Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 78-31-SMP - SCHNEIDER / NILSEN - SOUTHCENTER PLAZA SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT78-31-smp south 149th street duwamish river SCHNEIDER NILSEN OFFICE BUILDING SOUTHCENTER PLAZA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN LCB /ch MR. GARY NILSEN 16625 Redmond Way Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Nilsen: Copies of the minutes from the December 16 and 19 meeting of the Ad Hoc Com- mittee are enclosed. At the December 19 meeting, it was agreed that the next Ad Hoc Committee meet- ing would be scheduled once all data requested had been provided to Don Williams. Two items remain to be provided: (1) The original copy of the easement, and (2) The as -built drawing for the site, including the parking lot configuration. The City shares your eagerness to complete this review so that you can receive your Certificate of Occupancy. When we have received the two items noted above, I will schedule the next Ad Hoc Committee meeting. Enclosures cc: Do Williams �Mta Caughey Al Pieper Ted Uomoto Jim Hoel Larry Hard City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor January 8, 1981 Truly yours, c re . L. C. Bohrer, Chairman Ad Hoc Committee for the Review and Administration of the Schneider /Nilsen Dev. SCHNEIDER / NILSEN - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works De artmen ,.433 -1850 Mr. Gary Nilson Schneider /Nilson & Associates 16625 Redmond Way 204 Court Building Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Nilson: December 23, 1980 DEC 2 4 1980 Re: Southcenter Plaza Office Building Per the Ad Hoc Committee meeting of December 19, 1980, Public Works is providing you information to carry -out inspections and some pertinent design criteria for the asphalt trail behind your building for the development. • Design criteria for an 8 -foot wide trail shall be per the attached sketch. The subbase shall be tested for a minimum of 95% compaction per APWA. Trail elevation requirements - The water surface elevation for the Green River, with controlled discharge from the Howard Hanson Dam of 12,000 CFS as measured at Auburn (Portage Gauge) is elevation 21 (mean sea level datum to the nearest foot) at the subject site. Therefore, to assure that the trail is above the water and a low maintenance facility, the trail is to be built above this elevation. Trail location requirements - All of the developed trail shall be within City right -of -way or trail -use easements. An agreement shall. be provided for maintenance of the trail. In the future, the City will maintain the asphalt trail only. The developer is responsible for maintenance of the greenbelt or adjacent improvements to the trail. This agreement shall be executed prior to the sign -off of a Side- walk Trail Permit through Public Works. The developer is required to submit a plan of the proposed trail system, including as- builts, to upgrade the trail per the enclosed design and construction requirements. Prior to application of the Sidewalk /Trail Permit, this plan will be reviewed and approved by the City staff, and, as appropriate, per special requirements by the City Council for turnover as a public facility to the City. Mr. Gary Nilson Schneider /Nilson & Associates Re: Southcenter Plaza Office Building December 23, 1980 PRF /jm cc: Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director Ad Hoc Committee Don Williams, Recreation Supervisor Larry Hard, City Attorney Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director Al Pieper, Building Official Wes Jorgenson, Junior Engineer Attachment Sincerely, The City requires two feet minimum clearance between the edge of the asphalt trail and other developer improvements And five feet from the edge of the trail to the top of the dike bank. Although topography and other restrictions can cause some variations, Public Works will apply this criteria to the proposed City trail in the plan review. Inspection responsibilities - The City shall inspect the overall surface trail dimensions. The developer is required to provide the necessary surveys and recorded easement documents in order to provide a permanent record of the trail location. The developer is also required to provide necessary compaction tests and other test holes to allow City staff to verify the type and depths of overlay and subbase materials. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Phillip R. Fraser Senior Engineer page 2 ritAti olt ACII ;s0-1/ A . A44 ;/ �tdd1 W 4 PiNist '19 '1 ?j -` -1IIM SJN �idN1 -'91au 1\11Asci - 2 1 d 4 ;1) , 1. d Wel day 1 11 1?A•tli7 v 6 tsi tte - trtol tz- I elei JJOAdn l HAM u0 nz19 4 �1N NI/ likv?l �N��enn a�d� a � NoU.dla osA On� �fo ii� 1 1 ' / - ` 1;. 5 � �.� � � /� 47.44 gn L add '�• d� %iNd 7909 December 19, 1980 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE REVIEW AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE SCHNEIDER /NILSEN DEVELOPMENT Tukwila City Hall 4:00 P.M. Conference Room 3 MINUTES The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bohrer. In attendance were: L. C. Bohrer (Councilman - Chairman); Larry Hard (City Attorney); Jim Hoel (Fire Marshal); Don Williams (Recreation Director), Al Pieper (Building Official); Phil Fraser (Office Engineer); Mark - Caughey (Acting Director of Planning Department); Gary A. Nilsen (Developer); John Hanson (Attorney for Schneider /Nilsen); Lyle D. Schneider (Developer). Mr. Bohrer requested a review of action items from the last meeting. Don Williams, Recreation Director, stated he had contacted King County Hydraulics and requested an on -site inspection of the Schneider /Nilsen Development. They reported to the Ecology Department that the work done is inadequate and does not conform at all with the plans on file. The property is not well protected. Specific findings were: the dike is to have a top width of 20 feet constructed to an elevation of 24.4 feet (msl datum). The elevation was not determined, but the top width ranges from 8' to 11' which is unacceptable for river bank maintenance and equipment access; disturbed slopes not hydroseeded or filled in accordance with the plan; the rip rap section was not built in accordance with the plan and the cross sectional view. The riprap section is supposed to be 80 feet in length, but is 30 or 40' short of that. Toe rock does not exist in the job. The rip rap pladed is contaminated with a lot of soil, making it difficult to determine the quality of the work done. Larry Hard, City Attorney, said he had obtained a copy of the recorded easement. It states on Exhibit A: "The pedestrian access easement as described in the easement agreement shall be from the ordinary high water mark to a point 40' west of said ordinary high water mark over all of the following parcels of land..." Exhibit B has a profile of the bank and shows where the easement is and he says he is convinced that it will show elevation 7, although it is not readable on the copy of the easement. Mr. Hanson, attorney for the developers, said he was convinced of the elevation 7. He said he knew it was not a 20 point anything, it is a single digit, so it has to be ten or less. Mr. Hard said the problem he saw was that while it says ordinary high water mark, it does not say anywhere what that elevation is. Exhibit B apparently uses the 7' elevation. He said if it is possible he felt a search should be made for the original. Mr. Hanson said he would try to find it in the Redmond office. ACTION: Developer to provide the original copy of the easement for Committee review, including a copy of the developer's drawing dated 8 -7 -79. AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE R `P 'W & ADMINISTRATION OF THE SCHF 7 DER /NILSEN DEVELOPMENT December 19, 1980 Page 2 Mr. Bohrer asked the City Attorney if there is any conflict in the definition that is referred to as ordinary high water mark in this agreement? Mr. Hard said the easement uses the language of the Act, Exhibit B shows the profile of it and it does show elevation 7. This is the easement that was presented to the City and it was accepted by the City. Mr. Nilsen explained how they arrived at elevation 7. Phil Fraser, Office Engineer, said he had requested a definition of high water mark from the Corps of Engineers. Their definition of what the high water mark should be is based on a release of 12,000 cu. ft. per second measured at the gauge at Auburn. From that, and looking at a map which they have, which shows a series of water levels of the river, they show that the high water mark is approximately 21 feet. Mr. Nilsen suggested that they are looking at two different things. One, you are saying they are going to open up the flood gates and let that water run at so many feet per second when the Shoreline said that it was where the water was normally most of the year. Mr. Bohrer said this was a good point. Mr. Nilsen said as he understood it, it was based on how the water stood the major part of the year. Mr. Fraser said the term had never been determined in the City of Tukwila. Mr. Hard asked what the City has used as the ordinary high water mark for other property along the river? Do we know? He asked if it has ever been an issue? Mr. Fraser said this is the first time it has been an issue. Mr. Bohrer said he would like to look at the original copy so all can see what it says.. If what the City has done in the past is an issue, it may take some research. Mr. Bohrer distributed copies of a memorandum from Ted Uomoto, Director of Public Works, with comments on the definition of high water mark and other issues. Mr. Bohrer said some measurements were made on the site and he would like to get a report. Mr. Nilsen said from inside curb to inside curb measured 62 feet for the parking lot south of the building, farther north in this lot there is an entrance that comes in about in the middle and another measurement was taken just south of that entrance and it was about 61'. It does widen out. Phil Fraser, Office Engineer, said he and Al Pieper, Building Official, made measure- ments of the width of the south parking lot and from the building across the north parking lot to the curb along the trail. These dimensions were provided to Mark Caughey who had laid them out on a map. The Committee then reviewed the map. Mr. Bohrer said the map indicated that the current parking lot as built is on the easement on the south side and at a couple of points on the north side. Mr. Nilsen said they took a dimension off the corner of the building to the shoulder of the bank and at one point it measured 28'. He said the King County inspector said they need X number of feet for river bank maintenance. He said he should be corrected on that, it is 18'. They are required to have 15' by the Department of Hydraulics. Mr. Hard said the whole thing boils down to whether or not the improvements as constructed encroach on what is the easement. If it does not encroach then there is no problem. If it does, what are we going to do about it? Mr. Nilsen said if it is a matter of moving the curb, that can be done. AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR ', .. REVIEW & ADMINISTRATION OF T .NEIDER /NILSEN DEVELOPMENT December 19, 1980 Page 3 Mr. Bohrer said that at the south end of the site the trail is about 8' wide, the bank goes down quite steeply and there is some vegetation that hangs over and it is a hazardous situation. It is a hazard for the developer because the City has not accepted the trail. If someone went down there and walked along the trail and stepped off into the loose gravel on the ouside they would end up in the river. On the trails the City has there is a shoulder so if you get off on a shoulder you have time to recover before going down. Mr. Nilsen said there could be a guard rail or a fence, he could see the point. ACTION: Mr. Bohrer asked that the Ad Hoc Committee be supplied with an as -built drawing of the site. Mr. Nilsen said they would provide the drawing. This will answer the question of whether or not the parking lot extends over into the easement area, beyond that, to the point that it has caused the trail to be built in such a fashion that it is less than a stable location. Mr. Nilsen said in a meeting in the Mayor's office it was discussed as to whether or not a trail could be substituted for a sidewalk. Those present at the meeting were: Mayor Todd, Gary Nilsen, Don Williams, Ted Uomoto. He said they all agreed that it seemed a likely thing that could be done. It was discussed in some detail, depth of blacktop, width of trail, etc. Mr. Fraser said the City knows they want the trail along the entire bank of the Green River. It is a link in the trail. We have other portions of the trail constructed. We have certain minimum criteria for the improvement. Everything else that has been constructed on the trail to date meets the City's criteria. Mr. Fraser said the City's position on this is that they want this portion of Christensen Trail to be in conformance with the standards that the City is applying. Mr. Nilsen said it was done in the same manner as the parking lot with the same fill material. Don Williams, Recreation Director, said Public Works will inspect that development to see that it is built to specification because the City will assume the responsibility for maintenance once it is completed. Mr. Nilsen said they had not known there was a general specification for a trail. Mr. Fraser said the City would review the plans and then determine what is applicable. It has been done as standard practice on other portions of the trail. Mr. Hard asked if this trail conforms to City standards. Mr. Fraser replied that it did not. Mr. Bohrer said as far as he knew the City has not published a document entitled, "Criteria for the Construction of the Trail on the River called Christensen." The City has constructed a 1.2 mile segment of it and has currently under construction another segment of it that is about .6 of a mile. The specifications for the two elements are the same and are available. Mr. Nilsen said he wished they had put the sidewalk in the front, it would have been a lot cheaper. Mr. Fraser said he thought the developers would come back with a plan and it would be approved according to a discussion about three months ago. Mr. Hanson said his client was not told they would have to come up with a design that would have to be approved by Public Works. They would have done it. ACTION: Mr. Fraser will prepare a letter with specifications and test requirements for the trail. Don Williams noted that the trail still has to be built in the easement area. The location and width of South 149th Street and the changes required there were discussed. It was noted that a fire hydrant probably would have to be moved, but that the bus shelter probably could stay. It was noted that Puget Power would have AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE RI +1 & ADMINISTRATION OF THE SCHW DER /NILSEN DEVELOPMENT December 19, 1980 Page 4 to move a light pole. Mr. Hard said he would ask them to do so on Monday. Mr. Hanson said they would like to know what they have to do before they can get a certificate of occupancy. Mr. Bohrer stated that a list of items yet to be considered would be part of the minutes of the 16 December meeting. The next meeting will be scheduled when all action items have been provided to Don Williams. The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 P.M. LCB:nb cc: . City. Council Mayor Todd Department Heads City Attorney Schneider /Nilsen Development ionel C. Bohrer, Chairman Ad Hoc Committee for the Review & Administration of the Schneider /Nilsen Development di .1 - a 'U •.I r-1 G1 s. It al 1 41 •'•1 41 SI U) W N al 11 N 43 41 Fl 14 . « J r . -14191 l 01 1 .r Id c: N •" -.-4 0 41 Al 'c) O ■ s r..�.0 S4 r-1 id ai - U N w u) 00 0 0 • N I: i. 0 in 1 11 O >. 41 SI 0/ 44 11) ✓ I 0.i-�00 1 C1 ` r-1 I•: - --• 11 0 • >I No .I J ) k I a) ..-1 31 11 Id .l) 11 N r-4 O 41 r-I 1 8110.10 -A 01 C: to W O. W 41 .0 0 44 43 .-I 14 O 4 U rt N U W 11 r r N W 0 14 w N 0 W a a >1 0 U) • f .0 N U r-1 •r•1 W f W a J C: 0 rl .4 •r1 Id ,. W 0 lai.t`4J Io C . 1 4 14 N 0 0 14 E + 4-1 O 4 r-1 .n 044 1 i i : N O I : r " • llr r-I 41 .t: 1: r-I .- f) 01 -••I N 4.1 O .-1 •r1 •.1 4J r-I Ii 01 U n.1 0 .0 d w •rl 5 41 N W td ti W N 1) • II 0 r •r: a C: W U3 •rl Ql -IJ w .l: 41 •; 't:l •rt .[; .C: U U C: 0 r W 'U 43 91 4) •rI 41 N Al N 11 W 0 > is trial 0 t•: Ul W C: C O -IJ O >1 •-1 •rl N •r1 P. N 4) $4 rI al >. G 31 •I - ', .1.: N ai • W .n •ri W r: 4- -1) 1:.L 1-I N. 1 0 .se: 0 ••-i U) 11 i 4) 'U a) N U 1 N 'U lA C: 3-I .: N o a)-1 -IJ 12 O W 01E3SINO - rl - 0 U 4 r 44 W St U1 4.1 U) 0 0 0 11 41 - .l) W N r1 .1) .I) .0 '0 4- 'U x w f: U C 4 0 :d N N A .o 0 O ui r •r-1 ::1 r• O rl C U) N •••1 W O (If Q N al IJ - I.1 144 .C: r4 rI m U'U - U)'U til 0 Cl. r- + 0in Ill r; n' N .t, N SI 'U N S .Q . 4) .r r 'u N rI I- g U rd tr - 41 3-I 0• N a) r 0 O r1ANr4 >1 w0W0 43 .f, N a) >-I f: W U 1.1 C: 0 W S a N C: N N /d U) N C .,.1 N N •.-1 >I 0 W E$4 w'rr04. A W (/) 10 •.4 .f: 4) a1 W -hJ 'U W 41 'O U 0 SI > C 41 W 11 0 3.1 .Q f: N 4 14 i 0 E 1 > A n.N 0 N al r 0 a:A • . 1 .l1 01 U) 0 .0 0 . 0 'V M 41 0 CI .0 al nl N .0 Al 0 31 r: -I1 fi i•1 ut to • A .ti •rl w r1 W N •.1 to C. 0 U) :•' 0 c: +1 0 U) •• Al f!: f O O UI 70r1 4•t C Ul ul r•1 :e t I . (1 •� 1.1 N AS ' • 11 •►-I N N Al III al 'U O U! N w W 1 •.1 '0 •,.i N tg In t: 41 11 $t -1.1 -.4 C: co t) r f: .11 ;1 )1 4) N 14 Ii 1: 4 1 N l; N 4) 0 • u1 U•r U l•r1 0 41 0 b1 W U X 11 . 0 Q) r 0 U) r-1 • •rI 'Cl •rl 'V S 1 0 3 A 4.1 N 'fJ A3 0 O W d) 0 .n •11 W N 0 U . I I f: 111 .C: 01 41 0 Si 1 .r4 ) 1 'H U1 4. r •r1 i) - :) r) .r. •1. N -.4 4.1 0) to ID 41 /-1 0 w U n.0. - 1 'U.0• A - s r 11 0 W 41 't1 S-1 41 0. 11 •rI .I: ' f: • o •1 N .--I -- (A ri 0 : -••••1 r: •.-I 1-1 1-1 >1••-t :1 '(1 5 ✓ •rl 41 rl ,0 tV 01 U n al '0 w 0 N 4 Al 11 0 ••-t 11 ••I 41 0 •1 1 J 4J 3 U) U) N •1J I. bl :% 4J r W f), C) -) fl. It Al r1 . -I 1. in •-1 W AS N 0) •r) - a) 0 •rI r O C W Of 0 a l N N 3 i 0 O N 3 1P al 'U 7-1 11 N •'•1 VI it •rl A 4) S•1 41 N -•-1 C) Al is N 43 N f: r 'Cl 11) U) >, 11 .-I .0 41 0 .. 0 41 4 1) 0 •0 f: N 0 N O 0 W W N t)1 • - C •l r 11 C 71 Ul r N U) 0 A 111 .A 41 •n A S I r 41 In N 0 W 4) al - 0 11 0 0 RI . 4a (4 N r. O a ) O •.-1 >1(.9 W 0 r-1 131 1. 11 43 00 ."1 0 1 3 y P, U U 4 :1 > Id 4 UI N • • > '0 Q) n. tl) 'C1 4I N 1:71 .0 � H N r `d 1. f N • 1.; r - 1 W f: r 4) 11 () Al I.1 41 ;•1 0 -t .f; r 1 n, 0 a a o • 1 `d O • 0 E i 4-1 P . u w al ..4 Ii 'U t; t:) •r1 In O N $1 --) b W •IJ 4J 0 4. Co •1.1 I I r U) 4- Ul r1 4i IU N• -• N 41 IA 0 - r r - 1 1.1 4 4.1 41 f: u► 0 -.1 N W b' r .: Ia • 0 .4' .---1 .I) 0 W - , • ) :?.'• C+ U •r•1 14 IN !1 • ■ U ) W 04 X O W U) 0 .0 U) in (11 JJ 0 w .N N Al ■ 44 0 U to w I-I O 0 44 .r. to f; 0) N •.1 0 O, 14 0 1 4 14 Ul 0) N W • •> .0 .1) 1) N •1i 4) W 14 at 41 0 •rl a) - ) S•1 C 4a 'd 0 � U 0 4J U) 4J N > W U 'U . 4a E~ 0. Id 11 W N t~ U) SI N W S1 W N 'N 4W.4wr. W 0.