Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 75-01-R - FRANK TODD - REZONE75-01-r REZONE 62nd avenue south todd frank TODD REZONE DENIED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN APPLICATION TIMETABLE CHECKLIST PROJECT gp3,,m_e (R , / n1 f-) APPLICANT F y L T'o4�G/ TYPE OF APPLICATION ►-e 1. APPLICATION INFORMATION: Submitted for Review: 2c 04+ - 7q Additional Information Requested: Submitted: Requested: Submitted: 3. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REVIEW: Additional Information Requested: Submitted: " Requested: 8. ORDINANCE OR RESULUTION NO. ASSIGNED CITY OF aWILA Correspo'ndent's Address: PLANNINC « :PARTMENT GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY l se /53 FEE: /co RECEIPT NO. 7 FILE NO. hiF*7s — /-, ' 2. APPLICATION ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 2ef ocq 14 By: By: " Submitted: Requested: Submitted: ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION ACCEPTED: By: 4. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: A. PUBLISHED: MAILED: POS ED: B. DATE ADVISORY REPORT COMPLETED By: 5. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Hearing Date Assigned Results of Hearing: 6. PLANNING COMMISSION Hearing Date Assigned Results of Hearing: 7. CITY COUNCIL Hearing Date Assigned T' o k i it 1 R , 75 Results of Hearing: d- -e A 7-1 TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL RJLAR MEETING July 7, 1975 Page 3 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES - Cont. Proposed ordinance - MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED Cont. ORDINANCE BE READ FOR ITS SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed ordi- nance regulating the playing of radios, television sets, phonographs, musical instruments and other sound - producing devices by title only. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE DO NOT PASS. CARRIED. Proposed ordinance - Councilwoman Harris reported the Community Affairs Rezone from R -3 to Committee met on June 18 and June 25 for a total of RMH (Todd) 511 hours to discuss the proposed rezone. The Committee recommendation is to deny for the following reasons: 1. Direct conflict of interest against Appearance of Fairness Doctrine a. Applicant is Mayor of Tukwila. b. Staff must do work -up. c. Applicant speaking to Planning Commission and Council P/C meeting of December, 1974, Council meeting of January, 1975, Council meeting of March,1975 and letter from appli- cant of January, 1975. d. In November, 1974 Planning Commission Chair- man was an employee of Applicant /Mayor. e. Concern of citizen that staff was intimidated. 2. Rezone on its merits, land use in terms of health, safety and welfare of the community a. R -1 is to the North; no buffer zone between requested and existing zones. Had previously been applied by the Planning Commission as a standard; i.e., landscaping, inadequate less dense zoning between RMH and R -1 or R -3. b. Requested zoning is inconsistent with existing established adjacent zoning which has set the pattern for development in the area. c. RMH introduces a new use in residential area. Allowable use of office space is an encroach- ment into the interior residential area, rather than restricting this use to periphery of residential area. d. 62nd Ave. So. is the only legal access to site. In reality, traffic would occur on So. 153rd, a portion of which (the westerly 1/3) is a private road. It is estimated there would be a population increase of 250 people, and 780 vehicle trips per day, caus- ing a significant number of cars and /or delivery trucks to use So. 153rd, in a single - family actual use neighborhood, creating a safety concern. Increased traffic from 62nd Ave. So. into Southcenter Blvd. could lead to congestion at peak hours, and heavy traffic load on 62nd Ave. So., as well as introducing a new type of traffic (related to office use) in interior of residential area on a substan- dard street. e. Allowing such density which includes office space may result in future City costs; i.e., signalization of 62nd Ave. So. and Southcenter Blvd. 1076S'' Councilwoman Harris further stated this property is a smaller portion of R -3 area; R -3 would border the proposed rezone to the West. She stated the Committee voted to deny the rezone request and recommended "Do Not Pass" proposed ordinance. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECOND- ED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ FOR ITS SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY.* Scott Hutchison, repre- senting Frank Todd's attorney's office, stated the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine does apply in this case, but the fact that Mr. Todd is the Mayor does TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL RAL LAR MEETING July 7., 1975 Page 4 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES - Cont. Proposed ordinance - Cont. not constitute denial of Appearance of Fairness in . this case. He is a member of the community just. as are members of the City Council and he has a right to certain business pursuits. The purpose of the Appear- ance of Fairness is to insure full disclosure of adverse interests in matters and that there should be no over - reaching by public officials. There certainly has been a full disclosure and we have no proof there has been over - reaching on his part. There is also a right to review on these matters in court to decide whether or not there has been an arbitrary or capri- cious decision made on the part of the City Council, and if the rezone is denied because Mr. Todd is the Mayor of this community, we believe that that is an arbitrary and capricious decision. We will have the right to an appeal to reverse the Council's decision and this will involve extensive legal costs to him and to the City of Tukwila. We feel this should be taken into consideration also. Mr. Hutchison stated he felt the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine had not been violated in this case. The Planning Commission has made a recommendation in this matter and he re- quested it be read into the record. Mayor Pro Tem Traynor stated the findings of the Planning Commission have been entered into the record over the past several months at the Council table and would be found in pre- vious Minutes. *MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY, CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed ordinance reclassifying certain property from R -3 zoning to RMH zoning within the City of Tukwila by title only. Councilwoman Harris stated, in reply to Mr. Hutchison's remarks, that the Committee did consider the question of whether Mr. Todd should or should not be denied his rights as a citizen while serving in office. The Committee felt with the public's awareness of the conflict of interest issue, it seems to be desirable to avoid a situation that could be questioned under the existing guidelines, particularly when the Mayor has challenged another person regarding another subject sometime earlier on his right to speak as a citizen and then vote as a Councilman. She stated we all recognize we should not lose our civil liberties due to the fact we are public officials, but the public is becoming more sensitive to the activities of elected officials. Councilwoman Harris stated the Committee members felt it was inappropriate for the applicant while he was holding office to address the issue in writing and at the meetings himself; perhaps someone should have appeared on behalf of the applicant in this case. Councilwoman Harris read a telephone message memo from Mayor Todd stating he would accept a rezone to R -4 in lieu of RMH in an effort to avoid legal action if the rezone request were denied as recommended by the Community Affairs Committee. She objected that this was submittec before the Council voted on the issue and that the message appeared on City letterhead memo. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY STERLING, THAT THE REZONE REQUEST BE DENIED.* Councilman Johanson stated he did not understand how Mr. Todd was being denied his rights as a citizen -- there are other properties in the City tha are already zoned in this category for development. We are talking about classification of development of a piece of land in a certain category. Councilman Saul asked about the feasibility of rezoning to R -4 in lieu of RMH. Councilman Johanson stated the Committee did receive professional input that the City Council does not have that prerogative. The request before us is from R -3 to RMH. Councilman Sterling requested a legal opinion regarding Mr. Todd's request to change this to R -4. Kjell Stoknes, Planning Director, stated the Council is obligated to act on the rezone request to RMH in response to the applicant. If the applicant 1 TUKIVILA CITY COUNCIL 1CULAR MEETING July 7, 1975 Page 5 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES - Cont. Proposed ordinance - Cont. RECESS 8:00 P.M. - 8:07 P.M. Proposed ordinance - Transferring funds re: dumpster rental for City clean -up FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE IR 6)7 agrees to a lesser zone and revises the application to that lesser zone, the Council would then act on the revised application. He stated he did not know what the legal requirements were regarding review of the revision by the Planning Commission. However, this revision would have a less than or equal to impact on the area. Also he stated he did not know if a telephone message is adequate legal request for a change in the rezone request. Attorney Parker stated the telephone message is sufficient, but he felt the request would have to go back to the Planning Commis- sion for review. Mayor Pro Tem Traynor stated in the past we have not been able to limit the height of buildings in RMH«zones and R -4 is still a question in his mind. Before a vote is taken, he requested to know if a basement is considered a story. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Mayor Pro Tem Traynor called the meeting back to order with all Council Members present as previously listed. Kjell Stoknes, Planning Director, read a definition from the Uniform Building Code and also illustrated the criteria used consistently by the Planning Depart- ment. On a slope, the average height is taken between the two finished grades and if this average is less than half of the height of the first story, then it is a basement. If the average is equal to or more than half the height of the first story, then it is an additional story. Councilwoman Davis read a proposed policy statement for consideration by the City Council as follows: "This Committee finds that it is not the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to allow RMH zoning this far North of Southcenter Boulevard, but to have a gradual transition from RMH and C -1 zoning to R -1 zoning. This application is not consistent with this." Kjell Stoknes stated if the Council intends to consider the R -4 zoning, he would recommend no action be taken on the proposed ordinance until the applicant amends his request and the Planning Commission has considered the amendment. Councilwoman Harris stated the Council has authorized the Planning Department to conduct a review of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and staff is actively engaged in that project at this time. The map may be different in some areas of the City as an end result of this study. Perhaps everything could be held until the review is complete and public hearings are over. More rezone applications may follow. The Council could apply a policy statement on this. Councilwoman Davis stated if the applicant wished to resubmit his request for R -4 zoning, she felt it should be re- advertised for the public and the process should begin from start. *MOTION TO DENY REZONE REQUEST, CARRIED. City Clerk Shirlee Kinney asked for clarification regarding the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Traynor stated the ordinance is also intended to be denied by the previous Motion. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed ordinance transferring funds from the Current Fund to the Street Fund to pay the cost for refuse hauling. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DAVIS, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE REFERRED TO FINANCE $ PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. CARRIED, WITH SAUL JOHANSON VOTING NO. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL R JLAR MEETING July 7, 1975 Page 6 RESOLUTIONS Proposed resolution - Authorizing Mayor to execute agreement with Cabot Dow & Associates to negotiate union contracts Proposed resolution - Authorizing Mayor to execute agreement with King County re: LJPO grant funds for 1976, Canine Program Resolution #487, Segregating special assessment on property in LID #13, owned by Mario Segale MISCELLANEOUS AND Bicentennial signs theft Discussion - Sewer hook -up fees ordinance FURTHER AUDIENCE COMMENTS MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed resolution authorizing Mayor Frank Todd to execute an agreement on behalf of the City of Tukwila with Cabot Dow & Associates to negotiate union con- tracts in 1975. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, TO REFER PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO THE FINANCE AND PER- SONNEL COMMITTEE.* Councilwoman Davis stated the reso- lution should reflect only the word "Mayor" and not the name, Frank Todd. *CARRIED. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED RESOLU- TION BE READ. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an agree- ment with King County regarding Law and Justice Plan- ning and the distribution of certain law enforcement assistance funds for the year 1976. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO REFER PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Johanson stated the Finance Committee would like to have another proposed resolution considered at this time. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO INCLUDE PROPOSED RESOLUTION. CARRIED. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ FOR ITS SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed resolu- tion segregating special assessment on property in LID No. 13, owned by Mario Segale, by title only. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY STERLING, THAT RESOLUTION #487 BE ADOPTED AS READ. CARRIED. Police Chief John Sheets asked for citizen assistance in watching and reporting any suspicious activity where these signs are posted. The City's insurance does not cover the cost of $28.50 for each one of these signs and two are now missing. Councilman Sterling stated the Public Works Committee on June 5 requested amended wording regarding the sewer hook- up.fees to be included in a proposed ordi- nance. Attorney Parker stated the ordinance had al- ready been prepared. City Treasurer Mae Harris stated perhaps the City Attorney was thinking of the Metro fees ordinance. Councilman Sterling stated there may have been some confusion on this, but a memo was placed in the City Attorney's mail box regarding an amendment to the Tukwila Municipal Code regarding the regular connection charges. Discussion continued. Mayor Pro Tem Traynor suggested the instruction be given to the City Clerk to forward to the City Attorney regarding this proposed ordinance. He stated the Clerk is res- ponsible for these things getting on our Agendas and if the Council has business for the Agenda, it should be handled through the Clerk's office. Councilwoman Harris stated she felt the City Council should be able to directly request information from the City Attorney. Attorney Parker stated he preferred these things to be handled through the Clerk's office because then a record will be kept on the status of the business, it is more efficient and he can get additional information in regard to any request the Council makes automatically Otherwise, as in this instance, things may get over- looked. Councilwoman Harris stated a Council Committee has the authority to make requests directly to the City Attorney without going through any other department. MINUTES COMMUNITY AFFAIRS & LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Tukwila City Council The meeting of the Community Affairs & Legislative Committee of the Tukwila City Council was called to order by Chairwoman Harris at 5 :50 p.m., June 25. 1975 at the City Hall Annex, 6230 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington. Members Present: Mrs. Joanne Davis Mrs. Catherine Harris Mr. Reid Johanson, substituting for Mr. Jon•Sterling Staff Present: Mr. Kjell Stokness, Planning Director The following items of business were considered: 1. Rezone Request — Frank Todd, R -3 to RMH This item was continued from the meeting of June 18, 1975. Cpoies of various maps were posted on the bulletin board, as previously indicated in the prior meeting. Mrs. Harris indicated briefly history of zoning in area; that Ordinance 251 placed the initial classification of zoning on subject property, as well as on all areas of the city, with the exception of some unclassified use areas. Discussion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan followed. This plan indicates that multiple dwelling would be the use for generally the south area of the city, north from Southcenter Blvd., to the Tukwila School. It was noted that there is no city policy or directives indicating degree of density of multiple dwelling that should be applied. The Environmental Assessment and Negative Declaration Statement were reviewed. It was noted that the potential impact of this request would be that the potential of other property owners in the area requesting similar rezones to the RMH zoning capacity. Also noted that the RMH zoning allows the additional use of professional office space on the first two floors of each building. Traffic patterns of apartment users and professional office users was outlined; that traffic generated by the offices would be more evenly spread throughout the day, whereas traffic generated by the apartment residents would peak in the morning and evening hours. The only potential adverse affect associated with this application would be the potential of additional requests to the RMH category, allowing multiple dwelling to come closer into the single family areas. Discussion followed concerning the application itself. Mrs. Harris listed options available to recommend to the Council: 1. Grant — Subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Grant — Subject to conditions of #1 and adding to those conditions, i.e., no business or professional office space, actually have the necessary dedications before the ordinance is effective. 3. Grant — R -4 in lieu of RE, subject to conditions. 4. Deny 5. Contract Zoning, PAGE 2 Mrs. Harris stated the existing usea of area surrounding subject property is already an established pattern of a less dense use, and this would be an introduc tion of a new use, particularly with reference to the use of office spaces far into the residential area. Mrs. Harris advised the committee that whichever the the recommendation is to the Council, the committee should develop facts, findings and conclusions, based on sound reasoning. She further stated that on any request for a rezone, to keep in mind the health, safety and welfare, and best interest of the community, as to how any application would affect the welfare of the total community, as well as the particular area involved. Mrs. Davis expressed concern about the buffer between subject property and the R -1 property to the north, and the allowable use of business in the first two floors of the buildings. The buildings are higher on the hill, and closer to R -1; the use closer to So. 154th (Southcenter Blvd.) would not be minded. She stated that the Planning Commission, in developing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan the idea at the time was to have a graduated zoning. Discussion followed regarding traffic on So. 153rd. Although a portion is in private ownership, the reality is that it would be used to get to and from any development on subject property. The traffic pattern in the neighborhood would be changed. Mr. Johanson stated that in all of the discussion, he had not yet heard how the community would gain from this, aside from an influx of people. He indica— ted the question of how to make the community amendable to a stable population; that R -4 seemed to be the limit in density to attract people, rather than attracting a large number of transient people; he felt we would like to solidify the community. Fourplexes would be more amenable to attract a more stable community. In the interest of the community, he felt we do not have to solicit tax base in the form of residences, particularly if they don't do that much for the community, as compared to the industrial areas. It didn't appeal to him that the residential area developed into a high density zone. Mrs. Harris suggested that one of the things to consider would be the distribution of the types of 'residential units; we seem to have -a decline of single family in respect to available land; there is presently considerable undeveloped land zoned for multiple duelling. In the interest of the community, is it wise to get an overwhelming balance of dense multiple dwelling, and force a decline in single family units? What would be the affect of RMH within a few feet of R -1 — would they sell their homes? Mr. Johanson stated there were no people moving in or building many single family homes, but who would want to go into a $40 — $50,000 • home if they were uncertain as to what was going to be the zoning in the community. He illustrated that a few years ago there was a feeling of the community by petition action of the people, but the city since then has not solidified'-to`.the extent of defining areas of residential zoning. He posed the question, if people are not building single family residences, why are not apartments being built in the areas already zoned multiple dwelling? Mrs. Davis stated that in the past we realized there had been an error in zoning, and would be overwhelmed by apartments, and the only thing that saved the community was the sharp decline in the economy and that was the reason people did not build, in addition to the moratorium placed on building of apartments. 1' PAGE 3 , Mr. Stoknes expressed concern that Options #2 and #3 would be authorized. He doubted that office space could properly be deleted as an allowable use; and that the applicant perhaps should re -apply for the R -4 zoning if this were denied. Mrs. Davis read a letter received from Mr. Ed Bauch, dated January 14, 1975, regarding the Planning Commission meeting of December 1974. The letter is now part of the committee file. Mrs. Harris stated it is very difficult to separate the applicant from the position in a public meeting at the Planning Commission and the Council. When the applicant is the Mayor addressing either body, it just seems impossible, even when a person conscientiously tries, to divorce himself this is not Mr. John Brown, but the Mayor; if the applicant had some -one speak for him it may be better. The Mayor should not be denied his rights as a citizen, however, with the growing aware- ness of communities on the conflict of interest issue, it seems to be desirable to avoid a situation that could be questioned under existing guidelines. Mr. Johanson illustrated that he had attended a Planning Commission meeting on another subject, and spoke, he thought, as a citizen, and was challenged by the Mayor on the conflict of interest issue. The . committee inquired if there were any reports from any other department; i.e., fire, police, etc. Mr. Stoknes indicated a memorandum had been forwarded to all departments, asking them for comment, but did not receive anything back. Mrs. Davis expressed concern about fire equipment getting in and out of the proposed area. Mrs. Harris inquired of the committee if it felt it had discussed the options adequately, to pinpoint one of them, and develop it. Mr. Johanson suggested eliminating Options #1, 2, 3 and 5. Mrs. Davis and Mrs. Harris agreed. The committee then proceeded to develop its report to the Council, to deny the application: 1. Direct Conflict of Interest A. Against Appearance of Fairness Doctrine 1. Applicant is the Mayor of Tukwila 2. Staff,, must do . work -up . ... _. ,, Applicant speaking to the Planning Commission and the Council P/C meeting of Dec. ; 1974, Council meeting of Jan. 1975,• Council meeting of far. 1975, and letter from applicant of Jan. 1975. In Nov. 1974, Planning Commission Chairman was an employee of Applicant /Mayor 5 Concern of citizen that staff was intimidated 2. Rezone on its Merits A. Land -use in terms of .health,- safety and welfare'of.community. 