HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-23-79 - SEAFIRST NATIONAL BANK - DRIVE THRU DESIGN REVIEWdr-23-79
225 tukwila park
seafirst national bank drive up
•
City of Tukwila
Joyce /Nordfors Associates
119 South Main Street
Seattle, WA 98104
MC /ckh
Attachment.
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
30 August 1979
AT David Nordfors
RE: SEAFIRST BANK DRIVE -UP, PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
The Plan set submitted to the Tukwila Building Depart-
ment for building permit review was examined by the
O.C.D. on 21 August 1979; the attached comments resulted
from that examination. The concerns which you outlined
in our conversation this morning are addressed in item
3, sheet A-2 on the aforementioned attachment. Please
call me if you need further information.
Sincer
Mark Caughey
Assistant Planner
1
`` `LA q City Cul' Tukwila
J ▪ 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
• Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
190e
M EMORAN DUM
TO: Phil Fraser, Office Engineer - Department of Public Works
FROM: Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner - O.C.D.
DATE: 22 August 1979
SUBJECT: SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT, SEA -FIRST BANK DRIVE -UP
As you know, Planning Commission approval for this project left the
resolution of public sidewalk requirements to the assessment of your
office. However, 0.C.D. wishes to encourage you to require sidewalks
along the entire north and east boundaries of the total Sea -First
site, if you find justification to require sidewalks at all in this
vicinity. This recommendation is based on Ordinance #1025, the City
of Tukwila Sidewalk Plan, Section III of which identifies the Andover
Park West and Tukwila Parkway frontages as "high- priority" components
of the commercial sidewalk system.
Policy 1, Goal 2, Section III of Ordinance #1025 (attached) suggests
sidewalk construction priority should be analyzed according to foot -
traffic demand in the vicinity. As you observed in our conversation
this morning, this approach is difficult to accept literally since
construction of sidewalks where they previously did not exist tend
to attract new pedestrian activity. However, O.C.D. suggests that
the current permit application represents a significant opportunity
to complete a vital linkage in the sidewalk system which may not
occur again for many years. The opportunity for Sea -First to fulfill
these improvements at today's, rather than tomorrow's costs, might be
a factor to consider in your study of this matter.
MC /ckh
Attachment
BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW - SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK SITE
PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS
SHEET A -2:
1. Maintain minimum 12' one -way aisle width between new 0 parking stalls
adjacent to west property line of the existing Sea -First site, and the
new curb section shown on this sheet.
2. Proposed 0 stalls to hold minimum 24' curb length to accommodate ade-
quate back -up space.
3. Eliminate at least the 3 north -most proposed 0 parking stalls in order
to accommodate addition of a 6' wide landscape strip adjacent to the
north property line of the existing bank site.
4. Extension of a new sidewalk along the north property line of the exist-
ing bank site subject to requirements of the Public Works Department.
See attached memo of 21 August 1979.
5. Depict location of new or relocated utility transformer pad and equip-
ment, if any.
SHEET A -4:
1. Dimension exterior elevations, and note vehicular clearances.
.2. Note colors and textures to be applied to all exterior surfaces and
trim.
3. Depict any signing, directional or advertising, to be placed on any
elevation of either structure.
SHEET L -1, L -2, L -3:
1. Landscaping plans for this project subject to review by the Planning
Commission prior to occupancy, per condition 7 of 0.C.D. Director's
letter of August 1, 1979. — Plans not approved at this time.
2. See attached letter of 21 August 1979 for outline of staff concerns
regarding the current landscaping proposal.
SHEET M -1:
1. Roof - mounted vent not screened per intent of condition 1 of 0.C.D.
Director's letter of 1 August 1979.
21` August 1979
August 1, 1979
Dear Mr. Everett:
. �^
City of Tukwila
Administration
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845
Office of Community Development
Mr. Randy Everett
Joyce /Nordfors & Associates
119 South Main Street
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: Seattle First National Bank - Southcenter Drive -Up Facility
The Planning Commission reviewed your above referenced project during
their regular meeting of July 26, 1979. After considerable discussion
on the matter they approved your project subject to the following con-
ditions:
',I( Screening of all roof - mounted vents, if there are any roof -
mounted vents.
{g,-' Provide handicap provisions in parking lot per code. Parking
lot to comply with minimum parking lot standards in the Seattle
Zoning Code.
3. Parking on the north and west side of the building to be nego-
tiated between applicant and the Planning staff.
The 4,000 square foot proposed canopy to set back at least 50
feet from any right -of -way.
054' Traffic problems to be resolved by mutual agreement between the
applicant and the Public Works Department.
1 ,6: The Planning Division staff is to review and approve any revised
site plans prior to issuance of any building permits, except
item 5.
7. A landscape plan is to be approved by the Planning Commission
prior to occupancy of the new drive -up bank facility.
In your design of the roof for the proposed drive -up tellers, I would
recommend that you consider campers and other types of higher vehicles in
the design of the facility so that the roof line of the teller facility
would not be in conflict with these higher vehicles. That is a recommen-
dation, not a requirement.
Very truly yours,
ki() ktU
Kej Stoknes, irector
Offic of Community Development
KS /ckh
cc: Terry Monaghan
Phil Fraser
Mr. Randy Everett Page 2
Joyce /Nordfors & Associates August 1, 1979
While the Planning Commission did not require a sidewalk for your facility,
the City Council by ordinance #1025 has stated that at the time of building
permit application, an assessment should be made regarding the necessity of
sidewalks. If deemed necessary, the applicant should construct sidewalks in
conjunction with the building permit. This area is identified as an area of
high priority for sidewalks and should the Public Works Department deem side-
walks as necessary, a five foot sidewalk built to city standards would be
required and be..a condition of any building permit issued.
If you have any questions or wish to get together on this item please call
me at your convenience.
