HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 79-29-SMP - GAZECKI - ROCKY MOUNTAIN LOG HOMES SHORELINE MANAGEMENT79-29-smp
southcenter boulevard interurban avenue green river watercourse
GAZECKI - ROCKY MOUNTAIN LOG HOMES SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN
ROCKY MOUNTAIN LOG HOMES
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE
ONLY
Type of Action
I1 Substantial Development Permit
❑ Conditional Use
0 Variance
Display area with parking
upon the following property
township, range)
The project will
Application No. 79 - 29 - SMP
Administering Agency City of Tukwila
(City or County)
Date received 14 August 79
Approved XXX Denied
Date 30 June 80
Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to
TYLER G. GAZECKI
(name of applicant)
3300 Smith Tower
Seattle, WA 98104
to undertake the following development Construct Log -Home
BE
SEE ATTACHMENT
(be specific)
S/W ; Section 24, T.23 R 4
(legal description, i.e., section,
within shorelines of statewide
(be /not be)
significance (RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within
a URBAN designation. The following master
(environment)
program provisions are applicable to this development
Shoreline Master Program chapter 6
(state the master program sections or page numbers)
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant
to the following terms and conditions
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act
of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from
compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordi-
nances or regulations applicable to this project, but not incon-
sistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (7) in the
event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions
hereof.
CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS
NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL.THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING
THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL
OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED.
30 June 1980 Mark Caughey / ` �
(Date) Directof`, OffC
Community Development
THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE.
Date received by Department of Ecology
Approve Denied
This substantial development permit with conditional use/
variance is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to
chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to
the following additional terms and conditions:
(Date) (Signature of Authorized
Department of Ecology Official)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS ATTACHED
TO SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
79- 29 -SMP
1) Prior to issuance of building permitsto construct the project approved
under this Substantila Development Permit, the property owner or his
authorized agent shall complete the following actions:
A) Submit legal documents necessary to effect a grant of
easement to the City of Tukwila for that portion of the
subject property forty (40) feet landward from the mean
high water elevation of the adjacent Green River allow-
ing public access and right of the City to construct
recreational trials and related improvements thereon.
Said easement shall run with the land, and said docu-
ment shall be recorded with the County Department of
Records and Elections following review and acceptance
of the form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
B) Contact the Department fo Public Works and complete applications
for water and sewer connections. Public works will calculate the
following charges and collect from the applicant the maximum
possible charges. After necessary installations are completed
and actual costs are determined, the city shall refund
any excess monies collected.
WATER- Connection per TMC
Latecomer Charges
Installation costs (estimate)
SEWER- Connection per TMC
Inspection Fees
No installation if stub available;
otherwise estimated installation
costs
C) Submit application materials as prescribed by the Planning Department
for Board of Architectural Review approval of Site, Architecture,
Landscaping diagrams for the subject development.
2) Signing depicted on Exhibits A and C attached to this Substantial Develop-
ment Permit is not approved. A seperate permit subject to constraints of
TMC Title 19 shall be obtained for any signing installed on this site.
3) Sidewalk improvements shall be constructed concurrent with development of
this site as provided in City of Tukwila Ordinance 1158.
to 4
..
DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
The Southwesterly 100 feet in width of vacated Blocks 4 to 9 and
12 to 17, inclusive of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle,
as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 46, records of
King County;
TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which upon vacation attached
to said property by operation of law;
PARCEL B:
A strip of land lying adjacent and parallel to the Northeasterly
line of the following described property:
The Southwesterly 100 feet in width of vacated Blocks 4 to 9 and
12 to 17, inclusive, of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle,
as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 46,•records of
King County;
TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which upon vacation attached
to said property by operation of law;
Said strip of land being described as follows:
Beginning at Highway Engineer's'Station P.O.T. (2M) 127 +75.0
on the 2M -line shown on the State Highway Map of Primary State
Highway No. 1 (SR 405) Green River Interchange, Sheet 2 of 4
Sheets, established by Commission *Res. No. 1192, February 19,
1962;
thence Northeasterly at right angles to said 2M -line to a point
on the Northeasterly boundary of the above described property;
thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly boundary a
distance of 25 feet to the true point of beginning of this
description;
thence continuing Oorthwesterly along said Northeasterly
boundary a distance of 100 feet; •
thence Northeasterly at right angles to said Northeasterly
boundary a distance of 50 feet;
thence Southeasterly parallel to and' SO feet distant from said
Northeasterly boundary for a distance of 100 feet;
thence Southwesterly a distance of 50 feet, more or less, to
the true point of beginning;
ALL Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of
Washington.
Order No. 490429
•:•,■'-..
CONIC. C
• •
F/GRITO 3R05.
v IP 5' OFFSICT ‘IiRCL L "8"
( I,
4 i
1 i
r ivi
ry • / 41' ,.
j it?' N 59. 32.'54" W 157,43' 4r"
i
.1' 0 _--4----*-14 --w- / ,y, .., ■„,- • st' / Af A A Ii' 1 . r to
o / C: `CI
/ /
I / I ....,..• ,/ 1 ki
..,- ... .... /
4 1
I I I
/
/ -1. / /
J REL. 'A" •
/ - • F3AC /' . - , / / i' )1'
• )(/ .
1
i . /0.336 AC. , // .. i /,
/Th
i •
f
i •'' l ''.. / ' • • , • . . .1 •:' . / /
I .
(
. I 1 '. . : .. . / , . . /
F RE/ • / •
• I /
.
'A HA). 1 1 / •. .' / /
• PrtiiTi
th
1 : / /
/ / i j .
H)
• /
• - . - .) .... *: (7. '
i •i ••-kf..3
1 / /
5,• ,k 54 W / 133.34'
1.: /
IP 5' oPrse .
•
•
- 4)
FENCED SRAVEL
pARKtr4c., AREA
. ' , • • .
• . , •• . • .• :
._ .
! •.. ' , .. ....
•.:,'
• ' , • I , f • ■ . 4 • . . , - :, . . . . . , . . . .
' . ••■ • / • "r•:- , -. •■••••■ .,........: ...;, it: 1 ... 1
. , 1 ,,.., ,:- • . ..'! :,..: '.., i:: ',. „ .,!: .......'.. !
.( • '', `, ! . ' .,' e ,, . .. 4. ' ,:, • • • '
. . . • . ,';',.. •'.' ... .• 7• ;C: " .1, ''
• ' ; '. .. 1
• • - ' .• . - • 4 • ••• • 4 1, ,,,),.. ; . ,,, r , i i.,..' ....". •' . . • ,,,,,,..•:• . ., •
' ? . • *.•• :' l '.'.". '•'-.-. ,:; V - .. '':.‘ '..;.'...1 ' V. :,'`.• • ••. :. 1-
TRAFP L%1-IT
FIRE N'YI:5.
CATCH E5AS1N
MAN HC L.
0
\/
/ \
i-i1G1-4 CYCLONE. FENCE-
PIG NAIL
CONC. BLOCK
et • • ; • ,.,••
• • • . •• • - •
•
oeralo' 25-00 .
_
• - '
(
E -1- \./
(
Ei-EV
• 1
• .
•••••i•-''•-
•
gut k f r- a
51 5
FGGK - r P"DuHTA%N
t4 Jim f.iuorcT
1_4252 NLMES
- 'rfl t v.+'.. .
r 2 ��
S ITE LOCATION:
CGF'tIEg INTFIlint
TUKWUR, WAe
O.C- 41t,3K t../CIS.
CAM: (oltAIXT7D
Xis•LFT Ae, t•i71
rg.14• -TEA
r 75Z,K1 tix- 'I.aN
C- 4•zosl
ATI . '61a3
I4zt 1J. 34'y T.
.J
1
�IE>�IA�tiF
!7A/
I. NGrt-Tk rAr c - - caul 1 PACK 1'P WTI=S
'j> -11� Pr3�Fa. ITtLIJ�tST'S LarzaELT LP c=1-
�ACrb:
THS 1/4 TO - it - •E SOLI 15 •Za4..160 FMK
IND'Jsi1CIpL_ LSE. IT G IJI F1 CV6Z7 AT'THISTIME
W ITT} THE EXG' Prbt..1 or A c41Au rAJ t1
IcP.Q It . T1•IE CaRF1m-4 F NE".
