Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 77-40-CUP - DUBOIS TIMOTHY - DOUBLETREE CONDITIONAL USE77-40-cup 16500 southcenter parkway doubletree inn D OUBLETREE ZNN September 13, 1979 Mr. Terry Monaghan Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Terry: SOUTHCENTER • 205 STRANDER BLVD. • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 • TELEPHONE (206) 246-8220 First, I apologize for the delay in getting this alternate proposal for the first hand turn lane on Southcenter Parkway at Strander to you. As previously stated in our earlier conversation we feel that the benefits to be derived from the addition of the right hand turn lane accrue to the entire business community, not to us as individual property owners. Being part of the business community we agree with the need for the lane and agree we will benefit from the lane, but feel our benefit is no greater than any other business community property owner., Thus we feel our contribution to the right hand turn lane should be the same as other business community property owners and further we should be reimbursed for our land (at full market value) occupied by the lane and sidewalk. In the interest of all parties we are willing to compromise on our above stated position. We suggest: 1. We (Doubletree & Koehler) grant the City of Tukwila an easement to place a 5' sidewalk along our entire west property line. 2. That the City of Tukwila purchase the strip of land necessary to construct the right hand turn lane from us for a price of $3.50 per square foot. This figure represents approximately 40% of the full market value of this land. 3. That the City of Tukwila construct the new roadway and curb. cea OTHER DOUBLETREE LOCATIONS — Doubletree Inn of Phoenix • At Park Central, Mall • 212 West Osborn • Phoenix, Arizona 85013 • Telephone (602) 248 -0222 Doubletree Inn of Tucson • At Randolph Park • 445 South Alvernon Way • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • Telephone (602) 881-4200 Doubletree Inn of Scottsdale • At Fashion Square • 4710 North Scottsdale Road • Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 • Telephone (6021947.5411 Doublets•. Inn of Scottsdale • At Scottsdale Mall • 7353 East Indian School Road • Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 • Telephone (602) 994.9203 Doubletree Inn of Monterey • At Fisherman's Wharf • Monterey, California 93940 • Telephone (408) 649-4511 Page Two September 13, 1979 Terry Monaghan Under this proposal Plaza's and Stephen Koehler's combined contribution to the right hand turn lane is sizeable and this is more than a fair offer considering what we have stated previously. We look forward to resolving this matter. Cordially, Timot . subois General Manager TSD:dc cc Mayor Bauch Philip Fraser Stephen K. Koehler G. Peter Bidstrup • September 13, 1979 Dear Terry: STEPHEN K. KO EH LER COMPANY 10700 MERIDIAN AVE. N. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98133 Mr. Terence R. Monaghan Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Parkway Place S EP t 7 197$ We have had several discussions subsequent to your letter of June 15, 1979 in which you transmitted marked -up copies of grading and drainage plans for our Parkway Place Office Building, and also indicated that a recent city traffic study showed that the need for an additional northbound traffic lane in Southcenter Parkway is immediate. These discussions focused on two major issues: First, the issue . of physically accommodating the additional lane of traffic within the project site plan and, second, the issue of fiscal responsibility and burden of the additional lane. This letter will clarify our position on both of these issues. (206) 363 -8197 PHYSICALLY ACCOMMODATING THE ADDITIONAL LANE , We have always indicated our willingness to cooperate with the City to obtain this City desired additional lane. Our concern has been that of accommodating the lane within our approved building infrastructure including landscaping and parking. We are now pleased to report to you that we have received approval from the City to alter previously approved drawings so that the additional lane of traffic can be physically built without seriously impacting our project.' After receiving your letter -of June 15, 1979, we commissioned our architects to revise our site plan in a manner that would save our parking yet create room for the additional lane. STEPHEN K. KOEHLER COMPANY • Mr. Terence R. Monaghan Page Two September 13, 1979 The architect's solution was approved, as slightly modified, by the Planning Commission on July 26, 1979. Our landscaping plan, based upon this revised site plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 1979. Although we would have preferred the larger amount of landscaping area shown on our originally approved plans, we have cooperated to obtain the, necessary approvals so that the additional lane can be built. Attached for your review is one print of the revised site plan. Three areas of this revised site plan warrant further comment and clarification: 1. The "as noted" drawings returned to us were silent on radius required at the corner of Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway. With the additional 12 foot lane, a 50 foot radius would eliminate several parking spaces and the entire landscaping area at the corner. Based on this, and in part on a telephone conversation with you, we have shown a 30 foot corner radius. 2. The configuration of the curb cut at the northeast corner of the site is per your traffic engineer's recommendations. However, the roadway through the parking area is a 24' roadway as approved last year e by the Planning Commission. The "as noted" drawings are ambiguous on this and I thought it best to clarify this matter. A wider roadway would greatly reduce the previously approved parking. 3. Notes on the "as noted" drawings of June 14, 1979 make mention of a possible widening of Strander Boulevard in the future. We have developed our latest solution per the previously approved site plan, the building permit drawing set and the approved landscaping drawings. Discussions and negotiations regarding the widening of Strander Boulevard will have to take place if and when the widening becomes an immediate desire of the City. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND BURDEN One of the central issues of discussion has been that of who bears the financial burden of paying for this additional lane of traffic. We have given this matter considerable thought and we have asked the advice and consul of many technically qualified people. This period of consideration has only further reinforced our earlier conclusions. Our position STEPHEN K. KOEHLER COMPANY Mr. Terence R. Monaghan Page Three September 13, 1979 is that the full cost of the road as well as the cost of the private property at $3.50 per square foot of required land should be the burden of the City of Tukwila. Our position is based upon the following: 1. The right turn lane created is of far greater benefit to the City of Tukwila as a whole than it is to us. The traffic study has indicated that the need is immediate and would be desirable even if our project was not there. This is an improvement for the entire City and should be paid for by the City. 2. The need for this right turn lane did not arise until: over one half year after our site plan was formally approved by the City of Tukwila with letters issued on City of Tukwila letterhead indicating same; several months after a full building permit was issued for our project and, several months after financing commitments were executed. We relied upon these city approvals and commenced work on our project. The subsequent desire for an additional lane should be handled in the same fashion as it would be for an existing completed project. 3. We purchased the property in good faith only after having received City of Tukwila approval of our site plan. Financing of the building was concluded based on this �v n approval and the issuance of the building permit. The (1'� private property required by the new lane was purchased by us at considerable cost. The reduction of this land from our fee owned land reduces the value of our property and the underlying security of our mortgage loans. However, in order to cooperate and expedite the handling of this matter we are offering to deed the private property required by the additional lane to the City for $3.50 per square foot. This is less than one half the N amount we paid for the property and an even greater savings compared to present market values. We feel this amount is unquestionably fair. We would be glad to grant the City a sidewalk easement if desired. This may reduce the amount of property required to be taken. As we have both agreed upon, it will be to both of our benefits to accomplish this work as soon as possible. We expect our . building to be ready for occupancy late in December 1979. STEPHEN K. KOEHLER COMPANY Mr. Ternece R. Monaghan Page Four September 13, 1979 It would be beneficial to coordinate the street work with the completion of our landscaping and sitework on the west side of our site. Please let us know what we can do to finalize an agreement. This matter is an important one and thank you for your patience in allowing us to give the subject considerable thought. Our convictions have been founded on this thought process. Very truly yours, Ste % en K. Koehler SKK /vj Enclosure cc: Mayor Bauch August 1, 1979 Stephen K. Koehler Company 10700 Meridian Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98133 RE: Rev s oubietree Lodge Dear eve - and" Tim: V-ry truly your KS /ckh cc: Terry Monaghan Phil Fraser City °V Ad ministration 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development approval to 11 Stoknes, Director 0 ice of Community Development Mr. Tim Dubois Doubletree Inn 205 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 arkway Place Office Building n The Planning Commission at their regular meeting of July 26, 1979, approved a revision to your approved site plans for the above referenced projects to allow a five foot landscape strip and a five foot sidewalk adjacent to I feel this will give you the assurances you need that when you come back to the Planning Commission for your landscape plan approvals that they will not deny it based on noncompliance with the originally approved site plan. I appreciate your cooperation in trying to resolve the traffic problems in the general area and that you can work out an amenable solution with the Public Works Department to everyone's satisfaction. 29 March 1979 Mr. Tim Dubois, Manager Doubletree Inn Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Your request regarding certain approvals from the City of Tukwila. Dear Mr. Dubois: The City of Tukwila has reviewed and approved the following items as it relates to the new proposed Doubletree.Inn lying across Strander Boulevard to the south of the present Double - tree Inn facility: 1. All necessary zoning approvals have been granted by the City. This was accomplished through the grant- ing of the Conditional Use Permit as well as a staff review and approval of all necessary zoning matters: 2. The ingress and egress points have been authorized as a part of the Conditional Use Permit approved by the Tukwila Planning Commission. The Public Works Depart- ment was involved with that review and their approval was a part of this process. 