Planning Commission Page 4
Minutes July 26, 1979
Warren Pugh, Austin Company, said regarding condition 1 they would like this max-
imum height as defined by the TMC; they agreed to conditions 2 and 6. Under con-
dition 7 they would request that underground irrigation system be in the required
landscape areas and hose bibs in all other areas. He presented samples of an
exterior stucco type treatment for exterior walls, stating it would not be too
different from the City Hall and Xerox Building. He showed samples of a composi-
tion roofing material that gives the appearance of shake shingles. With respect
to condition 5 he said they are talking about thermal pane glass in wood frames
that are stained.
Discussion followed about truck deliveries. Mr. Pugh stated the deliveries would
be of the small type since the building will house offices.
Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, said his concern is that the building will be dominant
on the size of the lot and effort should be made in the selection of exterior wall
material should attempt to soften the effect and reduce the visual effect of the
building. He said he was concerned about the bulk of the building on that size
lot. Chairman Kirsop said the multi -roof levels soften the bulk. Mr. Pugh said
the exterior walls would be buff colored.
MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE
THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE HUNTINGTON BUILDING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
(1) MAXIMUM HEIGHT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH T.M.C. 18.20.030; (2) DRIVEWAYS AT ACCESS
POINTS TO BE 24' WIDE; ALL SITE ACCESS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART-
MENT. APPROVAL OF THIS DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ACCESS. (6) SUBMISSION OF A
DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT.
LANDSCAPING TO BE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DEVELOPMENTS TO THE WEST OF SUBJECT SITE.
(7) UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN ALL PLANTING AREAS.*
MOVED BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, TO AMEND THE MOTION AND CONDITION (3)
READ: "EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJOINING BUILDINGS AND
STUCCO BE IN MUTED TONE AND THERE BE A DELIVERY STALL ADDED. MOTION CARRIED.
* MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED.
�PMENT PLANS: SEAFIRST DRIVE -UP WINDOWS:
Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report.
ELEVATION AND PARKING PLANS: McCANN PROJECT #469:
Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report.
Mr. Hunt, the developer's representative, said the staff conditions were acceptable.
MOVED BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE
THE PARKING PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR McCANN PROJECT #469 SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING IN CHARACTER WITH CONCEP-
TUAL PLANTING SCHEME SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, DETAILED PLAN SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. (2) UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION OF ALL PLANTING
AREAS. MOTION CARRIED.
Planning Commission
Minutes
Discussion followed, with emphasis on the flow of traffic. Phil Fraser, Office
Engineer, suggested the traffic flow be an item of negotiation. Chairman Kirsop
remarked that there would be little foot traffic along Tukwila Parkway.
MOVED BY MR. WELSH, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE
THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRIVE -IN WINDOWS AND RELATED ITEMS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS: (1) SCREENING OF ALL ROOF - MOUNTED VENTS. (2) PROVIDE HANDICAPPED
PROVISIONS IN PARKING LOT PER CODE. PARKING LOT TO COMPLY WITH MINIMUM PARKING
LOT STANDARDS IN THE SEATTLE ZONING CODE. (3) PARKING AND LANDSCAPING REQUIRE-
MENTS ON THE NORTH AND WEST SIDE WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
PLANNING STAFF AND THE APPLICANT. (4) THE 4,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPOSED CANOPY TO
BE SETBACK AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM ANY RIGHT -OF -WAY. (5) TRAFFIC PROBLEMS WILL BE
RESOLVED BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
CONDITION (6) WILL BE ELIMINATED. (7) THE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF IS TO REVIEW
AND APPROVE ANY REVISED SITE PLANS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS,
EXCEPT ITEM 5. (8) A LANDSCAPE PLAN IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMIS-
SION PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE NEW DRIVE -UP BANK FACILITY. MOTION CARRIED.
REVISED PLANS: DOUBLETREE LODGE AND PARKWAY PLACE OFFICE BUILDING:
Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report.
Mr. Stoknes said staff recommended that the 10 -foot wide area recommended to be
developed as sidewalk would be acceptable as 5' sidewalk and 5' landscaping.
MOVED BY MR. WELSH, SECONDED BY MRS. AVERY, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACCEPT
THE REVISED PLANS FOR THE DOUBLETREE LODGE AND PARKWAY PLACE OFFICE BUILDING.
MOTION CARRIED.
LANDSCAPE PLANS: SEGALE PROJECT 791 -T:
Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, read the staff report.
Chris Crumbaugh, Segale Company, said an underground irrigation system would be
provided in all planting areas.
MOVED BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE
THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SEGALE PROJECT 791 -T WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: (1) AN
UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM BE PROVIDED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: 12:30 A.M.
MOVED BY MR. WELSH, SECONDED BY MRS. AVERY, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED.
Minutes prepared by:
aL d-4(x.A...)
N orma Booher
Recording Secretary
TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
Utty,
Eileen Avery
Secretary
Page 5
July 26, 1979
CI T Y OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
26 July 1979 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM VI F :VELOPMENT PLANS "- SeaFirst Drive -Up Windows
SUBJECT: Board of Architectural Review Application (C -M Zone)
APPLICANT: Seattle First National Bank
LOCATION: Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park East
ACTION: Construct drive -in windows and related items
BACKGROUND:
On June 15, 1979, Seafirst submitted an application for a building permit and a
related environmental questionnaire to the City for a six (6) lane drive -up bank
facility on the vacant lot east of and adjacent to their present bank site. In
addition there would be a 400 square foot teller's building, a 4,000 square foot
canopy, automobile queuing lanes and landscaping.
In addition they propose to remove the drive -in windows on the present bank site.
Both the properties are under review here due to their interrelationship to each
other and the common applicant.
ANALYSIS:
Parking: Total present building area: 9,536
Proposed teller building: 400
Proposed canopy: 4,000 sq. ft. N/A
Total building area: 9,936 Sq. Ft.
Required parking: 3.1 x 9.936 = 30.8
Parking provided: (Does not 84.0
include parking in 15 foot
required landscape area.)
Action: Parking is adequate. Provisions for parking and building entry must be
provided for handicapped. Parking lot to meet minimum standards of the
Seattle Zoning Code.
