The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit DR-09-79 - GLOBE PLASTICS / SCONZO - ADDITION DESIGN REVIEWThis record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below. DR -09 -79 Globe Plastics 290 Andover Park East RECORDS DIGITAL D- ) EXEMPTION LOG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION Page # tode Exemption = 8rlef Explanatory DeSclriptiop �t�tutel ule The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress' intent that social security numbers are a private concern. As such, individuals' social security Personal Information — numbers are redacted to protect those Social Security Numbers individuals' privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec. 5 U.S.C. sec. 41 DR1 Generally — 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure 552(a); RCW 552(a); RCW under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington 42.56.070(1) 42.56.070(1) State Public Records Act, which exempts under the PRA records or information exempt or prohibited from disclosure under any other statute. Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit Personal Information — expiration dates, or bank or other financial RCW DR2 Financial Information — account numbers, which are exempt from 42.56.230(5) RCW 42.56.230(4 5) disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5), except when disclosure is expressly required by or governed by other law. dr-09-79 290 andover park east globe plastics August 1, 1979 Sincerely, KS /ckh City � ty of Tukwila Peterson Industries, Inc. 290 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Administration 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development RE: Globe Plastics Addition The Planning Commission considered your proposed addition at their regular meeting of July 26, 1979. As a consequence of that meeting, they approved your proposed addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of five foot wide sidewalk from southeast property corner along Strander Boulevard to Andover Park East; inclusion of wheelchair ramp at corner of Andover Park East and Strander Boulevard. 2. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment. 3. Landscaping of all areas not used for driveways, parking or buildings; detail subject to staff approval at time of appli- cation for building permit. 11 Stoknes, Director ice of Community Development T Atalttn -4414 -4tafi CU-% e-e..e,7 ' " Maee( vitie t/ -iltto et, d-e e-104 .i-4 fk- 4A wa4s • �e , 6 6117 7 € eau', PLO iyrase -Y- c Planning Commission Page 3 Minutes July 26, 1979 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW VISED PLANS: GLOBE PLASTICS: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report. Mr. Sconzo, architect, said the parking and on -site truck maneuvering have been changed to meet the requirements of the City. He said they did not have any objections and would comply with all of the recommendations of staff. MOVED BY MR. WELSH, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE PROPOSED ADDITION FOR THE GLOBE PLASTICS COMPANY SUBJECT TO STAFF REPORT CONDITIONS 4, 5 AND 6. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: 10:15 - 10:20 P.M. Chairman Kirsop declared a five minute recess. The Planning Commission meeting was called back to order by Chairman Kirsop, with Commissioners and staff present as previously listed. LANDSCAPE PLANS: McCANN PROJECT #447: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report. Mr. Stoknes remarked that landscaping will have to be done in a manner that will accommodate fire truck entry. Chairman Kirsop remarked that the planting is shown on the east side of the building so that eliminates condition 1 and condition 2 does not seem necessary. MOVED BY MR. SOWINSKI, SECONDED BY MR. WELSH, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS OF McCANN PROJECT #447. MOTION CARRIED. LANDSCAPE PLANS: McCANN PROJECT #464: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report. Mr. Hunt, architect, said there had been some doubt about the adequacy of the screen around the yard storage area. Discussion followed with staff suggesting a rolled concrete curb to define the storage area. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, SECONDED BY MR. WELSH, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS OF McCANN PROJECT #464 WITH THE INCLUSION OF A CONCRETE CURB TO DEFINE THE STORAGE AREA SUBJECT TO PLANNING STAFF APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED. REVISED PLANS: HUNTINGTON BUILDING: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report. 26 July 1979 AGENDA ITEM . VI A . CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REVISED PLANS Globe Plastics INTRODUCTION: A revised site plan and elevations have been submitted by Thomas A. Sconzo, Archi- tects, for a proposed addition to the Globe Plastics Company at 290 Andover Park East, on the northeast corner at Strander Boulevard. An earlier proposal was denied by the Planning Commission at the meeting of 28 June 1979 based on the inadequacy of parking and on -site truck maneuvering as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. REVIEW: The new proposal consists of an additional 5,483 sq. ft. of warehouse space along the existing west wall of the building, with three 10' by 10' dock high truck doors . at the northwest end of the warehouse addition. The building is to be of smooth and rough formed concrete panels with plywood fascia along the roof line. Colors have not been specified. Parking will be in two areas, one at the south end of the site, off Strander Boule- vard, the other along the west building face. A total of 36 parking stalls are provided, meeting the 36 spaces required by the Tukwila Municipal Code; each stall is 20 feet long by 9 feet wide. The existing curb cut at the northwest corner of the site will be widened to forty feet to allow for access by large trucks. Parking near the loading area has been limited to two spaces directly north of the truck doors; a smaller curb cut is pro- posed to provide access to the fourteen stalls to the west of the building. The truck loading space is forty -five feet wide and 66 feet long from the wall face to the inside edge of the curb island on Andover Park East. These dimensions satisfy the TMC requirements for on site loading space (18.56.210). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed addition for the Globe Plastics Company subject to the following conditions: 1. Relo on of the two most northerl ng stalls to remove passenger vehicles truck loading a subject to staff approval. 2. Southern curb cut ••ver Park East limited to 24 feet. 3. All t o-way driveways to be 24' '•e. 8:00 P.M. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 26 July 1979 4. Installation of five -foot wide sidewalk from southeast property corner along Strander Boulevard to Andover. Park East; inclusion of wheelchair ramp at corner of Andover Park East and Strander Boulevard. Required per Ordinance #1025, sidewalk plan, declaring Strander Boulevard to be a high priority street in the commercial sidewalk system. 5. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment. 6. Landscaping of all areas not used for driveways, parking, or building; details subject to staff approval at time of application for building permit. floor plan site plan elevation globe plastics 9 July 1979 Mr. Dennis Sconzo Sconzo Architects 13219 Northrup Way #207. Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Globe Plastics Development Plans Dear Mr. Sconzo: The Tukwila Planning Commission considered the above referenced project at their regular June meeting, 28 June 1979. Please be informed the Com- mission denied the proposed expansion plans for Globe Plastics, Inc. based upon the inadequate parking and on -site truck maneuvering space which would result. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Should you decide to pursue this alternative, a letter of appeal should be filed with the City Council within 30 days of Planning Commission action. Of course, you also have the option of submitting revised expansion plans which respond to the concerns of the Planning Commission. These plans may be submitted at any time. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Res tfully, F 144/ 4a`ftaretrnm P anning Supervisor \I FNS /ckh cc: OCD Dir. Pub. Wks. Dir. Ma or Citycof Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 28, 1979 (- Page 9 DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Parkway Square - Hayden Island - Contd. MOVED BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARKING AS PRESENTED AND THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTED BE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) THAT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED AND REFLECTED IN THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED; (2) THAT A 15FOOT LANDSCAPE STRIP BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT; (3) THAT A 5 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK BE CONSTRUCTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 7 FEET ADJACENT EAST OF THE PRESENT WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, DESIGN PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; (4) THAT CURB CUT PERMITS BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; (5) THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH TMC 17.16 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS; (6) THAT A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT; (7) SIGNS ARE NOT APPROVED AND MUST COMPLY WITH SIGN CODE. * MOVED BY MR. SOWINSKI, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, TO AMEND THE MOTION AND ADD CONDITION (8) THAT COMPACT SIZE PARKING STALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN PER CENT OF THE REQUIRED OFF- STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. MOTION CARRIED. *MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: lobe Plastics c Mr. Satterstrom rea• - report stating the project had been tabled by the Board of Architectural Review in February pending a legal opinion from the attorney. It was determined that the present processing operation is subordinate to the distribution and warehousing of plastic products. It is an allowed use. The proposed addition of 5,480 square feet of warehousing space is approximately a 22% expansion to the existing building. The site plan shows a reduction in the asphalt pavement on the parcel. Thirty -five parking spaces will be provided. The northern curb cut on Andover Park East is proposed to be enlarged to forty feet. This reduces the landscaping area slightly. Three 10 foot by 10 foot dock high truck doors are proposed directly behind the enlarged curb cut. He said the parking does not meet City requirements. The 28,245 square feet of warehouse would require 28.245 spaces and the office would require 6.944 for a total of 35.189 or 36 parking spaces. The Department of Public Works has not received an application for a curb cut permit to enlarge the northern curb cut on Andover Park East. It appears that the only reason why an enlarged curb cut is necessary would be to allow truck maneuvering on Andover Park East. The staff recommended that the Board of ARchitectural Review deny the request by Globe Plastics based upon the fact that the site does not provide adequate parking and on -site truck maneuvering as required by the City. Mr. Sconzo, architect, explained the truck maneuvering as they anticipated it could be done. Mr. Orrico suggested redesign to assure that there would never be any off -site trucking. Mr. Satterstrom explained how employees would be unable to get out of their parking area. Mr. Sconzo said if parking and turn - around is increased they would have to leave out some of the landscaping. Mr. James asked if this matter should be referred to the Board of Adjustment? Mr. Satterstrom said it is likely the developer could apply for a variance or revise the site plan. Mr. Sconzo said they could not build on the south, they can only expand to the west. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DENY THE REQUEST BY GLOBE PLASTICS BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THE SITE DOES ;;OT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING AND ON -SIDE TRUCK MANEUVERING AS REQUIRED BY THE TMC. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 28 June 1979 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM VI B DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Globe Plastics (Expansion) A site plan and elevations (Exhibits A and B) have been submitted by Tom Sconzo Architects for review of a proposed expansion of Globe Plastics, Inc. located at 290 Andover Park East. The project had been tabled by the Board of Architectural Review at their regular meeting on Thursday, February 22, 1979 pending a legal opinion from the attorney. It was ultimately determined that the present processing operation is subordinate to the distribution and warehousing of plastic products. Therefore, it is an allowed use. FINDINGS: 1. Globe Plastics is located in the C -M District. 2. The building was constructed in 1971. 3. The proposed addition of 5,480 square feet of warehousing space is approximately a 22% expansion to the existing building. 4. The total building will have 28,245 square feet of warehouse space and 2,240 square feet of office space. 5. The site plan shows a reduction in the asphalt pavement on the parcel. Thirty - five (35) parking spaces will be provided. 6. The northern curb cut on Andover Park East is proposed to be enlarged to forty (40) feet. This reduces the landscaping area slightly. 