Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-10-80 - NORMED CORPORATION - DESIGN REVIEWdr-10-80 13014 42nd avenue south normed corporation City. of Tukwila S 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 • Frank Todd, Mayor B.S.H. Architects 406 Securities Bldg. Seattle, WA. 98101 Attn: Herb Bittman SUBJECT: Proposed NORMED Bldg. At the Board of Architectural Review's regular meeting of March, 1982, the staff presented informally your proposed revision to the approved architec- tural elevations of the Normed project. The staff's purpose in so -doing was to determine whether or not further, formal review of these changes would be necessary. After discussion and a visit to the site by the Board Chair- man, the decision has been made to allow the staff to administer the modi- fied elevations without further intervention by the B.A.R. You may pro- ceed with further work on your final drawings with the assumption that only staff review of the changes depicted on sheets M -1 and M -2 will be needed. Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Tukwila $ anning Department C M Caughey Associate Planner 31 March 1982 1 UKWILA 1.111 UJU17b1L, KtbULAK Pltt 1 LRU December 15, 1980 .Page 2 ~,.; PETITIONS,'COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS - Cont. Foster Golf Course Foot Bridge Mr. Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director, reported that the P Works Department is capable of designing the plans for the ilitation of the Golf Course Foot Bridge. This project woul require staff to work overtime if the bridge is to be operatio by the end of March, 1981. If the bridge opening can be delaye overtime could almost be eliminated. Mayor Todd offered that this item should be forwarded to the next work meeting of the Council and that all the information should be furnished to them so they can determine what they want to do with the bridge. The question is whether it should be repaired or replacec Councilman Phelps suggested the Public Works Committee discuss it at their next meeting prior to the Committee of the Whole Meeting. MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THIS ITEM BE PLACED IN THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE.* Councilman Bohrer asked if the rehabilitation work being proposed is adaptable to a new structure at a later date. Mr. Uomoto said no, the proposed work should last five years. Councilman Bohrer asked if staff could do the new bridge design. Mr. Uomoto said they have a consultant check on their design. Councilman Bohrer asked if it was possible and /or efficient to design the cable anchors to work with the current restoration and, at a later time, use them with a new bridge. Mr. Uomoto said, no. Councilman Bohrer clarified that the choice is repair the existing bridge or build a new one and that there is little can be done to salvage any expenditure in preparing this one to be used later. Mr. Uomoto agreed. *MOTION CARRIED. Appeal of B.A.R. Mr. Chris Anderson, 1102 East Republic, Seattle, said the appeal Decision: Sconzo is against the Planning Commission decision, sitting as the Board Associates of Architectural Review, to require a 5 foot wide planter strip on the south end of the vacated 44th Place South. In lieu of this, they are proposing that the 5 foot setback deter- mination of the B.A.R. be upheld. If the City elects to allow a 25 foot right -of -way, we request the building edge remain at the same point and that a 10 foot landscaping area along the building be required. MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY PHELPS, THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE ALTERNATE WHICH PROVIDES FOR A 25 FOOT TRAVEL LANE.* Councilman Bohrer noted that the original street that was vacated was a 40 foot right -of -way and did not, then, meet the street re- quirements. This will reduce the paved area even more and could set a precedent for that area by allowing substandard streets. Larry Shaw, Normed, Inc. explained that reducing the paved section does not benefit them. It only benefits L.D.R. It allows L.D.R. to build on the edge of the street. He said the footings for his building are poured with a five foot setback as required by the City. They have worked hard to cooperate with the City. Councilman Harris noted that what Council is doing is giving L.D.R. the five feet and allowing them to build right on the street edge. *MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY SAUL, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT COUNCIL UPHOLD THE B.A.R. DECISION. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL ACTION INTRODUCTION In December, 1979, representatives of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned the City Council to vacate 44th P1. So. which is a former pub- lic street, dividing the adja- cent sites of the two industrial concerns (see exhibit "A ") The petitioners, in arguing success- fully for the street vacation request, asserted that private use of 44th P1. as a joint drive- way serving the two sites would reduce the number of individual curb - breaks opening on South 134th St., and would facilitate a coordinated approach to design and development of the two sites. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION AGENDA ITEM Sconzo Assoc. - Appeal of B.A.R. Decision . The two projects were reviewed jointly by the Planning Commission, sitting as the Board of Architectural Review, on 25 September 1980. As a means of reinforcing the concept of a coordinated appearance to the two projects, LDR was required to provide a 5' wide planter strip on their common boundary with the non - vacated 44th Place So. To provide this planter setback will require reducing the width of the planned LDR building by 5', as no side yard setback on either the north or south edge of the building is proposed. Therefore, the applicants are appealling the B.A.R.'s decision to your council in hope that the side yard requirement will be overturned. DISCUSSION Before vacating 44th Place So., the Public Works Sub - Committee negotiated a Developer's Agreement with both LDR and Normed, the property to the north, the terms of which govern ed use of the vacated 40' right -of -way. Provision 2 thereof required a 5' sidewalk and a 5' wide landscape berm on the north edge of the vacated area adjacent to Normed. During its review, the B.A.R. determined that visual coordination of the two adjoining sites could be enhanced by providing a 5' wide planter area on both sides of the Drive- way (i.e. former 44th P1. So.) serving the two sites. INTRODUCTION In December, 1979, representatives of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned the City Council to vacate 44th P1. So. which is a former pub- lic street, dividing the adja- cent sites of the two industrial concerns (see exhibit "A ") The petitioners, in arguing success- fully for the street vacation request, asserted that private use of 44th P1. as a joint drive- way serving the two sites would reduce the number of individual curb - breaks opening on South 134th St., and would facilitate a coordinated approach to design and development of the two sites. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION AGENDA ITEM Sconzo Assoc. - Appeal of B.A.R. Decision . The two projects were reviewed jointly by the Planning Commission, sitting as the Board of Architectural Review, on 25 September 1980. As a means of reinforcing the concept of a coordinated appearance to the two projects, LDR was required to provide a 5' wide planter strip on their common boundary with the non - vacated 44th Place So. To provide this planter setback will require reducing the width of the planned LDR building by 5', as no side yard setback on either the north or south edge of the building is proposed. Therefore, the applicants are appealling the B.A.R.'s decision to your council in hope that the side yard requirement will be overturned. DISCUSSION Before vacating 44th Place So., the Public Works Sub - Committee negotiated a Developer's Agreement with both LDR and Normed, the property to the north, the terms of which govern ed use of the vacated 40' right -of -way. Provision 2 thereof required a 5' sidewalk and a 5' wide landscape berm on the north edge of the vacated area adjacent to Normed. During its review, the B.A.R. determined that visual coordination of the two adjoining sites could be enhanced by providing a 5' wide planter area on both sides of the Drive- way (i.e. former 44th P1. So.) serving the two sites. Page 2 The LDR building was designed in 1978, and included parking and other private land uses within 44th Place So. They contend, therefore, that further modification of their design concept, beyond what has already been done to comply with terms of the street vacation developer's agreement, is an unwarranted hardship. RECOMMENDATION We urge the Council to uphold the B.A.R.'s decision and require a 5' wide planter area setback on the north edge of the LDR site adjoining 44th Place So. Strictly speaking, the "M -1" zone, in which this property is located, does not require _ixar side -yard setback. However, we believe that the Board has acted in the Public interest in requiring a 5' side setback for the following reasons: Preservation of the coordinated development concept. We believe that the record of proceedings under which 44th Place So. was vacated indicate.'that a key intent behind the Council's favorable decision to sell this street right -of -way (at 1/2 its assessed value) was that the two developers would work . together to coordinate access to, and visual character of, their two projects. By requiring LDR to provide five feet of planting on its side of the common drive, a unified landscape theme for the principal public entry -path to the sites is assured. Establishment of development standards for the area. The LDR /Normed complex is the first industrial development to be proposed in the general area of vacant land situated between S.R. 181 42nd Ave S. and 'S..133rd Street. All of these vacant parcels are zoned M -1; thus, the setback standard established by the Board in the course of reviewing these early projects will set a prec- edent for other projects which will follow in the area. Consistency with the new zoning ordinance. The proposed zoning ordinance text, which is coming -up for your review very soon, requires a 5' wide side yard setback in M -1 zoning districts. .L .I 1 L N `v'I id S • -r) F Oikivil g • 115 14111! wow wawa • • • 0 A v oar Ws n , (I # 1 t Sr 123 lig 0 1'371 -b.% • i 1 1 1 III- s •g / ' ai 1 _Ai 1 ' •) ..., 1 .-Mr•vir-li-Acm.._ 4 ANNX! e . • 1 • • #1 OS! OW ell. .L .I 1 L N `v'I id Al 111114 Oikivil g . 2 oar Ws n , (I # 1 t Sr 123 lig 0 1'371 -b.% • i 1 1 1 III- s •g / ' ai 1 - A •Are. ••/••••■■••••••••••. • IF4V • • ...... ...... • • • • ...... ..... • • ...... ..... ..... . . .... • ..... • 8 . /18IHX3 • ■•• • . — 4 0. , • :1 • .• Wo114 • • ts a , • ....... •••••■ q • I . • • I • - • • ..... ....... • • • • • • ..... - • ....... • I ...... •••• •-• •••• ..... . ... ... . . . . . . ..... ' •DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT The City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Litho Development and Research (a /k /a J & R Investors) and Nonned, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPERS" agree as follows: WHEREAS, Developers are the owners of the following described properties: • 1. Litho Development & Research -- Lots 6 through 10 inclusive in Block 4 of . Fostoria Garden Tracts Subdivision Blocks 1 -5 in King County 2. Nonned, Inc. -- Block 3 in entirety of Fostoria Garden Tracts Subdivision Blocks 1 -5 in King County located in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, and WHEREAS, Developers have petitioned the City for the vacation of the following described portion of right -of -way: A forty (40) foot wide street identified as 44th Place South, lying between Blocks 3 and 4 in the plat of