1. R -1 is to the north; no buffer zone between requested and existing zones. Had previously been applied by the Planning Commission as a standard; i.e., landscaping, inadequate less dense zoning between RIH and R -1 (or R -3) N. PAGE 4 2. Requested zoning is inconsistent with existing established adjacent zoning which has set the pattern for development of the area. RMH introduces a new use in residential area. Allowable use of office spaces is an encroachment into the interior residential area, rather than restricting this use to periphery of residential area. 62nd Ave. So. is the only legal access to site. In reality, traffic would occur on So. 153rd, a portion of which (the westerly 1/3) is a private road. It is estimated there would be a population increase of 250 people, and 780 vehicle trips per day, causing a significant number of cars and /or delivery trucks to use So. 153rd, in a single — family actual use neighborhood, creating a safety concern. Increased traffic from 62nd Ave. So. into Southcenter Blvd. could lead to congestion at peak hours, and heavy traffic load on 62nd Ave. So., as well as introducing a new type of traffic (related to office use) in interior of residential area on a substandard street. Allowing such density which includes office space, may result in future city costs; i.e., signalization of 62nd Ave. So. and Southcenter Blvd. Moved by Mr. Johanson, seconded by Mrs. Davis, that the committee recommend to the Council that the application for rezone be denied, and a "Do Not Pass" be recommended on the proposed ordinance. Motion Carried. Mrs. :Davis read a proposed policy statement as follows: "This committee finds that it is not the intent of the comprehensive plan to allow RMII zoning this far north of Southcenter Boulevard, but to have a gradual transition from RMH and C -1 zoning to R -1 zoning. This application is not consistent with this." Moved by Mr. Johanson, seconded by Mts. Davis to recommend to the Council that the Council adopt = the , above :. statementas•a policy position. Motion Carried. 2. Sidewalk Comprehensive Plan Moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Johanson that this item be continued to the next committee meeting. Motion Carried. The meeting was adjourned. M. Catherine Harris Chairwoman U C C .4 MINUTES COMMUNITY AFFAIRS & LEGISLATIVE COMMMIT'i'LE Tukwila City Council The meeting of the Community Affairs & Legislative Committee of the Tukwila City Council was called to order by Chairwoman Harris at 7:30 p.m., June 18, 1975 at the City Hall Annex, 6230 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington. Members Present: Mr. Jon Sterling Mrs. Catherine Harris Mr. Reid Johanson, substituting for Mrs. Joanne Davis The following item of business was considered: Rezone Request — Frank Todd, R -3 to RPM Mrs. Harris posted on the bulletin board a copy of''the following: 1. City of Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2. City of Tukwila (actual) Zoning Map 3. Vicinity map of subject property Committee studied the Planning Commission and Staff Reports for November and December 1974, and the packet of materials provided to the City Council in March, 1 975. The history of the rezone request was reviewed as follows: The application was first heard by the Planning Commission in November of 1974 and was continued by the Commission to its regular meeting of December 1974. It was brought before the Council in January of 1975 with a recommendation by the Planning Commission to approve subject to conditions. The matter was referred to the Community Affairs Committee which brought the application back to the Council with the recommendation to remand it back to the Planning Commission for the following reasons: 1) a site plan was requested, 2) a specific indication from the individual from whom Mr. Todd is buying the property; that they either consent or not consent to the proposed rezone, 3) that Tukwila Municipal Code 18.98.030, section a through h (Environmental Assessment) be addressed. The Council in January confirmed the committee recommenda— tion and remanded it back to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission held hearings pursuant to the Council's request, in February, 1975, and brought the matter back to the Council in March. The Council set a public hearing for April, however, it was discovered that the legal advertisement for the public hearing to be held by the Council in April was inadequately worded to satisfy the requirements for a legal publication for a rezone, so it was rescheduled for Maya The Council held a public hearing in May, and the action of the Council at the next regular meeting was to refer it to the Community Affairs Committee. It was stated by Mrs.. Harris that the most complete set of documents was that provided to the Council by Staff in March. She enumerate& documents listed as enclosures to Staff memo from the Planning Department dated March 3, 1975. Mrs. Harris noted additional documents as follows: note from Mr. Todd to Mrs. Harris dated May 21, 1975, regarding_ the scheduling of consideration of the rezone by PAGE 2 the committee, 2) note to this committee from Mr. Todd attaching document from Ms. Mitsuye Kato, indicating support' of the rezone request, dated May . 27, 1975. The "To Whom It May Concern" was in Mr. Todd's writing, the signature appeared to be that of Mitsuye Kato, and the document was notarized. The Chairwoman accepted the document on its face value, noting however., that it appeared to be taped together, with Mr. Todd's writing above, the legal description typed below, the notary public below that. Also, the document presented is a copy. Mrs. Harris inquired if there was any comment. Mx. Johanson stated it appeared to him as if the legal was just added to a note, and that is how he got Ms. Kato's signature. Mrs. Harris stated she also questioned it, unfortunately, she had no knowledge or any evidence to present against it, that was a question she did not know how to address. Mr. Johanson stated he did not know how pertinent the document was to . the rezone request anyway, but it was a rather slipshod way of presenting it. Mrs. Harris indicated it was a stipulation of the Council in January, and that at the Public Hearing held by the Counoil in May, it was not received at that time. Mr. Todd also indicated at that time that it was not necessary, however it did come in subsequent to the Public Hearing. Mrs. Harris stated that since these notes were not part'of the file that we all had considered earlier, she wanted to enter them in the file now. She also noted the memo she had written to Mr. Todd on June 12, regarding the scheduling of the rezone request. Mr. Todd did receive this memo, and attended the Committee-of-the-Whole meeting of June 12, where this subject was discussed, and Mr. Todd indicated that he did not feel that it was necessary for him to attend the committee meeting, as his thoughts were already available to every -. body. This evening's subject material was discussed, and Mr. Todd was aware that we would be considering this subject this evening. The Staff Report of February 1975, which listed Findings and Conclusions, and Recommendations was read. Discussion of surrounding zoning, and access was discussed. The committee briefly recessed the meeting to conduct an on -site inspection of roadway, fire hydrant location, and general area. The site plan was reviewed. It showed there would be two structures; one of 76 units, 60 feet high, one of 36 units, 30 feet high. The site plan was posted on the bulletin board. The storm drainage was of concern - in that property to the south would be affected by run-off' if the drain- age was not tightlined to Southcenter Blvd. The meeting was briefly recessed while Mr. Johanson made an on -site inspection of the existing drainage, and described to the committee the pattern, and location of present ditch. Regarding access, although the reports indicate access would be from South - center Blvd., the committee was concerned about traffic using So. 153rd, a part of which is in private ownership. It would be natural for users of the development to use So. 153rd for access and egress. Mr. Johanson expressed concern that a road could be widened due to the east slope off the east side of 62nd Ave. So., and suggested that if the Council approved this rezone, that 10 feet be obtained from the developer to widen the road. ._ Moved by Mr. Johanson, seconded by Mrs. Harris to continue this subject to June 25, 1975. Motion Carried. M. Catherine Harris Chairwoman : STATE OF WASHINGTON,) ) ss. County of King ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Tract 11, Interurban Addition. to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Vol. 10 of Plats, p. 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said tract 11, which is 162.79 feet North of the SE corner thereof;. thence continuing North 0 °8'W. 359.88 feet to the Northeast corner of said Tract 11; thence S. 89 °52' W. along the northerly line thereof 300.86 feet; thence South 0 °8s E. 398.14 feet; thence North 89 °52' E. 141.65' feet; thence North 0 °8' W. 38.26 feet; thence North 89 ° 52' E. 159.21 feet to point of beginning On this day personally appeared before me Mitsuye Kato to me known to be the individual described in and who executed;the,, within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she,s'igned'i 1• the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the ue s � au?dj ', \ ' purposes therin•mentioned. ? ,. ' 1 GIVEN under my hand and offcial seal this 27th day of 04, 1975. 1%; • 3,, / - tLet 4 - s / . , e : j . • : , , Notary Pub is in and for the i ' 1 .+ ' ' State of Washington, residing 'at Seattle. May 19, 1975 c CITY OF TUKWILA AGENDA 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5 -5 -75 and 5 -8 -75 4. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS 5. BID OPENINGS, AWARDS AND CALLS a. Award - Legal Publications' b. Award - Park Play Equipment 6. APPOINTMENTS a. Deputy City Attorney, Land Use ,lading Ord. # 928 Leading Res. # 485 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS/ 1. Rezon rrom R3 to RMH, Frank Todd property 8. PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS a. APWA, Award of Honor to the City of Tukwila for 197+, Annual Safety Award Competition 9. OLD BUSINESS a. Fence: So property line, Tukwila Park b. Moratorium on building permits in LID #27 area - Discussion Earl c. Slide presentation: Proposed street lighting for residential undergroundingf j and costs 10. NEW BUSINESS a. Placement of historical marker: Mrs. Louise Strander, Secretary, Tukwila Historical Society b. Letter: Mayor Todd re: Police facility /City Hall Complex 11. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES a. Ord. - Re- classifying certain property from R3 zoning to RMH zoning within the City of Tukwila (Frank Todd property) 12. RESOLUTIONS a. Res. - #484 re: Cabot Dow & Associates, memo by Mayor re: same b. Res. - Authorizing the Mayor to execute LJPO Grant Award Contract x#75 -C -0024 "Burglary Amelioration Program" (1st reading) 13. DEPARTMENT REPORTS a. Treasurer's monthly report of investments - April 14. MISCELLANEOUS AND FURTHER AUDIENCE COMMENTS a. Executive Session: Council and City Attorney re: McAdoo vs. City of Tukwila 15. ADJOURNMENT � S MEMORANDUM CITY of TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT . TO: Honorable Mayor, City Council Members FROM: Kjell Stoknes Planning Director SUBJECT: Frank Todd Re -zone application DATE: 3 -3 -75 The above referenced item was recommended upon favorably by the Planning Commission. This recommendation was made subject to the findings, con- clusions, and recommendations of the attached staff report dated February 5, 1975. Please find attached with this memorandum the information I consider necessary in order for the city council to make an appropriate decision. Attachments: • 1. Staff report - February 5, 1975 2. Environmental assessment 3. Negative declaration of environmental significance 4. Planning Commission minutes - February 27, 1975. 5. Letter to city council from Frank Todd dated January 28, 1975. 6. Letter from Mrs. Kato, adjacent property owner, dated February 5, 1975. 7. City council minutes - January 20, 1975. 8. Community affairs committee minutes - January 8, 1975. 9. City council minutes - January 6, 1975.. 10. Planning Commission minutes - December 20, 1974: 11. Planning Commission minutes - November 21, 1974. 12. Staff report - Planning Commission- December 19, 1974. March 3, 1975 Mr. Frank Todd 14446 - 59th S. Tukwila, Wa. 98168 Dear Mr: Todd: CITY OF TUKWILA This letter is to Commission during did recommend the request. If you have any questions please call me. Very truly yours, Kjell Stoknes Planning Director KS /sjd Attachment: 1 C rank Todd, Mayor 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • RE: Your re -zone application from R -3 to RMH on 62nd. Ave. S. officially inform you that the Planning' their regular meeting of February 27, 1975, approval to the city council on your rezone This approval was given subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the staff report dated February 5, 1975, attached. I intend to schedule this before the city council during their regular meeting on March 21, 1975. Report prepared by: / v 424 Tukwila Planning Department CITY OF TUKWILA STAFF REPORT Date prepared: February 5, 1975 Applicant: Frank Todd Proposed action: Rezone application from R -3 to RMH Location: . Approximate vicinity 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street Hearing body: Tukwila Planning Commission Hearing date: February 27, 1975 Time: 8:00 p.m. Tl'ACHMENT it 1 FINDINGS: TTACHMENT I/ 1 1. This is a request to rezone a certain property from R -3 to RMH. 2. Subject property is located adjacent to and west of 62nd Avenue South approximately 300' from Southcenter Boulevard. 3. The subject property is located in an area identified by ' the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan as potential. multiple- family. 4. Access to the property would be from Southcenter Boulevard via 62nd Avenue South, a. secondary arterial. The existing right -of -way at 62nd Avenue South is 40'. City standards dictate that residential streets should have a minimum width of 50'. 5. The zoning on the property adjacent to the north is R -3 and R -1, to the east R -4, to the south R -3 and C -1, and to the west R -3. 6. A site plan has been submitted showing two apartment struc- tures on the property with a total of 112 apartment units on 114,759 square feet of land area, or one unit per 1,024 square feet of land area. The northerly structure would be 60' high and contain 76 units and the southern structure would be 30' high and.con- tain 36 units. 7. Sanitary sewers presently are located in Southcenter Boule- vard, however, they have not yet been extended up 62nd Avenue South. 8. A 6." water main presently serves the property with a hydrant located•at the corner of South 153rd Street and 62nd Avenue South. 9. The present storm drainage system on the property is an open ditch system. The open ditch system.stops immediately at the southern boundary of the subject property. 10. The property slopes toward the south at approximately 11 -12 %. 11. The uses allowed in the R -3 zone, which the property is presently zoned, would include duplexes, triplexes, four - plexes, convalescent and nursing homes with not over 12 patients and boarding and lodging houses with maximum of 12 boarders. The maximum allowed density is one apartment unit per every 2400 square feet of land area. Uses allowed in the requested RMH zone includes apartments, private clubs, schools, boarding and lodging houses, con- valescent homes, hotels. Professional office space could also be provided on the first two floors of structure. The maximum potential density is one apartment unit per every 200 square feet of land area for studio -type apartment units. 12. The height maximum allowed in the R -3 zone is 35'. In the RMH zone, no part of a building can exceed a heighth of 1h times the mean horizontal distance from such building to the center line of the abutting street or street : The site . plan submitted shows a maximum proposed height of 60'. • CONCLUSIONS: C 1. The rezone from R -3 to RMH would allow a considerably higher density on the property. Indications are however, that it would be difficult to develop any property to a density in excess of one apartment unit per 1,000 square feet of land area. In addition, the RMH zone would allow additional uses such as schools, private clubs and professional offices in addition to the apartment use. The peak automobile uses for these tend to vary more than apartment use and not peak in•the early morning and late afternoon. 2. The property is located on the sloped hillside above the Southcenter Boulevard, Interstate 405 and Interstate 5 and does lend itself more to multiple- family use than single - family. 3. The RMH zoning would be consistent with the. Comprehensive Plan since it is a multiple- family zone. 4. The fact that 62nd Avenue South is designated as a. secondary arterial would indicate that it would provide adequate access to RMH zoned property. The required street widths in residential areas is 50'. Since there is only 40' of right -of -way on 62nd• Avenue South, the applicant should be • required to deed 5' of his land adjacent to 62nd Avenue South for right -of -way purposes. In addition, an addition- al 10' utility easement should be required. 5. The project proposed in conjunction with this rezone would be consistent with the type of development that would be allowed on the R -4 zone property adjacent to the east. Specifically, the applicant is proposing 112 apartment units on 114,759 square feet of land for a density of one apart- ment unit per 1,024 square feet of land area. The R -4 zone allows a maximum density of one apartment per 1,000 square feet of land area. Other adjoining R -3 zoning could develop fourplexes to an RM 2400 density. 6. Although the applicant has submitted a site plan, it is not recommended that the rezone be given contingent upon that 2 ATTACHMENT # 1 3 TTACHMENT 1 1 k plan being built. Rather it is recommended that if a build- dating permit submitted on the property does not significantly I( ?k: " conform to the site plan, that it first be reviewed and ap- �' I proved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance. 7. Since sanitary sewers at the present time are not extended to the property, this should be a requirement or an appro- priate bond submitted, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. If the existing 6" water main is deemed not .to be adequate to service the property, an adequate water main must be provided or an appropriate bond submitted, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. Due to the amount of impervious services created by a de- velopment of this property, a considerable amount of run- off would be generated. Because of this, the applicant should be required at such time as he develops to create a storm water system which would not damage the property to the south. • 10. The slope of the property would enable the type of develop- ment proposed or allowed by the zone to be constructed. 11. The uses allowed by the RMH zone beyond the R -3 zone are apartments, private clubs, schools and hotels. 'Professional offices would also be allowed, but only on the first two floors. The density allowed in the RMH zone is one studio apartment unit per every 200 square feet of land area,•one 1- bedroom apartment unit per 400 square feet of land area or one 2- bedroom apartment unit per 600 square feet of land area. Past practices have shown that apartment complexes are generally not more dense than one apartment unit per 1,000 square feet of land area. (Ref. environmental assessment.) 12. The RMH zoning would allow the height of the proposed structures to significantly exceed the 60 feet proposed by the applicant. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the aforementioned findings and conclusions, we here- by recommend approval of this rezone application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the developer install all necessary utilities, as required by City Ordinance, prior to the issuance of a building permit. A bond deemed adequate by the public. service director may be substituted for the installa- tion of these utilities in order to allow the building permit to issue. If the developer actually installs the utilities, he shall be entitled to place a late comers agreement on them. TTACHMENT # 1 2. That the applicant enter into a developer's agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing that he will partici- pate in any local improvement districts on 62nd Avenue South to make improvements to the road or any utilities therein. 3. That the developer divert storm water in such a way that it will not cause damage to the property south of the subject property. 4. That the applicant dedicate the easterly 5' of his prop -, erty to the City for right -of -way and grant an additional 10' easement for utilities. That, if the building permit application submitted on the property does not significantly conform to the site plan submitted with this application, that it shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission *prior to its issuance. • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FEBRUARY 4, 1975 6TTACHMENT # 2 • This environmental assessment has been prepared to report on the potential impact of a legislative action rezoning a cer- tain property from R -3 to RMH. A. The Proposed Action: 1. The proposed legislation would change the zoning designation on a certain property from R -3 to RMH. 2. Justification: This rezone application is justi- fied since the property and its general vicinity is in an area identified by the Tukwila Comprehen- sive Land Use Plan as potential multiple- family. 3. Location: The subject property is located west of and adjacent to 62nd Avenue South approximately 300' north of Southcenter Boulevard, The legal description is as follows: that portion of Tract 11, interurban addition to Seattle; according to the Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: beginning at a point on the east line of Tract 11 which is 162.79' north of the southeast corner thereof; thence continuing north 0° 8' west 359.88' to the northeast corner of said Tract 11; thence south 89° 52' west along the northerly line there- of 300.86'; thence south 0 8' east 398.14'; thence north 89 52' east 141.65'; thence north 0° 8' west 38.26'; thence north 89° 52' east 159.21' to the point of beginning. 4. Historical Background: The best information avail- able indicates that prior to December 23, 1957, there was no zoning map adopted within the City of Tukwila and consequently the subject property is assumed to have been zoned single - family. On Decem- ber 23, 1957, a zoning ordinance was adopted by Ordinance #251, and in conjunction therewith, a zoning map was adopted which created R -3 zoning on the subject property.. The Comprehensive Plan Map, as amended by Ordinance #484 on May 15, 1967, in- dicates all the area between Southcenter Boulevard and South 151st Street as multiple- family. ATT ACHMENT # 2 5. Public Participation: The following opportunities for the public to participate have occurred to date: a. advertised public hearing before the Tukwila Planning Commission during their regular meeting of November 21, 1974. b. continued discussion on the matter during the regular Planning Commission meeting of December 19, 1974, at which time the Commission recommended approval of the rezone application to the City Council. c. matter was considered by the Tukwila City Council during their regular meeting of January 6,.19.75, and was referred to the Community Affairs Com- mittee for their recommendation. d. matter was considered at the January 8, 1975, Community Affairs Committee and the Committee recommended that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission instructing them not to reconsider the application until such time as a site plan was submitted and a proper environ- mental review made. They also raised a question as to whether or not the property could be re- zoned without the contract seller giving her approval. e. Committee recommendation was considered.by the City Council at their regular meeting of Jan - uary 20, 1975. The City Council concurred with the recommendation of the Community Affairs Com- mittee and referred the matter back to the Planning Commission with the instructions not to reconsider the application until such time as a site plan is submitted and a proper environ- mental review provided. f. at this point, site plans have been prepared and this environmental review is designed to sat- isfy environmental impacts. Public partici- pation will again be available through a pub- lished public hearing before the Planning Com- mission their regular meeting of Febru- ary 27, 1975 and then before the Tukwila City Council at a regular meeting for final disposition. 