7. Three (3) 10 -foot by 10 -foot dock -high truck doors are proposed directly behind the enlarged curb cut. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The parking does not meet that required per TMC 18.56. Mr. Sconzo has rounded off his calculations downward. The 28,245 square feet of warehouse would require 28.245 spaces and the office would require 6.944 for a total of 35.189 or 36 parking spaces. 2. The Department of Public Works has not received an application for a curb cut permit to enlarge the northern curb cut on Andover Park East. It appears that the only reason why an enlarged curb cut is necessary would be to allow truck manuevering on Andover Park East. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 28 June 1979 TMC 18.56, Off- Street Parking and Loading Regulations, addresses the specific uses and problems in more detail. In TMC 18.56.210, the adequacy of maneuver- ing of trucks on site is discussed. It is specifically stated that "there shall be provided and maintained on the premises adequate space for standing, loading and unloading services in order to avoid undue interference with pub- lic use of the streets and alleys." Adequate maneuvering space is addressed in Policy 2 of the Transportation Objective and Policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Its intent is to "discourage the maneuvering of automobiles or trucks on public right -of- way." The exist- ing parking lot at Globe Plastics allows the trucks to maneuver on the site. It would appear that the proposed addition and its associated parking area would force the trucks to maneuver on Andover Park East and back -in or use a portion of the parking lot designated for automobile parking spaces. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Architectural Review deny the reqeust by Globe Plastics, Inc. to expand based upon the fact that the site does not pro- vide adequate parking and on -site truck manuevering as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. a 0 a EXHIBIT A GLOBE PLASTICS (EXPANSION) A V E.F5 PAII, A -"b . • :"..: I t• 3 IJOrfTH t...,e.vik-r 0.;3 • IOW 1.4e.w• ...nprrt C groo, 0 1--1 (/) cc CL • w LU 0 1-1 CO >.< C.0 ca a•••• • - - • ISO, *WOO AMYL." 11 ■■••■••Ilta IJG•ei ADD 1'1 lt.114 . 7 7 •• 7 7 7 7 • 7 7 ----- 7 7 7 I:: --- 7 77 - 77 7 77 - - 77 Z. 7 VMS1 GI...CA/ATI a 1..1 Y., • S.. 4 IA..." (+yr., •••■>1> (.` nt• ar .11 y 3•64 7 1 X1• Al CMOS,. .1 C.% V(1■461 • 7.7r Yrry A live 4 heaui1-ie-N-SV› W.A., 1,00 .e VT1 • M.71.1. ▪ 11.11*, tat..10 S. fl* SAW ••• 441 MI/1.1... (.1 • I L lt■I) oar. •_ 7 -'-"as • 7 LA +Nam SO ...ow... trar,e . ..,•■•■■nual•aab.11 MCP. • /1:01:45. CityyJfTukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Departmen t 433 -1850 DATE: June 22, 1979 TO: Roger Blaylock, Planning Department FROM: Terry Monaghan, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Globe Plastics Site Per our discussion regarding the truck manuevering on Andover Park East, it is my recommendation that any project which would contribute to traffic congestion, cause undue delay to the motoring public and /or potential traffic hazards should not be allowed. In this context, the addition to the Globe Plastics building would appear to require that site - destined truck traffic backup and manuever on Andover Park East to use the loading doors. Please consider these comments in your plan review. dp aXHIBITC. GLOBE PLASTIC CITY OF TUKWILA I. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. 1. Name of Proponent: 'PE. - rein I tea - e_s 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Vie ,40.ax H42,= 0.4S7 ° 1 a{ VAR, Aftly-rid : - picyC 'p - rk gse,.4 2.4-Z -`54• 3. Date Checklist Submitted: J01.1E 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 191.."444 t0Aea, 44 %4Z- -1- Nte-Nrr 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: t &pprrma -r,o e aE .STIGS 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): cods.yortur c o,J6ag7E 7147 - -c)P ,400V77ofr 'Twig pc4/4 h /4pe4 5A-0e 6.e 14.0p1/74-/ !,✓/44 NAVE A ei.„64a 64s/evvr of 49!2" ?a 1112'; 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): LoeArio,../ op 7NS EX/SZ /N S mac/ /4,Di01■ /S o 41 his' w<.E. 4,00.4./E2 04r Tl144' 1,4/1 :, GTlcwj o6 bT1zA.l Z is1 -VA. A.iJ� AWBOvF1 P.4,¢.4 064407: 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Avd.. t Orlon 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO yC (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO_>' (c) Building permit YES NO C (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO < (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO K (f) Sign permit YES NO )K (g) Water hook up permit YES NO 1G (h) Storm water system permit YES NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES)< NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO . 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: "Id 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO z x z (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ( f) 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 081/047704/04.A540 s /N/4se,0 . Ar r/ 6-Z' •4"/ / 17# /1.G1PF 641ZFi zei. 04,4 734v A'G 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ( e) (f ) (g) Explanation: Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO X X f (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? )' Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? '(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: -4- YES MAYBE NO x C 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation : 40"/&7 770•/ /./cis6 ! r/04s /rerox 11 77 TL y f4/i.44. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? • Explanation: -5- YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? /( Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? • (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -6- (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: -7- YES MAYBE NO 1 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. 