HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-04-76 - BENAROYA COMPANY - PARKWAY PLAZA NORTH ADDITION AND SIGN REVIEWdr-04-76
17300 southcenter parkway
epic-nd-30
81-32-ope
dr-04-73
77-23-aui
benaroya parkway plaza north addition
TO: {jell Stoknes
FROM: Mayor Ed Bauch e
DATE: December 27, 1977
SUBJECT: Benaroya Lawsuit
EDB /mb
MEMURANDUM
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
CITY OF TUKWILA
14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067
I have received your memo to me on the same subject dated December 21, 1977.
After consultation with Larry Hard, I concur with your recommendation that we
attempt to arrive at a solution out of court that would be acceptable to all.
I would like a complete briefing (oral) by anyone who has something to contribute
on the subject at a workshop on January 4, 1978, at 2 p.m. in my office. I would
like you to schedule a meeting with the Benaroya people on Friday, January 6, at
2 p.m. at city hall.
1 A;dik re-ru Li/ le
eyvk pct ( /4 76 pis c_ 46.24.ecri �� ,� , ft
CGtPGI G/ S (D / v 0 t'e. s 0 cstJ et:o ►^2 to S
Sit /07,
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
21 December 1977
TO: Mayor Bauch
Kjell Stoknes
SUBJECT: Benaroya Sign Lawsuit
KS /ch
Attachment
MEMORANDUM
6230 Southcenter Boulevard ■ Tukwila, Washington 98188
Fit
Attached is a chronological list of events leading to
the above mentioned lawsuit. Events prior to 15 December
1976 are in the attached letter from Gary Crutchfield to
Ken Long.
Benaroya has not ever approached us with a master sign
proposal. for Parkway Plaza East. They have always been
incremental sign requests.•
I would like to arrange a meeting with Ken Long et al
and discuss a master plan we can both support to the.
Planning Commission that would . alleviate the lawsuit.
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
BENAROYA SIGN DENIAL
O.C.D.: 12/19/77
DATE ACTION
1 Request for allowed signing on Parkway Plaza made?
12/21/76 Interpretation by Building Official that all of Parkway Plaza from American
Home Furnishings to Eucaliptus Records is one building per the Uniform
Building Code. (Two small separate structures not discussed.)
12/23/76 Interpretation by Mr. Crutchfield that only one freestanding sign is allowed
for Parkway Plaza.
1/19/77 Parkway Plaza defined as two buildings for sign code only.
? Date permit applied for on second Parkway Plaza sign. '
1/31/77 Date second Parkway Plaza sign issued (Permit #1121).
4/14/77 Application made by Ken Long of Benaroya Company for an additional free
standing sign (3rd sign).
4/28/77 Matter brought before the Planning Commission per TMC 19.32.140 (A). Sign
request was denied.
5/10/77 Applicant was sent certified letter notifying him of the Planning Commission's
denial of their additional sign request (3rd Parkway Plaza sign).
6/ 3/77 Formal denial of sign made by Building Official. (As a result of Planning
Commission denial).
6/10/77 Interpretation made by Mr. Crutchfield of l /Iq/77 appealed to Board of
Adjustment.
7/ 1/77 Memo from Building Official stating his concurrance with sign code actions
made by Mr. Crutchfield.
7/ 6/77 Board of Adjustment denies appeal request and supports interpretation made
by staff.
7/ 7/77 Letter of denial sent out with appeal procedure.
8/11/77 Matter appealed to court by Benaroya Company.
23 December 1976
Mr. Kenneth Long
Benaroya Company
5950 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, Washington .98108
Dear Ken:
C T y of T U KW ILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
This letter is in response to your letter of 15 December 1976 which related
your basis for requesting additional signing for all phases of the Parkway
Plaza development located on Southcenter Parkway.
Several important factors have come to light in my research of the matter
in relation to the Tukwila Sign Code and they are outlined as follows.
1. Phase I, or Jafco, was constructed in 1972 and Permit #129 was issued on 28
August 1972 to erect a freestanding sign identifying the building as Jafco.
2. The Tukwila Sign Code was adopted by the City Council on 21 May 1973, well
after erection of the freestanding Jafco sign.
3. Phase II, or Parkway Plaza South, was constructed in early 1973 under
Building Permit #218. This construction Phase, together with Phase I,
constituted one (1) building under the restrictions of the Uniform
Building Code.
Section 19.32.140 (A) of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) restricts the
number of freestanding signs to one (1) per building. Since the existing
Jafco freestanding sign was authorized prior to the effective date of the •
Sign Code, it was classified as a legal nonconforming sign in accordance
with Section 19.28.030.(TMC). .