6. Relationship to Existing Laws, Policies and Plans: At the present time the subject property and general vicin- ity is identified in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan as potential multiple- family zoning. This is identified in map form and no policies and additional guidelines are offered to indicate which degree of multiple- family the area of this subject property should have, that is, R -2, R -3, R -4, or RMH. 2 In reading the chapter headings in the R -2 through the RMH zones in the Tukwila Municipal Code, they read as follows: a. R -2 district -- Two- family dwellings. b. R -3 district -- Three and four - family dwellings. c R -4 district -- Low apartments. d. RMH district -- Multiple residence high density. Multiple - family, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, could be interpreted to be any of .these above zoned categories. 7. Any Decisions Remaining Before Implementation•'of%the Legislation: At this point in the rezone application must again go before the Tukwila Planning Commission at an advertised public hearing on February 27, 1975. After a decision by the Planning Commission, final disposition will be made before the Tukwila City Coun- cil during a regular Council meeting. B. Existing Conditions: At the present time the subject property is zoned R -3, which allows three- and four - family dwellings with a maximum al- lowed density of RM 2400. The existing Comprehensive Plan identifies the property and vicinity for multiple- family. Adjacent zoning is as follows: 1. R -4 to the east. 2. C -1 and R -3 to the south. 3. R -3 to the west. 4. R -3 and R -1 to the north. Existing developments in the vicinity include an apartment complex to the northeast, vacant land to the east, a single- family dwelling to the south and one to the west, and vacant property to the northwest and north portions adjacent to the property. C. Environmental Impact of the Proposed Legislation: The primary potential impact of the proposed rezone appli- cation would be the potential of other property owners with- in the area identified on the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan map as multiple- family requesting similar rezones to the RMH zoning category. If other similar applications occur, they should be reviewed, unless new laws are created to guide the City in their review, under the same procedure as the applicant under this application. In the future, policies should be adopted to give the Planning Commission and City 3 iTTACHMENT LI 2 ti Council more guidance in their decision making role in the area identified by the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan as multiple - family. Uses allowed in the R -3 zone, which the property is present- ly zoned, include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, con- valescent and nursing homes with not over 12 gatients and boarding and lodging houses with a maximum of 12 boarders. The maximum potential density is RM 2400. Uses allowed in the RMH zone includes apartments, boarding and lodging houses, convalescent homes, convents and private clubs, schools, hotels, and office and clinics of a- professional nature. Maximum potential density is RM 200,'however, due to setback requirements, parking requirements, and height' limitations, it would be very difficult to exceed a poten- tial density of RM 1000. Some substantiation for'this . statement can be made from an analysis of existing developments. 1. Name: Address: .Zoning: Date built: # of units: Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: 2. Name: Address: - Zoning: Date built: # of units: Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: 3. Name: Address: Zoning: Date built: # of units: Land area: Sq. Ft. of land per unit: 4. Name: Address: Zoning: Date built: # of units: Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: Stardust Apartments 15016 Macadam Road RMH 1970 62 65,844 square feet 1,062 Southcenter Apartments 15036 Macadam Road RMH 1967 32 (8 triplexes and 2 fourplexes) 54,058 square feet 1,690 La Vista Apartments 5555 South 152nd Street RMH 1969 114 138,466 square feet 1,215 Canyon Estates 15100 - 65th Avenue South R -4 and RMH 1967 186 325,000 square feet 1,747 4 TACHP1EPJT # 2 5. Name: Address: Zoning: Date built: # of units: Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: 6. Name: Address: Zoning: Date built: # of units:. Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: # of proposed units: 112 Land area: Sq. ft. of land per unit: Village Green Apartments 14700 and 14800 Interurban Avenue South M -1 (allows R -4 density) 1967 88 142,600 square feet 1,620 San Juan Apartments • 6206 South 153rd Street' 1966 24 63,040 square feet 2,626 The density of the plans submitted by the applicant would be one unit per every 1,024 square feet of land area based upon the following calculations: 114,759 square feet 1,024 The site plan submitted shows two structures, the northerly one six stories tall and the southerly one three stories tall. Associated parking and landscaped areas are also shown. The additional allowable uses of professional office under the RMH zoning will not have a high impact on peak volume traffic in the early morning and late afternoon which is typical with apartments. Traffic generated by professional . offices tend to be more evenly distributed throughout the day. Because of this, should professional office uses occur, it is not anticipated that the traffic impact would be in excess of that allowed by apartment use. Since this is an action requesting a change of zoning, an impact analysis will not be provided on a particular devel- opment, since a development is not proposed. A separate impact analysis would be completed at such time as a speci- fic project is proposed for the property. The decision to not include an impact analysis of a specific development is based on a recent Supreme Court of Washington decision on Narrowsview Preservation Association vs The City of Tacoma, a part of which reads as follows: "It is entirely consis- tent for government to determine that a change in zoning• will not have a substantial impact on environment, based upon information available, when examined in relation to those uses already allowed by existing zoning and yet re- quire an environmental impact statement at such time as a preliminary plat or building permit is issued for a speci- fic project when details of specific structure and use of 5 ATTACHMENT #t 2 �x� property are more clearly defined." Cite: Wash., 526P.2d 899. D. Any Unavoidable Adverse Effects: The only potential adverse effects associated with this rezone application is not the application itself, but the potential requests for additional rezones to the RMH cate- gory in the area of the Comprehensive Plan allowing' multiple - family when closer into the single - family areas. Beyond this, no unavoidable adverse effects are antici- pated with this legislative action. It should be noted that at such time that a building%per- mit is applied for, an additional environmental analysis will be required of the specific development. E. Alternatives to the Proposed Action: There are only two alternatives to this proposed action since it is a specific rezone request from R -3 to RMH. Those two alternatives are grant the rezone as requested or deny it. ATTACHMENT # 2 F. Relationship Between Local Short Term Environmental Uses and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long Term Productivity: The sloped hillside where this property is located is not desirable for agricultrual uses nor are mineral known to be located thereon. It is anticipated that this area will be developed to an urban character and therefore the proposed action will be consistent under the title of this section. .\\AI nt.. ti • CITY OF TUKWILA TACHP9EfJT # 2 • • Vicinity map Todd property (rezone application) January 30, 1975 FIGURE 1 31 IN Akto IANWe ► " tli•X• ••. +•.y" . ,u• ••• �i► p 4 4 .• •At.. , ***Ade.* ._ ►0 � 4.�1. ...4. ; a i .�•.a 4i� O4i�.••••4re, V • Nrigv..%Ar '1%, % , ;o. * P•w CITY LIM1,. gfTACHMENT # 2 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CITY • TL1WJLA LEGEND INDUSTRIAL RETAIL SALES MULTIPLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY PUBLIC I I Todd property (rezone application) January 30, 1975 FIGURE 2 PASSED BY ORDINANCE 484 15 MAY 1967. ' - Zoning map • Todd property (rezone application Scale 1" = 200' January 30, 1975 FIGURE 3 i ✓ • + • v. . • 1 i•. =i — • CI • ( I t •Nal . 6S111 ; I do :77 15310 • • U rn N • ,�. y; —Monad 4' IRAIR .1 ICICIP 1 ° 4wMV. -�tY� 10•1ur< rsomow:s `=6EGTION A•A •10. Pir0 le Roe le AA* Y! "was V' riot tTACHPIENT II 2 _reset -- • _ • DECLARATION: Applicant - Frank Todd PLANNING DEPARTMENT 54b Kee 1 Stoknes, Director TMC:KMS:cs CITY OF TUKWILA Planning Department February 4, 1975 STATEMENT OF DECLARATION (A TTACHMENT # 3 APPLICATION FOR A REZONE OF A CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF 62ND AVENUE SOUTH AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD FROM R -3 TO RMH. INTRODUCTION: The following is a Statement of Declaration by the undersigned as the Responsible Official pursuant to Title 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. An Environmental Assessment has been completed on the proposed legislation and has been taken into consideration in this, Declaration. Based upon the Environmental Assessment as prepared, Section 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code dealing with environmental policy and the guidelines issued by the Washington State Depart- ment of Ecology for the implementation of the State Environ- mental Policy Act, I find that the proposed rezone application from R -3 to RMH will not have a significant effect upon the environment and therefore a complete Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The City reserves the right to require an additional environ- mental review, and full Environmental Impact Statement if deemed necessary, at such time as a building permit is applied for on the property. Planning Commission 27 February 1975 Minutes of Meet(7 Page 3 I TACH'1ENT it 4 F. PUBLIC HEARING - Rezone - Todd (62nd. Ave.) Staff explained the matter had been returned to the Planning Commission by the City Council for reconsider- ation with respect to an Environmental Assessment and site plans. A new public hearing has been advertised. Chairman Mettler opened the public hearing at:,9:40 P.M. Mr. Frank Todd, proponent, stated the. rezone is a reasonable and necessary classification which conforms to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation and stated the information contained in the Assessment Summary, Staff report and conceptual site plans and elevations further support the request. Mr. Ed Bauch, 16603 53rd. Ave. S., stated his opposition to additional RMH classification being extended to any property in the city. Stated he felt the city is already at a reasonable balance between multiple- family and single - family areas. Mr. Todd asked if Chairman Mettler was an employee of Mr. Todd's. Chairman Mettler replied "no ". Mr. Todd further asked Mr. Stoknes, Planning Director, if any pressure had been brought to bear upon his position by Mr. Todd through his position as Mayor. Mr. Stoknes replied "no ". Mr. Saul asked if it is customary to require the submis- sion of site plans and drawing of the proposed develop- ment for consideration of a rezone. Mr. Todd pointed out the Seattle City Light property was rezoned since the SEPA requirement and without site'plans. Mr. Saul noted the area referred to was surrounded by commercial and industrial classifications while this matter concerns high- density residential. Discussion ensued among Commissioners regarding the basic needs of property dimensions, access and utilities noting a site plan is not specifically required. Mr. Todd stated the drawing depicts a maximum height of 60 feet above ground level whereas RMH allows 150 feet in this particular case. Chairman Mettler closed the public hearing at 9:50 P.M. Mr. Zepp and Mr. Sneva both stated the information provided was in depth and served to support the original decision reached by the Commission. Mr. Stoknes read the findings, conclusions and recommendations contained in the Staff report. Planning Commission 27 February 1975 Minutes of Mee r lg Page 4 PRELIMINARY TTACHMENT # 4 Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Sneva and carried unanimously that based upon the finding and conclusions contained in the Staff report it is recommended to the City Council that the subject parcel of property be rezoned, from R -3 to RMH, upon the recording, with the King County Auditor, of a Developer's Agree- ment, entered into by the property owner and the City of Tukwila, to include the following stipulations: 1. That the developer install all necessary utilities, as required by City Ordinance, prior to the issuance of a building permit. A bond deemed adequate by the public service director may be substituted for the installa- tion of these utilities in order to allow the building permit to issue. If the developer actually installs the utilities, he shall be entitled to place a late comers agreement on them. 2. That the applicant enter into a developer's agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing that he will partici- pate in any local improvement districts on 62nd. Avenue • South to make improvements to the road or any utilities therein. 3. That the developer divert storm water in such a way that it will not cause damage to the property south of the subject property. 4. That the applicant dedicate the easterly 5' of his prop- erty to the City for right -of -way and grant an additional 10' easement for utilities. 5. That, if the building permit application submitted on the property does not significantly conform to the site plan submitted with this application, that it shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to its issuance. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE - Sign (Tuk -Inn) Staff explained the restaurant located near 48th Avenue and Interurban Avenue, previously known as VIP's, has changed management and the name of establishment to "Tuk- Inn ". The owner, Mr. Robert Oldright, was granted a variance from the M -1 zone height requirements in June 1972 (approximately one year prior to adoption of the Sign Code) to erect a sign 65 feet in height. Now, with the change in management and name of the restaurant, to erect a new sign face requires a sign permit issued in accordance with the Sign Code. Section 19.32.170 restricts the height of signs in an indust- rial area to 45 feet and the size of the face area is limited to 80 square feet total under Section 19.32.140. January 28, 1975 To: Tukwila City Council Members From:• Frank Todd Subject: Rezone request comments TACHMENT # 5 The City Council Minutes of January 8, 1975 committee meeting inaccurately reflect my official discussion regarding the rezone request. I did not speak to the request from the Council table but from the audience. Please see the Council Minutes of January .6, 1975 meeting approved by a unanimous 7- member vote of the City Council. Chapter 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (ordinance regarding impact statements) was passed June 15, 1973 by the Council. To this date no rezone request approval has been subject to an impact statement. For instance, the 47 acre City Light property was rezoned to CM (allowing 300 feet high buildings) without a '. statement being required. Mr. Bowen's request for zoning change on Foremost Dairy site did not require a statement; likewise, with the Lamb - Naylor et al rezone. To my knowledge, there is no pro- vision in the Chapter which requires a development plot plan on a rezone request. Mr. Mettler is not my employee. Ms. Kato has no legal authority to approve or disapprove - a change in zoning of the subject property. The City has on file my affadavit and a copy of the purchase contract regarding owner of record. Ms. Harris's reference to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine seems appropriate as it relates to the Council rather than the proponant oE the rezone. I might call to the attention of the Council that Chapter 18.98 delegates the decisive authority regarding the requirement of an impact statement with the Planning Director. I have not nor did not discuss this request with the Planning Director in a way to unduly influence him as his "boss" as Ms. Harris has suggested in the record of the January 8, 1975 committee meeting. . Rezone comments - Cont. Page 2 The Council should con the request on its merits and avoid personal or political considerations. I request the City Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendations to change the zone to RMH subject to the restrictions imposed by its deliberations and that the Council impose a further condition limiting building height to six (6) stories 'or 76 feet as measured from the ground level on the uphill side of the This is 66 feet for the building plus elevator shaft.. I agree that all other conditions imposed by ordinance will be met by the undersigned. Respectfully . submitted, T e e74.4. , Frank .Todd .7 J � fTACHMENT # 5 City Council City Planning Commission City of Tukwila, Washington •,TACHMENT If 6 5 -1 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we owners of the property lying immediately South and immediately West of Mr. Todd property support and endorse the zone change from R-3 to BMH. Very truly yours, 9 /444-e itLe-Aj/c-4 1U:L :1 _:Y ! lii i i uvu i'.Lii £UjUU January 20, 1975 • • Pa.z NSW PUSI'LTESS - Contd. ,Job description - Council Recording Secretary Council Order 02, providing Council... Members with keys to City Hall offices Council Order City Clerk to ordinance and numbers after Council meeti 03, Request announce resolution passage at ngs. • • RECESS 1 8:50 P.M. • - 9:00 OLD BUSINESS Proposed City Hall . Rezone request - Frar Todd property fr cm R3 to RMH 4 Councilwoman Harris suggested the•Committee of the hole take care of this item. Councilman Saul suggested the Person nel Committee. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, TO REFER THE PLOTTER OF A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE COUNCIL RECORDING SECRETARY TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING, JAi'U R ( 27, 1975. CARRIED. Mayor Pro -Tem Traynor asked what offices the Council' Members feel they need to have keys for. Councilwoman Harris stated she needed'a key for the door between the Clerk's office and the outer vestibule and a key for the Annex Building since the Community Affairs Committee meets in that office. Steve Hall stated Councilwoman Harris had previously requested a key to the Annex Building and he felt since he was in charge, • part - of his responsibility includes the security of the building. He stated he would release any responsibility for ,the building if any keys are given out. City Clerk Kinney stated she ' . demonstrated to the Council President that the lock on the door between her offices and the vestibule does not lock even though the lock is latched. Councilman Sterling stated the lock then should be replaced right away. :Councilman Saul noted the Order does not specify which offices the Council requests keys for. .Councilman Johanson stated he would be willing to sign a release for the keys issued to him, that he is not concerned with the integrity of the Council Members. Councilwoman Davis requested a key to the Council file cabinet Mayor Pro- -Tem Traynor suggested that keys be issued on an individual request basis only. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DAVIS, THAT COUNCIL. ORDER 02.BE ADOPTED. CARRIED. . MOVED BY STERLING, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, THAT COUNCIL ORDER #3 BE ADOPTED. CARRIED. City Clerk Shirlee Kinney stated she would be most willing to announce the number assigned to each ordinance and resolution as it is passed. TgCHMENT # 7 MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY HARRIS, TO RECESS,THE MEETING. 'CARRIED. •Mayor• Pro;Tem' Traynor called the Meeting back to order with all Council Members present as previously listed. • Councilman Saul stated the Council felt it necessary to . ternir. ate the professional services agreement with Mr. McAdoo. His plans did not follow the recommendations of the Planning Commission at all; The Council will be requesting the City Attorney to draw up a resolution rescinding the ' prior resoluti to retain Pair. McAdoo. He suggested the Public 'Works Committee pick up the matter now. Mayor'Pro -Tem Traynor stated that this seemed to be sitting stagnant for a long time and felt it should go to the Committee for a recommendation as soon as possible to the entire Council. We need to get started on this City Hall. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO REFER THE MATTER OF CITY HALL TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FOIL FURTHER STUDY. CARRIED. Councilwoman Harris stated the Community Affairs Committee met January 8 and minutes including discussion on this item have been supplied. We recommend that this be remanded back to the Planning Commission for the following reasons: No further action be taken by the Planning Commission until Section 18.9E 030, paragraphs a through h, of the Tukwila Municipal Code requirements have been submitted; Submittal of, site plans; Testimony or notarized letter of approval or disapproval from Ms. Mitsuye Kato be obtained before rezone is granted or denic It was pointed out that it is very difficult to avoid conflici with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. The fact that Mr. Todd, presently mayor of this City, did not immediately excusi himself from the Council table upon introduction of this subj4 at the January 6, 1975 regular Council Meeting is cuestionabli In addition, this Committee feels it is difficult for the Cit; staff, who are required to prepare reports and an analysis of . ja u .r y 20, 1975 Page 5 • OLD BUSINESS - Contd. Rezone request - Frank Todd property ..... from R3 to RMH - Contd. .-Report by Public Works Director re: Highline water district intertie Water district 75 intertie Water district #75 intertie Transfer of funds - Park Department. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Proposed ordinance - Authorizing Planning ... Director to waive re- quirements for under- ground utilities under certain circumstances Proposed ordinance - Powers and duties of Tukwila Park Commission Fund • this request, to entirely separate the relationship of applican from that of "the boss." It is unknown whether the Cha?rr:an of the Planning Commission is still an employee of Mr. Todd, • and whether he participated in the discussion during the Planning Commission public hearing. It would be appropriate that, should that relationship still exist, the Chairman excuse himself from any further consideration of that body in order to protect both the applicant and any decision of the Planning Commission of this particular- subject. Councilman Traynor stated he agreed with the findings of the committee, especially regarding the site plans requirement. This informa- tion is vital to the application for rezone and he was disan- pointed in the Planning Commission for not requiring these docu ments. He stated this City has bought several pigs in a poke in the past and he.thought they had learned their lesson by now. Councilwoman Davis pointed out this type of zoning allows for businesses in the first two floors of the building. She felt it should go back to the Planning Commission for further study. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, TO • REFER THE MATTER OF REZONE REQUEST FROM R3 TO R H BY FRANK TODD TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY AlekAIR COMMITTEE ' a CD +ll4;i'WA1lUrl6 ., CARRIED. . . Steve Hall, Public Works Director, requested this item be . deleted and discussion regarding this item be taken up with item 10.g.. on the Agenda. MOVED BY JOHANSON, SECONDED BY STERLING, TO DELETE ITEM 7.c. FROM THE AGENDA. CARRIED. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO ADD ITEM 7.d., TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN*THE PARK BUDGET. 'CARRIED. Councilwoman Harris explained the purpose of the transfer of funds for lights in the Park. She stated the Council is. not sure if the funds can be transferred from the Land Acquisition, Building and Development Fund for this purpose, however,.the ..funding should be recommitted and. allocated for this purpose for 1975.. MOVED BY HARRIS TO REFINANCE THE LIGHTING FOR THE . PARK IN.THE AMOUNT OF $17,000.