Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit DR-38-78 - PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS - DESIGN REVIEW
PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS DR -38.78 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 28 September 1978 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM V B • DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Park Place Condominiums Park Place Condominiums have been reviewed and approved by the City Council and the Planning Commission. The developer has agreed to develop the pro- ject according to the conditions of Ordinance #1071. STIPULATION 1: Each phase of development shall provide the same proportion of open space identified for the overall development, exclusive of the R -1 district. Total Project Area: 641,777 sq. ft. (Inclusive of R -1) Open Space: 342,132 sq. ft. or 53.2% Requested Phase 1: Total Project Area: 271,690 sq. ft. (Exclusive of R -1) Open Space: 143,581 sq. ft. or 52.8% Conclusion: The proposed meets the requirement, because the 53.2% overall open space includes the R -1 area, while the 52.8% does not include the R -1 area. STIPULATION 2: Each phase of development shall not exceed the density identified for the overall development, exclusive of the R -1 district. Site Area: 441,257 sq. ft. (10.13 acres) Units: 180 Overall Density: 2,451 sq. ft. per unit or 17.76 per acre Requested: Site Area: 271,690 sq. ft. (6.23 acres) Units: 91 Overall Density: 2,985 sq. ft. per unit or 14.6 per acre Conclusion: Phase I meets the condition requirement. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 28 September 1978 STIPULATION 3: Full application for Preliminary Plat of the entire R -1 district shall be made prior to issuance of any building permits for structures within the remainder of the 12 -acre site. A final Plat of said R -1 district must be properly recorded prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for any structures on the remainder of the 12 -acre site. Requested Phase 1: The applicant is not requesting any building permits at this time. Conclusion: The applicant will have to make a full application for subdivision prior to issu- ance of any building permit. STIPULATION 4: Within the R -1 district, the layout of lots and alignment and width of street(s) shall be determined at the time of subdivision review, irrespective of the general layout depicted in the FEIS; provided, however, any street or roadway within the R -1 district shall not provide for vehicular movement from any multiple- family structure through the R -1 district. Request: The Applicant is not submitting a subdivision request of the R -1 'zone at this time. Conclusion: No action necessary at this time. STIPULATION 5: All mitigating measures identified by the Final EIS and as required by the Respon- sible Official shall be assigned to each phase of development. (An extensive list of mitigative measures were included in the Final EIS on panes 13 through 17, Attachment B.) Request: The applicant is requesting site plan approval for Phase I. Most of the mitiga- tive measures apply to the construction activities and the facilities operation. Specific measures to the site plan review is limited to the following: (a) Light and Glare - Site plan review by City Staff of orientation of parking areas, with respect to dwelling units. Conclusion: The basic layout of each unit type is the critical factor controlling glare. In Buildings #1 and 2 the bathroom and kitchen windows will receive the glare. The kitchen and the second bedroom will receive the glare in Buildings #4 and 5, while Planning Commission 411 • Page 3 Staff Report 28 September 1978 in Buildings #7 and 8 the glare will enter the family rooms. Units in Buildings #6, 9 and 10 are screened by their own respective carports. Only Building 7 will possibly have a serious problem resulting from glare as a result of traffic circu- lation. In each of these cases the glare can be eliminated by proper landscaping. (b) Public Services - Provision of through - circulation corridors for emergency vehicles and police through the entire site; direct access to all buildings for fire - fighting equipment. Conclusion: The circulation corridors for emergency vehicles has been provided. However, the Fire Department has stated that "fire apparatus access is totally inadequate for Buildings #1, 2, 4 and 5." Therefore, the access must be redesigned. (c) Aesthetics - Retention of natural vegetation to the maximum extent possible. Conclusion: The Phase I design retains slightly more than originally estimated. (d) Aesthetics - Alteration of building designs to minimize occurrence of typical rectangular structures. Conclusion: All buildings have been altered to provide a greater sense of individuality. STIPULATION 6: Planning Commission review of detailed site, elevation and landscape plans, to include building and landscape materials, prior to issuance of respective build- ing permit. The express purpose of such review is to ensure each phase or por- tion of development is in general conformance with the overall development plans in Planning Division File No. MF 78 -06 -R and that each phase or portion of devel- opment is complementary to the other phases or portions of development. Conclusion: The normal procedure has been modified to require approval of the landscaping plan prior to issuance of Buildinn Permit. STIPULATION 7: In the event that construction of any proposed structure has not begun within 24 months of the effective date of this reclassification then said reclassification shall revert to the present designations (P -1 -12.0 and R -3) on that portion not platted for single - family residential; provided, however, the City Council may grant a single, 12 -month extension to the time period expressed hereinabove. Conclusion: No action necessary. Planning Commission 41) Page 4 Staff Report 28 September 1978 STIPULATION 8: All provisions, conditions and stipulations enumerated herein shall be recorded in the records of the King County Department of Records and all such provisions, conditions and stipulations shall be deemed to be attached to and run with the land and shall be binding upon all heirs, successors and assigns. Conclusion: No action necessary. Completed by City Clerk. STIPULATION 9. Satisfactory performance by