�• E 7. A SMALL ?La4% t3JLM FPRIEIP Br T•iE
G- tFEF.+J 11V6. u ' "R7 - fl E IT 15 ZONED
FVFt AND IS GIRRFNTizr
uNIMFizOEEF7.
�. we5T AC.fCGS 44TERufce1 t..1 /WE 1'i A -5TEEF
APIA ZONED FOR LOW - c>c -i i - f siolag TAt_.
utE. tT tis cuRRb1`trizr U■IMPROVF2=I
D.PIR fit 65 - F
TREA'1
R7L.P.S 5Fj NI
Iz c Li?SL. r p-
i
- -- N ula-ILEnIsK5 cur fIRcDM
*i�• � �cT-
e-mit4c6 :..G,. Put: .
STAR Et . eFowN.
•
I.0 PINE SHIPLAP °IDW4
GvEK42 EX7:,PUT:
Ft::Kr Kr
pt�ttlTv
T ,
rcruoaN.�
'c -Pg ? N /IN '
1
I L oT • b
•
PFZD.T
LATr:DN
elevation
•r1.1
44:1-At-nat.1 P-1
QT1 :
1
1.:CA-GiLA rift
2 0
I ke
IRVOCVDC.NG.tot4
6, e
3 6
0
01 er-Ae-1+
4 e
C;us REID Aft•FLE
3o
1-401zwiay .5plett. •
Cy o
ricc5:1- , :.. -- 1_ -
, ,..4.-., r• I cr:.2
- Fccx-r - 1--tov.fr4TiNat-4 LACC-, HOMES
nw,e5 1 JIM f:TIV. CEATIL6,v4
SIM L.Cc
axlile or iNr: 1 %)-
IlXvid-t. vw
c,,..1 : 7 ALKAttr /
'SAL*. : vor - 1
r..mi.i:
AZK DA--i - Co54 -2171
1421 I-4.34. .ST ti EATft.E - 7tA03
C
trrILI
13'
ed- C.'
/ .
1 1
/
/
/.
/ •
10140
a
s 30.34-
WATE.K
(4113,1-1 rzniel2 =Acne
154-Ccy-
if
E0t:02 '37.117x' SGcc;+E - N 12)1
IGGZ W 1 l
- LJ5a- Ti-,C
.F t.4 Ad 15
dL�lVN IL :3IY]
•1 Z
.-.c 41
- 4-f WA\ '3 .!srrn s wir.4
S ...r11 70, }•IML rO,4 >1 )1:
— =3.v - dr- H - 13
4
ffl
,t,�onao
qi
Ur�v�rys+ T
tt `� E•10117
Via
June 9,`1980
7:0'0 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
PUBLIC HEARING
Denial of Shoreline
Management Permit
filed by Gazecki
Associates to con-
struct a pre -cut
log home display
area near intersec-
tion of Interurban
Ave. & Southcenter
Blvd.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ME MG
City Hall
Council Chambers
MINUTES
Council President Saul called the Tukwila City Council Committee of
the Whole Meeting to order.
MABEL J. HARRIS, GEORGE D. HILL, J. REID JOHANSON, DORIS PHELPS,
Council President DANIEL J. SAUL, GARY L. VAN DUSEN.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE
MAY 27, 1980 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING BE APPROVED AS PUBLISHED.
MOTION CARRIED.
Council President Saul declared the Public Hearing open at 7:10 p.m.
James Stewart, Rocky Mountain Log Homes, stated he would like to
have the City Council consider the granting of the permit application
to construct a pre -cut log home display area at the intersection of
Interurban Avenue and Southcenter Boulevard.
He said they are the second largest distributor of log homes in the
country, as a guarantee of their quality they are FHA and VA approved,
they use Montana pine that has been cut dead - standing. They have
chosen Tukwila as a location because it is a regional center due to
Southcenter, they could take advantage of existing traffic that goes
past the location, being on the banks of the river it ties in with
the Fort Dent motif, it fits in with the wooded area and with the
identification of the waterway.
Ed Robinson, audience, said the City put a pre -cut log house along
the river in the industrial area. He could not see why the man is
being denied the permit.
Mayor Todd asked if it would be in compliance with the set -back
requirements of the Shoreline? Mark Caughey, Planning Department,
said the requirement is 40 feet and they are set -back more than that.
They will grant an easement to the City.
Randy Coleman, Tukwila Chamber of Commerce, said it seems the
surrounding area would not conflict with the idea of a log cabin.
Council President Saul said the area had been considered for a
convention center.
Dave Stewart, Rocky Mountain Log Homes, said they were in a home
show at the Southcenter Mall where there were booths for homes and
home ideas. The response they had to a mini -model of their log
cabin was immense. They received 100 leads from their display.
Ed Robinson, audience, said when the Bicentennial log cabin was
built there was talk about using it for other things. Maybe this
log cabin could be put to some other use.
Since there were no further comments, Council President Saul
declared the Public Hearing closed at 7:23 p.m.
Councilman Van Dusen said he disagreed with Mr. Caughey in his
Staff Report that this site has a high potential for recreational uses
Mr. Caughey said he is concerned about a building located so close
to a recreation area.
Council President Saul said he thought Rocky Mountain Log Homes
would find there would be a small amount of business attracted by
the log cabin.
Councilman Van Dusen said the Planning Department seems to have a
problem with the architectural differences to some of the other
buildings. He referred to the statement in the Staff Report that
stated the structure looks temporary both in form and in use. He
said he thought it will be a permanent office building. Mr. Stewart
said it will be a permanent building that will be built on a
concrete foundation.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
(.
June 9, 1980
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING - Contd.
Denial of Shoreline
Management Permit
filed by Gazecki
Associates to con-
struct a pre -cut
log home display
area near intersec-
tion of Interurban
r Ave. & Southcenter
Blvd. - contd.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Council Intern
DISCUSSION
Review of the prop.
1981 6 -year Transp.
Improvement Program
and
Prop. Res. adopting
revised & extended
Comprehensive
Transportation
Program.
Councilman Van Dusen remarked that any signs that were put up would
have to comply with the sign code. Mr. Caughey said that was correct.
Councilman Van Dusen said the concern about increased traffic would
not compare to the increased traffic due to Longacres and the park.
Mr. Caughey said most of the traffic will be during the weekend
when the park is used the most.
Councilman Van Dusen said with regard to the architectural differences,
he is getting tired of tilt -ups and concrete walls and glass.
Mr. Caughey, Planning Department, said one of the key ideas is to
have a continuity of architectural style. At the present time it
is a mixture. This site is gateway property and might set a trend.
If a small Lincoln -type log cabin is erected there it will be in
contrast to the glass and concrete walls in the area. He said he
felt there should be a restaurant with a view of the river or an
office building that would complement the site. It is 0.35 acres.
The City Council is requested to offer a recommendation of concurrence
or reversal of the decision not to issue a development permit. The
Council's recommendation is advisory only and the final decision on
the matter will rest with the local Shoreline Official or with the
State Shoreline Hearing Board.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY HILL, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ASK
FOR A REVERSAL ON THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT APPLICATION FILED BY ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOMES. MOTION CARRIED,
WITH HARRIS VOTING NO.
Council President Saul introduced Mr. Dennis Hydel, Council Research
Intern. He will be working for the City Council during the summer
on various projects assigned to him.
Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director, introduced Mr. Terry Gibson,
Entranco Engineers.
Mr. Gibson reviewed the background information on the six -year
Transportation Improvement Plan and the funding sources. He said
each City and County must annually update its 6 -year Transportation
Plan and file a copy of adopted program with the Secretary of Trans -
portion. This makes the transportation improvement plans known so
available funding sources can be allocated, after prioritization,
for specific city and county projects. He said the new route
additions to the Federal Aid Urban System is the 188th Connector,
the I -5 interchange at South 188th to 57th Avenue South; the Grady
Way Bridge Extension the west end of Grady Way Bridge to Southcenter
Boulevard; Minkler Boulevard Extension (Andover Park West to South-
center Parkway; Minkler Boulevard Bridge (east terminus to SR 181).