2 r S, t t Crl crl THOIMIAEttitteSedWille, Date / 41.4 ;t — -8- 13219 NORTHRUP WAY/ /BELLEVUE. WA 98005/206 641 -3115n YES. MAYBE NO Dear Mr. Sconzo: Mr. Dennis Sconzo 13219 Northrup Way #207 Bellevue, Washington 98005 cc. Dick Peterson Ping. Sup. City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: EXPANSION OF GLOBE PLASTICS May 21, 1979 Sincerely, 433 -1845 If I can be of any further assistence, please call me at 433 -1848. ` Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner Office of Community Development The City of Tukwila has taken a•formal written position concerning the expansion of Globe Plastics, Inc. located on Andover Park East. After detailed review of both the site and the Tukwila Municipal Code, it has been decided to process the expansion plans proposed by Globe Plastics, Inc. The decision is enclosed for your review. Basically, it has been determined . that the present processing operation is subordinate to the distribution and warehousing of plastic products. I have schedule the expansion plans to be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review at their regular June meeting on Thursday the 28th. A staff report will be completed and mailed to your by June the 22nd. TO: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Assistant Planner DATE: 9 May 1979 SUBJECT: GLOBE PLASTICS /C -M DISTRICT This memorandum is offered in response to a request by Globe Plastics to expand their present operation, (copy attached). Review of the business license for Globe Plastics revealed that they have considered themselves as a polyethylene converting operation since 1972. Trying to discover what a "polyethylene converting operation" was, I called the firm and talked with Mr. Dick Petersen. From that conversation, it appeared that the primary function of the building was the cutting of poly- ethylene, a plastic product. Based upon our conversation and a letter received on 22 February 1979, I requested a legal opinion from Larry Hard, the City Attorney concerning the legal position of the City. Mr. Hard .responded that in his "opinon that Globe Plastics, Inc. has made an illegal use of the subject property since it occupied the property in January of 1972. It has not established the existence of a non - conforming use... ". His opinion continued stating the doctrines of equitable estoppel and lanches, (copy attached). An on site inspection conducted on Thursday, 5 April 1979 revealed that 70 to 75 percent of the building was used for warehouse and office. Polyethylene in the form of rolls and drop clothes were being stored. A large cutting table was utilized for the converting process. The poly- ethylene is being chemically manufactured in Yakima and shipped to Tukwila for cutting and packaging. FINDINGS: C, City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar Q Bauch, Mayor MEMORANDUM 1. Globe Plastics is located in the C -M District. 2. The operation of Globe Plastics includes the storage, cutting and packaging of polyethylene, a plastic product. 3. The manufacture, assemble or processing of plastic and plastic pro- ducts is specifically limited to the M -2 District by TMC.18.42.010 (30). However, the storage of plastics in not limited to the' M -2 District. Memorandum Fred N. Satterstrom Page 2 9 May 1979 CONCLUSION: The cutting of polyethylene is part of the assembly process to produce the pro- duct. However, the packaging of a product in plastic should be excluded from this definition. Many manufactured products are packaged in plastic. Packaging is incidental to the manufacturing process. 4. TMC 18.41.010, M -1 District, allows the manufacture of products such as: artificial flowers, bags, brooms, brushes, buttons, clothing, electrical signs, furniture, mattressess, radios, and television sets. CONCLUSION: These products can be made of or contain plastic products. This appears to be a conflict in intent between TMC 18.41.010 and TMC 18.42.010. Technological changes since 1957 have revolutionalized the concept of plastics. In 1957, the uses of plastics were limited and most plastics were considered flamable and dangerous. At that time the manufacturing process generally included the assemble of the pro- duct. It appers that the primary intent of the TMC in 1957 was to limit the poten- tially dangerous plastics industry to the M -2 District. By 1971, thousands of products were being made in part or whole out of plastics. Today, many plastic products are non - flamable. An example close at hand is the Cello Bag Company. In 1957, paper was the primary material to use in making bags. Today, polyethylene is used in making bags. Globe Plastic is using the same material, polyethylene, but making drop cloths instead of bags. Logically, technological changes should result in modification of our zoning ordinance or a change in interpretation. 5. TMC 18.06 distinguishes between principal and accessory uses. 6. The uses allowed in TMC 18.32, the C -M District, are a composite of uses allowed in the C -1, C -2, and M -1 Districts. 7. TMC 18.40, M -1 District, does not address accessory uses. However, TMC 18.30.010 (43), C -2 District, allows "accessory uses customarily incident to the above uses." 8. TMC 18.42.010 (57) M -2 District, also allows "Customary accessory uses." CONCLUSION: The primary use of the building is the storage of plastic (75 - 80 %). The polyetheylene converting is a secondary use, which is allowed only in the M -2 District. The converting could be considered an accessory use if the converting function was dependent upon the warehousing. RECOMMENDATION: That TMC 18.42.010 (30), M -2 District, Heavy Industry, be interpreted to mean the chemical manufacturing of plastics from chemicals or petroleum products. The assembly, processing and packaging of plastics where no chemical change occurs or where it is a portion of another product is not.within the scope or intent of the term. Memorandum Fred N. Satterstrom RJB /ckh ' This interpretation of TMC 18.42.010 (30) does not resolve the problem of Globe Plastics operating in the.0 -M District, TMC 18.32. Either Globe Plastics should be forced to move or the TMC should be amended to allow the storage, assembly, and processing of plastics and plastic products in the C -M District. -w r rbr 0 cd 14144 14 0 rdd . .041,e2._ w(_ 4-I 144 •,- 64.1444.4.G f Gf?Zh p ed CZ; s ; M ../e' retc /Cal 0 f r o 14J ty r 1 ►1.aa+^kti • .. plaJir'GS... " i h. pct, M - / otlx/ i i / e o w ktIA 70 14..t cr 1 !s vo� e. r / h-e. (4.5 ow y' vt�a tc d M -/ in 1kc..uw o rot) 44..-t t-u . l / .. � n � t.Lo! +' 1 o PI d�k.c.. '� t�t.t. a4wt.0 f u c fic..��•t 9 it eV' ry mac✓ r i ,s f art- a f C; to bL's o f &r afi'ovts i rrtct-e c d y{.Grvt1' 11 bc• /GLb rat/ ata -A A flu, d i;r b wfr'ovt am d wit-c� h,9 L-15 i r4L 9 % a �i' �S Y. d u c. f3 J a' 1.t`9 Gt-f f n•ol ccj h-fal Pt1 -al c. 14.-4 t l x.P ti C-1 f7 y r v h b i f c i n, At_ M. -! 44 f 1 a .l,r o of r.u- wifit Ra9c ` -14-4-34. p /a J4 -- 1CJ / % p ro d-u. c.f.?' a ati �,s at,�► q a_ 0 yu fhz l a cu . y . crs a-144 c i ki itr- 1 c fi• o i f J I i u.Got iE -u-io a u- . CT t4 b c' s n IJ I j.1 t a vd,17 a " k - vy „ / a,d.46.r f i 'a,/ a k . I v t i4u- a.•b o r c- r C 4....1 0 frti / ArvK rt.-GO 11...t.144 Z.. ptoterLf we- p le vt•s p e, p ou d o a lu-A.d Mt d fi n cc r,r Grit 124, 1 LJ b'6 d . 