Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 78-32-SMP - SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT78-32-smp southcenter boulevard christensen road to interurban avenue southcenter boulevard road improvement SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor 19 December 1978 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director FROM: *Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Southcenter Boulevard /Shoreline Permit #78- 32 -SMP The Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for the street rehabilitation of Southcenter Boulevard from Christensen Road to Interurban Avenue has completed the 30 day local review. No major problems are anticipated. The SEPA review was completed and .a Declaration of Non - Significance was issued on 5 October 1978. Please find attached the permit for your signature. RJB /ch Attachment SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTE - THIS PAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 upon the following property The project will Application No. 78- 32 -SMP , Administering Agency Date received Approved �( Date l 'Petvti.bee Type of Action ® Substantial Development Permit ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to Public Works Department, City of Tukwila (name of applicant) (environment) program provisions are applicable to this development Circulation Element, Page 4.4. (state the master program sections or page numbers) 1. The edges of all fill areas must be rip rapped. City of Tukwila (City or County) October 13, 1978 Denied 1 9n to undertake the following development street rehabilitation to widden (be specific) • Southcenter Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes including curbs, 6 -foot wide sidewalk along the shoreline, rip rap and storm water retention and separation system. SE4 of Section 23, T. 23 N., R.4 W.W.M. and (legal description, i.e., section, the SW11 of Section 24, T. 24 N., R.4 W.W.M. in Tukwila, King County, Washington. township,, ,range) be within shorelines of statewide (be/met-be-1 significance (RCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a Urban designation. The following master Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordi- nances or regulations applicable to this project, but not incon- sistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 (7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL.THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING • THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,' OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS. INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED.' ppc. f / 78 ( ate Direc o ffice of Date received by Department of Ecology Approve Denied Community Development THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE. This substantial development permit with conditional use/ variance is approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: (Date) (Signature of Authorized Department of Ecology Official) CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT #M5i41OE0(FINAL DECLARATION OF /i'JON—S I Gid I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Road Improvement City of Tukwila Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No EPIC -FD -70 This proposal has been determined to (hnrw /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (rile/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was .made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kieil Stoknes Position /Title Date COMMENTS: 5 October 1978 Signature Southcenter Boulevard /62nd Ave. east to Interurban Director, Office of Community Development ;e MT c - FO -0, CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: et TI-r. © , , R 6(i� Ljotetcs Dept. G'Zc7 Scx�Ttd t't... T LI4. , - MK-Lick 1 4'3_ -I$o0 433 -I$5O 3. Date Checklist Submitted: "P3 19, 19 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: U Kwt tq p(0 p- . • 5 . Name of Proposal, i f applicable: S.C. RLdd. Rct4 pi4 ' €s s 3 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): TildVAE 1I - Rotas i rooe.meuk"s To S.C. 131.v 'J. CS To S.R. t &1 P F T T - IYhPra e K O & T C S C. 1BL1 c . cZs2- TO 66" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): o f I u«.. Lk) i Le. - SouTE- tc.c,Lcm. 13L.vd beTweG r3 G2 Athz. so . It t (rki bikJ 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1 (- & d 9. ,List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b). King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO ✓ YES VNO YES NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO ✓ (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO (f) Sign permit YES N0" (g) Water hook up permit YES N0 1/ (h) Storm water system permit YESV NO (i) Curb cut permit YES NO ✓ (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NOL)E: II. ENV I RONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or•overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Road G0r.3STe.c.)GT1 b/. w t ret roc So►�'►� • CciTr"39 'CM 1,1 (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation; . o ctADA-dwA1 Sec:rtot� - b., 4 • at Te,3 c Sport.not DYCL( Lrsrr>N- 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to t'•a normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: I N '\ Cf..) C©U LP I.JC"rto1-) Yhptrouz.merUtS 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? sv Lodd-f: f0.4 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: .IJSTA( 13 o"C 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: • Explanation: - 5 - YES MAYBE NO s �s� 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: W c d e u ;1.-q it) 4 latJa s WIC( ck U.o.c-1/43 Yrib tz 1 be Trt_.e._ YY)OVe w► e. LA C. • cz c/' E (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 415 4 (cw C4&( t fuc.2EAS Iu fia Yleys tit 2c yrotz_e 1'rict iiStemma 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? ./ (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Drai e ' ram roa4c.wAc/ New S 1 5 to - - y 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: -7- YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? 'k. ll)(11 w14.u/4_ Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: Signature and Title -8- `�- ifs -?k" Date YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Other public right -of -way S.W. 1/4, Section 24 -23 -4 tion, township, and range) LllY Ur IUKWILP APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 7 8-332- SM P PUBLICATION DATES Oc.� 19, Of a SEC.- TWP. -R. 234 2u /Z3/ oc`robe. E.G, (97 aV DATE RECEIVED °NI 8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DATE APPROVED /Z // / 6 ZONING DATE DENIED WATER BODY G7Ree.x) RsivcrZ TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with appropriate local, state, or federal officials to determine whether your project falls within any other permit systems. A fee of $100.00 payable to the City of Tukwila must accompany this application. 1. Name of applicant Public Works Department, City of Tukwila 2. Mailing address 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington 98188 3. Relation of applicant to property: Owner Purchaser Lessee 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant 5. General location of proposed project S.E. 1/4, Section 23 -23 -4, 6. Name of water area and /or wetlands within which development is pro— posed Green River 7. Current use of the property with existing improvements Improved street 8. Proposed use of property Improved street 9. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: $300,000.00 • (section, to the nearest quarter sec- 9. £ . Construction dates (month and year) for which " this permit is requested: 10. (To be completed by local official.) Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulk - heading, if any): pp C+Rea ►_ - � z, 0494q117 A4A.0../ 4 c , , ft/A.10 11. (To be completed by local official.) In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty -five feet a- bove the existing grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 12. Additional information: STATE OF WASHINGTON) CITY OF TUKWILA )ss I, Richard K. Williams , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above -named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this (Seal)-; Begin March, 1979 End November, 1980 j<. t (Signature) 13th day of fctnhPr. 0 1978 Notary Public in and f the State of Washington, residing at Tukwila • VICINITY MAP SOUTHCENTER BLVD. REHABILITATION PHASE 2 4 . w • _ . .. • .. yew I V 0, 27 g 4 50 '.r x•. Sr i '4oil � SOUtHCENTER BLVD. REHAB! LITATION PHASE 3 s -p w 100 CPI • $fR ROPERTY DIMENSIONS I4.i • a► z _ 101 A 'Fa avo ©. • • •R • • • r • • i . r 4-4 N • : v •aw• • .6" . 470 4 1s • />,) •11 4. a. ic 1111 111 <--wcrurk._ VECTAT1ON fl • _ - culF454- GUTT SOUTHCENTER BLVD. PROJECT - PHASE II & III rThC),\PW/ 22?-0" OUTI gOLLEV,\KI7 PROPOE__D IMFF-0\0-41ENT 62nd Va. E TO INTERUK3AN 6 5113EINALK iff5AISK1EK LIGHTS CUICI5AINIP G-UTTEK MATURN._ VE&FTATION G-F.EANt nvFK Phase II Sidewalk on South Side. DaRe i Sidewalk 1==a c. rohhb n o■Nor.