Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 76-20-R - GORDON KLOPPEL - SKY VIEW ACRES REZONEmf 76-20-r south 164th street and south 166th street east of 51st avenue south kloppel REZONE skyview acres REZONE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 29 June 1976 1 (: Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA Mr. Gordon Kloppel 16444 - 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Kloppel: 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of 24 June 1976, conducted a public hearing to consider your request to rezone a 3.25 acre parcel situated at the above address from R -1 -9.6 to R- 1 -7.2. The Commission, after consideration of the Findings presented by the Plan- ning Department and public input received during the public hearing, unani- mously voted to deny the rezone request based on the following conclusions: 1. The surrounding residential vicinity is developed to a density of an approximate average of 9,600 square foot lot size. 2. The R -1 -7.2 classification is normally reserved for relatively level residential areas where the natural land form does not inhibit or limit how development can be placed. 3. The poor drainage characteristics of the site (induced by the soil characteristics in conjunction with the slope and obvious in consider- ation of the nature of the site's vegetative cover and its proximity to known areas of springs) present a development problem which becomes more serious as density increases. 4. The R -1 -9.6 classification will help retain some of the'open space quality of the area which the Natural Environment and Open Space Elements of the emerging Comprehensive Plan promote. 5. The terrain in this area will not properly accept the proposed density increase. You as applicant maintain the right to file a petition for review by the City Council of the Commission's decision if filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this correspondence. Should you have any questions please contact this office at 242 -2177. Sincer4 y, yam, Gary Crutchfield Assistant /Planner GC /cw • Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PL ANN I NG CONN I SS I ON Minutes of the Meeting, 24 June 1976. Mr 7 b --2o --- The regular June meeting of the Tukwila. Planning Commission was called to order at 8:10 P.M. by Chairman Mettler with Commissioners Richards, Bowen, Bohrer, West and Kirsop present. Kjell Stoknes, Fred Satterstrom and Gary Crutchfield represented the Planning Department. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bohrer and carried to approve the minutes of the 27 May and 10 June meetings as prepared. Mr. Crutchfield noted the Planning Department had received a letter requesting that page 2 of the 22 April minutes be amended to delete the reference to McCann Development Company as owner of the Southcenter West Industrial Park. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. Bohrer and carried to amend the minutes of the 22 April 1976 meeting per the written request. (A copy of that letter is attached to these minutes.) CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report informing the Commission of recent Council actions regarding planning- related matters. FILL PERMIT APPLICATION - SEATTLE CITY LIGHT Mr. Satterstrom read the Staff Report explaining that water quality samples of the pond were in the process of being obtained. Read letter from Gordon Vickery, Seattle City Light, requesting the Commission's action be deferred until the regular July meeting and waiving the 30 -day requirement of Section 18.32.040 TMC. Chairman Mettler made a specific request that the City Attorney be present at the regular July meeting. Motion by Mr. Bohrer, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to delay action on this matter until the regular July meeting. Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 24 June 1976 Due to the large number of people in attendance for the proposed hearing under NEW BUSINESS, motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Kirsop and carried to amend the agenda to consider Item VA next. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONE from R -1 -9.6 to R -1 -7.2 (Kloppel) Mr. Crutchfield read the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Staff Report and explained location of the site and the nature of the proposal. Chairman Mettler opened the Public Hearing at 8:32 P.M. Mr. Gordon Kloppel, 16444 - 51st Avenue South, stated his intention to develop a good single- family home project and that a storm drainage system is being devised by his engineers which will satisfy the reservations expressed in the Staff Report regarding storm run -off. Mr. Richard LaShance, 16426 - 51st Avenue South, asked what kind of lot lay -out is proposed. Mr. Crutchfield displayed a preliminary plat drawing which depicted 14 lots at 7200 square feet each. Mr. Kloppel explained the layout and utilities stating very few trees would be removed. Mr. George Leeds, 5207 South 164th, stated his desire to retain as much green area as possible and felt that lots of less than 10,000 square feet are undesirable. Mrs. Kloppel, 16444 - 51st Avenue South, stated the woods as they are now con- stitute a fire hazard and there currently is inadequate fire protection. Mr. LaShance asked what kind of homes would be built. Mr. Kloppel stated he intends to develop split -level homes of.about 12- 14,000 square feet worth about $40,000 each. Mrs. Lois Pack, 5149 South 164th, stated her rear yard is very near the north boundary of the site and it is very wet and soggy ground. Mr. Farrel Tacket, 5317 South 164th, stated the property values of smaller lots would decrease the value of. the existing larger lots and that 9600 is more desir- able. Mrs. Pack stated there is a lot of undeveloped land in this immediate area and if this site is developed at 7200 then the rest of the undeveloped land would develop likewise. Mrs. Ruth Leeds, 5207 South 164th, stated 9600 lots are small enough and it is important to maintain the 9600 lot size as minimum. Mr. LaShance asked what kind of control does the City have on types of buildings and the development in general. Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Crutchfield stated the City has no real control on the type of building be it a rambler, split -level or tri- level. Noted also that in all candor many of the trees would be removed to accomodate the street, utilities, driveways, building and lawn areas. Mr. Stoknes noted the Planning Commission could place some restriction on the character of the development through the platting process. Mr. LaShance asked what control the City has on the value of the homes. Mr. Stoknes confirmed that as the reason. Page 3 24 June 1976 Mr. Stoknes explained that is completely out of the City's realm of authority. There being no further audience comments Chairman Mettler closed the public hearing at 8:50 P.M. Mr. Bohrer asked what beneficial gains were to be realized by 7200 zoning. Mr. Kloppel stated 3 additional lots could be developed within the proposed plat than could be at 9600 zoning and the economics are obvious. Motion by Mr. Bowen and seconded by Mr. Richards that based on the conclusions of the Staff Report and the conclusion that the terrain in this area will not properly accept the proposed density increase and that R -1 -9.6 zoning should be maintained, the Commission deny the rezone request. Motion carried unanimously. RECESSED PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Land Use Maps Chairman Mettler explained this was a continuation of the public hearing conducted on 27 May and 10 June and requested that comments not be repetitive of the comments received previously. Mr. Satterstrom read the Staff Report suggesting the Commission, at such time as the entire audience has had the opportunity to comment, close the public hearing, deliberate in public work sessions and conduct another public hearing before any final action is taken by the Commission. Concensus of all Commissioners to follow the suggested procedure. Mr. Stoknes read letters from Southcenter and Burlington Northern stating opposi- tion to proposed changes. Mr. Satterstrom read letters from McCann Development Corporation and Cabot, Cabot & Forbes stating their opposition to proposed changes. Mr. Wes Benefiel, 5111 South 163rd Place, asked if lack of appropriate access was the reason for proposing a residential designation on the Rendering Works property. Mr. Benefiel stated he is working on gaining access via 42nd Avenue and South 124th Street. Mr. Peter Buck, attorney representing Segale Business Park, pointed out the Staff proposed legend does not conform to the policies in that policies refer to 'light' ■ Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 24 June 1976 industry and the Staff map simply indicates 'industry'. Stated many of the people here would not oppose use of the Committee maps and suggested the Com- mission do so. Mr. James Davenport, attorney representing Tri -Land Corporation, has a long- term investment in Tukwila and feels somewhat distressed about the Staff - proposed map. The flow chart indicates nowhere the Staff's modification of the Committee - proposed map and feels such action is a breach of faith with Committee members. Mr. Jack Christopherson of CH2M Hill, representing Seattle City Light, emphasized the importance of citizen involvement and suggested working from the Committee - proposed maps. Mr. Leonard Steiner, 13239 N.E. 100th, Kirkland, referred to the Shoreline Act, SEPA, Alternatives for Washington and the fact that thousands of citizens through- out the State had expressed a need to preserve open space values and agricultural lands. Emphasized the needs of the people throughout the region and State are paramount to the individual property owner. Ms. Carol Coe, Seattle City Light, urged the Commission to work from the committee - proposed maps. Stated Seattle City Light highly regards citizen involvement. Mr. Norman Seethoff, Allied Stores Corporation, stated his understanding of the Staff - proposed map would make the existing Bon Marche Distribution Center a non- conforming use. Mr. Ken Long, Benaroya Company, referred to the hillside above Southcenter Parkway being designated single - family. Stated the commercial designation along Southcenter Parkway should extend all the way up the hill to the freeway which is the best natural barrier. Ms. Ann Mack, 9428 S.E. 54th Mercer Island, referred to agricultural land in the Valley and supports Staff's recommendation to maintain agricultural lands. Stated 35- 40% of the nation's food production i accomplished on lands impacted by urban- ization. If every community isolated itself from agricultural needs there would be little food production. Mr. Iry Iverson, 4007 - 36th S.W., stated residential designations on the hillsides along Southcenter Parkway are economically unfeasible. Charles Baker, 19641 S.E. 272nd, Executive Director of the Tukwila Industrial Council, stated the existing Comprehensive Plan has worked very well and sees no need for change. Mr. Buck again referred to the inconsistency in the Staff proposal regarding the deletion of industrial adjectives. Mr. Bruce Solly, manager of Segale Business Park, referred to the triangular shaped 6.5 acres noting the current flexibility. The Staff - proposed map takes that flexibility away. There is no market for professional offices. Such a • designation would greatly restrict the marketability of the land and, in turn, be inverse condemnation. Potential City revenue loss if the property is not designated retail approximates $45,000 annually. In addition to that, real property taxes would be less. Feels the citizens of Tukwila want more retail activity. Planning Commission Page 5 Minutes 24 June 1976 Mr. Christopherson reiterated Mr. Solly's assertions noting marketing analysis on the regional distribution of professional offices. With the amount of office area indicated in the Staff's proposal much of it may never develop. Most office uses desire to locate near supportive uses such as airports and hospitals. Staff pro- posals should be justified with research and analysis. Considerable discussion ensued as to when to close the public hearing and to begin work sessions. Motion by Mr. Bohrer and seconded by Mr. Richards to recess the public hearing until 8:00 P.M., Thursday, 8 July 1976 to accept any further comments. Motion carried with Mr. Kirsop voting NO. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Landscape Plan - Steak & Ale Restaurant Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report noting the Riverzone is not planted in accor- dance with the Shoreline Program. Also noted the London Plane trees indicated along the periphery have been deleted and none of the planting areas, except the Riverzone, are irrigated in any manner. Commissioners discussed importance of maintaining an aesthetic appearance at the primary entrance into the commercial /industrial complex. Also discussed the main- tenance of the large cottonwood near the river. Motion by Mr. Kirsop, seconded by Mr. West and carried to approve the plan subject to the following "conditions: 1. The periphery of the site, specifically along Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway, be planted with a complimentary tree species no more than thirty (30) feet on center. 2. The Riverzone be planted in accordance with the Shoreline Master Program. 3. All planting areas be irrigated in an acceptable manner. 4. All the above conditions be specifically approved by the Planning Depart- ment prior to occupancy of the building. 5. If the large cottonwood tree is in fact on this property, that it be retained. There being no further business to discuss, motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Richards and carried to adjourn the meeting. Chairman Mettler adjourned the regular meeting at 11:15 P.M. `L. Minutes ,prepared by: Harts West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission Gary ` ield Assistant lanner ,. yJ"?fti ]!`rs`'ssrl` ? � L i f T$�k;. ��rtL"�.:� ` 4 r ; z �` . '+itiy, �3. a f � I , CEILING $INTER1 5 E 11!� U PL a , ANA IL 16 June 1976 City of Tukwila Planning Commission 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 22 April 1976 Gentlemen: On 22 April 1976, Donald Hagerty, Harold D. Burley and I attended the Planning Commission Meeting. It has been brought to our attention that there is an inaccuracy in the Planning Commission Minutes of the 22 April 1976 meeting. If this inaccuracy had been brought to our attention prior to your following meeting, we.would have appeared to ask correction. However, unfortunately, the meeting minutes were not mailed to us by the Planning Commission. Please refer to the second item on page 2 of the above referenced minutes, "BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, BUILDING ALTERATION - McCann Project #186 ". Please refer to the third sentence, "Mr. William Cramer, Ceiling Interior Supply Systems (applicant), stated that the McCann Company stilled owned all the property and had given their approval when Ceiling Interior had leased the buildings ". My statement at the Planning Commission meeting was in response to a question raised as to the advisability of securing per- mission from the adjacent property owners in regards to the requests under consideration. My statement was that the owner of the building we were renting also owned the two buildings to the west and that we had received • prior written approval to make the building alterations under consideration prior to entering into lease agreement on the premises. We hereby respectfully request that appropriate action be taken to ammend the Planning Commission Minutes of 22 April 1976 to reflect the above correction. If necessary, we would be happy to attend the next meeting of the planning commission and make formal request that the prior minutes be so,ammended. Thank you for your past and present considerations. Sincerely yours, "1 / (( (I '� r,���t -� •H.4 Director HWC:jj t S :iM";i.f Y . .. •1'Ihi t . . 'S . I NGT0 . aT ( 1 � CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 24 June 1976 • 8:00' P.M. AGENDA ITEM V A : PUBLIC HEARING REZONE (Kloppel) ) REQUEST: REZONE from R -1 -9.6 to R -1 -7.2 APPLICANT: Gordon Kloppel, 16444 - 51st Avenue South LOCATION: Between South 164th and South 166th, East of 51st Ave. So. AREA: 3.25 Acres ZONING: R -1 -9.6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Single - Family Residential FINDINGS: 1. The subject site is 3.25 acres situated approximately 150 feet east of 51st Avenue South. 2. The entire site is currently zoned for single- family residential use with a minimum lot size requirement of 9600 square feet. 3. The site has a moderate or rolling slope, ranging generally from 5-15%, with certain small portions exceeding a 15% gradient. (SEE, Map 1 -4, Data Inventory and attached Exhibits "A ", "B" and "C ".) 4. The slopes on this site generally .are :stable when modified (SEE Map 1 -3, Data Inventory). 5. The till soils found on this site generally have high bearing capacity, slight erosion hazard increasing moderate on slopes exceeding 15 %, fair to poor internal drainage (hardpanoccurs close to ground surface restricting downward percolation); and fair arability. (SEE, Figure 1 -8, Data Inventory) 6. The site is heavily wooded with alders, willows', and cottonwoods, tree species indicative of wet, poorly drained areas. (SEE, Map 1 -7, Data Inventory) 7. The Public Works Department regards the storm run -off and associated drainage needs as a serious development problem. (SEE, Exhibit "D ") Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 24 June 1976 8. This site is in close proximity to areas of known springs. (SEE, Map 1 -5, Data Inventory) 9. Val -Vue Sewer District, under their U.L.I.D. #6, installed a gravity flow sewage disposal system in this area in 1973. 