672 / Page 3 9 May 1979 F. A. LcSOURD WOOLVIN PATTEN DONALD D. FLEMING GEORGE M. HARTUNG MEADE EMORY LEON C. MISTEREK DWAYNE E. COPPLE THOMAS O. McLAUGHLIN PETER LcSOURD JOHN F. COLGROVE C. DEAN LITTLE Dear Mr. Blaylock; LESOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING, HARTUNG Si EMORY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154, ,,,, t _ �� 1 , (206) 624 -1040 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 April 3, 1979 Re: Globe Plastics, Inc. 0.C.D. CITY OF TL V LA APR 4 1979 F. g<" & LAWRENCE E. HARD RODNEY J. WALDBAUM BRUCE G. HANSON RICHARD P. MATTHEWS Q WILLIAM TOONE M. COLLEEN WEULE DANIEL Q WOO CARL J. CARLSON ROBERT L PALMER COUNSEL You have requested an opinion from our office regarding a proposed expansion of Globe Plastics, Inc. It is my understanding that on June 25, 1971, a building permit was issued to Globe Plastics, Inc. The permit application states that the proposed use of the building was to be "office warehouse ". At the time the building permit was issued, the zoning of the subject property was C -M. The proposed use of "office warehouse" is allowable under the C -M zoning classification. At the time Globe Plastics, Inc. applied for the building permit, it was aware that its proposed use of the property included the cutting of polyethylene film into various sizes for plastic drop cloths and tarps. In June, 1971, the manufacturing, assembly or processing of plastics or plastic products was allowed only in an M -2 district. As a result, processing of plastics was not an allowed use under the C -M zoning classification in 1971 and has never been an allowed use from that dat to the present time. Globe Plastics, Inc. proceeded to construct a facility pur- suant to the building permit. It then engaged in the business of processing plastics and other activities in the subject facility. There was no later review of the use of the property by the City of Tukwila Office of Community Development or its predeces- sors. However, ever since January, 1972, the City of Tukwila has issued annual' business licenses to Globe Plastics, Inc. to allow it to conduct its business at the subject location. In its most recent annual business license application, Globe Plastics, Inc. has stated that the type of business rendered at the subject property is "polyethylene converting ". Presumably, this description was the same as used by the company on its Mr. Roger J. Blaylock April 3, 1979 Page Two prior business license renewal forms. I do not know what Globe Plastics, Inc. stated on its application for a new business license which it must have filed in late 1971 or early 1972. In early 1979, Globe Plastics, Inc. submitted plans to expand its physical facility at the subject site. The additional space will be used for office and warehouse functions together with a slight increase in the plastic processing function. Based on the above facts, it is my opinion that Globe Plastics, Inc. has made an illegal use of the subject property since it occupied the property in January, 1972. It has not established the existence of a non - conforming use and, it would appear, that no variance or conditional use permit was ever granted to the company. In my opinion, it will be necessary for Globe Plastics, Inc. to seek a variance in order to continue and expand its facility to continue its use for the processing of plastic products. In the event the city requires Globe Plastics, Inc. to seek a variance, the City of Tukwila should be aware that there are certain matters which will be raised by the applicant in support of its claim to have a right to continue its present use of the property and to expand it. The first doctrine is a doctrine of equitable estoppel. It will be the position of Globe Plastics, Inc. that it acted in good faith in reliance on the fact that the city issued a building permit in 1971. This gives rise to the doctrine of equitable estoppel which in the opinion of one court is defined as follows: . . . equitable estoppel [applies] to a local government exercising zoning power where a property owner (1) in good faith, (2) upon some act or omission of the government, (3) has made such a 'substantial change in position or has incurred such extensive obligations and expenses that it would be highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the right he acquired ". Mr. Roger J. Blaylock April 3, 1979 Page Three Another matter which will be raised by the applicant is the doctrine of laches. Laches is applied where a party, such as the City of Tukwila, fails to exercise rights which it may have in a timely manner. In this case, it will be the position of Globe Plastics, Inc. that the City of Tukwila has always known about the activities conducted at the facility and has not taken any action to inhibit its current use. In fact, the city has issued business licenses based on the fact that it is aware that Globe Plastics, Inc. is conducting a business involving "polyethylene converting ". Both of these doctrines are valid and have a great deal of force and effect. However, there is a fundamental rule of law which provides that if a land use is prohibited by zoning ordinance, the user cannot establish a right to continue, change, or expand that use simply by obtaining a permit which the issuing officer was without authority to give. In our case, the building • official had no authority to issue a building permit for a use prohibited in a C -M district. In addition, a number of courts have refused to uphold claims of a right to a non - conforming use even after long periods of municipal acquiescence in the illegally permitted use. To summarize, I believe the city can refuse to approve the development plans being submitted by Globe Plastics, Inc. on the grounds that they would allow a use which is prohibited by the zoning applicable to the property in question. Furthermore, I believe the city could consider taking steps to prohibit the use which is currently being conducted on the property. In the event the City of Tukwila does take that position, and it requires Globe Plastics, Inc. to seek a variance for approval, the city should be prepared to have its actions challenged in court. In that event, there could be significant attorney's fees involved. If you have any questions about this opinion, or if there are any facts which I did not correctly recite, please do not hesitate to call me to discuss this matter. LEH :th cc: Mayor Bauch Very truly yours, LeSOURD, PAT EN, FLEMIN HARTUNG & EMORY Lawre E. Hard RJB /ckh Attachments cc: Ping. Sup. City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development 27 February 1979 Mr. Larry Hard LeSourd, Patten, Fleming, Hartung & Emory 3900 Seattle First National Bank Building Seattle, WA 98154 RE: ; „:Globe Plastics, Inc. Dear .Mr. Hard: Recently, the Planning Division received development plans for a proposed expansion of Globe Plastics, Inc. The firm has been operating within the City since January of 1972 in the C -M district. However, their activities may not be allowed by the zoning ordinance. Mr. Dick Peterson, Vice - President of Peterson Industries, Inc., has provided us with an explanation of the firm's activities, which I have attached. The C -M district