3. The State Environmental Policy Act'has been complied with and a Final Declaration of Non - Significance provided. No additional environmental review is required on this property for this project. I hope the above satisfactorily suits your needs. Very truly yours, vj Kjll 5toknes, Director Of ice of Community Development KS /ckh cc: File `.J City 1 Tukwila Administration 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development • 1909 q ti City of Tukwila DATE: October 1, 1979 TO: Mayor Bauch FROM: Terry Monaghan SUBJECT: 6,AIWWe)2— e 6200 Southcenter Boulevard . • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 Letters from Stephen K. Koehler Company and Doubletree Inn Attached are letters from both Mr. Koehler and Mr. Dubois relative to access onto Strander Blvd. and Southcenter Parkway and the requirements for a right turn lane on Southcenter Parkway. These letters are the result of discussions back and forth regarding the impact of these two projects on traffic in the immediate area. Unfortunately, these discussions began after both buildings were under construction, but before the access permits were issued for Southcenter Parkway. Both owners felt they had acquired access approval when their plans were approved by the Planning Commission. This notwithstanding, when these project plans were reviewed by us, we asked Entranco Engineers to review the project.with respect to their traffic study. They provided us with a design and comments which showed, among other things, a new 12' wide right turn lane in the northbound leg of Southcenter Parkway. After reviewing this with Mr. Koehler and Mr. Dubois, they provided us with the proposals outlined in the attached letters. My comments on their proposals are as follows: 1) The cost of the land to the City would be: - To Koehler (6.5' X 299.72) + (24' X 6.5) = 2 X $3.50 = 7091.63, say $71,100. - To Doubletree (6.5' X 449.37) $3.50 = 10,223,17, say $10,225. $17,325. Comment: I. would suggest an MAI appraisal of land before .$3.50 per square foot is agreed upon. 2) The cost of paving to the.City would be: 803' X 6.5' X $3.00 = $15,658.5, Comment: I would suggest paving being done by developer to City Standards would most cost effective. 3) The cost of curb to the City would be: 803 L.F. X $5.00 = $4,015, say $ 4,100 Comment: I would suggest curbing be constructed by developer's contractor. say $17,000. rm Memo to Mayor Bauch Re: Letters from Stephen K. Koehler and Doubletree Inn October 1, 1979 4) The cost of sidewalk along west property lines (Southcenter Parkway) to the City would be: (803 X 5) 9 X $13.00 = $5,799, Comment: I strongly suggest that this sidewalk be installed by developers at their cost as originally approved by City. If we accept these proposals, the cost to the City would be: with sidewalks Southcenter Parkway CZ - 1-7,000 _ 4j00 5. - 5,800 $44,225 page' 2 without sidewalk - $38,425 I need your guidance regarding these proposals. I would. suggest the proposal without the sidewalk is the maximum the City should participate. Pending your comments and guidance, I am instructing that no curb cut permits be issued. TRM /jm cc: Phil Fraser Kjell Stoknes say $ 5,800. PLANNING BUILDING PARKS & RECREATION! CITY of TUKW1LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 14 October 1977 Mr. Timothy DuBois, Manager Doubletree Inn 205 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Conditional Use Permit Dear Mr. DuBois: The Tukwila Planning Commission, at a special meeting of 13 October 1977, conducted a public hearing to consider your application for Conditional Use Permit to authorize construction and operation of a motel /restaurant complex near the southeast corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway. The Commission, based on the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report and testimony received and conclusions reached during the public hearing, granted a Conditional Use Permit for the development described in the applica- tion (City of Tukwila Planning Division M/F #77 -40) with the following stipulations: 1. On -site traffic circulation problems alluded to during the public hearing (specifically, turn- around circulation at building entrance) be con- sidered for modification of the site plan. 2. The landscape strip adjacent and parallel to Southcenter Parkway be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at driveway inter- sections and include a sidewalk. 3. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, to include the canopy and pedestrian bridge, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of Building Permit. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 N (206) 212 -22177 Mr. Timothy DuBois, Manager Sincerely, Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner GC /ch cc: Mayor Bauch Dir, OCD Bldg Off Page 2 Doubletree Inn 14 October 1977 4. Landscape along Southcenter Parkway, within the boulevard driveway and along the periphery of ,. the site shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper and all such areas as well as those ad- jacent the buildings shall include an automatic irrigation system. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of the Occupancy Permit. 5. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by Title 19 (TMC) for commer- cial use areas. This correspondence shall constitute the Conditional Use Permit together with the conditions stipualted hereinabove and must accompany application for Building Permit. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Special Meeting, 13 October 1977. This special meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission was called to order at 8:00 P.M. by Chairman Kirsop with Commissioners West, Avery, Sowinski, Bowen, Richards and Hartong present. Gary Crutchfield represented the Plan- ning Division. Chairman Kirsop noted this meeting had been scheduled to conduct the Public Hearing for the Doubletree Lodge Conditional Use Permit application. Opened the Public Hearing at 8:02 P.M. and Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report and explained its Exhibits. Mr. Peter Bidstrup, Doubletree Corporation, thanked the Planning Commission for scheduling this meeting and introduced his associates, Mr. Timothy DuBois of Doubletree Corporation and Mr. Bob Smith of Peter Lendrum Associates, architect for the project. Mr. Smith displayed and explained drawings of the atrium, ground floor, typical floor, building elevations and site plans. Noted his objection to the recom- mended 25 -foot wide landscape strip adjacent Southcenter Parkway. Stated the 15 -foot wide strip required under the CM zone will provide enough area to accomplish the city's objective, that is, visual relief. Commissioner Richards noted that a taxi, after dropping off a passenger at the motel entrance, will be forced to circulate through a parking area. Noted a better circulation pattern would eliminate those hazards. Commissioner Avery questioned the effect on the parking required by the Board of Adjustments variance if the 25 -foot wide landscape strip is required. Mr. Smith stated the design cannot survive if that requirement is imposed. Assured the Planning Commission the desired effect can be accomplished within the typical 15 -foot wide planting strip. Commission and applicant discussed building location and functions as they related to the circulation system. Principal conclusion reached that the southwest driveway is necessary to accomodate service deliveries. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 r (206) 242 -2177 Planning Commission Page 2 Minutes of Special Meeting 13 October 1977 Commissioner Richards asked how "future" the 4 -story motel expansion is? Mr. Smith and Mr. Bidstrup both noted it is dependent upon future market considerations. Commissioner Richards noted that it is not certain and therefore the ground area assigned to it could be used to facilitate a better site and circulation design. There being no further public comment, Chairman Kirsop closed the Public Hearing at 8:55 P.M. Chairman Kirsop asked about the pedestrian bridge referred to in the Staff Report. Mr. Smith explained it would serve to connect the two motel buildings but would not necessarily be a bridge per se since the design has not been determined. Commissioner Richards questioned the degree of impact to public services. Specifically noted the Fire Department's concern about additional personnel and /or equipment. Chairman Kirsop noted the current equipment can handle the proposed development and if appropriate pre -fire planning measures are taken there should be no problem. Motion by Mr. Richards and seconded by Mr. Sowinski, based on the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report and the testimony received and the con- clusions reached during the public hearing, the Planning Commission grant a Conditional Use Permit for this application with the following stipulations: 1. On -site traffic circulation problems alluded to during the public hearing (specifically, turnaround circulation at building entrance) be considered for modification of the site plan. 2. The landscape strip adjacent and parallel to Southcenter Parkway be increased to twenty -five (25) feet in width, be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at the driveway intersection and include a sidewalk. 3. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, to include the canopy and pedestrian bridge, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of Building Permit. 4. Landscape along Southcenter Parkway, within the boulevard driveway and along the periphery of the site shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper and all such areas as well as those adjacent the buildings shall include an automatic irrigation system. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of the Occu- pancy Permit. 5. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by Title 19 (TMC) for commercial use areas. Commissioner Hartong stated that even though the 32 -foot wide utility easement along Southcenter Parkway cannot be built upon, it seems a penalty to require more than the 15 -foot wide typical strip. Mr. Crutchfield read Section 18.60.035 (8) M1 Planning Commission Minutes of Special Meeting which authorizes the Planning Commission to require greater setbacks as well as other conditions. Noted the Planning Commission is so authorized in this case because the applicant is requesting to develop a facility which is not typical; therefore, the Planning Commission may require. non-typical setbacks when it is deemed necessary for the public welfare. Motion by Mr. Bowen and seconded by Mrs. Avery to amend the main motion to delete from stipulation #2 the requirement "...be increased to twenty -five (25) feet in width... ". Ayes: 4 Nays: 2 Motion carried. Main motion, as amended, carried. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Crutchfield informed the Planning Commission that the Planning Association of Washington (PAW) will be holding their Fall Conference in Spokane on November 3 - 5. Noted the agenda seems quite worthwhile and urged any Commissioners to attend if possible. Stated money is available in the budget for expenses. Commissioner Sowinski stated he would like to attend and noted he would provide a report to the Planning Commission upon his return. Commissioner Richards asked about having a work meeting about parliamentary pro- cedures. Commissioner Avery noted she knows several parliamentarians who would probably be interested. Mr. Crutchfield noted he would schedule a work meeting in the near future for the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment as both bodies would benefit. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Hartong and carried to adjourn the meeting. Chairman Kirsop adjourned the Special Meeting at 10:05 P.M. Minutes prepared by: Gar Crutchfield Assistant lanner Hans West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission Page 3 13 October 1977 • D S ■ D 2 C a- i THIS SECTION NOT INCLUDED 8 w+o . nomads • 1110e.4o • ■ *btu mew SOUTMCINT•A •A /KWAV •+a rew NOT . ,ao 0o ' TN IS SECTION INCLUDED wrn rtw • - -^ s r (� E M E . M . �LO.DGE.. z 0 U W z 0 i I I • CI T Y OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 13 October 1977 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM. IT • PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit ( Doubletree Lodge) REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to authorize construction and operation of motel /restaurant complex pursuant to Sec- tion 18.64.020 (20) (TMC). APPLICANT: Timothy DuBois, Doubletree Inn, 205 Strander Boulevard, Tukwila LOCATION: Generally located at the southeast corner of the inter- section of Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway. SIZE: Approximately 8 acres (352,561 square feet) ZONE: CM (Industrial Park) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial (New Plan) This hearing, originally scheduled for the regular September meeting of the Commission, was formally postponed to this evening to allow completion of the environmental review. That review has been completed and a Declaration of Non - Significance issued. FINDINGS: 1. The Doubletree Inn, applicant, is pursuing purchase of Parcel II of the Allied Stores short plat generally located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway. (SEE, Exhibit A) 2. The applicant proposes to develop a motel /restaurant complex on Parcel II. Motels are classified as conditional uses under Section 18.64.020 (20) (TMC). 3. The proposed development consists of a 7 -story 208 -room building, a 4 -story 104 -room building, and a freestanding restaurant building with a seating capacity of 350. (SEE, Exhibit B) 4. A variance from the strict application of parking requirements was granted by the Board of Adjustment on 1 September 1977 which required a minimum of 500 parking spaces be provided for the uses as defined in the application, (SEE, Exhibit C). The variance was principally based upon a determination of multiple -use between uses within the two motel buildings. Planning Commission Page 2 Staff Report 13 October 1977 5. Environmental review of the proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and City of Tukwila ordinance #986 led to a Declaration of Non - Significance (SEE, Exhibit D) based on the findings and conclusions as out- lined in Exhibit E. (The basic and additional environmental information provided by the applicant exclusive of the "Trillium EIS" is attached as Exhibit F.) Consequently, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required for this proposal. 6. The site is classified CM (Industrial Park) which restricts building heights to thirty -five feet except as modified by Chapter 18.60 (TMC) which states: "In the M -1, M -2 and CM districts situated south of Interstate 405 and within the city limits, buildings may be erected to a height not to exceed three hundred feet provided ..." (SEE, Chapter 18.60.035, TMC.) 7. Section 18.64.010 (TMC) provides that the Planning Commission may authorize the proposed use under such conditions as the Commission deems necessary provided it finds: A. Such use will not materially injure the appropriate use of neighbor- ing property, B. Such use will conform to the general intent and purpose of Title 18, C. Such use will include the necessary off - street parking and loading facilities for such use. 8. The parcels situated immediately north, south and east of the subject site are designated by the new Comprehensive Plan for commercial development, classified CM (Industrial Park) and vacant while the parcel situated west and across Southcenter Parkway is designated for commercial use, classified C -2 (Local Retail) and is being developed by the MacDonald's Corporation for a fast -food service outlet. 9. The principal ingress /egress to the subject site is of a boulevard nature and is situated at least one hundred feet from either of the two driveways authorized for the MacDonald's development across Southcenter Parkway. (SEE, Exhibit G) 10. Exhibit G also indicates a secondary ingress /egress point near the southwest corner of the subject parcel. 11. The commercial strip located along the west line of Southcenter Parkway is composed of several shallow parcels whose only means of access is Southcenter Parkway. (SEE, Exhibit G) 12. The two -way left turn lane in the center of Southcenter Parkway will be heavily used for turning movements by northbound traffic to the west side of Southcenter Parkway and southbound traffic to the east side of South - center Parkway. 13. On -site parking for the proposal conforms to the minimum number of spaces required by the Board of Adjustment through a variance procedure and is well oriented to the proposed use areas. Planning Commission Page 3 Staff Report 13 October 1977 14. A typical 15 -foot wide strip of landscaping is proposed adjacent to South - center Parkway and a five -foot wide strip is proposed along the remaining periphery. The interior of the parking area and the building pads include substantial and well oriented landscape enhancement areas. 15. Exterior treatment of the buildings is described in Exhibit F to generally be opaque surfaces of muted warm tone masonry and stucco with solar bronze glass. Landscape materials and lighting are described to generally be of a uniform character to create a human -scale expression. 16. The Sidewalk Plan, adopted by the City Council under Ordinance #1025, designates the east side of Southcenter Parkway as a "high priority" link in the commercial sidewalk system. A sidewalk is not indicated in any of the plans for the proposed development. 17. Title 19 (TMC), the Sign Code, authorizes 45 -foot high signs for industrially classified lands. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Since the proposed development exceeds the basic height limit, the provi- sions of Section 18.60.035 are applicable and are assessed as follows: 18.60.035 (1): Proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. 18.60.035 (2): Proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. 18.60.035 (3): Not applicable. 18.60.035 (4): Setbacks from property lines in consideration of pro - posed building height appear to be sufficient to preclude undue effect on adjacent properties. 18.60.035 (5): Due to the general nature of the descriptions of exterior treatment and landscape materials, the Planning Commission should review detailed proposals under Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of Building Permit. 18.60.035 (6): Generally, the proposed use will not be unduly detrimen- tal to surrounding property. Several conditions, however, may be neces- sary to ensure such. 18.60.035 (7): Not applicable. 18.60.035 (8): This is a general provision which can be appropriately met under the provisions of Section 18.64.010 (TMC), Conditional Use Permit conditions. 18.60.035 (9): The Board of Adjustment has thoroughly investigated the degree of on -site parking necessary for the proposed uses. This provi- sion is therefore inapplicable. Planning Commission Page 4 Staff Report 13 October 1977 18.60.035 (10): This provision can and should be effectuated through staff review at time of Building Permit application. 2. Turning movements on Southcenter Parkway will greatly increase with this development. With commercial development of the west side of Southcenter Parkway in furtherance of the new Comprehensive Plan, a single ingress/ egress point on Southcenter Parkway will better channelize turning movements and reduce left -turn conflicts, thereby contributing to the preservation of a desirable level of safe public use of Southcenter Parkway when both sides of the street are fully developed. 3. The building height (in excess of 80 feet) will have a dramatic effect in consideration of surrounding building heights despite its setback from the streets, particularly Southcenter Parkway. To diminish this effect, a land- scape strip of greater width and bermed to provide visual relief should be included along the east line of Southcenter Parkway. The landscape materials included in the peripheral landscape strips should be of considerable size and character to attain a desirable degree of visual protection to adjacent properties within a short period of time. 4. Details of exterior treatment of the canopy and pedestrian bridge as well as the principal structures need identification and should be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of Building Permit. 5. Detailed landscape plans, to include automatic irrigation and a sidewalk along Southcenter Parkway, should be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of the Occu- pancy Permit. 6. Inasmuch as the proposed development is of a commercial nature and the new Comprehensive Plan promotes commercial development of all adjacent properties, freestanding signs should be restricted so as not to exceed the provisions established for commercial use areas under Title 19 (TMC). 7. The proposed use will conform to the general intent and purpose of Title 18 (TMC) and will not materially injure the appropriate use of neighboring property if the following measures are implemented: A. The ingress /egress point proposed near the southwest corner of the parcel be deleted and the boulevard design of the principal driveway be retained. B. The landscape strip adjacent and parallel to Southcenter Parkway be increased to twenty -five (25) feet in width, be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at the driveway intersection and include a sidewalk. C. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, to include the canopy and pedestrian bridge, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of Building Permit. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 5 13 October 1977 D. Landscape along Southcenter Parkway, within the boulevard driveway and along the periphery of the site shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper and all such areas as well as those adjacent the buildings shall include an automatic, irrigation system. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of the Occu- pancy Permit. E. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by Title 19 (TMC) for commercial use areas. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission, based on the environ- mental information and Findings and Conclusions contained in this Staff Report, grant a Conditional Use Permit for development of the motel /restaurant complex described in the application and with the stipulations listed under Conclusion #7 hereinabove. AT TIME OF PRINTING PA,“S $�CeEA*i0a 12 September 1977 Mr. Timothy DuBois Manager, Doubletree Inn 205 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Sincere y, Gary Crutckield Assistant Planner GC /ch cc: Mayor Bauch Di r, OCD Bldg Off C!TY c3= TLI K _A OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Variance Application for New Doubletree Facility Dear Mr. DuBois: The Tukwila Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting of 1September 1977, con- ducted a public hearing to consider your application for variance from Section 18.20.070 (Parking Requirements) of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC). The Board, upon due consideration of all testimony received during the hearing and based on the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report and the information contained in the variance application, granted the variance from Section 18.20.070 (TMC) with the following stipulations: 1. Development of Phase I, to include the 7 -story hotel /restaurant building and the freestanding restaurant, shall include a minimum of 500 parking spaces. 2. This variance shall be in effect only as long as the principal use of the property remains a hotel /convention facility and reflects multiple use. 3. Construction of Phase II must be reasonably initiated within five (5) years or said development shall provide parking in compliance with Sec- tion 18.20.070 (TMC). This correspondence shall constitute variance authorization and must accompany application for building permit. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. EXHIBIT C 6230 Southcenter Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 98168 ;<, (205) 242 -2177 CONDITIONAL. USE PERMI DOUBLETREE LODGE Location of Proposal Lead Agency CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT fT;C^ FINAL DECLARATIOil OF C`, ;,M C& QN- SIGIJIFICANCE Description of proposal Two multi -story motels and one restaurant • Proponent Doubletree Inn S.E. Intersection of Strander Blvd. & Southcenter Pkwv. This proposal has been determined to (,u /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4 'is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, O.C.D. Date 7 October 1977 Signature City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -32 • COMMENTS: Per Findings and Conclusions of Memo from Fred Satterstrom dated 6 October 1977. EXHIBIT D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DOUBLETREE LODGE 6 October 1977 TO: Kjell Stoknes, Responsible Official FROM: Fred Satterstrom SUBJECT: Environmental Checklist: Doubletree Lodge FINDINGS: ME1\/1U RANDUM a •�� ? C + � Z. f 7 I 'Y Aro 32—A. C=FC or CaM •:L!:. T'f C= V3LC ::-;,■:_NT The following is a short chronology of the progress of the environmental review on the proposed Doubletree Lodge: 1.. Application for Conditional Use Permit was made by Doubletree Inn, Inc. on 1 September 1977. The environmental checklist was submitted at this time. 2. The environmental checklist was distributed to and comments were received back from the Engineering Department (8 September 1977), Fire Department (19 September 1977), Police Department (14 September 1977), and Building Department (6 September 1977). 3. Additional information was requested from the applicant on 19 September 1977. 4. Applicant responded to the request for more information on 21 September 1977 and again on 30 September 1977. 5. A public hearing before the Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit is scheduled for 13 October 1977. 1. A draft Environmental Impact Statement has been completed for this.site in 1973 for the proposed Trillium project. This draft EIS was submitted as an attachment to the environmental questionnaire for the Doubletree Lodge.. 2. Some filling will occur on the site - approximately 3,200 cubic yards will be required. 3. Storm drainage will be contained on the site following construction and channeled into the public storm drain system. 4. Additional traffic which is expected to be generated by the proposed project w i l l continue to add to the downward trend in ambient air quality. 5. It is anticipated that this project alone will not create a need for additional police or fire personnel. However, cumulatively, a need for such personnel will develop as a result of further expansion oF.commercial and industrial use in . this area. EXHIBIT E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DOUBLETREE LODGE Kjell Stoknes Page 2 Memorandum 6 October 1977 6. The topography of the subject site was previously altered when the site was filled and graded, in part. 7. Increased impervious surfaces will increasx storm water runoff rates, contri- buting to the overall drainage problem associated with the Green River system. 8. The site does not contain any identified rare or endangered species of flora or fauna, and does not serve as a significant habitat for any species of wildlife. 9. The ambient noise levels of the.surrounding commercial community will be increased both during the construction phases and when the proposed complex is fully operational. 10. The proposed project itself will probably not necessitate the upgrading of street signalization but may create a need for channelization on Southcentr Parkway. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Even though completed in 1973, the draft EIS for the Trillium project sub- stantially describes the impacts which might occur today if a project such - as the Doubletree Lodge were to be built on the site. With some minor addi- tions, the Trillium EIS is generally still valid. 2. Additional information was requested concerning those factors which have changed since 1973 (traffic, utilities, etc.) and they were found to be only insignificantly impacted by the proposed project. 3. The adverse effects to the natural environment on the subject site appear to be insignificant. 4. The adverse effects to the human environment from development of the proposed project on this site appear to be insignificant. 5. The procedural requirements of SEPA seem to be substantially complied with by virtue of the draft EIS having been done in 1973. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the abovementioned Findings and Conclusions, I recommend that an EIS not be required on the Doubletree Lodge proposal. FNS /ch CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (ATTACHMENT) 6. The complex will be an exciting and unique development for Tukwila. The close proximity of the project site to major vehicular systems, the Seattle- Tacoma International Airport, and to a- growing commercial, industrial and retail center,. suggest development of a unique hotel- restaurant complex. This complex will consist of a 7 -story hotel containing 220 guest rooms surrounding a central atrium which contains ban- quet and meeting rooms, restaurant and cocktail lounge, cafe, swimming pool, jacuzzi, racket ball courts, administrative offices, and related service areas. In addition, there will be a free standing restaurant and 500 parking spaces. This mixed use concept will provide an urban vitality to the area through the interaction of people, parking, landscape, building masses, and other functions taking place. Implemen- tation of the mixed use concept will enable each enterprise to command a higher economic return in a collective manner as opposed to standing alone. The planning concept is to develop seperate but interdepen- dent functions. Site planning objectives are to insure that each use functions in all aspects (identification, parking, and servicing), without compromising other uses. Each use would compliment the other and effectively act as a complete- ly interrelated unit. A coordinated palate of materials has been selected for the entire project. All opaque surfaces (walls, parapets, land- scape elements), will be of muted warm tone masonry and stuc- co. All glazed surfaces will be solar bronze glass. All public spaces (interior and exterior) will be treated uniform- ly with respect to landscaping, lighting and paving materials. The objective being to create a natural, humanly scaled ex- pression of the basic project materials. Signing will be re- stricted to major functions. As an indication of the intended construction specifications, the hotel tower will be a fully fire protected post - tensioned concrete frame with a ribbed split- face'masonry and stucco skin, and exposed space frame roof structure. Mechanical sys- tems will provide control and temperature response equal to or better than general northwest standards. All public spaces will he finished consistent with overall project criteria, i.e . warm materials, ample lighting, etc. Elevators will be geared with a maximum interval of 30 seconds. EXHIBIT F CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DOUBLETREE LODGE Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 2 Exhibit "B" gives a general illustration of the overall pro- ject design. The phases of the planned development and the anticipated square footage of the proposed facilities are listed in Ex- hibit "C ". 7. The development resulting from the proposed action will occur on a project site located within the corporate limits of Tuk- wila. The subject site is a portion of the S.E. Quadrant beginning approximately 130 feet south of the center line of Strander Blvd. fronting on Southcenter Parkway. Interstate S intersects Interstate 405 to the northwest of the site. Landmarks in the immediate vicinity include Southcenter Shop- ping Complex to the north, Andover Industrial Park to the south, and Long Acres Race Track less than a mile to the east. The Green - Duwamish River flows about one quarter of a mile away to the east. 10. The project will be, constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase will consist of the hotel tower with its ancillary fac- ilities, a free standing restaurant and 500 parking spaces. The second phase will consist of a future tower with 104 guest rooms and supplemental meeting rooms added to the initial in- crement of construction. Explanations for "YES" and "MAYBE" answers indicated on pages two through eight. Responses to these questions are reinforced by in- formation and conclusions found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Trillium Complex previously proposed for the subject site. This report was prepared in July, 1973. The fol -. lowing answers are geared for this specific project, a project' much smaller in scope. Nevertheless, direct reference can be made to the previous Environmental Impact Statement since the majority of infor- mation contained in that document remains valid today. A copy of the reference Environmental Impact Statement appears as Exhibit "C ". Question No. 1(a) • • 1(b) Explanation The existing geologic substructure is expected to be disturbed through placement of a driven pile founda- tion system. Excavation for building foundations, site landscape features and utilties will result in soil displace- ment. Overcovering of the soil will occur from .build- ing slabs, walks and at paved parking surfaces. Question No. 1(c) 2(a) 2(b) 2(c) 3(b) 3 (d) 3(e) Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 3 Explanation The natural topography of the site and contiguous land has previously been by extensive fil- ling for land development, construction of flood control levees and highway cut and fill alterations. The subject site itself has been raised above the original flood plain of the Green River by landfill. Landfill on the subject