS 'RACK SPRINKLERS',
INCREASED SMOKE— VENTING, ONE —HOUR WALLS, ADDITIONAL
EXTINGUISHERS, ETC. MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING UPON THE
EXACT•USAGE AND CONTENTS. THESE FEATURES WERE
UNDETERMINABLE FROM THE INFORMATION PROVIDED.
PLEASE INCLUDE THESE COMMENTS IN YOUR REVIEW OF THE ABOVE
MENTIONED PROJECT.
CC :TFD PILE
Edgar D. Bauch
Mayor
Hubert H. Crawley
Fire Chief
YCURS VERY TRULY,
YOUR TUKWILA FIRE DEP AR T iiE
Page 6
MC /j as
4) LANDSCAPING STANDARDS DEPICTED ON EXHBIT "D" (LDR) SHALL ESTABLISH
THE BASIC THEME FOR BOTH SITES. MODIFICATIONS TO EXHIBIT "D" SHALL
BE AS FOLLOWS:
A. MINIMUM INITIAL PLANTING HEIGHT OF PSEUDOTSUGA MENSIEMSII
ADJACENT TO FREEWAY SHALL BE 10 FEET AT 20' -25' ON CENTER.
B. PLANTINGS INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5' WIDE STRIP SPECIFIED IN
STIPULATION 2 ABOVE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
C. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF
APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PROJECT OCCUPANCY PERMITS.
MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION.
Chair Kirsop clarified the intent of the motion to allow further resolution
of the LDR design concept to staff without necessity of returning to the
B.A.R.
After discussion among the Commission, it was agreed that a meeting for
purposes of disposing of current planning cases would be held on 16 October
1980. The regular meeting of 23 October 1980 will be devoted to a public
hearing on the proposed zoning code, map and environmental documents.
The regular meeting of 25 September 1980 adjourned at 11:26 P.M. until
16 October 1980.
Prepap by:
lark Caughey
Acting Planning Director
TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
Eileen Avery
Secretary
Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect
919 124th Ave. N.E. #101
Bellevue, WA 98005
Attn: Ric Anderson
MC/bik
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Frank Todd, Mayor
Subject: "LDR" - Trash Enclosure
16 January 1981
Our office has examined the proposed trash enclosure solution depicted in yan
transmittal of 7 January 1981, and finds it acceptable. Thank you for.consult-
ing us on this matter.
Tukwili anning Dept.
rk Caughey
sociate Planner
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, RE(J..AR MEETING
December 15, 1980
Page 2
PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS - Cont.
Foster Golf Mr. Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director, reported that the Public
Course Foot Works Department is capable of designing the plans for the rehab -
Bridge ilitation of the Golf Course Foot Bridge. This project would
require staff to work overtime if the bridge is to be operational
by the end of March, 1981. If the bridge opening can be delayed,
overtime could almost be eliminated.
Appeal of B.A.R.
Decision: Sconzo
Associates
Mayor Todd offered that this item should be forwarded to the next
work meeting of the Council and that all the information should be
furnished to them so they can determine what they want to do with
the bridge. The question is whether it should be repaired or replaced.
Councilman Phelps suggested the Public Works Committee discuss it
at their next meeting prior to the Committee of the Whole Meeting.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THIS ITEM BE PLACED IN
THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE.*
Councilman Bohrer asked if the rehabilitation work being proposed
is adaptable to a new structure at a later date. Mr. Uomoto said
no, the proposed work should last five years. Councilman Bohrer
asked if staff could do the new bridge design. Mr. Uomoto said
they have a consultant check on their design. Councilman Bohrer
asked if it was possible and /or efficient to design the cable anchors
to work with the current restoration and, at a later time, use them
with a new bridge. Mr. Uomoto said, no. Councilman Bohrer clarified
that the choice is repair the existing bridge or build a new one
and that there is little can be done to salvage any expenditure in
preparing this one to be used later. Mr. Uomoto agreed.
*MOTION CARRIED.
*MOTION FAILED.
Mr. Chris Anderson, 1102 East Republic, Seattle, said the appeal
is against the Planning Commission decision, sitting as the Board
of Architectural Review, to require a 5 foot wide planter strip
on the south end of the vacated 44th Place South.
In lieu of this, they are proposing that the 5 foot setback deter-
mination of the B.A.R. be upheld. If the City elects to allow a
25 foot right -of -way, we request the building edge remain at the
same point and that a 10 foot landscaping area along the building
be required.
MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY PHELPS, THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE ALTERNATE
WHICH PROVIDES FOR A 25 FOOT TRAVEL LANE.*
Councilman Bohrer noted that the original street that was vacated
was a 40 foot right -of -way and did not, then, meet the street re-
quirements. This will reduce the paved area even more and could
set a precedent for that area by allowing substandard streets.
Larry Shaw, Normed, Inc. explained that reducing the paved section
does not benefit them. It only benefits L.D.R. It allows L.D.R.
to build on the edge of the street. He said the footings for his
building are poured with a five foot setback as required by the
City. They have worked hard to cooperate with the City.
Councilman Harris noted that what Council is doing is giving L.D.R.
the five feet and allowing them to build right on the street edge.
MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT COUNCIL UPHOLD THE B.A.R.
DECISION. MOTION CARRIED.
December 15; 1980
7:00 P:M.
FLAG SALUTE AND
CALL TO ORDER F'
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS
OFFICIALS IN
ATTENDANCE
MINUTE APPROVAL
VOUCHER APPROVAL
CITIZEN'S COMMENTS
Appreciation Award:
Ralph Trepanier
8:05 P.M.
Appreciation to
John McFarland
\.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Todd, presiding, led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
Regular Meeting of the Tukwila City Council to order.
LIONEL C. BOHRER, MABEL J. HARRIS, GEORGE D: HILL, DORIS E. PHELPS,
DANIEL J. SAUL, Council President.
MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS
BE EXCUSED FROM THE MEETING. MOTION 1 CARRIED.
CARL CARLSON, Deputy City Attorneys SHIRLEY KRISTOFFERSON, Acting
Finance Director; JOHN MCFARLAND, /Administrative Assistant; TED
�. ` UOMOTO, Public Works Director; MAXINE ANDERSON, City Clerk.
S %
MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEtING OF DECEMBER 1, 1980,,,6E APPROVED AS PUBLISHED. MOTION
CARRIED.
MOVED Y PHELPS, SECONDED/BY HARRIS, THAT THE VOUCHERS, APPROVED
BY THE NANCE COMMITTEE4'BE ACCEPTED AND WARRANTS BE DRAWN IN
THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS'. MOTION CARRIED.
"laims Fund/Vouchers #8563 - #8566
Current F4d
Street Fund\
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Claa'ms F
Current Rind
Street Find
Arteri '1 Street
Water fund
Sewer Fund
Firemen's Pension
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
LI 30: 010/8695 8,730.0
C11/8696 25.41
PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS
Final Acceptance:
57th So. St.
Improvement Proj.
8563 $ 7,740.58
8564 434.15
8565 274.24
8566 252.38
$ 8,701.35
Vouhcers #8567 - #8697
8567 - 8647 &8697
8648 -8665
8666
8667 -8678
8679-8691
8692 -8694
Revenue 3
$ 44,995.17
40,880.33
135.60
1,573.38
15,450.02
209.19
$103,243.69
8,755.41
Tukwila City Hall
Council Chambers
Ma'or Todd recognized the Appreciation Award for Distinguished
SOrvice presented to Ralph Trepanier as an expression of ap-
reciation for meritorious effort and for diligent and competent
ervice in keeping the roads and stree of Tukwila in the best
usable condition. The award was presen -d to him at the annual
Road and Street Maintenance School.
Councilman Johanson arrived at the meeting.
Councilman Bohrer noted that at the last meet g, John McFarland,
Administrative Assistant, announced that he wa leaving the City.
Mr. McFarland has been an excellent city employe- and has done a
lot for the City. Councilman Bohrer expressed hi thanks, not
only as a Councilman, but also as a resident of th City. Council
all agreed. Mayor Todd wished him the best of luck
Memorandum from Wes Jorgenson, Public Works Department, stated that
the 57th Ave. South and South 147th Street Improvement Project has
been completed in accordance with the plans, specifications and
change orders. The final construction cost was $212,329.75. He
recommended the Street Improvement Project be accepted.
MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 57TH
AVENUE SOUTH & SOUTH 147TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. MOTION
CARRIED.
Nohwest Medical Supp
P.O. Box 3644 Phone 622 -0444
Seattle, WA 98124 Area Code 206
December 11, 1980
Mr. Daniel Saul, President
Tukwila City Council
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Dear Mr. Saul and Council Members:
Before you vote on the LDR /Sconzo appeal of the decision
of the Board of Architecture, we would appreciate your
careful consideration of the points I attempted to make
Monday night at the Council's Committee of the Whole
Meeting.