* Councilman Sterling noted we do not yet know where the money will be•coming.from. *MOTION WITHDRAWN.. MOVED. BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY JOHANSON, TO CONTINUE THE NATTER OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR PARK LIGHTING TO THE. FEBRUARY 3, 1975 REGULAR MEETING. CARRIED. Councilman Sterling suggested a legal opinion may be in order to determine if Park development expenses can come from the Land Acquisitioi Co uncilwoman. Harris stated the. Community Affairs Committee recommended a "do not pass" on this. Crossing legislative authority is. contrary to State law and the Council itself does not know that we are empowered to grant this authority. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY HARRIS, TO READ PROPOSED ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY. CARRIED. Attorney Parker read proposed ordinance amending Section 13.08.070 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, authorizing the Planning Director to waive the requirements foe underground utilities under certain circumstances by title only. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY STERLING, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE DENIED. CARRIED. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DAVIS, TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO INCLUDE ITEM 8.b., PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGARDING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE TUKWILA PARK COMMISSION. CARRIED. Councilwoman Harris stated the committee made recommendations regarding the proposed ordinance at its January 8 meeting; she then reviewed the amendments to the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro-Tem Trayni asked Attorney Parker if he had seen this. revised ordinance. Attorney Parker replied no. Steve Hall stated he had not seen the revisions either. Attorney Parker added that he had not approved the ordinance as to form yet. MOVED BY DAVIS, SECOND: BY JOHANSON, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGARDING POWERS AND DUTI OF HE TUKWILA PARK COMMISSION BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 3, . 19 AGENDA. CARRIED. • PINUTES Community Affairs & Legislative Committee Tukwila City Council . . - `'TACHMENT # 8 The committee meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Harris at 5:35 P.M., January 8, 1975,.at.the Annex Building, 6230 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washi.ngton.. Committee members present: M. Catherine Harris Joanne Davis Jon Sterling • St aff members present: tlIell Stokness Planning Director cs Richard -Hunt, Recreation Supervisor .• Others: . . : , 3 4 : ' .. . William Moore, Chairman, Park Commission W : _ Mr. Ed Bauch µ The following items were considered: : . A..-Proposed.'ordinance — .Duties and Powers of the Tukwila Park Comfaissiam .?1 _ :.. .:. ; - ... The committee reviewed the letter from the Public Works Director, Mr. Steve Hall, dated December 11, 1974, regarding this proposed ordinance It was noted that Mr. Hall's letter was written on the basis•of:the original draft, . rather than the amended ordinance ' submitted•to the Council subsequent to the meeting of the Park • Commission,' which two.: members "of this committee were present. Points'in Mr. Hall's . letter were reviewed as follows:' • 1. Third:_ paragraph: the word "control ". had been changed 'Approve ". in the amended ordinance. • . 2.. Fourth paragraph:. there was no discussion on this. item; it remains the same. paragraph :. concerning the. word "construct”-- -.:There was lengthy •,discussion - regarding. the interpretation and other. words in• Section• 5c of proposed ordinance. moved by Mr.. Sterling, seconded by Mrs._ to ' - change the first paragraph of Section 50 to read "Plani promote and set policy and standards for the management, construction, development, maintenance and operation, . either within or without the city limits, parks, playfields, and recreation grounds belonging to or leased by• the City of Tukwila; ", and the last sentence be the same. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. • Sixth paragraph: Discussion on interpretation and types of contracts which would be occurring, and included discussion on scheduling of park availability for organized. sports and free time activities. Motion by Mrs. Davis,. seconded by ir. Sterling, to change the words "enter into'! to read "Approve or reject ". 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It . was concluded by those present that the wording of "for the purpose of conducting a recreation progran......" clarified the matter of limiting the meaning?of this section to those contracts to further or accomplish a program or _ / /y}T _ITACHME�JT 8 ; acticy, and did not include authe. to award any- contract involving construction of a major project. 5. ' Seventh paragraph: The wording had been changed from '"Director of Parks and Recreation" to "Director of Public - Works and•the Recreation Supervisor" in the amended ordi— nance. However, discussion followed on amending the newer language. It was moved by Mrs Harris, seconded. by Mrs. Davis to insert the words "or their authorized representa— tives" between "Supervisor" and "with" in Section 5i, and and adding a period after the word Department. 3 ayes;. 0 no ' s; motion carried. . _ ........ . . • It was moved by Hrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling, to. ::•strike the words "and shall serve as an advisory board to the Supervisor of Park Maintenance and the Recreation ':Supervisor "; add paragraph. ! j ' stating "The Park Commission shall assist' the Director of Public Works and'the Recreation '=`"Supervisor ' in submitting an annual budget and shall approve ; budget before.it is submitted to the City Council; 'and. making the last . paragraph . 11 k' . 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion :carried. • . . _..._ _ 2 he;. committee - wishes to express its appreciation •. to Mr. Hall for his comments on this proposed ordinance. B. Transfer of Parks finds' in 1974 budget..;: :.. Mr :'-Hant'read a'letter dated December 26,. from himself to the City Clerk regarding this subject, and further. explained that the •.• Council had ' transferred • $10,000 in late 1974 from the Contingency • mind to this department:-for the purpose of installing lights in the main Tukwila Park. This money thus part of the Current Fund. The project had ' not been finalized,. and the bids awarded by the . ' end. �f '1974. Thus the unexpended . money expired at the .end of .the year. "When the Council formulated the budget for 1975, this program was not refunded. . . It : 'liras•;: determined that • the financing.. for the park righting should be re—co fitted in 1975 as it is a project• previously 'approved by.•' the• Cocil. It' :ras moved. by Mr.: Sterling, '.seconded by Mrs.' Harris, un to recomaend to the Council that $17,000 be transferred from the Land`Acquisition Fund to the Park Maintenance Fund. for the purpose of providing park lighting. 3 ages;" 0 no's; motion carried. • • It was moved. by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling that the .amount. of $2,805.74 for Operating Supplies• and Repair & Maintenance kind, - which. also expired at the end of 1974 due to being unexpended, be referred to the Committee—of—the—Whole for discussion. 2 ayes; 1 no; motion carried. C. Proposed ordinance — Mending T.M.C. authorizing Board of Adjust — .= merit to. consider variances re: Underground. Utilities • The discussion centered around the question of whether the proposed ordinance is legally Within the scope of duties of the Board of Adjustment, as the Board is primarily concerned with zoning matters. . • . . • . • The committe vested the Planning Direct r- 0 seek legal opinion cone Jag this subject. This propk d. ordinance was continued, to the next committee meeting: ATTACHMENT # *3 D. . Proposed ordinance - Amending T.M.C. authorizing Board of Adjustment to consider appeals from and exceptions to Sign Code. . . • The committee requested the Planning Director to seek legal advice from Mr. Parker, City. Attorney, regarding: Should the sign code . be changed from Title 19 in the Tukwila Municipal Code, and incor- porated in Title 18, Zoning Code? . This item was continued to the next committee meeting. - E. Proposed ordinance - Amending T.M.C. authorizing Planning Director , ' to waive requirements for underground utilities under certain circumstances. The committee recommends "Do Not Pass", as it feels that granting Staff -legislative or quasi-legislative authority is contrary to ' state law.- . . . , F. Proposed resolution Accepting petition from residents of Dingamish- Allentown area as modified by King County Boundary Review Board. There. was lengthy discussion relating to badkground of this annexa- . tion and general points of accepting or rejecting area as modified. . . , It was moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mrs. Harris, to continue - . this item to. the next committee meeting. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. • Discussion followed as-to what the next step would be in ' relation to the Council meeting as a Committee-of-the-Whole.. It was moved.. by Mrs. Harris, seconded by. Mr. Sterling, to rescind 'motion to continue to next committee meeting. . 3 ayes; 0 no Is;- motion carried. It was moved by Mr. Sterling, seconded by Mrs. Davis to recommend to the Council "Do Not Pass Resolution as Worded". .3 ayes; .0 no Is3 motion .carried. It was moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling, to place sub- ject on Committee-of-the-Whole agenda for 1/13/75 for discussion to determine the direction the council desires to proceed on this matter.. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. The committee feels that a "Do Not Pass as Worded" action does not kill the subject. Should the Committee-of-the-Whole take the direction of accepting the area as modified, the, petition will be required to be re-certified, before passing a resolution of acceptance. If sufficient signatures are not on the petition, and cannot be obtained within 30 days after being returned to the - ' original petitioners, the entire matter is dropped, and no election takes place. G. Rezone .reouest - Frank Todd; from R-3 to RMH • The committee recommends to the Council that the applioatiOnbe • remanded back to the Planniner Commission for the _following: . ______...... T:ACH 1 €f 1 : • .• 1. .. the Planning Commission not to consider this •`+ • application further until 'a document has been submitted - ' covering the points contained in Section 18.98.030, . a through h of the Tukwila Municipal• Code. • • Submittal of site plans to indicate proposed development of - property building placement, parking arrangement, land — scaping, and other pertinent information. •• Ai As there may be a legal question as to whether this property can be rezoned without the specified approval of Ms. Mitsuye Kato, from Whom Mr. Todd is purchasing '. :.- the property, it is felt her testimony or notarized letter of approval or 'disapproval is necessary. Duriag the discussion of, this subject, it was' pointed • out • that is .is•very difficult to avoid conflict with the Appearance or.Pairness Dootrinn.... The fact that Mr. Todd,. presently Mayor of this city, did not immediately excuse himself from the council table upon . 'introduction of this - subject at the January 6, 1975 'regular counoil• meeting is. questionable to this committee.. In addition, - -this committee_ feels it is difficult for the city staff, who are required to prepare reports and an 'analysis . of this request,• to entirely separate the relationship of applicant froth of "the boss".. It. is. unknown Whether - the Chairman of the Planning Commission is still an employee of Mr. • Todd, . and . irhether . he participated in the ' • discussion during the Planning Commission public hearing.: It would be appropriate. that, should that relationship still exist, the 'Chairman excuse himself from any further consideration of that.body • in:order to protect both.the applicant 'and any decision of he • Planning Commission of this particular subject..- The committee' meeting adjourned• at 11:30` January 8, 1975• -11/ • _ = J � 1 � . ;,t9 P,,.. � : 1 ".A.•7 �rI.0 Catherine Earris Chairwoman . = ':TUKI':ILA CITY. COUNCIL RDLAR.MEETING ' Jar_•uar :' 6, 1§75 .•: P : ase 2 • :'APPOINTMENTS - Cont. :Planning Commission - Cont. Board of Adjustment . RECESS 7:20 P.M. - 7:25 P.M. Request for rezone - Frank Todd from •R -4 to Rai:: ACHMENT strongly in . favor of Mr. Sneva remaining-on the Plan- ning Commission. Although some feel we should have • just: the residents on the Commission, this gentleman's knowledge and help to the Planning Commission and the City is very valuable. He stated he highly concurred with this appointment and urged the other Council Members to concur also. *CARRIED, WITH DAVIS AND HARRIS VOTING NO. From the audience, Mr. Sneva stated he . looked forward to serving again and that he enjoyed being on the City of Tukwila Planning Commiss- ion. He thanked the Mayor and Council for the oppor- tunity to serve again. Councilman Traynor continued with Mayor Todd's Decem- ber 30 letter re- appointing Mrs. Phyllis Pesicka to Position No. 1 in the Board of Adjustment. Kjell Stoknes stated he felt there had been an error in designating this as a one -year term. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY DAVIS, TO RECESS TO RESEARCH THE ITEM. CARRIED. Mayor Todd,called•.the meeting back to order with all Council Members present as previously listed. Mayor Todd stated according to Ord. #860, Position No. 1 should now be a four -year 'term from January 1, 1975 to December 31, 1978. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL,'TO RATIFY THE MAYOR'S RE- APPOINTMENT TO POSITION NO. 1 IN THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. ROLL CALL VOTE: 2'AYES - TRAYNOR, SAUL; 4 NOS - GARDNER, DAVIS, HARRIS, JOHANSON. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUI, TO AMEND THE AGENT; TO INCLUDE AN ITEM 6.c. CARRIED. New Planning Director - Steve Hall, Public Works Director, introduced Kjell Kjell Stoknes. Stoknes to the Council and audience as the City's . new Planning Director. He briefly reviewed Mr. Stoknes' background and experience with the City of Kirkland and stated he hoped the City of Tukwila would have a long relationship with Mr. .Stoknes. ., PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS Mayor Todd relinquished the chairman's gavel to Counci President Traynor: Councilman Traynor read a letter dated December 24, 1974 from Gary Crutchfield review- ing the public hearing of the .Planning Commission held December 19, 1974. Kjell Stoknes, Planning Director, stated he had been involved in the.preparation of this, but from a technical standpoint, the terminology; "dedication of a 10 -foot easement" was not correct and suggested "granting" be substituted. He stated he hesitated to comment further until he became more familiar with the Tukwila Municipal Code. Councilman; Johanson stated he had some questions regarding the • rezone: (1) Since this borders R -1 on the north side,. how would RMH affect the surrounding property? On either side is R -3 and R -4 zoning with C -1 on the front. He stated a 10 -story structure does not seem to fit into the general trend of planning for the area (2) In answer to the question, can.the property be used as it is presently zoned, the answer is yes. (3) Is there a need in the area for the RMH zoning? (4) How is the subject property related to surroundin uses in zoning? It is related but it is certainly not the type of what is surrounding. He stated he could remember the affects on the residents before when a structure of this type was proposed. And in the matter of proprieties, the Mayor is asking for a rezon on his own property while he holds office which seems V strange to him. Councilman. Traynor asked if anyone 'fli1s CITY 'COUNCIL"' R 'tAR . 1EETIN G' - '-- -7-- - TACITIEI ';7. 7 Januar 6, 1975 Pace 3 PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR CLATTERS - Cont. Frank Todd rezone Cont. • wished to hold a public hearing before the Council, although it is not a requirement to do so. Frank Todd stated as the petitioner, he would like to re- quest a public hearing date set before the City Counci and the public because there seems to be a few ques- tions here; he wished the opportunity to answer'those questions. Councilwoman Harris stated there are some things about this that are not answered for several of us. The normal operating procedure is to refer this to committee and these are, of course, public and the committee can come back to the full Council with its recommendations. She stated her questions included: (1) Perhaps an environmental impact state- ment should be required due to the extensive change in the topography; (2) Is the applicant the actual owner of the property and has the title to it or is there an option involved? Perhaps a sale of the pro - perty is contingent upon the approval of this rezone. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DAVIS, THAT THE MATTER OF THE REZONE REQUEST FOR FRANK TODD BE REFERRED TO THE CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE.* . Councilman Saul stated a.public hearing seems to be in order for additional input. We won'.t be able to find out any answers by putting this into committee. • Councilwoman Davis stated she felt the questions should be answered before holding a public hearing. She stated when she sat on' the Planning Commission, . the maps and slides were accompanied by a layout of the structure which does not appear. here. Frank Todd stated he has been around City Hall for nearly. 20 years and this is the first time he has seen the pro- cedure change where the Planning Commission recommen- dation went to a committee rather than a public hear- ing. It is very irregular to proceed along these • lines. How can the committee adjudicate•a problem without.knowing all the facts and the only place you can get the facts is by reading the packet before you which proves ownership and by holding a public •hearing Councilman Traynor stated he objected to the numerous rezone requests and he, because of overloading the committee if he happens to show up at the committee meeting, would prefer to 'discuss this at a public hearing also, to have all the answers provided to us by the Planning staff and the petitioner. Councilwo- man Davis asked what Councilman Traynor had meant by "overloading the committee".. Councilman. Traynor re- plied he would be the fourth Member of .the Council present at the committee meeting. Councilwoman Harri; stated all of the information can be given at a com- mittee hearing and the petitioner and the public are entitled to be present. The Tukwila Municipal Code stated the Council is entitled to take final action on a rezone request without-a public hearing provided the Planning Commission has held its public hearing. She stated she would like to see the staff report and other information. Councilman Traynor stated he real ized the Council is not required to have a public hea: ing but he felt the Council should have one. Council man Johanson stated one of his concerns is with So. . 153rd, a private street, which joins 62nd Avenue. He stated there had been quite a bit of discussion ' about pushing 62nd all the way through.' He stated he felt the committee should be meeting before the public hearing, that the City would not runt to waste the money on a public hearing before the committee met. Steve Hall, Public Works Director, referred to "a map of the area noting the grades and logical access to the property. He stated it would be more logical to v have access at the southeast corner off o f 62nd Ave. r , 'TUKtiti ILA CITY P.4 MEETING ,'January 6, 1975 :Page r PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS. AND SIMILAR MATTERS 'cont.: - Frank Todd - rezone Councilman Johanson noted the difficulty - in' cutting Cont. for a.road because of the hard rock in the area. - . Councilman Sterling arrived at the meeting at 7:50 P.M. Councilman Traynor and Frank Todd briefly informed Councilman Sterling of previous'conversatior Discussion continued on the matter of extending 62nd Ave. Steve Hall stated it would be difficult since there are many rock outcroppings'in the way and'•the fact that the existing apartments would be so close. From an economic standpoint, there is no reason to extend 62nd Ave. through. There would be a loop for circulation around 153rd and 62nd. Councilman Sterli asked what the reason was for this to committee Councilwoman Davis replied it, was 'for further study. Councilwoman Harris stated again that the public is entitled to attend all committee meetings.. All the information can be gained and presented at that time. Each Member of the.Council has several meetinf he is required to attend. The procedure to refer things to committee is quite proper and quite, author- ized. She stated she, felt it was not right to have Council Members and staff come out frequently to extra meetings that do not need to be scheduled if the matter can go through the Council's regular' channels. Frank Todd stated his. next statements may not get any votes for the approval of his rezone; bul he would take exception to Councilwoman Harris' position that he knew of a committee meeting held last Saturday in Councilman Johanson's house and he stated he was sure he would not have been welcome to attend. *ROLL CALL VOTE: 4 AYES - .GARDNER, DAVIS, HARRIS, JOHANSON; 3 NOS - STERLING, TRAYNOR, SAUL. CARRIED. • OLD BUSINESS Professional services agreement - STR re: "S" Line Bridge. Discussion: Flood control and wetlands study meeting Councilman Johanson asked if Mayor Todd would like t( ask any additional questions about the Saturday meet- ing.. Mayor Todd replied no, he was bringing the poll up to illustrate that not all committee meetings are necessarily held in public or made available to the public. Was this meeting advertised? Councilmai Johanson replied. that committee meetings do not.have to be advertised. Mayor'Todd stated then how is the public going to attend a committee meeting when they do not know you are going to have a committee meetin4 Councilman Johanson stated two constituents of the public were present. Steve Hall, Public Works Director, stated the City h; designated Stevens, Thompson & Runyan as engineers b: Resolution'and the Resolution stated that the contra; tual agreement would follow for approval by the Counn which is what this agreement is. Administration has given its approval, and the City Attorney has review4 it. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY GARDNER, TO AUTHOl IZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE PROFESSIONaL SERVICES AGRE] MENT REGARDING SIGNALIZATION OF THE "S" LINE BRIDGE WITH STEVENS, THOMPSON F, RUNYAN. CARRIED, WITH HARRI: VOTING NO. ' Councilman Gardner announced a meeting of the :•retlan, flood control and Soil Conservation .Service people a Renton City Hall on Thursday, January 9, 1975 at 7:31 P.M. Government officials and members of the public are invited to attend. Mayor Todd asked if a public hearing before the Tukwila City Council is scheduled Planning Commis � , n minutes of the y u1ar Meeting • the basis that deannexation is being considered as • the most logical solution to the matter and, should the deannexation proposal prove to be fruitless, the Commission will again entertain the rezone re- .' quest at no additional fees to the applicant. .. •.REZONE - Todd ;Staff read historical information contained in Staff Considerable focused on access, particularly = westerly extension of South 153rd Street .from 64th ' .Avenue .. Staff : •confirmed : that South 153rd Street is • .. a. private street. Also noted that a westerly extension :. 