the applicant of terms and conditions substantially similar to the Concomitant Zoning Agreement. (a) The developer shall retain all flora located in the R -1 zone north and east of the ridge line between the ridge line and the single - family lots (R -1 zone) and east of buildings 5, 6, and 8, in a natural growth preservation zone, as designated on the site plan. Trees may be selectively cut east of the ridge line in the R -2 zone where necessary for installation of improvements, although efforts shall still be made to preserve vegetation in the R -2 area. Conclusion: Buildings #5, 6 and 8 are renumbered 5, 6 and 7 and comply with requirement. (b) To preserve the visual landscape buffer in the R -2 zone at the north edge of the property, the developer shall retain all flora within 20 to 25 feet south of the north edge of the property in the R -2 zone in a natural growth preservation zone, as designated on the site plan. Conclusion: Not applicable at this phase. (c) To enhance the visual landscape buffer between the project and the residential area to the north, the developer shall install and maintain in the natural growth preservation zone established pursuant to condition 2 above, additional conifers 10 to 12 feet in height when planted, where necessary to improve the landscape buffer. Conclusion: Not applicable at this phase. 4. The developer shall, insofar as practicable, retain additional vegetation in other natural growth preservation zones between buildings and other improvements in the R -3 and R -4 areas south of the ridge line. However, the developer may make limited cuts, if any, in those zones necessary for the installation of utilities. These additional natural growth preser- vation zones shall be designated on the site plan. Planning Commission Page 5 Staff Report 28 September 1978 Conclusion: The applicant has increased the buffering around Building 9. (e) All natural growth preservation zones established pursuant to the above conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall also be ,designated on the plat or plats of the property. The developer's restrictive covenants to be recorded shall provide that no owner or resident of the project may cut trees in that zone, except that the home - owners'. association may authorize cutting or pruning required by death or decease of trees or by a hazard to safety. The covenants shall also require maintenance of vegetation in the zones by the homeowners' association. Conclusion: The Planning Commission should require administrative or Commission review of restrictive covenants to assure compliance. (f) At the time each phase of the project is submitted to the Planning Commis- sion for review, the developer shall stake all proposed buildings sites in that phase. The sites shall be inspected by an official from the Department of Community Development. After inspection, the developer shall make minor adjustments where feasible in the building locations in order to preserve as many trees as possible on the site. If conifers 4 inches or greater in dia- meter, or deciduous trees 12 inches or greater in diameter, measured 2 feet from ground level, must nevertheless be cut in connection with the construc- tion of a building, the developer shall plant new trees on a 1 -for -1 replace- ment basis. Conifers and deciduous trees shall each be replaced by similar kinds of trees. Conifers when planted shall be from 10 to 12 feet in height. The developer shall include in the restrictive covenants to be recorded a pro- vision for maintenance of all such planted trees by the homeowners' association. Conclusion: The staff has not inspected the site to date. (g) The developer shall limit the height of all buildings in the R -4 zone to not more than 3 habitable stories. Conclusion: As so shown in site plan. Access and Traffic (h) The City's Public Works Director must approve the road access to the property along 62nd Avenue South, so that access to the project will be compatible with the future design and grade of 62nd Avenue South. (i) The developer shall design access at the southeast corner of the project so that vehicular traffic will be routed south on 62nd Avenue South, despite the low probability of increased traffic along 153rd Street. The City shall install road striping and directional controls to aid the routing of traffic south on 62nd Avenue South. Planning Commission • S Page 6 Staff Report 28 September 1978 (j) The developer shall participate in either a developer's extension of 62nd Avenue South, or a local improvement district for the improvement of 62nd Avenue South, at the option of the City's Director of Public Works. Conclusion: Review of these construction provisions are the responsibility of the Public Works Director. Agreement Pursuant to City of Tukwila Ordinance 10712 Condition: 1. The developer shall design the storm water system to retain storm water to a ten -year storm interval with the following objectives built in: a. Oil separators /water quality control; b. Ground water recharge; c. Controled outlets from ponds; d. Outfalls to go into approved systems. Conclusion: This condition should be complied with prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. The developer shall provide a trail connection from 62nd Avenue South to Tukwila Elementary School. Conclusion: The developer has not shown or stated that the entire trail would be constructed at this phase of development. 3. All construction, including grading and clearing activities, are to be sub- stantially the same as Exhibits I - XII as contained in the Office of Commun- ity Development Planning Division Master File #MF-78-06-R. No clearing or grading of the land is to occur until written approvals are received from the responsible official. Grading and clearing activities necessary for the installation and roads may commence upon approval of road and /or utility drawings by the Public Works Director. Conclusion: No action necessary. 