1. Normed, Inc. has relied in good faith on the repeated
assurances of the Office of Community Development
(Planning Department), Building Department and lately
the determination of the Board of Architectural Review.
These assurances and determinations have explicitly
been that the City would require a minimum five foot
setback from the previous 40 foot street edge
regardless of whether the street was vacated.
2. Our entire project has been designed in cooperation
with the Planning Department. Had we been informed
that a 60% coverage concrete jungle project would be
allowed next door we would have developed a similar
non - aesthetic project. In essence, if the B.A.R. is
reversed, our cooperation will result in us being
penalized. Such a reversal will only go to prove
the notion that those who defy government and scorn
their neighbor can win through intimidation.
3. The Office of Community Development (Planning Dept)
has specifically informed us that at no time has LDR
or Sconzo been lead to believe that they can build
up to the edge of the previous right of way. In
fact they initially (in 1978) designed their building
without input from the City and long before we
approached them to vacate the street.
Tukwila City Council
December 11, 1980
Page two
We therefore earnestly request that the five foot setback
determination of the B.A.R. be upheld. Furthermore, if the
City elects to allow a 25 foot right of way we request the
building edge remain at the same point and that a 10 foot
landscaping area along the building be required.
Please note that this setback requirement will only reduce
the coverage of the LDR project slightly and that they will
still have a very heavily covered site exceeding 50 %.
Also please note that our request will enhance the value
of both of our projects and will make this area a better
place to work.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lawrence M. S
NORMED, INC.
LMS /av
cc: Council Members
Mark Caughey
Al Pieper
iDecember 8,1980 - --
Page .5
DISCUSSION - Contd.
-McAllister Condo
Proj :- Dev. _ .._
58 condos "in
ranging from 2 to -16
units each - contd.
. ..r ....Vr.. ....Y. ...Y
C
Council President Saul stated perhaps one reason they have'planned
oily - 58 - units is because it is so expensive to bu . id'and another
reason is probably the steepness of the hill.
-Mr. Loveland said the cost of excavating the property might be in
excess -of„ $450,000, they have: not received a bid on it.
Councilman Phelps,,a (e&.j f there is a project they have built that
w,�
the Council,,might look at.'°•�Mr „,. Loveland said he would provide that
information "to the Planning Department.
=.. tCouncilman Bohrer asked if they would consider'building on pilings
rather than excavating. Mr. Loveland said they would,
get into the site that would be a consideration.
Sconzo Associates, Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director, said in December 1979 repre-
Appeal of BAR decision. sentatives of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned the City Council to
vacate 44th Place South (former public street, dividing the adjacent
sites of the two industrial concerns). The petitioners, in requesting
the street vacation, asserted that private use of 44th Place as a
joint driveway serving the two sites would reduce the number of
individual curb breaks opening on South 134th Street and would
facilitate a coordinated approach to design and development of the
two sites.
The two projects were reviewed jointly by the Planning Commission,
sitting as the Board of Architectural Review; in September 1980.
As a means of reinforcing the concept of a coordinated appearance
to two projects, LDR was required to provide a 5' wide planter strip
on their common boundary with the non - vacated 44th Place South.
To provide this planter setback will•require reducing the width
of the planned LDR building by 5' as no side yard setback on either
the north or south edge of the building is proposed. The applicants
are appealing the BAR's decision to the Council in hopes that the
side yard requirement will be overturned.
Mr. Caughey said before vacating 44th Place South, the Public Works
Committee negotiated a Developer's Agreement with both LDR and
Normed, the property to the north, the terms of which governed use of
the vacated 40' right -of -way. Provision 2 required a 5' sidewalk
and a 5' wide landscape berm on the north edge of the vacated area
adjacent to Normed. During the review the BAR determined that
visual coordination of the two adjoining sites could be enhanced
by providing a 5' wide planter area on both sides of the driveway,
serving the two sites.
The LDR building was designed in 1978 and included parking and
other private land uses within 44th Place South. They contend that
further modifications'of their design concept, beyond what has alread
been done to comply with terms of the street vacation developer's
agreement, is an unwarranted hardship.
Mr. Caughey said it is the staff recommendation to uphold the BAR
decision and require a 5' wide planter area setback on the north
edge of the LDR site adjoining 44th Place South. The M -1 zone in
which this property is located, does not require any side yard setbac
They believe that the Board has acted in the public interest in
requiring a 5' side setback in order to preserve the coordinated
development concept, establish development standards for the area,
and to be consistent with the new zoning ordinance.
Chris Anderson, Sconzo Associates, said their engineering and
architectural plans were issued in 1978. In May they were asked
for additional landscaping and setback beyond that required in
Resolution 729. He said he and Mr. Aden expressed their concerns
about the landscaping. He said they feel that the additional land-
scaping along the side would mean they would have to redesign the
building. This would be a hardship. Resolution 729 asked for land-
scaping and sidewalk on the north side after vacation of the street.
Access to the building was by the vacation of the street.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
December 8, 1980 ( 'I)
Page. 6 •
DISCUSSION - Contd.
Sconzo Associates, Councilman Van Dusen said he recalled sidewalks and landscaping
Appeal of BAR decision would have been required but some particular reason was given
- contd. and we agreed to it as long as there was a sidewalk and land-
scaping on the other side.
Mr. Anderson said the landscaping and sidewalks were discussed
and the type of foot traffic there would be on the site. At the
time the people from Normed had 10' landscaping strip and turned
it into a 5' sidewalk that would be sufficient. He said their
building had been done based on that decision.
Larry Shaw, Normed, said they originally contacted the City in
1979 and felt they had a good project and could work with the City
and Planning Department if they agreed to certain setbacks.
He said he thought the important point was that when the building
was designed by LDR the street was not vacated. At that time
it was his understanding that the setback was required. The
building was developed and planned in 1978 and at that time the
street was ' a City street. The reason they would like to see the
landscaping is that the street was vacated and they have to go
down the road to their building and they would be looking at the
bleak walls of the building. This was discussed with the Planning
Commission and they agreed there should be some kind of landscapinc
We will have a concrete wall looking at us. There could be
safety problems also. We have agreed to move the building back
to have landscaping. They would like to have it also on the
other side of the street. The City codes require setbacks. It
was Normed who requested the street vacation. A 5' setback would
not destroy their project. He said they could not get a site
plan from Sconzo..
Mr. Anderson said the site plans were available and were
developed before Mr. Shaw bought the property.
Councilman Bohrer said the street was a public street in 1978 and
if there was not a 5' setback it was not according to code.
MOVED BY BOHRER, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE SCONZO ASSOCIATES
APPEAL OF BAR DECISION BE ON THE AGENDA OF THE DECEMBER 15, 1980
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. *
Councilman Harris asked if both of these buildings are in the
formative state? Mr. Anderson said neither have been built yet.
He said they have agreed to modify the offices and put on a lot
of wood to make the building more attractive. They have no
intention of putting up an unsightly building. It is difficult to
camouflage a warehouse.
Mark Caughey, Planning Department, said the developers have
agreed on most aspects, LDR has agreed to change the surface
of the building, they are trying to cooperate. We are down
to the landscaping. The Council is the appeal authority for
the BAR.
Council President Saul said the Council would like to know the
effect of reducing the 5' setback from the street.
Mark Caughey, Planning Department, said he would have a building
report from the Fire Department for the next meeting.
*MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY VAN DUSEN, THAT THE COh„J,Il`EE OF THE
8:30- 8:38 3 WHOLE MEETING RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION - CARRIED.
The Committee of the Whoje,Meging was called back to order by
Council President,Saunwith Council Members present as
previously
Foster Golf Course -- -'Ted Uomoto, Director of Pubile-Works, stated on Novemt 28, 1980
Foot Bridge=MReport. the golf course manager observed this4 osening of one of the
suspension cables, which caused the saggfngof the suspended
aka
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM :, Sconzo Assoc. - Appeal of R.A.R. nectsinn
At last week's Committee -of- the -Whole Meeting, we explained that the Board of
Architectural Review required the L.D.R. design team to provide a 5' wide planter
strip on the common boundary with the non - vacated 44th P1. South right -of -way.
Per the Developer's Agreement which effected the street vacation petition, the
following use is to be made of the right -of -way corridor:
91.644r.t"► 31DE
w,t,{G
4aI Wv4
rotu4R 44SI�
30 "1/AT
During last week's discussion, an alternative useage concept was suggested which
would provide a 5' wide planter area on the south edge of the R/W corridor by reduc-
ing the travel -way pavement width from 30' to 25'. Therefore, the right -of -way
would be configured as follows:
R/ w R1 w
LOCZ
This:alternative, provided a 25' wide travel -lane, is acceptable to the Public Works
and Fire Dept. Staff.