A letter to PSCOG is being drafted with the request that these new
four routes be added to get 1981 funding for these projects.
Councilman Hill said he felt the projects listed as top priority
are not realistic. At the last Public Works Committee meeting he
thought the City was trying to find projects that we could get funded
and get immediate relief. The Grady Way extension is fine, but it is
still too expensive for the City.
Mr. Gibson said the projects are not necessarily listed in order
of priority. Some are regional traffic projects.
Councilman Hill said we have a lot of projects that have been committe
but we have not had the money because we have had to take money to
study the requirements. He said he did not want to take a project
that will take four years to complete.
19 May 1980
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Attention: Mark Caughey
Re: Shoreline Permit #79 -29 -SMP
In response to your letter of March 31, 1980 we are requesting an appeal
of the decision made on permit #79 -29 -SMP.
Please schedule a hearing before the Tukwila City Council for the first
meeting during the month of June for the review of this permit application.
Thank you.
GAZECKI ASSOCIATES
Tyler G. Gazecki
TGG /ceg
GAZECKI ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES
0
3300 SMITH TOWER • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ■ PHONE (206) 625 -1520
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATIOi OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
Proponent
Location of Proposal
Lead Agency
This proposal has been
pact upon the environm
(c). This decision wa
environmental checklis
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Date 2 April 80
COMMENTS:
CONDITIONS PERTINENT T
C. Sufficient lighti
D. State Flood Contr
E. Landscaping requi
activities.
F. Application for s
application.
Construct log home display area
Tyler G. Gazecki
S/E quadrant, Southcenter Blvd. @ Interurban Ave.
City of Tukwila
determined to Fha /not have) a significant adverse im-
nt. An EIS (+s7tis not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
made after review by the lead agency of a completed
and other information on file with the lead agency.
Mark Caughey
Acting Planning Director
FINAL DECLARATION:
File No. . EPIC - 116 -79
Signature
A. A 40' riverfront asement be dedicated to the City with provisions
to allow for cons ruction of appropriate recreation facilities.
B. Sidewalks to be p ovided on Southcenter Blvd. street frontages with
crosswalks provid d for pedestrian access, as required by Public Works
Department.
g at sight to provide for proper police patrol.
1 Zone permit required.
ed to moderate increased runoff due to construction
permit to be made separately from building permit
APPLICATION NO. RECEIVED
OLD.
SEC.- TWP. -R. gry
DATE RECEIVED
2. Mailing address
Section 24, Township 23, Range 4
tion, township, and range)
CITY OF TUKWILA
APPLICATION FOR
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
1. Name of applicant Tyler G. Gazecki
3. Relation of applicant to property:
Owner
Purchaser
Lessee
Other X - Design Consultant to Lessee
PUBLICATION DATES
DATE APPROVED 1111111111111111 ZONING µ -I
DATE DENIED 'tic VW 14%6'4 WATER BODY GC�.EIJ R .
TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is
authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check
with appropriate local, state, or federal officials to determine whether your project
falls within any other permit systems. A fee of $100.00 payable to the City of Tukwila
must accompany this application.
1421 North 34th Street, Seattle, Washington
4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant
flianp Wplls Real Fstatp inc.
15 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington
5. General location of proposed project Southwest Quarter,
6. Name of water area and /or wetlands within which development is pro-
posed Green River
7. Current use of the property with existing improvements
Property is currently vacant
8. Proposed use of property Display and marketing of pre -cut log cabins
9. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project
including additional developments contemplated but not included
in this application:
Est. total construction cost $45.000
Fair Market Value $ 55,000
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Go/A".
(section, to the nearest quarter sec-
C C
9. B. Construction dates (month and year) for which this permit is
requested:
Begin 10/79 End 2/80
10. (To be completed by local official.) Nature of the existing shoreline.
(Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon,
marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such
as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; material such as
sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulk -
heading, if any):
Streamside shoreline, low -bank rip -rap protected
11. (To be completed by local official.) In the event that any of the proposed
buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty -five feet a-
bove the existing grade level, indicate the approximate location of
and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will
have an obstructed view.
12. Additional information:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
CITY OF TUKWILA ) Ss
I , • i ��I� C . =�1 , being duly
sworn, certify that I am the above -named applicant for a permit to con-
struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act
of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are
in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn to me this day of
(Seal)
NONE
(Signatu e)
zi,i/ /717
�L f
r
Notary Public in " and for the
at State W hion, residing
Gazecki Associates
3300 Smith Tower
Seattle, WA. 98104
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
31 March 1980
Attn: Tyler Gazecki
Re: Application 79- 29 -SMP - Denial of Substantial Development Permit
The above- captioned Shoreline Management Substantial Development applica-
tion, received for filing by this office on 14 August 1979, requests City
approval to construct a pre -cut log home display area on a 0.35 ac + adjoin-
ing the Green River water course. After comparison of materials su5mitted
in support of the application to the policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Master
Plan and the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, the proposed action has been
found inconsistent with those policy objectives; the Substantial Development
Permit, therefore, is denied.
FINDINGS:
A) Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 2
"Locate commercial /industrial development in areas with low potential
for recreation or other public uses."
RESPONSE: The subject property stands at the gateway of the principal
access path to Fort Dent Park. Also, this property is with-
in the City's proposed Riverfront Park System described in
the Park and Recreation Master Plan. Thus, this site has a
high potential for recreational uses, when viewed in its
neighborhood context.
-- Economic Development Element - Goal 3
"Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the
river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of
lesser quality."
I
Ltr. to Gazecki Associates Page 2
Application 79- 29 -SMP 31 March 1980
RESPONSE: Most of the recent developments proposed or constructed
on the river frontage of Tukwila favor long -term -uses
such as hotel or office structures, and architectural
concepts employing substantial exterior materials such
as masonry or precast members with glass. The effect of
these developments is to promote high quality appearance
and a sense of permanence.
By contrast, the proposed log -cabin display 'home" seems
to be incongruous with other recent development proposals
in its immediate locale. The structure looks temporary,
both in form and in use. It is also doubtful that the build-
ing could be converted readily to another use should the
proposed occupants go out of business due to cyclical
market fluctuation or prolonged periods of "tight" money.
It appears to us that the proposed development is not
consistent with the high level of quality which has char-
acterized recent shoreline development in Tukwila.
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 4
"Determine and consider the visual impact that the commercial /industrial
development will have on the surrounding area."
RESPONSE: The subject business will depend on drawing customers from a
wide- ranging market area. As evidenced by the extremely -
large sign proposed on Sheet 2 of 2 of the application plan
set, orientation to Route 405 is important to the marketing
'concept of the business. The visual impact of such signing,
and of the building itself which will act in a way similar to
a sign, imposes a disproportionate aesthetic encumbrance on
surrounding properties.
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 1
"Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor
outside interests at the expense of the local population."
RESPONSE: It is our conclusion that the region - serving nature of this
business proposal will have little direct benefit to the
residents of 'Tukwila. The City Council has maintained a
consistent policy of encouraging local- service level business
activity along the Interurban Avenue corridor. Thus, while
this business will probably attract some trade activity from
the local population, the increased traffic attracted to
Interurban Avenue from outside the community and the inten-
sive advertising methods needed to serve this business seem
to diminish its somewhat limited benefit to the immediate
community.
Ltr. to Gazecki Associates Page 3
Application 79 -29 -SNIP 31 March 1980
B) Shoreline Management Act of 1971
-- Commercial Development (WAC- 173 -16- 060(4))
(a) Although many commercial developments benefit by a shoreline
location, priority should be given to those commercial develop-
ments which are particularly dependent on their location and/
or use of the shorelines of the state and other development
that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of
the people to enjoy the shorelines of the state.
RESPONSE: The proposed development does not depend directly on a
shoreline location to facilitate the conduct of business.
While the proposed shoreline location might give this
particular entrepreneur a competitive "edge" due to the
unique aesthetics of the site, no direct correlation bet-
ween the shoreline environment and vacation home sales
operation is apparent.