5.. Based on the legal nonconforming status of the Jafco sign and the fact
it must conform to the Sign Code in 1980 (reference Section 19.28.030),
Permit #345 was issued on 16 November 1973 which authorized erection of
one (1) freestanding sign for the entire building (then consisting of
Phase I and II) in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.32.140 (A).
6 • Phase III, or Parkway Plaza North, was constructed during the summer of
1976 under Permit #995. The combined construction of Phase I, II, and III
constitutes one (1) building under the provisions of the Uniform Building
Code (SEE: Attached Memorandum dated 21. December 1976.)
•
6230 Southcenter Boulevard N Tukwila, Washington 98188 w (206) 242 -2177
• - == �..+ ��
•
Mr. Kenneth Long Page 2
23 December 1976
Benaroya Company
In consideration of the factors described hereinabove and all aspects of the
Sign Code, the only conclusion is that the entire Parkway Plaza building
(composed of all three construction phases) is one (1) multi- tenant building
and is authorized one (1) freestanding sign. .The existing Jafco signs are
legal nonconforming signs and may remain until the required conformance date
established in Section 19.28.030 (TMC). The existing 'Parkway Plaza' free-
standing sign, authorized under Permit #345 in accordance with the Sign Code,
constitutes the one (1) authorized freestanding sign for the entire Parkway
Plaza building.
One alternative to the existing situation would involve moving the existing
Parkway Plaza sign to a more advantageous location.
A second alternative would be to make application to the Planning Commission
for a Shared Directional Sign, in accordance with Section 19.32.020 (TMC), to
identify what may be termed 'Parkway Plaza South', and another Shared Direc-
tional Sign to identify what may be termed 'Parkway Plaza North'.
The entirety of this letter constitutes my interpretation of the Sign Code
as it applies to the Parkway Plaza development lying east of Southcenter
Parkway. Should you have any further questions or desire to discuss the
matter, please contact me at your convenience. •
Sincerely,
Gary Crutchfield
Assistant Planner
GC /cw
Attachment: as.
cc: Kjell Stoknes, Dir, OCO
Al Pieper, Bldg Off
-411W-Yz p3i
y k % y 4e
/c
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAD RANDUM
CBTY of TUKW' LA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY OEVELOPM =NT
21 December 1976
Al Pieper, Building Officer
Gary Crutchfield � .sistant Planner
FREESTANDING. SIGNS at PARKWAY PLAZA DEVELOPMENT
For the purpose of determining authorized signing at the Parkway Plaza
development east of Southcenter Parkway, I need your determination as
to .whether or not the Jafco, Parkway Plaza South, and Parkway Plaza North,
et al, constitute one, two, or three buildings under the Uniform Building
Code.
Please reply at earliest convenience.
•
GC /cw
Uniform Building'Code Section 504 Section 506 (b) Unlimited
Area was' the. criteria :usedto authorize the construction of the new building •
.15' from the, existing building.
•
Therefore, the entire Parkway:Plaza building from American Home :Furniture on
the'south end .to ,Eucaliptus Records on the-north is classified as one building.
•Any other classification would cause the•buildings to. be in violation of the
• code due to lack of 60' separation.
•
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
pLANNIN( DIVISION
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF REPORT
6 July 1977 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM V A : APPEAL: Freestanding Sign at Parkway Plaza
The Benaroya Company, through attorney Jerome Hillis of the firm Hillis,
Phillips, Cairncross, Clark & Martin, has appealed the decision of the
Building Official in denying a sign permit application for the erection
of a freestanding sign at the Parkway Plaza development on Southcenter
Parkway. The appeal was filed in accordance with Section 19.12.060 of
the Sign Code and, rather than conduct a public hearing, the Board should
conduct a review of all information and testimony in a manner similar to
a public hearing and decide the appeal based on the information and testi-
mony received.
FINDINGS: 0
1. The Jafco building, constructed in 1972, became part of the Parkway
Plaza building when the latter was constructed in 1973. The result
constituted Phase I. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
2. Construction of the Parkway Plaza building included two smaller indivi-
dual buildings situated between the principal building and Southcenter
Parkway. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
3. Construction of the Parkway Plaza north building (Phase II) was accom-
plished in 1976. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
4. The existing Parkway Plaza sign south of Jafco ir:as permitted as the
freestanding sign for the principal building in November 1973.
5. The existing Parkway Plaza sign north of Jafco was permitted in 1977
for the north building in accordance with the interpretation of the
term "building ".
