Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 77-54-CUP - WESTWATER MOTEL - CONDITIONAL USE
77-54-cup west valley road strander and i-405 WESTWATER MOTEL CONDITIONAL USE CONDITIONAL USE PLANNING PARKS d RECREATION BUILDING 19 December 1977 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Westwater Corporation c/o Jet Inn 3000 South 176th Street Seattle, Washington 98188 ATTN: Mr. Don Cruickshank RE: Westwater Motel Dear Mr. Cruickshank: The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular December meeting, con- ducted a Public Hearing in consideration of your application for Condi- tional Use Permit for the above - referenced project. The Commission, based upon the Staff Report and testimony received during the hearing, granted the Conditional Use Permit with the follow- ing stipulations: 1. The ingress /egress point located on Strander Boulevard shall be restricted to right -turn in, right -turn out only. 2. That the landscape strip located along West Valley Highway be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at the driveway entrances. Landscaping along .both streets and in front of and alongside of the proposed building shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Com- mission sitting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to is- suance of occupancy permit. 4. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, including the loca- tion and construction of the proposed heliport, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of building permit. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard w Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242-2177 " Mr. Don Cruickshank Westwater Corporation 6. A sidewalk of at least 5 -foot width be installed by the applicant along the north margin of Strander Boulevard. 7. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by•Title 19 (TMC) for commercial use areas. 8. Full application for building permit be made within 18 months from date of approval of this Conditional Use Permit. Application for Building Permit should reflect compliance with these stip- ulations. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Gary Crutch ield Assistant Planner GC /ch cc: Dir, OCD Bldg Off Page 2 19 December 1977 5. That the applicant is directed to apply for a variance from the . parking requirements, TMC 18.56, on the basis that the Westwater facility may be "over- parked" due to the multiple -use nature of the complex. Planning Commission Minutes Page . 4 15 December 1977 Motion by Mr. Sowinski, seconded by Mr Hartong and carried to deny approval of the proposed site plan and advise the applicant to revise the plans to provide adequate parking orientation for secondary tenants and resolve the potential hazards relative to the use of the rail easement by Diebold trucks. Mr. Milt Reimers, Coldwell Banker, asked for guidance from the Planning Commission. Commission pointed out general design alternatives which may resolve the problems noted in the motion. Chairman Kirsop declared a 5- minute recess and reconvened the meeting at 10:12 P.M. • with Commissioners and Staff present as previously noted. NEW BUSINESS: t.A PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Westwater Motel) Chairman Kirsop opened the Public Hearing at 10:15 P.M. and Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report. Mr. Don Cruickshank, Westwater Management, stated his firm's agreement with the recommendation made by Staff and offered any further details be provided by the architect who is present. Chairman Kirsop asked if provision of sidewalk was acceptable. Mr. Cruickshank stated the applicant's, acceptance of that stipulation., Mr. Satterstrom explained multiple use concept referred to in Staff recommendation #5 and its relationship to parking requirements. Explained that City Attorney has concluded that such can only be addressed by the Board of Adjustment through a variance procedure and the Planning Commission has the authority under the Conditional Use Permit review to require the applicant to go through the variance procedure. On that basis, Staff recommends stipulation #5 be revised to read: That the applicant is directed to apply for a variance from the parking requirements of TMC 18.56 on the basis the Westwater facility may be "over- parked" due to the multiple -use nature of the complex. Mr. Cruickshank stated the applicant will file application for variance at earliest convenience. Mr. Ed Killingsworth, architect, agreed with Staff's intention and noted his pre- ference to provide less parking with the acknowledgment that it can be expanded on- site if there is a future problem. • Mr. Larry Stricker, architect, explained site and elevation drawings and typical floor plan. There being no further public•comments, Chairman Kirsop closed the Public Hearing at 10:50 P.M. Planning Commission Page 5 Minutes 15 December 1977 Mr. Hartong noted the City has issued several Conditional Use Permits and not realized any development. During the interim, community values change and unlimited permit could become a regretful action. Suggested a reasonable time limit be attached to this Conditional Use Permit. Motion by Mr. Hartong, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to grant the Conditional Use Permit with the following stipulations: 1. The ingress /egress point located on Strander Boulevard shall be restricted to right -turn in, right -turn out only. 2. That the landscape strip located along West Valley Highway be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at the driveway entrances. Landscaping along both streets and in front of and alongside of the pro- posed building shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sit- ting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of occupancy permit. 4. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, including the location and con- struction of the proposed heliport, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commis- sion sitting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of building permit. 5. That the applicant is directed to apply for a variance from the parking requirements, TMC 18.56, on the basis that the Westwater facility may be "over- parked" due to the multiple -use nature of the complex. 6. A sidewalk of at least 5 -foot width be installed by the applicant along the north margin of Strander Boulevard. 7. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by Title 19 (TMC) for commercial use areas. 8. Full application for building permit be made' within 18 months from date of ' approval of this Conditional Use Permit. In accordance with the Commission's earlier decision to split the agenda, Chairman Kirsop recessed the regular December meeting to 8:00 P.M., Wednesday, 21 December 1977. TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION Minu ; prepared by: Gary Crutch ield Assistant Planner Hans West Secretary 15 December 1977 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF' REPORT 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM VII A. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Westwater Motel) REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to authorize construction and opera- tion of motel complex pursuant to Section 18.64.020 (20), T.M.C. APPLICANT: Donald C. Cruickshank, Westwater Motel Representative, 14923 - 64th Avenue, Surrey, B.C. LOCATION: Subject site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. SIZE: Approximately 6.4 acres (280,800 sq. ft.) ZONING: M -1 (Light Industry) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial This hearing was originally scheduled for the Commission's regular November meeting but was formally postponed to this evening to allow completion of the environmental review. That review has been,completed and the hearing may proceed. FINDINGS: 1. The proposed development consists of a 250 -room motel complex which "steps up" from three stories on the west end of the building to seven stories on the east, (SEE, Exhibits A - F). 2. The motel complex includes approximately 9,000 sq. ft..of banquet /meeting rooms, two restaurants, two bars, health club, hotel retail shops, and swimming pool. 3. On -site parking for 406 vehicles is proposed. Based on a general analysis of parking requirements, this figure appears to conform to Chapter 18.56, TMC. 4. Environmental review of the proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and City of Tukwila Ordinance #986 led to a Declaration of Nonsignifi- cance, (SEE, Exhibit G) based on the findings and conclusions as outlined in Exhibit H. A declaration of nonsignificance was issued on 21 November 1977. 5. The subject site is zoned M -1 (Light Industry) which restricts building heights to forty -five (45) feet except as modified by Chapter 18.60 (TIC) which states: "In the M -1, M -2, and CM districts situated south of Interstate 405 and within . the city limits, buildings may be erected to a height not to exceed three hun- dred (300) feet provided...(SEE, Chapter 18.60.035 TMC).— Planning Commission (..`; Page 2 ' Staff Report 15 December 1977 6. Section 18.64.010 (TMC) provides that the Planning Commission may authorize the proposed use under such conditions as the Commission deems necessary provided it finds: A. Such use will not materially injure the appropriate use of neighboring property; B. Such use will conform to the general intent of Title 18; C. Such use will include the necessary off- street parking and loading facilities for such use. 7. The subject property is designated by the new Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan (Ordinance #1039) as "Commercial." The property to the east lying across the West Valley Highway is designated "Commercial ", as are the pro- perties lying to the north and south of the subject site. 8. Existing development in the vicinity includes a single - family residence to the north, restaurant to the south, restaurant and duplex units to the east, and the Green River to the west. Across the Green River to the west lies Andover Industrial Park. 9. The subject site accesses onto West Valley Highway and Strander Boulevard. According to the Circulation Map of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, West Valley Highway is designated as a "Major Arterial" and Strander Boule- vard as a "Secondary Arterial ". 10. Three ingress /egress points are depicted on the proposed schematic site plan drawings. Two of these curb -cuts are located on West Valley Highway, one on Strander Boulevard. The northernmost curb -cut on West Valley Highway is located about 20' from the property line. A distance of approximately 300' separates the north and south curb -cuts on West Valley Highway; the southernmost curb cut being located about 200 feet from the intersection with Strander Boulevard. The curb -cut on Strander Boulevard is situated approximately 160' from the intersection with West Valley Highway. All curb -cuts appear to be proposed at 24' width. 11. Generalized landscaped areas are shown on the proposed site plan. A 15' -wide landscaped strip is proposed along Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. Landscaped areas are also proposed along the Green River and in the central court area of the U- shaped building. Ponds are proposed but their exact loca- tion and size have not yet been determined. Small clusters of landscaping are also proposed to be interspersed in,the parking and internal circulation areas. 12. The Sidewalk Plan, adopted by the City under Ordinance #1025, designates the north side of Strander Boulevard as a "high priority" link in the commercial sidewalk system. A sidewalk is not indicated in any of the plans submitted for this project. 13. At this time, the applicant has not determined the exact exterior building materials that will be used on the proposed motel. Based upon conversations with the applicant, either an exposed aggregate or stucco will be used. Colors will be light tones. 14. A heliport is proposed by the applicant to be located on the site. As yet the exact location has not been chosen. 15. Title 19 (TMC), the Sign Code, authorizes 45 -foot high signs for industrially classified lands. 16. The proposed project requires a shoreline permit. The applicant has applied for same and the application seems to generally conform to the City's Shore- line Master Program. 17. The information concerning the environmental impacts of the project (as con- tained in the Westwater environmental questionnaire) are hereby incorporated by reference into these Findings, (SEE, Exhibit I). 18. Objective 1, Policy 7 of the Commerce /Industry element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages adequate parking for all economic land uses, but discourages "over- parking ", i.e., needless or unnecessary parkin°. Pagc Staff Report 15 December'1977 Planning Comrnissi! 19. In conjunction with Finding #18 above, the Doubletree Inn has obtained a variance from code parking requirements because of the multiple -use nature of their proposed motel complex on Southcenter Parkway. The.Westwater pro- posal appears to be similar in that the multiple -uses contemplated will doubtless "share" parking space. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Since the proposed development exceeds the basic height limit of M -1, the provisions of Section 18.60.035 are applicable and are assessed as follows: 18.60.035 (1): Proposal appears to exceed the minimum requirement. 18.60.035 (2): Proposal appears to exceed the minimum requirement. 18.60.035 (3): Not applicable. 18.60.035 (4): Setbacks from property lines due to proposed building height appear to be sufficient to preclude adverse impacts to adja- cent properties. 18.60.035 (5): Due to the schematic nature of the descriptions of exterior treatment, landscape materials, and heliport location, the Planning Commission should review more detailed plans under Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of building Permit. 18.60.035 (6): Generally, the proposed use should not be unduly detrimental to surrounding properties. Several conditions, however, may be necessary to ensure this. 18.60.035 (7): The proposal will also require permits from the state and. King County for flood control. 18.60.035 (8): This is a general provision which can be appropriately met under the provisions of Section 18.64.010 (TMC), conditional use permit conditions. 18.60.035 (9): The requirement of 3.1 parking spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of gross floor area is designed primarily to accommodate office uses, not motel complexes. A strict application of TMC 18.56 (Parking Regulations) to the Westwater project would require approximately 401 parking spaces. The proposed number is 406 spaces. In light of multiple -use nature of the Westwater project, the site could be "over- parked ". 18.60.035(10): This provision can and should be effectuated through staff reveiw at time of building permit application. 2. Turning movements and traffic volumes will increase as a result of this proposal. Although the ingress /egress points on Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway appear to be located at appropriate distances from inter- sections and property lines, the Public Works Department feels that a right - turn in, right -turn out limitation should be imposed on Strander Boulevard. In addition, channelization for left -turn movements on West Valley Highway will have to be worked out through the Washington State Highway Department. 3. The building height of the proposed structure (in excess of 90 feet) will have a dramatic effect in consideration of surrounding development despite its setback from the streets. To diminish this effect, landscape materials included in peripheral strips should be of substantial size and species as to diminish the scale of the building. 4. Details of exterior treatment of the building and location of the heliport need identification and should be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of the building permit. 5. The proposed motel complex seems to be consistent with planned land use in the vicinity. (The Land Use Plan Map designates this area as "Commercial. ") , Planning Commission L • Page 4 Staff Report 15 December 1977 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission, based on the • environmental information and the Findings and Conclusions contained in this Staff Report, grant a conditional use permit for the development of the West - water Motel complex with the following conditions: 1. The ingress /egress point located on Strander Boulevard shall be restricted to right -turn in, right -turn out only. 2. That the landscape strip located along West Valley Highway be bermed to reach a minimum height of four (4) feet except at the driveway entrances. Landscaping along both streets and in front of and alongside of the pro- posed building shall include trees of 3 -inch minimum caliper. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of occupancy permit. 4. Exterior treatment details of all buildings, including the location and construction of the proposed heliport, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission sitting as a Board of Architectural Review prior to issuance of building permit. 5. Parking requirements for the proposed Westwater Motel shall be calculated by Staff on the basis of the multiple -use criteria established by the Board of Adjustment through their decision on the variance granted to Doubletree Lodge (File No. MF 77 -40 -CUP). A revised parking plan for Westwater shall be submitted to the Board of Architectural Review at the same time as the plans for exterior treatment and heliport location. 6. A sidewalk of at least 5 -foot width be installed by the applicant along the north margin of Strander Boulevard. 7. Freestanding signs shall not exceed the height limit established by Title 19 (TMC) for commercial use areas. VICINITY MAP HOTEL ENTRANCE KILLINGSWORTH, BRADY & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS PROJECT ARCHITECT, LARRY STRICKER BANQUET wrestwater hotel SITE PLAN ENTRANCE ELEVATION SECTION 1 20' SHOPS J SKYLIGHT GARDEN BELOW 1 1 1 11 SIBUREIREELBED 1 ■■■••••■ IMMO KITCHEN & BANQUET ROOM BELOW LOBBY LEVEL 1=4d HEALTH CLUB RECEIVING HOTEL SERVICES BAR WE.* Miolp - RESTAURANT KITCHEN BANQUET ROOM ;_;LOBBY: GROUND FLOOR Description' of proposal Westwater Hotel Development Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency City of Tukwila This proposal has been determined to (1.7/9T/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (6o/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Farr" -e WFINAL DECLARATION OF 5 nr E /t1GN —S I GId I FI CANCE Westwater Corp. Northwest corner of West Valley Rd. & Strander Blv4 Kjell Stoknes File No. EPIC —FD -43 Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date November 1977 Signature WESTWATER HOTEL - EXHIBIT G ( AL4„elt:1 CITY or T UKW I A OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17 November 1977 MEMORANDUM 6230 Soutiv7tmtvr Bout.w:ar:1 n TukuiSa. TO: FILE FROM: Fred N. Satterstrom SUBJECT: Westwater Hotel Environmental Questionnaire and EIS for And- over Industrial Park /Andover East After reviewing the draft EIS prepared by Wilsey & Ham, Co. for Andover Industrial Park /Andover East, I have discovered' the following: 1. The draft EIS covered that area known as "Andover East ". Andover East comprised about 8l acres and included the present Westwater site and the existing Jolly Ox Restaurant site. 2. The draft EIS analyzed the impacts of Andover East on the basis of commercial development. "Andover East will be developed in accordance with the City's M -1 Zoning Classification. The anticipated use of this site will be for commercial facilities." (SEE, p. 12 of the draft EIS) . 3. The organization of EIS .subsections in the draft EIS for Andover Park corresponds well with WAC 197 -10 -440 as do the required physical and human elements detailed in WAC 197 -10 -444. 4. The draft EIS was distributed in the summer of 1973 to agencies shown on the distribution list.. 5. Responses to the draft EIS were received from the following: a. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) b. Puget Sound Governmental Conference (PSGC) c. Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army d. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency e. Washington State Dept. of Fisheries f. Washington State Dept. of Social /Health Services g. Department of Transportation, U.S. WESTWATER HOTEL EXHIBIT H Memorandum File Page .2 17 November 1977 6. It is my opinion that the draft EIS would not be substantially changed on the basis of the abovementioned comments. There is no evidence that I can find to indicate that a final EIS was actually distributed. ' FNS/ch I. BACKGROUND CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental. Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50. 00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. 1. Name of Proponent: WESTWATER CORPORATION • 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 14923 64th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3S1X8 3. Date Checklist Submitted: October 18, . 1977 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Planning Division, OCD, City. of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: WESTWATER HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal. (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will . give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): A 250 room luxury hotel oriented to providing superior service and amenities to the business traveler, convention groups, and tourists. Emphasis will be placed on meeting the needs of the . . local business community and seminar groups. A subtle but imaginative low- profile design will blend with the natural environment of the site. The focal point of the hotel will be a large enclosed atrium "Activity Center" stressing pools and waterfalls flowing through abundantly landscaped areas adjoining the river's edge. Quality, personal service, and professionalism at competitive rates will be the goals for the development and the management of this complex. WESTWATER HOTEL EXHIBIT I The facilities are described as follows: 250 rooms; over 9, 000 sq. ft. of banquet /meeting rooms; two restaurants; two bars; a health club; hotel retail shops; a swimming pool; over 400 parking spaces; a five -six story Class A building cascading down to three ,stories toward the rear of the site (closer to the river). N/C -2- 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): Located on the northwest corner of West Valley Road (SR 181) and Strander Boulevard approximately three blocks south of Highway 405 and one block southwest of the entrance to Longacres Race Track. The west edge of the 6.9 acre site borders the. Green River. • As described in paragraph 6 above, the low profile, high quality image and heavily- Landscaped project environment will enhance the surrounding properties creating a proud community asset,.. The. Hotel will be buffered from properties on all sides by rows of trees and shrubs; also the parking areas will be segmented. and beautified by abundant landscaping. Since the site does not have any plants there now, the new land- scaping will improve the environment in the immediate area. All of the large trees just outside the west edge of the site (grow- ing in the river bed) will be enjoyed as the visible focal' point of many of the guest rooms and public spaces. The berm along the west side of the site (river's edge) will not be excavated or removed, but rather will be enhanced by a ground cover (grass, etc.). 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Project: April, 1979 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES x NO _ (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES x NO _ (c) Building Permit YES x NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution. Control Permit YES _ NO x (e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES x NO YES x NO YES x NO YES x NO. YES x NO _._. YES x NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NONE 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NONE 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regard- ing the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Shoreline Management Application, Flood Control Zone Permit II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS -3- (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" ° answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcoveringof the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO x x x (f) Explanation: Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO Excavation for foundations, and for basements, if included, will be made. For the most part, this work is expected to be limited to the zone of engineered compacted fill which has been previously placed on the site. Any changes in topography will be principally associated with grading for basements. Topographic changes outside of the buildings will be minor, relating primarily to landscaping. There is a minor potential for wind erosion of soils during construction; i. e., possible dust. However, the nature of the soils, the extent of earthwork and natural moisture conditions will inhibit this potential impact. (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture . or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: The major source of pollution at the site is due to vehicular traffic. Exhaust emissions far outweigh all other sources combined. Traffic along the adjacent arterials can create levels of carbon monoxide, the primary vehicular pollutant of up to 5 mg /m during peak hour traffic (eight hour standard is 10 rng / The additional traffic generated . by the facility will increase the traffic less than 5%. The increase in air pollution levels will be indistinguishable from present levels and is estimated at less than a 0. 2 mg /m increase. x x (d) (f) (g) -5- (c) Alterations to the.course or flow of flood waters? There will be emissions from the kitchen facilities due to cooking. However, they are expected to be minor when compared to the vehicular pollution levels.. The rooms will be heated with electricity so will be no emissions from this source. Solid waste will be removed by a disposal company so there will be no incineration. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a)' Changes in currents; or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Change in the .amount of surface. water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, includ- ing but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria or other substances into the ground waters. x (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x Explanation: -6- The proposal will decrease the absorption rate of rainfall into the ground by virtue of an extensive covering of im- pervious surfacing for pavements and buildings. The drain- age pattern relative to surrounding properties would remain unchanged, except that highway drainage, presently ponding and /or draining north through a roadside swale to the Bow Lake pipeline right -of -way will be collected in the internal system. Internally the storm waters would be collected and concentrated on the surface and entered into an underground conduit system for discharge into the Green River. The peak rate of surface runoff under this proposal would be increased by a factor of approximately 3. 4 times and the total volume of surface runoff increased.by a factor of approximately 2. 6 times. No alterations to the course or flow of flood waters is anticipated. The increase in peak rate of flow and volume from the site into the Green River will provide a short -term increase in the amount of surface water in the Green River. This increase will be imper- ceptible in relation to the total flow in the river and will probably result in a compensating decrease iri groundwater flow to the river over the longer term. All storm water runoff presently running overland and in earth channels to the Green River will be collected in a conventional underground drainage system with catch basins for silt and debris collection and will be routed through an oil separator prior to discharge into the Green River. There will be minimal changes in temperature.. There will be an increase in turbidity due to solids accumulation. A portion of the solids will be removed in the collector basin. The proposal, by virtue of the increased impervious area, will decrease the capability of the ground to absorb water and place it in the groundwater table. The rate of flow of groundwater will then be reduced as well as the quantity of groundwater. There should be no effect on the direction of groundwater flow. Groundwater quality will be reduced as stated above: however, no direct addition or withdrawals or acquifer interceptions will occur. Groundwater quality should be unaffected as no new substances will be entered into the groundwater table. No present use is made of groundwater in this area for public water supplies which will be unaffected by this proposal. (a) Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops; microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal .replenish- ment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO x The site consists of a few old fruit trees and a small stand of large poplar trees near the river. The remainder of the site is assorted common grasses and bushes interspersed with barren areas. The grasses and bushes and•sorne of the trees will be removed during construction. Upon completion of the project the site will be landscaped and several ornamental species will be introduced. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x Explanation: The site is a marginal habitat area providing refuge for a few small birds and mammals (rabbits). The trees growing along the river's edge will not be touched. However, some of the small birds and rabbits might be displaced during construction. Upon completion the abundant new landscaping should encourage birds to enjoy the area. 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: • YES MAYBE NO Existing noise levels on the site are created primarily by vehicular traffic on Strander Boulevard and the West Valley Highway. A series of measurements were taken on October 4, 1977 to document the existing noise levels. Readings were taken on the site about 100 feet north of Strander Boulevard and 150 feet west of the West Valley Highway. Noise levels in "A" weighted decibels (dBA) showed that the L10 (sound level in decibels that will be exceeded 10% of the time) is 67 dBA. The L50, or average sound level is 63 dBA and the L90, or minimum sound level is 59 dBA. Present state regulations on noise created primarily by motor vehicles shall not exceed 76 dBA. The increase in noise levels due to the facility will be directly related to an increase in traffic. New traffic (see Traffic section) generated by the facility will increase volume on Strander Boulevard and the West Valley Highway by less than 5 %. This will increase the noise levels about the same amount. A doubling of traffic (100 %) is necessary to cause a 3 dBA increase in noise levels, the minimum level. required for the average person to perceive a difference in noise. Therefore, the small increase in traffic created by the facility will be indistinguishable from existing noise levels. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x Explanation: All signing will be of similar quality standards. The lushly landscaped parking lot areas will be subtlety lit . 'to enhance the garden -like quality of the complex. The Hotel building itself will be softly lighted, compatible with the character of the Hotel. -9- 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: • A 1-Totel is in conformance with the best use of the land now and in the future, particularly because of its high quality and archi- tectural character. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? • x Explanation: The project will not use Or deplete any known natural resource. 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Nothing other than the normal risks associated with the operation of a restaurant and hotel. YES MAYBE NO x Explanation: Explanation: (c) -10- 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? The Hotel will employ approximately 200 -;250 employees, over 95% of which probably live today in the greater. Seattle area. To get closer to the Hotel some employees might move to Tukwila, thereby strengthening the local demand for apartments and /or houses. The general economic effect of this Hotel facility also should magnify somewhat the need for residual goods, services and employment. This might affect in a minor way the population growth rate in Tukwila. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x Some of the 200 -250 hotel employees and those industries which would supply the goods and services for the Hotel complex might create an increased demand for housing and apartment rentals in Tukwila. A residential market demand analysis would have to be made to determine the ultimate possible effect (including present construction levels, 'absorption and vacancy rates, etc. ), 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new 'parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of . circulation or movement of people and /or goods? .YES MAYBE NO x (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Explanation: West Valley Highway Strander Boulevard ADT Peak Hour 35,680 4,350 5, 740 660 Average Peak Weekday Hour Hotel 2,684 246 Dining Room 122 7 Restaurant • 296 19 3, 098 272 Banquet Room 400 100 (Special Occasion) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x The facility is oriented towards vehicular traffic and will increase traffic levels in and around the site. Current traffic along the adjacent arterials is: YES MAYBE NO Peak hour occurs between 4 p. m. and 5. p. m. on weekdays. The intersection of Strander Boulevard and the West Valley Highway is scheduled for signalization in mid -1978. Trip generation due to the site development is expected to be as follows: 3, 498 372 Sixty percent of the trips will be diverted from existing traffic while forty percent can be considered "new" traffic.. Total "new" traffic is about 1400 trips /day. -12- 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an affect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? x (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: All services are available to the site. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) . Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Increase in energy consumption commensurate with similar types of facilities. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need . for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid N,vaste and disposal? Explanation: All utility lines can be found on roads adjacent to the site. 17.. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or, potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: NONE 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: On the contrary, the abundantly landscaped low profile Hotel will create a lovely and rich view for the public and visitors. to Tukwila. The tall trees along the river bed will continue to be in view, in fact, will be enhanced by complementary landscaping and lighting. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: Included in the Hotel complex will be a Health Club, swimming pool, etc., therefore,; it will increase the availability of quality recreational opportunities in the area. -13- YES MAYBE NO x x x x x Pi -14- Explanation: CER'T'IFICATION BY APPLICANT: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal • result in an alteration of a significant archeo- logical or historical site, structure, object or building? There are no known archeological or historical objects or structures in the area of this site. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful Mis- representation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. YES MAYBE NO October 18, 1977 Date x Board of Adjustment :.' Page 6 Staff Report 1 September 1977 Activity # or Area Factor Minimum Spaces Required Hotel Rooms 312 .75 /Room 234 Meeting Rooms 10,920 sq. ft. 1/150 sq._ft. 73 Eating & Entertain- 1/75 sq. ft. ment 4,650 sq. ft. x (75 %) 47 Administrative Offices 2,070 sq. ft. 3.1/1,000 sq. ft. 9 Employees 41 1 /employee 41 SUB -TOTAL 404 Purposely excluded from this breakdown is the freestanding restaurant proposed as a part of the ultimate complex. It is excluded due to its individual nature and negligible intra -hotel multiple use. Although it is reasonable to assume some of this restaurant's patrons will walk from the hotel, the actual number is believed to be negligible and, in fact, the bulk of the patrons will arrive by car from origins other than the hotel. Hence, the 1 space /5 persons is deemed to be the minimum number of spaces necessary to ,service the separate restaurant facility, resulting in the requirement of 75 parking spaces. Hotel Complex 404 spaces Freestanding Restaurant 75 TOTAL MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 479 spaces RECOMMENDATION: Based on the Findings and Conclusions in this Report as substantiated by the Parking Variance Proposal, Staff recommends the variance from Section 18.20.070 be granted with the following stipulations: 1. Development of Phase I, to include the 7 -story hotel /restaurant building and the freestanding restaurant, shall include a minimum of 500 parking spaces. 2. This variance shall be in effect only as long as the principal use of the property remains a hotel /convention facility and reflects multiple use. 3. Construction of Phase II must be reasonably initiated within five (5) years or said development shall provide parking in compliance with Section 18.20.070 (TMC). STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Ketarins. 2 Y.P.C. Form No. 87 Affidavit of Publication ss. T'er L'ret Ertw- fl being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that E he is the Ch i. e Clerk of THE RENTON RECORD- CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a otiee of Public as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of consecutive issues, commencing on the c i ;OV e21ill`er day of , 77 , and ending the Cs day of r ovembe ,19 77 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 1 3' ~a which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Chief Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this ` day of i ovomber 19 77 �� e. L. Notary Public` in/and for State of Washingt residing at Kent, King Co ty. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING NarFer €t Herto ). h ss, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that s is the Chi C1 ', rk of THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a LC ' t i C e of runic ITeerinF as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 2 consecutive issues, commencing on the 2 day of OvE t � ?er 19 77 , and ending the 9 November 77 , both dates day o 19 inclusive, and that such was newspaper re regularly distributed to its sub- _. g Y )!'¢��I scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ' charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 1 ' v ' which ''`' °' has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. N=ovember , 19 77 Y.P.C. Form No. 87 Chief Clerk k c Subscribed and sworn to before me this ` day of l/ T . Notary Public in nd for the State of Washingt ti, residing at Kent, King ty. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. 17 November 1977 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEMW P • PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Westwater Motel) Environmental review has not been completed as yet and Staff requests the Com- mission formally postpone the hearing to the regular December meeting scheduled for Thursday, 15 December 1977. • 197? . Koll Business Centers 1901 Dove Street Newport Beach, California 92660 Harold W. Hill P.O. Box 700 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Glacier Park Company Tax Dept. 437 Central Bldg. 810 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Relco Investment Company P.O. Box 88606 Tukwila Branch Seattle, WA 98188 BNL Development Co. Tax Dept. 437 Central Bldg. 810 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 4 Notary Public in and for the Stet of Washington, residing at AFFIDAVIT I, Gary Crutchfield , being duly sworn, hereby declare that all legal notice requirements of Title 18 have been ful- filled and a notice has been mailed to each of the following addresses. Norman K. Dewey P.O. Box 88377 Seattle, WA 98188 Broadacres, Inc. 653 Skinner Building Seattle, WA 98101 R. D. Van Woerden 27625 - 10th Avenue South Redmond, WA 98054 City of Seattle 1015 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3r,L F da of Ocitamt, r REAL PROPERTY OWNERS AND LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET'OF SITE Name and Address Land Use A. Koll Business Centers Restaurant 1901 Dove Street Newport Beach, California 92660 B. Harold W. Hill P. 0. Box 700 Mercer Island, Washington 98040 C. Glacier Park Company Tax Dept. 437 Central Building 810 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 D. Relco Investment Company P. 0. Box 88606 Tukwila Branch Seattle, Washington 98188 E. BNL Development Company Tax Dept. 437 Central Building 810 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 F. Norman K. Dewey P. 0. Box 88377 Seattle, Washington 98188 G. City of Tukwila 14475 - 59th South Tukwila, Washington 98188 - Residence Commercial Restaurant Vacant Office Park Park' . APPENDIX "A" H. Glacier Park Company Warehouse Tax Dept. 437 Central Building 810 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 I. Broadacres, Inc. Warehouse 653 Skinner Building Seattle, Washington 98101 J. R.D. Van Woerden Residence & Feed Lot 27625 - 10th Avenue South Redmond, Washington 98054 K. City of Seattle Pipeline 1015 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 17 November 1977 (date) CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th Avenue South, to consider APPLICATION for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to authorize location of a 250 room MOTEL /BANQUET FACILITY at the northwest corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. All intere! ;ted persons are encouraged to appear and be heard: . Hans West, Secretary 8:00 P.M. (time) Tukwila Planning Commission For further information contact Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner, at 242 - 2177. Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle o 2 and 9 November 1977 31 October 1977 Sincerely, GC /ch Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner Please find attached a copy of Public Notice intended to inform you of the pending action of the Tukwila Planning Commission. You, as a nearby property owner, may attend the meeting and /or present written comments to either the Planning Commission or this office for entry into the official record. Should you desire . additional information, please contact me at 242 -2177. 17 November 1977 (date) CITY OF TUOILA • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 P.M. (time) Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th Avenue South, to consider APPLICATION for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to authorize location of a 250 room MOTEL /BANQUET FACILITY at the northwest corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway. All interested persons are encouraged to and be heard. . Hans West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission For further information contact Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner, at 242 -2177. Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle o 2 and 9 November 1977 r westwater hotel OWNER: MANAGER: Same Westwater Management Inc. 14923 - 64th Avenue, Surrey British Columbia, Canada ARCHITECT: Killingsworth, Brady & Associates, Inc. Larry Stricker, Project Architect 3833 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, California CIVIL ENGINEER: Wilsey & Ham 631 Strander Boulevard Tukwila, Washington SOILS ENGINEER: Dames & Moore 1155 N. E. 100th Street Seattle, Washington westwater hotel Area Map Vicinity Map Aerial Site Plan & Topography Map Elevations Typical Floors Typical Room Architectural Program Environmental Checklist Form See Back Flap Environmental Checklist Attachments See Back Flap Application For Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Copies of All Construction Reports See Back Flap See Back Flap -J w CC Fgo :4 TYPICAL GUESTROOM FLOOR i'Lgto" 11 0 - 1 171. prograni GUEST ROOMS (Includes 10 -12 Suites) 380 x 250 = Manager's Suite Royal Suite (2) 1120 x LOBBY Entrance /Windbreak /Desk MEETING ROOMS 95, 000 1,500 2, 240 98, 740 . 7,425 Banquet Room (Includes .six 300 S. F. Meeting Rooms) 5,000 Small Meeting Rooms 4 x 300 1, 200 Lobby, Coats, Toilets 1, 800 Circulation - 3,000 Storage 1,200 12,200 ADMINISTRATION 2,400 SHOPS 4,000 DINING Restaurant 2, 160 Cocktail Bar 1, 250 Cafe 1,800 Intimate Bar 990 6.200 SERVICES Maids' Room at Each Floor 6, 000 Kitchen 4, 000 Bulk Storage 2, 000 Employees' Cafeteria 1, 120 Employees' Lockers 2,000 Laundry & Housekeeping 2, 000 Timekeeper /Receiving 200 Mechanical 5,400 Loading Dock /Can Wash 1,400 24,120 PUBLIC CIRCULATION Skylight Garden 17,000 Corridors . (6 x 3840) 23, 040 40,040 TOTAL 197, 125 Square Feet PARKING REQUIRED Hotel Rooms Banquet Room (Including 6 Meeting Rooms) Meeting Rooms (4) Restaurant Cafe Bar Intimate . Bar 250 x 1 Space /Room 250 Spaces 5,000 1,200 6,200 x 1/75 Square Foot 83 Spaces 120 Seats 120 60 . 40 340 5 Seats /Parking Space 68 Spaces TOTAL 401 SPACES 406 PROVIDED • 0 tossil :rounder °y L 1 I f . `? :.dsgcsys ss,51- °h :5:'sd. I: ;Irk] fain 51 .r• s : ki.e.mce 00% rl •�•ii i Io51 t 5 106 H ST 1,0;11 s„ 1 1251 H 5 a l 12610 11910 5T 5 100TH 5T BOJLEVARD PARR ` . 12 U iM1YDALE n 1 117145T. 5 • „0911 sr „ s 6N 5 106,0 ST 429T SOT« 5 1.510 Sl 5, 5. 154TH ST. 5 12410 51 DUWAMISH IIJTSN 11.1 0 0TH ``51 r4 z2no 113 •� ® ® Qn 5 7 ` �o Dy--;;;.:41-2:z.,„,;, "y�� 5- �� o , � , ®MI + ,F RG = � .I s• ® 9 .130w iiiiiiiiii, " kV `� - � ,� ® 5 11190 .. c 5 Il O S f •. 1\ J 'H iIv ` / �� 9 n ?IVERTON r 1 . 4 / — 1 561 X® „ N S1]6TMST Jr, ;11,0 v (l3500 1 I I a�Ss H s 5 137,0 sr VIII . y 5 'Foster t 1.9� s'r 1)910 51 . •01x'1 1` ° ,. ,r: _ �� ®- 5 r. I Cr , , Golf \ _ IC 1 '< - • 5 1 S1FF. 111 SurISP4 1; s 1 \GI°d.r i ©100TH „sti r -•' 19910 s a f . 1007« 5 T ; N ,ph� ® ® 5 1 11 sT. '�. Linl n�� 9r so.,;.., I �� � 0 �R' r ` 5 ^ 102nD 5�� , ° „ UNAMINTICOM y a f rl� N MN ST ® b� 9AU H ip 5 Noel" q S t 5 S 100TH ST. • milinim 1011TH 1 er RIVERTON 150111 EfGHTS 5 1501„ art.. ® s RsznO 1 � sP M® ■�! INIE • i s 4711' 1515T NEM 5 ISIS 0 54 2(447 10000 5 9 cr04 5 PTA./ • F6 ST N = 5 I551 5r. 1600 SIO WAY • 5 131AD ST. Ciy 74.3 FL 1001« 5 D." 5 109TH sr MW.1k s. 5011157. 5 1' .A i 5 13201) ST. TUKYY; • 2 :��• '. L ® 5 15]AD 55T1'E $ • IIT \ s T11bi! s, J GT..T... 1133 11. R.nleni N.ScIL ■110 11 Lake Burin , T•r[ Lt 60001 -© 16 Dull EEEIGNEE 11 n _. l �� � f I „ S lrp THREE 'I REC P0!ii f • I rnJ roelcule \ • ._n. Ail, T •:. ITM.. T7.. — s • ros CG.J N 1 S an LS.s — , p s _ 11 +00 s 1 5 5 1'25 B ®. ®1 ow Q. •T a z 51°.T 5 n 00� 5' „ 1 G ! . E, B 1 E ' LY as1o6T «= l n o ar , -0, s JOel (rr Ie= 1.1' ; Rainier Go F p a ; a dd. 511c1•. � h lU1 *' • CountryC � mr l sr. - IPri.olel _ — S. 12 %H PL e 1 SEATTLE INTERNATIO AIRPORT; N S ..: CI spy© kb 1 mom s ��NafhinglDn r.- Park • s McMICKEN S s; BE HEIGHTSs -®lam 4 M -pi m 5' ® 500 5 Rijg m'9L^L_1 > 114,0 STS NOES uNy f.ock . __0000 _ JAKE RiCGF. ;tongacre5 Roc. Track SW SiST sr 1� 3 109 eridg. • d. 1 0L111 U:il -C Coleman Pt VP11i, CU. HILLS SE ' Lake IA Washington • &each P 142110 ST 5 5 Re n anal School G•e*nynaad Ceronry .strivag. S. • NDETId SC. H.-Urines CT. SL. sx • MAPLEWOOD tr•st IsTH ST. 1,1-1,61KLUTO AV SI. l b ' 11000 2000 ST 1T7TV st SE IOTH SE. Dn. ST. A s , sT 12.72 qk t 132s0 e 5E 13360 ST AE 112TH SE IlArk 5 5 ON M. Houns H. Sth. 1870 PL E t2OTH 2270 0 si-r-kiric—ti p., <E. - SE sni j-,. 1 ,„. plo Go. and, ,,,, z a 5 E. 10714 iir 1.T. ClUb, RIC.! •aa, • 4ter- , _4.,. 1 .... sr e “ , S E 1•2/1 1 8 ,,f---- ,,5:4 F-' ........ c) o ' 4. +, 0 —.....—... E ..., !.•.......■- . e_ s 7 1 ,r -- -:- SE 1160I ST SE 132 SE I36TH Sr M 4pj VAL The H.M. Gousha Co. SC , r•TH SI /42hD PL t 56 128714 . 1. 3 S E ,•13STH JONES " To Mt. Rainier Nat'l Park and Yakima/ 11500 13000 17, RDITON • 0 ( • • , HTIT T T COALFIELD 11412 ST 11000 p. p.mf Foilstand MC NEIL ISLAND U.T.I'D STATES PEN1TTNTIkk• HOHRHE Cromwell Wollbche 4(. N o I P . TT rcesoicoc AsTr is - University . 'Place Menlo Park VASHON Vashon Centert ISLAND .Portage Quartermaster aon Ellisport 092 To Olympia To Mount Rainier Nall Glenwood Walla Lisabuela ,./ — Cmcent 5 Sunrise Beach F LaM - .01agnolia Beach k Tahlequah Vashon °Heights Dockton MAURY ISLAND 47 Manianita t Acres Beach Shawnee Harbor NEI" ba Gig Harbor \Gve. Dash '7."1"!? Pon' Point [1.4 Mum NT4 2 Acres ; WISIO ruteeri.: .t TACO.A NANNiTIWS 21.10GT 4, Brown's Point R ecoO a' ac ■111.1.1 Area cosered by detailed street map rm 6401,5 Wo L _ Fife Ft Ark Lakota Wm STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss KING COUNTY A F F I D A V I T Robert E. Reynolds, being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: I am a Real Estate Officer in the Trust Division of Rainier National Bank. Rainier National Bank, Harold S. Shefelman, Mondo Desimone, and Rose D. Maselli, as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Giuseppe Desimone, deceased, are the owners of the real property located on the West Valley Highway between Strander Boulevard and Highway 405, which is the subject of the attached Application for Change of Land Use Classification. I am authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of the property owners. The property owners have no objection to this attached Application for a conditional use permit which would allow a hotel complex on the property. The Lessee, or sublessees or their assigns, will be under- taking the development, and the property owners have no responsibility for the development or control over it. Therefore, although the property owners are willing to have their names used in the Application, and fully support the Application, the property owners have not participated in any way in the plans for the hotel development, and of course if the plans are not carried out as promised, the property owners will not be responsible or liable in any way. Robert E. Reynolds, Real Estate Officer, Trust Division, Rainier National Bank Rainier Tower Seattle, Washington 98124 Tel. No. 621 -4376 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this - 7'7' /day of 6660.(28-4/ , 1977. ,L) Notary Public in nd for the State,..of Wapington, residing, at • FOP OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No Receipt No Fi li-' Date Hearing Date APPLICATION FOR CILANGr OF 17ND USE CIASSIFJ.C1l'1'f.ON OR r•` :)JIi''ICATION OF LAD USE REGULATIONS IN TIE CITY OF `JJI . flI Planning Ccxrmission Action City Council Action Oreli nance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWr:R ALL THE FOLLOWING WFSTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY_ Name WESThATER MANAGEMENT, INC. Address 14923 64th Avenue L Surrey,. B. C. V35 ] .Telephone No. (604) 689 -5771 Property Petitioned for`rezoning is located on west valley Highway (SR 181) between Strander Boulevard and Highway 405 Total square footage in property 299,329 square feet LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See attachments A and B EKi.sting Zoning C -M Zoning requested Conditional use permit :What are the uses you propose to develop on .this property? Development of a 250 room 'Hotel complex including 'large banquet /meeting facility two es anrant�, tw^ lrarc� a health club, over 400 parking spaces, swimming pool. etc' N of permanent off — street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 406 parking lot areas. Number required 401 NOTICE `10 APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in . reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate . your request may be attached to this sheet. .(See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific . minimum requirements.) also the 8" sewer line on the east side of the site is adequate. ' • Form D 1. Wnat provisions will be made to screen adjacent'and surrounding prbp=rty fromn any incompatible effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification In addition to the large trees now along the river bank, extensive landscaping will be added around the periphery of the hotel and the edges of the 'site, plus throughout the , 2. •+'rut provisions will barnacle to provide-for necessary street widening to City 'minimum stari rds" Existing minimum city street width •tandard will be. met. • 3. 1.;hat ):Fora/ i'Jions will be IPcIdz for adulate sew r and Later sarviCe? The 10' water • main on West Valley Highway is adequate for anticipated demand (150 ib.' Static-Pressure); • 4. An .:r . which 1:: ; • _ ` :.Liao ^e — r These facilities w it be superior in quality and aesthetic character to any existing competition in the area. Considerable community pride, quality image, and revenues will be created. LOT B EXHIBIT A • Ail Lh(7,tcrtajn•I. pcot:)orty :;ituake. in the of C.:;,)nty SLate t. b:*ing a pcKtion of Section 25, c:nd MW: parLicularly• descrIbod•as at a ppInt on the westerly xight-of.- way line of .tAlc \: t. Valley Itighway (S :) 181) aL a point which S81°07'31" W 50.00 feet from the'eenter line thereof et Hicillway F.ngincors Stati 1601.00; thenco from 1.) or Bi.:GiiNG along said westerly right- of way line 517."18 E 139.70 feet to a point thc,reon; thence leaving saita wester:1y lino S77'41'30" W 50.75 f....(!t; thence . S34'15'14' W 212.15 fe't; thenee S17°03'35" E 120.00 feet .to a point on the northerly right-of-way Jinn of Strander Boulevard; thenoc! along aid northriy right-of-Way line from a tangent, . that 1.)2•ers S72°56 W along the arc of a - curve to the lefft having a radius of 700.00 feet and a central angle of 11°22'16", en arc lcnqth of 138.92 feet; thence S W 12 feet to a 1. on the easterly GI: the Green River; thence along said eaterly bank northerly to an intersection thereof witli the soUtl line of thc Lake.Pipdline right-of-way (30 fot wicle); thente along su.id southerly line S',.i7'12 E 194.01 Lo a point on the wonLerly riht-of-way of said West Va11 thEmcc. •estc!rly right-of-wny line S0 29" 165.06 feet to the rolilT o BT3M1.:NI1•;G, ana containing 253,C30 square feet of land more or less,. LOT C 'EXHIBIT A (Cont d) c All tat certain real properily situate in the City of Tukwila, Cony of.1:ing, State of Washington, beinx:1 a portion of Section 25, Town:Thip 23 flortL, IZange 4 East, WiliNmette Meridian, and bejnamorepr.rtieUlarly des-rid .o fllowo: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly right-of:- way line of the Wst..Valley iijhway (S.R. 181) at . a point which 1)ears S81'07'31" W 35.00 feet from the cenLer line thereof at lighway Engineers Station 162+50; thence from said POINT OF lC,INNING icng aid westerly right-. .of-wav line'and northerly richt-of-way line Of Strander Zoul,:.:vard the following courses: S05"15'06" E 112.35 feet, tangent 1:0 the • • precc!ding course along the arc of a curve to the right havng a radius of 50.00 fc2et and a dentral ang3e of S6°22 an arc length of 75.38 feet, tangent.to'the.proceding• curve S81°07'31" W 2C.58 feet, and .tangent • to the preceding course aloncithe arc of •a . curve to th'. I-ft having a radius of .7.00.00 feet and a central angle of an arc length of 100.00 feet . to a pointthereon; thence N17°03'35" W 120.00 feet; thence N34°15'14" E 212.15 feet; thence N 77°41'30" E 50.75 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of said West Val)ey Highway; thence alona said westerly right-of-way line S12'18'30" E 110.75 feet to the POINT 01? BEGINNING and containing 40,499 sToare feet of land more or less. 8X808 Raoorm • . • RECEIPT D fie ('O /SI 977 Received From ) Address 3a • . 1 / ` '_r1 'mod .�- t�.CJAA- 1 , fors $,.3 For. • 0 l V 7 i L ' 7 � . _ , id � - ; I ( J t , a t _ a a L c - i - 2 A - ' 9 / 7S.erz) c Le/ ' ACCOUNT HO. J PAID • AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH 4J By AMT. FAID CHECK EAlANCE DUE MONEY ORDER l~ 8X808 Raoorm • . • OR OFFICE USE ONLY ppl. No. Planning Commission Action eceipt No. iling Date City Council Action earing Date Ordinance No. & Date PPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: ame WESTWATER MANAGEMENT INC. British Columbia. Canada. V351X8 APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF LAND USE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA Address Health Club over 400 parking spaces, pool, etc. (see attachments A and B Form B 14923 64th Avenue, Surrey Telephone No. (604) 689 -5771 roperty Petitioned for rezoning is located on West Valley Road (SRIR1). westside etween Strander Boulevard and Highway 405 otal square footage in property 299. 329 sq. ft. (6. 9 acres) EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY xisting Zoning CM Zoning requested conditional use permit hat are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Development of a 250 -room Hotel complex including larger banquet /meeting facilities, two restaurants. two bars. Number of permanent off - street parking spaces that will be provided on property ?, 406 spats Number required 401 spaces NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying ' regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements. ) In addition to the large trees now along the river bank, extensive landscaping will be added around the periphery of the Hotel and the edges of the site plus throughout the parking lot areas. Form B 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any incompatible effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification? 2. What provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City minimum standards? Necessary minimum City street widening standards will be met.. 3. What provisions will be made for adequate sewer and water service? The 10" water main on West Valley Highway is adequate (150# static pressure); the 8" sewer line on the east side of the site is adequate for anticipated demand. 4. Any other comments which the petitioner feels are appropriate: These facilities will be superior in quality and esthetic character to any existing competition in the area. Considerable community pride, image and revenues will be created. cie„.-A (1 L, 0-1 - 1 - 3 ) • All that certain real property situate in the City of Tukwila, Cou;ity of King, State of . Washington, being a portion •oi Section 25, Township 22 North, th, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, and being more particularly described as follows:: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly right-of- way line of the West Valley Highway (S.R. 181) at a point which bears S81 ° 07'31" 11 50.00 feet from the center' line thereof at Highway Engineers Station 160 +00; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING along said westerly right - of way line S12"18'30" E 139.70 feet to a point thereon; thence leaving said westerly line S77 °41'30" W 50.75 feet; thence S34 °15'14" : I0 2.12.15 feet; thence S17 °03'35" E 120.00 feet to a point on the northerly right -of -way line of Strander. Boulevard; 'thence along said northerly right -of -way line from a tangent, that bears S72°56'25" W along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 700.00 feet and a central angle of 11 °22'16 ", an arc length of 138.92 feet; thence S61°34'09" •- W 124.01 feet to a point on the easterly hank of the Green River; thence along said easterly bank northerly to an intersection thereof with the southerly line of the .Bow Lake Pipeline right -of -way (30 feet wide) ; thence along said southerly line S87°12'48" E 194.01 . feet to a point on the westerly right-of line of said West Valley Highway; thence along said westerly right -of -way line S08 °52'29" E 165.06 . feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and .containing 258,830 square feet of land more or less, J1/4674 /_04 Meridian; and being more particularly descr ibed as follows • All tliat certain real property situate in the City of Tukwila, County of Xing, State of Washington, being a portion of Section 25, Township .23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette . • BEGINNING at a point on the westerly. right-of-:- ..way .line of the West, Valley highway (S . R. .181) at a point which . bears S81'07'31" W 35.00 * feet from the center line thereof at Highway Engineers Station 162+50; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING along said westerly right -.. -of -way line' and northerly •right -of -way line . Of Strander Boulevard the following courses: :S05°15'06" E 112.35 feet, tangent to the preceding course along the arc of a curve - to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 86°22'37", an arc . length of 75.38 feet, tangent to the.preceding curve S81 ° 07'31" W 28.58 feet, and tangent • to the preceding course along the arc of • curve to the left having a radius of .700.00 . . feet and a •central angle of 8°11'06", an arc • length of 100.00 feet to point thereon; thence N17°03'35" W 120.00 feet; thence • N34°15'14" E 2.12.15 feet; thence N 77°41'30" E 50.75 feet to the westerly right -of -way line of said West Valley Highway; thence along said westerly right -of -way line S12 °1830" E 110.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 40,499 square feet of land more or less. site plan