(b) New commercial developments on shorelines should be encouraged
to locate in those areas where current commercial uses exist.
RESPONSE: The proposed project, if approved, would represent an iso-
lated retail /service business in an area which is currently
vacant and in which the emerging land -use pattern is recrea-
tion and office development. Supporting commercial activ-
ities for this project are not found in the immediate sur-
rounding neighborhood.
C) Interurban Corridor Study Design Plan -
-- Framework Plan, Section D
Reinforcement of gateway identification points at each end of the
Corridor path.
RESPONSE: Report No. 3 of the Interurban Avenue Corridor Study was
presented to the City Council in June of 1978 and has be-
come the benchmark reference for development in this portion
of Tukwila. The plan identifies the Southcenter Blvd./
Interurban Avenue intersection as a key "gateway" to the
Corridor; "gateway definition" says the plan text, "should
distinguish the local sub -area and express its relationship
with Tukwila and its surroundings."
The corridor plan emphasizes creation of a local- serving
pedestrian scale commercial /public recreation activity
center in the corridor area. The proposed log home dis-
play, as mentioned earlier, appears to depend on a regional
Ltr. to Gazecki Associates Page 4
Application 79- 29 -SMP 31 March 1980
market area rather than local. Also, the architectural
concept of the log home seems to contrast with, rather
than reinforce, the identity of Tukwila's emerging develop-
ment character north of Route 405. It appears, therefore,
that the proposed display use of this site will not provide
a consistent "gateway" theme for the Interurban Avenue area
as envisioned by the Corridor Study plan.
D) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan
-- Commerce and Industry Element
Compatibility:
Policy 1. Encourage the grouping of uses which will mutually and
economically benefit each other or provide necessary
services.
RESPONSE: The proposed log home display, as previously mentioned,
would constitute a lone business enterprise in an area
with little potential for mutually supportive retail
activity. Also, this particular type of business has
no peer in the City of Tukwila.
Most business land uses, when grouped, complement one
another since the clientele drawn to one will generally
frequent others. This policy is intended to facilitate
the planned grouping of complementary uses and thereby
maximize the drawing power or reputation of each grouping.
This concept could minimize business failures and promote
prosperity in the business community. The proposed appli-
cation does not seem to lend itself readily to the business
grouping concept.
For the foregoing reasons, therefore, the City Planning Department is
compelled to maintain the integrity of its long -term Shoreline Management
Program by denying application 79- 29 -SMP.
Should you wish to appeal this decision to City Council, according to
WAC 173 -14 -180, please so state in writing to this office by April 15,
1980. You may also elect to follow those procedures outlined in RCW
90.58.180 and appeal this matter directly to t State Shoreline Hearing
Board.
MC /ch
Enclosure
cc: Mayor, Dept. of Ecology
rk Caughey
Acting Director
TUKWI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tyler G. Gazecki
3215 N.W. 60th St.
Seattle, WA. 98107
City of Tukwila
Building Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1853
Office of Community Development
Re: Shoreline Permit Application 79- 29 -SMP
Dear Mr. Gazecki:
We have reviewed the application you have filed with this office for a shore-
line permit; all legal requirements for the publishing of notices pertaining
to this application have been met.
We are prepared to issue a negative declaration for the proposed structure
and related construction upon receipt of a) a legal description of the
property in conjunction with a plat and title report and, b) an accurate site
plan showing property lines adjacent to the river and Interurban Avenue.
The application for a shoreline permit will be approved by the City and referred
to the State subject to compliance with conditions as specified in the enclosed
attachment. Items II A & B must be completed prior to the granting of City
approval for a shoreline permit; Items II C -H will be conditions of the permit
and will be handled in conjunction with the future application for a building
permit.
If you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval, please call
the Planning Department at any time.
LS /mkb
Attachment
cc: Matsen, Cory, Matsen & Sprague
Attn: Joseph R. Matsen
Short, Cressman, & Cable
Attn: Paul Cressman
Sinerely,
Linda Stansfield
Planning Assistant
8 November 1979
•.
79- 29 -SMP /EPIC 116 -79
Filed By Tyler Gazecki For
Rocky Mountain Log Homes
November 1979
I. Negative declaration will be granted upon receipt of:
Leal description of property.in conjunction with plat, and
title report.
Accurate site plan showing property lines adjacent to river
and Interurban Avenue.
II. ,Shoreline Permit approval will be subject to:
A. Written notice from City of Tukwila Public Works Dept.
verifying compliance with Court Order No. 5 relating to
regular and special connection charges for water and sewer.
Pacse.LouL-41. B. Easement of either 20 or 40 feet (depending on location of
-- Tv? CA= 6 property line) adjacent to river allowing public access and
right of City to construct recreational trail and related
recreation facilities thereon; dedication would be an accep-
table alternative.
C. Approval of site plan, structure, landscaping, and sign
subject to Board of Architectural review prior to issuance
of building permit.
D. Concrete sidewalks to be provided along both street frontages;
sidewalk to be 10' wide adjacent to Interurban Avenue, 5'
wide on Southcenter Blvd. frontage. Sidewalks to be built
to City of Tukwila standards, and to be completed prior to
occupancy of structure.
E. Vehicular access to be off of Southcenter Blvd. only; access
location to be approved by City of Tukwila Public Works Dept.
F. Sufficient outdoor lighting to be provided at site subject
to staff approval prior to issuance of building permit.
G. State of Washington Flood Control Permit required.
H. Submittal of plan demonstrating movement of construction
equipment on site without interference with traffic'on
adjacent streets prior to issuance of building permit.
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
°'r'. CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING -- Denial of Shoreline Mgmt. Permit 79- 29 -SMP
On 14 August 1979, the Seattle firm of Gazecki Associates filed the subject
Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit application to construct
a pre -cut log home display area on 0.35 Ac. site at the S/E Quadrant of
Interurban Avenue and Southcenter Blvd.(SEE, Ex. A)
After reviewing the application materials in relation to the Tukwila Shore-
line Master Program, The Comprehensive Plan, The interurban Avenue Corridor
Study, and the Shoreline Act of 1971; the Planning Director, as Acting
Shoreline Official of the community, made a preliminary finding of Denial
for the application.
Section WAC- 173 -14 -180 of the Shoreline Act of 1971 provides for an optional
public hearing process when a shoreline permit applicant is aggreived by the
local official's decision. Thus, your council is requested to review the
Planning Director's findings and then to offer a recommendation of concurrence
or reversal regarding the decision not to issue a development permit.
Please bear in mind that the Council's decision is advisory only, and that
the final decision on this matter rests with the local Shoreline Official
or with the State Shoreline Hearing Board.
The following is an analysis of the perceived inconsistencies of this pro-
posal with the City's existing development policies:
A) Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 2
"Locate commercial /industrial development in areas with low potential
for recreation or other public uses."
RESPONSE: The subject property stands at the gateway of the principal
access path to Fort Dent Park. Also, this property is with-
in the City's proposed Riverfront Park System described in
the Park and Recreation Master Plan. Thus, this site has a
high potential for recreational uses, when viewed in its •
neighborhood context.
-- Economic Development Element - Goal 3 -- -
"Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the
river and discourage any future edonamic activities that may be of
lesser quality." .
RESPONSE: Most of the recent developments proposed or constructed
on the river frontage of 11zkwila favor long-term-uses
such as hotel or office structures, and architectural.-
concepts employing substantial exterior materials such
as masonry or precast members" with glass. The effect of
these developments is to promote high quality appearance
and a sense of permanence. . -
By contrast, the proposed log -cabin display "haw" seems
to be incongruous with other recent 'development proposals
in its immediate locale. The structure looks temporary,
both in form and in use. It is also doubtful that the build-
ing could be converted readily to another use should the
proposed occupants go out of business due to cyclical
market fluctuation or prolonged periods of "tight" money.
It appears to us that the proposed development is not
consistent with the high level of quality which has char-
acterized recent shoreline development in Tukwila. .
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 4
"Determine and consider the visual impact that the canmerciai /industrial
development will have on the surrounding area."