> f:000.0 : :lb ON A0.l0PI [ , 'Cl 4.1 •n N P: N N Id r4: 4) 4) C) U) 64 a 44 dJ (-4 4-1 E. .0 Of 0 Si) U z Os U) 0 N ill n I-1 a El H E- ' 0 It) H :•) P. ill 1.1 14 U ] ( C ' 11 P 01 n. 7 City C f Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 MEMORANDUM To: Ad -Hoc Committee;-Southcenter Plaza FROM: Committee Staff DATE: 5 December 1980 SUBJECT: Issue Paper The Ad -Hoc Committee has met on two occassions (26 Nov. and 1 Dec.) since its creation by the full council on 22 November 1980. A number of issues have been raised, some of which are germain to the Committee's investigation of the status of improvements to Southcenter Plaza, and some of which are not. This memorandum attempts to bring- together a master inventory of legitimate areas of inquiry: which will guide the Committee's work, and to list known references dealing with each area of concern. Area Of Inquiry 1) Shoreline Setback Encroachment A) Has the 40' setback line been encroached upon by parking area improvements? 1) Was the 40' setback line staked in the field prior to construction of the project? 2) What is the ordinary mean high watermark 2) from which the 40' setback line was meas- ured? 3) What is relationship between ordinary 3) mean high water,elevation and 12000 CFS elevation as concerns this project? 4) Why was parking area layout not con- 4) Plan set approved by staff structed per approved Bldg. Permit Plan? B) Has loose fill and debris been deposited on river bank? 1) Which agency(ies)has jurisdiction to impose standards for protecting in- tegrity of river bank and enforcing compliance? Documentation /Reference 1) Bldg. Offical's Log RCW 90.58.030 (2b) (OMHWM Defined) Survey drawina 8 -7 -79 by L.I. Schroeter, P.E. Letter of 10 Jan 80 from K. C. D. P.W. 11 Jan 80 1) Research Don Williams by Telecom 1 Dec 80 ;7908 LCB /ch Dear Mr. Nilsen: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor Mr. Gary A. Nilsen, Sr. GAN Enterprises 16625 Redmond Way, #204 Redmond, WA 98052 December 1, 1980 At the November 24, 1980 Committee of the Whole meeting, the Tukwila City Council established an ad hoc committee to review and administer further City actions on your development on Interurban Avenue. The committee is composed of Councilman Gary L. Van Dusen, Council President Daniel J. Saul and the undersigned. The committee was established because of concern over potential violations of city ordinances and policies at your development. A major concern is the apparent gross violation of the River Zone setback and other provisions of the City's Shoreline Management Act. The initial meeting of the ad hoc committee was held on November 26, 1980. . We are engaged in the preparation of our list of concerns and will discuss them with you upon completion. Pending completion of action by the ad hoc committee, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 307, 3 -A (c) of the Uniform Building Code, no Certificate of Occupancy for beneficial use of the building will be granted by the City of Tukwila. cc: Tukwila City Council Mayor w Obpartment Heads City Attorney Truly yours, ,al<e4 /c L. C. Bohrer, Councilman Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee for Review & Administration of the Schneider /Nilsen Dev. �j lLA 1908 November 26, 1980 C City of Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE REVIEW AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE SCHNEIDER /NILSEN DEVELOPMENT Tukwila City Hall 4:00 P.M. M I N U T E S Conference Room 3 The meeting began at 4:00 P.M. with Committee Members Bohrer and Van Dusen present. City Officials in attendance included John McFarland, Administrative Assistant; Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director; Don Williams, Recreation Supervisor; Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director; and Al Pieper, Building Official. Committee Chairman Bohrer opened the meeting by noting that the City Council had formed the Ad Hoc Committee because of concern over apparent violations of City ordinances at the development and because of pending litigation involving the Schneider /Nilsen Development, the Village Green adjacent to the north, and Mayor Todd who previously owned both properties. The motion establishing the Committee included an amendment requiring close coordination of all actions with the City Attorney. Chairman Bohrer said that he intends to keep the City Council fully in- formed of all committee actions, and that all actions are subject to final review and approval by the City Council. Committee Chairman Bohrer stated that the pur- pose of this meeting was to organize the efforts of the Committee and to request staff assistance in providing data and information. Staff will be used as a re- source, and the actions of the Ad Hoc Committee are its own responsibility. Chairman Bohrer discussed the near term action plan for the Committee, including: A. The initial organizational meeting in progress. B. Notification to the developer of the Committee formulation. C. Identification and verification of violations /concerns. D. Coordination with the City Attorney. E. Discussions with the Developer. F. Development of an agreement between the City and the Developer. G. Review and approval of the agreement by the City Council. John McFarland was requested to draft a charter for the actions by the next meeting and coordinate with Chairman Bohrer. Al Pieper presented the Building Department file on the development for review by the Ad Hoc Committee. The Build- ing permit application was received December 18, 1979. After departmental review, the building permit was approved on January 14, 1980. It was noted the plan clearly indicated a 40 foot setback for all structures and parking lots as required by the Shoreline Management Act. Chairman Bohrer stated that he had estimated the parking lot setbacks were 25 -30 feet along much of the site. Discussion ensued relative to the elevation of the mean high water mark as used in the Shoreline Management Act. MINUTES - -AD HOC COMMITTEE, SCHNEIDER /NILSEN DEV. November 26, 1980 Page 2 Mark Caughey will determine this elevation, if possible. It was noted that the as -built configuration of the parking lot and stalls does not follow the site plan approved with the building permit. Mark Caughey noted that an easement grant- ing the City use of the river zone for recreation trail purposes was on record with the County. Concern was expressed over potential City liability for actions in the "parking lot" on the river zone easement granted the City. Al Pieper agreed, at the Ad Hoc Committee's request that pending final City Council action, no Certificate of Occupancy, either final, temporary or verbal would be given for the site. It was noted that soil and debris from construction of the parking lot had been pushed over into the river. It was determined that the City enforces the Shore- line Management Act. The Corp of Engineers is concerned about potential filling of the river channel impeding flow. Don Williams will call to request inspection by the Corp and King County Hydraulics. The Committee requested that the department heads present. identify all apparent violations and concerns in writing by the next meeting. Chairman Bohrer stated that he would prepare a letter to the developer and solicit input from the Fire Department. The dispute over access to the Village Green to the north was noted as a related subject in the Public Works Committee. Chairman Bohrer stated he felt any require- ments arising from Public Works Committee should be incorporated in the agreement with the developer. The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be Monday, December 1, at 4:00 p.m. in Conference Room #3. The Ad Hoc Committee meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m. cc: City Council Mayor Todd ,/Department Heads City Attorney Lionel C. Bohrer, Chairman Ad Hoc Committee )at c� Ecok)ry ECY 050 -6 Rev. 1/79 to construct and maintain cc: King County Hydraulics City of Tukwila FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT Permission is granted under provisions of Chapter 86.16 RCW, this 14th day of January , 19 80 to SCHNEIDER /NIELSEN DEVELOPMENT (Name of Applicant) 16625 Redmond Way, Suite 204 Court Bldg, Redmond, Washington 98052 (Address) Building ' (Description of works) . PERMIT NO. 1- 3894 -2 for the period , 19 to , 19 or in perpetuity in NE% Section 23 , Township 23 N., Range 4 E. W.M. and /or in Section , Township N., Range W.M. on Green River located within the Green River (Name of stream or flood plain affected) (Flood Zone) Flood Control Zone No. 2 . Said works, structures, or improvements must be in accordance with the Application No. 1- 3894 -2 and plans attached thereto on file with-the Department of Ecology, which are incorporated by reference as terms of this permit. The work herein authorized shall commence on or.after the 14thiay of 19 80 and shall be completed on or before thel4th day of January , 19 81 , or before such dates as may be specified by any extensions granted. This permit is subject to the conditions printed.on the reverse hereof and the acceptance by the permittee. C:Y?1 .1\elt 0 . .... ,:..- ;; Regional Manager DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY THIS PERMIT is subje( 'o the following conditions: 1. This permit . granted under authority of Chapter 1S9,".._ssions Law of 1935.' (Chapter 86.16. RCW) 2. No property rights are granted herein, or does this permit absolve permittee • from liability for any damage which may be suffered to life or to property, public or private, by reason of works, structures and improvements authorized hereunder. 3. This permit does not obviate the necessity of obtaining other permits required by federal, state, or local law. 4. The permittee shall remove, at his awn expense, all falseworks, structures and • materials incident to the construction of the work herein authorized. Works and structures erected under permit covering a specific period of time shall be removed by the permittee at his own expense upon the expiration of said period or at the expira- tion of any extension of time which may be granted. ' 5. Should permittee fail to remove, at the proper time, materials, works and 'structures referred to under paragraph 4, the director reserves the right to have it done at the expense of the permittee. 6. Any alteration of plans for works and structures made subsequent to the filing of an application or the issuance of permit shall be subject to approval by the director... 7. The director shall be notified by the permittee of the completion of works under this permit so the department may make final inspection and give final approval. 8. The action taken by the department herein shall not imply or create any liability for•any damages against the state, as provided by RCW 86.16.100. 9. When necessary to provide for the proper maintenance or operation of the works, structures, or improvements as authorized herein, the department may issue supplementary orders providing for such. 10. This permit is subject to further special conditions as follows: A. The water surface elevation for the Green River, with controlled discharge from the Howard Hanson Dam of 12,000 cfs as measured at Auburn (Porter Gauge), is 22.4 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum) at the subject site. The proposed finished floor elevation is shown to be at or above elevation 22.4 feet. B. Approval of this development and other applications will reduce the storage area for flood waters, resulting in a higher elevation for the 100 -year frequency floodplain, unless improvements are made to discharge flood waters from the flood plain. C. The required dike and riverbank improvements shown on their plan must be completed prior to construction of the proposed building. King County Department of Public Works must be notified prior to disturbing the existing riverbank. D. No fill, structures, or improvements shall be placed within 30 feet of the top of riverbank, unless approved by the King County Division of Hydraulics. This includes the disturbed areas shown on drawing 2of3. E. Additional improvements to this site will require State Flood Control Zone Permits. 11. This permit'is accepted subject to provisions of law and regulations and conditions herein prescribed. (Permittes) .: • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY Type of Action C C Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use 0 Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to Gary A. Nilsen, Sr. and L. D. Schneider (name of applicant) 16625 Redmond Way, Suite 204 Redmond, Washington 98052 Application No. 78 - 31 - SMP Administering Agency City of Tukwila (City or County) Date received. October 4, 1978 Approved X Denied Date 30 March 1979 to undertake the following development the development of an office building of approximately 70,000 square feet. (be specific) upon the following property Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 (legal description, i.e., section, North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington township,, ,range) The project will be within shorelines of statewide (be/met significance (RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a Urban designation. The following master • (environment) program provisions are applicable to this development Page 6.3 and 6.4 (state the master program sections or page numbers) Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions (See Attached Sheet) This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordi- nances or regulations applicable to this project, but not incon- sistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. ArpI PDAre171 CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL. THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT 'WITH THE REnTONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED.' THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE. Date received by Department of Ecology Approve Denied This substantial development permit with conditional use/ variance is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: (Date) (Signature of Authorized 5;;( 4„, irector, Office of ommunity Development Department of Ecology Official) CONDITIONS OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (MF #78- 31 -SMP) 1. That a public access easement of forty (40) feet in width from the ordinary high water line will be given to the City of Tukwila by a separate legal document prior to the end of the 30 day review period of the State of Washington for the construction, repair and maintenance of sidewalks and trails for public access to the shoreline. 2. That the drainage ditch along Interurban Avenue South be placed under - ground in culvert subject to approval of both the Tukwila, Department of Public Works and the Washington State Department of Transportation. 3. That a detailed landscape plan be reviewed by the Planning Staff prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL DECLARAT I Oil OF /i'i0U -S I Gii I F I CA iCE Responsible Official Kiell Stoknes Description of proposal Nilsen Shoreline Substantial Development Permit /Office Bldg. Gary A. Nilsen, Sr. South 14(4th Straat /fluwamich Rivar City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -71 This proposal has been determined to (f /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (r /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Position /Title Director, Office of Community Develo ment Date 30 March 1979 Signature \CAA-44124 APPLICATION NO. MF - 3 I - SMP PUBLICATION DATES + jst 6c1';bee SEC.- TWP. -R. 23/23 `l DATE RECEIVED Io / 6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DATE APPROVED ZONING DATE DENIED WATER BODY G -REaAJ ,R.rVE4L TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with appropriate local, state, or federal officials to determine whether your project falls within any other permit systems. A fee of $100.00 payable to the City of Tukwila must accompany this application. 1. Name of applicant " AP, J1)/ �5 � _ L. 2. Mailing address //j r j�-j `i� ` 1 .S 3. Relation of applicant to property: g 33�� v ' ~ PP Owner Purchaser ,- Lessee Other (: CITY OF TUKWILA APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT -1976 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant rang / /1-4 - s9. / 9!i, ., ffl�/ 9 A4 9arZo 7 5. General location of proposed project /'�/ / , 4-4 ' '- 3! 7 24/ �; 7rVIV4A 'W c.3 section, to t e nearest quarter sec L&/v 7 ,,,967 W4.,1IV 47 46 tion, township, and raFge) 6. Name of water area and /or wetlands within which development is pro- posed CX1� (i )7z) 7. Current use of the prop with existing improvements 8. Proposed use of property Q bp4 2424 W ,- 9. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project inclug .7;., add, tional dcvelnnments nnntrempl ate'3 hn - nnt- inC.`ivae' in this application: 9. B. Construction dates (month and year) for which this permit is requested: Begin Nov, / 9723 End 10. (To be completed by local official.) Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulk - heading, if any): 11. (To be completed by local official.) In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty -five feet a- bove the existing grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 12. Additional information: STATE OF WASHINGTON) CITY OF TUKWILA )ss (Seal) I, . fxy , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above -named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this j3rz, day of ,4u 11 79 n1(cy /977 /-2c2 _. o t ry r.Ind for the -- • R.Ch ATIOfl PLAUMNG • 18 August 1978 Respectfully, I t : 1\1 Satterstrom planning Supervisor f Mr. Ron Agostenelli c/o Mutual of Seattle, Inc. 8 West Mercer Street Seattle, Washington 98119 CITY of T UKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Short Plat Application in Tukwila Dear Mr. Agostenelli: The Short Subdivision Committee considered your application for short plat on 10 August 1978. The Committee voted to table the short plat application until the following . conditions have been met: 1. A complete title report is submitted to the City which includes all properties subject to the subdivision. 2. All owners of subject property must sign the short plat appli- cation. 3. A metes and bounds legal description of parcel 1. and 2 be sub- mitted. 4. Verification of back -taxes payment be shown. 5. Submittal of drawings verifying the Interurban right -of -way and edge of pavement. 6. Verification of present property lines. Please be advised that the Short Subdivision Committee will not re- convene on this matter until these documents and drawings have been submitted to. the City. Please contact me if you have any questions on this matter. 6230 Sout :hconto r lloulovard u Tukwila, Washington 98188 14 (206) 242 -2177 11 01 2 0' 1 Ls ktkS 1? Ec.Ucz ■t.a "*• F=czz. 1 ©3 VtE /4c&� l iv -tez tnic._ -1* ah F-. Soc:s ?LA- f?. . 1 P1 OF i I DSO - kr \ . t Co . E ca LtX`t t w s c 6C61100413 1 kr" S PA - t o E. tr Findings: Conclusions: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Todd FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director Ric- DATE: 23 June 1981 SUBJECT: Schneider /Nilsen Development This morning our office researched the implication of deleting 22 parking stalls from the Southcenter Plaza Office development through realignment of the boundary with the property to the north. The following is a sum- mary of our findings and conclusions: 1) The approved building permit plan set shows a total enclosed building floor area of 58,000 square feet in a two -story configuration. 2) The approved plan set depicts 179 parking stalls to be provided on -site; actual field count reveals approximately 201 stalls are currently - available to serve the project. 3) Minimum parking space availability for this project is 3.1 spaces/ 1000 square feet gross floor area as prescribed in TMC 18.56.160, equaling 179 total spaces required. 