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM LDR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING /NORMED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
INTRODUCTION
In December, 1979, representatives
of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned
the City Council to vacate 44th
Pl. So. which is a (former) pub-
lic street, dividing the adja-
cent sites of the two industrial
concerns. The petitioners, in
arguing successfully for the
street vacation request, asserted
that private use of 44th P1. as
a joint driveway serving the two
sites would reduce the number of
individual curb - breaks opening on
South 134th St., and would facili-
tate a coordinated approach to
design and development of the two
sites. Accordingly, this report
will discuss and compare the site
layout and architectural approach
used in the two adjoining develop-
ments from the standpoint of com-
p1ementarity.
7 n
WL : •
� \\
;,;
M -I \
t
se ■
:: /
i i II IS
t / M —I //
- \\_ \ :,......‘ H.--___ \ ; \
a
1 I !-- ail ta<
--11-- p I ...1 C
' a T
SITE LAYOUT
1. Proposed "Normed" Site (3.46± acres) - This project consists of two free-
standing office /warehouse buildings covering 42% of the site. Under terms of
the agreement vacating 44th P1. So., a 5' sidewalk and 5' wide planter strip
must be provided on the west side of the driveway, as depicted on Exhibit "E ".
Note that frontage landscaping improvements will be provided within the
public right -of -way on South 134th St. This approach has been found ac-
ceptable to the Public Works Department.
Staff is satisfied with the Normed site layout as presented, with exception
of the 5' wide planter strip adjoining the freeway ramp. We suggest that a
minimum of 10' wide planter area, as provided on the LDR site, is necessary
for adequate visual screening of the site from public view of the adjoining
highway.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1980
Page 2
LDR & NORMED INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
2. Proposed "LDR" Site (1.01± acres) - This project is a freestanding industrial
warehouse with loading dock and office /showroom. Like the Normed project,
a frontage landscape area of similar width is provided within the So. 134th
St. right -of -way. Note also that a 10' wide rear planter strip is provided
adjacent to the freeway ramp to enhance visual screening value.
Staff's principal concern is the lack of side yards proposed for the LDR
project. The Tukwila Police and Fire Departments both wish to be able to
drive a vehicle along the east side of the building, and suggest that a 20'
lane (split 10' on LDR's side, and 10' on the adjoining site's side of their
mutual property boundary) is in order. While this objective is a worthy one
from a public safety standpoint, the Planning Division believes that a minimum
5' wide planter area on the west side of the building is a more desire -
able trade -off and would have less of an impact on the interior space utility
of the building.
3. Trash Enclosures - We note that neither site has provided outdoor space
for trash dumpster enclosures. Unfortunately, tenants who place these
units inside their building are not always careful to return them inside
promptly after collection. We suggest, therefore, that a single outdoor
enclosure be at the north side of the LDR Building, and that
individual enclosures be provided for each tenant on the Normed site.
ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
In comparing the exterior materials proposal for both developments, it seems
that there are sufficient similarities in scale and texture to support the
concept of visual complementarity. We suggest the following minor changes
in the LDR building concept, however, to enhance the visual identity of the
two projects as a joint development:
1. Substitution of a metal or glassweld color fascia band on the warehouse
portion in place of rake - finish concrete texture. The result will be to
add a slight overhang to the top of the building wall, creating -.a slight
shadow line and reducing apparent visual height.
2. Substitution of sandblasted concrete texture in place of "smooth finish"
exterior walls on the warehouse portion of the building.
LANDSCAPING
Exhibit "D" of the LDR set contains a specific landscape plan for the site.
We find the plan adequate and suggest that the plant materials selected and
initial sizes specified be established as the standard for the Normed, site
as well, with exception of the following:
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1980
Page 3
LDR & NORMED INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
1. Rear Property Line - Minimum 4' high Douglas Fir specimens at 30' o.c.
are inadequate to achieve significant screening value in a timely fashion.
We suggest that a minimum 10' height at 20' -25' centers be established as
the standard for the rear perimeter landscaping concept of both
sites
2. West Elevation Landscape Area - As mentioned previously, we suggest that
a 5' wide planter area be required between the west wall of the LDR
building and the pavement edge of (former) 44th P1. So.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of site architecture and landscaping concept for
the Normed and LDR industrial buildings, according to exhibits A, B, C & D
of the LDR application and Exhibits E, F, & G of the Normed application sub-
ject to conditions as follows:
1. Modification of Exhibit "E" (Normed) to include a 10' wide planting strip
on that portion of the site immediately adjoining the freeway exit.
2. Modification of Exhibit "A" (LDR) to reflect addition of a 5' wide planter
strip between the west wall of the LDR building and the east edge of pave-
ment of former 44th P1. So.
Provision of outdoor trash enclosures for each tenant space within the
Normed project and one such enclosure to serve the single tenant LDR
building. Trash enclosures shall be gated, and design thereof shall be
approved by staff prior to release of building permits.
4. Modification of Exhibits "B" & "C" (LDR) to reflect the the following
changes:
A. Substitution of metal or glassweld color fascia band in place of rake -
finish concrete texture.
B. Substitution of sandblasted concrete texture in place of "Smooth
Finish" exterior walls on the warehouse portion of the building.
5. Landscaping standards depicted on Exhibit "D" (LDR) shall establish the basic
theme for both sites. Modifications to Exhibit "D" shall be as follows:
A. Minimum initial planting height of pseudotsuga mensiemsii adjacent
to freeway shall be 10 feet at 20' -25' on center.
B. Plantings installed within the 5' wide strip specified in Stipulation
2 above shall be subject to staff approval.
C. Automatic irrigation system details shall be subject to staff ap-
proval prior to issuance of project occupancy permits.
I
INTRODUCTION
In December, 1979, representatives
of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned
the City Council to vacate 44th
P1. So. which is a former pub-
lic street, dividing the adja-
cent sites of the two industrial
concerns (see exhibit "A ") The
petitioners, in arguing success-
fully for the street vacation
request, asserted that private
use of 44th P1. as a joint drive-
way serving the two sites would
reduce the number of individual
curb - breaks opening on South
134th St., and would facilitate
a coordinated approach to design
and development of the two sites.
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM • Sconzo Assoc. - Appeal of B.A.R. Decision
The two projects were reviewed jointly by the Planning Commission, sitting as the
Board of Architectural Review, on 25 September 1980. As a means of reinforcing the
concept of a coordinated appearance to the two projects, LDR was required to provide
a 5' .wide planter strip on their common boundary with the non - vacated 44th Place So.
To provide this planter setback will require reducing the width of the planned LDR
building by 5', as no side yard setback on either the north or south edge of the
building is proposed. Therefore, the applicants are appealling the B.A.R.'s
decision to your council in hope that the side yard requirement will be overturned.
DISCUSSION
Before vacating 44th Place So., the Public Works Sub - Committee negotiated a Developer's
Agreement with. both LDR and Normed, the property to the north, the terms of which govern-
ed use of the vacated 40' right -of -way. Provision 2 thereof required a 5' sidewalk
and a 5' wide landscape berm on the north edge of the vacated area adjacent to Normed.
During its review, the B.A.R. determined that visual coordination of the two adjoining
sites could be enhanced by providing a 5' wide planter area on both sides of the Drive-
way (i.e. former 44th P1. So.) serving the two sites.
Page 2
The LDR building was designed in 1978, and included parking and other private land
uses within 44th Place So. They contend, therefore, that further modification of
their design concept, beyond what has already been done to comply with terms of the
street vacation developer's agreement, is an unwarranted hardship.
RECOMMENDATION
We urge the Council to uphold the B.A.R.'s decision and require a 5' wide planter
area setback on the north edge of the LDR site adjoining 44th Place So. Strictly
speaking, the "M -1" zone, in which this property is located, does not require any
side -yard setback. However, we believe that the Board has acted in the Public
interest in requiring a 5' side setback for the following reasons:
Preservation of the coordinated development concept. We believe that the
record of proceedings under which 44th Place So. was vacated indicate'that
a key intent behind the Council's favorable decision to sell this street
right -of -way (at 1/2 its assessed value) was that the two developers would work .
together to coordinate access to, and visual character of, their two projects.
By requiring LDR to provide five feet of planting on its side of the common
drive, a unified landscape theme for the principal public entry -path to the
sites is assured.
Establishment of development standards for the area. The LDR /Normed complex
is the first industrial development to be proposed in the general area of•
vacant land situated between S.R. 181 42nd Ave S. and S..133rd Street. All
of these vacant parcels are zoned M -1; thus, the setback standard established
by the Board in the course of reviewing these early projects will set a prec-
edent for other projects which will follow in the area.