site was placed in compacted layers and left to settle and further compact the un- derlying soil over an extended period of time. This is consistent with good engineering geologic practice. . The existing irregular topography of the pr -oject site will be modified through regrading (and'possibly fil- ling from off -site sources). The basic character of the proposal is such as to gen- erate increased vehicular traffic in the immediate vicinity. This will cause an incremental increase in all vehicular contaminants over current levels at the site. Burning of natural gas for operation of cooking appliances is a possible additional new source of emis- sions. Concentrations of airborne dust can be expected to temporarily increase during construction phases. "In general, air quality at the site will probably remain marginal by existing standards due to the num- ber of sources in proximity to the site." It is expected that exhausted fumes from restaurant cooking might be considered objectionable to certain people. A slight increase in temperature of the existing micro climate is expected due to construction of new paving areas, and building surfaces. The water absorbtion characteristics, drainage patterns and runoff volumes for the project site will be altered through the introduction of paved areas and structures eventually covering about 75% of the surface area. Surface runoff from the site would eventually enter the Green River system through culverts in accordance with the Flood Control District and master plan of the City of Tukwila. Surface runoff from the project site entering the storm drain system will contain hydrocarbons, oils and par- ticulates washed from paved surfaces. Resulting lead concentrations in the Green River would increase to • Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 4 Question No. Explanation levels which are significant in a biological sense. Runoff will add to temperature and other biological and physical stresses on the river. "Any increase in the discharge of inorganic nutrients or organic matter into the system from any source could be detrimental to the viability of the river." 3(g) Recharge of ground water quantities in the immediate vicinity of the site will be slightly restricted due to runoff being disposed into a storm drainage system. In addition, there will be low water intake of the existing artificial fill at landscaped areas due to poor percolation. 3(h) A small portion of runoff can be expected to be intro- duced into landscaped areas. This runoff will contain petroleum contaminants and particulates washed from paved surfaces. Percolation, although slow through existing artificial fill, would be introduced into • good water- bearing aquifers presently beneath the site. 3(i) The construction of the project will not affect the amount of water available at the source of public sup- plies. Demands imposed by the project may reduce the amounts available for allocation to alternative uses. 3(e) Cont'd 4 (a) 4 (c) 5(a) The project site is a filled and graded field covered with grasses, clover, thistle, yarrow and a few scat- tered willow and alder saplings. The primary vegeta- tion type is composed largely of introduced Eurasian weeds which indicates a complete disruption of the original plant community. All these vegetation types will be removed from the site. Other kinds of vegeta- tion will be introduced as landscaping. When the existing fill was placed on the site, a barrier. to the normal replenishment of existing species was initiated. This barrier will be further established with the construction of the proposed project. With the change in existing flora, the proposed project can be expected to eliminate a bird foraging area for seed and insect eating migrant waterfowl, winter resi- dents and the natural inhabitants. Some of the breed- ing habitat for the Redwing Blackbird and a few mammals will be eliminated. The created environment of the pro- posed site is also considered quite good for foraging, Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 5 5(c) The proposed project can be expected to create a barrier to normal movement of fauna across the sub- ject site. 5(d) The subject site lies within the Green - Duwamish River watershed and storm drainage system. Any stormwater introduced into the drainage system will add to the deterioration in the quality of the river and conse- quently affect the fish habitat. • 6. The ambient noise levels of the surrounding commercial community will be increased both during the construc- tion phase and when'the.proposed complex is fully oper- ational. Predicted noise levels due to increase in overall traffic is mainly a function of traffic volume • and traffic speed. The addition of truck traffic would be the predominant noise source. The proposed project would experience minimal truck traffic. 7. Light levels in the vicinity of the project site will be increased by illumination of buildings and parking areas, and by the introduction of reflective surfaces on buildings and paved areas. Glare will be minimized by careful selection of light fixtures. 9(a) The construction of the project will not affect the amount of natural gas, water and electricity available at the source of public supplies. Demands imposed by the project will, however, increase the rate of consump- tion and may reduce the.amounts available for allocation to alternative uses. Question No. 5(a) Cont'd 11. Explanation seed - eating and insectivorous bird species. In es- sence, one man -made habitat will be replaced with another. The rate of population growth in the vicinity may be stimulated by the attraction of new workers employed in the construction and operation of the proposed pro- ject plus additions to the work forces employed in eco- nomic sectors which may experience secondary and ter- tiary effects from the added population and business activity. The possible extent of these effects is ex- pected to be minimal based upon present and projected population growth statistics for the City of Tukwila. } 13(a) 13(b) 13(c) 14(a) Use Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 6 Question No. Explanation 12. A demand for new housing be created with the attraction of new workers employed in the construc- tion and operation of the proposed project. Exist- ing housing patterns indicate the majority of the work force employed within the City of Tukwila reside elsewhere. This trend is expected to continue. cCon- sequently, any housing demand would be minimal. • The basic character of the proposed project is such as to generate increased vehicular traffic in the im- mediate vicinity. Based upon a parking study conducted for the proposed project, a maximum of 475 cars are anticipated at any one time. A copy of this report appears as Exhibit "D ". Interpolation from trip gen- erating factors as outlined in the reference Environ- mental Impact Statement we can expect: Restaurant Hotel Square Footage Gen. Factor Trips per 1000 Sq.Ft. Generated 10,000 22.6 226 188,500 21.6 4071 Total - 4297 The proposed project will generate a demand for new off - street parking. Attached parking study (Exhibit "D ") indicates a requirement for 47S new parking spaces based upon multiple use. The proposed project will provide 500 parking spaces. Peak flow in the vicinity of Southcenter will.be co- incident with peak flow anticipated at the hotel -res- taurant complex. The proposed project can expect to add approximately 8% to existing daily traffic and ap- proximately 6% at peak flow periods. Recent and present modifications to existing street and freeway overpasses will accommodate this increase. The proposed project in itself will not create a need for new fire protection services. The cumulative effect of expanding urban development in the vicinity of the pro- posed project will however require incremental increases in fire protection equipment as development progresses. The proposed project being multi -story will require specific capabilities in fire fighting techniques and equipment for high rise buildings. Future upgrading of equipment can be anticipated. Environmental Checklist (Attachment) Page 7 14(b) 14(e) 14(f) The proposed project will require availability of an ambulance service and first aid facilities. Existing services are anticipated to accommodate the need for first aid protection. 15(a) • The proposed project will use substantial amounts of electricity for lighting, heating and air conditioning. Natural gas will be used for cooking where proven to be more efficient than other power sources. 15(b) The construction of the proposed project will not affect the amount of natural gas or electricity at the source of public supplies. Demands imposed by the project will however, increase the rate of consumption and may reduce the amounts available for allocation to alternative uses. 16(b) RDS :bal 8 -30 -77 The proposed project will employ security personnel for normal on site security. Police protection would however be required for criminal offenses and traffic related matters. It is anticipated that this protec- tion could effectively be administered with present law enforcement personnel. The traffic generated by the proposed project will moderately add to the total daily, traffic in the vici- nity and subsequent requirements for maintenance of pub- lic streets. Present maintenance personnel can easily accommodate this minor maintenance. The proposed project may require alteration to existing telephone equipment in order to provide the required quantity of incoming lines. 18. The main tower of the proposed project due to its pro- posed height (85 -feet) and length (200 -feet) may tend to block distant vistas to Mt. Rainer and the Cascade Mountain Range from neighboring businesses. The extent of this blockage is minor compared to that created by the previous planned project. i am [Lur Lz4a September 21, 1977 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Planning Department 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Fred: Peter A. Lendrum, A.I.A. James T. Lendrum, F.A.I.A. Carl Buchanan, Jr., A.I.A. Henry G. Metzger, Jr., A.I.A. Arch E. Maddock, Jr. Bernard Deutsch, A.I.A. Clarence H. Campball, P.E. E. Venable Micou Joseph W. Peace, A.I.A. Robert D. Smith, A.I.A. Robert E. Teegardin, A.I.A. F ! • F`�i oa G7 LdA �. 4 , Q y = S EP. 2 3 1977 :ITY 0 'KW3A Re: Environmental Checklist for Doubletree Lodge PALA 7541 This letter has been prepared to provide additional information and to respond to questions raised in your letter dated September 19, 1977, regarding the environmental checklist for Doubletree Lodge. The following responses occur in the same order as they appear in your letter: Checklist Question 1(c): At this point in the project design, it is anticipated that approximately 3,200 cu. yd. of fill will be required around the site. This amount will balance the cut and fill operation to bring the site to appropriate finish grade. It is expected that the free- standing restaurant foundation system will bear on a 10' thick bed of structural fill (3,700 cy. yd,). A major portion of this excavated soil will be used as site fill. The remaining 500 cy. yd. of soil would be removed from the site while approxi- mately 3,700 cu. yd. of structural fill must be imported. Assuming a 12 yd. capacity per truck load, it is expected that approximately 360 round trips (4,300 s 12) would be required. The structural fill will be obtained from a single source. That source is expected to . be the Stuck River Pit owned by Miles Concrete Co., located near Pacific City. Checklist Question 1(e): Approximately 75% of the site will be covered by either structures, paved walking surfaces or paved walking areas. The remaining 25% Peter A. Lendrum Associates — Architects Incorporated, 3820 North Third Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602) 264 -9541 Environmental Checklist PALA 7541 Sept. 21, 1977 Page Two will be maintained as landscaped areas. Within these landscaped areas, no soil erosion would occur. Therefore, sedimentation or siltation in the "City Light Pond" to the east would not be con- tributed to by the Doubletree site. Checklist Question 2(a): Updated atmospheric conditions are presently being obtained. Once obtained, they will be compared to existing air quality standards. Checklist Question 3(d): The existing site in its undeveloped state contributes to the level of surface water in the "City Light Pond" mainly by surface run -off. When the site is developed, all surface run -off will be eliminated. Consequently, any storm water will be channeled into the existing 36" storm sewer in Southcenter Parkway. This system has no effect on the water level of the pond. City Light is in agreement with this proposal. It is their . desire that no storm water or surface run -off be channeled into the pond. Checklist Question 13(c): Current daily traffic levels and flow characteristics for streets adjacent to the Doubletree project are presently being obtained. Once all this information is obtained, an appropriate response can be made to traffic related questions. Checklist Question. 14(a): The proposed project will create a need for new fire protection services. The proposed project being multi -story will require new training for specific capabilities in fire fighting techniques and equipment use for high -rise buildings. This plus the cumula- tive effect of expanding urban development in the vicinity of the proposed project will require incremental increases in fire pro- tection equipment as development progresses. Future up- grading of equipment can be anticipated to handle high -rise buildings. Checklist Question 14(b): As stated previously, the proposed project will employ security personnel for normal on -site security to be controlled by a security manager responsible for both Doubletree facilities. Police pro- tection would be required for criminal offences such as burglary, larceny, parking lot grand larceny, assults and traffic related matters. Additional law enforcement man -hours would be required to Environmental Checklist PALA 7541 Sept. 21, 1977 Page Three provide needed service. The Police Chief feels that this service would not require a full additional officer in itself. However, continued community development would require incremental staff increases. Checklist Question 18: A perspective sketch of the proposed site is being prepared and will be available on September 30. We anticipate that all remaining questions can be responded to. by September 30, 1977. Respectfully, PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - CTS, INC. Project Manager 'RDS /tvd 9/21/77 MST A0 28 September 1977 City of Tukwila Planning Department 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor Re: Environmental Checklist for Doubletree Lodge Dear Fred: mo 00000000 Peter A. Lendrum, A.I.A. James T. Lendrum, F.A.I.A. Carl Buchanan, Jr., A.I.A. Henry G. Metzger, Jr.. A.I.A. Arch E. Maddock, Jr. Bernard Deutsch, A.I.A. Clarence H. Campbell, P.E. E. Venable Micou Joseph W. Peace, A.I.A. Robert D. Smith, A.I.A. Robert E. Teegardin, A.I.A. rim L.2) • SF_P30 977 CITY OF 1t N3 PALA 7541 This letter has been prepared to supplement our letter dated 21 September 1977. Now that additional updated information has been gathered, we can respond to the remaining questions raised in your letter dated 19 September 1977. Checklist Question 2(a) The following discussion is based on air quality measurements from nearby monitoring stations maintained by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Measurements for suspended particulates and sulfer dioxide (SO2) are given in tables 1, 2, $ 3. Sulfer dioxide levels are within established standards and do not present any known problems at this point in time. The concentration of suspended particulates was 163 micrograms per cubic meter of air (ugm /m measured on 6 February 1976 at Southcenter. The ambient air quality standards as adopted by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency for suspended particulates are 60 ugm /m (micrograms per cubic meter) annual geometric mean and 160 ugm /m 24 -hour average never to be exceeded. For implemen- tation purposes, the standard value for suspended particulates Peter A. Lendrum Associates — Architects Incorporated, 3820 North Third Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602) 264 - 9541 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 2 can be exceeded 15% of the time in a given month without violating the ambient air quality standard for the'year. Thus the measure- ment at Southcenter of 163 ugm /m probably does not alone consti- tute a violation. Table 2 also indicates that the concentrations of suspended parti- culates have increased in the area in the last 3 years. This trend will probably continue to increase in the future but will remain within accepted standards. Particle fallout (Table 4) is within established standards_ This means that soiling of buildings, cars or clothes does not appear to be a problem in the area. A summary of motor vehicle related air contaminants is presented in Table 5. Of the summarized pollutants, carbon monoxide is the most problematical. There is a continuing downward trend in the number of days the 8 -hour carbon monoxide standard (9 parts per million) is exceeded. 1972 1976 Duwamish 3 days 0 days Seattle (James) 112 days 56 days The maximum 8 -hour concentration in 1976 monitored in the Duwamish Valley Area was 8 ppm. This is below established standards. Two other pollutants from motor vehicles are hydrocarbons and photo- chemical oxidants. Monitoring of hydrocarbons was suspended in 1973 while present photochemical oxidants periodically exceed recommended levels. Efforts are underway to continue reducing emissions from both indus- trial and automotive sources. Even though the air quality at the site is basically within existing standards and is continuing to improve, it can be expected to reverse somewhat due to the number of new sources in proximity to the site including the proposed pro- ject. Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 3 Concentrations 24 -Hour Max. (McMicken Heights) 136 (Duwamish) 205 (Kent) 171 (Tukwila) 163 * Partial year 1976 TABLE 2 • SUSPENDED PARTICULATES (ug /m TABLE 1 SULPHER DIOXIDE (PPM) McMicken Duwamish Kent Tukwila Standard Annual.Avg. .01 .01 .00 .00 .02 Daily Max. .04 .05 .02 .03 .1 Hourly Max. .29 .16 .28 .36 .4 Standard Annual Avg. 1976 1975 1974 1973 Value (McMicken Heights) 42 30 35 35 60 ug /m (Duwamish) 49 37 48 (Kent) 49 32 33* (Tukwila) S.C. • 45 34 36* Standard Value 60 ug /m3 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 4 1 -Hour Avg. 160 ugm /m .08 PPM Kent TABLE 3 OXIDANT (PPM) • • Ambient air quality standards not to be exceeded more than once per year: McMicken Ht. Duwamish •AVG MAX MIN AVG MAX MIN • AVG MAX MIN 1976 April 1 4 0 2 5 0 1 3 0 May 2 5 0 2 7 0 2 4 0 June 1 5 0 2 7 0 1 4 0 July 1 8 0 2 7 0 1 5 0 August 1 5 0 1 6 0 1 4 0 September - - 0 1 6 0 1 4 0 October 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 November 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 December 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 6 0 1977 January 0 3 0 1 3 0. . 1 2 0 February 1 3 0 2 4 0 1 4 0 March 2 4 0 2 5 0 Discontinued April 2 8 0 3 8 0 28 Feb. 1977 TABLE 4 SOILING INDEX (COH /1000 Lin. Ft.) Daily Max. Hourly Max. Standard 1976 McMicken Heights 2.3 . 3.4 5.0 Duwamish 1.8 .3.4 5.0 Kent 2.0 3.4 5.0 Tukwila 2.2 3.1 5.0 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 5 TABLE 5 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) D[1WAMISH VALLEY Standard = 9 PPM Number of 8 -Hour violations = 0 Number of violation days = 0 Average Maximum • Minimum. 1975 October 2 10 0 November 2 12 0 December 2, 13 0 1976 January 2 11 0 February 1.6 14 0 March 1.5 8 0 April 0.8 6 0 May 0.8 3 0 June 1.3 5 0 July 0.7 3 0 August 1.2 5 0 September 1.6 7 0 October 2.4 9 0 Discontinued 4 November 1976. Checklist Question 13(c) The following discussion is based on the most current (1974) traf- fic level measurements available from the State Highway Department: The daily traffic levels on Southcenter Parkway averages around 14,000 vehicles per day with peak days, exceeding 25,000 vehicles per day. See Table 6 for existing flow on adjacent streets. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 5,324 vehicle trips per day (See Table 7). Projecting the anticipated percentage of vehicle arrivals and de- partures by direction (Table 7), we can expect added traffic levels as indicated in Table 8. Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 6 Traffic capabilities have increased on adjacent streets because of the following recent improvements: 1. Creation of a 5 -lane roadway on Southcenter Parkway with the . center lane being a two -way left -turn lane. 2. Improved signalization on Southcenter Parkway. 3. Widening of the Klickatat Avenue Bridge over the I -5 Freeway. 4. Relocation of the I -5 Northbound Off -ramp north of Klickatat Avenue. Consequently, traffic capabilities have been increased. Due to these increased capabilities, it is estimated that the existing streets can adequately handle the increased traffic expected to be generated by the proposed project. . • • r� 6 EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC • '` to ( 720) 0 (900) ( U42o �L� IO73o t 2 ( .l,t, (t ' z O) • A f- ' _(700) € (ito) • 010M St „ r - . w c - A r r d +r S t . C+ `^ r±? ;: . ^r1 ,:w tr 7 uw c^ Y^t�. rr,+ ✓°, 1....:4,;,41.14:, • d:f5c�'«.,�ra. ` :: w �� : i.sa rl a.+ra:c� ;1 .: saY e:.wJ ls:ti.:V;.w:iiu%ars±.i: ;:�i:/ i iZ .: . r • ?�'`� � w t 1 : 1 u' a. . F. ri . 5020 DAILY AVERAGE (440) PM PEAK LEGEND = (4O4,O) r r r.. . x 7 .'9A'sR••w . Z^. •` „X' ^ . nrcrt - 2- "zr•; r.t.tm"7 ,9"M""'","!7-"" • �' • ' iSi .r%:..:++i:..:d•��i4'�••��",- •�' �, `:�•�•:wi�.'+tilinF• ai:.sd`,..:. .e-. i.: ld•:.:.: a. e:. iyw37o: ia,: ilc��` wr: bMG:+ '«•inin3.:Ts: wr'. :a�J+s�::.if.:�.iw - All 1 7 E PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATED ONLY BY PROPOSED PROJECT PHASES 1 & 2 ` e''t o . ,r xtnxe=icsw.a x5ram7 a - 73%”. 10%' kli - ) 13'ia. ':i . 0.. La 2i ret Y .''•� i:•sFci�+iC' s ..a:.'' .Y i' "u:.�a .:�t.�{,�..T�'' ::`' -� TRIP GENERATING FACTOR PER 1000 S.P. AREA GEN.. FAC. • HOTEL 236,000 21.6 RESTAURANT 10,000 22.6 :• 420 CARS TRIPS 5,098 226 5,324 LEGEND 8% PERCENT OF DAILY AVERAGE (426) NUMBER OF VEHICLES PER DAY ABLE 8 • ' .i •.. .. :. . ... :. 1` .171%: .'T i7 ''•?'o7,7, j' O Ie.",TY:•r?^'e/.7:tarrrq�:, r7,+",77^t :�>*:;•i:.iii.•..i:.�•a «� mix::%:. z +.y: ' iJn.. :4:«:..► .' Ce j (1� Cam) X072. • • • r+a{o*•ere••s++.�n.:+..xw.