1) 22 surplus parking stalls have been provided by modifying the approved layout of the northerly portion of the parking area. However, it appears that some of these stalls may not conform to the minimum dimension requirements of the zoning code. 2) Assuming, however, that all spaces are properly configured, it appears that the 22 stall surplus now present will offset exactly the anticipated reduction in parking availability brought about by the boundary line adjustment. 3) Further reduction of on -site parking will place the project in non - conforming status, unless prior approval of the Board of Adjustment is obtained as provided in TMC 18.56.160. Page -2- Mayor Todd 2 June 1981 BC /mc /blk 4) During the interim period preceding adoption of Draft Zoning Or-•- dinance #4, the Board of Architectural Review has followed the policy of allowing up to 30% of required off - street parking to be sized according to "compact" stall dimensions. Should further reduction in available parking become necessary in this case, it may be possible to make -up the loss through re- striping to compact space sizes. It should be noted that the final configuration of the boundary line adjustment may affect more than the 22 stalls actually deleted. Careful attention should be given to maintaining full required width of aisleways and adequate backing /turning space, lest additional parking stalls be rendered dimensionally non- conforming and the project thereby under- parked. • I tti l [�i�i1� JH . 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ i W A V S ft7i 1 3 NI tr { 11 I - 4g D5, ;,AGE" ';O j+i5) �+CYl.l�tir• �� .t 's -rte- , V eI1ic 4 f}cceS5 Fgr F•A -e) R e�'d E vnc‘ p 1 ,.. ° rc & •.:Q OLti`^ G 5 ,.. l riI I J.I' ..t I I I L I U 1 7. MAINTAIN SPRINKLER PROTECTION FOR ALL 171 =c ME- 1 1 . s L w A e 7 T s ? $E1.I I N FIELD 11 /0b/i5 134 - PH1L pa t.s d- "(t.c' UO Ko r o , (t1 g-5 ogs vIO& ( oc k �, --atilt _____--_ R eel: mac`' e cQ I , 4 K` ^ co. E • i 4,7. 4 4 04 ti. .`ri V/\\1 4 . 08 __ i4 4 1 I �4Li j v • coo/4 t cSI, I I,o -3 + 1 °p �,� +b ' 0111 PI' 0"a 0 �1 9'� `Yi- � M ��7J V IV TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City o f Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM Ted M. Uomoto, Public Works Director Phillip R. Fraser, Senior Engineer December 23, 1980 Review of Southcenter Plaza Project Curb -Cut Permit Per the attached memorandum from Wes Jorgenson dated December 16, 1980, it is noted that Wes had two concerns on the Curb - Cut /Access permit: 1. Adequacy and safety of the access at S. 149th Street. 2. Sidewalk- driveway aprons. The Ad Hoc Committee decision on the sidewalk is, per your input, deferred for resolution at a later date than the time frame for sign -off on the Curb - Cut /Access permit. This issue shall be the subject of a separate permit yet to be applied for by the developer at a time in the future. It is my understanding that if the Ad Hoc Committee determines, through Council action, that a sidewalk in front of the property is required at this time, then I would recommend that the sidewalk be six -feet wide and about three feet back of the existing extruded curb in front of the office building. However, it is recognized, since the City has not carried out an extensive geometric survey of Interurban Avenue S. at this location, that this sidewalk may have to be relocated through the redevelopment of Interurban Avenue S. sometime in the future. The developer has constructed the two southerly access points per the approved plan. Therefore, I consider these access points to be acceptable for sign -off by Public Works now. Presently, there is a private property owner dispute as to private property boundary descriptions at S. 149th Street. Once S. 149th Street location is resolved and a recorded survey is provided, the necessary determinations and actions can be taken in securing adequate and safe access for the north entrance for the subject site. Without the public right -of -way determined for S. 149th + Street, Public Works is limited to sign -off only for the two southerly access, points now. I recommend that the Building Department be provided a status report at this time on this issue and other outstanding permits. I recommend that minimal modifications to the public street in S. 149th Street be provided by the developer, at the developer's cost, so that the building may be opened per the developer's schedule early next month. I also Ted M. Uomoto Review of Southcenter Plaza Project Curb -Cut December 23, 1980 recommend the developer provide the City with an agreement to participate in an LID for full development of this short section of street to bring it up to current street public standards. This LID should be carried -out right away. By this series of events, the developer can expediciously get his needed access and the City can go through the longer process of obtaining a street improvement project through the private property owners. Per the Ad Hoc Committee meeting of December 19, 1980, I have written . the attached letter to the developer which reviews the status of the sidewalk/ trail behind the building site with regards to plan review, permit and design 'requirements, and inspection responsibilities. PRF /jm Attachments (2) cc:Wes Jorgenson, Junior Engineer Ad Hoc Committee Larry Hard, City Attorney Al Pieper, Building Official Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director page 2 *ILA p Tukwila Washington 98188 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard 1908 ' Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Ad Hoc Committee FROM: Ted M. Uomoto, Public Works Director DATE: December 17, 1980 SUBJECT: AD HOC MEETING - December 19, 1980 As I am unable to attend the next December 19, 1980 meeting, this memorandum should provide the information which relates to Public Works on the item on the agenda which was not discussed in the December 16 meeting. I would like to also provide additional information relating to the water level of the Green River as it relates to the definition of "ordinary high water mark ". Reference to RCW 90.58.030 (Attachment #1) which gives the definition of "ordinary high water mark" and Appendix B - Definition (Attachment #2) from the City of Tukwila's Shoreline Master Plan has the identical definition. Generally this definition would be suitable to tidal sea water, lakes, or uncontrolled rivers. Following are comments I received from various sources in response to the following basic questions as it related to the Green River by Tukwila. Question 1. Under the definition of "ordinary high water mark ", what is your interpretation as to the applicability of this phrase for the Green River near Tukwila? Department of Ecology - Olympia Office Difficult to define as it applies to the Green River as the river is controlled by the Hanson Dam. Corp of Engineers - Seattle District They would refer to the mean high water as "ordinary high water mark" - would be difficult to apply with flows controlled by the Hanson Dam. King County Basically the same as the Corp. of Engineers except they may consider the mean high water level to lie that elevation established by the 9,000. cfs flow at the Auburn gauge. Horton Dennis & Associates Same as Corp's basis. For anything less than Corp's basis, they would seek a waiver approval from the Olympia Department of Ecology office. 1(B) Ad Hoc Committee page 2 December 17, 1980 Question 2. What is your interpretation or definition of "mean high water" and how is this level determined where flow is controlled by the Hanson Dam? Department of Ecology - Olympia Office They would refer to Corp. of Engineers for technical data. Corp. of Engineers - Seattle District Their definition of "mean high water mark" would be the mean high water level at the site in concern when 12,000 cfs is flowing by the Auburn gauge. King County Basically the same as the Corp. of Engineers except they may consider the mean high water level to be that elevation established by the 9,000 cfs flow at the Auburn gauge. (Same answer to question 1 & 2.) Horton Dennis & Associates Same as Corp's basis. For anything less than Corp's basis, they would seek a waiver approval from the Olympia Department of Ecology office. (Same answer to question 1 & 2.) My conclusion and recommendation is that the City should use the Corp's basis for any future projects along the river. In reference to the Southcenter Plaza project, I am unable to reconcile the method used to develop the elevation level and reference line for the 40 -foot setback established by the developer's surveyor. The measurement made by Public Works was based on the vegetation demarkation line as discussed in my December 1, 1980 memo. The folowing are my responses to the questions in the December 5, 1980 memo. - This is my opinion on loose fill. In my past design and construction experience with the Corp. and my relationship with King County, any embankment fill for levee construction required it to be consolidated. Where sliver fills would not permit consolidation, then sandy gravel material or quarry spalls were used. Loose fill is not desirable as it would generally slough -off from the first high water flow and receding stage of the river. Hydro seeding should be done early in the season so that solid stand of root system can be established by the time high water occurs. 3(A)(1) - Site plan which showed the sidewalk was not routed to Public Works for review. Public Works did review the plans furnished to Public Works. The sidewalk plan was shown on the site plan and not on the drawings received by Public Works - probably an oversight. Ad Hoc Committee December 17, 1980 TMU /jm cc: Mark,Caughey, Acting Planning Director Don Williams, Recreation Supervisor Al Pieper, Building Offical page 3 3(A)(2) - Reference to my memo December 1, 1980 (previously furnished to the Committee), third paragraph of the first page. I can only presume the developer thought they had the "green light" to proceed with construction from that meeting. Public Works routine procedure is that we would expect to see the revised proposed drawing for our review, subsequent field check, and approval. 3(A)(3) - Not sure how sidewalk waiver would affect Homotel at this time. Permitted uses in the shorelines of the state shall be designed and conducted in a manner to minimize, inso- far as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment of the shoreline area and any interference with the public's use of the water. (1971 ex.s. c 286 § 2.] *Reviser's note: In subsection (7), a literal translation of the session law's reference '... section 11 of this 1971 act...' would read 'RCW 90.58.110'. The above reference to 'RCW 90.58.100' which codifies section 10 of this act is believed proper in that (1) section 10 lists the elements includable within the muter programs while section 11 nei- ther defines nor mentions such elements, and (2) in the course of pas- sage of the bill, section 7 was deleted causing old section 11 to be renumbered section 10, but the above reference wu not amended in consonance with the renumbering. 90.58.030 Definitions and concepts. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the fol- lowing definitions and concepts apply: (1) Administration: (a) "Department" means the department of ecology; (b) "Director" means the director of the department of ecology; (c) "Local government" means any county, incorpo- rated city, or town which contains within its boundaries any lands or waters subject to this chapter; (d) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corpo- ration, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal corporation, or agency of the state or local governmental unit however designated; (c) "Hearing board" means the shoreline hearings board established by this chapter. (2) Geographical: (a) "Extreme low tide" means the lowest line on the land reached by a receding tide; (b) "Ordinary high water mark" on all lakes, streams, and tidal water is that mark that will be found by ex- amining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abut- ting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971 or as it may naturally change thereafter: Provided, That in any area where the ordi- nary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water; (c) "Shorelines of the state" are the total of all 'shorelines" and "shorelines of state —wide significance" within the state; (d) "Shorelines' means all of the water areas of the state, including reservoirs, and their associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them; except (i) shorelines of state —wide significance; (ii) shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is twenty cubic feet per second or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and (iii) shorelines on lakes less than twenty acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes; (c) "Shorelines of state —wide significance' means the following shorelines of the state: "Soreline Management Act of 1971 11 400 90.58.030 (i) The area between the ordinary high water mark and the western boundary of the state from Cape Disap- pointment on the south to Cape Flattery on the north, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets; (ii) Those areas of Puget Sound and adjacent salt wa- ters and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide as follows: (A) Nisqually Delta from DeWolf Bight to Tatsolo Point, (B) Birch Bay from Point Whitehorn to Birch Point, (C) Hood Canal from Tale Point to Foulweather Bluff, (D) Skagit Bay and adjacent area from Brown Point to Yokeko Point, and (E) Padilla Bay from March Point to William Point; (iii) Those areas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters north to the Ca- nadian line and lying seaward from the line of extreme low tide; (iv) Those lakes, whether natural, artificial or a com- bination thereof, with a surface acreage of one thousand acres or more measured at the ordinary high water mark; (v) Those natural .rivers or segments thereof as follows: (A) Any west of the crest of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the mean annual flow is measured at one thousand cubic feet per second or more, (B) Any east of the crest of the Cascade range down- stream of a point where the annual flow is measured at two hundred cubic feet per second or more, or those portions of rivers east of the crest of the Cascade range downstream from the first three•hundred square miles of drainage area, whichever is longer; (vi) Those wetlands associated with (i), (ii), (iv), and (v) of this subsection (2)(e); (f) "Wetlands" or "wetland areas" means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all marshes, bogs, swamps, and river deltas associ- ated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of this chapter; the same to be designated as to location by the department of ecology: Provided, That any county or city may determine that portion of a one — hundred — year —flood plain to be in- cluded in its master program as long as such portion in- cludes, as a minimum, the floodway and the adjacent land extending landward two hundred feet therefrom; (g) "Floodway" means those portions of the area of a river valley lying streamward from the outer limits of a watercourse upon which flood waters are carried during periods of flooding that occur with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually, said floodway being identified, under normal condition, by changes in surface soil conditions or changes in types or quality of vegeta- tive ground cover condition. The floodway shall not in- clude those lands that can reasonably be expected to be met 90 RCW (1979 U.)- -p 553 N ' a 'U ••i r•I W •. 11 nl r al •r1 •r1 4J )4 N N 1a 5 U 3 C: a J •rl W N l -A to 41 .c: 1d .c: N U I g .: a•► Z -84 . 'cl •O 0) 14 • • 3 c. 4 - ) .O :7 r-1• rd aJ O 10 W IA 1: 11 U •rl N 'll I ` 00 0 W110 '' 11 11 0 ` . >1al t1 W44 al 1 14,,7 ) 4J 1.1 in 10 0 111 al 7 14 al al I W 0 • W .r : W1•; C11C r-I 41 l:. I : '-1 - C) 111 •rl rU + 0 •-1 ••1 I • J r -1 1 r it) • r".WU 3 W .IJ •r1 11 0 C c: aJ C r; N N •r1 W aJ W .r aJ '(] •r1 ,C: ,C: U» t)► E ? W'U 4) 44 01•ri 01 N N )I a) O > .: A Xb1NJ N W L: C: O 4J O >1 r-1 ri N •• O, N 43 N >, C 11 4) J .c•; N nl N A •' al r. 4 •IJ r, .X:: 1a al 4 0 .Y O •rl N aJ'U aJ id 0 11 C: 0 'U W C )1 N 0 as 14 dJ 0 a) • U 11 al O •rl 0 U 4.1 r=: 4.1 W 11 U) '1 -1 U) 0 0 0 1.1 al - a) W N rl _IJ aJ .A 'cl 4$ U g aJ f: 1l1 b . n $0 0 o W r. rl :.+ .: .-1 C•r1NN•'•I W r: 1d aJ aJ • 14 14 .C: rl N U 'O - u1 'U W b1 r U U1 .c: W • rd ,r f � N nl '-I .0 r: U N r; •W140.(114- r O 4r1A al r "r, 4) J W 0 Q 4) '0a) :1 >10tP 14 C O U) 11 N C N N N rd C •• N 11 •r1 >1 0 0) W 4J'O W'cl U J N r . N W l•1 1: 14 .rl r: N 'I-1 C-' ."x.0 11101 0 N N f~ 0 U a l i IY / H sr c9 H (9 `~ H rli : •t. 0 >1 n, 1.9 O 't: U • I I 1 -1 ,�/ I-1 C) rr' `a o'• N W 0 >5 In 1 1 0 Ill '0 £1 u • rl 0) rl gLl + U In'ti 11 ••1 u) N • 41 W J .A •IJ W N 4 N .1 • 14 O ai N 114 -.14 Nr 4.1 a) 010 u CI W 4 •rl A a) r-1 .1: N W U14J A 11 r .14 O •.-• >1 AC >r N C .0 nl W 'a 0x•04 )1 aJ N W .1 C •1 14 o al 13' r • :: 14 (U O..Y0 1-I U J 'H r-1 E-1 J N > W 0 ra .A ( i 'U •)) •r-, ,� .clr ►u 01 41 0 0) 11 i: )1 • • .:: t) `: •rl >, N N N W W (0 •.1 ' •r1 1.1 Ol U C U 1 -1 al 0) N 14 O •rl •,.1 0 01 0 •' 1 W 4) U N .-I • •rl '0 •rI '0 Si W 3 N >, W O aJ Si r: N .0 A 14 ••• •r1 al :J C) .c: O 010x1 'U.() •r1un , *1 .r 0 r •`1 U r1 1.1 N .A 1 Or 0 0 •1 nl 'U W O • (1) 0 no a) aJ .)) A r aJN .--e 0111 1 ► UN3 N 0 41 11 ••1 0 nl r: N O - tP 11) a 1 O • lo r: .-1 r:. r: U> 1 N U NN0W 0) n1.0f1W0 W r•-i 4J 0 U 0 >1 p N N 0 U N tl >t r1 W 17r la 'tf - N CT N al al 43 4- U aJ 11 c) 01 11 In • •rl p rd Or:0JJANA rl C1,J 4 .) p.1 rill . I.1 011 (� N aJ 41 i) r: u O •rl N O N •r1 ,17 .1y 3 't1 49 .g U)w10•' WN N I: 1d N -r1 •') Or N 0 N of O r l >: O i ' 1 (U - W W 11 •r1 W •'-I O l4 N 4 U 44 r r], 41 • W o.> r .000. c :: P: N N rd ,1 4) .1J 0 •1 N ;7 W U a U) H • P1 a' 41 .r. • 4) al N (1' • X111' U g 00 0l>1• - I 4 1 4 .4 a N .1 r 1 0 U X U Si 4' • A441d 'Old 00100 aJ 0 N ctrl U) • - 0 41 •r 1 •r1 {J to 01 - VI 01 r 1 >'� rr' 0 Si Na 1)1 3 N N 01 aJ I: bar W ••4 V U •rl r 01 u1 rd >1 1. N rS •r•1 N N U C 'cl a1 N >t NON O (• a) A• rl N U £1 1U .A '11 •n • U) Ar . k 4a J >1N W O : 11 •r N O Id U N 0) N4a N .1J r: N r: W4a c: -1: •r1 A 01 •1 O .r; rl • rl4 -I al 4� ;• 4J•.1JN Rr 0) 0 1 14 .r. n N •• 4 1 • • U) O U tJ' 0 1 14 N N W W U 7 W 1.1 . J..a: 11 N 14 • N a I N N 1 N N'N O M 4 ( 111 .4 D . E C ,'1 .0 0 111 Q p1 0 awe a U co; H p4 JOHN' E. I IANSON \vll.l.lAM E. ZWINK I I1)H0) JOI IN M. RAKER II JOHN •I•. LUI)LO\v s ), I I'I1I \V li. ti'l'l(:\I(;I I'I' JOHN W. MARTIN, IN, JH. I'A•fl(IC :IA [i. HOHlilt•1 'i I., \ \ \' OI 1'I(:I S HANSON, ZWINK St BAKER, RS. Mr. Lionel C. Bohrer Tukwila City Council Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Schneider /Nilsen Dear Mr. Bohrer: 'j ;L \te r , C.C.D. CITY CF ll:;.'J1ll1 .LE O.C.D. .cm of TutYUA Development •�w•- Iwo 1' 0. 1980 December 9, 1980 We are writing to you on behalf of our clients, Messrs. Schneider and Nilsen, as a follow -up to our letter of Decem- ber 5, 1980. 