10. Water service is located along 51st Avenue South and is managed by Water District #75. 11. The entire land area lying south of South 160th Street and west•of Interstate 5 and within the corporate boundaries has been classified R -1 -9.6 since passage of Ordinance #315 in January 1961.' 12. The residential neighborhood lying outside the Tukwila corporate limtis is classified by King County as RS -7200. (minimum lot size 7,200 square feet.) 13. The Pleasant Heights Addition #2, located immediately north of the subject site and along South 164th Street, was platted in 1959 through King County at an average lot size of 9,600 square feet. 14. Tukwila Terrace, located along South 163rd Place, was platted in 1962 through the City of Tukwila with a minimum lot size of 9,600 square feet. CONCLUSIONS: 1. All utilities, with the exception of storm drainage are available. 2. The surrounding residential vicinity is developed to a density of an approximate average of 9,600 square foot lot size. 3. The R -1 -7.2 classification is normally reserved for relatively level residential areas where the natural land form does not inhibit or limit how development can be placed. 4. The poor drainage characteristics of-the site (induced by the soil characteristics in conjunction with the slope and :obvious in consider- ation of the nature of the site'.s vegetative cover 'and its proximity to known areas of springs) present a'development problem which becomes more serious as density increases. 5. The R -1 -9.6 classification will help retain some of the open space quality of the area which the Natural Environment and Open Space Elements of the emerging Comprehensive Plan promote. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission adopt the Findings and Conclusions of this Staff Report and deny the rezone request. \\ '. I. N\ \I \ t '..... 0 f �,� 'j Vl x 3 30.5 S l03vL I t vs ; A 1 1 pm 1 0 p A 11 11 al t � t ? II.' I; 0.0 T J '5.5 x 4- s ► 273.01 t • ) fort , ; , 'ti . f — l:(:- r_ - � . /r--t . , �.. J . r i i I , r� . t r4. . r —1 --r rr ; ! r r r.;; i t ; �- 1 . /L'',_a _ - � •_ I J r L:7-1;1 �, 7 ail/ 1 t f � /J i � I . ••. ' ..{ r7 ,i�;�.r� r . • :i l ' ~ �i l "��iLj 1-{ �=A L � '1 � 11 , 1 /r / I /I►i/1 / +��`� \1'`k.t1 l �_ / — r! \ L : . X _ . {.1 Ir ` r = - � T � 1 1 I t I ii / ! '1.1 "/! • ! i!f' I d 095 I 1 COS .0S 101 = - :A 172-2 NQ1,1 CO/ C W 2 2 lj r PUBLIC& NORKB DEPARTME, ;T 8830 Bouthoenter Boulevard' " Tukwila, Washington 98087 telephone C 208 3 242.-2177 June 18, 1976 n ' 2 INTER- OFFICE MEMO 0 J To: Gary Crutchfield, Planning Dept. _ 5 From: Dick Williams, Public Works Dept. m • Subject: Sky View Acres - Storm Run -off se if Regarding the above- referenced plat, it is my understanding that t the property slopes in a West to East direction. With this in mind CL and considering the amount of additional storm run -off that will be • generated by the development (i.e., paving, roof areas, etc.).and noting that no provision has been made for piping the run -off to W 54th Ave. So., I would recommend that an engineering study be com- a pleted before approval of the plat. The study should address itself w to not only the problem of piping the storm run -off to 54th Ave. So. e but also to the possible overloading of the existing storm system on 54th Ave. So. i iii f As you may or may not know, 54th Ave. So. has a history of slippage and slide problems and with this in mind, I feel that every precaution Q should be taken in order to minimize the impact of the additional run - 3 off on this very unstable area. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask. cc: Steven M. Hall, Public Works Director •- Gene.Isler, Field Superintendent Dick Williams, Engineering Technician • • 24' June •1976 • (date) • • • CIT`( OF TUKWILA Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • 8:00 P.M. (time) Notice is. hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMPMISS will conduct a . PUBLIC HEARING on the above date, at City Hall; 14475 - 59th Avenue South, t� consider REZONE, from R -1 -9.6 to . R- 1 --7.2; on a parcel of .property generally located between South 164th Street and South 166th Street and east of 51st Avenue South.. All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. • • Hans B. West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission • • For further' information contact Gary Crutchfield at . 242-2177. 9 and 16 June 1976 •Notary, Pubi i cF. n and for the tat 0. :W4shingtori;;residing a AFFIDAVIT I, Gary Crutchfield , being duly sworn, hereby declare that all legal notice requirements of Title 18, TMC have been ful- filled and a notice has been mailed to each of the following addresses. 5106 S 166th King County Building & Land Use Division 5215 S 164th 5213 S 164th 5207 S 164th 5201 S 164th 5149 S 164th 5143 S 164th 5137 S 164th 5129 S 164th 5121 S 164th 5109 S 164th 5103 S 164th 16444 - 51st S 16446 - 51st S 16452 - 51st S 16460 - 51st S 16604 - 51st S 16606 - 51st S 4848 S 166th 16445 - 51st S 16431 - 51st S 16427 - 51st S 16415 — 51st S 4927 S 164th 16603 - 53rd S Val -Vue Sewer District Water District #75 Subsc ibed and sworn to before me this /7- day of 1976. Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING V.P.C. Form No. 87 T une. , 19....76 ss. a.r.a...C.a mn.a g.n.e being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that .s be.. is the of THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a Nl?. l.C.e...o f...P.U.l1 lrf; xi.n�r., Pinrilk .t . ng.. CC::>?its.::.1.or. - 1az.o.ne as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of t7,40 consecutive issues, commencing on the 9 day of june ,19 ....7.6 and ending the ...16.. day of a.ul'1e ,19.... "r6, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.. ..9.