6. Section 19.32.140 (A) states... "One freestanding sign per building
shall be allowed,.exce t when buildin s are sue'ortive to the rinci al
of a business where sins are allowed onl for the rinci
al
ecificall emitted b the Plannin. Commission."
activit
use, unless s
7. Since the term "building ".is not defined within the Sign Code and the
definition contained in the Zoning Code does not complement the Sign
Code, an administrative interpretation was made in January 1977 which
defined building, as used in the Sign Code, to mean "an individual
structure physically and visually separate from any other structure."
(SEE, Exhibit "B ")
Board of Adjustment
Staff Report
Page 2
6 July 1977
8. As a result of that interpretation, Section 19.32.140 (A) was refined
to effectively state that any individual structure which is physically
and visually separate from any other structure qualifies for a free-
standing sign UNLESS the particular individual building is supportive
to the principal activity of a business. In the case of a supportive
building, it shall not qualify for a freestanding sign UNLESS a free-
standing sign is specifically permitted by the Planning Commission.
9. The Benaroya Company filed an application, dated 4 April 1977, for a
permit to install another "Parkway Plaza" sign as one of the two free-
standing signs permitted by virtue of the two small individual buildings
situated between the principal building and Southcenter Parkway. (SEE,
Exhibit "C ", Application for Sign Permit.) .
•
10. At the time of application, staff informed the applicant that the
responsible administrative officers considered the two smaller build-
ings, although individual and separate from other buildings, are sup-
portive to the principal activity, specifically the Parkway Plaza retail
complex, and therefore refused to issue a permit for such.
11. As provided for in Section 19.32.140 (A), the applicant requested the
Planning Commission consider specific authorization of the sign. The
Planning Commission, at its regular meeting conducted 28 April 1977,
denied specific authorization because it was considered duplicative
signing. (SEE, Exhibit "0 ", Planning Commission Minutes, 28 April 1977.)
12. The applicant was formally notified of staff denial of the permit appli-
cation on 3 June 1977. (SEE, Exhbit "E ".).
13. Mr.' Hillis, 'representing the applicant, properly filed written appeal of
the Building Official's decision in accordance with Section 19.12.060
(TMC). (SEE, Exhibit "F ", Letter of Appeal.)
14. The letter of appeal states the existence of at least four (4).
separate buildings in the complex and asserts that each qualifies for
a freestanding sign.
15. The'letter of appeal refers to a previous administrative interpretation
as the basis for permission of sign installation, specifically the inter-
pretation explained in Exhibit "B ".
16. The letter of appeal extracts from Section 19.32.140 (A) only a portion
of the freestanding sign restriction, specifically "one freestanding sign
per building shall be allowed ". The remainder of that restriction, as
explained in Finding 8, is not alluded to.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The two small buildings located in the midst of the parking area do con-
form to the definition of "building" as explained in Exhibit "B" and as
asserted by the appellant.
Board of Adjustment
Staff Report
2. The appellant asserts that "one freestanding sign per building shall
be allowed. ", but ignores the balance of that particular provision.
Specifically, that provision authorizes one freestanding sign for
every principal building.
3. The determination of "supportive" is obviously difficult in many
instances. In this particular case, however, the copy indicated on
the proposed sign (Exhibit "C ") serves to confirm the determination
by Staff that the principal use of the property is a retail complex
named Parkway Plaza and all of the buildings within that project area
are supportive to that principal activity.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board consider the term "supportive" as it
relates to the Parkway Plaza complex and, more specifically, the two smaller
buildings and sustain the administrative denial based on the information
provided in this Staff Report.
Page 3
6 July 1977
Y
Por.l;s.
RECREATIOI
PLANNItin
EUIL01tII
5 December 1977
Sincer'ly,
Gary Crutch ield
Assistant P anner
GC /ch
Enclosures
cc: Dir, OCD
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LeSourd, Patten, Fleming & Hartung
3900 Sea -First Building
Seattle, Washington 98154_
ATTN: Mr. Lawrence E. Hard
6230 Southce :ter Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 98189 [c (206) 292 -2177
RE: Benaroya v. Tukwila
Dear Larry:
Please find enclosed a copy of some of the documents requested
in your letter to me dated 28 November 1977.
The enclosed does not include (A) letter from Ken Long of Jack
A. Benaroya Company to Gary Crutchfield, dated 15 December 1976
and, (B) letter from Ken Long to Gary Crutchfield re: sign request
for south end of Parkway Plaza, dated 6 April 1977. I have conducted
thorough searches of both the Planning and Building Divisions files
for these two documents to no avail. They may possibly be obtained
from the Benaroya Company.
F. A. LESOURD
WOOLVIN PATTEN
DONALD D. FLEMING
GEORGE M. HARTUNG, JR.