153rd would be the most' logical manner . to • provide -1 "access to Tracts 9, 10 & 11. Mr. Todd pointed out that 62nd Avenue•is platted. which would provide access v:-..to Tracts 9 & :•:10. and •that •Tract 11 has frontage on Southcenter• Boulevard or. 62nd Avenue;. .therefore he e would not agree to dedication of land along his north • property line to provde•access to other properties ,...:_Staff pointed out that it.had•not intended. to imply the ':: land should be dedicated : by ' Mr. Todd, but only' that • .the extension of 153rd would be the most logical access route.. The question of density was. briefly discussed and `generally centered on the probable height of develop- ' 'rent under - either H - 4., or RMH zoning. . Mr. Todd stated P - 4 zoning would dictate several shOr t. buildings of : ' ,cheap grad: of construction whereas RMH zoning would .induce probably a• ten (lorstory apartment building of a much higher-grade of'. construction. : "Staff recdmmended that any rezone of the property in- clude the requirement that Property Use & Develop- ment Agreement be executed and recorded to run with • the land regarding such matters as the 62nd Avenue right -of -way and future storm drainage.. - 20 December 1974 A"' : 'age 2 . (TACUMENT. l ` 10 Motion by Mr. Lamb to recommend to the City Council. the parcel of land described in the rezone. application -' be rezoned, from R - 3 to RMH, with the.stipulation Planning Copmission Minutes of e Regular Meeting - • • • - • . . • . . • . that the property owner execute a Property Use & Development Agreement to include the following . stipulations: 1) To deed, without cost and without reserva- tion or restriction, to the City of Tukwila, •a strip of land five (5) feet wide along the eastern boundary of the property, to provide • . for the widening of 62nd South to a standard street width of fifty (50) feet. 2) To dedicate, to the City a,ten -(10) foot wide utility *easement along the eastern by Mr. Lamb,: seconded by Mr. the Public Hearing to the . •- ,• • r .. • ..,•]Pt. Southland Corporation-(7-11 Stores) • : .Staff explained the Sigri Cada restricts lie size of • Sign face to 99 square feet•and requires all free-- • . Standing be setback from all-property lines a • ”_distance at least equal to. he overall height of the . .sign. The indicated location of the sign does not conform to the location requirements of the Sign Code. Commission generally agreed the sign could be located so as to comply. • Motion by Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Lamb'and.carried to • approve the sign subject to the following conditions: . Frank Todd, Mayor CITY ©FTUKWLA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the Regular Meeting, 21'November 1974 TTACHME "IT # 11 The regular November meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission was called to order at 8:20 p.m. by Chairman Mettler. Members present were: Mr. Link, Mr. Zepp, Mr. Lamb, Mr. Kirsop and Mr. West. Chairman Mettler called for approval of the minutes of the 24 October meeting. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Link and carried to approve the minutes of 24 October 1974 as pre- . pared. OLD BUSINESS Public Hearing - REZONE - Todd Gary Crutchfield, Staff, read advertisement and displayed map and slides of the subject property. Chairman Mettler opened the Public Hearing at 8:35 p.m. and called for comments from proponents. Gary Crutchfield intro- duced a written statement. by Mr. Todd to the effect that .he • was unable to'attend the Public Hearing due to the City Bud - get hearing scheduled for this evening. No one else present to speak in favor of the request. Chairman Mettler called for opposition comments from the audience. No one was present to speak against the request. Chairman Mettler closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. Staff read Staff report explaining access, utilities and other land use factors. • TACHMENT # 11 Minutes, 21 November 1974 . Page 2 • Commission was generally concerned with the right -of -way of South 153rd Street as well as the Kato rezone and its related conditions regarding an access along the face of the hill to meet 62nd Avenue South. Motion•by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to con tinue the discussion of this matter to the next regular meeting to allow. Staff additional time to research those factors men tioned:as well as allow the Commissioners to observe the subject parcel first-hand. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: A. Fiberchem Addition Staff displayed site plan of proposed loading /unloading dock extension and Mr. Tom Sconzo, architect, further explained the probable future expansion of building area to surround the new dock extension. . Motion by Mr. Zepp, seconded by Mr. Link carried to ap- prove the dock extension with the stipulation that a full height panel be placed on that portion of the dock facing Andover Park East. B. . Project 181 (G. E.) Addition Staff displayed site plan and elevations of proposed addition to G.E. warehouse located on South 180th Street. Mr. Link excused himself from discussion and voting on the matter due to his conflict of interest. . Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to approve the site plan subject to approval of .a. detailed 'landscape plan prior to issuance•of occupancy permit. C. C,C & F (X Project) Staff displayed site plan of proposed buildings to.be located at the northeast corner of Andover Park West and Minkler Boule- vard. Also pointed out the excess of parking provided as well as the probable expansion area of building X -2. Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. West and carried to ap- prove the site plan subject to the following conditions: 1) Elimination of the 34 parking stalls indicated at the southeast corner of the site plan. Staf.e Report fr: TTACHMENT u 12 19 December 1974 • Page 2 . D.* REZONE Todd: The Public Hearing on this matter was conducted and. closed At the, regular November meeting and the matter tabled to allow Staff to supply additional information regarding South 153rd Street and the possibility of some form of access: along the face of the hill to open additional pro- perty lying west of the subject property. The existing portion of South 153rd, between 62nd Avenue South and a point approximately 100:feet west of 64th Avenue South, has. been confirmed to be 'private property by of a thorough review.of legal descriptions obtained at.The King County Department of Assessments. That portion of 62nd.Avenue South which. extends in a.north -south direction between Tracts 11 and 16 is a forty (40) foot right -of -way. .Tract 16, 'commonly referred to as the "Wingate" property, was rezoned'by Ordinance #508 on 5' Feb- ruary 1968 to R -.4 with the requirement.that a Developer's Agreement be executed. The Developer's' Agreement requires dedication of'a five (5) foot. strip of land along the east side of 62nd Avenue • South and a twenty (20) foot strip of':.land along the . north property line of Tract 16 and participation in the improvement of both 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street. • On the other hand, Tract 18, commonly referred to as the "Williams" property, was rezoned to R - 4 by . Ordinance #514 on 18 March.1968, only one month fol- lowing the Wingate rezone. Ordinance #514 simply rezoned the Williams property to R - 4 with absolutely • no conditions or stipulations and, most importantly, void of the dedication requirements reciprocal to . the.Wingate rezone. Although the minutes . of the Public Hearing on the Williams rezone implies considerable discussion centered on access, the discussion focused on the northerly extension of 62nd Avenue South and completely ignored South 153rd Street. With regard to public access to those properties lying westerly of the subject.parcel, the Public Works Director has indicated the westerly extension of South 153rd Street to be tl3e most viable alterna- tive. This option would avoid excessively steep_ grades while providing adequate access to all Pt Tracts 10 & 11. Staff Report 1E • r 4 Pertinent land use factors are reiterated below. 1) DENSITY (Determined on basis of total area of pro- perty & the particular zone's minimum lot area per unit requirement): . 2) HEIGHT: Zone & Size of Unit'. # - Units R - 3 1 & 2 family 18 3 family ' 14 4 family 11 R - 4 1 & 2 family 28 3 family 22, Apartments 113 RMH No bedrooms (studio) 565 1 bedroom 282 2 bedroom 188 R - 3 R - 4 RMH One & one -half .times the : - mean horizontal distance from building to center- line of street. 3) ACCESS: Keeping the aforementioned history of the surrounding rezone conditions and land use implica- tions in mind, 62nd Avenue South and.South 153rd Street should be addressed by way of a Development Agreement. TOPOGRAPHY: The entire site is sloping; generally 140 foot'elevation along the southern portion rising to generally 180 foot elevation along the northern portion, an 11.4 percent slope. A soils report is not available• at this time. ATTACHMENT 0 12 19 December'1974 Page 3 35 feet 45 feet (: Staff Report SURFACE RUNOFF: Approximately 85,000 square feet of impervious surface area will require a drainage sys- tem. An open ditch exists along the west line of 62nd Avenue South which may provide the necessary capacity; however, at such time as the surrounding parcels begin to develop, a storm sewer system should be provided. • SANITARY SEWER: The nearest sanitary'sewer line is an existing 8" line running easterly along the north line of Southcenter Boulevard. The development of this property could either include a) the sanitary sewer along 62nd Avenue to'Southcenter Boulevard and a late -. comer's agreement or b) connect to the Southcenter Boulevard line via the west property line, due south, . which would require two easements. '.. 'r7) WATER: An existing 6 ".water line is located along the west line of 62nd Avenue South and is readily access- ible to the subject property. TTACHMENTV 12 19 December 1974 Page 4 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The entire south face of the Tukwila hill has been designated, for several years, as multiple - family use. Thus, any multiple family classification would be within the confines of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Each land use factor enumerated above deserves analysis and judgement as the synthesis of these factors constitute the .' basis for any recommendation which may evolve from the Commis sion to the City Council. Due to the fact definitive site. plan is not available, Staff recommends that any recommendation to the subject parcel include the requirement that a . Property Use & Development Agreement be entered. into and re- corded to run with land. Such Development Agreement should • address not only the specific development of the subject, parcel but also the effect on anticipated development of surrounding parcels of land. NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING: Sign Appeal (JAFCO) JAFCO, on 23 October 1974, applied for a Sign Permit to authorize the erection of a wall sign to be located on the west face of the warehouse portion of the building. At the time of application, the sign had already been erected. Mr. Fred Burink, of Jafco, explained that the new sign would iden- tify a "warehouse sales" area located nearly 200 feet south of Dear Mr. Traynor: Frank Todd, Mayor CITY or TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Dwayne Traynor, President, City Council City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98067 24 December 1974 2) To dedicate, to the City of Tukwila, a ten (10) foot wide utility easement along the eastern boundary of the property. The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular December meeting held 19 December 1974, conducted a Public Hearing to consider a request by Mr. Frank Todd to rezone, from R - 3 to RMH, a 2.5 acre parcel of property generally lo- cated approximately 300 feet north of Southcenter Boulevard on the west side of 62nd Avenue South. A vicinity map is attached as Exhibit "A" to clarify the location. The Public Hearing was duly advertised as. shown in Exhibit "B" and the application is attached as Exhibit "C ". The related Staff Reports and minutes of the meeting are attached as Exhibit The Planning Commission recommends the City Council rezone the. parcel of land described in the application from R 3 to RMH with the stipulation that the property owner execute a Property Use & Development Agreement to inc1ude the fol- lowing stipulations: 1) To deed, without cost and.without reservation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila, a strip of land five (5) feet wide along the eastern boundary of the property, to provide for the widening of 62nd Avenue South to a standard street width of fifty (50) feet. ry ° rutchf ie Assistant Plan Mr. Dwayne Traynor 24 December 1974 Page 2 Agree to participate in, and not object to, the improvement of said 62nd Avenue South to City of Tukwila standards for a fifty (50) foot wide street, including but not limited to grading, paving, and drainage of said street., Planning Department Staff will be available should you desire any additional information. • GC /sl Encl: as spectful STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING } 55. That the annexed is a true copy of a AFFIDAVIT of PUBLICATION No Kenneth 3obinSOn ,being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says:That he is the Associate Publisher of THE HIGHLINE TIMES, a weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned hos been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of publication at eurion, King County, Washington; that by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and at all tunes mentioned heroin has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication of any advertisement, notice, summons, report, proceedings, or other official document required by law to be published; that said newspaper was published regularly, at least once each week, In the English language, as e newspaper of general circulation in Stirlen, King County, Washington, at the time of application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of said application, and is now and at all times mentioned herein has been so published. Public Notice regarding Notice of Public Hearing as it was published in regular Issues of said newspaper once each week for a •- period of • t'^' ' consecutive weeks, commencing on the u day of ' November , 19_Z� and ending on the 13 day of November , 19 74, both dotes inclusive, and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of said period. That the full amount ; of. the flee charger for the foregoing puolication is the sum of $ I- which amount has been paid in full. at the rate 2•35 7 s;.lu p'bT'ltlrtMf38'terletr for the first insertion and 53T1'3"pertttr'Rl►vd•tterds= .$ 1.95 for each subsequent insertion. of Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 3 th day Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing of = edernl " :pv ., ,, s::. : rj'; r .tr: Public Notice • . FtinMTood, Mayor .1 WI = art OP TUKLA • ','. -� ..{ • 0770 Sovrtsc rrei awe. I's: , i1 s '; =i?UKWI R WASHINGTON 98057 ; t,:: ;PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' y T 4 :!, - tones OF PUSUC HEARING ` :. :1 :': .:• Nr •' 21 November 1174 9 RO Wesel! h 5M hereby given that the TUHWM PUNNING CC/ MISSION will hold a PUBLIC' HEARING mete atove date.at Cep Hall,: I: - • 14475 ..-59111 Ah, Avenue NSIDER a. REQUEST tp.REZONE, from R3 lo RMH. a; i . I prat of prose ty O011111140 located 350 feet oath of sam,anter Boulevard an the wart aide of 62nd Avenue South and legally de- :. scribed ore fatows -7r 'i' 4ry:.• , a• '_T hat portiondTrad ti, tlts binAddmonto : 1 Seattle; axadl^9 lo the plat recorded N•' '^ Vdtm+-10•d Plats :pogo 58, in King .� •.Wa as td• :.: eecinnIng ii a poii oe e. s1* d satd. r . T r a c t 11 wN flat dt lr 15279 feet nor of the . _ . southeast corner thereof; thence contest, • __ • irg north °degrease• west 359.85 =:' .. • . tar northeast comer d said Tract .11: ••: Iten a sash 89 decrees west alcnit . ,_ the northerly' Orr Mensal'300.88 feet:.:, feet: thence 'north 89 08' ess sa 4 nor degrees 52 east'`.. :141.55 feel: thence north 0 degrees OW e .....- west 31L28 feel;thwoe north 89 degrees -• east •1592t•feet-1m Ste po a o. .- • b soiree hg ' ;>r:Itif.. : r : : r .l.:..,.: • •.AO inlereesed porscreVeri.e1 umge to*: amber and be h, f. • a:; ? ? z• , T PutwYrd 8 and 13 NOMembat 197 :rjeet dense irireces'dagi es'S2:•e at - ""• 14t.SSfeel: ttwrice n o degrees Ce'?F west 3828 feet:thence north 89 douses 'A ,75Z. feet: to: • Fcint i _ct.`: 'b ,.� '.. FlF , i . ;- `, .:: s e erStrirest -•., 'a . `�;, , `• tr c:•.. r 4 :. -'•. TuknW Ptam4+4 Csrrgrestion- isrp:«ETt .3 { ., `:. PoNishad. Wand 43 Novemchr- t97_44r` per cGluzu inch r : • APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL TEE FOLLOTI.r.‘.1IG QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY t9 '" ( o 60 Address / VU-e4k Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on 0 - 4 el Sb between /J3 t€ - and /.14/ - z Total square footage in property ' 41.y . .,li /.-0 96'00 cS41--I-7—• - .- • . i / i . . G ,LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROFMTY • • , . t - • - : - - ' 'I '.•::-... :' ' . 0 .. .-. • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. 11O. Receipt No. • 0.05 Filing Date 0 c.- \cV1 4. • City Council Action • Hearing Date ; i (114 • Ordinance No. & Date 7/:///idt9 4M •• Telephone No. C77 4•••••■••••■■• •••.• APPLICATION FO R CHANGE OF • LAND USE CIASSUICATIOIT OR • • /10D.UICATION OF LWD LE REGUIATIONS IN `NE CITY OF TifiallIA Eldsting Zoning Zoning requested ierei :That are the uses you propose to develop on this property? rr • ('Q /Elk' l'il=ter of riermanent off-street paring scaces that will - oe proIrtded on , :sznperty? • :'=;.;--- Number required . . . .• . , . . • NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in •. reclassifying property or modifying regUlations. . Evidence or • ....:• additional inforration you desire to submit' to substantiate your request ray be attached to this sheet. (See Application . Procedure sheet Item No 2 for specific minim= requirements.) 1. That provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any ir effects which may arrise as a result of the nroposed land use. classificatic 1 • A /C4 ci e" . 7?■ I .17/#1 I .1) r 2,. nrorrisions will made to provide for necessary street-widening to City • rinimult stand.ards? I :c (-7 /-f n/c: LX.'LLS" _z__, ' • .. Planning Commission Action , . • . • • • nrovisions will be made for adecuate sewer and water service? /,‘,/ it 6'6 /52 r . 4. An7 other com which the petitioner feels are aporooriate: / C d 7A/ 77,4:- /44 . ?Yd....) JS (7 4 re 4 .7. PI 7. • , .. • • • • Subscribed and .sworn befo thig 47-- � n ... ;L day of :: � 1• � G (c, • ?ia .a, r oc ► ; c iii: Viand. o7.7 uhe Sta cr_: OX. ;rTashingtcn . sidi aT... % i I State ). -• • fi . 'I: / .T: _ . l . :J - "1: • _ .i • • • • • 4; lit (0 (D (7 0 G+ o l0 (D (D (D el ( • ci• ci •- cl L>.it - N 'a• 0 1'i• —] w 11 CD • cf i-1: C, �. . UQ c7 i i� r- tll u t - ; � i ch rd CD CU (0 O 03 (U J . 0 I --rd d • 0 0 ct tr k S . c • :• " 0.0 LD c1- }-f • c 'h'; : j {p. 0 p '•..q `:i :.: p cl ci u..i v] N Sp.,i:': y H O • try •o > .' '': 'd 0 0 •• • }-r, Q.1 P.' E"3 w iu ; • 1J. Q• J CD C� C l ' t 4 � . 4' I i i ).• n t] co OU () p c i -1 , j,W•�Aat . 4 t c { 'w :i j 1 i 0 1: ,91P'0:::...1......‘,...,.,:.'09.. r �; 13 ' • .i p y t� O O J-+ C i' 1 :1 !• '.1:'. 11--4.-4 C ,j LY ci d • �I' .c 1- C Vjf tD O t l O 1 S (0 ( D " tr • r �-' 0) l0 c+ cl- f D •t ' . . • !� - • ^'.i,• N+ U W to J, � �, .- 4. •;• >; 09 H): • 0 O 0 I-J.."it• ; -. �'l�..i v. t U I-+, Si Ij i'i i1 ••;•;:t�; C b - • 0 (D cl• ci 1i • Cu'. • ,. . : N t r i y •11 I1). ' H- • r'' CO + • . (D 1S' . ., ID ID . i Fd Cf : i . . . O H. 0 i•i I-'• •' :. N 1'•': t.:' ;'�. 2 ' . o 1' i o N p, . Otl c) :: 0 0 t1 0 !D , ; t; .2:;.i4,..: ; b. , :; 1-1. .,e IT ;.. ' •: Vii , . • '• : c1 . .... -, I { � J � . . , 7 J t . i.•. C C"1'� • S C • I �,:'1• • n' i H / 1 � 4 iI':i ��y'{ �) :. a . 1 ji • Y . • • WTI G. 3 . . ....... • . • it Map Dept. Reference m•-e-oos. • •• • • � F • • -Y j .,ice ; . L . `\ �� '. . \ ;' \: tit:'•`: ' : ;`: \`\,�i,. �,�\ . \� . \. .. tii :," . ;i;::■ ` •` •:■ `: - •• :.\\••;R:- .;.\••;, — l� '3Dt•Iv • - - � : N3.3 3 QIVd '1Y1V - • 40 1WV t% J • / . . . . l ' aHVd POE( •: .' .. IWn07:)v :,.. • •:7 • • .•;......\-: .•.. v••••:. ss.::.„.,::. .... ,,,,. . . -....• • ". ',...: Asargardsteri d 6 r A ., ; ..\••• • ••• zJ \.. ( 1 ;, \. : ": t ;, t / 6 �,. \\ '�' ; .a..p • Y WILA Minutes : 9 the Regular Meeting, 21 November 1974 The regular November meeting of the'Tukwila Planning Commission" was called. to •order at . p.m. by Chairman Mettler•. - Members.. present: were: Mr. Link, Mr. Zepp, Mr. Lamb, Mr. Kirsop and Mr: West. . Chairman Mettler called for approval of the minutes of 24 October meeting. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Link and.carried . to- approve the minutes of:24 October 1974 as pre- pared. OLD BUSINESS Frank Todd, Mayor 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION , 5 Public Hearing - REZONE - Todd Gary Crutchfield, Staff, read advertisement and displayed map and slides of the subject property. Chairman •Mettler'opened the "Pu'blic Hearing at 8:35 p.m. and called for-comments from pro orients. Gary Crutchfield intro- duced a ..lr it_ ten. sta tein n.. by Mr. Todd" to the effect' that .1'_e was unable to attend the Public Hearing due to , the City Bud - get hearing scheduled for this evening.: No one else'was present to speak in favor of the request. Chairman Mettler called for opposition comments from the audience. No one was present to speak against the request. Chairman Mettler closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. Staff read Staff report explaining access, utilities :and other land use factors. Minutes,. 21 November 1974 Commission was generally concerned with the right -of -way of South.153rd Street as.well as the Kato rezone and its related conditions regarding an access along the face of the hill to meet. 62nd Avenue South. Motion-by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to con tinue'the discussion of-this matter. to the next regular meeting to 'allow: Staff additional time to research those factors men - tioned:as.•well as allow.the Commissioners to observe the subject %.parcel first -hand. BOARDOF`ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: A. .Fiberchem Addition Staffdiiplayed site plan of proposed loading /unloading dock extension -and Mr -Tom Sconzo, architect, further explained the probable future expansion of building area to surround the new.dock extension. Motion ' byMr : Zepp',. seconded by Mr Link • and carried to 'ap- provethe: dock extension with the stipulation that a full height;panel.be placed on that portion of the dock facing AndoverPark East.: B. Project 181 (G.E.) Addition - Staff displayed site plan and elevations of proposed 'addition to G.E ::warehouse'located on'South_'l8Oth Street.. Mr.