•.1a which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. l chief. .0 e.rk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16 day of edipit, 44 . cel( Notary Public in and for t State of Waj tngton, residing at Kent, Kin : County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. South,1 41fK d`Souhi p61h S treeCe `ot <riAlI ri ertteted (; djOt3ppe b'i ti ertl ila `Planning: Comm iilon,L., r`t'ryrith r1(n!orr atiofl cO R i&t1, 4d a . 242= 7 4�::4'� I }ied.iii'ttje ettopp., a►id ):6,{ 978 r, • OFrICE MEMO CITY or TUKWILA TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ,OC� } [( � 12,E.7-01 a, • 3M Le. wu .t CA/ uk2te., awe. 11A4 vU1L. a � � Lc c av�t ' G•VL'�l`YC.t� �Y vy c . r - 1 5eC4 v e- 0 f The- 4( v t. 5 i fit' 01/4 i avr�� Got�.t.po ✓�. 4-c,4 1� L. S t /Lc 1 . - 1 co. °A 6 t o c, i vv `f ins G„ v.c I v/nit/LA t j e+ a v A (DV Wt_' C..d, '{or Q. 5oi f5 AAA 6i ?e.3-" o t( U.. /, tA.,1,d 1,) (o GE euxx n, T( em , t G S e,_04 7 to me e+ro 5 I Ova i5 (r b kept. w ■k.A cUi) 0 jet) 'Moat • r4t,t, -J•wo of ws wt,c�ke e.,1 em -6 i •w\ t uti o y\ cyF 14t e.. -f e r ra l vti. )t.4, ofAcz r to 4j vik44.1' ki 6 v v , *04 5 AAA G1 �� r, 42 ttM c,e6 uV i to cc (.1. r• vtitk.cf .cr Atveitt 7W 0 ove,e) ■ 0 f'L _ 7 ot, "� f Lo'r ek i!� A �t.S.Vtl. • o f %'rj f - G6 • GL � a - at. J, V r Gr \� -rC,t,�� ' "1~(•CC.�� ML,, "{ "a • bG• YGmzv M • 7 a A I t '7 i - k • v t t,t o 'f' ` t •k.e., v r~ e.1 f-i o N w 14- �. V Q i 6 vtAo 0 1bt ex VV A/ . Eve ect £'� c 7-t •vt i t,Iq k f •-1 o 10 - ii,L Yes o 'f - h/.€2 t-vPi - Jalcean a ('{ . �J l KU! •e.a.sc<+t a() re c-v c -a.-NO vt Jo e 5 / I vt,fr-__ it - `h2... 6 (.4.-1, 4) i ' eGi 0 f ? r I ) c. r - - e i 0_ . - ( - kc M c." 1\4 i L.k�vr H I c -i j 11 •I ✓1. G. v e- t. 5 c et 1 A---c-C--(t. • To Y �7 ,& i I�- a r M ,� l 4 ``J -6t . (4 , , G,, v 4 11 �tv�.ct..L...v t1 5 e. c.--i I j • 4l.•�� 15 �tp June 15, 1976 (- VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT P. O. BOX 6063 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 RIVERTON HEIGHTS CH 2 -3236 City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98067 Planning Department Attn: Gary Crutchfield Subject: Rezone on a parcel of property generally located between S. 164th and South 166th and East of 51st Ave. So. The above generally described parcel of property at present is unavailable to Sanitary Sewer service. Sanitary Sewer could be provided in the near future under the District's owner extension program. Should you require any additional information, please contact this office. TJM:de Sincerely yours, 7'fr-46wii0= T. J. Mate lick Manager 9 June 1976 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 Water District #75 19863 - 28th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98188 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the. Tukwila Planning Commission will consider a request for rezone in accordance with the attached public notice. Should you have any questions or desire to submit written comments please contact me on or before Thursday, 17 June 1976. Sincerely, Gary CrutcAfield' Assistant Planner GC /cw Encl: as PLANNING DEPARTMENT • 24'June 1976 (date) • 1. • • CITY OF TU KWI LA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • 8:00 P.M. (time) Notice is hereby given that the'Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION • will .conduct a.PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall; 14475 - 59th Avenue South, to consider a REZONE, from R -1 -9.6 to R- 1 -7.2, on a parcel of property generally located between South 164th Street and South 166th Street and east of 51st Avenue South. • Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. Hans B. West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at . 242-2177. 9 and 16 June 1976 9 June 1976 Val -Vue Sewer District. 14816 Military Road South Seattle, Washington 98168 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the Tukwila Planning Commission will consider a request for rezone in accordance with the attached public notice. Should you have any questions or desire to submit written comments please contact me on or before Thursday, 17 June 1976. Sincere Gar 'Crutc ield Assistant 'lanner GC /cw Encl: as Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT . . 24' June 1976 (date) • • • CITY OF TUKIIILA • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila • PLANNING COMMISSION . will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall; 14475 - 59th. Avenue South, to consider a REZONE, from R -1 -9.6 to R- 1 -7.2; on a parcel of property generally located between South.164th Street and South 166th Street and east of 51st Avenue South. All interested persons are encouraged to'appear and be heard. Hans B. West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at . 242 -2177. Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on 9 and 16 June 1976 9 June 1976 Gentlemen: Gary Crut9I field Assi stan Planner GC /cw Encl: as Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY or TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Building & Land Development 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98104 Please be advised that the Tukwila Planning Commission will consider a request for rezone in accordance with the attached public notice. Should you have any questions or desire to submit written comments please contact me on or before Thursday, 17 June 1976. Sincer • 24' June 1976 (date) • Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION • will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date, at City Hall, 14475 - 59th . Avenue South, to consider a REZONE, from R -1 -9.6 to R- 1 -7.2, on a parcel of .property generally located between South 164th Street and South 166th Street and east of 51st Avenue South. • CITY OF TUKWILA • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on 8:00 P.M. (time) • All inter'ested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at . 