3o2 SURREY WILDING 10777 MAIN STREET 13L wASI IING t'ON 98004 (206) 454.3374 It has come to our attention that the Hometel Corporation, owner of property bordering our clients' to the north, has applied for a remodeling permit with the City of Tukwila for some construction work being performed on the easterly portion of the Hometel property. Their application was erroneously made for a "remodeling permit ". Hometel will undoubtedly be required. to obtain a building permit, since the construction work in- volves a substantial addition to one of their buildings. It is definitely not "remodeling ". In view of the requirement for a building permit, it will be necessary for Hometel to satisfy the SEPA requirements and to obtain a Shorelines Permit. The Shorelines Permit will un- doubtedly require a forty foot easement along the river on the easterly border of the Iiometel property. This will allow the City to extend the jogging /hiking trail which'now crosses the rear of our clients' property across the Hometel property, and eventually to the north along the river. The result will be a substantial improvement for the benefit of the public. The City will have the opportunity to require the necessary improvements for the jogging /hiking trail in lieu of construc- 1 Mr. Lionel C. 1ohrer December 9, 1980 Page two ( e I • HANS( ZWINK & BAKER; P.S. tion of the sidewalk along Interurban Avenue in front of the Hometel property. A sidewalk along Interurban would serve no useful function whatsoever. The requirement for building a sidewalk would impose an unreasonable expense on the Hometel Corporation at this time, because it would require the filling of a very deep drainage ditch and construction of a culvert system to accommodate surface water. The minimal benefit, if any, to the public cannot justify the excessive expense for accomplishing that construction. We urge you to take this opportunity to extend the jogging /hiking trail and to defer the construction of the sidewalk along Interurban Avenue until the public will obtain some tangible benefit'from that construction. Yours very truly, I-HANS0N, ZWIN & BAKLR JLh /ab cc: Mr. Frank Todd, Mayor, City of Tukwila cc: Mr. Ted Uomoto, Department of Public Works cc: Mr. Mark ° Caughey, Planning Department cc: Mr. Al Pieper, Building Inspector cc: 'Mr. Don Williams, Director of Parks & Recreation cc: Mr. Lawrence Hard, City Attorney cc:. Messrs. Gary Nilsen and Lyle Schneider P.S.. l LAW OFFICES HANSON, ZWINK & BAKER, P.S. JOHN E. HANSON WILLIAM E. ZWINK (1980) JOHN M. BAKER II JOHN T. LUDLOW MATTHEW B. STRAIGHT JOHN W. MARTIN, JR. Mr. Lionel C. Bohrer Tukwila City Council Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Southcenter Plaza Building Dear Mr. Bohrer: December 5, 1980 302 SURREY BUILDING 10777 MAIN STREET BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 454.3374 We are writing to you on behalf of our clients, Messrs. Lyle Schneider and Gary Nilsen of Schneider /Nilsen Development, in connection with their construction of Southcenter Plaza on Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila. We have reviewed the letter from Hometel Corporation to Tukwila City Council dated October 31, 1980, and minutes of your Ad Hoc Committee regarding this development dated November 26, 1980. It is important that we make the following comments and responses in connection with statements made in those documents. 1. In the letter from Hometel, the writer states in Paragraph 2 on Page 2, that our clients are using a portion of the right -of -way between the Southcenter Plaza office building and The Village Green (Hometel property) for parking. This statement is simply not true. Prior to the construction of our clients' building, our clients obtained an accurate, survey, and they have developed their property in accordance with that survey. The survey establishes that the pavement of the street separating the Hometel property from that of our clients is not located in the street right -of -way. A portion of the pavement'is located on our clients' property. We will be pleased to review our survey with you and answer any questions regarding our use of our prop- erty as it relates to the street right -of -way. Mr. Lionel C. Bohrer Tukwila City Council December 5, 1980 Page two 2. The minutes of your Ad Hoc Committee on November 26 make references to encroachments on the City's easement along the river which borders our clients' property on the east. We are unaware of any such encroachments. To our knowledge, the construction of our clients' building has been accomplished in accordance with the plans approved by the City of Tukwila and other governmental agencies. If you or your committee have any facts to substantiate the statements relating to any such en- croachments, we would like the opportunity to review them and resolve any potential misunderstanding. 3. The minutes of your Ad Hoc Committee also make reference to deviations in the parking configuration on our clients' prop- erty. There have been some adjustments of the parking lot perim- eter which were required during construction to accomodate the terrain and to provide for additional parking spaces. A compar- ison of the approved parking plan with the actual lay-out on the ground indicates that any such deviation is insignificant. The construction of our clients' building is very near the point where it will qualify for a Certificate of Occupancy. We do not want any delay in obtaining that Certificate. My clients and I want to attend all meetings of your committee or the City Council, or the City staff, in which our clients' project is dis- cussed, so that information can be freely exchanged, facts can be efficiently determined and all matters can be resolved with- out delaying the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Please notify me by telephone or letter of the time and place of each meeting to assure our attendance. By this letter, we are requesting from you a clear statement of any matters which must be resolved before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. We will make any necessary response imme- diately. Any delay in the process for issuing the Certificate of Occupancy will result in serious problems relating to completion of the building and its financing. We sincerely ask for your prompt cooperation. JEH /ab cc: Mr. Gary Nilsen Mr. Lyle Schneider Yours very truly, SON, ZW BAKER, P.S. HANS( V, ZWINK & BAKER, P.S. E. Hanson TO: FROM: DATE: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 MEMORANDUM Ad Hoc Committee Ar omoto, Public Works Director D cember 1, 1980 SUBJECT: SOUTHCENTER PLAZA PROJECT The following information provides my knowledge from my involvement with the Southcenter Plaza project. The building permit, for this project, was issued in early 1980. Public Works received the drawings furnished from the Building Department. Phil Fraser did the sign -off on the drawings furnished. The drawings furnished to Public Works did not include the sidewalk plan. Later in the summer, the developers, Mr. Nilsen and Mr. Schneider, came to the City to discuss their concern on sidewalk construction in front of their project. A meeting was held in the Mayor's office with the Mayor which included Don Williams, Mark Caughey, and myself with the developers. The developers expressed their concern that their proposed sidewalk, in front of the building, was not practical as it would present a traffic hazard to the pedestrian to the extent that a truck, traveling at high speed, could cause a pedestrian to be pulled toward the street. They also were concerned of the storm run -off splashing onto the pedestrian due to the nigh -speed traffic. They stated that a sidewalk in front of their building would lead to no -where as there were no existing sidewalks either side of their lot to connect to. The developer's alternate plan was to construct a trail in the back of the building to replace the sidewalk in front. This would also provide them the opportunity to landscape the front area for .a more pleasing appearance.Their alternate recommendation was to build an asphalt walk which would serve as a sidewalk substitute and also serve as a trail along the riverbank. Most of the discussion then related to how this trail could be connected in the future and how the pedestrian traffic problems could be minimized as the trail leaves the riverbank area and heads toward Interurban Avenue. I expressed my opinion in that meeting that Public Works would be favorable toward this alternate plan with the proviso that the developer grant a sidewalk easement or right -of -way to accommodate the future sidewalk construction and that the developer would also agree to participate in the future LID for sidewalk construction. My understanding at this meeting v,as that the developer would then prepare a revised plan which would be a revision to the building permit drawing for review and approval by the City. Ad Hoc Committee page 2 Southcenter Plaza Project On November 5, 1980, Public Works received the developer's letter dated November 4 (copy attached) with drawings which showed their proposed location of the AC Walk along the river. This plan was then reviewed by our department. However, during the course of our review, our staff was informed that construction was proceeding on this AC Walk. Therefore, in order to expedite the review process for the developer, we' informed, the developer that we would include in the Public Works Committee agenda, their concern as we already had a similar waiver request on the agenda for the Record Stationary development (copy of November 5 agenda attached). In this Public Works Committee meeting, the developer's request was discussed although no conclusion or recommendation was made other than this matter would be referred to and discussed further in the Committee of the Whole meeting of November 10, 1980. In preparation of the November 10 meeting, I wrote the November 6 memo (copy attached) to the Mayor giving my opinion on the matter. This memo was included in the Committee of the Whole agenda package. In the Committee of the Whole meeting of November 10, 1980, this matter was referred back to the Public Works Committee for further study and recommendations for the Public Works Committee meeting of November 19, 1980. Since Public Works did not receive any formal response in writing from the developer regarding their commitment and intent to participate in a future sidewalk LID and intent to grant to the City an easement or right -of -way for future sidewalk construction, we then sent the November 12 letter reminding them of our request for their "letter -of- intent" (copy of our November 12 letter attached). The developer subsequently responded by their undated later (copy attached) which was received in Public Works on November 17, 1980. The Public Works Committee again reviewed the developer's concern on November 19, 1980 in the Public Works Committee meeting (copy of November 19 agenda attached) in preparation for the November 24,. 1980 Committee of the Whole meeting which then formed the AD Hoc Committee. About the middle of November, Mark Caughey had requested Public Works assistance in taking some field measurements related to this project. On November 20, 1980, Mark Caughey, Phil Fraser, Wes Jorgenson, and I made joint field inspections of this site. Wes Jorgenson and I took some field measurements at various locations of the project. Phil noted the measurements. The measurement was taken from an approximate point estimated to be the average high water mark of the river. The location of the mean high water line appeared to be where the bank vegetation showed sign of solid growth above the river water surface at that time. The measurements were noted on a drawing and furnished to Mark the following day. My observation and comments related to this site inspection are: 1. The edge of the paved parking area was less than 40 -feet at several locations. TMU /jm Attachments Ad Hoc Committee Southcenter Plaza Project 2. Earth material was deposited over the river bank. 3. The partially completed AC Walk had varying widths. 4. Portions of the walk had apparently settled on its own which indicates the subgrade earth material was not properly compacted or poor material was placed. 5. Walk construction was probably accomplished under adverse weather conditons as the completed construction would not meet our standards of construction. This report was prepared in response to the AD Hoc Committee request made in the meeting of November 26, 1980. '7,7777 7 page 3 Noverber 4, 1980 Ted Uanoto Department of Public Works City of Tukwila Tukwila Washington 98168 Dear Mx. Uomoto : ENTERPRISES 16625 REDMOND WAY • SUITE 204 REDMOND, WA 98052 • (206) 883.9330 PUR.Ir %•• • • • i. CITY Of 'NOV 5 1980 Schneider /Nilsen Development is requesting a waiver of the requirement of a sidewalk to be constructed adjacent to Interurban Ave. in front of the new South Center Plaza office building. This request is based upon two criteria 1) Safety 2) Esthetics. Attached please find a copy of our architectual site plan drawings shoe the proposed sidewalk adjacent to Interurbann Ave. , and the existing new pathway along the Green River, with the proposed alteration for the access to the pathway from Interurban Ave. . As the drawing clearly shows the proposed walk along Interurban is a definate hazard to pedestrian traffic being just inches away from speeding cars and trucks. At certain times of the day this traffic moves in excess of 50 m.p.h. The addition of a concrete ribbon in front of the building would destroy the landscaping buffer that has already been installed. Two things that must not be overlooked are that there is not another piece of sidewalk along Interurban Ave. to connect to this strip, and well before this project was started it was agreed by most individuals involved in planning, Public Works and Parks and Recreation, that the improvement of the trail on the river would benefit the public considerably more than the unsafe and unsightly walk paralleling Interurban Ave. Secondly, the walk ands at the south and of our property and the people have to walk out into the road to travel further south. We find this an objectionable request by the City due to the afoxmentibaed reasons, (safety of pedestrian traffic, esthetics .r: font A. Nil t. Sr.- partner r /jtin CONSTRUCTION • GAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • GAN REAL ESTATE Ke' 190 it* City of Tukwila 2) LID 30 Attachment 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor 1) Water /Sewer Rate Study MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works Committee FROM: fl omoto, Public Works Director DATE: October 31, 1980 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA - November 5, 1980 Committee Action: Meet with consultant and receive the results of their preliminary study, discuss alternate rate structures to be presented to the Committee of the Whole for discussion and adoption. 'Committee Action: Review status of project,' discuss alternative . course of action. 3) Record Stationary & Office Supply Sidewalk Waiver Committee Action: Review request submitted by Hansen Hansen & Johnson for waiver from Sidewalk Ordinance #1158 for the Record Stationary & Office Supply Store at 17000 West Valley Highway. cc: Mayor Todd John McFarland, Administrative Assistant Ted Freemire, Superintendent Shirley Kristofferson, Acting Finance Director Maxine Anderson, City Clerk with, original attachment City cf Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM T - ,Jomoto, Public Works Director DATE: November 6, 1980 SUBJECT: WAIVERS TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS ALONG INTERURBAN AVENUE Mayor Frank Todd Two separate developers have requested the City grant them waivers from Ordinance 1158 to delete the construction of the sidewalk along Interurban Avenue from the construction of their development. One developer is identified as the Schneider /Nilsen Development at 14900 Interurban Avenue and the other is the future Record Stationary & Office Supply at 17000 West Valley Highway. Public Works has reviewed both projects and discussion has been held with the Public Works Committee members. Their attached letter summarizes the rationale the developers have presented in requesting the waiver. Public Works would favor their request as long as the developer agrees and complies with the following conditions. 1) Grant, at this time, easement or rights -of -way to the City to allow for future construction of a sidewalk. 2) Submit to the City their agreement to participate in a future LID project related to the construction of the sidewalk. Public Works would favor the waiver at this time because of the following reasons: 1) We cannot accurately determine the location and elevation of the sidewalk along Interurban Avenue as no master plan and geometrics of the street section has been established. 2) Any sidewalk construction at this time would be removed in the future when the final street construction is accomplished. 3) Sidewalk construction in front of these two buildings would be an isolated sidewalk as there are no sidewalks existing in this area. • 4) The developers have stated they would be willing to comply with the two conditions related to furnishing easement /right -of -way and participation in a future LID. cc: Maxine Anderson, City Clerk John McFarland, Administrative Assistant Mr. Gary Nilson General Partner Schneider & Nilson & Associates 16625 - Redmond Way 204 Court Building Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Nilson: City t of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 November 12, 1980 Re: Southcenter Plaza Office Project Sidewalk Waiver 'Your request for a waiver for installation of a sidewalk for your development has been referred, by City Council, to the Public Works Committee for their review. The Public Works Department requests a "letter- of- intefit" from the owner of the development agreeing to provide an easement for a sidewalk in front of your property in conformance with the new sidewalk ordinance, recorded at King County, to run with the land. Also, in the "letter - of- intent ", the owner agrees to participate in an LID for sidewalks in the future. To have this letter on hand for the next Public Works Committee Meeting, I request it be sent no later than November 17, 1980. cc: Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director Al Pieper, Building Official Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director t. Sincerely, Phillip R. Fraser Senior Engineer • — -! sot" ro! Department of Public Works ttn: Ted Uanoto City of Tukwila Tukwila Washington 98168 Re: Sidewalk on South Canter Plaza Office Site ENTERPRISES 16625 REDMOND WAY • SUITE 204 REDMOND, WA 98052 • (206) 883.9330 Dear Mr. Uanoto : This document will serve as our letter of intent to provide the City of Tukwila, at such time as is required, a legally described and properly recorded sidewalk easement paralleling Interurban Ave along our westerly property line. We further agree to participate in a LID for sidewalk construction along our westerly property line as described above. GAN/ jmn Gary A. Nilsai, Sr. Schneider / Nilsen Develorinent Partner GAN CONSTRUCTION • GAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • GAIN REAL ESTATE Gli UF .1Unr1.1. 'NOVl 3 T 1980 TO: FROM: DATE: M EMORANDUM Public Works Committee Ted ltdbmoto, Public Works Director November 17, 1980 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA - November 19, 1980 - 4:30 P.M. - 6:00 P.M The November 19, 1980 Public Works Committee Meeting will discuss three agenda topics from the November 5, 1980 meeting. Hopefully, the Committee will be able to arrive at recommendations which can be discussed in the next Committee of the Whole Meeting of November 24, 1980. Horton Dennis & Associates will again be requested to attend both meetings for the water rate sessions. 