The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit DR-18-78 - DGH - OFFICE BUILDING DESIGN REVIEWDR-18-78 1035 ANDOVER PARK WEST DGH OFFICE BUILDING PARKS A RECREATION 31 May 1978 Mr. Dave Peterson Gabert & Associates 2819 Elliott Avenue Seattle, Washington 98121 CITY of T'UKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4. Architectural screening of roof- mounted equipment. RE: D.G.H. Office Building, Tukwila Dear Mr. Peterson: The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular May meeting, considered the development plans proposed for the above - referenced project. The Commission, sitting as the Board of Architectural Review, approved the plans with the following stipulations: 1. Eliminate one curb cut and relocate the other so as to be at least 250 feet from the centerline of Andover Park West. 2. Relocate the single parking space from the southeast corner to that area gained by elimination of one curb cut. 3. Exterior building treatment consist primarily of face brick and stucco accent; colors to be of earth tone to complement surrounding developments. 5. Planning. Commission approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. As a point of information, precise location of curb cuts is determined by the Public Works Department through the curb cut permit system. The Commis- sion's stipulation constitutes a reconunendation to that department for con- sideration within that system. Drawings submitted for building permit should reflect these provisions. Should you have any questions please call. Sincer GC /ch Gar/ Crut hfield Assistant Planner cc: Assoc Plnr, Off Engineer, Bldg Off 6230 Southcenter Boulevard n Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 292 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 25 May 1978 8 :00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM V H • Development Plans: D.G.H. Office Building (Upland Drive) D.G.H. Enterprises has proposed development of a two -story office building . on lot 2 of Upland's Industrial Park. This site is situated immediately south of the U.P.R.R. office building and is approximately 300 feet south of the Minkler Boulevard- Andover Park West intersection. The building will contain 25,500 square feet of floor area; the 79 required parking spaces are provided in a somewhat irregular fashion. Two curb cuts, both situated on Upland Drive, provide ingress /egress for the site. Exterior treatment consists of face brick along the top band and the entire wall facing Andover Park West, stucco for both the center and bottom bands; bronze glass. Staff recommends approval of the development plans with the following stipula- tions: 1. Eliminate one curb cut and relocate the other so as to be at least 250 feet from the centerline of Andover Park West. 2. Relocate the single parking space from the southeast corner to that area . gained by elimination of one curb cut. 3. Exterior building treatment, specifically color combinations, be clarified prior to issuance of Building Permit. 4. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment. 5. Planning Commission approval of a detailed landscpae plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. • - 7. 1 17SKS rV.• dv '9 1 C! 7La.) 1•Pdc! R!J<a - slim *.w rIAIXPN •••• • •• ....w t.••r iuw • s 3a3t o..te 0 �acicieS p • . $ 4 W I ANIclitt4 OLIO 4N011*a% �� aWw��Nff ete sg r o aaE e MN:"""`"' SaP a 1 Planning Commission Minutes • Page 6 25 May 1978 Landscape Plan: Project #364 (Southcenter South Industrial Park) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the materials and manner of landscape. Motion by Mr. Sowinski, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to approve the land- scape plan as presented. Development Plans: Project #781 (Segale Business Park) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the site and elevation drawings. Mr. Lance Mueller, architect, presented revised site plan responding to the staff concern regarding parking at the north end of the building. Explained the owner desires to postpone installation of landscape along the west line of the major parking area until such time as development of that adjacent land area is identi- fied. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to approve the revised site plan and elevations dated 10 May 1978 with the following stipulations: 1. Provision of landscape separation strip along the west line of major parking area and along the south line of the southerly parking strip. 