Riverton, replat as • of Lots 1 to 5, Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded N- in Volume 13 of plats on page.40, records of King County, . formerly identified as Ruth Street, except any portions thereof taken by primary State Highway No. 1, Foster Inter- co change to South 118th Street located in the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the City desires said right-of-way to be constructed and improved in accordance with certain conditions. • NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO COVENANT AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Developers agree to maintain the full 40' wide vacated right -of -way and to construct improvements within the full width thereof. The Developers agree also to prevent any encroachment upon said right -of -way. Developers agree' to construct, at their sole expense, im- provements to said 40' wide right -of -way consisting of a road, free of any obstructions, on the southerly 30' there- of adjoined by a 5' wide landscaped area on the north edge of said roadway. The said landscaped area shall be adjoined on its north edge by a 5' wide sidewalk. If said improvements, as described in paragraph 2 above, do not meet minimum construction standards for the City of. Tukwila, the City may refuse to accept any dedication of said right -of -way. - • • . This Developer's agreement shall be recorded and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns, grantees and successors to this agreement. DATED THIS 8 DAY OF m Q y , 1980 LITHO +. OPME & •ES RCH BY 1.1 TITLE • ATTEST: ity •ttorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: STATE OF Or ) ftLliwoonoli SS. COUNTY OF KIN ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) • BY 11 t111400 TITLE Ot`ce.. 1Li ACC ' TED: APPROVED AS TO ADEQUACY: On this day personally appeared before me Sow t"te,1lgdv■ „to me known to be the vice , respectively of LITHO •DEVELOP- MENT AND RESEARCH, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, . and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and. voluntary act, and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS e DAY OF Hal).- , 1980. • v -8 -8Y otary •u• c in an or e tats of residing at Qor'1kundi) OrtoAq • On this day personally appeared before me L,,& ence M .S4,cuw to me known to be the Vice-- Prrstdu. , respectively of NORMED4 INC. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated %hat,theywere authorized to execute said instrument. • GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL THIS 2_ DAY OF .. , 1980':•, Notary Public in and for the State of. Washington, residing atigrA4144, tyo uwi a f , • • • 1 1 ��% %%%% , A 1909 4? City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Bittman, Sanders, Hasson Associates 406 Securities Building Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: Board of Architectural Review Action - Normed Building At its 25 September 1980 meeting, the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review approved the site and architectural concept for the Normed Industrial Complex, as described on Exhibit E, F and G of the application, according to the follow- ing conditions: We appreciate your participation in the design- review process. MC:nb Frank Todd, Mayor cc: Normed, Inc. P. 0. Box 3644 Seattle, WA 98124 Mark Caughey Acting Director 1 October 1980 1. Provision of outdoor trash enclosures for each tenant space within the Normed project. Trash enclosures shall be gated, and design thereof shall be approved by staff prior to release of building permits. TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 b.U.. - 1 Relative to tree retention, they stated their willingness to attempt to Y 9 P identify and retain significant existing trees on the site as long as their efforts to refrain from damaging the northerly ravine are not hindered thereby. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, WITH MR. ARVIDSON'S SECOND TO APPROVE THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FOR THE QESTAR OFFICE COMPLEX, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" OF THE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.. 1) THE COLOR OF THE METAL ROOF FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING SHALL BE DULL BROWN NON- REFLECTIVE FINISH, SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. 2) THE WESTERLY DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT "A" SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. THE EASTERLY DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE IS APPROVED PROVISIONALLY AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" AND MAY BE MODIFIED, RELOCATED OR DELETED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, AS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE TRAFFIC. SAFETY IN THE PROJECT VICINITY. 3) A COMPREHENSIVE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR THE SITE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO.THE FOUNDATION INSPECTION PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SAID PLANTING PLAN SHALL INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SITE (4" TRUNK DIAMETER OR GREATER) TO BE RETAINED OR REMOVED. STAFF SHALL BE ENPOWERED TO REQUIRE MINOR MODIFICATION OF APPROVED EXHIBIT "A" IN ORDER TO PROMOTE RETENTION OF SIGNIFICANT NATIVE CONFLICTS CONCERNING INDIGENOUS VEGETATION PRESERVATION. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, WITH MR. ARVIDSON'S SECOND TO AMEND STIPULATION 3 OF THE MAIN MOTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 3) A COMPREHENSIVE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR THE SITE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SAID PLANTING PLAN SHALL INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SITE (4" TRUNK DIAMETER OR GREATER) TO BE RETAINED OR REMOVED. STAFF SHALL BE ENPOWERED TO REQUIRE MINOR MODIFICATION OF APPROVED EXHIBIT "A" IN ORDER TO PROMOTE RETENTION OF SIGNIFICANT NATIVE TREES. THE B.A.R. SHALL HAVE FINAL AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE STAFF /APPLICANT CONFLICTS CONCERNING INDIGENOUS VEGETATION PRESERVATION. AMENDMENT CARRIED 5 -0 MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED 5 -0. D) LDR, Inc. (Sconzo Assoc.) - Site, architecture and landscaping for an industrial building on south 134th St., adjacent to State Route 181. E) Normed, Inc. (BSH Assoc.) -. Site and architecture for an industrial complex on South 134th St., adjacent to State Route 181. Chairman Richard Kirsop read the staff report. Kris Anderson was present to represent LDR; Herb Bittman and Larry Shaw were present on behalf of Normed. 1 Page 5 Mr. Anderson stated his concurrence with all suggested staff conditions except Items 2 and 4. He then reviewed the sequence of steps which were followed to bring the building to its current design configuration. Regar- ding Stipulation 2, it is their position that the 5' side yard adjacent to the west edge of the building could probably have been provided had the city so requested earlier in the design process. Mr. Anderson stated that an acceptable alternative to Stipulation 4 might be to require a common fascia color scheme in lieuof'glassweld /metal panels. Discussion followed relative to the intent and practicality of requiring the 5' side yard refer- enced in Stipulation 2. Mrs. Avery asked about adequacy of parking on the LDR site. Mr. Caughey explained that the minimum number of spaces are provided, due to restrictions imposed by City Council against any private use of the 44th P1. So. right - of -way. Previously, additional parking had been provided within that corridor. Mr. Bittman explained that the proposed colored fascia panel was included to provide visual interest at eye level from S. 134th St. to compensate for the street elevation being higher that of the site. Discussion then fol- lowed relative to increasing the width of the north planter strip on the Normed site. REFERRING TO THE INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTION TO VACATE 44TH PL. SO., MR. ORRICO MOVED TO APPROVE THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FOR THE NORMED PROJECT, ACCORDING TO EXHIBITS E, F, AND G OF THE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW WHICH PERTAIN TO SAID SITE: 1. PROVISION OF OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES FOR EACH TENANT SPACE WITHIN THE NORMED PROJECT. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE GATED, AND DESIGN THEREOF SHALL BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO RELEASE OF BUILDING PERMITS. IT IS FURTHER MOVED THAT THE DEVELOPERS OF THE LDR SITE BE REQUESTED TO RE- DESIGN THEIR PROJECT IN CONCERT WITH THE HEREBY - APPROVED NORMED PROPOSAL, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) ITEM "2" UNDER STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS (Modification of Exhibit "A" (LDR) to reflect addition of a 5' wide planter strip between the west wall of the LDR building and the east edge of pavement of former 44th P1. So.) 2) PROVISION OF OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES FOR EACH TENANT SPACE WITHIN THE LDR PROJECT. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE GATED, AND DESIGN THEREOF SHALL BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO RELEASE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 3) MODIFICATION OF EXHIBITS "B" AND "C" (LDR) TO REFLECT THE FOL- LOWING CHANGES: A. SUBSTITUTION OF METAL OR GLASSWELD COLOR FASCIA BAND IN PLACE OF RAKE - FINISH CONCRETE TEXTURE. B. SUBSTITUTION OF SANDBLASTED CONCRETE OR OTHER TEXTURE IN PLACE OF "SMOOTH FINISH" EXTERIOR WALLS ON THE WAREHOUSE PORTION OF THE BUILDING, AS APPROVED BY STAFF. Page 6 4) LANDSCAPING STANDARDS DEPICTED ON EXHBIT "D" (LDR) SHALL ESTABLISH THE BASIC THEME FOR BOTH SITES. MODIFICATIONS TO EXHIBIT "D" SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: A. MINIMUM. INITIAL PLANTING HEIGHT OF PSEUDOTSUGA MENSIEMSII ADJACENT TO FREEWAY SHALL BE 10 FEET AT 20' -25' ON CENTER. B. PLANTINGS INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5' WIDE STRIP SPECIFIED IN STIPULATION 2 ABOVE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL. C. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PROJECT OCCUPANCY PERMITS. MR. SOWINSKI SECONDED THE MOTION. Chair Kirsop clarified the intent of the motion to allow further resolution of the LDR design concept to staff without necessity of returning to the B.A.R. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0. After discussion among the Commission, it was agreed that a meeting for purposes of disposing of current planning cases would be held on 16 October 1980. The regular meeting of 23 October 1980 will be devoted to a public hearing on the proposed zoning code, map and environmental documents. The regular meeting of 25 September 1980 adjourned at 11:26 P.M. until 16 October 1980. Prepay, by: ark Caughey Acting Planning Director MC /j as Cs TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Eileen Avery Secretary a+lrtw1 3rf7i` amass W 0N �"' 7 _____ t�G�md /NPf 114 • tidal 1..Lfa.w C a --3'T s_. sa_, • II i _L 1 ,` v.•, -so L .221• 4120 - 6•41 0,2•00'71 72N07.O vim _JOY - ,..-114}1, rmd i u.wn0 © aL.b'aaO 32•S b t 'Imrs•vtq rsto1:sos 70 • tarn coNg 3W•bd •000 II 000 1 1 MV Tt.! 1•"R1G1.•1 'VS ..•da 0.7.02 C.••r -» 0 122•at .2. I-d ?I-'i' d Oa.. I is •� . r s�ia».u.baz . 1fC13HDS gwdr $ 13ooa 0•..•'210 Sin O H 75 .S1•• •7no9 Is! 'CM 1'h't'.G i'N ' on 1 i .%l 41, 0W.11. 0 .0e0s00 'Tb '7hPJ� r r ?`q 't { 3 '7.07 - I. - .. r S N O I S Vad ••••1 .•.•'w TWA • HSIIJIId ..wlvi''t IVN•..1 '111 14.1••• , l 01•••. S S - too w1S '7511:.1 . 4••■•14 w :111 •G•<•a •C.9- 'n7.: '1.0..0 ..Nr11 •• 'C5 j ••SNO••• HSINId ve I 'sue -0 a 010 49 •r z trsrf4 : 9'S ?.0o 11:05 MLbO. L •.. lave. .JN• « ° fvr Or - n x• 7 G•D tOO•t. I N I 'Vd •T� • 0CY ON •4ry ��0 • Qr.1 tan •6100 W OOZE _ I't r Si000.H Ono) 0 , 710 7202 . L S., •■ xt•4 No11dIZf.X'a h JK 11n9' !17-, ;1114 :A • (•1N •i -- S 0100 ,v• f-- . •__...Mf N= • • a i'•W � -. _ 1•M . __ ... t ._ 4n M1 j dVu h1INIVIA • a. rnbaa. 