1) Water /Sewer Rate Study 2) LID 30 Committee Action: This item was forwarded from the Committee of the Whole Meeting of November 10, 1980. Meet with consultant and discuss proposed ordinance. Discuss alternate rate structures to be presented to the Committee of the Whole for discussion and adoption. Committee Action: Review status of project, discuss alternative course of action. 3) Request for Waivers to Construct Sidewalks Along Interurban Avenue and West Valley Highway Mayor Todd John McFarland Ted Freer.:ire ::axine Anderson Hortor. Dennis & Associates Committee Action: Review requests submitted by: Record Stationary & Office Supply 17000 West Valley Highway Southcenter Plaza 14900 Interurban Avenue � City of Tukwila `1908 ' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor M EMORANDUM Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director 4/ Don Williams, Recreation Supervisor November 19, 1980 Nielsen and Snyder office building and trail I have some concern regarding the recent paving of a supposed recreation trail near the bank of Green River behind the new Nielsen and Snyder office building on Interurban Avenue. I am concerned that through previous "conceptual" discussions they have had with The Mayor.and several city staff they have gone ahead and paved what they believe is an acceptable recreation trail. Although they have not paved the entire length of the previously discussed "possible" trail, what has been paved does not match our established design for Christensen Greenbelt Park. I would point out that whether a trail or sidewalk is constructed is not a decision for my office to make. If the Mayor /City'Council decide a trail is acceptable, I would then work with the developers, but to this day I am confused as to why the developers assume the trail is what was to be built and neither of them has asked me to supply design information or review any plans. My opinion is the developer paved what they feel is an acceptable trail, but under our design criteria it is not for the following reasons: A. All of our paved river trails are set back at least five feet from the crest of the bank to allow for erosion control. B. Subbase material and the thickness of the blacktop paving must be of sufficient thickness to support medium weight maintenance vehicles. This requires a soils engineer to study the site and provide information on proper path con- struction. C. At least a 1% grade sloping to the river is desirable for drainage. D. The minimum width of the trail (all usable space) is eight feet. At least two feet of open, unobstructed space is re- quired on the landward side of the trail. "Open" means no paving should be done to allow for natural drainage and also no part of a parked vehicle should intrude into this area. This means if there is adjacent parking, the front or back of any vehicles should be kept back by properly locating curb stops. Page 2 DW /jas E. Disturbing the river bank is not an area I am legally involved with, however it is my opinion that what has been done would not please the Corps of Engineers or King County Hydraulics Division. Dirt, construction material and large blocks of concrete have been pushed over the bank, all which is not normally allowed. F. One additional concern is that if a trail is to be estab- lished we should receive documented survey information informimg us of the exact location of the easement. At this time I have no idea of the easement's location. The above items are my main concerns regarding the "possible" trail. At this time I am looking to your department as the department to resolve existing or potential problems. Please keep me informed of what is hap- pening. Dear Mr. Nilson: C �� 4 / City of Tukwila Gk Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard � �1�1�^j� Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 Mr. Gary Nilson General Partner Schneider & Nilson & Associates 16625 - Redmond Way 204 Court Building Redmond, WA 98052 November 12, 1980 0V, 1 5 Re: Southcenter Plaza Office Project Sidewalk Waiver Your request for a waiver for installation of a sidewalk for your development has been referred, by City Council, to the Public Works Committee for their review. The Public Works Department requests a "letter -of-- intent" from the owner of the development agreeing to provide an easement for a sidewalk in front of your property in conformance with the new sidewalk ordinance, recorded at King County, to run with the land. Also, in the "letter - of- intent ", the owner agrees to participate in an LID for sidewalks in the future. To have this letter on hand for the next Public Works Committee Meeting, I request it be sent no later than November 17, 1980. cc: Ted Uomoto, Public Works Director Al Pieper, Building Official Mark Caughey, Acting Planning Director Sincerely, fp , • ,� t 12= c Phillip R. Fraser Senior Engineer GV /ch City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor f 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Al Pieper, Building Official FROM: • Gary Van Dusen OATS: November 10, 1980 SUBJECT:. Southcenter Plaza -- Interurban Ave. 1- 1. We have the continued problem of building debris and other materials being pushed and left over a supposedly inviolate embankment - -in this case, the river. Why? 2. A drainage ditch has been dug into the river bank to allow drainage (SE Corner). a. Is this proper? b. Where should the drainage be from that property? c. What is the future prognosis of the problem? 3. It appears to me an encroachment of the Shoreline Management Act setback requirements is not adequate. Have you checked and measured? 4. Slippage of the edge of the parking lot is evident. This warrants concern. Any answers.or suggestions? — DIVrjON OF HYORAULICg .. NAME INITIAL I1r — s• --. Arctruz...'q • g..,,r- . Marr.miakis - - Davies ' Hamitton f iew . -- 4. jz orGZ , Seal I , ' :. ''..: ...- •: . • - . ''''...!........,..'..'' . . . .. .. ,....................... ‘';'..r•V• " ......•••••••••.:_••■•••••46:-.34••••••• ',..............; :-..”..L.I.,•••••.... .1. .... I. .., 1..... • ......4.• -- - As:er.i..7..;,•.....i.....Atei.....;?... :,::•-!„ :.•••('•gat;A. N.zi-4 F.4;i?.. i . ' '''...*C7Mrtil ; AA • 't ta ' "... ' ' . . , . • • Wu. ' ••-.Er?"•;;4147+-:•7 '" . -- • 4....;#4 ....: ••:,- -,--. ?w A. f . ! . . , .. -Tr t.g...7....44.• , • • r ; -- - • 16625 REDMOND WAY • surrE 204 REDMOND, WA 98052 • • ... e •• -' .., • . . • . • '' l ' ' .. " ,f , T I FT".} . .4 >4 .‘ t e .... • • 4`' el 4,r-. • , ...-(0 -, ..-4.0.11,..., .. ••••:441 4, :. '- -_•.., v , •.-- •,.:' :.: 7, i''. ' *.'..•:-.:,.:'...''. '• ': ''''' - 7. ": *: 7 . ""'::'`"..":"'"'-''.'''.!.. • .'•*- .:' - ,- - ..,' - - - - 7'7.`'; , -.:7;:, , :7T-',1.....A.q,...•44.. . y . z .. , i,..,,,..,..... ,,•- '' ' ' ..'..:-:. ".. ;.• ....,:" ...'s,'• . 1-s•-•••:••.*: f',,';•:...., •.:. . •:' ,"!' .:: ...„. . • .:, • • - . . :•••,,,. ,.., :: '..: ,-.... r .-,.%. ....,......:,;., .......,•• r• •• ..:., _ A . '..::.; - . February 20, 1980 ";. — - .:' , .. -..'; .• ..' • King County Department of Public Works • , Hydraulics Division , -• Room 976 King County Administration Building Seattle Washington 98104 . . Attn: Mr. George Wannamaker Dear Sirs: This letter is to advise your Bank Improvement for Southcenter Plaza Interurban Ave': So. Tukwila Washington, We anticipate this for completion is • • • • , .. • • 7 • • • • : River Bank 2-25-80. Estimated dollar amount $3,500.00. • • . • • .4 0.J 0.4- -1: Ar,,,4•-r • • - .4 ..•• • t• , t • • ".! • . • . •..? • 4% :• • •• • • C • : office that.we are proceeding with the Rivezy-yi,„„, a Schneider/Nilsen Development, at 14900 Department of Ecology permit #1-3894-21 -• Improvement to begin 2-22 .. ••• -A..1 7 • " ..,••,i : .1... ,i' .,...:; r., '7. . 1 :';-. 'CV, V •", V.V.,/.... ; '7.1 ‘ ' " ; '.. ''': :44. ;, ft-it• • . • VT.*, ' ''' 'IT ; ' ' '' ''1 :' .04 ' s ' ' ';1•7:1%'' ' ' •i ' ql 4 P,V,•14-..nit-I.v ‘ • • ,-• 1, ......,,,... ••• Lt-40,•.‘,.,•;!...! '‘1::.. . ., Z....,.... • ' : ;1•.*.- '‘',:t.4"4'..• 1..,,-.),...f.:;,: , 1 .;• • `•-• -V* • .-::i•- Gary A. Nilsen, Sr Partne . - • - f ;) •--,;. %, ,.., • •,...,1 . Schneider/Nilsen Development '.15.11.7 . • ' .., ,_ ....,- - -,..,..,3,, -:..-,.- . 4e ' ' ' '.'., 6 - .i..1•:.;,r3;,!++.0 t (•••3 • •-"•• ''..:: .' • • . `.,. , .. . : \ ' • t:':. _ •- ::.' ; r.; -." --=•••• -v.''' :-.''' ,.."''1 MLA- elt, CA) NI A/Q.:* ',Li AS 1--1 .- k-.1 AS tSs%' t.3 'IQ . . riBlISION .0E. GAN CONSTRUCTION • GAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • GAN REAL ESTATE : .':,:.5.'f',ifiitIt •If.• lys •■ . . .....,‘ 4. „„ 1 . , • i' !.. - - '"• ..: "......77.7.0-.-- • , . ' .•••,:•% 3 • . 'RICTOR /OIL )N DETAIL 447 • 12'[MP • d • NOTE : ALL METAL PARTS 4 SURFACES 'cv MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALV, a COMPLETE CORROSION r N PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED, NOTE: REFER TO PRAWING BY OTUERS FOR RIVER BANK DETAILS - z_ 175 IF 1 5.0.011 OUTLET PIPE s 27 za I C. 1 2 C:13.2 =i ehtoz TYPE I C.3.4471 TYPE II OVERFLOW CHANNEL PROFILE G"CONC. CURB (C.(3. l ONLY) 7 3' -0" C.B. I s Z0.20 C.B. 2 1 2`CLA55 B A SPHtLT OVERFLOW CHANNEL DETAIL Existing contours. ,taken from a- survey by Leonard Sehroerer,.Civil Engineer and Land .Surveyor - Seattle. Washington. For additional information eontaet 7:_ For river bank details refer to drawing.enrit1ed, `••.• 3. "River Bank:Aetails ".byLeonard I: Schroeter 375LF-121 5 = 0.015 uYDROSEED ALL DISTURBED SLOPES 1 • GENE 1. 2. 4. 5. - se • _"„■• . 1". • L i ; ,;:.... , ..•••• I/ 0 6 . 11 ..... 1 - •, ..;••.:?:: .-_-,. , ...4e .• –.' st —• ' fl'b441rIt • ' -% . : .. , 1 I•ciA' . r , • ' % ...,.-.‘.. , - . - ... .. . . ..... , -- , • '. 7 ::: ...,. . , . -'-• t ?,.:....... s ',...) ,..47.. . nt . 1 1 :: (‘‘ ) ' ''.' . i - ' -1\ '. . TC,-- y•-• x,.. ce01..Petr k c/t/ ;?..ce)W 3 :eot•-±eof .ar 4 .;•:;;* - • - .erwrorre. 7 . 4, • 4 V.` 1404. • 'di, .A: • e fStt l itf 14 ' 7'7 •1 1. 1 7, t;:k, 8, .4.. 170 . L r "t.A"..31'1X•44yt:' 0.‘ •.: - • .1, F4 • - i* . -ff.t7 • 4 ''';' 7 ■-,e;,17.1.4'!.ii?...; 4 0 it• '• • ?"••• • .. • • • ••■• • I i•• i ,.,.. IX '• ‘ ,...di-'1:i.. ,-,,•;rt ;,... j c.; : : : ;1,..?Vi rci ■ti . ;,•4 . 4 , 1 4 A7 ... .1 4 .it . 1 . ! . . , »; , ,;:-•:-. : . ? .. f . •' ... .."-1?. t; : :et. ',',-;; , . ,•,...: : .. • Sit.. " 1 ail :1131e4 ..i, 1,..1 .:.)- ,-.i...-P .tv,... ..... ,, :. • ....,.. . 'i...4 ' io.r.r.0..v..• .." ...- ,-., rt. i • • :),.: ... :.,...„ s__,,..._...„ ... — ---.....•. ...,,.....,...,..; .: .. - " - • . .,... . • ..... .. .. '''-'-r),r.Vairto..Y.- ,,,, • • 4f . .... .. . ,:' • ...;.• .,, ....., 'I: 2' .: ; . , . • ..,:'... •,-. 77,7 .. . ', .....,:,.-, :..•• :A.. Vt.:-:, ' 4-.....:t.e...: . .,:.:.-...:4,' . :.., ,....,......,..., ;.,......, . ..., ,...: .,.:„,,, .:.. ..., ... : .... . ... --..... ••••,:a4- ..,•4 •'. s‘.4".. .. - • t . 7.,;,.... ,,.. • . ' • • ..7:. ..,. ' "..!......-(.:--. ! • .,. - . „. .* ;.• .- 7 i'i:Ii•e, ,,,...:?;... .,,.., ,..• • :... • *)%i 1%.„ g• tbi i .5 . i:t„: i . , • :i ' '• .. •-..., Erf..d.!;'ali,;,;.- 7 .' • - • ;1 X letn'., ''':■4;;;1'7 '` .4' Z.• • .., -'M ..• •:t..., . - " ' r 7 ' !): it •1•JCZ";!:' • - , , . . . - . • 4; ;' ‘ . 4 6 ‘7"- - j 46-4 ..t .27 . 7 : • • : : . • • 'A, , 01.-1 ,0, 1 •7 ?. v., • a ` ^ . A' v -..",.,;....:...;..... .• i •:. : • . „ . • 4.....,.. 11 ,0 .1.- 4 i.... • , • - ' ... : ,. •.• . 4 ..., .-...m.mr . '..../. P.' f .- ' 1 ': • 1 ' : 7 , .• .: r or J- ...1;.1 i ., i . ..- 7 . - : . -. i4. A - i • , : ' ■• '..,-.:.• %l 'i ,",,,.." ''...■;.•:.-' ' It ; : • . • . . ',-,-. , .. , ,. ,-.. ■ rd." - " : •, '".ii., :,..i. ....,:r , . . ..•; .. 7 . ; r .-. . • • . • . ,. , . ;., ..:,.: .. ... !; 1 .• • la .1•47,4e A' '• • ' 1: . i ; •-• ' • • -14 ‘:•• " it ••• - 411; .• • " •••'" • • ,,, • • • '"z- ="-* • ty. • 'A xie.:1;t•":7`!..7 ;:.. 4 10 I, • 1-, . ' • • . . : " • • - • " • • • ....•••••• . • • . - • -• ••:••.4 ,•••• '+•••• . : : • . 21rifter I,/ • " • • . 7 ••• • • : • • .• -•!••••••••17.... •••••••••: ■ • • '.7 . • ''• • 14 ./77,0%4101044.17;/-e444143)004.e. hdoosyref51,-0,•• 79 4-07471476/ - . ...........1• 4 . , . . . . .. uni , :•,..A , • ,!:.1 L: - • .,,..;. ,..., ....e" "T. t ,... a ' 1.1.4.- . ..:: .. .Ttlf ;•;■i ' . . • '',7:10;.: i ! • i' ...... rraro -" Le -•-.--, - , • . ..,..:.- ..., ••,.. • ,.••-• • .•• • • • ...t • ._,. .,::: ) -. ,-.....::., • :.. • . .. • 7 ,--,. .....-:- , ; , ."7 , s"' `7:17 • t• : ..;• •7-. l' 7.:•". ,-.--- .. +I r.---,.;,.1;. ...-.,-..- --. ..... . .. ., ; • . • 7 . •!: • • --.....!-!•,•*-:■-:'!.::::-7 --- 71 ---- 771:7 - .:: —.- : -.7.-- - - --- ' • ..:. ... 1 ...„ - •,f •,..., ..... .,.,),.... • 1 1 .... . • r . . • . • • ''.. *** e.., ......... . . • ...... '1.1;11.i..r04,4;:t.):::...1.::.... ..7.... ..:: i:ri.1 ... ::. **. • . : 1 .. .* . : ..:* : ' r . • .. ...- . ' '......:1.:* . •:71. T..... • .• . . •. • ...... ' .-.• ..■ . ••••'....:4)4*$:?1, '. 1 4.tii A.; :;••• • • • . ,...:.... ,ati, ..i /1.• I, .. " ''. .. '.... . .. . ' • . . . . . . .. . , . %... .,,,.. r .'• ..1:: c 0.. 0.11 .; +. * 1 ' ;CI .: ' ' .. ..‘.. : ..• • • % . • • I '..,I ... ,...., k, . .* *. t .' ' .':. . . 77•-•,.":'•,.,' , • ' • : .. • : •...... . . :,. . . • . . • .• ... . i. -,.. 1 . y. - .......,... . .-:'... • i..4 4...• );.-'. '.. - .. • - -;:. •... i^ . , • 1 : ;1: 1;•••• , .4:4141 77.-1 ,•• Crir. • • • • • • . : ; • • " " • ," - • • • . 7- . "• ; • • . • >fir .. nir 4 6 • . . i ... 4R. -JO. i off _ , Ao. ...7",,Ttg• w _ i A 'PPP iro' ,r b:T.411r Apq t. q. IR...' :"' '4,24Ipt 41‘44.4P.,VA'tittis..N.74AVI.,IST.i :41' :.'t • iP •-• _.ifshilY2.— I. rf,dos....* ..,..:,,,,,,„,,.. _ . il 4P-4 0 - P"C*.v• '0' #1.441* 4 T1 fArd4re',R. A *itif 11,1 " - ft.." 4-j t ' '_ ' i 4 t d e ' '4. 44(41•11111■1-1114 143..4s. I • 4P 404 1 rtii 4s, "••fref , • ji,'•• .411 . • .: V --- - , c• 1 ■••• * ../..;,.:argtoi 1 to ..,4a 4114■••;',P,71r$11.0 • . ,...„ •ri......, ..-%!;(::'• 0.(4 '41' • -.,..1 , 0 , - • 4; 01 7. • ., .. 7 - • f . 4 . . . , • a ; • • • i .. • . • 7.- ;,;•••7• I • ..- , • i • . . 41,V • '1 4, • 43 •.0.4.".".4a1Tr-r'i-s-••••7•7 4■74.i. .:••••• • • • .4. it • . . , . , „ • • • • , • ri • • • • . • • u • 7 9 . . p-• • ,. 1 • . • • -• ' • January 25, 1980 Herman Huggins Northwest Regional Office Department of Ecology 4350 150th Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 Dear Mr. Huggins: • �ril s Department ? �• c' James W. Guenthe ' f ' 900 King County Adml ! 500 Fourth Avenue ••! Seattle. Washingto • King County -t John D. Spellman, Cou Telephone: (206) 34 Reference is made to our phone discussion of January 1 attached letter dated January 10, 1980 concerning the Application and plans previously submitted by Schneide construction of a building and required dike and river Green River. Reference is made to comment no. 3 of our letter dated the proposed dike and riverbank stabilization be compl of the proposed building. In lieu of this comment, we. the following: 1. The applicant must post a construction /performa riverbank stabilization prior to commencing con building. The proposed dike should be construc construction as originally recommended. 2. The applicant must write a letter of "Hold Harm and State free from all responsibility for any building caused by riverbank erosion prior t� s caused by construction equipment used to constr zation. The applicant must address the feasibi riverbank stabilization with the finished build 3. The required riverbank stabilization must be co August 31, 1980. 4. King County Department of Public Works must be ing the existing riverbank. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Crawford of my staff at 344 -3874. Sincerely, G. E. WANNAMAKER, P.E. Acting Manager Division of Hydraulics GEW CWC /LRG /ah Wanna 1 .ibbanann An�irusk Mamanakis i ..avies Hamition Enclosure: cc: Mr. Al Pieper City of Tukwila DIV la • F HYDRAULICS . : 1 l COY INIT AL m 1115 , 1980 and to our previous tate Flood Control Zone /Nilsen Development for ank improvements along the January 10, 1980 requiring . ted prior to construction • suggest consideration of ce bond for the required truction of the proposed ed prior to building ess" declaring the County ' - amages to the proposed abilization or any damages ct the riverbank stabili- ity of constructing the ng in place. pleted no later than . otified prior to disturb - Larry Gibbons or Curt l.iAter Dated Jan. 1980 7 Mr. Herman Huggins Northwest Regional Office Department of Ecology 4350 150th Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 G.E. Wannamaker, P.E. Acting Manager Division of Hydraulics GEN LRG:CP7C:bj enclosures cc: Mr. Al Pieper, City of Tukwila King County �* ` tashington John D. Spellman, County •utive Department of Public Works James W. Guenther, Director 900 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone: (206) 3442517 ;MN 1 01980 Dear Mr. Huggins: We are enclosing a State Flood Control Zone Application and plans submitted to this office by Scheider/Nilsen Development for construction of a build- ing in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. We have reviewed the application and are submitting the following comments: 1. The water surface elevation for the Green River, with controlled discharge from the Howard Hanson Dam of 12,000 c.f.s. as measured at Auburn (Porter Gauge), is 22.4 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum) at the subject site. The proposed finished floor elevation is shown to be at or above elevation 22.4 feet (MSLD). 2. Approval of this development and other applications will reduce the storage area for flood waters, resulting in a higher eleva- tion for the 100 -year frequency flood plain, unless improvements are made to discharge floodwaters from the flood plain. 3. The required dike and riverbank improvements shown on their plan must be completed prior to construction of the proposed building. King County Department of Public Works must be notified prior to disturbing the existing riverbank. 4. No fill, structures, or improvements shall be placed within 30 feet of the top of riverbank, unless approved by the King County Division of Hydraulics. This includes the disturbed areas shown on drawing: 2 of 3. 5. Additional improvements to this site will require State Flood Con-. trol Zone Permits. If you have any questions, feel free contact Mr. Curt IC Crawford on 344 -3874. Sincerely, .20 ) •-• ' i: r• ‘ 4 ...• • s ... 1 .. : . ' '1 i {, ' N . (:)-'—' AI • .%,, %,"rt . ;, 1 s , .5 • V... ....,--" .-, s• ‘ \ .•\ . — . 1 16 ....,,‘. '.. • , .0. '' ...s'''•:...' — .....',......-;."..: . . -.. ..7..`.....:` .- ' . . --......, -....._ .. .4.•. N.. • . ... ' ' • N • 4 --" ••••••,-,* ' :s /440, ! , 1 • %.1 i • 0.1,•,, Paved \ CtittIvated' • 2/5.. K , • .!•::,.."&f, . . •••.! 25.'5 4k. Order No. 396952 PARCEL A: PARCEL B: EXHIBIT "I" Tract 1 of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion lying Northerly of a line which extends Northeasterly, perpendicular with the Westerly line of said tract, from a point on said Westerly line which is 685 feet Southeasterly from the Northwest corner of said tract. That portion of the following described property lying between the South line of South 149th Street as conveyed by Puget Sound Power & Light Company to the City of Tukwila, by deed dated October 25, 1965, recorded' August 28, 1965, under Auditor's File No. 6557639, and the South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. That certain piece of land 100 feet wide, being 50 feet in width on each side of the centerline of definite location of the Seattle- Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) across that portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim lying within the Northeast quarter,of. Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County,. Washington, the centerline of said strip of land being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North boundary line of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim in Section 23, Township.23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., 230.7 feet from the Northeast corner of said Donation Claim; thence South 22 ° 37' East 1497.5 feet to point; thence curving to the left with a spiral having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet, through 7 ° 30' of curvature to a point; thence continuing to the left with,an eight decree curve through 23 ° 08' of curvature a distance of 289.2 feet; thence continuing curving to the left with a spiial having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet through 7 ° 30' of curvature to a point; thence South 60 ° 45' East 509.5 feet to a point on the left bank of the White River, which bears South 29 ° 58' East from the Northeast corner of said William H. Gilliam Donation Claim a distance of 2443.2 feet, said strip of land in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for highway purposes recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 6557639, 6614483 and 721214- 0434. F. A. LeSOURD WOOLVIN PATTEN DONALD D. FLEMING GEORGE M. HARTUNG MEADE EMORY LEON C. MISTEREK DWAYNE E. COPPLE THOMAS O. McLAUGHLIN PETER LeSOURD JOHN F COLGROVE C. DEAN LITTLE Mr. Mark Caughey Assistant Planner Office of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Easement Agreement for Nilsen Office Development Dear Mr. Caughey: I have reviewed your letter of October 8, 1979 and its enclosures regarding the proposed easement agreement. I am enclosing the easement with some minor editorial changes which I have made. I believe the easement agreement is adequate with the changes indicated. LESOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING, HARTUNG & EMORY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 SEATTLE - FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154 LEH:th Enclosure cc: Mayor Bauch (w /oEnc.) 1206) 624 -1040 November 2, 1979 Very truly yours, LeSOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING, HARTUNG & EMORY Lawrence E. Hard LAWRENCE E. HARD RODNEY J. WALDBAUM BRUCE G. HANSON RICHARD P. MATTHEWS O. WILLIAM TOONE M. COLLEEN WEULE DANIEL D. WOO CARL J. CARLSON ROBERT L. PALMER COUNSEL • EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT made this day of , 1979, by Gary A. Nilsen, Sr. and L. D. Schneider (the "Grantors "), in favor of CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation of King County, State of Washington (the "Grantee "). WITNESSETH Proposed 6/28/79 MF i78- 31 -SMP Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, Crinto*c grant', con- vey‘, and confirm to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for public access for the purpose of constructing and operating a recreational trail open to the public, and related construction and improvements, across and upon the property described on the attached "Exhibit A" and.,further shown on the map attached as "Exhibit B ". Grantee shall have the right without prior institution of suit or proceeding at law, at such time may be 'deemed appropriate by Grantee, to enter upon said property for the purpose of operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing or re- constructing a public recreational trail and related improvements, without incur- ring legal obligations or liability therefor; provided, said operating, maintain- ing, repairing, replacing, or reconstructing of a public recreational trail or related improvements shall be accomplished in such a manner that private improve- ments shall not be disturbed or destroyed. In the event they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by Grantee. This shall be a covenant running with the land forever and shall be binding on Grantors' successors, heirs and assigns. By: By: STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. , On this day of , 1979, before me personally appeared and to me known to be the of the individuals that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and.deed of said individuals for the uses and purposes mentioned therein, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument. y•. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Wash- ington, residing at The pedestrian access easement as described in the easement agreement shall be from the ordinary high water mark to a point 40 feet west of said ordinary high water mark over all of the following parcels of land: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Parcel A: Parcel B: EXHIBIT A Tract 1 of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion lying Northerly of a line which extends Northeasterly, per- pendicular with the Westerly line of said tract, from a point on said Westerly line which is 685 feet Southeasterly from the Northwest corner of said tract. That portion of the following described property lying between the South line of South 149th Street as conveyed by Puget Sound Power & Light Company to the City of Tukwila, by deed dated October 25, 1965, recorded August 28, 1965, under Auditor's File No. 6557639, and the South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. That certain piece of land 100 feet wide, being 50 feet in width on each side of the centerline of definite location of the Seattle- Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) across that portion of the William H. Gilliam Dona- tion Claim lying within the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, the centerline of said strip of land being more particularly 'described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North boundary line of the William H. Gilliam Dona- tion Claim in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., 230.7 feet from the Northeast corner of said Donation Claim; Thence South 22 °37' East 1497.5 feet to point; Thence curving to the left with a spiral having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet, through 7 °30' of curvature to a point; Thence continuing to the left with an eight degree curve through 23 ° 08' of curva- ture a distance of 289.2 feet; Thence continuing curving to the left with a spiral having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet through 7 ° 30' of curvature to a point; Thence South 60 ° 45' East 509.5 feet to a point on the left bank of the White River, which bears South 29 ° 58' East from.the Northeast corner of said William H. Gilliam Donation Claim a distance of 2443.2 feet, said strip of land in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for highway purposes recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 6557639, 6614483 and 7212140434. 11 .11 I .. ..- -.ti' - . • • • • • .4rzaX.er...a ACA. AtAbl WO' . .4 ) 1iti. r 1.--.P' i ■ • • • : i 1 11+...g • 1 t +. s i . I "] I •Er , r . • ricmr10M0 "0. at t 400(..7 Avnwilw.r "V 14v--,1,rr . f if •..,.. -1 :.1' -. • : • ": • :-.: ..,.:?.. , .--.., • ;:',..• 14. .I) „a • er --: I: • .. ,. . . ot-ipv4e, I • • ."•;21:_tc p Ur...4W • • • • `7. • ":- • .1 .5•1r Wall' YIP .41...• 1. me • •ber oyes rs- rz•wicr /6/-e/.5.2yr • .11.2,....wr a". 4 .Thot .44 prr 61 Ott L Jr eRCAzona int ! •. EXHIBIT B .- 2.731e•ra."3,41 . /•••.• •• • /•.) - .) . - 4: 7 41 1 . : :',;').,.; ; : . • -, • I / ft: ( At i ' ... ". .4 , 1 )9 .• ' 1 1 '•-•-• "ji - tr..er:turt 1 P a' )- ( . .-". tv ,......,,,,, / , • ... --••-..., : / ..:. .,,.. - 1 i- 1 t .1 ,... "Z11' . • - . ,•••„ ..._, --:: .- )-. .• 1 ' 1 I A. rtisea, .e.- siva' - •,. . ;., i 1 .0•."14 ..V.. . fie 3-14..", ."1 ..',..14,0 4 ......., .••*•....... • - • • -.0 ,■03 roorfory . . . . . n.:, „ " . .." "L ‘ . ' , j. .. ... . I .. .. ......./ I . . ... . .-..., \ ..;‘,..., h........ ..... ... .- ...k 1.• A"..1. •-S., '' .;• 3 1 '. .1 --.:?....... ir .--4- .1 . . 1 --- ,....r._•; ...--' ••% A" . r i f' 1 j i lt . r. 1 r o: '. I . I . 0 /71 1.01.. -1 '.: - ..z1 ,I ..7:19: ! T r1 iFri .A i i 141 I Fr, FT 1 1 .11 iii-iu. . 1 . • . 1 : • „,...:, 1 1 1 • 7r.ril::. ••••• • 'wry, .......roott • 1 INC **woe ark:. .; :?". Or.l.C.1. • ! I. i p+1.1 LAW A 741"1.:' • - . . . .0 ir"' --Ai' ;Torte Aw.SC...X•Ar a AA: 7.royclosare ACIZZ5 : • .1:1, 0.2 13:44.17:Th•••:".:J0 77T4 t .".!•VVOS. ptPiPile exec etS easemeh+ ()Jere ow Amer • : • • • . • - •0 . •-:_- • •• " JI • • -A'A • )Z • _ _-,-• ••• ;• _ - • • *.• • ■• I • I T . • • E!'" . '9 ATaK. • - ------ - - • t(t . .N1.3 1•• . • • ar.;4/77•5. /z7,9 • /44..m 41‘.71:11C, Aor .7d7 AM 40. Z.tralW • - AVC 0 ..10. 010 .01Ki. 0151177Z.e 4 AM. 0,1 .r..eele.2.1 A.445r ; Dear Gary: Gan Enterprises 16625 Redmond Way, Suite 204 Redmond, WA 98052 ATTN: Gary Nilsen City oe Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 8 October 1979 Office of Community Development Vi sa n ialD RE: Proposed Revision to Shoreline Management Sub Development Permit 78- 31 -SMP 1. Eliminate all vehcile parking areas and circulation paths within the 40' wide river frontage zone. 2. Dimension all parking stalls, aisle widths, and back -up distances to compliance with City of Tukwila standards (see enclosed "Plate 1 "). JeU. At your request, we have depict proposed layout revisions as it relates to your s mit only, to your office project on Interurban Avenue and Sout Street. Our intent in so doing is to determine if the magnitude these changes is within the scope of your current shoreline develop ment permit, or if revision thereto is needed. Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Section 173 -14 -064 describes the Tv c {per criteria upon which the local jurisdiction may assess proposed changes ' OP o to approved shoreline plans. Paragraph 2(b) under this section pro- vides that "...any revisions authorized under this subsection shall g06. not exceed...setback or any other requirements of the master program paeMr for the area in which the project is located." Page 6.3 of the Shore- line Master Program describing a river zone of 40' setback from mean high water, as in your case, does not provide for vehicle paths within that 40' wide space. Your proposed revision encroaches into the 40' setback space with a significant amount of paved vehicle driveway area. Also, a substantial landscaped space adjacent to the east side of building which appeared on your original idea has been replaced by parking are previously located beneath the building. Therefore, in order to revise your project within the scope of WAC 173 -14 -064 and to avoid re- opening of the shoreline permit approval process, we recommend the following modifications to your 9 -24 -79 drawing: Gary Nilsen Gan Enterprises MC /ckh Enclosure Sincerely, Page 2 8 October 1979 3. Provide a minimum 4" deep by a minimum 4' wide bark - filled pedestrian path running the entire length of your site's river frontage at or near top of bank to provide a "people - space" in lieu of the substantial landscape area which has been eliminated from the east side of the building. In addition, the river bank cross section drawings prepared by Leonard Schroeter dated 8 -7 -79 are not entirely clear to us in their meaning. It appears that a portion of the building will encroach into the 40' river zone, and that unjustified grading will be conducted from top of bank to the high water line. Neither of these proposed situations are acceptable to us. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter; please call upon us for further assistance as needed. Mark Caughey Assistant Planner 8. Diking for(lood control purposes. B. The River Zone shall consist of 40 feet, as measured on a horizontal plane, from the mean high water mark and shall contain no uses other than: 1. Public and /or private foot paths or trails. 2. Recreation facilities such as benches, tables, view- points, overlooks, etc. 3. Recreation structures such as picnic shelters not to exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. 4. Support facilities for pollution control such as run- off . 00nds and filter systems, provided they are on or below grade. 5. Information and direction signs conforming to the underlying zoning district. 6. Diking for flood control purposes.. River Zone Uses Shall Conform to the Following Standards: than. twenty -five (25) 1. Access roads shall be located no closer feet to the mean high water mark. 2. The centerline of railroad lead tracks shall be located no closer than forty (40) feet to the mean high water mark. . 3. The River Zone shall be landscaped with suitable plant material . from the appropriate set -back line or edge of road or track to the river, consistent with flood control measures, as follows: a. Large hardy shade trees at a maximum of 30 feet.on center such as sycamore, maple, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, alder, poplar, cottonwood, birch and black locust. b. One of the following: 1. Live groundcover at a maximum of 18. inches on center such as ivy, salal, salmonberry, oregon grape. 2. Natural grass such as red fescue, field grass, clover. 3. Addition to the existing natural vegetation where appropriate. 4. Recreation. structures shall not be located closer than twenty- five (25) .feet to the mean high water mark.. RCW 90.58.200. 78 -07 -011 (Or- 14-050. filed 6/14/78; Order 73- d 10/23/73; Order 71 -18, § 173- 1.) substantial progress toward con- 1. for which a permit has been ac act must bc undertaken within ?proval of the permit. Substantial truction shall include,' but not be of bids, making of contracts, pur- ilved in development, but shall not r uses which are•inconsistent with WAC 173 -14 -100. In detcrmin- hc two -year period hereof. there the time during which a develop- , pursued by construction and thc reasonably related thereto made it pursue: Provided, That local gov- iscretion extend the two -year time is time based on factors, including itiously obtain othcr governmental luired prior to the commencement which a permit has been grantcd as not been completed within five val of the permit by local govern - :rnment that granted the permit m of the five -year period, review a showing of good cause, do either Permits for Developments on Shorelines 173 -14 -064 Time requirements of permit. luircmcnts shall apply to all sub- . conditional use and variance nit for one year; or permit: �g hcrcin shall preclude local gov- : permits with a fixed termination years. [Statutory Authority: RCW (Order DE 78 -7), § 173 -14 -060, DE 75 -22, § 173- 14 -060, filed 18, § 173 -14 -060, filed 12/16/71.1 Applicability of permit system to permit system shall be applied in to federal agencies on lands meet - ie Shoreline Management Act and iorclines of the state. ics shall not be required to obtain errs undertaken by thc federal gov- ;ned in fee by the fcdcral govcrn- ral got;crnment grants or reserves to ovcrnment, substantial jurisdiction se lands. .tem shall apply to nonfederal activ- clopmcnts undertaken on lands sub - w. ncrship, lease or easement, even tav fall within the external bounda- ership. (3) The permit system shall apply to development undcrtakcn on lands not federally owned but undcr lease, casement, license, or othcr similar federal property rights short of fee ownership, to thc fcdcral government. (4) Federal agency actions shall be consistent with the approved Washington state coastal zone management program subject to certain ,limitations sct forth in thc federal coastal zone management act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. [Statuto- ry Authority: RCW 90.58.200. 78-- 07 - -011 (Order DE 78 -7), § 173 -14 -062, filed 6/14/78; Order DE 75 -22, § 173 -14 -062, filed 10/16/75.1 WAC 173 -14 -064 Revisions to substantial develop- ment, conditional use, and variance permits. When an applicant seeks to revise a substantial development. con- ditional usc, or variance permit, local government shall request from the applicant detailed plans and text de- scribing the proposed changes in the permit. (1) If local government determines that the proposed changes arc within the scope and intent of the original permit, local government may approve a revision. (2) "Within thc scope and intent of thc original per- mit" shall mean the following: (a) No additional over water construction will be involved; (b) Lot coverage and height may be increased a max- imum of ten percent from the provisions of the original permit: Provided, That revisions involving new structures not shown on the original site plan shall require a. new permit, and:' Provided further, That any revisions au- thorized under this subsection shall not exceed height. Jnt eovcragr setback or any other requirements of the master program for the arca in which thc project is located (c) Landscaping may bc added to a project without necessitating an application for a new permit: Provided, That thc landscaping is consistent with conditions (if any) attached to the original permit and is consistent with the master program for the arca in which the projcct is located; (d) The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed; (e) No additional significant adverse environmental impact will be caused by the projcct revision. (3) If the revision or the sum of the revision and any previously approved revisions pursuant to WAC 173 -14- 064 will violate the terms of one or more of the provi- sions in WAC 173 -14- 064(2) above, local govcrnmcnt shalf require that the applicant apply for a new substan- tial development, conditional use. or variance permit. as appropriate. in the manner provided for hcrcin. (4) The revised permit shall become effective imme- diately. Within eight days of thc date of final local gov- ernment action the revised site plan, text and thc approved revision shall be submitted to thc appropriate regional office of the department and the attorney gen- eral for the completion of their files. In addition, local government shall submit a notice of revision approval to (Ch. 173-14 WAC- -p 31 • • I. PARKING: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98196 Edgar a ea,cn, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Kjell Stoknes, O.C.D. Director FROM: �Y oger Blaylock, Assistant Planner DATE: 13 March 1979 SUBJECT:. Nilsen Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit / #78- 31 -SMP The original 30 day local review period for the Nilsen Office Building ended on November 15, 1978. The decision was delayed at the applicant's request. During the second week of. February, he submitted revised devel- opment plans. These plans were sent to both the Fire and Public Works Departments for review. The Fire Department stated that the access road around the building was necessary because it would be impossible for them to fight a fire from Interurban Avenue and block the street. Public Works has stated that the applicant might have trouble accessing the sanitary sewer to the north. Sewer is available on the west side of Interurban Avenue. This could result in a sewer line having to be pounded across underneath Interurban Avenue. The project proposed has improved significantly in its treatment of the shoreline. However, the following points should be specifically