allows any use allowed in the C -1, C -2 or M -1 district. However, the manufacturing, assembly or processing of plastics and plastic products is allowed only in the M -2 district (TMC 18.42.010). The storage of plastics is not addressed specifically in any section of the ordinance. Off hand, it would appear: that the cutting of polyethylene film into various sizes for plastic drop cloths and tarps is a form of processing plastics. However, the question of whether the operation is a non - conforming use is complicated by the fact that the Planning Commission approved development plans on April 15, 1971, that a building permit was issued on June 25, 1971 and a business licen was issued in January of 1972. Since that time a business license has been renewed each year. In your opinion, is Globe Plastics, Inc. a non - conforming use or an illegal use? What is the appropriate administrative or legal procedure that should be followed for their present operation? How should we react to the requested expansion of the facility? If I can be of any help clarifying any of the points above, please call. Sincerely, 1 ?o c. Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner Plannin g Commission Page 4 Minutes 22 February 1979 MOTION BY MRS. AVERY AND SECONDED BY MR. WELSH TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION BY CHANG- ING 30 FEET IN CONDITION #1 TO 120 FEET. AMENDMENT CARRIED WITH MR. RICHARDS AND MR. SOWINSKI VOTING NO. ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED WITH MR. RICHARDS VOTING NO. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: AITON BUILDING #2 Mr. Blaylock read the staff report and explained the inadequate application for B.A.R. review. MOTION BY MRS. AVERY AND SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI TO TABLE ACTION ON THE DEVELOP- MENT PLANS FOR AITON BUILDING #2 UNTIL THE REGULAR MARCH MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: XEROX BUILDING Mr. Blaylock read staff report and explained the displayed drawings. Omer Mithun, architect, stated he generally agreed with the staff report except for the condition regarding the location of the dumpster. Suggested the dumpster location be addressed at time of landscape plan review. Mr. Blaylock explained the proposed dumpster location was a considerable distance from the structure which might contribute to a litter problem. Also indicated the property adjacent to the north is planned for residential land use. MOTION BY MR. SOWINSKI AND SECONDED BY MRS. AVERY TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOP- MENT PLANS FOR THE XEROX BUILDING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THAT A DETAILED LANDSCAPING PLAN WITH DUMPSTER LOCATION BE APPROVED BY THE B.A.R. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. 2. THAT THE ACCESS TO THE SITE SE?ALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 3. PARKING SCHEME "B" IN EXHIBIT #5, ATTACHED, MAY BE UTILIZED ONLY IN AREAS WHERE VEHICLES WILL NOT OVERHANG LANDSCAPE AREAS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO TMC 18.56. Mr. Richards stated he did not approve of a dumpster located near the residential district. Said the purpose of the office district was to "buffer" the residential districts, not to create nuisances for them. Said single - family properties must be protected. MOTION CARRIED. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mr. Blaylock read the staff report and explained the potential legal problem. Planning Commission Page 5 Minutes 22 February 1979 MOTION BY MRS. AVERY AND SECONDED BY MR. WELSH TO TABLE THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR GLOBE PLASTICS UNTIL A LEGAL OPINION IS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REVIEW: VIP'S Mr. Al Pieper, Building Official, read the staff report and explained the dis- played drawings. MOTION BY MRS. AVERY AND SECONDED BY MR. WELSH TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED SIGN PLANS WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE SIGN BASE IS LOCATED IN A LANDSCAPED AREA EQUAL TO 50% OF THE SIGN SIZE. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING: SCHNEIDER REZONE (R -1 TO C -1) Chairman Kirsop opened the public hearing at 9:40 P.M. Mr. Satterstrom read the staff report. Mr. Robert Kessey, representing the applicant, stated he concurred with the staff report. Stated he felt the topography in the area, however, separated the build- ing from Southcenter Boulevard. Mr. Lee Phillips, 5560 South 154th, stated he opposed the proposed rezone on the basis it would be detrimental to the adjacent single - family properties. Malcolm McLeod, attorney for adjacent landowners, presented a petition with 92 signatures against "spot zoning" in the City of Tukwila. Stated several adverse impacts would result if rezone is approved: views will be impaired - natural vegetation will be removed from site this is an example of "spot zoning" which will be detrimental to resi- dential properties - proposed parking is illegal proposed building design is below the standard of the surrounding community neighborhood may be severely disrupted Mr. John Merrick, 6532 South 154th, stated he opposed the rezone due to increased taxes and blockage of views. Stated he felt the "timing" of this rezone was poor. Mr. Kessey stated the. trees along Southcenter Boulevard may have to be removed but the site will be landscaped. Said the development is valuable for City tax rolls 22 February 1979 AGENDA ITEM VI E • RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION EE •P EN PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT A site plan has been submitted by Tom Sconzo Architects for review of a proposed expansion of Globe Plastics, Inc. located at 290 Andover Park East in the C -M zone. 8 :00 P.M. lobe Plasti Expansion The C -M zone allows any use in the C -1, C -2, or M -1 zones. The manufac- ture, assembly or processing of plastic or plastic products is allowed only in the M -2 zone. The Planning Division has requested a written detailed explanation of Globe Plastics, Inc.. operation. The City Attorney will be requested to provide legal advise on whether their operation is a non- conforming use. The staff recommends that the item be tabled indefinitely until a legal opinion is obtained from the City Attorney. floor plan site plan UCFrrH 51/5VATI nta\v AvPI1I t.t (ACW MD MI IOW N1J ales- t....MVATI kJ W • Y. • 1 n fI _ tua...y .a -ffsm ,t •p -It il >h'•riM nyv..,.ae rM.c.N I�I) J S 1 5 yrrti FJ Z.P rS LVR " II' PLAN r.Ar,V,11.J4 nCOUIP M .✓�I�rCMOY7C. (� K_.. t LWO CRt -jTs .a ta,t/J Lbr'A9 4q ' e Ylw.i . - .tb L.1u *art a l.G iM ►e few T.MOfp 17 C•1 q's r0I01e.0 re.KWO.I TO 4LrU6 PLAS1 t.- ! � 7 &SCOW= tnna��.1 /.,u..