2. Planning Commission approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 3. Planning Commission approval of these plans are subject to revision as may be required under Building Permit review with specific regard to the 24 -foot wide driveways. Development Plans: U.P.R.R. Office Building (Andover Park West) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the proposed development. Mr. Lance Mueller, architect, presented revised site plan which responded to the staff recommendation regarding the curb cut. Motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to approve the revised site plan dated 10 May 1978 with the following stipulations: 1. Planning Commission approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 2. Signing must be authorized in accordance with Title 19, TMC. L,D6velopment Plans: D.C.N. Office Building (Upland Drive) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the Proposed development. Planning Commission Minutes . Page 7 25 May 1978 Mr. Gabert, architect, stated he had discussed the curb cut recommendations with the Public Works Department with the common conclusion that the exact location could be worked out with that office. Also noted that exterior treatment has not been decided upon by the client and they desire to do that at a later time. Commissioners discussed the alternative exterior treatments (face brick or cement plaster) with the applicant, concluding it should be decided now if a building permit is being pursued prior to the regular June meeting. Mr. Gabert stated the face brick with stucco accent will be used. Motion by Mrs. Avery, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to approve the develop- ment plans with the following stipulations: 1. Eliminate one curb cut and relocate the other so as to be at least 250 feet from the centerline of Andover Park West. 2. Relocate the single parking space from the southeast corner to that area gained by elimination of one curb cut. 3. Exterior building treatment consist primarily of face brick and stucco accent; colors to be of earth tone to complement surrounding developments. 4. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment. 5. Planning Commission approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. Mr. Larry Canaan, owner of the land, objected to the preclusion of a curb cut on Andover Park West. Mr. Crutchfield, recalling discussions occurring at the time Upland platted the land, pointed out the concept is not a new one but that the actual decision as to the issuance of a curb cut permit for access on Andover Park West is with the Public Works Department. Mr. Canaan noted the proposed development plan does not require such a curb cut but noted it might be necessary should this development not proceed. Building Revisions: Bedford Building (Andover Park West & Minkler) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the two revisions proposed. Commissioners and Mr. Milt Reimers, representing applicant, discussed the con- flict inherent in the proposed ramp and door on the south wall. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to reject the new door and ramp on the south wall and to approve the alterations to north and east walls as proposed. Landscape Plan: Bedford Building (Andover Park West & Minkler) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the material and manner of land- scaping. E t11 f1U * luilnuuRi 1 111E11/,U1tO 2Q()TN -1)11AND . wive {' -e2A „ A EAST � L /ATION — ANDOVER I'AfzK WET II . I _ 01111i1.1111.1.1111I I I T 1 1 9 4 5 6 7 8 j _K3 Oe ez Ed Lz 9z ez trz t zz ,z OZ 6 el a al GI ai 'El zi a O� 1 ..._ _111111nUIWdp1.lpld!11111 1 .110 1 111jl it1111 l llll� I Il1111IIIIII1111IIIIIIIIIIIUIIII IIIiluuIIII41iulllulual01111 XTE1eIOF N T V I .. . e C; . 44e4IT fcP 'r -/ recto I CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO F THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS [ THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1. — 0 i 15 r ° S. a' PROPPg6D FSUILDWG ♦.. — `w � - - -- � —i r- -Q - - -- - - - - - -� 11411ALLS .. 1JPJ- 4D DKI\/E SITE PLAN 0 "44..1.6 I 5" rALLg 4 De De ZI�IZO� NET IZEN17)45- . AK5 3.i ‘ Ao 66 .10 c 44 .-' 1 D 7q GAW 1 2HC , WN DR -Kt-IS I i I S J 43 NUM &EN ati s o uW 0 of hts. 0 `pITIIfII Ilr iII iirp2i .i Titirq 1iltp rr , ir r , iTroin I I�lip 1.1 0€ 6z se cz 92 sz az ea zz IF pZ 61 e i ci 91 si a� 'e� a n p� _._la111911 u�luil� 011,l1.11091itiimigI I11wupIuuluulgiltuilo ullip4 llu1 Holu 1ii�ul> � u ul!l u�uuluu�llulqu�iipJui lu �ih l ! IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT .Y.