addressed and conditional: The 216 parking spaces provided meet the minimum code requirements for the 69,700 square feet of gross floor area. Seventy -three (73) spaces are provided in the basement of the building. All the parking spaces are 9 x 20 feet. This is in excess of the present standard of 9 x 19 feet. The aisles are appropriately sized at 24 feet in width. No com- pact stalls are designated. Since the site is very narrow any additional landscaping that could be placed on the property would be aesthetically advantageous. Therefore, I would recommend that the parking stalls be reduced to 9 x 18 feet and allow a one foot overhand. It appears that this extra landscaping should be placed along Interurban Avenue and the northern property. This would add four (4) feet of landscaping to help buffer the parking lots from the street. Memorandum Page 2 Kjell Stoknes 13 March 1979 II. DRAINAGE EASEMENT: The site plan implies the existence of a 10 -foot easement adjacent to 30 -foot road right -of -way. I have reviewed the assessor's maps and there is an ease- ment for drainage. It varies from 10 to 15 feet. This has to be shown on the drawing. The easement is held by State Highway Department and it is presently occupied by a drainage ditch. This will have to be covered. The specific designs will have to be approved by both the State Highway Department and Department of Public Works. The state maintains the ditch; however, when a culvert is installed the maintenance is transfered to the City. III. SHORELINES PUBLIC ACCESS /SIDEWALK: Access to the shoreline must be assured for the public. The standard practice is to require a 40 -foot wide public access easement; however, in this case I would recommend that a six -foot wide cement walk be required within the easement instead of placing it along Interurban Avenue. The design plans for the improvement of Interurban Avenue have not been finalized; therefore, a hasty decision may lock us into a standard that is not well thought out. However, a condition of the Shore- lines Permit should be to require participation in an L.I.D. to construct the side- walk along Interurban Avenue at a future date. To prevent the sidewalk from dead ending at the north end of the property, there needs to be an easement and physically constructed sidewalk with a minimum width of five (5) feet to provide pedestrian access back out to Interurban,Avenue. IV. ACCESS DRIVEWAY: The access driveway is-not necessary for traffic circulation; however, it is necessary for emergency fire access. The Shoreline Plan requires the building to be setback either forty (40) feet or fifty (50) feet from the Ordinary High Water Line depending upon the placement of an access road. The access driveway as shown on the site plan should be eliminated. It is not allowed by the Shore- line Master Plan; however, I would recommend that a twelve (12) foot wide cement emergency fire access be allowed. It would be designed to blend in as part of the required cement walkway. Removable posts could be palced to allow access for pedestrians and bicycles. V. LANDSCAPING: First, I would recommend that the applicant be informed to resubmit the site plan to show the following: The applicant should be required to submit detailed landscape plans to the Plan- ning Division for approval with the building plans. Landscaping must be complete prior to occupancy. • Memorandum Page 3 Kjell Stoknes RJB /ckh 13 March 1979 1. A reduction of the width of the parking lot to 60 feet from the present 64 feet. The area created by the reduction to be added to the landscaping along the Interurban Avenue and the northern property line. 2. The specific location of the drainage easements along Interurban Avenue. 3. The location of the 40 -foot wide public access easement along the shore- line. 4. The location of a six (6) foot wide cement sidewalk providing pedestrian access to the shoreline, plus the location of the sidewalk and easement adjacent to the northern parking lot showing the connection back to Interurban Avenue. 5. The access driveway should be replaced with an emergency fire access lane of .twelve (12) feet width. The design should blend the fire lane into the cement walkway. Secondly, the issuance of the Declaration of Non - Significance and Shorelines Manage- ment Substantial Development Permit should be conditioned on the following: • 1. That the developer construct a curb and cement sidewalk along Interurban Avenue within one (1) year after the adoption of the Interurban Plan by the City of Tukwila unless an agreement is reached with the adjacent property owners, such as an L.I.D. and is formalized within that one (1) year period. 2. That a detailed landscaping plan be submitted to and approved by the Board of Architectural Review prior to occupancy. 3. That a 40 -foot wide public access easement be granted immediately adjacent . to the shoreline, along with a pedestrian easement to intertie the shore- line easement and Interurban Avenue, adjacent to the northern parking area. This two part recommendation is suggested to shorten the conditions attached to the Shoreline Permit and have them included on the site plan. CHAPTER 28A.45 F1CW PLEASE FILL OUT COMPLETELY .!r NAME Franklin E. Todd, Jr. and Lu ..o z Joann A. Todd, his wife J Q Lu `n � STREET 14446 59th Ave. S. 1'7 , CITY PARCEL A: PARCEL B: STATE ZIP LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY OR IN CITY OF Tract 1 of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat recorded' in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion lying Northerly of a line which extends Northeasterly, perpendicular with the Westerly line of said tract, from a point on said Westerly line which is 685 feet Southeasterly from the Northwest corner of said tract. That portion of the following described property lying between the South line of South 149th Street as conveyed by Puget Sound Power. & Light Company to the City of Tukwila, by deed dated October 25, 1965, recorded August 28, 1965, under Auditor's File No. 6557639, and the South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. That certain•piece of. land 100 feet wide, being 50 feet in width on each side of the centerline of definite location of the Seattle- Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget'Sound Electric Railway) across that portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim lying within the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, the centerline of said strip of land being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North boundary line of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., 230.7 feet from the Northeast corner of said Donation Claim; thence South 22 °37' East 1497.5 feet to point; thence curving to the left with a spiral having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet, through 7 ° 30' of curvature to a point; thence continuing to the left with an eight decree curve through 23 ° 08' of curvature a distance of 289.2 feet; thence continuing curving to the left with a spiral having 9 chords 21 feet long, a distance of 189 feet through 7 ° 30' of curvature to a point; thence South 60 °45' East 509.5 feet to a point on the left bank of the White River, which bears South 29 ° 58' East from the Northeast corner of said William H. Gilliam Donation Claim a distance of 2443.2 feet, said strip of land in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for highway purposes recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 6557639, 6614483 and 721214- 0434. 1% REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX COUNTY RECORDER NAME L. D. Schneider, a married man as his separate estate and Gary Nilsen and Judy Nilsen, his wife STREET 16625 Redmond Way, Court Bldg. CITY Redmond STATE WA 111.5 (null y:'III ICC mo .•:Itii 1 I, i ,r ier. Pay by cash or certilied check to King Coun ty Recorder. This form subject to audit anti verification and incomplete forms returned. Property Class ZIP } Assessed Value 359600 0610 0% HOWARD D09A10 P 2083i DES mows way 5 SEATTLE WA 359700 0005 04 8022 7000 FRANKLIN E 14546 39TH 49E 5 T13*W11LA 351700 0020 01 8022 501 51140222 HILLCREST ASSOC 117 H HERCER 5T SEATTLE L:. MRCP. U•I1Nla- NNW • AAI011MA/ 359700 0021 04 SANFORD R01 PO S00 176 SHELTON WA 255700 0022 01 'K' PACIFIC TEL A TEL CO 5 15 61 351700 002306 r PUGET IOWMO POSEN8 PUGET POWER SLOG 1111E9UE MA 151700 0024 OS 8022 501 11140222 HILLCREST ASSOC 117 W MERCER ST SEATTLE WA 351700 0040 03 8022 301 31190221 HILLCRESI ASSOC 117 W 1010ER ST SEATTLE WA 331700 0041 05 HOPPER Y A PO w8 S4665 T1ATW11A WA 351700 0042 03 4879 16 1 134796 2 LANG C Y 14120 6210 AVE S SEATTLE WO 331700 0060.00 IE11114I 5818090 G )17.CALLEIA ROMIANI 991,x' IlTENUN ;11'n)16 u PON OF 819 0 ... 18.376 8 1 23801 20900( 00151140139 INTERNIAN ADO TO SEATTLE 1 871,20 7 1 23801 11000 57120 WA 18067 4 T 23801 5135 1 outs 2 10.386 8 1 23801 3570 1177 IMTERUNIAM A00 TO SEATTLE 1 55370 LESS ST LESS M 250 FT $ LESS BEG AT MIM OF M RGM OF S 151TN ST A 98111 SWLY RGM OF 559 1 39 SO P1 OEM AT N/A TO A 30 F1 FR STA 108• 20177 18314 11GNT CO 14009 1177 14111 1177 18111 91111 0371 MOH A11101111111[i4 4 27.35 OF 10 NUN TN 0 22.1890 Y ALC SO 1*11 391.53 FT TN S 11•37.52 Y 150 FT TN $ 22.46.30 E PLT SO 1013 227.33 FT TN S 16.31.00 PLT r 1199 Of S 14150 ST TO RLM Of 10 S 100.26 16'33.10 f AEC 10 9 899 140.51 1/ IN 9 63 91 11 1 0.51 fT TO POO 1*111M9A9 TO SCOTTIE 0 Off 1111 RCM SON S.R S O4P1 ST *1195 AT 1/11 10 $ 30 FT FM STA 100.27.35 OF SS 9119 TO 9 22.46•3 11 111.37 FT TO 1109 IN 00010 9 22.46.30 Y 231.16 F1 TN S 11.37.32 Y 13* FT TO S 22.96.30 E PLT S0 11611 227.33 F1 TN $ 16.31.10 E PLT M 1159 OF S 14179 ST TO 1109 2 191EMM1A0 800 10 SEATTLE POO 9E` AT 101!9 Of M Rix OF S 141111 1 s TM 112 KG 46 SO * Y 111.31 FT TN M 64 SEC 31 111* SS SIC Y110FTTNS039E9 21 RIM SO SIC Y 110.26 FT TO 9 ROM OF S 19119 ST IN S 16 9EG 311110 OS SEC E 140.51 FT TN N 6S KG 41 RI% 10 SIC E 0.51 ft 1 POO 2 101111100100 AM TO 1(41111 *.706 1I1( * 550 F1 AS MIAS ALS Y LO LESS 1T l *0SPON MILT OFL56ECOMCOO TN 1*. ISO TO 10 SIG 911 9 2 r1119AM Aye TO SEATTLE $ POO a KG MY C00 1N $ 230 if TN E 11* 40 FT TNMWL4 TAP ON 0 LM 10 it E Of MW cos 19 W 10 *EC 3 I9IEBUN*A1 800 TO SEATTLE1A.316 0 M 460 FT 1GW 9 1/2 VAC ST AOJ 3 S IMMOMBOAO 400 WO FT LE** 1 17 559 X316 S 1/2 Of VAC ST 804 LESS S1 TITESM*9 9 ASS TO SEATTLE S 129 FT LESS ST av7UL 30 4 1 T 0 1 1 1 F A R C E C 0 1 7 * 9 U 0 O N N E 0 7 j P A L E 23/01 2)001 23,300 11'100 MOO 23001 i _5W0 23101 10161 1111 ,-si i *5.5 A5 I..r 1'100 17 23110t i 71000 1 331000 23801 111000 I 5100 23001 ! IBM P A e G E 1. Wit 541 • 1000744 54 16157 • 1669653 110836 7 1 1165 45714 SSA 0S } 11 M1�E 2000764 N 19661521 913074 1664653 TOILL 2n; 104367 65'46 0404 5750 7 7 28 514 3013 0Y I -. 11 MIIM•r11 II I T MCI I Call issaumme 1111 11 3-1 WNW 79 7!3101 : AME 1 t 1 91w69M 1 0850 our 1 9RNI6 1 NOW w Ige91.5 4,1 359700 0405 04 POPE JQY LARRY 0 14924 6290 5 11xW1LA NA 359700 0420 OS 5ANFOR0 ROM PO 807 1/6 SHELION 6141 359700 0421 04 ¥' SAREIE RICHARD 13044 37111 AYE S SEATTLE MA 359700 0422 03 8022 Sol 51140222 ( 1 NILLCREST ASSOC 117 N MERCER ST SEATTLE 63A 359700 0440 01 SANFORD ROM PO 602 116 S11ELTON AA WICK LAMA. -Mall •M M. 359700 0445 06 010010 COMSTRUCTIOM 1265 240 S SEATTLE MA 359100 0446 OS 0100I0 COMSTRUCTIOM 7265 210 S SEATTLE MA 90101 41100 359700 0960 06 0022 001511051$31216 1000 FRANKLIN E TINMI1LA1N AVE S IAA 98161 359700.0941.05 1 7 utv MGM OF 651, AVE 5 SS ST IMTERUROAM ADD TO SEATTLE P09 MLY I ELY OF lM BEG S11 C0R 98067 OF TR NARKED RES TN 5 43 FT TN E Ply S LM OF IN 3 310 F. N'I TO Alf NGM Of 63711 AVE S LESS 20 FT STRIP ADJ RES 22 20471 'MIMOSA* A00 10 SEATTLE LA 95544 120 OF A P11 70 AVE 5 I POO VAC 11VER ST ADJ LES PON Of 11 22 L? WIMP FOLD AEG 415 FT RELY OF Nil P000 LM OF TA 22 M11N R1N1 Of I1TERIMIAI AVE TN S61LY AT N/A 10 SO AVE 130 FT IN swim AT R/A 185 FT TO 1ELV AT A/A 150 FT TN SFLY 185 FT LESS PON MLY Of LM AEG 330.44 FT E Of SA CON TM 1 22.44.30 15e F1 IN M PLY $ LR 42.48 F1 TAP MCN 1 ISO FT M of Ay LM Of ST NMY TM M 22.44.30 4 PL1 SO 14*? TO M LM OF TO 22 22 23 18.314 CO377 IMTERYMAR A00 TO SEATTLE AS roe viie es 98141 AEG AT INTOV01 S ST SO TR FOLS 22 P000 E AI7M 4LY RIG1 OF 11TER11RSA1 AVE STN ARAL! *LC SO 1A.? MGR 51 FT TN M 128 FT IN SELY ►LL TO S0 AVE SO FT TO S LM OF 22 TM E 120 FT TO IEG 22.23 11.316 1177 i1TER11RAAM A00 TO SEATTLE POO Of 22.23 LA MLY Of LM SEG 338.64 FT E OF SW COO TN M 95119 22 30 M 51 Ft TN M PL7 S LM 42.41 FT TAP ACM 111 150 FT A Of AL! LM OF ST 1MW TM 122 44 30 M P17 SD MMY 10 1 11 Of TR 22 A VAC ST AOJ 20877 ��I8 A00 TO SEATTLE /4 98504 of S L R22P0 V S S LM EIMEAS ALG IMTERURIAR AVE S I POO VAC RIVER 24 10.316 4 18 re 8 e sammommum 111 1: 8171 1 4016 LG 4131412118.? OF 107 I 111MYARE TN 1YL91A1 SIN TO RS AVE 131 FT TM 894.5 AT 1/A 103 ft is RELY AT 1/A /S1 IT TN EEL? 185 P1 22-/3 18.386 70 *071 1 A 2* i I VW 77 S� w ? 1Er :lief 2t 8 SLIL5 L1 11 AV91711 IILT i0: ? Pt vs my / 151 FT TN 818.5 AT 11 F1T AVE 131 FT TM 1EL? 1 Al N1A 10 IP01 22 2 A� 4 10.386 70 1T TO 23.2 8 VAC �IME1 ST IT �� $ A t M I F pPpFOSS OF 1L? V ATE TM ? 1E IT1 FT T1 ITS FT TO MOLT Ft TO Y1 AT 10tt LE 31 FT TN OIL? AT 0/A TN•ti11 21 1$3$3(110.386 t0 ELT V CO Alues ILV TAO FT OF LILT I2SFT M Pus ALG LILT I $ LOS Lt 1T NLIT 5 Re T 23501 ; 5000 4141 T T T T T 1 T T T 23401 23401 j 11200 1 1 1000 23801 23804. 2300' 2� 63100 461600 23401 41'000 1 24300 PANCiE 1 3 1 4700 00 2304 SOSO 23001 1100* 51w 2241 1 (3494 56F1 00 RI 1 wfi � 0 2 4 RS1 9 I T1 U } 1 354;81 a ON 15946 22431 10T y 1405 02 Tit 103110 M 449!11111 ►r P A G E MSC/ 11■n ►MACK 444/144 -IYN A MM000/ 14441.11114:11114104 NILLr*NS SEATTLE GARDEN IR 1 2 10 10,341 H1LLT7NS SEATTLE GARDEN INS E 45.5 FT OF 1 4 2 LESS S 14 FT L0 E OF W 131.5 F1 6 LESS W 72 FT 1.2 13 18.386 NILLIIANS SEATTLE GARDEN 71S 1 LESS w 137.5 FT 1 3 18 FT OF 2 LESS W 137.5 FT 1 10 18.386 N1LL1M15 SEATTLE GARDEN ENS W 72 FT 3 14 18.306 WILLMAR% SEATTLE GANGER TIM 1 1 10 14.366 MILLNANS SEATTLE GARDEN TRS SLY SO FT MEAS AI A,A F0 S LN • 14 11.386 HILLMANS SEATTLE 0440EN IRS LESS Sly SO F1 MIAS AT N'A FR S L1 12 3 15 14.346 HILLMANS SEATTLE GARDEN TINS LESS NO 4 1 . 11-6 , 7 13 18.386 HILLMANS SEATTLE GA4014 1RS LESS ST NWr 4 15 14.346 1411106 G6 1 SEATTLE 0EN TRS LESS ST LESS ST MWy 9 15 18.386 141`11161 SEATTLE WAIN TRS LESS ST LESS S1 MW? IS 1 1 .314 1 SEATTLE cam* TAS MILLM6 RDE LESS ST LESS ST s M 1112 13 11.314 4 1 re i 76 T 70 T 71 T TI T 11 T 7 T 71 T 71 1 F8 T 76 T 16 1 =1 i 2)001 : I 23001 •, 1 23001 23401 T i i! ; 1 23801 i E 1 23601 I 23401 23801 23001111000 23801 23001 23101 PAIR 1 • 'AOa 11500 1 100C 23100 1 }} i V1o0 ! 0400 23000 1 i )<t00 109 1 1 172 1 1 1 521500 991500 i i i 14100 1 i ' 1101 i 11 *00 I• 1 . i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ; EL: MML i 4345,5 ! i i 1 1 ! } I i 1 1 i i i 1 i ! ; I ! i ! 0016 VM 29961 $top? 06101 S 0T\5 I g� ' ; 259124 i i . 371 1 1 96 i i 1910U 1 1 !277 { 11 1 C5924 1259121 1 i 12 }l1 1 211 smarm ! 1 3 1 I 1 I 1 i • j i 1 ; 1 I 1 i 1 i 1 S f f I . 111 I { 1 1 i 4 1 . 1 .i I 1 I 1 i ! ! 1 ? t 1 ; ! 3 1 1 i 1 i ! i ! i E ! i 1 11 ! NN TO? 4545d2 ' ! 1 } i i 1 ' 1 1 I i: . 1 c 1 ! i ! 1 1 ; . 179969 : $2c3? 84!11 07145 i 1 r41;29 i 1 {31100 i i I i i !16Si?b 1 111411 1 I 1 21 . 251121 1 !231 i 211440 06 M10UMT ti 1 ! 1 i i 11 i 1 NEST PAO i i INC7 Y not 1 1 1 f PAGE -102? Jotsliv01071276 T000 fNANKLIN E 1',004 591N AYE S 1U41411I.A WA 94061 336590 INS 04 P0g1NEN RONALD v 10254 59714 alt S SEATTLE WA 98148 336590 1306 05 par15 W 6 5904 S 1 %0TH TURWILA WA 10047 336590 1347 04 P01714EN LENA 1521 S KENTON SEATTLE W 94118 334530 1355 03 1260 200212631 0476 F11[AS TEO 7 16%12 R10401411 SE 5NOM0M15N WA 94290 336595 1340.04 4511 91601101776 1NE1.13 S C 1 %250 59TH AWENUE S SEATTLC WA 14181 334590 1341.05 7055 IT 2 00211 0%77 510(11SER Davie 14214 59TH AYE S SEATTLE IM 91144 336590 1365 01 PUGET SOUSA POWER 6 LIGHT CO PUGET POND SLOG 6ELLEWUE WA 14004 334590.1370 0% 0 FI0AIT0 CO INC 6 %1 NW 48TH ST SEATTLE WA 907d7 336590•1395.05 METRO LANG DEVELOPMENT INC AOST4 PO 601 660S0 TUKWILA WA 1114 336590 1100 00 METRO L110 DEVELOPMENT INC 06914 PO 101 16050 TUIWILA WA 94111 336510 1401.03 MET60 L60 OE0ELOP11E11 INC 00574 10 601 66050 TUKWILA W 98148 134590 1415 SEATTLE WA 14550 1735 09 MtlRLL AIr01-110/ AAA SEGALE M610 A 14010 S CERTEN PKWY TUKWILA WA 334510.1125 01 W000 J 11105 IMIERSUM6 AVE S TUKWILA WA 334510 1435 07 I� S 1I6�AY0/A0 AWE S TUKWILA WA 3 TUK K WIL A tC 310 CUTS 1(10 VIRGINIA A 14011 51714 1 TUKWILA W 334,907111S! OS _ '0146 wall 14146 AOSTA 16161 Mt/ 1S1AS 40171 18141 M L1 SEATTLE L SS ST 13 14.396 I/11T NAA1 amor11p NISS1 AMU IS A 11.3„ 7 $.314 IS 16 OAKS SEATTLE / 1A06E6 I11' LESS M 0it 114 6 TMl 1L 14 1 1 1 1A.%AL IA 1 1 t 2)001 2310 P A 0 C E 23161 2316 231K , 1411 L 1 01 0 T I N U a J N f N k 1 1 o a E L 640 41C1 • • OM ' ,1,67'1U 1707 U! LORE JEli 142YILAMTERUR/AN AVE 5 336510 1510 OS 400 SEATTLE TRUST BLOC RE 1EUEMUE WA MNCs1 MIMEO -M1111 1.010119116 134590 ISIS 00 LOCK AM 00475 14211 IMIERUMAI S SEATTLE NA 14161 336540 152. 09 2821 295425 1174 AIEL E 4 13082 SITS AVE S SEATTLE W 14168 334590.1525.08 RESLOCK 38301.0 M 16431 SYL.ESTEN NO SW SEATTLE 11A 98166 316590-1530 01 ALASKA PACIFIC ERECTORS INC 30115 3900 L1N0EN AVE N SEATTLE W 18103 331590 1550 06 ALASKA PACIFIC ERECTORS IMC C0415 3900 LIMO AVE MO SEATTLE W 91103 336590.1510.02 C NMETT IMC 545 13011STNr ON SEAIILE YA 334590 1510 00 LEE AWN N 6991 S 1447N TuKWILA MA 336540.1590 01 SCNYALN ELi2A3E7N M 73Al31LA 334590 1600 06 YIESE A S 2/603 Y .ALLE9 NYY KENT W 33 4330 180001 1605 0 5030 251N AVE S SEATTLE 1M 336590.1630.00 5030 T 251N AVE S SEATTLE NA 334510 1650 05 Aillia lall11110.Rrtr AAA 3 ANNUM �M AI S 336590 l*S 01 9 2 015 S 1391N SEATTLE IM 336310 *610 04 MINNOW NM9 A 6238 1 14340 ►L TYN111LLA HA 1/2 LESS ST 13061 �� t6 15 11.354 00178 M1L1MA3S SEATTLE GAMOEM TRS S611.1 1/2 OF 25 0 PON 24 Yl1 OF 48004 L■ N31G AT 1 TO WV LM FM PT 121.925 FT NELY OF MOST SLY EOM LESS ST 14148 1106/ 14031 91104 94104 14002 91160 NAM r.Cw1+1 26 5 NILLNAMS SEA11LE TNS LESS S1 11144 21 HILLMANS SEATTLE INS T$4.53 5 FT s 111111ILA N00(3 A30 4 6104011 M I11NAMS SEAT7 N TITS (341 Y 0 AS A3 *LC S LM MILl14N3S SEATTLE TAS LESS N 113 FT 1.2 3 4 16 11.346 NIIINAMS SEATTLE GANOEN INS M 113 FT 5.6 16 11.346 01/4 NILLMAMS SEATTLE CANON 105 94118 1.4 16 09.0170 NILLNANS SEATTLE GAMIN INS MILLNMO SEA111.E16ANOt3 103.314 F0216 11 ILLMANS SEATTLE INS 0111100 s 105 11 TWO 20 16 18.346 NILLMAMS SEATTLE GAAOEM INS 21.22.23 16 11.316 8 e 3 e 10 le I/ IL 15 13 1e 4 1 1 6 3 1 11 le ,......... 00 11 1 211 NILUMMS 8t*1Tlt 78112 1 +3.4 11 316' 1 0014.4.3888 StItlLI a OF 105 ALl OF 1 2 3 8 1 9 981 ' ITT I11F 1 LO f Lt Mi11 /M: itt • F1 8 1123401. 1 23801 1 T T 1 1 1 1 1 T T 1 1 1 1 T T T T 1 23101 2310 2310 2343. 1 3 2340 1 13101 !1 23111 / 1 23481 1 23801 1: 23101 21 23001 2 160 490 400 300 2610 20 23104. 23101 23101 ; S 23401 23101 i 514 23401 3 3 0 N • t } MI 23101 2 200 13 [4921 •22041 l /Y1 2415r 1330 25140 so 47101 QO! INK NO VI I. ISIUE wire 1 16 F F /4621 1 2135 2206 } ftrfat 19157 150 5740 42213 4.11 1 144 146663 1131 0, N 6 3 U 2psi,pr • „sox /682 91161 F Al•l�w 0010/11111•••11 11K/ • 0•11 PAGE 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Affidavit of Publication ss. Ann...E.....W.31bty being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that glib the Chinf...Clark of THE RENTON RECORD- CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a Shoreline Application as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 2 consecutive issues, commencing on the d®1 ,19 .. 