LEON C. MISTEREK
DWAYNE E. COPPLE
THOMAS 0. McLAUGHLIN
PETER LeSOURD
JOHN F. COLGROVE
C. DEAN LITTLE
Mr. Gary Crutchfield
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Enclosure
Re: Benaroya v. Tukwila
(206) 624 -1040
LESOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING & HARTUNG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3900 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98164
November 28, 1977
Dear Gary:
Enclosed is a copy of a letter I received from
Richard R. Wilson in the above matter. Would you please
provide me with the information requested if such
information is available.
Very truly yours,
awren
LeSOURD, PA TEN, FLEbI G & HARTUNG
E. Hard
DECEIVE D
NOV 2 8197T
OW OF TUKWILA
LAWRENCE E. HARD
RODNEY J. WALDBAUM
BRUCE G. HANSON
RICHARD P. MATTHEWS
D. WILLIAM TOONE, JR.
M. COLLEEN WEULE
DANIEL D. WOO
ROBERT L. PALMER
COUNSEL
SUSAN R.AGID
PETER L. SLICK
H. RAYMOND CAIRNCROSS
MARK S. CLARK
JEROME L. HILLIS
GEORGE W. MARTIN, JR
DAVID E. MYRE, JR.
LOUIS D. PETERSON
JOHN E. PHILLIPS
RICHARD S. SWANSON
RICHARD R. WILSON
Dear Larry:
tr 6.
LAW OFF :CES OF
HILLIS, PHILLIPS, CAIRNCROSS, CLARK & MARTIN
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION
403 COLUMBIA STREET
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
Mr. Lawrence E. Hard
LeSourd, Patten, Fleming &
Hartung
3900 Sea -First Building
Seattle, Washington 98104
November 22, 1977
Re: Jack A. Benaroya Co. v. City of Tukwila
623
AREA CODE 208
As I told you by telephone, the Response to the Writ of
Certiorari submitted by the City is insufficient in some
respects, and we would appreciate your supplementing the
Response with the following additional materials and furnishing
us with copies:
1. Tukwila's zoning ordinance and sign ordinance,
as specified in the Writ.
2. Planning Commission agenda for April 28, 1977.
? 3. Letter from Ken Long of Jack A. Benaroya Company
to Gary Crutchfield, dated December 15, 1976.
4. Letter from Gary Crutchfield to Ken Long in
response to Long's letter, dated December 23,
1976.
5. Memorandum from Gary Crutchfield to Al Pieper re
freestanding signs at Parkway Plaza (with Pieper's
reply), dated December 21, 1976.
Letter from Ken Long to Al Pieper re sign request
for Parkway Plaza North Building, dated January'
17, 1977.
7.7. Letter from Ken Long to Gary Crutchfield re sign
request for south end of Parkway Plaza, dated
April 6, 1977.
Mr. Lawrence Hard
November 22, 1977
Page 2
Please let me know if you have any difficulty obtaining .
any of the above materials. If necessary, we can furnish
you with copies of the letters from our files, if the City
is willing to certify these copies as true and correct.
RRW:kk
•
Very truly yours,
HILLIS, PHILLIPS, CAIRNCROSS,
CLARK & MARTIN, P.S.
ll•-
Richard R. Wilson
AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
27 October 1977 8:00 P.M.
SIGN REVIEW: Parkway Plaza North (Benaroya)
Mr. Ken Long, architect for the Benaroya Company, has requested authoriza-
tion for certain signing on a portion of the Parkway Plaza North facility.
Staff offers the following analysis.
FINDINGS:
1. The south wing of the building is proposed to be occupied by what appears
to be a department store, specifically "Syrdal's ".
2. The north face of the south wing of the building (180' x 16' - 2880 + 48
(overhand) = 2928 x .035 = 102.48 square feet) qualifies for 102 square
feet.
3. The west face of the portion to be occupied by Syrdal's (160' x 16' -
2560 + 48 (overhand) = 2608 x .035 = 91.28 square feet) qualifies for
91 square feet.