� �.!' ear.. e. e... o R... �d.'irat:��►rJiir',rr��,,�%. Vi tC5�t3'>�'J' ww - 12601 107 7414, • PROJECTED TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC INCLUDING PROPOSED PROTECT PHASES 1 $ 2 • 8072 IlAILY AVERAGE . (8 S 2) PM PEAK • LEGEND Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom PALA 7541 9 -28 -77 Page 10 Checklist Question 18 A perspective sketch of the proposed site is being prepared as requested and will be delivered to the Planning Department on or before. 30 September 1977. If there are any questions regarding the enclosed information, please give us a call. Respectfully, PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS, INC. Robe t D. Smith, Project Manager RDS :bal 9 -28 -77 cc: Peter Bidstrup Tim Dubois N • 1 14 1 1 • 1 ��,-JI i10 1 d0 } 30 ( B.f I 60 /0 5 4 71 / 54753 AYE , SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY t 4 • • e. 9 1 -- - - - - -- - - -- -. - - 0 CROSS. 3 October 1977 Dear Mr. DuBois: GC /ch Gar, ? Cru chfi el d Assistan Planner Mr. Timothy DuBois, Manager Doubletree Inn 205 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT RE: Conditional Use Permit Application 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 292 -2177: The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular meeting conducted 22 Septem- ber 1977, formally postponed the public hearing required for your application in order that the Environmental Review be completed prior to any such hearing. The Commission, at your request, has scheduled a Special Meeting to be con- vened at 8:00 P.M., Thursday, 13 October 1977 at the City Hall Council Cham- bers. The public hearing will be conducted at that time if the Environmental Review has been completed in time to prepare a sufficient Staff Report. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ■ NEW BUSINESS: Planning Commission( Page 4 Minutes 22 September 1977 Mr. Nordfors, architect representing applicant, stated the truck maneuvering will be no problem since they receive goods at night and the longest vehicle is a 22 ton truck. The building will be wood -frame with stained cedar siding exterior. Partial excavation in southwest corner in conjunction with construc- tion will be revegetated in accordance with the rezone restrictions. No air conditioning is planned but the building does include a parapet which should screen any of the minor equipment which might be installed. Motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to approve the plans with the following stipulations: 1. Any roof - mounted equipment be architecturally screened. 2. A detailed landscape plan, to include treatment of the southwest corner of the lot and sidewalk along Southcenter Parkway, be reviewed for approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. BLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Doubletree Inn) Mr. Crutchfield explained the environmental review of this project has not been completed and requested the Planning Commission formally postpone this hearing until the next regular meeting. Mr. Timothy DuBois, Manager of Doubletree Inn, stated his firm fully intends to submit all the information necessary to facilitate staff's completion of environmental review within the next week and, due to financial factors and timing, requested the Commission conduct a special meeting earlier in October. Mr. Crutchfield stated that although he could not commit the environmental review to be completed by a certain date he anticipates its completion in early October if all necessary information is received next week. Motion by Mrs. Avery, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to postpone this public hearing until 8:00 P.M. Thursday, 13 October 1977 in the City Council Chambers to allow for completion of the environmental review. ANY OTHER BUSINESS: Vice - Chairman Richards noted a proliferation of commercial trucks being parked out near the street at Parkway Plaza in direct violation of the Sign Code. Mr. Crutchfield explained the Board of Adjustment had complained about the same subject twice before and the Building Officer had notified the Planning Division that the Sign Code is "hazy" on this subject and even if explicitly prohibited, the Building Division does not have the manpower to enforce it. : +. 22 September 1977 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM VII A: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Doubletree Inn) Application for Conditional Use Permit was received earlier this month from Doubletree Inn and the public hearing was scheduled and advertised for this meeting. In conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit application, an Environmental Checklist was required in accordance with State laws and City Ordinance #986. Since State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) procedures must be fully complied with prior to any action regarding the permit application and additional in- formation has been requested under SEPA, Staff was unable to prepare a suffi- cient Staff Report with respect to the permit application and therefor requests the Commission, by motion, table the hearing until the regular October meeting . to allow compliance with SEPA procedures. . 22 September 1977 (date) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF TUKWILA • Hans West, Secretary 8:00 P.M. (time) All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 — 59th Avenue South, to consider A CONDITIONAL -USE PERMIT to authorize construc- tion and operation of HOTEL /MOTEL CONVENTION FACILITY to be generally locatgd at the southeast corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and South - center Parkway. Tukwila Planning Commission. For further information, please contact Gary Crutchfield at 242 - 2177. Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on 7 and 14 September 1977 31:D C)u I.d IE 7L` IRL ]E M xiNTINT Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Real Estate Division Bellevue, WA 98009 Alstores Realty Corp. Le Roy Miller P. 0. Box 12510 Seattle, WA 98111 The Bon Marche Wilbur Fix 4th & Pine Seattle, WA 98101 Rainier National Bank 235 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Irvin A. Iverson 950 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Skarbo's Scandinavian Furniture Import 1420 2nd Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle City Light 1015 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SOUTHCENTER • 205 STRANDER BLVD. • SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98188 TELEPHONE (206) 246.8220 OTHER DOUBLETREE LOCATIONS — Doubletrae Inn of Phoenix • At Park Central. Mall • 212 West Osborn • Phoenix, Arizona 85013 • Telephone (602) 248-0222 Doubletree Inn of Tucson • At Randolph Park • 445 South Alvernon Way • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • Telephone (602) 881 -4200 Doubletree Inn of Scottsdale • At Fashion Square • 4710 N. Scottsdale Rd. • Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 • Telephone (602) 947-5411 Doubletree Inn of Scottsdale • At Scottsdale Mall • 7353 East Indian School Road • Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 • Telephone (602) 994 -9203 15 September 1977 Mr. Tim DuBois, Manager Doubletree Inn Strander Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Conditional Use Permit Dear Mr. DuBois: Sincerely, Gary Cru hfield Assistant Planner GC /ch C CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6230 Southcenter Boulevard is Tukwila, Washington 98188 in (206) 242 -2177 As you are well aware, your conditional Use Permit application was scheduled for a hearing before the Tukwila Planning Commission at their meeting scheduled for 22 September 1977 on the presumption that the environmental review required under State and local law would be completed in time to prepare the Staff Report for the meeting. Since the environmental review is required by law to be completed prior to any action regarding the permit application and such has not occurred to date, I have requested the Planning Commission formally postpone the public hearing on your application to 27 October 1977 to allow completion of the environmental review. Insofar as we discussed the potential of this event at the time of application, I trust you understand this action. Should you have any questions, however, please contact me at your convenience. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING oath, deposes and says that ..!;:j.10. is the 1 1.d f of THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a rif as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of consecutive issues, commencing on the day of .entt7er , 1977 V.P.C. Form No. 87 fni:Gmber Affidavit of Publication Subscribed and sworn to before me this ss. an rb U' . h being first duly sworn on - A co or ?'„t i lLt ,19.7 , and ending the 14 day of ` ,19.77..., both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $12....4 which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. /470.4.4.7 .!.:C..:.L:J. (' j.f ''''tr day of Z / Notary Pub k in and for State of Wa gton, residing at Kent, K' County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. 2 September 1977 Please find attached a copy of Public Notice intended to in- form you of the pending action of the Tukwila Planning Commis- sion. You, as a nearby property owner, may attend the meeting and /or present written comments to either the Planning Commission or this office for entry into the official record. Should you desire additional information, please contact me at 242 -2177. Sincerely, Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner GC /ch Puget Sound Power & Light Real'Estate Division Bellevue, WA 98009 Rainier National Bank 235 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Irvin A. Iverson 950 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Skarbo's Scandinavian Furniture Import 1420 - 2nd Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 Notary Public in and for the of Washington, residing at AFFIDAVIT I, Gary Crutchfield , being duly sworn, hereby declare that all legal notice requirements of Title 18 have been ful- filled and a notice has been mailed to each of the following addresses. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 77 , Co. Alstores REalty Corp. LeRoy Miller P.O. Box 12510 Seattle, WA 98111 The Bon Marche Wilbur Fix 4th & Pine Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle City Light 1015 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 2nd day of September APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. Planning Commission Action Receipt No. Filing Date City Council Action Hearing Date Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: Name Timothy S. Dubois Address 205 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Telephone No. 246 -8220 Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on Southcenter Parkway between Strander Blvd. and South 180th Street Total square footage in property 352,561 Square Feet. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See Attachment. Existing Zoning CM (Industrial Park) Zoning requested No Change. Form B What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Restaurants, Lounge, Convention Facilities and Sleeping Rooms. Number of permanent off- street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 500 Number required 604 NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.) 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any in- compatible effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification? The project will be adequately screened from surrounding property by a continuous 5 foot minimum landscaped planter. 