4'ni0R NCu.92d..0J cthmoKb •..,dp •' ■2Ol70t0 twMo0 '•1. K. L LISP • 700 7101, NGL'G17.75= •• 19231V611 N • L••.•i .IY•aO••• ` 71»11 ••(v.n,N!.•. '•+uvr•t 2-111';•• - •■ • 17r. - 12 ipso MIL.. Stn. JOIN .L0v1 O.Lb .0 If! •7 ) a. •0'0 T CC'C. • 077 6 ^' V a •NUtf ..a•••5 - •o'L.. 4 t.0a ea. I . at. 0 '011!} "9 - T - A L,,.•z•t •-•at .t •••c. r N' 100.1 _0 .• C••• »•. s'0 11tL . art. s N. NN11.1 M Sv. v,wfvl. .0 21�.LYM iL 01. riO• 01 1fl2 •• i .r'•rr ...L•J T.ZWAMir 5n 111'111n NO11.d12l2Sa 1V931 531011 'Td2i31439 • w••.n 7 _ -W... be 1SOit T ON Ja1MI 11v1S J•L•Wbd 1.Y 6 NtwJ. NO.1LOa 49a1 'r•rvM • J.LNROJ 4N.V .0 y ‘22.10 Sava • Civ10 710 L. •-•00, 1• 0 On . 0500730 T•/ • Ss ^Rai MObv.J v.baLLGOr ••0 S O••■ ti C'r'1 1..0. r0 JR -1'1• -tan 20.0 NOLtrn.0 N, •,-••' 7 ♦.:•o e d 0• W. b0 0 51 0, •..S'nr0 •.11vO 2••"1n - al..* CL 00.r0C011sw fl 11 COLON 11 4.030 0 y10••^.1'•PLL CCV 000„ 4 b1 1.1 O. '7.N •\:.'. - I'9 LW./ M 'Y ig11]Mt'72I 7[•1 Lt'OI.I 7G: ••to...L.N 12...•0010 . 02 . • NI .1 ON.1 Ca••e■• se 9 ‘21/••2 1.' CrLtri SN•Cr: -,7v' :•O VYt.n. • 5.-•••• ' 0. •__ 1 .a7-S• •71•T.+OCt 'oeSt s• 7..••••12,0 i r - S27=•r7 - 1 , 11 SS ,,S G.. ' -w" �iv.aCN0.�J ,^Y• -J CL%03 1•1•.19 ' V1.M011.1 e0 ..•L.0 .tl.j 00. r,...S = +C.•9+t`'J ip 4••V1'S • 10•••0 •0.0 J.LCN• 5,0.71 .12 9b1.M JarM L7'N'M CNW OOi:r tv,0 • CNI•+1I 71•/» CV 42..= No S- NGOJ b „ v D.Wt,0 aMN•ib a'a J9 00011 SC 00 0.1.. V C LY11�.4 SY.`'ano024a.N•Ht 170 - 1 3.0 •T110 in'i7taG.a - `�_� t!I Cnv ✓.� v.1. "T,v ^f 't1t•0 • AO 1.70•P 1•.. 0. VLa•M ••.O SN+. ea t -.1 Wel 0.• 9 T v I .40'#t N i YClS. ".••••••••• 'S • - - CNv no.7 r NLI• 1.00.01100. r 1400 - The t 11 4, -5 )*� - 4. - 12 .1,-0 0 1,1•1' - -' 471 - �:-= s,^ -1Z�s` o fiD • • , 1 ty '� ; • S • l K • sck fnfn•d r1.11twL • 3.1 ywn a , • Ars 14,1••• . IELEv. • 1 • ste.r....• Ofe.,60.•1',e. WO I4.7•1:1* • 4% r'VOLL uwilub . • ; • . StMI 114 •e rt. • 10 Ye.* -•••••••• 5TAIR11 mrsaK . lye I.. - 0 / • 1 1.14' • • . rns. • ; I-- CY.01314‘..- P.Ti4C<Ver. e ., • ei• I FR4 1= 1 .. Ir k a= LC! FN. st= 1 A WK. •1•••. _ : a . fie la • r 13 2 -IORSZANINE.i fl..DOP% - • sca•mo ./.41;lAt ,••_:••_, •_ .41.0, 4. - •41.• • 1:: • '. • . .. • . 1 . • . • r r o . . . . . e M . •'• .1:•••. . .. . 1--....e..adrary . -7.41..Garar.4 • • •• • . Jm= dar ' - 0 1 ,..,...., . —I , • Ars 14,1••• . IELEv. • 1 • ste.r....• Ofe.,60.•1',e. WO I4.7•1:1* • 4% r'VOLL uwilub . • ; • . StMI 114 •e rt. • 10 Ye.* -•••••••• 5TAIR11 mrsaK . lye I.. - 0 / • 1 1.14' • • . rns. • ; I-- CY.01314‘..- P.Ti4C<Ver. e ., • ei• I FR4 1= 1 .. Ir k a= LC! FN. st= 1 A WK. •1•••. _ : a . fie la • r 13 2 -IORSZANINE.i fl..DOP% - • sca•mo ./.41;lAt ,••_:••_, •_ .41.0, 4. — ^ -- ---- - - - - -- -4 EA5T = LEV[TION -:a..c Ya•• I h O r •O '•f. O . . • 'G /wn.ee�oa.�. . WEe.T EL vv OWL •..+r • • AIYO/TI AKA. ® Ite.`I • LDFi_ ThCM*/ • / / / /C hkaa • A j; xe+ s- Y S ':Z!"..iti ••• 4 se• 1 r •• V* C. bra 1154.• • ••••11111.111.11..... NAV lee Yea 5/.•.• Nave. •-ft.Notoc V'se ••• Yt•-• 54% • •••••••••••1•• .44 • Oh. • .0 :• •'• •• •••••••ft• ..4•61.A.• ••■■•• locrata444,44o. ...M. • S. • U.S •.....05.• fumy.. • man h '""'" 51111CaTe.. ... TYPICAL StC-1:3,1• OUTLYING SHRUBS it CALL WON'S (.....5+0.•+.. um ow PW' --- 7611Wfi . affillna. 1"Tir • . ;Whi *O C.1...111.14 7.e S. f"""" •••••• 1.111111. Lea TYPICAL t tC7101.1- PLANTING ItteD WIL.DING 6 cALe • .I•Nt BITTMAN SANDERS HASSON 1 ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATIS PS A • I • A .1111 ..... Il• 11..1 • • 4 11.44 11 ° a raf. 5 Vv1. 21.5% SYN. 11....1 ove en r.....117 let v.v... 1 • M.... Pra. .0..4 U kart.. a• 4.1. • ••••• Ir. • /.11,7 . 0.0.11C }an) a... , •••■1 ff.• taNN as 4 eons. af• 11.4b. at. TYPICAL PLANTING NeNt :rec..* • . (a • 6N.... Y.s so_ uLkwriNG PLX,4 uiLothic • c...• I. I. - • I' • ---- II 0 U 4 I••••••••Me•Nt.....: et•-es 1.111111•411 •1•11011•110. 1 4.. Rm... lc.... • 1;4 • , 14,162.. • 1.• viatta.1.413 ASIA • _ ••••■■• f eV. At !If. ■•••• - NV, ,• l■-••• . ..C .. ... rt....414 ■•• ' 7 4. °•• IZZ: 0.1:11 • .T.• • e s. • , r FUTURE DUILOING f; • T Tf IL _L.-- • P ks1 1' st 6 t• LA14 • OUTLY•JC• • 6. 4. 6 0 ri.okN A iNA 11144147■Ve 14661., 6 IS 0 ikPLIJIP J 0.$4.1*R-1^%,. PARS— 4aufw J..Ef * *** 14.- MOW ' •• 1- 44.4.41+4.4 !! 4•47 akt 7 .- 3 .•••• ••••• • •••■•.....• 7.1r t ' 1 r ierd irCil 11741141A-TILIFIaP. • 21191°‘ ii MOP ITVIIIPTT) BITTMAN SANDERS HASSON L ARCHITECTS A•I•A A N D A S S O C I A T E S P S .o NIL1.. • .. rauu y. t 4m y r u r/1M►IFO V• . ru1LDIr16 DATA • s ly._WuRdW1f / raw 1rsVOTa1A1. N APtriCUGS %Pak w/ awce. 61/04. sr" on Vs A Poo restouri$ irmu Or1.417E I•Rr•• i .Loos \ 'WM, MP . mow. 100 si rim iisn. 1 0 61 /4M>i ..^.. ^•• . h Ml PPEUMIr1ARY ',rr PI r • +1P -0' 0 rtt&P P W T M PC 4•/-: " <i M14* 4r►CCr 4 44v ►N4C 4D. U 'NIII..NAM/. E.y411 r3q- VP' •/k Ifir CLANATIPH yir 416(.117r1 A Det.T a -1 "'"' a Mel anl 111, It - : : i Pa - -, 100 IP .F. — r .3 ■ 1.1111.11111111111,111111.111 maw liIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiillit . liiiiiiiiine • • • 411IPTUTI *M VD" gillAATIR1 T.R. AISPI•oorty fA41.4..• Ao• ••••••,„( GriAr7 ov-a 1 :.11111 111111fm IOW +1:2, Ismommw4. fft _ tp. 7 oltsh BITTMAN SANDERS HASSON I ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES PS A • I - A 4.6 SIC. .1111•81.• %I.S61.1.1tiON •23.391. 21.1110 S I i .ffe4ed•I eFeumiriAF e:4-EVATIC7ry 4 =elat PPOPP*M7 irivwnalfr- 1h?* sr 1101 mgrAcAL &uPPu-'1 ittv *rimer 44.01 PLALIE 50. 11414•U-A. .5.444151T F 1t� 'HXG N/ha•WIn•N. G* 11'N7J 4 J41-41* wdW'* -lot �yMVd ndt i eia4' Wet. • Oftal9 11.1y*1011•Y/a* sda64i rarer-- lie■roji I .• u*•■• • un• uaS • ••unu. *MI I • V • 1 • V S i . $ 3 1 V 1 3 O S S V O N V S1J311 HJbV ' NOSSVH Sb Wl 3aNVS NVlls VISO •O -.10 •an d • v 1.101.W49 1116 •o -.t _.4h U I1VM - 1* aNgsi 1Ja11VAa 12 11.40dJ will/ mow' 111 i Pi lip =MI Alma.. um III. laiN MEI *VAIN ammo erwlwm om I I 77.7 70,7777,..,,, r a V7.777,..o .. . —.. - . . . . .