Landscaping:
The C -M zone requires a 15 foot landscape strip adjacent to all public roads and
external boundaries.
Planning Commission
Staff Report
New facility: This provision is met and exceeded.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend this project be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Screening of all roof - mounted vents.
Page 2
26 July 1979
Old facility: There is inadequate landscaping on the north and west property
lines. Parking is shown within the required 15 foot landscape
areas.
Action: The parking layout must be revised on the north and west sides of the
property to provide 15 foot provisions for landscaping. Landscaping on
the north side may be reduced below required fifteen feet if necessary
to allow adequate room for one row of angle parking and a one way
traffic aisle.
Setbacks: (Required = 50' front setback)
The setbacks are as follows:
Present building: Appears to be several feet short of required setback.
Proposed building: Appears to be several feet short of 50 feet on north
front setback.
Action: The present building is established and no action needed. The pro-
posed structure should be moved to meet setback requirements.
Traffic: A traffic generation /flow study was required by the Public Works Depart-
ment. This was provided and in review by the department. It appears to
be in substantial compliance with their requirements. A dedication for
an acceleration lane may be required.
Action: Approve subject to necessary mitigating measures to solve potential
traffic problems associated with this facility. No deviations to the
zoning code are allowed without a variance if due to traffic demands.
Height: All buildings will be below the 35 foot height allowance.
Sidewalks: This is a pedestrian oriented commercial activity on a street with a
high priority for sidewalks as identified by the City's Sidewalk Plan
as adopted by Ordinance #1025.
Action: A five foot sidewalk should be required on the sides of the property
adjacent to Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West.
2. Provide handicapped provisions in parking lot per code. Parking lot to
comply with minimum parking lot standards in the Seattle Zoning Code.
3. Eliminate parking on the north and west side of the present bank site.
Planning Commission
Staff Report
Page 3
26 July 1979
Provide a fifteen foot landscape strip in these areas, except north of
present bank building where this requirement may be reduced if necessary
to provide one row of angle parking and a one -way traffic aisle.
4. The 4,000 square foot proposed canopy to be setback at least 50 feet from
any right -of -way.
5. Applicant is to provide such mitigating measures to solve trafficpro-
blems as deemed necessary by the Public Works Department, including dedi-
cation or new construction.
6. Applicant is to construct a five foot continuous sidewalk on all land
adjacent to Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West prior to occupancy.
7. The Planning Division staff is to review and approve any revised site
plans prior to issuance of any building permits, except item 5.
8. A landscape plan is to be approved by the Planning Commission prior to
occupancy of the new drive -up bank facility.
f
a1
y
/
.-1 v
j RT W.
▪ tIT4
uprow
• eL w•V..a.N.
yew2 J
R.N.
•
..�. e:
ens "MCP)
WOW C.a0
•
_— •m•t.,•
LW
WNW NIC'CW•13-1W.L
t
tK.0
dd
•
15�
974.E
ass Road
,4J
•
.r.ol
— 7.l LKSb.s f �•i• CJ.
- -� -. - .. - ----
VEW. etiorf.
_ 1
9
8
g
2
•-I I
.1
�1
< — •t.._ c,W .�
I aro.a
d o.
e
s 1e
1. 1 1 1 1 1 gip
• b/ ILYar
• .•N
YYbt2 `o=
•ra
ANIL
•
w :.. `• _-
(Lyt W SW... pm
SOIN1Cailta►/1e
Td/cwia Parkway
- II %(j 1 ••
Pik
•'v
c
• we. . 1 c )
td
JUL 1 3 1979
Q.
- a•r•
OgrlITAISTATIF
. - SOU TH-
CENTER
BRANCH
DRIVE • U?
Joyce Nordtors &N
•••••∎`Yw•••••Y••
Jima *O.
SITE PLAN
7.14.7 , c.i.
cult • .1 .•t• --
0
0
ec
co
w
W
0
4 s.
Ce
1-
z
W
0
x
F
0
Q.G.D.
CITY OF P_I:S:iStA
v
JUL 1 3 1979
\ \\
TUKWILA PARKWAY
Tee Into Ex1st 5w to.y Serer
approximately Ma location.
Construct 91 LF. 6" 5an,tory
Sewer, Slop. nt 00701 t (t4r 11�.r
Exec -F14---
W M. by of
SOUTHCENTER'ACCESS R. 0
Remove Extol. Conc Curb Exist. M W.
Rim Elev•(21 d) \
CBe1,TypeI fE'tB'S°n.hY LErB •(lo7o) - 51
/ Fe el • 211 ,.,. r• I 5...r ' --
..7r —I E.• 1020:+.:+ ^ ter• L_I'_ .... �t
\ 25 f22)
Remove Ext5t
Concrete Curb
(ryp.)
em
Q ove Existing 14 L. F. '5prinkl
Concrete Curb Each
\ � •'4 a (43) ` d-a ` ,
▪ s k � q \
32 LF6'
N Drain Pipe 4' .`
See 5heet , Cg 0 07 • II
Grate El 22.1
O ' 1.E-12 1863(W) \ .
T IE-24- 17b3(N45)
24
C.B' 4, Type I[
u — Outlet Control
Rim El.-240
LE- 12
I.E-2ti•1738(5)_.�
Grate EL- —
0, 1.E-W.19.43(5
J�f E-24.163o(N)
/ /'y t4
22
r ates
R 9 .
an Ex CB
Gr El {203rd
\\ I E {1444)
• '\\ r
1.E•1446"
Ott.Epnl. 11c
L Contractor to verify locations and
Inverts err exist,n9 uhldie, prior to
Construe-hen
2 All work &holl be performed In actor -
donee wilt, A PW A. JpeCificotnns,
1177 edmon 4 City of Tukwila Jtan-
dards
5. Existing topographic information
obtained from survey by gush,
Roed 4 Hitdv s, P.S.,Inc dated
rebruory 20, 1479.