242-2177. Hans B.' West, Secretary Tukwila Planning Commission 9 and 16 June 1976 8 June 1976 Sincerely, Encl: as c Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY of TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner GC /cw PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dear Resident:. Please find attached a copy of a Public Notice informing you, as a nearby resident, of a public hearing to be conducted at 8:00 P.M., Thursday, 24 June 1976 by the Tukwila Planning Commission to consider a request to rezone a parcel of property described in the notice attached hereto from R -1 -9.6 to R-1-7.2. If granted, the rezone would allow the construction of single-family residences on lots of 7,200 square feet rather than the current requirement of 9,600 square feet. The Planning Department will accept written comments prior to the meeting and will submit them as exhibits at the hearing should you desire not to attend.: Should you desire any further information, please contact me at at your convenience. Seasonal High Water Table X X Flood Hazard Low Shear Strength Slope Slippage Potential Compressibility Organic Soil Shrink Swell Potential . Pollution Potential Coarse Textured Subsoil Slow Permeability in Subsoil X Very Gravelly Depth to Bedrock, 20 -40" SOILS WORKSHEET FILE NO.: NAME: SOIL TYPE: MAP NO.: Degree of Limitation: Reason for Limitation: Soil Related Comments: Recommendatio Essent (1 MF 76 -20 -R KLOPPEL, Go AmC 10 s : Other Considerations: rdon PLAN( t'° DEPARTMENT CURRENT DENSITY: 9600 S.F. REQUESTED DENSITY: 7200 S.F. Foundation for low Buildings MODERATE Shallow Excava- tions SEVERE Septic Tank Filter Fields SEVERE This soil has a consolidated glacial till (hardpan) at 24 -40" that is essentially impervious to water; hence the cause of the seasonal high water table. This problem could be mitigated by the installation of subsurface drains on the "uphill" side of the proposed structures. 1. Install streets, utilities and storm drains prior to construction. ( 2. Design and management of surface drainage systems should be planned prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All water should be conveyed to a safe, non - erosive outlet. ( 3. Design and management of sub - surface drainage system should be planned prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All water should be conveyed to a safe n o n - e r o s i v e outlet. ( i 4 . Avoid soil disturbance during rainy season. 5. Seeding, mulching, netting and mechanical forms of protection can be used to stabilize exposed soils. ( 6. Brush and small trees should be chipped for erosion controlling mulch material. 7. Vegetation which is not required to be removed because of construction should be retained to help reduce soil erosion or stabilize slopes. S. Avoid over -the -slope dumping of soil, vegetative waste or debris. 9. Denuded ground should be protected as soon as construction allows, but not later than October 1. 10. All road designs should utilize available soils information. 11. All stockpiles of excavated soil should have erosion protection at all times. 12. An explanation of what is to be done with excavated soil should accompany the final plan. SCS Soils BnSimm Date r 76. r o = . = , ( ; A il : _ r- - � ( >� I / _ I l 1 / /A : = _ l ► _ f � , ,�-� � � bi rte/ I I fJI(il( iII Ill, /irfti /% f 1 . ry �.., i ' I I. i ,u e i i i 1 .fl_i _ _ I / I 1 I . I i 1 i i i I . n 1 n 1 1 1 l 1 I I n 1 I l I I 1./ 1 u 1 I I - I • I I 1 .% ' --• (: I iI f1:: llllll /1 /! /il r %I 111/lWd/Mrh CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other • forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation proposals. BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant ' 2. Address and phone of Applicant: 3. Project name: Sly l✓ XCW 4. Project location: /444.2%---0 5 /S' 'tip', 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: 7-v /-xigT ras ,.•smv,44.4- 1 4. -/-' 1€ zgevo Sri i v/h J 6. Estimated completion date: l iLr /177 aR 4,6 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: Aft, . ' /. YID • 52 8.' What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. • YES V NO (b) King County Hydrolics Permit 'YES. . NO1/ (c) Building permit • YES NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES • NOV (e) Sewer hook up permit . • • YES V'. NO (f) Sign permit . YES VNO (g) Water hook up permit YES NO (h) Storm water system permit YES 1 (i) Curb cut permit YES k " NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NOV (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NOI-/ • (1) Other 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: /Q2) 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department 11. /Accepted by agency on: 6 0 - SF by: d. Crack4e. (to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist) • C ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (b) Disruptions, displacements - or overcovering of the soils: (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? • (f) Changes in deposition or ' erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed. of •the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? : Explanatio � W � uv cor►\s YU L 6 Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? •(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: • -1- (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) Yes Maybe No Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub- structures: Water. Will the Losai result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? t J` (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face.'water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through .direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seep- age of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances .into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies ?' • • -2- C Yes Maybe No Explanation: AJi dc{ttitifelt tucdease 4ce ruN.r6 ' 1 *cal a-Ffec)t Proy'T tact /Ike Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro -flora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (b) (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a,barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No Explanation: ,vC3 /Nb /V /e) o JA/ 4 �(/ V L.C,,eo,. 