- ...........77.7comemoval . . . . „........i,...„. .......1,• „..., ... ........._ __________ ...,..,..,1111.3_,91.". . . Wri•el Thristl9.,51 Pirl _ r.-:::-.%.,:.- :::.:r.-...‘...r , r..-..z.7......• r • .; iS , =scam it ammo. . • - N/ - . . . i ; J.:3iHcs wire: aux: tsvia Prra..km,orrs WIT Crl :11 71.1 0 .1 1 ,1.07 - 1v1 11 . 30.• 710.1; ?On Z , 7:11134 criforl• ,W! 1ra 7.17 7711v1X4 'war; )Ia .4t .114.• 5Citi '1W 0710,1 xr4Jr. curl .0 7;41 !XI.. .L *VC,. 4.4 4rxulj lC j r "340.. 4.1 11 a ra 21,1.0.03 ArIM 7 ...T. Km Cr., tr. 4 ra ,Q • 7,•Z IL, WWI), II? " Uth,74 a Jr4121 -914 r r•f h CorNOIC.,1 /13'd . . ••-• • - re r ea . s a ;15r_.11`,"•2Criplw,...},:;‘ , 12:7:" . C:4,12 r raraw., MITI.. MK; • *Horror( A . =r,r111 NMI 7.11 0 H•d1 • 1 .01.• • 01.1, 0106 —3 7 .77.77 , 77."0.7 , ....1 72.C.rt c5 / rtu O1II1Q N2N .1.,__2Ad=rrt_err rnar, .312 f 1 . 1 . •••• flax PV'II racial vrlvlj a I t - • -1" 0 c., iii;n1 "°1 401 1 1 I MI 4W7G.....7 • Jatil alr.le.ic Ten) i 1 r ,,,,,R i. I ' ('' • :' . i. - • • • ' • ' C........ 6: ' Irt kr 4. 7 ' .. ...)<.!.;. ..'. ' 1 • .. ; .a2ricr 2 rerv,7 " • O. - • r. 0 '7 „ . _LSO '1 .1- hrtr a .. I 1 • . 42 or,01.1..1. a a.17 - Nrnrimaacrir? • 110V 77.7 70,7777,..,,, r a V7.777,..o .. . —.. - . . . . .- ...........77.7comemoval . . . . „........i,...„. .......1,• „..., ... ........._ __________ ...,..,..,1111.3_,91.". . . Wri•el Thristl9.,51 Pirl _ r.-:::-.%.,:.- :::.:r.-...‘...r , r..-..z.7......• r • .; iS , =scam it ammo. . • - N/ - . . . i ; J.:3iHcs wire: aux: tsvia Prra..km,orrs WIT Crl :11 71.1 0 .1 1 ,1.07 - 1v1 11 . 30.• 710.1; ?On Z , 7:11134 criforl• ,W! 1ra 7.17 7711v1X4 'war; )Ia .4t .114.• 5Citi '1W 0710,1 xr4Jr. curl .0 7;41 !XI.. .L *VC,. 4.4 4rxulj lC j r "340.. 4.1 11 a ra 21,1.0.03 ArIM 7 ...T. Km Cr., tr. 4 ra ,Q • 7,•Z IL, WWI), II? " Uth,74 a Jr4121 -914 r r•f h CorNOIC.,1 /13'd . . ••-• • - re r ea . s a ;15r_.11`,"•2Criplw,...},:;‘ , 12:7:" . C:4,12 r raraw., MITI.. MK; • *Horror( A . =r,r111 NMI 7.11 0 H•d1 • 1 .01.• • 01.1, 0106 —3 7 .77.77 , 77."0.7 , ....1 72.C.rt c5 / rtu O1II1Q N2N .1.,__2Ad=rrt_err rnar, .312 f 1 . 1 . •••• flax PV'II racial vrlvlj a I t - '0.9. ...VW ,.............. »10.41 MI 4W7G.....7 WY. 11.7 ...., , - - f..... ,... C Clira. .r.ar ,..-ot C........ .— 17 7.7 Vila-C Nes ,...., )34 .• 3 a 't: : .0 if '' z b. c-iNVir43 .a2ricr 2 rerv,7 " • O. - • r. 0 '7 „ . _LSO '1 .1- hrtr a .. 77.7 70,7777,..,,, r a V7.777,..o .. . —.. - . . . . .- ...........77.7comemoval . . . . „........i,...„. .......1,• „..., ... ........._ __________ ...,..,..,1111.3_,91.". . . Wri•el Thristl9.,51 Pirl _ r.-:::-.%.,:.- :::.:r.-...‘...r , r..-..z.7......• r • .; iS , =scam it ammo. . • - N/ - . . . i ; J.:3iHcs wire: aux: tsvia Prra..km,orrs WIT Crl :11 71.1 0 .1 1 ,1.07 - 1v1 11 . 30.• 710.1; ?On Z , 7:11134 criforl• ,W! 1ra 7.17 7711v1X4 'war; )Ia .4t .114.• 5Citi '1W 0710,1 xr4Jr. curl .0 7;41 !XI.. .L *VC,. 4.4 4rxulj lC j r "340.. 4.1 11 a ra 21,1.0.03 ArIM 7 ...T. Km Cr., tr. 4 ra ,Q • 7,•Z IL, WWI), II? " Uth,74 a Jr4121 -914 r r•f h CorNOIC.,1 /13'd . . ••-• • - re r ea . s a ;15r_.11`,"•2Criplw,...},:;‘ , 12:7:" . C:4,12 r raraw., MITI.. MK; • *Horror( A . =r,r111 NMI 7.11 0 H•d1 • 1 .01.• • 01.1, 0106 —3 7 .77.77 , 77."0.7 , ....1 72.C.rt c5 / rtu O1II1Q N2N .1.,__2Ad=rrt_err rnar, .312 f 1 . 1 . •••• flax PV'II racial vrlvlj a I t - s " .. ...V0 PA ....WI" ' WPC - to To run.. no44r.Ter. IF ran_ Jelf•If ••••• 44.-• 771 F.0 ;r• S' 1■41.0.141. BITTMAN SANDERS HASSON I ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES IS A•I•A • MO 111111.•11.• . •••••111•••• • 413.2.11 • lome Waft 0u...a ■00.•• • gill; ' II- P.N. I • Ctlee 11 I I r — AAP LAI tti'1•4 1 LJIL.P1N . • 1 \;* • ! • :M.:. ALL. 0.00•4•.0, 4,1411t* 11.1114.9.00 vTl• SiSomIO KO... IOUS wau,0444 • 4404,1• tif 3,401/42 Of or o AcoowTse..s. (.41 01 404 -- I • SSSSS • M •••• •• 1 GJ , 916, 14 .4..7, to74•44.4. 111414.. kr .S . 171: cat- e • .; „ " OLIO SAO a. &PI t."- (A"). WA*—:. .TI ON 0 '4•4 AL.L 1 ON ys r-o• •s, • . ty. I A ' • ;Slat . ..a .. .4= t -L Z F.: T 1. 0 N A.- as A- .4.4 aft..1 lage.geo ".5. ot v47 / WA • - • .. IRAS. we UMW.. MI aca Om 1•44.441.4411. tot 4.4. _e .444 4.4444 214 4.4 of. . • ;e4iltgairits tf.GTIon A 141044 ff1J45. WIf NOR. .. MED I riCA.WIP4S.044o, PAP•14 411118TD fuer or 4 143 NNW ANIMA , 11~1011011 .•••• - •.•••••41. j low, *AK 13.1f . 1 &2 0 ort e.ION 0 . • ..o. --.- -77 I '... 1 ! *.- i 1 - . ! ..Cill 4 ,I I J i ril ...' .i.-::_--' — -,....t.....- :11 1 I i •. I ' { 0 F./v. 7, 1 .•: ,.. : ' I 1 ' it-4,44 p r..\ y '7; , 81 1_ i 1.). i . i• , . 2 ,....„..., . 1 1 1 ,... _...• PLANNIN; DEPT. = •D yrt - 4"75% , -:<•:D #Q1 :e.;14V • . • . • s." .f• -r • I- 40 111111 ----111111111111111111111111.11•111MMO --4 • 4..00. :::••••• • „ it• • • 7 . • :191. *. • • . • -0 ditt we vim - a-7 sm. 1111111101111111111111 •••■.. titoi.t. ••••••••■••• • • PS ••••• •trie ti••••tr DA!. ct.r....aa. WOW • -_•-• IPINPAGI _ • - i•••• .41 RITTMAN SANDERS HASSON 1 ARCHITECTS D ASSOCIATES PS A•I•A cis ttttt 11.• • SIAM& Salon ! • •/• L.• \* AT I ON o F- N OBJOICW. fO • Cy*T • OF t t. -.2 • F E ® S• VAT ON .1•1. ai too...40* 'AV... ray NOrulf.r.Pie, ffittltio•• M. *II MP -it 7t OVA pet, IVIMININ 1151111113 e ‘.• T _ _ 1,414._••••••••at - I • =47, • ES A 5 - r ( •ys %IF 21. • A=0 ••••■•Ir AM, 4 • - ••••*.4 • — St. I - C awn,. 1,••••••) • I • ....•••••• •••• •••••... 4.1.4 • 1 3 ; •••• .2:41ATG.4 7.911.4 R.tvr 5+1.31%.17 IN G., NI AT ON , 14111.61 111.14..011.4 NOR. PP I 1 Dt.W,Tfk PARK. • 111.1. Or. P4.• O! 13.01•••• 1141/a•••••411 • •4 ..■•■•■• .1111.• (1.