1 City of Tukwila datum
5 I00yr.er firma el.v.ilnnt -:01
6 Storm sourer calculations tweed on
layr stone
7. limited to sanitary service e taabhes are
L EGEND
M.H. Mon tide CB Catch Bann
CL Curb Inlet PE. Poiyethelene
Lt Lineal Feet WM Water Meter
F.H. Fire Hydrant LC Invert eleatcrt
- R- Ridge L,ne r5. rinuh Surface
V. EleetneoI Walt T.V. TelephoneVaidt
Ex. Existing CO. Clam Out
Emating Propo ed
(Z4.0) Elevation 24.0
o MN. or TypelICB. 0
O Solitary Sewer Geancut 0
- -- 5onitary Sewer
==== Storm Sewer
rn
e CL or CO. o
rf, SEATTLE'F/RS
NAT/ONAL BANT K
SOUTH -
CENTER •
BRANCH
DRIVE-UP
Joyce Nordfors &Associates
faTi
• .liyl
SITE GRADING,
DRAINAGE & UTILITIES
PEy15gKS .Iae110 19u•19
/� pf Mare rime SCALE ••yl•o
\ Few.es Lea.ec I ,tea sx. 111
• &Mit Sew/
an
C /79 79049 •
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Seattle -First National Bank
Exchange Building, Floor 15
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:
821 2nd Ave., Seattle, WA 98104 583 -5565 (Glen Thistle)
June 14, 1979
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
?gozs
. 1 5 1979
BUILDING DEPT,
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Southcenter Branch Drive -Up
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
6 lane drive -up bank facility (consisting of a 400 SF teller's
building & a 4,000 SF Canopy), automobile queuing lanes and landscaping
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
The site is located adiacent to the existing hranc'h hank at 1hp N rnrner
of Southcenter Shopping Center. The site is graded, unimproved, and generally
• flat, surrounded by a service station (S), parking lots (S &W), freeway (N) &
vacant land (E).
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: November 1979
9 List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES X NO
(c) Building permit YES X NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit
(e) Sewer hook up permit
(f) Sign permit
(g) Water hook up permit
(h) Storm water system permit
(i) Curb cut permit
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington)
(k) Plumbing permit (King County)
(1) Other:
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT
YES NO X
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Flood control zone application
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover -
ing of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? _
-2-
X
Explanation:
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? 'X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
Explanation:
Disruptions of the soil & changes in topography will be
limited to excavations for footings and addition of
slight landscape berms.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of'the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(g)
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
(h) .Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
WATER DETENTION SYSTEM PER KING COUNTY REQUIREMENTS
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
LANDSCAPING WILL ADD MAPLE TREES, EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND 'LAWN
TO THE SITE
Explanation:
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration X
or movement of fauna? _
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
ADDITIONAL SITE LIGHTING AND AUTO LIGHTS
WITHIN SITE.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
' tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides., chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
{
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X.
Explanation:
Additional vehicular traffic to the site may be generated.
X .
Explanation:
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
X
X
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? X
(b) Communications systems? X
(c) Water? X
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
(e) Storm water drainage? X
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
X
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
C
■
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
e
Signature and tle
David Nordfors, Joyc 4ordfors & Assoc.
Partner
-8-
June 14, 1979
Date
•
YES MAYBE NO'
X
X
X
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
BUILDING DEPT,
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE APPLICATION NO.
5 1979 Dated June 14, 1979
*APPLICATION is hereby made by
Seattle -First National Bank (583 -5565)
(Individual, corporation, etc.)
of 821 2nd Ave., Seattle, WA 98104 ,for permit to construct
(Post office address)
6 lane drive -up bank facility
and maintain
Southcenter Branch Drive -Up
(Name of works, structures or improvements)
located in S.E. 1 /4 Section 23 , Township 23 North, Range 4 (E) (W) .W.M.,
(N1 NW' /4, etc.)
situated in the City of Tukwila
(Location with reference to nearest town or well known locality)
to be known as
all or portion of which will be located upon the banks or in and over the channel or over and across the
flood plain of Green River , a tributary of Puget Sound
(Name of stream or body of water) (Name of stream or body of water)
in
This permit is sought i n perpetuity
(In perpetuity; or, if temporary, state number of years)
Definite location and plan of the proposed works, structures or improvements are shown on attached sheets
numbered TS -1 t E -5 , inclusive, which are parts of this application.
Construction will commence
King County
•SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
ECY 050.1 -5
Rev. 7/78
(Nature of works: bridge, dike, road, revetment, logging works, gravel pits, etc.)
August 1979
State Flood Control Zone No. 2
(Date)
and will be completed November 1979
(Date)
Remarks:
FOR SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK.
By ...
David t
(Construct, reconstruct, modify)
(Applicant)
and thereafter operate
dfors & Assoc. 624 -3f
Plans Examined and
Reported by
Field Examination and
Report by
Application Returned
for Alteration
PERMIT
Recommended by
issued
Name
Date
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
BUILDING DEPT,
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE APPLICATION NO.
5 1979 Dated June 14, 1979
*APPLICATION is hereby made by
Seattle -First National Bank (583 -5565)
(Individual, corporation, etc.)
of 821 2nd Ave., Seattle, WA 98104 ,for permit to construct
(Post office address)
6 lane drive -up bank facility
and maintain
Southcenter Branch Drive -Up
(Name of works, structures or improvements)
located in S.E. 1 /4 Section 23 , Township 23 North, Range 4 (E) (W) .W.M.,
(N1 NW' /4, etc.)
situated in the City of Tukwila
(Location with reference to nearest town or well known locality)
to be known as
all or portion of which will be located upon the banks or in and over the channel or over and across the
flood plain of Green River , a tributary of Puget Sound
(Name of stream or body of water) (Name of stream or body of water)
in
This permit is sought i n perpetuity
(In perpetuity; or, if temporary, state number of years)
Definite location and plan of the proposed works, structures or improvements are shown on attached sheets
numbered TS -1 t E -5 , inclusive, which are parts of this application.