4. Exterior finish of all buildings is to be consistent with the following: a. Four - plexes and smaller: Exterior finish is to be six or eight inch channel siding or comprable material. b. Structures larger than four- plexes: Exterior finish to be combination of stucco and cedar or stucco and brick, depending on building. . Planning Commission • • Page 7 Staff Report 28 September 1978 c. Carports to be of wood or comprable materials. d. T -1 -11 or comprable materials are not to be used in the exterior of any structures. Conclusion: No action necessary. RECOMMENDATION: The evidence indicates that the site plan for the Park Place Condominiums is deficient in respect to several conditions imposed by Ordinance #1071 of the City of Tukwila. The site plan should be resubmitted with the following speci- fic modifications: 1. Provision for "direct access to all buildings for fire - fighting equipment." (The Fire Department is specifically concerned with Buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5.) 2. The location of the trail connecting 62nd Avenue South to the Tukwila Elementary School should be clarified. 3. That the access street be modified to reflect the access agreement of Exhibit #11, which requires a 60 -foot right -of -way, two 15 -foot wide paved roadways and a 10 -foot divider. • • ATTACHMENT B Park Place Site Plan - 28 September 1978 Measures Proposed to Mitigate or Eliminate Adverse Impacts The following mitigating measures that are feasible and economically practical with available technology have been suggested for mitigation or elimination of adverse impacts, including: Soils, Geology and Topography 1. Requirement for additional soil tests on building sites, and certification by qualified specialists of adequate foundation design for each structure. 2. Retention of storm runoff waters during and after construction to reduce water contamination by suspended silts and to reduce peak flow volumes. 3. Inclusion of no -build areas on steep slopes, storm water ponding areas and areas containing major groupings of vegetation. 4. Control of grading operations to avoid peak rainfall periods. 5. Replanting of exposed slopes. 6. Use of decks, cantilevering to minimum disturbance of steep slope areas. Traffic and Transportation 1. Control of traffic flow through site design to provide major access to Southcenter Boulevard, an arterial, via South 62nd Street. 2. Allow site access to Northeast corner of site which goes through single - family areas, only for proposed single- family lots. 3. Cooperation with adjacent property owners t� the south and east to improve 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd. Street for visibility, width and general circulation. Air Quality 1. Specification of construction practices to minimize air pollution. 2. Implementation of sprinkling during construction to control dust. Water Resources 1. Use of landscaping to contain runoff and decrease velocity of overland flow. 2. Use of energy dissipating devices on drainage lines descending steep slopes. 3. Consideration of reduction of extent of impervious surfacing. 4. Use of siltation devices in the interim drainage system. 5. Proper use and maintenance of oil- separating devices in the storm drainage system. • -2- • 6. Use building area and parking lot surface designs to detain water. Flora 1. Minimal and selective vegetation removal, particularly in the northeast and easterly portions of the site. 2. Predominant use of native species or compatible ornamental varieties in land- scaping. 3. Hydroseeding of cut and fill areas within short time frame of grading. 4. Native growth protection easements and no -build zones placed on areas with slopes 25 percent or greater and around existing surface water holding ponds. Fauna 1. Maintain water habitat by proper use and maintenance of siltation and oil separation devices in the interim and permanent storm drainage system. 2. Phased development to allow existing wildlife to adjust and migrate. Noise 1. Incremental traffic noise impacts can be reduced by phasing project over a two- to three -year period. 2. Limitation of construction activities to normal working hours (i.e., 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). 3. Use of heavily insulated buildings, double -pane windows, landscaping, fences and earth berms as noise attenuating measures. Larger structures on south face of site will baffle some noise from I -405 and I -5. Light and Glare 1. Use of landscaping, fencing and building orientation to block headlight glare into dwelling units. 2. Site plan review by City Staff of orientation of parking areas, with respect to dwelling units. Public Services 1. Provision of through - circulation corridors for emergency vehicles and police through the entire site; direct access to all buildings for fire - fighting equipment. 2. Development of recreational facilities and preservation of open space within the proposed development. (Recreational Space Plan required by Ordinance #1040) 3. Stringent design requirements and equipment specifications for storm drainage control. 4. Requirement of regular maintenance program for privately owned roads and utilities. -3- • 5. Phasing of the project to delay impacts on the school district. 6. Cooperate with adjacent property owners and City for development of roads and public services in the area to serve the site. Utilities 1. Provision of hookups to existing dead -end water services to provide better fire flows and water service. 2. Linkage of other utilities to provide better service for the south face of Tukwila Hill. 3. Use of weather stripping; wall, floor and ceiling insulation and insulated glass in the dwelling units. 4. Use of common -wall construction as materials- and energy- saving devices. 5. Installation of water - saving devices in the dwelling units. Risk of Explosion, Upset or Hazardous Emission 1. Required procedures and safety standards will be followed if blasting operations are necessary including use of a licensed and bonded blasting firm. 2. Advance notice to adjacent property owners. 3. Provide bond to endimify for damages. Aesthetics 1. Retention of natural vegetation to the maximum extent possible. 2. Alteration of building designs to minimize occurrence of typical rectangular structures. 3. Retention of natural areas and additional landscaping and screening between different use areas. 4. Preservation of trees along ridge line will screen project from single - family homes to the north. 5. Add an additional 30 to 40 foot buffer zone along the north property line to the existing wooded area on the southerly perimeter of the school playfields. E. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 1. Elements of the Physical Environment Soils, Geology, Topography 1. Potential erosion of soils during clearing and grading. 2. Extensive excavation of rock for roadway access at 62nd Avenue S.E. -4- • • 3. Some alteration of topography by cuts and fills. Air Quality 1. Some degradation of air quality in the project vicinity. 2. Increase in suspended particulates from fireplaces, residential heating and construction activities. Water Resources 1. Increased runoff and decrease in water quality. 2. Slight alteration of stream flow characteristics in a year -round stream. Flora Removal of 50 percent of natural vegetation on the site. Fauna 1. Reduction of quality and quantity of wildlife habitat within the project area. /11 111,41111...111 P L C CM KS DEPAPTM Friti:7in=7. 7•''9=! Tukwila, 1.17 -Ahi ,ton SM 3 7 talra +hortz C MC= 242 - 2177 CD M E M O R A N D U M Date: September 20, 1978 © To: Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner From: Dick Williams, Office Engineer P, CO Subject: Park Place The north right -of -way lines orr153rd Avenue South should be projected west in a straight line. The offset configuration as shown is not approved. E. Sanitary sewer must be extended from 62nd Avenue South and Southcenter iC Blvd. to serve the site. Water is available at the northeast and south- east corners of the site. Existing storm drain is not available to the site. 1311 No comment at this time regarding the streets to the site. Interior (j circulation is not commented upon at this time. Public Works Department reserves the right to review and comment on VI specific utility and access proposals when presented. RKW /dp E ani sza rn,1 .;—;—.----- _, run),,4/. ii.•'.1.7*1.: .: /,' I I / I , ' '.../ .- 7 • • 9. --',11.' • ; ,f'' 1 i ' , ,--- ks „,„ • .:::,,-&--' ATTACHMENT " • : , 8 .-. ...--"- ,..- I I ,- ',.. --- ---... — '1 ./ mi -;,,---- 1:-,- r \ • , > .-- - -,-, , . ' __..---,, . _.::_..- ■L_-_-_---i --- --- ..--;- ( I ' ' 1 .• ( r:--- : -"\ \ IT =3.= • / ,-,./ t .--V - * ,,-------"----;'- 1 ® 1 .- i -;,-------,,,, \ j ■___ l''?,- ./ 1 I \ ° • - -_, - 1' , _ ..• - - , ih- • 2 /1 j / /,(,///,/,, /P. ••••2;.../ I , , / /IT; ,' , • / / 1 ! / 7 1 /. , ; / , / / ' y / / • / ki__r4 8 • • • . t - _ , , / , , / - . -, t-- i- - r--------"-'----------F--- ,._ ., • TI1TT -t • ----- agg[ITLPW ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 93301 NE BIM, BELLEVUE, WA. 9000B 1200-7•7.4000 ,Ilti,:•■•• .', ''' ... J . .... .: ..... • • • • .......... . ...... • • 50 N 10 1 In5 • F 50Nla11ne • 50 NI O 11116 F E C ATTACHMENT "E" • • ......... ........ • • ...... • • ....... ..... • • • ...... • • • • ............. • • • • • "' ....... • ... A TTACHMEO" F" m m E 0 0 0 P 0 co 2 at Z) r ✓ 0 A O P m 0 r 0 G) 5 NE r- 03 c r 0 z LIst)@@kPW EEID, ODD 1 ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 1E301 NE OTN, BELLEVUE, WA. OBOOB 12013-747•40000 ••• ........... • ....... •••• -•• ........ soNla-line w r 0 Z 0 co , j • lid • sOnnanine w ATTACHMEr lag @UTP T J J S v rz b'cDhE ca o c o beta, ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 18301 NE 0111. BELLEVUE. WA. 98008 000.747.4050 ... r.' E�EVATIO"7 - .NT 'r tee' •-∎ �i`it - "!.7,4,7-1,-... yi ,.; . (:. ... EDg@OTPW TEA- NIEHQR pp@op LIE& LL2 Pil-ernigarth CONDOMINIUMS tvtoPa.A. INNOWOO TAM -0N101, CO ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 15301 NE 011.4. BELLEVUE. WA. 9000131201,747-0050 ■ ...... ......... • • .. .. .. . ' . . . -••• ... • • • ......... -••• . ..... ......... ...... ••• -•■ 0 E 0 Irl E 0 z x rrz p r It‘ ■Isem !NON ATTACHMENT "I" -o 0 0 P1 H 0 zZ rri E 011-41' r _ L— J No/ Fl p Lrfizort.,) ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 111130i •■• •,4. ••“-IVUS, WA •1100. 110111-74117-4000 PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS CAR PORT ELEVATIONS 3/1611=11-0" Planning Commission Page 4 Minutes 28 September 1978 Chairman Kirsop recessed the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Chairman Kirsop reconvened the meeting at 10 :15 p.m. CORPORATE SQUARE Mr. Blaylock explained drawing and read the staff report. Mr. Richards felt stipulations #4 and 5 were unnecessary. Mr. Bob Kacel, Leason Pomaroy, mentioned the irrigation of the landscape areas was completed and he did not foresee any problems with complying with stipula- tion #1 of the staff report. MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS THAT THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN BE DENIED UNTIL OWNER CAN SHOW NEED FOR IT. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND. Mr. Richards mentioned that he felt it wasn't safe for employees to walk that far to work. MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MRS. AVERY AND CARRIED THAT THE PROPOSAL FOR THE SITE /LANDSCAPE PLAN BE DENIED PENDING JUSTIFICATION. MR. BOWEN VOTED NO. RK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS Mr. Blaylock read and explained the staff report. Mr. Blaylock noted that stipulation #3 of the staff report should read 50 -foot right -of -way not 60. Mr. Blaylock displayed and explained exhibit #11 concerning access road. Commission discussed stipulation #1 of staff report. Mr. Leonard Milbrant, Architect, 16042 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, explained fire truck access to complex. Mr. Milbrant mentioned the buildings were approximately 200 feet long. Mr. Richards felt this was not an unreasonable distance to lay out fire hose. Mr. Milbrant mentioned that the buildings are located far enough apart to avoid spreading a fire. Mr. Milbrant explained how trail connected to 62nd Avenue South. Mr. Milbrant explained that open space was less than what was mentioned in staff report and will amend them and return them to the planning staff. Mr. Blaylock explained stipulation #3. Commission discussed access road location. Mr. Milbrant explained that they were working with the Public Works Department's desires. �. Planning Commission Page 5 Minutes 28 September 1978 MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THE LOCATION OF THE TRAIL CONNECTING 62ND AVENUE SOUTH TO THE TUKWILA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOULD BE CLARIFIED AND IMPROVED FULL LENGTH DURING PHASE I. 2. THAT THE ACCESS STREET BE MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ACCESS AGREEMENT OF EXHIBIT #11. Mr. Milbrant said the parking stalls were 9' x 20'. SKARBO LANDSCAPE PLAN Mr. Blaylock read the staff report. Commission and staff discussed location of sidewalk. Mr. Satterstrom stated that sidewalks have been required on other developments along Southcenter Parkway namely Benaroya and Parkway Plaza. Mr. Mahlum desired to have sidewalk along edge of parking lot, not road. Chairman Kirsop questioned poplars along property line. Mr. Satterstrom informed Mr. Mahlum that curb -cuts in commercial areas are 24', thus, staff recommended landscaping for area not shown on landscape plan. MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS AND SECONDED BY MR. BOWEN TO APPROVE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. PLANTING AREAS ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PERIMETERS BE IRRIGATED IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER. 2. SIDEWALKS ON EAST PERIMETER BORDER SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; PLANTING ON EAST PERIMETER BORDER PARKING AREA. 3. CENTRAL LANDSCAPE STRIP ON SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BE EXTENDED TO ENSURE NORTH CURB -CUT WILL NOT EXCEED 24' WIDTH, PER TMC 18.56.040. 4. SOUTHWEST PORTION OF LOT BE LEFT AS NATURAL VEGETATION. MR. RICHARDS WITHDREW MOTION AND MR. BOWEN WITHDREW SECOND. MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS AND SECONDED BY MRS. AVERY TO APPROVE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. PLANTING AREAS. ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PERIMETERS BE IRRIGATED IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER. - 2. CENTERAL LANDSCAPE STRIP ON SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BE EXTENDED TO ENSURE NORTH CURB -CUT WILL NOT EXCEED 24' WIDTH, PER TMC 18.56.040. • Pacific Townhouse Builders Seattle office: Mariner Building, 1370 Stewart Street, Suite 105, Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 682 -7830 Bellevue office: 1115 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -1726 December 14, 1979 Mr. Kjell Stokness Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Stokness: DEC i 7 So: This letter is Pacific Townhouse Builders' written notifi- cation that Phase I of the " Sunwood" condominium project (Ord. 1071) will be increasing the unit count from 91 to 92. The additional unit being added to the northeast corner of building B (building 2); it will be a third floor type "A" unit. Also, Pacific Townhouse Builders will insure that there is a total of 138 parking stalls for Phase I (1.5 requirement). With this change, building A and B (1 and 2) will be iden- tical in design and elevation appearance. The Building Depart- ment should delete sectional 5 -A -28 and 5 -A -26, page A -10 of the Building Permit set of plans. Please be advised that the total number of units of "Sunwood" (Ord. 1071) will remain 180 as approved by the City Council, the only difference being that with the incorporation of this change, there will be 92 units in Phase I and 88 units in Phase II. Sincerely, PACIFIC TOWNHOUSE BUILDERS Donald F. Dally, Partn'r cc. Mr. Al Pieper, Director, Building Dept. Mr. Dick Gilroy Mr. Leonard Milbrandt t S�� (7//f/79 Pleatte (Sr .fin €5O (1 Pe 4 L4 o -J 1908 k .City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard o Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor M E 0 RAN D U M - s��` TO: Al PTpO Building Official \� r .' FROM: Fred.%N. Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor J ► ; %- `� t ' ,� ��:� A. DATE: 2:5 ay 1979 :) j r14 /Y SUBJECT: Parke Place Grading Permit /� ;1 1) f;JJ IT ,�' J 11- �,n' V r�' I have reviewed the Planning Division files on the Parke Place development and find nothing which would pre -empt the City from issuing a grading per- mit prior to a building permit if certain conditions are fulfilled. It should be understood that the grading permit of which I speak relates only to the grading activities required for roadway and parking lot areas, and specifically excludes any grading for building sites. This area is defined by a red line on the grading permit application maps. Following are the Planning Division's recommendations: 1. Grading activities to be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. At no other times are any grading activ- ities authorized per this permit. 2. No blasting or use of explosives is authorized per this grading per- mit. Any such activity must be requested under separate cover. 3. The "affected area" (i.e., that area outlined in red on grading per- mit application) shall be flagged on the site and inspected by a representative of the Office of Community Development prior to com- mencement of grading activities. Such City representative shall inspect the site with representatives of the owner /developer and, together, said representatives shall make every reasonable effort to retain major trees in planned parking and maneuvering areas. Following inspection and approval by the 0.C.D. representative, such approval to be made in writing to the owner /developer, authorized grading activities may commence. 4. Clearing and grading activities for roadway purposes must be approved by Public Works Department pursuant to concomitant zoning agreement of Ordinance #1071. S. Clearing and grading activities associated with this permit must be . approved by the Responsible Official (SEPA) prior to issuance of permit. FNS /ckh cc: File MF 106 -R O. Dir . Wks. Dept. City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 - Office of Community Development 2 March 1979 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director FROM: Fre . Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor SUBJECT: Revis d Site Plan Proposal. Park—PTace Don Dally of Pacific Townhouse Builders, developers of the proposed Park Place complex, claims the plans for L.I.D. #29 will indirectly impact the placement of buildings in their site plan. He asserts that the proposed elevation of the planned intersection improvement of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street (approximately 10 feet lower than existing elevation) will require extensive excavation for the entrance driveway which, in turn, necessitates shifting certain buildings northward. I contacted Frank Martin of Jones & Associates to verify the proposed ele- vation of 62nd Avenue at its intersection with South 153rd Street upon com- pletion of L.I.D. #29. According to him, the proposed elevation is 161 feet, not 1572 as shown on the revised Park Place site plan. The existing elevation of the roadway is 170 feet, so the vertical cut will be approxi- mately 9 feet at this point. After examining the original site plan and comparing it to the new revised site plan, I'm not convinced it is necessarily the L.I.D. which is respon- sible for the shift in the site plan. Attached you will find a rather simplistic drawing which shows the amount of excavation along the proposed driveway under (a) existing conditions with no change in roadway elevation, and (b) with proposed elevation at driveway intersection according to plans for L.I.D. #29. As you can see, either plan calls for significant excava- tion in order to accommodate the driveway. Plan B,-of course, does require the greater amount of excavation. It is my opinion that even the original site plan would have required some shifting in building location if an engineered retaining wall were not in- stalled along the face of the excavation. The revised site plan does not propose to use retaining walls at all but instead utilizes a slope of 12 H: 1 V. Note that the revised site plan proposes to break Building . #5 into two (2) Kjell Stoknes Memorandum . RECOMMENDATION: Page 2 2 March 1979 The cut which will result from the driveway excavation will not be pretty. According to my crude calculations, the vertical cut into the slope could be 22+ feet in some places if the elevation of 62nd Avenue South is dropped nine feet by L.I.D. #29. Nevertheless, extensive excavation of rock for roadway access at 62nd Avenue South was forseen as an unavoidable adverse impact in the Final environmental impact' statement and was contemplated on the Grading Plan which became Exhibit IV to Ordinance #1071. Before any excavation or grading can be done on the site, a building or grading permit will have to be issued. Before a building permit can be issued, the site plan (and other details) must be reviewed and approved by the Board of Architectural Review. Because of the severity of the pro- posed excavation, it will be incumbent upon the Board to: - reduce or mitigate the adverse visual impact of the excavation - ensure the stability of the cut slope - Preserve as much natural tree growth as possible in the "preservation zones," particularly in the southernmost areas - ensure quality building design and materials in all buildings; again, particularly in the highly visible buildings along the south edge of the property Therefore, I recommend we accept the idea of possible shifts or relocation of structures as generally depicted in the revised site plan submitted by Don Dally (attached) subject to the following. conditions: 1. Exact locations of all buildings in Phase I to be approved by the Board of Architectural Review. 2. Detailed drawings showing cut, slope, rockery, or retaining wall details be submitted for B.A.R. review and approval. 3. Soil tests in the driveway entrance area be completed prior to excavation of said driveway entrance. Purpose of the soil test is to determine extent of necessary cut area prior to undertaking of excavation activities. FNS /ckh Attachment zd Entrance 10 talk Place, p� fnhcoexiioi c 64-*1 hrenue $. flan 5 Mminfes e /,eweriai of elevation at 6L44 Avenue, Driveway rule alt /S 4.A • CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 October 1978 Mr. Leonard J. Milbrandt McClarty and Johnson, P.S., Inc. 16301 Northeast 8th Street Bellevue, Washington 98008 RE: PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS PHASE I /SITE PLAN APPROVAL Dear Mr. Milbrandt: The Tukwila Planning Commission at their regular meeting on Thursday, September 28, 1978, approved Phase I of the Park Place Condominiums development as presented, if the following conditions are met in addi- tion to those imposed by Ordinance #1071 of the City of Tukwila: 1. The location of the trail connecting 62nd Avenue South to the Tukwila Elementary School should be clarified and improved full length during Phase I. 2. That the access street be modified to reflect the access agreement of Exhibit #11. Specific review for final approval of the access design will be con- ducted by the Department of Public Works. If I can be of any further assistance, please call me at 433 -1848. RJB /ch Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3 October 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Terry FROM: Rog SUBJECT: PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS I noticed when I prepared the review for the Planning Commission concerning the Park Place Condominiums that two (2) conditions imposed by the Council which are directed to your review authority as Public Works Director should possibly have been combined into one condition. The first condition requires that you "approve road access to the property along 62nd Avenue South" while the second limits "a11 construction including grading and clearing activities.... to be substantially the same as Exhibit I - XII as contained in the Office of Community Development Planning Division Master File #MF- 78- 06 -R." I would be happy to provide you with copies of all of the conditions, if you don't already have them. RJB /ch 6230 Southcenter Boulevard ■ Tukwila, Washington 98I88 ■ (206) 242 -2177 • City of Tukwila Fire Ch of Crawley Fire Department OFFICE E Fi MEMO TO: Planning Dept. FROM: Fire Marshal SEP 2 2, 191E CO Of 100/411A SUBJECT: Comments and requirements for proposed Parkplace Condominiums & DATE: Campanella waiver. 9 -21 -78 Parkplacei 1. Waterflow tests need to be made, at the developer's expense, in order to demonstrate that adequate water is available for firefighting purposes. Fire flow requirements shall be deter- mined by the Fire Dept. using the schedule of the Insurance Services Office. 2. Fire apparatus access is totally inadequate for buildings #1, 2, 4 & 5. 3. Any buildings with interior hallways or corridors shall be protected fully by automatic sprinkler systems. 4. Any parking areas under buildings shall be protected by automatic sprinkler systems. Campanella: 1. Grades and resultant access roads and drives are too steep for Fire apparatus use. 2. Any parking or driving areas under buildings shall be protected by automatic sprinkler systems. 