Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 74-67-R - SEATAC FOOD SERVICES - REZONE OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS74-67-r 13829 51st avenue south rezones outside city limits seatac food services COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA Mr. Edward B. Sand, Director Land Use Management Division W 217 King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Sand: This is to inform you that this office, in behalf of the City of Tukwila, has no comment regarding the proposed rezone referred to above. Thank you for the notification. Yours truly, 7 • GC /lt 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 RE: .File #242 -74R Frank Todd, Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT • . 6rutchf i Planning Techn'&ci n 24 June 1974 Pursuant to King County Coucil Ordinance No. 263, Article 5, Section 15, requests for review by the Examiner must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the Examiner's hearing. i• Pursuant to Article 5, Section 17, as amended, an aggrieved party .. may submit a notice of appeal to the Council within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the Examiner's hearing, rehearing, or reconsideration, whichever occurs later. The original and 15 copies of the written appeal. arguments must be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the latest of the aforementioned. These shall be filed with: Clerk of the King County Council King County Council Offices Suite 402 King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 -NOTE- YOUR ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE LAST PARAGRAPH OF THE ATTACHED EXAMINER'S DECISION OF RECOMMENDATION where you will find specific dates for filing a notice of appeal to the Council of the matter under consideration 'herein. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: Land Use Management preliminary: Deny. Land Use Management final: Deny. Examiner: Deny. DIVISION REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: EXHIBIT TWO: Assessor maps marked: - April 30, 1974 OFFICE OF THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION EXAMINER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TIE KING COUNTY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: Land Use Management File No. 213 -74 -P Proposed Ordinance No. 74 -201 SEA -TAC FOOL) SERVICES, INC. SR to CG 0.57 acres (24,830 square feet) located between 51st Avenue South and Interstate Highway No. 5 on the north side of South 139th Street, if extended; two blocks east of the Tukwila City limits. The Land Use Management preliminary report on Item 213 -74 -P was received by the Examiner on April 16, 1974. After reviewing the Land Use Management report, examining available information on file with the application and visiting the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing on Item 213 -74 -P was opened by the Examiner at 9:31 A.M., April 23, 1974. All parties having indicated that they were familiar with the Division's preliminary report dated April 23, 1974, said report was entered in the record by reference. All correspondence received was summarized in the Division's preliminary report. Mr. Mitchell, Land Use Management, entered the following exhibits: EXHIBIT ONE: Land Use Sheets marked as follows: Ex. 1-1: Land Use Sheet 324E Ex. 1 -2: Land Use Sheet 325W (to be retained in the Division's permanent working files). Ex. 2 -1: SE4 of Section 15 -23 -4 Ex. 2 -2: SW4 of Section 14 -23 -4. Testifying in support was: FINDINGS: EXHIBIT THREE: FLOYD ROMERO, applicant 13829 - 51st Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168 1. General Information: Request: Existing zone: STR: Location: Acreage:. Water District: Sewer District: School District: Fire District: -2- 213 -74 -P Page 2 12 color slides of subject property and surrounding area, marked 3 -1 through 3 -12. No one else was present to testify in this matter. The Examiner directed questions to Mr. Romero and Land Use Management. Mr. Romero made additional comments. The Division's final recommendation was to deny the application as stated in their preliminary report. The hearing on Item 213 -74 -P was closed by the-Examiner at 10:29 A.M., April 23, 1974. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENJVITION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: CG (General Commercial) SR (Suburban Residential) E 15-23-4 Lying between Primary State Highway 41 (I -5) and 51st Avenue South and 130' south of South 138th Street. 0.57 acres (24,830 square feet) 35 City of Tukwila 144 18 2. The applicant purchased the property in 1967 and established a business office in the house on the site. The kitchen in the house was used to test the cost of preparing various hot meals. The applicant was advised by a realtor at the time he purchased the property that there were no zoning restrictions in unincorporated King County. In November, 1973 the applicant began using the house on the property for the preparation of 1000 hot meals per day for senior citizens residing in King and Pierce Counties. The cost of purchasing the hot meals is subsidized under a federal grant program. Three employees work at the site at the present time and this number could increase to five employees in the future. Two panel trucks deliver the meals to locations in King and Pierce Counties, each truck makes one trip per day. The trucks travel from the site by way of 51st and 52nd Avenues South a distance of approximately four blocks to Interurban Avenue, then north on Interurban Avenue a distance of three blocks to the Interurban Avenue interchange on Interstate Highway No. 5, then onto the freeway for travel to points of destination in King and Pierce Counties. When the applicant applied for a Health Department certification for the kitchen facility at the site this year, he found that the existing zoning does not permit the present use. Action by the King County Division of Building on the zoning violation is being withheld until the .King County Council acts upon this application for reclassification. The application was submitted in order to obtain zoning which would permit the present use to continue. The house on the site has not been used as a residence since 1967. The Division of Land Use Management has concluded that the present use would not qualify as a home occupation under the provisions of the King County Zoning Code. 3. The environmental assessment contained in the Division of Land Use Management preliminary report is incorporated here by reference. 