Construction will commence
King County
•SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
ECY 050.1 -5
Rev. 7/78
(Nature of works: bridge, dike, road, revetment, logging works, gravel pits, etc.)
August 1979
State Flood Control Zone No. 2
(Date)
and will be completed November 1979
(Date)
Remarks:
FOR SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK.
By ...
David t
(Construct, reconstruct, modify)
(Applicant)
and thereafter operate
dfors & Assoc. 624 -3f
c
INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
Provisions of Law
By Chapter 86.16 RCW the state assumed full regulatory control over its navigable and non - navigable waters, subject always to
federal control of navigation. State regulatory control is exercised by the director of the Department of Ecology through regulatory
orders, the designation of flood control zones and the issuance of permits for construction, operation and maintenance of any works or
structures within such zones.
Any construction of new structures or modification or reconstruction of existing structures without permit, and the construction,
operation or maintenance of any works or structures in violation of any order of the director of the Department of Ecology shall be pre-
sumed to be a public nuisance and may be abated.
Applications for Permits
Applications must be made to the Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA 98504, on Form ECY 050 -1 -5 furnished by the department and
which must be filled out in full. It must show whether the works are of a permanent nature such as a highway bridge, road or dike, or of a
temporary character such as a log boom, logging works across a stream or bridge on logging spur. If temporary in nature, the applicant
must include the period the proposed works will be in use. (The permit requires removal of temporary works at the end of the stated period.)
Two copies of maps and plans of the proposed works are to be included. These must be on sheets 81/2 inches wide with a clean left -hand
margin of 1 inches for binding and, where possible, must be 11 inches long. Sheets of greater length should be folded to 81 x 11 inches.
Each sheet must have a title in the lower right -hand corner showing: name and number of flood control zone, name designated for pro-
posed works, name of applicant and of engineer under whose direction plans have been prepared, the scale of maps and plans expressed
numerically and graphically, and the date. Spaces for application and permit numbers must be in the lower right -hand corner of the title,
thus: Application No. , Permit No. Maps and plans should be numbered consecutively.
The map must show the definite location of the works by reference to government corners and section lines and to all streams and
bodies of water which may be affected. Diagrammatic plans of the works and structures shall clearly indicate to scale and by written
dimensions and elevations all contemplated obstructions to passage of flood waters and all openings and provisions for the passage of
water under, over, through and around such proposed works, together with known high water elevations and their approximate dates
of occurrence.
Where works and structures will reduce the cross - sectional area of a stream channel at bank -full stage, the map must show to scale cross
sections of the channel spaced at intervals approximately equal to twice the bank -full width of the stream over a reach long enough to include
not less than three such cross sections beyond both the upstream and downstream terminals of the proposed works. Known high water marks
with dates of occurrence should be shown on cross sections. The location of all cross sections should be indicated on the map. All elevations
shown on plans should refer to U.S.G.S. datum.
The department assumes no jurisdiction over structural designs, but is solely concerned with the probable effect of proposed works and
structures on the safe passage of flood waters, their probable influence on the regimen of streams and bodies of water, and their adverse
effect on life, health, and property.
Delays in construction beyond stated dates may, under certain conditions, necessitate altered designs to meet new conditions.
Under "remarks," please provide pertinent information not otherwise covered. The application must be signed by the applicant or by
persons having full authority to do so.
Exemptions
Avoid costly surveys. Flood zone boundaries quite generally follow government section and subdivisional lines. It follows that certain
areas within the zones may not be affected by flood waters and works, structures or improvements cannot influence flood conditions.
Applications and permits will not be necessary for works in such locations. Likewise, incorporated cities and towns or parts thereof included
within a zone will not generally be required to secure perrnits for street and road improvements which conform to general existing plans of
thoroughfares and existing improvements.
Abuses of these regulations governing exemptions may subject works to abatement pursuant to RCW 86.16.090.
TRAFFIC STUDY
For
Seattle First National Bank
Tukwila Branch
Existing Facility
The existing Seattle First National Bank, Tukwila Branch,
includes two drive -up banking facilities (windows) located
on the west portion of the property: In addition, an "escape
lane" is provided so that motorist who change their minds
have an opportunity t:.o remove themselves from .the drive -up
queue.
Access to the existing drive -up facilities is internal
(within the site) and is gained via an entrance driveway
located on Tukwila Parkway, from driveways served by an
existing north-south (private) road connecting 'Tukwila Parkway
with the Southcen Ler Access Road, Etnd from a "split" driveway
system situated on the southwest portion of the property.
These driveways are sketched on Figure 1 and Figure 2 along
with their associated hourly traffic demands.
The exisb:i,ny drive-up facilities were monitored during a peak
business period. An observer was stationed in order to
obtain GU- second flow rates from the present drive -up facilities.
The peak 60- second flow rates are listed in Table 1. •
O.C.D.
CITY UP 1C. "ILA
JUL i 3 1979
Chrislopler bravo pei
9688 ruinier. avenue .0
• T ittle washin4ori
le .7234567 )8118
/27
230
-'
2 I
1 -4( 14/RDAlg WA 5- moi/Nn
(r
F/CD/
EX/3///YS P.E/9/ HOt4
VZ2144 /VD
l R/ (C /97, 4-,01)- : ;00 p-m-
f
N
;
I
42-
\
/,6D 7 5
5
•
i5
7_? •
"
-- "/0
1 4. 1
1;
•
•
-)f iVii WA r /1,01/Eisf2/Tr73 -
f7C/IRE 2
.Evs AioN)
7
.
7PE.., 71)4 r ,'g /?7,
/2:Cy —
60-S.cmd Service Rates
Cxix(ioy Drive-up Windows
(Priday 6/29/79)
10 46
chriaopherbro■vn 13'2\
■.i3C" attic wwthin Lofi
Time Freq. i � Time q. me reg. a I,zeg. Time Freq.