4. Benaroya Company proposes the following sign areas on the respective faces
of the south wing of the building (SEE, Exhibit C):
A. North Face of South Wing: 69 square feet
B. West Face of South Wing: 168 square feet
5. The applicant's request is compared to Sign Code restrictions as follows:
Building Portion Area Allowed Area Requested
North Face 102 s.f. 69 s.f. = 33 s.f. under
West Face 91 s.f. 168 s.f. = 77 s.f. over
193 s.f. 237 s.f. = 44 s.f. over
6. The applicant asserts that since the proposed tenant, Syrdal's, will occupy
such a large space in comparison with the general tenant spaces in the re-
mainder of the building, the excess signing should be authorized. (SEE,
Exhibit A)
Planning Commission Page 2
Staff Report 27 October 1977
7. The applicant also asserts that the proposed Syrdal's signing on the west
face of the south wing will result in a more consistent pattern of sign
density. (SEE, Exhibit A)
8. The Planning Commission approved the signing plan requested by the appli-
cant in September 1976 as outlined in Exhibit B.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The original signing plan was authorized to relieve an identification pro-
blem anticipated for the small tenants of Parkway Plaza. The applicant
now desires a variation from the original signing plan to accomodate the
desires of a large tenant.
2. Staff is unable to perceive an identification problem if the areas allowed
under the Sign Code are adhered to as originally established. The proposed
number of individual " Syrdal's" signs on the west face is simply too many
to meet the area restrictions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission deny the requested sign areas and
direct the applicant to conform to the signing plan approved at his request
in 1976 and as outlined in Exhibit B.
'+ : { '.
°�
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
October 6, 1977
City of Tukwila
Board of Adjustment
6230 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Tenant signs for Syrdal's, Parkway Plaza North
Enclosed is a drawing indicating the requested signage for Syrdal's.
The analysis of square footage of signs is as follows:
North elevation - 102 sq. ft. allowed, 69 sq. ft. requested.
West elevation - 91 sq. ft. allowed, 168 sq. ft. requested
In adding the two elevations together, the requested signage equals 237
square feet, with the allowable square footage totaling 193 square feet.
This represents an overage of approximately 18 %.
Please note that the tower signage is within the square footage allowed.
Because Syrdal's is a very large tenant in comparison with the general
tenant spaces leased in Parkway Plaza North, it is difficult to identify
the portion of Parkway Plaza North which will be Syrdal's without the re-
quested signage. Also on the west elevation by allowing the signage re-
quested, there will actually be achieved a more consistent pattern with the
present density of signs to the south of the Syrdal space.
We would appreciate this matter being placed on the agenda for November
1977, and request acceptance of this slight overage of area for the
signage.
Kenneth D. Long
Chief Architect
cc: Phil Syrdal
EXHIBIT A
Parkway Plaza North: Tenant Sign
( Syrdal's)
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
! 1_
BI;I LD I:IG
28 September 1976
Jack Benaroya Company
5950 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98108
ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Long
Dear Mr. Long:
The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular meeting conducted 23 September
1976, considered your signing proposal for Parkway Plaza North.
The Commission approved the scheme as outlined below.
1. Wall signs located on the 10 -foot fascia will be a standard height
of 4 feet.
2. Wall signs located on the 6 -foot fascia will be a standard height of
3 feet.
3. Those tenants not otherwise qualifying for at least 40 square feet of
sign area shall be authorized 40 square feet of sign area.
All other requirements of the Tukwila Sign Code shall be adhered to including
the necessary permit for each tenant sign. Should you have any questions,
please contact me at 242 -2177.
Sincerely
I
Gary Crutchfield
Assistant Planner
GC /cw
cc: Al Pieper, Bldg Div
CE G Y of TLiKV./ L A
OFFICE or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
•
_
•
EXHIBIT B
--- Parkway Plaza North: Tenant Sign
• (Syrdal'.$)
6230 Soatii.:cnter Bou1_vard n Tukwila, !•:a !;in an 9315B a (206) 242 -2177
(,
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
October 6, 1977
City of Tukwila
Board of Adjustment
6230 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Tenant signs for Syrdal's, Parkway Plaza North
Enclosed is a drawing indicating the requested signage for Syrdal's.
The analysis of square footage of signs is as follows:
North elevation - 102 sq. ft. allowed, 69 sq. ft. requested.
West elevation - 91 sq. ft. allowed, 168 sq. ft. requested
In adding the two elevations together, the requested signage equals 237
square feet, with the allowable square footage totaling 193 square feet.
This represents an overage of approximately 18 %.
Please note that the tower signage is within the square footage allowed.
Because Syrdal's is a very large tenant in comparison with the general
tenant spaces leased in Parkway Plaza North, it is difficult to identify
the portion of Parkway Plaza North which will be Syrdal's without the re-
quested signage. Also on the west elevation by allowing the signage re-
quested, there will actually be achieved a more consistent pattern with the
present density of signs to the south of the Syrdal space.
We would appreciate this matter being placed on the agenda for November 3,
1977, and request acceptance of this slight overage of area for the
signage.