• • 0 I w pt„..As AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION In December, 1979, representatives of LDR and Normed, Inc. petitioned the City Council to vacate 44th P1. So. which is a (former) pub- lic street, dividing the adja- cent sites of the two industrial concerns. The petitioners, in arguing successfully for the street vacation request, asserted that private use . of 44th P1. as a joint driveway serving the two sites would reduce the number of individual curb - breaks opening on South 134th St., and would facili- tate a coordinated approach to design and development of the two sites. Accordingly, this report will discuss and compare the site layout and architectural approach used in the two adjoining develop- ments from the standpoint of com- plementarity. CI T Y OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDI NORMED IN STRIAL BUILDING SITE LAYOUT 1. Proposed "Normed" Site (3.46± acres) - This project consists of two free- standing office /warehouse buildings covering 42% of the site. Under terms of the agreement vacating 44th P1. So., a 5' sidewalk and 5' wide planter strip must be provided on the west side of the driveway, as depicted on Exhibit "E ". Note that frontage landscaping improvements will be provided within the public right -of -way on South 134th St. This approach has been found ac- ceptable to the Public Works Department. Staff is satisfied with the Normed site layout as presented, with exception of the 5' wide planter strip adjoining the freeway ramp. We suggest that a minimum of 10' wide planter area, as provided on the LDR site, is necessary for adequate visual screening of the site from public view of the adjoining highway. ■ • • 4.1 st • vrl' PSI I Itl 65 1%3136 j�3 T7 /CT 65 :- JI S p 133 R D �" � � _ U \ ,10-J NORMED Site LDR Site ST ACT vPElI PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 22, 1980 Page 2 LDR & NORMED INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 2. Proposed "LDR" Site (1.01±. acres) - This project is a freestanding industrial warehouse with loading dock and office /showroom. Like the Normed project, a frontage landscape area of similar width is provided within the So. 134th St. right -of -way. Note also that a 10' wide rear planter strip is provided adjacent to the freeway ramp to enhance visual screening value. Staff's principal concern is the lack of side yards proposed for the LDR project. The Tukwila Police and Fire Departments both wish to be able to drive a vehicle along the east side of the building, and suggest that a 20' lane (split 10' on LDR's side, and 10' on the adjoining site's side of their mutual property boundary) is in order. While this objective is a worthy one from a public safety standpoint, the Planning Division believes that a minimum 5' wide planter area on the west side of the building is a more desire - able trade -off and would have less of an impact on the interior space utility of the building. 3. Trash Enclosures - We note that neither site has provided outdoor space for trash dumpster enclosures. Unfortunately, tenants who place these units inside their building are not always careful to return them inside promptly after collection. We suggest, therefore, that a single outdoor enclosure be provided at the north side of the LDR Building, and that individual enclosures be provided for each tenant on the Normed site. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT In comparing the exterior materials proposal for both developments, it seems that there are sufficient similarities in scale and texture to support the concept of visual complementarity. We suggest the following minor changes in the LDR building concept, however, to enhance the visual identity of the two projects as a joint development: 1. Substitution of a metal or glassweld color fascia band on the warehouse portion in place of rake - finish concrete texture. The result will be to add a slight overhang to the top of the building wall, creating -_.a slight shadow line and reducing apparent visual height. 2. Substitution of sandblasted concrete texture in place of "smooth finish" exterior walls on the warehouse portion of the building. LANDSCAPING Exhibit "D" of the LDR set contains a specific landscape plan for the site. We find the plan adequate and suggest that the plant materials selected and initial sizes specified be established as the standard for the Normed site as well, with exception of the following: • ., PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 22, 1980 Page 3 LDR & NORMED INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 1. Rear Property Line - Minimum 4' high Douglas Fir specimens at 30' o.c. are inadequate to achieve significant screening value in a timely fashion. We suggest that a minimum 10' height at 20' -25' centers be established as the standard for the rear perimeter landscaping concept of both sites. 2. West Elevation Landscape Area - As mentioned previously, we suggest that a 5' wide planter area be required between the west wall of the LDR building and the pavement edge of (former) 44th P1. So. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of site architecture and landscaping concept for the Normed and LDR industrial buildings, according to exhibits A, B, C & D of the LDR application and Exhibits E, F, & G of the Normed application sub- ject to conditions as follows: 1. Modification of Exhibit "E" (Normed) to include a 10' wide planting strip on that portion of the site immediately adjoining the freeway exit. 2. Modification of Exhibit "A" (LDR) to reflect addition of a 5' wide planter strip between the west wall of the LDR building and the east edge of pave- ment of former 44th P1. So. 3. Provision of outdoor trash enclosures for each tenant space within the Normed project and one such enclosure to serve the single tenant LDR building. Trash enclosures shall be gated, and design thereof shall be approved by staff prior to release of building permits. 4. Modification of Exhibits "B" & "C" (LDR) to reflect the the following changes: A. Substitution of metal or glassweld color fascia band in place of rake - finish concrete texture. B. Substitution of sandblasted concrete texture in place of "Smooth Finish" exterior walls on the warehouse portion of the building. 