5 / .7 7 7" S Afa . 7 �e�,�tr(c�t�� / Fauna.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep - tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? A4 'V Explanation: 7745 c :'t ,&ie -J r 4) 441 / ,a(1/J E W // -4)c-/ ' • ' "'r /N Tt S Noise.. Will the proposal increase exist • ing noise levels? Exp1anation: ,/Ne3t-E — ; " -r 'S✓st :ZSO , S /4)/4 /�b1 /‚� cs= /'/s� 77 ACe" A 7`' �f 1 r • 7 ' 7 k7s?7, s"14:3e4E -,001/1-7 807 rot"-y- / -3- Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: . (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- .. ural resource? Explanation:. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: -4- Yes Maybe No V Explanation: - ,,r)t otQ / 5 /,G: ./ 2ST . Wlu /77©/ L h j a - 'A/ !N / 7M' ii p/7 ,N q C : 1I x 7S', Aitr' ' '2r ��}- -• �/ Land Use. W i l l the proposal result in the /� alteration of the present or planned land -2 use of an area? Explanation: 14/1yQc "eA 75 ,t vS /7 Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth 2 rate of the human population of an area? . Explanation: ;/ " '. -7 /.11 . C!e>7 Housing. Will the proposal affect existing x housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? _ Explanation: 6614,0 wl Ceuta GNU lAX 14 1 04E 5-F• t4.4044 & l eA•St 6E m' 14 L ods Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? Yes 'Maybe No (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, • or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne or air traffic? Explanation: .l✓EA 1 14411454-00/ 00 0/ 4r -sue 7 7 V 1.--14 =1 t V 25 c4 4? ztiv / ve 5 i- c 4 / 7- //V 4- "E. QA . 67 sr i 'v i s; ' Local Services. Will the have an ' .effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other 'governmental services? Explanation: G1�i 1,111 Wag 7v +iii MW Act, AA/ lam/ 7 f , k) .dvra✓ 7 be /L elkm s ue.. =f ,5 7 AA =M4/ ms s Energy Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: i% %ZiS/.2(dlZ A � �= � z s / j /6 r� -/ ., J�"' // V • 0{ Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the follow- ing utilities:, /. (a) Power or natural gas? 10 (b) .Communications systems? V (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? 1■ (f) Solid waste and disposal ? - • G''` ' 1 Y A/o provision slonK til �D �e'wu�yc' te7a £ 1,444 p esa , Explanation; , : �� " -- V /C' , a � - /= ��I - Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard.or. potential . health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open • to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 1.7 Explanation: /,V »r 7f / W& h 4-4:r -- 777L/C ,.tt 7F-ig 7b /7f1 /-5,itA / ��, 6 - s7 &7 , j . /,a © ,/ 43O /e -,cD /AJ S/7 /7 °�,.�/2 t,t ©rte 7-771-=-5-76- U., z. '' Explanation: Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: /C&) c/ 77 f :S AL v545* / /mod � ' -• , l s , Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi- cant . increase in city revenues? Ex lanation: 7 .�?40A1 /L W464 c' � �'d p ALL/ �,�C' ;� / 2 /� t,Mw,QtILes w .�.►.,t lz4.. utis��►�,����t' uP• ' . Employment. Will the proposal create a significant amount of new jobs? Explanation: /./d, '°` /,-5:77A)66 .t£c k 'V Z "'lath . p we, .i Yes Maybe • Ho V CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I hereby certify that the information furnished in this environmental checklist sheet is true and accurate to the best. of my knowledge. Project Name: gnature and Title (/ /z=c(} 4e CS Project Address: / ,Z— `ag5 , 157 S/ 54. BELOW THIS LINE FOR' CITY USE ONLY ACTION .BY OTHER' DEPARTMENTS: CITY OF TUKWIL'1 I. Date of Review: Building .by: CO or ( -) Planning 6'1 -16 by: /' �p (_. u.+ck4 tc( ( +) or Engineering • by: CO or ( -) Police by: CO or (-) Fire by:: ( +) or ( -) Agency review of environmental checklist determined. that: ':.The project is exempt by definition. y The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental. affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ -. :: mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit More specific information is needed to determine impact. Date ature and. Tit e of Responsible Official 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: 'by Jude eczi C " iC- �2�L' 4e Z� --�� 2 / 9' 9 Date =Check one D to . by Staff Person Letter, 'phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and. City of Tukwila. Ordinance No.. 759. (+) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be'done. (• -). Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not'be'done; AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAID •.BALANCE • �`:•. DUE:.:,. 8K808 Rada rm ACCOUNT HOW CASH •.• . CHECK MONEY • ORDER :.`:.. PAID RECEIPT' Date ';5' 197 5309 Received From Address '/ ' YV'7 .5r1 cL- z 7 / €- i Dollars $100; «y For 0 r.c ( 2-/-:9 , 6 /'-/- 7 -) Sky -View Acres; Boundary legal: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter section 26, township 23 north, range 4 east,W.V., in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said sub - division, at a n -, i nt which is N 0 W 956.78 feet from the southwest corner thereof ;thence continuing N 0°14 W 50.01 feet: thence S;, 89 E 182 feet: thence N 0 ° 14 1 13" W 139.89 feet; thence S 89 E 1_65 ft. thence S 0°14 E 80.00 feet; thence S 89 E 317 feet; thence S 0 °14'13" E 266.67 feet: thence N 89 °21'31" W. 384 feet; thence N 0 ° 14'13" W 88.89 feet; thence N 89 ° 21'31" W 75 feet; thence N 0°14 W 67.89 feet; thence N 89 ° 21 1 31" W. 205 feet to the point of beginning. Except the west 30 feet for road. tdm R. P. McPCiddy & Associates LANG SLIRVEVINGI & CIVIL EIVCSIIVEERINIC 27060 164th . S. E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 AREA CODE 206 - UL - 2 -1590 June 4, 1976 ELLUROMETER CONTROL. SURVEYING LAND SURVEYING AND PLANNING AFFIDAVIT I P being dUly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner bf the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this - 7 day of kotry.Public in and for the State of Washington, residingat Fora C : ature of C. t aser or owner 3 7 ."