Kenneth D. Long
Chief Architect
cc: Phil Syrdal
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
IL
4. , ,, • 4 . ,4 ,-4 4 . 4 ,. , .,,.. 4 - , ....44 4 ,• 4 4. 4 , 4 0.4.4- 4 4, f 4.0, 404
• . • .. •
• • , .
;• • • •••• • .:•.` :••• , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ........ .
• RA-IL
moo 0f01HC6I■treR
AL-6): ale- -40-30
• 31- 32r- cm
D II. 4-1
23-Av%
Wi■iikeNoA
1 1 2 cietYNA\I R.Aziot NDR-rist
ADDlitt*
. „ . • . • • • . . . ; .• •
. 7"",' "."?.•;" '," ".'"" . .. , „ . • ' „ 4 " , , , • ' . ' ' ' " • • "" „ . " - `. ","" „ • : , ' • ' ! , ' "' ''
0
0
32 36 446" 40 549'
32
40 ._
40
_ . 40 •
• 32 36 •
•
B
1
• I
—OF
—
32 T 36
100'
•
•
,10',
\
1..r,,, err. tor0.`i11.),"*MktA9M.#1.?Mlvrtsi.Mt`rlArilivtartm.
, .%; , •4 ,- 4,C4=4:4 - ;14;■:...01;4:4 • •
16111S INCH 1 2 3
40
- -t • • t r - -
r- -I . .
V a a
■
• , n:A17..4fr.,.
• mm--.■•■■r**--p.•■r-}o•r1=1■••••••riorn
PARKING
FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWaersm•Nv—
40 44'.6" 40 40 40
I
1 4
: , • •...
• „.... . • • • •
•
8
.9=1.
.' •
—•
E.
F
40 4 40 40
40 j, 40
288'
11111
4 5 6 7
B
0--
40 48
.
ar
0
0
at
0
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
JAPCI3
•0 0/ 00s " '`"
_p A N
,
r '• , • • • • •
•
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS-
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DOE TO 1
• •. ..• •
•
•
•
•
•
ACCOUNT
LOCATION
7 `o
JOB' NO,
DESIGNER
DELIVERY
DATE
ad- ar t incorporated
CREATORS OF THE NEW .LOOK IN ELECTRICAL ADVERTISING
CITY t ILA STATE u
ll i W DWG. BY_ r '
Q `e:!E =`'C . (I��t= r, j L4. .c24 &
ti
211 tJKA YGE
LEASE 36 ❑ 60 ❑ OTHER
CASH SALE ❑
INST. SALE ❑ MONTHS
GUARANTEE 90 DAY ❑ OTHER ❑
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
CLNG: NONE ❑ 90 ❑ OTHER ❑
REPT: NONE ❑ AS NEC. ❑ OTHER ❑
SHOP ORDER BY
DATE
DESIGN NO.
DATE
REVISION
SHOP DWG.
ENGR. CALC
•
ENGR. DWG.
REVISION '
` CUSTOMER APPROVAL
-lf
NOTES THIS RI AN ORIGINAL UNPUDLISNED,DRAWINO. CREATED •Y AD ART INCORPORATED. IT IS.SUDMITTEO FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE. IN CONNECTION WITH A PROJECT DEINO PLANNED rap YOU BY AD ART INCORPORATED. IT IS NOT TO BE SHOWN TO ANYONE OUTSIDE YOUR ORGANIZATION, NOR IS IT TO BE USED. REPRODUCED, COPIED OR EXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION.
a
rnfi .: .. +t.•+3r -4. +• ^.+t y eut . V'}!e�Sr J ••
Paxy,.sr �w ru + >a+ t • a . r• ^. t rx•
.Y.T Y F M � :ih!••Mi+ N .k7 I+PJI ^'rA
w - r _ _ . e .. f MYF�d9�n , .. .. 1HYt , O1 G"t `t p r
rr+r•K"Si� .tF"9'.. * a7 • r t RC x:F' , ✓ .