5. Landscaping standards depicted on Exhibit "D" (LDR) shall establish the basic theme for both sites. Modifications to Exhibit "D" shall be as follows: A. Minimum initial planting height of pseudotsuga mensiemsii adjacent to freeway shall be 10 feet at 20' -25' on center. B. Plantings installed within the 5' wide strip specified in Stipulation 2 above shall be subject to staff approval. C. Automatic irrigation system details shall be subject to staff ap- proval prior to issuance of project occupancy permits. 1908 • City of Tukwila 6200 soutr ;enter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM FEES: RCPT. M.F. EPIC. J.. NOTE: Please write legibly or type all requested information -- incomplete applications will not be accepted for processing. SECTION I. GENERAL DATA 1) APPLICANT'S NAME Bittman, Sanders, HassonTEJ,EPHON :(206) 623 -2911 and Associates PS 2) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 406 Securities Bldg. ZIP: 98101 3) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Normede Inc. TELEPHONE:( 206) 622 -0444 21=C -6 4) PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS P.O. Box 3644, Seattlezlp 93124 5) LOCATION OF PROJECT: (geographic or legal descrip.) South 134th Street and 44th Place South KROLL PAGE: 6) NAME OF PROJECT(OPTIONAL) Industrial Park for Northwest Medical Supply SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION 7) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE: Two buildings containing offices and warehouse. 8) DO YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT IN PHASES? 9) PROJECT DATE a. NET ACRES b. GROSS ACRES a. NAME: b. NAME: Ix ADDRESS: ADDRESS: c. PARKING SPACES 134' d. FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION 1 + rAPi ne e. LOT AREA COVERAGE BLDG. 65 000 sQ.FT. LANDSCAPE 20000 SQ. FT. PAVING 570Q0 SQ. FT. 10) DOES THE AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE SITE EXCEED 10 %? ' D YES ENO 11) EXISTING ZONING M -1 12. EXISTING CCMP.PLAN 13) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION DYES NO ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? e AND 14) IF YOU WISH TO HAVE COPIES OF CITY CORRESPONDENCE, STAFF REPORTS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS SENT TO ADDRESSES OTHER THAN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNER, PLEASE INDICATE BELOW. nrPD SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT I, Herbert Bittman (agent) , being duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained an. the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to t'' be o knowledge. and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 15th day of September , 1980 , DATE 9 -15 -80 �� ®/ /f •' _ ure �' �?''` •3' • ser or owner) A`•ary Pr. is in an or residing at Issaquah Was ington SECTION IV: SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS NOTE: All applications require certain supporting documents and information which are described in the following table: TYPE OF APPLICATION (CHECK BOX(ES)) SUPPORTING INFORMATION REQUIRED REZONING 1E, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ., 1C, 3, 4, 5, 7,.11 VARIANCE 1F, 4, 7, 11 or 17 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1D, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12 . SHORELINE MGMT. PERMIT 18, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11,1.3 SHORELINE MGMT PERMIT REVISION., 4, 10, 16 . WAIVER 1A, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 SHORT PLAT 4, 5, 9 BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 4, 5, 8 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 11, 12, 13 LANDSCAPE REVIEW 14 SUBDIVISION 4, 5, 6, 15 SIGN VARIANCE 4, 6, 16, 17 * *See TABLE 1 for detailed description. Y lI r k • --enbitglonaxlmenlKnEttetrmarrinII .:/.( Z ' TIIN•VOter•41 -, tr,veeAs Pfit9PO49f2 - (ADJI001-rr, flave01 BITTMAN SANDERS -HASSON ARCHITECTS AND AS,SOCIATES PS En A•I•A 406 SECURITIES BUILDI oc sz Be ez BB se vz ez BB tz oe I a a a st a 'a a 01,1 • ....111111I11111111111111111111111111,1111111111111410.1!IIIIIIII14011141111111111111P1111111111111111111111111111111111111111,11 SEATTLE,. WASNIN•TON 111101 " -•.: • • •,, • . 623.241) . , ,,. • 2 3 4 5 FLExl LE RULER -302 AWmari • 1.4 I-i I M Fz- V I7 REVISIONS . . IV . , . . . _ . .. . . • . . • . • — . orn:...zeg...e....................1■................. . IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT DA • . • , DIAWM • • rTh 1.1r1 riAFT:':' ..„ , • Iv, I ..„ligb4,41,.., 1.1 .1.2,41-L3viottt: 1111111(1 ;494X'c'W4/7V/YeA draMITscuni5=121,S1/220^•• (A 1/P1" $1.40VATI:Pri "G" I/t" ot-ev•riort BITTMAN SANDERS HASSON AND ASSOCIATES P .S 406 SECURITIES 'BUILDING • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON • eXex 1 1101 TQr 0 2 3 4 5 ARCHITECTS • A • I • A • :. 2,3 :2 11 • THIDTITO 7 s: gaIDUEMETT2221EEKEREEIff c BE Be LE 9E SE VZ CZ aZ I 0Z 61 DI LI 91 SI bl CI L It 0 : -1 11 1 114 1 111 / 41 4 11 00 01 6640640 1 .16 0 6 6111 0 11 0 410111116641011 4b 6161616441164111 • REVISIONS 0. . DAVI IT DuICIITION x • prp4A) , fr6 ,9. DATI 4Z412 • , DMA IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS l CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ■ • AW:Tz- . • • ' ve tt.DV#1 TIPN • ..•• • ', • „ .17,1Oti . 1W i7Q,17 1/[:11:".07rP01::. r Via" 451:11747A icqivokor•ep ,fionotim HWY ogP€01 afflot-* Atn.c109 (&(.4$414.014o 112¢4•A,1rof2 Otttfbr/ arl GPI 1.47APITie, 01,01 Fs6o14 (.4.1t r:44oist. Vr 1 'o' • -17FLIV BITTMAN SANDERS H.ASSON I .ARCHITECT-$. AND ASSOCIATES PS .'A•1•A , 406 SECURITIES IUILDING • SEATTLIE, WASHINGTON 48101 • 623-2111 111 ifirrilipti 11111 11011111 2 3 4 ripTI • . 5 6 7 FLE %ISLE RULER .362 Awrcarrs 1 OE CZ [IL LE 9Z SZ VZ CZ ZZ I Q Z 61 01 a 91 SI 'El t 0 Flri1414 NOVO." REVISIONS SY 011011IPTION 0 Ulf tiltri 12 II I CKID--, D SAW Ilfiank@IN4 : IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS l ' 1. CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT )(*Mfai0E- a 1 HOPTHv4 :ME121(,'6,C4prt:T.. oTp-a-r 41 44 1CN.C„' oaE 5olimuies• • • , , • ,, „ -• •• • •• • I 4r9f bittman sanders hasson architects .