4:15 2 el:18 1 5:81 1 5:24 2
16 2 39 l 02 4 25 2
17 1 40 4 03 1 26 4
18 3 4l 1 04 2 27 1
19 3 42 3 05 0 28 2
20 2 43 1 86 0 29 2
21 2 44 2 07 2 5:30 1
22 1 45 1 08 2 31 3
23 1 46 1 09 0 32 1
24 1 47 3 18 2 33 2
25 4 48 2 11 0 34 3
26 4 49 1 12 1 35 1
27 2 50 3 13 3 36 1
28 1 51 0 14 1 37 0
29 1 52 0 15 0 38 0
4:30 2 53 l 16 1 39 O '
31 0 54 3 17 1 40 0
32 1 55 3 18 3 41 0
33 3 56 0 19 1 42 2
34 1 57 1 20 1 43 2
35 2, 58 1 21 2 . 44 2
36 Q 59 2 22 0 5:45 ' 1
37 1 5:00 2 23 3 46 1
On reviewing Table 1 it will be noted that several 60-second intervals
show »O`' departure ratoa. Thi�� 7.0/ departure rate does' not | mean that
there was no demand. Rather, there was queuing at the dr
windows and the tellers were sufficiently busy that for short periods
ou vehicles were moving.
-~-
• '' • ``
Font ()t 1 i. L•1 i c)I):nerv.ti:.i.olle, the (.onsoquences of these
st:tni.I.itlt) and ':1 :tullJl.i nu queues wore diversions Crum the
drive -u I;ac I I i 1 i ; l.t) Lhc parki.rty (walk-in) Licil it;i_es.
Ind cod , : i v I':t I ntOLo1 t :it.. s Q.I. fed to us the cil:ih machines
rt the.e Lll,tll t, t i.. ill l i ne i tlul' wil.l,.i.n Lh batik or at L
drive-up w.11lutl :.'.
On 111e I.)a.J.I. ; of
for 111e t }:; :I.t;1. 1.11.1
terms of vehien);
interval.. Tab la
60 Minu 1;(
15 Minute
10 Minute
60 Second
u P :i.e id. clbservaLions, Lhe service rates
r Zvi - -t.lp lic ill ties can be described in
At 1 WI: nl :i.tiute over a se 1 CC Led time
I 1 du se r Lbes the max iiuunl service ra tes .
Mu:: i H `;t. l'v ice RitLeS
i u(.I Drive-up Pao i :cities
(Two Tellers)
AVtL aqe
AVO rtt qr
Average
AvurLtge
1.60
2.13
2.20
1.0
Vehicles /Minute
Vehicles /Minute
Vehicles /Minute
Vehicle /15 Seconds
The maximum survicu ra Le of one vehicle every 15 seconds
defines the ul. Lima Le or maximum that can be expected . This
maximum demand wi 11 not take place over any sustained (hour)
time in Ler. va 1 but can be used to define a "peak hour factor" .
Projected Capacity
Seattle First. Natiotlal. Bank will be constructing 6 drive -up
windows on an existing vacant site immediately east of the
present bank. As a part of -this .construction program the
existing two dr..i.ve -up windows will be demolished and the
space occupied by the .existing facilities converted to
parallel parking.
The proposed 6 -lane drive -up facility is schematically
depicted on Figure 3 . This figure also incorporates anti-
cipated p e a k hour demands.
It will be noted that t1'le new drive -up facility and asso-
ciated revisions to access roads precludes the continuing
use of the existing north -south linkage between Tukwila
Parkway and the Southcen tear Access Road by non -bank customers.
For exalupl c , during the evening peak hour 178 non -bank related
vehicles per llottr used this access road to gain entry onto
Tukwila Parkway. An additional 35 bank related vehicles per
hour used this facility, over its major .portion, to gain
chri5Lopher brown �;-?\
9688 rainier avenue Fx
,llllle wathinglon
Le l:7234567 )8118
0/0/yri
1 ;11,e; ; /,,a/. -4
4 ///nzu
_so pia /X - )(-
6 a/4
/U7/),/
_L-_7/715/1
02/
n ,
• 7
1 I 1 i 1 /
, t! . f
1 1
f N t
gg vi i i i
!
/ : L
• :
.,;-
?ic cip -ozie_u/i-/.
t•-■ / /
\
(2 .1' el J
U/ af4 ../G' 4 4444 grilip
. f7 ,
/ a.y1:71r.) .1100 ell '2.1/14 / ; .2
(
access to the existing drive -up windows. In other words,
on the e x i s t i n g "private road" about 84 percent of the
current traffic demands (during the peak hour) is non -bank
related. During ng t. noon peak hour, 71 percent of the traffic
using this accel road is non -bank related.
The projected changes in traffic demand are described on
Figure 3. Since the principal concerns are those associated
with the peak hour the street system which coincides
wi th the Ix'. k hour 01 Ulc bank, discussion is limited to
the maximum peak hums; described on Figure 1. Facilities
that can accommodate this peak hour can accommodate demands
which are Less.
In terms of present streets and arterial facilities the
assumption made in the trip distribution is that the City
of Tukwila w i l t install a traffic signal at the intersection
of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West. Conversations with
staff of I ?I'1'LRANco Engineers, the consultants 1.'o the City of
Tukwila, suggests that this parL:icuar traffic signal may be
a high priority :item. In any case, if the ci ty does not
install ;► 4r'aff:i.c signal there is every reason to believe
L1h.r L - the c i t y w.i.].1 consider a multi-way STOP sign at this
location. This Lyle of device is recognized by the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and I- lighways
(MU'TCD) , published by the U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration (1971) and adopted by the
Washington State highway Commission on February 22, 1972
pursuant Lo RCW 47.36. The MUTC'D, Section 213 -6, Multi -way
Stop Sign slates .
1. "Who're traffic signals are warranted and urgently
needed, the multi-way stop is an interim measure
that can be installed quickly Lo control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal
installation."