-Link :excused himself from discussion and voting on 'the matter his conflict. of-interest. . . t._oti on• by: Mr. Kirsop, . seconded by Mr .. . ;Test and carried to aporove ,the si to plan. subject to approval of .a detailed 'landscape. plan p for Co issuance of occupancy permit. • • C. C,C'& F,(X Project) . Staff displayed site plan of proposed buildings to.be located at the northeast corner of Andover Park West and Minkler Boule- vard. Also pointed out the excess of parking provided as well as the probable expansion area of.building X -2. Motion by Mr. Link, seconded .by Mr . West and carried to ap- prove the site plan subject to the conditions: • • 1) .Elimination of the 34 parking stalls indicated at the southeast corner of the site plan Planning Commission Minutes of the Regular Meeting 20 December 1974 Page 2 the basis that deannexation is being considered as the most logical solution to the matter and, should the deannexation proposal prove to be fruitless, the Commission will again entertain the rezone re- quest at no additional fees to the applicant. .. REZONE - Todd Staff read historical information contained in Staff Report regarding surrounding properties, land use :factors and displayed topographical map of the vicin- ity. The Public Hearing had been conducted and closed at the November meeting and the discussion tabled to this meeting to allow the additional information re- quested to be supplied by Staff. rConsiderable discussion focused on access, particularly :. westerly extension of South 153rd Street from 64th ':Avenue. Staff confirmed that South 153rd Street is 'a private street. Also noted that a westerly extension of 153rd would be the most logical manner to provide access to Tracts 9, 10 & 11. Mr. Todd pointed out that 62nd Avenue is platted which would provide access to Tracts 9 &' that Tract 11 has frontage on Southcenter Boulevard or 62nd Avenue; therefore he would not agree to dedication of land along his north 'property line to provide access to other properties. Staff pointed out that it had'not intended to imply the land should be dedicated by Mr. Todd, but only that the extension of 153rd would be the most logical access route. The question of density was briefly discussed and generally centered on the probable height of develop ment under ei ther . R - 4 or RMH zoning. Mr. Todd stated R - 4 zoning would dictate several short. buildings of cheap grade of construction whereas RMH zoning Would. induce probably a ten (l0) story apartment building of a much higher grade of construction.. Staff recommended that any rezone of the property in- clude the requirement that a Property Use & Develop- ment Agreement be executed and recorded to run with the land regarding such matters as the 62nd Avenue right -of -way and future storm drainage.. Motion by Mr. Lamb to recommend to the City Council the parcel of land described in the rezone application• be rezoned, from R - 3 to RMH, with the Stipulation Planning Co Minutes of • NEW BUSINESS SIGN REVIEWS . ission e Regular Meeting C that the property owner execute a Property Use & Development Agreement to include the following stipulations: 1) To deed, without cost and without reserva- tion or restriction, to the City of Tukwila, a strip of land five (5) feet wide along the eastern boundary of the property, to provide for the widening of 62nd Avenue South to a standard street width of fifty (50) feet. 2) To dedicate, to the City a ten (10) foot wide utility easement along the eastern boundary of the property. Agree to participate in, and not object to, the improvement of said 62nd Avenue South to City of Tukwila standards for a fifty foot wide street, including but not limited to grading, paving and draining of said street'. Motion seconded by Mr. Kirsop and carried. PUBLIC HEARING Sign Appeal Staff recommended the Public next regular meeting because sent or represented. Motion Zepp and carried to postpone next regular meeting. . ( 20 December 1974 Page 3 Hearing be postpoined to the the appellents were not pre -.. by Mr. Lamb, seconded by Mx. the Public Hearing to the • A. Southland Corporation (7 -11 Stores) • .Staff explained the Sign Code restricts the size 'of sign face to 99 square feet and requires all free- . standing signs be setback from all- property lines a distance at least equal to the overall height of the sign. The indicated location of the sign does not conform to the location requirements of the Sign Code. Commission generally agreed the sign could be located . so as to comply. Motion by Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Lamb and. carried to approve the sign. subject to the following conditions: • Staff Report (7 19 December 1974 ' Page 2 D. REZONE • Todd: The Public Hearing on this matter , was conducted and closed at the regular November meeting and the matter tabled.to allow Staff to supply additional information regarding South 153rd Street and the possibility of some form of access along the face of the hill to open additional pro - perty lying west of.the subject property. The existing portion of South 153rd, between 62nd Avenue South and a point approximately 100 feet west of 64th Avenue South, has been confirmed to be .private property by .of a thorough review of legal descriptions obtained at..The King County Department of Assessments. ,That portion of 62nd .Avenue South which extends in a ".north -south direction between .Tracts 11 and -. ...is 'a. forty . (40) foot right -of -way. . Tract 16,cornmonly:referred to as the "Wingate" ; ,property, was rezoned, by. Ordinance #508 on 5 Feb ruary to R -.4 with the requirement.that a Developer' s, Agreement'be executed.. The Developer's Agreement requires dedication of a five (5) foot. strip of land along east side of 62nd Avenue South and a twenty (20) strip of:;_land along the .. north property line•of Tract 16 and participation in' the improvement of both 62nd Avenue South and South ' 153rd Street. On the other hand, Tract.18, commonly referred to as the "Williams" property, was rezoned to R - '4.by Ordinance #514 on.18 March.1968, only one month fol- lowing the Wingate rezone. Ordinance #514•simply . rezoned the Williams property to'R - 4 absolutely no conditions. -or stipulations and; most importantly, void of the dedication requirements reciprocal to . the Wingate rezone_ Although the minutes of the Public. Hearing on the Williams rezone implies. considerable discussion centered on access, the discussion focused on the.northerly extension of 62nd Avenue South and completely ignored South.153rd Street. With regard to public access to those properties lying westerly of the subject parcel, the Public Works Director has indicated the westerly extension of South 153rd Street to be the most :viable alterna tive. This option would excessively steep grades while providing adequate access to. all of Tracts 10 & 11. Staff Report Pertinent land use factors are reiterated below. DENSITY (Determined on basis of total area of pro- perty & the particular zone's minimum lot area per unit requirement): HEIGHT: Zone & Size of Unit .: .R• - 3 family. 3 family 4 4•:.family : & 2 family, _ . 3 family Apartments RMH No bedrooms (studio) :565 - 1 bedroom 2 bedroom 19 December 1974.- Page 3 # Units .35 feet 45 feet'' & one -half times the .mean horizontal distance . from building to center-, line of .street:- One 3)' ACCESS: Keeping the aforementioned history of the surrounding rezone conditions and land use implica- tions in mind, 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street should be addressed by way of a Development Agreement. 4) TOPOGRAPHY: The entire site is sloping; generally 140 foot elevation along the southern portion rising to generally 180 foot elevation along the northern portion, an 11.4 percent slope. . A soils report.,.is not available at this time. . - Staff'Report 6) _ SANITARY SEWER: The nearest sanitary sewer line is an existing,8" line running easterly along the north line of Southcenter Boulevard. ..The development of this .,. property'could either .:include a) the sanitary sewer :.along 62nd Avenue to Southcenter Boulevard and a late ; : comer's agreement or . b) , connect . to the Southcenter line via the west property line,: due south, ,which .would require' two easements : ;; WATER: An existing :6" .water .line is ,located along the west line of 62nd Avenue 'South and is readil y access- • ' `ible to the subject property._ COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The entire south face of :the Tukwila hill. has been designated, ' , for.._several . :, as multiple- family. use.. Thus', 'an muitiple- family.classification would be within the confines . 'of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Each land use factor. enumerated'above deserves analysis and judgement as. the synthesis of these factors.constitute•the • basis for any recommendation which.may evolve from the Commis sion to the City Council.. Due to the fact definitive site plan is not available,.Staff that any recommendation to rezone the subject parcel include the 'requirement that a • Property Use & Development Agreement be entered. into and re- corded to run with land_ -Such Development Agreement should. . address'' not only the specific development of the subj ett parcel but also the effect on ' anticipated development.:of. surrounding parcels of land. 5) ',SURFACE RUNOFF: Approximately 85,000 square feet of :impervious surface area will require a drainage sys- -.tem. An open ditch exists along the west line of 62nd Avenue South which may provide the necessary '.capacity; however, at such time as the surrounding ; ;parcels begin to develop, a storm sewer system should be provided. NEW BUSINESS '19 December 1974 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING: Sign Appeal ( JAFCO) JAFCO, on 23 October 1974, applied for a Sign Permit to authorize the erection of a wall sign to be located on the west face of the warehouse portion the 'building. At the time of application, the sign had already been erected'. Mr. Fred Burink, of Jafco, explained that the new sign would ide tify a "warehouse sales" area located nearly 200 feet south of (!/ Planning CommiS. 'n Minutes of the A .l ular Meeting the basis that deannexation is being considered as the most logical solution to the matter and, should the deannexation proposal prove to be fruitless, the Commission will again entertain the rezone re- quest at no additional fees to the applicant. D... REZONE - Todd 20 December 1974 :age 2 . Staff read historical information contained in Staff :Report regarding surrounding properties, land use ; :factors and displayed topographical map of the vicin- .ity. The Public Hearing had been conducted and closed at the November meeting and the discussion tabled to :'this meeting to. allow the. additional information re- ested to be supplied by Staff.. • Considerable discussion focused on access, particularly. :::the westerly. extension of South 153rd Street.from 64th: ' Avenue. • Staff 'confirmed :that South 153rd Street is.. "..:a private street. Also noted that a westerly extension 4 of 153rd would be the most logical manner. to • provide 'access to Tracts 9, 10 & 11. Mr. Todd pointed out. ;;that 62nd Avenue.is platted.which would provide access;., •to Tracts • 9. &:• and .that -Tract 11 has frontage on • Southcenter•Boulevard or .62nd Avenue;. therefore he would not agree to dedication of land along his north' property line to provide.access to other properties.• ' -Staff pointed out that it'had not interided.to imply the .land should be dedicated by Mr. Todd, but .only that • ., the extension of 153rd would be the most logical access route. the question of density was. briefly discussed and .generally centered on the probable height of develop- ment under . either R - ' '? . or R { zoning. Mr. Todd stated. P -- 4 zoning. ' would dictate several short. buildings of: .cheap grade of: construction whereas RMH zoning would. induce probably a ten (10 . apartment building . a much higher grade of Staff recommended that any rezone of the property in- clude the requirement that a Property Use & Develop - ment Agreement be executed and recorded to run with the land regarding such matters as the 62nd Avenue right -of -way and future storm drainage. Motion by Mr. Lamb to recommend to the, : City Council • the parcel of land described 'in the rezone.application be rezoned, from R - 3 to RMH, with the :stipulation Planning C9mmission Minutes of e Regular Meeting 20 December: 1974 Page 3 that the property owner execute a Property Use & Development Agreement to include the following . stipulations: 1) To deed, without cost and without reserva- tion or restriction, to the City of Tukwila, a strip of land five (5) feet wide along the eastern boundary of the property, to provide for the widening of 62nd Avenue South to a standard street width of fifty (50) feet. - 2) To dedicate, to the City a ten (10) foot wide utility easement along the eastern • boundary of the property. . 3) Agree to participate in, and not object the improvement of said 62nd Avenue South to • - City of Tukwila standards for a fifty foot- wide street, including but not limited to • • -.grading, paving and draining of said. street'... Motion seconded by Mr. Kirsop and carried. NEW BUSINESS . HEARING:- Sign Appeal.(JAFC0) . . Staff recommended the Public Hearing be postponed to the , ,•next. regular meeting because the appellents were not pre- •0 represented.. Motion by Mr". Lamb, . seconded by Mr. ...'Zepp and carried to postpone the Public Heating:to the • ,next regular meeting. . • r • SIGN REVIEWS . •Southland Corporation"(7-l1 Stores) . . .Staff explained the Sign Code restricts the site of sign face to 99 square feet. and requires all free- Standing signs be setback from all property lines. a distance at least equal to the overall height of the sign. The indicated location of the sign does not conform to the location requirements of the Sign Code. Commission generally agreed the sign could be located so as to comply. • • Motion by Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Lamb to approve the sign subject to the following conditions: . •:. • Frank Todd, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of the Regular Meeting, 21 November 1974 The regular November meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission was called to order at 8:20 p.m. by Chairman Mettler. Members present were: Mr. Link, Mr. Zepp, Mr. Lamb, Mr. Kirsop and Mr. West. Chairman Mettler called for approval of the minutes of the 24 October meeting. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Link and carried to approve the minutes of 24 October 1974 as pre- pared. OLD BUSINESS Public Hearing - REZONE - Todd Gary Crutchfield, Staff, read advertisement and displayed map and slides of the subject property. Chairman Mettler opened the Public Hearing at 8:35 p.m. and called for comments from proponents. Gary Crutchfield intro- duced a written statement by Mr. Todd to the effect that he ' was unable to attend the Public Hearing due to the City Bud- g et hearing scheduled for this evening. No one else present to speak in favor of the request. Chairman Mettler called for opposition comments from the audience. No one was present to speak against the request. Chairman Mettler closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. Staff read Staff report explaining access, utilities and other land use factors. Minutes, 21 November 1974 . Page 2 . Ima Commission was generally concerned with the right -of -way of South 153rd Street as well as the Kato rezone and its related conditions regarding an access along the face of the hill to meet 62nd Avenue South. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to co f' n- tinue the discussion of this matter to the next regular meeting to allow Staff additional time to research those factors men - tioned as well as allow the Commissioners to observe the subject parcel irst- h an d . BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: A. Fiberchem Addition Staff displayed site plan of proposed loading /unloading dock extension and Mr. Tom Sconzo, architect, further explained the probable future expansion of building area to surround the new dock extension. Motion by Mr. Zepp, seconded by Mr. Link and carried to ap- prove the dock extension with the stipulation that a full height panel be placed on that portion of the dock facing Andover Park East. B. Project 181 (G.E.) Addition Staff displayed site plan and elevations of proposed addition to G.E. warehouse located on South. 180th Street. Mr. Link excused himself from discussion and voting on the matter due to his conflict of interest. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to approve the site plan subject to approval of a detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of occupancy permit. C. C,C & F (X Project) Staff displayed site plan of proposed buildings' to be located at the northeast corner of Andover Park West and Minkler Boule- vard. Also pointed out the excess of parking provided as well as the probable expansion area of building X -2. Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. West and carried to ap- prove the site plan subject to the following conditions: 1) Elimination of the 34 parking stalls indicated at the southeast corner of the site plan. (7 Minutes, 21 November.1974 Page 3 2) Approval of elevations prior to issuance of Building Permit. 3) Approval of detailed landscape plans prior to issuance of, Occupancy Permit. D. Doce's Landscape Plan Staff displayed landscape plan noting the plan states the plantings would be accomplished in phases with the last phase being completed wi Staff assumed this phase • system was due to the cost of providing such an intense land- scape effort of high quality. However, recommended the time period be shortened so as not to exceed 24 months. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Zepp and carried to approve the landscape plan presented with the following stip- ulations: 1) Trees indicated along the street fronts be planted 60 feet on center during Phase I (winter 74 -75) with the remaining number of indicated street tree plantings be accomplished during Phase II (winter 75 -76). Interior plantings indicated for the parking lot, including the Lombardy Poplars, be accomplished during Phase III (winter 76 -77). E. C,C ,& F (M -3) Landscape Plan Staff displayed landscape and irrigation plan recommending approval as this plan is essentially the same landscape theme as that existing at C,C & F Buildings #1, 2 & 3 located im- mediately north of this development. Thus, the proposed landscape plan provides continuity along Andover Park East. Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. West and carried to ap- prove the landscape plan as presented. F. #741 Segale Business Park Staff displayed site plans and elevations, noting the land- scaping indicated should coincide with the Master Landscape Theme recently approved by the Commission. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Link and carried to approve the site plan, elevations and landscaping with the acknowledgement that all landscaping shall coincide with the Master Landscape Theme. . Minutes, 21 November 1974 Commission agreed to conduct the regular December meeting on 19 December 1974. Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. Kirsop and carried to adjourn the regular November meeting. Chairman Mettler adjourned the regular November meeting at 9:45 p.m. Page 4 Herb t Lamb, Sec Tukwila Planning Commission CITY OF TUKWILA Planning Commission OLD BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: Frank Todd, Mayor 6230SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Planning Commission Regular Meeting 21 November 1974 Comprehensive Plan Review: This item of old business, as well as the following two items, have been tabled for some time and likely will be for an additional length of time. A new Associate Planner will probably be hired during the month of December. Zone Revisions: This matter must wait for completion of the Comprehensive Plan Review. Burlington Northern Rezone: The Commission has direc- Staff to investigate the possibility of mutual de- annexation with Renton regarding the common municipal boundary. 'To date, some information has been gathered; however,'it is not detailed enough at this stage.and should be ready for analysis by the Commission at their next regular meeting. Public Hearing - REZONE (Todd).: Mr. Frank Todd has entered into a real estate. contract to purchase ap- proximately 2.5.acres of land, from Ms,. Mitsuyn. Kato, generally located approximately 300 feet north of Southcenter Boulevard on the west ale of 62nd Avenue South. The property, outlined,in re- the attached vicinity map, is approximately 113,6'00 square feet and is zoned R - 3. The rezon? request is to classify the property RMH, The pertinent land use factors are listed as follows. . ( 21 November 1974 Staff Report Page 2 1) Density (Excluding area for circulation, parking j & landscaping) R - 3 One & two family 18 Three family 14 Four family 11. R - 4 One & two family 28 Three family 22 Apartments 113 RMH * No bedrooms 565 One bedroom 282 Two bedrooms 188 2) Sewer: The nearest sanitary sewer line is an existing 8" line running easterly along the north line of Southcenter Boulevard. An easement would be required across two parcels to the south to connect a gravity - flow system. 3,) Water: An existing .6" line is located along the west line of 62nd Avenue South and is 'readily access- ible to the subject property. 4) Access: Adequate access is essentially limited to 62nd Avenue from Southcenter'Boulevard as 62nd Avenue is•not open beyond the north line of the subject pro- perty. South Street, extending westerly from 65th Avenue, ends at the east line of Tract...16.but continues westerly, via.a twenty (20). foot roadway.' over private property, to connect with 6.2nd'Avenue' South near the north line of the subject property. 5) Slope/Topography: The entire site is sloping; 140 foot elevation at the southern portion rising to 180 foot elevation at the north.end, an 11.4 percent slope. 6) Surface runoff: Approximately 85,000 square feet of impervious surface will require' a drainage system. .The nearest storm drainage system is located along the north line of Southcenter Boulevard where there exists an open ditch of sorts. That storm water is eventually contributed to the creek 'located near the 405 freeway. ( C 21 November Staff Report. .Page 3 7) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: The entire south face of the Tukwila hill has been designated, for several years, as ultimate multiple- family use. Thus, the requested reclassification falls within the confines of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The land use factors enumerated above deserve scrutiny as they are the basis for any recommendation which may evolve from the Commission. In any case, Staff recommends that any reclassification of the subject property be accompanied • by the stipulation that a Property Use.and Development Agree- ment be entered into and recorded with the land. Said Agree- ment should include standard;. provisions such as a specific development plan and reversion clause. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: A. Fiberchem Addition: The Andover ACC has required a full- height panel be placed on the front of the dock extension rather than the proposed fence with red- wood slats. Two loading /unloading openings will be included in the panel to facilitate the proposed activity. Staff recommends.approval,subject to com- pliance with the ACC condition requiring the panel. B. Project . 181 Addition: This proposed building addi- tion affects the existing General Electric building located on South 180th' Staff recommends ap- proval subject to approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. C. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes (x Project): Staff recommends approval of site plan subject to the following con- . ditions: 1) Elimination of the 34 parking stalls indicated at the southeast corner of the property. .2) Approval of elevations prior. to issuance of Building Permit. 3) Approval of detailed landscape plan prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. D. Doce's Landscape.Plan: Staff recommends approval • subject to all plantings indicated along street fronts be accomplished prior to issuance of Occu- pancy Permit and the remaining indicated interior plantings be accomplished within two years from date of landscape plan approval.* • Staff Report 21 November'1974 Page 4 E. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes CM 3) Landscape Plan: ' Staff recommends approval as presented. F. #741 Segale Business Park: With the exception of the 24 foot access indicated at the south end of' the project, Staff recommends approval as presented. 'EN -5 • r I .. 4... / `i .1. ss ?r c, I' 15 1 1 Z LL I 1 1 i I I t ..A -I R 1 1 if � 1 \- 33 13Z � 31 ` - 300 S 12 l ' 1 29 2 2T i 1 s - 4 1 18 i 9 I 11 1 12 i. f3' 115 1 , J ' r4r'ir [ 0 + •_• J 1 I I i ' 1' 1 i 1 r 6 1 ( 1 � Ja I I �11L ' - \ �_ _ + J__ . ,I�' ; M;N rLS 1a 1. 1 'I 1 I I S . /54TH 5 1 6 1' 8 1 9 1 10 h ' 1 � .t 1 � P A r i M 1 Nt r :3 A.l2 Tukwila - 40 27 n H 1 2 1 1 ' i 1 1 y M I_ J 4 r �. i /!!! /� / / / /// W . , , ..-- Staff Regort ( ) l9 December 1974 • Page 2 D REZONE - Todd: The Public Hearing on this matter was conducted and closed at the regular November meeting and the matter tabled to allow Staff to supply additional information regarding South 153rd Street and the possibility of some form of access along the face of the hill to open additional pro- perty lying west of the subject property. The existing portion of South 153rd, between 62nd Avenue South and a point approximately 100 feet west of 64th Avenue South, has been confirmed to be private property by of a thorough review of legal descriptions obtained at. The King County Department of Assessments. That portion of 62nd Avenue South which extends in a north -south direction between Tracts 11 and 16 is a forty (40) foot right -of -way. Tract 16, commonly referred to as the "Wingate" property, was rezoned by Ordinance #508 on 5 Feb - ruary 1968 to R - 4 with the requirement that a Developer's Agreement be executed. The Developer's Agreement requires dedication of "a five (5) foot strip of land along the east side of 62nd Avenue South and a twenty (20) foot strip of ':. land along the north property line of Tract 16 and participation in the improvement of both 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street. On the other hand, Tract 18, commonly referred to as .the "Williams" property, was rezoned to R - 4 by Ordinance #514 on 18 March. 1968, only one month fol- lowing the Wingate rezone. Ordinance #514 simply rezoned the Williams property to R - 4 with absolutely no conditions or stipulations and, most importantly, void of the dedication requirements reciprocal to the Wingate rezone. Although the minutes of the Public Hearing on the Williams rezone implies considerable discussion centered on access, the discussion focused on the northerly extension of 62nd Avenue South and completely ignored South 153rd Street. With regard to public access to those properties lying westerly of the subject.parcel, the Public Works Director has indicated the westerly extension of South 153rd Street to be the most viable alterna- tive. This option would avoid excessively steep. grades while providing adequate access to all of Tracts 10 & 11. • Staff Report 2) HEIGHT: R - 3 Pertinent land use factors are reiterated below. 