.. .. �. roer:.. .. 7'+'y',I •. . +�SUWA'�G. .... .: �.. YP?4 ,... :fi r •. ... t �
.: .... �. ... �, r , ..., ...rte ».. - - .t in•
•
BLDG. INSPECTION BY
•
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION
TYPE OF INSTALL I
I•/3 I v: l 1 l _. I � I �I iii i I 6v ' "I V.ia�Jl..l I I .Y:il.fl I CI .I._:I '�. .. I . I _ I I •.. I _, I ' . I ,. I .. I � I ... � I ,< i I•..I I I I I I I I I I I
I I y l I y l I I I I I I I I I I
O 16THSINCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8'r
_(I(UMOFLEXIBLE RULER -302 A,WGERMANY—
EST. NO. DAYS FOR PERMIT AFTER APPLICATION
TOTAL ' AMPS ' ' CIRCUITS
=X7
DATE
e
DATE
PERMIT DWGS. BY BRANCH OFFICE [) FACTORY ❑
CALCULATION REQUIRED ❑ BY REGISTER ENGR. ❑
LOCATE LEADS
J
FILE
SH /MTL
PURCHASE
PLEX
V.F. TYPE OF COPY
WOOD ' SPECIAL MATERIAL
PA
ALUM J / REL. TO PROD. DATE BY
•
CAB: SH /MTL ❑ EXT. ALUM. ❑ TYPE
BORDER COLOR
FINISH BACKGROUND COLOR
1
a
1)1.14:11.0, .
COPIES TO ► TYPE: VERTICAL ❑ HORIZONTAL ❑ SINGLE ❑ DOUBLE
B /G: SOLID ❑ OPEN ❑ SH /MTL n P.E. ❑ OTHER ❑
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS,
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
) OTHER ❑
DATE
•
•
OTHER
J \ COMPLETED BY
SPECIFICATIONS
. DATE
. y 'eA a A'F.rs •:i•M•.9 » Jam. J' n- v..�t•.
C^'.as !•.Y Y+-Y 1 IM.'k'xN Y . T.^�` P �'T' -• f ?'.
.r . .f.i "� .. rs.�TiT.. +. r. w•yrtrr n`r+ni ,»v!.�•�;nc?..;M "!^'P.. +rhl+.u+a!?' l.!• 4- Y .w , i� .,f . .. "'t `nt. �•... -r v.�- .....mr- c•..•• ,.w^�
I'
•
•
•11
of,■ T 0, '3 :1 -et
P-10 ems:m.4c.
• "0.:*1:11-1'142
t'410509SPC.,( Ce}‘,„
No'
• IC4):
°
-1:21$1
rac e.:Ms.t...s-s4-r ra.a. • •
TYPICAL STOIrfr0IN
to104 011713 c
(7)
METAL - , , CP..; t 041'10.. ,Jolk.rr' •
„. •
Not C-0,•-iTrz-aaTope. 000171$' „
iS •5.e 14.1r) fcc'$1 r-Of4t L_IWIT Ma'am 0,0 1 2 E-.• (
rpe>012.0i •
00.x. r..t.41"r...
r-wc, r
L cop.;e ANAL. a_MG"'N5
TT -
124nri,. • '
" ; r- -1
tiff;i
•
• ■-.1.4.sobt•-e.c.x.E••15 • pa-ovicytp me•ri■-■-•
1.1011.W'r AZT aA.c.-4et".Up.A.4 4.1.43;,0.4 eMdi
..
a • = "Wt.",
• L
wroono :!T • ' T!".
1 IT
a I
• lI , •
• l ■
.4
.. r
.4t.2A
.40 • • 1 '
4
• . • ;r:,?.1,, "i
" YA0 1 ., t h ,
• . 7
•.;
7.: 4 '
1
•
Ifei5;4111,
2 3 4 5 6 7 F3
FLEX11.1 E flULEU •392 AWn
0€ 6Z De LZ 9Z SZ VZ CZ ZZ 1Z OE 61 DI LI 91 SI VI 'Cl Z1 II 01.
.........billi!IIIII111))11111111)11111
• •
' , IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
,..CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO •
., THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
,.. _....._ _. _.
" • • ).*:.
. .
WIDTH OF TENANT SPACE 20'
111.111117 1111 1 1 11111.1.1111 1 111111111
.�i
20
60
`zJL V I? I\WO RAM WEST E L E V A T I O N
1I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�IIIhJhIhJhIhIhIilhI�1111I���Iii�I�I�I�I 'III'Ii illlil' III' IIII 'I'I'IliiiIIII'�IlililIIIlIIIII lllllllllllllllll
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
rLEXILLE 9ULEI1•3U Awrr:mn,
20
OE 6E 9E Lz 9Z 9Z Ve ee Ze le OE GI el LI 91 0 .l 'el ZI II OI
I u1d1111 mduu1uulnnmdnu1111S1 4mi6m1uu6m1uuhiii1mduu1mdmiluuhm1nnluu1uuhm1uulmi1uu6m1iudoa1uuhni1uuinn1uulnu1unllmlu
•
40 20 I 60
Sox
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
AAA r••u. ueuu!r_ts
11 CAR
'FCO "PARKINO :'
Od68O' mil
PARK.