7.g..., and ending the 15 day of .0.0 t. , i .8.... both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.46.4. 5which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Subscribed and sworn to before me this O C t. 19.. Y.P.C. Form No. 87 Notary Publ Chief Clrk 15 day of .WA nd for the'State of Washingt'on, residing at Kent, King C nty. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • ! • 4 • 414 4611 41 1E4 ,11,0010 1:6 L - " . c!SsceiPTI Laic, tyseol- . 1 1 o w ; 5 . c3 7 d 1 At„ 7 4 4 T6la WalaISH 1:1 PIM% • 4c:AL4 1":11■3* • gh srlo.rie - e e w tv 11 i E) r Slo" - 1 ) PIN I PPPI I I I PPW1 41 1 111 1 111 1 1 0 1 WHIPPIPPIWWWWIMPIPPRPRIO ' lik 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OE or Se a vz CL PE CZ et It 03 61 CI Lt 91 CI ti 'CI tl 11 01.1 , _... 1110 M 1111111 4 11101111,1 0044414014 1 40 111 1 1 6 111 4 1 0 111 1 1 , MIIM6160.401/1444401 . 1111611111 1 t , ;.„ --- 7111 • 7"*- ,;* .-t•- •-I44 ra• ..:". IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOI THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTI L 1 we' _re r 1 * • - • • •: ao *--- 7(:)A=e4 4 Tr.AIL EAlrotE047..la 4:11Kap ,:ragwa.e, ft. 1 De c fl JS.21 ,p 1,tidt : Wt1.48.1.2TON Cr4o/4.4■41111 • 2rvait Dawr Atrylf, ,troa Ogi - mizoceet ta•C6 12•CK sz•Ls rarritox mmi Elam that portion lying Northorly of a line which . • , . extends Ilprtdonstax rb ig. heoodictd with th ar wio deaterly line of oaid tract, from a point on said Weotorly lino - which in 665 feet Southeasterly from the Northwest corner of eaid tract. PARCEL 9, That portion of the following doscribod proporty lying between the South line of South 149th Street no con- ' veyed by Puget Sotod Power and Light .Company to the City of Tte.twila, by deod datod October 25, 1965, re- corded August 28, 1965. under Auditoeu File .No. 655707, and tho South line of the Northeast qunrtor of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. W.M.. In , King County. naabington. That certain piece of land 100 foot wide, being 50 feet In width on each side of the centerline of definite location of the Soattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now 0 p Puget Sound Electric Railway) across that portion of tho William R. Gilliam Donation Claim lying within the Northeant quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North. Range 4 East, W.M.. in King County. Washington, the centerline of told otrip of land being more particularly described as follows. 1 4004.4 ... palcai*A:41e17. ' vh;?. Fr • Nor 49 1426 52; FT ...pAi2141t4‹, sT,ALL-5 . _ . 115TAI. . 0F 'FsT p(2..:., 5a; Fr OF 428A re2./ 24,4 , so;Fr NET' 3 + 41 .. .. 7 UMILUXAX 7 (On 114- 61 (..1 Tract 1 of Interurban Addition to Senttle ac cording to 10 of' Plata. page 55, In . . 0 OA %31 _c4V.MS., ... .. , , i • ! il..: • !I i; (I : 0 . )P 1 g:133; . 1 31 . — • ! i ' : ! :1 , Beginning at a point of the North boundary line ok the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim in Section 23. Town- ship 23 North, Range 4 Sant. ,.I1.. 230.7 feet from the 1:2 . . i 0 ...; ,,. ! thence outh 22 oat 1497 feet to oint .T.i, ;14 p 'thenco curving to e left with n spiral loving 9 chordu !! Northoaat corner of mad Donation Clnimi tho !!, 21 feet long. a diutanco of 1b9 feet, through 7 of . S. g.5 p; 1 Es curvature to u point; O. qi 4 . thence continuing eurtimiltotthitloth viAht decree curve W 7'10 thraugn 23.o8 . of curvature a distance of 269.2 feet, it' . la V ,' .....,,, ,, thence continuing to the left with a upiral '. having 9 chords 21 feat long, a distance of 569 feet ' --.“, .7 r l i F-0 throu,h 7.30: o curvature to a oi t. loft bank of the White River, which bean. South 29.51. thence South 60 45' Ecot 509.5 foot o a point on tho t : ... .t;17.41; East from the Northeast corner of uaid William H. . Gilliam Donation Claim a dintanco of 2443.2 feet, uald W is.of land in King County, Washington. •' that portion convoyed to the State.of Washington 1 1 ;::: . for highway E63 urposeo recorded under Auditor's P m' ile No 6557639, 6614 and 7212140434. 47 117EV16131,4 • r /i � ` • 110::17 11P 'X,»a B • ? � ..4019111 eguiii,e.ri "We, art :' Acc. -;, • 1.6.eaff ; cROSS.z O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 _QFLEXIBLE IIUIEB•70]J•W OE 6Z BL LZ 9Z SZ 4Z EZ ZZ iZ 0Z 61 91 hi 91 SI 4I 'CI Zl II Oi 1HUlmi1mdim1uulmi6ulmi1uuing1nulnn1nnlun1nulnuIuulmiluuhmluulmilmdmi1uulou1uuhni1uu6m1milmi1mduu1milmi1uulnu1ooluu1u 24x IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • • ti.L. • . I • • //ML (e /% A:2.4 /sr %M /TS. 70:4-14.1 Harr iz f1/V4 (:I Zo,4) - /✓o i.rio< e {' .4ccr >s ova/"'i✓ic r%ii o . ,4 /zo,v7 'z. SCALE/ %: f0� I S>`o in� . � ' �c.�cfni,E. 6� /n.7/i�is'a /e ✓ i>`ial�s e!` ,� /i /of On 3Z. '!2 r. freed. .• /e44; JVOi9BOSZ• d/JrlJ! it r�+ 11rji1. rArr4jprt • • 2s 20 _ ... . tgorY.nln� /y�,� /�O /, 1r�irnl11ntni 3 4-/ Fiol/. G 2B. a , • OE eZ ee LZ 9Z 9Z az CZ zZ tz OZ M e, a 91 9i a$ 'eI n a OL;. mlbiu�ull�il�� lriplluttllll !U ��I u m ari6ilu1401011li1111,0 uu 11411104 61 ud�ulliil104III,141.41111 • IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 • L r0.0-1E tV--g t•T• tV,Ke,,,YLMI.Z ' , •',.;:t . V, — ,-. ... r kk.1 , 441 4 -04a,rpr.44 , 4,4 ,4 47 , •'qr .14.44 , ... , 4t,;,..44 /011,44 alit5.4,:e.pi 4 , - ._;&feu• ,,,, -51 , •$...ree..4.*,% 10 •0 1 * , „ m. 417,. 4,, • - .4 ,c4fisreilue4 .`"•414,f4 . ,,,s4,444,40,, .A14414/kw44 1 4 p■, 0:. 4- • 1 Lhxtitii n,, 4 19kpft.. XXX,Ltilg... , . ,.. ,...., No p-4.*1-,., rii,•: . ,%;ar vara4tAv iP -- .1, 4 4.:4.4.0. :PisF4Ft ,_ 404 . -1 • 0 041f1... 411;lit.'‘..1 a4404....10."4. ').4, 4 :,'•*70 . 0114 ... . XX.r4B9P LA 1 tfefeL.1` i4 ,12.,...s.A. . } .it' .',.* tik., , ,,, 01,, ,, %-y- i L , , ..ii.. , r e — 4 '••- '0 .- 411 .fl..; T / 10.'4 - 44,, 4.4 4 • , . , 4., 4. '.4 otel.-4r a - 4.4.: 4: 94,1, .4.14 •Xt , Fd...., S., 1. ',..,,,,' ..1 , ,...ok: y 4,1, i 1.4V 10...14 iP,PV21., t.'• - Jh •CLV‘ .,..t04 4 .Q0 ;4 416 ‘ P 114 , • ,i ^ 'I)* I i giNgr*P A OPi i/..r Oti V • 0 "'' ',I -...' V • 4Y1 '',''....;;;;;.• Vit:',CA,J, trt .1 ■ 4 •t"Li - 4 ..St •■•• , , ...r, ',Al . : ' 0 7 11 .914 ig02111672 111 MI, • "MN • ' n•B !" tEFAI 4 • • IrrrOKIAPA' ,`" • ,• • • , -.;•" .4,•;•• -- • ••• • •' • lipppoopppoiwinquilwoovOwpoiwOupopopopopirpiiiiliiiiilitliwilily 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -•••• . -- (T:,4 •‘-." .,• k* ,1444": • t4- ' • •• FLEXIBLE nuLut -302 A W 37.74 OC GZ BC LZ 9Z GC Ve CZ CZ t Q Z 01 CI LI 91 GI 71 'CI EI U OL 24x 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT 1S LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT - ■7 71 :1 -7 " 1 , 0 . „! o'Pa .:.C�0 ,.:42,2Yr ;.a .,.r4R..,rsF.4fs � .. . . ; ::.; .!• J'7 r NO.- .11 0.4$,°6^•1947,9:7te,-•-•,` ^+P, -, ;:Y•• .... ;mo w }•.; +t+"..;:n.s ;%DA1E :GW'it,' , 1 f: yf✓ 1 ^ r h, 1'1; •` L'%ON'411RJ .'8.b$' *I:8TE$ „d:; OI,Vl ENGINE ,,, . 220l:aw. isiiin- OfATIli NiAmmefoN (0161' . • '242 •d04i :,� ,ras,;• „y_ f (; Y 1 . `j? ,N 1 . g ,,4:• - " :. /q � „U ' ',At 15029 .' Su r a . f v L or: .S N DEVELOPMENT c/u GAN C rERpRisE 883 9730 ?6625 REDMONP WA r, Sr 204- REDMOND., w/1 • 980S2 _ tlui O a . DAir, ;7 ,,,. %S DRAWN . : .�. /35 ,. I • • •_ 'i' ' "'' OF 1':'';; r .5) ,'4 � l0' .S...fenrE.r. • •4,r 61709 �"' •,' k b, l y • • + 4 , N 1V m 1 ,4 PM4 j: :ARE 1440 so. Fr. 2.0 ACRES EadE aF PA V,N . 5 5. R. 181 M.P._ 9.17 i ft. P. 13.32 (v .. 79.90 : u 1 1 n.: 1 e I t •e•' of C S S F t� r r,, ,o- r D , a r Pr LE - � )' y 1 d 6 t5 M .;�5�. RocK �I S , p i . . T.; p. �,o ) T ` GHIDEN �, l V ' L P, �< • .;< `Q� 1 5 \ d j" ❑O iZE. s zoo _i_ "i . • `q1 '�' 17',..t,' . • �ti o� by So, CORP. LIMITS OF TUIY IVILA 1 TV FOSTER 1NTERCHA ioE I NTERURBAN AVENUE S. i 4. L: X 11 i11 1; 1111j11(1 i0111111111111j111jf11111111 1X11111)lililijriIiiil.1 filililiitill`ifi li(i'11i 1ftl IFIil� 0 •• ^• ^•' 1 2 4 5 6 7 8. • FLE %IDLE nULEa •7bR Aw,7m� OE 82 D. LZ 9Z SZ bZ ea 22 IZ OZ 01 al Ll 91 SI bl 'El 21 11 01, Iuldluiluu111aII1n111NIu11111i11 4 111m 1 liii11m111111ffiu1ua1161louluuluiiimilmduulpuhmlludlmllpihullwouloiduiiluillonluplmiloplllnlil 4 0 4' l a 71 G�FFv fJ /aA• Nom` 1 y/ l� e a 7:a1.1. R.R_ r,:,< •i -',• E. r:4, T _ P JnR, Sew. M . Rim 23.04 E /e,.. 26,97 q, g / N✓„ 1x23 .1 . • I 1 1 0 % y b 1 / 5" '3 •P Pr.,^Agrf 5",,..A' 14 300 /s' o , E�r.mr „1 - - 1V /,r 7x121 a r. P, q i � V v r \`'-' F _ A r 73097 05 , .,^ 777 �_ . +< ,•� . Irt' � •:- } '• " < ..' tiv7 N21''24.•3-4,W,.... � j , • I .... a �� f - r } cL g /2 / 0 0 SA N. SEW. /1,H• Rim 29,06 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT 1S LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ytiri ,FARegL • ?runt i e Inl.rttr1 + Pdd ktio1't1 S egttloi d 4°`4,Iw yppodb 1Lio '..'4 p_ _u, p*Rb 551 • Lo,nty ` ►aahti> v +loti► ; 1 1 4: i pr..bi t p. tdnS •N'o4•b'hez¢Y:of lido whlch•,extpnia",14rif eaalori J. 4letctsr';p)tlt•the:ttert47e 9 1,La d 'ui andil 'NiS ° " on_;i h.h SonVe khlch..in '43 f.ril'. ~ou`OlreaatuNtJ f'rart, the. Forthworcl;aoiioer iiai i tr ctr 1 •2 Th v o i it a n'0i thet $o 11cpyirg dgg7•itwd pr°perty lying,Lntv.an pe 5to. 3 south 1149th a:ro at�ya ocQ40ynd 1y � PlN id LS ¢m ' to th0 ¢tily r Tuinrilla ) . ;tY d>5 '�0o#ober .5, 9G5.• 7o •,tbuaet - 49494, umle�' W1tot T1de„ %116: 6$39 11 t ' Sout hhltne of t he , 1loltfe4ot.qu. t4 no1 �aq`tC4K$ ' 'fri 2o� : 3 lI 11 7bi Kb,''4 �ita Y ,1} r i UnQ Couhty'i za I G •s Thnt oak4atn �teo * �}ttAd 0 fee;L r>xla boin 5ei.ri°i :A.. •vtdth on a ohtal live tot i Sau o o f ,- t e a l''he so'a Taaop,q,Ln tnn (now %!uget nd Eied tLL c 1MaJ): ZO1IU tM .Pot'ti f { t he?N3 ign C11 snl D o 7 t t en Clo4 7 �Lthi R the Iio rt * ° l gUistwr 4t o 2eftibn:'13 ' 1.y'tA �e•.hg.14 P ila''I a Af 0minty, I;ath ng t,Tu.can o en'71p. 45'.F id ' . .1.44ibing uore .p'nr c 1I W d eac 'r 1Ted e a f ellown! r a li .. •; t ,9 o ginMn6. et t P 4 UTf"o:� 'yt he 17 orth Iw a1' U[! w,t11' NN yiCt ,i,on�. fldtat3 n' Clain i x j{gptll 2 Q, Todnoh 3 itart171 Rdnga l Fb 11 N , 2 3O7tt Y oM!L IIl O h e e a tl 1 11 n}}1L.s1l n faun. c17c1ki '.04iao�Bo li�'L'O3`f• t V 7 t 5"�eel L . ii poidti :/i , • .� , �''is'h`r` tiBBo;:�f,1i � vZ 1 J .. y;.eliotdil li ai.4t • r}' dM1 9C � 89�. fo "i ;d�. hzrnl 7 U eti34n' €tZro'Ut4 1- )i Jt i 'ri: t j 13 Sp 1tf [i•;' thgnCe;; luhid t 4. 2 d i ' R•,.alth:± :oiCht.d.g 4 otirn.';il -xOt h4'""q atr 1 3danq �89ta feet�'1 ;.; •ti�btc'. u'`;` -h' 'thbado'\eoittiimi:n6c'" ° ) AtAi•tpo T • ti: vitt;:h'oplhil „tiaictilj( ?}'•; hbni.4:• b '4.LA LlV d'af- 489 t' i, . ,thr'atl(b 7 °30 of rliOttaro •to p pots% t < -1 / 1 f E fc t sou�l1 °4 7 5 fi feat tq n po!of on 1hp:Iakt bn111e a4 .he Yh& • �. • ioii mjSa14 fkiit SX t1 thn Nol`E1w3o!G�dorMp Q#Pn }td; A� • ) 0t 214aM/i4}.1 `p o9Pin'Gl1 < �n R dtatanee at' 7A43;p, ft •diiq se el. tat o1 a4of KLr4: Bouptyy'•. Vaahlcj, o4Jti t t' . + L7(Cg'Pr' oicf# !! eyod i to she stato of •N�..yhtnpt ;n h ljiiiA; td'oo r,AlMt'toit ?>s • Ft1e Noa 6557639,�eh1ititni3Ond J2t21.40 1• 300 C C04r Or l'nwi ' SFrr4 EArcnrNr /03200 ^ 11 4 (a4.rr1 ...), • R.M 25,6 • 1wr, I4.O 11 0, b�V • k1 r"f •_ '� °t '5 t it-31-3 &P 5 ); 5 / / / I • P wn r 111 wimp flitrIpill 1 ►11t1T1111'11 rlifrrjn r 3 FLEMIBLE RULER -3O Awgmr OE 6Z Be LZ 9Z 9Z 6Z CZ ZZ IL oZ 61 BI LI 91 GI VI 'CI ZI II 00 1 _.JIII111111111111111111pI111111001111110II 1 JIII1I41 1111 I1IIIIf J 1Ril 6111IIII II111111111011l11J111111UI111111111161111l161IIl1ll. 1111IIII 111111111111II111111111111111111p1111 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT 1S LESS` CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOf THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. . , „ '1 1 : a pPir1111111111ropi ' fp] ' ' 2 3 4 5 8 • 0 e 5Z 04 LE 9Z SZ VZ CZ ZE M OE M M a WM 91 cl a 11 OL. ....,_10111 1 . • ' • • . . . ' IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ' I' ,.; • r 4. �'� ( ' Imjr ' 11r1O1 •ft1iTf.if�1.IJIi1i11rl�ir� ti 0• »•»» 1 2 4 5 6 7 8.• l oc sz D. ez 9x sz az ea zz iz OZ 'CI zI u 0 .... 1114111104401i104giil40 4inip4010101141di400116i 4d4 I ip.(igdii 1001i)mil41001 6dUuh ! • IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS _CLEAR THIS NOTICE, I ORIGINAL DOCUMENT II�III�III�I�I�III�III[9 FII[EI[i111r l lil�Tl1(I�nFpll�fj�il r11T I1T[I1f�T�l(T�I�r�l�I�l jgT(�1�T�f�i�f�i14 r 3 ; IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 1 0 •TM•� 1 2 4 5 6 7 8• = �FLEXI6 LE PULEN- 76�AWFiRCSr z {l 24x CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOi , THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 0E 62 BC 22 92 92 92 C2 22 12 OZ 61 BI LI 91 BI VI • CI 21 II Ol f 11111111111111 1111, II1III11111111111I10114IIp111 ,d1110111)f 111IIII1))IIIl1 411 11 1 1 111111 1 111IIIIII111111IIIIII111 111 I1111111I111U1111 1 1111111111111111111111111111111III1p11111 gk • ._..r + ri ®► "o . %ice► •'irO�" srlld� it s irlf��� utli.' 'i .�== ���a•►. �� NWT ! W e : MI I ®0. ®®PI ® 01�s � BMW ® ®® IMO 1� I hI I R •L.. 'ali. JH� .r.Yr 1, � {C '�, � .�� 4�`�% � (� 1rf7 + ���� �I® ...•'Iib`Vif, "t`. vilfih;«& 11.U�.1 cr :: :� \a^.aax.(F .r laths ....2 : .4.. :' '' Y'r Ms. .11411.1111:4 ®ll1t1 r ®31 ®1111,111 1I 1®1 :1 ®1' 1 ®1® 51F 1I III1 �. 4�717 �Af•1•l•�Naw. I� �1 lil �� 1 11 ® ®il1ri1 ® � 1 ®I1 11,111F1 F e 4 Ht=j 4ti -lo_ w , •per ° - : jir s 111111 i i 1 lLt "'CV 177711J11114 SHEET,'f: r 111Ili illirfi1 ?rrr ijij l rfrf 3 4 ..1.,2P_E: ..�q ro)I. "OR.-• tiwY1la1.1 AW is asR rapesS,�ravne+� . `'0 �� `° � WAWA § WA WAWAtrA��►®AVA►V.A'N f ? l i h RU9¢ rDi � 5LGP2:; T � EGTo�I: THSU 4x1 - , JOB NO .' .SHEET '' 1 '� 1T11,I)IrI)I l� 5 6 7 IA FLEMULE RULER•202AWW ,�—._ OE 62 D. L2 92 92 92 EL 22 I2 OZ 61 91 LI 91 9I bl 'CI 21 11 Ol Im dmi�uill) ul�) plhull) Il lllllll�l l�Il))` Ip) �Igp�)) III�I) II) I�) hl ull udlollll) dmlll lgllltllludull llllllUllllllll) I!! I))) ll) I) I )ulha�utdm)�uub)liluidllulmdpuh ! IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS' CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO1 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT rYPE :TOP • 20.00 . 11; IV% 10.00 t.70 * GAL- 4; 'TYPE 1- TOP+19.40 • • 1.E,8"•:10. 10.45 TOP .2040 '; ',10P • .20.00 ' • I.E. 16.5 0.oio NM. DISTURBED stopE9 • NO1E: REFER TO. DRAVJNevBY OTNE • FOR RIVER BANK DETAILS 4.c.1911 mypRoEEEP ALL DIEURBED • • • 17ELF-,2*, 5•0.015 -EUB,GRADE• inga=j imagism wI , 0 ''',AOTH..,.&:440014T11111,IINCiii on. •- oyme•witp 1 ,1111 1 * ) 2.. , ; fiii 11 $: 442111111 S" 3115.1' 42P 1.11. # . ; I r !liA :g f"C; • 1 7. • 'i,tV4ZP V. 4 ■•"..` , ekt.,51{47.,„. EELF-12.! LE.27.0 RIPRAP, ,.NEAV ALL • , , ) a I 1 - ' ' to t : l s l : T 6, TYP C; I' • , cs. , E. TOP 24.40 C.B. G 1 . 7 4 P . : 1. : ‘1'....21. 30 "; • - . ' TOP = al. 20 ' ' ' • ' • )•. • . • "t • ! ,3,70,n,f,MaKROMIlitti7tIlMtx,,y,•,4,,",4:7,11"--L•aw.e..,0••=,10•14v.1‘ 041t41,01t$117.1.jt" 11111111[11 01111TlirlifillitilirlipippirpinTryfyi 1( 3 4 OE 8 D LZ 9Z SZ VZ CZ ZZ I Q G 01 LI I t t 'Cl CI II 01 . „1111111111111111111111111111011111110111111111111111110IIIIIAIM FLEXIBLE FLX8L flULEI • 302 AWmon, IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS . CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT _ . 7:•P' '71‘' 4 - /115,0 e /So' • Afrrs...- Ark, : • ..f07% • • ._#,P% IVA 4/tre 440,7 7. • / ' 2$ C72,17,.~449 of , • :i0Kr• .4.14-34.4ged ft• /Ofe 61%.272: 2.972- 7/ ern en ./r/O // ./144 ,o-to e...4"4.wegfolf • 11...V ,, c ; M • '''‘ USit*'4 rF • 2 .-;/..64-.." • . t2,.; . 1 Tfig=1- •-• itrla • . f /0 .71 Cr -14. • • Pt • :4 • • voloc" /- ?Ad. / 45:0 • •C of/ r- 74.• I • • ••••••••!". r PS 1 • 441: 20 of 20 - 6' • • .• • •_ - • 1_ ••• -• ..... --•-•- • n-re 44,4 ...4 11 3 OC 6Z DC LZ 6Z SZ VZ t 1Z Z 61 et a 91 91 I CI Z1 11 0 , „ ■ flic/L (-2.0- 75) e /14 R c • .,.........:. -....2,..i.“....;•.•„•.,;:.•:•.' "...i.•!.....• .../,1,,,.....• ••'...............".'.. ''•• • •••,,,..:,.....', .... • ' 0 . . a x"../../: .6 7 / // 17-- 4 ::.. / 20 Aeo.e/zo,vr..vz Xer/c 0 eteo& • -.1p/r."' o ' /8/ C0..4:. //v / Pa of 7b,e7-1//4.., To /f7' 2:4/nr.eov,..xwar , • • b • . • .., • . /AB I. .,;, IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS P?,_CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO .....). ...', THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • • -. . '.• • -1 : • • • • .• • •. - . 7 • • - ' '• . • : C. C • • • • . .r . '''';‘':.•\ • • •• ,. ••'•'.:.• ' •••.--,-.•••:'•-;:',-„!..1'...... • ...".1, .".,. : . 1 , ' : . E ::.'• :. ., ... . .. . .. • . ,., . ,,• • . '."..,' , • .• •' . ..„.. . • , ... •: ',. • •••••!.: ....'•.:••-y.;•.:',-:, - ••. •• . •:• • . : .. .. • l'.••••• - • ' . •••••._, , g: . ..k.. . 77„;. . ;37.„. :: .: •••i,i .. .; . : . i.w .,. :).?*.:0..-t;..t....,,, . ... .-. k ...70 .. 4ti : '.'.., .. ; .:•• .. ••• . ... . ‘ . ,..".....:..,,;:.: . .,,... ,i, .. .., • • •/.0 - ..;: / g.,.. .. 6: ,4•' ii../ /1 . 4. '' t .. ,'*" • ,i ' • • : :. . . .i • • • . • r I• { t { II�1�tll I! hI iill„li I {�� aft 7 74 rt BDf Y vY 1.9/A- ZYAS77 7 W w• rJ {,. , 'c - /G /!lY /a7", 4 em o' s rNS { i \ ..... \ENI ..' ; • /B /• . Jr 9.%7 : 72 .lJ.° /3.02 so.. qeerf : . /,G 4 7/7a - CJ� 7T.GX/s!!C.9,:7V G✓sr - %iJ' /c/�N :`,. F es" 2i-' •; . :C9 :; .: • c •/97d ,'ci71 DF. '7�Z'XM /G9 / /L�il'd%. A . ?.. ,• 5'0, 000 l�'9�r 1 /rY� '•'•; .: /7, SfT S'JF$9i1/ ?9 4 J , Iri r l rpT ppirpTirnPppr r pit m 7"l{Iri1j{P 1 �1r�r rir�rtIfriry {FpfriliI IA1rrP oc az ae LL 92 SL 62 CZ ZZ IS OZ 61 el LI 91 SI VI 'CI ZI 11 0 '... �.. b{{ Ibul�lul llp.<<�{ulu{I�l�l�I!ua�l�!.u��� {>! a II���uUlullllullu��lll�llulu��l�plllu�uul�pll{ �pluu�uilm{ ��) i�lu�uuluu�lp�l� {p�uplupllp�lul�lp IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DICE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT �i9JftT2. A • 77'/• 7 / Q /4/7 7V/Siz°Pi.v. f,/,lZ477,GN/ 7' cS ,. � • 7 Z 77 7',�T 4 : 2 7 /p/' ifiZ.ZVE i0 4 "' t�'973; /71 /1 . =a, AO' � '! •7++'T 77 fr 4) /V4 No *//,U'12yG "%.!✓.Y.E ,4i #' A e ;i ,r' ?'C !!✓�i� . /r// :f/ Ti/E LY ..4 ; , C✓4 , 4,2 • 4 Z • ?X ' Flzs✓J '4 V47' GV cYJrO /i/ EX'GY !/NE ' 40/c'/1 CS X86 7 c 7 , _' Ate! T.y� Nca ?7f 7 �cxN�� a� cs94 . TGfL7. . .7 r • °�ifT1aY ac''T`JC 77etr = - 4' 77!C.5a!/W //4J .-' ,xY/iA1 /99Z' csT.7Z 7 As" ceav • TJ - �:!k� c.�k/NO fl�i1/t� ' /Jy 'r Cal/P9,1"/ 7a. 73''E c /T/ dt 'TU/Y6r!Ji9 �J' , /re .- A✓a &', : i5 Ui•t J4 AG e9A-1 f/L. 4' 6,6676.39 "MO 77,9.6' Sal /T L✓ �" Tf/C d/oC'!?= .°';957 .e,W,fT.EJ('. GA" ___ 7 ' sa, ..77-4414.194 �.3 4/e,47 �,9 f/a6 4- 9; s,/ M.; //4./ 1 , 0 ; co, A.09. 7174;7" GC%% /•V P /fib v,• -94I7 /'k �Et� lsi .I' %SOFA `? // 179 441 E/ // Sly O TNG c E L/d�E cF O,A•/ TH•e'r 2_ - .Tfi =a ' /Mrevz-mB94' . ,v9eJ+/AS'0 , 44 , ,C'92',/t/9k / . f?2; 77;497" "a2meav a.c 7 l� %�l/4 2 N Gl! .9M y.,p7.7m1 l/'1 'ALY /JV r • 114%771 / N Tnle oC 7 / /,L 7"'^f' if/OT7 3 , .r,p,4 ;;A # /� . , - " -lava CO. ./4 Tir/G <�E /✓T27 C C c59/•47 .37757/° cam' - :•t A: FlJ,:GI.Y.0 ': ,6 ." /Jf;:V /.fir /'T , ,°D /NT - M,X V • rGOU'LL?9- i '.L4/Ve Z' 4 /1G44 .44///7 peza.1747;cf/• G'G9/Nl /JY 1°770-1./. ', 14240t ..W,‘' °3 .P Ti,••>" 47.9.!/ ' •711E ,44aCTY. 57 671-17G•r` -. c59 /U Sn!/Tf1 •z2 F• 7" • /197. E.='j 7D 9 �YyT : Tf!EY = /C7/. .. : E ZeF7 4 ZV A y.9.f9Z • . /0"///4 9 G�GC7�C5 2/ CELT �l/�i, 9 di�'72741l -%6' G7C /LEP^/ f�`tT r/1.EQ1 >/! T°�l�' O3- G //�Yf92 7"E 7' /� ¢f/7,;: 72!E.l 'E . , =e/7// 450'15' • F c7 7) PG/•t•'� ex/ 7 7/4 - • 4 r ;6'94•1' of Z /rA iS /16 4', !N' ' F•rr '. r7J3 ` ^9' 53' ,-.R -'T : ZU9 ,. 5 • h.OS h ' • c23tif f-' a- S9,va .44/C4 : h: ri /.LL/.w..cay.3 7 W C 492AI2 > .DJCY725/_.P .e F— .' -T2 10-4? Cv 41,91 faC, /LM/ e.Z4V- YAK TJ "//E OF d4 F'-S F /GE il/✓S. 6667.637, /'o /tea° 3 , J4?4U • 72/./'4#3 •