Consistency with the new zoning ordinance. The proposed zoning ordinance
text, which is coming -up for your review very soon, requires a 5' wide side yard .
setback in M -1 zoning districts.
Alai*
Ave sole
140•
essm ..41/4 I. 4.. 14
_immoNa
NVIel .AsIV2cs•CIN171
•
>•22142
.24 t4 moo
-6•6.41. gra:r•24 4•1•4•01•0
11•110101:161•1•611•11111 AM, fa..m6r011 et; 0, c ••
• 0.111 *outlaw. W "mama' S
•aave at. .6 Kt cAe 1w imnri
assri
O 111314!A• AM 4 Ma& 4..4 4•6.11,44 ▪ ••. 144 40
1I•Al 4 Na • ALAN ■444
in :pi ••• .1.4. 6 4616...g.g.1 •In• ARA
- 4441••■.• 441 1•1114•1106411 - ▪ 4••••41••11
c.3.LON ^r4213 ria h
c.Nnic.ing 4.1
. . -
0 V
. . . •
.. c leCrg r :-"M 11.9 " 1.47:11- --
Atom AAA
IsAssam.
AtIF44111X1144
•
•
•
•
•
rr!":11.
. 0 1:
4 •
. .
•
'V t.
3 • 7
4
• • • . . • , • •
elee.
s•r• s
- 34 — FGirlUICIF
,
- *MA.
L. •
—4
1.1.1c
tI N , 610t4 .
V
.
o 4
el..
..........
.'n"
eel
Pro
el
it
G
. 014 , 1
4444,..04
ca........•
...-pr
I
a?. ••••4 ••
"...1
.0. 061
NWT)
36 V a r,Orgii l 67• ...... • I
-
4-
/(401 4111111. 'Welt
11Pit 4111 e 1
) Atal eiti", ( 41
1214
t
.
t • ..- _ -, Oral; i
•
-.
t
I E .
" V
' a -
O •
WW1 • • -
4c•I •
Alai*
Ave sole
140•
essm ..41/4 I. 4.. 14
_immoNa
NVIel .AsIV2cs•CIN171
•
>•22142
.24 t4 moo
-6•6.41. gra:r•24 4•1•4•01•0
11•110101:161•1•611•11111 AM, fa..m6r011 et; 0, c ••
• 0.111 *outlaw. W "mama' S
•aave at. .6 Kt cAe 1w imnri
assri
O 111314!A• AM 4 Ma& 4..4 4•6.11,44 ▪ ••. 144 40
1I•Al 4 Na • ALAN ■444
in :pi ••• .1.4. 6 4616...g.g.1 •In• ARA
- 4441••■.• 441 1•1114•1106411 - ▪ 4••••41••11
c.3.LON ^r4213 ria h
c.Nnic.ing 4.1
. . -
0 V
. . . •
.. c leCrg r :-"M 11.9 " 1.47:11- --
Atom AAA
IsAssam.
AtIF44111X1144
•
•
•
•
•
rr!":11.
. 0 1:
4 •
. .
•
'V t.
3 • 7
4
• • • . . • , • •
elee.
s•r• s
- 34 — FGirlUICIF
,
- *MA.
L. •
—4
1.1.1c
tI N , 610t4 .
•
..........
.'n"
At+, bilrerse/Wa t..........
,V, .V VollOiN
ALPAgAel
1111.4• .
2 • 64-16"
IICAlliKIIIN A.......an.eraimil
G
01•••• r.11? •
•1...11
ca........•
...-pr
I
a?. ••••4 ••
"...1
.0. 061
NWT)
36 V a r,Orgii l 67• ...... • I
f•
cAll'Ailll
1214
a Pd an . Chrortara
4.411• iv7ir4vAng
two
_Wr.. 1 '1 1 N N7 ci .. .
Alai*
Ave sole
140•
essm ..41/4 I. 4.. 14
_immoNa
NVIel .AsIV2cs•CIN171
•
>•22142
.24 t4 moo
-6•6.41. gra:r•24 4•1•4•01•0
11•110101:161•1•611•11111 AM, fa..m6r011 et; 0, c ••
• 0.111 *outlaw. W "mama' S
•aave at. .6 Kt cAe 1w imnri
assri
O 111314!A• AM 4 Ma& 4..4 4•6.11,44 ▪ ••. 144 40
1I•Al 4 Na • ALAN ■444
in :pi ••• .1.4. 6 4616...g.g.1 •In• ARA
- 4441••■.• 441 1•1114•1106411 - ▪ 4••••41••11
c.3.LON ^r4213 ria h
c.Nnic.ing 4.1
. . -
0 V
. . . •
.. c leCrg r :-"M 11.9 " 1.47:11- --
Atom AAA
IsAssam.
AtIF44111X1144
•
•
•
•
•
rr!":11.
. 0 1:
4 •
. .
•
'V t.
3 • 7
4
• • • . . • , • •
elee.
s•r• s
- 34 — FGirlUICIF
,
- *MA.
L. •
—4
1.1.1c
tI N , 610t4 .
'new-1e6: PAtelax PAirdr 1,..V. 25% S•LA.)
bM•
VX)Pr: ibEt.11. 1.4com ivt0012--0 1-AATIoia
P? • te.
iboar• SPol: FiAce- cm v. Mooyi • 0- mAnc.. W.
Fb • to
FAMA : MC012 , 0•1-.4kric , .
SURFACES
NORTH ELEV.
-- '`1NORTH ELEV.
SOUTH ELEV.
SOUTH ELEV.
EAST ELEV.
EAST ELEV.
WEST ELEV.
WEST ELEV.
REVEAL
REVEAL
H.M. DOOR
DOOR TRIM
H.M. DOOR
DOOR TRIM
TRUCK DOOR
TRUCK DOOR
SOFFIT
FLASHING
FLASHING
DOWN SPOUT
TRIM
TRIM
11
TYPE
PANT
'I
1
PA i1- fxornel
T. 1.
COLOR
ec
rv!rstAF.AA
robstteu
rAt.t.
rAt4
V.(11.151-1E0-
"MINI
MANUFACTURER
COMPANY CODE
4Aoorb. Mort-o-tutirr-- IS
11
1 1
THOMAS A. SCONZO / ARCHITECT
SCONZO / ASSOCIATES
919 124th AVE. N.E.
BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005
(206) 455-3203
CUNIRACIOR:
It I I
Mco*,
•
Wtti•o-rnia
IDENTITY
NUMBER
Moon.0.1AATI4 611y.18
IL
6, • It-
• I G 1 • i
• t8
- lo
Sc..565Hau t222.01.14011.1. rnecO•6+ 6. 18
t.ev. 25,0 610- 154 Fs•23.
F4/8. mace). , yV
JUI3:
PUR.
0
Exterior
colors.
INST.
0
REMARKS •
5PtAc•Fg.s• cmv.
.5Pt4l% V-Aels • CfAU.
6Pvir V:-"AcE, c.441),
Airzo 1.0AP loatiektief (40.1t0
PMC-kilbcoe.
kV/• Fike4A- \ •
_ _
V DS. SAN-US AS esol
VW 0-10re LOGATe-P.
rrvi MIST 0 le 1.4Aw.
(:DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
(. )
The City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation in the State of
Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Litho Development and
Research (a /k /a J & R Investors) and Normed, Inc., hereinafter referred
to as "DEVELOPERS" agree as follows:
WHEREAS, Developers are the owners of the following described
properties:
1. Litho Development & Research -- Lots 6 through 10 inclusive
in Block 4 of Fostoria Garden
Tracts Subdivision Blocks 1 -5
in King County
2. Normed, Inc. -- Block 3 in entirety of Fostoria
Garden Tracts Subdivision Blocks
1 -5 in King County
located in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, and
WHEREAS, Developers have petitioned the City for the vacation of
the following described portion of right -of -way:
mr
A forty ( 40) foot wide street identified as 44th Place South,
O lying between Blocks 3 and 4 in the plat of Riverton, replat
31) of Lots 1 to 5, Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded
ti in Volume 13 of plats on page 40, records of King County,
C) formerly identified as Ruth Street, except any portions
thereof taken by primary State Highway No. 1, Foster Inter -
C change to South 118th Street
located in the City of Tukwila, and
WHEREAS, the City desires said right -of -way to be constructed
and improved in accordance with certain conditions.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Developers agree to maintain the full 40' wide vacated
right -of -way and to construct improvements within the full
width thereof. The Developers agree also to prevent any
encroachment upon said right -of -way.
2. Developers agree' to construct, at their sole expense, im-
provements to said 40' wide right -of -way consisting of a
road, free of any obstructions, on the southerly 30' there-
of adjoined by a 5' wide landscaped area on the north edge
of said roadway. The said landscaped area shall be adjoined
on its north edge by a 5' wide sidewalk.