«.aN....r reentrrnny s 1171 PETERSON INDUSTRIES INC. February 21, 1979 Mr. Roger Blaylock City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Blaylock: f 290 Andover Park East, SEATTLE, WASH. 98188 • Phone (206) 242-6543 RECEIVED O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWILA fie gZ AVOW eflft This letter is in regards to your inquiry of Peterson Industries Inc., Globe Plastic Company, a subsidiary of Peterson Industries, and Peterson Sales, Inc. a separate leasce of the building located at 290 Andover Park East, in Tukwila. We built this building approximately seven years ago. It was built as a fac- ility for Globe Plastic Company, and Peterson Sales Inc. Globe Plastic Company is a converter of finished polyethylene material into plastic drop cloths and tarps, which is strictly the cutting of polyethylene film into various sizes. This is done by five, to seven, women who fold and package these products by hand. We do no manufacturing whatsoever, and our business has not changed one bit in the seven years we have been here, with the exception that Peterson Sales Inc., which acts as a manufacturers representative, and warehousing facility, has grown in their warehousing operation some three hundred percent, as compared with Globe Plastic Company whose rate of growth is more like one hundred fifty percent. When we built this building it was with the understanding that when we were ready we had the ability to expand out to the West, even with our existing offices, which could add up to an extra six to seven thousand square feet. We also understood that this met with all the set backs, prescribed parking areas, and landscaping regulations. Our expansion would in no way create any further traffic in the area. At the present time we have fourteen employees regularly using thirty parking spaces, and four of these people ride together on a daily basis, in fact, we cannot foresee an increase of more than three to four people in our total organization in the next four to five years. Normally any increase in the workload in our facility is handled either by night work, or overtime on weekends. The same is true with incoming and outgoing freight. We average approximately three to four truckloads in per week, and seven to ten smaller trucks outgoing per week. Normally incoming freight consists of one third, to one half truck, which could increase between two thirds, to one full truck. As far as the outgoing freight is concerned, we ship via common carrier, and normally this ranges between twenty to fifty cases per truck. This realis- tically could increase up to eighty to ninety pieces per truck, which in no way could increase the trucking traffic. We have been a member of your community for the past seven years, and have always met with all of your regulations, inspections by both fire and police departments, and have bent over backwards to uphold the quality of the area by maintaining.a neat and attractive facility. We need this expansion to continue to maintain an aggressive and profitable business, which in turn helps to maintain a healthy economy for all of us. Very truly yours, PETERSON INDUSTRIES INC. Dick Peterson Vice- President DP:pt Mr. Thomas Sconzo 13219 Northrup Way #207 Bellevue, WA. 98005 City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845. Office of Community Development : EXPANSION OF GLOBE PLASTICS Dear Mr. Sconzo: Staff review of the development plans submitted for Globe Plastics , Inc. by your firm, has revealed a serious legal question. The function of Globe Plastics, Inc. as a legal allowable use in the CM -Z one is in ques- tion. The original building permit was issued for and office and ware- house. A detailed written clarification of the operations of Globe Plastic will need to be submitted prior to further processing of the application. The written clarification will have to be reviewed by both Planning Division staff and the City Attorney. The item has been removed from the February 22nd meeting of the Board of Architectuaral Review. Until a determination is made to whether the use is a legal non - conforming use, it will not be put back on the agenda. Closing date for the March 22nd meeting will be March 8th. If I can be of any further assistance, I can be reached at 433 -1848. RJB /ckh cc: Ping. Sup. City Attorney 15 February 1979 Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner 4. LOCAL MANAGER CITY OF TUKWILA -,,200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 ANNUAL BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION License due January 1 or upon opening date of business; PRINT or TYPE information. You must fill in ALL blanks. LICENSE FEE: $25.00 Application for: New Business License Business License Renewal X 1. NAME OF BUSINESS PETERSON INDUSTRIES INC. 2. LOCAL BUSINESS ADDRESS 290 ANDOVER PARK E. 3. COMPANY HEADQUARTERS P. 0. BOX 88028 Name Residence Address Phone 5. Check whether INDIVIDUAL PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION X If INDIVIDUAL, list owner; if PARTNERSHIP, list partners; if CORPORATION, list officers. In all cases, give title, residence address and phone number of each. A. D. PETERSON, PRESIDENT 6558 PARK POINT WAY N. E., SEATTLE, WA 98115 523 -143 R. W. PETERSON, VICE - PRESIDENT 4 CRESCENT KEY, BELLEVUE, WA 98006 746 -842 6. EXPLAIN, IN DETAIL, THE TYPE OF BUSINESS OR SERVICE RENDERED: POLYETHYLENE CONVERTING 7. SIZE OF PROPERTY APP. 68,500 (Sq. ft. or acres) SIZE OF ALL FLOOR SPACE YOU USE APP. 25,000 (Sq. ft.) 8. TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 12 NUMBER IN EACH TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT: Retail Sales Wholesale Sales Medical • IF SO, PLEASE STATE MATERIALS AND QUANTITIES: Office 5 Other 9. ORIGINAL OPENING DATE OF BUSINESS IN TUKWILA JANUARY 3, 1972 Have you ever had a Tukwila Business License? YES 1978 License No. 78 -335 10. DO YOU USE OR STORE FLAMMABLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? NO 11. WILL ANY TYPE OF GAMBLING BE CONDUCTED ON THESE PREMISES: NO IF SO, SPECIFY TYPE: Pull Tabs Card Room Other DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE Check No.';') $ as Rec. No. Date )) , I� -� Clerk ( Building Planning LICENSE COMMITTEE APPROVAL: , Mayor , Police Chief , OCD Director DATE ISSUED 1:4 BUSINESS LICENSE NO. 71-0 Phone 242 -6543 Manufacturing 5 Warehousing 2 Washington State Registration No. C - 578 024 918 Title PRESIDENT Date 12 -15 -78 7/ I hereby certify that I have completed the above form by filling in all blanks; the statements furnished by me on this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ` '2 Signed ii.. JOB A.DR LSS �? 9 0 ,9 /�/-�ooc Pub I< /= A 5.. DATE JL) kJC= 7 \ (c 7/ 4EGA.L 1 OESCA. .. -T NO. BLK TRACT SEE ATTACHED SHEET) OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 2 Lf2 -c ' - t <_ C • :ONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. �/ 3 - A77CC� 73 '/ 1 . Fc�2 r t�s =�r_� �3 Nr . 