3. If the development were to be approved as shown, it would be afirm requirement that the total structure be protected by an automatic sprinkler system. 4. It is doubtfull that sufficient water is available to satisfy fire flow requirements for such a structure. Up to date flow tests will be required. 5. Fireplace chimneys as shown present a severe and unacceptable fire hazard. 6. The total conflagration hazard potential of such a structure is reminiscent of the antiquated and presently illegal construction of "Row-Houses" such as are found in areas such as Boston, New York, Ireland and England. This type of structure is totally no acceptable to the Tukwila Fire Dept. cc: TFD file Sincerely: Jim Hoel Chief. City of Tukwila i Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 September 14, 1978 City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Attn: Planning Dept. Re: Park Place Condominium Phase I Site plan approval submission Dear Fred, maalarty and Johnson, p.s., Inc. architects and planners 16301 northeast eighth street bellevue, washington 98008 phone: (206] 747 -4050 ECEI VE SAP 14 1978 CITY OF nxcrviu Herewith please find the required drawings and statistics for the required site plan review process by the Planning Commission. If there are any questions, or additional information required please call me at 747 -4050. Sincerely, McCLARTY & JOHNSON, P.S., INC. Leonard J. Milbrandt Enclosures LJM:lmh willis r. moclarty, president ben h. johnson, aia, secretary - treasurer edwin r. gamon, aia, vice president robert k. depner, aia, vice president PARK PLACE CONDO PROJECT STATISTICS PHASE I LOCATION: CITY OF TUKWILA CODES: tukwila zoning ordinance and ubc 1973 EDITION SEISMIC ZONE: III FIRE ZONE: III OCCUPANCY: H- MULTI - FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V -N, & V -ONE HOUR IN R -4 ZONE ZONING: Area Acreage DU /acre R -4 145,566 3.34 21.3 R -3 90,749 • 2.08 9.62 GREEN BELT 35,375 .81 0 SITE AREA 271,690S.F". 6.23 acres SITE COVERAGE / Total Project 17.8 40 1'(` Phase one 41,444S.F. 73 PAVING COVERAGE Total Project Parking and Roads Walks and Patios Tennis Court Pool and patio ma \y✓ 66,022S.F. 10,643 7,200 2,800 86,665S.F. OPEN AREAS 143,581S.F. UNIT STATISTICS Phase one Zone Zone R -4 24 - C units R -3 8- B units 12 - D units 8 - G•units 18 - E units 4 - H units 12 - F units 5 - E mod. units 71 units 20 units 91 total PARKING STATISTICS Zone Spaces req'd. _ _Provided R -4 107 110 R -3 40 40 147 150* *75 of these spaces are covered DENSITY Total project (single family N.I.C.) 17.05 D_.U. /acre Phase One (single family N.I.C.) 16.79 D.U. /acre PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUM BUILDING STATISTICS • Building #1 6 - F unit (1 BR) @ 850 S.F. = 5100 9 - E unit (1 BR) @ 995 S.F. = 8955 3 - E mod. (2 BR) @ 1250 S.F. = 3750 6 - D unit (2 BR) @ 1100 S.F. = 6600 total 24 units net sq. ftg. 24,405 S.F. common areas corridors 3160 stairs 822 gross 28,387 S.F. Building #2 (same as bldg #1 minus 1 - E mod. unit.) total 23 units Building #3 Recreation Building Building #4 and 5 bldg 4 bldg 5 net sq. ftg. 23,155 S.F. corridors 3160 stairs 822 gross 27,137 S.F. Lower level Upper level 12 - C unit @ 1060 S.F. .= 12 - C unit @ 1060 S.F. = net sq. ftg. Buildings #6 and 9 bldg 6 bldg 9 1200 S.F. 1400. S.F. 2600 S.F. 12,720 S.F. 12,720 S.F. 25,440 S.F. 2 - H unit (1 BR) @ 828 S.F. = 1656 2 - G unit (2 BR) @ 1124 S.F. = 2248 3904 same as above 3904 net sq. ftg. 7,808 S.F. Buildings #7 and 8 bldg 7 bldg 8 2 - B unit (2 BR) @ 1175 = 2350 2 - B mod (2 BR) @ 1230 = 2460 4,810 S.F. same as above 4,810 net sq. ftg.. 9,620 S.F. re • Septembe•7, 1978 PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS Recreation Space Required Recreational, areas Total project - 180 units @ 200 SF /D.U. = 36,000 S.F. Phase one - 91 units @ 200 SF /D.U. = 18,200 S.F. Provided Recreational areas - Total Site Covered Recreational Areas Tennis court Pool & Patio Rec. Bldg. 7,200 S.F. 2,800 S.F. 2,600 S.F. Total covered 12,600 S.F. Uncovered Recreational Areas A - Wooded plus lawn areas with slope less than 1:4 (1) 4,988 S.F. (2) 7,000 S.F. Phase I (3) 4,983 S.F.* (41) 12,300 S.F. 29,771 S F (4,) 7,750 S.F. (51. 5,020 S.F. Phase II (6) 7,050 S.F. (7) 3,800 S.F. (8) 4,635 S.F. (9) 6,840 S.F. ** 35,095 S F 29,771 S.F. 35,095 S.F. Total 64,866.S.F. Uncovered Recreational Areas B - Wooded open space with slope greater than 1:4 max allowed 64,866 S.F. (50% of total) Area Totals Covered 12,600 Uncovered less than 1:4 64,866 . Uncovered more than 1:4 64,866 Total Recreation Area provided 142,332 S. 790 S.F. /Dwelling Unit. *Area (3) will include a fenced area with swings and small play toys for pre- school age children adjacent to pool area. * *Area (9) will include a giant toy play zone at the top of open space hill. (SEE SITE PLAN FOR RECREATION ZONES) LEc. 290 240_ — 230— _ 220_ - 210 - -_ 200__ _ 190___- 190 _- 17.0_ I60 150__ 14Q_ 15Q_ AYeo4 SECTION D -0 Z N !n is%19ryrICo A'r. 5U11.4711-1& -- -- OVICO D Pte *ea stare ertecter OncovERst, Rec. Ate slope less I" A 50 -0" VK.-Ter7 RIUtT OF WAY L'D 225 220 53X,E TRAJL •h5i Ml LINK '1p 'iLil OOL PER FkRrS ti 12ECZEATIONJ CMPT ro0 155 G4571,40 1-191 .66. 62 ND AVE SO Apr ¢ �. SITE PLAN 1 "•50' -0" NORTH ms a°, a W" a Zn m Zo a Qm 0 Jo amm �3 • i W i W J WJ W L m r z ao Q� m rr� ❑O Q �❑ VV CD2V ITfjI�I VV VV 129 • ■ li MAR '3Q 19-,I,t7 FEW- MAR -:,I,.397S REY- AUG 2, 1978 77 -99 • - •.', t - . •, -. :. •-•• ' • . f • • .. t7:7,4."-T-...---,,,‘: . ." . . • -`;',.' ...' .. .-.- :,• •• ..,,.. . • !•-•• .;.1"-..!:: ', •-... ....• ',L, . • -s, ' •:: I. .',..." -.;:l. ...•,-!:"."...:: .." . , :. . s;Liz, "t ' , .. • , •,-41.i.asmisife•concipi:--- • , ' ;:..' . " '7';g Li: ::-......;:,,....‘....; ., ::: : • • • , .. :.'. '', • .... , . . 1 :1* •••.., Azi %.Gi• '.. -Aee.;,::.4,174en '.94..,;d3..t be 1 as they sow aulef '7, All .of ' • .', • ;:;.•,....,:*•., ' t ... .. *"..';. •*; , .t, , ...J.; tli98 e•••eisiies.v111. be unto:J.:for a trail, system., , l'oest. vlel? tee .. * .... 1 . •••• . ::-. ;. . ' 'eaeeetion of .age .open ei•il....Orthf,f1.1'.6f•Ehe ,. *m.Y be-cr..v.,:_ . . f '.. '-'' i': •.'..,:.'•.•'..'-• °Y.'14I'''"!..‘.'"''`.`0':il't*Pq!6,.''' '-11 -..'. ' f• .- .- '.i: ; '• ' • - • . — 7v-FirsZe14.d,tk,' • • • , • 'egg te r0iee 1•-s. 1,;1•fll*,' • • . *'*(31 ,9i.ediaces not • tn- Prestov.40n ioge.s rip be 00bi81y 01eo,' ; • - • ..