RESPONSE: The subject business will depend on drawing customers from a
wide - ranging market area. As evidenced by the extremely -
large sign proposed on Sheet 2 of 2 of the application plan
set, orientation to Route 405 is important to the marketing
'concept of the business. The visual impact of such signing,
and of the building itself which will act in a way similar to
a sign, imposes a disproportionate aesthetic encumbrance on
surrounding properties. ' •
-- Economic Development Element - Policy 1
"Commercial/industrial development along the shorelines should not favor
outside interests at the expense of the local population."
RESPONSE: It is our conclusion that the region- serving nature of this
business proposal will have little direct benefit to the •
residents of Zlikwila. The City Council has maintained a
consistent policy of encouraging local- service level business
activity along the Interurban Avenue corridor. .Thus, while
this business will probably attract some trade activity from
the local population, the increased traffic attracted to
Interurban Avenue from• outside the community and the inten-
sive advertising methods needed to serve this business seem
to diminish its somewhat limited benefit to the immediate
community. •
B) Shoreline Management Act of 1971
-- Commercial Development (WAC-173-16-060 (4) )
(a) Although many commercial developments benefit by a shoreline
location, priority should be given to those commercial develop-
ments which are particularly dependent on their location and/
or use of the shorelines of the state and other development
that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of
the people to enjoy the shorelines of the state.
RESPONSE: The proposed development does not depend directly on a
shoreline location to facilitate the conduct of business.
While the proposed shoreline location might give this
particular entrepreneur a competitive "edge" due to the
unique aesthetics of the site, no direct correlation bet-
ween the shoreline environment and vacation home sales
operation is apparent.
(b) New commercial developments on shorelines should be encouraged
to locate in those areas where current commercial uses exist.
RESPONSE: The proposed project, 1f approved, would represent an iso-
lated retail /service business in an area which is currently
vacant and in which the emerging land -use pattern is recrea-
tion and office development. Supporting commercial activ-
ities for this project are not found in the immediate sur-
rounding neighborhood.
C) Interurban Corridor Study Design Plan
-- Framework Plan, Section D
Reinforcement of gateway identification points at each end of the
Corridor path.
RESPONSE: Report No. 3 of the Interurban Avenue Corridor Study was
presented to the City Council in June of 1978 and has be-
come the benchmark reference for development in this portion
of Tukwila.. The plan identifies the Southcenter Blvd./
D)
Interurban Avenue intersection as a key "gateway" to the
Corridor; "gateway definition" says the plan text, "should
distinguish the local sub -area and express its relationship
with Tukwila and its surroundings.'
The corridor plan emphasizes creation of a local- serving
pedestrian scale commercial /public recreation activity
center in the corridor area. The proposed log home dis-
play, as mentioned earlier, appears to depend on a regional
market area rather than local. Also, the architectural
concept of the log home seems to contrast with, rather
than reinforce, the identity of Tukwila's emerging develop-
ment character north of Route 405. It appears, therefore,
that the proposed display use of . this site will not provide
a consistent "gateway" theme for the Interurban Avenue area
as envisioned by the Corridor Study plan.
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan
-- Commerce and Industry Element
Compatibility:
Policy 1.
The proposed log home display, as previously mentioned,
would constitute a lone business enterprise in an area
with little potential for mutually supportive retail
activity. Also, this particular type of business has
no peer in the City of Tukwila.
Nbst business land uses, when grouped, complement one
another since the clientele drawn to one will generally
frequent others. This policy is intended to facilitate
the planned grouping of complementary uses and thereby
maximize the drawing power or reputation of each grouping.
This concept could minimize business failures and promote .
prosperity in the business coaaaniity. The proposed appli-
cation does not seem to lend itself readily to the business
grouping concept.
For the foregoing reasons, therefore, the City Planning Department is
compelled to maintain the integrity of its long -term Shoreline Management-
Program by denying application 79- 29 -SMP.
RESPONSE:
Encourage the grouping of uses which will mutually and
economically benefit each other or provide necessary
services.
12 March 1980
Mr. Mark Caughey
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mark:
Tyler G. Cazecki
TGG /ceg
enclosures
GAZECKI ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES
RECEIVED
Q.C.Q.
CITY OF 111ZIUI
MHrt 4 1980
Enclosed please find a revised site plan and topography plan indicating the
correct rear property line of the land parcel located at the southeast corner
of Interurban and Southcenter Boulevards in Tukwila. Per our last meeting
on January 4, 1980, the establishment of this boundary line was the only item
keeping our Shoreline and SEPA applications from being forwarded to Olympia.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Kindest regards,
3300 SMITH TOWER • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 • PHONE (206) 625 -1520
r
L
MAIN
Setttle.
(2061 E:3•_i; 5
( )
Pa'
a ` •, S. Se ,l a :
;2 :510
:nen, \'n .w e' -. •
dilansam nia hiJa hiSLIPrlunuB
Please address correspondence to the office checked below:
Description:
BBALLARD WEDGEWOOD
0
9338 35th A.e. N E.
5ea:tle, V.A 49115
(2 6284520
(X* Owner's standard coverage
( ) Purchaser's standard coverage
( ) Mortgagee's standard coverage
( ) Mortgagee's ALTA coverage
( ) Tax Registration
NORTH AURORA WEST SEATTLE
Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
10608 N.E. 8th Street
Bellevue, WA. 98004
Attn: Gary Mix
As hereto attached.
Ll
1209 11. 155th St.
Se,attle.:'.A 98133
(205) 628.4600
-, RECEIVED
L 1 y 197 Your Order No.
Pu Sound Power & Light Co.
REAL ESTATE DIY. Our Order No. 490425
J
4450 Ca:,I. A e S.W.
Seat' Si :16
I200.528.4515
ISSAQUAH
U
1595 kW. Gilman Blvd.
Issa:luah, WA vd327
(206)392.5331
PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
Washington Land Title Association Form
a.
Amount Premium
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation
—continued—
-......---
continued—
w
1 Tra ;3;z, tericc Corp :ra t
BEL(.EVUE AUBURN
I'r ', 4 •
10635 N.E. 8th St. 3:0 A:t1::n V t••
H.1 1493 Au9.:n
Bellevue, WA 9 ;299 (2.:0)311.2:'
628 -4642
Sales Tax Total
$1,000.00 $27.50 $1.46 $28.96
(Tentative Amount -- See Note 3)
Total
Date: December 4, 1975 at 8:30 A.M. $28.96
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of
any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre-
liminary commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in
subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy
form. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specified
herein.
OT E: 1. Int csti atiou should be made to determine if there are an) serriee, installation, ,naiute,altce.
or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity.
2,1n the event this transaction fails to close. a cancellation Jee will he charged for serf ices
rendered in accordance with our rale schedule,.
A.
1.
7
EXCEPTIONS:
1% Excise tax if unpaid.
EASEMENT
Grantee:
Purpose;
Area Affected:
Dated:
Recorded:
Recording No.:
AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THHEREOF:
- continued-
Order No. 470 425
Fiorito Brothers, a co- partnership
consisting of J. D. Fiorito, E.
Detore, U. .Y. Merlino and E.
Ferullo
Ingress and egress
See copy attached
December 15, 1970
January 27, 1971
710127 -0176
(Affects Parcel B)
2. Waiver of Damages No. 363572 dated November 13, 1905,
executed by James F. McElroy to Puget Sound Electric
Railway and Seattle - Tacoma Interurban Railway
(now Puget Sound Power F, Light Company), releasing said
second parties from all claims for loss or damage
resulting from washing and otherwise, an abreviated copy
of which is hereto attached.. (Affects Parcel A)
3. Any question that may arise due to shifting and changing in course
of the White River (Green River).
(Affects Parcel A)
4. Any prohibition of or limitation of use, occupancy or improvement
of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian
owners to use any waters which may cover the land.
(Affects Parcel A)
5. Right of the State of Washington in and to that
portion, if any, of the property herein described which
lies below the line of ordinary high water of
Green River.
6. First and Refunding Mortgage by Puget Sound Power & Light Company
to Old Colony Trust Company dated June 2, 1924, and recorded in
Volume 894 of Mortgages, page 338 (said mortgage being sometimes
called the "Original Mortgage ") as supplemented and modified by
various supplemental indentures the latest being a fifty -first
supplemental indenture dated June 1, 1967 and filed for record June
16, 1967, under Auditor's File No. 6190862.