3. If said improvements, as described in paragraph 2 above,
do not meet minimum construction standards for the City
of Tukwila, the City may refuse to accept any dedication
of said right-of-way. -
4. This Developer's agreement shall be recorded and shall be
binding upon the heirs, assigns, grantees and successors
to this agreement.
DATED THIS 8 DAY OF
LITHO ' u . OPME►T & ES RCH
BY
TITLE I)
, 1980
"46 7 ° 7 >'
es•
0
oCI
N-
CD
c0
ATTEST:
A PROVED AS TO FORM:
.,
ity ttorney
•
STATE OF 2TON )
COUNTY OF WAow1W
S S.
NORMED, INC.
BY Ut11D40.0
TITLE / jce 7
ACC •TED:
or, tyo u w a
APPROVED AS TO ADEQUACY:
a rman, •u . i /ror s
On this day personally ppeared before me Sov\ Re.ileM —to
me known to be the V i c.e , respectively of LITHO •DEVELOP-
MENT AND RESEARCH, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, .
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed
of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein' mentioned, and on
oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS Er DAY OF ila..vr , 1980.
0 -8 -8g/
otary •u c n an or e tate
of , residing at Ppr`t�ouna�
Ore ova
A/1naJ =;
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at
•
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS.
COUNTY OF KING )
• On this day personally appeared before me L„0.wceice. M.St ave to
me known to be the vice - Ces'duc , respectively of NORMED; INC.,
the corporation that executed d the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that -the were
authorized to execute said instrument. .f:r: .
• GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS 1:24 DAY OF , '198'::,,
THOMAS A. SCONZO
City of Tukwila
Planning Department
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
ATTN: Mark Caughey
Dear Mr. Caughey,
In response to your letter dated November
to appeal the September 25, 1980 decision
Review on this project.
cc: Frank Todd
Bob Iden
919 - 124th AVENUE N.E.
BELLEVUE, WA. 98005
206 455 -3203
Please inform us as to.when we may appear
of the Whole for this appeal.
Sin
November 21, 1980
omas A. Sconzo
Architect
NOV 2 4 1980
RE: LDR Building Proposal
Tukwila, WA
18, 1980, we hereby request
of the Board of Architectural
before the City Council Committee
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect
919 124th Ave N.E.
Bellevue, Wa 98005
Subject: LDR Building Proposal
MC /blk
18 November 1980
In response to your letter of 7 November 1980, you may appeal all or any
portion of the Board of Architectural Review's 25 September 1980 decision
on the LDR Project.
Please send a written request for appeal at your convenience; we shall
place your request on the first available agenda of the City Council
Committee of the Whole.
Tukwila Planning Dept.
Mark Caughey
Acting Director
THOMAS A. SCONZO / GG,
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
ATTN: Mark Caughey
919 - 124th AVENUE N.E.
BELLEVUE, WA. 98005
206 - 455 -3203
November 7, 1980
RE: LDR Warehouse
Tukwila WA '
Dear Mr. Caughey,
We are in receipt of your letter dated October 1, 1980 outlining
the Board of Architectural Review Action taken on this project.
We agree to make the changes as outlined in item three of your
letter. We also agree to provide the items requested per item
two. We, however, take issue with item one of the Review. We
believe that the landscaping required under this item is contra -
dictary with previous agreements between the City and the Owner.
Because we disagree with this item, we would appreciate to hear
from you regarding what alternatives we have. Is there an appeal
process available to us?
cc: The Henorable Frank Todd
Mr Bob Iden
Sinc
as A. S
Architect
v •
• MC:nb
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect
919 124th Ave. NE
Bellevue, WA 98005
ATTENTION: Kris Anderson
SUBJECT: Board of Architectural Review Action - LDR Building
At its 25 September 1980 meeting, the Tukwila Board of Architectural
Review elected not to approve the site and architectural concept for
the LDR project; however, the Board did provide guidance for redesign
of the project as follows:
1) Item "2" under Staff Report Recommendations
(Modification of Exhibit "A" (LDR) to reflect addition of
a 5' wide planter strip between the west wall of the LDR
building and the east edge of pavement of former 44th P1. So.)
2) Provision of outdoor trash enclosures for each tenant space
within the LDR project. Trash enclosures shall be gated,
and design thereof shall be approved by staff prior to
release of building permits.
3) Modification of Exhibits "B" and "C" (LDR) to reflect the .
following changes:
A. Substitution of metal or glassweld color fascia band
in place of rake - finish concrete texture.
B. Substitution of sandblased concrete or other texture in
place of "smooth finish" exterior walls on the warehouse
portion of the building, as approved by staff.
Please feel welcome to call upon us for assistance in resolving this
matter.
cc: Ralph Johnson
5104 NE Oregon St.
Portland, Ore. 97123
TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mark Caughey
Acting Director
1 October 1980
I
Relative to tree retention, they stated their willingness to attempt to
identify and retain significant existing trees on the site as long as
their efforts to refrain from damaging the northerly ravine are not
hindered thereby.
MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, WITH MR. ARVIDSON'S SECOND TO APPROVE THE SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FOR THE QESTAR OFFICE COMPLEX, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBITS
"A" AND "B" OF THE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
1) THE COLOR OF THE METAL ROOF FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING SHALL BE
DULL BROWN NON- REFLECTIVE FINISH, SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL.
2) THE WESTERLY DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT "A" SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
THE EASTERLY DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE IS APPROVED PROVISIONALLY AS SHOWN
ON EXHIBIT "A" AND MAY BE MODIFIED, RELOCATED OR DELETED BY THE
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, AS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE TRAFFIC_ SAFETY
IN THE PROJECT VICINITY.
3) A COMPREHENSIVE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR THE SITE SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE FOUNDATION INSPECTION
PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SAID PLANTING PLAN SHALL INCLUDE AN
INVENTORY OF ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SITE (4" TRUNK DIAMETER
OR GREATER) TO BE RETAINED OR REMOVED. STAFF SHALL BE ENPOWERED
TO REQUIRE MINOR MODIFICATION OF APPROVED EXHIBIT "A" IN ORDER
TO PROMOTE RETENTION OF SIGNIFICANT NATIVE CONFLICTS CONCERNING
INDIGENOUS VEGETATION PRESERVATION.
MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, WITH MR. ARVIDSON'S SECOND TO AMEND STIPULATION 3 OF THE
MAIN MOTION TO READ AS'FOLLOWS:
3) A COMPREHENSIVE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR THE SITE SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
FOR ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SAID PLANTING PLAN SHALL INCLUDE
AN INVENTORY OF ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SITE (4" TRUNK DIAMETER
OR GREATER) TO BE RETAINED OR REMOVED. STAFF SHALL BE ENPOWERED
TO REQUIRE MINOR MODIFICATION OF APPROVED EXHIBIT "A" IN ORDER TO
PROMOTE RETENTION OF SIGNIFICANT NATIVE TREES. THE B.A.R. SHALL
HAVE FINAL AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE STAFF /APPLICANT CONFLICTS CONCERNING
INDIGENOUS VEGETATION PRESERVATION.
AMENDMENT CARRIED 5 -0
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED 5 -0.
v / D) LDR, Inc. (Sconzo Assoc.) - Site, architecture and landscaping for
an industrial building on south 134th St.,adjacent to State Route 181.
E) Normed, Inc. (BSH Assoc.) - Site and architecture for an industrial
complex on South 134th St., adjacent to State Route 181.
Chairman Richard Kirsop read the staff report. Kris Anderson was present to
represent LDR; Herb Bittman and Larry Shaw were present on behalf of Normed.
Page 5
Mr. Anderson stated his concurrence with all suggested staff conditions
except Items 2 and 4. He then reviewed the sequence of steps which were
followed to bring the building to its current design configuration. Regar-
ding Stipulation 2, it is their position that the 5' side yard adjacent to
the west edge of the building could probably have been provided had the
city so requested earlier in the design process. Mr. Anderson stated that
an acceptable alternative to Stipulation 4 might be to require a common
fascia color scheme in lieu af'glassweld /metal panels. Discussion followed
relative to the intent and practicality of requiring the 5' side yard refer-
enced in Stipulation 2.
Mrs. Avery asked about adequacy of parking on the LDR site. Mr. Caughey
explained that the minimum number of spaces are provided, due to restrictions
imposed by City Council against any private use of the 44th P1. So. right -
of -way. Previously, additional parking had been provided within that corridor.
Mr. Bittman explained that the proposed colored fascia panel was included to
provide visual interest at eye level from S. 134th St. to compensate for the
street elevation being higher' than that of the site. Discussion then fol-
lowed relative to increasing the width of the north planter strip on the
Normed site.