_.`5 • • (Nailing Address) (City) (State). 2 G (Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. Receipt No. Filing Date Hearing Date APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF L \ND USE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA Planning Commission Action City Council Action Ordinance No. & ce APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL l ¢ FOIy_O.TING C U STIONS NEATLY AND ACCURA`Ic LY: Name /L Property Petitioned for rezoning is between KeP- '1' Add ress_ 5 Telephone No. located on S �""� '�. 1-)ii Total square footage in property 1 - 2 3 , C 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY s" Existing Zonanl` —�� Zoning requested' What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Number of Form B permanent off—street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 4 ,11,-, . or,: O Number required / / / iC) NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.) 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any incompatible effects which may arrise as a result of the proposed land use classificatic 4, 4' 4g4i.41.1t..e4i 2. 1, a t provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City minim mi standards? �" - .r.. , =». . J . � C . P/ 77 k /1j 3. What provisions will be made for adequate sewer and water service? 'S'. 1j4J Are- 4. Any other corc which the petitioner feels are appropriate: m % -zo • R eerweal 6 VA 4 s ((aLo ATG4SI K LOPPL R�ZOP'J E 5K'-ViJ MR6 • if KoE A . L . S c A H ARCHITECTS ( S ) . 1 STANDARD 0 5 455 FORM 30' 300-284 I IS VHS INCH 1 • EA S A 1 7 G N 0 : YOL. $3 Al 7/ - 2 LrGAL • , • • , /: !'/,' TS Di if 7 % . UNRECORDED Thnt portiOn of the southwest nunrter Of the northwest,quarter of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 Fest, W.M., City • . • Tukwila, County of King, State of Wasingtpn, Clescribe4 as follows: 13eginnirig at a noint on the West line of said sub-divisian,lat point which As N 0°14 *956,78 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; Thence continuing, N'O°14'13"W 50.01 feet; Thence S 89 • 21`31"r 182 feet; Thence N014'13" ld 139.89 feet; Thence' 8921' 31"F 165 feet; Thence S 0°•14.'13"F. 80.00 - feet; Thence S 89°21 317 feet; Thence S 0°14 266:67 feet; Thence N M°21 feet; Thence N 0°14'13"W R.R9 feet, Thence 69°21.131 75. feet; Thence N,0°14'13"W 67.89 feet;.. The.nee,N R9. 31"W 2.05.,feet:tO the point of 'eginning. ; , " • , F.YCFPT the West 30 feet for rod. SKY-VIEW ACRES • ' , : „. , • NuMP,FIZ NtnOtR or PROPO8rsi.,ZONFI." •ATtR .:PPitr1•0*,!•ia.;47 livarli•; ; ; TFUTHONP- - •s' ; • ::411.1.00.nc Public ; ; • .; friDll 5 .6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 Awsnoripv= l Erron 1 37: . • , „ • • . • . • sourll CENTER VICINITY MAP SCALE: 4in=lmi • • nelF 1(9 -20-R GORDY KLOPPEL 18444-51ST AVE $O. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 R. P. WI( IDDY AND ASSOCIATES 27060-164TH S. E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 DATE APPROVED SY 6 - 9-7 6 4 SKY-VIEW ACRES 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT 1.$1WEJOJ THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAt DOCUMENT r 1 \ SCALE DRAWN DV REVISED PH: 631-2880 DRAWING NUMBER 300-284 KR A. MADE IN U.S.A. r U) 14; 30' LrGAL DFFCRI.P : . F.V.E4SANT VOL. 43 PG. 7/ (65 r 1 UNRECORDED • SKY-VIEW ACRES la I SA 1E:4 HE: i TE Nump,,r7R!. or LOT tpTF.: ... NJ!PR or ..: 3 25 iIuFrr That portion of the couthwest quarter of the northwest quarter of 5ec4ion 26, Township 23 North, Rang f; 4 raat, W.N.,.in the City of I Tu wila, County.of King, State of Wasington, described follows: . . . . . Beginning. at a Taint on the West line of said sub-divisiOn, at n point which - 1410010°14113"W. 956.78 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; Thence continuine N 0 50.01 feet; Thence S 89' • 21'31"r 182 Thence N '0°14'13"W 139.89 feet; Thence F 89°21' 31"F 165 feet; Thence S 0°14'13"r' 80.00' feet; ThenCe •S• . 89°21'3.1"r. HI 317 feet; T ,S V14'1•3"E 266.67 ,feet.; Thence .N S°21 ':31."W: 384, feet ;.• Thence .N 0°14' 1.3"W 88.89;feet ; Thence N 89.°21'31"14:: 7.5 feet.;, Thence N 0°14'13"W 67..89, feet; 'Thence N R9°21.' 205 feet to the Ootnt of hee,inning..• , •' A , . . , . . FYCITPT the 30 feet for road. ,•! pRopQ T1T) • . • • . . . . . .beta,ched. . cinittict ! • . • Water T)lstrict No, 75 school. s No ..491'.'" ' 0 qv sm. 711 sr SOUTH CENTER VICINITY MAP SCALE: 4in=lmi nelf 1(0-Zo—R GORDY KLOPPEL /6444-5/ST AVE SO. SEATTLE, -WASHINGTON 98188 R. P. McK IDDY AND ASSOCIATES 27060-164TH S. E. KENT WASHINGTON 980.31 DATE APPROVED 6L 9-7:6 • SCALE D e•scALtFLot.. Cacc.K.-s . Ada eTIoNf L lk>C67-1M6-tret 1 Re 1 a Ai cei-Ster OriLiTY t- low 1■Da I u ,p604 -Cd, emoigagstari _fro I it1 re re-vn. ri - oft 2 SKY-VIEW ACRES DRAWN BY REVISED r6/00 PH: 631-2880 DRAWING NUMBER 300-284 K. R. A. KoE AARCHITECTS' L A ENE O I s S T A 4 I 4 5 1 3 AND FORM 1 300-284 • " lokiglaNs4kAtunkusia.6.1odiri.t4.1.11 t^„.. I I I T I RT I frrnI ritnirrirrilTrirrtirir 3 5 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 Awainua • • ••• IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ,• . CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE I TI S DIJE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ‘f: MADE IN U.S.A.