1) DENSITY (Determined on basis of total area of pro- perty & the particular zone's minimum lot area per unit requirement): Zone & Size of Unit'. # Units 1 & 2 family 18 3 family 14 4 family 11 R - 4 1 & 2 family 28 3 family 22., Apartments 113 RMH No bedrooms (studio) 565• 1 bedroom 282 2 bedroom 188 19 December Page 3 R - 3 35 feet R - 4 45 feet RMH One & one- half.times the mean horizontal distance from building to center- line of street. 3) ACCESS: Keeping the afo history of the surrounding rezone conditions and land use implica- tions in mind, 62nd Avenue South and•South 153rd Street should be addressed by way of a Development Agreement. 4) TOPOGRAPHY: The entire site is sloping; generally 140 foot elevation along the southern portion rising to generally 180 foot elevation along the northern portion, an 11.4 percent slope. A soils report is not available at this time. Staff Report 19 December 1974 Page 4 SURFACE RUNOFF: Approximately 85,000 square feet of impervious surface area will require a drainage sys- tem. An open ditch exists along the west line of 62nd Avenue South which may provide the necessary capacity; however, at such time as the surrounding parcels begin to develop, a storm sewer system should be provided. SANITARY SEWER: The nearest sanitary sewer line is an existing 8" line running easterly along the north line of Southcenter Boulevard. The development of this property could either include a) the sanitary sewer along 62nd Avenue to Southcenter Boulevard and a late- comer's agreement or b) connect to the Southcenter Boulevard line via the west property line, due south, which would require two easements. . 7) WATER: An existing 6" water line is located along the • west line of 62nd Avenue South and is readily access- ible to the subject property. 8) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The entire south face of the Tukwila hill has been designated, for several years, as multiple - family use. Thus, any multiple - family classification would be within the confines of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. . Each land use factor enumerated above deserves analysis and judgement as the synthesis of these factors constitute the basis for . any recommendation which may evolve from the Commis= sion to the City Council. Due to the fact definitive site plan is not available, Staff recommends that any recommendation to.rezone the subject parcel include the requirement that a Property Use & Development Agreement be entered into and re- corded to run with land. Such Development Agreement should address not only the specific development of the subject parcel but also the effect on anticipated development of surrounding parcels of land. NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING: Sign Appeal (JAFCO) JAFCO, on 23 October 1974, applied for a Sign Permit to authorize the erection of a wall sign to be located on the west face of the warehouse portion of the building. At the time of application, the sign had already been erected. Mr. Fred Burink, of Jafco, explained that the new sign would iden- tify a "warehouse sales" area located nearly 200. feet south of Staff Report the retail sales area but within the same building and oper- ated.by. the same tenant. In reviewing the sign application, an on -site inspection of the site was made to determine the extent of existing identification. With the exception of the one wall sign for which the application was made, there exists one (1) large pylon sign, double -face; a " JAFCO" sign above the glass entrance to the retail sales area; a painted " JAFCO Southcenter" on the north face of the warehouse portion; and two (2) freestanding "JAFCO Parking" signs located near the two entrance /exit drives to the parking area. ' Section 19.32.140 of The Tukwila Municipal Code states... "(A) Signs on Faces of Buildings. One sign is permitted for each street upon which the property fronts." In consideration of the fact the west face of the building already contained one building face sign and, moreover, the two freestanding "parking" signs located near the east curb of Southcenter Park- way did not conform to the sign code, Staff recommended the Building Official approve the requested sign upon removal of the non - conforming parking signs. Staff so informed Mr. Burink who stated the Jafco management considered the non - conforming parking signs essential to the operation of the facility. Thus, Mr. Ruppert, Tukwila Building Official, denied the application on the basis of Section 19.32.140. Jafco has since properly appealed the denial and the public hearing for such appeal has been duly advertised. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Whereas: 19 December 1974 Page 5 1) The Building Official defines the Jafco building as one (1) building, and 2) There exists at least one (1) wall.sign on the west • face of the Jafco building; and 3) The parking signs do not conform to Title 19 of The Tukwila Municipal Code, and 4) The requested additional wall sign has been erected without benefit of a Sign Permit as required by • Section 19.12.010 of The Tukwila Municipal Codes, and 5) The distance between the two dales areas implies seperate tenants; Therefore, Staff recommends the Planning Commission re- verse the decision of the Building Official's denial ONLY on Staff Report . 19 December '1974 Page 6 the following basis: 1) The two non - conforming parking signs be removed. 2) The Sign Permit fee be doubled in accordance with Section 19.12.110 (TMC). SIGN REVIEWS A. Southland Corporation: The Southland Corporation (7 -11 Stores) has applied for a sign permit to install a freestanding double -face sign to identify the re- cently constructed 7 -11 Store located just north of 58th Avenue on Interurban Avenue. The size limita- tions prescribed by Section 19.32.140 limit the total square footage of both sign faces to a maximum of 99 square feet. Section 19.32.070 requires all freestanding signs to be set back from all property lines a distance at least equal to the overall height of the sign. Thus, Staff recommends the proposed sign be approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The total square footage of all sign faces not exceed 99 square feet. 2) The sign be located in a landscaped base and setback from all'property lines a distance at least equal to the overall height of the sign. B. Gull Service Station: The service station located on. West Valley Highway near Longacres, previously identi- fied as Gulf Oil, is now requesting a permit to change the sign to read Gull. Staff recommends approval with the stipulation the sign be located in a landscape base. C. Woodtape.: The Woodtape building, located on Treck Drive, has requested approval of a.small ground level sign. Staff recommends approval. D. Southcenter Office Building: Don Koll's office building, located just south of Strander Boulevard on Andover Park East, is completed and the requested sign meets The Sign Code and has been approved by The Andover A.C.C. Staff recommends approval. E. Koll Commerce Center: The Koll Commerce Center, lo- cated between Christensen Road and the Overmeyer buildings, has requested approval of two (2) ground - level signs, one to be located on either corner of the driveway entrance so as to identify the Center Staff Report C 19 December 1974 Page 7 to both east and west bound traffic on Strander Boulevard. The proposed signs meet the sign code requirements and Staff recommends approval with the stipulation the signs be setback from the curbs so as to preclude vision obstruction. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (There were no site plans submitted for approval the past month.) OTHER BUSINESS Underground Utilities in Residential Area As the Commission is aware, the City Council adopted . some time ago, a 10 year Capital Improvement Program for ? Residential Underground Utilities which designates certain areas within the residential land area to be undergrounded within the next ten years. This Program was formulated and adopted specifically to further the intent of The Underground Utilities Ordinance which required all utilities in the City to be undergrounded by June 1972. However this Program does not specifically relieve those in the residential area from undergrounding any new or rebuilt overhead facilities. A current and particular case involves the construction of an accessory building which, to be served by Seattle City Light, would require the replacement of an existing pole with a larger one and the overhead line from pole to accessory building. The only variation prescribed by the Code from the undergrounding requirement is the variance procedure.. The variance procedure is not only strict in its criteria for granting variances but the seventy -five dollar application fee is prohibitive to some families and, in con- sideration of the likelihood that within two to ten years their facilities will be undergrounded as prescribed by the Program, many citizens, as well as the Staff, consider the variance requirement and related fees to be unnecessary in some instances. Thus, the Planning Department Staff and Public Works Director respectfully suggest the Commission delegate the authority to waive the underground utility requirement in those instances deemed appropriate by Staff. This authority would be limited to residential land uses and only rebuilds or new minor facilities and would be used in relation to the Capital Improvement Program. / da'ry 'iutchfie Assi tant Plann Others: 1INUTES Tukwila City Council The following items were considered: Community Affairs & Legislative Committee The committee meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Harris at 5:35 P.M., January 8, 1975,:at. Annex Building, 6230 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington. Committee members present: M. Catherine Harris Joanne Davis Jon Sterling Staff members Ole1l-Stokness, Planning Director Richard•Hunt, Recreation Supervisor William Moore, Chairman, Park Commission Mr. Ed Bauch A,. Proposed' ordinance Duties and Powers of the Tukwila Park- Commission. The committee reviewed the letter from the Public Works Director, Mr. Steve Hall, dated December 11, 1974, regarding this proposed ordinance. It was noted that Mr. Hall's letter was written on the basis. of the original draft, rather than the amended ordinance submitted the Council subsequent to the meeting of the Park Commission, at which two :members "of this committee were present. Points•in Mr. Hall's letter were reviewed as follows 1. Third_•paragraph: the word "control" had been changed to "Approve" in the amended ordinance. 2. Fourth paragraph: there was no discussion on this item; it remains the same. .i Fifth paragraph: , concerning the word "construct" :There was lengthy discussion regarding the interpretation :: of this and other words in Section. 5c of proposed ordinance. It was moved by Mr. Sterling, seconded by Mrs... Davis . to change the first paragraph of Section 50 to read "Plan, promote and set policy and standards for the management, construction, development, maintenance and operation, • . either within or without the city limits, parks, playfields, and recreation grounds belonging to or leased by the City of Tukwila; ", and the last sentence be the same. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. • Sixth paragraph: Discussion on interpretation and types of contracts which would be occurring, and included discussion on scheduling of park availability for organized sports and free time activities. Motion by firs. Davis, - seconded by ?Tr. Sterling, to change the words "enter into" to read "Approve or reject ". 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It was concluded by those present that the wording of "for the purpose of conducting a recreation program......" clarified the matter of limiting the meaning of this section to those contracts to further or accomplish a program or • acti . � y, and did not include authd, ' c y to award azy - contract involving construction of a major project. 5. - Seventh paragraph: The wording had been changed from "Director of Parks and Recreation" to "Director of Public - Works and the Recreation Supervisor" in the amended ordi- nance. However, discussion followed on amending the newer language. It was moved by Mrs. Harris, seconded. by Mrs. Davis to insert the words "or their authorized representa tives" between "Supervisor" and "with" in Section 5i, and and adding a period after the word Department. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling, to strike the words "and shall serve as an advisory board to the Supervisor of Park Maintenance and the Recreation Supervisor "; add paragraph . 1 j 1 stating`the Park Commission shall assist the Director of Public Works and the Recreation Supervisor in submitting an annual budget and shall approve,, the annual budget before it is submitted to the City Council; and making the last paragraph 'k'. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. The . committee -wjshes to express its appreciation to Hz . Hall for his comments on this proposed ordinance. - B. Transfer'of Parks funds'in 1974 budget Mr.-Hunt read a letter dated December 26, 1974 from . himself to the City Clerk regarding this subject, and f'urther:explained that the Council had transferred 310,000 in late 1974 from the Contingency Fund to this department for the purpose of installing lights in the main Tukwila Park. This money thus became part of the Current Fund. The project had not been finalized, and the bids awarded by the end of 1974. Thus the unexpended money expired at the end of the year. When the Council formulated the budget for 1975, this program was not refunded. It • eras' determined that the financing for the park righting should be re— committed in 1975 as it is a project previously approved by,' the. Council. It ' *as moved by Mr, Sterling, seconded by Mrs. Harris, to recommend to the Council that ;$17,000 be transferred from the Land Acquisition Fund to the Park Maintenance Fund for the purpose of providing park lighting. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling that the amount of S2,8O5.74 for Operating Supplies and. Repair & Maintenance Fund, which also expired at the end of 1974 due to being unexpended, be referred to the Committee -of -the -Whole for discussion. 2 ,dyes; 1 no; motion carried. C. Proposed ordinance - Amending T.M.C. authorizing Board of Adjust - went to consider variances re: Underground Utilities The discussion centered around the question of whether the proposed ordinance is legally within the scope of duties of the Board of Adjustment, as the Board is primarily concerned with zoning matters. The committekr luested the Planning Direct °; o seek legal opinion concerning this subject. This proposed ordinance was continued to the next committee meeting. • D. Proposed ordinance - Amending T.M.C. authorizing Board of Adjustment to consider appeals from and exceptions to Sign Code. . The committee requested the Planning Director to seek legal advice from Mr. Parker, City Attorney, regarding: Should the sign code be changed from Title 19 in the Tukwila Municipal Code, and incor- porated in Title 18, Zoning Code? This item was continued to the next committee meeting. E. Proposed ordinance - Amending T.N.C. authorizing Planning Director to waive requirements for underground utilities under certain circumstances. The committee recommends "Do Not Pass ", as it feels that granting Staff;legislative or quasi - legislative authority is contrary to • state law. F. Proposed resolution - Accepting petition from residents of Duwamish Allentown area as modified by King County Boundary Review Board. There.was lengthy discussion relating to background of this annexa- tion and general points of accepting or rejecting area as modified. It was moved by Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mrs. Harris, to continue this item to the next committee meeting. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. .Discussion followed as.-to what the next step would be in relation to the Council meeting as a Committee-of-the-Whole. It was moved. by Mrs. Harris, seconded by Er. Sterling, to rescind motion to continue to next committee meeting. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It was moved by Mr. Sterling, seconded by Mrs. Davis to recommend to the Council "Do Not Pass Resolution as Worded ". 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. It was moved by Mrs, Davis, seconded by Mr. Sterling,, to place sub- ject on Committee -of- the -Whole agenda for 1 /13/75 for discussion to determine the direction the council desires to proceed on this matter.. 3 ayes; 0 no's; motion carried. ~. The committee feels that a "Do Not Pass as Worded" action does not kill the subject. Should the Committee - the - Whole take the direction of accepting the area as modified, the.petition will be required to be re- certified, before passing a resolution of acceptance. If sufficient signatures are not on the petition, . and cannot be obtained within 30 days after being returned to the original petitioners, the entire matter is dropped, and no election takes place. . G. Rezone ,request - Frank Todd; from R -3 to RMH The committee recommends to the Council that the appli.aation be _� ___�___ . _ __:_.__... 'emended_ Usk to the Planning Commission for the following: ' /�'s ( 7 (,,4V11 % � A M, Catherine Harris Chairwoman C : Directing the Planning Commission not to consider application further until a document has been submitted . - covering the points contained in Section 18.98.030, a through h of the Tukwila Municipal. Code. Submittal of site plans to indicate proposed development of property building placement,' parking arrangement, land — soaping, and other pertinent information. AL As there may be a legal question as to whether this property can be rezoned without the specified approval of Its. Mitsuye Kato, from whom Mr. Todd is purchasing the property, it is felt her testimony or notarized letter of approval or disapproval is necessary. During the discussion of, this subject, it was pointed out that is is vary difficult to avoid conflict with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrins.. The fact that Mr. Todd,: presently Mayor of this city, did not immediately excuse himself from the council table upon . introduction of this subject at the January 6, 1975 council meeting is questionable to this committee. In addition, this committee feels it is difficult for the city staff, who are . required to prepare reports and an analysis of this request,. to entirely separate the relationship of applicant from that of "the boss ".. It is imknon whether the Chairman of the Planning Commission is _ still : :an employee of Mr. Todd, and whether he participated in the discussion during the Planning Commission public hearing. It would be appropriate that, should that relationship still exist, the Chairman excuse himself from any further consideration of that body • in=order to protect both the applicant and any decision of the Planning Commission, of this particular subject. The committee meeting adjourned at 11:30 P.M. January 8 C TWtrq/. CITY LIMITS CITY OF TUKWILA Vicinity map Todd property (rezone application) January 30, 1975 FIGURE 1 r COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA LEGEND i• �� 01,1 Ah. INDUSTRIAL RETAIL SALES MULTIPLE FAMILY pssil SINGLE FAMILY I PUBLIC Todd property (rezone application) January 30, 1975 FIGURE 2 PASSED BY ORDINANCE 484 15 MAY 1967 I p I Zoning map January 30, 1975 Todd property (rezone application Scale 1" = 200' 7AC. lY� .4.,ta S, 1c- $< FIGURE 3 /52ND ST _. • J C • :,. O • •n • • EN • 3 •� • /U .. 13111. 1-111,1111311 11-5- 15310 15310 . . ; . • tunos 3rINSAY : tiI XV"Idwo", 1rv3W121N'dd emit° o vi el �jrW A 1 1 - :o I J ...Awls n 1 -- -LW Ir C l J. J9 I 1I!iI!I ; =11t►11==i11UM11r llhiIII1111 r.o.i. wee +.e.wA.wnov ✓ —, -- w , = 'i i Iiilllllli . �IIIIHIIli11fi1311 raw' .14.o.P1 Mw.w.. "mom{ ■I •w... 1YM.e- •ar x.a-: � � ii1 V1d 9115 C7304Qbd (10 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON 4 1APTI) ORDINANCE NO • ORDINANCE RE- CLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R -3 ZONING TO RMH ZONING WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA WHEREAS, Frank Todd, the owner of the following described property having petitioned the Planning Commission, requesting re- classification of said property from R -3 zoning to RMH zoning in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, On November 21, 1974, a public hearing on said petition was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Tukwila and the City Council having, received a favorable recommenda- tion from the Planning Commission with respect to the aforementioned petition, and the City Council having held a public hearing on said petition on , and WHEREAS, The City Council finds the requested classifica- tion to be in the best interests and general welfare of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto is hereby classified as RMH in accordance with Ordinance No. 251 of the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the map attached to Exhibit A as illustrative of the property described in Exhibit A. Rezoning to RMH is subject to the following conditions: 1. That the property owner deed to the City of Tukwila, without cost and without reservation or restriction, a strip of land five, feet wide along the easterly boundary of the property to provide for the widening of 62nd Avenue South to a standard street width of 50 feet. • 2. That the property owner deed to the City of Tukwila a ten - foot -wide utility easement along the easterly boundary of the property. 3. That the property owner agree to participate in and not object to the improvement of said 62nd Avenue South to City of Tukwila standards for a 50- foot -wide street, including but not limited to, grading, paving and drainage of said street. 4. That. construction on said property be limited to a building height of six stories, or 76 feet as measured from ground level on the uphill side of the building, said height to include the elevator shaft, if any. The City Clerk is directed to record a copy of this ordinance and map with the County Recorder. Published: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, And approved by the Mayor, at a regular meeting thereof this day of Approved as. to Form: City Attorney • Attest: , 1975. Mayor City Clerk EXHIBIT A. That portion of Tract 11, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Vol. 10 of Plats, p. 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said tract 11, which is 162.79 feet North of the SE corner thereof; thence continuing North 0 °8'W. 359.88 feet to the Northeast corner of said Tract 11; thence S. 89 °52' W. along the northerly line thereof 300.86 feet; thence South 0 °8' E. 398.14 feet; thence North 89 °52' E. 141.65 feet; thence North 0 °8' W. 38.26 feet; thence North 89 °52' E. 159.21 feet to point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION I 4. • • s • rN • Q 5MI T �'•:.'; L..y is • t•� ,ti .• �.yaq! r °-'' c rt.u ,..•„ tiry;�•_ .t•. .I. „ t j •.t • ..so • •,** , ' I� f� • • , 1 • •• 4 �t tr E r' ' � or . ...•- -- T } T � . 1 , e 1t t• •,. I' l . • : CITY OF LA. • WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE RE- CLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R -3 ZONING TO RMH ZONING WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, Frank Todd, the owner of the following des abed property having petitioned the Planning Commission, requesting re- classification of said property from R -3 zoning to RMH zoning in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, On November 21, 1974, a public hearing on said petition was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Tukwila and the City Council having received a fai/orable recommenda- tion from the Planning Commission with respect to the aforementioned petition, a d \ } it d&• �pNn�` ti-t. • Gbw Mta WHEREAS, The City Council finds the requested reclassifica- tion to be in the best interests and general welfare of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto is hereby classified as RMH in accordance with Ordinance No. 251 of the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the map attached to Exhibit A as illustrative of the property described in Exhibit A. Rezoning to RMH is subject to the following conditions: 1. That the developer install all necessary utilities, as required by City ordinance, prior to the issuance of a • building permit. A bond deemed adequate by the Public Service Director may be substituted for the installation of these utili- ties in order to allow the building permit to issue. If the developer actually installs the utilities, he shall be entitled to place a late comers agreement on them. 2. That the property owner enter into a developer's • agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing that he will partici- pate in any local improvement districts on 62nd Avenue South to make improvements to the road or any utilities therein. 