•■•••1 III rim IIIIHu�„�Illllh E- 1.1fti V E&' A m o N • CUr14 G-UTT 1S SOUTHCENTER BLVD. PROJECT - PHASE II & III FOAPWAY . 2'` D" • t5AKKIEK LtG ITS GUKS ANA GUTTE SOUTHC ENTER SOULE-WV P9OFOSE D IMPf- O\I =MENT 002 nd. E TO INTERUKBAN KIATUKPC VE C- TATON C. /0/7/76 Phase II Sidewalk on South Side. U Phase tMI on r i e. 1 — C,o--O" Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING SS. Ann. being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that .she. is the Ch.ie ... C,1.e.rk,.... of THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a . r as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 2 consecutive issues, commencing on the 1.8 . day of Oct ,19 78 and ending the 26dayof Oct ,19.. inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ g gg which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred: Ool s for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. ....Ch er Cte'rk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26 day of Ott V.P.C. Form No. 87 , 19 .'g.. Notary Pub i and for the State of Washipton, residing at Kent, King county. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. PUBLIC (::JORKB DEPARTME 6230 Bauthcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98067 telephone t 906 3 849 - 9177 October "4, 1978 z _ J Office of Community Development City of Tukwila m 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 hd Attention: Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner Q Subject: Shoreline Management Permit Application /Southcenter Blvd. Phase II CL a. Attached please find the required forms, maps, drawings, etc. as out - W lined in the application instructions. In addition, I would like to i t respond to the following items on the checklist: W m A. 1. f. Not applicable it g. Not applicable W i. Not applicable Q 3 j. Not applicable (A k. Fill material will be generated from cut areas or 1. be imported from local pit sources and will be Class W "B" Roadway Ballast. W 1. Extracted materials should consist of some ledge ME rock, sandstone, asphalt concrete and crushed rock. Material not used on site will be disposed of in the n . area indicated on the vicinity map. Z n. Not applicable W o. Urban. W p. All. Z n A. 2. c. Property northerly of side is zoned and is utilized z as apartment sites and parks. Property southerly of W site is limited access freeway, I -405. ti Roger Blaylock October 4, 1978 Page 2 If I can provide any further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Richard K. Williams Office Engineer "=,:; •s }: 8' 32 'MP OUTHCENTER- 'BLVD ROAD IMPROVEMEN° • • ✓ 0. '" 101 wales 4.0 / 21- C te a • 09611"164E WEARS ; .!l • ENOINEERINO •BTREETB•WATER•BEWER. ARKB•BUILDINO• deli ned drawn checked prof . eng field kk ne U R S COMPANY A Professional Services Organisation SEATTLE, WASHINGTON SOUTHCENTER BLVD. REHABILITATION PHASE II file no 440G -05 -29 sceleu i ;v r.:5 dale revisions 6 +00. '1i nip trolliciTtRrpTypilltropiroiri pi`�1�1y1r 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 _® ^•°r° OE az 9e Lz 9z 9z to Ea ZS tz OZ 6t 91 Lt 91 9r I ' Et Zt tt ot:, .. _._11.81llul X1111 �luu1iuluul1ud !u1101110.11iiu1V411111.1 u>�ui ui111,10 di�dult6,u �(" • -Zan, . IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DOE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT o4-oo B." SVY►P 2' 50 45 AD • 35 30 25 3 1- r •ENOINEERING1•111TREETB•WATER• BEWER•PARKEPISUILDINO• desi ned drawn checked proj eng proj dir field bk no A Professional Services Organization . SEATTLE, WASHINGTON PHASE IE revisions Meno4406.05-29 soaleW11 date • • :1. ---- 35 25 • / - •"/ z ,o z z • cz, •ct •ct / 2 " ' top —25 LLI 0 I 2+00 11 12ETEKTIoN- SEPERATI ON STRUCTURE -7-. 2 3 ___10.434g-30 — 7 — r„ • %, 1 011 13+00 oe az oe L gz gz vz cc I cte 61 ei a 91 o ea. 'et czt • ...J111.1ItIIII1111411114 I . . 14111111(1111111111thAlipkilltiIIIIIIIII4i4111141111111111.111141101.11111411111.111111111149,11.1li;.:' , • , . . „ GREEN T21VER _______ $: -....„....... • •---_______ -_____ •-.,____ . . ,__ ----<:- -.... .7 -----....,„ ..---,-.„ ....."-- -........... ."..... .. ............. 0......... ....../ ----...„ ..../..- --- ■ ------. *-----.. s ' - es -......_ \ ■ ------.. _ -----........ — -......__ "-----..., --...,,, , --- —.......... 7 - -..... . "` ....,,,.: .....:/a ............ --....:„. 14400 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS SLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DOE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT S ;''tt, 8 • 15+00 • 1 16+00 2 w -cr fy 1- 2 35 30 25 IL 1