• • 1eee ie,1.4...ea es p0 oii. 1 • 141. !eleitlacemant tiCele ■eigu.1.. by-rezone cesidifien1,16 rill • coricintisated'igliarklee artaidi40 viauallf brealOs Paved vocaa• • Vdiere-tiviluldVal•ptevacy •Irgit pubLic arms le a concern, dense -: - eVeOgr00ll 00r08009 .411 be provided...4 • f 1 p i1 •, .* • lava 00000 °'7"°•1. • • 000 3"■••,‘ , ,i• • ••• • *• •= • • (-71 Decoradive shrubs and t-rees v111 Mt used ao.pilvvide color and accent 01 building entries and public-areal. • t • 18) Planting bedOell a gretIii cover of ley; seller, cr.regoeigrape, • and Varga 01.0) 0. used al4 traosittonizeireell.- andlgrootb prWeervat.tog'sones. anVits complicertervesslid' parking areas. 2,0 • • . 205 B01.446RY R-3 R-4 (9 5 190 16.5 i 11\111 MDTI • • is0 N 0 INJ 10 �o w 2 (6 2 (9 ti -ID a 0 4 (I) 3 U e, I I CC ICT ,( 77-99 0 ro z 0_ LI -:-.5-r-r.15" 1 1 117�41 _s u ��1�rTTTT rya 4112.:. 1!li(4 he G°3OMMT BODE GL I V TDOGJ . BUILDINGS .I & 2 %WNW E A G°3 . C ll C MAT D OO flvJ BUILDINGS 1a 2 L ffX T EIIOrZ FINISH S61- 1PUL SIvlNH: - TI.ICGO - TtZIM, F ALGONIEs -EP& . SNAKES W I t4P.PJAISI ANOD i-e-E>7 ALUM. Ft ME.. • 1 I 1 __J L -I 1 ' L .4:. �' L - L J • • FIKE1'LacE5: PAINT METAI CHIMNEY TOPS FLAT 6L,ACIG. IFG°3Of 'T C L V TDOO N BUILDINGS I a 2 J ❑O 0 O O or 3 [LEFT MDN)L E E MA OO INI BUILDINGS I 84 2 14 E;-1". -18 ( 77 -99 111111M �I 111 — ■■!■'.I u ��I =°11111111111111r- 111 � iwnuwui • [7.11 CXTERJOR PIHISH SGICDULE SIGI NO: IA S GEGAR CHANT-4n- 51GIN(&. TeIM c i ) 4 cRDAR GoRN�IZ TRIM. I x10 CEDAR FASCIA A- pA E Gcx4lznS. FZOOFIN bs GE PAR SHAKE -S. 1,4114120141: A NOPI EE9 ALUM KEAME-,, FIIZEPL.OGE • PAINT METAL Gr{I MI.IE:Y TOPS FLAT ESL.AGK. RIM ,INEM � �'�. 111111111Eeeu.ii11 illllllllli �� Itn::a...... ca an ��_ • �nunnn a_e=4..■•■-e NE .An CS E VAT U- BUILDINGS 4 a 5 0= laT O f-i L7 • ?b _-A IP � II 11 FG2CDN1 11 ELEV. `L- L_ F U SOME ELEV. REC. BLDG. REC. BLDG. __ LEFT a1:DCE BEM BUILDINGS 4 a 5 L- - - - - - - - 1 I -- - - - - - - -{ _1 1 ~ •1 G°3C L,G°3 C LE Mo REC. BLDG. G°31:10D T ff, E LE V. REC. BLDG. G°30GHT' BODE C LLa =II u! 111PIf A a rap 171: 0 11 tn O Ot ►- m U) w 00 1 w CC m ■ TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 145E-rr. "18 ( 77 -99 1 ( 77-99 ) I; I ill 'II ;11 TOP OF PLATE R LEVEL GRAD • LDNOT. B FG;'3MOMT ELEVA,TOCDN 1/4" BUILDINGS j 7 a 8 Tio riN 15ri SChULE SI PI 1"44I' I Y. fs ZEI2AR CHANNEL. -51716, fC p...1 I y 4 L E.12.4a. y c'a 17Atz L;SAF-LE--- -sH k I mAeg=ra M NT METAL_ 4.HINISIE.Y TOPS FLAT I31-Ae-K 1 LEVEL LIVING ROOM • • 0 CO CO 0 w _J lil ID o5 N U) 0 m UNIOT B - LEAE=2 ELEVATE:DOM 1/4" BUILDINGS 7 ta 8 ...C. • a • ■ / ..-•■ 6_, ..--- ..._ . .... ....- 0;11111---.6111111•••11.7.06■7,1r= A....77...1.■ , - 1114,7:alli....4..'• NI ■-•••■••a. ........'s. -..., Pim.= 1111 1.....;',.■ . - JUT 9 - SOME ELEVATOMOM 1/4" BUILDINGS 7 a t4 4,E11: I1-1 P173MINT ELEV. BUILDINGS 6 a 9 ME.AG73 ELEV. fir BUILDINGS 6 a 9 • _ • FICDE ELEV. 6 & 9 111 0 VI ID �o w 2 Zo 410 es a a) Ui im 3 '3 111 i m.„. I I; a 6 4 2 FRONT ELEVATOMINI BUILDING 10 EXTffflOR ffINISH SCHEDULE : ES CE0Ax GHANNE,.. 510,K40. 1R RA 1 X 4 C.E.AR 6,0FenjeF 1 X.10 capp,F2 rAscIA & oArzcie RODF'INC., •• CEDAR. SHAKE F-0 C.ff NIMPOWS: 41,10121r7 ALUM. FK-clrlE riszan_Ac_r s • 0A Nrr we TA C I wINEY" ToP5 "1-.4% K , lk BUILDING 10 LE [LE VAT 0 CD NI MODE ELEV. BUILDING 10 (I) z 0 1d LiJ as 0 0 0 14 ••".E.'F'1. 1118 77-99 Yandsupiq}'ncapt S yY -, yr w.' i eaivaal n rode r111 ba left they newo:S.o . Ari of for,; a'ti':iL ey 5�,q, �, - A1LSOd$ w t CM- ouapaioa ol. ph. open apace - northadaO'ot.'Ltle rt4ge Rey;?e ercea by r=ility eaaeeconm iLSegoi ;¢{•'••, a.� a^ - • fr (•j.) 9.0.ldlne gild parkLlqas•(f :will.1ee;Otak.d` M 'veers 'possible.: • :^1fted•to 'ie Aan majo>� .'.S-." • -,J ea'nob In 'preaery t(o ranee: ieleeY,iv, lk• learak selsinad as pc tkble -(4) •'Rai4atesene'bto2$'requir d bj rezone condi ion d6 111, bs p tmatily • conoantaated' f,n parki.ng '. do visually, yeakup. paged; ' (gl,• Nhls individual privacy fraoi publie area 1e a cern, derma.' evergreen .c ning em11 b. 'provided., ''•� (6). Latin areas ra}} bee placed a4444Eant to undo){ .hl erioeae' urol�e'. (7);• Oocxacive aerobe and tie.* tll'De ed'aa provide e61o[ and • :teener: n! bualdloq .enacting and p bti exert (a P1 ¢Ling th • a giwad.eovo f ivy la 1 gragan:yg pe and,fe whLi-0g used.4. Va a10n. Dntr ealLre ana:OF 9 Cionlzonea .an4 as comp- }Smentr_ rzeFa.,yn Pna'!un9 .0 -.. 220. • .:t ,� 1 ��. • .O 0 TEMPORARY TURNAROUND i4 - 5-P -f:" 18 77 -99 79 -1 -SMP 79 -2 -SS 79 -3 -R 79 -4 -SMP 79 -5 -CUP 79 -6 -V 79 -7 -SS 79 -8 -V 79 -9 -W 79 -10 -SMP 79 -11 -CA 79 -12 -A 79 -13 -A 79 -14 -A 79 -15 -A Trammell Crow Warehouse Park Granted Inactive Delniel Recorded Granted Denied Approved Approved APprovej- Appraqe 1 3 c - { ! t 7 315E 344W 334E 345W 325W 344W 335W 344W 334W 325E 315E 350W 324E 79- 4 -SMP McCann Pro- 2/27/79 ject #452 i- I L ;: NO. NAME 79- 1 -SMP Trammel Crow Warehouse Park Terranomics Short Plat 79- 3 -R Schneider 79- 5 -CUP Weymouth Motel 79- 6 -V Terranomics Sign Variance 79- 7 -SS Western Athletic Club 79- 8 -V McLester 164th 79- 9 -W McNamara FILE DATE 2/ 1/79 3/ 1/79 3/12/79 3/14/79 3/27/79 4/ 5/79 BOARD OF ADS. HEARING DATE DECISION &. DATE P.LI\NN I NG DEPARTMENT .STER FILE OF HEARJ NG S PLAN. COMMISSION DECISION APPEAL .CITY' COUNCIL HEARING DATE & DATE :MEETING DATE as Feb?uct /9 vevixd a -�a -79 DECISION RESOLUTION OR COMMENTS & DATE ORDINANCE NO. g! LtM VIA FILE NO. :• HAME FILE DATE : (WARD OF ADJ. HEARING DATE DECISION & DATE P.LANNI G DEPART PLAN. COMMISSION HEARING DATE • E► -. s - DECISION & DATE c OF APPEAL . . HEARINGS . • ---- -- .CITY' COUNCIL .- MEETIIIG DATE DECISION & DATE RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE NO. COMMENTS • 79-10-SMP P I- oo -/ef- 4/12/79 • .. . • • - - - - - -- ZZ9 -11- A Alton • uvoi 4/10/79 , . April 26, 1979' • . • . 0.l+r S/2 4-4Z s� '2 /9/71 • • 7//b/79 t'pr' v 04 /1/ A Segale Anne ati on Pro- posed Zoning 7 4/25/79 9 - • !• • . • . — " - • ;' • . ' • l� r ,v I 11 79 -13 -A Crestview Annexation Zoning 5/ 9/79 79 -14 -A Riverton Annexation Zonin' . 5/16/79 . . . • _ -15 -A Schneider Annexation Zoning 5/].6/79 - • - - • • • ' .• ' • • • • • APPLICANT DESCRIPTION r INDEX OF BOUT {fir..,' Division and filed in the Land Information System (L.I.S.) file: