Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 74-62-SMP - ADEN COMPANY / SEGALE - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT74-62-smp SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM 14040 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH ADEN COMPANY #74-09 SEGALE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to WAC 173 -14 -060, the City of Tukwila has reviewed a request by: Mario A. Segale to extend the expiration date of: ❑ the two (2) year substantial progress date, (WAC 173 -14 -060 (1)) OR the five (5) year completion date, (WAC 173 -14 - 060 (2)) on the following Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit: Local Permit Number: Date Approved: State Permit Number: Date Approved: Se 0 M7 (Date) EXTENSION OF , SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98188 74 -09 13 November 1974 #N- 678 -1q -A 2 January 1975 The permit is hereby extended for a period of Substantial improvements must be made by CITY OF TUKWILA project must be completed by 13 November 1980 1 Year . The Direc k4, Office of Community Development • 1908 - • Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98188 ATTN: Mario A. Segale RE: Extension of Shoreline Management Permit MC /ckh Enclosure cc: Dir. 0.C.D. Sin Mar Ca Assist City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development • 28 September 1979 In accordance with your request of September 12, 1979 the City of Tukwila, acting upon authority of W.A.C. 173 -14 -060, has granted a one (1) year extension of the completion date of revised Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit number N- 678 -17 -A (74 -09). The new project completion date is 13 November 1980, as noted on the enclosed extension document. Copies of the extension document have been forwarded to the State. Depart- ment of Ecology and Attorney General's Office to complete those agencies' files on this matter. y t Planner Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 15345 - 36th St. N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development 28 September 1979 RE: Extension of Revised Shoreline Management Permit #N- 678 -17 -A (74 -09) Accompanying this letter is a copy of the extension granted to Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit number N- 678 -17 -A (74 -09) issued to Mario A. Segale on 28 September 1979. The City of Tukwila has exercised its authority under WAC 17 -14 -060 as a local government agency,. determining that a one (1) year extension of the project completion date is justified, due to the relatively large scale of the subject development. The new project completion date for this permit, therefore, is 13 November 1980. MC /ckh cc: Dir., 0.C.D. ar C Assistan Planner I . • 190S • TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar 0. Bauch. Mayor . MEMORANDUM Kjell Stoknes, O.C.D. Director Mark Caughey, Coordinator - Current Planning 28 September 1979 SEGALE BUS. PK - EXTENSION OF SHORELINE PERMIT MC /ckh Attachments An application for extension of the completion date of the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for Segale Business Park was received at this office on 19 September 1979. After reviewing the original permit file (MF 74 -09), and a subsequent application for revision (MF 78- 27 -SMP), I find no impediment to approving the requested extension for a one (1) year period. If you agree with my findings, please sign and date the extension docu- ment, and review the attached correspondence for authorization to release. DCC. CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following . terms and conditions: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Manage- ment Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit require- ments. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction Permit shall not be issued forty- five (45) days =fter approval by the City of Tukwila Planning Department or until any review proceedings initiated within this 45 day review period have been completed. '4. • Pursuant to Section 14, Chapter 286, Laws of 1971 Extra Session, the City of Tukwila has taken the following actions: APPROVED 5. Special Conditions: A. Minimum floor elevation to be as prescribed by State Department of Ecology Flood Control Permit. B. The River Zone, as defined in the Tukwila Shore- line Master Program, shall contain no uses other . than those specifically allowed: Within s Ma Program, except any non- conforming use as de- fined in the Master Program. C. Storm drainage shall be accomplished in accordance with requirements dictated by the Director of Public Works, City of Tukwila. 6. Project Name, D;i:;cription and Application Number: ADEN Warehouse, Shoreline Management Permit #74-09 Kjell Stoknes 15 January 1975 PIar ng Director Date City of. Tukwila Planning Dept. 5-74 Revised It Northwest Regional Office 15345 N.E. 36th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 March 5, 1975 Planning Department City of Tukwila 14475 - 59th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98067 Sincerely, BOB STEVENS Authorization Control and Compliance BS:II cc: Harold T. Klein, President Aden Corporation 14040 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 Northwest Regional Office, Telephone: (206) 885 -1900 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: KING COUNTY APPLICANT: HAROLD T. KLEIN : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 716-17-A (74 -09) (WAREHOUSE ADDITION & LIGHT MANUFACTURING) The 45 -day review by the Department of Ecology and Attorney General's Office for the above Shoreline Management Permit will terminate on March 8, 1975. If no notice of appeal is received by the above date, construction pursuant to the permit may then commence provided, however, all other local, state, and federal laws regulating such construction have been complied with. 98052 Stated' \M'ishitlgtol l DcI ) rl111CI It Ol FrOIOgy C ITY tO F. T U 1KW:I L:A 14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 Frank Todd, Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Harold Klein President ADEN Corporation 14040 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 GC /sl Encl: as cc: Pub Wks.Dir Bldg Off 16 January 1975 Dear Mr. Klein: Please find enclosed a copy of City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Permit #74 -09. and the correspondence forwarding the permit and application to the appropriate State agencies . for review as required by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Also please note the general and special conditions of the permit as any violation may cause revocation of said permit. Upon completion of the required 45 - day review period without any significant objection to the issuance of the .Shoreline Permit, you will receive written notice from the Department of Ecology and, at such time, application for a City of Tukwila Building Permit may be made provided . all other applicable Federal, State and local regulations . have been complied with. Sincerely, / ary tr utchfie Ass'stant Plan • Frank Todd, Mayor CITY OF TU KWI LA -14475 - ; ;59TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office Attn: Shoreline Permits 15345 N.E. 36th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Gentlemen: 15 January 1975 Please find enclosed a copy .of -City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Permit #74 -09 and its related application, - drawing and Negative Declaration. The permit.was granted in accordance with Section II, Shoreline Act of 1971 as well as the Shoreline Management Master Program adopted by this municipality.. Only upon receipt of proper notification shall the per- mittee be notified and allowed to commence the approved construction. GC/s1 Encl: as cc: S.A.G. Appl. S i GG -CC 'ry - rutchf i - 1d. Assi tant• P1: niter Frank Todd, Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT State' Attorney'General Shoreline Permits Temple of Justice Olympia, Washington 98054 Gentlemen: GC /sl Encl: • as cc: D.O.E. APpI. CITY OF TUKWILA . - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 15 January 1975 Please find enclosed a copy of City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Permit #74 -09 and its related application,_.' drawing and Negative Declaration. The permit was granted in accordance with Section II, Shoreline Management=Act.- of 1971 as well as the Shoreline Management Master Program adopted by this municipality. Onlyupon receipt . of proper notification 'shall the per mittee be notified and allowed to commence the approved construction. rely, Gary Crutchf 1 ' Assistant Planner_ STATEMENT OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO •CHAPTER 18.98 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRON- MENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1971. APPLICATION FOR .A SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT TO LOCATE A WAREHOUSE TYPE STRUCTURE. HAROLD T. KLEIN - APPLICANT. INTRODUCTION: The following is a statement of declaration by the under- signed as the responsible official pursuant to Chapter 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. • An Environmental Assessment has been submitted on the Shore- line Management Permit application to locate a new warehouse on•a shoreline of statewide'significance." DECLARATION: Based upon the . Environmental Assessment submitted, Chapter . 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal. Code'dealing with Environmental Policy and the guidelines issued - by the Washington State Department of Ecology for the implementation of the State 'Environmental'Policy Act, I find that the proposed applica -- Lion for a Shoreline Management Permit-to locate, a. new ware- house structure will not have a significant effect upon the environment and therefore an Environmental Impact Statement As not required. Planning Department j 11 S okn s, Director KS /sl CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 15, 1975 January 6, 1975 Gentlemen: Sincerely, RLP:11 City of Tukwila Planning Department 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98067 ‘4 R. LEIGHTON PRATT Authorization Control and Compliance Section cc: Mr. Mario A. Segale Segale Business Park P.O. Box 38924 Tukwila, Washington 98188 SUBJECT: KING COUNTY APPLICANT: MARIO A. SEGALE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 678 -17 -A (74 -09) (BUSINESS PARK) The 45 -day review period by the Department of Ecology and Attorney General's Office for the above Shoreline Management Permit terminated on January 2, 1975. If no notice of appeal is received by the above date, construction pursuant to the permit may then commence provided, however, all other local, state, and federal laws regulating such construction have been complied with. Northwest Regional Office, 15345 N.E. 36th Street, Redmond, Washington 98052 Telephone: (206) 885 =1900 State ( Was' lingt( )I yart rue! ll Ot 1.1x )k)gv AFFIDAVIT of PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING No tfi onnn t•h Rol" i naon being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: That he is the As sac i r to t g }ter of THE HIGHLINE TIMES, a weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned has been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of publication at Stirlen, King County, Washington; that by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and at all times mentioned herein has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication of any advertisement, notice, summons, report, proceedings, or other official document required by law to be published; that said newspaper was published regularly, at least once each week, in the English language, as a newspaper of general circulation in Burson, King County, Washington, at the time of application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of said application, and is now and at all times mentioned herein has been so published. That the annexed is a true copy of a Pt tlbi 3 " r,, period of rerardini Notice of A•pplicntion for Shoreline 14ana ;ement as it was published in regular issues of said newspaper once each week for a on the _day of Der orTifi('.r Subscribed and sworn to before me this ttJO consecutive weeks, commencing , 19 and ending on the 1 day of Dece,aber , 19 74 , both dates inclusive, and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to Its subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of S 11.93 which amount has been paid in full, at the rate of S4.20 per hundred words for the first insertion and 113.15 per hundred words for each subsequent insertion. 11th of December !.i , 19 74 day Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way t 110 - 01-e 4 °4 ° lji.yWiii;If 41 }yl - T i , ME MMO* sn'M+Pr3ir6i 4 rung awhuCSai al ') giiM` ' 7iiiiiprr6f;a�4iMli - i!ocMM kil�i�it »:6oiir�' 1 Ssa Oitt4dT ti f, ` - Wn iY. glpri , `9sMlwlpp in "�apOild F �� 'DtwMiii2011.(ss ciii li ;• `rtikypsnaidti?�ip as ioyy x ) { i o D b i tgYA.d ofiM f aloi� u� ;.1( CM! 1 ::47s;BQ..u7 . u i (30; d "ci �ssi p Mc Y i cl3iili -: Reoc�tldn,tliii0ds a£ fn�: ra .03br;e - , . ;:; ✓. , CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCEDURES FOR HAROLD T. KLEIN NEW WAREHOUSE PURSUANT TO WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1971 CHAPTER 43.21 c, R.C.W. CITY CF TUKWILA O :INANCE NO. 759 A. THE PPOPCSED ACTICN 1. Type of Action The City of Tukwila will urcer:ake administrative ccticr:s and approval procedures to Permit the construction arc operation of a proposed removal of existing house cr:o erection of a new warehouse by Harold T. Klein. All review and permit procedures are prescribed by Tukwila City Ordinances and have been codified within the Tukwila Municipal Code. 2. Location and Description of the General Features of the Project Site (Refer to Location Map) The proposed site is located at 14040 Interurban Avenue South within Tukwila, Washington. This construction is in addition to structures long standing and of a going concern. In the last decade, rapid industrial growth in the Green - Duwamish River Valley has resulted in dramatic changes in land use. The newer industrial establishments include the Alaskan Camper Manufacturing. Bert Well Industries, and a storage lot for pipes, tanks and related machinery, and Oak Harbor Freight Lines terminal. Prominent features of the nearby area include the Green River bordering the subject site to the east; and Interstate 5 one mile away. The Black River junction (a transfer facility maintained by the Milwaukee Road and the Burlington Northern) is located directly across the river. Other land uses is the nearby area include several residences across Interurban Avenue and the Foster Golf Course to the north between Interurban Avenue and the Green River. Thus, the general vicinity is devoted to a wide variety of land uses. 3. Development Resulting from the Proposed Action The proposed warehouse will be developed on an existing industrial site. The dimensions of the warehouse are 40 feet x 90 feet and the house to be removed is approximately 30 feet by 50 feet, including its detached garage. The net new covered area is then approximatly only 2100 square feet. The finished floor elevation of the warehouse will be 18.0 feet, which is.-- consistant will all other structures on the - .premises. Surface run -off water presently drains to Maule Avenue where the City maintains c storm sewer. Roof run off water will be collected by gutters and down spouts and routed to that some sewer. No new vehicular traffic will be generated or noise. Justification for the Proposed Action The proposed action is justified in that it represents the lawful implementation of the previously determined City of Tukwila policies as embodied within official plans, ordinances, and resolutions. The project is also justified in terms of existing need for the products and services of the facility. Industrial areas in the Green River Valley are rapidly expanding and require such supporting services. The present facility is cramped and unsightly. The earehouse will provide protection from the elements, sight and theft. 5. Proposed Method of Financing and Timing The proposed action, as a series of administrative actions, will entail no expenditures of public funds outside of those normally required to support city administrative. processes. The estimated cost of the project is $9,900.00. Construction is estimated not to exceed two (2) months after the necessary permits and approvals are obtained and the facility should be ready for occupancy around May 1, 1975. b. EXISTING NATURAL CONDITIONS 1. Topography The subject site lies within a broad meander loop on the floodplain of the Green - Duwamish River. Upland areas of Tukwila and Riverton Heights border the valley to the west. The Black River residential area is on the uplands to the east across the river. Approximate elevation of the site is 17 feet above mean sea level. 2. Soils /Geology Six inches to one foot of gravel fill cover the entire site. Newberg silt loam and river bed alluvium are present beneath the fill materials. 3. HYDROLOGY Most of the water that runs off the site enters the Duwamish River via a drainage ditch. Some cording of surface water is present during periods of high rainfall. Groundwater is probably present beneath the site approximately at river level. a, WATER QUALITY a. The Green River The subject site is located adjacent to the Green River but will not influence water quality airectly, as a result of surface runoff; or indirectly, as a result of wash water reaching the sanitary sewer system which is ultimately discharged to the river after treatment by METRO. All water facilities presently exist and no expansion is proposed. METRO is federation of cities united to deal with waste water disposal and transportation service. The METRO comprehensive Sewerage Plan includes an extensive network of sewer trucklines and several sewage treatment plants. The Renton Treatment Plant is located just south of the subject site near the Old Black River Junction in Tukwila. Treated sewage from Tukwila is discharged from this facility into the Green River. Thus, for most water quality parametersm except coliform counts, the Renton Treatment Plant over- shadows the effect of effluent from sources immediately downstream. Since June 1965, the Renton Treatment Plant (RTP) has been discharging increasing amounts of treated effluent to the Duwamish River as new trunklines have been constructed and the treatment plants service area has been enlarged. The design capacity of the present Renton secondary treatment process is 36 million gallons per day, although the actual volume of effluent varies. ` Just upstream of the subject site, conditions of low dissolved • oxygen have often been recorded in the late summer. The Green - Duwamish River still experiences similar low dissolved conditions _ during the summer months. Although METRO Data indicates an improving trend in dissolved oxygen, the RIBCO analysis indicates low dissolved oxygen levels are still a problem. The dissolved oxygen is depleted by the oxidation (degradation) of natural as well as man -made materials and is replaced naturally by aeration at the air -water surface or by mixing with water having greater dissolved oxygen and /or by photosynthesis of aquatic plants. Since the degradation of the more common wastes requires their oxidation, the variation in dissolved oxygen is a significant indicator of the general amount and persistence of pollutants. The capacity of water to retain dissolved oxygen is also reduced with increasing temperatures. Ammonia and phosphate concentrations in the Green /Duwamish River are relatively low adjacent to the subject site but have signifi- cantly increased downstream from the Renton Treatment Plant out - fall since the introduction of the effluent in 1965. The Renton Treatment Plant is only 16% efficient for ammonia and 3% efficient for phosphates. The concentrations of these nutrients are at ' least doubled as a result of the present input of treated effluent from the plant. According to METRO data, the Renton Treatment Plant is a quite significant source of nitrites and nitrates. The impact on aquatic life in the estuary attributable to this input of nutrients is, however, unknown at this time. Maximum concentrations of all nutrients in the Duwamish Estuary occur at low tide, partly because of this time there is a minimum of seawater dilution of fresh water nutrient sources. High levels of nutrients are also recorded in the fall and winter, however, when light conditions are minimal, a severe algal bloom cannot be sustained. Nuisance blooms and eutrophication are well known problems that develop from increases in phytoplankton production frequently caused by nutrients in domestic waste water. However, the USGS Study indicates that in the case of the Duwamish River, nutrient concentrations do not control the occurrence of the blooms inas- much as nitrogen and phosphorous compounds always are present in sufficient quantities for a bloom to exist. For example, previous data indicates that a bloom occurred prior to the installation of the Renton Treatment Plant. The chief factors controlling whether or not a phytoplankton bloom will occur are favorable hydrological and climatic conditions. Nutrients from the paved surfaces resulting from the continued process of industrialization of the Green River Valley may function to increase the biomass produced by phytoplankton blooms once the other favorable conditions are established. The dissolved oxygen of surface waters is increased by the photo- synthetic process of the bloom, but the dissolved oxygen of the subsurface waters is decreased as the plants die and oxygen is consumed in decomposition processes. In the upstream reaches, the river may be loaded slightly beyond its natural B.O.D. (Biological Oxygen Demand) as indicated by the fact that both the average dissolved oxygen values and average B.O.D. values at the Renton Treatment Plant monitoring station are generally lower than at the upstream monitoring stations. The high B.O.D. in the river as it passes through Tukwila is probably due to the cumulative effect of numerous point sources of effluent, mostly as a result of drainage from developed areas adjacent to the river. These numerous sources of outfall result in cumulative adverse effects on the river, although each individual source along may have a relatively small impact. b. Street and Paved Surface Contaminants At the present time, runoff from existing paved surfaces in the area eventually reaches the Green - Duwamish River from various discharge points. Street surface contaminants include those substances which are capable of being washed off paved traffic lanes, parking lots, as well as these substances derived from the pavement itself during normal wear and tear. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency undertook a recent study to investigate and define the water pollution impact of urban storm water discharge and to develop alternative approaches suitable for reducing pollution from this source. Basically, it was determined that runoff from street surface is generally highly contaminated, and at certain times (i.e., a heavy rain- fall after a long dry period) the pollution loading can equal or exceed contaminants found in an equivalent volume of san- itary sewers. In general terms, it is expected that both organic and non - organic substances increasingiy load up over time since the last cleaning by artificial means, or the last rinsing by natural means. Street and paved surface contaminants are then trashed off in varying quantities depending on the intensity of the subsequent rain or efficiency of the subsequent cleaning. The amount of pollutants washed off also varies depending on the type of paved surface, the usage and the adjacent land use. In general, industrial areas have substantially heavier loading than other types of land uses, probably because they are swept - less often, if at all, and industrial activities tend to gen- erate more dust, etc. On the other hand, commercial areas have substantially lighter loading intensities than the mean for cities on the whole, because they are swept so often. Residential areas were found to have an average loading intensity of contaminants comparable to the average for all land uses. The following Table gives a breakdown of these comparisions: CONTAMINANTS (LBS /CURB /MILE) EXISTING ON STREET SURFACES LAND USE. MEAN. MEAN (lb /curb mile) Residential 1,200 Low /old /single 850 low /old /multi 890 med /new /single 430 med /old /single 1,200 med /old /multi 1,400 Industrial 2,800 light 2,600 medium 890 heavy 3,500 Commercial 290 central business district 290 shopping center 290 1 , 40 0 NUMERICAL WEIGHTED In terms of the character of the contaminants, the greater portion of the overall pollution potential is associated with the fine solids. Silt-like material (smaller than 43 microns) accounts for 5.9% of the total solid but about one - fourth of the chemical oxygen demand and about one --7ird to one- half of the algal nutrients will be associated with or collected upon these particulates. Silt of this size also accounts for over one -half of the heavy metals and nearly tnree- fourths of the total pesticides. This is significant in that conventional sweepers typically leave behind 85% of the material smaller than 43 microns; nor is material of this size not affected by catch basins. The large quantities of street and paved surface contaminants reaching the Green River as a result of continued development in the Valley contribute, to a large degree, to water quality problems in the Green River. 5. Biology a. Zoology (1) Aquatic Wildlife - Fisheries The Green River, which flows by',the subject site, produces hundreds of thousands of resident and non - resident fish annually. Most of the salmon populating the river are released as fry or fingerlings from the Washington State Depart- ment of Fisneries Hatchery on Big Soos Creek, one -half mile above its junction with the Green River. This notchery is the largest in the Puget Sound area and is considered to be one of the most productive salmon hatcheries in the state. As many as 50,000 fish return to the hatchery during peak years. Substantial natural spcwrirg also occurs. A number of credromous trout species migrate, spawn and rear in the 105.2 miles of the Green -liver and its tributaries. The steelhead fisheries resource, in particular is quite valuable, Between 10 and 20 thousand have been taken annually for the last several years. Terrestrial Wildlife - Birds and Mammals The Green River, as it flows through Tukwila is port of the Pacific Migratory Waterfowl Flyway. Birds known to most probably occur in the Lower Green River Valley freshwater environment and the predominantly early to mid - successional vegetational environments of the dikes and immediately adjacent areas. Most of these species are ecologically dependent on marsh and river habitats which have become increasingly scarce as regional urbanization pro- ceeds. Development controls along the river edge may aid the preservation of portions of the habitats required by these species. The aquatic habitat serves as an important refuge and resting area where birds are reasonably free of predation and disturbance and may carry on their courtship, preening and other activities. In addition many other birds are attracted to and are supported by the region's meadows brush, tree thickets, stands of large trees and the relatively undisturbed and sparsely vegatated old fill areas. The subject site has no vegitation and has been so devoid for many years. (2) 6. Botany The original plant community of the Green River which probably consisted of a mixed Red - cedar, Douglas -Fir, and Big -leaf Maple forest has been totally disrupted by prior human activity. Many herbaceous plant species now found adjacent to the river were introduced because of their suitability for grazing purposes. Vegetation is often allowed to progress to later stages of ecological succession olond undiked portions of the river bank, and the resulting stands of trees create valuable habitat areas. On the subject site no trees can be found. Willows, alder and maple are however commonly found along other undiked portions of the river bank. In disturbed areas of the Green River bank, where vege- tation has been allowed to re- establish for only a short period of time, herbaceous shrubs occur (early to mid - successional plant communities), such as the red and white clover. After about four or five years following disturbance, decidous brush invades the herbaceous cover and will remain intact until over shadowed by trees, if trees are allowed to grow the shrub mid - successional plant community is characterized by the thickets it forms. These are commonly made up of Blackberries, Salmonberries, Red Elderberries, Vine Maple, Willows and Sitka Mountain Ash. When disturbed areas adjacent to the river are filled, the above described successional processes occur at considerably slower rate. From the standpoint vegetation, the quality of fill material is not comparable to the original soils. 7. Noise The subject site is located sufficiently far from both Interstate 5 and Interstate 405 that noise from these sources is not audible. Traffic flow along Interurban Avenue is the predominant source of noise affecting the acoustical environment. Noise measurements taken along Interurban Avenue show that between 57 - 60 dbA (76 - 79 dBC) can be expected on the subject site as a result of traffic on Interurban Avenue. The proposed warehouse will introduce no additional noise. 8. Air Quality The subject site is influenced both by statinary sources of polltants, the Seattle Industrial area; and auto related sources such as the nearby freeways and arterials. Concentrations of all contaminants increase from the Renton - Tukwila area to the Duwamish industrial area where standards set by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency are sometimes exceeded. The proposed warehouse will introduce no new air pollutants. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1. Impact on Topography /Geology /Soils The major impact on the topography, geology and soils of the area occurred when the decision was made to clear and fill the site. Soils that had moderate agricultural pro- ductivity were covered over by fill aterials. Topographic relief was not changed markedly, however, the level of the site was raised approximately two to five feet. 2, Impact on Hydrology Runoff from the site will increase as a result of the area of impervious surfaces to be constructed. This increase in runoff causes flood peaks in urban drainage systems to be higher and decreases the lag time between peak rainfall intensity and peak storm storm water discharge. 3. Impact on Water Quality The subject site is located adjacent to the Green - Duwamish River and will influence the water quality of this body both directly and indirectly, to a very small extent, the new covered area being only about 1.,2e8 square feet net. b2.1 06 Surface runoff from roofed surfaces will be discharged into the river via existing storm drains on Maule Avenue. Although the proposed project will only result in about 4000 square feet of valley bottom lands being used for industrial purposes, this proposed usage must be considered within the larger context. Industrial developments in general contribute higher quanitities of street and paved surface contaminants than other types of land uses. The entire lower Green - Duwamish River Valley is experiencing rapid industrialization. This trend in land use is creating a cumulative water quality problem for the Green River, although the subject site itself contributes an im- measureably small fraction of the total. Regardless of how water from industrial sites is handled, either through a drainage system or through the METRO Sanitary Sewer Treatment facilities, all water ultimately is discharged to the nearest body of water, the Green River. 4. Biological Impact The major biological impact occurred when the site was filled. The proposed project will necessitate the re- moval ofa'trees. . Noise Impact The proposed project will generate no new traffic. Noise from existing employee traffic should be insignificant. 6. Air Impact Development of the proposed action will result in no new source of vehicular related contaminants entering the air shed over the Duwomish industrial area. Frank Todd, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA 14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT A D E N NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. Location & Description of Project The proposed project is to be located on a portion of Lots 21 - 25 of Block 9 of Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, situated in Section 14, Township 23, Range 4 East. The described site lies within 200 feet of the Duwamish River and a Shoreline Management Permit must be obtained. Development includes a 90' x 40' prefabricated steel building intended for warehouse (storage) use. The new building will replace an existing 1500 square foot obsolete residential house and garage. No pave- ment is anticipated but some landscaping is intended to be placed along the front of the new building. II. Purpose The proposed project is intended to provide a housed storage area which will facilitate the provision of an orderly and thus, more aesthetically pleasing'in- dustrial land use. Although the building is intended for storage, some manufacturing activity may take place from time to time. III. Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project The subject parcel of land is currently used for mis- cellaneous and disorderly outside storage. The con- struction of the housed storage area will thus enhance the visual environment to some degree. No pavement or additional parking will be required thus restricting additional storm water runoff to 2100 square feet of additional roof area. (Figure determined by subtracting roof area of existing house and garage from the proposed 3600 square . feet of new roof area.) Existing storm drainage consists of an Negative Declaration 2 January 1975 Page 2 open ditch approximately fifty feet west of the pro- posed building location. Said ditch is drained directly to the Duwamish River by way of a 400 feet long 18 inch diameter storm sewer outfall. With an appropriate drainage system to the existing ditch, water quality and aquatic life will not be measur- ably affected. No additional parking or pavement is required to implement the project and no additional traffic is anticipated as a result of the construction. Thus, current levels of air quality, noise and traffic will realize no significant adverse effect. IV. Alternatives to the Proposed Project Although a do- nothing attitude would maintain the status quo and thus, ensure that no part of the en- vironment realizes further disruption, the insigni- ficant degree of environmental disruption associated with the current proposal would seem to support the proposed construction. V. Long Term Productivity and Irreversible Resource.Committments Long term productivity related to the proposal is the long term benefit to the visual environment provided by the indoor storage of industrial mater ials currently stored outside. Irreversible resource committments are confined to that portion of land to be occupied by the proposed construction. APPLICATION NO. SM- SEC. -TWP. -R. 1 4 - _ - 9- DATE RECEIVED f© 2)45Y- 7 3. Applicant is: CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON APPLICATION SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Owner Lessee Contract purchaser Other (specify) j / 4 e A v w" r! 1 PUBLICATION DATES 4/1 1/ Per 7 / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GAies DATE APPROVED X 5 v N ZONING _Z14147 frAu OaS %a DATE DENIED WATER BODY �t r� p y jZ j V Er it- APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1. Name of applicant /4b y , 14, 2. Mailing address If C - O /A /»s AU -x,t7'i /- Ii >1 / I LL), s}#, / A' / Telephone 02/') cvz - 0 ?i'. E;' s. 11) or ? 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and- intersection) 5/91%-1 /N 6. i.egal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: (..s12 j & I R-)1" g. Intended use of property: VI-/A l L- g' ou9 /}1, )J j op) � C - - � U 1 4 - , / t / c� - -,- City of Tukwila Planning Dept. 3 -72 FORM 286 9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements: 10. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project including . additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: O ©C7 . 00 B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested: Begin l> End 11. Does this project require shoreline location? Explain. 12. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, local governmental agencies or the City of Tukwila for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: WILL ti I� 9 un ti l' 1 M C� � Q t i y FZ eAi r7 /J 'ILO L f c / 13. Site and vicinity maps (Refer to application instructions): 14. Additional information: 3/ -2- )'W/ 1„11 c per, I S C:• g 6 City of Tukwila Planning Dept. 3 -72 FORM 286 -3- STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss CITY OF TUKWILA ) A »e /1 orz &77OAJ /tJ2 % , /(C. e I/)1 P/e /Jew T , being duly . sworn, certify that I am the above-named/applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management. Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this Signature day of 1) T77 Notary Public ' and for the State of Washington,,resi in at described real estate, with the appurtenances, in P RCE L 1 Lots 21 and 22 in Block plat recorded in Volume 9'of Hillman's Seattle Garden .Tracts, as per 11. of Plats, page 24,. records of King County. PARCEL 2 Lots 23,-24 and that portion of, Lot 25, lying Northwesterly of a line "146: feet and 4 inches long drawn from the Southwest corner. of Lot 25, to intersect the South'line of Lot 24, all in Block 9 of Hillman's - Seattle Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, records of King County; Situate in the Town of Tukwila, County of Ring, State of Washington. 14040Interurban Ave. South KING County, State of Wahington: Seattle, Washington 98168 Phone. (206) 243 -3020 Ao�N C. o ° MvM 'j 4;14-#09 (.6P11,e, / Lk2SY'vP i 4040 I■ AV s 1l r • • 0 16 '1113 INCH 1 2 • k. ' •;• . . 1.; 4 • • '"Pr%,, • • • ; 2 •' • OOLTILGALPII AGEIPRDOF •1111 ..... FORM" • N )12/ • I • / . ` ., • . \ . .• , \ -.. , / . c^4,- \ ,-• \ I 1 6 • .. 4/ • : :.' - • '. • 4Y!' 4 • -,. < . . • . .., e : tc ., :,... • _ K t A/ • _. ,, . ,.... - el Q- 1 • :V, • _. •-.-.. • -•,-• V / •-' • -- L / e$1 us: r /7_ y rTJ I2 3 IN Li J'ITH • _ , \ : • N •'• - " ; • • • • FLEXIBLE RULER - 302 AWcsant.a.rav— • :"" „ 4t4t1,4, ifelittrW6'10M-Ptg•troirtit1Huvrermo'0•TrmitreviAtxrt • • =4..:=• 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011111TIIIIIIIII I I itriltitrilti I II 11111111 Frilli 3 4 5 6 7 0C 6Z EIG L2 9Z GZ VZ , CZ ZZ tZ 03 „ 61. 8L Gl• 91 GI . : • Cl• Z1 LI (JILL: J11.1.111.1111.1)11.1JJ1111.1,11.11.0 11111110 VIII iluillypti tp kluijAmluditititujimiiwilitRifothio 7 • „::E. .ff; . • '• • • • • • • • • • • I • • • . , gs 1442-smr \-% igotto loiLFKOitet64 M t\ ELev, Ict.o F66 "rt..)w 4 „. .• • SCALE: "\ , \I \ \ 4.. • \ 0 f ' i ‘ -r. , i I 1 4 I 1 '.. * t% APPROVED BY 1 - -40— r • - PC-4 EW Vs/1412.6Hr. u S 41r ":": • • - , F• - : , • • -" • • • • • • _•:,•••.;,. • .. • - • "Ati:i.;,■•• ••••• • • . 6 Tl. 1 ?‘t tth.E NAP „1: ( W ••• ADEN CORPORATION 14040 Interurban Avenue South . Seattle, Wn. 96168. CH 3-3020 1 (42 2-4 7 /14-e DRAWN BY T K DRAWING NUMBIER''' • .• • ' I • , ft , toxis4 4 001 , , . IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS _CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO. THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • , t lily, i I I I I i iiii I 'I T I 11T I I II II I I VI ti ll I • 0 . , 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER-30z 11201 ON - WO ”03 213dVd INIdd8V310 'S •311d0Eld • I 31Vld OE 6 Z 8 G 9 z gz gz EE 13 OZ Gl 81 LI 91 St • VI 'Et . Et It Oil, • , I IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LgSS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 1 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • ....4•7 2 . 71:1 0 0 pt:I • 0 : c!,,p TzD,2 0 I I • I ; g' r") CO a . Fp. • >1 0 . . ...........,:a1MVA =r• rir Sal 0 A I :I h. r milli ■ Af.)----ST. 1 VA II/ =III --7-- • . 4 I --,-. 11111111111 1 - 2=1111. Ihnillu•VRIAV-7.4111TarrilluirMatIrlIRRIO I AIMILWithifill11111111111M 70 I 111•11111111111111111111111=1 LIPAIratarANI11- IIDKOIMAIIII r AI if _illi MIIIIIIIIII■ 111111111111111110. IIIIIIIIIIMINIMII 70 AING: z. Mr" WI - ...., I • E e■Ii= 40 azat....... "LIT "I■e limmimmaame 1:111.1nsim meaiii taineim.v-viinsimmloomiumpatuata I i Mill 60 k 50 1 IIII =1;isai vuommumn mnyr 9.11111111111111=11. 141-,M. aw r i , 1 Wilt111 Ism Arm, immr.„ ■ .1,E2 i - , 1 is, ammo L. imp 1 MIP MP. Mim, min I j 1 1 -9 _ ••■=imirdis ..1 40 40 = C C II = 1 1 1 ...1 .. , , 1•1101■1•111111■ mg..1=, Ersimi ■Noti■WIIIIIM110■9111111111111•11.11•1 ..LNIII WILVIOM WfWe7=1,M P 1 alat.74•117111 J =Pk , , MIMIIIII "111111.1116-. •NIIIM • .o.w.I.NNT lima - y rite MCI. II effer „y111/01111=1/6______ NMI IIMPIIIIIIIW . 11 ,NAgi NIIIIINIZO a MIME 111111%! =mums =1111■11111■11111111111■111• MINLIII•1111= WIllk=1EMMIll ; MIEN JANIPAIIIIMINIMINI I I W M I MON B NM: /0 W WIMAIIIIIIIII. ,1 1111•111111171/1•1111MIUMICOMall AM. ff .. .al I 1■=1 INIIIRIBRIMIIIMIN IMMIRreN E 11111.016111MSEM -- ■ , =Elm riaffaisralitamarawswmilmardwarawauwa AMI•iiililliii W MilaWINPAIIIII■ I • =28 MINIM .. .0 . MI w 1.1= Wt. =111 / D5 • "•-- - 75' ° e.:: ki t )t /Ai ) 1111,. 