By instrument recorded April 20, 1971 under Recording No. 710420 -0370,
a portion of Parcel B has been released from the lien thereof.
• Interest of persons not yet revealed and when so revealed, matters
which the record may disclose by a search against their names.
k1 /f4E
NOTE 1:
General taxes for 1975 in the sum of $12.12 have been paid.
(Tax Account No. 295490- 0422 -03)
(Covers Parcel B)
Order No. 490425
NOTE 2:
Parcel A is carried as "Operating Property" on the King County
tax rolls
(Tax Account No. 295490 - 0420 -39)
NOTE 3:
The premium shown herein is tentative and will be adjusted when
the sales price has been determined.. •
DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
The Southwesterly 100 feet in width of vacated Blocks 4 to 9 and
12 to 17, inclusive of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle,
as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 46, records of
King County;
TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which upon vacation attached
to said property by operation of law;
Order No. 49042'
PARCEL B:
A strip of land lying adjacent and parallel to the Northeasterly
line of the following described property:
The Southwesterly 100 feet in width of vacated Blocks 4 to 9 and
12 to 17, inclusive, of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle,
as per plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats on page 46,•records of
King County;
TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which upon vacation attached
to said property by operation of law;
Said strip of land being described as follows:
Beginning at Highway Engineer's'Station (2M) 127 +75.0
on the 2M -line shown on the State Highway Map of Primary State
Highway No. 1 (SR 405) Green River Interchange, Sheet 2 of 4
Sheets, established by Commission .Res. No. 1192, February 19,
1962;
thence Northeasterly at right angles to said 2M -line to a point
on the Northeasterly boundary of the above described property;
thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly boundary a
distance of 25 feet to the true point of beginning of this
description;
thence continuing Northwesterly along said Northeasterly
boundary a distance of 100 feet;
thence Northeasterly at right angles to said Northeasterly
boundary a distance of 50 feet; ,
thence Southeasterly parallel to and '50 feet distant from said
Northeasterly boundary for a distance of 100 feet;
thence Southwesterly a distance of 50 feet, more or less, to
the true point of beginning;
ALL Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of
Washington.
Drawn by Checked Date Plat VoL PG. Order No. 1 • ' Y
To assist in locating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company
assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location.
mil. .
`,
• • •
• ' r J `I
•.v �J O , 0 1 : �. • •.
• I \\ l _ � / 1 . .
SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER
d
t, ( " o r ••
(!
v .•
I e-
is 0
04. ` •,� ; i '!� i;I j i,J ■ l ,y am. 1 , J •
•
.....
.....
.....
,....--.
! `<. �,� ,f ` s i . " i.. t.•''� -. 4., ; / A.
} . 't ' •, ' • \ %:' v `\ y ) Z.� 4 1 h .Z.. i e s ` r.
• P `
r/
Note —This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property.
RDTEt THIS DESCRIPTION IS SUSJ!CV YO
P:' ?I:ION UPON EXAMINATION OF TFTtW
i ttip UALILLLY IS ASSUMED fOR ERROR.
The Southwesterly 100.00 feet in width of vacated Blocks 16 and 17
of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle, as per plat recorded
in Volume 14 of Plats on page 46, records of King County, Washington.
Together with vacated.etreets adjoining, chieh upon vacation
attached to said property by operation of law.
EXCEPT therefrom that portion of the above described land, lying
Northwesterly of the Southeasterly line of a strip of land;
50.00 feet in width, the centerline being described as follows:
Beginning at Highway Engineer's Station P.O.T. (2M) 127 -75.0
on the 2M -line shown on the State Highway Map of Primary State
Highway No. 1 (SR 405) Green River.•Interchange, Sheet 2 of 4
sheets, established by Commission Res. No. 1192, February 19, 1962;
thence northeasterly at right angles to said 2M -line to a point .
on the northeasterly boundary of the above described property.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ,Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Shirley Kristofferson, Finance Director
Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director
26 June 1980
L.I.D. 25 Service Charges - Duane Wells Property
Our office is preparing to issue•a Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permit for improvements to the Wells property on Southcenter
Boulevard. As described in the attached correspondence from City
Attorney Larry Hard, the property owner is obligated to pay certain
charges peripheral to the L.I.D. 25 court settlement. I request
your assistance in determining the value of these charges and obtaining
payment thereof. Per Mr. Hard's direction, we shall not release
the Shoreline Management Permit until written confirmation is received
by us from the finance department indicating receipt of all payments
owing tothe City.
Thanks for your help.
XC: Tyler Gazecki
Pub. Wks. Dept.
MEMORANDUM
11
F. A. LcSOURD
WOOLVIN PATTEN
DONALD D. FLEMING
GEORGE M. HARTUNG
MEADE EMORY
LEON C. MISTEREK
DWAYNE E. COPPLE
THOMAS 0. McLAUGHLIN
PETER LESOURD
JOHN F COLGROVE
C. DEAN LITTLE
Dear Kjell:
I have
to the City
application
ment Permit
LESOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING, HARTUNG Si EMORY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3900 SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154
(206) 624 -1040
November 2, 1979
Mr. Kjell Stoknes
Director of Community Development
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: OCD File 79- 29 -SMP
reviewed the letter from Mr. Paul Cressman
dated October 18, 1979 regarding the
for Shoreline Management Substantial Develop -
filed by Tyler Gazecki.
LAWRENCE E. HARD
RODNEY J. WALDBAUM
BRUCE G. HANSON
RICHARD P. MATTHEWS
D. WILLIAM TOONE
M. COLLEEN WEULE
DANIEL D. WOO
CARL J. CARLSON
ROBERT L. PALMER
COUNSEL
The court order which was filed in the lawsuit
brought by Dwayne Wells against the City regarding LID 25,
specifically recited that Mr. Wells and his successors
in interest in the property in question would be responsible
for payment of any connection charges associated with the
land. I am enclosing a copy of the pertinent portion of
the court order dealing with that fact.
The City must abide by the terms of the agreement
in its dealings with Mr. Gazecki. As a result, I don't
believe the Substantial Development Permit can be issued
without having made arrangements for payment of these
charges.'
If you have any questions about this matter, please
don't hesitate to call. °
LEH:th
cc: Mayor Bauch (w /Enc.)
Enclosure
Very truly yours,
LeSOURD, PATTEN, FLEMIN4,
HARTUNG & EMORY
La rencL E . Hard
C� X01
Q.C.D� .
CITi Of TU UILA
Nov 6 Via
•
not warranting that it has any right to grant such ingress
or egress easement driveway to Grantors, but it will take'
no action to prevent or preclude Grantors from utilizing
said ingress and egress' easement rights which Grantors may
have.
4. Grantors shall have the right of ingress and
egress from and to said Grantors' real property parcels
located generally northwesterly and southeasterly of South-
center Boulevard to, on and upon Southcenter Boulevard and
shall have the right to have two curb cuts 24 feet in width,
for access to each parcel off of Southcenter Boulevard to
serve Grantors' real property located northwesterly and
southeasterly of Southcenter Boulevard, provided that said
curb cuts are not located within an area 30 feet from the
northwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue.
5. There will be no assessment made to Grantors
as participants in the final assessment roll of City of
Tukwila Local Improvement District No. 25. Grantors shall
pay such other standard charges for water and sewer as are
charged against property owners for use of such improvements
and services when requested, including but not limited to
regular and special connection charges as set forth in
Chapters 14.04 and 14.16 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
6. Grantee agrees that left turns will be per-
mitted and authorized by Grantee so that vehicular traffic
using Southcenter Boulevard can turn left onto Grantors'
real property located northwesterly of Southcenter Boule-
vard and southeasterly of Southcenter Boulevard; provided,
that the left turn lane will not be located within 153.36
feet, north 30 °26'6" east of the intersection of the center-
lines of Southcenter Boulevaru anti Interurban Avenue South.
7
JOSEPH MATSEN
CLYDE RAY CORY, JR.