3. That the developer divert storm water in such a way that it will not cause damage to the property South of the subject property. 4. That the property owner deed the easterly 5 feet of his property to the City for right -of -way and grant an addi- tional 10 foot easement'for utilities. 5. That if the building permit application submitted on the property does not significantly conform to the site plan submitted with this application, it shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to its issuance. The City Clerk is directed to record a copy of this ordinance and map with the County Recorder. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, And thereof this approved by the Mayor, at a regular meeting day of , 1975. Attest: Mayor City Clerk EXHIBIT A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Tract 11, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Vol. 10 of Plats, p. 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said tract 11, which is 162.79 feet North of the SE corner thereof; thence continuing North 0 °8'W. 359.88 feet to the Northeast corner of said Tract 11; thence S. 89 °52' W. along the northerly line thereof 300.86 feet; thence South 0 °8' E. 398.14 feet; thence North 89 °52' E. 141.65 feet; thence North 0 °8' W. 38.26 feet; thence North 89 °52' E. 159.21 feet to point of beginning. 27 February 1975 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th Avenue South, to CONSIDER a REQUEST to REZONE, from R -3 to RMH, a parcel of property generally located 350 feet north of Southcenter Boulevard on the west side of 62nd. Avenue South and legally, described as follows: That portion of Tract 11, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: n /IF x-3=0,-£ / 8:00 p.m. Beginning at a point on the eastline of said Tract 11 which is 162.79 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence continuing north 0° 8' west 359.88 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract 11; thence south 89 52' west along the northerly line thereof 300.86 feet; thence south 0° 8' east 398.14 feet; thence north 89 52' east 141.65 feet; thence north 0 8' west 38.26 feet; thence north 89 52 east 159.21 feet to the point of beginning. All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. Herbert Lamb, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission Publish in The Highline Times, 12 and 19 February 1975. CITY of TUKWILA The above referenced subject is scheduled for a public hearing again before the Planning Commission during the regular meeting of February 27, 1975. To give you adequate time to review the relevant factors, please find enclosed the environmental assessment, negative declaration and staff report on the subject. The remainder of the packet for the February 27, 1975 meeting will be distributed during the night of the meeting. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department rf SUBJECT: Frank Todd rezone application KMS:cs 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 Attachments: environmental assessment negative declaration of environmental significance staff report Frank Todd, Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 14, 1975 STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING ��aeath _lobloson ,being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: That he is the of THE HIGHLINE TIMES, a weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned has been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of publication at surien, King County, Washington; that by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and at all times mentioned herein has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication of any advertisement, notice, summons, report, proceedings, or other official document required by law to be published; that said newspaper was published regularly, at least once each week, in the English language, as a newspaper of general circulation in Burton, King County, Washington, at the time of application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of said application, and is now and at all times mentioned herein has been so published. That the annexed is a true copy of a ? idle lbtit. loss deT__ 1ialtlta of Toublir arias as it was published in regular issues of said newspaper once each week for a period of t consecutive weeks, commencing on the day of February , 191E. and ending on the_11_day of February , 19 73 , both dates inclusive, and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of said period. of C AFFIDAVIT of PUBLICATION No. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day t n b l ' i 1 i • r y y . 19 L_ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Federal WZ r7a, heN��sn firl Miij ', PLAMIM10'' 001/iM9Np � J " i cHE iil ohNa * 9IoM s 11EOUE$T 1e boll; Nriicitpi estoi.�pte�i l,r : , "01614 iid. a.iand' e 'tYiiirlild ii loliiii'i'S ;. i: ?hRipMOiiblTiicill " tiriiA�en�') ::.11004,10 dFai;psfli*hi W..i irk'( }L ;v`? '9syliNrq'illpsi ianhi`ilra � *sit itswhiohtiti- illa7l,tM irolli_ t' !i ri 1 •nat.6 i(iiit seas re is 1-A. 1 ec sliTiiait th.i n to d s NNN.N ei.oay.wr ssit l411N.fsil; 44*:1 i '0'dq SN _' *ilk Mtn Ji4ri4insdnmii,N .ice+M,; slit Mttiiitb.l ikei'cl " tindid•pes0110.1si n �? Larillk all That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 16.31 which amount has been paid in full, at the rate *2.83 per solim lush dr$ INIM11!lfor the first insertion and 4 i11 for each subsequent insertion. *1.93 per saline lush Applicant - Frank Todd INTRODUCTION: DECLARATION: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 54 Kee 1 Stoknes, Director TMC:KMS:cs CITY OF TUKWILA Planning Department February 4, 1975 STATEMENT OF DECLARATION APPLICATION FOR A REZONE OF A CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF 62ND AVENUE SOUTH AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD FROM R -3 TO RMH. The following is a Statement of Declaration by the undersigned as the Responsible Official pursuant to Title 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. An Environmental Assessment has been completed on the proposed legislation and has been taken into consideration in this Declaration. Based upon the Environmental Assessment as prepared, Section 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code dealing with environmental policy and the guidelines issued by the Washington State Depart- ment of Ecology for the implementation of the State Environ- mental Policy Act, I find that the proposed rezone application from R -3 to. RMH will not have a significant effect upon the environment and therefore a complete Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The City reserves the right to require an additional environ- mental review, and full Environmental Impact Statement if deemed necessary, at such time as a building permit is applied for on the property. ; January 28, 1975 To: Tukwila City Council Members From: Frank Todd Subject: Rezone request comments The City Council Minutes of January 8, 1975 committee meeting inaccurately reflect my official discussion regarding the rezone request. I did not speak to the request from the Council table but from the audience. Please see the Council Minutes of January 6, 1975 meeting approved by a unanimous 7- member vote of the City Council. Chapter 18.98 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (ordinance regarding impact statements) was passed June 15, 1973 by the Council. To this date no, rezone request approval has been subject to an impact statement. For instance, the 47 acre City Light property was rezoned to CM (allowing 300 feet high buildings) without a' statement being required. Mr. Bowen's request for zoning change on Foremost Dairy site did not require a statement; likewise, with the Lamb - Naylor et al rezone. To my knowledge, there is no pro- vision in the Chapter which requires a development plot plan on a rezone request. Mr. Mettler is not my 'employee. Ms. Kato has no legal authority to approve or disapprove a change in zoning of the subject property. The City has on file my affadavit and a copy of the purchase contract regarding ownership of record. Ms. Harris's reference to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine seems appropriate as it relates to the Council rather than the proponant of the rezone. I might call to the attention of the Council that Chapter 18.98 delegates the decisive authority regarding the requirement of an impact statement with the Planning Director. I have not nor did not discuss this request with the Planning Director in a way to unduly influence him as his "boss" as Ms. Harris has suggested in the record of the January 8, 1975 committee meeting. Rezone comments - Cont. Page 2 I request the City Council accept the recommendations to change the zone to imposed by its deliberations and that condition limiting building height to measured from the ground level on the This is 66 feet for the building plus I agree that all other conditions imposed by the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CC fC '`-' " F ank Todd The Council should consider the request on its merits and avoid personal or political considerations. Planning Commission's RIM subject to the restrictions the Council impose a further six (6) stories or 76 feet as uphill side of the building(s). elevator shaft. by ordinance will be met t C ITY CI TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. John Richards Manson Bennett Associates 1411 - Avenue Building Seattle,, Washington 98101 Dear' .John• Frank Todd, Mayor 30 January 1975, Please.:find enclosed a copy of Ordinance 4298 amending • #251 by establishing a zone classification titled RMH and setting forth development restrictions for . said classif ication.• Should you have any questions regarding this matter, don't hesitate to call. Also enclosed is a copy of Ordinance #533, adopted in 1968,.amending #251 as stated in Section 9 of said Ordinance #533. As one can readily see, Section 9 amends the original restrictions only to the extent of . the underlined portions. It is obvious to this office that the original rear yard requirement was inadvertently . deleted by those codifying the amendments. GC /cs Encl: as (2) Sinely, .Gary cutch.fie a .Ass' stant. Plan c CITY OF TUKWILA Dear Mr. Parker: Frank Todd, Mayor 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Wayne Parker City Attorney Puget .Sound National Bank Building Midway, Washington 98031 RE: South 153rd Street 27 January 1975 A portion of South 153rd Street has recently been discovered to be private property .(colored pink on the attached map). It has been the assumption of the City administration over the past four to five years that the street was public right - of -way and thus was maintained by minicipal services. It has only recently been posted as a private street but, to the best of my knowledge, is not and has not been closed to public traffic at any time since its construction sometime around 1969. Our question is whether or not the City may claim the street as a public right -of -way under the law of adverse possession? We would appreciate a reply at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, GC /sl Encl: as l , /Taty chfie d Assi tant Plan { January 22, 1975 Mayor Frank Todd 14446 - 59th South Tukwila, Washington 98168 RE: Rezone request at 62nd Avenue South from R3 to RMH Dear Mayor Todd: 4 This letter is to officially inform you of the City Council's action on your above rezone request. The Council, at their regular meeting of January 20, 1975, at the recommendation of the Community Affairs Committee, referred the matter back to the Planning Commission with the request that the Commission not reconsider the application until the following has been accomplished: 1. That a document be submitted covering the points contained in Section 18.98.030 a - h of the Tukwila Municipal. Code. (Environmental Procedures Section). That site plans be submitted to indicate the proposed development to include' building placement, parking• arrangement, landscaping, and other pertinent informa- tion. 3. They also requested that the testimony or notorized letter of Ms. Mitsoye Kato, the seller of the property, be provided indicating approval or disapproval of the rezone. (Perhaps we should get a legal opinion on this). I would like to get together with yoll at your discretion to . a l e termine ;That steos you wish to take on the a:oplica tion•_ Very truly yours, k ,- . $ as ;6'..:1 Kell Stoknes Planning Director KS /sl cc: Skip Traynor • Wayne Parker Ron Mettler Dan Saul Steve Hall CITY OF. TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of TURWILA _.J .... (6) If seller's title to said real estate is subject to an'existing contract or contracts under which seller is purchasing said real estate, ,or any mortgage or other obligation, which seller is to pay, seller agrees to make such payments in accordance with the terms thereof, and • purchaser a statutory warranty p r's , . taken for public tse, free of encumbrances except. any that may attach after date of closing through any person other' than the seller, and subject to the following:. L * <, ; " =�' • deed to said real estate, excepting any part thereof hereafter AL ESTATE CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made and entertd'lnto this ' "30th " day of Mitsuye Kato, a Single hereinafter called the "seller," and lv l s 1L21. 1 . Todd and Joan A. ,Todd, . his ; wife • :September p of beginning. _• -,� �,, ,,..Sb&tguas. ••af., and_ conditiopa this.contact_ ,a arn follows;,�Th � e_nurchaserice � .•� r� y . la, j . ,c' G. s. s.•1 _•JU•wVr'r- Ui''►111�. ... Lt.� ,.. .- � Li :.;1 . ...,�.. (L� Lt.� -�.�,t i.- r hereinafter called the "purchaser," ..... '• WITNESSETH: That the•seller agrees `to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following Q described real estate, with the appurtenances, in Kin County, State of Washington: CD That portion' of Traci; :' x Interurban t Addition to Seatt e a c cordin to the plat recorded in'Volume of Plats, page 55, in King g Bounty, Washington,. described., asollows: It' i. olu rs::_:y .I•.. Beginning at a point on the eastline of said Tract 11 which is 162.79 feet north of,�thet outheast corner thereof; thence continuing north 0 °8 west °359.$8 -feet:to the northeast corner of said Tract 11; ;$ thence south 89 °52 west along'the northerly line thereof 300.86 feet; - thence south .0 °08 t east 398.14 feet; thence . north 89 °52'. east 141.65 feet; thence north 0 °081 west 38.26 feet; thence north 89 °52.! - ' : east 159.21 feet to :. the Dint ... 1� llwiluti,,,; 0, ' ; :s. ��t `t '�p� t 21, • .4 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ss• COUNTY OF KING c AFFIDAVIT of PUBLICATION No Kenneth Robinson ,being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: That he is the Associate Publisher of THE HIGHLINE TIMES, a weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned has been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of publication at eurien, King County, Washington; that by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and at all times mentioned herein has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication of any advertisement, notice, summons, report, proceedings or other official document required by taw to be published; that said newspaper . was published regularly, at least once each week, in the English language, as a newspaper of general circulation in Stirlen, King County, Washington, at the time of application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of said application, and Is now and at all times mentioned herein has been so published. That the annexed is a true copy of a Public Notice regarding Notice of Public Hearing 'AI{;YSUMis . as it was published in regular issues of said newspaper once each week for a'';' . 1M1bs11.L5niq aTlyliHi1i11151p:11Ajj_ period of tWO consecutive weeks, commencing on the 6 day of on the 13 day of I`iottetabe C , 19 74, both dates inclusive, and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of sold period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of S 15.00 which amount has been paid in full, at the rate $2.83 per 81$0:70 1ihY1lllfiftlffirP PtftTor the first insertion and $11,5•VOThemmdl•weMs $1 per for each subsequent insertion. of November Subscribed and sworn to before me this November , 19 _ and ending 13th day ,19 74 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Tday column Column 411101 . i'`�gNts?. pl/1 Asillw,esusl, b tJOt110Eq 1i s ;;ff<'QUEBT�ts'f1EZOI0,. i0. i1,Ni/t,Yad .1,, iir *d ttio01doxe n 13101 SalrlosiMN eais10d :0ttesiS111 : NM'tl d'Aiiii* did I1 jMY ; eOlbldil'11111' "i < fO1 aTfiE1( t�iliAslsnAdaonSi., 11sdis ; soseslA 30p01 ivy,, itoConla ;N1/he•61,N6 q; 1 1;w11e11Ytl1T7iNNna ma1Iis , ` 1olsri.stasliwilsrslM �ssiolaonliu't � igns lf0dsp:snrw11tAliSetatb 1/0111153 1.111/ 01.10,.1531 11 k drnes'smAht11dlg ssezteAjlbiQ 'Ilr 30111 Ai1t; PdteuI Cf..si,t.N:fy mitiiieNro 1010105 55.01111 tM inch inch NOT . OPEN ;. • 62ND Wil Co. 3 The Company has not surveyed the premises described in 3-975 7 0 below is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the j assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show ALL highways, roads and ease- adjoining or affecting said premises. 11 T OE` /Q a N • Map Dept. Reference M- s 3-975970 ----,---\.. ' --- --'-■,_'-.......___ -- ::::■. ,.... ,..,,........„ ---,.... -..... '...--,,.... /., s`-... - -.......7 .._ s.....,: -- -...\.....:\< - 7' .c-1 '-..,.. -.-......„......-----..___ ..... --- -■ -- -.. -- 7.:z.,,, •telf... ." -•••--. "'"---... ... ,........ . ':77:-.......,... -,-'..' ..--.. --- •,. -**-...- - s--..." --- ..---- X- ‘ • -•"-. • - • ":.■ .1 •• --.::::-.. •---:-..,.. •-•.... "1..-=7 .. ..Z . > • .."'" -.......... -.........___ ... ■ ..L........ ..__ ........ _ _ ---. .. 7 -....._ ....... --.... ...",...:...›.......--. ''.--- s. "-...„ ..,, - 79.0 C • ; f / i r. .... ..- r , .--- -......_ .... 1“ ■ ../....7„...y- )e06 :A ,., .. '. :- II? b :4 : :.y' , ;k� 1 ,.,: r j . . : 2i'• :t :k'T. • .: .. -. .. '�• :f• :•r: :1�' ! " ^!'i, ,('. Sit rc :11.,!..„.: : ` y..,t(• . �L' . •.`v:i :,'1TX'' GF3..t vl ,.. , . , • ♦,�Y. f ..')' L*4•!.i G ' i • \•1.. 3.zi ..a1 : 1 ..c.w': :-..S Y.4 r ; • • i. •^'.r �+ , -i �i t a, ' , V: • •: ..` ic`. .. 4 ,17:! ;= (6) If s.4 is title to said real estate a subject to an ex sting contract or cone -st. uuuc,. wufau x11. u fru...+.�..••., —___ ` . or an m ort . pay, ' 4 j. y ;zsxe or other obG lion .which seller is to ?ra seller agrees to make such payments in accordance with the terms thereof, and' ` - ypop default, the purtzrer shall have the rii 't to make any payments necessary to remove the ilPfault, and any payments so made shall. 'P.: be applied to the payments next falling da seller under this contract. .... �... • (7) The seller ay ppoa. receiving ( ?ayment of the purchase • price and interest in the. .anner• above specified, to execute • and • deliver to purchaser a . statutory warranty • ;d0:- . . • ••- -• . •,. • • deed to said real estate, excepting any part tb of hereafter ^•• taken for public cse,' free of enaimbrances except any that may attach after date of closing through any person oth r •t • • seller, and subject to the fofowin -• hy.• •;�'; - - • . .. s'!C i '� -14: .... _ , . _ ..;;. • '7--.''' . .Si- 1.:• , -:''''• fats w :.. • -Jrf4i .`:c _, .. , ti3:•iK • s:? ?� - :r: S;,iSbFi; ti ` " t, ^ • f i t h ; � r 1., 4 - - - + i. ^.i. a. : .., -. .:•f :. . : •i �i: 9Jj" f r . � f - ,i' : :+�1 :. t' :' :.S.r :� ;� :•., •2 ::[ • G:'' • CO madea entertii".l '•- 30th' "' ' day of S 197 . : . � ;k , ;sill - -• x `.- • ': % > _:. t: : betwser itsu a - rat ; 'a •si n g le: _ : :.. Y g W oman , • . ,; : r f +;.c ,.�•. ;. • _.. r t p a r 1. .7.'.:''c :u: f':, :. q y . > : r f ,:f..• .. - . j- . 1.:!,-.1...:1•••-•i r . .t r,; ..: .�',/ ' t. ; yet.. \.+ –..L:: _lL.. �� :::4�:.: • :A .v bi.'.:r ...5 ': . hereinafter called the "seller," and i4r . T odd • and • Joan A - his'wife , _ • `iii ', � , _ :: 1 : ..9 �ry- �-, t�• , t.• r r. ; , r s, t.i,. - {. ? . ..t,1.�:Y. ,�,rJ . YfTk `.•7 : ,,..e4-r!f, !1Fe tt :r1i'th v. .: 4:, t:... r. ::.••. : :.5 • ,-. • • SU4 .iil :ti: :1. .t : :wt . r : r• ' i'= is�'' 1•. 1 ':�..r...'ik n.(.rUj'�Yt'•�•C�I1 �J :•M�'�•• • • c.., •. •=.7•4'..; hereinafter called the "purr - haler "` `' - • WITNFSSETH: That therseller agrees to sell to• the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following described • real .estate, with he- appuitenances , in r ".: ` $ing ' County. State of Washington: That' portion • of Tract :.11,.• .,Interurban• Addition %to ' Seattle ; '. according uo the plat recorded ini. : Volume..,l0•••of,Plats, page . 55, . in Ling ounty, Washington,. described:;as.foll'owsi.: :• ' Beginning •at •a 'point on•: :the eastline of ' said Tract ll which is • ` -- . 162.79 feet north: of (southeast corner thereof; thence • continuing •• north 0 °8 : west ::359 :88. feet:.to the northeast - corner of said. • Tract • 11; "i thence south 89 °52 ' - west along 'the northerly line thereof ' 300.86 `I feet; - thence south.0 °08e east. 398.14 .feet;. :..•thence .north. X39 °52t. east 1¢1 feet; 'thence 0 °08! west 38.26 feet; .thence north 89952•!;,x. east .. ' j • 159., 21 feet to : the • point• :of beginning. / :� ,�‘\,`��•� ; r , 111., S i . . • •rq•a'. ;•- 'c,.':,:1'. r, ;: ,: : :v Y t , j , , \\ . <S ]- fY f tf ; b ,,� .� r;,, :_. _ :, .. :._. +. .- %' ` �.,'.. .i ,, 'r • " i • ' :.net :; s ,' .r . ►. / -j� - . -- _ teaa:.alrrLcnndittow ht• ooat , sact.,23 , foll ori ce is tt - ^ ' . - ��� . t +y -- . ✓ . . AFFIDAVIT Form C I, 7 J k 'T , being , duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers, herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my In maledge and belief. (Signature of Contract: Purchaser or owner) r ‘a Mailing A: dress C��GGc�t (City) (Telephone) State) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. Receipt No. APPLICATION FOR CIANGE OF LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF LAND USE REGULATIONS III THE CITY OF TUKWILA 0 03 - 7 Name / )/ betwe en Filing Date � , � 0 G." D Lkr Y 14' City Council Action Hearing Date s !U; ;uei•ritafl,' Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOIL, VING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: Address / V����J -x' Telephone No. < 7 / "�'.2 ;I -- Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on 6 1 7L CC elve So /.J �? :� - . and /•,.f Total square footage in LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY it Existing Zoning A - 3 Zoning requested A: 15/. What are the uses you propose to develop on this property' Form B Planning Commission Action Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on property? ('[)tl L7 l Number required NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.) 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any imcorn • tible effects which may arrise as a result of the proposed land use classificatic 2 . What provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City minimum standards? t1 /v 3. What provisions will. be made for adequate sewer and water .Service? >twk' w�Ta/S: __.L�)!( r� e� tim_ ��i %.G r ?r &6:64(_ , f- rients trhich the petitioner feels are appropriate: 4. Any other co _ h r ti 7 /S ((se-- /.3 7-,-,J r' /T /n/ - /I /.S re r is 1 r. a+ ....„ " " .• • - . „ • • • /1' •L: (02. M6 ODD, FOI.11 • • .• • „ • „ • , • • " • • • "- „• • • • • • 3 i 160 144 PROPOZE.0 • • 'T P L-NNJ 4 11..6• -/`• ' - I II I I I I 111111111 I II II 111111 I I I I I I II 111111111111111 Ill 111 110111111111 1 • FLEXII3LE RULER -302 AW n.•••■■,— • 24x , IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 91: SZ 1 /Z CZ EP. i O GI 91 GI 91 St 1 71 'CI Z1 it pi. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111114111111111111111111i111111111i1111111111111111II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111111 ••■•■•••.••••■•••••M**.m... SECTION A-A rf4c 4eci 4 ere y yd MANSON BENNETT & ASSOCIATES DIX 1.441 p.o,at1 ZUZ INSICCONI. 1111=1731. 5SAAIIINOTON' eiO INV . 'NO a I eroD1? REZONE F rt,YY• M F- 75— I — R q/ F R ECEIVE FEB 0 3 1975 CITY OF TUKWILA