2. What provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City minimum standards? Existing street widths meet City standards and will not require alteration. 3. What provisions will be made for adequate sewer and water service? Adequate sewer and water service is available at the site. 4. Any other comments which the petitioner feels are appropriate: t- Subscribed and sworn before me this 1st AFFIDAVIT Tukwila, (City) 2.46 -8220 t Yjf Viublic: and or the State of Washington, �'es;i7igfsa,' Seattle, Washington • �t'U 11 day of September ,1977 . (Telephone) k I, Timothy S. Dubois , being duly sworn, declare that I am the manager, contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowl - and belief. 205 Strander Boulevard (Mailing Address) (Signature of Co tract Purchaser or Owner) (Timo ••i , General Manager) Washington 98188 (State) C. 1$1 C•NT•. I PA VICINITY MAP. PROPOSED DOUBLETREE HOTEL TUKWILA, WASHINGTON I NTeig 0 4 0 a a 0 z 4 a p. TA TIE ANDOVER PARK WEST SITE SOU I INICENTER PARKWAY IIIIIIIIIII III i:•41II I I 111 II I III Illlll I 41111 :11111111121111114 11 1111 '.x'1111111 THIS •SUCTION OS? 1NC•Y0 /0 :' NOT :.. I N C L U D U D •OYTMC■NTU11 •AQKWAY • *MR Maslaa L T =MOM- R3 L ® =3Z- SEAT U'LE WL SHOINJGTON • 1.41 15.111.7; I FUTURE TOWER •If . • INCL IJ 0 • 0 • MMMMMM NT•811 NANKWAT UNA. MIAS TIMIII• •110T ION T INGLIMO • 11:=ELOMLM-TRE.M 1.0033 SEATTLE WASHONGTON 2 m N7 Ea sac FASCIA AA A 11KYLa0MITS ■•II■ /!• III •••••••••••••i ■ • ■M.��.�� ■ � e iim.■.a■!Ciad NM i •• i mu aim= u • • ■ ■ iui�'' imm.i ••U. ■■ Le, i ■111111■��.i IIII w T r4111111 07, I BLAZONS MMS v RIT -macs ••••■..SDUTHCENTER PKWY STRANDER BLVD CNIZO DELMTIREE LC :MGM SEATTLE WASHDINGT ®I N 0 R 7114, 11 ■113•77 U In w 41 tootl < a i DK308 R.J vm ( RECEIPT D to ,AI / 19 6777 Received From / - e1 :� -- , ,. Address ►_41, �� _ -..� 4 ' ..L.:` 4 sc,tcLee — 4_ i� _ _ q AccouNr H HOW PA , , APAT. OP C CASH ' ,. (� /fJ�� AMT. PAID C CHECK ✓ ✓ ` DUE O OF.DER � � D DK308 R.J vm ( Memorandum UT A0 _=endITUND A©citss TELEPHONE CALL MEMO PROJECT: JOB NO. : DATE: SUBJECT: CONVERSATION WITH: Dist: 21nC. -e • Cr �IGk 1.) ■ ..) 1I� 12 v�n � Fatrktvn v —left t toe' P 1 S Ag 4-rse-1—. 2 , App -�-r�r _ • ■/ztrt.tncl pv- t env" '14-t h "'�� �-�°' �J� X t • ` J7 ins, rmubC1 Ir u I v'jnn P4n4 a. I,« cam, (2) PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS, INC. • tetec PALA 109 C ,• • .. • • • • • • r v,r, F L_A amp - A r,a SAC - ` - i +nn • PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - ARCHI TL•CTS , INC 1 le 4. \ , Q. I I t • '- to e4 y -cetztt^ v : +r'coUylrg= . O. L S4MtO PY1trP " 1 1r"r� "' "r1 U1r n'" ' E j�" �' f/"1 4ti rc ( )E cc - -63 5c!fft 22. (=R.r v=sel'Cke err - 4-,_r,\ 1,e 0=9 Li 1V (l.) (E) 4 Ze, PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS, INC. 411n • 2z Cf> 4- 71 { • r=) -Lt._-:)in PETER A. LENDRUM ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS, INC. • T item% s irtJ .a• mow.► • on iavna NVId adV.760NVi- wbMrb •11111,9 I.111J91MYY •- • . • I • r.. ; • • • • /1-- 411 . ...MC . • , .•- . • • • • •••-• , • • " ,..• - ••• , • • ' • : ' ' . AVAANtiVel 1:1 .2. ; ' • - • •••• • ; • GOUISIXTRMI • sotsmicarrrea TUKWILA WASHINGTON • • . • ,‘? POP 00UESLUTAGII, INC. • •; aQ.t .. vt*ITI ' rI bins" Ern l0 zni mm nE .D mr z Z A 11). � ti-� � �a ' ;ri,,�v `�": . i, y ..� f 4"7' " :.r= •. . . . . `T';=;? ,_, f�;r. '. . 7h¢.:.r. yt' amass. :o zzfZlit7 111ZST � 4. :^ � .k?? :4 < 4s f_�i . 4 Ty. � r"r � y �` f } l r r s ;: s ;� a. �yycd ?�a z i�u�l a7 ��:'.'. � =A. � 4' Ty. 1 * .Ili. !� %.�.4..nu��' ?;li i'M Wo w Q� Z 0' (nw az Ea tra OW zz au Wo JW 4 N W 1,L 44,61 H I '4.%*#n WU Saz • 'Ean 1«1 -d 5 FA 3 11 j « I T X 1-4 __A_ pia-, 49 1 73 j 1" Lt. fir —1 1 N ■ F 3 £, P ETER A LENDRUM ASSOCIATES 0 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • INTERIORS • • W ° � 0 aW Ug 0 • Y/ az Q . 3 re& om Z? WZ J Q• ' N a ..u6► 4401 M F'= W PE 11-40-co? WOO 5DUTACk1iVz p•N/ DOLtr;LEIR LOME r • a W J 3 0 m W 0 2 4 a I- N T H I S SECTION N O T I N C L U D ED II 11111 III 11IIIIrJT{11 ;! ITl m1 0 + + "• 1 2 3 �.....w� . «....sw...._ e.......� .��._r . Y.._.Y .r..M� SL.... u4..:.+..,.e......�i:::_..ix... S O U T H C ENTER. P A R K W A Y F. emEGrion = 0€ 6z ee ez 9z 9z rz GE zz ¢ oe et et u et m a •et at a 01. r Ig11111 !IUI 1 1 1 0 1 4 1 )161111k 1 !1! 111111 k4lluulluJ 111111ip1uu1111, iululWulllu11P14u14ul,11.4, g1)111111111 I DOUBLETREE IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS ME TO. THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 130.00 THIS SECTION N O T INCLUDED SOO PARKING SPACES .u...nJi 2 Q J a. HOTEL r L� ii..4,0_cor '1541 Z • Tort I -4ICNTA. W 0 1to y Le p11J- IM i EXHIBIT B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DOUBLETREE LODGE riTrilliriffiliTT11 Il iI 0 MT" INC" 1 2 r iI I 1`i 1`ritiIiLi rl 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER - 302AWiiRIT.N�— 0€ 6Z 86 LZ 9Z sZ VZ EZ ZZ tZ OZ 61, ' 81 LL 91 91 I ' . El Zt 11 I Q( ,, �1IIII[ Il. 11 1 , i 111111111I1111111111111I111111 1111111111111111 IIIII1IIIIIIIII,1IIII,�II I IJIIII��IIJJI III(, IhI,( 1, �I�IU' IIIL111111IIIJJ ,��I�II�III,I�I�(II�.�) 11111 1,1 1ll11 11111I�LI��I IIIII (,llL ,111111 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS _CLEAR THAN THIS IT IS DUE TO ..- THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT L 13 E.CT1 ca' • .; r I I.•I:, I. I.I I I I I . S OU TH;C; E, NT E R •, '.000.1111, • ' 130.00 502.40 H i l l ' : w i ll .I I �. A• ' ':J -Wilt iJ — 'L Itsst7 • t:O , . SEATTLE WAS a1 S ECTION INCLUDED rill Dp �lI'�III�II�)III� y 0 III 710INCH 1 2 I I 3 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER - 302Awr rll�.N- O£ 7 B6 LZ 9Z SZ hZ EZ ZZ tZ 03 6t 91 Ll 91 SI I ' I . El at tl 01.r. _ 1II0. 01) 11111111111111111111IIIJ�,II111 1,1,1111111IIIIIIII�IIIII IIIIIIiI,I,�I�41 �I 0111IJ1LII1.11 �I,IIIII411141II Ilh1jll1111.0!.141j1Illi 111 ikJII(!lhlllin.4I ,1111.11 4 PJ IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS _CLEAR. THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS. _DUE_ TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT UN N E w I F( in d tna El ■ r ri' C��1 F [ g 1 • Y I :. 0 :rJ 7541 2 W 0 PRELIMINARY 8 -16 -77 ' • • • " "", - pCHITS cocelfes•..,.• *OMNI apuentaTol. . issevlitse%. • • , Eil‘s.fi' • II • • 1itti 0 S TUIPNCH 1 I. • Space 'Frame: 1..0. deep space frame aaaaa int about 110 L'.. in both directions tl beamlfeslumas • 21..0". • • • 2. Roof and Typical Floor: • 'Masse tensioned concrete sssss • . • ' . spartning.to concrete or assonry walls with sheer perpendicular to the b 3. Second S. post tensioned con sssss slehs,spennimm to • ' transfer bums which span to cset.in.place concrete columas. . . • .Thore will also he cast.in.place contrite shear walls SUM': ; • the foundetion to floor. • - • 4. faun d I III ililifttitiVit 2 3 „II II .• •• . • • • .•, •... 5 6 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW010Wzi 0C 6 ee L ez sz .ez ze I O 6L 81 Gt 91 • si 'et et II 0 ),,,JotoitlopipinktImii II 11111 I Hid h I d d 1,4161,1,11,,j41441111,91141,111Lo.u,ii.miiikitilmiwillii,,tikpip),,,41,4,111,1011,1101! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! • • • • ' .1 .-""‹ lame -UP 1! • -.-- soCICTAti' iWlli 11 • • • • • ' , ••.' • , , • - • • • • ' • ' , • • •... . Mehl , UML0 MaT2 M, 3 7.' 7? P.:, LE WAS Ll'41 GTO • . • ABBREVIATIONS • Reitman ' C Conference Suite • DD Double Double Unit E Electrical Closet EDF Electric Drinking 'Fountain 'ELEV Elevation ENER GEN Emerapncy Generator H.R. • Eucalyptus Room EQUIP Equipment • Fuel Tank • Janitor Closet' ▪ King Unit H Nen • • ND Hold REP • r Counter, Refrigerator 0 Re sssss tient ENT Service Entrance Section ' STOR Storage . Transformer '• • V • Vestibule ' VIP R.I.P. Suite . . NM.' • Vending • • . Rumen • • 71- ct)i> ; 7 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 't_CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 1 A . • 'FTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT I (3 7541 13-16-77 a ' • , PRELIMINARY ▪ . . . '. -. ■ . I• . 1 CIO SRLOWI� • A ) C C 1 PLOORS RU 7 1 KING SLOW 1 OPEN ATRIUM 'G ... r . "' muau:wtiYJ.ld'nl�4wlYr�T.J+i� tilnVi::k 41ti1S{. cwy:: 0 If /HS INCH 1 2 3 0€ 6Z Be LZ 9Z SZ tZ CZ ZZ lZ OZ . 61 _ „�.., ��I�I�II��IU11�1 111111, ��llllll ,�)�ll�l, IIIII�IIII IIII�IIIIII JII�I�I�I,���,I�„If,I�I�JJjI� 1111 I 5 6 7 E ®FLEXIBLE RULER - 302AWnil . el 1.1 l 91 Sl , El Zl II ot,z, W1III)1I111411i11►II,6I j11!,444.1 140b1l11IAIIILI1ll11111,• ROOM SCHEDULE TYPE ROOMS UNITS DID Cl UNIT) 109 108 K t 1 UNIT] 99 99 C 11.8 UNITS ) 10 15 VI.P. C2 UNITS) 9 9 TOTALS NOTE: ALL UNITS DOUBLE /DOUBLE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11 - -cup 6 SE Rtir`l L, F. WAS L Ki GT O [N] IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR. THAN THIS NOTICE , IT IS _ DUE . _T0.:: :; : : THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 0 0 r 2 7541 8 -16 -77 0 W 0 PRELIMINARV • 1' :••• • • :•• ,1 , • 11 PUZMM • EATTria wAsHomerom. • • • • , ...• Is THI INCH 2 110 3 •.. ,• : *fano 5 3.• .• . •-•-, • • . !Tr FASCIA • D IILUI • • ±.■ 1111111.11 11.1111110.1.11.1M11.11110. • I!! PITTrirm trfire FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW •,XXXTAT o€ 6Z Be LE 9Z SZ 4 7Z EZ ZE L 03 61 91 a 91 St ht 'El Z1 11. Qi I I IF. 161,1144.1411.11.0111111 3' 3 . • , • . . • • „ , • . ,SKYLIGHTS ' . • • CLEARSTORY , ,,,-----ogsg R ipur- FACE I NG kt ' — RIBBED RY SPLIT. FACE MASON SOUTHCENTER PKWY IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS _CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE,,IT S .. IE TP E rTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL =,-ern.--,rmw, . • 7541 8 -18 -77 a PRELIMINARY • ;1, • .14 ••• ! • •i • • . • • •. • • •. EXPOSED • SPACEFRAME • wi METAL DECK , G.LIGHT . • WEIGHT CONCRETE • , . .• •", • . • - SPLIT FACE • ,• .•KYLIGHT• . . XPOS1O .111PACEFRAM• w/METAL DECK a" puma . • : INSULATION BUILT UP ROOF • • • • • 9" POST • • ) TENSION GDWC • SLANW/a"PlOtO , INSULA BUILT UP HOOF : • CLEAR PLASTIC HANDRAIL CEMENT • • PLASTER • SPANDREL " • BALCONY RAIL !• SKYLIGHTS •, " , . PORTE COCliERE mEmtinio • • ' • ' • . . . . • urArmiititervem • 4 •N , ff • ..••• • ' • • , .■ ■" ftt 01111111 r trnt 21 0 ISMS INC/1 1 2 3 4 . , . PT9TOTTTTT 5 • `. 6 7 • FLEXIBLE RULER -302AW .1 • 06 6 Be LZ 9Z Sz CZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 91 LA 91 SI VI 11 . .,,,,,J11,11111111.111I4.1111141,101,1111J,1111,9111111111111111116A1111111111116[6111ildlillittqlitit411.11)1111111,11141114146111J1t#11 , 1111111001111111111 , 111 . 01,1J1111!':' . . . , I . • , • 11“ POE ,T POOP . SLAM. Wf PI1010 INSULATION BUILT UP POOP . , • : EPIACINI2 SUPPORTS AT .7 • • . • METAL STUD • $ CEMENT . • WS" CEMENT PLASTER ON 37W;MIITAL STUDS IN/ 31?• MATT INSULATION & OM" TYPE X YP MO ITYP/ E" POET TENSIONED .jee• MOLAR •POONER CLAIM IN A NODIZUD. Noolzoo. ALUM FRAME ITYP1.. COMBINED SECTION • :77 4 • • .• • •.• • l /TRANSFER • BEAM • BEYOND • +?; .:!77 4-Jfi 5 T.5 PL05 -r .. • .„ . PP Otl.ir • : 111F-.2111.:1"7- 71 • _ 4. 3 , ....1.1 .6 110.11.,,. " ! • LOADING '•ATRIUMIQ, • I 4 '• MEETING HK 0 CK - tari . •.••■• • bal. . . 11 ri L .. T IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ' P CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • ..... • • ' 7541 8-15-77 • PRELIMINARY •