JOSEPH R. MATSEN
THOMAS E. SPRAGUE
PATRICK J. LAYMAN
WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN
MfITSEil, CORY, rturrsEn & SPRMGUE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1117 WASHINGTON BUILDING
1325 FOURTH AVENUE
SEfITTLE, W4Sl1I(1GT0n 98101
October 23, 1979
Mr. Kjell Stoknes
Director
Office of Community Development
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Bldv.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Director:
JRM /jr
cc: Mr. & Mrs. Jacob Nielsen
Very truly yours,
623 -4594
AREA CODE 206
FOR HAND DELIVERY BY
LEGAL MESSENGER - RUSH
Re: Application #79- 29 -SMP, Tyler Gazecki for Shoreline
Management Substantial Development Permit to con-
struct a model home display site.
Location: NE corner, Southcenter Boulevard and Inter-
urban Avenue, adjacent to the Green River
watercourse
I am writing you this letter on behalf of my clients,
Mr. and Mrs. Jacob Nielsen, who own acreage that is improved
with numerous buildings and also used for pasture and is
located southerly and across the Green River from the pro-
posed project location and is directly affected by improve-
ments on the so- called Fiorito brothers property involved .
in the above application.
From the limited information supplied to the Nielsens,
the applicant's proposed use seems to be incompatible with
that of the surrounding area; the proposed sign in partic-
ular appears to be offensive.
Please register the dissent of my clients to the approv-
al of the application.
• MATSEN, CORY, MATSEN & SPRAGUE
oseph R. Matsen
SHORT, CRESSMAN & CABLE
00" FLOOR, SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
1001 FOURTH AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154
TELEPHONE
(208) 682 -3333
October 18, 1979
Mr. Kjell Stoknes, Director
Office of Community Development
Planning Division
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98183
Dear Mr. Stoknes:
KENNETH P. SHORT
PAUL R. CREWMAN
DONALD A. CABLE
WILLIAM L. HINTZE
JOHN O. BURGESS
DOUGLAS R. HARTWICH
ROBERT E. HEATON
JOHN H. STRABBDROER
DONALD W. TERRELL
PHILLIP OFFENBACEER
PAUL A. BARRETT
,Ar
EDWARD R. LANOENBACH, JR.
JAMES A. OLIVER
DAVID R. EOOPMANS
WILLIAM H. MCINERNEY, JR.
KENNETH L. MYER
ROBERT S. JAFFE
JOSEPH D. PVCKETT
STEVEN W. HALE
ROBERT J. SHAW
ROBERT J. HENRY
CARL B. GOODWIN, JR.
Re: Comments Regarding Application #79- 29 -SMP,
Tyler Gazecki for Shoreline Management
Substantial Development Permit
KEITH O. BALDWIN
PAUL R. CHESSMAN, JR.
MARE A. OOLDINO
WESLEY N. EDMUNDS, JR.
COLLEEN KIEE=
ROBERT H. DOUTSITT
BRIAN E. LAWLER
ANDREW W. MARON
THOMAS L. OLLMAN
IVAN E. LANDRETH, JR.
GRANT HINNEAR
This office represents Fiorito Bros., a Washington partner-
ship with offices at 1100 Northwest Leary Way, Seattle, Washing-
ton 98107. Fiorito Bros. are the owners of a parcel of property
adjoining the subject property. Fiorito Bros. are strongly
opposed to the proposed development for which a Shoreline Manage-
ment Substantial Development Permit is now being sought. This
opposition is based upon the total failure of the owner and
lessor of the property for which development is proposed, to
make adequate provisions for water and sewer facilities for their
property.
A brief history of the development of this entire area may
provide your office with some further understanding of Fiorito
Bros.' opposition. Over the past six years, neighboring land
owners, including King County and the Fiorito Bros., have been
engaged in the formation and implementation of a local improvement
district for the installation of roads, sanitary sewer facilities,
and watermains in the area. The City of Tukwila has had responsi-
bility for the administrative services connected with the LID.
The improvements under the LID have been essentially completed
but only at a cost to King County and the Fiorito Bros. which
substantially exceeded the initial estimated costs. Many of the
excess costs were directly related to actions by the owner and
lessor of the property for which a Substantial Development Permit
is now sought.
Mr. Kjell Stoknes
Office of Community Development
October 18, 1979
Page 2
Under the circumstances, it would be extremely unfair
for the City of Tukwila to permit the applicant to develop
his site without obtaining adequate connection to the newly
installed watermains and sanitary sewer system, and without
requiring either the lessee or the lessor of the property
proposed for development to join and retroactively pay their
pro rata share of the costs incurred in forming and imple-
menting the LID improvements. To permit otherwise would be
to subvert the LID process by providing an unwarranted exemption
to a single property owner within an LID area.
Even more detrimental to the area would be to permit the
development of the subject property as a model home display
site without requiring protection to the surrounding environ-
ment afforded by adequate hookups to the existing watermains
and sanitary sewer facilities.
After having discussed this matter with Mark Caughey of
your staff, we understand that a public hearing is not scheduled.
We desire that : a public hearing be held before your decision
Please advise when we can be heard.
PRC /kjs
cc: Mr. J. Dan Fiorito
R- p,acfully submit
Paul R. Cre'sman•
floor plan
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
ss.
Th.cxe.s.a...akOb.i n being first duly sworn on
oath, deposes and says that ...1h.e is the Chief M ark of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a
week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
published four (4) times a week in Kent King County, Washington, and it is
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County,
Washington. That the annexed is a ....\.`,•.e et.i?1a
T1 ,5S2
as it was published in regular issues (and
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
of consecutive issues, commencing on the
29 day of may , 1980 , and ending the
day of 19 both dates
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of s..8. which
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
128 , 19. 80
V.P.C. Form No. 87 Rev. 7-79
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30 day of
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing atKing County.
— Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June
9th, 1955.
— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
t.s'a s�•,F•;,� =y };r , ye ej.
/PM rek
r
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
}
ss.
Theresa Skobin being first duly sworn on
oath, deposes and says that s he is the Ch Clerk of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a
week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
published four (4) times a week in Kent King County Washington, and it is
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County,
Washington. That the annexed is a 1 14 tii7.9. .?. 4 ?F ?.i.1.R.i1.t 1
as it was published in regular issues (and
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
of 1 consecutive issues, commencing on the
10 day of Septer ber
day of ,19 , both dates
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21 • °, 'wh i ch
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
V.P.C. Form No. t7 Rev. 7.79
19 79
and ending the
Chei' Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 2 day of
i ... v y a
Notary Publi n • n s , r e State of Washington
residing at Kent, King Count
— Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June
9th, 1955.
— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
':�lpt0l,tVi
NCO
CERTIFICATE OF SEGREGATION NO.
WITHIN
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
RECORDED IN VOLUME , PAGE
OF PLATS, KING COUNTY, SITUATED IN
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
(This space for Recorder's Use) CERTIFICATION
Office of Community Development,
City of Tukwila
Examined, approved and certified this
rci .
day of Q � -�-., tij � r- , 1977
\44AL..4)
Din for
Department of Assessments, King County
Examined this
19
Assessor
Deputy Assessor
day of
SEGREGATION DESCRIPTION
A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGREGATED PARCEL IS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT 'A'
HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE INCORPORATED HEREIN.
DECLARATION:
Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee
simple of the land herein described do hereby segregate a portion thereof
for the purpose of lease pursuant to RCW 58.17 and Tukwila Municipal Code
Title 17 and acknowledge that said segregation does not constitute a sub-
division of the land herein described for purposes of sale or other trans-
fer. The undersigned further declare this document to •be_ the graphic
representation of said segregation and any and all inscriptions included
herein are in accordance with the desire of the owner(s).
I n wi t s whe'iheof
Name
Name
OREGON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
County of Multnomah
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
County of
poses therein mentioned.
ave set our hands and seals.
Name "/ Name
Name
Name
On this day personally appeared before me Bruce Hosford
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the with-
in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the
same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pur-
poses therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 2nd day of October , 19 79 .
