The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit DR-19-78 - UPRR - OFFICE BUILDING DESIGN REVIEWDR-19-78 1015 ANDOVER PARK WEST UPRR UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OFFICE BUILDING FLANtIINC., PARKS & REEG BEAT I BUILDING 31 May 1978 Mr. Lance Mueller Lance Mueller $ Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, Washington 98122 Gary rut hfield Assistant Planner GC /ch cc: Assoc Plnr Bldg Off CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: U.P.R.R. Office Building, Tukwila Dear Mr. Mueller: .The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular May meeting, considered the development plans proposed for the above - referenced project. The Commission, sitting as the Board of Architectural Review, approved the revised site plan dated 10 May 1978 with the following stipulations: 1. Planning Commission approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 2. Signing must be authorized in accordance with Title 19, TMC. Drawings submitted for building permit should reflect these provisions. Should.. you have any questions please call. Sincer • • /9 Ouljd?u P�aw /a� ?a - ny� 6230 Southcentec Boulevard n Tukwila, Washing 98188 n (206) 242 -2177 . Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 25 May 1978 Landscape Plan: Project #364 (Southcenter South Industrial Park) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the materials and manner of landscape. Motion by Mr. Sowinski, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to approve the land- scape plan as presented. Development Plans: Project #781 (Segale Business Park) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the site and elevation drawings. Mr. Lance Mueller, architect, presented revised site plan responding to the staff concern regarding parking at the north end of the building. Explained the owner desires to postpone installation of landscape along the west line of the major parking area until such time as development of that adjacent land area is identi- fied. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to the revised site plan and elevations dated 10 May 1978 with the following stipulations: 1. Provision of landscape separation strip along the west line of major parking area and along the south line of the southerly parking strip. 2. Planning Commission approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 3. Planning Commission approval of these plans are subject to revision as may be required under Building Permit review with specific regard to the 24 -foot wide driveways. D evelopment Plans: U.P.R.R. Office Building (Andover Park West) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the proposed development. Mr. Lance Mueller, architect, presented revised site plan which responded to the staff recommendation regarding the curb cut. Motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to approve the revised site plan dated 10 May 1978 with the following stipulations: 1. Planning Commission approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 2. Signing must be authorized in accordance with Title 19, TMC. Development Plans: D.G.H. Office Building (Upland Drive) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the proposed development. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 25 May 1978 Mr. Gabert, architect, stated he had discussed the curb cut recommendations with the Public Works Department with the common conclusion that the exact location could be worked out with that office. Also noted that exterior treatment has not been decided upon by the client and they desire to do that at a later time. Commissioners discussed the alternative exterior treatments (face brick or cement plaster) with the applicant, concluding it should be decided now if a building permit is being pursued prior to the regular June meeting. Mr. Gabert stated the face brick with stucco accent will be used. Motion by Mrs. Avery, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to approve the develop- ment plans with the following stipulations: 1. Eliminate one curb cut and relocate the other so as to be at least 250 feet from the centerline of Andover Park West. 2. Relocate the single parking space from the southeast corner to that area gained by elimination of one curb cut. 3. Exterior building treatment consist primarily of face brick and stucco accent; colors to be of earth tone to complement surrounding developments. 4. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment. 5. Planning Commission approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. Mr. Larry Canaan, owner of the land, objected to the preclusion of a curb cut on Andover Park West. Mr. Crutchfield, recalling discussions occurring at the time Upland platted the land, pointed out the concept is not a new one but that the actual decision as to the issuance of a curb cut permit for access on Andover Park West is with the Public Works Department. Mr. Canaan noted the proposed development plan does not require such a curb cut but noted it might be necessary should this development not proceed. Building Revisions: Bedford Building (Andover Park West & Minkler) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the two revisions proposed. Commissioners and Mr. Milt Reimers, representing applicant, discussed the con- flict inherent in the proposed ramp and door on the south wall. Motion by 61r. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to reject the new door and ramp on the south wall and to approve the alterations to north and east walls as proposed. Landscape Plan: Bedford Building (Andover Park West & Minkler) Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the material and manner of land- scaping. 25 May 1978 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM V G: Development Plans: U.P.R.R. Office Building (Andover Park West Union Pacific Railroad has proposed development of a single -story office building for its Traffic Department to be located on lot 2 of Upland's Industrial Park. The lot fronts on Andover Park West near the intersection with Minkler Boulevard. The building will contain just under 5,000 square feet and the site provides parking for 30 cars. About one -third of the parcel is intended to be left unimproved. Vertical board -form concrete spandrel and smooth concrete walls with several concrete vertical columns provide exterior treatment. Mechanical equipment is noted to be located in roof well, thereby eliminating the need for additional screening measures. The drawing also includes a proposed free- standing sign. A single 25 -foot wide curb cut provides access to the site at a point approximately 150 feet from the Minkler Boulevard- Andover Park West intersection. Staff recommends approval of the development plans with the following stipulations" 1. Relocation of the single 25 -foot wide curb cut to a point closer to the south property line. 2. Planning Commission approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 3. Signing must be authorized in accordance with Title 19, TMC. 41A . orrTir Pim I i .0-.0 I . law -- . . - .. • • ' • L -.--m. , L : . :"--- - 1 L " 1 I ismal, • 1 1 1 *1 -, • .1 _:= 1- 1 1 L., r.,--_-_-_,,,, r r t_i J L-1 r --, I 1 MC _,i I I L. .- - E ---i : 1 . ri .. i I i t. 1 I u Li -4 1 I P - 1- - --, ! I --- T1 ill -1 71 i *, I.- L....1 i LI._ c • i . XI ow. • dm. -. 11111 .. Jl 3714A0 a *0 • nor* al •lAC er IVA - 7i'/el :1/1,111 rU?: !I a coaa cc 14017•1MLAU q.. •1•••••••1 ac Ettll 64003440JB EtEnEtPO * St JellatlUA IBOUEti 4:• le24 17 .-rr) y!IVIA A rV1ii.41 I 1 • I n 1 , 2641 IBA - ' rosomaNY F ervs fsPtir Gomm K'. • 1 81 -D �� 11I�1lI ��I iI I II11N1111�iI�I f�Il�lii l 'li Ilil �fl!; INNI II NIIMMINIIIIIIRMENNERN '4'1 r N %p'fr,�r�'�, Tti saf, ,and .. U's X1 gelagragli i• • 6* u, 69' 55'' o2° :119.30' d ICI NAE RA1LWINP 'ikltFFi4 - PE- PARt1''IUN' .. tOPOIVER ?RRK. NAST •- MINI:t ia, rout, W/ oomo 01?x1 REAEF • tr 0 1111IlliiirlOpr1VITTVrT TIPT Tilnl,nTP 0/11 1011/ TPOTOTITIPITIT r id ITT911111i lilli 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 6Z eL Lt 9z GE Yz CZ 6Z tL oZ fil 9 LI 91 GI VI 'CI • I IL O1. I __ 11111111111111111114 ,111111111 11 11 111111l 1➢ I�Itmblullm1Imloil1auluu1uu11114 liO41114111114 111111Im61uluuh l' IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT C 0 9 C 0 s • 0 C