•' WAH.14000E 4D 000 /'1
c..1125, 5OI4DO
.,TOTA L:I ,NEW . .,1411131
.JAFCO; ,EXIBTINO , :. .: •
TOTAL Mi '.D• • , ,,..:.;.
. :TO:TAL : THIS . :SCHEM
yOy N
o.
• n 'e ,
o
i n_
J '
J
Id 0
< O.
a •
F
_ O
• _:..
• •
F'
t
z
L J
O , F
n <
t y
L M
O
Y ,. _ •
1•> . t
O
O .
• •u
c
6
1. :4
2
•
= a
z •
e`.
I1I1111III�IIIIIIIIIIIIiIilIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIII' I' IIII�IliiII' IlI' IIIIIIIiiiIIIII' I' IIIII 'IIIIIII'nI'I'I'I'I'I'I�II11111
0 •'• • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I %IDLE RULER • 302 AWr.ww.,.._
OE GZ OL LZ 9Z GZ 4Z EE ZZ IZ OZ GI Ol LI 91 SI 71 EI ZI Il OL
lunlnu1nuluu1nuhni1nuluu1unluu1uulnu1uuluu1uuhw1uulmi1mihmluuluu1unhm1niduu1uulnn1uuluu1im6m1unlwi1uuinu1uuluu1unlniilu
30X
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
J
gaMil
I >LY
I F,S l
��'�� f Its; �?1 is {{ •} e � 1 ,... l , .��,
.9 4 +1S . 9 �F .�,.tn�j 6 N L , t Ei;l
• �R !•dt1.1'�:we7sIlr °.Y��Y:,,.t t7'. 12 r e +ah�!' ?I _.._ Aa -i, r..�i; �.t:;
?P ^f)�y.": „:;}i i,: Er.. !`i
A rv& I �' SR '1, �� �.. .:#i!RYx"'• `_�..P..'s�.'
�U,.yt, � r•��g
TILT -U 'COri.ct2F1'1
. ` ,' a y'r C t +4 .a
T't �� � � � �S� r}.i.: F 4 c .. : ' Y l • '.f o p„ 1 I ,, t . ,
IIIIIIIIIIIII�lllllliII' I' I' IIlllllIl�IIIIII�IIIIIIII�111111IIil��l�i ii ii�IIII II1)1IIIIIllI ll�11111II'I'I'III'IIllll l
0 .m• ^.” 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
LE %IULE RULER• 302
0€ GE 04 LE. 9Z SE 4Z CZ ZZ IZ OZ GI UI LI 91 SI 91 'CI ZI II Ol
. luulnu1unlmi1uuhul1uulnu1mdmi1uulun1unlnn1mduu1uuluu1mi6mluuluu1mlhm1mdnu1uuluu1uuhm1imhm1uulmi1uuhm1uulnu1uuluulu
30X
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
r,.
f. JtJ
r• St e f ,,
.p• ws
SI .L
St .: •• t p•S �
V
O IS
S 5 ^�l GI te
7
l
4l 1_
ti
N
r.
j i ZZ 4,37
,/. -aif
t ,G
yncatm+ ie^•: r' �i.• D,' Y.;^ zT�rtat :�YYer�.tttrn.duur:..S.nr:.:L•. - t:�' =L'ASM^.z:i".•. ^.caC.7Ciy
t`
vl e
5
51.1 5, . ..
t t' It
i, y
M r-
Jlye rY
. %J]• dt t.r
.:'O/'.!Y r "•iY� PAijTy� „yr_ p,/OVJN<:.'<f rreei
•
•
r. Jrr fuv: '
/rAC.VS
-
Os•/ /J._r
f,.7 SJ.ea
"At)
L`”
.5'
/ /,
VIII�IIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIIINIIII 'ZIIIl1�1110110p11110111 P0110PO lll, lll' 1111111111116111111111111111 '11111y1111INT
MAT% 11lfl IUl lG it • 342 AY/a'na
OE ' I, /I y � S a 7a c as II oz I I I 9 'I t l i :t II OL
6udun 11111111111111111 m11111+ NIIS11 111111111 116111 111d1111111111111111n111111111111111111111111111111111411 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
V
e e
t5 ts ..`ti
5
, L5
30X
ins/Ai MN
/f /SIJ
JfNNF M.N.
OJrSJN'S.00 /L. / /,JL N\
DyM &SO
• SO. JL
1. I(
t� ✓ �� l _ L
Q I �• `•JJ l /w' /A
•
: =CLI=sru1•are:.xMtf r
l7R . .iL1 - 1&
1 .5.5 A /N /.h. /
/. /. / /. /./
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR IS DUE TO
ORIGINAL DOCUMENT