REFERRING TO THE INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTION TO VACATE 44TH PL. SO.,
MR. ORRICO MOVED TO APPROVE THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FOR THE
NORMED PROJECT, ACCORDING TO EXHIBITS E, F, AND G OF THE APPLICATION
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW WHICH PERTAIN TO SAID SITE:
1. PROVISION OF OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES FOR EACH TENANT SPACE
WITHIN THE NORMED PROJECT. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE GATED,
AND DESIGN THEREOF SHALL BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO RELEASE
OF BUILDING PERMITS.
IT IS FURTHER MOVED THAT THE DEVELOPERS OF THE LDR SITE BE REQUESTED TO RE-
DESIGN THEIR PROJECT IN CONCERT WITH THE HEREBY - APPROVED NORMED PROPOSAL,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1) ITEM "2" UNDER STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
(Modification of Exhibit "A" (LDR) to reflect addition of a
.5' wide planter strip between the west wall of the LDR building
and the east edge of pavement of former 44th P1. So.)
2) PROVISION OF OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES FOR EACH TENANT SPACE WITHIN
THE LDR PROJECT. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE GATED, AND DESIGN
THEREOF SHALL BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO RELEASE OF BUILDING
PERMITS.
3) MODIFICATION OF EXHIBITS "B" AND "C" (LDR) TO REFLECT THE FOL-
LOWING CHANGES:
A. SUBSTITUTION OF METAL OR GLASSWELD COLOR FASCIA BAND IN
PLACE OF RAKE - FINISH CONCRETE TEXTURE.
B. SUBSTITUTION OF SANDBLASTED CONCRETE OR OTHER TEXTURE IN
PLACE OF "SMOOTH FINISH" EXTERIOR WALLS ON THE WAREHOUSE
PORTION OF THE BUILDING, AS APPROVED BY STAFF.
Page 6
4) LANDSCAPING STANDARDS DEPICTED ON EXHBIT "0" (LDR) SHALL ESTABLISH
THE BASIC THEME FOR BOTH SITES. MODIFICATIONS TO EXHIBIT "D" SHALL
BE AS FOLLOWS:
A. MINIMUM INITIAL PLANTING HEIGHT OF PSEUDOTSUGA MENSIEMSII
ADJACENT TO FREEWAY SHALL BE 10 FEET AT 20' -25' ON CENTER.
B. PLANTINGS INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5' WIDE STRIP SPECIFIED IN
STIPULATION 2 ABOVE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL.
C. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF
APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PROJECT OCCUPANCY PERMITS.
MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION.
Chair Kirsop clarified the intent of the motion to allow further resolution
of the LDR design concept to staff without necessity of returning to the
B.A.R.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
After discussion among the Commission, it was agreed that a meeting for
purposes of disposing of current planning cases would be held on 16 October
1980. The regular meeting of 23 October 1980 will be devoted to a public
hearing on the proposed zoning code, map and environmental documents.
The regular meeting of 25 September 1980 adjourned at 11:26 P.M. until
16 October 1980.
Prepay l by:
ark Caughey
Acting Planning Director
MC /jas
TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
Eileen Avery
Secretary
' 'WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. //
CITY OF TUKW
i
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA VACATING THAT PORTION
OF 44TH PLACE SOUTH GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN SOUTH 134TH
STREET AND PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. ONE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has received a valid petition re-
questing vacation of a certain portion of 44th Place South and,
WHEREAS, the City Council on 11 February 1980 held a public
hearing in accordance with RCW 35.79.020 and
WHEREAS, on 8 May 1980 a developer's agreement was executed by
the petitioners setting forth stipulations regarding use of the vacated area,
AS FOLLOWS:
NOW, THERE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA DOES ORDAIN
Section 1: That portion of 44th P1. So. as described and shown
on the map attached as Exhibit "A" is hereby vacated.
Section 2: Pursuant to Ordinance #1086, Section 5; such vacation
of land shall not become effective until persons acquiring the land to be vacated
have compensated the City in an amount equal to one -half the assessed valuation
of said property pursuant to RCW 35.79.030.
Section 3: The total square footage of the area to be vacated is
14,800 SF and current value, based upon the adjacent property values, as shown
on the records of the King County Department of Assessments is $0.50 per square
foot. In accordance with Section 2 of this ordinance compensation due the
City of Tukwila at one -half the total value of the land to be vacated is
$3,700.00.
Section 4: The individuals and /or corporations acquiring the
land to be vacated shall furnish to each'other a perpetual easement granting
access rights to their individual properties as appropriate.
Section 5. The City of Tukwila, in accordance with RCW 35.79.030
shall retain the right to exercise and grant easements in respect to the vacated
land for the construction, repair and maintenance of public utilities and
services.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
at a regular meeting thereof this J /40 day of 1 , 1980.
APPROVED AS TO FORM-
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Published Record Chronicle - June 20, 1980
. te e
yor
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
FEES:
RCPT.
M.F.
EPIC.
NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete
applications will not be accepted for processing.
SECTION I. GENERAL DATA
1) APPLICANT'S ,NAME RALPH JOHNSON TELEPHONE: ( )
2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS X104 NE OREGON ST. ZIP: 97123
3) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME SAp2 A E OR TELEPHONE: ( )
4) PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS SAME ZIP:
5) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) TOTS 6 7 , 8. 9 & 10
OR RT.00X 4 ALT. TN RTVFRTON REPLAT OF LOTS 1. 2, 3, 4, &
S OF FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS. AS RECORDED TN VOL 13 OF
PLATS PG. 40 RECORDS OF KIN@LICOENTY WASH., LESS PORTION
6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) LDR TAKEN BY PRIMARY STATE HIGH-
WAY NO. 1 FOSTER INTERCHANGE.
SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION
7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: CONSTRUCT 20,000 SF
CONCRETE TILT -UP WAREHOUSE /OFFICE BUILDING.
8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES? EIYES
9) PROJECT DATE
a. NET ACRES - 844 c. PARKING SPACES 31
b. GROSS ACRES 1,01E)8 d. FLOORS OF
CONSTRUCTION
e. LOT AREA COVERAGE BLDG . 2 0 , 6 T O2. FT. LANDSCAPE 4,483 SQ . FT.
PAVING 19 , 202 SQ. FT.
10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10 %? 1D YES D NO
11) EXISTING ZONING Ml 12. EXISTING CCMP.PLAN Ml
13) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION [JYES W
ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP?
14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER
DOCIAENT'S SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE
I.NDICATE BELOW.
a. NAME:
b1i LL1 V UE, WA
b. NAME: ADDRESS:
1
e
THOMAS A. SCONZO ADDRESS: 919 - 124th AVE. N.E.
•
Subscribed and sworn before me
t this g day of 4 , 19
Notary .lic in an tor t e to Washington
,,e
\ residing at�eJlh&cya,A- ,,,�
SECTION II: AP'L.ANT'S AFFIDAVIT
, being duly sworn, declare that I an the
contract purc aser or owner of t e property involved in this application and
that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
DATE 6_ 8 gib x
/ : // 4• .
i• .- re o Con act
rc aser or owner)
SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: All applications require certain supporting documents and
information which are described in the following table:
TYPE OF APPLICATION (CHECK BOX(ES)) SUPPORTING INFORMATION REQUIRED
REZONING 1E, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1C, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11
VARIANCE 1F, 4, 7, 11 or 17
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1D, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12
SHORELINE MGM T. PERMIT 1B, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13
SHORELINE MGMT PERMIT REVISION 4, 10, 16
WAIVER ]A, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13
SHORT PLAT 4, 5, 9
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 4, 5, 8
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 11, 12, 13.
LANDSCAPE REVIEW
14
SUBDIVISION 4, 5, 6, 15
SII VARIANCE 4, 6, 16, 17
* *See TABLE 1 for detailed description
P
5 134 57 AusaNcet4T Td ST Rr ral
• Vic-MS-So
:IIbl
*211- 3
wR COR?OR11 c*4
...',‘
24 6A. rae.t- .,
secriON..-:CO:iat ••.•
77
- ,
0
.To e,C
•
c,.2. To r.Lm
•
P',E.1
MX147
pay
: Cow. e
• . .
cot4G.e..uaa,
KSFEF
F-ACIF,T14.
_
to
-
I IC., 05'
4
ni
7
mr-A . to
Et_ay. 4..14.ce •
p44.151 .
la4- ST.
Lf
L.
v ..
V • 7
•
•
PoLs.
,44a. •
ti
J
6'1 Le
4Y
0
0
a
T03-
(.'
,
ps1
AiG 2.7 ')
5 . •
-c, &ay c.caNfroci
11- r'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a
P.'S= Ix1
0€: esz ee LE 9Z sz ee ze le (:)E 61 el a 91 I td CI :
611111111111111111111111111111111111111111411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111111
I. • AL-1- WORK. SHALL. CONF,ORM WITH A-PPt_tc.i.E8L.E. c...00er., ANC.D
.: RE.Colii.-"TI ONG .
a. GeNartAs....corrrRAriroll •
GH.1A-.1- VERiPY ALL DIME:NEHONS AND ..