4. The Director, Division of Land Use Management, determined that approval of the subject application would not constitute a major action significantly affecting the quality of the environment, and that an environmental impact statement is not required. His determination was based on responses from reviewing agencies, site inspection, information submitted by the applicant, and evaluation of the natural, physical, and social systems affected, as identified in Section 5, Ordinance 1700. 5. The applicant made the following assertions: 213 -74 -P Page 3 a. The site is exposed to the adverse impact of Interstate Highway No. 5. b. Most of the houses within one block of the freeway are rented to transient tenants. c. It is not reasonable to retain single family residential zoning on properties in this neighborhood lying within one block of the freeway. d. The multiple family zoning recommended by the City of Tukwila Planning Commission is not reasonable for those properties loc within one block of the freeway. e. The proposed use would not have a detrimental affect on adjoining properties or the neighborhood. f. Other property owners in the area want the County to permit higher intensity uses on land which is impacted by the freeway. g. The applicant could purchase property already classified CG, but the cost of such property would be much greater than the cost of the existing site. Such increased cost would have to be reflected as an increase in the cost of providing hot meals for senior citizens. -3- CONCLUSIONS: 27.3 -74 -P Page 4 6. The Highline area zoning was adopted in 1967. The Division of Land Use Management and the Environmental Development Commission have not scheduled a review of the area zoning. The opinion of the Division of Land Use Management is that a re -study of the area zoning will not be started for at least two years. 7. The applicant did not own the property at the time the State of Washington purchased the right -of -way for Interstate Highway No. 5. He has no knowledge of the damages, if any, paid to the previous owner by the -State for the adverse impact of the freeway. 8. The City of Tukwila Planning Commission has requested that this application be denied. Their letter asserts that revisions to the City Comprehensive Plan, which are being prepared but have not been adopted, will propose multiple family residential use for the area in which the subject property is located. 1. The freeway does have an adverse impact on the site. However, houses in the area which have an exposure to the freeway similar to that of the subject property, are being used as residences. 2. It would be reasonable to increase the intensity of use permitted in this area if that could be done without 'detriment to the neighborhood. 3. The application does not conform to the Comprehensive Plan policies for commercial uses. It does not conform to Policies B -2, B-- 6,B -10 and H -2 as cited on page 4 of the Division of Land Use Management preliminary report. 4. The specific use proposed by the applicant would not have a significant adverse impact on the neighborhood because of the small scale of the operation. However, other uses permitted inithe CG classification could be detrimental to affected properties, even when situated on a small site. If this application were approved, applications for commercial zoning on other properties in the neighborhood having locations similar to the subject site would also have to be approved. The impact of such classifications would be detrimental to the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the application. e Bruce C. Laing ZONING & SUBDIVISION EXAMINER TRANSMITTED this 30th day of April, 1974 by cerfified mail to the parties of record: Floyd Romero 213 -74 -P Page 5 TRANSMITTED this 30th day of April, 1974 to the following: Land Use Management Division, King County Department of Community & Environmental Development King County Department of Public Works & Transportation King County Department of Health • Washington State Highway Commission, District #1 Washington State Highway Commission, District #7 City of Tukwila, Attn: Gary Crutchfield Pursuant to Ordinance 263, as amended, Article 5, Sections 15 and 17, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or. before May 7, 1974. If a notice of appeal is filed on or before. May 7, 1974, the appellant will have until May 14, 1974 to file written appeal arguments. The original and 15 copies of said arguments shall be filed with the Clerk of the Council. Pursuant to Ordinance 263, Article 5, Section 19. "Action of the Council Final. The action of the Council approving or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within twenty (20) days from the date of action an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court in and for the County of King, State of Washington, for the purpose of review of the action taken." RS -7,200 RS -7,200 200 RM 1OO 140 T1 - LST. S RS -7, 200 V' / � /1 /% (,.: 213-74-P APPENDIX B Applicant: SEA -TAC FOOD SERVICE, INC. Request: S -R to C -G STR: 15 -23 -4 Proposed Reclassification N � // T U W d 9 22 t 0' 400' R S -R A