11111, / 0 , .1,---- 13j4 rY2,7 - 7/ A. 10:■■■/FAC.1 Er riMil • =NI Kr - rim 40 - armairomosigurdreavimporri =NI= -row Ilb. ‘tA " ma • 0C- 1 b 111WEI: ''' 'I • las so •mrari 111•11 Ma NI M IP w 10-4-71■ Aral AMIN LTJ • 7111111.11111115"41r4- IIIIIP111 •""111111111M 1741111PONIAIVINI M -11C/A11712,40.11/111 n MM 1.,g4 ... ... IMEWM • mil•IMIAlt F.72f. ...1:4/ AWILMI• eifieZt!irdiroT vranome N. 111111101111 11.111111111111 s' = 1111111111111111 MOM -- _ - - 18' - 45 ELL - - \ M N EL . .205 it',4TERTIGLIT c4 BLOCKIN G \ NOTE: N. T: S. -\\." _...- i -.? /-.16" 51 DE OUTLET 45° V / 6" . / E . CONTRACTOR ,TO CONTACT PUGET \4> 7 •4\ ail CO veq ...---- • ELL I EA f' LIGNT AND WAsk 1 NSI D MI-1. SOUND POW I9 /0 ---- 1 4 11 )41/4 NI3TURAL GAS .00. PRIOR TO ANY 4 • • \ , iv ' \ 1) . - PAC IZIP RAP AND FLR Ex'CAVATION \•.... ,so ■ ,-.3 14 51-AAIKET ALOA1G RIVER 5,41‘11< ,-1- M 14 3 ------- L /c.' ---..,..._ ‘a ' R a. c ovz-R5 " . \--\C'‘ /0 ' ;4c/-I SICE OF OUTFALL A.41 4--.. ...s .5E4 M. H. OETA I 4,, ; ... ,,,„,, i delli - 77 ' .51..1g . ilsr 4 .-- - 45 I 4) . E ET' ._...--- )6 .57D OUTL ELL /N5/ DE -- -1v1.1 - 1. .--- _ I I 1 PIT RUN FILTER ...------------- e,LANKET SEWER pIP.F .-.... , Id ...i.le ' .a.1 -......‘ :1? 1 \ i ' G' c ' A. rie /0 \ \ Ei/57 ' C. a MI-1 I . .1w- 11 \ • 20" \ A --1- 18" SIDE OUT T 45° _ . , le4 rk - is , ‘ A E-I.-L INSID M.N. . _Mb/. COVE R :-% \, S".. rn / t,) let . 6. J. / . - t, gL c5.5 - ..4. •• ' ' --- ._. --- tP - ----- -. ...A ",...,,py / ';!`t r. • ' --..---. --.. .......--- EX IT P/L1NO -.. r - l e / - NI, ---- . -a-- s---rt, . ".•:"--* -.. 3 0 ----- ,.. --...., ,...... ' °). \ / 61; -',..,\,.......„...,c,..„, \\•.:-.-- •,,- t .nic. co SL // ...s.,, ..e.. . LA - .1 CO V. /. / / An / UlieP • 4' : . 12 .. - ' '-.,. ...2.- / + • --...a "ii, 11-" ''' ' aN ....„ c. - ik •,. s ,. 2 i 1 1-11 '.. --.... , ,...v. ---...... . ''". *---... „ <9 . :ANN ..".. 1 ...--------. SECTIO N ..=. \ - 0%,-- \ \, \ .,. ) .. , 1 WATER SUFF.4CE S LOPE AS REQUIRED ' 1 (WOES) , \ . q „..-.1 . / J.:19: \ t'I \ \ . -- --xi' ......,.._7....„ IV \ 17 ...-v, ‘E.• A.. (-) ' : 2 . 3/ - E 57 - v:-...- .- • 4 • • .-• -- I . SANK ON EAU/ SIDE ' \ \ .9 --.., "•••1 .3 • I 1.'-'0 , cl) 'I. \ C.• ' &V conic. sl.Aa AAICHORED 70 .. I • • . 1-..,- -"-t..1 \ N • IV / C; s ... EX/ST. P/LIA/C4 WITH Vz"C48LE .„.-;■•■, I i \ -,-..1 ,•-•,„ Elv1.65DDED IN CoNC. -,:‘,.,-.- ',SECT .9 ..... • ' I:WO Erl5T co P; ./6 Vi. -10' 8 • 1 :•4 7 s,.. . k ION OUTFALL STRUCTURE ...„ Qk ....k _ • • ' SCALE 3 /8 1 . 1-0 EL. -.3.0 \..\-..': •:\ . " - ITI..c)-OWNAI.5 :Ec 5 : I %;., --1.• ... 4rogA4 SEWEg • - \ -, . ,I NOTE '\\- ) '.-> -4. . 1 ....• . \. . . RIP R4P ROCX .S“AILL- AVERAGE \ - 0 OT FA Lt.: .5TRUCTURE. ,1 20% or RocK WEl&WNG L.5:55 774AN 14.(92.3rnp ,0 P 1 • ••.. '_-_o" L./.7. 6sEE DETAIL. W SIJE.ET .100'TO 250 ' W/77./ NO MORE' 7144 Al -..-- 4- ' m pV. P/ PE --.... A- .,.. ,...1 \ .50 44.ibl. qock• sizE 70 BE .40 t..r' 0' - \ I: ( 1/ N ,.-,.....v . - . - .2 . -- \ -, > EX/57 - 5EINEP, 1 , I . 7, ' ---///-1 i 16 " PI PE 7-1 - ill L ' 0 ..... . I. , 1 WATE RT1,61-/T . . COVE . 7r . ' . q s '1)..-.:1,0 • C GT.1 F 0 R M • 'IWO CONSTliOCTION RECOROS ............;.' re........41 . .. _ ... ..........._ - - - ' i53.,-vf.-i't,, I s . •(:.<:h. ' DATE INITIAL . REVISION CITY OF T-UKWILA - . DRAINAGE PROJECT NO I . . .. • ''''' ,_,.. 1... -- 1 i 1 III ----...z., I! 0, r t Vre 6 , ''g. 1 ca..4.i.r...24 - • DI*: .....i4 j 4 ,, : lb e; " pi r?. -.... ...- , , • • • 8c . CONSULTIN ENGINEERS- if. -- . WASHINGTON V . • HORIZONTAL vurcm. , 1-= so . I., ‘y• PM No. 440G-5-2 0" I _ I " .. .. . 4 c.:::: 4 .;" , / , . ... . ' 4 . • \ s •- -..'' Hill'etliGOON„ ,., , • .1 ' - ,k„ , !t . ,:,.., A C ON • C...8, i0.. DWG. No. i I / 3 NEC . • .. .. , . pRok't - 1,V.5 IDE.. c)-'1AMSE- • L 1P / • , 4g.cii.17:r. . . Mt-i.. W77-/ , /2.!' .coNC. . Q . , .,..‘• - - . . PrP. . .',D E TA 1..L.=...:MIA \i.--Ez....."/..0 :70.• • I5 OA/ p7P.- ' "•. . iv ' 4. ' \.. • •SCALE:13.6."."../'70" : . / ..... SECTION, .„ ',.(e. • ,... . • ... . .:!.. ,.... • .., . „. , -_-_-- ... A . , t lily, i I I I I i iiii I 'I T I 11T I I II II I I VI ti ll I • 0 . , 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER-30z 11201 ON - WO ”03 213dVd INIdd8V310 'S •311d0Eld • I 31Vld OE 6 Z 8 G 9 z gz gz EE 13 OZ Gl 81 LI 91 St • VI 'Et . Et It Oil, • , I IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LgSS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 1 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • ....4•7 2 . 71:1 0 0 pt:I • 0 : c!,,p TzD,2 0 I I • I ; g' r") CO a . Fp. • >1 0 NOI .. ALL ELECTRICAL OUTLETS MUST 8E 2 -Co" ASOV E F. SLAB AT ELEV 20' -6" MIN.) SOUTH ELEV. r• =IO'o FUTURE FLR. SLAB WEST ELEV, EY.1ST BLDG EXISTING "1 PAVED NREA CoR JGtT :51 DING E11E.1RGREEN PLANTING EXIST, FLAT ROOF HEIGHT : I B EXISTING STRUCTURE IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • EXIST, LARZE CEDAR ' •1T<E£ PROPERTY LINE I3U G SIDE OPEN. �ljrr:Tp11v 1TriTr iTijr�"(I � Il n1Jr n ..,.... 2 3 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER• 302 AW ifFti' OE 6Z BC LZ 92 SZ 42 C2 22 12 OZ 61 Bl Ll 91 SI 4I 'CI 21 II 011:' •,,.,► IgI�IIIII�I���IIIJIIp�Il�I� )Il���ll�J!i�,R�l���ii�fn f,�tl�fi(� , iJ ���lll�u���l( llli��b�, ffj�I�I��II�����, �I�, ���I�I��III��LI ,fDI�,�Ili,l�lq�l.III��I(I�III �i��III��I�Iill ,i(���I��I�I,n��l� I BLDG SIDE OPEN 15-O" DRIVEWAY EXIST LP CEDAR. "TREE EXIST. HOUSE AND DETACHED GRRAGE COVERS AF X. 5.E. HALF OF Fk"O?OSED NEW BIDS. (SEE W EST' ELEV. VIEW) VERTICAL CORRUGATED �S PRE - PAINT METAL SIDING 44E' MAULE AVE TO EAST PROFERTY LIME: [NOTC OTCH SITE PLAN' 1 0- 0' 14 4 z -Sm? l�OWO IN1nCuA,I ■ 7 ( RIVER 'SIGH WINTER UNE 1 7°)4 MAULE AVE TO . \ EAST. FRUFEKTY LINE 8' ACCESS 4 WALKWAY ADEN 14040 - INTERURBAN AVE. SO, COKPORATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 93168 PLOT PLAN SNOWING NEW BLDG. ADD. •