...
•
: coNorroNs . orq - 7 - 1-Ia'0...,UILDiNar AND Si _ANIP wIt-t... E.,E.-
RESOON`all.3L-M...FORITI.7mi.JaiNi OF .17114 WPRK 117 Tr-lia .V.',0RK or ..:
OTHERS; • • . .
. ...
3. GEN, CoN7R. SHALL 'FORN if:bi--4 AN D INsTAL ARPFOveD PRCrrE.O.T1 VS •
• GUARDS. AT al...4.. 7 GAS METERS OP, .......-.>, WHERE
AS REDD. I3'r GOVaRNINC.T. A.u 1-4 . • • ' .
4. CHAMFER ALL; rtIGH7 ANGLE'. CORNECZS cni MXPO: CONC ,
• GOL-LJMN.G. 011...,AGTERG AND WALL ..-- EX_ C 9 , .`..A/1 • Fl-tiV4
5. UT cYonl ri .
o NS, erC. 5HPL. rGS. IN
• AC.C.4 W fTH G•ry'. OF "MIKW11-.A..., . •
Ca. GEN. C.0,V11;...c. . Cf-X3RCINA . W.ITH: Hi 5 .susS At_L. CSA:se.,
Gi.JR.a...S/AC.C.E.-S .ORP-Nit,..JC.7S As . REQD, fp::,R NCI. 4 mL QUIP
7, A1-1.....ST.C. WAL.J-S INC.)-1.JOLAMT FIJRRFaC>
• 5f*L1=-:'ae PitRes i - • • '
.5'AC Occcr6'inic.:i. Ex.rrs,:si • G'IC.,1GO . AND of4.1cRA
IN :. ACC-C;I:Vcob.NICE W riThi :OSHA: . 5P AND UENC •-.Sac • .a.
.9. '04e.mtc.AL 'Plam. 'E..x MC; .: TID: SW.. /NSTA.. •iN
"to: S YE. woo' Cx1:50 s •Twouca:locrr - w..xcEPT . A. , • Ncrreb • • . . .
. t' 1 . pi.-"s - ro:.),A.ya- .LIGHT G::V.S1 IINI
6, 77,e,c1 ANo I 4 , :R.N.!m-0. GGPLA
1,2 ,Z,.1- Agsj ID OF C_,/-NRC)/-1
AS .Piac.16....baiD VOL.. , 0 PNC-Tr-S IQ, tac••••ors-,:=5
Ku-4 ; VVAS1-1. (_._M POR 0 IN - r e csr.cLN
t 1 A\CR`r S a • 1 N 1.
6-4ANGE .
H UTILITIES:
SENNERs Cary' o T O1/:•0F .‘A./ORK TL a442.
WAT OF ,f-14 Ant iN
W.4'TE 125. HA'5., A Ca" MAIN IN .S
• TE.1-
• • •
12 N-4
ePSZ0::=N AEgkIAL,SURV • • , .
CX T c3:M. i3Lue) • COCC,OF 1 11-
STEP OP PATIO ALT Si6a 1=L,A.az. s ,
r 5o.1::.
cev.47-tss.,14.:
. ..
I. • • • _
•
03Le.v"
os; c.oRNE.R. • 4 . ' . • .
GENERAL_ • .1-10TES
FILL. 1 Pg5C R! 1c
6ourtGE : S. IS4-
vo L.c..1r7g 04W 10:60 . _
conpo' WELL Mix-Et, Htet, RS1-I TO
SLUE c.1.2.4 5 FM1' P..+JN ,
UTI LIT"( SMIOLS
DF„SCRiPTiOr-i
Ins] 6prziNV.Le2EID. •
P>.1.
zoNe :
OGC.UP.....,42 •
1301L.CEF-1Co. GT. 4tr 2Ito"
zon4a.
VTE oRMA. n. c,
pr,P.KIN6- aZ.0D
100 siezac.FLCo9 e2 1, I e.'1)
: • ... • \%.;;:.A
• 1°4).
MARK PLOoR EASE
WALL •' ( REi"(AkS
NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST . ,4Arti
a
S;E.,
s.
coruc
4.
G.
11)0,
C01
7,
MARK
C
D
FOL.D.
" c‘s
CONC.
VAT.
PL.00 R
titizme2
RaDEME2.
00F5.
ca;Ne.,
(c)a
EASE.
k
WOOD
rIvNe.zacto,.,
e.1.1t,a c.4.uto
- rHicectsi ass
FRAME FI
MMTAL- PLASHING
G DooR HGAC/
CALA-KING •
•.5 •
Ravi SI ONI
G.
. 0.1 P e. Flkf...G1,(-1. 5_1, 6 PI
ou:roacizEigivros. jA 1 . 4763- a 0- •
:."•• : .
I.a • INvaiti!.El..M.VA • " •
giING'itYDR•HNIT".
MA'INI
-5- sAns _ .
s 0 .- c■rb,-4,,, LINE e_ • '
C04.•••t..,
G..5./Ctoc)
CI•00.
CIN70
s. .
.1
1:444114Y).
FLINT. LA16
H. c..
W000
FRAME-
SE/Vit-A ,
,
CONC.
„.„, •
PINI$1-1 .
• •
•
WA
•
SOLIT H.
1.1txt•i)
FIAT LaTay,
•
1%
Hri,ct.p.ts
Doort
Irt,141.1; NOTG:
t)COR FP...Nme 4
TRIM "TlE,
HARMN/001D.
DRAWN: •
CHM.C.KMD:
.C274
C.1
G4,104,
COf-IC .
•CoNc
. EA •
mi
LecrE\
''L' SPACEA @ ' SA;
. L..c4A
ff t4MS 41PER
JAME HEAD '
cow../cot.
CNN.)
".•.
WESiti
11
,•::. :••••••:• '
• ::••••••
, J!c ,
•••
•'••
,t(i
•
•
•.01
PAallf•
44
.F.
3E " hILL OttlX.,./4.6 •
•4...te.pito-i••vrwtt*4-
•
FR.MARK6 '
•" , ••• - .•{!•:.••••4, 0 „"•.
Wicirt4.1 E€3.4:77
•••
47.777
a
a
*.
• pzE ,
. -
MaDs.:AR.e4147..M AN0:017..ern
:
ALUM 4'RA1 P:g...
NP.P.R9w
DQ opc=;.::
F" 2.:
.
a
K2"
viIV a-AR •eour
0, c..
'2" ALV. DOOR
77
R-ekito 34
W.?zei7itit)1.)Lt:
THOPnAtil A.ScOokm:o -
. IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
V 43,2 .
aNninnorwreelf.
T -
C4 4 Nap
IND
twiri...
A
1
rvc
1
_
0:o,'
••• ,
4/0',' ,
/
15'
0.'44!'
•
III
-
• -
oe.
r •
.t
■
1
11:
10,
vi m
fe
•
,
.
..c.,..e.....„,
'
•
0
.To e,C
•
c,.2. To r.Lm
•
P',E.1
MX147
pay
: Cow. e
• . .
cot4G.e..uaa,
KSFEF
F-ACIF,T14.
_
to
-
I IC., 05'
4
ni
7
mr-A . to
Et_ay. 4..14.ce •
p44.151 .
la4- ST.
Lf
L.
v ..
V • 7
•
•
PoLs.
,44a. •
ti
J
6'1 Le
4Y
0
0
a
T03-
(.'
,
ps1
AiG 2.7 ')
5 . •
-c, &ay c.caNfroci
11- r'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a
P.'S= Ix1
0€: esz ee LE 9Z sz ee ze le (:)E 61 el a 91 I td CI :
611111111111111111111111111111111111111111411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111111
I. • AL-1- WORK. SHALL. CONF,ORM WITH A-PPt_tc.i.E8L.E. c...00er., ANC.D
.: RE.Colii.-"TI ONG .
a. GeNartAs....corrrRAriroll •
GH.1A-.1- VERiPY ALL DIME:NEHONS AND ..
...
•
: coNorroNs . orq - 7 - 1-Ia'0...,UILDiNar AND Si _ANIP wIt-t... E.,E.-
RESOON`all.3L-M...FORITI.7mi.JaiNi OF .17114 WPRK 117 Tr-lia .V.',0RK or ..:
OTHERS; • • . .
. ...
3. GEN, CoN7R. SHALL 'FORN if:bi--4 AN D INsTAL ARPFOveD PRCrrE.O.T1 VS •
• GUARDS. AT al...4.. 7 GAS METERS OP, .......-.>, WHERE
AS REDD. I3'r GOVaRNINC.T. A.u 1-4 . • • ' .
4. CHAMFER ALL; rtIGH7 ANGLE'. CORNECZS cni MXPO: CONC ,
• GOL-LJMN.G. 011...,AGTERG AND WALL ..-- EX_ C 9 , .`..A/1 • Fl-tiV4
5. UT cYonl ri .
o NS, erC. 5HPL. rGS. IN
• AC.C.4 W fTH G•ry'. OF "MIKW11-.A..., . •
Ca. GEN. C.0,V11;...c. . Cf-X3RCINA . W.ITH: Hi 5 .susS At_L. CSA:se.,
Gi.JR.a...S/AC.C.E.-S .ORP-Nit,..JC.7S As . REQD, fp::,R NCI. 4 mL QUIP
7, A1-1.....ST.C. WAL.J-S INC.)-1.JOLAMT FIJRRFaC>
• 5f*L1=-:'ae PitRes i - • • '
.5'AC Occcr6'inic.:i. Ex.rrs,:si • G'IC.,1GO . AND of4.1cRA
IN :. ACC-C;I:Vcob.NICE W riThi :OSHA: . 5P AND UENC •-.Sac • .a.
.9. '04e.mtc.AL 'Plam. 'E..x MC; .: TID: SW.. /NSTA.. •iN
"to: S YE. woo' Cx1:50 s •Twouca:locrr - w..xcEPT . A. , • Ncrreb • • . . .
. t' 1 . pi.-"s - ro:.),A.ya- .LIGHT G::V.S1 IINI
6, 77,e,c1 ANo I 4 , :R.N.!m-0. GGPLA
1,2 ,Z,.1- Agsj ID OF C_,/-NRC)/-1
AS .Piac.16....baiD VOL.. , 0 PNC-Tr-S IQ, tac••••ors-,:=5
Ku-4 ; VVAS1-1. (_._M POR 0 IN - r e csr.cLN
t 1 A\CR`r S a • 1 N 1.
6-4ANGE .
H UTILITIES:
SENNERs Cary' o T O1/:•0F .‘A./ORK TL a442.
WAT OF ,f-14 Ant iN
W.4'TE 125. HA'5., A Ca" MAIN IN .S
• TE.1-
• • •
12 N-4
ePSZ0::=N AEgkIAL,SURV • • , .
CX T c3:M. i3Lue) • COCC,OF 1 11-
STEP OP PATIO ALT Si6a 1=L,A.az. s ,
r 5o.1::.
cev.47-tss.,14.:
. ..
I. • • • _
•
03Le.v"
os; c.oRNE.R. • 4 . ' . • .
GENERAL_ • .1-10TES
FILL. 1 Pg5C R! 1c
6ourtGE : S. IS4-
vo L.c..1r7g 04W 10:60 . _
conpo' WELL Mix-Et, Htet, RS1-I TO
SLUE c.1.2.4 5 FM1' P..+JN ,
UTI LIT"( SMIOLS
DF„SCRiPTiOr-i
Ins] 6prziNV.Le2EID. •
P>.1.
zoNe :
OGC.UP.....,42 •
1301L.CEF-1Co. GT. 4tr 2Ito"
zon4a.
VTE oRMA. n. c,
pr,P.KIN6- aZ.0D
100 siezac.FLCo9 e2 1, I e.'1)
: • ... • \%.;;:.A
• 1°4).
MARK PLOoR EASE
WALL •' ( REi"(AkS
NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST . ,4Arti
a
S;E.,
s.
coruc
4.
G.
11)0,
C01
7,
MARK
C
D
FOL.D.
" c‘s
CONC.
VAT.
PL.00 R
titizme2
RaDEME2.
00F5.
ca;Ne.,
(c)a
EASE.
k
WOOD
rIvNe.zacto,.,
e.1.1t,a c.4.uto
- rHicectsi ass
FRAME FI
MMTAL- PLASHING
G DooR HGAC/
CALA-KING •
•.5 •
Ravi SI ONI
G.
. 0.1 P e. Flkf...G1,(-1. 5_1, 6 PI
ou:roacizEigivros. jA 1 . 4763- a 0- •
:."•• : .
I.a • INvaiti!.El..M.VA • " •
giING'itYDR•HNIT".
MA'INI
-5- sAns _ .
s 0 .- c■rb,-4,,, LINE e_ • '
C04.•••t..,
G..5./Ctoc)
CI•00.
CIN70
s. .
.1
1:444114Y).
FLINT. LA16
H. c..
W000
FRAME-
SE/Vit-A ,
,
CONC.
„.„, •
PINI$1-1 .
• •
•
WA
•
SOLIT H.
1.1txt•i)
FIAT LaTay,
•
1%
Hri,ct.p.ts
Doort
Irt,141.1; NOTG:
t)COR FP...Nme 4
TRIM "TlE,
HARMN/001D.
DRAWN: •
CHM.C.KMD:
.C274
C.1
G4,104,
COf-IC .
•CoNc
. EA •
mi
LecrE\
''L' SPACEA @ ' SA;
. L..c4A
ff t4MS 41PER
JAME HEAD '
cow../cot.
CNN.)
".•.
WESiti
11
,•::. :••••••:• '
• ::••••••
, J!c ,
•••
•'••
,t(i
•
•
•.01
PAallf•
44
.F.
3E " hILL OttlX.,./4.6 •
•4...te.pito-i••vrwtt*4-
•
FR.MARK6 '
•" , ••• - .•{!•:.••••4, 0 „"•.
Wicirt4.1 E€3.4:77
•••
47.777
a
a
*.
• pzE ,
. -
MaDs.:AR.e4147..M AN0:017..ern
:
ALUM 4'RA1 P:g...
NP.P.R9w
DQ opc=;.::
F" 2.:
.
a
K2"
viIV a-AR •eour
0, c..
'2" ALV. DOOR
77
R-ekito 34
W.?zei7itit)1.)Lt:
THOPnAtil A.ScOokm:o -
. IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
V 43,2 .
aNninnorwreelf.
•
„ • ,
I
Or-41. 44Afie..TC'
' t .b•
,..••••• - %4
-,
:
___ . _ _.
r 't i i . 1 — I
•• LI 4 . ; 1, t ; • - ; ' , .. ,,,( 11:V57, II
11 1 R $ •
I I ''' ; •
H 1 —
a__ -- - - - - - —
t --- 7 2f-j j ::___-. 11 1.
tIME ,- y)'A.,.,, ........i...,-
LANC16›, '
rsff.r1.,
MCOME ot.Ahrio
Mr 1.
:61"gli7t14,576,V,
ESA .
ffipliprirrirpolpirfirriTrii
6
rfinTrirmipifOir%
7
E =7171 ••-
oe az ae az az az az az az tz of at at a 91 I I 'CI zi It O
....._Iiiilli11111011111011t101.140(q
••c.ol./.1Z.Totz.
Ps.
rO)
bea Moon . Mcott.o.MATICM
LLECIcta.
;TV.Taf
- ro
T.A.1■11V.I. •
1
t_ I - I r.4" A) 1 el 1
L . --,.... 7 1 : pm, • : %. " - -,
C y p p , E 4! .. r 2 n r c A s T , coNic: 5 144 P' : . ' V i • CI"
•
- , IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 1 • n,
I cLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
A
5 tx-Lcre P7C77.r
LLGVIR
OFner AM6.4
Ayr
Ad
M w oe t SCONZO
ryrr
STATE Of WASHINGTON
0
'FEN/15101J
Vrgs.L.4)1
0
76.ei
Lt
1M-1-80 aDd-e
THOMAS A. SCONZO
...OW, N■•■■ 99 64 I .31.56
1!
•
0
y
•
• frent31.
: h coma. 4 2L.A4 7 ,_
: " ,1■13/ 122E) Nr-G212CE MUNI
' vb",
Yf-.)
- _
--I Ley4,,Ti
C•0
J 011-IT .
rftliiill i II I ifirl Intl Rill Itiltill Irtrirril I PRITT 1[
0 •.• .. 6
:4 IULEfl - 3O
OE AZ 13L CZ 9Z SZ VZ CZ at IZ 0 61 131 LI 91 GI 19 'CI ZI II 01- • :
.101114111011,111A1111.1014 !.
•
PV C. ossi•• -
GoLl•e•Crue.
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESSE
: CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
s.
C.C:71-1POS Ow
FSOOrl Las
t-ra•-• P
METAL:" FA:SLIP, '
:
0
i0
0
SItEETIMMIrentnritelltmittelt..12201231.ft
E.110k)A;
•
U 9P10 t' IhI'W
I
• /
THOMAS A. SCONZO
1::A 4o
40
. :
/VI ii V: 11:. NO 911,39/206
•
• /I
•
elevation plan