74/.; :5 7 7N L� L' .j xRc.:•EcT OR DESIGNER 1 MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. I 1 . f ,_1(:7 .fz -f_1I LC•"t1c ! 2.6 UC12 c - Ic. ,r"tl•r t M l) zwi - ENG MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 -_ • .ER MAIL AOOP..LSS BRANCH 6 .__ O� fiUILC' 3 _ , .�FF1 C c=. `44.Ar2 L rt�, 7 • 8 Class of work: NEW • ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 9 Describe vlork: C".�ti_i : (j r'_ -1 F-)t) ( C . 171 I ` 'j f i; - {2. J L A iJ . 10 Change of use from Change of use to 1 1 Valuation of work: S S / 20 ne) r) 1 PLANCHECKFEE / � / PERMIT FEE �`7` 4 • - � L. :: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Type of Occupancy Group Division Size of Bldg. (Total) Sq. Ft. No. of / Stories Max. Occ. Load Fire 7 Zone ti� Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required Kx.Ves ❑No APPLICAT ACCEPTED BY �)' ��.�Z - i PLANS CHECKED BY : / / et,... APPROVE FOR ISSUANCE BY. "/// / <c� /�� / J No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING Covered ) SPACES: I Uncovered Po" LLL NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I$ COM• MENCE D. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LO AL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION O E P RFORMAN OF CONSTRUCTION. j / ,A / C � . Special Approvals Required Not Required Approved ZONING HEALTH DEPT. /Ve • FIRE DEPT. SOIL REPORT OTHER (Specify) ' FOUNDATION FRAMING 1.4 OF OWNS j •INNER BUILDER) FINAL . / ,UN ( S GNATUPE OR AUTHORIZED AGCNT "+,_ IDATEI DUILDIHERMIT Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. CI ')F TUKWILA BUILDING MIT 1 75 - 59th Ave. So. / Tukwila, Washington 98067 — WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ON THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT OCCUPANCY PERMIT REQUIRED BUILDING PERMIT NO. N° 032 PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION K' M.O. CASH 7. C`7 5/7/ -y , e . $ �' - 7/.7'`/1/ /l '• . Stan D. Minkler, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA 14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 Minutes of the Meeting, April 15, 1971 The regular meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Harrison at 8:05 P.M. Members present: Mr. Kirsop, Mr. Traynor, Mrs. Harris, Mr. Sneva, Mr. Link, Mr. Johanson, Miss Nelson, Mr. West and Mr. Mettler. The minutes of the March 18th meeting were read and approved. Mr. Harrison presented a resume of a discussion between himself and the City Attorney concerning the proposed Service Station Ordinance. The City Attorney suggested the following: a. Removal of the station after one year of vacancy. b. Removal of some clauses concerning paving and some other changes in wording of the ordinance. c. In particular, the minimum lot size of stations, as written, was questioned as being unrealistic. In the discussion of this meeting Mr. Sneva stated he felt the proposed 20 foot set -back was not sufficient, particularly that it was too close on corners. Mr. Zepp, City Superintendent, questioned if the proposed ordinance would supercede Ordinance 251 in set -back requirements in M -1 zoning. The following items of business were considered: 1. Request for Sign Permit - Mazda Motors PLANNING COMMISSION Alvin B. Harrison, Chairman Ronald F. Mettler, Vice - Chairman Mr. Zepp presented information regarding this request, which included a letter of ruling from the City Attorney, and an application for a sign permit. Mr. Zepp noted he was following Ordinance 251 procedures in submitting the plans and permit application to the Planning Commission. He also stated the papers complied with all other require- ments of 251. Mr. Harrison read the letters from the City Attorney and Mr. Charles Baker regarding the sign. Discussion followed concerning features of the sign to which the A.C.C. objected. Mr. Zepp cited conversations with Epcon Sign Company's attorneys in which they requested guidance to resolve this problem. It was noted the plans for the sign did not include certain technical data regarding its construction. Mr. Link moved that the building permit for the Mazda Motors sign not be granted until the structural adequacy of the sign be demonstrated according to the building code. Mr. Johanson seconded and the motion carried. 2. Seattle City Light - Discussion on Variance Mr. O'Brien, Burien - Tukwila Area Manager for Seattle City Light, presented details regarding a variance for setting two new poles on South 134th St., replacing some existing poles, and use all overhead wiring. This would be to extend three -phase service from South 133rd St. to a manufacturing building owned by Mr. Ray F. Nelson, located on 4th Ave. So. and South 134th St., which is situated just outside the city 3. Other Business - 2 limits. (It should be noted that this was a preliminary discussion, inasmuch as a formal application for variance had not been presented to the Planning Commission.) Mr. O'Brien compared costs of extending three -phase service to Mr. Nelson by overhead and underground methods from different locations of existing three -phase service. lbs. Nelson at present desires overhead service; but is making provisions in his building for future underground service. Lengthy discussion followed concerning type of underground service, details of poles, arrangement and number of overhead wires, etc. ;►ir. Harrison suggested using overhead wiring to front of property, and then underground from the property line to the building, with pad - mounted transformers. It was also suggested that sir. O'Brien consult further with City Light engineering to work out such a compromise and more definite cost figures. Mr. Traynor moved that a formal request for variance be submitted, and further discussion be delayed until this request came in. Mr. Sohanson seconded and the motion carried. --�^ a. H. S. Ferguson Office and Warehouse Building in Andover Industrial Park. Plans comply with all set -back requirements and covenants. Parking includes 26 spaces with possible future parking provided. Miss Nelson moved the plans be accepted subject to technical review and approval by appropriate city officials. Mr. Traynor seconded and the motion carried. b. Project 181 Warehouse and Office Building in Andover Industrial Park. Plans show five truck docks and 35 parking spaces. Set -back and covenant requirements are met. Mr. Link moved the plans be accepted subject to technical review and approval by appropriate city officials. Mr. Kirsop seconded and the motion carried. c. Plans for landscaping of grounds around the Radio Shack building. The A.C.C. has approved these plans, and the Planning Commission concurred. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. 7 M. Catherine Harris, Acty Secty Tukwila Planning Commission f/ I� �I elevation parking requirements site plan globe plastic floor plan site plan