In view of the potential signalizaLion at Tukwila Parkway
and Andover. Park West along with the viability of a multi -
way STOP sign cont.rol as MA interim measure, the traffic
distribution of Figure 3 is considered most likely. In the
event that neither a traffic signal nor multi -way STOP sign
control are installed, the only modification to Figure 3
will be a decrease in demand for Andover Park West with an
increase in demand on the parallel access road on the western
border of the property. In other words, the installation of
a traffic signal will draw traffic to Andover Park West
rather than t the Southcenter Access Road since access to
Tukwila Parkway wil.l be simplified by virtue of the signal.
If the signal or 3 -way STOP sign is not installed, traffic
chrialopher brown pe.
9688 rainier avenue a
aide wabhin4on
Le : 7239567 )8[18
Conclusions
leaving tllk. d i.vo -Uj. Facility wi..11. Lend to split at
about 60/40 (Right turn /Left turn) on the southbound exit
road.
'1'ltu data tin 1'ii:lul o 3 describes the projected demands asso-
ciated w.i t.11 tllc n. w .Live -up facility. It may be concluded
that because thc the ww drive-up facility removes a substantial
number of huh h,1111; ai-::;oc1 L Led thru trips, actual demand to
Tukwila i.ar•Icw.ly h,..1 w ,. en Andover Park West and the Southcenter
Access Road will
Pl.IrLI1(1 , illo 1'11,1, Access Driveway, northbound from the
now drive-Hi, I , I i I i ty w i l l be limited to "Right Turn Only ".
This "I<I01 '1'111 :1i Only" Irl"ivemenL gains access onto Tukwila
Parkway V 1.1 .111 "accol erai.Lon lane" whose length is about
130 feet... This acceleration lane essentially provides an
oppor. Lull i t.y for rlx. rg .i.ncl and /or as a holding lane for merging
vehicles so that the eastbound thru movement can proceed
U nite i1.) L Lecl .
Because the access driveway to Tukwila Parkway from the
proposed drive-up facilities is limited to "Right Turn Only"
movements, the principal exiting component will be to the
SouLhcenter. Access Road on the southern boundary of the
project site. Willi the installation of the traffic signal
at Andover Park We:, t. and Tukwila Parkway, it is expected that
the major demand will be to Andover Park West so that access
onto Tukwila Parkway can be achieved via the traffic signal.
The traffic signal will reduce current .delays and therefore
make this route a more attractive route because of reduced
travel Lime. A 3 -way STOP sign at this intersection will
also produce the same result.
Note that all of the above assumptions do not include estimates
associated with potential signalization of Tukwila Parkway at
the I- 405 o11- rain!.) /Southcenter Access Road. This 'latter
signalization project is predicated on Department of
Transportation proposals with respect to the I -405 on -ramp
modifications /redesign /relocation /ramp metering. Should
signalization at this location be implemented either conjointly
with signalization of Andover. Park West and Tukwila Parkway
or at a later date there will be a slight shift in demand to
the Southcenter. Access Road. The split in demand will likely
increase southbound exit movements. Such increases will be
minor.
IL may be concluded that with the removal of non -bank re-
lated thru trips along with reductions to left- turning
movements, the implementation of the 6 -lane drive -up facility
Christopher Drown pe.
9688 rainier av nue a
&cattle Washington •
lei: 7234567 • "98118
will no : >:i_clni 1=.i_cun Ll. y impact Tukwila Parkway. However, it
is expected Lhal: mi nor queuing will take place on the
Southcenter. Access Road (eastbound direction) and Andover
Park West: (northbound) . This queuing will be associated
with t.raflic Le'ft-turning to 'Tukwila Parkway.
There will.. be no iinpac L on Andover Park West at Tukwila
Parkway if the city installs either a traffic signal or a.
multi -way STOP :.ign.
Should the city e:LecL. to do neither of these, then addi-
tional queuing wi.:11 take place on Andover Park West . For
example, standing queues have been observed on Andover Park
West .from Tukwila Parkway to the Southcenter Access Road.
(Friday, July 6, 1979 at , 4:45 wi th 12 standing vehicles) .
Excessive queuing on Andover Park West from Tukwila Parkway
ruay inhibi. L the left-turn movement from. access roads.
Nevertheless, vehicles not able to gain access to Andover
Park West will remain queued on the Southcenter Access Road
and, as a :Low speed facility should not be subject to
increased accident: hazard.
For the "no build" alternative, the existing traffic patterns
will likely prevail. There will be additional demand. for
"walk -in" cusLonAers since the existing drive -up facilities
cannot handle ex is tiny demand. In terms of traffic opera-
tions for the City of 'Tukwila, there will be increased demand
on the pros en t pr iva Le road by non -bank oriented vehicles .
Probably, the continued use of the existing private road
by non -bank oriented vehicles along with bank, vehicles
will increase the lxo tontia 1 for accident involvement.
The proposed drive- up facility, although increasing traffic
demand on Andover Park West as well as on the Southcenter
Access Roads, will 1.1 kel.y account for improved traffic
performance on Tukw i..i. i Parkway between Andover Park West and
the 1 -405 on-ramp. This improvement will be due to reduced
nor 1:h-to-west: .ft IA-turn exiting movements between the 1 -405
on -ramp and Andover Park West.
Surninary
The proixo: :. LI G- -1..tn drive -up fac ity will :
1 . I uc:t:t. i :.se l.ra.ffic demand on the Southcenter Access
2 . 1 tie i I c � I f i.c demand on Andover Park West.
3. 7 ncr :pis e the north-to-west left -turn demand at
Andover Park West and 'Tukwila Parkway which can
chrislopher Brown
9688 rainier avenue 5.
cable Waahing on
l
le :723 %7 118
be safely handled by:
a, n traffic is signal : or
b. A multi -way STOP sign.
The most important conclusion will be that. the implementation
of t h i s drive-up facility along with its associated driveway
modifications will reduce potential accident hazard by
eliminating substantial numbers of "mid- block" access movements
on Tukwila Parkway. The concentration of traffic to signalized
intersections, as opposed to present "mid- block " .driveways,
will result in improved traffic performance although total
traffic volumes will be slightly increased.'