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this
Notary Public rd forthe State of ash3•�rg- ,
uregon
seal residing at Portland, Oregon
My commission expires November 14, 1981
On this day personally appeared before me
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the with -
in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the
same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pur-
day of , 19
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
seal residing at
Certificate of Segregation Page 8 of 4
;''0c tit 6 /771
Date
Certificate No: .
Certificate of Segregation No:
Land Surveyor's Certificate: •
This illustration correctly represents a
survey made by me or under my direction
in conformance with the requirements of
appropriate state statute.
Direction:
4 4,1 uklo
St c.:mp
Page
SEGREGATION PARCEL 1
THAT PORTION OF C.C. LEWIS DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS PARCEL A, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40 °01'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF
920.15 FEET FROM THE MONUMENT "HUB" AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF
A CURVE ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED,
SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST AND 20
FEET SOUTH OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH
49 °24' WEST ON A CURVE 150.00 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE
CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD A DISTANCE OF 835.00
FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81 °44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET
FROM A MONUMENT "HUB" AT THE END OF A COURSE ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY
1200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS
14 AND 15; THENCE NORTH 49 °24' WEST A DISTANCE OF 2535.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 9 °36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 52.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 82 °40'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 550.51 FEET, THENCE NORTH 7 °19'30"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 201.78 FEET, THENCE NORTH 82 °40'30" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 460.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE LEFT BANK OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, SAID
LEFT BANK BEING ALSO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE C.C. LEWIS DONATION
CLAIM; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LEFT BANK OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RIVER
TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 0 °38'00"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 159 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST IN A STRIP OF LAND 16 FEET IN
WIDTH, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS PARCEL B, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE C.C. LEWIS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37,
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASH-
INGTON, WHICH BEARS NORTH 40 °01'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 920.15 FEET FROM
THE MONUMENT "HUB" AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER-
LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED, SAID POINT OF INTER-
SECTION BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE QUARTER
CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 49 °24' WEST ON A LINE 150.00
FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON
JUNCTION ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 835.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81 °44'15"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT "HUB" AT THE END OF A COURSE
ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF CURVE
BEING APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER
BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE NORTH 49 °24' WEST A DISTANCE OF 2535.00
FEET; THENCE NORTH 9 °36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 52.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 °38'
WEST 16.155 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 °38' EAST
16.155 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 °40'30" WEST 117.97 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT -
OF -WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
SAID MARGIN OF THE RIGHT -OF -WAY A DISTANCE OF 213 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY,
RADIALLY FROM THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 16 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY CONCENTRIC WITH AND PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -QF-
WAY LINE TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 82 °40'30" WEST FROM THE POINT OF BE-
GINNING; THENCE SOUTH 82 °40 EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH TRACT 47, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING. COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT
THAT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN THE 16 FOOT STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED
ABOVE AS PARCEL B; HEREIN DESCRIBED PORTION OF TRACT 47 HEREINAFTER REFERRED
TO AS PARCEL C.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE C.C. LEWIS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, LYING
EASTERLY OF TRACT 47, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL C ABOVE,
AND LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A 16 FOOT STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED
AS PARCEL B, ABOVE, AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE TRACT OF LAND
DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A, ABOVE.
'EXHIBIT 'A' PAGE 4 OF 4
9 01
3 . y . _ki2, g .. irg4 0 01ti S :~
/, gRl 1 II illiqr ; I
a! a it i i l tiblImile it :a it i' 111164 i t, an4 QC I ; 4 1 1 1 g i : ! j en. II 1
Y
4 ; ii P830 ;P! 4.:Irloillitipg igb
>).- k ' Pld :11 §gg bit!lb!liMidn di
'" 1 —7 i ri X I V Ps X 19"116iVIP. 44
----J L I 1 r c a i a< e iiI
..0- Vat Ci i ! :/ ilhiii fildhaiAinli hi
� ��li
1 ?s
0
1. V
CI
V
6
a� a - ��ffi� 4 - �e nda<� M a s
gy � � ; 14401 Z
J ". �G.. " M� Y om- ^I �a NY Al �
sa 01fig�N: � ' ;= 'r ?i � s _ ?��� �a b � aa� o s „, Pli glidirgOT E: 011 g ..ft 1 d W .."gs101010.0is li d Pi 141Eigkpli gy_ vi j;
gi : ;; 1 !!!!!!Vint; . ; 0; !I; fiii g .1.P: 40FiTqlrx; 4 g T islarg
N- "WI 1 F zills' -- 10 -1 X A4 l V - ke. t ...'• E .ti,,,, =.4 2 A. w 0. u g F.Ag ti ..q.1_>; wS -
ifi TIlipmim4r1;5•4; vr; ...10.3-40 li_ _ 1st IA • . .s . i rsi ,. .4a .1,22e 4 .
I i i !61 ; i : g 1 ; n4a1; 061 :254 1 iii lirg . P ililli 1 .ct41 1! :ill !Ii!lili!Hillii:i
I!! lki! ll aleffilnli!!!! 4 !4 !n 4111 f7: :: : il : :::,::::,:::::.:,, :
A 12 1;Al i rM44 ' 5'; ; !!; ill WI
3 1 4 i/ Erts a4 .;:e ! x re txxil * t8 i
.1 v „Axle - i l l;r :: :e: rir;V: ..- !
j' "°' ; "1 '4'81 6'1 fg 4 x''' ; °2;”? - .. ; ' ;°" ;§ *x iiTS!! ;t- Plf ; 0 .41 .0r4;A f 5s
i ' h "w°°"' 4' ;th;l!ttlihlElt17??4t ..--. t, t J liz, gno.p.,
l
TUK t /LA BUS /NESS CENTER
FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SECTION /0, T23N, R4E, W.M.
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON
GARONER EJVG /NEERS, INC. Seattle, WA
Sheet 2 of 2
• • aft • Al,
i
• 0 1
. • • .... • •
gfezerett
L YI :S tYCP3 :6 9 4:2 -•
• C•••
I - ..• • •••••
rze6c9goee 141
ko \
4.
:OW
•
ct?
September 24, 1979
i .\MMILL GROW COMPANY
7110 S.W. FIR LOOP
TIGARD. OREGON 97223
(503) 639-9434
King County Department of Tax Assessors
Abstract Section
King County Administration Building
. Seattle, WA 98104
RE: TUKWILA BUSINESS CENTER
Crow - Spieker - Hosford #63
Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila,WA
Gentlemen:
Tax Lots: 734060 - 0700 -04 & 000480 - 0003 -06
We are the owners of the above described premises. In order to
comply with the City of Tukwila's binding site improvement
plan approval process, we request that you merge our two tax
lots.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter
further, please give me a call. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
Bruce E. Hosford
Partner
BEH /ddl
City L Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
Minutes of the regular meeting of September 20, 1979.
Meeting was called to order at 2:15 P.M. by Chairman Kjell Stoknes.
Committee Members Present: Kjell Stoknes, 0.C.D. Director
Terry Monaghan, Public Works Director
Hubert Crawley, Fire Chief
Staff Present: Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner
ITEM #1: APPLICATION #79 -25 -SS - FAKKEMA SHORT SUBDIVISION
Representative of the applicant present: Edward Gonzalez
Mr. Stoknes noted that those revisions to the Short Plat which were requested
by the Committee at its 16 August 1979 meeting have now been made by the
applicant.
Chief Crawley expressed concern about fire service access problems due to
the 15% + existing driveway grade on site. Mr. Gonzalez explained his
strategy to reduce the gradient by cutting and securing the slopes with a
retaining wall. Mr. Stoknes noted that the adjacent single - family lot is
already served by an adequate driveway, and asked the applicant if he would
object to a common -drive between his lot and the existing homesite. Mr.
Gonzales had no objection to this approach.
Considerable discussion ensued regarding the City's obligation in approving
this application to be certain that future purchasers of this site are aware
of technical difficulties associated with its development. The Committee's
concensus is to impose "performance standards" for improvement of the property
which will be recorded with the approved Short Plat, and will appear on future
title reports as an alert to potential buyers of the site.
MOVED BY MR. CRAWLEY, WITH MR. MONAGHAN"S SECOND TO APPROVE APPLICATION 79 -25 -SS
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 15 %.