Suggested traffic con Lrd. device installations are shown on Figure4 .
Note that this figure also includes, for future consideration,
the addition of a "right turn" lane '..on the southbound .drive -up
access road. This latter concept is for consideration if the
State DOT (or city) implements signal control at Tukwila
Parkway and the 1-405 ramp.
chri8lopher brnvvn pe,
9688 rainier avenue s.
c�7 z 34 56? � auhi n'lon
:rrY
el-r "big /
-/.1704?/ /C
- 7,g c v.z/10
•• _;74/12_57L2f s
___/ >-----
L__
/
V f
•
;
eg'77 zmy • ./
4w..%,,szAkhr/e -
, , 6
/YcYr7 Z/If/g /
1
7 Va.1/s
—
/
-0
1 1
SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK
March 5, 1979
Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom
Planning Supervisor
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
4 l' � i .lk ,
Rog'r V. 011enburg
Development Officer
RVO:cm
cc: Joyce /Nordfors
119 S. Main Street
Seattle, Washington 98104
RE: SOUTHCENTER BRANCH NEW DRIVE -UPS
Dear Mr. Satterstrom:
Enclosed are the following documents:
Site Plan Schematic
Portion of agreement - Seafirst and Southcenter
BANK PROPERTIES PLANNING
AND DESIGN DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
0.C.D.
CITY OF TUKWILA
1UIR T urn
These are transmitted for your information and review related to building setbacks.
As you will note in the agreement, Seafirst and Southcenter granted reciprocal
non - exclusive easements for access and parking. This does not require us to
provide a specific driveway but is rather a general easement for access. We are
particularly interested in traffic not driving through our property to Southcenter,
which is one of the reasons we are studying ways to route and slow down the
traffic.
This is a schematic plan used for study and review at this stage of our design.
Your comments and suggestions are most appreciated and helpful. I trust you will
not feel we are providing a driveway from Tukwila Parkway to the Southcenter
parking lot, therefore requiring a 50 foot setback from such driveway. We are
proceeding on such assumption and will appreciate your verification that this is
true.
Thank you for your assistance to date. I shall look forward to your early reply.
Sincerely yours,
821 SECOND AVENUE / EXCHANGE BUILDING, FLOOR 15 / SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
5544945
DATED this /( day of February, 1963.
By
the Bank a
nonexclusive easement over the real property described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto for access to the Bank's premises described in
Exhibit "B" by the customers and employees of the Bank and for
4 parking by the customers of the Bank on the portions of the real
property described in Exhibit "A set aside for parking'from time
to time for the customers of Southcenter and its tenants and their
customers.
6. The Bank hereby gives and grants to Southcenter a non-
exclusive easement over the real property described in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto for access to the premises described in Exhibit "A"
by customers and employees of Southcenter and its tenants and their
customers, and for parking by the customers of Southcenter's
tenants on the real: property described in Exhibit "B" set aside
for arkin from time to time for the customers of the Bank. Said
P g
easements shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the
successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto.
SOUTHCENX CORPORATION
/4:-( 7"4"_pe i )
Its President
SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK
COMMERCIAL GOALS AND POLICIES
The goals and policies associated with this system are as follows:
Goal 1: Emphasis should be placed upon completion of existing sidewalk
discontinuities prior to constructing sidewalks in other areas.
sidewalks to retail structures.
Goal 3: The City should join property owners on a 50% matching basis for
construction of sidewalks on an L.I.D. basis.
Policy 1: Timing should provide for construction of high priority
systems first.
Policy 2: Landscaped areas should be preserved to the maximum
extent possible.
Goal 4: The commercial sidewalk system should be tied to the residential
sidewalk system, where feasible.
-6-
Policy 1: Where short sidewalk discontinuities exist, city
crews should be used to complete the segment.
S
Goal 2: Sidewalks adjacent to public rights -of -way should be required with 1
new pedestrian- oriented commercial. construction.
Policy 1: Priority should be given to construction of sidewalks
where there is the highest amount of pedestrian traffic.
}
Policy 2: Sidewalks should have a minimum width of five (5) feet.
Policy 3: Safe pedestrian access should be made available from.
5544945
5. Southc( r er hereby gives and grant to the Bank a
nonexclusive easement over the real property described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto for access to the Bank's premises described in
Exhibit "B" by the customers and employees of the Bank and for
parking by the customers of the Bank on the portions of the real
property described in Exhibit "A" set aside for parking from time
to time for the customers of Southcenter and its tenants and their
customers.
6. The Bank hereby gives and grants to Southcenter a non-
exclusive easement over the real property described in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto for access to the premises described in Exhibit "A"
by customers and employees of Southcenter and its tenants and their
customers, and for parking by the customers of Southcenter's
tenants on the real property described in Exhibit "B" set aside
for parking from time to time for the customers of the Bank. Said
easements shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the
successors
DATED
and assigns of each of the parties hereto.
this
/t' day of February, 1963.
- 3-
SOUTHCE CORPORATION
,/ 1
Its President
SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK
11
1�1
sew cuur, •
0
CURB ,
4;Q ; lL.f�t = J i4. i1.
,- rpo4s� c ;ti � Cl,o i,o tts). p _ p N I ..
. .1 I I JV' fIJ'
46
1914P..:,:
iftt
ACTEWM i1-Eh' .II F.
Plc .. /12-4.171
SEATTLE-FIRST
NATIONAL BAN$
p -23 -7q
REVISIONS. •
90104 PHONE t2l624•
JOB NO
SCALE' 1. 11 '
• DATE ''7:11.11iJE F314
!!! ' aH w„
I OE sx O. Lz 92 9x 4.z CZ xx Ix OZ el el Ll 9l 9l el 'Cl Zl U 0�
Imdmllmi6g11{ NIhN{IIINI11411N4IIIIII PIINdImlmduNlm11INImlbmlmduNluNlmilNlihNIINNIINI (mdNI11NNhmINNhNIIlglbnllunluuhi
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT